1: \documentclass[12pt]{article} 

2: 

3: \usepackage{epsfig}

4: \hoffset -0.5in \textwidth6.5in

5: \textheight 8.50in \topmargin -0.5in

6: %\setlength{\textheight}{241mm}

7: %\setlength{\textwidth}{170mm}

8: \begin{document} 

9: %

10: %\begin{center}

11: 

12: 

13: \title{{\bf{Ground state Pseudo-scalar Meson masses\\ in

14: the Separation Geometry model.}}

15: \author{G.R. Filewood\\

16: Research Centre for High Energy Physics,\\

17: School of Physics,

18: University of Melbourne,\\

19: Parkville, Victoria 3052 Australia.}

20: \date{\today}

21: \abstract

22: In this paper the techniques of discretised QCD 

23: developed in physics/0109024 

24: are extended to a study of ground-state

25: pseudo-scalar

26: mesons  involving higher generation quarks. The correspondence

27: with empirical values is good with the exception of the

28: charmed-bottom meson with the predicted value of 6.911GeV

29: varying considerably from the empirical value of

30: $6.4\pm0.39\pm0.13$  although

31: it is still within two sigma and provides an avenue

32: for further testing of the theory.\\

33: $\;$\\

34: $\;\;\;\;$PACS 14.4, 14.80B, 14.80C, 13.40D, 11.30E, 11.30P}

35: \maketitle

36: 

37: 

38: 

39: 

40: \section{Introduction}

41: 

42: In a previous paper a calculation methodology

43: was developed to perform discretised QCD mass

44: calculations. Calculation of the nucleon masses

45: was performed as an example of the technique.

46: 

47: The purpose of this paper is to extend the calculation

48: technique developed in the previous paper

49: to cover quarks of generation higher than the

50: first.  In this paper we will

51: examine a selection of $J=0$ ground state

52: mesons. To do so requires 

53: additional hypotheses

54: above and beyond those presented in the

55: previous paper; the validity of which once again

56: depends upon the empirical success (or failure!)

57: of the methodology. We begin by re-examining some

58: of the basic geometric concepts from the 

59: previous paper in an abbreviated form.

60: 

61: \section{Basic ideas.}

62: Consider the symmetry of a coloured cube;

63: 

64: \vspace{0.5cm}

65: 

66: {\centerline

67: {\epsfig{file=cube.eps,width=9cm}}}

68: 

69: \vspace{0.5cm}

70: 

71: \noindent

72: where the cube has been given some colour; two 

73: opposite faces red, two green and two blue. In this

74: example the observed colour of the cube is a 

75: function of the position of the cube

76: (or equivalently of the observer!); in the 

77: language of contemporary physics it is `gauge

78: dependent' (although `phase dependent' would, of course, be 

79: a better description). Indeed, if we imagined that the

80: rotational symmetries of the cube manifested  as continuous

81: rotations in the embedding space 

82: then the observed colour would indeed be

83: a function of the local phase of the generators of the 

84: rotations. Alternatively we could consider that the

85: colour axes are somehow fixed in an `internal'

86:  space defined by geometry generators and that as the cube 

87: rotates there is a continuous change in the spectrum  of

88: colours seen by the observer. The colour itself would 

89: then be described by a continuous local phase symmetry.

90: 

91: This is the basic idea behind discretised QCD;

92: that quark `colour' may be represented by

93: a special kind of `gauged' cubic symmetry. 

94: In standard theory the `colour' of a quark is not an observable. 

95: The `colour' of a quark is like phase in electro-magnetic theory; 

96: local gauge invariance means that the colour is not an observable 

97: just as the local phase of an electron wave-function is not an 

98: observable.

99: 

100: In standard QED a phase factor that varies locally (i.e. varies with

101: spatial position) is not invariant in the absence of a gauge field

102: because;

103: 

104: \begin{equation}

105: \partial_{(x)}({e^{i\theta_{(x)}}}\psi)

106: =i\partial{\theta_{(x)}}{e^{i\theta_{(x)}}}\psi+

107: {e^{i\theta_{(x)}}}\partial{\psi}

108: \end{equation}

109: 

110: \noindent

111: and so, because the first derivative of 

112: the field enters into the 

113: Lagrangian, the Lagrangian will not be 

114: invariant under a local phase 

115: transformation. In QED if we add the 

116: photon gauge field, however, 

117: local phase invariance of the Lagrangian is restored.

118: 

119: In the case of quarks the local phase 

120: information is more complex

121: than a simple $U(1)$  $e^{i\theta_{(x)}}$ and 

122: is governed by $SU(3)_c$ 

123: symmetry but the principle is the same. However, 

124:  the gauge particles of QCD, the gluons, 

125: unlike the photon of QED, carry the charge 

126: of the underlying field; 

127: the gluon carry `colour' charge. Moreover, 

128: instead of the single photon 

129: the gluons come in eight `colour' varieties. 

130: There difference are a 

131: consequence of the non-abelian nature of 

132: $SU(3)$ and the fact that 

133: there 

134: are eight generators  instead of a single $U(1)$ generator.

135: 

136: In discretised QCD the 

137: `local phase' 

138: information for 

139: $SU(3)$ is

140: carried by a three-dimensional `cube' 

141: embedded in a four-dimensional

142: space-time; which is to say that 

143: the time dimension is 

144: {\it{undefinable}}

145: inside the boundary of the cube. 

146: The discrete phase of the cube -

147: the spatial position of it's faces, 

148: edges and vertices, and the length

149: of the edges, area of square faces 

150: and three-dimensional volume of the

151: cube - represents 

152: colour (and other local gauge) 

153: information which is rendered 

154: {\it{unobservable}} by the gauge 

155: fields; the geometry of the colour 

156: gauge fields is postulated to be 

157: in the form of two-dimensional 

158: `flat-square' geometries analogous to

159: the square faces of the cube. 

160: Thus the geometry of a 

161: gluon in this schema

162: is that of a `flat square' and it 

163: contains colour information 

164: relative to

165: the surface of the cube from which 

166: it is emitted and the surface to

167: which it is absorbed in the 

168: time-containing embedding space. 

169: There are 

170: fundamental theorems in the 

171: theory which tell us that any 

172: two-dimensional

173: geometry will always have zero 

174: rest-mass so that the `flat-square' 

175: geometries will always propagate at 

176: the speed of light. Conversely, 

177: a three-dimensional geometry such a  

178: `cubic' quark will always have 

179: non-zero rest mass.

180: 

181:  With local gauge invariance no geometric

182: feature of the `cube' structure itself 

183: will be  directly observable as such - we might consider it

184: a snapshot `image' of a quark at an instant in time

185: but to observe it over an interval of time

186: t=0 requires, by the time-energy uncertainty

187: relation, an infinite energy probe which of course

188: is not possible. Can we {\it{indirectly}} infer

189: the existence of such an underlying symmetry for

190: quark structure? 

191: 

192: Well, we might try and see if some of the physical

193: properties

194: of quarks emerge from a study of such discrete symmetry.

195: The property which seems to correlate is particle mass

196: and in a previous paper {\cite{filewood}} this idea

197: was explored. Discrete subgroups of SU(3)

198: can be extracted which can be mapped onto the

199: cubic symmetry - rather like a collection of

200: discrete `snapshot' images of a continuously

201: rotating cube and it is found that the  order

202: of these groups (i.e. the number of elements

203: in the group) are related to the rest mass.

204: These discrete sub-groups have  the same basic

205: symmetry properties of the parent group but in

206: a discrete form -  so, for example, we might have

207: three fixed discrete colours for our cube rather

208: than a continuous spectrum as the generators of the

209: geometry act.

210: In the previous  paper the issue of how an

211: extended object such as a `cube' may be a representation

212: for an object, such as a quark, which empirically 

213: behaves like a point was discussed so that issue

214: will not be revisited here. A brief summary 

215: of the ideas from {\cite{filewood}} is as follows.

216: 

217: 

218: Material particles such as quarks and leptons

219: are assumed to be represented by a special kind

220: of geometry termed `affine-set' geometry. The nature of

221: affine-sets in this schema is related to a decomposition

222: of the structure of the continuum of space-time. Local

223: phase factors - U(1), S.U.(2) or S.U.(3) - are assumed 

224: to be due to this geometry and local gauge invariance

225: is assumed to be the mechanism whereby this local

226: phase is rendered unobservable. Geometrically this

227: becomes equivalent to making the underlying decomposition

228: of the continuum -

229: which is present on the {\it{boundary}} of

230: the geometry -

231: unobservable. The gauge fields themselves also

232: relate to the geometry of the boundary.

233: 

234: The mass of any fundamental object is then

235: a relic of an otherwise empirically unobservable

236: geometric foundation to physical structure. The fundamental

237: symmetry of an affine-set geometry is a permutation symmetry

238: and it is the number of matrix elements representing this

239: symmetry (always discrete) - minus any massless generators

240: and modulo any radiative corrections from the gauge fields -

241: which in general defines the mass; although the situation

242: becomes quite complex with hadrons.

243: 

244: Conventionally to calculate a hadron mass, such as a 

245: spin-zero meson, one would postulate a form for 

246: the potential, insert assumed current quark masses

247: and then try and determine the (quantum) ground state

248: energy to define the mass. 

249: Now whilst this approach may be  completely valid,

250: and may be necessary for calculating excited states,

251: in discretised QCD we assume that 

252:  the discrete symmetry dictates the form and

253: value that the potential and current quark masses can

254: take in the ground state by dictating the total energy,

255: current quark masses and all the symmetry features

256: that the potential must satisfy.

257:  To calculate the mass one then determines the 

258: appropriate components of energy from the symmetry

259: and then sums them to obtain a mass; which is a  much

260: simpler approach than working from an assumed

261: potential  - particularly if the current quark mass

262: is significantly different to the constituent mass

263: implying that the quarks 

264: in the hadron are very relativistic

265: even in the ground state. Constituent and current quark mass

266: components are readily calculated in the discretised QCD

267: approach without the requirement for knowledge about

268: the velocity of the quarks or  relativistic

269: corrections.

270:  The energy of the quarks is simply dictated

271: by the symmetry and can be written down from the

272: matrix representation.

273: 

274: The calculation of the mass of a ground state meson

275: is performed by summing the mass/energy of several

276: different component parts. These parts

277: are;

278: 

279: 1; constituent quark energy -

280: this is equivalent to the kinetic energy of

281: the quarks; always taken `on-shell' at $\alpha_s=1$

282: (`on-shell' here means a particular energy scale,

283: called the $T_r$ scale, which is dictated by the 

284: symmetry),

285: 

286: 2; constituent gluon energy - due to the

287: energy of the gluons exchanged by the quarks,

288: 

289: 3; current quark mass -which is the self-energy

290: of individual quarks and consists of the following

291: three sub-components;

292: 

293: \hspace{1cm}a; energy equivalence of 

294: current quark operator content,

295: 

296: \hspace{1cm}b; Higgs scalar components and 

297: 

298: \hspace{1cm}c; potential energy of separation of current quarks.

299: 

300: 

301: Each of these parts must be separately calculated and, after

302: application of radiative corrections, summed to obtain

303: a final mass. We begin by revising the matrix representations

304: for the different components.

305: 

306: 

307: 

308: \section{Matrix representations 1; the $T_r$ group}

309: 

310: 

311: 

312: 

313: $T_r$ is the unique 

314:  sub-group of SU(2) with 24 elements and

315: is the S.U.(2) analogue of the tetrahedral

316: point symmetry (spinor) three-dimensional

317: group $T_d$. $T_r$ has the following fundamental

318: representation;

319: 

320: 

321: 

322: 

323: 

324: \begin{equation}

325: \begin{array}{ccccc}

326: &1&2&3&4\\\\

327: \alpha:&

328: \left(

329: \begin{array}{cc}

330: 1&0\\0&1

331: \end{array}

332: \right)&

333: \left(

334: \begin{array}{cc}

335: -1&0\\0&-1

336: \end{array}

337: \right)&

338: \left(

339: \begin{array}{cc}

340: 0&i\\i&0

341: \end{array}

342: \right)&

343: \left(

344: \begin{array}{cc}

345: 0&-i\\-i&0

346: \end{array}

347: \right)\\\\

348: \beta:&

349: \left(

350: \begin{array}{cc}

351: i&0\\0&-i

352: \end{array}

353: \right)&

354: \left(

355: \begin{array}{cc}

356: -i&0\\0&i

357: \end{array}

358: \right)&

359: \left(

360: \begin{array}{cc}

361: 0&-1\\1&0

362: \end{array}

363: \right)&

364: \left(

365: \begin{array}{cc}

366: 0&1\\-1&0

367: \end{array}

368: \right)\\\\

369: \gamma:&

370: \left(

371: \begin{array}{cc}

372: ia&-b\\b&-ia

373: \end{array}

374: \right)&

375: \left(

376: \begin{array}{cc}

377: -ia&b\\-b&ia

378: \end{array}

379: \right)&

380: \left(

381: \begin{array}{cc}

382: -ia&-b\\b&ia

383: \end{array}

384: \right)&

385: \left(

386: \begin{array}{cc}

387: ia&b\\-b&-ia

388: \end{array}

389: \right)\\\\

390: \delta:&

391: \left(

392: \begin{array}{cc}

393: b&ia\\ia&b

394: \end{array}

395: \right)&

396: \left(

397: \begin{array}{cc}

398: -b&-ia\\-ia&-b

399: \end{array}

400: \right)&

401: \left(

402: \begin{array}{cc}

403: b&-ia\\-ia&b

404: \end{array}

405: \right)&

406: \left(

407: \begin{array}{cc}

408: -b&ia\\ia&-b

409: \end{array}

410: \right)

411: \\\\

412: \epsilon:&

413: \left(

414: \begin{array}{cc}

415: a&ib\\ib&a

416: \end{array}

417: \right)&

418: \left(

419: \begin{array}{cc}

420: -a&-ib\\-ib&-a

421: \end{array}

422: \right)&

423: \left(

424: \begin{array}{cc}

425: -a&ib\\ib&-a

426: \end{array}

427: \right)&

428: \left(

429: \begin{array}{cc}

430: a&-ib\\-ib&a

431: \end{array}

432: \right)

433: \\\\

434: \phi:&

435: \left(

436: \begin{array}{cc}

437: ib&a\\-a&-ib

438: \end{array}

439: \right)&

440: \left(

441: \begin{array}{cc}

442: -ib&-a\\a&ib

443: \end{array}

444: \right)&

445: \left(

446: \begin{array}{cc}

447: ib&-a\\a&-ib

448: \end{array}

449: \right)&

450: \left(

451: \begin{array}{cc}

452: -ib&a\\-a&ib

453: \end{array}

454: \right)

455: \end{array}

456: \end{equation}

457: 

458: \noindent

459: where $a={1\over2}$ and $b={{\sqrt3}\over2}$.

460: The elements of these matrices are built up

461: from the roots of unity; square roots, fourth 

462: roots and sixth roots. These elements close to

463: form a group with 24 elements which we shall

464: designate $T_r$. The generators of the

465: group may be taken as the $\gamma_4$ and

466: $\delta_4$ matrices. Note that, although it is a

467: sub-group of 

468:  the continuous version $SU(2)$, $T_r$ has only

469: two, instead of three, generators. 

470: 

471: $T_r$ group is a kind of discrete spinor group.

472: It is analogous to the geometric group

473: $T_d$ familiar to physical chemists which is the

474: group of the tetrahedron in three-dimensions with

475: 24 elements and 2 generators.($T_d$ is a point space

476: group in three dimensions 

477: familiar to physical chemists which is spinorial

478: but is not isomorphic to $T_r$).

479: 

480: 

481: 

482: The {\it{mass-equivalence}}

483:  of $T_r$ is defined as ${\cal{R}}.(4!-2)$

484: where (4!-2) is the number of {\it{non-generator}}  elements

485: in the group and $\cal{R}$ incorporates any radiative

486: corrections due to the elevation of the cardinality

487: of the boundary of the geometry to the continuum

488: by the gauge fields. In the transition to

489: a  field theory analogue the

490: discrete pair of $T_r$ generators 

491: are assumed to   manifest as  continuous

492:  (massless) intrinsic spin generators and this is 

493: the source of the $-2$ in the above definition; 4!

494: is of course simply the order of the $T_r$ group.

495: 

496: 

497: 

498: 

499: 

500: \section{Matrix representations 2; embedding $T_r$ in SU(3)}

501: 

502: 

503: Quarks are assumed to have a cubic symmetry in 

504: affine-set geometry in discretised QCD. Just as 

505: with the analogy between $T_d$ and $T_r$ we wish

506: to find a way of embedding a point-symmetry

507: representation of a cube in a complex space.

