1:  

2: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

5: \documentclass[12pt]{article}

6: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

7: \usepackage{a41}

8: \usepackage{epsfig}

9: \usepackage{axodraw}

10: \usepackage{amsmath}

11: \usepackage{amssymb}

12: \newcommand\e{{\rm e}}

13: \newcommand\PP{{\mathbb{P}}}

14: \newcommand\XINT{\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}}

15: \newcommand\YINT{\int_{-1}^{+1}}

16: \newcommand{\DIRJ}{{\cal Q}^J_{\alpha}(p_2,p_1)}

17: \newcommand{\DIRJF}{{\cal Q}^{J,5}_{\alpha}(p_2,p_1)}

18: \newcommand{\DIRA}{{\cal Q}_{D \alpha}(p_2,p_1)}

19: \newcommand{\PAULA}{{\cal Q}_{P \alpha}(p_2,p_1)}

20: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}

21: \newcommand{\bq}{\begin{equation}}

22: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}

23: \newcommand{\eq}{\end{equation}}

24: \newcommand{\gap}{\stackrel{>}{\sim}}

25: \newcommand{\lap}{\stackrel{<}{\sim}}

26: \newcommand{\fem}{$f_2^{em}$}

27: \newcommand{\lam}{$\Lambda$}

28: \newcommand{\qsq}{$Q^2$}

29: \newcommand{\alsq}{$\alpha_s(Q^2)$}

30: \newcommand{\dals}{$\delta \alpha_s$}

31: \newcommand{\pbinv}{pb^{-1}}

32: \newcommand{\lsim}{\raisebox{-0.07cm   }

33: {$\, \stackrel{<}{{\scriptstyle\sim}}\, $}}

34: \newcommand{\gsim}{\raisebox{-0.07cm   }

35: {$\, \stackrel{>}{{\scriptstyle\sim}}\, $}}

36: %\newcommand{\gsim}{\stackrel{>}{\sim}}

37: %\newcommand{\lsim}{\stackrel{<}{\sim}}

38: \newcommand{\dfeq}{\stackrel{\scriptsize =}{\scriptsize df}}

39: \newcommand{\als}{\alpha_s}

40: \newcommand{\aqu}{\langle Q^2 \rangle}

41: \newcommand\pB{[\mbox{pb}]}

42: \newcommand\MSbar{$\overline{\mbox{MS}}$}

43: \newcommand\order{{\cal O}}

44: \newcommand\mat{{\cal M}}

45: \newcommand\ds{\displaystyle}

46: \newcommand\MeV{\,\mbox{MeV}}

47: \newcommand\GeV{\,\mbox{GeV}}

48: \newcommand\TeV{\,\mbox{TeV}}

49: \newcommand\secu{\,\mbox{sec}}

50: \newcommand\kvec{\mbox{\boldmath $k$}}

51: \newcommand\pvec{\mbox{\boldmath $p$}}

52: \newcommand\lvec{\mbox{\boldmath $l$}}

53: \newcommand\MT{Morfin and Tung}

54: \newcommand\CALL{{\cal L}}

55: \newcommand\KG{\kappa_G}

56: \newcommand\KA{\kappa_A}

57: \newcommand\LG{\lambda_G}

58: \newcommand\LA{\lambda_A}

59: \newcommand\PD{\not p}

60: \newcommand\MP{M^2_{\Phi}}

61: \newcommand\BE{\beta}

62: \newcommand\XL{\log \left| \frac{1 + \B}{1 -\B}\right |}

63: \newcommand\SM{\frac{\hat{s}}{M_{\Phi}^2}}

64: \newcommand\SMM{\frac{\hat{s}^2}{M_{\Phi}^4}}

65: \newcommand\SMMM{\frac{\hat{s}^3}{M_{\Phi}^6}}

66: \newcommand\SMMMM{\frac{\hat{s}^4}{M_{\Phi}^8}}

67: \newcommand\BC{\beta^2 \cos^2 \theta}

68: \newcommand\CB{\beta^2 \cos^2 \theta}

69: \newcommand\CBB{\beta^4 \cos^4 \theta}

70: \newcommand\CBBB{\beta^6 \cos^6 \theta}

71: \newcommand\CBBBB{\beta^8 \cos^8 \theta}

72: \newcommand\SH{\hat{s}}

73: \newcommand\uh{\hat{u}}

74: \newcommand\thh{\hat{t}}

75: \newcommand\sh{\hat{s}}

76: \newcommand\epsi{\varepsilon}

77: \newcommand\ea{\varepsilon_1}

78: \newcommand\eb{\varepsilon_2}

79: \newcommand\Ea{\epsilon_1}

80: \newcommand\Eb{\epsilon_2}

81: \newcommand\ch{{\rm{ch}}}

82: \newcommand\shh{{\rm{sh}}}

83: \newcommand\thhh{{\rm{th}}}

84: \newcommand\st{\sin^2 \theta}

85: \newcommand\BR{\left(1 - \CB \right)}

86: \newcommand\ka{\kappa_1}

87: \newcommand\kb{\kappa_2}

88: \newcommand\kap{\kappa_1'}

89: \newcommand\kbp{\kappa_2'}

90: \newcommand\xx{\tilde{x}}

91: \newcommand\GG{\tilde{g}}

92: \newcommand\hh{\tilde{h}}

93: \newcommand\AAA{\alpha_1}

94: \newcommand\AB{\alpha_2}

95: \newcommand\Kvec{\mbox{\boldmath $K$}}

96: \newcommand\Pvec{\mbox{\boldmath $P$}}

97: \newcommand\Uvec{\mbox{\boldmath $U$}}

98: \newcommand\Vvec{\mbox{\boldmath $V$}}

99: \newcommand\bx{\overline{x}}

100: \newcommand\by{\overline{y}}

101: \newcommand\FFA{\mbox{$\widetilde{F}^a$}}

102: \newcommand\ub{\mbox{$\overline{u}(p_2,S_2)$}}

103: \newcommand\uu{\mbox{$u(p_1,S_1)$}}

104: \newcommand\g{\mbox{$\gamma$}}

105: \newcommand\T{{\sf T}}

106: \newcommand\fP{{I\!P}}

107: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

108: %\setcounter{page}{11}

109: %\setcounter{equation}{46}

110: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

111: \begin{document}

112: \noindent

113: %

114: \sloppy

115: \thispagestyle{empty}

116: \begin{flushleft}

117: DESY 02--011 \hfill

118: {\tt hep-ph/0202077}\\

119: January  2002

120: \end{flushleft}

121: %

122: %\setcounter{page}{0}

123: % 1

124: %\mbox{}

125: \vspace*{\fill}

126: \begin{center}

127: {\LARGE\bf Polarized Deep Inelastic Diffractive }

128: 

129: \vspace{2mm}

130: {\LARGE\bf $ep$ Scattering: Operator Approach}

131: %

132: 

133: \vspace{2cm}

134: \large

135: Johannes Bl\"umlein$^a$  and

136: Dieter Robaschik$^{a,b}$

137: \\

138: \vspace{2em}

139: \normalsize

140: {\it $^a$~Deutsches Elektronen--Synchrotron, DESY,\\

141: Platanenallee 6, D--15738 Zeuthen, Germany}

142: \\

143: \vspace{2em}

144: {\it $^b$~Brandenburgische Technische Universit\"at Cottbus, 

145: Fakult\"at 1,}\\

146: {\it  PF 101344, D--03013  Cottbus, Germany} \\

147: %\today

148: \end{center}

149: \vspace*{\fill}

150: %

151: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

152: \begin{abstract}

153: \noindent

154: Polarized inclusive deep--inelastic diffractive scattering is dealt with

155: in a quantum field theoretic approach. The process can be described in 

156: the general framework of non--forward scattering processes using the 

157: light--cone expansion in the generalized Bjorken region applying the

158: generalized optical theorem. The diffractive structure functions 

159: $g_1^{D(3)}$ and $g_2^{D(3)}$ are calculated in the twist--2 approximation 

160: and are expressed by diffractive parton distributions, which are derived 

161: from pseudo-scalar two--variable operator expectation values. In this

162: approximation the structure functions $g_2^{D(3)}$ is obtained from 

163: $g_1^{D(3)}$ by a   Wandzura--Wilczek relation similar as for deep

164: inelastic scattering. The evolution equations are given. We also comment 

165: on the higher twist contributions in the light--cone expansion.

166: %

167: \end{abstract}

168: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

169: \vspace*{\fill}

170: \newpage

171: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

172: \section{Introduction}

173: %\renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}

174: %\setcounter{equation}{0}

175: \label{sec-1}

176: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

177: 

178: \vspace{1mm}

179: \noindent

180: Unpolarized deep inelastic diffractive lepton--nucleon scattering was 

181: observed at the electron--proton collider HERA some years ago~\cite{EXP1}.

182: In the region of hard diffractive scattering this process is described 

183: by structure functions which are represented by diffractive parton 

184: distributions. They depend on two scaling variables

185: $x$ and $x_{\PP}$ and are different from the parton densities of deep 

186: inelastic scattering. New diffractive parton densities are expected

187: to occur in polarized deep inelastic diffractive lepton nucleon 

188: scattering. They can be measured at potential future polarized $ep$

189: facilities capable to probe the kinematic range of small $x$~, 

190: c.f.~\cite{SXPOL}. Dedicated future experimental studies of this process

191: can reveal the helicity structure of the non--perturbative color--neutral 

192: exchange of diffractive scattering with respect to the quark and

193: gluon structure and how the nucleon spin is viewed under a diffractive

194: exchange.

195: At short distances the problem can be clearly 

196: separated into

197: a part, which can be described within perturbative QCD, and another

198: part which is thoroughly non--perturbative. In this paper we use the

199: light--cone expansion to describe the process of polarized diffractive

200: deep--inelastic scattering similar to a recent study for the unpolarized

201: case~\cite{BRDIFF}. While the scaling violations of the process can be

202: calculated within perturbative QCD, the polarized diffractive 

203: two--variable parton densities are non--perturbative and can be related 

204: to expectation values of (non--)local operators. Their Mellin-moments 

205: with respect to the variable $\beta = x/x_{\PP}$ may, in principle, be 

206: calculated on the lattice and one may try to understand the ratios of 

207: these moments and those for the related deep--inelastic process w.r.t. 

208: their scaling violations as being measurable in future experiments.

209: 

210: In this paper we describe the process of polarized deep--inelastic

211: diffractive scattering, which is a non--forward process in its hadronic

212: variables, at large space--like momentum transfer $q^2$. In this approach

213: there is no need to refer to any specific mechanism of color--singlet

214: exchange. It is completely sufficient to select the process by a 

215: rapidity gap between the final state proton and the other diffractively  

216: produced hadrons, which is sufficiently large. 

217: The operator formulation allows straightforwardly the

218: description of also higher twist operators in the light cone expansion,

219: which is potentially more involved in other scenarios~\cite{FACT},

220: to which we agree on the level of twist--2.

221: 

222: We firstly derive the  Lorentz--structure of the process for the

223: general kinematics, before we specify to the case of 

224: $-t = -(p_2 - p_1)^2, M^2 << -q^2$ which is

225: often met in experiment. The 

226: diffractive parton densities are derived on the level of the twist--2 

227: operators. In this approximation the scattering cross sections are 

228: described by two structure functions $g_1^{D(3)}(x,Q^2,x_\PP)$ and

229: $g_2^{D(3)}(x,Q^2,x_\PP)$ for pure electromagnetic scattering\footnote{

230: The exchange of electro--weak gauge bosons requires at least five 

231: structure functions \cite{BK}. QED radiative corrections to the process 

232: were given in \cite{PRAD}.}. Also in the present case it turns out that 

233: the structure functions are related by the Wandzura--Wilczek 

234: relation~\cite{WW}. Analogously to the unpolarized case, 

235: Ref.~\cite{BRDIFF}, the anomalous dimensions ruling the evolution of

236: the polarized diffractive parton densities turn out to be those for

237: deep--inelastic forward scattering.

238: 

239: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

240: \section{Lorentz Structure}

241: \vspace*{-5mm}\noindent

242: %\renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}

243: %\setcounter{equation}{0}

244: \label{sec-2}

245: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

246: 

247: \vspace{1mm}

248: \noindent

249: The process of deep--inelastic diffractive scattering is described by the

250: diagram Figure~1.

251: The differential scattering cross section for single--photon 

252: exchange is given by

253: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

254: \begin{equation}

255: \label{eqD1}

256: d^5 \sigma_{\rm diffr}

257: = \frac{1}{2(s-M^2)} \frac{1}{4} dPS^{(3)} \sum_{\rm spins}

258: \frac{e^4}{Q^2} L_{\mu\nu} W^{\mu\nu}~.

259: \end{equation}

260: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

261: Here $s=(p_1+l)^2$ is the cms energy of the process squared and $M$ 

262: denotes the nucleon mass.

263: 

264: \vspace*{0.8cm}

265: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

266: \begin{center}

267: \begin{picture}(-50,100)(0,0)

268: \setlength{\unitlength}{0.2mm}

269: \SetWidth{1.5}

270: \ArrowLine(-150,100)(-100,100)

271: \ArrowLine(-100,100)(-50,120)

272: \Photon(-100,100)(-70,70){5}{5}%

273: \ArrowLine(-30,30)(0,0)

274: \ArrowLine(-100,0)(-70,30)

275: \SetWidth{5}

276: \ArrowLine(-30,70)(0,100)

277: \SetWidth{1.5}

278: \CCirc(-50,50){26}{Black}{Yellow}

279: \setlength{\unitlength}{1pt}

280: \Text(-160,110)[]{$l$}

281: \Text(-40,130)[]{$l'$}

282: \Text(-90,75)[]{$q$}

283: \Text(-110,-10)[]{$p_1$}

284: \Text(10,-10)[]{$p_2$}

285: \Text(10,110)[]{$M_X$}

286: \end{picture}

287: \end{center}

288: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

289: 

290: \vspace*{1mm}

291: \noindent

292: \begin{center}

293: {\sf Figure~1:~The virtual photon-hadron amplitude for 

294: diffractive $ep$ scattering} 

295: \end{center}

296: The phase space $dPS^{(3)}$ depends on five variables

297: since one 

298: final state mass varies. They can be chosen as 

299: Bjorken~$x= Q^2/(W^2+Q^2-M^2)$, the photon virtuality $Q^2=-q^2$, 

300: $t = (p_1 - p_2)^2$, a variable describing the non--forwardness w.r.t.

301: the incoming proton direction,

302: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

303: \begin{equation}

304: \label{eqV1}

305: x_{\PP} = - \frac{2\eta}{1-\eta} = 

306: \frac{Q^2 + M_X^2 - t}{Q^2 + W^2 -M^2} \geq  x~,

307: \end{equation}

308: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

309: demanding $M_X^2 > t$ and where

310: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

311: \begin{equation}

312: \label{eqV2}

313: \eta = \frac{q.(p_2 - p_1)}{q.(p_2+p_1)}~\epsilon~\left[-1,\frac{-x}{2-x}

314: \right]~,

315: \end{equation}

316: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

317: and $\Phi$ the angle between the lepton plane $\pvec_1 \times \lvec$ and

318: the hadron plane $\pvec_1 \times \pvec_2$,

319: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

320: \begin{equation}

321: \label{eqV3}

322: \cos \Phi = \frac{(\pvec_1 \times \lvec).(\pvec_1 \times  \pvec_2)}

323:                  {|\pvec_1 \times \lvec ||\pvec_1 \times  \pvec_2|}~.

324: \end{equation}

325: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

326: $W^2 = (p_1+q)^2$ and  $M_X^2 = (p_1+q-p_2)^2$ denote the hadronic

327: mass squared and the square of the diffractive mass, respectively.

328: The process of hard diffractive scattering is characterized by a large

329: rapidity--gap of the order $\Delta y \sim \ln(1/x_{\PP})$ \cite{COL}.

330: As we will show below it is {\it this property}, which is sufficient for 

331: our treatment below and no reference to a special kind of a 

332: non--perturbative color--neutral exchange is not needed.\footnote{

333: Indeed, the literature offers a large host of different pomeron 

334: models, c.f.~\cite{POM},

335: to describe these processes. The fact that many of the descriptions yield

336: similar results at equally large rapidity gaps and the same kinematic 

337: variables supports our observation.}

338: 

339: Unpolarized deep inelastic diffractive scattering was considered in a

340: previous paper~\cite{BRDIFF} in detail. Here we focus on the polarized 

341: part only, which can be measured in terms of a polarization asymmetry

342: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

343: \begin{equation}

344: \label{eqP1}

345: A(x,Q^2,x_{\PP},S_\mu) = \frac{d^5 \sigma(S_{\mu}) - d^5 \sigma(-S_\mu)}

346:                               {d^5 \sigma(S_{\mu}) + d^5 \sigma(-S_\mu)}~.

347: \end{equation}

348: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

349: $S_\mu$ is the spin vector of the incoming proton with $S = S_1$ and

350: $S.p_1 =0$.

351: Since the cross sections are linear functions in the initial--state

352: state proton spin--vector, the denominator projects on the even and the 

353: numerator on the odd part in $S_\mu$. 

354: 

355: We consider the case of single photon exchange, which is projected by the

356: polarized contribution

357: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

358: \begin{equation}

359: \label{eqPLE}

360: L_{\mu\nu}^{\rm pol} = 2i \varepsilon_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma} l^\rho q^\sigma

361: \end{equation}

362: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

363: to the leptonic tensor. Since the electromagnetic current is conserved,

364: the strong interactions conserve parity and are even under 

365: time--reversal,\footnote{Here we disregard potential contributions due to

366: strong CP--violation~\cite{THOOFT}, because of the smallness of the 

367: $\theta$--parameter, $|\theta| < 3 \cdot 10^{-9}$~\cite{THETA}.} 

368: and the hadronic tensor has to be hermitic due to Eq.~(\ref{eqPLE}), the

369: following relations hold~\cite{TM}~:

370: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

371: %\begin{equation}

372: \begin{alignat}{3}

373: \label{eqP2A}

374: {\sf Current~conservation:}&~~q^{\mu}~W_{\mu\nu}(q,p_1,S_1,p_2,S_2)

375:   &=&

376: W_{\mu\nu}(q,p_1,S_1,p_2,S_2)~q^{\nu} = 0~,\\

377: {\sf P~~invariance:}&~~W_{\mu\nu}(\overline{q},%

378: \overline{p}_1,-\overline{S}_1,\overline{p}_2,%

379: -\overline{S}_2)  &=&

380: W^{\mu\nu}(q,p_1,S_1,p_2,S_2)~, \\

381: \label{eqP2C}

382: {\sf T~~invariance:}&~~W_{\mu\nu}(\overline{q},%

383: \overline{p}_1,\overline{S}_1,\overline{p}_2,\overline{S}_2)   &=&

384: \left[W^{\mu\nu}(q,p_1,S_1,p_2,S_2)\right]^*, \\

385: \label{eqP2B}

386: {\sf Hermiticity:}&~~W_{\mu\nu}(q,p_1,S_1,p_2,S_2)

387:  &=&

388: \left[W_{\nu\mu}(q,p_1,S_1,p_2,S_2)\right]^*,

389: \end{alignat}

390: %\end{equation}

391: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

392: with $\overline{a}_\mu = a^{\mu}$. Constructing the hadronic tensor we 

393: seek a structure which is linear in the initial proton spin. 