508: 

509: 

510: We can parallel the root structure of SU(3) by

511: embedding three copies of  SU(2) 

512: in SU(3). We can  embed three copies of the 

513: $T_r\;\{\lambda_{ij}\}$

514: group as follows to form a discrete sub-group

515: of SU(3);

516: \begin{equation}r=\left(

517: \begin{array}{ccc}

518: 1&0&0\\

519: 0&\lambda_{11}&\lambda_{12}\\

520: 0&\lambda_{21}&\lambda_{22}

521: \end{array}

522: \right)

523: \;;\;g=

524: \left(

525: \begin{array}{ccc}

526: \lambda_{11}&0&\lambda_{12}\\

527: 0&1&0\\

528: \lambda_{21}&0&\lambda_{22}

529: \end{array}\right)\;;\;

530: b=

531: \left(

532: \begin{array}{ccc}

533: \lambda_{11}&\lambda_{12}&0\\

534: \lambda_{21}&\lambda_{22}&0\\

535: 0&0&1

536: \end{array}

537: \right)

538: \end{equation}

539: 

540: \noindent

541: and we also form the following `colour-dual'

542: embeddings;

543: 

544: \begin{equation}\bar{r}=\left(

545: \begin{array}{ccc}

546: -1&0&0\\

547: 0&i\lambda_{11}&i\lambda_{12}\\

548: 0&i\lambda_{21}&i\lambda_{22}

549: \end{array}

550: \right)

551: \;;\;\bar{g}=

552: \left(

553: \begin{array}{ccc}

554: i\lambda_{11}&0&i\lambda_{12}\\

555: 0&-1&0\\

556: i\lambda_{21}&0&i\lambda_{22}

557: \end{array}\right)\;;\;

558: \bar{b}=

559: \left(

560: \begin{array}{ccc}

561: i\lambda_{11}&i\lambda_{12}&0\\

562: i\lambda_{21}&i\lambda_{22}&0\\

563: 0&0&-1

564: \end{array}

565: \right)

566: \end{equation}

567: 

568: \noindent

569: The three `colour' matrices

570: $r,g\;\mbox{and}\;b$ plus the `colour-dual'

571: basis $\bar{r},\bar{g}\;\mbox{and}\;\bar{b}$

572: together form a discrete version of the 

573:  group of $SU(3)_c$.

574: Also notice that each set of colour matrices

575: forms a group with 24 elements. The `dual' or

576: `colour-bar' matrices alone do not form a group

577: since the product of any two colour-bar

578: matrices is a colour matrix. However, the

579: combination of $c_i+\bar{c}_i$ (for colour index

580: i) forms a group

581: with 48 elements and two generators located

582: in the colour-bar set of elements. 

583: Let us

584: call this group $T_c$. It is also a 

585: `discrete spinor' 

586:  analogous to the $T_r$ group;

587: \begin{equation}

588: (i\gamma_4.i\delta_4)^2=-I_2

589: \end{equation}

590: Note that the colour-dual is not the same

591: as the Hermitian conjugate matrix.

592: 

593: We might propose $T_c$  as a model

594: for a Skyrmion field of charge 4; i.e.

595: one with cubic symmetry. 

596: A corresponding point symmetry

597: (spinor) discrete group would be $O_h$

598: which has 48 elements and two generators

599: but, again like the $T_d\;{\rightarrow}T_r$

600: analogy, is not isomorphic to $T_c$. We will see 

601: later how the geometric analogy works

602: but to obtain a picture think

603: of the three colours as represented

604: by the three orthogonal pairs of opposite faces of

605: the cube; one pair of faces representing each

606: of the three possible  $T_{c_i}$ 

607: groups with the four vertices of

608: each of the two square faces 

609: representing each tetrahedral

610: sub-group. To represent the total geometry

611: we form a `particle vector' which is composed

612: of three components. First form a matrix

613: representation of $T_{c_i}$ as follows;

614: \begin{equation}

615: R=\left(\begin{array}{cc}

616: r&0\\0&\bar{r}\end{array}

617: \right),

618: G=\left(\begin{array}{cc}

619: g&0\\0&\bar{g}\end{array}

620: \right),

621: B=\left(\begin{array}{cc}

622: b&0\\0&\bar{b}\end{array}

623: \right)

624: \end{equation}

625: \noindent

626: and then form the three-component particle

627: vector $\stackrel{\rightarrow}{P}=

628: (R,G,B)$.

629: (Of course the order of the components here

630: is arbitrary).

631: 

632: Now define the following `current-quark' operators;

633: \begin{equation}

634: q_r=\left(

635: \begin{array}{ccc}

636: -1&0&0\\

637: 0&i&0\\0&0&i\end{array}

638: \right),

639: q_g=\left(

640: \begin{array}{ccc}

641: i&0&0\\

642: 0&-1&0\\0&0&i\end{array}

643: \right),

644: q_b=\left(

645: \begin{array}{ccc}

646: i&0&0\\

647: 0&i&0\\0&0&-1\end{array}

648: \right)

649: \end{equation}

650: \noindent

651: 

652: Lastly we require what is referred to in the

653: text as a `script identity' $\cal{I}$. It carries

654: a colour index;

655: \begin{equation}

656: {\cal{I}}_r=\left(

657: \begin{array}{ccc}

658: 1&0&0\\

659: 0&-1&0\\

660: 0&0&-1\end{array}\right),

661: {\cal{I}}_g=\left(

662: \begin{array}{ccc}

663: -1&0&0\\

664: 0&1&0\\

665: 0&0&-1\end{array}\right),

666: {\cal{I}}_b=\left(

667: \begin{array}{ccc}

668: -1&0&0\\

669: 0&-1&0\\

670: 0&0&1\end{array}\right)

671: \end{equation}

672: 

673: The purpose of these constructions will become

674: apparent as follows. We form operators from the

675: $q_i$'s and $\cal{I}$'s as follows (the following

676: examples are red format but the other colours follow

677: suit);

678: \begin{equation}

679: \begin{array}{cc}

680: U_r&D_r\\\\

681: \left(

682: \begin{array}{cc}

683: {\cal{I}}_r&0\\

684: 0&I_3\end{array}\right)&

685: \left(

686: \begin{array}{cc}

687: q^*_r&0\\

688: 0&q_r\end{array}\right)\\\\

689: \left(

690: \begin{array}{cc}

691: q^*_g&0\\

692: 0&q^*_g\end{array}\right)&

693: \left(

694: \begin{array}{cc}

695: I_3&0\\

696: 0&I_3\end{array}\right)

697: \\\\

698: \left(

699: \begin{array}{cc}

700: q^*_b&0\\

701: 0&q^*_b\end{array}

702: \right)

703: &

704: \left(

705: \begin{array}{cc}

706: I_3&0\\

707: 0&I_3\end{array}

708: \right)

709: \end{array}

710: \end{equation}

711: 

712: \noindent

713: where each operator has three

714: components represented above in column format.

715: 

716: 

717: Two things need mentioning at this stage;

718: 1; the quark operators $q_i$ and ${\cal{I}}_i$

719: are assumed confined to their respective colour

720: space i; that is, the $q_r$ operators only operate

721: on the red particle vector  matrix etc, 

722: and 2; the order of the 

723: application of the operators is of no significance

724: because they are diagonal matrices.

725: 

726: These `operators' will represent the current quark content

727: of a hadron and the `particle vector' will determine

728: the constituent mass/energy.

729: 

730: 

731: 

732: 

733: \section{Matrix representations 3; glue}

734: 

735: 

736: 

737: 

738: Discretised gluon operators are represented

739: as follows;

740: \begin{equation}

741: b\;\left(\begin{array}{cc}

742: I_3&0\\

743: 0&q_bq^*_g

744: \end{array}

745: \right)

746: g^*.

747: \left(

748: \begin{array}{cc}

749: g&0\\0&\bar{g}

750: \end{array}

751: \right)

752: =

753: \left(

754: \begin{array}{cc}

755: b&0\\0&\bar{b}

756: \end{array}

757: \right)

758: \end{equation}

759: 

760: \noindent

761: where * represents the complex conjugate.

762: Similar upper product 

763: operators are defined for example;

764: 

765: \begin{equation}

766: r\;\left(\begin{array}{cc}

767: q_rq_g^*&0\\

768: 0&I_3

769: \end{array}

770: \right)

771: g^*.

772: \left(

773: \begin{array}{cc}

774: \bar{g}&0\\0&{g}

775: \end{array}

776: \right)

777: =

778: \left(

779: \begin{array}{cc}

780: \bar{r}&0\\0&{r}

781: \end{array}

782: \right)

783: \end{equation}

784: 

785: These are then combined to form 

786: operators which operate on the particle

787: vector $\stackrel{\rightarrow}{P}$

788: for example;

789: \begin{equation}

790: \left(

791: \begin{array}{c}

792: g\;\left(\begin{array}{cc}

793: I_3&0\\

794: 0&q_gq^*_r

795: \end{array}\right)

796: r^*.\\\\

797: r\;\left(\begin{array}{cc}

798: I_3&0\\

799: 0&q_rq^*_g

800: \end{array}

801: \right)

802: g^*.\\\\

803: \left(\begin{array}{cc}

804: I_3&0\\0&I_3

805: \end{array}\right)

806: \end{array}

807: \right)

808: \end{equation}

809: 

810: \noindent

811: when applied to the particle vector

812: $\stackrel{\rightarrow}{P}=(R,G,B)$

813: produces $(G,R,B)$ i.e. this is a R-G

814: gluon.

815: 

816: 

817: 

818: 

819: 

820: 

821: \section{Matrix representations 4; current Quarks.}

822: 

823: 

824: 

825: 

826: 

827:  The current quarks are built

828: up from the quark operators used previously

829: to define the particle types. The current quark

830: masses are the corresponding masses of these

831: operators plus an extra piece whose origin may be 

832: the Higgs field but which can be interpreted in

833: terms of a potential of separation  between current quarks.

834: 

835: We can split up the operators into two

836: pieces; which is convenient for calculations.

837: Each current quark operator consists of a vector composed

838: of 3 blocks $6\times6$ matrices. Each $6\times6$

839: block is composed of two $3{\times}3$ blocks on

840: the diagonal. We 

841: separate out

842: the upper $3{\times}3$ blocks as one set of

843: matrices and the lower $3{\times}3$ set of 

844: blocks as another and represent them as

845: follows (the representation below is for

846: the proton as the reader can confirm

847: by applying the operators to the 3-quark (first generation

848: only)column

849: particle vector $\stackrel{\rightarrow}{P}=

850: (R,G,B)$) remembering that the red operators

851: operate only on the red $\stackrel{\rightarrow}{P}$

852: components etc.;

853: 

854: \vspace{0.5cm}

855: 

856: \begin{equation}

857: \mbox{strong component}=

858: \begin {array}{c}

859: red\rightarrow\\

860: green\rightarrow\\

861: blue\rightarrow

862: \end{array}

863: \left(

864: \begin{array}{ccc}

865: \cal{I}&q^*&I\\

866: q^*&\cal{I}&I\\

867: q^*&q^*&q^*\\

868: \end{array}

869: \right),

870: \;\;\;

871: \mbox{E.M. component}=

872: \left(

873: \begin{array}{ccc}

874: {I}&q^*&I\\

875: q^*&{I}&I\\

876: q^*&q^*&q\\

877: \end{array}

878: \right)

879: \end{equation}

880: 

881: \vspace{0.5cm}

882: 

883: The rows of these matrices are the three

884: colours (order red, green and blue in the

885: notation used in this paper from top down)

886: and the columns are the type of quark;

887: the left hand and central column of each

888: matrix above is an up-type quark and the right

889: hand column is a down-type quark. The up-type

890: quarks have their colour defined by the colour

891: of the single identity they carry. Thus for example

892: the first column of these matrices represents an 

893:  up red  quark. The single q or q* in the down defines its

894: colour so that the last column above is a blue down

895: quark in each case.

896: 

897: The strong components couples to the $C_i$ colour matrix

898: of the particle vector which does not contain

899: any generators. The E.M. component couples

900: to the $\bar{C}_i$ matrix with two generators.

901: (This coupling is required to properly define the

902: charge characteristic of the particle in the given 

903: representation).

904: The order of a $C$ matrix is 24 elements. The

905: order of a $\bar{C}$ matrix is (4!-2) elements

906: where, as in the case of the $T_r$ group, the

907: generators are assumed to be massless intrinsic

908: spin generators in the transition to a continuum

909: field theory. 

910: 

911: The masses

912: of the current quark operators are  defined in

913: terms of the matrices to which they couple.

914: The exception to the rule applies to the

915: identities in the E.M. component which are

916: spinless and of order 4! (i.e. the generators

917: of $\bar{C}$ are massive under the identity

918: components of the current quarks - the I

919: or the $\cal{I}$ components). The identities

920: in the strong component act like `strong charges'

921: and carry a relative mass sign. For example, in

922: the proton mass listed the two identities cancel

923: the two script identities leaving only the net 

924: 5 q*'s to contribute to the `strong' matrix  mass.

925: 

926: 

927: 

928: 

929: 

930: 

931: 

932: \section{The Higgs sector}

933: 

934: 

935: 

936: 

937: 

938: This is the least satisfactory part of

939: the theory but some progress can be

940: made with a combination of a few 

941: simple suppositions and comparison with

942: empirical data. There are some interesting

943: hints of new physics in the discretised model

944: of the Higgs sector and in what follows we

945: shall mention these in passing.  We divert initially to study

946: the vector gauge boson masses because these

947: provide some support for what follows with

948: the fermions.

949: 

950: 

951: 

952: There seems to be a general rule in affine-set

953: geometry relating the the {\it{maximal massless 

954: subgroup}} of a geometry to possible unitary symmetries

955: in the transition to a field theory

956: although we have no formal mathematical

957: proof of the connection. Let us

958: look at this in terms of the $T_r$ 

959: tetrahedral group. This is

960: the group which in the previous paper 

961: \cite{filewood} was used to

962: underpin lepton (and indirectly viz the $T_c$

963: analogue also quark) structure.

964: The  permutation group 

965: corresponding to $T_r$  is $S_4$ 

966: - the characteristic symmetry of a

967: four-point   affine-set geometry.

968: 

969: If we form a mental picture of a tetrahedron

970: we note that it has four 3-vertex subsets

971: forming four triangular faces. To see that there is an

972: orbit of the $T_r$ group with three elements note

973: that; 

974: \[

975: (\epsilon_2)^3=I_2

976: \]

977: where $\epsilon_2$ is one specific matrix  listed in the

978: table of $T_r$ group matrices.

979: Here $\epsilon_2$ is the analogue of a $C_3$ rotation in

980: a three-dimensional tetrahedron described by

981: the group $T_d$ familiar to physical chemists. The

982: continuous analogue of this will be a U(1) rotation

983: in a two-dimensional plane.

984: The stabiliser of this orbit is the single remaining

985: point of the set of four defining the geometry

986: and this sets the orientation of the associated 

987: U(1) symmetry axis. The affine-set

988: tetrahedron in the previous paper 

989: was associated with charged lepton masses

990: and the three-point sub-group associated with

991: the photon geometry. That is, the photon geometry

992: is the maximal massless subgroup of the $S_4$

993: tetrahedral group and the single stabiliser point

994: dictates the associated symmetry as U(1).

995: 

996: Without proof we may seek to generalise this result

997: to scalar geometries. Scalar affine-set geometries have

998: the peculiar property that any sub-set of points 

999: always defines a permutation group. There will always be

1000: a maximal massless set which will form an orbit

1001: with the remaining points forming the associated 

1002: stabiliser. We postulate that this stabiliser, when part

1003: of a scalar set of points, will always define a unitary

1004: symmetry as a function of the number of points in the

1005: stabiliser. We express this more precisely as follows;

1006: 

1007: 

1008: 

1009: 

1010: \vspace{0.5cm}

1011: 

1012: {\underline{Hypothesis}; if a scalar affine-set geometry 

1013: of order $S_n$ exists then its' corresponding

1014: unitary symmetry group is at most SU(n-m) where 

1015: the index

1016: (n-m) is the number

1017: of points of the affine-set geometry present in the stabiliser 

1018: of the orbit

1019: of the maximal massless sub-group containing m points  and

1020: (n-m) is  a prime number; or,

1021: if (n-m) is not a prime number, then 

1022: the geometry defines  a product

1023: of unitary groups of prime index whose sum of indices is

1024: (n-m).

1025: 

1026: 

1027: \vspace{0.5cm}

1028: 

1029: For $S_8$ (fermionic!)cubic symmetry

1030:  it is interesting to note that,

1031: although we have previously seen that it is

1032: a spinor geometry not a scalar,

1033: in the case of the strong interaction

1034: in colour space the

1035: gluon geometry is a `flat' (two-dimensional and

1036: hence massless; see {\cite{filewood}

1037: for more detail}) 4-point geometry which can represent

1038: a single square face of the cube. 

1039: In colour space this is the maximal massless

1040: subgroup of degree $S_4$. Hence m=4, n=8

1041: and the  decomposition is 

1042: either to SU(2)xSU(2) or SU(3)xU(1); the latter of

1043: these two prevails empirically -

1044: presumably because the U(1) subgroup

1045: is specified by the requirement that

1046: the quarks are electro-magnetically charged.