394: Upon noting that

395: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

396: \begin{eqnarray}

397: \label{eqP3}

398: \varepsilon^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta} = - \varepsilon_{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}

399: \end{eqnarray}

400: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

401: the spin  pseudovector  $S_{1\mu}$ has to occur together

402: with the Levi--Civita pseudo--tensor.

403: The most general asymmetric  hadronic tensor, which

404: obeys Eqs.~(\ref{eqP2A}--\ref{eqP2B}),

405: is\footnote{A sub-set of this structure based

406: on $p,q$ and $S$ was considered in Ref.~\cite{DJT}.}

407: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

408: \begin{alignat}{10}

409: \label{eqH2}

410: W_{\mu\nu} &=&~~

411: i \left[ \hat{p}_{1\mu} \hat{p}_{2\nu}-

412: \hat{p}_{1\nu} \hat{p}_{2\mu} \right] \varepsilon_{p_1,p_2,q,S} 

413: &\frac{W_1}{M^6}&~~

414:                 &+&~~

415: i \left[ \hat{p}_{1\mu} \varepsilon_{\nu S p_1 q}

416:      - \hat{p}_{1\nu} \varepsilon_{\mu S p_1 q} \right] 

417: &\frac{W_2}{M^4}&

418: \nonumber \\ &+&~~

419: i \left[ \hat{p}_{2\mu} \varepsilon_{\nu S p_1 q}

420:      - \hat{p}_{2\nu} \varepsilon_{\mu S p_1 q} \right]

421: &\frac{W_3}{M^4}&~~

422:                 &+&~~

423: i \left[ \hat{p}_{1\mu} \varepsilon_{\nu S p_2 q}

424:      - \hat{p}_{1\nu} \varepsilon_{\mu S p_2 q} \right]

425: &\frac{W_4}{M^4}&

426: \nonumber \\ &+&~~

427: i \left[ \hat{p}_{2\mu} \varepsilon_{\nu S p_2 q}

428:      - \hat{p}_{2\nu} \varepsilon_{\mu S p_2 q} \right]

429: &\frac{W_5}{M^4}&~~

430:                 &+&~~

431: i \left[ \hat{p}_{1\mu} \hat{\varepsilon}_{\nu p_1 p_2 S}

432:      - \hat{p}_{1\nu} \hat{\varepsilon}_{\mu p_1 p_2 S} \right]

433: &\frac{W_6}{M^4}&

434: \nonumber\\ &+&~~ 

435: i \left[ \hat{p}_{2\mu} \hat{\varepsilon}_{\nu p_1 p_2 S}

436:      - \hat{p}_{2\nu} \hat{\varepsilon}_{\mu p_1 p_2 S} \right]

437: &\frac{W_7}{M^4}&~~

438:                 &+&~~  i \varepsilon_{\mu \nu q S}

439: &\frac{W_8}{M^2}&~.

440: \end{alignat}

441: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

442: It is constructed out of the four--vectors $q,p_1,p_2$ and $S =S_1$.

443: Terms with a genuine structure $\propto M^2/q^2$ are not considered.

444: Here we use the abbreviations

445: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

446: \begin{eqnarray}

447: \hat{V}_\mu &=& V_\mu - q_\mu \frac{q.V}{q^2}~, \\

448: \hat{\varepsilon}_{\mu v_1 v_2 v_3}            &=&

449:     {\varepsilon}_{\mu v_1 v_2 v_3}            -

450:     {\varepsilon}_{q v_1 v_2 v_3} \frac{q_\mu}{q^2}~,  \\

451: \tilde{\varepsilon}_{\mu \nu v_1 v_2}            &=&

452:     {\varepsilon}_{\mu \nu v_1 v_2}            -

453:     {\varepsilon}_{q \nu v_1 v_2} \frac{q_\mu}{q^2}

454:   - {\varepsilon}_{\mu q v_1 v_2} \frac{q_\nu}{q^2}~.

455: \end{eqnarray}

456: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

457: The Schouten--relation~\cite{SCHOUT} in either of the forms

458: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

459: \begin{eqnarray}

460: \label{eqP6}

461: X_\mu \varepsilon_{\nu\rho\sigma\tau} &=&

462: X_\nu \varepsilon_{\mu\rho\sigma\tau} +

463: X_\rho \varepsilon_{\nu\mu\sigma\tau} +

464: X_\sigma \varepsilon_{\nu\rho\mu\tau} +  

465: X_\tau \varepsilon_{\nu\rho\sigma\mu}  \\

466: g_{\lambda\mu} \varepsilon_{\nu\rho\sigma\tau} &=&

467: g_{\lambda\nu} \varepsilon_{\mu\rho\sigma\tau} +

468: g_{\lambda\rho} \varepsilon_{\nu\mu\sigma\tau} +

469: g_{\lambda\sigma} \varepsilon_{\nu\rho\mu\tau} +  

470: g_{\lambda\tau} \varepsilon_{\nu\rho\sigma\mu}

471: \end{eqnarray}

472: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

473: is  used to eliminate other possible structures. Particularly, the

474: spin vector $S_\mu$ may always be contracted with the Levi--Civita

475: symbol, along with it it has to occur due to parity conservation.

476: Because $S.p_1 = 0$ two other structures are eliminated using

477: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

478: \begin{eqnarray}

479: q.p_1 \tilde{\varepsilon}_{\mu \nu S p_1}

480: &=& p_1.p_1 \varepsilon_{\nu \mu q S}

481: - \left[\hat{p}_{1\mu}\varepsilon_{\nu p_1 q S} - \hat{p}_{1\nu}

482: \varepsilon_{\mu p_1 q S}\right]\\

483: q.p_1 \tilde{\varepsilon}_{\mu \nu S p_2}

484: &=& p_1.p_2 \varepsilon_{\nu \mu q S}

485: - \left[\hat{p}_{1\mu}\varepsilon_{\nu p_2 q S} - \hat{p}_{1\nu}

486: \varepsilon_{\mu p_2 q S}\right]~.

487: \end{eqnarray}

488: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

489: The structure functions $W_i$ are real functions and are given by

490: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

491: \begin{equation}

492: \label{eqD3}

493: W_i = W_i(x,Q^2,x_{\PP},t)~.

494: \end{equation}

495: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

496: 

497: Let us consider the limit in which target masses can be neglected

498: and $t$ is very small. In this case the proton momenta become

499: proportional: $p_2 = z p_1$ with,

500: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

501: \begin{equation}

502: \label{eqD4}

503: z = 1 - x_{\PP} =  \frac{1 + \eta}{1 - \eta}~.

504: \end{equation}

505: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

506: Correspondingly the hadronic tensor simplifies to

507: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

508: \begin{eqnarray}

509: \label{eqD5}

510: W_{\mu\nu} &=& i \varepsilon_{\mu \nu q S} \frac{W_8}{M^2}

511: + i \left[\hat{p}_{1\mu} \varepsilon_{\nu S p_1 q}

512: -       \hat{p}_{1\nu} \varepsilon_{\mu S p_1 q}\right] \frac{W_9}{M^4}~,

513: \end{eqnarray}

514: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

515: and contains only two structure functions,

516: where

517: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

518: \begin{eqnarray}

519: \label{eqD6}

520: W_9 = W_2 + (1-x_{\PP}) \left[W_3 + W_4 \right]

521: + (1-x_{\PP})^2 W_5~.

522: \end{eqnarray}

523: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

524: One may wish to re-write Eq.~(\ref{eqD5}) further into the form which is

525: similar to that used in polarized deep--inelastic scattering.

526: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

527: \begin{eqnarray}

528: \label{eqD5A}

529: W_{\mu\nu} &=& i \varepsilon_{\mu \nu \lambda \sigma} \frac{q^\lambda

530: S^\sigma}{p_1.q}

531: g_1(x,Q^2,x_{\PP})

532: + i  \varepsilon_{\mu \nu \lambda \sigma}

533: \frac{q^{\lambda}(p_1.q S^\sigma - S.q p_1^\sigma)}{(p_1.q)^2}

534: g_2(x,Q^2,x_{\PP})~.

535: \end{eqnarray}

536: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

537: This again is achieved by using the Schouten relation~Eq.~(\ref{eqP6})

538: noting that 

539: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

540: \begin{eqnarray}

541: \label{eqSCH1}

542: \hat{p}_{1\mu} \varepsilon_{\nu S p_1 q} - \hat{p}_{1\nu}

543: \varepsilon_{\mu S p_1 q} = - \frac{(S.q)(q.p_1)}{q^2}

544: \varepsilon_{\mu \nu q p_1} + \frac{(q.p_1)^2}{q^2} 

545: \varepsilon_{\mu \nu q S}~.

546: \end{eqnarray}

547: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

548: The relation between the structure functions

549: $W_{8,9}$ and $g_{1,2}$ is~:

550: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

551: \begin{eqnarray}

552: \label{eqg1}

553: g_1 &=& \frac{q.p_1}{M^2} W_8 \\

554: \label{eqg2}

555: g_2 &=& \frac{(q.p_1)^3}{q^2 M^4} W_9

556: \end{eqnarray}

557: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

558: 

559: Due to the dependence of the structure functions on $x_{\PP}$ or 

560: $\eta$,~Eq.~(\ref{eqV1}), the process is {\it non--forward} w.r.t. the

561: protons, although the algebraic structure of the hadronic tensor

562: is the same as in the forward case. Finally the generalized 

563: Bjorken--limit is carried out, 

564: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

565: \begin{eqnarray}

566: \label{eqBL}

567: 2 p_1.q = 2M \nu \rightarrow \infty,~~~~~p_2.q \rightarrow \infty,~~~~~

568: Q^2 \rightarrow \infty~~~{\rm with}~~x~~{\rm and}~~x_{\PP} =~{\rm fixed}~,

569: \end{eqnarray}

570: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

571: which leads to (\ref{eqD5A}) using (\ref{eqg1},\ref{eqg2}).

572: For the scattering cross sections we consider the cases of longitudinal 

573: and transverse target polarization for which the initial state hadron

574: spin vectors are given by

575: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

576: \begin{eqnarray}

577: \label{eqSPI}

578: S_{\parallel} &=& (0,0,0,M)\\

579: S_{\perp} &=& M(0,\cos\gamma,\sin\gamma,0)~,

580: \end{eqnarray}

581: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

582: and $\gamma$ the spin direction in the plane orthogonal to the 3--momentum

583: $\vec{p}_1$.

584: In the limit $p_2 = zp_1$ and $M^2,t = 0$ the $\Phi-$integral becomes 

585: trivial in the case of longitudinal nucleon polarization, while it is

586: kept as differential variable for transverse polarization.

587: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

588: \begin{eqnarray}

589: \label{eqD7}

590: \frac{d^3 \sigma_{\rm diffr}(\lambda,\pm S_{\parallel})}

591: {dx dQ^2 d x_{\PP}} &=&  \mp 4 \pi s \lambda

592: \frac{\alpha^2}{Q^4} \Biggl[

593: y \left(2 - y - \frac{2xyM^2}{s}\right) x g_1(x,Q^2,x_\PP)

594: \nonumber\\ & &~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

595: - 4 x y \frac{M^2}{s} g_2(x,Q^2,x_\PP) \Biggr]   \\

596: \frac{d^4 \sigma_{\rm diffr}(\lambda,\pm S_{\perp})}

597: {dx dQ^2 d \Phi d x_{\PP}} &=& \mp 4  s \lambda \sqrt{\frac{M^2}{s}}

598: \frac{\alpha^2}{Q^4}

599: \sqrt{xy\left[1-y-\frac{xyM^2}{s}\right]} \cos(\gamma - \Phi)

600: \nonumber\\ & &~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\times

601: \left[yx g_1(x,Q^2,x_\PP) + 2x g_2(x,Q^2,x_\PP)\right]~,

602: \end{eqnarray}

603: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

604: where $y = q.p_1/l.p_1$ and $\lambda$ denotes the degree of longitudinal

605: lepton polarization.\footnote{In the case of longitudinal nucleon

606: polarization polarized diffractive scattering was discussed neglecting

607: the contribution due to the structure function $g_2$ in \cite{BARY}.}

608: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

609: \section{The Compton Amplitude}

610: %\renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}

611: %\setcounter{equation}{0}

612: \label{sec-3}

613: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

614: 

615: \vspace{1mm}

616: \noindent

617: We first consider the operator given by the renormalized and 

618: time--ordered product of two electromagnetic currents

619: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

620: \begin{eqnarray}

621: \widehat{T}_{\mu\nu}(x) &=&

622: RT \left[J_\mu\left(\frac{x}{2}\right)J_\nu\left(-\frac{x}{2}\right) S 

623: \right] \nonumber\\

624: &=&

625:  -e^2 \frac{\tilde x^\lambda}{2 \pi^2 (x^2-i\epsilon)^2}

626:  RT

627:  \left[

628: \overline{\psi}

629: \left(\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)

630: \gamma^\mu \gamma^\lambda \gamma^\nu \psi

631: \left(-\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)

632: - \overline{\psi}

633: \left(-\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)

634: \gamma^\mu \gamma^\lambda \gamma^\nu \psi

635: \left(\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)

636: \right] S

637: \end{eqnarray}

638: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

639: Here, $\tilde x$ denotes a light--like vector corresponding to $x$,

640: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

641: \begin{eqnarray}

642: \label{xtil}

643: \tilde x = x + \frac{\zeta}{\zeta^2}\left[ \sqrt{x.\zeta^2 - x^2 \zeta^2}

644: - x.\zeta\right]~,

645: \end{eqnarray}

646: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

647: and $\zeta$ is a subsidiary vector. Following Refs.~\cite{BGR,BR} the

648: operator $\widehat{T}_{\mu\nu}$ can be expressed in terms of a vector

649: and an axial--vector operator decomposing

650: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

651: \begin{eqnarray}

652:  \gamma_\mu \gamma_\lambda \gamma_\nu = \left[g_{\mu\lambda} g_{\nu\rho}

653:  + g_{\nu\lambda} g_{\mu\rho} - g_{\mu\nu} g_{\lambda\rho} \right]

654:  \gamma^\rho - i \varepsilon_{\mu\nu\lambda\rho} \gamma^5 \gamma^\rho~.

655: \end{eqnarray}

656: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

657:     We will consider only the contribution of the latter one, since this

658: yields the polarized part,

659: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

660: \begin{eqnarray}

661:  \widehat{T}_{\mu\nu}^{\rm pol}(x)  =

662:   i e^2 \frac{\tilde x^\lambda}{2 \pi^2 (x^2-i\epsilon)^2}

663:   \varepsilon_{\mu\nu\lambda\sigma}

664: O_5^\sigma  \left(\frac{\tilde x}{2}, -\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)~,

665: \end{eqnarray}

666: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

667: with $\varepsilon_{\mu\nu\lambda\sigma}$ the Levi--Civita symbol.

668: The  bilocal axial--vector light--ray operator is

669: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

670: \begin{eqnarray}

671: \label{oo5}

672: O^{\alpha}_5\left(\frac{\tilde x}{2},-\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)

673: &=&

674: \frac{i}{2} RT

675: \left[\overline{\psi}\left(\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)

676: \gamma_5\gamma^\alpha\psi\left(-\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)

677: + \overline{\psi}\left(-\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)

678: \gamma_5\gamma^\alpha\psi\left(\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)\right]S~.

679: \end{eqnarray}

680: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

681: The polarized part of the Compton operator 

682: $\widehat{T}^{\rm pol}_{\mu\nu}$ is related to the diffractive scattering

683: cross section using Mueller's generalized optical theorem~\cite{AHM} 

684: (Figure~2), which moves the final state proton into an initial state 

685: anti-proton.

686: 

687: \vspace*{7mm}

688: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

689: \begin{center}

690: \begin{picture}(200,100)(0,0)

691: \setlength{\unitlength}{0.2mm}

692: \SetWidth{1.5}

693: \Line(-107,102)(-107,-2)

694: \Line(7,102)(7,-2)

695: \Photon(-100,100)(-70,70){5}{5}

696: \ArrowLine(-30,30)(0,0)

697: \ArrowLine(-100,0)(-70,30)

698: \SetWidth{5}

699: \ArrowLine(-30,70)(0,100)

700: \SetWidth{1.5}

701: \CCirc(-50,50){26}{Black}{Yellow}

702: \setlength{\unitlength}{1pt}

703: \Text(15,107)[]{\large $2$}

704: \Text(50,50)[]{\large $=~~{\rm Disc}$}

705: \Text(-105,115)[]{$q$}

706: \Text(-105,-15)[]{$p_1$}

707: \Text(5,-15)[]{$p_2$}

708: \Text(75,115)[]{$q$}

709: \Text(75,-15)[]{$p_1$}

710: \Text(95,-15)[]{$p_2$}

711: \Text(60,35)[]{$X$}

712: \Text(175,20)[]{$X$}

713: \Text(275,115)[]{$q$}

714: \Text(275,-15)[]{$p_1$}

715: \Text(255,-15)[]{$p_2$}

716: \setlength{\unitlength}{0.2mm}

717: \SetWidth{1.5}

718: \Photon(80,100)(110,70){5}{5}

719: \ArrowLine(80,0)(110,30)

720: \ArrowLine(130,30)(100,0)

721: \Line(150,50)(200,50)

722: \Line(150,45)(200,45)

723: \Line(150,55)(200,55)

724: \Line(150,40)(200,40)

725: \Line(150,60)(200,60)

726: \ArrowLine(240,30)(270,0)

727: \ArrowLine(250,0)(220,30)

728: \CCirc(130,50){26}{Black}{Yellow}

729: \CCirc(220,50){26}{Black}{Yellow}

730: \Photon(240,70)(270,100){5}{5}

731: \end{picture}

732: \end{center}

733: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

734: 

735: \vspace*{10mm}\noindent

736: \begin{center}

737: {\sf Figure~2:~A. Mueller's optical theorem.}

738: \end{center}

739: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

740: The polarized part of the Compton amplitude is obtained as the 

741: expectation value

742: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

743: \begin{eqnarray}

744: T^{\rm pol}_{\mu\nu}(x) 

745: = \langle p_1,S_1,-p_2,S_2|\widehat{T}_{\mu\nu}|p_1,S_1,-p_2,S_2\rangle~,

746: \end{eqnarray}

747: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

748: which is   forward w.r.t. to the direction defined by the state

749: $\langle p_1,-p_2|$.

750: The twist--2 contributions to the expectation values of the operator

751: (\ref{oo5})  is obtained

752: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

753: \begin{eqnarray}

754: \label{eqSCA}

755: \lefteqn{\hspace*{-13.5cm}

756: \langle p_1,S_1,-p_2,S_2|O^{A,\mu}_{5}(\kappa_+ \xx,\kappa_-\xx)|

757: p_1,S_1,-p_2,S_2\rangle = } \nonumber\\ \left.  \hspace*{3cm}

758: \int_0^1 d\lambda

759: \partial^{\mu}_x

760: \langle p_1,S_1,-p_2,S_2|O_{5}^A(\lambda \kappa_+ x,\lambda \kappa_-x)

761: |p_1,S_1,-p_2,S_2\rangle \right|_{x=\xx}

762: \end{eqnarray}

763: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

764: as partial derivative  of the expectation values of

765: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

766: \begin{eqnarray}

767: O^A_5(\kappa_+x,\kappa_-x)

768: = x^\alpha O^A_{5,\alpha}(\kappa_+x,\kappa_-x)~,

769: \end{eqnarray}

770: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

771: the corresponding            pseudo-scalar operator.  The index $A = q,G$

772: labels the quark-- or gluon operators, cf.~\cite{BGR}. From now on we

773: keep only the spin vector of the initial--state proton and sum over

774: that of the final--state proton.

775: 

776: The pseudo-scalar twist--2 quark operator matrix element has the 

777: following representation\footnote{For parameterizations

778:   of similar hadronic

779: matrix elements see e.g.~\cite{PARA}.} due to the overall symmetry in $x$

780: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

781: \begin{eqnarray}

782: \label{eqSCAM}

783: \langle p_1,S_1,-p_2|O^q(\kappa_+ x,\kappa_- x)|p_1,S_1,-p_2

784: \rangle =

785: xS

786: \!\!\!         \int \!\!\!

787: Dz ~\e^{-i \kappa_- x p_z} {f}^q_5(z_+,z_-)

788: \end{eqnarray}

789: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

790: with $S \equiv S_1$, $\kappa_- =1/2$ and

791: where all the trace--terms were subtracted, see

792: \cite{BGR,TRAC}.

793: ${f}^A_5(z_+,z_-)$ denotes                              the scalar

794: two--variable distribution amplitudes and the measure $Dz$ is

795: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

796: \begin{eqnarray}

797: \label{Dz}

798: Dz = d z_+ d z_-

799: \theta(1 + z_+ + z_-) \theta(1 + z_+ - z_-)

800: \theta(1 - z_+ + z_-) \theta(1 - z_+ - z_-)~.

801: \end{eqnarray}

802: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

803: Here, we decomposed the vector $p_z$ as

804: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

805: \begin{eqnarray}

806: p_z = p_- z_- + p_+ z_+ =  p_- \vartheta + \pi_- z_+~,

807: \end{eqnarray}

808: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

809: with $z_{1,2}$ momentum fractions along $p_{1,2}$ and $p_{\pm} = p_2 \pm

810: p_1$, $z_\pm = (z_2 \pm z_1)/2$ and

811: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

812: \begin{eqnarray}

813: \vartheta = z_- + \frac{1}{\eta} z_+,~~~~~~~~~~~~~\pi_-

814: = p_+ - \frac{1}{\eta} p_-~,

815: \end{eqnarray}

816: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

817: with       $q.\pi_- \equiv 0$. In the limit         $M^2, t \sim 0$, in

818: which we work from now on, the vector $\pi_-$ even vanishes.

819: 

820: The Fourier--transform of the Compton amplitude is given by~\cite{BR}

821: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

822: \begin{eqnarray}

823: T_{\mu\nu}^{\rm pol}(p_1,p_2,S,q)

824: &=&   \int d^4x \e^{iqx} T_{\mu\nu}(x) \nonumber\\

825: &=& 4i \varepsilon_{\mu\nu\lambda\sigma} \int Dz \left[

826: \frac{Q_z^{\lambda} S^{\sigma}}{Q^2_z + i\varepsilon} - \frac{1}{2}

827: \frac{p_z^{\sigma} S^{\lambda}}{Q^2_z + i\varepsilon}%

828: + \frac{Q_z.S}{(Q^2_z+i\varepsilon)^2}

829: p_z^{\sigma} Q_z^{\lambda}\right] F_5(z_+,z_-),

830: \end{eqnarray}

831: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

832: with $Q_z = q - p_z/2$ and

833: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

834: \begin{eqnarray}

835: \overline{u}(p_1) \gamma_5 \gamma_\lambda u(p_1) = 2 S_\lambda~.

836: \end{eqnarray}

837: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

838: The function $F_5(z_+,z_-)$ is related to the

839: polarized distribution function $f_5(z_+,z_-)$ by

840: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

841: \begin{eqnarray}

842: \label{vecval}

843: F_5(z_+,z_-) = \int_0^1 \frac{d\lambda}{\lambda^2}

844: f_5\left(\frac{z_+}{\lambda},\frac{z_-}{\lambda}\right)

845: \theta(\lambda-|z_+|)\theta(\lambda-|z_-|)~.

846: \end{eqnarray}

847: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

848: We re--write the denominators by

849: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

850: \begin{eqnarray}

851: \label{eqDENO}

852: \frac{1}{Q^2_z+i\varepsilon} = - \frac{1}{qp_-}\frac{1}{(\vartheta

853: - 2\beta  + i \varepsilon)}~,

854: \end{eqnarray}

855: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

856: defining

857: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

858: \begin{eqnarray}

859: \beta =  \frac{x}{x_{\PP}} = \frac{q^2}{2q.p_-}~.

860: \end{eqnarray}

861: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

862: The conservation of the electromagnetic current is easily seen

863: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

864: \begin{eqnarray}

865: q^{\mu}T_{\mu\nu}(p_1,p_2,S,q)  =

866: q^\nu T_{\mu\nu}(p_1,p_2,S,q)~.

867: \end{eqnarray}

868: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

869: It follows because the contraction with $q^{\alpha}$ leads to 

870: Levi--Civita symbols being contract with the same 4--vector.

871: By

872: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

873: \begin{eqnarray}

874: \label{eqFF}

875: \widehat{F}(\vartheta,\eta) = \int Dz F(z_+,z_-) 

876: \delta(\vartheta - z_- -z_+/\eta) = \int_\vartheta^{-{\rm sign}(\vartheta)

877: /\eta} \frac{dz}{z} \widehat{f}(z,\eta)

878: \end{eqnarray}

879: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

880: we change to the variable $\vartheta$, the main momentum fraction in

881: the subsequent representation. Eq.~(\ref{eqFF}) is the pre--form of

882: the Wandzura--Wilczek integral~\cite{WW}. It emerges seeking the

883: representation of vector--valued distributions~(\ref{vecval}) in terms

884: of scalar distributions, cf.~\cite{BGR,BR}. In most of the applications

885: these integrals remain. An exception is the Callan--Gross relation,

886: see Refs.~\cite{BR,BRDIFF}, where all these integrals cancel and only

887: scalar distribution functions remain.

888: Here

889: the distribution function $\widehat{f}_5(z,\eta)$ is related to

890: $f_5(z_+,z_-)$ by

891: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

892: \begin{eqnarray}

893: \label{eqFF1}

894: \widehat{f}_5(z,\eta) = \int^{\eta(1-z)}_{\eta(1+z)} d\rho~

895: \theta(1-\rho) \theta(\rho+1) f_5(\rho,z-\rho/\eta)~,

896: \end{eqnarray}

897: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

898: with $\rho = z_+/\eta$.

899: 

900: The Compton amplitude takes the following form:

901: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

902: \begin{eqnarray}

903: \label{eqCOMP1}

904: T_{\mu\nu}^{\rm pol}(p_-,S,q) &=&

905: 4i  \varepsilon_{\mu\nu\lambda\sigma} \int_{+1/\eta}^{-1/\eta}

906: d\vartheta \Biggl\{\frac{q^\lambda S^\sigma}{Q_z^2+i\varepsilon}

907: - q.S

908: \frac{\vartheta q^\lambda p_-^\sigma}

909: {(Q_z^2+i\varepsilon)^2}\Biggr\} \nonumber\\

910: & &~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

911: \times \int_\vartheta^{-{\rm sign}(\vartheta)/\eta}\frac{dz}{z}

912: \widehat{f}_5(z,\eta)~.

913: \end{eqnarray}

914: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

915: The $\vartheta$--integral in Eq.~(\ref{eqCOMP1}) can be simplified

916: using the identities

917: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

918: \begin{eqnarray}

919: \int_{+1/\eta}^{-1/\eta} d\vartheta \frac{\vartheta^k}

920: {(\vartheta-2\beta+i\varepsilon)^2}\int_\vartheta^{{\rm sign}(\vartheta)

921: /\eta} \frac{dz}{z} \widehat{f}_5(z,\eta)

922: &=&

923: \int_{+1/\eta}^{-1/\eta} d\vartheta \frac{k \vartheta^{k-1}}

924: {(\vartheta-2\beta+i\varepsilon)}\int_\vartheta^{{\rm sign}(\vartheta)

925: /\eta} \frac{dz}{z} \widehat{f}_5(z,\eta) \nonumber\\    & &

926: ~~~~~~~-\int_{+1/\eta}^{-1/\eta} d\vartheta \frac{\vartheta^{k-1}

927: \widehat{f}_5(\vartheta,\eta)}

928: {(\vartheta-2\beta+i\varepsilon)}~.

929: \end{eqnarray}

930: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

931: As we work in the approximation of $M^2, t << |q^2|$ 

932: the vector $p_-$ obeys the representation

933: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

934: \begin{eqnarray}

935: \label{vect}

936: p_- &=& - x_\PP p_1~.

937: \end{eqnarray}

938: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

939: Using these variables the Compton amplitude reads

940: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

941: \begin{eqnarray}

942: \label{eqCOMP2}

943: T_{\mu\nu}^{\rm pol}(p_1,S,q) &=&

944: -4i  \varepsilon_{\mu\nu\lambda\sigma} \int_{+1/\eta}^{-1/\eta}

945: \frac{d\vartheta}{\vartheta - 2 \beta + i \varepsilon} \Biggl\{

946: \left[\frac{q^\lambda S^\sigma}{q.p_1}

947:  + \frac{q.S}{(q.p_1)^2} q^\lambda p_1^\sigma

948: \right]

949: \int_{\vartheta}^{-{\rm sign}(\vartheta)/\eta} \frac{dz}{z}

950: \Hat{\Hat{f}}_5(z,\eta) \nonumber\\

951: & & ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~- \frac{q.S}{(q.p_1)^2}

952: q^\lambda p_1^\sigma

953: \Hat{\Hat{f}}_5(\vartheta,\eta) \Biggr\}~.

954: \end{eqnarray}

955: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

956: Here,

957: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

958: \begin{eqnarray}

959: \Hat{\Hat{f}}_5(z,\eta) =  \frac{1}{x_\PP} \widehat{f}_5(z,\eta)~.

960: \end{eqnarray}

961: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

962: Taking the absorptive part one obtains\footnote{The `imaginary part'

963: concerns that of the Schwartz-distribution Eq.~(\ref{eqDENO}).

964: Because of the relations, Eqs.~(\ref{eqP2C},\ref{eqP2B}) an overall $i$

965: emerges in the hadronic tensor.}

966: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

967: \begin{eqnarray}

968: \label{eqIMPAR}

969: W_{\mu\nu}^{\rm pol} &=& 

970: \frac{1}{2\pi}~{\sf Im}~T_{\mu\nu}^{\rm pol}(p_1,p_2,q) \nonumber\\

971:            &=&       

972: i \varepsilon_{\mu\nu\lambda\sigma} \frac{q^\lambda S_1^\sigma}{q.p_1}

973: {\sf G}_1(\beta,\eta,Q^2)

974: + i  \varepsilon_{\mu\nu\lambda\sigma} \frac{q^\lambda (p_1.q S^\sigma

975: - S.q p_1^\sigma)}{(p_1.q)^2}

976: {\sf G}_2(\beta,\eta,Q^2)~,

977: \end{eqnarray}

978: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

979: where

980: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

981: \begin{alignat}{4}

982: \label{eqG1}

983: {\sf G}_1(\beta,\eta,Q^2) &=& \sum_{q=1}^{N_f}

984: e_q^2\left[\Delta f_q^D(\beta,Q^2,x_{\PP})+ \Delta

985: \overline{f}_q^D(\beta,Q^2,x_{\PP})

986: \right]

987: &\equiv&  g_1^{D(3)}(x,Q^2,x_{\PP})~, \\

988: \label{eqG2}

989: {\sf G}_2(\beta,\eta,Q^2) &=& 

990: -{\sf G}_1(\beta,\eta,Q^2) + \int_\beta^1 \frac{d\beta'}{\beta'}

991:  {\sf G}_1(\beta',\eta,Q^2)

992: &\equiv&  g_2^{D(3)}(x,Q^2,x_{\PP})~,

993: \end{alignat}

994: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

995: with $N_f$ the number of flavors, choosing the factorization scale

996: $\mu^2 = Q^2$. As we were working in the twist--2 approximation, the

997: Wandzura--Wilczek relation (\ref{eqG2}) describes

998: ${\sf G}_2(\beta,\eta,Q^2)$.

999: 

1000: To derive the representation for the diffractive parton densities

1001: $\Delta f_q^D$, Eq.~(\ref{eqG1}), we consider the symmetry relation

1002: for the polarized distribution functions $F^A(z_1,z_2)$, Ref.~\cite{BR},

1003: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1004: \begin{eqnarray}

1005: \label{eqSYM1}

1006: F^A_5(z_1,z_2) =  F^A_5(-z_1,-z_2)~.

1007: \end{eqnarray}

1008: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1009: It translates into

1010: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1011: \begin{eqnarray}

1012: \label{eqSYM2}

1013: \widehat{F}^A_5(\vartheta,\eta) =  \widehat{F}^A_5(-\vartheta,\eta)~,

1014: \end{eqnarray}

1015: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1016: and, cf. Eq.~(\ref{eqFF}),

1017: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1018: \begin{eqnarray}

1019: \label{eqSYM3}

1020: \Hat{\Hat{f}}^A_5(\vartheta,\eta) =  \Hat{\Hat{f}}^A_5(-\vartheta,\eta)~.

1021: \end{eqnarray}

1022: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1023: The polarized diffractive quark and anti--quark densities are given by

1024: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1025: \begin{eqnarray}

1026: \label{eqPART}

1027: \sum_{q=1}^{N_f} e_q^2 \Delta

1028: f_q^D(\beta,Q^2,x_{\PP}) &=&

1029: \Hat{\Hat{f}}_5(2\beta,\eta,Q^2) \nonumber\\

1030: \sum_{q=1}^{N_f} e_q^2 \Delta

1031: \overline{f}_q^D(\beta,Q^2,x_{\PP}) &=&

1032:   \Hat{\Hat{f}}_5(-2\beta,\eta,Q^2)~.

1033: \end{eqnarray}

1034: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1035: Unlike in the deep--inelastic case, where the scaling variable

1036: $x~\epsilon~[0,1]$, the support of the distributions

1037: $\Delta f_q^D(\beta, Q^2, x_\PP)$ is $x~\epsilon~[0, x_\PP]$.

1038: 

1039: We express the diffractive parton densities in terms of

1040: the distribution function $f_5(z_+,z_-)$ directly

1041: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1042: \begin{eqnarray}

1043: \label{eqREL}

1044: \Delta

1045: \Hat{\Hat{f}}_5(\pm 2\beta,\eta,Q^2)

1046:  =  \frac{1}{x_\PP}

1047: \int_{-\frac{x_{\PP} \pm 2x}{2-x_{\PP}}}

1048:                               ^{-\frac{x_{\PP} \mp 2x}{2-x_{\PP}}}

1049: d \rho f_5(\rho,\pm 2\beta + \rho(2-x_{\PP})/x_{\PP};Q^2)~.

1050: \end{eqnarray}

1051: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1052: The latter relations are needed to compare experimental quantities with

1053: those which might be obtained measuring the corresponding operators

1054: on the lattice.

1055: 

1056: Finally, we would like to make a remark on the evolution of the

1057: diffractive parton densities being derived above. In a previous paper

1058: \cite{BRDIFF} the corresponding evolution equations for unpolarized 

1059: diffractive scattering have been derived in detail. Also here one

1060: may start with the general formalism for non-forward scattering,

1061: see e.g.~\cite{BGR}, and discuss the evolution of the scalar operators.

1062: The evolution equations are independent of the parameter $\kappa_+$

1063: emerging in the anomalous dimensions

1064: $\gamma^{AB}_5(\kappa_+,\kappa_-,\kappa_+',\kappa_-';\mu^2)$ which 

1065: therefore may be set to zero. Moreover, the all-order rescaling relation

1066: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1067: \begin{eqnarray}

1068: \label{eqresc}

1069: \gamma^{AB}(\kappa_+,\kappa_-,\kappa_+',\kappa_-';\mu^2) = \sigma^{d_{AB}}

1070: \gamma^{AB}(\sigma\kappa_+, \sigma\kappa_-,\sigma\kappa_+',

1071: \sigma\kappa_-')~,

1072: \end{eqnarray}

1073: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1074: holds, with $d_{AB} = 2 + d_A - d_B$, $d_q=1, d_G=2$. A straightforward

1075: calculation leads to the evolution equation for the polarized (singlet)

1076: diffractive parton densities $f^A_5(\vartheta,\eta;\mu^2)$ in the

1077: momentum fraction $\vartheta$

1078: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1079: \begin{eqnarray}

1080: \label{eqEV2}

1081: \mu^2 \frac{d}{d\mu^2} f^A(\vartheta,\eta;\mu^2)

1082: =  \int_\vartheta^{-{\rm sign}(\vartheta)/\eta}  \frac{d\vartheta'}

1083: {\vartheta'} P^{AB}_5\left(\frac{\vartheta}{\vartheta'},\mu^2\right)

1084: f_B(\vartheta',\eta;\mu^2)~.

1085: \end{eqnarray}

1086: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1087: The splitting functions $P_5^{AB}$ are the {\it forward} splitting 

1088: functions~\cite{SPLIT}\footnote{For the non--forward anomalous dimensions

1089: see \cite{SPNF}.}, which are independent of $\eta$ resp. 

1090: $x_{\PP}$. Taking the 

1091: absorptive part the usual evolution equations are obtained, with the

1092: difference that the evolution takes place in the variable $\beta$.

1093: The non-forwardness $\eta$ or $x_\PP$ behave as plain parameters.

1094: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1095: \begin{eqnarray}

1096: \label{eqEV4}

1097: \mu^2 \frac{d}{d\mu^2} f^{D}_A(\beta,x_{\PP};\mu^2)

1098: = \int_\beta^1 \frac{d\beta'}{\beta'} P_{5,A}^B

1099: \left(\frac{\beta}{\beta'}; \mu^2\right)

1100: f_B^D(\beta',x_{\PP};\mu^2)~.

1101: \end{eqnarray}

1102: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1103: 

1104: We expressed the Compton amplitude with the help of the light--cone 

1105: expansion at short distances and applied this representation to the

1106: process of deep--inelastic diffractive scattering using Mueller's

1107: generalized optical theorem. This representation is {\it not} limited to

1108: leading twist operators but can be extended to all higher twist

1109: operators. The corresponding evolution equations for

1110: the higher twist hadronic matrix elements depend on more than one

1111: momentum fraction $\vartheta_i$, which have a less trivial connection to

1112: the outer kinematical variables similar to the case of deep--inelastic

1113: scattering~\cite{BRRZ}. The construction is similar to the

1114: above  and applies as well the generalized optical theorem. The evolution

1115: of the associated parton correlation functions is for the same reason

1116: forward.