1047: 

1048: 

1049: Now, for the standard model we have SU(3)xSU(2)xU(1)

1050: so that m=6. What is the appropriate value of n?

1051: In affine-set theory all massive fermions decompose 

1052: to $T_r$  ($S_4$) equivalent units (for example, in calculating

1053: the mass of a cubic quark in previous sections

1054: the cube was decomposed into $T_r$ units which were then summed).

1055:  In the absence of the

1056: Higgs field, standard model fermions are massless

1057: so the obvious choice is to take n-m=4;

1058: that is, setting the fermions as massless and

1059: representing the maximal massless subgroup - so that

1060: n=10 or an $S_{10}$ scalar affine-set geometry

1061: with 10! elements represents the standard

1062: model prior to spontaneous symmetry breaking. Now,

1063: when we give the fermions mass there will be

1064: a shift in the maximal massless sub-group from

1065: n-m=4 to n-m=3 where the triangle $S_3$ symmetry

1066: is the photon group. (Note that 

1067: the persistence of a massless

1068: object of order $S_4$

1069: - gluons -  is unique to colour space

1070: and not a $T_r$ (spinor)  representation; the issue

1071: of the masses of neutrinos is more complex -

1072: in the case at hand we are only concerned with the

1073: usual electro-weak symmetry breaking problem of 

1074: ensuring that the photon is massless but the standard

1075: model charged fermions

1076: gain mass).

1077: This shift in maximal massless sub-group may be the

1078: affine-set theory analogue of spontaneous symmetry

1079: breaking and can be analysed in discrete theory

1080: in the following way.

1081: 

1082: 

1083: A factorial number has a  decomposition

1084: into factorial sub-groups;

1085: 

1086: \begin{equation}

1087: n!=\sum_{k=1}^{n-1}k.k!+0!

1088: \label{decomp}

1089: \end{equation}

1090: 

1091: Symmetry breaking will demand a

1092: decomposition of the $S_{10}$ symmetry to

1093: sub-groups of order no more than $S_9$.

1094: (This is because the standard model has 

1095: n=6 and for the photon m=3). Now, a scalar 

1096: affine set can be decomposed in the pattern of

1097: (\ref{decomp}) because, in the absence of any 

1098: spin generators, every subset of points defines

1099: a subgroup which is always a permutation group.

1100: The

1101: symmetry breaking can be effected by discarding

1102: the massless pieces of order $S_3$ (or less),

1103: which gives a {\it{minimal}} decomposition

1104: into exactly

1105:  six massive components

1106: (remember we have discarded the

1107: massless pieces);

1108: 

1109: \begin{equation}

1110: S_{10}\rightarrow

1111: 9.S_9+8.S_8+7.S_7+6.S_6+5.S_5+4.S_4

1112: \label{Hig}

1113: \end{equation}

1114: 

1115: The photon is now the maximal massless geometry

1116: of order $S_3$ and the possible unitary symmetries 

1117: by hypothesis 9 are (neglecting the possibility of

1118: multiple U(1) subgroups and allowing only groups of

1119: prime index);

1120: \[

1121: \begin{array}{cc}

1122: A:&

1123: S_9{\rightarrow}SU(3){\times}SU(3)\;\mbox{or}\;

1124: SU(3){\times}SU(2){\times}U(1)\;\mbox{or}\;

1125: SU(2){\times}SU(2){\times}SU(2)

1126: \\

1127: B:&

1128: S_8{\rightarrow}SU(5)

1129: \\

1130: C:&

1131: S_7{\rightarrow}SU(2){\times}SU(2)\;\mbox{or}\;

1132: SU(3){\times}U(1)

1133: \\

1134: D:&

1135: S_6{\rightarrow}SU(3)\\

1136: E:&

1137: S_5{\rightarrow}SU(2)\\

1138: F:&S_4{\rightarrow}U(1)

1139: \end{array}

1140: \]

1141: 

1142: 

1143: 

1144: It appears that a decomposition into a product of unitary 

1145: groups requires a {\it{gauged}} symmetry and that the scalar

1146: Higgs components are not gaugable as such in their couplings

1147: to the fermions. The

1148: {\it{physical}} explanation for this is that the scalar

1149: Higgs components for the fermions `live' in the interior

1150: space of the geometry (e.g. `inside' the cube for a quark)

1151: and that this space does not contain the time dimension and

1152: cannot be gauged for this reason. Comparison

1153: with empirical data shows that,

1154: for the Higgs field - fermion mass couplings,

1155:  possibilities A and C do not occur whilst

1156: B,D,E and F appear to manifest physically.

1157: (Possibility A seems to contains the standard model decomposition

1158: for the non-Higgs gauged sector but this was by construction;

1159: see above). It is particularly

1160: interesting that, as we shall see, the empirical correlation with

1161:  possibility B is good which may be the 

1162: first empirical suggestion of the existence of an $SU(5)$ symmetry

1163: in nature.

1164: 

1165: The situation is complicated because of the requirement

1166: for a  propagating Higgs field to render the electro-weak

1167: theory unitary. This requirement is specifically in relation

1168: to the vector gauge bosons which require the Higgs field

1169: in their radiative corrections to preserve unitarity. This

1170: is not possible if the Higgs components are `buried outside time'

1171: as it were in the `interior' timeless space of three-dimensional

1172: affine geometries representing the massive vector gauge

1173: bosons! Indeed, as we shall see, comparison with

1174: empirical data does indeed show that the Higgs propagates

1175: in relation to the vector gauge bosons which we will now study in

1176: some detail.

1177: 

1178:  We know that, for completeness and consistency,

1179: we require a model for the massive vector gauge 

1180: bosons. $T_r$ is a spinor group and unsuitable

1181: but there is a three-dimensional point symmetry 

1182: group $T$ which has only vector generators.

1183: $T$ has 10 non-generator elements and 2 generators

1184: but 12 elements do not represent an $S_n$ symmetry

1185: of an affine set ($S_3$ for example has 6 elements

1186: whilst $S_4$ has 24 elements). However, if we 

1187: discard the massless photon orbit from the

1188: scalar $S_{10}$ the $S_4$ scalar subgroup which results 

1189: will acquire mass

1190: through a decomposition of the Higgs field. This 

1191: decomposition is an inevitable consequence of affine

1192: sets.This could be 

1193: used to couple to a four-point {\it{bosonic}} $T$

1194: geometry to give it 

1195: an affine symmetry (i.e. re-define its'  elements

1196: as a permutation group).

1197: Thus we might then try to couple this scalar quantity to

1198: a $T$ geometry to define it by chopping it

1199: in half to mirror the fact that $T$ has 12 

1200: instead of the $S_4=4!$ elements of the affine

1201: set of a four-point (spinor) geometry. This seems to work.

1202: The other mass

1203: components we must assume couple to the geometry

1204: rather like `lumps of lead' and are not  distinctly

1205: related to the $T$ morphology - although 

1206: comparison with empirical data shows that this

1207: does not apply to the (scalar not fermionic!)

1208: $S_8$ sub-component  which  is

1209: also chopped in half. One may account for this

1210: as relating to a coupling to a `$T$'bosonic-version of

1211: the quark $T_c$ geometry.  Empirically

1212: this gives a very good  fit to the data i.e.

1213: with the singular assumption that

1214: there is mixing, which is maximal,

1215: at the $S_8$ (quark) level  and  also at the 

1216: $S_4$ (lepton) level; which intuitively is

1217: physically sensible. The way we do it is, given

1218: that  the number 

1219: of elements of 

1220: $T$ is half that of $T_r$, we assume  ${1\over2}.4.S_4$ may be 

1221: regarded as defining 4 units of (bosonic) $T$ as distinct 

1222: from 2 units of (fermionic) $T_r$. Similarly, we may postulate

1223: a bosonic  point symmetry analogue of the fermionic

1224:  $T_c$ group with half the number of elements 

1225: in each $T_r$ sub-group analogue (i.e. $C_i$ and $\bar{C}_i$)

1226: and representing

1227: the point group $O$ of the cube with vector generators.

1228: Comparison with empirical data gives 

1229: the mixing  represented  as; 

1230: 

1231: 

1232: \vspace{0.5cm}

1233: \begin{center}

1234: \[

1235: S_{10}\rightarrow

1236: 9.S_9+8.S_8+7.S_7+6.S_6+5.S_5+4.S_4

1237: \]

1238: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}\hline

1239: Boson&9.$S_9$&$8.S_8$&$7.S_7$&$6.S_6$&$5.S_5$&$4.S_4$\\\hline

1240: $W^+$&1&1/2&1&1&1&1/2\\\hline

1241: $W^-$&1&1/2&1&1&1&1/2\\\hline

1242: $Z^0$&1&2&1&1&1&2\\\hline

1243: \end{tabular}

1244: \end{center}

1245: 

1246: \vspace{0.5cm}

1247: 

1248: \noindent

1249: Here each boson is represented by an $S_{10}$ permutation

1250: symmetry based on a permutation of the ten non-generator

1251: elements of the discrete (bosonic) group $T$. The decomposition

1252: results from rendering the photon massless which pulls out

1253: the $S_3$ subgroups leaving only the massive pieces of order

1254: $S_4$ or greater.

1255: Notice how mass components have shifted from the 

1256: $W^{\pm}$ to the $Z^0$ with 50\% of the charged

1257: boson $S_8$ component shifting across from 

1258: the $W^{\pm}$ to the $Z^0$. The resulting electro-weak mixing

1259: angle can be precisely calculated but it is interesting to note

1260: that, in spite of the value of the angle, it this theory

1261: it results from maximal mixing! 

1262: We proceed with a calculation of the

1263: predicted masses of the bosons from the above table.

1264: 

1265: The W bosons acquire radiative corrections to

1266: their mass. The standard affine-set geometry

1267: correction is applied; it is non-perturbative 

1268: (see \cite{filewood});

1269: ${\cal{R}}=1+\alpha_{(q^2=M_W^2)}$

1270: and the shifted (mixed into the $Z^o$)

1271: components keep their

1272: radiative corrections. Here the Higgs components 

1273: acquire radiative corrections; unlike the case for the 

1274: fermions the Higgs field propagates in space-time

1275: in the case of the mass components of the $W$ bosons

1276: (necessary for unitarity)

1277: and those components mixed from the $W$'s into the $Z$. 

1278: Comparison with physical data shows that the

1279: Higgs components native to the $Z^o$ do not propagate

1280: in the theory and do not acquire radiative corrections! The 

1281: physical implications of this are quite astonishing. (It implies,

1282: for example, that spin statistics and space-time structure

1283: are not independent and that electro-magnetism has

1284: an interpretation in terms of space-time structure - this arises because

1285: of the double whammy implied by the data correspondence;

1286:  to a high degree of precision

1287: the data correspondence with theory shows that the Higgs components

1288: {\it{do not}} propagate with respect to the fermions (they are buried

1289: inside the geometry and outside the time dimension). This is represented

1290: by the lack of radiative correction to the mass components of 

1291: the fermions derived directly from the Higgs sector.

1292:  Only  for the charged fundamental (i.e. no fermionic

1293: sub-structure) bosons does the Higgs 

1294: appear to propagate in space-time;

1295:  but only in respect to the 

1296: fundamental boson  carrying electro-magnetic charge. 

1297: We must speculate that

1298:  the mixed 

1299: component from the W's to the Z are sufficient to confer unitarity 

1300: on the Z. The radical interpretation, which I favour, is that

1301: the Higgs changes the statistics of space-time; that is, it acts as 

1302: a supersymmetry operator on space-time structure (as distinct from 

1303: supersymmetry in the particle spectrum) and generates electro-magnetic

1304: charge in the process. If this is true we would not expect to find

1305: a `free' Higgs floating around in a particle accelerator because

1306: its' existence would violate charge conservation even though it is 

1307: electrically neutral!

1308: 

1309: Now,

1310: $\alpha_{(q^2=M_W^2)}\approx128^{-1}$

1311: and the calculation proceeds by summing the number of 

1312: matrix elements of the groups in question

1313: (the matrix order will be equal to the number

1314: of group

1315: elements). Calculation 

1316: from the above table gives the W mass as;

1317: \[

1318: W_M^{\pm}=(1+\alpha_{q{\approx}M_W^2}).3467400\]

1319: and the $Z^0$ mass as; 

1320: \[

1321: Z_M^0=3628776+(1+\alpha_{q{\approx}M_W^2}).322656\]

1322:  where the numbers

1323: are obtained by summing over the number of elements in 

1324: the respective groups.

1325:  (For example, $9S_9$ has 9.9!=3265920 elements).

1326: These numbers are converted to MeV by using the 

1327: mass equivalence of the $T_r$ unit which is exactly

1328: equal to the electron rest mass;

1329: $T_r=(1+\alpha_{q^2=m_e^2}+G_f)(4!-2)\approx0.511MeV$

1330: and $G_f$ is a dimensionless number which reflects

1331: the relative strength of the weak interaction at low energy;

1332: we may take 

1333: $(1+\alpha_{q^2=m_e^2}+G_f)\approx1.0073115$.

1334: One then readily obtains;

1335: 

1336: \[M_W=80.578GeV(80.41(0.10))\]

1337: and

1338: \[

1339: M_Z=91.173GeV(91.187(0.007))\]

1340: 

1341: and

1342: \[sin\theta_w=\]

1343: 

1344: This provides empirical support for the claim that 

1345: the breakdown components of the $S_{10}$ symmetry

1346: listed previously do indeed represent the Higgs field.

1347: 

1348: 

1349: 

1350: 

1351: If a 3 `units' of $S_{10}$ Higgs couples to the vector gauge

1352: bosons which represent the adjoint rep. of

1353: S.U.(2) then we might  expect a 2 units of `Higgs'

1354: to specify the fermion masses - at least this is

1355: the supposition we will make.  As before 

1356: requiring  a vacuum structure with

1357: massless photons (and gravitons

1358: ; also ignoring for the moment the existence

1359: of the massless gluon which we must treat as somehow

1360: separate to   spontaneous symmetry breaking)

1361: irreversibly breaks  down the $S_{10}$ scalar

1362: into six components. 

1363: If we start with two $S_{10}$

1364: units this means that in the quark sector 

1365: a maximum of six objects can acquire mass 

1366: and in the lepton sector

1367: another six objects can acquire mass; the six masses in 

1368: each case will have a hierarchy based on eq.({\ref{Hig}}).

1369:  In the situation of

1370: simplest symmetry the tau neutrino has the same mass as

1371: the top-quark  etc. as per the following table;

1372: 

1373: \vspace{0.5cm}

1374: 

1375: \begin{center}

1376: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}\hline

1377: Fermion&$9.S_9$&$8.S_8$&$7.S_7$&$6.S_6$&$5.S_5$&$4.S_4$\\\hline

1378: $top$&1&0&0&0&0&0\\\hline

1379: $bottom$&0&1&0&0&0&0\\\hline

1380: $charm$&0&0&1&0&0&0\\\hline

1381: $strange$&0&0&0&1&0&0\\\hline

1382: $up$&0&0&0&0&1&0\\\hline

1383: $down$&0&0&0&0&0&1\\\hline

1384: $\nu_{\tau}$&1&0&0&0&0&0\\\hline

1385: $\tau$&0&1&0&0&0&0\\\hline

1386: $\nu_{\mu}$&0&0&1&0&0&0\\\hline

1387: $\mu$&0&0&0&1&0&0\\\hline

1388: $\nu_{e}$&0&0&0&0&1&0\\\hline

1389: $e$&0&0&0&0&0&1\\\hline

1390: \end{tabular}

1391: \end{center}

1392: 

1393: \vspace{0.5cm}

1394: 

1395: \noindent

1396: where one `Higgs' unit of mass  has been used to generate the 

1397: quark masses and one to generate the lepton masses

1398: as per eq.(\ref{Hig}). (Of course we would need another

1399: two `Higgs' if we wanted to also give mass to equivalent

1400: sets of anti-particles).

1401: However, the geometry of the neutrinos in the 

1402: theory is `flat' which means they can only have

1403: masses generated radiatively; they cannot acquire 

1404: `volume' masses which are characteristic of the

1405: the Higgs components

1406: (a scalar affine-set geometry of four or

1407: more points will always define at least a 

1408: three-dimensional space. Thus the above table is badly

1409: broken. We may assume that mass components

1410: cannot be shifted `horizontally' between columns because to

1411: do so would require another round of symmetry breaking

1412: to strip-off more massless sub-units.

1413: Clearly all the mass from the listed $\nu_{\tau}$

1414: will appear in the top (it has nowhere else to go).