1117: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1118: \section{Conclusions}

1119: %\renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}

1120: %\setcounter{equation}{0}

1121: \label{sec-5}

1122: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1123: 

1124: \vspace{1mm}

1125: \noindent

1126: The differential cross section of polarized deep--inelastic 

1127: $ep$--diffractive scattering for pure photon exchange is described by 

1128: eight structure functions. They depend on the four kinematic variables, 

1129: $x, Q^2, x_{\PP}$ and $t$. In the limit of small values of $t$ and%       target

1130: neglecting target

1131: masses two structure functions contribute. In the generalized Bjorken

1132: range and the presence of a sufficiently large rapidity gap the scaling 

1133: violations of hard diffractive scattering can be described within 

1134: perturbative QCD. In this range processes, which are dominated by

1135: light--cone contributions, are described. The scattering amplitude can be

1136: rewritten using

1137: Mueller's generalized optical theorem moving the outgoing diffractive

1138: proton into an incoming anti-proton. In this kinematical domain

1139: diffractive scattering {\it is} deep--inelastic scattering off a state

1140: $\langle p_1,S_1,-p_2|$. Non-forward techniques may be used to describe

1141: this process. In this way the two--variable polarized amplitudes

1142: turn into the polarized diffractive parton densities, which depend

1143: on one momentum fraction and a parameter $\eta$, which describes

1144: the non--forwardness, and is directly related to the variable $x_\PP$.

1145: For the absorptive part the scaling variable can be expressed by

1146: the variable $\beta$, which also is the variable on which the

1147: evolution kernels act in the twist--2 contributions, whereas $x_\PP$ 

1148: remains as a simple parameter of the process. In the limit 

1149: $t, M^2 \rightarrow 0$ the twist--2 contributions to the two structure 

1150: functions $g_{1,2}^{D(3)}(x,Q^2,x_\PP)$ are related by a 

1151: Wandzura--Wilczek relation in the variable $\beta = x/x_\PP$.

1152: The approach followed in the present paper for twist--2 operators

1153: can be synonymously extended to higher twist--operators in the kinematic

1154: domain of the general Bjorken limit.

1155: 

1156: \vspace{2mm}

1157: \noindent

1158: {\bf Acknowledgement.}~For discussions we would like to thank J.~Eilers 

1159: B.~Geyer, and X.~Ji. We thank J.~Dainton, M.~Erdmann, and D.~Wegener  for their

1160: interest in the present work.

1161: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1162: \begin{thebibliography}{999}

1163: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1164: %

1165: %[1]

1166: \bibitem{EXP1}

1167: M. Derrick et al., ZEUS collaboration, Phys. Lett. {\bf B315} (1993) 481;

1168: \\

1169: T. Ahmed et. al., H1 collaboration, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B429} (1994) 477;\\

1170: J. Breitweg et al., ZEUS collaboration, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C6} (1999) 43;

1171: \\

1172: C. Adloff et al., H1 collaboration, Z. Phys. {\bf C76} (1997) 613.

1173: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1174: %

1175: %[2]

1176: \bibitem{SXPOL}

1177: R. Holt et al., EICC, {\sf A Whitepaper on the Electron Ion Collider},

1178: March 2001;\\

1179: see e.g. {\sf Workshop on the Prospects of Spin Physics at HERA},

1180: DESY 95--200, eds.~J. Bl\"umlein and W.-D. Nowak;\\

1181: {\sf Deep Inelastic Scattering off Polarized Targets: Theory Meets

1182: Experiment}, DESY 97--200, eds.~J. Bl\"umlein et al.

1183: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1184: %

1185: %[3]

1186: \bibitem{BRDIFF}

1187: J. Bl\"umlein and D. Robaschik, Phys. Lett. {\bf B517} (2001) 222.

1188: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1189: %

1190: %[4]

1191: \bibitem{FACT}

1192: A. Berera and D.E. Soper, Phys. Rev. {\bf D50} (1994) 4328; {\bf D53}

1193: (1996) 6162;\\

1194: J. Collins, Phys. Rev. {\bf D57} (1998) 3051; Erratum: {\bf D61} (2000)

1195: 019902;\\

1196: F. Hautmann, Z. Kunszt, and D.E. Soper, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B563} (1999) 

1197: 153.

1198: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1199: %

1200: %[5]

1201: \bibitem{BK}       

1202: J. Bl\"umlein and N. Kochelev, Phys. Lett. {\bf B381} (1996) 296;

1203: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B498} (1997) 285;\\

1204: J. Bl\"umlein and A. Tkabladze, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B553} (1999) 427;

1205: {\tt hep-ph/9905524}.

1206: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1207: %

1208: %[6]

1209: \bibitem{PRAD}

1210: D. Bardin, J. Bl\"umlein, P. Christova, and L. Kalinovskaya,

1211: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B506} (1997) 295;\\

1212: A. Arbuzov, D. Bardin, J. Bl\"umlein,  L. Kalinovskaya, and T. Riemann,

1213: {\sf Code HECTOR}, Comp. Phys. Commun. {\bf 94} (1996) 128,

1214: {\sf hep-ph/9511434}.

1215: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1216: %[7]

1217: \bibitem{WW}

1218: S. Wandzura and F. Wilczek, Phys. Lett. {\bf B72} (1977) 95.

1219: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1220: %

1221: %[8]

1222: \bibitem{COL}

1223: J.C. Collins, {\tt hep-ph/9705393}.

1224: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1225: %

1226: %[9]

1227: \bibitem{POM}

1228: For recent surveys see:\\

1229: M. W\"usthoff and A.D. Martin, J. Phys. {\bf G24} (1999) R309;\\

1230: W. Buchm\"uller, {\tt hep-ph/9906546};\\

1231: G. Ingelman, {\tt hep-ph/9912534};\\

1232: J. Bartels and M. Kowalski, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C19} (2001) 693.

1233: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1234: %

1235: %[10]

1236: \bibitem{THOOFT}

1237: G. t'Hooft, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 37} (1976) 8.

1238: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1239: %

1240: %[11]

1241: \bibitem{THETA}

1242: see e.g. S. Aoki and T. Hatsuda, Phys. Rev. {\bf D45} (1992) 2427.

1243: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1244: %

1245: %[12]

1246: \bibitem{TM}

1247: R.D. Tangerman and P.J. Mulders, Phys. Rev. {\bf D51} (1995) 3357.

1248: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1249: %

1250: %[13]

1251: \bibitem{DJT}

1252: D.A. Dicus, R. Jackiw, and V.L. Teplitz, Phys. Rev. {\bf D4} (1971) 1733.

1253: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1254: %

1255: %[14]

1256: \bibitem{SCHOUT}

1257: M. Veltman, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B319} (1989) 253;\\

1258: B. De Wit and J. Smith, {\sf Field Theory in Particle Physics},

1259: (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1986), p.~414.

1260: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1261: %

1262: %[15]

1263: \bibitem{BARY}

1264: J. Bartels, T. Gehrmann, and M. Ryskin, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C11} (1999)

1265: 325.

1266: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1267: %

1268: %[16]

1269: \bibitem{BGR}

1270: J.~Bl\"umlein, B.~Geyer, and D.~Robaschik, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B560} (1999) 

1271: 283.

1272: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1273: %

1274: %[17]

1275: \bibitem{BR}

1276: J. Bl\"umlein and D. Robaschik, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B581} (2000) 449.

1277: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1278: %

1279: %[18]

1280: \bibitem{SPLIT}

1281: H. Ito, Progr. Theor. Phys. {\bf 54} (1975) 555;\\

1282: K. Sasaki, Progr. Thepr. Phys. {\bf 54} (1975) 1816;\\

1283: M. A. Ahmed and G.G. Ross, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B111} (1976) 441;\\

1284: G. Altarelli and G. Parisi, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B126} (1977) 298;\\

1285: R. Mertig  and W.L. van Neerven, Z. Phys. {\bf C70} (1996) 637;\\

1286: W. Vogelsang, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B475} (1996) 47.

1287: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1288: %

1289: %[19]

1290: \bibitem{SPNF}

1291: J. Bl\"umlein, B. Geyer and D. Robaschik, Phys. Lett. {\bf B406} (1997) 

1292: 161;\\

1293: I. Balitsky and A. Radyushkin, Phys. Lett. {\bf B413} (1997) 114;\\

1294: For the near-forward representation: X. Ji, Phys. Rev. {\bf D55}

1295: (1997) 7114.

1296: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1297: %

1298: %[20]

1299: \bibitem{AHM}

1300: A.H. Mueller, Phys. Rev. {\bf D2} (1970) 2963; Phys. Rev. {\bf D4} (1971)

1301: 150;\\

1302: P.D.P. Collins, {\sf An Introduction to Regge Theory and High Energy

1303: Physics}, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1977), pp.~331.

1304: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1305: %

1306: %[21]

1307: \bibitem{PARA}

1308: J. Bl\"umlein, J. Eilers, B. Geyer, and D. Robaschik, 

1309: {\tt hep-ph/0108095}.

1310: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1311: %

1312: %[22]

1313: \bibitem{TRAC}

1314: B. Geyer and M. Lazar, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B559} (1999) 339;  {\bf B581}

1315: (2000) 341;\\

1316: B. Geyer, M. Lazar, and D. Robaschik, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B618} (2001) 99.

1317: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1318: %

1319: %[23]

1320: \bibitem{BRRZ}

1321: R.K. Ellis, W. Furmanski, and R. Petronzio, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B212}

1322: (1983) 29;\\

1323: J. Bl\"umlein, V. Ravindran, J. Ruan, and W. Zhu, Phys. Lett. {\bf B594}

1324: (2001) 235.

1325: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1326: \end{thebibliography}

1327: \end{document}

1328: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1329: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1330: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1331: 

1332: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1333: \begin{eqnarray}

1334: S_-^\mu = - \overline{u}(p_-) \gamma_5 \gamma^\mu u(p_-)~.

1335: \end{eqnarray}

1336: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1337: 

1338: 

1339: 

1340: 

1341: 

1342: 

1343: 

1344: 

1345: %

1346: %[4]

1347: \bibitem{MD}

1348: M. Diehl, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B} (Proc. Suppl. {\bf 79} (1999) 723, Proc.

1349: DIS 99, eds. J. Bl\"umlein  and T. Riemann.

1350: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1351: %

1352: %[8]

1353: \bibitem{SCHOUT}

1354: M. Veltman, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B319} (1989) 253;\\

1355: B. De Wit and J. Smith, {\sf Field Theory in Particle Physics},

1356: (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1986), p.~414.

1357: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1358: %

1359: %[9]

1360: \bibitem{DJT}

1361: D.A. Dicus, R. Jackiw, and V.L. Teplitz, Phys. Rev. {\bf D4} (1971) 1733.

1362: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1363: %

1364: %[10]

1365: \bibitem{RAPGA}

1366: J.C. Collins, {\tt hep-ph/9705393};\\

1367: H. Navelet and R. Peschanski, {\tt hep-ph/0105030}.

1368: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1369: %

1370: %[11]

1371: \bibitem{BT}

1372: J. Bl\"umlein and A. Tkabladze, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B553} (1999) 427.

1373: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1374: 

1375: 

1376: 

1377: 

1378: 

1379: 

1380: 

1381: 

1382: 

1383: 

1384: %

1385: %[9]

1386: \bibitem{BGRY}

1387: J. Bartels, T. Gehrmann, and M. Ryskin, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C11} (1999)

1388: 325.

1389: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1390: %

1391: %[1]

1392: \bibitem{THOOFT}

1393: G. t'Hooft, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 37} (1976) 8.

1394: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1395: %

1396: %[2]

1397: \bibitem{THETA}

1398: 

1399: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1400: %

1401: %[3]

1402: \bibitem{DJT}

1403: D.A. Dicus, R. Jackiw, and V.L. Teplitz, Phys. Rev. {\bf D4} (1971) 1733.

1404: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1405: %

1406: %[1]

1407: \bibitem{EXP1}

1408: M. Derrick et al., ZEUS collaboration, Phys. Lett. {\bf B315} (1993) 481;

1409: \\

1410: T. Ahmed et. al., H1 collaboration, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B429} (1994) 477;\\

1411: J. Breitweg et al., ZEUS collabortaion, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C6} (1999) 43;

1412: \\

1413: C. Adloff et al., H1 collaboration, Z. Phys. {\bf C76} (1997) 613.

1414: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1415: %

1416: %[2]

1417: \bibitem{SXPOL}

1418: small x polarized facilities.

1419: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1420: %

1421: %[3]

1422: \bibitem{BR2}

1423: J. Bl\"umlein and D. Robaschik, DESY 01-072, {\tt hep-ph/0106037}.

1424: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1425: 

1426: 

1427: 

1428: 

1429: 

1430: 

1431: 

1432: 

1433: 

1434: 

1435: 

1436: 

1437: %

1438: 

1439: 

1440: 

1441: 

1442: %[3]

1443: \bibitem{FL}

1444: C. Adloff et al., H1 collaboration, Phys. Lett. {\bf B393} (1997) 452.

1445: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1446: %

1447: %[4]

1448: \bibitem{EXP3}

1449: H. Abramowicz and J. Dainton, J. Phys. {\bf G22} (1996) 911.

1450: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1451: %

1452: %[5]

1453: \bibitem{BAKO}

1454: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1455: %

1456: %[6]

1457: \bibitem{DL}

1458: A. Donnachie and P.V. Landshoff, Phys. Lett. {\bf B191} (1987) 309;

1459: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B286} (1987) 704;  Phys. Lett. {\bf B437} (1998) 408;

1460: {\tt hep-ph/0105088} and references  quoted therein.

1461: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1462: %

1463: %[7]

1464: \bibitem{SUR}

1465: A. Hebecker, Phys. Rep. {\bf 331} (2000) 1 and references therein.

1466: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1467: %

1468: %[8]

1469: \bibitem{NP}

1470: H. Navelet and R. Peschanski, {\tt hep-ph/0105030} and references 

1471: therein.

1472: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1473: %

1474: %[10]

1475: \bibitem{BH}

1476: W. Buchm\"uller and A. Hebecker, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B476} (1996) 293;\\

1477: W. Buchm\"uller, T. Gehrmann, and A. Hebecker, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B537} 

1478: (1999) 477.

1479: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1480: %

1481: %[11]

1482: \bibitem{EBKW}

1483: J. Bartels, J. Ellis, M. Kowalski, and M. W\"usthoff,  

1484: Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C7} (1999) 443.

1485: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1486: %

1487: %[12]

1488: \bibitem{FS}

1489: D.~M\"uller, D. Robaschik, B. Geyer, F.~Dittes, and J.~Ho\v{r}ej\v{s}i,

1490: Fortschr. Phys.  {\bf 42} (1994) 2; \\

1491: X. Ji,  J. Phys. {\bf G24} (1998) 1181.

1492: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1493: %

1494: %[13]

1495: \bibitem{RAD}

1496: A.V.~Radyushkin, Phys. Rev. {\bf D56} (1997) 5524; {\tt hep-ph/0101225}.

1497: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1498: %

1499: %[14]

1500: \bibitem{BGR}

1501: J.~Bl\"umlein, B.~Geyer, and D.~Robaschik, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B560} (1999) 

1502: 283.

1503: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1504: %

1505: %[15]

1506: \bibitem{KROLL}                           

1507: M. Diehl, T. Feldmann, R. Jakob, and P. Kroll, Phys. Lett. {\bf B460}

1508: (1999) 204; Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C8} (1999) 409;\\

1509: P. Kroll, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A666} (2000) 3.

1510: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1511: %

1512: %[16]

1513: \bibitem{LAT}

1514: G. Martinelli and C.T. Sachrajda, Phys. Lett. {\bf B190} (1987) 151;

1515: {\bf 196} (1987) 184;\\

1516: M. Guagnelli, K. Jansen, and R. Petronzio, Phys. Lett. {\bf B459} (1999)

1517: 594; {\bf B493} (2000) 77.

1518: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1519: %

1520: %[17]

1521: \bibitem{MD}

1522: M. Diehl, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B} (Proc. Suppl. {\bf 79} (1999) 723, Proc.

1523: DIS 99, eds. J. Bl\"umlein  and T. Riemann.

1524: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1525: %

1526: %[18]

1527: \bibitem{TARR}

1528: B. Tarrach, Nuov. Cim. {\bf 28A} (1975) 409.

1529: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1530: %

1531: %[19]

1532: \bibitem{COL}

1533: J.C. Collins, {\tt hep-ph/9705393}.

1534: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1535: %

1536: %[20]

1537: \bibitem{BR}

1538: J. Bl\"umlein and D. Robaschik, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B581} (2000) 449.

1539: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1540: %

1541: %[21]

1542: \bibitem{AHM}

1543: A.H. Mueller, Phys. Rev. {\bf D2} (1970) 2963; Phys. Rev. {\bf D4} (1971)

1544: 150;\\

1545: P.D.P. Collins, {\sf An Introduction to Regge Theory and High Energy

1546: Physics}, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1977), pp.~331.

1547: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1548: %

1549: %[22]

1550: \bibitem{PARA}

1551: S. Weinberg, {\sf The Quantum Theory of Fields}, {\bf Vol.~1}, (Cambridge

1552: University Press, Cambridge, 1995), pp.~452;\\

1553: J. Bl\"umlein, J. Eilers, B. Geyer, and D. Robaschik, to appear.

1554: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1555: %

1556: %[23]

1557: \bibitem{NFLO}

1558: T.~Braunschweig, B.~Geyer, and D.~Robaschik, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 

1559: {\bf 44} (1987) 407;\\

1560: I.I.~Balitsky and V.M.~Braun, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B311} (1988/89) 541;\\

1561: A.V.~Radyushkin,

1562: Phys. Lett. {\bf B385} (1996) 333; Phys. Rev. {\bf D56} (1997) 5524;\\

1563: J.~Bl\"umlein, B.~Geyer, and D.~Robaschik, Phys. Lett. {\bf B406} (1997) 

1564: 161 and Erratum;\\

1565: I.I. Balitsky and A.V. Radyushkin, Phys. Lett. {\bf B413} (1997) 114;\\

1566: J.~Bl\"umlein, B.~Geyer, and D.~Robaschik, {\tt hep-ph/9711405}, in~:

1567: Proc. of the Workshop~{\sf Deep Inelastic Scattering Off Polarized

1568: Targets: Theory Meets Experiment}, eds.~J.~Bl\"umlein et al., (DESY,

1569: Hamburg, 1997) DESY 97--200, p.~196.\\

1570: X.~Ji, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 78} (1997) 610; Phys. Rev. {\bf D55} (1997)

1571: 7114;\\

1572: L. Mankiewicz, G. Piller, and T. Weigl, Eur. J. Phys. {\bf C5} (1998) 

1573: 119.

1574: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1575: %

1576: %[24]

1577: \bibitem{NFNLO}

1578: F.M. Dittes and A.V. Radyushkin, Phys. Lett. {\bf B134} (1984) 359;\\

1579: S.V. Mikhailov and A.V. Radyushkin, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B254} (1985) 89;\\

1580: F.M.~Dittes, D.~M\"uller, D. Robaschik, B. Geyer, and J.~Ho\v{r}ej\v{s}i,

1581: Phys. Lett. {\bf B209} (1988) 325;\\

1582: A.V. Belitsky, D. M\"uller, L. Niedermaier, and A. Sch\"afer,

1583: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B546} (1999) 279.

1584: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1585: %

1586: %[26]

1587: \bibitem{RSBJP}

1588: C. Royon, L. Schoeffel, J. Bartels, H. Jung, and R. Peschanski, 

1589: Phys. Rev. {\bf D63} (2001) 074004.

1590: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1591: \end{thebibliography}

1592: \end{document}

1593: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1594: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1595: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1596: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1597: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1598: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1599: \documentclass[12pt]{article}

1600: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1601: \usepackage{a41}

1602: \usepackage{epsfig}

1603: \usepackage{axodraw}

1604: \usepackage{amsmath}

1605: \usepackage{amssymb}

1606: \newcommand\e{{\rm e}}

1607: \newcommand\PP{{\mathbb{P}}}

1608: \newcommand\XINT{\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}}

1609: \newcommand\YINT{\int_{-1}^{+1}}

1610: \newcommand{\DIRJ}{{\cal Q}^J_{\alpha}(p_2,p_1)}

1611: \newcommand{\DIRJF}{{\cal Q}^{J,5}_{\alpha}(p_2,p_1)}

1612: \newcommand{\DIRA}{{\cal Q}_{D \alpha}(p_2,p_1)}

1613: \newcommand{\PAULA}{{\cal Q}_{P \alpha}(p_2,p_1)}

1614: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}

1615: \newcommand{\bq}{\begin{equation}}

1616: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}

1617: \newcommand{\eq}{\end{equation}}

1618: \newcommand{\HERM}{\stackrel{=}{{\small\sf H}}}

1619: \newcommand{\TREV}{\stackrel{=}{\small\sf T}}

1620: \newcommand{\PARI}{\stackrel{=}{\tiny\sf P}}

1621: \newcommand{\gap}{\stackrel{>}{\sim}}

1622: \newcommand{\lap}{\stackrel{<}{\sim}}

1623: \newcommand{\fem}{$f_2^{em}$}

1624: \newcommand{\lam}{$\Lambda$}

1625: \newcommand{\qsq}{$Q^2$}

1626: \newcommand{\alsq}{$\alpha_s(Q^2)$}

1627: \newcommand{\dals}{$\delta \alpha_s$}

1628: \newcommand{\pbinv}{pb^{-1}}

1629: \newcommand{\lsim}{\raisebox{-0.07cm   }

1630: {$\, \stackrel{<}{{\scriptstyle\sim}}\, $}}

1631: \newcommand{\gsim}{\raisebox{-0.07cm   }

1632: {$\, \stackrel{>}{{\scriptstyle\sim}}\, $}}

1633: %\newcommand{\gsim}{\stackrel{>}{\sim}}

1634: %\newcommand{\lsim}{\stackrel{<}{\sim}}

1635: \newcommand{\dfeq}{\stackrel{\scriptsize =}{\scriptsize df}}

1636: \newcommand{\als}{\alpha_s}

1637: \newcommand{\aqu}{\langle Q^2 \rangle}

1638: \newcommand\pB{[\mbox{pb}]}

1639: \newcommand\MSbar{$\overline{\mbox{MS}}$}

1640: \newcommand\order{{\cal O}}

1641: \newcommand\mat{{\cal M}}

1642: \newcommand\ds{\displaystyle}

1643: \newcommand\MeV{\,\mbox{MeV}}

1644: \newcommand\GeV{\,\mbox{GeV}}

1645: \newcommand\TeV{\,\mbox{TeV}}

1646: \newcommand\secu{\,\mbox{sec}}

1647: \newcommand\kvec{\mbox{\boldmath $k$}}

1648: \newcommand\pvec{\mbox{\boldmath $p$}}

1649: \newcommand\lvec{\mbox{\boldmath $l$}}

1650: \newcommand\MT{Morfin and Tung}

1651: \newcommand\CALL{{\cal L}}

1652: \newcommand\KG{\kappa_G}

1653: \newcommand\KA{\kappa_A}

1654: \newcommand\LG{\lambda_G}

1655: \newcommand\LA{\lambda_A}

1656: \newcommand\PD{\not p}

1657: \newcommand\MP{M^2_{\Phi}}

1658: \newcommand\BE{\beta}

1659: \newcommand\XL{\log \left| \frac{1 + \B}{1 -\B}\right |}

1660: \newcommand\SM{\frac{\hat{s}}{M_{\Phi}^2}}

1661: \newcommand\SMM{\frac{\hat{s}^2}{M_{\Phi}^4}}

1662: \newcommand\SMMM{\frac{\hat{s}^3}{M_{\Phi}^6}}

1663: \newcommand\SMMMM{\frac{\hat{s}^4}{M_{\Phi}^8}}

1664: \newcommand\BC{\beta^2 \cos^2 \theta}

1665: \newcommand\CB{\beta^2 \cos^2 \theta}

1666: \newcommand\CBB{\beta^4 \cos^4 \theta}

1667: \newcommand\CBBB{\beta^6 \cos^6 \theta}

1668: \newcommand\CBBBB{\beta^8 \cos^8 \theta}

1669: \newcommand\SH{\hat{s}}

1670: \newcommand\uh{\hat{u}}

1671: \newcommand\thh{\hat{t}}

1672: \newcommand\sh{\hat{s}}

1673: \newcommand\epsi{\varepsilon}

1674: \newcommand\ea{\varepsilon_1}

1675: \newcommand\eb{\varepsilon_2}

1676: \newcommand\Ea{\epsilon_1}

1677: \newcommand\Eb{\epsilon_2}

1678: \newcommand\ch{{\rm{ch}}}

1679: \newcommand\shh{{\rm{sh}}}

1680: \newcommand\thhh{{\rm{th}}}

1681: \newcommand\st{\sin^2 \theta}

1682: \newcommand\BR{\left(1 - \CB \right)}

1683: \newcommand\ka{\kappa_1}

1684: \newcommand\kb{\kappa_2}

1685: \newcommand\kap{\kappa_1'}

1686: \newcommand\kbp{\kappa_2'}

1687: \newcommand\xx{\tilde{x}}

1688: \newcommand\GG{\tilde{g}}

1689: \newcommand\hh{\tilde{h}}

1690: \newcommand\AAA{\alpha_1}

1691: \newcommand\AB{\alpha_2}

1692: \newcommand\Kvec{\mbox{\boldmath $K$}}

1693: \newcommand\Pvec{\mbox{\boldmath $P$}}

1694: \newcommand\Uvec{\mbox{\boldmath $U$}}

1695: \newcommand\Vvec{\mbox{\boldmath $V$}}

1696: \newcommand\bx{\overline{x}}

1697: \newcommand\by{\overline{y}}

1698: \newcommand\FFA{\mbox{$\widetilde{F}^a$}}

1699: \newcommand\ub{\mbox{$\overline{u}(p_2,S_2)$}}

1700: \newcommand\uu{\mbox{$u(p_1,S_1)$}}

1701: \newcommand\g{\mbox{$\gamma$}}

1702: \newcommand\T{{\sf T}}

1703: \newcommand\fP{{I\!P}}

1704: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1705: %\setcounter{page}{11}

1706: %\setcounter{equation}{46}

1707: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1708: \begin{document}

1709: \noindent

1710: %

1711: \sloppy

1712: \thispagestyle{empty}

1713: \begin{flushleft}

1714: DESY 01--XXX \hfill

1715: {\tt hep-ph/0202077}\\

1716: June  2001

1717: \end{flushleft}

1718: %

1719: %\setcounter{page}{0}

1720: % 1

1721: %\mbox{}

1722: \vspace*{\fill}

1723: \begin{center}

1724: {\LARGE\bf Polarized Deep Inelastic Diffractive} 

1725: 

1726: \vspace{2mm}

1727: {\LARGE\bf {\boldmath $ep$} Scattering: Operator Approach}

1728: %

1729: 

1730: \vspace{2cm}

1731: \large

1732: Johannes Bl\"umlein$^a$  and

1733: Dieter Robaschik$^{a,b}$

1734: \\

1735: \vspace{2em}

1736: \normalsize

1737: {\it $^a$~Deutsches Elektronen--Synchrotron, DESY,\\

1738: Platanenallee 6, D--15738 Zeuthen, Germany}

1739: \\

1740: \vspace{2em}

1741: {\it $^b$~Brandenburgische Technische Universit\"at Cottbus, 

1742: Fakult\"at 1,}\\

1743: {\it  PF 101344, D--03013  Cottbus, Germany} \\

1744: %%\today

1745: \end{center}

1746: \vspace*{\fill}

1747: %

1748: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1749: \begin{abstract}

1750: \noindent

1751: A quantum field theoretic treatment of inclusive deep--inelastic 

1752: diffractive scattering is given. The process can be described in the

1753: general framework of non--forward scattering processes using the 

1754: light--cone expansion in the generalized Bjorken region. Evolution 

1755: equations of the diffractive hadronic matrix elements are derived at the 

1756: level of the twist--2 contributions and are compared to those of inclusive 

1757: deep--inelastic forward scattering (DIS). The diffractive parton densities 

1758: are obtained as projections of two--variable parton distributions. We 

1759: also comment on the higher twist contributions in the light--cone 

1760: expansion.

1761: %

1762: \end{abstract}

1763: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1764: \vspace*{\fill}

1765: \newpage

1766: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1767: \section{Introduction}

1768: %\renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}

1769: %\setcounter{equation}{0}

1770: \label{sec-1}

1771: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1772: 

1773: \vspace{1mm}

1774: \noindent

1775: Unpolarized deep inelastic diffractive lepton--nucleon scattering was 

1776: observed at the electron--proton collider HERA some years ago~\cite{EXP1}.

1777: In the region of hard diffractive scattering this process is described by structure functions which

1778: by diffractive parton distributions, which depend on two scaling variables

1779: $x$ and $x_{\PP}$ and are different from the parton densities of deep 

1780: inelastic scattering. New diffractive parton densities are expected

1781: to occur in polarized deep inelastic diffractive lepton nucleon 

1782: scattering. They can be measured at potential future polarized $ep$

1783: factilities capeable to probe the kinematic range of small $x$~, 

1784: c.f.~\cite{SXPOL}. For virtualities in the range $Q^2 \gsim 10 \GeV^2$

1785: values of $x \gsim 10^{-3} \ldots 10^{-4}$ can be probed.

1786: Dedicated future experimental studies of this process

1787: can reveal the helicity structure of the non--perurbative color--neutral 

1788: exchange of diffractive scattering with respect to the quark and

1789: gluon structure and how the nucleon spin is viewed under a diffractive

1790: exchange. At short distances the problem can be clearly separated into

1791: a part, which can be described within perturbative QCD, and another

1792: part which is thoroughly non--perturbative. In this paper we use the

1793: light--cone expansion to describe the process of polarized diffractive

1794: deep--inelastic scattering similar to a recent study for the unpolarized

1795: case~\cite{BR2}. While the scaling violations of the process can be

1796: calculated within perturbative QCD, the polarized difractive two--variable

1797: parton densities are non--perturbative and can be related to expectation

1798: values of (non--)local operators. Their Mellin-moments with respect to

1799: the variable $\beta = x/x_{\PP}$ may, in principle, be calculated

1800: on the lattice and one may try to understand the ratios of these

1801: moments and those for the related deep--inelastic process w.r.t. their

1802: scaling violations.

1803: 

1804: 

1805: 

1806: The diffractive events are

1807: characterized by a rapidity gap between the final state nucleon and the 

1808: set of the diffractively produced hadrons due to a color--neutral 

1809: exchange. The (semi-inclusive) structure functions emerging in the 

1810: diffractive scattering cross section show the same scaling violations as 

1811: the structure functions in deep inelastic scattering within the current 

1812: experimental resolution~\cite{EXP3}. This is a remarkable fact, which 

1813: should also be understood with the help of field--theoretic methods within 

1814: Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD). In the description of diffractive $ep$ 

1815: scattering one has to clearly distinguish~\cite{BAKO} the case of hard 

1816: scattering, i.e. large $Q^2$, from that of softer hadronic interactions, 

1817: cf. also~\cite{DL}. A perturbative description of the scaling violations 

1818: can only by hoped for in the former case, to which we limit our 

1819: considerations in this paper.

1820: 

1821: There is a vast amount of varying descriptions of the underlying dynamics

1822: of the diffractive scattering process\footnote{For surveys and a recent

1823: account see~\cite{SUR}.}, ranging from intuitive phenomenological 

1824: models~\cite{INGEL} to non-perturbative semi-classical 

1825: descriptions~\cite{BH}, being able to describe and to parameterize 

1826: \cite{EBKW} the existing data differentially.

1827: 

1828: In this paper we describe the process of inclusive deep--inelastic

1829: diffractive scattering, being a non--forward process, at large space--like 

1830: momentum transfer using the general light--cone expansion for the 

1831: non--forward case, cf.~[12--14]. As will be shown, the scaling

1832: violations of 

1833: the diffractive structure functions can be described perturbatively in 

1834: this region. We show that the diffractive parton densities can be derived

1835: as a special projection of  two--variable distribution functions 

1836: $f^A(z_+,z_-)$, where $z_+$ and $z_-$ are light--cone momentum fractions;

1837: for other projections in similar cases related to different observables 

1838: see e.g.~[13--15]. In particular we have {\it no need} to

1839: refer to the specific mechanism of the non--perturbative color--singlet 

1840: exchange between the proton and the set of diffractively produced hadrons

1841: and consider instead the expectation values of operators of a given twist

1842: and their anomalous dimensions. In this way we can generalize the analysis 

1843: to operators of higher twist. This formulation is very appropriate for 

1844: potential later studies of the corresponding operator matrix elements with 

1845: the help of lattice techniques similar to the case of deep--inelastic 

1846: scattering \cite{LAT} calculating their Mellin--moments.

1847: 

1848: The paper is organized as follows. In section~2 we consider the Lorentz

1849: structure of the differential cross section for inclusive deep--inelastic 

1850: diffractive scattering. The short--distance structure of the matrix 

1851: element is derived in section~3 using the (non--local) light--cone 

1852: expansion in the generalized Bjorken region. In section~4 we derive the 

1853: anomalous  dimensions for the case of twist--2, discuss the implications 

1854: for higher twist operators and compare the case of diffractive scattering

1855: to that of deep--inelastic scattering, and section~5 contains the

1856: conclusions.

1857: 

1858: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1859: \section{Lorentz Structure}

1860: \vspace*{-5mm}\noindent

1861: %\renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}

1862: %\setcounter{equation}{0}

1863: \label{sec-2}

1864: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1865: 

1866: \vspace{1mm}

1867: \noindent

1868: The process of deep--inelastic diffractive scattering is described by the

1869: diagram Figure~1.

1870: The differential scattering cross section for single--photon 

1871: exchange is given by

1872: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1873: \begin{equation}

1874: \label{eqD1}

1875: d^5 \sigma_{\rm diffr}

1876: = \frac{1}{2(s-M^2)} \frac{1}{4} dPS^{(3)} \sum_{\rm spins}

1877: \frac{e^4}{Q^2} L_{\mu\nu} W^{\mu\nu}~.

1878: \end{equation}

1879: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1880: Here $s=(p_1+l)^2$ is the cms energy of the process squared and $M$ 

1881: denotes the nucleon mass.

1882: 

1883: \vspace*{0.8cm}

1884: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1885: \begin{center}

1886: \begin{picture}(-50,100)(0,0)

1887: \setlength{\unitlength}{0.2mm}

1888: \SetWidth{1.5}

1889: \ArrowLine(-150,100)(-100,100)

1890: \ArrowLine(-100,100)(-50,120)

1891: \Photon(-100,100)(-70,70){5}{5}%

1892: \ArrowLine(-30,30)(0,0)

1893: \ArrowLine(-100,0)(-70,30)

1894: \SetWidth{5}

1895: \ArrowLine(-30,70)(0,100)

1896: \SetWidth{1.5}

1897: \CCirc(-50,50){26}{Black}{Yellow}

1898: \setlength{\unitlength}{1pt}

1899: \Text(-160,110)[]{$l$}

1900: \Text(-40,130)[]{$l'$}

1901: \Text(-90,75)[]{$q$}

1902: \Text(-110,-10)[]{$p_1$}

1903: \Text(10,-10)[]{$p_2$}

1904: \Text(10,110)[]{$M_X$}

1905: \end{picture}

1906: \end{center}

1907: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1908: 

1909: \vspace*{1mm}

1910: \noindent

1911: \begin{center}

1912: {\sf Figure~1:~The virtual photon-hadron amplitude for 

1913: diffractive $ep$ scattering} 

1914: \end{center}

1915: The phase space $dPS^{(3)}$ depends on five variables\footnote{For the

1916: commonly used notation of four variables see e.g.~\cite{MD}.} since one 

1917: final state mass varies. They can be chosen as 

1918: Bjorken~$x= Q^2/(W^2+Q^2-M^2)$, the photon virtuality $Q^2=-q^2$, 

1919: $t = (p_1 - p_2)^2$, a variable describing the non--forwardness w.r.t.

1920: the incoming proton direction,

1921: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1922: \begin{equation}

1923: \label{eqV1}

1924: x_{\PP} = - \frac{2\eta}{1-\eta} = 

1925: \frac{Q^2 + M_X^2 - t}{Q^2 + W^2 -M^2} \geq  x~,

1926: \end{equation}

1927: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1928: demanding $M_X^2 > t$ and where

1929: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1930: \begin{equation}

1931: \label{eqV2}

1932: \eta = \frac{q.(p_2 - p_1)}{q.(p_2+p_1)}~\epsilon~\left[-1,\frac{-x}{2-x}

1933: \right]~,

1934: \end{equation}

1935: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1936: and $\Phi$ the angle between the lepton plane $\pvec_1 \times \lvec$ and

1937: the hadron plane $\pvec_1 \times \pvec_2$,

1938: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1939: \begin{equation}

1940: \label{eqV3}

1941: \cos \Phi = \frac{(\pvec_1 \times \lvec).(\pvec_1 \times  \pvec_2)}

1942:                  {|\pvec_1 \times \lvec ||\pvec_1 \times  \pvec_2|}~.

1943: \end{equation}

1944: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1945: $W^2 = (p_1+q)^2$ and  $M_X^2 = (p_1+q-p_2)^2$ denote the hadronic

1946: mass squared and the square of the diffractive mass, respectively.

1947: 

1948: Unpolarized deep inelastic diffractive scattering was considered in

1949: previous paper~\cite{BR2} in detail. Here we focus on the polarized part 

1950: only, which can be measured in terms of a polarization asymmetry

1951: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1952: \begin{equation}

1953: \label{eqP1}

1954: A(x,Q^2,x_{\PP},S_\mu) = \frac{d^5 \sigma(S_{\mu}) - d^5 \sigma(-S_\mu)}

1955:                               {d^5 \sigma(S_{\mu}) + d^5 \sigma(-S_\mu)}~,

1956: \end{equation}

1957: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1958: where $S_\mu$ is a hadronic spin vector, with $S_1.p_1 = S_2.p_2 = 0$.

1959: Since the cross sections are linear functions in the initial-- and final 

1960: state proton spin--vectors, the denominator projects on the even and the 

1961: numerator on the odd part in $S_\mu$. If the final--state spin remains 

1962: unmeasured, the denominator refers to the unpolarized cross 

1963: section~\cite{BR2}.