1415: Using   a number of different inputs

1416: including theoretical and empirical (for example the

1417: known lepton masses have been used to help construct

1418: the following table) it is possible to determine the correct

1419: form of the quark-lepton mass mixing matrix;

1420: 

1421: \vspace{0.5cm}

1422: 

1423: \begin{center}

1424: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}\hline

1425: Fermion&9.9!&8.8!&7.7!&6.6!&5.5!&4.4!\\\hline

1426: $top$&2&10/8&0&0&0&0\\\hline

1427: $bottom$&0&5/8&0&0&0&0\\\hline

1428: $charm$&0&0&1&3/6&0&0\\\hline

1429: $strange$&0&0&0&1/6&3/5&0\\\hline

1430: $up$&0&0&0&0&0&0\\\hline

1431: $down$&0&0&0&0&0&0\\\hline

1432: $\nu_{\tau}$&0&0&0&0&0&0\\\hline

1433: $\tau$&0&1/8&1&2/6&0&0\\\hline

1434: $\nu_{\mu}$&0&0&0&0&0&0\\\hline

1435: $\mu$&0&0&0&1&2/5&0\\\hline

1436: $\nu_{e}$&0&0&0&0&0&0\\\hline

1437: $e$&0&0&0&0&0&0\\\hline

1438: \end{tabular}

1439: \end{center}

1440: 

1441: \vspace{0.5cm}

1442: 

1443: 

1444: The first thing to notice is that, no sooner had

1445: we argued that components cannot be shifted

1446: `horizontally' than a $5.S_5$ disappears from 

1447: the up/$\nu_e$ column entries.

1448: We will modify the accounting later to

1449: bring the `bboks back into balance'.

1450:  We might have expected

1451: a `1' at the up on-diagonal

1452: entry; and indeed in the charged pions

1453: appear to acquire an $S_5$ mass component

1454: as an SU(2) singlet (see the calculation

1455: of the charged pion mass given in subsequent sections)

1456: but the mixing of the components of the first

1457: generation quarks and leptons is a little complicated

1458: and not well understood but

1459:  we will look at it more closely later. 

1460: For the moment simply regard the above table as

1461: a semi-empirical analysis. 

1462: 

1463: The Higgs components

1464: are lopsided towards the quark sector precisely because of

1465: the masslessness 

1466: (with respect to the Higgs mechanism)

1467: of the neutrinos. One might have expected

1468: a 9.9! for the $\nu_{\tau}$ but if the neutrinos are massless

1469: (or have masses only generated radiatively)

1470: then this component is picked up by the top quark which has a

1471: 2 in the first column. The 8.8! has broken up in the S.U.(5)

1472: multiplets (1+5+10).8!=2.8.8! in descending order of mass from

1473: the top. This decomposition is in keeping

1474: with hypothesis 9 which specifies SU(5)

1475: as the appropriate symmetry for the stabiliser of

1476: the 

1477: $S_8$ terms

1478: under a massless photon. In fact (1+5+10) is the only breaking

1479: possible here if S.U.(5) dictates the allowed components

1480: (there are only three available `slots' if the neutrino

1481: is massless and the sum of terms must

1482: be 16). This symmetry is apparently not a gauged symmetry and

1483: appears quite distinct to familiar local-gauge 

1484: symmetries. The tau gets a singlet S.U.(5) rep of mass

1485: and  there is mixing

1486: of mass components between the top and the bottom based

1487: on the S.U.(5) multiplets 5 and 10. No Higgs mass shifts between

1488: columns but there is effective 

1489: quark mass mixing because the Top

1490: acquires a component from the column diagonal for the bottom.

1491: The list gives the top quark mass as $\approx$ 160GeV. and

1492: the bottom mass as $\approx$ 4.65GeV. These are the dominant,

1493: but not the only, components of the `current-quark'

1494: mass of these quarks.

1495: 

1496: 

1497: The $S_7$ symmetry is unbroken. The neutrinos

1498:  have no Higgs components

1499: of mass in this theory and the lepton sector 

1500: 7.7! units of elements shifts to the tau; the only available

1501: slot. The third tau term is interpreted as the sum of

1502: two singlets. The other entries follow the appropriate

1503: multiplets of the unitary groups appropriate for 

1504: the corresponding decomposition given by hypothesis 9. 

1505: 

1506:  Note that there is  {\it{inter}}-generational mixing of mass

1507: components in the lepton sector with the tau extending into the

1508: muon column. This inter-generational mass-mixing,

1509: seen also at the level of the strange quark,

1510: could be significant for neutrino oscillations if the radiatively

1511: generated neutrino masses follow a pattern similar to the

1512: massive leptons.

1513: 

1514: 

1515: The up and down quarks and the electron  have no Higgs

1516: components at all.

1517: The scalar Higgs components (a scalar component

1518: has no massless generators) are associated with unstable particles

1519: and the stripping of these components from the up and down

1520: quark will also  be required if proton stability is to be ensured.

1521: Where the expected 5.5! for the up quark

1522: goes we shall shortly see.

1523: 

1524: No components appear in the 4.4!=U(1) column. The two 4.4!

1525: components and the up-quark 5.5! component get rearranged

1526: as the following which represent a mixture of S.U.(2) and

1527: U(1) components;

1528: 

1529: \vspace{0.5cm}

1530: 

1531: \begin{center}

1532: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|}

1533: \multicolumn{4}{c}{CURRENT QUARK U(1) COMPONENTS}\\\hline

1534: quark type&`strong-charge'&generation multiplier&

1535: strong component\\\hline

1536: top&+&3&2.(4!-2)\\\hline

1537: bottom&-&3&4.(4!-2)\\\hline

1538: charm&+&2&2.(4!-2)\\\hline

1539: strange&-&2&4.(4!-2)\\\hline

1540: up&+&1&2.(4!-2)\\\hline

1541: down&-&1&4.(4!-2)\\\hline

1542: \end{tabular}

1543: \end{center}

1544: 

1545: \vspace{0.5cm}

1546: 

1547: \noindent

1548: The total mass represented by the

1549: above table is exactly 5.5!+2.4.4! as required

1550: so that every part of the Higgs mass is accounted for

1551: except the components $3.3!+...$ the masslessness of

1552: which induced the breakdown of the initial Higgs unit

1553: of mass 10!$\approx$83GeV in the first place.

1554:  These are the exotic U(1)

1555: components we have sought to complete our calculation

1556: of proton and neutron masses. They represent a truely

1557: remarkable piece of structure of the Higgs field

1558: because with them the scalar components have been 

1559: transmuted into tetrahedral spinor units of mass

1560: with clear mixing  implied between quark generations. 

1561: `Higgs' units, such as the $2.9.S_9$ 

1562: associated with the top 

1563: appear with no gauge field corrections to

1564: them in mass calculations (a common feature of

1565: all Higgs components) which is an indicator that

1566: they are `buried outside time'; they are situated

1567: effectively `inside' the timeless space demarcated

1568: by the boundary of tetrahedral units (one can think of 

1569: them as occupying the inner surface of the boundary of 

1570: the geometry whereas the gauge fields occupy the outer

1571: surface -  the time dimension does not

1572: exist within the boundary of any affine-set

1573: geometry embedded in space-time). This is discussed in more

1574: detail in \cite{filewood}. In that paper we also saw

1575: that the current-quark U(1) components could be

1576: interpreted in terms of a strong-interaction potential

1577: between current quarks \cite{filewood}.

1578:  In the case of the up  quark 

1579:  four out of the six surfaces of the cube (each quark is

1580: a `cube' in this theory)

1581: are electro-magnetically charged (i.e. 2/3rds). 

1582: The remaining  two

1583: surfaces of the cube are uncharged electro-magnetically

1584: but acquire a `Higgs-charge', or perhaps

1585: more appropriately a `strong-charge' because 

1586: it can be interpreted as a strong interaction

1587: potential; in the case of the up

1588:   the

1589: two units represented in the above chart (vis-a-vis 4 for

1590: the down) are the complement of the

1591: four (res.2) electro-magnetically

1592: charged square surfaces of the cube;

1593: accounting for the total of six square

1594: surface sub-geometries for each cube.

1595: One can easily see this structure in the

1596: quark operators given in the previous section.

1597:  Presumably this means that, for example

1598: in the case of the up, only four of the

1599: six surfaces of the cube are being presented to 

1600: space-time; the other two surfaces are outside time

1601: (?folded in).

1602: 

1603: 

1604: The `Higgs-charge' concept arose because the above U(1)

1605: mass units in question have been given massless generators

1606: and in space-time this would mean electro-magnetic

1607: charge due the the spinning triangular sub-geometries.

1608: The Higgs charge seems to be an analogue of electro-magnetism

1609: but in a timeless colour space (it might lend support to

1610: the idea of instantons?). From a phenomenological

1611: point of view the Higgs charges are difficult to understand

1612: (will they effect the results of deep inelastic scattering

1613: at ultra-high energy in spite of the fact that they are

1614: located in a timeless 3-space? Can they be `pushed' into

1615: space-time at high energy leading to deviation from the

1616: standard model predictions at high energy?)

1617: but the methodology required to use them in calculations

1618: is known precisely. To calculate the energy associated with

1619:  current quark U(1) components  one averages

1620: the absolute value of the sum of the respective `Higgs charges'.

1621: For example, in the case of two up quarks the value is;

1622: 

1623: 

1624: 

1625: \begin{equation}

1626: \mbox{up-up current quark Higgs energy}={1\over2}|+2.(4!-2)+2.(4!-2)|

1627: =2.(4!-2)

1628: \end{equation}

1629: and so-on for the other components. One sees that the

1630: choice of charge is arbitrary except that the up-type

1631: quarks and down-type quarks must have opposite sign

1632: just as they do for conventional electro-magnetic charge.

1633: The logical choice is to give the same Higgs charge 

1634: sign as the E.M. charge for each quark. Thus for the

1635: up-quark four of the six surfaces have positive 

1636: electro-magnetic charge (2/3rds of the surface of the

1637: cube) and two of the six surfaces (1/3rd of the surface)

1638: have a positive Higgs charge.

1639: It is these terms which

1640: define the additional masses for the proton and neutron

1641: expressions set earlier in the paper.  The

1642: proton we have three kinds of couplings; one up-up

1643: and two up-downs so the sum $\Sigma = 4(4!-2)$ and for the neutron we have

1644: two up-downs and one down-down $\Sigma=6.(4!-2)$. 

1645: 

1646: Notice that, from the point of view of the

1647: Higgs field,  it really is only at the level of the U(1)

1648: Higgs charges that the nucleons can be considered

1649: to have any component of the strange or other

1650: higher-generation quark content since these Higgs

1651: energies may alternatively be interpreted as

1652: being generated fractionally by the first generation

1653: component of the higher generation quarks - which

1654: are identical to that of the up and down

1655: (the pattern is repeated identically for each

1656: generation so that, for example, a top-quark

1657: has a +2(4!-2) corresponding to a first, second

1658: and third generation representation -

1659: although what you get depends upon the actual

1660: quark content of a given hadron).

1661:  We will later see however

1662: that the remaining components of the current up and down

1663: quarks (developed in the preceding section) 

1664: have a similar  interpretation in terms of mixing 

1665: with higher generations not obvious from the 

1666: previous calculations performed for the nucleons

1667: \cite{filewood}.

1668: 

1669: 

1670: 

1671: \section{Ground state meson masses}

1672: 

1673:  Now we start on the main purpose of this paper;

1674: a study of ground state meson masses

1675: in order to gain insight into the 

1676: mass structure of higher generation

1677: quarks.

1678: 

1679: The nucleon masses and the electron mass

1680: are particularly simple

1681: which  might be expected for the fundamental stable

1682: matter constituents of the universe. They were examined

1683: closely in \cite{filewood}. However

1684: we can use the same techniques of analysis to

1685: determine ground state meson masses. The techniques are

1686: a generalisation of the methods already developed for

1687: the nucleons with slight modifications

1688: because of the presence of only two effective

1689: quarks in a meson. 

1690: 

1691: For the nucleons we had only first generation

1692: quarks to consider and we developed a three-colour

1693: particle vector on which the current quark representations

1694: acted. For mesons the situation is slightly

1695: different because in general only one

1696: colour is active in the particle vector.

1697: For example, we may consider that 

1698: a $\pi^{+}$ meson consists of the quark content

1699: $U_r\bar{D}_r$  where $r$ is a single colour.

1700: In calculating the corresponding constituent mass

1701: this means that only one of the possible three

1702: colour components of the particle vector becomes

1703: massive and the remaining two are

1704: treated as  massless. However, we then {\it{sum}}

1705: over all possible permutations of discrete colour

1706: which gives a multiplier of 3. (By contrast with 

1707: the nucleons we had three massive components and

1708: hence a multiplier of 3! for the colour permutations).

1709: 

1710: For a first generation particle vector representation

1711: we thus have only one massive component but in two 

1712: possible parity states over which we must sum;

1713: 

1714: \vspace{0.5cm}

1715: 

1716: \begin{equation}

1717: \left(

1718: \begin{array}{cc}

1719: c_i&0\\

1720: 0&\bar{c}_i

1721: \end{array}

1722: \right)

1723: \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;

1724: \left(

1725: \begin{array}{cc}

1726: \bar{c}_i&0\\

1727: 0&{c}_i

1728: \end{array}

1729: \right)

1730: \label{paritystates}

1731: \end{equation}

1732: 

1733: \vspace{0.5cm}

1734: 

1735: The matrix order of $\bar{C}_i$ is $(4!-2)$

1736: and the matrix order of $C_i$ is simply $4!$

1737: (the generators of the $T_c$ group are in the

1738: barred matrix and assumed to be massless intrinsic

1739: spin generators in the transition to a field theory).

1740: Current quark

1741: coupling to both possible parity combinations 

1742: introduces a multiplier of 2. Thus the

1743: total constituent order for a meson with two

1744: first generation quarks becomes;

1745: 

1746: \vspace{0.8cm}

1747: 

1748: \centerline

1749: {\epsfig{file=order.eps,width=10cm}}

1750: 

1751: \vspace{0.8cm}

1752: 

1753: The order of the constituent gluons is similar.

1754: Typical gluon formats are;

1755: 

1756: \vspace{0.5cm}

1757: 

1758: \begin{eqnarray}

1759: C_i&\left(

1760: \begin{array}{cc}

1761: q_iq_j^*&0\\

1762: 0&I_3

1763: \end{array}

1764: \right)

1765: C_j^*

1766: \;\;\;\;\;;\;\;\;\;\;

1767: C_i\left(

1768: \begin{array}{cc}

1769: q_iq_j^*&0\\

1770: 0&{\cal{I}}_k

1771: \end{array}

1772: \right)

1773: C_j^*

1774: \nonumber

1775: \\

1776: \;&\nonumber

1777: \\

1778: C_i&\left(

1779: \begin{array}{cc}

1780: q_i{\cal{I}}_kq_j^*&0\\

1781: 0&I_3

1782: \end{array}

1783: \right)

1784: C_j^*

1785: \;\;\;\;\;;\;\;\;\;\;

1786: C_i\left(

1787: \begin{array}{cc}

1788: q_i{\cal{I}}_kq_j^*&0\\

1789: 0&{\cal{I}}_k

1790: \end{array}

1791: \right)

1792: C_j^*

1793: \end{eqnarray}

1794: 

1795: \vspace{0.5cm}

1796: 

1797: \noindent

1798: and the order of any gluon operator is

1799: the same as the order of the product $C_iC_j^*$

1800: which is $4!^2$ (note that $^*$ indicates the

1801:  conjugate transpose  matrix which is not the same

1802: as the barred matrix). With discrete colour there

1803: are two possible transitions for any given

1804: colour state i.e.;

1805: 

1806: \[

1807: C_i

1808: \rightarrow

1809: C_j\;\;\;\;

1810: \mbox{and}\;\;\;\;

1811: C_i

1812: \rightarrow

1813: C_k

1814: \]

1815: 

1816: 

1817: \noindent 

1818: where \{i,j,k\} are the three possible discrete

1819: colours. This  doubles the gluon matrix order.

1820: There is a further doubling of the order 

1821: due to coupling to either of the two possible

1822: parity states of the particle vector which gives

1823: the glue matrix order for a ground state meson

1824: with only one pair of first generation quarks

1825: as $2.2.(4!)^2$.

1826: 

1827: 

1828:  When dealing with higher generation quarks the

1829: situation is similar  but more complex;

1830:  generally the rule holds that second generation

1831: quarks have double representations and third generation

1832: quarks have triple representations. Notice that the 

1833: U(1) Higgs components have exactly this structure.

1834: 

1835: 

1836: The rules for meson calculation are as follows;

1837: 

1838: 1; From the possible matrix representations of

1839: a particle vector choose a representation capable

1840: of expressing the quark generation content of 

1841: the meson. This is the G or generation number $1{\leq}G{\leq}3$

1842: where G is the highest generation present. Thus for example

1843: a bottom containing meson  will have a G=3. A $K^0$ meson will

1844: have G=2 etc.

1845: 

1846: 2; Calculate the P or parity number which represents the

1847: number of parity formats present in the particle vector.

1848: (For example, in the case of the first generation we

1849: only have two formats; left and right given by 

1850: eq.(\ref{paritystates});

1851: in higher generation representations there can be more than

1852: two!). Parity `formats' are not always the

1853: same as conventional  parity; 

1854: only for first-generation mesons

1855: is there a true correspondence. The meaning of this will

1856: become clear as we proceed through examples.

1857: 

1858: 3;

1859: Calculate the number S. S is the number of 

1860: distinct states seen by the gluons and is a multiplier

1861: for the gluon energy. S stands for `summed quantum

1862: numbers' and is sometimes represented as $\Sigma$

1863: in the text.

1864: 

1865: 4;

1866: Calculate the representation number R which is the

1867: total number of representations needed to represent

1868: the quark content  of the meson.

1869:  Up-type quarks have two representations

1870: in the second and third generation components. These

1871: additional representations eliminate spinorial identities

1872: which otherwise appear in the charm or top

1873: in the higher generation content. We will discuss this

1874: in more detail as we come to it. These additional representations

1875: do {\it{not}} contribute to the generation number G. However,

1876: these additional representations induce additional permutations

1877: of `parity format' and do change the P number. 

1878: Such permutations are

1879: called {\it{superparity}} in the text because of the induced

1880: interchange of scalar and spinorial components.

1881: 

1882: 5;

1883: Calculate the `bare' constituent quark mass $=G.P.22.24.3$

1884: for three possible colours.

1885: 

1886: 6;

1887: Calculate the constituent `bare' gluon mass

1888: $=R.S.24.24.2$ for interchange of 

1889: one pair of colours.

1890: 

1891: 7; Sum the terms for the charged current

1892: quark mass = C using the standard format

1893: of current quark representations.

1894: 

1895: 8;

1896: Add the universal radiative correction multiplier

1897: ${\cal{R}}$

1898: for quark-lepton unification;

1899: 

1900: =${\cal{R}}.(G.P.22.24.3+R.S.24^2.2+C)$

1901: 

1902: 9;

1903: Add on the appropriate scalar and U(1)

1904: Higgs field components for the quark content

1905: of the meson; these have no radiative correction.

1906: 

1907: This technique should work for any meson. We have

1908: already seen that it works for the nucleons;

1909: modulo changes in the formula for the presence

1910: of three discrete colours `simultaneously'

1911: in the particle vector with  the corresponding

1912: glue order changes for three colours of quark

1913: simultaneously present. We will

1914: now examine some specific examples to illustrate

1915: the above principles. We will see that we get quite

1916: good results except for the charmed-bottom meson

1917: where the is a marked deviation away from the

1918: empirical result.

1919: 

1920: 

1921: 

1922: 

1923: \section{The pions}

1924: 

1925: 

1926: 

1927: 

1928: The charged pion consists of an up/antidown or

1929: down/anti-up combination. The calculation is the

1930: same for both. We calculate first the {\it{constituent}}

1931: mass which consists of both quark and gluon energy. These

1932: values are found in the theory by summing over the matrix

1933: order of the representation of the particle vector and 

1934: glue. Note that the particle vector does not specify

1935: the quantum state of the object but sums over all

1936: possible discrete quantum states. The specific quantum

1937: numbers of the state are specified by the {\it{current quark}} 

1938: components which are calculated separately.

1939: 

1940: For the pions G=1, P=2 so the `bare' constituent quark

1941: order is 2.3.22.24=3168.

1942: 

1943: S is best calculated using a table.

1944: 

1945: \begin{center}

1946: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|}

1947: \multicolumn{3}{c}{Pion Structure}

1948: \\\hline

1949: Parity combinations&$\pm$&$\mp$\\\hline

1950: First generation parity&-1&+1\\\hline

1951: Superparity&0&0\\\hline

1952: Summed numbers&-1&+1\\\hline

1953: \end{tabular}

1954: \end{center}

1955: 

1956: A word of explanation here. The two parity combinations

1957: are the same as in eq.(\ref{paritystates}). For example we may

1958: regard the $\pm$ as the diag.\{$C,\bar{C}$\}

1959:  combination and the

1960: $\mp$ as diag.\{$\bar{C},C$\} matrix. It makes no difference

1961: to the mass calculation which we regard as the left-handed

1962: part of the quark particle vector and which the right-handed

1963: but we routinely adhere to the pattern $\pm=-1$

1964: and $\mp=+1$ for first generation parity.

1965: The superparity

1966: of the two states represented here is identical

1967: and both have been set at zero (superparity is only

1968: formally definable for mesons with 2nd and 3rd

1969: generation valance quarks; we will discuss this when we reach

1970: it).

1971:  The summed numbers are simply the sum of the superparity

1972: and parity numbers

1973: in the case at hand 

1974: (but whith higher generation quarks includes

1975: other quantum numbers). 

1976: S is the number of {\it{different}} summed

1977: numbers $\Sigma$ and represents the number of distinct states

1978: coupled to  by gluons. For example, in the case of the 

1979: pions the possible summed numbers are +1 and -1  so that S=2 

1980: (physically this is equivalent

1981: to the statement that the strong interaction is independent

1982: of the parity of the state and couples to both right and

1983: left-handed states doubling the gluon matrix order).

1984: 

1985: We only need one representation for the pions so 

1986: R=1. (R is the number of $\pm$'s and or $\mp$'s  per box in the

1987: parity combinations section of the table -

1988: for the pions each box has only one such symbol).

1989: 

1990: Thus the gluon order is $R.S.2.24^2=2304$.

1991: 

1992: To calculate the current quark mass we need

1993: a standard representation of the quark content. The notation

1994: is identical to that used for the nucleons and

1995: we create an anti-down (or anti-up) by taking the

1996: complex-conjugate representation. For a meson we 

1997: have colour and anticolour combinations of quarks

1998: in the current-quark content. The red-antired $\pi^+$

1999: content is;

2000: 

2001: \begin{center}

2002: \begin{tabular}{ccc}

2003: \multicolumn{3}{c}{Charged Pion Current Quarks.}

2004: \\\hline\\

2005: &$\;\;\;\;

2006: $strong component$\;\;\;\;$&E.M. component\\

2007: \\

2008: red$\rightarrow$&${\cal{I}}\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;q$

2009: &$I\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;q*$\\

2010: green$\rightarrow$&$q*\;\;\;\;\;\;\;I$&$q*\;\;\;\;\;\;\;I$\\

2011: blue$\rightarrow$&$q*\;\;\;\;\;\;\;I$&$q*\;\;\;\;\;\;\;I$\\\\

2012: &$\;\;\;\;\;{\stackrel{\uparrow}{\mbox{up}}}\;

2013: \;{\stackrel{\uparrow}

2014: {\mbox{anti-down}}}$

2015: &$\;\;\;\;\;{\stackrel{\uparrow}{\mbox{up}}}\;

2016: \;{\stackrel{\uparrow}

2017: {\mbox{anti-down}}}$\\\\\hline

2018: \end{tabular}

2019: \end{center}

2020: 

2021: Notice that the definition of unit charge differs with

2022: a bosonic meson to a fermion. The application of the 

2023: above current quarks to the standard particle vector

2024: interchanges the $C$ and $\bar{C}$ matrices but adds

2025: a + sign to one and a - sign to the other which is

2026: the definition of unit charge for the boson. (Incidentally

2027: this notation means that only one neutral pi meson

2028: occurs in the representation along with the two charged

2029: states; for this reason we will call this

2030: method of defining unit charge the `adjoint' 

2031: representation as distinct to the `fundamental'

2032: representation used for the fermionic nucleons).

2033: Note, however, 

2034:  that the bosonic nature of the object is represented

2035: in its {\it{current-quark}} content not in the particle

2036: vector.

2037: 

2038: The calculation of current-quark mass proceeds as for the

2039: case of the nucleons. We need only sum one colour combination

2040: of current quarks since the particle vector includes all

2041: possible colour permutations. The masses are read off the

2042: chart. The three q*'s in the E.M. component generate,

2043: with the doubling due to the coupling to the second

2044: parity state (as per the nucleons), 6.(4!-2) units and,

2045:  with the two cancellations

2046: in the strong component

2047: (the q* cancels the q and the ${\cal{I}}$

2048: cancels the I in the strong matrix),

2049:  the residual q* and 4 identities

2050: (one from the strong component and three from the

2051: EM part) generate,

2052: again with parity doubling,

2053: 5.2.4!. Summing all these components and applying rule 8

2054: we obtain, with some reorganisation,

2055:  ${\cal{R}}.\{7!+6!+4.4!-12\}$ for the total

2056: mass.

2057: To this we must add the Higgs U(1) components. This is

2058: quite simple in the case of the charged pion and was

2059: previously calculated as (4!-2) for an up-down type

2060: combination with no radiative correction.

2061: However the resulting mass is about 136MeV whereas the

2062: empirical mass is 139.5679MeV. Comparison with 

2063: empirical data shows that the deficiency is

2064: almost exactly a scalar Higgs of value 5!+4! which suggests

2065: that there is a component of strange quark present

2066: (which has an identical first-generation current-quark

2067: representation to the down except for the Higgs 

2068: scalar component). The effective  component of strange quark

2069: present is given by the ratio;

2070: 

2071: \begin{equation}

2072: {\mbox{{Higgs scalar in pion}}\over{\mbox{Higgs scalar in strange}}}=

2073: {{5!+4!}\over{6!+3.5!}}

2074: \end{equation}

2075: 

2076: \noindent

2077: where the strange Higgs scalar component has been taken

2078: from the Higgs component table. Thus if we use a mixture 

2079: of down and strange to form the charged pion

2080: we obtain the mass $\pi^{\pm}=139.5679$MeV. which is 

2081: close to the

2082: correct value of 139.57018(35)MeV{\cite{groom}}.

2083: 

2084: The calculation for the neutral pion proceeds in an

2085: analogous fashion with the appropriate current-quark

2086: content substituted. The Higgs U(1) component is

2087: most accurately given by averaging one up-up,

2088:  one up-down and one down-down component from the

2089: Higgs U(1) table and the result of the

2090: calculation is $\pi_0\approx

2091: 134.9728$MeV. which is the correct value{\cite{groom}}.

2092: This value, however, does {\it{not}}

2093: include any component of Higgs scalar for

2094: the strange quark which appears to be absent

2095: in the neutral pion. Why a component of strange

2096: appears explicitly in the $\pi^{\pm}$ and not

2097: in the $\pi^0$ is unclear. It is possible that

2098: the strange-down mix (Cabibbo-type)

2099: is an incorrect interpretation

2100: and that the presence of singlet SU(2) and U(1)

2101: Higgs components in the charged pions represents

2102: an incomplete formation of the Higgs U(1) 

2103: components with the $\pi^{\pm}$'s; that is to say,

2104: that the up-quark has a singlet SU(2) and U(1) scalar

2105: piece in the charged pion.

2106: An answer will require a more sophisticated 

2107: version of the theory 

2108: of the Higgs field. Interestingly the charged B meson

2109: seems to have identical Higgs SU(2) and U(1) singlets

2110: associated with the up quark component (see subsequent 

2111: calculation) which are also missing in the neutral B

2112: meson.

2113: 

2114: 

2115: 

2116: 

2117: \section{Higher generation quarks.}

2118: 

2119: 

2120: 

2121: For the up and down species of quarks

2122: we employed a block diagonal representation

2123: of both the particle vector and  the current

2124: quark operators that act on the particle

2125: vector. Thus for the $T_{c_i}$ group each colour

2126: $6\times6$ block has the format;

2127: 

2128: \[

2129: \left(

2130: \begin{array}{cc}

2131: C_i&0\\

2132: 0&\bar{C}_i

2133: \end{array}

2134: \right)

2135: \;\;\;or\;\;\;

2136: \left(

2137: \begin{array}{cc}

2138: \bar{C}_i&0\\

2139: 0&{C}_i

2140: \end{array}

2141: \right)

2142: \]

2143: 

2144: 

2145: \noindent

2146: where $C_i$ is a  $T_c$ colour matrix of 

2147: colour i.

2148: This is not the only way that a

2149: consistent representation can be formed capable of 

2150: coupling to a given current quark operator

2151: representation however. We will call this arrangement,

2152: when the $q_i$'s of the current quark 

2153: operators and the $C_i$'s 

2154: of the particle vector are in the same format

2155: as `in phase'. It only applies to the situation

2156: where a hadron has first generation quarks.

2157: Consider the following matrix;

2158: 

2159: \vspace{0.5cm}

2160: 

2161: \[

2162: \left(

2163: \begin{array}{cccccc}

2164: \lambda_{11}&0&0&0&\lambda_{12}&0\\

2165: 0&\bar{\lambda}_{11}&0&\bar{\lambda}_{12}

2166: &0&0\\

2167: 0&0&-1&0&0&0\\

2168: 0&\bar{\lambda}_{21}&0&\bar{\lambda}_{22}&0&0\\

2169: \lambda_{21}&0&0&0&\lambda_{22}&0\\

2170: 0&0&0&0&0&+1

2171: \end{array}

2172: \right)

2173: \]

2174: 

2175: \vspace{0.5cm}

2176: \noindent

2177: where the $\lambda_{ij}$ are the individual

2178: elements of a given $C$ matrix.

2179: The above matrix is a higher generation representation;

2180: it is blue format following the standard used in this

2181: paper and the colour is dictated by the position of 

2182: the identities on the main diagonal. We call this a

2183: `phase-shifted' representation. Now if we apply a 

2184: similarly `phase-shifted' blue quark operator the

2185: physical results are unaltered. However if we operate

2186: on the phase-shifted particle rep. with the original

2187: $q_b$ $6\times6$ matrix (in this example a blue

2188: down quark q operator);

2189: 

2190: 

2191: \vspace{0.5cm}

2192: 

2193: \[

2194: \left(

2195: \begin{array}{cccccc}

2196: i&0&0&0&0&0\\

2197: 0&i&0&0

2198: &0&0\\

2199: 0&0&-1&0&0&0\\

2200: 0&0&0&-i&0&0\\

2201: 0&0&0&0&-i&0\\

2202: 0&0&0&0&0&-1

2203: \end{array}

2204: \right)

2205: \]

2206: 

2207: \vspace{0.5cm}

2208: 

2209: \noindent

2210: we get the following;

2211: 

2212: 

2213: 

2214: \vspace{0.5cm}

2215: 

2216: \[

2217: \left(

2218: \begin{array}{cccccc}

2219: \lambda_{11}&0&0&0&\lambda_{12}&0\\

2220: 0&\bar{\lambda}_{11}&0&\bar{\lambda}_{12}

2221: &0&0\\

2222: 0&0&+1&0&0&0\\

2223: 0&\bar{\lambda}_{21}&0&\bar{\lambda}_{22}&0&0\\

2224: \lambda_{21}&0&0&0&\lambda_{22}&0\\

2225: 0&0&0&0&0&-1

2226: \end{array}

2227: \right)

2228: \]

2229: 

2230: \vspace{0.5cm}

2231: 

2232: 

2233: \noindent

2234: which is the same as the original matrix 

2235: in terms of the positions of the $C$

2236: and $\bar{C}$ matrices (note that the 

2237: actual entries $C_{ij}$ or  $\bar{C}_{kl}$

2238:  will have changed

2239: in value - we are only interested in whether

2240: the barred and unbarred matrices mix or not)

2241: but the sign on the identities on the main diagonal

2242: has changed. To maintain consistency we modify the

2243: down blue q operator by changing sign on the

2244: operator identities (compare with previous);

2245: 

2246: \vspace{0.5cm}

2247: 

2248: \[

2249: \left(

2250: \begin{array}{cccccc}

2251: i&0&0&0&0&0\\

2252: 0&i&0&0

2253: &0&0\\

2254: 0&0&+1&0&0&0\\

2255: 0&0&0&-i&0&0\\

2256: 0&0&0&0&-i&0\\

2257: 0&0&0&0&0&+1

2258: \end{array}

2259: \right)

2260: \]

2261: 

2262: \vspace{0.5cm}

2263: 

2264: \noindent

2265: This sign change has three effects;

2266: 

2267: 1. it distinguishes the first and 

2268: higher generation quark operators,

2269: 

2270: 2. it  causes the higher generation q operator

2271: to act like a script identity operator which 

2272: un-couples it from the $T_c$ generators; it

2273: behaves like a scalar rather than a spinor 

2274: operator. As we shall see, this actually has

2275: an effect on particle mass calculation

2276: which may represent the first evidence of 

2277: supersymmetry in nature and

2278: 

2279: 3. it is required to maintain charge conservation.

2280: 

2281: Remarkably, as can be checked, the 

2282: (non phase-shifted) script identity

2283: operator requires a similar change

2284: in the sign of its' component which couples

2285: to the diagonal identity of the $C$ or $\bar{C}$

2286: matrix which causes it to act as a discrete spinor

2287: generator! Thus under the altered phase

2288: representation of the particle vector the

2289: non-phase shifted current quark operators undergo

2290: an interchange of scalar and fermionic pieces!

2291: 

2292: These changes apply to all second and third generation

2293: representations. The altered phase couplings can

2294: be pictorially represented;

2295: 

2296: \vspace{0.6cm}

2297: 

2298: 

2299: \centerline

2300: {\epsfig{file=phase.eps,width=10cm}}

2301: 

2302: \vspace{0.6cm}

2303: 

2304: \noindent

2305: In the above diagram the diagonal entries in

2306: a q operator (here blue) have been listed

2307: in the  verticle column of entries. The first generation

2308: couplings are the in-phase ones and the second and

2309: third generation couplings are out of phase.

2310: The `coupling' lines in this diagram represent the

2311: relative position in the 6x6 matrix occupied

2312: by the $C_i$ and $\bar{C}_i$ with respect to the

2313: discrete current-quark operator on the left.

2314: There is an apparent  ambiguity  between what we call

2315: second and what we call the third generation

2316: representation; it makes no difference 

2317: in practice since

2318: the third generation is found by summing over

2319: all three possibilities. The first generation is

2320: always fixed in phase to that of the current

2321: quark operators; in the notation used here the

2322: `phase' of the operators stays fixed and that

2323: of the particle vector changes between different

2324: generation representations. It might be possible 

2325: to represent the symmetry using fixed particle 

2326: vector and changing the phase of the operators

2327: but the physics will be the same.

2328: 

2329: Note two interesting things;

2330: 

2331: 1; the operator structure undergoes a 

2332: supersymmetry transformation in the

2333: higher generation representations and

2334: 

2335: 2; the representation theory limits the

2336: number of possible generations to three;

2337: this seems to be a unique feature of the

2338: discretised form of QCD since the continuum

2339: theory does not demand only three generations.

2340: 

2341: As a general interpretation of the higher 

2342: generation representations probably the simplest

2343: way to consider them is as additional possible ways

2344: in which the symmetry can be expressed geometrically.

2345: The `in-phase' representation dominates the first

2346: generation representation because this is the representation

2347: in which electro-magnetic charge is defined in a 

2348: consistent way.

2349: 

2350: 

2351: \section{Kaons}

2352: 

2353: 

2354: 

2355: 

2356: In this section we calculate

2357: the mass of the spin-0 $K^0$ and $K^{\pm}$

2358: using the principles outlined in the previous

2359: sections.

2360: 

2361: The basic principles are as with

2362: the pions. A particle vector is established

2363: capable of expression all permutations of

2364: particle type and the actual quark content

2365: is carried in the current quarks. Thus

2366: the `stangeness' quantum number, which will

2367: be $\pm1$, is carried by the current quark

2368: content but the particle vector carries

2369: the potential for either strangeness quantum

2370: number. The G number is clearly 2 since

2371: the highest generation number in a Kaon

2372: corresponds to the strange quark. The particle vector

2373: contains a representation for the first generation

2374: and a second one for the second generation; it is

2375: duplicated. The tabulation for the structure

2376: of the particle vector is as follows;

2377: 

2378: \vspace{0.5cm}

2379: 

2380: \begin{center}

2381: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}

2382: \multicolumn{9}{c}{Kaon Structure;

2383: Particle Vector}

2384: \\\hline

2385: $C/{\bar{C}}$ combinations (1st,2nd)

2386: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\pm\;\;\pm$}

2387: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\pm\;\;\mp$}

2388: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\mp\;\;\pm$}

2389: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\mp\;\;\mp$}

2390: \\\hline

2391: (First generation) parity&-1&$\;$&-1

2392: &$\;$&+1&$\;$&+1&$\;$\\\hline

2393: (Second generation) strangeness&$\;$&+1&$\;$&-1

2394: &$\;$&+1&$\;$&-1\\\hline

2395: Superparity&\multicolumn{2}{c|}{+2}

2396: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{-2}

2397: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{-2}

2398: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{+2}

2399: \\\hline

2400: Summed Numbers&\multicolumn{2}{c|}{+2}

2401: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{-4}

2402: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{0}

2403: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{+2}

2404: \\\hline

2405: \end{tabular}

2406: \end{center}

2407: 

2408: \vspace{0.5cm}

2409: 

2410: 

2411: From which we can read 

2412: from the first row that R=2

2413: (the number of sets of $\pm$ signs per

2414: box in the first row) and  P=4. 

2415: P is the number of different boxes in the

2416: first row;

2417: in this case the `parity' of the second

2418: generation component, which is the strangeness

2419: quantum number, contributes to the total

2420: number of different `parity' states -

2421: the `stangeness quantum number' is literally

2422: the parity of the second component of the

2423: particle vector; more specifically it is 

2424: related to the corresponding part of the 

2425: current quark that couples to the second

2426: generation component of the particle vector. 

2427: Strangeness is actually defined in the opposite

2428: way to the `parity' in the first generation;

2429: for example here $\pm$ has been chosen as

2430: odd parity in the first generation component whilst

2431: $\pm$ has been chosen as even for the strangeness.

2432: The `superparity' depends on whether the combination

2433: of parity and strangeness assignments is odd or

2434: even. Thus, for example $\pm\pm$ is even with 

2435: value +2, whilst $\pm\mp$ is odd with value -2. The

2436: S number is the number of different summed numbers

2437: and represents the number of distinct states 

2438: recognised by gluons. A summed number is formed by

2439: adding all the entries above it in a given column.

2440: In the present example

2441: S=3.

2442: 

2443: We can immediately write down the particle vector

2444: order as $G.P.3.22.24=12672$. The gluon order

2445: is $R.S.2.24.24=6912$.

2446: 

2447: The components we have just calculated represent

2448: the constituent quark content of the Kaons;

2449: they are common to the charged and neutral versions

2450: and represent a sum over all possible discrete states

2451: that the quark pair can exist in.

2452: We must now determine the current quark mass

2453: of the different Kaons. From the Higgs mass

2454: chart we know that the strange quark has

2455: Higgs scalar contributions 6!+3.5! with no

2456: gauge field radiative corrections. To calculate the

2457: remaining components of mass we need a chart of

2458: current quark components. In the second generation

2459: representation only the strange quark is represented;

2460: 

2461: 

2462: \begin{center}

2463: \begin{tabular}{ccc}

2464: \multicolumn{3}{c}{Neutral kaon; Current Quarks

2465: (First generation).}

2466: \\\hline\\

2467: &$\;\;\;\;

2468: $strong component$\;\;\;\;$&E.M. component\\

2469: \\

2470: red$\rightarrow$&$q*\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;q$

2471: &$q\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;q*$\\

2472: green$\rightarrow$&${{I}}\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;I$

2473: &$I\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;I$\\

2474: blue$\rightarrow$&${{I}}\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;I$

2475: &$I\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;I$\\\\

2476: &$\;\;\;\;\;{\stackrel{\uparrow}{\mbox{down}}}\;

2477: \;{\stackrel{\uparrow}

2478: {\mbox{anti-strange}}}$

2479: &$\;\;\;\;\;{\stackrel{\uparrow}{\mbox{down}}}\;

2480: \;{\stackrel{\uparrow}

2481: {\mbox{anti-strange}}}$\\\\\hline

2482: \end{tabular}

2483: \end{center}

2484: \begin{center}

2485: \begin{tabular}{ccc}

2486: \multicolumn{3}{c}{Neutral kaon; Current Quarks

2487: (Second generation).}

2488: \\\hline\\

2489: &$\;\;\;\;

2490: $strong component$\;\;\;\;$&E.M. component\\

2491: \\

2492: red$\rightarrow$&$\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;q$

2493: &$\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;q*$\\

2494: green$\rightarrow$&$\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;I$

2495: &$\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;I$\\

2496: blue$\rightarrow$&$\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;I$

2497: &$\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;I$\\\\

2498: &$\;\;\;\;\;\;

2499: \;{\stackrel{\uparrow}

2500: {\mbox{anti-strange}}}$

2501: &$\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;

2502: \;{\stackrel{\uparrow}

2503: {\mbox{anti-strange}}}$\\\\\hline

2504: \end{tabular}

2505: \end{center}

2506: 

2507: \noindent

2508: The q's cancel the q*'s in the first generation 

2509: representation of the current quarks leaving 

2510: the eight identities which, with the parity

2511: doubling (coupling to both the right and left

2512: handed components of the particle vector)

2513: we obtain a mass of 16.24.

2514: 

2515: For the second generation representation

2516: there is the analogue of a supersymmetry

2517: transformation on the components with the

2518: identities in the E.M. component coupling to

2519: generators (i.e. (4!-2) unit which is explicitly spinorial)

2520: and the q's and q*'s coupling to the

2521: scalar value 4!; this is the reverse of the 

2522: pattern seen in the first generation components.

2523: This kind of transformation is essential to

2524: eliminate any electro-magnetic charge generation

2525: component of the second generation representation;

2526: since $I^{\dagger}=I$ the identities coupled to the

2527: generators generate no charge. (It is interesting to note

2528: that the existence of this kind of structure may be

2529: the first evidence of supersymmetry in nature -

2530: it is a form of concealed supersymmetry and, of

2531: course, in the present example discretised and not

2532: continuous).

2533: The q therefore cancels the q* in the second 

2534: generation representation and the mass of

2535: the second generation representation,

2536: again with doubling for coupling to both

2537: parity components, is 4.4!+4.(4!-2).

2538: 

2539: Finally we must calculate the Higgs U(1)

2540: components from the table. The strange has

2541: a component of 4(4!-2) for each of its 

2542: two generation components. There is an

2543: `interaction' between the down and each of the

2544: two components of the strange leading to a doubling

2545: of the down-down U(1) order to 8(4!-2).

2546: 

2547: Summing all these components and applying

2548: the universal radiative correction ${\cal{R}}$

2549: we obtain;

2550: \begin{eqnarray}

2551: K^0{\mbox{mass}}&=&

2552: {\cal{R}}.\{

2553: \mbox{Particle order + gluon order + current quarks\}

2554: + Higgs sector}

2555: \nonumber\\

2556: &=&

2557: {\cal{R}}.\{

2558: 12672+6912+568\}+6!+3.5!+8.(4!-2)

2559: \end{eqnarray}

2560: 

2561: \noindent

2562: which translates into a mass of $K^0= 497.0368$MeV

2563: using the electron rest mass expression which compares with

2564: the empirical value of 497.672(31)MeV.

2565: 

2566: 

2567: For the charged Kaon we must alter the current

2568: quark content to accommodate the up or anti-up

2569: quark. The appropriate chart is;

2570: 

2571: \begin{center}

2572: \begin{tabular}{ccc}

2573: \multicolumn{3}{c}{Charged kaon; Current Quarks

2574: (First generation).}

2575: \\\hline\\

2576: &$\;\;\;\;

2577: $strong component$\;\;\;\;$&E.M. component\\

2578: \\

2579: red$\rightarrow$&${\cal{I}}\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;q$

2580: &$I\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;q*$\\

2581: green$\rightarrow$&$q*\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;I$

2582: &$q*\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;I$\\

2583: blue$\rightarrow$&$q*\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;I$

2584: &$q*\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;I$\\\\

2585: &$\;\;\;\;\;{\stackrel{\uparrow}{\mbox{up}}}\;

2586: \;{\stackrel{\uparrow}

2587: {\mbox{anti-strange}}}$

2588: &$\;\;\;\;\;{\stackrel{\uparrow}{\mbox{up}}}\;

2589: \;{\stackrel{\uparrow}

2590: {\mbox{anti-strange}}}$\\\\\hline

2591: \end{tabular}

2592: \end{center}

2593: \begin{center}

2594: \begin{tabular}{ccc}

2595: \multicolumn{3}{c}{Neutral kaon; Current Quarks

2596: (Second generation).}

2597: \\\hline\\

2598: &$\;\;\;\;

2599: $strong component$\;\;\;\;$&E.M. component\\

2600: \\

2601: red$\rightarrow$&$\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;q$

2602: &$\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;q*$\\

2603: green$\rightarrow$&$\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;I$

2604: &$\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;I$\\

2605: blue$\rightarrow$&$\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;I$

2606: &$\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;I$\\\\

2607: &$\;\;\;\;\;\;

2608: \;{\stackrel{\uparrow}

2609: {\mbox{anti-strange}}}$

2610: &$\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;

2611: \;{\stackrel{\uparrow}

2612: {\mbox{anti-strange}}}$\\\\\hline

2613: \end{tabular}

2614: \end{center}

2615: 

2616: The calculation proceeds as before. The particle

2617: vector and gluon calculations are identical. The mass

2618: of the first generation chart can be read off

2619: as 2.\{3.(4!-2)+5.4!\}. The second generation

2620: component is identical to the neutral Kaon and

2621: is 2.\{2.4!+2.(4!-2)\}. The Higgs U(1) component

2622: is twice the up-down value and is therefore 2.(4!-2).

2623: Thus the mass is;

2624: \begin{equation}

2625: K^{\pm}{\mbox{mass}}={\cal{R}}\{

2626: 12672+6912+556\}+6!+3.5!+2.(4!-2)=493.7143MeV

2627: \end{equation}

2628: \noindent

2629: which compares favourably with the empirical value of

2630: 493.677(13)MeV{\cite{groom}}.

2631: 

2632: 

2633: 

2634: 

2635: 

2636: \section{D mesons}

2637: 

2638: 

2639: 

2640: In this next example we will study the simplest

2641: mesons containing charm to see how the 

2642: second generation structure of the strange is 

2643: extended.

2644: 

2645: Charm quarks, as for the case of the

2646: strange quark, have a second generation

2647: representation but it is dual. The reason

2648: for this seems to be the presence of the

2649: script identity. Since ${\cal{I}}^{\dagger}

2650: \neq{\cal{I}}$ a supersymmetry transformation

2651: from the first to second generation component

2652: produces an effective additional charge.

2653: This is eliminated by duplicating the second

2654: generation representation in the particle vector.

2655: A working chart for the particle vector and gluon

2656: contributions to $D^{\pm}$ and $D^0$ is;

2657: 

2658: \begin{center}

2659: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}

2660: \multicolumn{13}{c}{D meson Structure;

2661: Particle Vector}

2662: \\\hline

2663: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\mp\;\;\;\;\mp\mp$}

2664: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\mp\;\;\;\;\mp\pm$}

2665: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\mp\;\;\;\;\pm\pm$}

2666: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\pm\;\;\;\;\mp\mp$}

2667: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\pm\;\;\;\;\pm\mp$}

2668: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\pm\;\;\;\;\pm\pm$}

2669: \\$C/{\bar{C}}$  (1st,2nd)

2670: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\;$}&

2671: \multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\mp\;\;\;\;\pm\mp$}

2672: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\;$}&\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\;$}

2673: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\pm\;\;\;\;\mp\pm$}

2674: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\;$}

2675: \\\hline

2676:  parity&+1&$\;$&+1

2677: &$\;$&+1&$\;$&-1&$\;$&-1

2678: &$\;$&-1&$\;\;$\\\hline

2679:  charm&$\;$&+1&$\;$&-1

2680: &$\;$&+1&$\;$&+1&$\;$&-1&$\;$&+1\\\hline

2681: Sup.parity&\multicolumn{2}{c|}{+2}

2682: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{-1}

2683: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{-2}

2684: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{-2}

2685: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{+1}

2686: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{+2}

2687: \\\hline

2688: $\Sigma$ &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{+4}

2689: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{-1}

2690: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{0}

2691: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{-2}

2692: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{-1}

2693: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{+2}

2694: \\\hline

2695: \end{tabular}

2696: \end{center}

2697: 

2698: 

2699: \noindent

2700: From which we can read

2701: that G=2 (contains a second generation quark),

2702: P=8 (total number of permutations of the

2703: plus/minus signs),

2704: R=3 (the number of plus/minus signs per 

2705: combination) and S=5 (the number of different summed

2706: numbers). Plugging these into the mass formula

2707: gives a total order for the particle vector

2708: plus glue as 42624.

2709: 

2710: The next step is to evaluate the current quark

2711: mass. Let us consider the neutral D meson first.

2712: 

2713: 

2714: 

2715: \begin{center}

2716: \begin{tabular}{ccc}

2717: \multicolumn{3}{c}{$D^0\;\;\;$; Current Quarks

2718: (First generation).}

2719: \\\hline\\

2720: &$\;\;\;\;

2721: $strong component$\;\;\;\;$&E.M. component\\

2722: \\

2723: red$\rightarrow$&${\cal{I}}\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;{\cal{I}}$

2724: &$I\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;I$\\

2725: green$\rightarrow$&$q*\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;q$

2726: &$q*\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;q$\\

2727: blue$\rightarrow$&$q*\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;q$

2728: &$q*\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;q$\\\\

2729: &$\;\;\;\;\;{\stackrel{\uparrow}{\mbox{up}}}\;

2730: \;{\stackrel{\uparrow}

2731: {\mbox{anti-charm}}}$

2732: &$\;\;\;\;\;{\stackrel{\uparrow}{\mbox{up}}}\;

2733: \;{\stackrel{\uparrow}

2734: {\mbox{anti-charm}}}$\\\\\hline

2735: \end{tabular}

2736: \end{center}

2737: \begin{center}

2738: \begin{tabular}{ccc}

2739: \multicolumn{3}{c}{$D^0\;\;\;$; Current Quarks

2740: (Second generation).}

2741: \\\hline\\

2742: &$\;\;\;\;

2743: $strong component$\;\;\;\;$&E.M. component\\

2744: \\

2745: red$\rightarrow$&$\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;{\cal{I}}$

2746: &$\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;I$\\

2747: green$\rightarrow$&$\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;q$

2748: &$\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;q$\\

2749: blue$\rightarrow$&$\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;q$

2750: &$\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;q$\\\\

2751: &$\;\;\;\;\;\;

2752: \;{\stackrel{\uparrow}

2753: {\mbox{anti-charm}}}$

2754: &$\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;

2755: \;{\stackrel{\uparrow}

2756: {\mbox{anti-charm}}}$\\\\\hline

2757: \end{tabular}

2758: \end{center}

2759: 

2760: In evaluating the mass it is assumed that

2761: the script identity generates a mass component

2762: with the opposite sign to that of the identity

2763: in the second generation representation. With the

2764: `supersymmetry' transformation the q's in the 

2765: second generation representation couple to a

2766: Tr unit of 4! with no massless generators.

2767: 

2768: A cancellation occurs in the first generation

2769: component between the q's and the q*'s. The 

2770: coupled script identities in the first generation

2771: are considered equivalent to the coupled I's

2772: and don't cancel.

2773: The scalar Higgs components from the table

2774: for the charm quark are 7.7!+3.6! and

2775: an explicit calculation of the U(1) Higgs

2776: components gives a value of 4.(4!-2).

2777: The calculation gives a mass $D^0$=1864.39MeV.

2778: (empirical value 1864.6(0.5).

2779: A similar calculation of the $D^{\pm}$

2780: mass gives a value of 1867.56MeV

2781: (the empirical value is 1869.3(0.5).

2782: 

2783: 

2784: 

2785: 

2786: 

2787: \section{Charmed strange}

2788: 

2789: 

2790: 

2791: 

2792: Again this meson contains only second generation

2793: quarks at most so $G=2$. The strange quark requires

2794: only one second generation representation and the

2795: charm requires two so $R=3$. The superparity

2796: numbers are the same as for the D mesons;

2797: 

2798: \vspace{0.5cm}

2799: 

2800: \centerline

2801: {\epsfig

2802: {file=charmstrange.eps,

2803: width=10cm}}

2804: 

2805: \vspace{0.5cm}

2806: 

2807: In the above diagram the left hand sign-pair

2808: of each triplet is due to a single component in

2809: the second generation strange representation and

2810: the remaining two sign pairs are due to

2811: the charm. The quantum numbers which the

2812: particle vector must represent can be calculated

2813: from this diagram and are as follows;

2814: 

2815: 

2816: \vspace{0.5cm}

2817: 

2818: 

2819: \begin{center}

2820: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}

2821: \multicolumn{13}{c}{C-S meson Structure;

2822: Particle Vector}

2823: \\\hline

2824: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\mp\;\;\mp\mp$}

2825: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\mp\;\;\pm\mp$}

2826: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\mp\;\;\pm\pm$}

2827: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\pm\;\;\mp\mp$}

2828: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\pm\;\;\pm\mp$}

2829: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\pm\;\;\pm\pm$}

2830: \\$C/{\bar{C}}$ `parity'S 2C 

2831: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\;$}&

2832: \multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\mp\;\;\mp\pm$}

2833: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\;$}&\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\;$}

2834: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\pm\;\;\;\mp\pm$}

2835: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\;$}

2836: \\\hline

2837: Strangeness&-1&$\;$&-1

2838: &$\;$&-1&$\;$&+1&$\;$&+1

2839: &$\;$&+1&$\;\;$\\\hline

2840:  charm&$\;$&+1&$\;$&-1

2841: &$\;$&+1&$\;$&+1&$\;$&-1&$\;$&+1\\\hline

2842: Superparity&\multicolumn{2}{c|}{+2}

2843: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{-1}

2844: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{-2}

2845: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{-2}

2846: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{-1}

2847: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{+2}

2848: \\\hline

2849: $\Sigma$&\multicolumn{2}{c|}{+2}

2850: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{-3}

2851: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{-2}

2852: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{0}

2853: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{-1}

2854: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{+4}

2855: \\\hline

2856: \end{tabular}

2857: \end{center}

2858: 

2859: \vspace{0.5cm}

2860: 

2861: Points to note;

2862: 

2863: 1;

2864: The strangeness assignment is given by

2865: the first sign pair of any triplet;

2866: $\pm=+1$ and $\mp=-1$.

2867: 

2868: 2;

2869: The charm assignment is a function of the

2870: remaining two sets of sign-pairs;

2871: $\pm\pm$ or $\mp\mp$ is an even permutation

2872: of charm $+1$ and $\mp\pm$ or $\pm\mp$

2873: is an odd permutation and defined as charm

2874: of -1.

2875: 

2876: 3;

2877: The superparity of an odd charm pair (charm=-1)

2878: is zero. The superparity assignment of the 

2879: strange is 1 with the sign  depending on whether it is

2880: an odd or even in sign with respect to the

2881: charm. The superparity assignment of the

2882: even charm permutation pair (charm = +1) is 1.

2883: Thus an even combination (such as $\pm\pm\pm$)

2884: has superparity +2 whilst an odd combination

2885: (such as $\mp\pm\pm$) has superparity -2. The

2886: superparity is found by summing over the two

2887: quarks. Where the absolute value of the 

2888: superparity of the charm is zero (i.e. for

2889: odd charm pair permutations charm = -1) then

2890: the single strange is odd by definition and

2891: has a superparity of -1.

2892: 

2893: 4;

2894: The $\Sigma$ value is the sum of the 

2895: strangeness assignment, charm and superparity

2896: for a given triplet of signs. S is the number of

2897: {\it{different}} values of $\Sigma$ so in this case

2898: S=6.

2899: 

2900: 5;

2901: P is the number of different sign triplets;

2902: here P=8. R is the number of entries in

2903: the sign blocks; here we have triplets

2904: so R=3. Clearly for only second generation

2905: quarks G=2. 

2906: 

2907: Plugging in the values for the

2908: constituent quark and gluon energy;

2909: \[

2910: G.P.3.(4!-2).4!+R.S.2.(4!)^2=46080

2911: \]

2912: which is the matrix order which may be

2913: interpreted as the number of possible

2914: distinct discrete states that are possible

2915: particle vector representations.

2916: 

2917: Now we must calculate the current quark mass.

2918: 

2919: \begin{center}

2920: \begin{tabular}{ccc}

2921: \multicolumn{3}{c}{C-S meson; Current Quarks

2922: (first/second generation).}

2923: \\\hline\\

2924: &$\;\;\;\;

2925: $strong component$\;\;\;\;$&E.M. component\\

2926: \\

2927: red$\rightarrow$&${\cal{I}}\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;q$

2928: &$I\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;q*$\\

2929: green$\rightarrow$&$q*\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;I$

2930: &$q*\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;I$\\

2931: blue$\rightarrow$&$q*\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;I$

2932: &$q*\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;I$\\\\

2933: &$\;\;\;\;\;{\stackrel{\uparrow}{\mbox{charm}}}\;

2934: \;{\stackrel{\uparrow}

2935: {\mbox{anti-strange}}}$

2936: &$\;\;\;\;\;{\stackrel{\uparrow}{\mbox{charm}}}\;

2937: \;{\stackrel{\uparrow}

2938: {\mbox{anti-strange}}}$\\\\\hline

2939: \end{tabular}

2940: \end{center}

2941: 

2942: The first and second generation representations are

2943: identical although for the second generation rep.

2944:  it is the identities

2945: in the E.M. matrix which couple to the $\bar{C}$

2946: generators whilst the $q^*$ in the E.M. matrix

2947: are un-coupled from the generators and are

2948: acting as scalars. Unit E.M. charge is defined

2949: by coupling to the G=1 part of the particle vector.

2950: We need, however, to calculate the mass of only

2951: one set of representations of the current quark

2952: operators since only one set is needed to couple

2953: to both the G=1 and G=2 parts of the particle vector.

2954:  

2955: 

2956: As usual the masses are read off the chart. 

2957: The triplet of $q^*$'s couples to a $T_r$

2958: equivalent unit of order (4!-2) and all

2959: other components couple to order 4! One $q$

2960: cancels a $q^*$ and one $\cal{I}$ cancels an $I$

2961: in the strong matrix. There is a doubling of

2962: the order to couple to reverse particle vector

2963: formats giving a total matrix order of;

2964: \[

2965: 10.4!+6.(4!-2)

2966: \] 

2967: which, along with the 46080 matrices of the 

2968: constituent mass will be given a standard

2969: non-perturbative radiative correction

2970: ${\cal{R}}=1+\alpha_{em}+\alpha_{GF}\approx1.0073115.$

2971: 

2972: To this the appropriate Higgs components for the 

2973: two current quarks must be added. These are read off

2974: the Higgs chart as a matrix equivalent order.

2975: The energy of potential separation of the two quarks

2976: is also read off the standard chart; both the charm and

2977: the strong have values -2 for the second generation

2978: representation. There is no first generation representation

2979: of the current quarks so the appropriate matrix

2980: order is $|-2-2|(4!-2)$ with no radiative correction

2981: ($\alpha_s=1$ at the $T_c$ or $T_r$ scale).

2982: Thus the C-S ground state meson has the composition;

2983: 

2984: \vspace{0.5cm}

2985: 

2986: \centerline

2987: {\epsfig{file=CS.eps,width=10cm}}

2988: 

2989: \vspace{0.5cm}

2990: 

2991: Which gives the charmed-strange meson mass

2992: as 1969.12MeV (1968.6(0.6){\cite{groom}}) which is  within

2993: the empirical boundaries.

2994: 

2995: 

2996: 

2997: 

2998: 

2999: 

3000: 

3001: 

3002: 

3003: \section{B mesons}

3004: 

3005: 

3006: 

3007: 

3008: In this section we will evaluate a B meson 

3009: mass as an example of bottom containing

3010: calculations.

3011: 

3012: The combination of an up or down

3013: quark with a bottom quark will

3014: require a generation number of G=3

3015: to define a particle vector. To create a

3016: bottom quark we duplicate the

3017: second generation representation and

3018: keep it in phase with the third representation

3019: in terms of parity and superparity 

3020: assignments. The following tabulation

3021: will illustrate the ideas involved;

3022: 

3023: \begin{center}

3024: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}

3025: \multicolumn{9}{c}{B meson Structure;

3026: Particle Vector}

3027: \\\hline 1st, 2nd \& 3rd gen.

3028: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\mp\;\;\mp\;\;\mp$}

3029: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\mp\;\;\pm\;\;\pm$}

3030: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\pm\;\;\pm\;\;\pm$}

3031: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\pm\;\;\mp\;\;\mp$}

3032: \\$C/{\bar{C}}$ comb. 

3033: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\;$}&\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\;$}

3034: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\;$}&\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\;$}

3035: \\\hline

3036: (1st gen.) parity&+1&$\;$&+1

3037: &$\;$&-1&$\;$&-1&$\;$\\\hline

3038: B.ness = $\Sigma$ 2nd \& 3rd.

3039: &$\;$&-2&$\;$&+2

3040: &$\;$&+2&$\;$&-2\\\hline

3041: Superparity&\multicolumn{2}{c|}{-3}

3042: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{-3}

3043: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{+3}

3044: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{+3}

3045: \\\hline

3046: Summed Numbers&\multicolumn{2}{c|}{-4}

3047: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{0}

3048: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{+4}

3049: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{0}

3050: \\\hline

3051: \end{tabular}

3052: \end{center}

3053: 

3054: 

3055: The Bottomness here is the sum of the

3056: `parity' of the second and third generation

3057: components and is rather like an extension

3058: of strangeness as it has the same sign 

3059: configuration. Notice that for the 

3060: Bottom quark the second and third generation

3061: components are always `in phase'.

3062: 

3063: The superparity is related to the total 

3064: number of $\pm$ or $\mp$'s and is

3065: odd or even according to the

3066: product

3067:  e.g.; $\pm\mp\mp$=even=+3. The

3068: summed numbers are self explanatory.

3069: 

3070: From the above table we can read off 

3071:  P=4 and S=3. R in this case is 2

3072: not 3 because the representations of 

3073: the second and third generation components

3074: are identical in each case.

3075: 

3076: Thus the particle order is;

3077: \begin{equation}

3078: R.S.2.24^2+G.P.3.22.24=25920

3079: \end{equation}

3080: for two colour-exchange equivalent gluons and three

3081: possible colours of particle vector.

3082: 

3083: The first-generation current quark mass

3084: chart is identical to that for

3085: the Kaons apart from the scalar pieces.

3086:  This was given as ${\cal{R}}

3087: (10.4!+6.\{4!-2\})+\mbox{scalar part}$

3088: for the $B^{\pm}$.

3089: 

3090: The second generation and third generation

3091: components of the B meson are identical

3092: duplicates of the second generation

3093: component for the Kaons so the corresponding

3094: mass is  tripled (the third generation 

3095: component is double valued with respect to

3096: the second). Thus the sum of the second

3097: and third generation pieces for the 

3098: charged B contributes ${\cal{R}}(12.4!+12.\{4!-2\})$.

3099: 

3100: From the tables of Higgs scalar components the

3101: B quark has components 5.8! plus U(1) contributions.

3102: The U(1) contribution is 

3103: assumed to be four times the

3104: up-down current and thus =4(4!-2);

3105: i.e. doubled on the coupling to the third

3106: generation representation. The

3107: charged B mass is then 5276.1MeV

3108: (the empirical value is 5278.9(1.8)MeV).

3109: A similar calculation gives the $B^0$ mass

3110: as 5280.5MeV (5279.2(1.8)MeV empirical). Note

3111: that we seem to have an identical situation to

3112: that with the pions; the up quark appears

3113: to have scalar Higgs pieces single SU(2) and single

3114: U(1) in the charged B meson. If these are included

3115: the predicted charged B mass would increase to 5279.4MeV.

3116: 

3117: 

3118: \section{Bottom-strange meson}

3119: 

3120: As for the case of the charmed-strange

3121: the first generation component of the

3122: current quarks of the strange-bottom

3123: will not acquire mass because  of the absence

3124: of any massive up or down current-quark

3125: content. However the particle vector

3126: continues to reflect the summing over

3127: generation representations and the G number

3128: will be 3. A strange and a bottom can be

3129: represented with R=2. The SQN's are found

3130: from the following chart of quantum

3131: numbers;

3132: 

3133: 

3134: 

3135: \begin{center}

3136: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}

3137: \multicolumn{9}{c}{B-S meson Structure;

3138: Particle Vector}

3139: \\\hline  2nd, 2nd \& 3rd gen.

3140: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\mp\;\;\mp\;\;\mp$}

3141: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\mp\;\;\pm\;\;\pm$}

3142: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\pm\;\;\pm\;\;\pm$}

3143: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\pm\;\;\mp\;\;\mp$}

3144: \\$C/{\bar{C}}$ comb.

3145: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\;$}&\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\;$}

3146: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\;$}&\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\;$}

3147: \\\hline

3148: S.ness&-1&$\;$&-1

3149: &$\;$&+1&$\;$&+1&$\;$\\\hline

3150: B.ness = $\Sigma$ 2nd and 3rd 

3151: &$\;$&-2&$\;$&+2

3152: &$\;$&+2&$\;$&-2\\\hline

3153: Superparity&\multicolumn{2}{c|}{-3}

3154: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{-3}

3155: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{+3}

3156: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{+3}

3157: \\\hline

3158: Summed Q Numbers&\multicolumn{2}{c|}{-6}

3159: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{-2}

3160: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{+6}

3161: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{+2}

3162: \\\hline

3163: \end{tabular}

3164: \end{center}

3165: 

3166: Thus G=3, R=2 (the two bottom sets of

3167: $\pm$ signs - the two on the right

3168: of each box - are always `in phase' and

3169: are treated as a single rep.),

3170: P=4 (the number of different boxes

3171: of sets of $\pm$  signs)

3172: and S=4 because there are 4 different

3173: SQN's.

3174: 

3175: Hence the constituent particle

3176: vector order is 3.4.3.(4!-2).4!

3177: and the corresponding glue order

3178: is $4.2.2.(4!)^2$.

3179: 

3180: For the current quarks we note that

3181: the bottom will sum over both 

3182: higher generation reps. whilst the 

3183: strange will only have a single 

3184: higher generation rep. Thus for a

3185: second generation representation of 

3186: the current quark content of the 

3187: neutral S-B

3188: we will have;

3189: 

3190: \begin{center}

3191: \begin{tabular}{ccc}

3192: \multicolumn{3}{c}{$S{\bar{B}}$ meson; Current Quarks

3193: (first/second generation).}

3194: \\\hline\\

3195: &$\;\;\;\;

3196: $strong component$\;\;\;\;$&E.M. component\\

3197: \\

3198: red$\rightarrow$&${q^*}\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;q$

3199: &$q\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;q*$\\

3200: green$\rightarrow$&$I\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;I$

3201: &$I\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;I$\\

3202: blue$\rightarrow$&$I\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;I$

3203: &$I\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;I$\\\\

3204: &$\;\;\;\;\;{\stackrel{\uparrow}{\mbox{strange}}}\;

3205: \;{\stackrel{\uparrow}

3206: {\mbox{anti-bottom}}}$

3207: &$\;\;\;\;\;{\stackrel{\uparrow}{\mbox{strange}}}\;

3208: \;{\stackrel{\uparrow}

3209: {\mbox{anti-bottom}}}$\\\\\hline

3210: \end{tabular}

3211: \end{center}

3212: 

3213: The $q$ cancels the $q^*$ and the mass of

3214: the identities is 8.4! in the first generation

3215: and 4.4!+4.(4!-2) in the second generation

3216: (because of the super-symmetry transform the

3217: identities couple to the spinor generators in

3218: the second generation rep.). These values then double

3219: for the coupling to $C{\bar{C}}$/${\bar{C}}c$ pairs

3220: in the particle vector.

3221: 

3222: The bottom alone has a third generation rep.;

3223: 

3224: \begin{center}

3225: \begin{tabular}{ccc}

3226: \multicolumn{3}{c}{$S{\bar{B}}$ meson; Current Quarks

3227: (3rd. generation).}

3228: \\\hline\\

3229: &$\;\;\;\;

3230: $strong component$\;\;\;\;$&E.M. component\\

3231: \\

3232: red$\rightarrow$&$\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;q$

3233: &$\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;q*$\\

3234: green$\rightarrow$&$\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;I$

3235: &$\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;I$\\

3236: blue$\rightarrow$&$\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;I$

3237: &$\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;I$\\\\

3238: &$\;\;\;\;\;{\stackrel{\uparrow}{\mbox{strange}}}\;

3239: \;{\stackrel{\uparrow}

3240: {\mbox{anti-bottom}}}$

3241: &$\;\;\;\;\;{\stackrel{\uparrow}{\mbox{strange}}}\;

3242: \;{\stackrel{\uparrow}

3243: {\mbox{anti-bottom}}}$\\\\\hline

3244: \end{tabular}

3245: \end{center}

3246: 

3247: The mass equivalence of the above table is 

3248: of double value again with respect to the 

3249: previous table and is thus 8.4! + 8.(4!-2)

3250: because the $q$ again cancels the $q^*$ and

3251: the identities on the right couple to the

3252: spinor generators.

3253: 

3254: From the Higgs table the scalar mass of the

3255: bottom is again 5.8! and for the charm 6!+3.5!

3256: whilst the potential energy of separation of

3257: the current quarks (the U(1) terms) are based

3258: on bond between second to second and second 

3259: to third generation reps. The second to second

3260: bond for the BS will be double the down-down.

3261: (The d-d is 4.(4!-2)). The second to third

3262: bond is double again giving net \{16+8\}.(4!-2).

3263: 

3264: With the radiative correction we have

3265: a total mass matrix order;

3266: \[

3267: {\cal{R}}.{(29344)+{\mbox{current quark mass}}}

3268: \]

3269: Which gives a value 5.367GeV using the given values

3270: for the current quarks  and

3271: the Higgs components for the bottom and the strange 

3272: from the chart. The empirical value is 5.369(24){\cite{groom}}.

3273: 

3274: 

3275: \section{Charmed bottom.}

3276: 

3277: 

3278: \begin{center}

3279: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}

3280: \multicolumn{13}{c}{C-B meson Structure;

3281: Particle Vector}

3282: \\\hline

3283: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\mp\;\;\mp\mp$}

3284: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\mp\;\;\pm\mp$}

3285: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\mp\;\;\pm\pm$}

3286: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\pm\;\;\mp\mp$}

3287: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\pm\;\;\pm\mp$}

3288: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\pm\;\;\pm\pm$}

3289: \\$C/{\bar{C}}$;B,2C 

3290: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\;$}&

3291: \multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\mp\;\;\mp\pm$}

3292: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\;$}&\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\;$}

3293: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\pm\;\;\;\pm\mp$}

3294: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\;$}

3295: \\\hline

3296: B.ness&-2&$\;$&-2

3297: &$\;$&-2&$\;$&+2&$\;$&+2

3298: &$\;$&+2&$\;\;$\\\hline

3299:  charm&$\;$&+1&$\;$&-1

3300: &$\;$&+1&$\;$&+1&$\;$&-1&$\;$&+1\\\hline

3301: Sp.parity&\multicolumn{2}{c|}{-3}

3302: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{+2}

3303: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{+3}

3304: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{-3}

3305: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{+2}

3306: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{+3}

3307: \\\hline

3308: $\Sigma$&\multicolumn{2}{c|}{-4}

3309: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{-1}

3310: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{+2}

3311: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{0}

3312: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{+3}

3313: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{+6}

3314: \\\hline

3315: \end{tabular}

3316: \end{center}

3317: 

3318: Notes;

3319: 1; The first of every three sets of $\pm$ signs is

3320: due to a {\it{double valued}} bottom. It represents

3321: the relative orientation of the $C/\bar{C}$ in the

3322: combined second and third generations which are 

3323: always in sync. The other pair of $\pm$ signs is due

3324: to the second generation representation of the charm

3325: quark. 

3326: 

3327: 2; The bottomness quantum number is defined from

3328: the first of each three sets of signs so that

3329: $\mp\;**$ is the particle vector potential 

3330: to express bottomness -2 (this quantum number is 

3331: double valued in discretised QCD as mentioned - it

3332: does NOT mean a bottomness of 2 in conventional

3333: theory when the number is normalised to unity)

3334: and $\pm\;**$ is bottomness +2.

3335: 

3336: 3; as previously the charm quantum number is defined

3337: in terms of odd or even permutations of its' second

3338: generation reps. so that $*\;\pm\pm$ 

3339: or $*\;\mp\mp$ is

3340: +1 unit of charm and $*\;\pm\mp$ or $*\;\mp\pm$ is 

3341: -1 unit of charm.

3342: 

3343: 4; The superparity number of

3344: the negative charm quantum number is 0; that is

3345: the charm product

3346: $\pm\mp$ or $\mp\pm$ has zero superparity. The charm

3347: combination $\pm\pm$ has superparity +1 and

3348: the combination $\mp\mp$ has superparity -1.

3349: The bottomness

3350: quantum number has a superparity $|2|$ value

3351: with the sign following the quantum number bottomness.

3352: The given superparity states are then the corresponding

3353: sums of superparity.

3354: 

3355: 5; The $\Sigma$ is then the sum of the bottomness, charm

3356: and superparity quantum numbers. here S = 6 is the

3357: number of different $\Sigma$ values and represents the 

3358: number of distinct matrix representations seen by the

3359: gluons.

3360: 

3361: In the case of the ground state C-B meson G = 3

3362: is the generation number. The P number is the 

3363: number of distinct sets of sign triplets and 

3364: here P = 8. R is the representation number and

3365: parallels the quantum numbers R =  1 for the

3366: charm and R = 2 for the bottom in this chart

3367: so that the total is R = 3.

3368: 

3369: Thus the constituent matrix order (number of 

3370: distinct matrices in the particle vector and

3371: gluon representations);

3372: 

3373: \[

3374: \mbox{Constituent quarks} = G.P.3.4!.(4!-2) =38016

3375: \]

3376: 

3377: \[

3378: \mbox{Constituent glue} = R.S.2.(4!)^2=20736\]

3379: 

3380: The current quark reps. look identical to those of

3381: the Kaon with the C replacing the up and

3382: the B replacing the strange  but remember

3383: that this rep. is duplicated for the second

3384: generation representation with the appropriate

3385: supersymmetry transformation of the operators;

3386: 

3387: 

3388: 

3389: \begin{center}

3390: \begin{tabular}{ccc}

3391: \multicolumn{3}{c}{C-B; Current Quarks

3392: (2nd generation rep.).}

3393: \\\hline\\

3394: &$\;\;\;\;

3395: $strong component$\;\;\;\;$&E.M. component\\

3396: \\

3397: red$\rightarrow$&${\cal{I}}\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;q$

3398: &$I\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;q*$\\

3399: green$\rightarrow$&$q*\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;I$

3400: &$q*\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;I$\\

3401: blue$\rightarrow$&$q*\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;I$

3402: &$q*\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;I$\\\\

3403: &$\;\;\;\;\;{\stackrel{\uparrow}{\mbox{charm}}}\;

3404: \;{\stackrel{\uparrow}

3405: {\mbox{anti-bottom}}}$

3406: &$\;\;\;\;\;{\stackrel{\uparrow}{\mbox{charm}}}\;

3407: \;{\stackrel{\uparrow}

3408: {\mbox{anti-bottom}}}$\\\\\hline

3409: \end{tabular}

3410: \end{center}

3411: 

3412: The matrix order here is $2\{10.4!+6.(4!-2)\}$

3413: where the multiplier 2 arises because we are summing

3414: over first and second generation representations.

3415: The bottom will additionally have  a third generation

3416: rep. which will have a mass of $2(4.4!+4\{4!-2\})$

3417: 

3418: The `static' purely strong energy of separation of 

3419: the quarks using the table;

3420: 

3421: \vspace{0.5cm}

3422: 

3423: \begin{center}

3424: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}

3425: \multicolumn{13}{c}{chart of static strong potentials}

3426: \\\hline

3427: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{up}

3428: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{down}

3429: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{charm}

3430: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{strange}

3431: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{top}

3432: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{bottom}

3433: \\\hline

3434: First generation

3435: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{+1}

3436: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{-2}

3437: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{+1}

3438: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{-2}

3439: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{+2}

3440: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{-4}

3441: \\\hline

3442: Second generation

3443: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{0}

3444: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{0}

3445: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{-2}

3446: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{-2}

3447: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{0}

3448: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{0}

3449: \\\hline

3450: Third generation

3451: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{0}

3452: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{0}

3453: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{0}

3454: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{0}

3455: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{?+4}

3456: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{?-4}

3457: \\\hline

3458: \end{tabular}

3459: \end{center}

3460: 

3461: \vspace{0.5cm}

3462: 

3463: Using the above table we have potential

3464: first generation rep. to first for

3465: the CB as $|+1-4|(4!-2)$ and first to third

3466: an identical value while second to third potential 

3467: $|-2-4|(4!-2)$ with an identical second to

3468: first giving a net $18(4!-2)$. The 

3469: Higgs values from the charts are

3470: \[

3471: \mbox{charm}=6!+3.5!\]

3472: and

3473: \[

3474: \mbox{bottom}=5.8!\]

3475: 

3476: These last values i.e. the $18.(4!-2)+5.8!+6!+3.5!$

3477: have no radiative corrections. The remaining mass

3478: is given a $T_r$ scale radiative correction

3479: ${\cal{R}}=1+\alpha_{em}+G_f$

3480: and the result of the calculation is

3481: 

3482: Mass C-B =  6.9116GeV

3483: 

3484: \noindent

3485: which unfortunately is well above the empirical

3486: value of about 6.4GeV{\cite{groom}}.

3487: 

3488: 

3489: 

3490: 

3491: \section{Top-antidown and Top-antiup meson  ground states.}

3492: 

3493: We saw in the case of the B mesons that

3494: the second generation component of the

3495: B quark is a `dummy' duplicate; it doesn't

3496: contribute to the R representation number.

3497: Thus we can use the model of the charm-containing

3498: meson to produce a calculation of the T

3499: mesons by extending the the D meson calculations

3500: just as an extension of the K calculations gives

3501: the B meson masses. The top quark mass however

3502: is overwhelmingly dominated by the Higgs scalar

3503: components of the top quark which, from the table, are 

3504: $2.9.9!+10.8!\approx159.9GeV$. 

3505: With discretised Q.C.D. we can do a precision

3506: calculation of the ground state mass containing a 

3507: top quark but the result varies little from the

3508: top mass for combination with light quarks. Such combinations

3509: are unlikely to be stable. Nevertheless the calculation can

3510: be done as an exercise.

3511: 

3512: Clearly G=3 for a top/anti-up or top/anti-down

3513: combination. To get the R,P and S values we

3514: need a table of possible quantum states

3515: (only the first entry of the $C/{\bar{C}}$ is given;

3516: the reader can fill in the remaining values if 

3517: interested!);

3518: 

3519: \begin{center}

3520: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}

3521: \multicolumn{13}{c}{$T\bar{U}$ , $T\bar{D}$ mesons Structure;

3522: Particle Vector}

3523: \\\hline

3524: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\mp\;\;\;\;\mp\mp\;\mp\mp$}

3525: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$$}

3526: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$$}

3527: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$$}

3528: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$$}

3529: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$$}

3530: \\$C/{\bar{C}}$

3531: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\;$}&

3532: \multicolumn{2}{c|}{$$}

3533: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\;$}&\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\;$}

3534: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$$}

3535: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\;$}

3536: \\\hline

3537: (1st Gen)&+1&$\;$&+1

3538: &$\;$&+1&$\;$&-1&$\;$&-1

3539: &$\;$&-1&$\;\;$\\\hline

3540: Top&$\;$&+2&$\;$&-2

3541: &$\;$&+2&$\;$&+2&$\;$&-2&$\;$&+2\\\hline

3542: Sup.p'&\multicolumn{2}{c|}{-3}

3543: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{-1}

3544: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{-3}

3545: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{+3}

3546: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{+1}

3547: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{+3}

3548: \\\hline

3549: $\Sigma$&\multicolumn{2}{c|}{0}

3550: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{-2}

3551: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{0}

3552: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{+4}

3553: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{-2}

3554: &\multicolumn{2}{c|}{+4}

3555: \\\hline

3556: \end{tabular}

3557: \end{center}

3558: 

3559: Because of the dummy duplication of the second generation

3560: representation we take R=3. Obviously P=8 and S=3.

3561: Thus the particle and glue order is

3562: 48384 (to be multiplied by $\cal{R}$).

3563: The topness number is defined in much the

3564: same way as charm but this in not the top quantum

3565: number as such; this is carried in the current

3566: quark representation. (The particle vector sums

3567: over possible states and that is why it includes

3568: top quantum numbers with opposite signs; just

3569: as for bottomness, charm and stangeness in 

3570: the other particle vectors studied).

3571:  We can use the D meson current

3572: quark mass calculations to determine

3573: the current quark mass by doubling the value

3574: of the second generation component for the

3575: D to get the top containing masses.

3576: The charged $T\bar{D}$ mass is then $\approx

3577: 161.038$GeV and $T\bar{U}\approx161.037$GeV.

3578: 

3579: We will leave the calculation of other

3580: top containing meson masses to the reader

3581: as an exercise.

3582: 

3583: 

3584: 

3585: \section{Conclusion}

3586: 

3587: We have seen that the discretised system, as outlined in 

3588: previous papers and extended here, is capable of 

3589: providing a good method of representing particle masses

3590: and defining symmetries involved in the observed spectrum of

3591: masses. The model has all the overall symmetry features of the

3592: standard model and is predictive. It is interesting that the 

3593: predicted mass of the charmed bottom meson varies significantly

3594: from the early measurements although it is still within two

3595: standard deviations and it will be interesting to see

3596: if the empirical value moves toward the predicted mass as

3597: measurements of the rest mass of the C-B ground state 

3598: improve. 

3599: 

3600: The weakest area of the theory is the Higgs sector but

3601: this is also the most interesting as it seems to provide the

3602: first empirical evidence that $SU(5)$ is a real symmetry of

3603: nature; albeit of a most unusual kind!

3604: 

3605: There is quite a lot of scope for further research in this

3606: topic with numerous unsolved problems and a number of

3607: hints in the correspondence with empirical data of new

3608: physics beyond the standard model. In particular it would

3609: be interestion to address the question of the relationship

3610: between the mass calculation, and the mixing patterns present,

3611: and the CKM matrix entries.

3612: 

3613: 

3614: 

3615: \begin{thebibliography}{9}

3616: \bibitem{BTC}

3617: E. Braaten, S Townsend and L Carson.

3618: Phys.Lett. B235, 147, 1990.

3619: 

3620: C. Hughton, N. Manton and P. Sutcliffe,

3621: Nuc.Phys.B 510, 507, 1998.

3622: 

3623: \bibitem{groom}

3624: D.E.Groom et. al.The European Physical Journal

3625: C15, 1 (2000).

3626: 

3627: \bibitem{filewood}

3628: physics/0109024 and references contained therein.

3629: 

3630: 

3631: \end{thebibliography}

3632: %\end{center}

3633: \end{document}