1964: 

1965: We consider the case of single photon exchange, which is projected by the

1966: polarized contribution

1967: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1968: \begin{equation}

1969: \label{eqPLE}

1970: L_{\mu\nu}^{\rm pol} = 2i \varepsilon_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma} l^\rho q^\sigma

1971: \end{equation}

1972: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1973: to the leptonic tensor. Since the electromagnetic current is conserved,

1974: the strong interactions conserve parity and are even under 

1975: time--reversal,\footnote{Here we disregard potential contributions due to

1976: strong CP--violation~\cite{THOOFT}, because of the smallness of the 

1977: $\theta$--parameter, $|\theta| < 3 \cdot 10^{-9}$~\cite{THETA}.} 

1978: and the hadronic tensor has to be hermitic due to Eq.~(\ref{eqPLE}), the

1979: following relations hold~\cite{TM}~:

1980: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1981: \begin{equation}

1982: \begin{alignat}{2}

1983: \label{eqP2}

1984: {\sf Current~conservation:}&~~q^{\mu}~W_{\mu\nu}(q,p_1,S_1,p_2,S_2)

1985:  & &=

1986: W_{\mu\nu}(q,p_1,S_1,p_2,S_2)~q^{\nu} = 0~,\\

1987: {\sf P~~invariance:}&~~W_{\mu\nu}(\overline{q},%

1988: \overline{p}_1,-\overline{S}_1,\overline{p}_2,%

1989: -\overline{S}_2) & &=

1990: W^{\mu\nu}(q,p_1,S_1,p_2,S_2)~, \\

1991: {\sf T~~invariance:}&~~W_{\mu\nu}(\overline{q},%

1992: \overline{p}_1,-\overline{S}_1,\overline{p}_2,-\overline{S}_2) & &=

1993: \left[W^{\mu\nu}(q,p_1,S_1,p_2,S_2)\right]^*, \\

1994: {\sf Hermiticity:}&~~W_{\mu\nu}(q,p_1,S_1,p_2,S_2)

1995: & &=  

1996: \left[W_{\nu\mu}(q,p_1,S_1,p_2,S_2)\right]^*,

1997: \end{alignat}

1998: \end{equation}

1999: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2000: with $\overline{a}_\mu = a^{\mu}$. Constructing the hadronic tensor we 

2001: seek a structure which is linear in the initial and final proton spin.

2002: Upon noting that

2003: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2004: \begin{eqnarray}

2005: \label{eqP3}

2006: \varepsilon^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta} = - \varepsilon_{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}

2007: \end{eqnarray}

2008: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2009: the terms which depend either on $S_{1\mu}$ or on $S_{2\mu}$ have to 

2010: occur together with the Levi--Civita pseudo--tensor, whereas separate 

2011: terms $\propto S_{1\mu} S_{2\nu}$ are possible.

2012: The most general asymmetric parity--conserving hadronic tensor, which

2013: obeys current conservation, is\footnote{A sub-set of this structure based

2014: on $p,q$ and $S$ was considered in Ref.~\cite{DJT}.}

2015: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2016: \begin{eqnarray}

2017: \label{eqP4}

2018: W_{\mu\nu}^{\rm pol} &=&

2019: ~~i \varepsilon_{\mu\nu\alpha\beta} S_1^\alpha q^\beta H_1

2020: + i \varepsilon_{\mu\nu\alpha\beta} S_2^\alpha q^\beta H_2 \nonumber\\

2021: & & + i \varepsilon_{\mu\nu\alpha\beta} p_1^\alpha q_\beta \left[

2022: S_1.q H_3 + S_1.p_2 H_4 + S_2.q H_5 + S_2.p_1 H_6 \right] \nonumber\\

2023: & & + i \varepsilon_{\mu\nu\alpha\beta} p_2^\alpha q^\beta \left[

2024: S_1.q H_7 + S_1.p_2 H_8 + S_2.q H_9 + S_2.p_1 H_{10} \right] 

2025: \end{eqnarray}

2026: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2027: Other terms as

2028: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2029: \begin{eqnarray}

2030: \label{eqP5}

2031: V_{\mu\nu} &=&~~

2032:  i \left[

2033: q^2 \varepsilon_{\mu\nu\alpha\beta} S_k^\alpha v_1^\beta

2034: + q_\mu \varepsilon_{\nu\rho\alpha\beta} q^\rho S_k^\alpha v_1^\beta

2035: - q_\nu \varepsilon_{\mu\rho\alpha\beta} q^\rho S_k^\alpha v_1^\beta

2036: \right] \widetilde{H}_{1}^k \nonumber\\  & &

2037: + i \left[

2038: q^2 \varepsilon_{\mu\nu\alpha\beta} v_1^\alpha v_2^\beta

2039: + q_\mu \varepsilon_{\nu\rho\alpha\beta} q^\rho v_1^\alpha v_2^\beta

2040: - q_\nu \varepsilon_{\mu\rho\alpha\beta} q^\rho v_1^\alpha v_2^\beta

2041: \right] S_k.v_3 \widetilde{H}_{2}^k~ \nonumber\\ & &

2042: + i \left[\tilde{u}_{3\mu} \varepsilon_{\nu\rho\alpha\beta} q^\rho

2043: -         \tilde{u}_{3\nu} \varepsilon_{\mu\rho\alpha\beta} \right]

2044: q^\rho u_1^\alpha u_2^\beta u_4.u_5 \widetilde{H}_3(u_k|_{k=1}^5)~,

2045: \end{eqnarray}

2046: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2047: with

2048: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2049: \begin{eqnarray}

2050: \label{eqPTE}

2051: \tilde{u}_\mu = u_k - \frac{q.u_k}{q^2} q_\mu~,

2052: \end{eqnarray}

2053: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2054: and $v_1 \neq q$, $v_k|_{k=1}^3~\epsilon~{p_1,p_2}$ leaving out the 

2055: combinations where $v_3 = p_k$, and $u_k~\epsilon~\{q,p_1,p_2,S_1,S_2\}$

2056: such that only one spin vector occurs, reduce in 4--dimensions

2057: to the structures contained already in Eq.~(\ref{eqP5}) using

2058: the Schouten--idendity~\cite{SCHOUT}

2059: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2060: \begin{eqnarray}

2061: \label{eqP6}

2062: X_\mu \varepsilon_{\nu\rho\sigma\tau} =

2063: X_\nu \varepsilon_{\mu\rho\sigma\tau} +

2064: X_\rho \varepsilon_{\nu\mu\sigma\tau} +

2065: X_\sigma \varepsilon_{\nu\rho\mu\tau} +

2066: X_\tau \varepsilon_{\nu\rho\sigma\mu}~.

2067: \end{eqnarray}

2068: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2069: The structure functions $H_i|_{i=1}^{10}$ are chosen to be real.

2070: Therefore one finally may 

2071: parameterize the hadronic tensor in terms of the two structure functions 

2072: $G_1$ and $G_2$ only

2073: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2074: \begin{eqnarray}

2075: \label{eqP8}

2076: W_{\mu\nu}^{\rm pol} &=& i \varepsilon^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta} S_\alpha

2077: q_\beta~G_1 

2078: + i \varepsilon^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta} p_\alpha q_\beta~S.q~G_2~.

2079: \end{eqnarray}

2080: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2081: with

2082: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2083: \begin{equation}

2084: \label{eqD3}

2085: G_i = G_i(x,Q^2,x_{\PP},t)~.

2086: \end{equation}

2087: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2088: The size of the rapidity--gap \cite{RAPGA} is of the order

2089: $\Delta y \sim \ln(1/x_{\PP})$ and large in the kinematic domain of the 

2090: facilities envisaged for the future~\cite{SXPOL}.

2091: 

2092: If target masses can be neglected, $M^2 \sim 0$, and $t$ is considered

2093: to be very small, the in-- and outgoing proton four--momenta become 

2094: proportional,~$p_2 = z p_1$, where

2095: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2096: \begin{equation}

2097: \label{eqD4}

2098: z = 1 - x_{\PP} =  \frac{1 + \eta}{1 - \eta}~.

2099: \end{equation}

2100: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2101: In this limit the polarized

2102: hadronic tensor is described by two structure functions

2103: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2104: \begin{eqnarray}

2105: \label{eqP9}

2106: W_{\mu\nu}^{\rm pol} &=& i \varepsilon_{\mu\nu\alpha\beta} q^\alpha

2107: \left\{S_1^\beta \left[G_{11}+G_{21}\right]

2108: + S_2^\beta \left[G_{12}+G_{22}\right] \right\}

2109: - i \varepsilon_{\mu\nu\alpha\beta} q^\alpha

2110: \left\{\left(\frac{S_1.q}{p_1.q}\right)p_1^\beta G_{21}

2111: + \left(\frac{S_2.q}{p_.q}\right)p_2^\beta G_{22} \right\}~,

2112: \end{eqnarray}

2113: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2114: where

2115: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2116: \begin{eqnarray}

2117: \label{eqD6}

2118: G_{11} &=& H_1-G_{21}\\

2119: G_{12} &=& H_2-G_{22}\\

2120: G_{21} &=& H_3+(1-x_{\PP} H_7\\

2121: G_{22} &=& H_5+(1-x_{\PP} H_9

2122: \end{eqnarray}

2123: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2124: Although in this limit the hadronic tensor is structurally the same as

2125: for the deep inelastic process the dependence of $\eta$, resp. $x_{\PP}$,

2126: points to the non--forwardness on the side of the initial and final

2127: state proton.

2128: 

2129: For the present process we will consider  a limit, similar to the

2130: Bjorken limit,

2131: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2132: \begin{eqnarray}

2133: \label{eqBL}

2134: p_1.q  \rightarrow \infty,~~~~~p_2.q \rightarrow \infty,~~~~~

2135: Q^2 \rightarrow \infty~~~{\rm with}~~x~~{\rm and}~~x_{\PP} =~{\rm fixed}~,

2136: \end{eqnarray}

2137: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2138: which leads to

2139: $p_i.q G_{ki}(x,Q^2,x_{\PP}) \rightarrow g_{ki}^D(x,Q^2,x_{\PP})$.

2140: Let us consider the case in which the spin of the final--state proton

2141: is summed over. This removes all contributions $\propto S_{2\mu}$ from

2142: $W_{\mu\nu}^{\rm pol}$.

2143: The initial proton polarization vector may be choosen either

2144: longitudinal or transversal to the momentum $p_1$,

2145: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2146: \begin{eqnarray}

2147: \label{eqSPI}

2148: S_L = (0,0,0,M),~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~S_T=M(0,\cos\alpha,\sin\alpha,0)~.

2149: \end{eqnarray}

2150: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2151: The corresponding differential scattering cross sections read~\cite{BT}

2152: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2153: \begin{eqnarray}

2154: \label{eqPS1}

2155: \frac{d^3 \sigma_{\rm diffr}^{\rm pol}(\lambda,\pm S_L)}

2156: {dx dQ^2 d x_{\PP}}

2157: &=& \pm \lambda \frac{4 \pi \alpha^2}

2158: {x Q^4} \left[y \left(2 - y - \frac{2xyM^2}{S}\right) 

2159: xg_1^D(x,Q^2,x_{\PP})

2160: + 4 \frac{x^2 y M^2}{S} g_2^D(x,Q^2,x_{\PP})\right]\nonumber\\ \\

2161: %-------

2162: \label{eqPS2}

2163: \frac{d^4 \sigma_{\rm diffr}^{\rm pol}(\lambda,\pm S_T)}

2164: {dx dQ^2 d \phi d x_{\PP}}

2165: &=& \mp \lambda \frac{4 \alpha^2}

2166: {x Q^4} \sqrt{\frac{M^2}{S}}\sqrt{xy\left[1 - y - \frac{xyM^2}{S}\right]

2167: } \cos(\alpha - \phi) \nonumber\\ & &~~~~~~~~~\times

2168: \left[yx g_1^D(x,Q^2,x_{\PP}) +

2169: 2 x g_2^D(x,Q^2,x_{\PP}) \right]~,

2170: \end{eqnarray}

2171: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2172: with $y = q.p_1/l.p_1$ and $\phi$ the azimuthal scattering angle.

2173: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2174: \section{The Compton Amplitude}

2175: %\renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}

2176: %\setcounter{equation}{0}

2177: \label{sec-3}

2178: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2179: 

2180: \vspace{1mm}

2181: \noindent

2182: The renormalized and time--ordered product of two electromagnetic

2183: currents is given by

2184: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2185: \begin{eqnarray}

2186: \widehat{T}_{\mu\nu}(x) &=&

2187: i RT \left[J_\mu\left(\frac{x}{2}\right)J_\nu\left(-\frac{x}{2}\right) S 

2188: \right] \nonumber\\

2189: &=&

2190:  -e^2 \frac{\tilde x^\lambda}{2 \pi^2 (x^2-i\epsilon)^2}

2191:  RT

2192:  \left[

2193: \overline{\psi}

2194: \left(\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)

2195: \gamma^\mu \gamma^\lambda \gamma^\nu \psi

2196: \left(-\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)

2197: - \overline{\psi}

2198: \left(-\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)

2199: \gamma^\mu \gamma^\lambda \gamma^\nu \psi

2200: \left(\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)

2201: \right] S

2202: \end{eqnarray}

2203: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2204: $\tilde x$ denotes a light--like vector corresponding to $x$,

2205: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2206: \begin{eqnarray}

2207: \label{xtil}

2208: \tilde x = x + \frac{\zeta}{\zeta^2}\left[ \sqrt{x.\zeta^2 - x^2 \zeta^2}

2209: - x.\zeta\right]~,

2210: \end{eqnarray}

2211: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2212: and $\zeta$ is a subsidiary vector. Following Refs.~\cite{BGR,BR} the

2213: operator $\widehat{T}_{\mu\nu}$ can be expressed in terms of a vector

2214: and an axial--vector operator by

2215: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2216: \begin{eqnarray}

2217:  \widehat{T}_{\mu\nu}(x)  =

2218:  - e^2 \frac{\tilde x^\lambda}{i \pi^2 (x^2-i\epsilon)^2}

2219:  \left[S_{\alpha \mu\lambda \nu} 

2220:  O^\alpha\left(\frac{\tilde x}{2}, -\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)

2221: +i \varepsilon_{\mu\lambda \nu \sigma} 

2222: O_5^\alpha  \left(\frac{\tilde x}{2}, -\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)

2223: \right]~,

2224: \end{eqnarray}

2225: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2226: where

2227: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2228: \begin{eqnarray}

2229: S_{\alpha \mu\lambda \nu} = g_{\alpha\mu}g_{\lambda \nu}

2230:                           + g_{\lambda\mu}g_{\alpha \nu}

2231:                           - g_{\mu\nu}g_{\lambda \alpha}~.

2232: \end{eqnarray}

2233: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2234: The  bilocal light--ray operators are

2235: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2236: \begin{eqnarray}

2237: \label{oo}

2238: O^{\alpha}\left(\frac{\tilde x}{2},-\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)

2239: &=&

2240: \frac{i}{2}RT

2241: \left[\overline{\psi}\left(\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)

2242: \gamma^\alpha\psi\left(-\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)

2243: - \overline{\psi}\left(-\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)

2244: \gamma^\alpha\psi\left(\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)\right]S~,

2245: \\

2246: \label{oo5}

2247: O^{\alpha}_5\left(\frac{\tilde x}{2},-\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)

2248: &=&

2249: \frac{i}{2} RT

2250: \left[\overline{\psi}\left(\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)

2251: \gamma_5\gamma^\alpha\psi\left(-\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)

2252: + \overline{\psi}\left(-\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)

2253: \gamma_5\gamma^\alpha\psi\left(\frac{\tilde x}{2}\right)\right]S~.

2254: \end{eqnarray}

2255: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2256: The general operator $\widehat{T}_{\mu\nu}$ is now to be related to the

2257: diffractive scattering cross section. This is possible upon applying

2258: Mueller's generalized optical theorem~\cite{AHM} (Figure~2), which

2259: moves the final state proton into an initial state anti-proton.

2260: 

2261: \vspace*{7mm}

2262: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2263: \begin{center}

2264: \begin{picture}(200,100)(0,0)

2265: \setlength{\unitlength}{0.2mm}

2266: \SetWidth{1.5}

2267: \Line(-107,102)(-107,-2)

2268: \Line(7,102)(7,-2)

2269: \Photon(-100,100)(-70,70){5}{5}

2270: \ArrowLine(-30,30)(0,0)

2271: \ArrowLine(-100,0)(-70,30)

2272: \SetWidth{5}

2273: \ArrowLine(-30,70)(0,100)

2274: \SetWidth{1.5}

2275: \CCirc(-50,50){26}{Black}{Yellow}

2276: \setlength{\unitlength}{1pt}

2277: \Text(15,107)[]{\large $2$}

2278: \Text(50,50)[]{\large $=~~{\rm Disc}$}

2279: \Text(-105,115)[]{$q$}

2280: \Text(-105,-15)[]{$p_1$}

2281: \Text(5,-15)[]{$p_2$}

2282: \Text(75,115)[]{$q$}

2283: \Text(75,-15)[]{$p_1$}

2284: \Text(95,-15)[]{$p_2$}

2285: \Text(60,35)[]{$X$}

2286: \Text(175,20)[]{$X$}

2287: \Text(275,115)[]{$q$}

2288: \Text(275,-15)[]{$p_1$}

2289: \Text(255,-15)[]{$p_2$}

2290: \setlength{\unitlength}{0.2mm}

2291: \SetWidth{1.5}

2292: \Photon(80,100)(110,70){5}{5}

2293: \ArrowLine(80,0)(110,30)

2294: \ArrowLine(130,30)(100,0)

2295: \Line(150,50)(200,50)

2296: \Line(150,45)(200,45)

2297: \Line(150,55)(200,55)

2298: \Line(150,40)(200,40)

2299: \Line(150,60)(200,60)

2300: \ArrowLine(240,30)(270,0)

2301: \ArrowLine(250,0)(220,30)

2302: \CCirc(130,50){26}{Black}{Yellow}

2303: \CCirc(220,50){26}{Black}{Yellow}

2304: \Photon(240,70)(270,100){5}{5}

2305: \end{picture}

2306: \end{center}

2307: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2308: 

2309: \vspace*{10mm}\noindent

2310: \begin{center}

2311: {\sf Figure~2:~A. Mueller's optical theorem.}

2312: \end{center}

2313: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2314: Consequently, the Compton amplitude is obtained as the expectation value

2315: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2316: \begin{eqnarray}

2317: T_{\mu\nu}(x) = \langle p_1,-p_2|\widehat{T}_{\mu\nu}|p_1,-p_2\rangle~,

2318: \end{eqnarray}

2319: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2320: which is forward w.r.t. to the direction defined by the state 

2321: $\langle p_1,-p_2|$.

2322: The twist--2 contributions to the expectation values of the operators 

2323: (\ref{oo},\ref{oo5})  are obtained

2324: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2325: \begin{eqnarray}

2326: \label{eqSCA}

2327: \langle p_1,-p_2|O^{A,\mu}_{(5)}(\kappa_+ \xx,\kappa_-\xx)|

2328: p_1,-p_2\rangle = \left.

2329: \int_0^1 d\lambda

2330: \partial^{\mu}_x

2331: \langle p_1,-p_2|O_{(5)}^A(\lambda \kappa_+ x,\lambda \kappa_-x)

2332: |p_1,-p_2\rangle \right|_{x=\xx}

2333: \end{eqnarray}

2334: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2335: as partial derivatives of the expectation values of

2336: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2337: \begin{eqnarray}

2338: O^A(\kappa_+x,\kappa_-x)

2339: = x^\alpha O^A_\alpha(\kappa_+x,\kappa_-x)

2340: \end{eqnarray}

2341: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2342: the corresponding scalar and pseudo-scalar operators. The index $A = q,G$

2343: labels the quark-- or gluon operators, cf.~\cite{BGR}. In the unpolarized 

2344: case only the vector operators contribute. The scalar twist--2 quark

2345: operator

2346: matrix element has the representation\footnote{For parameterizing hadronic

2347: matrix elements see e.g.~\cite{PARA}.} due to the overall symmetry in $x$

2348: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2349: \begin{eqnarray}

2350: \label{eqSCAM}

2351: \langle p_1,-p_2|O^q(\kappa_+ x,\kappa_- x)|p_1,-p_2\rangle = xp_-

2352: \!\!\!         \int \!\!\!

2353: Dz ~\e^{-i \kappa_- x p_z} {f}^q(z_+,z_-)

2354: + x\pi_-\!\!\!         \int \!\!\!

2355: Dz ~\e^{-i \kappa_- x p_z} {f}^q_\pi(z_+,z_-),

2356: %\hspace*{11.2cm} (21)  \nonumber

2357: \end{eqnarray}

2358: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2359: where we assume that all the trace--terms have been subtracted, see

2360: \cite{BGR}.

2361: ${f}^A(z_+,z_-)$ and $f^A_\pi(z_+,z_-)$ denote the scalar 

2362: two--variable distribution amplitudes and the measure $Dz$ is

2363: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2364: \begin{eqnarray}

2365: \label{Dz}

2366: Dz = d z_+ d z_-

2367: \theta(1 + z_+ + z_-) \theta(1 + z_+ - z_-)

2368: \theta(1 - z_+ + z_-) \theta(1 - z_+ - z_-)~.

2369: \end{eqnarray}

2370: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2371: Here, we decomposed the vector $p_z$ as

2372: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2373: \begin{eqnarray}

2374: p_z = p_- z_- + p_+ z_+ =  p_- \vartheta + \pi_- z_+~,

2375: \end{eqnarray}

2376: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2377: with $z_{1,2}$ momentum fractions along $p_{1,2}$ and $p_{\pm} = p_2 \pm

2378: p_1$, $z_\pm = (z_2 \pm z_1)/2$ and

2379: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2380: \begin{eqnarray}

2381: \vartheta = z_- + \frac{1}{\eta} z_+,~~~~~~~~~~~~~\pi_-

2382: = p_+ - \frac{1}{\eta} p_-~.

2383: \end{eqnarray}

2384: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2385: Note that, $q.\pi_- \equiv 0$. In the approximation $M^2, t \sim 0$, in 

2386: which we work from now on, the vector $\pi_-$ vanishes.

2387: In this limit only the first term contributes to the matrix element

2388: Eq.~(\ref{eqSCAM}).

2389: 

2390: The Fourier--transform of the Compton amplitude is given by~\cite{BR}

2391: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2392: \begin{eqnarray}

2393: T_{\mu\nu}(p_1,p_2,q) &=& i \int d^4x \e^{iqx} T_{\mu\nu}(x) \nonumber\\

2394: &=& - 2 S_{\rho\mu\sigma\nu} \int Dz \left[

2395: \frac{p_-^{\rho} Q_z^{\sigma}}{Q^2_z + i\varepsilon} - \frac{1}{2}

2396: \frac{p_z^{\rho} p_-^{\sigma}}{Q^2_z + i\varepsilon}%

2397: + \frac{Q_z.p_-}{(Q^2_z+i\varepsilon)^2}

2398: p_z^{\rho} Q_z^{\sigma}\right] F(z_+,z_-)~,

2399: \end{eqnarray}

2400: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2401: with $Q_z = q - p_z/2$. The function $F(z_+,z_-)$ is related to the

2402: distribution function $f(z_+,z_-)$ by

2403: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2404: \begin{eqnarray}

2405: F(z_+,z_-) = \int_0^1 \frac{d\lambda}{\lambda^2} 

2406: f\left(\frac{z_+}{\lambda},\frac{z_-}{\lambda}\right)

2407: \theta(\lambda-|z_+|)\theta(\lambda-|z_-|)~.

2408: \end{eqnarray}

2409: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2410: The denominators take the form

2411: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2412: \begin{eqnarray}

2413: \frac{1}{Q^2_z+i\varepsilon} = - \frac{1}{qp_-}\frac{1}{(\vartheta

2414: - 2\beta  + i \varepsilon)}~,

2415: \end{eqnarray}

2416: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2417: where

2418: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2419: \begin{eqnarray}

2420: \beta =  \frac{x}{x_{\PP}} = \frac{q^2}{2q.p_-}~.

2421: \end{eqnarray}

2422: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2423: The conservation of the electromagnetic current is easily seen

2424: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2425: \begin{eqnarray}

2426: q^{\mu}T_{\mu\nu}(p_1,p_2,q)  =

2427: q^\nu T_{\mu\nu}(p_1,p_2,q)  =

2428: - 2 p_{-,\nu(\mu)} \int Dz F(z_+,z_-) = 0~,

2429: \end{eqnarray}

2430: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2431: since the symmetry relation, \cite{BR},

2432: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2433: \begin{eqnarray}

2434: \int Dz F(z_+,z_-) = 0~,  

2435: \end{eqnarray}

2436: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2437: holds.

2438: Subsequently we will use the distribution

2439: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2440: \begin{eqnarray}

2441: \label{eqFF}

2442: \widehat{F}(\vartheta,\eta) = \int Dz F(z_+,z_-) 

2443: \delta(\vartheta - z_- -z_+/\eta) = \int_\vartheta^{-{\rm sign}(\vartheta)

2444: /\eta} \frac{dz}{z} \widehat{f}(z,\eta)~.

2445: \end{eqnarray}

2446: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2447: The distribution function $\widehat{f}(z,\eta)$ is related to 

2448: $f(z_+,z_-)$ by

2449: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2450: \begin{eqnarray}

2451: \label{eqFF1}

2452: \widehat{f}(z,\eta) = \int^{\eta(1-z)}_{\eta(1+z)} d\rho~

2453: \theta(1-\rho) \theta(\rho+1) f(\rho,z-\rho/\eta)~,

2454: \end{eqnarray}

2455: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2456: with $\rho = z_+/\eta$.

2457: 

2458: The Compton amplitude may be re-written as

2459: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2460: \begin{eqnarray}

2461: \label{eqCOMP1}

2462: T_{\mu\nu}(p_1,p_2,q) &=& 

2463: -2 \int_{+1/\eta}^{-1/\eta} d\vartheta \Biggl\{

2464: \left[-q.p_- g_{\mu\nu}

2465: -2\vartheta p_{-,\mu} p_{-,\nu} + (p_{-,\mu}q_\nu +p_{-,\nu} q_\mu)\right]

2466: \frac{1}{Q_z^2+i\varepsilon} \nonumber\\

2467: & & ~~~~+ \left[\vartheta (q_\mu p_{-,\nu} + q_\nu p_{-,\mu}) - \vartheta

2468: q.p_- g_{\mu\nu} - \vartheta^2 p_{-,\mu} p_{-,\nu} \right]\frac{1}

2469: {(Q_z^2+i\varepsilon)^2}\Biggr\} \nonumber\\

2470: & &~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

2471: \times \int_\vartheta^{-{\rm sign}(\vartheta)/\eta}\frac{dz}{z}

2472: \widehat{f}(z,\eta)~.

2473: \end{eqnarray}

2474: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2475: The $\vartheta$--integrals in Eq.~(\ref{eqCOMP1}) can be simplified

2476: using the identities

2477: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2478: \begin{eqnarray}

2479: \int_{+1/\eta}^{-1/\eta} d\vartheta \frac{\vartheta^k}

2480: {(\vartheta-2\beta+i\varepsilon)^2}\int_\vartheta^{{\rm sign}(\vartheta)

2481: /\eta} \frac{dz}{z} \widehat{f}(z,\eta)

2482: &=&

2483: \int_{+1/\eta}^{-1/\eta} d\vartheta \frac{k \vartheta^{k-1}}

2484: {(\vartheta-2\beta+i\varepsilon)}\int_\vartheta^{{\rm sign}(\vartheta)

2485: /\eta} \frac{dz}{z} \widehat{f}(z,\eta) \nonumber\\    & &

2486: ~~~~~~~-\int_{+1/\eta}^{-1/\eta} d\vartheta \frac{\vartheta^{k-1}

2487: \widehat{f}(\vartheta,\eta)}

2488: {(\vartheta-2\beta+i\varepsilon)}~.

2489: \end{eqnarray}

2490: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2491: One may further re-write Eq.~(\ref{eqCOMP1}) referring to $p_1$ instead

2492: of $p_-$,

2493: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2494: \begin{eqnarray}

2495: \label{eqCOMP2}

2496: T_{\mu\nu}(p_1,p_2,q) &=& 

2497: 2 \int_{+1/\eta}^{-1/\eta} d\vartheta

2498: \left[-g_{\mu\nu} 

2499: + \frac{p_{1,\mu}q_\nu +p_{1\nu} q_\mu)}{q.p_1}

2500: +\vartheta  x_{\PP} \frac{p_{1\mu} p_{1\nu}}{q.p_1}\right]

2501: \frac{\widehat{f}(\vartheta,\eta)}{(\vartheta - 2\beta +i\varepsilon)}~.

2502: \end{eqnarray}

2503: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2504: Before we consider the absorptive part of the Compton amplitude

2505: we exploit the symmetry relation for the unpolarized distribution 

2506: functions  $F^A(z_1,z_2)$, Ref.~\cite{BR},

2507: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2508: \begin{eqnarray}

2509: \label{eqSYM1}

2510: F^A(z_1,z_2) = - F^A(-z_1,-z_2)~.

2511: \end{eqnarray}

2512: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2513: It translates into

2514: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2515: \begin{eqnarray}

2516: \label{eqSYM2}

2517: \widehat{F}^A(\vartheta,\eta) = - \widehat{F}^A(-\vartheta,\eta)~,

2518: \end{eqnarray}

2519: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2520: and, cf. Eq.~(\ref{eqFF}),

2521: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2522: \begin{eqnarray}

2523: \label{eqSYM3}

2524: \widehat{f}^A(\vartheta,\eta) = - \widehat{f}^A(-\vartheta,\eta)~.

2525: \end{eqnarray}

2526: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2527: Seeking the form of Eq.~(\ref{eqD5}), Eq.~(\ref{eqCOMP2}) transforms to

2528: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2529: \begin{eqnarray}

2530: \label{eqCOMP3}

2531: T_{\mu\nu}(p_1,p_2,q) &=& \int_{1/\eta}^{-1/\eta} d\vartheta \left[

2532: \left(-g_{\mu\nu} +\frac{q_\mu q_\nu}{q^2}\right) + \frac{2x}{q.p_1}

2533: \left(p_{1\mu} - q_\mu \frac{p_1.q}{q^2}\right)

2534: \left(p_{1\nu} - q_\nu \frac{p_1.q}{q^2}\right) \right] \nonumber\\

2535: & &~~~~~~~~~~\times

2536: \left[\frac{\widehat{f}(\vartheta,\eta)}

2537: {\vartheta - 2 \beta + i\varepsilon}

2538: -

2539: \frac{\widehat{f}(-\vartheta,\eta)}

2540: {\vartheta - 2 \beta + i\varepsilon}\right]\nonumber\\

2541: & & ~~~~~~~~~~~+ 2\frac{p_{1\mu} p_{1\nu}}{q.p_1}

2542: \int_{1/\eta}^{-1/\eta}

2543: d\vartheta \left(\vartheta x_{\PP} - 2x

2544: \right) \frac{\widehat{f}(\vartheta,\eta)}{\vartheta - 2\beta + 

2545: i \varepsilon}~.

2546: \end{eqnarray}

2547: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2548: Taking the absorptive part one obtains

2549: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2550: \begin{eqnarray}

2551: \label{eqIMPAR}

2552: W_{\mu\nu} &=& \frac{1}{2\pi}~{\sf Im}~T_{\mu\nu}(p_1,p_2,q) \\

2553:            &=&       

2554: \left(-g_{\mu\nu} +\frac{q_\mu q_\nu}{q^2}\right) 

2555: {\sf F}_1(\beta,\eta,Q^2)

2556: + \frac{1}{q.p_1}

2557: \left(p_{1\mu} - q_\mu \frac{p_1.q}{q^2}\right)

2558: \left(p_{1\nu} - q_\nu \frac{p_1.q}{q^2}\right) 

2559: {\sf F}_2(\beta,\eta,Q^2) \nonumber

2560: \end{eqnarray}

2561: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2562: where

2563: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2564: \begin{eqnarray}

2565: \label{eqF1}

2566: {\sf F}_1(\beta,\eta,Q^2) = \sum_{q=1}^{N_f} 

2567: e_q^2\left[f_q^D(\beta,Q^2,x_{\PP})+\overline{f}_q^D(\beta,Q^2,x_{\PP})

2568: \right]

2569: \equiv  F_1^{D(3)}(x,Q^2,x_{\PP})~,

2570: \end{eqnarray}

2571: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2572: with $N_f$ the number of flavors, choosing the factorization scale

2573: $\mu^2 = Q^2$, and

2574: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2575: \begin{eqnarray}

2576: \label{eqCG}

2577: {\sf F}_2(\beta,\eta,Q^2) = 2x {\sf F}_1(\beta,\eta,Q^2) \equiv

2578: F_2^{D(3)}(x,Q^2,x_{\PP}).

2579: \end{eqnarray}

2580: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2581: If we compare the distribution functions $f_A^{D}$ with the parton

2582: distributions in the deep inelastic case, the role of $x$ in the latter

2583: case is taken by the variable $\beta$. Both variables have the range

2584: $[0,1]$, through which Mellin transforms w.r.t. these variables can

2585: be evaluated. On the contrary, the support in $x$ of the diffractive

2586: structure functions is limited to $[0,x_{\PP}]$. Although $\beta$ in the

2587: diffractive case compares to $x$ in the deep inelastic case, the 

2588: Callan--Gross relation, at lowest order in $\alpha_s$, Eq.~(\ref{eqCG}), 

2589: is given by the factor $2x$ between the two structure functions. 

2590: 

2591: The diffractive quark and anti--quark densities are given by

2592: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2593: \begin{eqnarray}

2594: \label{eqPART}

2595: \sum_{q=1}^{N_f} e_q^2 f_q^D(\beta,Q^2,x_{\PP}) &=&

2596: -\widehat{f}(2\beta,\eta,Q^2) \nonumber\\

2597: \sum_{q=1}^{N_f} e_q^2 \overline{f}_q^D(\beta,Q^2,x_{\PP}) &=&

2598: ~~\widehat{f}(-2\beta,\eta,Q^2)~.

2599: \end{eqnarray}

2600: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2601: We finally can express the diffractive parton densities in terms of

2602: the distribution function $f(z_+,z_-)$ directly

2603: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2604: \begin{eqnarray}

2605: \label{eqREL}

2606: f^D(\beta,Q^2,x_{\PP}) &=& - \int_{-\frac{x_{\PP}+2x}{2-x_{\PP}}}

2607:                               ^{-\frac{x_{\PP}-2x}{2-x_{\PP}}}

2608: d \rho f(\rho,2\beta + \rho(2-x_{\PP})/x_{\PP},Q^2)\nonumber\\

2609: \overline{f}^D(\beta,Q^2,x_{\PP}) &=& 

2610: - \int_{-\frac{x_{\PP}+2x}{2-x_{\PP}}}

2611:                               ^{-\frac{x_{\PP}-2x}{2-x_{\PP}}}

2612: d \rho f(\rho,-2\beta + \rho(2-x_{\PP})/x_{\PP},Q^2)~.

2613: \end{eqnarray}

2614: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2615: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2616: \section{Evolution Equations}

2617: %\renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}

2618: %\setcounter{equation}{0}

2619: \label{sec-4}

2620: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2621: 

2622: \vspace{1mm}

2623: \noindent

2624: The evolution equation of the scalar twist--2 quark and gluon operator 

2625: Eq.~(\ref{eqSCA}) read, cf.~\cite{BGR},\footnote{The non--singlet

2626: evolution equations are structurally the same as that with the

2627: anomalous dimension $\gamma^{qq}$.}

2628: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2629: \begin{eqnarray}

2630: \mu^2 \frac{d}{d\mu^2} O^A(\kappa_+\xx, \kappa_-\xx; \mu^2) =

2631: \int D\kappa' \gamma^{AB}(\kappa_+,\kappa_-,\kappa_+',\kappa_-';\mu^2)

2632: O_B(\kappa_+'\xx,\kappa_-'\xx;\mu^2)~,

2633: \end{eqnarray}

2634: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2635: with $\kappa_\pm =(\kappa_2 - \kappa_1)/2$ and the measure

2636: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2637: \begin{eqnarray}

2638: D\kappa =   d\kappa_+ d\kappa_- \theta(1+\kappa_+ + \kappa_-)

2639:                                 \theta(1+\kappa_+ - \kappa_-)

2640:                                 \theta(1-\kappa_+ + \kappa_-)

2641:                                 \theta(1-\kappa_+ - \kappa_-)~.

2642: \end{eqnarray}

2643: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2644: We consider the non--forward evolution equations to trace an eventual

2645: $\eta$--dependence.

2646: Here $\gamma^{AB}(\kappa_+,\kappa_-,\kappa_+',\kappa_-',\mu^2)$ is the

2647: general non--forward twist--2 singlet evolution 

2648: matrix.~\footnote{The leading order and next--to--leading

2649: order non--singlet and singlet anomalous dimensions were calculated in

2650: Refs.~\cite{NFLO,RAD} and \cite{NFNLO}.}

2651: The same evolution

2652: equation applies to the matrix elements

2653: $\langle p_1,-p_2|O^A(\kappa_+,\kappa_-)|p_1,-p_2\rangle$, which may be

2654: related to the distribution functions $f^A(\vartheta,\eta)$ 

2655: by\footnote{Note that the we identified here $\tau = \xx.p_-/\xx.p_+$

2656: with $\eta = q.p_-/q.p_+$ which is possible after the Bjorken limit is

2657: taken.}

2658: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2659: \begin{eqnarray}

2660: \label{eqFOU}

2661: f^A(\vartheta,\eta) = \int \frac{d\kappa_- \xx p_-}{2\pi}~\e^{i\kappa_-%

2662: \xx p_- \vartheta}

2663: \langle p_1,-p_2|O^A(\kappa_+,\kappa_-)|p_1,-p_2\rangle 

2664: (\xx p_-)^{1-d_A}~,

2665: \end{eqnarray}

2666: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2667: where $d_q=1$ and $d_G=2$. Eq.~(\ref{eqFOU}) and the inverse Fourier 

2668: transform

2669: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2670: \begin{eqnarray}

2671: \label{eqFOUI}

2672: \langle p_1,-p_2|O^A(\kappa_+,\kappa_-)|p_1,-p_2\rangle (\xx p_-)^{1-d_A}

2673: = \int_{1/\eta}^{-1/\eta}

2674: d\vartheta'~\e^{-i\kappa_-' \xx p_- \vartheta'} f^A(\vartheta',\eta)

2675: \end{eqnarray}

2676: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2677: are used to obtain evolution equations for $f^A(\vartheta,\eta;\mu^2)$.

2678: To perform the $\kappa_-$--integral the dependence on this variable has 

2679: to be made explicit in the anomalous dimensions $\gamma^{AB}$ to all

2680: orders. The scalar operator matrix elements, Eq.~(\ref{eqSCAM}), do not 

2681: depend  on the light cone mark $\kappa_+$ due to translation invariance 

2682: on the  light--cone, which therefore can be set to zero in 

2683: Eq.~(\ref{eqEV1}). Furthermore, the anomalous dimension $\gamma^{AB}$ 

2684: obeys the re-scaling relation, cf.~\cite{BGR},

2685: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2686: \begin{eqnarray}

2687: \label{eqresc}

2688: \gamma^{AB}(\kappa_+,\kappa_-,\kappa_+',\kappa_-';\mu^2) = \sigma^{d_{AB}}

2689: \gamma^{AB}(\sigma\kappa_+, \sigma\kappa_-,\sigma\kappa_+',

2690: \sigma\kappa_-')~,

2691: \end{eqnarray}

2692: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2693: with $d_{AB} = 2 + d_A - d_B$. The anomalous dimension transforms to

2694: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2695: \begin{eqnarray}

2696: \label{eqAN1}

2697: \int D\kappa'~\kappa_-^{d_B-d_A}

2698: \gamma^{AB}\left(0,1,\frac{\kappa_+'}{\kappa_-},

2699: \frac{\kappa_-'}{\kappa_-};\mu^2\right) &=& 

2700: \int D\alpha~\kappa_-^{d_B-d_A}

2701: \widehat{K}^{AB}(\alpha_1,\alpha_2;\mu^2) \nonumber\\  &=&

2702: \kappa_-^{d_B-d_A}

2703: \int_0^1 du (1-u) \int_0^1 d\xi  \nonumber\\

2704: & & ~~~~~~~~~~\times

2705: \widehat{K}^{AB}(\xi(1-u),(1-\xi)(1-u);

2706: \mu^2) \nonumber\\

2707: &=& \kappa_-^{d_B-d_A} \int_0^1 du  \widehat{\widehat{K}}^{AB}(u;

2708: \mu^2)~,

2709: \end{eqnarray}

2710: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2711: with  $\alpha_1=[1-(\kappa_+'+\kappa_-')/\kappa_-]/2=\xi(1-u),

2712: \alpha_2=[1-(\kappa_+'-\kappa_-')/\kappa_-]/2=(1-\xi)(1-u)$.

2713: The $\kappa_-$--integral yields

2714: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2715: \begin{eqnarray}

2716: \label{eqKAPM}

2717: \int \frac{d\kappa_- \xx p_-}{2\pi}~\e^{i\kappa_- \xx p_-(\vartheta-u

2718: \vartheta')} (\xx p_- \kappa_-)^{d_B - d_A} 

2719: = \widetilde{O}^{AB}(u\vartheta' -

2720: \vartheta) =

2721: \left\{\begin{array}{ll} \delta(u \vartheta' -  \vartheta) &~

2722: {\rm for}~A=B=q,G \\

2723: \partial_u \delta(u \vartheta'-\vartheta) &~

2724: {\rm for}~A=q,~B=G \\

2725: \theta(u \vartheta'-\vartheta)/\vartheta  &~

2726: {\rm for}~A=G,~B=q

2727: \end{array} \right. \nonumber

2728: \end{eqnarray}

2729: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2730: The following evolution equations for the distribution functions 

2731: $f^A(\vartheta,\eta)$ are obtained~:

2732: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2733: \begin{eqnarray}

2734: \label{eqEV1}

2735: \mu^2 \frac{d}{d\mu^2} f^A(\vartheta,\eta;\mu^2)

2736: = \int_0^1 du \int_\vartheta^{-{\rm sign}(\vartheta)/\eta}

2737: d\vartheta'~\widetilde{O}^{AB}(u\vartheta'-\vartheta)~\widehat{\widehat

2738: {K}}^{AB}(u;\mu^2) f_B(\vartheta',\eta;\mu^2)~.

2739: \end{eqnarray}

2740: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2741: The functions

2742: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2743: \begin{eqnarray}

2744: \label{eqANOMF}

2745: \vartheta' \int_0^1 du~\widetilde{O}^{AB}(u\vartheta'-\vartheta)

2746: \widehat{\widehat{K}}^{AB}(u;\mu^2) \equiv P^{AB}\left(\frac{\vartheta}

2747: {\vartheta'},\mu^2\right)

2748: \end{eqnarray}

2749: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2750: are the {\it forward} splitting functions, which are independent of 

2751: $\eta$ resp. $x_{\PP}$, leading to

2752: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2753: \begin{eqnarray}

2754: \label{eqEV2}

2755: \mu^2 \frac{d}{d\mu^2} f^A(\vartheta,\eta;\mu^2)

2756: =  \int_\vartheta^{-{\rm sign}(\vartheta)/\eta}  \frac{d\vartheta'}

2757: {\vartheta'} P^{AB}\left(\frac{\vartheta}{\vartheta'},\mu^2\right)

2758: f_B(\vartheta',\eta;\mu^2)~.

2759: \end{eqnarray}

2760: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2761: They act on the momentum fraction $\vartheta$ of the diffractive parton

2762: densities. Note that the range of $\vartheta'$ is yet different from that

2763: of the corresponding quantity for deep inelastic scattering. After

2764: identifying $\vartheta = 2\beta$ taking the absorptive part, however, one

2765: arrives at the twist--2 evolution equation

2766: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2767: \begin{eqnarray}

2768: \label{eqEV4}

2769: \mu^2 \frac{d}{d\mu^2} f^{D}_A(\beta,x_{\PP};\mu^2)

2770: = \int_\beta^1 \frac{d\beta'}{\beta'} P_{A}^B\left(\frac{\beta}{\beta'};

2771: \mu^2\right)

2772: f_B^D(\beta',x_{\PP};\mu^2)~.

2773: \end{eqnarray}

2774: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

2775: In the case of deep inelastic

2776: scattering the corresponding identification for the momentum fraction is

2777: $z = x$. The dependence of the diffractive parton densities w.r.t. $\eta$,

2778: or $x_{\PP}$, is {\it entirely} parametric and not changed under the 

2779: evolution, which affects $\beta$. In the case of the twist--2 

2780: contributions factorization proofs were given~\cite{FACT}, leading

2781: to the same evolution equations,~(\ref{eqEV4}), which are confirmed by

2782: the present derivation. For phenomenological applications to 

2783: next-to-leading order, see e.g.~\cite{RSBJP}.

2784: 

2785: We expressed the Compton amplitude with the help of the light--cone 

2786: expansion at short distances and applied this representation to the

2787: process of deep--inelastic diffractive scattering using Mueller's

2788: generalized optical theorem. This representation is {\it not} limited to

2789: leading twist operators but can be extended to all higher twist

2790: operators synonymously. The corresponding evolution equations for

2791: the higher twist hadronic matrix elements, which depend on more momentum

2792: fractions $\vartheta_i$ than one, transform analogously to the case

2793: of twist--2 being outlined above. A central parameter 

2794: $\kappa_+ = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n \kappa_i$ may be set to zero, and 

2795: analogous re--scaling relations apply. By virtue of this also here 

2796: forward evolution equations are derived. However, the connection of the 

2797: momentum fractions $\vartheta_i$ to the outer kinematic parameters is 

2798: less trivial than in the case of twist--2 due to the structure of the 

2799: corresponding Wilson coefficients. This is the case also for deep 

2800: inelastic scattering, cf. e.g.~\cite{BRRZ}.

2801: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2802: \section{Conclusions}

2803: %\renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}

2804: %\setcounter{equation}{0}

2805: \label{sec-5}

2806: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2807: 

2808: \vspace{1mm}

2809: \noindent

2810: The differential cross section of unpolarized deep--inelastic 

2811: $ep$--diffractive

2812: scattering is described by four structure functions for pure photon

2813: exchange, which depend on the four kinematic variables, $x, Q^2, x_{\PP}$

2814: and $t$. In the limit of vanishing target masses and $t \rightarrow 0$

2815: only two structure functions contribute. In the case of hard diffractive

2816: scattering the scaling violations of these structure functions can be

2817: described perturbatively. This is possible in transforming the 

2818: non--forward amplitude of the process via Mueller's optical theorem, by

2819: rotating the final--state proton into an initial--state anti--proton.

2820: The Compton--amplitude is calculated for the hadronic two--particle state

2821: $\langle p_1,-p_2|$ and w.r.t. this state in the forward direction.

2822: The diffractive parton densities are associated to the general 

2823: two--variable distribution functions, which describe the hadronic matrix

2824: element. The scaling variable of the diffractive parton densities, which

2825: directly compares to the Bjorken variable $x$ in the deep--inelastic case,

2826: is $\beta = x/x_{\PP}$. However, the Callan--Gross relation takes the

2827: usual form $F_2^D(x,Q^2,x_{\PP}) = 2x F_1^D(x,Q^2,x_{\PP})$. Due to

2828: the transformation of the problem, which is made possible applying 

2829: Mueller's optical theorem, the anomalous dimensions are the same as for

2830: forward scattering. We demonstrated this by an explicit calculation

2831: in the case of the twist--2 operators, however, the same mechanism

2832: applies also for higher twist operators using the light cone expansion.

2833: In the case of the twist--2 contributions the effective momentum fraction,

2834: $\vartheta = z_- +z_+/\eta$ may be identified with the variable $2\beta$

2835: for diffractive scattering. The dependence of the parton densities on

2836: $x_{\PP}$ is not affected by QCD--evolution, which acts on the variable

2837: $\beta$.

2838: 

2839: \vspace{2mm}

2840: \noindent

2841: {\bf Acknowledgment.}~For discussions we would like to thank

2842: J. Bartels, W. Buchm\"uller, J.~Dainton, B.~Geyer, P. Kroll, and G. Wolf.

2843: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2844: \begin{thebibliography}{999}

2845: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2846: 

2847: 

2848: 

2849: 

2850: 

2851: 

2852: 

2853: 

2854: 

2855: 

2856: 

2857: 

2858: %

2859: 

2860: 

2861: 

2862: 

2863: %[3]

2864: \bibitem{FL}

2865: C. Adloff et al., H1 collaboration, Phys. Lett. {\bf B393} (1997) 452.

2866: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2867: %

2868: %[4]

2869: \bibitem{EXP3}

2870: H. Abramowicz and J. Dainton, J. Phys. {\bf G22} (1996) 911.

2871: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2872: %

2873: %[5]

2874: \bibitem{BAKO}

2875: J. Bartels and M. Kowalski, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C19} (2001) 693.

2876: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2877: %

2878: %[6]

2879: \bibitem{DL}

2880: A. Donnachie and P.V. Landshoff, Phys. Lett. {\bf B191} (1987) 309;

2881: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B286} (1987) 704;  Phys. Lett. {\bf B437} (1998) 408;

2882: {\tt hep-ph/0105088} and references  quoted therein.

2883: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2884: %

2885: %[7]

2886: \bibitem{SUR}

2887: M. W\"usthoff and A.D. Martin, J. Phys. {\bf G24} (1999) R309;\\

2888: A. Hebecker, Phys. Rep. {\bf 331} (2000) 1 and references therein.

2889: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2890: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2891: %

2892: %[9]

2893: \bibitem{INGEL}

2894: G. Ingelman and P. Schlein, Phys. Lett. {\bf B152} (1985) 256;\\

2895: J. Bartels and G. Ingelman, Phys. Lett. {\bf B235} (1990) 175;\\

2896: G. Ingelman, {\tt hep-ph/9912534}.

2897: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2898: %

2899: %[10]

2900: \bibitem{BH}

2901: W. Buchm\"uller and A. Hebecker, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B476} (1996) 293;\\

2902: W. Buchm\"uller, T. Gehrmann, and A. Hebecker, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B537} 

2903: (1999) 477.

2904: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2905: %

2906: %[11]

2907: \bibitem{EBKW}

2908: J. Bartels, J. Ellis, M. Kowalski, and M. W\"usthoff,  

2909: Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C7} (1999) 443.

2910: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2911: %

2912: %[12]

2913: \bibitem{FS}

2914: D.~M\"uller, D. Robaschik, B. Geyer, F.~Dittes, and J.~Ho\v{r}ej\v{s}i,

2915: Fortschr. Phys.  {\bf 42} (1994) 2; \\

2916: X. Ji,  J. Phys. {\bf G24} (1998) 1181.

2917: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2918: %

2919: %[13]

2920: \bibitem{RAD}

2921: A.V.~Radyushkin, Phys. Rev. {\bf D56} (1997) 5524; {\tt hep-ph/0101225}.

2922: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2923: %

2924: %[14]

2925: \bibitem{BGR}

2926: J.~Bl\"umlein, B.~Geyer, and D.~Robaschik, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B560} (1999) 

2927: 283.

2928: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2929: %

2930: %[15]

2931: \bibitem{KROLL}                           

2932: M. Diehl, T. Feldmann, R. Jakob, and P. Kroll, Phys. Lett. {\bf B460}

2933: (1999) 204; Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C8} (1999) 409;\\

2934: P. Kroll, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A666} (2000) 3.

2935: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2936: %

2937: %[16]

2938: \bibitem{LAT}

2939: G. Martinelli and C.T. Sachrajda, Phys. Lett. {\bf B190} (1987) 151;

2940: {\bf 196} (1987) 184;\\

2941: M. Guagnelli, K. Jansen, and R. Petronzio, Phys. Lett. {\bf B459} (1999)

2942: 594; {\bf B493} (2000) 77.

2943: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2944: %

2945: %[18]

2946: \bibitem{TARR}

2947: B. Tarrach, Nuov. Cim. {\bf 28A} (1975) 409.

2948: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2949: %

2950: %[20]

2951: \bibitem{BR}

2952: J. Bl\"umlein and D. Robaschik, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B581} (2000) 449.

2953: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2954: %

2955: %[21]

2956: \bibitem{AHM}

2957: A.H. Mueller, Phys. Rev. {\bf D2} (1970) 2963; Phys. Rev. {\bf D4} (1971)

2958: 150;\\

2959: P.D.P. Collins, {\sf An Introduction to Regge Theory and High Energy

2960: Physics}, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1977), pp.~331.

2961: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2962: %

2963: %[22]

2964: \bibitem{PARA}

2965: S. Weinberg, {\sf The Quantum Theory of Fields}, {\bf Vol.~1}, (Cambridge

2966: University Press, Cambridge, 1995), pp.~452;\\

2967: J. Bl\"umlein, J. Eilers, B. Geyer, and D. Robaschik, to appear.

2968: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2969: %

2970: %[23]

2971: \bibitem{NFLO}

2972: T.~Braunschweig, B.~Geyer, and D.~Robaschik, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 

2973: {\bf 44} (1987) 407;\\

2974: I.I.~Balitsky and V.M.~Braun, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B311} (1988/89) 541;\\

2975: A.V.~Radyushkin,

2976: Phys. Lett. {\bf B385} (1996) 333; Phys. Rev. {\bf D56} (1997) 5524;\\

2977: J.~Bl\"umlein, B.~Geyer, and D.~Robaschik, Phys. Lett. {\bf B406} (1997) 

2978: 161 and Erratum;\\

2979: I.I. Balitsky and A.V. Radyushkin, Phys. Lett. {\bf B413} (1997) 114;\\

2980: J.~Bl\"umlein, B.~Geyer, and D.~Robaschik, {\tt hep-ph/9711405}, in~:

2981: Proc. of the Workshop~{\sf Deep Inelastic Scattering Off Polarized

2982: Targets: Theory Meets Experiment}, eds.~J.~Bl\"umlein et al., (DESY,

2983: Hamburg, 1997) DESY 97--200, p.~196.\\

2984: X.~Ji, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 78} (1997) 610; Phys. Rev. {\bf D55} (1997)

2985: 7114;\\

2986: L. Mankiewicz, G. Piller, and T. Weigl, Eur. J. Phys. {\bf C5} (1998) 

2987: 119.

2988: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2989: %

2990: %[24]

2991: \bibitem{NFNLO}

2992: F.M. Dittes and A.V. Radyushkin, Phys. Lett. {\bf B134} (1984) 359;\\

2993: S.V. Mikhailov and A.V. Radyushkin, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B254} (1985) 89;\\

2994: F.M.~Dittes, D.~M\"uller, D. Robaschik, B. Geyer, and J.~Ho\v{r}ej\v{s}i,

2995: Phys. Lett. {\bf B209} (1988) 325;\\

2996: A.V. Belitsky, D. M\"uller, L. Niedermaier, and A. Sch\"afer,

2997: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B546} (1999) 279.

2998: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

2999: %

3000: %[25]

3001: \bibitem{FACT}

3002: A. Berera and D.E. Soper, Phys. Rev. {\bf D50} (1994) 4328; {\bf D53}

3003: (1996) 6162;\\

3004: J. Collins, Phys. Rev. {\bf D57} (1998) 3051; Erratum: {\bf D61} (2000)

3005: 019902;\\

3006: F. Hautmann, Z. Kunszt, and D.E. Soper, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B563} (1999) 

3007: 153.

3008: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

3009: %

3010: %[26]

3011: \bibitem{RSBJP}

3012: C. Royon, L. Schoeffel, J. Bartels, H. Jung, and R. Peschanski, 

3013: Phys. Rev. {\bf D63} (2001) 074004.

3014: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

3015: %

3016: %[27]

3017: \bibitem{BRRZ}

3018: R.K. Ellis, W. Furmanski, and R. Petronzio, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B212}

3019: (1983) 29;\\

3020: J. Bl\"umlein, V. Ravindran, J. Ruan, and W. Zhu, Phys. Lett. {\bf B594}

3021: (2001) 235.

3022: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

3023: \end{thebibliography}

3024: \end{document}

3025: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3026: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3027: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3028: + i \left[(p^\mu q^2 - \nu q^\mu) \varepsilon^{\nu\rho\alpha\beta} 

3029: q_\rho S_\alpha p_\beta

3030: -(p^\nu q^2 - \nu q^\nu) \varepsilon^{\mu\rho\alpha\beta}

3031: q_\rho S_\alpha p_\beta\right] H_4   \nonumber\\ & &

3032: +~\left[(p^\mu q^2 - \nu q^\mu) \varepsilon^{\nu\rho\alpha\beta}

3033: q_\rho S_\alpha p_\beta

3034: +(p^\nu q^2 - \nu q^\nu) \varepsilon^{\mu\rho\alpha\beta}

3035: q_\rho S_\alpha p_\beta\right] H_5~,

3036: