1: \documentstyle[12pt,epsf,epsfig,amsmath]{article}
2: \hoffset -0.2in
3: \textwidth 6in
4: \textheight 8.5in
5: %\setcounter{page}{1} `
6: \parskip 7pt \openup1\jot \parindent=0.5in
7: \topmargin -0.5in
8:
9: % the stuff below defines \eqalign and \eqalignno in such a
10: % way that they will run on Latex
11: \newfont{\thiplo}{msbm10 scaled\magstep 2}
12: \newfont{\gothic}{eufb10 scaled\magstep 2}
13: \newfont{\unc}{eurb10}
14: \newskip\humongous \humongous=0pt plus 1000pt minus 1000pt
15: \def\caja{\mathsurround=0pt}
16: \def\eqalign#1{\,\vcenter{\openup1\jot \caja
17: \ialign{\strut \hfil$\displaystyle{##}$&$
18: \displaystyle{{}##}$\hfil\crcr#1\crcr}}\,}
19: \newif\ifdtup
20: \def\panorama{\global\dtuptrue \openup1\jot \caja
21: \everycr{\noalign{\ifdtup \global\dtupfalse
22: \vskip-\lineskiplimit \vskip\normallineskiplimit
23: \else \penalty\interdisplaylinepenalty \fi}}}
24: \def\eqalignno#1{\panorama \tabskip=\humongous
25: \halign to\displaywidth{\hfil$\displaystyle{##}$
26: \tabskip=0pt&$\displaystyle{{}##}$\hfil
27: \tabskip=\humongous&\llap{$##$}\tabskip=0pt
28: \crcr#1\crcr}}
29: % eqalignnoleft is eqalignno positioned flush left on the page
30: \def\eqalignnoleft#1{\panorama \tabskip=0pt
31: \halign to\displaywidth{\hfil$\displaystyle{##}$
32: \tabskip=0pt&$\displaystyle{{}##}$\hfil
33: \tabskip=\humongous&\llap{$##$}\tabskip=0pt
34: \crcr#1\crcr}}
35: % \eqright causes display equation material between \eqright and \cr
36: % to be positioned flush right on the page. This is useful
37: % in breaking long lines in a display equation.
38: % \eqright is usually used in conjunction with \eqalignnoleft.
39: \def\eqright #1\cr{\noalign{\hfill$\displaystyle{{}#1}$}}
40: % \eqleft causes display equation material between \eqleft and \cr
41: % to be positioned flush left on the page.
42: \def\eqleft #1\cr{\noalign{\noindent$\displaystyle{{}#1}$\hfill}}
43: % The oldref and fig macros are for formatting
44: % references and figure lists at the end of the paper.
45: % If you type \oldref{1}Dirac, P.A.M. you will get
46: % [1] Dirac, P.A.M.
47: % Same goes for \fig except you get Figure 2.1
48: \def\oldrefledge{\hangindent3\parindent}
49: \def\oldreffmt#1{\rlap{[#1]} \hbox to 2\parindent{}}
50: \def\oldref#1{\par\noindent\oldrefledge \oldreffmt{#1}
51: \ignorespaces}
52: \def\figledge{\hangindent=1.25in}
53: \def\figfmt#1{\rlap{Figure {#1}} \hbox to 1in{}}
54: \def\fig#1{\par\noindent\figledge \figfmt{#1}
55: \ignorespaces}
56: %
57: % This defines et al., i.e., e.g., cf., etc.
58: \def\ie{\hbox{\it i.e.}{}} \def\etc{\hbox{\it etc.}{}}
59: \def\eg{\hbox{\it e.g.}{}} \def\cf{\hbox{\it cf.}{}}
60: \def\etal{\hbox{\it et al.}}
61: \def\dash{\hbox{---}}
62: % common physics symbols
63: \def\tr{\mathop{\rm tr}}
64: \def\Tr{\mathop{\rm Tr}}
65: \def\partder#1#2{{\partial #1\over\partial #2}}
66: \def\secder#1#2#3{{\partial~2 #1\over\partial #2 \partial #3}}
67: \def\bra#1{\left\langle #1\right|}
68: \def\ket#1{\left| #1\right\rangle}
69: \def\VEV#1{\left\langle #1\right\rangle}
70: \def\ME#1#2{\left\langle #1\right|\left. #2 \right\rangle}
71: \def\gdot#1{\rlap{$#1$}/}
72: \def\abs#1{\left| #1\right|}
73: \def\pr#1{#1~\prime}
74: \def\ltap{\raisebox{-.4ex}{\rlap{$\sim$}} \raisebox{.4ex}{$<$}}
75: \def\gtap{\raisebox{-.4ex}{\rlap{$\sim$}} \raisebox{.4ex}{$>$}}
76: % \contract is a differential geometry contraction sign _|
77: \def\contract{\makebox[1.2em][c]{
78: \mbox{\rule{.6em}{.01truein}\rule{.01truein}{.6em}}}}
79: % The command \sectioneq produces numbering of equations by section
80: \def\holdtheequation{\arabic}
81: \def\sectioneq{\def\theequation{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}{\let
82: \holdsection=\section\def\section{\setcounter{equation}{0}\holdsection}}}%
83:
84: % The commands \beginletts and \endletts delimit sections of
85: % text in which successive equation numbers are distinguished by
86: % sequentially appending lower case letters
87: \newcounter{holdequation}\def
88: \beginletts{\begingroup\setcounter
89: {holdequation}{\value{equation}}\addtocounter
90: {equation}{1}\edef
91: \holdtheequation{\theequation}\setcounter
92: {equation}{0}\def
93: \theequation{\holdtheequation\alph{equation}}}
94: \def\endletts{\endgroup\setcounter
95: {equation}{\value{holdequation}}\refstepcounter{equation}}
96: % The command \num provides automatic numbering in LaTex when used in
97: % place of (equation number) in PlainTeX-style equations
98: \def\num{(\refstepcounter{equation}\theequation)}
99: % \auto is shorthand for \eqno\num
100: \def\auto{\eqno(\refstepcounter{equation}\theequation)}
101: % The commands \begineq and \endeq provide for one vertically
102: % centered automatic number for multiline equations
103: \def\begineq #1\endeq{$$ \refstepcounter{equation}\eqalign{#1}\eqno
104: (\theequation) $$}
105: % The command \contlimit puts (a\rightarrow0)
106: % under \longrightarrow
107: \def\contlimit{\,{\hbox{$\longrightarrow$}\kern-1.8em\lower1ex
108: \hbox{${\scriptstyle (a\rightarrow0)}$}}\,}
109: % The command \centeron#1#2 backs up #2 so that it is centered
110: % over #1. \centerover and \centerunder work like \centeron,
111: % except that they raise or lower #2 to place it over or under
112: % #1.
113: \def\centeron#1#2{{\setbox0=\hbox{#1}\setbox1=\hbox{#2}\ifdim
114: \wd1>\wd0\kern.5\wd1\kern-.5\wd0\fi
115: \copy0\kern-.5\wd0\kern-.5\wd1\copy1\ifdim\wd0>\wd1
116: \kern.5\wd0\kern-.5\wd1\fi}}
117: %
118: \def\centerover#1#2{\centeron{#1}{\setbox0=\hbox{#1}\setbox
119: 1=\hbox{#2}\raise\ht0\hbox{\raise\dp1\hbox{\copy1}}}}
120: %
121: \def\centerunder#1#2{\centeron{#1}{\setbox0=\hbox{#1}\setbox
122: 1=\hbox{#2}\lower\dp0\hbox{\lower\ht1\hbox{\copy1}}}}
123: % The commands \lsim and \gsim provide symbols for
124: % `less than of order' and `greater than of order'
125: \def\lsim{\;\centeron{\raise.35ex\hbox{$<$}}{\lower.65ex\hbox
126: {$\sim$}}\;}
127: \def\gsim{\;\centeron{\raise.35ex\hbox{$>$}}{\lower.65ex\hbox
128: {$\sim$}}\;}
129: % The command \st (for stroke) puts a slash through the succeeding
130: % character in math mode
131: \def\st#1{\centeron{$#1$}{$/$}}
132: % The command \newcases works like \cases except that
133: % the baselines and type size are the same as for
134: % display equations
135: \def\newcases#1{\left\{\,\vcenter{\normalbaselines\openup1\jot \caja
136: \ialign{\strut$\displaystyle{##}$\hfil
137: &\quad##\hfil\crcr#1\crcr}}\right.}
138: % The command \super inserts the characters in its argument as a
139: % superscript with the correct spacefactor.
140: \def\super#1{\ifmmode \hbox{\textsuper{#1}}\else\textsuper{#1}\fi}
141: \def\textsuper#1{\newcount\holdspacefactor\holdspacefactor=\spacefactor
142: $^{#1}$\spacefactor=\holdspacefactor}
143: % The command \supercite redefines \cite so that it makes superscripted
144: % citation numbers. It is to be used in conjunction with the
145: % \label command (for example, with one of the list-making
146: % environments). The command \oldcite restores the original LaTeX
147: % \cite command.
148: \let\holdcite=\cite
149: \def\supercite{\def\cite{\newcite}}
150: \def\oldcite{\def\cite{\holdcite}}
151: \def\newcite#1{\super{\newcount\citenumber\citenumber=0\getcite#1,@, }}
152: \def\getcite#1,{\advance\citenumber by1
153: \def\getcitearg{#1}\def\lastarg{@}
154: \ifnum\citenumber=1
155: \ref{#1}\let\next=\getcite\else\ifx\getcitearg\lastarg\let\next=\relax
156: \else ,\ref{#1}\let\next=\getcite\fi\fi\next}
157: % The command \nskip gives a vertical skip of the specified
158: % dimension (in braces) without including any extra \baselineskip
159: % or \parskip.
160: \def\nskip#1{\vbox{}\vskip-\baselineskip\vskip#1\vskip-\parskip\noindent}
161: % The command \lskip skips vertically by one line, i.e.,
162: % the current \baselineskip. There is no indentation unless
163: % \indent is specified.
164: \def\lskip{\vskip\baselineskip\vskip-\parskip\noindent}
165: \def\np{Nucl.\ Phys.\ }
166: \def\pr{Phys.\ Rev.\ }
167: \def\prl{Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ }
168: \def\pl{Phys.\ Lett.\ }
169: \def\arnps{Ann.\ Rev.\ Nucl.\ Part.\ Sci.\ }
170: \def\mn{\mu\nu}
171: \def\epm{e^+e^-}
172: \def\pom{{\rm P\kern -0.53em\llap I\,}}
173: \def\spom{{\rm P\kern -0.36em\llap \small I\,}}
174: \def\sspom{{\rm P\kern -0.33em\llap \footnotesize I\,}}
175: \def\gev{{\rm GeV}}
176: \def\mev{{\rm MeV}}
177: \def\parens#1{\left(#1\right)}
178: \relax
179: \def\contlimit{\,{\hbox{$\longrightarrow$}\kern-1.8em\lower1ex
180: \hbox{${\scriptstyle (a\rightarrow0)}$}}\,}
181: \def\upon #1/#2 {{\textstyle{#1\over #2}}}
182: \relax
183: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}
184: \def\srf#1{$^{#1}$\ }
185: \def\mainhead#1{\setcounter{equation}{0}\addtocounter{section}{1}
186: \vbox{\begin{center}\large\bf #1\end{center}}\nobreak\par}
187: \sectioneq
188: \def\subhead#1{\bigskip\vbox{\noindent\bf #1}\nobreak\par}
189: \def\rf#1#2#3{{\bf #1}, #2 (19#3)}
190: \def\autolabel#1{\auto\label{#1}}
191: \def\til#1{\centeron{\hbox{$#1$}}{\lower 2ex\hbox{$\char'176$}}}
192: \def\tild#1{\centeron{\hbox{$\,#1$}}{\lower 2.5ex\hbox{$\char'176$}}}
193: \def\sumtil{\centeron{\hbox{$\displaystyle\sum$}}{\lower
194: -1.5ex\hbox{$\widetilde{\phantom{xx}}$}}}
195: \def\sumtilt{\sum^{\raisebox{-.15mm}{\hspace{-1.75mm}$\widetilde{}$}}\ }
196: \def\gltext{$\raisebox{1mm}{\centerunder{$\scriptscriptstyle
197: >$}{$\scriptscriptstyle <$}}$}
198: \def\intcent#1{\centerunder{$\displaystyle\int$}{\raisebox{-2.2mm}{$ #1 $}}}
199: \def\kbar{\underline{k}}
200: \def\qbar{\underline{q}}
201: \def\kbarsl{\underline{\st k}}
202: \def\qbarsl{\underline{\st q}}
203: \def\parens#1{\left(#1\right)}
204: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.5}
205: \def\pbar{\underline{p}}
206: \def\pbarsl{\underline{\st p}}
207: \def\q{\unc q}
208: \def\p{\unc p}
209: %-------------------------------------------------------------------
210:
211: \newcommand{\bit}{\begin{itemize}}
212: \newcommand{\eit}{\end{itemize}}
213: \newcommand{\cl}{\centerline}
214: \newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}
215: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}
216: \newcommand{\beqa}{\begin{eqnarray}}
217: \newcommand{\eeqa}{\end{eqnarray}}
218:
219:
220: %\pagestyle{empty}
221:
222: \begin{document}
223:
224: \begin{titlepage}
225:
226: \rightline{\vbox{\halign{&#\hfil\cr
227: &ANL-HEP-PR-02-19\cr
228: &\today\cr}}}
229: \vspace{0.25in}
230:
231: \begin{center}
232:
233: {\large\bf THE CHIRAL ANOMALY AND HIGH-ENERGY}
234:
235: {\large\bf SCATTERING IN QCD}\footnote{Work
236: supported by the U.S.
237: Department of Energy, Division of High Energy Physics, \newline Contracts
238: W-31-109-ENG-38 and DEFG05-86-ER-40272}
239: \medskip
240:
241:
242: Alan. R. White\footnote{arw@hep.anl.gov }
243:
244: \vskip 0.6cm
245:
246: \centerline{High Energy Physics Division}
247: \centerline{Argonne National Laboratory}
248: \centerline{9700 South Cass, Il 60439, USA.}
249: \vspace{0.5cm}
250:
251: \end{center}
252:
253: \begin{abstract}
254:
255: Infra-red properties of the triangle anomaly and the ``anomaly pole''
256: are elaborated and applied to the study of high-energy scattering in QCD,
257: when the gauge symmetry is partially
258: broken to SU(2).
259: It is shown that the chiral flavor anomaly provides a wee-gluon
260: component for Goldstone bosons that combines
261: with interactions due to the U(1) anomaly to produce an infra-red
262: transverse momentum scaling divergence in scattering amplitudes.
263: After the divergence is factorized out, as a wee gluon condensate
264: in the infinite momentum pion,
265: the remaining physical amplitudes have confinement and
266: chiral symmetry breaking. A lowest-order contribution
267: to the pion scattering amplitude is calculated in detail.
268: Although originating from very complicated diagrams, the amplitude
269: has a remarkable (semi-)perturbative simplicity. The momentum structure is
270: that of single gluon exchange but zero transverse momentum quarks
271: inject additional spin and color structure via anomaly interactions.
272:
273: \end{abstract}
274:
275:
276: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\arabic{footnote}} \end{titlepage}
277:
278: %\setcounter{page}{2}
279:
280: \mainhead{1. INTRODUCTION}
281:
282: Any solution of the full regge limit of QCD must,
283: almost certainly, involve a resolution of the unsolved problem of
284: matching perturbation theory with confinement.
285: Since the limit involves large energies
286: it's description should not be too far from perturbation theory. Conversely,
287: since small momentum transfers are involved, both
288: confinement and chiral symmetry breaking must be manifest in
289: the contribution of physical $t$-channel states. In this paper
290: we will show that a transition from perturbation theory to confinement
291: can indeed occur in the regge region.
292:
293: For some time we have pursued what might be called a ``semi-perturbative''
294: description of the QCD pomeron. In doing so we have
295: made extensive use of the formalism of (multi-)regge theory,
296: which many authors currently studying
297: the pomeron make little or no reference to. In this paper we endeavor to keep,
298: at least the most unfamiliar parts of, this formalism to a minimum.
299: Nevertheless, we can summarize the reasons why we believe that
300: regge poles and regge theory must play a fundamental role in solving the
301: regge limit of QCD as follows.
302:
303: In general,
304: multiparticle $t$-channel unitarity has been shown to be satisfied
305: when the only $J$-plane singularities are regge poles and the regge cuts
306: generated by them - provided the regge cut discontinuities satisfy
307: ``reggeon unitarity'' \cite{gpt}-\cite{arw00}. No other solution is known.
308: It is well established\cite{fkl}-\cite{arw93}
309: that when the gauge symmetry of QCD is spontaneously broken,
310: multi-regge limits of quark and gluon
311: amplitudes are described perturbatively by reggeon diagrams
312: containing massive gluon and quark regge poles. Both $t$-channel (reggeon)
313: unitarity and $s$-channel unitarity are satisfied. General arguments
314: imply that the small
315: transverse momentum part of the massless theory
316: can be obtained smoothly from the massive theory. In which case, the
317: unitarity properties of the massive theory, including reggeon unitarity,
318: should persist in the
319: massless theory. (Note that the BFKL pomeron, which is not
320: a regge pole and also does not satisfy $s$-channel unitarity, is a large
321: transverse momentum phenomenon that
322: appears only when a subclass of diagrams is isolated and
323: summed to all orders - without a transverse momentum cut-off.)
324:
325: The critical pomeron\cite{cri} is an abstract
326: solution of reggeon unitarity, obtained
327: via reggeon field theory (RFT), that produces asymptotically
328: rising cross-sections. A single regge pole and the
329: corresponding regge cuts are the only $J$-plane singularities.
330: Since the critical pomeron retains the factorization
331: properties of a single regge pole, if it
332: occurs in QCD it will be associated\cite{arw84}
333: with a ``universal wee-parton distribution'' in hadrons. This
334: universality property
335: allows wee partons to carry vacuum properties which, in combination
336: with rising cross-sections, should lead to the
337: maximal asymptotic applicability of the parton model.
338:
339: We expect the occurrence of the
340: critical pomeron in QCD to be of crucial importance, therefore, both for
341: the satisfaction of $t$-channel unitarity and for the maximal validity of the
342: parton model. To see that it can indeed occur we
343: have proposed\cite{arw93,arw84,arw80} starting with the gluon and quark
344: reggeon diagrams of spontaneously-broken QCD.
345: With a transverse momentum cut-off imposed,
346: the gauge symmetry can be restored in stages
347: and RFT can be used to analyze the infra-red divergences that occur.
348: We have anticipated that the only
349: additional ingredient beyond the perturbative regge behavior of gluons
350: and quarks will be chirality transitions produced by the fermion anomaly.
351: Quarks will, therefore, play an essential role.
352:
353: We have now shown that chirality transitions occur\cite{arw011}-\cite{arw98}
354: in effective triangle diagram reggeon interactions obtained by
355: placing quark lines on-shell in large quark loops. These interactions
356: appear in the reggeon vertices that couple different reggeon channels
357: (in a general multi-regge limit). In particular, they occur in
358: the triple-regge vertex\cite{gw} that couples three distinct
359: reggeon channels - each
360: carrying a separate transverse momentum.
361: Such vertices include the couplings of bound-state
362: reggeons (e.g. pions and nucleons) together with their couplings
363: to the physical pomeron. Effectively, therefore, vertices of this kind
364: determine the bound-states of the theory and their high-energy scattering
365: amplitudes.
366:
367: Our expectation has long been that
368: when the gauge symmetry is restored first
369: to SU(2), giving ``color superconducting QCD'',
370: SU(2) color confinement will be due to the appearance of a
371: condensate in reggeon states produced by
372: infra-red divergent ``wee-gluon'' configurations coupling through
373: anomaly interactions. The resulting pomeron
374: could then be in a supercritical phase\cite{arw91}
375: of RFT, implying that the
376: critical pomeron would occur as the full SU(3) gauge symmetry is restored
377: (provided the transverse cut-off can be removed first - a strong requirement).
378: A-priori, however,
379: to understand in detail how the anomaly interactions
380: produce the condensate, and determine both hadron states
381: and the pomeron, it is necessary to self-consistently
382: construct the full multi-regge S-matrix.
383: This is a very complicated project to carry out. We
384: outlined, essentially, how it could be done in \cite{arw98},
385: although we did not then have the full knowledge of anomaly vertices
386: that we now have.
387:
388: In this paper, as an intermediate step
389: before attempting to construct the full multi-regge
390: S-Matrix, we approach the problem from a different stand-point.
391: We use a procedure that is less rigorously
392: formulated (as will become apparent)
393: than the multi-regge approach. However, it leads directly to
394: explicit results and provides a straightforward
395: understanding of the physics that is involved. Also
396: the terminology used is, we hope, more widely familiar.
397: The new approach is not only sufficient to show how,
398: in infinite momentum scattering, anomalies determine
399: both the physical states and the exchanged pomeron,
400: but it also allows us to obtain explicit high-energy
401: scattering amplitudes. In fact,
402: we directly calculate
403: the on-shell (massless) pion amplitude rather than the amplitude for
404: spacelike reggeized pions to scatter, that multi-regge theory would
405: lead us to try to calculate.
406:
407: We start directly from infra-red properties of the triangle diagram.
408: It is well-known\cite{gth1}-\cite{ach}
409: that, when the quarks involved are massless,
410: the chiral flavor anomaly requires that an
411: ``anomaly pole'' appear in the vertices for an
412: axial current to couple to
413: pairs of vector currents carrying light-like momenta. If there is
414: confinement and the chiral symmetry is broken spontaneously this pole
415: becomes a physical Goldstone pole. In Section 2 we
416: study in detail how the pole
417: is generated in the triangle diagram and show that, in the
418: momentum configuration involved, one propagator carries
419: zero momentum (and undergoes a chirality transition)
420: while the other two carry the external light-cone momenta. We also
421: show that while the tensor coupling of the anomaly pole necessarily vanishes
422: on-shell at finite momentum, an on-shell
423: coupling potentially exists at infinite momentum.
424:
425: In Section 3 we show that in color superconducting
426: QCD the role of light-cone momenta in producing
427: the anomaly pole implies the existence of
428: crucial wee-gluon effective couplings for Goldstone bosons
429: at infinite momentum.
430: (The massive gluons produced by the color symmetry breaking are
431: essential for the existence of these couplings.)
432: As a result,
433: the quark/antiquark ``pion'' and quark/quark (or antiquark/antiquark)
434: ``nucleon'' Goldstone states that appear\cite{kog}
435: have just the (massless) wee gluon content that we envisaged emerging from
436: our general reggeon diagram analysis. The presence of the wee gluons
437: then leads directly to the contribution of U(1) anomaly reggeon
438: interactions in the high-energy scattering of pions (and nucleons).
439: An overall logarithmic divergence is produced that selects anomaly
440: mediated scattering as the dominant physical process. The divergence
441: can be factorized off as the expected ``condensate'' within the scattering
442: pions - with the residue being the physical scattering amplitude.
443: The ``anomaly pole'' is manifest as a transverse
444: momentum $\delta$-function that factorizes the momentum
445: dependence of the divergent wee gluon
446: interactions and
447: the ``parton interaction'' of the massive sector of the theory.
448:
449: The lowest-order contribution to the pion scattering
450: amplitude has a remarkable simplicity. The momentum structure is
451: just that of lowest-order gluon exchange. However, zero momentum quarks
452: inject spin and color structure (via anomaly interactions) that
453: modifies the signature and color symmetry properties of the amplitude.
454: Because of the complexity of the initial
455: diagrams and the resulting reduction process we limit the
456: presentation, in this paper, to an ``existence proof'' that demonstrates
457: how the kinematical and
458: dynamical properties of the chiral flavor and U(1)
459: anomalies actually combine with
460: transverse momentum divergences to produce physical amplitudes.
461: To do this we follow the
462: reduction process through in detail for just one of the diagrams involved.
463:
464: In Section 4 we discuss both the conclusions that can be drawn from our
465: results and the further work that needs to be done to establish the
466: relationship of the critical pomeron to QCD. We also discuss some more
467: general issues of principle.
468:
469: \newpage
470:
471: \mainhead{2. PROPERTIES OF THE TRIANGLE GRAPH}
472:
473: In our previous paper\cite{arw01} we based our infra-red anomaly analysis
474: on the rather abstract discussions of \cite{cg} and \cite{bfsy}.
475: In this paper we will use
476: explicit evaluations of the triangle graph (in particular kinematic
477: configurations) that exist in the literature\cite{hor,ach}. In the following
478: we summarize and expand
479: the results and properties we will use. We will particularly
480: emphasize the important role of (both external and internal)
481: light-cone momenta in the infra-red properties that we exploit.
482:
483: \subhead{2.1 Invariant Amplitudes and Ward Identities}
484:
485: We consider the elementary triangle diagram amplitude
486: $$
487: \Gamma_{\mu \alpha \beta}(k_1,k_2)~
488: =~ {1 \over (2 \pi)^4} \int { d^4 p~ Tr \{ \gamma_5
489: \gamma_{\mu} ~ (\st{k}_2
490: - \st{p})~ \gamma_{\alpha}~ ~( - \st{k}_1 + \st{k}_2 - \st{p}) ~
491: \gamma_{\beta}~ (-\st{k}_1 - \st{p} ) \}
492: \over (p + k_1 - k_2)^2 (k_2 - p)^2
493: (p + k_1)^2 }
494: \auto\label{tamp}
495: $$
496: where the notation is illustrated in Fig.~2.1.
497: \begin{center}
498: \leavevmode
499: \epsfxsize=2.3in
500: \epsffile{trnt.ps}
501:
502: Fig.~2.1 Triangle Diagram Notation
503: \end{center}
504: The significance of routing the external momenta as we have done will be
505: discussed shortly. The amplitude
506: $$
507: T_{\mu \alpha \beta}(k_1,k_2)~=~\Gamma_{\mu \alpha \beta}(k_1,k_2)
508: ~+~ \Gamma_{\mu \beta \alpha}(k_2,k_1)
509: \auto\label{tamp12}
510: $$
511: is the lowest order interaction of the axial vector current
512: $A_{\mu}(q)$, where
513: $A_{\mu} = \bar{\psi}\gamma_5 \gamma_{\mu}\psi$ and
514: the vector currents, $V_{\alpha}(k_1)$ and $V_{\beta}(k_2)$,
515: where $V_{\mu} = \bar{\psi}\gamma_{\mu}\psi$ and $\psi$ is a massless
516: fermion field.
517:
518: $T_{\mu \alpha \beta}$ can be decomposed into invariant amplitudes by writing
519: $$
520: \eqalign{T_{\mu \alpha \beta}(k_1,k_2) ~&= ~ A_1~
521: {\hbox{\large $\epsilon$}}_{\sigma\alpha\beta\mu}~ k_1^{\sigma} ~+~ A_2~
522: {\hbox{\large $\epsilon$}}_{\sigma\alpha\beta\mu} ~k_2^{\sigma}
523: ~+~A_3~
524: {\hbox{\large $\epsilon$}}_{\delta \sigma\alpha\mu}~
525: k_{1\beta}k_1^{\delta} k_2^{\sigma} \cr
526: ~~~& +~A_4~ {\hbox{\large $\epsilon$}}_{\delta \sigma\alpha\mu}
527: ~ k_{2\beta}k_1^{\delta}
528: k_2^{\sigma}~+~A_5~ {\hbox{\large $\epsilon$}}_{\delta \sigma\beta\mu}
529: ~k_{1\alpha}k_1^{\delta}
530: k_2^{\sigma}~+~A_6~ {\hbox{\large $\epsilon$}}_{\delta \sigma\beta\mu}
531: ~ k_{2\alpha}k_1^{\delta}
532: k_2^{\sigma} }
533: \auto\label{inde}
534: $$
535: Bose symmetry implies
536: $$
537: T_{\mu \alpha \beta}(k_1,k_2)~= ~ T_{\mu \beta \alpha}(k_2,k_1)
538: \auto\label{bsym0}
539: $$
540: and so requires that
541: $$
542: \eqalign{A_1(k_1,k_2)~&=~-A_2(k_2,k_1) \cr
543: A_3(k_1,k_2)~&=~-A_6(k_2,k_1) \cr
544: A_4(k_1,k_2)~&=~-A_5(k_2,k_1) }
545: \auto\label{bsym}
546: $$
547: In addition, the vector Ward identities
548: $$
549: k_1^{\alpha}~\Gamma_{\mu \alpha \beta}~=0 ~,~~~
550: k_2^{\beta}~\Gamma_{\mu \alpha \beta}~=0
551: \auto \label{vwi}
552: $$
553: require
554: $$
555: A_2~=~k_1^2~A_5 ~+~k_1\cdot k_2 ~A_6
556: \auto\label{vwi1}
557: $$
558: $$
559: A_1~=~k_2^2~A_4 ~+~k_1\cdot k_2 ~A_3
560: \auto\label{vwi2}
561: $$
562:
563: A-priori, a term of the form
564: $$
565: A(k_1,k_2)~
566: {\hbox{\large $\epsilon$}}_{\delta \sigma\alpha\beta}~ k_1^\delta
567: k_2^{\sigma}~(k_1 + k_2 )_{\mu}
568: \auto\label{exa}
569: $$
570: with $A(k_2,k_1)= - A(k_1,k_2)$ ,
571: could be added to (\ref{inde}). Such a term separately satisies the
572: Ward identities (\ref{vwi}). However, because of the identity
573: $$
574: \eqalign{~~~{\hbox{\Large $\epsilon$}}_{\delta\sigma\alpha\beta}
575: k_1^{\delta} k_2^{\sigma} [k_1 + k_2]_{\mu} ~=~&
576: - ({\hbox{\Large $\epsilon$}}_{\delta \sigma\alpha\mu}k_{1\beta}
577: -{\hbox{\Large $\epsilon$}}_{\delta \sigma\beta\mu}k_{2\alpha}
578: -{\hbox{\Large $\epsilon$}}_{\delta \sigma\beta\mu}k_{1\alpha}
579: +{\hbox{\Large $\epsilon$}}_{\delta \sigma\beta\mu}
580: k_{2\beta}) k_1^{\delta}k_2^{\sigma}\cr
581: &
582: ~+~{\hbox{\Large $\epsilon$}}_{\sigma\alpha\beta\mu}k_2^{\sigma}~
583: (k_1\cdot k_2 - k_1^2)
584: ~-~{\hbox{\Large $\epsilon$}}_{\sigma\alpha\beta\mu}k_1^{\sigma}~
585: (k_1\cdot k_2 -k_2^2)}
586: \auto\label{epid}
587: $$
588: (\ref{exa}) can be re-expressed in the form (\ref{inde}).
589: As we will see, the identity (\ref{epid}) can be used\cite{hor}
590: to simplify (\ref{inde})
591: in many special kinematic situations. Note that, with $A$ a constant,
592: (\ref{exa}) does not satisfy
593: Bose symmetry. Nevertheless, in asymmetric momentum configurations
594: it can, effectively, appear with a constant coefficient. This
595: will be important for the discussion later in this Section.
596:
597: We define the integral (\ref{tamp}) as the limit $m \to 0$ of that in which
598: a fermion mass $m$ is added. (\ref{inde}) and (\ref{bsym}) hold also when
599: $m \neq 0$ and ultra-violet regularization
600: can be carried out with (\ref{vwi1}) and (\ref{vwi2})
601: maintained. Indeed, it is well-known that the Ward identities (\ref{vwi})
602: can be regarded as a consequence of routing the external
603: momenta as we have done in Fig.~2.1. An ``anomaly ''
604: then appears in the Ward identity for the axial current.
605: Since only the $A_1$ and $A_2$ terms in (\ref{inde}) contribute to
606: the axial current divergence, the anomaly has to appear in these
607: terms. In fact, ultra-violet regularization of
608: (\ref{tamp}) directly produces the contribution
609: $$
610: T_{\mu \alpha \beta}(k_1,k_2) ~= ~ {1\over 4 \pi^2}~
611: {\hbox{\large $\epsilon$}}_{\sigma\alpha\beta\mu}~ k_1^{\sigma} ~+~
612: {1\over 4 \pi^2}~
613: {\hbox{\large $\epsilon$}}_{\sigma\alpha\beta\mu} ~k_2^{\sigma} ~~+~~\cdots
614: \auto\label{uvco}
615: $$
616: leading to the divergence equation (when $m=0$)
617: $$
618: (k_1 + k_2)^{\mu}~T_{\mu \alpha \beta}~=~
619: {1\over 2 {\pi}^2 }~{\hbox{\Large $\epsilon$}}_{\delta\sigma\alpha\beta}
620: ~k_1^{\delta} k_2^{\sigma}
621: \auto\label{awi}
622: $$
623:
624: The (coefficient on the) right-hand side of (\ref{awi})
625: is commonly referred to as ``the anomaly''.
626: Even though the anomaly occurs only in $A_1$ and $A_2$ the vector Ward
627: identities (\ref{vwi1}) and (\ref{vwi2}) require related terms to
628: appear in the other $A_i$.
629: We will be particularly concerned with the infra-red
630: behavior of the massless $A_i$ that is required\cite{cg,bfsy}.
631:
632: \subhead{2.2 Explicit Formulae for the $A_i$}
633:
634: No (non-integral) analytic expression for the full amplitude
635: (\ref{tamp}) exists in the literature. However, it is possible to
636: give explicit expressions in limited kinematic configurations.
637: For example, when $k_1^2=k_2^2~$ the imaginary parts of each of the
638: invariant amplitudes $A_i$ is given in \cite{hor}. For our purposes we
639: will use the following set of formulae, given in \cite{ach}, for the full
640: amplitudes.
641:
642: When $k_1^2 = 0$ ($k_2^2, q^2 < 0,~ m^2 >0$)~,
643: $$
644: \eqalign{A_6~&=~-A_3~= ~- ~{1 \over 2\pi^2}{1 \over k^2_2 -q^2} \biggl(
645: {k_2^2 \over k_2^2 -q^2 } L_1 ~-~ {m^2 \over k_2^2 -q^2 } L_2 ~- ~1\biggr) \cr
646: A_4~&= ~ {1 \over 2\pi^2}{1 \over k^2_2 -q^2 } ~ L_1 \cr
647: A_2~&= ~ {1 \over 4\pi^2}\biggl(
648: {k_2^2 \over k_2^2 -q^2} L_1 ~-~ {m^2 \over k_2^2 -q^2 } L_2 ~- ~1\biggr)\cr
649: A_1~&= ~ {1 \over 4\pi^2}\biggl(
650: {k_2^2 \over k_2^2 -q^2 } L_1 ~+~ {m^2 \over k_2^2 -q^2 } L_2 ~+ ~1\biggr)\cr
651: A_5 &= -A_4 - {3 \over \pi^2}k_2^2 {d \over d k_2^2}\biggl( {1 \over
652: k_2^2 - q^2 } L_1 \biggr) +
653: {3 \over 2\pi^2}k_2^4 \biggl({d \over d k_2^2}\biggr)^2\biggl( {1 \over
654: k_2^2 - q^2 } L_1 \biggr) \cr
655: & ~~~~ + {3 \over 4\pi^2}k_2^2 {d \over d k_2^2}\biggl( {1 \over
656: k_2^2 -q^2 } L_2 \biggr) +
657: {1 \over 2\pi^2}m^2 k_2^2 \biggl({d \over d k_2^2}\biggr)^2
658: \biggl( {1 \over k_2^2 -q^2 } L_2 \biggr)}
659: \auto\label{k2q}
660: $$
661: where
662: $$
663: \eqalign{ ~~~~L_1 ~&=~ -~ \rho~ \ln{ \rho +1 \over \rho -1} ~+~
664: \beta ~\ln{ \beta +1 \over \beta -1} ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\cr
665: L_2 ~&=~ - ~\rho ~\ln^2{ \rho +1 \over \rho -1}~ + ~
666: \beta ~\ln^2{ \beta +1 \over \beta -1} \cr
667: \rho^2~&=~ 1 ~- ~ 4m^2/q^2 ~,~~ ~~ \beta^2~=~ 1 ~- ~ 4m^2/k_2^2 }
668: \auto\label{L1L2}
669: $$
670: Note that the simple relationship between $A_6$ and $A_2$
671: in (\ref{k2q}) is required by the
672: Ward identity (\ref{vwi1}) which, when $k_1^2=0$, becomes
673: $$
674: A_2~=~k_1 \cdot k_2~A_6 ~=~{q^2 - k_2^2 \over 2} ~A_6
675: \auto\label{vwi11}
676: $$
677:
678: If the limit $ m^2 \to 0$ is taken in (\ref{k2q}) the result is
679: $$
680: \eqalign{~~~~A_1~&=~{1\over 4{\pi}^2} \biggl({k_2^2 \over k_2^2 -q^2 }~ln{k_2^2
681: \over q^2} ~+~1 \biggr)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\cr
682: A_2~&=~{1\over 4{\pi}^2} \biggl({k_2^2 \over k_2^2 -q^2 }~ln{k_2^2
683: \over q^2} ~-~1 \biggr) \cr
684: A_3~&=-A_6~=~{1 \over 2{\pi}^2 }{1 \over k_2^2 -q^2}
685: \biggl({k_2^2 \over k_2^2 - q^2}~ln{k_2^2
686: \over q^2} ~-~1 \biggr) }
687: \auto\label{k1m0}
688: $$
689: While the Ward identity (\ref{vwi1}) does not determine $A_5$ in this limit,
690: $A_4$ can be obtained from (\ref{vwi2}).
691:
692: If instead the limit $ k_2^2 \to 0$ is taken, with $m^2 >0$, the result is
693: $$
694: \eqalign{~~~~A_6 ~&= ~-A_3 ~= ~ {1 \over 2 \pi^2} ~{1 \over q^2} \biggl( 1 +
695: ~{m^2 \over q^2} ~\ln^2{ \rho +1 \over \rho -1}~\biggr) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
696: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\cr
697: A_4 ~&=~-A_5 ~=~-~ {1 \over 2 \pi^2} ~{1 \over q^2} \biggl( 2 -
698: ~ \rho ~\ln{ \rho +1 \over \rho -1}~\biggr) }
699: \auto\label{k1k20}
700: $$
701: $A_1~=-A_2$ can be obtained from the vector
702: Ward identities and using (\ref{epid}) gives\cite{ach}
703: $$
704: \eqalign{T_{\mu \alpha \beta} ~&= ~ A_6~q_{\mu}
705: {\hbox{\Large $\epsilon$}}_{\alpha\beta\sigma\delta}~ k_1^{\sigma}
706: k_2^{\delta} \cr & ~+~ (A_4 + A_6)~
707: ({\hbox{\Large $\epsilon$}}_{\mu\alpha\sigma\delta} ~k_1^{\sigma}
708: k_2^{\delta}k_{2\beta}~-~
709: {\hbox{\Large $\epsilon$}}_{\mu\beta\sigma\delta} ~k_1^{\sigma}
710: k_2^{\delta}k_{2\alpha}) }
711: \auto\label{Tk0}
712: $$
713: where $A_4$ and $A_6$ are given by (\ref{k1k20}). Note that the first
714: term has the form of (\ref{exa}). This is consistent just because
715: $k_1^2= k_2^2 =0, ~q^2\neq 0$ is not possible in a symmetric momentum
716: configuration. Also the anomaly is produced by the first term alone
717: while, within the momentum configuration that we are discussing,
718: each term separately satisfies the vector Ward identities.
719:
720: When $k_2^2 \to 0$, with $q^2$ fixed,
721: (\ref{k1m0}) gives
722: $$
723: A_{1,2} ~\to~\pm~ {1 \over 4 \pi^2 }~,
724: ~~~~ A_3~\to ~ {1 \over 2 {\pi}^2}~ {1 \over q^2}
725: \auto\label{k20}
726: $$
727: That is, a pole appears in $A_3$ ($= - A_6$).
728: If, instead, we integrate over spacelike values of $q^2$, we obtain
729: $$
730: \int~ dq^2~A_3(q^2,k_2^2)~f(q^2,k_2^2)~
731: \centerunder{$\longrightarrow$}{\raisebox{-6mm}{$k_2^2 \to 0$}} ~ ~
732: {1\over \pi}~f(0,0)~=~ \int~ dq^2~{1\over \pi}\delta(q^2)~f(q^2,0)
733: \auto\label{dfn}
734: $$
735: (provided $f(q^2,k^2_2)$ is regular at $q^2,k_2^2 = 0$).
736:
737: The pole that appears in $A_3$ (and $A_6$) is the ``anomaly pole''
738: discussed by a number of authors\cite{cg}-\cite{ach}. The coefficient
739: coincides with that of the anomaly and it is possible to give general
740: arguments\cite{cg,bfsy} that this pole is directly required by (\ref{awi}).
741: The simplest way to see that this might be the case
742: is to note that if $k_1^2=k_2^2=0$
743: and $A_4$ and $A_5$ are not (sufficiently) singular
744: the identities (\ref{vwi1}) and (\ref{vwi2}) reduce to the very simple
745: form
746: $$
747: A_3~=~ {2 \over q^2}~A_1 ~, ~~~~ A_6~=~ {2 \over q^2}~ A_2
748: \auto\label{vwi3}
749: $$
750: (\ref{uvco}) then leads directly to (\ref{k20}). In fact, we will
751: see below how the momentum routing of Fig.~2.1 that produces the
752: ultra-violet anomaly (\ref{uvco}) is also responsible
753: for the numerator that accompanies the anomaly pole.
754:
755: The amplitudes $A_4$ and $A_5$ will play very little role in our discussion.
756: It is well-known that these amplitudes do not contribute at $k_1^2=k_2^2=0$
757: when $T_{\mu\alpha\beta}$ is contracted with physical polarization tensors.
758: Our analysis will also be concerned with momentum configurations and
759: components of $T_{\mu\alpha\beta}$ such that these amplitudes do not
760: contribute. Note that (\ref{k1k20}) implies,
761: and it is straightforward to check directly
762: from (\ref{k2q}), that the limits $m \to 0$ and $k_1^2, k_2^2 \to 0$
763: do not commute for $A_4$ and $A_5$. A property that we will avoid in our
764: analysis.
765:
766: Finally we emphasize that if we keep only the pole
767: terms in $T_{\mu\alpha\beta}$, as we will eventually do, then the vector
768: Ward identities will necessarily be violated, for at least some momenta.
769: As elaborated in \cite{arw98} the reggeon Ward identities that are necessary
770: to avoid infra-red divergences in regge limit amplitudes depend on Ward
771: identities being satisfied for all momenta. We will see below
772: that when the Ward identities are
773: satisfied only by a limited range of momenta, infra-red divergences occur
774: that, nevertheless, produce gauge-invariant amplitudes.
775:
776: \subhead{2.3 Interpretation}
777:
778: The results of the previous sub-section extend straightforwardly to the
779: case when there are gauge and flavor symmetries and
780: $T_{\mu \alpha \beta}$ is a three-point amplitude for currents
781: defined in terms of appropriate combinations of fermion fields.
782: The anomaly in (\ref{awi}) is then a number determined by adding
783: all contributing triangle diagrams. Most importantly, as is very well known,
784: the ultra-violet anomaly in all (flavored)
785: axial current Ward identities remains unchanged as gauge field interactions
786: are included\cite{awb}. As a result, the general arguments alluded to
787: above\cite{cg,bfsy} (and more directly the identities
788: (\ref{vwi3}) ) determine that a pole
789: with coefficient given by the anomaly is always present in the special
790: kinematic configuration $k_1^2=k_2^2=m^2=0$.
791: As first argued by 't Hooft\cite{gth1}, if there is confinement and there are
792: no physical massless fermions, this pole
793: has to be reproduced by a Goldstone boson pole. As we will discuss in the
794: next Section,
795: this will provide the basis for our use of the chiral flavor anomaly
796: to extract ``infinite momentum''
797: pion couplings to physical current
798: components that produce scattering amplitudes.
799: For the U(1) anomaly there will be no Goldstone boson pole
800: but instead the $\delta$-function (\ref{dfn}), produced by
801: the integration of the anomaly pole over $q^2$,
802: will contribute in an essential manner to infinite momentum amplitudes.
803:
804: To interpret the pole in
805: (\ref{tamp}) in terms of Landau singularities we note the following.
806: The expressions for the $A_i$ given above demonstrate
807: that, when a fermion mass $m$ is present,
808: only two-particle normal thresholds
809: are present in each invariant channel. These thresholds are
810: responsible for the $\ln{q^2}$ and $\ln{k_2^2}$
811: factors that are present in (\ref{k1k20}). The pole at
812: $q^2 = k_2^2$, which is superficially present in each of the $A_i$,
813: cancels when the logarithms have their physical
814: sheet values. On unphysical sheets of the logarithms a pole is present
815: and corresponds to the triangle Landau singularity. When $k_2^2 \to 0$
816: followed by $q^2 \to 0$ the physical sheet thresholds coincide at the
817: point of interest and the unphysical sheet singularity is able to
818: enhance the thresholds.
819:
820: The simplest example of this last discussion is provided by (\ref{k1k20})
821: which gives
822: $$
823: \eqalign{~~A_6(q^2,m^2)& ~~
824: \centerunder{$\longrightarrow$}{\raisebox{-6mm}{$q^2 \to 0$}}
825: ~~ ~ {1 \over 2 \pi^2} ~{1 \over q^2} \biggl( 1 +
826: ~{m^2 \over q^2} ~\ln^2{ [1 + ({-q^2 \over m^2})^{1\over 2} + \cdots}]
827: ~\biggr) ~~~~~~\st{\longrightarrow}~~\infty ~~~~~~~~~~~
828: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\cr
829: A_4(q^2,m^2) &~~ \centerunder{$\longrightarrow$}{\raisebox{-6mm}
830: {$q^2 \to 0$}}
831: ~~~ {1 \over 2 \pi^2} ~{1 \over q^2} \biggl( 2 -
832: ~ \rho ~\ln{[ 1 + {2 \over \rho} + \cdots] }\biggr)~
833: ~~~~~~~~~~~\st{\longrightarrow}~~\infty}
834: \auto\label{k1k201}
835: $$
836: and so, for $m^2 \neq 0$, the pole is absent. The only finite $q^2$
837: singularity in either amplitude is the threshold at $q^2 = 4m^2$. If
838: we continue around this threshold then $\rho \to - \rho$ and so
839: $$
840: \ln{ \rho +1 \over \rho -1} ~\to ~ \pi i - \ln{ \rho +1 \over \rho -1}
841: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
842: \auto\label{k1k202}
843: $$
844: and the pole at $q^2 = 0$ is present. It is present on the physical sheet
845: only at $m^2 = k_1^2=k_2^2 =0$.
846:
847: We conclude that the Goldstone boson pole appears, in very special kinematics,
848: because an unphysical singularity enters the edge of the physical region
849: in the massless limit.
850: It occurs in $A_3$ (and $A_6$), and not in the other
851: $A_i$, because the unphysical singularity is a double pole rather than
852: a single pole. It would be interesting to determine more explicitly
853: how this feature
854: relates to the momentum routing ambiguity associated with the anomaly.
855:
856: \subhead{2.4 Internal Momentum Analysis}
857:
858: In the next Section we will want to derive anomaly pole couplings from
859: the reduction of more complicated diagrams to triangle diagrams and also
860: to separate the anomaly pole from
861: the ultra-violet anomaly contribution. For these purposes
862: it is important to determine the internal momenta $p$ in (\ref{tamp})
863: that generate the pole. We will see that
864: light-cone momenta play a crucial role. Note that an external
865: light-cone momentum is necessarily involved since
866: if $k_1^2 = k_2^2 = q^2 = 0$ then, necessarily,
867: $k_1 \parallel k_2 \parallel k_+$ where $k_+$ is light-like.
868: We first consider reaching the $q^2=0$ limit via the momentum
869: configuration
870: $$
871: \eqalign{k_1 &= (k_+/\sqrt{2},k_+/\sqrt{2},0,0) ~~~~ ~~
872: \equiv ~~~~k_1^+= k_{1-}= k_+~, ~~k_1^- = 0~ ,~~k_{\perp} =0 \cr
873: \hbox{$\vspace{0.2in}$}
874: k_2 &= (-k_-/\sqrt{2},k_-/\sqrt{2},0,0) ~~~~
875: \equiv ~~~~k_2^+= 0~,~~ k_2^- =k_{2+} = -k_-~ ,~~k_{\perp} =0 }
876: \auto\label{k+k-}
877: $$
878: in which $k_1^2 = k_2^2 = 0$ and $q^2 = - 2 k_+ k_-$.
879:
880: We will shortly understand the anomaly pole contribution to (\ref{tamp})
881: as produced by external momentum numerator factors together with a pole
882: produced (by the denominators) in a part of the integration region
883: that includes zero internal momentum. At first sight,
884: (\ref{k+k-}) is not a very sensible configuration to
885: discuss. If we consider the pole contribution of $A_3$
886: to $ T_{32-}$, for example, this has the form
887: $$
888: T_{23-}~=~-~ {\hbox{\Large $\epsilon$}}_{\sigma\delta 2 3}~
889: {k_1^{\sigma} k_2^{\delta}~k_{1-} \over 2 \pi^2 q^2}
890: ~~=~-~{k_+^2 k_- \over 2 \pi^2 q^2}~~=~ {k_+ \over 4 \pi^2 }
891: \auto\label{A3an}
892: $$
893: and so there is no divergence as $q^2 \to 0$. At best we can obtain a finite
894: contribution by taking $q^2 \sim k_- \to 0$, with $k_+$ kept finite.
895: As a consequence, in the momentum configuration (\ref{k+k-}), the anomaly pole
896: contribution can not be distinguished from other non-singular contributions.
897: However, for our initial goal of obtaining a simple
898: understanding of the origin of the denominator
899: pole the momentum configuration (\ref{k+k-}) will be very useful. (Indeed, it
900: will play a key role throughout the paper.)
901:
902: If we drop the numerator terms
903: in (\ref{tamp})and keep only the $k_+$ and $k_-$ - dependence
904: we obtain
905: $$
906: \eqalign{I(k_+,&k_-,m^2)~ =~ I(q^2, m^2)~= ~ \int~ dp_+ dp_- d^2 p_{\perp}
907: ~ [2p_+(p_- - k_-) - p_{\perp}^2 -m^2 + i\epsilon ]^{-1} \cr
908: &[2(p_+ - k_+)(p_- - k_-) - p_{\perp}^2 -m^2+ i\epsilon]^{-1}
909: [2(p_+ - k_+)p_- - p_{\perp}^2 - m^2 +i\epsilon]^{-1} }
910: \auto\label{a1}
911: $$
912: We will find that $I(q^2, m^2)$ is finite as $\epsilon \to 0$ only when
913: $m^2 \neq 0$. This is not surprising since
914: $I(q^2,m^2)$ is closely related to $A_4$ and $A_6$, as given by
915: (\ref{k1k20}). As we already noted above, the $k_1^2, k_2^2
916: \to 0$ limit commutes with the massless limit for $A_6$, but not for
917: $A_4$. As a result, we expect that for part of $I(q^2,m^2)$
918: the limit $m^2 \to 0$ will not exist. ( Of course, the numerator terms
919: in (\ref{tamp}) will play a central role in determining the nature of the
920: divergence that occurs.) However, the pole term we
921: are looking for appears, with the same (anomaly) coefficient, in both
922: kinematic terms in (\ref{Tk0}) as $m^2 \to 0$. We therefore
923: anticipate that the momentum
924: region generating it will be unambiguous in this limit.
925:
926: We will first evaluate $I(q^2,m^2)$ exactly. After we determine
927: the origin of the pole we will give a more direct argument to locate the
928: contributing momentum region.
929: We begin by making the (scaling) change of variables
930: $$
931: p_+ ~=~x_+ k_+~, ~~~ p_-~=~x_- k_-~,~~~ p_{\perp}~=~
932: (k_+ k_-)^{1\over 2} x_{\perp}
933: \auto\label{cgv}
934: $$
935: and also write $ m^2 ~ - i\epsilon
936: ~=~2 k_+ k_- ~\mu ~=~-q^2~\mu$. If we carry out the angular
937: $x_{\perp}$ integration (which gives a factor of $2 \pi~$)
938: and write $y~= ~x_{\perp}^2 /2$ we then have
939: $$
940: \eqalign{ I(q^2,m^2)~&=~{\pi \over 4~ q^2}~I(\mu)~=~
941: ~{\pi \over 4~ q^2}
942: ~\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} dx_+~\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} d x_-
943: \int_{0}^{+\infty}dy ~~ \times \cr
944: & {1 \over [(x_- -1)x_+ -y - \mu][ (x_- - 1)(x_+ -1) -y - \mu]
945: [ x_-(x_+ -1)- y - \mu]}}
946: \auto\label{imu}
947: $$
948: The propagators can be separated via partial fractions and the $y$ -
949: integration can then be carried out to give
950: $$
951: \eqalign{ I(\mu)~=~ \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}& dx_+
952: ~\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} d x_- ~~
953: {1 \over (x_- - 1)(x_- -x_+)}
954: \ln{[(x_- -1)x_+ - \mu]}\cr
955: & ~-~{1 \over (x_+ - 1) (x_- - x_+)} \ln{[ x_-(x_+ -1) - \mu]}\cr
956: &~+~ {1\over (x_- - 1)(x_+ - 1)}\ln{[ (x_- - 1)(x_+ -1)- \mu]}
957: }
958: \auto\label{imu1}
959: $$
960:
961: We can evaluate (\ref{imu1}) by contour integration in the $x_-$ - plane
962: as follows.
963: The three logarithmic branch points are on the same side of the
964: $x_-$ - integration and the contour can be closed to zero
965: unless $1 > x_+ > 0$. (Note that
966: if the numerators of (\ref{tamp}) were present then we could not
967: close the contour without obtaining a contribution from the
968: large $x_-$ - region.) When $1 > x_+ > 0$ the logarithmic
969: branch cuts lie as illustrated in Fig.~2.2.
970: \begin{center}
971: \epsfxsize=5.5in
972: \epsffile{x-pl.ps}
973:
974: Fig.~2.2 The $x_-$ - plane ( $\mu~= ~ [m^2 -i\epsilon]/q^2$ ).
975: \end{center}
976: In this case, the contour can be closed
977: around the one branch cut, as illustrated, and
978: $I(\mu)$ is then given as an integral over just this discontinuity, i.e.
979: $$
980: \eqalign{ I(\mu)~&=~ 2\pi~i ~\int_{0}^{1}dx_+ \int_{1 + \mu/x_+}^{\infty}
981: dx_- ~~ {1 \over (x_- - 1) (x_- - x_+)}\cr
982: &=~ 2\pi ~i ~\int_{0}^{1}dx_+~{1 \over 1-x_+}~
983: \ln{\big[1 + x_+(1-x_+)/ \mu \bigr]}}
984: \auto\label{imu20}
985: $$
986: which an integration by parts allows us to rewrite as
987: $$
988: \eqalign{ &I(\mu)~=~ 2\pi ~i ~\int_{0}^{1}dx_+~
989: \ln{\big[ 1-x_+ \bigr]}~~
990: {1 -2x_+ \over \mu + x_+(1-x_+)}\cr
991: &~\centerunder{$\longrightarrow$}{\raisebox{-5mm}{$\mu \to 0$}}
992: ~~ 2\pi ~i ~\int_{0}^{1}dx_+~
993: \ln{\big[ 1-x_+ \bigr]}~~\biggl[
994: {1\over x_+ }~-~ {1 \over (1-x_+)} \biggr]
995: }
996: \auto\label{ipts}
997: $$
998:
999: The first term in (\ref{ipts}) is finite while the second one has a
1000: logarithmic divergence of the kind we expected to find. As we discussed, we
1001: expect this divergence to be modified by, and to be dependent on,
1002: the numerator terms that we are presently ignoring. The first term we
1003: expect to be closely related to the anomaly pole term. If we consider the
1004: behaviour of the integrands of both terms near $x_+ =0$ then we note that
1005: the first term has a constant term in it's Taylor expansion while the second
1006: does not. If we extract this term as a piece that is independent of how we
1007: handle the divergence of the second term we obtain
1008: $$
1009: I(\mu)~ = 2\pi~i~~\int_{0}^{1}~dx_+ ~\big[1~+~ O(x_+) \bigr]
1010: ~~ = ~ 2\pi~i ~+ ~ \cdots
1011: \auto\label{imu2}
1012: $$
1013: giving
1014: $$
1015: I(q^2,m^2)~~\centerunder{$\longrightarrow$}{\raisebox{-5mm}{$\mu \to 0$}}
1016: ~~ {\pi^2 ~i \over2 q^2} ~~ + ~~ \cdots
1017: \auto\label{imu4}
1018: $$
1019: If an additional function $R(p_+,p_-,p_{\perp})$ (produced by propagator
1020: numerators, for example)
1021: were present in the
1022: integrand of $I(q^2,m^2)$ then, if we
1023: again use the limit $k_- \to 0 $ to obtain $q^2 \to 0$, the
1024: pole residue would simply contain an additional factor of $R(0,0,0,0)$.
1025:
1026: Note that if we cut off the $x_-$ - integration at $x_- = \lambda_-$ we
1027: obtain an extra contribution to $I(0)$ of the form
1028: $$
1029: \eqalign{ I(0)~&=~ 2\pi ~i ~\int_{0}^{1}dx_+~{1 \over 1-x_+}~
1030: \ln{\biggl[{\lambda^- - x_+ \over \lambda_- -1} \biggr]} \cr
1031: &=~ 2\pi ~i ~\int_{0}^{1}dx_+~\ln{\bigl[ 1-x_+\bigr]}~
1032: \biggl[{1 \over \lambda^- - x_+} - {1 \over \lambda_- -1} \biggr]}
1033: \auto\label{x-co}
1034: $$
1035: in which the integrand has no constant term in it's expansion around
1036: $x_+=0$ and so, in this sense, does not modify the anomaly term
1037: extracted in (\ref{imu2}). Therefore the anomaly term originates
1038: close to the lower end-point for the $x_-$ - integration (i.e.
1039: $x_- =p_- /k_- \sim 1$)
1040: and is, indeed, independent of how we treat the large $x_-$ region.
1041:
1042: That the integration by parts, to obtain (\ref{ipts}),
1043: is necessary to clearly expose
1044: the anomaly term is a consequence of the contour integration we used. We
1045: can extract the same term more directly from $I(q^2,m^2)$ as follows. First
1046: we write
1047: $$
1048: \int_{0}^{+\infty}~ {dy \over [ (x_- - 1)(x_+ -1) -y - \mu]}
1049: ~~~\centerunder{$\to$}{\raisebox{-4mm}{$\mu \to 0$}}~~~
1050: \ln{(x_+ - 1)} ~+\cdots
1051: \auto\label{lny}
1052: $$
1053: giving, if we undo the scaling of $x_-$,
1054: $$
1055: \eqalign{ I(q^2,m^2)~&\to~~
1056: ~{\pi \over 8~ k_+}
1057: ~\int_{0}^{1} dx_+~ln{(x_+ -1)} \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} d p_-
1058: \cr
1059: & {1 \over [(p_- -k_-)x_+ - m^2/2k_+][ p_- (x_+ -1) - m^2/2k_+]}
1060: ~~+~\cdots }
1061: \auto\label{lny1}
1062: $$
1063: We can then close the $p_-$ contour around the second pole to obtain,
1064: in the limit $m^2 \to 0$,
1065: $$
1066: \eqalign{I(q^2)~&= ~{\pi^2i \over 4~ k_+}
1067: \biggl( ~~\int_{0}^{1} dx_+~{ln{(1 - x_+)}
1068: \over k_-~ x_+ }~\biggr) ~~+~\cdots \cr
1069: &= ~ {\pi^2i \over 2~ q^2 }~~+~\cdots }
1070: \auto\label{lny2}
1071: $$
1072: which reproduces (\ref{ipts}), and hence (\ref{imu4}), directly.
1073:
1074: Note that the denominator $k_-~ x_+$ in (\ref{lny2})
1075: is provided by the propagator that carries only the $k_-$
1076: external momentum. The factors $k_-^{-1}$ and $x_+^{-1}$ represent the
1077: separate ``particle'' and ``antiparticle'' poles of this propagator
1078: and both contribute in an essential manner.
1079: $k_-^{-1}$ produces the $(q^2)^{-1}$
1080: pole in the final result. The residue of the pole at $x_+ = 0$, multiplied
1081: by $\ln{(1-x_+)}$ (which is the integrated propagator
1082: contribution obtained from (\ref{lny}) ),
1083: is integrated to produce the final anomaly coefficient.
1084: That both particle and antiparticle poles
1085: contribute to the anomaly pole is
1086: a very important point that we will elaborate on shortly.
1087:
1088: To determine that (\ref{imu4}) is indeed the anomaly coefficient that we want
1089: we must reintroduce the propagator numerators,
1090: that we have so far neglected, and evaluate them
1091: at zero internal momentum. In the configuration (\ref{k+k-}) the
1092: external momentum numerators contribute the combination of
1093: light-like momenta and $\gamma$ - matrices
1094: shown in Fig.~2.3.
1095: \begin{center}
1096: \leavevmode
1097: \epsfxsize=2.8in
1098: \epsffile{trnt1.ps}
1099:
1100: Fig.~2.3 Vertices and Propagator Numerators for $\Gamma_{32-}(k_+,k_-)$.
1101: \end{center}
1102: The corresponding contribution to $\Gamma_{32-}(k_+,k_-)$ is
1103: $$
1104: \eqalign{Tr\{\gamma_5
1105: \gamma_3 ~& [k_2 \cdot \gamma]~ \gamma_2~ [k_1\cdot \gamma]
1106: ~\gamma_- ~[(k_1-k_2) \cdot \gamma]\} \cr
1107: ~&= ~Tr \{\gamma_5
1108: \gamma_3 ~ [k_2^- \gamma_-]~ \gamma_2~ [k_1^+ \gamma_+
1109: - k_2^- \gamma_-] \gamma_-
1110: [k_1^+ \gamma_+] \} \cr
1111: & = ~Tr \{\gamma_5 \gamma_3~\gamma_- \gamma_2~ \gamma_+ \gamma_-
1112: \gamma_+ \} ~k_+^2 k_- \cr
1113: & = ~- 2~Tr \{\gamma_5 \gamma_3~\gamma_2 \gamma_-~ \gamma_+\} ~k_+^2 k_- }
1114: \auto\label{gma1}
1115: $$
1116: The well-known identity for a product of three orthogonal
1117: $\gamma$ - matrices
1118: $$
1119: \gamma_{\alpha}\gamma_{\beta}\gamma_{\lambda}~=~
1120: g_{\alpha\beta} \gamma_{\lambda} ~+~ g_{\beta\lambda} \gamma_{\alpha}
1121: ~-~ g_{\alpha\lambda} \gamma_{\beta} + i \epsilon_{\mu\alpha\beta\gamma}
1122: \gamma^{\mu} \gamma_5
1123: \auto\label{3ga}
1124: $$
1125: then gives
1126: $$
1127: \eqalign{- 4~Tr \{i \gamma_5^2 ~+
1128: ~\gamma_5 \gamma_2\gamma_3 \} ~k_+^2 k_-
1129: & = ~ 4i ~Tr \{ \gamma_5^2 \} ~k_+^2 k_- ~~~~~\cr
1130: & = 16 i ~k_+^2 k_- }
1131: \auto\label{gma11}
1132: $$
1133: Combined with (\ref{imu4}),
1134: this gives the desired contribution of the anomaly pole
1135: (after taking into account the factor of
1136: $1/(2\pi)^4$ in the original integral (\ref{tamp}) ).
1137:
1138: If we return to the original momenta
1139: we see from (\ref{lny})-(\ref{lny2}) that
1140: the relevant integration region for the anomaly pole is
1141: $$
1142: i)~~ p_{\perp}^2 ~
1143: \centerunder{$<$}{\raisebox{-1mm}{$\sim $}}
1144: ~~ q^2 ~~~~
1145: ii)~~0 ~~\leq ~~p_+ ~ \leq k_+ ~~~~
1146: iii) ~~ p_- ~~ \sim ~ ~k_- ~\to ~0
1147: \auto\label{intr01}
1148: $$
1149: and that any additional factors in the integrand (besides the propagator
1150: denominators) are to
1151: be evaluated at zero internal momentum.
1152: The surviving external light-cone momentum then flows directly
1153: around two of the three internal propagators.
1154: This will be very important in the next Section.
1155:
1156: In the following, we will use
1157: manipulations analagous to (\ref{gma1}) and (\ref{gma11}), in which the
1158: numerators carrying the limiting momentum configuration are combined,
1159: to determine whether the anomaly is present in diagrams.
1160: However, as we noted above, the anomaly pole terms are not actually
1161: singular in the limiting momentum configuration we have discussed.
1162: To consistently isolate anomaly pole contributions to
1163: $\Gamma_{\mu\alpha\beta}$ it is necessary
1164: to work in a kinematical configuration
1165: where singular contributions are obtained. This is the case
1166: if an additional external transverse momentum $q_{\perp}$ is part of
1167: the limiting momentum configuration, such that $q^2
1168: \sim q^2_{\perp}$, while the corresponding propagator numerator
1169: provides a factor that is $O(q_{\perp})$ and vanishes more slowly than
1170: $q^2$. We will, nevertheless, be able to
1171: apply the above analysis by exploiting the
1172: Lorentz invariance properties of the internal momentum integration.
1173:
1174: \subhead{2.5 Frame Dependence of the Anomaly Numerator}
1175:
1176: A second momentum configuration that can be used to approach $q^2 = 0$ is
1177: $$
1178: \eqalign{~~~~&k_1 ~= ~(k/\sqrt{2},k /\sqrt{2},0,0) ~~~~ ~~
1179: \equiv ~~~~k_1^+~= k~, k_{1-}~ = 0~ ,k_{\perp} =0 \cr
1180: & k_2 ~= ~(- k/\sqrt{2},- k\cos{\theta}/\sqrt{2}, 0,
1181: - k \sin{\theta}/\sqrt{2})\cr
1182: &\centerunder{$\sim$}{\raisebox{-4mm}{$\theta \to 0$}} ~-~k_1 ~-~
1183: (0,0, k \theta/\sqrt{2}, 0)~= ~-~k_1 ~-~(0,0,q,0) }
1184: \auto\label{k+k-2}
1185: $$
1186: where
1187: $$
1188: q^2 ~=~ (k_1 +k_2)^2 ~
1189: ~\centerunder{$\sim$}{\raisebox{-4mm}{$\theta \to 0$}}
1190: \auto\label{qth}
1191: $$
1192: In the configuration (\ref{k+k-2}),
1193: we obtain the largest numerator if we consider
1194: the anomaly contribution of $A_3$ to $ T_{--3}$. This has the form
1195: $$
1196: T_{--3}~=~ {\hbox{\Large $\epsilon$}}_{\sigma\delta - 3}~
1197: {k_1^{\sigma} k_2^{\delta}~k_{1-} \over q^2}
1198: ~~=~{~k^2 [k \theta /\sqrt{2} ] \over q^2}~ ~~
1199: \centerunder{$\sim$}{\raisebox{-4mm}{$\theta \to 0$}}~~~
1200: {\sqrt{2}k \over \theta}
1201: \auto\label{A3an11}
1202: $$
1203: and so a divergence is present.
1204:
1205: In the limit $q \to 0$ , the external momentum flow
1206: and $\gamma$ - matrix couplings are now as shown in Fig.~2.5
1207: \begin{center}
1208: \leavevmode
1209: \epsfxsize=2in
1210: \epsffile{trnt3.ps}
1211:
1212: Fig.~2.4 Vertices and Propagator Numerators for $ T_{--3}$ .
1213: \end{center}
1214: Essentially the same calculation as (\ref{gma1}) and (\ref{gma11})
1215: gives the numerator in (\ref{A3an11}) directly from the external
1216: momentum propagator numerators. (Note that the propagator that carries
1217: zero momentum in the limiting configuration is now that corresponding
1218: to the vertical line in Fig.~2.4.) It remains, therefore,
1219: to understand the anomaly pole
1220: as arising from an internal zero momentum configuration.
1221:
1222: Since all invariants remain unchanged it must, of course,
1223: be possible to obtain (\ref{k+k-2}) from (\ref{k+k-}) via a Lorentz
1224: transformation. This can be done as follows. We first set $k_+=k_-= q$ (which
1225: can be done trivially via a Lorentz transformation to the ``center of mass
1226: frame''). We then apply a boost
1227: $a_y(\zeta)$ to obtain
1228: $$
1229: \eqalign{k_1 ~&\to~ \biggl({q \cosh{\zeta}\over \sqrt{2}} ,
1230: {q \over \sqrt{2}},
1231: {q \sinh{\zeta}\over \sqrt{2}},0\biggr) \cr
1232: k_2 ~& \to \biggl({q \cosh{\zeta}\over \sqrt{2}}, - {q \over \sqrt{2}},
1233: {q \sinh{\zeta} \over \sqrt{2}},\biggr) ~~=~ k_1 ~ - ~(0,\sqrt{2}q,0,0) }
1234: \auto\label{bay}
1235: $$
1236: which, if $q\cosh{\zeta}=k $ is kept finite as $q \to 0$, differs
1237: from (\ref{k+k-2}) only by a rotation.
1238:
1239: If we consider (\ref{tamp}) directly in the momentum configuration
1240: (\ref{k+k-2}), the numerator contribution giving
1241: (\ref{A3an11}) will be multiplied by a denominator integral that is a Lorentz
1242: invariant. If the reverse Lorentz transformation to that giving
1243: (\ref{k+k-2}) from (\ref{k+k-}) is applied to the momentum integration
1244: variables then $I(q^2,0)$, as given by (\ref{imu}), will appear and the
1245: above analysis can be used to extract the anomaly pole, with (\ref{k+k-2})
1246: now appearing as the limiting momentum configuration. This implies, of course,
1247: that the limit $q^2 \to 0$ is provided by an internal momentum configuration
1248: that is reached by an infinite boost from the original zero momentum region.
1249:
1250: We can further enhance the anomaly numerator if we instead apply $a_y(\zeta)$
1251: directly to (\ref{k+k-}), but now let $q^2 \to 0$ by taking $k_- \to 0$.
1252: This gives
1253: $$
1254: \eqalign{&k_1 ~\to ~\biggl({k_+\cosh{\zeta} \over \sqrt{2}},
1255: {k_+ \over \sqrt{2}},
1256: {k_+\sinh{\zeta} \over \sqrt{2}}, 0\biggr) \cr
1257: &k_2 ~\to ~\biggl({k_-\cosh{\zeta} \over \sqrt{2}},-{ k_- \over \sqrt{2}},
1258: {k_-\sinh{\zeta} \over \sqrt{2}}, 0\biggr)}
1259: \auto\label{bay1}
1260: $$
1261: and so, for example, $T_{23-}$ (defined with respect to the
1262: axes of the new frame) is given by
1263: $$
1264: T_{23- } ~ \sim ~ {\hbox{\Large $\epsilon$}}_{\sigma\delta 23}~
1265: {k_1^{\sigma} k_2^{\delta}~k_{1-} \over q^2}
1266: ~\sim ~ {\bigl[-~k_+ k_- \cosh{\zeta}~\bigr]
1267: ~ ~ k_+\cosh{\zeta} \over \sqrt{2}q^2}
1268: \auto\label{bay3}
1269: $$
1270: Now, if we let $k_- \to 0$ and take $\cosh{\zeta} \to \infty$ such
1271: that $k_- \cosh{\zeta}$ remains finite, the numerator in (\ref{bay3})
1272: $ \to \infty$ while $q^2 \to 0$ and most importantly (as we discuss in
1273: the next subsection) that part of the numerator contained in square brackets
1274: remains finite. This demonstrates that the anomaly pole can have a finite
1275: coupling to infinite momentum states. (It is, of course, crucial
1276: for the enhancement (\ref{bay3}) that the tensor component discussed is
1277: defined with respect to the axes of the new frame.)
1278:
1279: It will be important in succeeding Sections
1280: that both the component of $T_{\mu \alpha \beta}$ that dominates
1281: and the zero momentum line involved, depend on how the anomaly pole limit is
1282: approached (or, equivalently, the Lorentz frame involved). This is
1283: because our analysis of anomaly contributions in high-energy scattering
1284: is not Lorentz invariant, but rather we combine contributions that are
1285: (initially calculated) in different finite and infinite momentum frames.
1286:
1287:
1288: As noted in \cite{cg}, if we consider the helicities
1289: of the internal massless fermions producing the anomaly pole numerator
1290: we find that the fermion
1291: that carries zero momentum must effectively flip it's helicity.
1292: Equivalently, it must reverse it's particle/antiparticle identification.
1293: The vertex at one end of the propagator must be that for production
1294: of a particle while, simultaneously, that
1295: at the other end describes the production of the antiparticle.
1296: This is possible just because, as we discussed above,
1297: both particle and antiparticle
1298: poles contribute to a divergence that occurs when the propagator carries
1299: zero momentum. This process is an integral
1300: part of the formation of a pion pole.
1301:
1302: The pion scattering amplitude that we derive in the next Section will
1303: also contain
1304: a zero momentum propagator (within a U(1) anomaly interaction)
1305: which describes a physical zero momentum
1306: transition. If this process, and that producing the pion pole,
1307: are to be interpreted as a physical processes the Dirac sea must be
1308: shifted at the second vertex relative to the first. The
1309: production of the antiparticle has to be reinterpreted as production of a
1310: state that fills a hole in the sea, i.e. the absorption of an antiparticle.
1311: That is to say, there must be
1312: spectral flow of the Dirac sea during the interaction.
1313: In a field-theoretic path integral language, this phenomenon
1314: is what produces a ``chirality transition''
1315: due to a topological background gauge field. However, in our discussion
1316: there is no implication that a topological background field is involved.
1317:
1318: We also note that the part of our calculation of the
1319: ``anomaly pole'' in the above that
1320: involved only the denominators could equally well be applied to
1321: the calculation\cite{fl0} of a gluon triangle (involving
1322: an effective vertex) that appears in the coupling of a reggeized
1323: gluon to on-shell gluons. This coupling need not satisfy
1324: a gauge invariance Ward identity.
1325: Of course, the $\epsilon$-tensor structure of the anomaly
1326: that is due to the fermionic numerators will not occur. However, a
1327: particle/antiparticle transition, via a zero momentum propagator,
1328: can be responsible for the helicity transition that occurs.
1329:
1330: The ultra-violet anomaly is well-known to
1331: originate from the region
1332: $$
1333: p_+ ~~\sim ~~ \p_- ~~ \sim ~~ p_{\perp}~~ \to ~~\infty
1334: \auto\label{uvan}
1335: $$
1336: Therefore, in principle,
1337: we can keep the anomaly pole in $T_{\mu\alpha\beta}$ while
1338: dropping the ultra-violet anomaly if we integrate only over the
1339: momentum region (\ref{intr01}). Isolating
1340: the anomaly pole from the ultra-violet anomaly will be an important part
1341: of our analysis in the following. While we can
1342: suppose that, as a matter of principle, we are restricting the
1343: integration region, in practise we will simply use
1344: an anomaly pole coupling as discussed in the following
1345: subsection. This violates full
1346: gauge invariance
1347: but, as we discuss, if we keep only the anomaly
1348: pole term and restrict our analysis to $k_1^2=k_2^2=0,~ q^2 \sim 0$ ,
1349: we will keep the partial gauge invariance
1350: that is sufficient to produce gauge-invariant amplitudes.
1351: Nevertheless, the loss of full gauge invariance plays a crucial
1352: role in generating the transverse momentum infra-red divergences that
1353: are the cornerstone of our confinement dynamics. By manipulating the
1354: relative contributions of the anomaly pole and the ultraviolet anomaly
1355: we will effectively be regulating the relative
1356: ultra-violet and infra-red spectral flow.
1357:
1358: \subhead{2.6 The Pole Residue as a Goldstone Boson Coupling}
1359:
1360: A major question is whether we can use the identification of the
1361: anomaly pole as a Goldstone boson pole to obtain information about
1362: the interactions of physical Goldstone bosons.
1363: If we keep just the anomaly pole contributions
1364: of $A_3$ and $A_6$ to $T_{\mu \alpha \beta}$ we can write
1365: $$
1366: T_{\mu \alpha \beta}(k_1,k_2) ~=~-~{1 \over 2 {\pi}^2 } ~
1367: {({\hbox{\Large $\epsilon$}}_{\delta \sigma\alpha\mu}k_{1\beta}
1368: ~-~{\hbox{\Large $\epsilon$}}_{\delta \sigma\beta\mu}
1369: ~ k_{2\alpha})~ k_1^{\delta}
1370: k_2^{\sigma} \over (k_1+k_2)^2} ~~~ +~\cdots
1371: \auto\label{pipo}
1372: $$
1373: This expression does not satisfy the vector Ward identities and does
1374: not have the axial current anomaly. According to the above discussion, it
1375: is nevertheless obtained if we keep only the integration region
1376: (\ref{intr01}) in (\ref{tamp}), together with the momentum dependence
1377: of propagator numerators given by the external momenta.
1378:
1379: When $k_1^2=k_2^2=0$, we can use the identity (\ref{epid}) to obtain
1380: (what is essentially (\ref{Tk0}) with $m^2 \to 0$)
1381: $$
1382: T_{\mu \alpha \beta}(k_1,k_2) ~=~-~{1 \over 2 {\pi}^2 }~{
1383: [~-{\hbox{\Large $\epsilon$}}_{\delta\sigma\alpha\beta} [k_1 + k_2]_{\mu}
1384: ~+~({\hbox{\Large $\epsilon$}}_{\delta \sigma\beta\mu}k_{1\alpha}
1385: ~-~{\hbox{\Large $\epsilon$}}_{\delta \sigma\alpha\mu}
1386: k_{2\beta})~]~ k_1^{\delta}
1387: k_2^{\sigma} \over (k_1+k_2)^2~} ~~~+~\cdots
1388: \auto\label{pipo1}
1389: $$
1390: where the additional omitted terms are those that are less singular as
1391: $q^2=(k_1 +k_2)^2 \to 0$. (Note that to justify omitting these terms it is
1392: crucial that we consider a component in which there is a singularity at $q^2=0$
1393: and the numerator does not cancel the denominator singularity, as in
1394: (\ref{A3an}) ). Each term in (\ref{pipo1})
1395: separately satisfies the vector Ward identities (for momenta
1396: which satisfy $k_1^2=k_2^2= 0$)
1397: but only the first term has the appropriate factorised form to
1398: provide a pion pole coupled to the axial current $A_{\mu}$. The second term
1399: corresponds to the $A_4$ and $A_5$ contributions in (\ref{inde}) which we
1400: anticipated would not contribute to the tensor components that would
1401: appear in our discussion. Therefore, we might expect that we can use
1402: $$
1403: T_{\mu \alpha \beta}(k_1,k_2) ~=~{1 \over 2 {\pi}^2 }~{
1404: [k_1 + k_2]_{\mu}~{\hbox{\Large $\epsilon$}}_{\delta\sigma\alpha\beta}
1405: ~ k_1^{\delta}
1406: k_2^{\sigma} \over (k_1+k_2)^2} ~~~+~\cdots
1407: \auto\label{pipo2}
1408: $$
1409: to obtain physical pion pole couplings, anticipating that $[k_1 +k_2]_{\mu}$
1410: provides the coupling to the axial current $A_{\mu}$ while the factor
1411: ${\hbox{\Large $\epsilon$}}_{\delta\sigma\alpha\beta}k_1^{\delta} k_2^{\sigma}$
1412: provides the coupling to currents $V_{\alpha}$ and $V_{\beta}$. (In a
1413: general current vertex the $1/2{\pi}^2$ in (\ref{pipo2}) will be
1414: replaced by the
1415: appropriate anomaly coefficient.) (\ref{pipo2})
1416: not only satisfies the vector
1417: Ward identities but also produces the anomaly in the axial current.
1418: Remarkably, perhaps,
1419: we have obtained these properties from (\ref{pipo}) simply by
1420: restricting to the momentum region
1421: $$
1422: k_1^2~=~k_2^2~=~0~,~ ~ q^2~ \to~ 0
1423: \auto\label{zmr}
1424: $$
1425: and asking for a factorizable pole residue. Therefore, if we restrict our
1426: discussion to the region (\ref{zmr}) (and to components of
1427: $T_{\mu\alpha\beta}$ to which the second term in (\ref{pipo1}) does
1428: not give a leading contribution) all desired, factorization,
1429: gauge invariance and
1430: anomalous divergence properties are contained in (\ref{pipo2}).
1431:
1432: While it is well-known that (\ref{pipo2}) describes well the decay of a
1433: physical (massive) pion into physical photons there is, not surprisingly,
1434: an obvious problem with attempting to use it to discuss the
1435: coupling of a pion to dynamical gluon currents.
1436: It is crucial for our infra-red anomaly analysis
1437: that the ``pion'' is massless. In this case
1438: the ``pion pole'' appears only in the $q^2 \to 0$ limit in which
1439: $k_1 \parallel k_2 \parallel k_+$ where $k_+$ is light-like.
1440: Because of the {\Large $\epsilon$}-tensor,
1441: the numerator in (\ref{pipo2}) then vanishes in any
1442: finite momentum configuration - as we have seen explicitly
1443: above. In general, if the limiting
1444: configuration is approached via a vanishing spacelike momentum $q$ and
1445: $k_+$ is the non-vanishing component of $k$ then, at best,
1446: $$
1447: {\hbox{\Large $\epsilon$}}_{\delta\sigma\alpha\beta}~ k_1^{\delta}
1448: k_2^{\sigma}~~\sim~~k_+ q
1449: \auto\label{qdep}
1450: $$
1451: which, of course, still vanishes as $q \to 0$.
1452: The fundamental reason for this is that
1453: (\ref{pipo2}) is
1454: antisymmetric in $k_1$ and $k_2$ and, because of Bose symmetry,
1455: can only describe the contribution of
1456: antisymmetric momentum configurations of the kind we have discussed.
1457: For consistency, it
1458: must vanish at the symmetric point where $k_1^2 = k_2^2 = q^2 =0$.
1459: The conclusion is, clearly, that we can not obtain a finite coupling
1460: as $q^2 \to 0$ and the limit onto the (massless)
1461: pion mass-shell is taken. Therefore,
1462: the anomaly provides no information about physical, finite momentum,
1463: massless pion-gluon interactions.
1464:
1465: However, we see from (\ref{bay3}) that
1466: if we go to an ``infinite momentum frame'' we can
1467: keep components of $q$ finite, even though $q^2 \to 0$ and the ratio
1468: $q/k_+$ goes to zero. If we use (\ref{pipo2}), instead of
1469: (\ref{bay3}), to evaluate $T_{23-}$ in this frame, we obtain
1470: $$
1471: T_{23- } ~ \sim ~ {\hbox{\Large $\epsilon$}}_{\sigma\delta 3-}~
1472: {k_1^{\sigma} k_2^{\delta}~k_{12} \over q^2}
1473: ~\sim ~ {\bigl[-~k_+ k_- (\sinh{\zeta} )~\bigr]
1474: ~ ~ k_+\sinh{\zeta} \over \sqrt{2} ~q^2}
1475: \auto\label{bay4}
1476: $$
1477: which, not surprisingly, gives the same leading result as (\ref{bay3}).
1478: (Note that the second term in (\ref{pipo1}) gives a non-leading
1479: contribution.)
1480: The ``infinite momentum'' pion coupling is now given as
1481: $$
1482: \hbox{\Large $\epsilon$}_{\sigma\delta 3 - }~
1483: k_1^{\sigma} k_2^{\delta}~
1484: ~\sim \bigl[~k_+ k_- \sinh{\zeta}~\bigr]
1485: \auto\label{bay5}
1486: $$
1487: which, as we noted above, is finite if $k_- \to 0$ with
1488: $ k_- \cosh{\zeta}~$ kept finite. We conclude that,
1489: although the anomaly provides no information about finite momentum
1490: gluon couplings, it can potentially provide
1491: information about the ``wee-gluon'', or ``wee-parton'' couplings
1492: of the infinite momentum pion. We will discuss such couplings in the
1493: next Section. We will find that the current component involved can not
1494: be that of a simple local current but must itself originate from a non-local
1495: interaction that produces an effective local interaction at infinite
1496: momentum.
1497:
1498: \newpage
1499:
1500: \mainhead{3. BUILDING COLOR SUPERCONDUCTING PION AMPLITUDES}
1501:
1502: \subhead{3.1 The Gluon and Quark Spectrum}
1503:
1504: When the gauge symmetry of QCD is sontaneously broken
1505: from SU(3) to SU(2) the resulting theory
1506: is commonly called
1507: ``Color Superconducting QCD''. Our eventual goal is to give a detailed
1508: construction of high-energy
1509: scattering amplitudes (for Goldstone bosons) in color superconducting
1510: QCD and then to discuss the restoration of the full gauge symmetry
1511: using Reggeon Field Theory.
1512: In this paper we want to concentrate on how the kinematical and
1513: dynamical properties of the chiral flavor and U(1)
1514: anomalies discussed in the previous Section combine with
1515: transverse momentum infra-red divergences to produce
1516: such amplitudes. For this purpose we will use
1517: only general properties of the gluon and quark spectrum, which
1518: we now discuss, and will make only qualitative comments about color and color
1519: factors.
1520:
1521: Some number of quark flavors will be present,
1522: which we will not specify since we will not give them distinct masses.
1523: The symmetry breaking could be due to the expectation
1524: value of a complex color triplet scalar field, with
1525: Yukawa couplings generating a mass for SU(2) singlet
1526: quarks. Alternatively, and perhaps preferably,
1527: since the scalar field itself plays no role in our discussion,
1528: the symmetry breaking could equally well be dynamical and due to a
1529: diquark condensate associated with the additional chiral symmetry breaking
1530: dicussed below. Independently of the nature of the symmetry breaking,
1531: the complete structure of the broken gauge group,
1532: i.e. all the interactions of massless and massive gluons amongst themselves
1533: together with their interactions with massless and massive quarks, will be
1534: important.
1535:
1536: The gluon spectrum consists of a massless SU(2) triplet, two massive SU(2)
1537: doublets with mass $\sim M_C$, and a massive singlet with mass $M_C$.
1538: The quark spectrum consists of a massless SU(2) doublet and a massive singlet
1539: for each flavor, with mass $m_C \sim M_C$.
1540: Because of the equivalence of quark and antiquark color
1541: representations, there is an extended chiral symmetry\cite{kog}.
1542: In particular, SU(2) color singlet
1543: axial currents can be formed from pairs of quark fields and pairs
1544: of antiquark
1545: fields, in addition to the usual quark/antiquark currents. We will
1546: generically refer to the SU(2) singlet quark/antiquark Goldstone bosons
1547: associated with chiral symmetry breaking as pions and will refer to
1548: the singlet quark/quark Goldstone bosons as nucleons.
1549:
1550: We will be considering infra-red divergences due to both the massless
1551: quarks and the massless gluons. To discuss these divergences
1552: we should, initially, invoke a
1553: second symmetry-breaking mechanism to give all quarks and gluons masses.
1554: A second complex triplet scalar could be used for this purpose or the
1555: symmetry breaking could again be dynamical.
1556: We simply assume that there is an
1557: an initial mass $M$ for the SU(2) gluons that is taken to zero and
1558: an SU(2) quark mass $m$ that is also taken to zero. When $m \to 0$ the
1559: anomaly pole
1560: discussed in the last Section, will be produced by massless quark loops.
1561: This will be our starting point. When the gluon mass $M \to 0$ also,
1562: there will be an overall
1563: infra-red divergence that will produce confinement and
1564: select the color zero amplitudes in which the anomaly pole becomes a pion
1565: or nucleon pole. As we will see, our analysis involves only on mass-shell
1566: states and gauge-invariant transverse momentum diagrams. The only breaking
1567: of gauge invariance in our discussion will be that associated with
1568: phase-space cut-offs in anomaly generating diagrams. As we implied in the
1569: previous Section, gauge-invariance will be preserved
1570: for those momenta involved in physical amplitudes.
1571:
1572: \subhead{3.2 Transverse Momentum Infra-red Divergences}
1573:
1574: Before discussing anomaly couplings we first summarize, briefly, the
1575: established properties of the gauge-invariant
1576: massless transverse momentum diagrams that will
1577: be involved. The overall infra-red divergence we discuss in the following
1578: will be produced when these diagrams couple through anomaly generating
1579: effective interactions.
1580:
1581: It is well-known
1582: from perturbative calculations\cite{fkl}-\cite{arw93} that
1583: in gauge theories the regge limit is described
1584: by transverse momentum diagrams. When all gluons and quarks
1585: have a mass there are no infra-red divergences and high-order leading and
1586: next to leading log calculations show that these diagrams
1587: exponentiate (in momentum space)
1588: to produce regge pole and regge cut behavior.
1589: Both gluons and quarks lie on regge trajectories, i.e. they ``reggeize''.
1590: Reggeization of the gluon corresponds to the exponentiation
1591: $$
1592: {s \over t - M^2 }~~\equiv~{1 \over t-M^2 }\int{dJ~S^J \over (J-1)}~
1593: ~~\to ~~~ {s^{1 - \Delta(t)} \over t - M^2 }
1594: ~~\equiv~{1 \over t-M^2} \int{dJ~S^J \over (J-1+\Delta(t))}
1595: \auto\label{regg}
1596: $$
1597: where $1 - \Delta(t)$
1598: is the (massive) gluon regge trajectory given (in the leading log
1599: approximation) by
1600: $$
1601: \Delta(-Q^2)~=~ {(Q^2 + M^2) \over 16 \pi^2}
1602: \int {d^2k_1 \over k_1^2 +M^2}
1603: ~{ d^2k_2 \over k_2^2 + M^2}~
1604: \delta^2(Q -k_1-k_2)
1605: \auto\label{regt}
1606: $$
1607:
1608: As is illustrated by (\ref{regg}),
1609: momentum space exponentiation corresponds to power series summation in
1610: the $J$ - plane ($J = $ complex angular momentum). We can further illustrate
1611: this by considering an amplitude for which the leading high-energy
1612: behavior is given by the regge-cut corresponding
1613: to two reggeized gluons. In this case the lowest-order result is (apart
1614: from a normalization factor)
1615: $$
1616: A_0(J,t)~=~ {1 \over J-1}~\int {d^2k_1 \over k_1^2 +M^2}
1617: ~{ d^2k_2 \over k_2^2 + M^2}~
1618: \delta^2(Q -k_1-k_2)
1619: \auto\label{2rdi12}
1620: $$
1621: where $t=Q^2$ .
1622: The momentum space exponentiation corresponding to reggeization of the gluons
1623: is now described by replacing the fixed pole at $J=1$ by the two-reggeon
1624: propagator
1625: $$
1626: \Gamma_2~=~{1 \over J-1 + \Delta(k_1^2) + \Delta(k_2^2)}
1627: \auto\label{2rdi2}
1628: $$
1629: giving
1630: $$
1631: A_0(J,t) ~\to~ A(J,t)~=~
1632: \int {d^2k_1 \over k_1^2 +M^2}~{ d^2k_2 \over k_2^2 + M^2}~
1633: {\delta^2(Q -k_1-k_2)
1634: \over J-1 + \Delta(k_1^2) + \Delta(k_2^2)}
1635: \auto\label{2rdi}
1636: $$
1637: Further momentum space exponentiation is provided by
1638: reggeon interactions that, in the $J$ - plane, simply iterate
1639: (\ref{2rdi}) - which we identify as a ``two-reggeon state''.
1640: The form of the interaction depends on the
1641: $t$ - channel color of the iterated reggeon state, i.e.
1642: we can write\cite{bs} (imposing $k_1 + k_2 = k_1'+ k_2'$)
1643: $$
1644: \Gamma_{22}(k_1,k_2,k_1',k_2' )=
1645: a~(k_1+k_2)^2+b~M^2 - c~R_{22}\left(k_1,
1646: k_2,k_1',k_2'\right)~,
1647: \auto\label{g22}
1648: $$
1649: where $a, b$ and $c$ are color factors (that include an overall normalization
1650: factor) and
1651: $$
1652: \eqalign{
1653: R_{22}(k_1,k_2,k_1',k_2')= ~~
1654: &~{{\left(k^2_1+M^2\right)\left(
1655: {k^2_2}'+M^2\right)+\left(k^2_2+M^2\right)\left(
1656: {k^2_1}'+M^2\right)}\over
1657: {\left(k_1-k_1'\right)^2+M^2}}\cr
1658: + &~{{\left( k^2_1+M^2\right)\left( {k^2_1}'+M^2\right)+
1659: \left( k^2_2 +M^2\right)\left({k^2_2}'+M^2\right)}
1660: \over {\left( k_1 -
1661: k_2'\right)^2+M^2}}~. }
1662: \auto\label{r22}
1663: $$
1664: The (massive) BFKL equation\cite{fkl} is simply the color zero
1665: reggeon ``Bethe-Salpeter''
1666: equation obtained by iterating the reggeon interaction $\Gamma_{22}$ in
1667: reggeon diagrams. $\Gamma_{22}$ is not a Fredholm kernel and so
1668: the solution of the BFKL equation need not contain only regge poles. Indeed,
1669: the BFKL pomeron is generated from the large transverse momentum region
1670: and is a fixed cut. For our purposes, we will impose an upper transverse
1671: momentum cut-off and (ultimately) will utilise only the infra-red properties
1672: of the BFKL equation.
1673:
1674: In general, it can be shown\cite{asen} that the contributions of all
1675: logarithms (down to an arbitrary non-leading level) can be described
1676: by transverse momentum diagrams.
1677: Abstract S-Matrix results\cite{gpt}-\cite{arw00}
1678: on unitarity in the complex angular momentum plane (reggeon unitarity)
1679: imply that the transverse momentum diagrams can be organized into an elaborate
1680: exponentiation phenomenon in which
1681: a complete set of reggeon
1682: diagrams appears, involving all possible $J$-plane multi-reggeon states.
1683: For our present purposes we require only a few infra-red properties that
1684: existing calculations, combined with general arguments, imply
1685: are satisfied by the complete set of reggeon diagrams
1686: (or, equivalently, the complete set of transverse momentum diagrams).
1687: A more extensive discussion can be found in \cite{arw93}.
1688:
1689: When $M \to 0$ infra-red divergences appear in both the
1690: reggeon trajectories and the (integrated)
1691: reggeon interactions. At first sight the divergence
1692: $$
1693: \Delta(Q^2) ~~\centerunder{$\longrightarrow$}
1694: {\raisebox{-5mm}{$M^2 \to 0$}} ~~ \ln{M^2}
1695: \auto\label{del0}
1696: $$
1697: exponentiates to zero all reggeon amplitudes
1698: via the regge pole exponentiation (\ref{regg}). In the $J$ - plane
1699: this exponentiation of divergences is reflected in the vanishing of
1700: the reggeon propagator (\ref{2rdi2}), and all higher
1701: multi-reggeon propagators. However, since divergences also appear in the
1702: reggeon interactions, to discuss the $M\to 0$ limit in detail,
1703: it is advantageous
1704: to undo the reggeon diagram organization and go back to transverse momentum
1705: diagrams. The reggeon interactions and reggeon trajectory
1706: contributions can be combined into ``kernels'' $
1707: K^I_N(\hdots,k_i,\hdots,{k_j}', \hdots)$, where $I$ denotes
1708: SU(2) color. If the kernels are defined
1709: to include a transverse
1710: momentum conserving $\delta$-function they are dimensionless
1711: (in transverse momentum) and describe the iteration of
1712: dimensionless
1713: lowest-order ``multigluon transverse momentum states'' $T_N$ where
1714: $$
1715: T_N~=~{1 \over J-1}~ \int~ \prod_{i=1}^N~ {d^2k_i \over k_i^2 }
1716: \auto\label{2rdi1}
1717: $$
1718: For example,
1719: $$
1720: \eqalign{
1721: K_2^I (k_1,k_2,k_1',k_2')
1722: &~=~ \delta^2(k_1+k_2-k_1'-k_2')~\biggl[\Gamma_{2,2}^I
1723: (k_1, k_2,k_1',k_2') \cr
1724: &+ ~k_1^2 k_2^2 \left[ \Delta(k_1^2)
1725: + \Delta (k_2^2) \right]
1726: \bigl[ {{1} \over {2}} \delta^2\,
1727: (k_1 - k_1') + {{1} \over {2}} \delta^2\, (k_1 - k_2')
1728: \bigr] \biggr]\cr
1729: }
1730: \auto\label{ki2}
1731: $$
1732:
1733: For simplicity we refer to $T_N$ as a ``multigluon state'' in the
1734: following. In this context a multigluon state will always be the lowest-order
1735: transverse momentum diagram contributing to a multi-reggeon state.
1736: As such, the multigluon state will carry the color and signature
1737: properties of the parent multi-reggeon state. Note that gauge
1738: invariance (in the form of reggeon Ward identities\cite{arw98})
1739: implies that the kernels $K^I_N$ have zeroes (when any $k_i$ or ${k_j}'$
1740: vanishes) which, at fixed $Q^2$, prevent the poles in the $T_N$
1741: from producing divergences. At fixed $Q^2$, therefore, the
1742: divergences come only from the trajectory
1743: and interaction terms contained in the kernels.
1744:
1745: When the $t$-channel
1746: color is non-zero the divergences produced by $\Gamma_{2,2}^I$ do not cancel
1747: those due to the $\Delta(k_i^2)$ terms in (\ref{ki2}) and, in general,
1748: for a multigluon kernel with non-zero color, the interaction
1749: divergences do not cancel the trajectory divergences. As a result
1750: $$
1751: T_N~K^I_N~
1752: =~{1 \over J-1}~ \int~ \prod_{i=1}^N~ {d^2k_i \over k_i^2 }
1753: ~K^I_N(\hdots,k_i,\hdots,{k_j}', \hdots)~\to ~\infty~,~~~Q^2, I \neq ~0
1754: \auto\label{KIN}
1755: $$
1756: and so the exponentiate of divergences due to reggeization dominates and
1757: sends the sum of all diagrams in any colored
1758: channel to zero, as illustrated in Fig.~3.1.
1759: \begin{center}
1760: \leavevmode
1761: \epsfxsize=4.5in
1762: \epsffile{kiker.ps}
1763:
1764: Fig.~3.1 Iteration of a Massless Gluon Kernel.
1765: \end{center}
1766: When $I=0$ and $Q^2 ~\neq 0$,
1767: the trajectory and interaction
1768: divergences do cancel. As a result there is no
1769: exponentiation of divergences. $K^0_2$, as given by (\ref{ki2}),
1770: is the familiar (massless) BFKL kernel and
1771: if there is no ultra-violet cut-off on the
1772: transverse momenta (as we will shortly impose)
1773: the iteration shown in Fig.~3.1 produces the BFKL pomeron.
1774:
1775: The disappearance of all colored multigluon states is not
1776: confinement since, in the color zero diagrams,
1777: the gluon poles in the states remain - even though there is
1778: a cancelation of divergences for $Q^2 \neq 0$.
1779: If the iterated diagrams are coupled gauge invariantly
1780: to scattering states then such couplings will also have the
1781: necessary zeroes to make the complete amplitude finite at fixed $Q^2$.
1782: This is the infra-red
1783: finiteness property which is extensively exploited in BFKL applications.
1784: Nevertheless, at $Q^2 = 0$ a singularity remains that is
1785: associated with the multigluon states and whose exact nature depends on
1786: the behaviour of the kernels as $Q^2 \to 0$. Confinement could be produced
1787: if the $Q^2 = 0$ singularity can be
1788: absorbed into a ``condensate'', as will be
1789: the case at the end of our analysis. \footnote{In effect, we will
1790: use the scale
1791: invariance properties of color SU(2) reggeon diagrams, which generate all of
1792: the conformal symmetry properties of the BFKL pomeron, only to generate a
1793: factorizing infra-red condensate. We then build up the regge pole nature of
1794: the pomeron through the remaining, massive, part of the gauge group.}
1795:
1796: In leading-log calculations the infra-red finiteness
1797: property of the dimensionless
1798: kernels leads directly to
1799: conformal scale invariance. In general non-leading log contributions the
1800: introduction of a scale for the gauge coupling
1801: destroys all scale-invariance properties. If,
1802: however, there is an infra-red fixed point for the gauge coupling
1803: (as is the case when a large number of massless quarks are present) the
1804: scale invariance properties will still be present in the infra-red region.
1805: In this paper we effectively assume the existence of such a fixed point.
1806: We will also, for the purposes of this paper, impose an upper cut-off
1807: on the transverse momenta. Infra-red finiteness
1808: then implies that the kernels $K^0_N$ scale canonically
1809: as $Q^2 \to 0$ so that
1810: $$
1811: \int_{|k_i|^2, |k^\prime_j|^2 ~<~\lambda} ~\prod_i {d^2k_i \over k^2_i}
1812: ~\prod_j {d^2k^{\prime}_j \over {k'}^2_j}~
1813: K^0_N ( k_1, \cdots k_N, k^{\prime}_1, \cdots k^{\prime}_N)
1814: ~ \sim ~ ~\int^{\lambda_{\perp}} {dQ^2 \over Q^2}
1815: \auto\label{irscl}
1816: $$
1817: where, as in the above, $Q = \sum k_i = \sum k'_j $ . If (\ref{irscl})
1818: is obtained via the limit $M^2 \to 0$, this divergence would appear
1819: as a factor of $\ln{ [M^2 / \lambda_{\perp}]}$.
1820:
1821: To understand the implications of this last divergence
1822: we formally rewrite (\ref{irscl}), analogously to (\ref{KIN}), as
1823: $$
1824: (J-1)^2 ~T_N ~T'_N ~K^0_N
1825: \auto\label{irscl0}
1826: $$
1827: and note that infra-red finiteness implies firstly that
1828: $(J-1)~T'_N~K^0_N$
1829: is finite when the $k_i$ are finite and, also, that $(J-1)T_N~K^0_N$
1830: is finite when the $k'_j$ are finite. Consequently,
1831: there are two contributions to the
1832: divergence in (\ref{irscl}), depending on
1833: whether the $Q^2$ - integration is performed as part of the integration over
1834: the $k_i$ or as part of the integration over the ${k'}_j$. In the first case
1835: the divergence is obtained from the region $\{ ~k_i~ <<~ k'_j ~~
1836: \forall ~i,j\}$ ,
1837: whereas in the second case it is the region $\{ ~k'_j~ <<~
1838: k'_i ~~\forall ~i,j\}$. In effect, either the $T_N$ or the $T'_N$ integration
1839: produces the divergence, but not both.
1840:
1841: If a color zero multigluon
1842: state is coupled without the Ward identity zero
1843: (involving the transverse momentum of the complete state) that
1844: is (normally) a consequence of gauge invariance, (\ref{irscl}) is
1845: a potential source of an infra-red divergence. This will be the case
1846: for the anomaly couplings that we discuss below. It is important that
1847: as the kernel
1848: $K^0_N$ is iterated a divergence always occurs when $Q^2 \to 0$.
1849: The degree of divergence does not increase but rather,
1850: in an integral involving a product of many kernels, there is
1851: a distinct contribution from each $T_N$. The divergent $T_N$
1852: can then be isolated and the remaining integrations
1853: organized, in the complete set of diagrams,
1854: as illustrated in Fig.~3.2.
1855: \begin{center}
1856: \leavevmode
1857: \epsfxsize=5.5in
1858: \epsffile{kiker2.ps}
1859:
1860: Fig.~3.2 Isolation of the Divergence Associated with $T_N$.
1861: \end{center}
1862: It follows that the residue of the logarithmic divergence
1863: can be written in the factorized form
1864: $$
1865: {1 \over J-1 }~ \int~{dQ^2 \over Q^2}
1866: \int ~\prod_i {d^2k_i \over k^2_i} ~\delta^2(Q - \sum k_i)
1867: ~|M^0_N (J, k_1, \cdots k_N, \lambda_{\perp})|^2
1868: \auto\label{cld}
1869: $$
1870: where $M^0_N$ is given by the sum of diagrams shown in Fig.~3.3.
1871: \begin{center}
1872: \leavevmode
1873: \epsfxsize=3.4in
1874: \epsffile{mona.ps}
1875:
1876: Fig.~3.3 Diagrams Contributing to $M^0_N$
1877: \end{center}
1878:
1879: In the following we will need to know the interaction
1880: between massless multigluon states and the massive (reggeized) gluons that
1881: are also in the theory. For SU(2) color zero we can
1882: distinguish two classes of multigluon states, as follows.
1883: First we introduce the color charge
1884: conjugation operator for both gluons and quarks. For a gluon field, with
1885: color matrix $A^i_{\alpha, \beta}$, color charge conjugation $C$ gives
1886: $$
1887: A^i_{\alpha\beta}~~\to ~~-~A^i_{\beta\alpha}
1888: \auto\label{gccc}
1889: $$
1890: while a quark with a given helicity is transformed to an antiquark of the
1891: opposite helicity. We can also define the signature $\tau$ of a multigluon
1892: state as $\tau=\pm 1 $
1893: for an even/odd numbers of gluons. There are, essentially,
1894: two distinct color zero combinations of gluon fields, i.e.
1895: $$
1896: Tr\{ \delta_{ij}~ A^i~A^j\}~, ~~~ Tr\{ \epsilon_{ijk}~ A^i~A^j~A^k\}
1897: \auto\label{cz}
1898: $$
1899: which both have $C= +1$ but can, respectively, create $\tau=+1$ and
1900: $\tau= -1$ states. However, since a multigluon state inherits
1901: the signature of a multireggeon state, $\tau$ must satisfy
1902: $$
1903: \tau~=~C~P
1904: \auto\label{tcp}
1905: $$
1906: where $P$ and $C$ are, respectively,
1907: the behavior of the coupling of the
1908: multigluon state under the parity and color
1909: charge conjugation operations.
1910: In perturbation theory such couplings have $P= +1$ for color zero.
1911: $P= -1$ corresponds to ``abnormal'' parity (as would be required
1912: for the coupling of a color zero axial vector - such as the winding-number
1913: current). From (\ref{cz}) and (\ref{tcp}), it then follows that
1914: only even signature combinations of gluons can couple. Odd signature
1915: multigluon states can couple only via the abnormal parity
1916: properties of the anomaly couplings that we discuss next.
1917: However, a kernel describing the
1918: interaction of massless and massive gluons will not contain any anomaly
1919: and so, as illustrated in Fig.~3.4, it will vanish
1920: for odd-signature combinations of massless gluons.
1921: \begin{center}
1922: \leavevmode
1923: \epsfxsize=2.4in
1924: \epsffile{rgint.ps}
1925:
1926: Fig.~3.4 Interaction of Massive and Massless Gluons.
1927: \end{center}
1928: In the following we will also need to
1929: assume that, at least for $\lambda_{\perp}$ sufficiently
1930: small, when odd signature gluons do couple (via an anomaly coupling)
1931: and then interact amongst themselves the
1932: $M^0_N(J, \cdots)$ given by Fig.~3.3 is not singular for $J \geq 1$. This
1933: will justify our extraction of an overall scaling divergence from what, in
1934: lowest-order, is just a simple, odd-signature, multigluon state.
1935:
1936: We will need only elementary properties of quark (and antiquark)
1937: transverse momentum
1938: diagrams. Although we will not need to discuss reggeization effects in any
1939: detail, it is important that massless gluons again produce infra-red
1940: divergences in multi-quark transverse momentum
1941: kernels defined analagously to the
1942: multi-gluon kernels. Again, also, the exponentiation of reggeization implies
1943: that only color zero states survive.
1944: In fact, because our introduction of regge kinematics will be to some
1945: extent artificial, even the use of transverse momentum diagrams for
1946: quarks will seem, in part,
1947: to be forced. If the ``full multi-regge'' calculation, to which we refer
1948: at various points in this paper, were to be carried out then quark
1949: transverse momentum diagrams would appear directly and naturally. Color zero
1950: quark (and antiquark) states would be directly selected by infra-red
1951: divergences.
1952:
1953: For fermions,
1954: in addition to using light-cone momenta $k_{\pm} = (k_0 \pm k_1)/\sqrt{2}$ ,
1955: it is convenient\cite{kms}
1956: to use complex momenta $\kappa = k_2 +ik_3$ to describe
1957: transverse momenta and also to use a corresponding notation for transverse
1958: $\gamma$ - matrices, i.e.
1959: $$
1960: \gamma~=~(~\gamma_2~+~i~\gamma_3~)/\sqrt{2},
1961: ~~~~\gamma^*~=~(~\gamma_2~-~i~\gamma_3~)/\sqrt{2}
1962: \auto\label{cga}
1963: $$
1964: We then have
1965: $$
1966: \gamma^2~=~ {\gamma^*}^2 ~=~0~, ~~~~
1967: \gamma~\gamma^*~+~ \gamma^*~\gamma ~= ~2
1968: \auto\label{cga1}
1969: $$
1970:
1971: In the regge limit the transverse part of
1972: an exchanged fermion propagator dominates, i.e. for a massless fermion
1973: $$
1974: {\st{k} \over k^2} ~~\to ~~ {1 \over 2} \biggl(\gamma^*{1 \over \kappa*}
1975: + \gamma {1\over \kappa} \biggr)
1976: \auto\label{frp}
1977: $$
1978: where the two terms represent the two different chiralities. For two fermion
1979: exchange the combination of opposite sign chiralities dominates and so the
1980: transverse momentum state corresponding to (\ref{2rdi1}) is
1981: $$
1982: F_2~=~{1 \over J}~ \int~ d^2\kappa_1 d^2\kappa_2
1983: \biggl( {\gamma \over \kappa_1 }\otimes {\gamma \over \kappa_2 }
1984: ~~+~~ {\gamma^* \over \kappa_1^* }\otimes {\gamma^* \over \kappa_2^* }\biggr)
1985: \auto\label{f2tr}
1986: $$
1987: where the $\otimes$ sign indicates that the two $\gamma$ - matrices are
1988: separately associated with the two fermion lines.
1989:
1990: \subhead{3.3 Pion Couplings to Wee Gluons}
1991:
1992: We now generalize the light-cone analysis of the
1993: triangle anomaly pole in the previous
1994: Section to derive further anomaly pole couplings involving wee gluons.
1995: It will be helpful to describe these couplings before we
1996: discuss their role in producing high-energy scattering amplitudes.
1997:
1998: The massless pion (and nucleon) Goldstone states we create will have two
1999: distinct components, as illustrated in Fig.~3.5(a).
2000: \begin{center}
2001: \leavevmode
2002: \epsfxsize=4in
2003: \epsffile{pwgcn.ps}
2004:
2005: Fig.~3.5 (a) Pion Components (b) the Anomaly Coupling.
2006: \end{center}
2007: A massless pion, with light-cone momentum $k^+_1$,
2008: will contain an (odd-signature, color zero) ``wee-gluon'' component with
2009: light-cone momentum $k_2^-$ (where $k_2^-/ k^+_1 \to 0$ ) together with
2010: a massless quark-antiquark pair that carries the flavor
2011: quantum numbers and the light-cone momentum $k^+_1$.
2012: The pion coupling to both components will be provided by
2013: the triangle diagram anomaly as
2014: illustrated in Fig.~3.5(b).
2015: We discuss a diagram containing three massless gluons since this
2016: is the simplest color zero, odd signature, multigluon state
2017: of the kind discussed in the previous subsection.
2018: Our discussion will easily generalize
2019: to any number of massless gluons coupling at adjacent points.
2020: The anomaly couplings we obtain will imply
2021: that the leading high-energy behavior
2022: in pion scattering arises when
2023: either the quark or the antiquark carries all
2024: the light-cone momentum $k^+_1$. For our immediate
2025: discussion we will take it to be the quark that carries this momentum.
2026:
2027: Fig.~3.5(b) contains two
2028: ``effective vertices'' that are each obtained by placing propagators on-shell
2029: in a larger diagram, as illustrated in Fig.~3.6. As in our discussion
2030: of the elementary triangle diagram we justify keeping only
2031: the anomaly pole part of the diagram by appropriately
2032: restricting the internal momentum
2033: region. As we discuss in the following subsection, the on-shell
2034: propagators will then arise consistently
2035: from longitudinal momentum integrations (that are external to the triangle).
2036: \begin{center}
2037: \leavevmode
2038: \epsfxsize=4in
2039: \epsffile{fanom1n.ps}
2040:
2041: Fig.~3.6 Reduction to a Triangle.
2042: \end{center}
2043: We again allow light-like
2044: momenta $k_1^+$ and $k_2^-$ to flow through the diagram and
2045: generate the numerator factors shown.
2046: The pion mass-shell will be approached
2047: in the limit that we take $k_2^- \to 0$ with $k_1^+$ kept fixed.
2048: In this limit, therefore, the massless gluons become wee gluons.
2049:
2050: The generation
2051: of an effective vertex for the wee gluons is straightforward and is
2052: illustrated in Fig.~3.7.
2053: \begin{center}
2054: \leavevmode
2055: \epsfxsize=4in
2056: \epsffile{rdve.ps}
2057:
2058: Fig.~3.7 Generation of an Effective Vertex.
2059: \end{center}
2060: The wee gluons will all carry the same (longitudinal) polarization
2061: and so, as the hatched lines in Fig.~3.7 are placed on-shell,
2062: we will obtain an effective vertex
2063: $$
2064: \gamma_-
2065: \int ~{dk'_{1^+} ~\gamma_+ k_1^+ \over k'_{1+} k_1^+ + \cdots }
2066: ~\gamma_-
2067: \int ~{dk'_{2^+} ~\gamma_+ k_1^+ \over k'_{2+} k_1^+ + \cdots }
2068: ~\gamma_- ~
2069: = ~ \gamma_- \gamma_+ \gamma_- \gamma_+ \gamma_-~=~4\gamma_-
2070: \auto\label{rdve}
2071: $$
2072: We will give more details on how these integrations arise later.
2073:
2074: The generation of an effective vertex involving the external
2075: quark/antiquark pair is a little more complicated.
2076: Because the internal quark and antiquark carry distinct quantum numbers
2077: they can interact only by gluon exchange. To obtain a gauge-invariant
2078: transverse momentum diagram the gluon must be on-shell.
2079: In a conventional transverse momentum diagram the
2080: produced quark/antiquark pair would have opposite chiralities (to couple
2081: to the transverse momentum state (\ref{f2tr})). This will
2082: not be the case in our analysis since the
2083: quark/antiquark pair will carry the
2084: light-cone momentum $k^+_1$. However, as we
2085: discuss further in the following,
2086: we expect our analysis to be the continuation to
2087: light-like pion momentum of spacelike reggeized pion
2088: exchange within which the quark/antiquark pair would appear
2089: as a transverse momentum state.
2090:
2091: The interaction needed to
2092: produce a quark/antiquark pair (with opposite chiralities)
2093: in a transverse momentum state
2094: has the $\gamma$ - matrix structure shown in Fig.~3.8(a).
2095: The quark/antiquark interaction that we will need is shown in Fig.~3.8(b).
2096: In both cases we have included
2097: the (upper) $\gamma$ - matrices that come from the internal
2098: numerators of the triangle diagram as well as the (lower) $\gamma$ - matrices
2099: associated with the propagating quark/antiquark state. The middle
2100: $\gamma$ - matrices are the couplings to be
2101: produced by the exchanged gluon.
2102: \begin{center}
2103: \leavevmode
2104: \epsfxsize=3in
2105: \epsffile{mint.ps}
2106:
2107: Fig.~3.8 (a) Production of a Transverse State (b) The Needed Interaction.
2108: \end{center}
2109: In the ``needed interaction'',
2110: one $\gamma_{\perp}$ interaction will be necessary
2111: to obtain the anomaly numerator.
2112: In our case we will need
2113: $\gamma_2$ because we will specifically choose the $\{3\}$ -
2114: component of the axial current generating the triangle diagrams we utilise
2115: (see Fig.~3.11 below).
2116: The replacement of the second $\gamma_{\perp}$ interaction by $\gamma_-$
2117: is necessary to allow the quark to carry a light-like momentum implying, of
2118: course, that the spin structure of the
2119: quark/antiquark state can not be symmetric.
2120:
2121: The $\gamma$-matrix structure of the
2122: interaction due to the exchange of an on-shell
2123: massless gluon can be written as
2124: $$
2125: \sum_{i=1}^4~ \gamma^i ~\otimes ~ \gamma_i ~=~ \gamma^+ ~\otimes ~\gamma_+ ~+~
2126: \gamma^- ~\otimes ~ \gamma_-~+~\gamma^*_{\perp} ~\otimes ~\gamma_{\perp} ~
2127: +~\gamma_{\perp} ~\otimes ~\gamma^*_{\perp}
2128: \auto\label{m0int}
2129: $$
2130: where the $\otimes$ factor indicates that the two $\gamma$ - matrices
2131: operate on distinct fermion lines. The diagonal nature of this interaction
2132: implies that it can not produce either the interaction of Fig.~3.8(a) or
2133: that of Fig.~3.8(b).
2134: The exchange of an on-shell massive gluon with mass $M_C$ produces,
2135: however, an additional interaction
2136: $$
2137: { \gamma \cdot \hat{k} ~\otimes ~ \gamma \cdot \hat{k} \over M_C^2}
2138: \auto\label{mMint}
2139: $$
2140: where $\hat{k}$ is the momentum of the gluon.
2141: As is shown in Fig.~3.9,
2142: \begin{center}
2143: \leavevmode
2144: \epsfxsize=4in
2145: \epsffile{mMint.ps}
2146:
2147: Fig.~3.9 The Exchange of an On-Shell Massive Vector
2148: \end{center}
2149: the new interaction contains the needed coupling. (It also
2150: contains the transverse state coupling of Fig.~3.8(a).)
2151: The $\gamma$ - matrix and momentum structure of the effective vertex
2152: involving Fig.~3.9 is then as illustrated in Fig.~3.10.
2153: \begin{center}
2154: \leavevmode
2155: \epsfxsize=5.5in
2156: \epsffile{rdve1n.ps}
2157:
2158: Fig.~3.10 Generation of a Second Effective Vertex.
2159: \end{center}
2160: We have defined $\tilde{k}$ such that $k_1^+$
2161: flows directly into the quark line without flowing along the exchanged gluon
2162: line. (This will give the final high-energy behavior most directly.) In this
2163: case the $\hat{k}$ appearing in Fig.~3.9 is identified with $\tilde{k}
2164: + k_2^-$ and so, as illustrated, the component of (\ref{mMint}) that we need
2165: is
2166: $$
2167: { \tilde{k}_2~(k_2^- + \tilde{k}^-)~~\gamma_2 \otimes \gamma_- \over M_C^2}
2168: \auto\label{mMint1}
2169: $$
2170:
2171: In Fig.~3.11 we combine together the anomaly triangle diagram numerators
2172: and the $\gamma$ - matrix dependence of the above effective vertices
2173: for the triangle diagram of Fig.~3.6.
2174: As illustrated, the resulting numerator factor is
2175: $$
2176: \eqalign{ \gamma_2~ [ k_2^- \gamma_-]~ \gamma_5
2177: \gamma_3 ~ [k_1^+ \gamma_+]~ \gamma_-~ [k_1^+ \gamma_+]~ \gamma_-~
2178: ~& = ~-2~ \gamma_5 \gamma_2 \gamma_-\gamma_3 \gamma_+ \gamma_-
2179: ~~ (k_1^+)^2 k_2^- \cr
2180: & = ~- 4~\gamma_- \gamma^2_5 ~ ~(k_1^+)^2 k_2^- ~~+ ~\cdots \cr
2181: & = ~- 4~\gamma_- ~ ~ (k_1^+)^2 k_2^- ~~+ ~\cdots }
2182: \auto\label{gma12}
2183: $$
2184: which includes the anomaly numerator, together with an additional
2185: $\gamma_- $ that couples to the produced
2186: quark/antiquark pair.
2187: \begin{center}
2188: \leavevmode
2189: \epsfxsize=3.7in
2190: \epsffile{fanom2n.ps}
2191:
2192: Fig.~3.11 The Full Anomaly Numerator.
2193: \end{center}
2194: The role of the $\gamma_2$ - coupling in
2195: producing (\ref{gma12}) is clear.
2196:
2197: We will put the exchanged gluon on mass-shell via the $\tilde{k}^+$ -
2198: integration. Including the numerator factor of $(\tilde{k}^- + k_2^-)$
2199: that appears in (\ref{mMint1}) this integration has the form
2200: $$
2201: \int {d \tilde{k}^+~(\tilde{k}^- + k_2^-) ~\gamma_-
2202: \over 2(\tilde{k}^- + k_2^-) \tilde{k}^+~ -~\tilde{k}_{\perp}^2~ -~M_C^2 }~
2203: \times ~ \cdots ~~~\sim ~~ \gamma_-
2204: \auto\label{msh1}
2205: $$
2206: The momentum dependence of the quark/antiquark effective vertex is
2207: then simply the remaining factor of $\tilde{k}_2 $ in (\ref{mMint1}).
2208: The denominator of the reduced
2209: diagram coincides with that of the triangle diagram,
2210: and so the anomaly pole is generated straightforwardly. The full
2211: anomaly pole amplitude produced by Fig.~3.5(a) is therefore
2212: $$
2213: ~\gamma_- ~ { \bigl[~(k_1^+)^2 k_2^- \tilde{k}_2~\bigr] \over M_C^2~q^2}
2214: \auto\label{Fan1}
2215: $$
2216: The presence of a massive gluon is clearly crucial
2217: for the generation of this amplitude.
2218: (Since we are not going to sum diagrams nor include
2219: color factors in our discussion we will also
2220: (effectively) ignore all numerical factors.)
2221:
2222: \subhead{3.4 The Four-Current Amplitude and the Contributing Diagrams}
2223:
2224: A major purpose of the approach developed in
2225: this paper is to avoid, as much as possible, the multi-regge
2226: theory that has been a feature of our previous papers. Our intention is
2227: to focus directly on properties of the anomaly and thus to
2228: arrive, as directly as is possible,
2229: at the dynamical interactions of pions (and nucleons).
2230: Having the above pion couplings in hand, it might be anticipated
2231: that we could obtain a pion scattering amplitude by considering
2232: a four axial current amplitude
2233: $$
2234: M_{{\mu}_1{\mu}_2{\mu}_3{\mu}}~(p_1,p_2,p_3,p_4)~=~
2235: <{A}_{{\mu}_1}^1(p_1){A}_{{\mu}_2}^2(p_2)
2236: {A}_{{\mu}_3}^3(p_3){A}_{{\mu}_4}^4(p_4)>
2237: \auto\label{4ca}
2238: $$
2239: in which the currents carry
2240: flavor quantum numbers such that pion (or nucleon)
2241: scattering could appear. If there is confinement (of SU(2) color)
2242: and chiral symmetry breaking, we
2243: expect to find a contribution to the current amplitude of the
2244: form (with a momentum conserving $\delta$-function removed)
2245: $$
2246: M_{{\mu}_1{\mu}_2{\mu}_3{\mu}}~\centerunder{$\longrightarrow$}
2247: {\raisebox{-5mm}{$p_1^2,p_2^2,p_3^2,p_4^2 ~ \to 0$}}
2248: ~ {p_{1{\mu}_1}p_{2{\mu}_2}p_{3{\mu}_3}
2249: p_{4{\mu}_4}
2250: \over
2251: p_1^2~p_2^2~p_3^2~p_4^2 } ~~A(s,t)~~+~~~\cdots
2252: \auto\label{mcp}
2253: $$
2254: where $s=(p_1 + p_3)^2$, $t=(p_1 + p_2)^2$ and, up to a normalization factor,
2255: $A(s,t)$ is the pion scattering
2256: amplitude. The omitted terms are less singular as $p_i^2 \to 0, i=1,..,4$.
2257:
2258: We would not expect, of course, to be able to find the pion amplitude
2259: $A(s,t)$ at finite momentum. Instead, we might anticipate that
2260: combining the regge limit ($s \to \infty$ , $t$ fixed)
2261: with the mass-shell limit ( $p_i^2 \to 0, i=1,..,4$ ) would enable us
2262: to exploit the infinite momentum properties of the anomaly discussed in the
2263: previous Section. We would look for the appearance of
2264: pion poles via the anomaly pole interactions discussed above.
2265: Isolating the anomaly pole dynamically (i.e. within a larger diagram)
2266: is, however, highly non-trivial. To
2267: proceed without multi-regge theory we will have to follow
2268: a procedure which may appear contrived, if not artificial. It will,
2269: nevertheless, have the significant advantage of taking
2270: us directly to the high-energy pion scattering amplitude. While
2271: we will briefly explain how the procedure would be fully
2272: justified within a complete multi-regge analysis, we will be able
2273: to stay away from the full calculation.
2274: We will indeed consider a four-current amplitude but the currents
2275: will not be simple local operators.
2276: We will also describe the formation of amplitudes
2277: in terms of diagrams that can be thought of, initially, as
2278: feynman diagrams. However, many of the
2279: integration regions in the diagrams will be
2280: cut-off, or even removed altogether. Before
2281: amplifying on our procedure, or discussing the justification,
2282: we first describe the kinds of diagrams that will be involved.
2283:
2284: To have all the necessary anomaly effects present
2285: the diagrams must, unfortunately perhaps, be extremely
2286: complicated. Even though almost all of this complexity will gradually
2287: drop away as we proceed towards a physical pion scattering amplitude.
2288: The simplest class of diagrams which combine all the anomaly interactions
2289: are those shown in Fig.~3.12(a).
2290: As indicated, the diagrams contain both massless and massive gluons
2291: together with massless quarks.
2292: From diagrams of the form shown in Fig.~3.12(a),
2293: we will obtain pion scattering via pomeron exchange
2294: as illustrated in Fig.~3.12(b).
2295: The $F_i$ amplitudes contain diagrams that will
2296: generate the flavor anomaly and a pion pole as described above.
2297: The $U$ amplitudes contain diagrams that will
2298: generate the U(1) anomaly, as described in \cite{arw011} and \cite{arw01}.
2299: The $U$ amplitudes
2300: will provide the coupling of the pion to the ``pomeron''
2301: that is exchanged in the regge limit.
2302: \newline\parbox{3.4in}{\begin{center}
2303: \epsfxsize=3.4in
2304: \epsffile{pipnn1n.ps}
2305: \newline$~$
2306: \newline $~$
2307: \epsfxsize=3.2in
2308: \epsffile{pipnn1not.ps}
2309:
2310: (a)
2311: \end{center}}
2312: \parbox{2.5in}{
2313: $~$
2314: \newline $~$
2315: \newline $~$\newline $~$
2316: \newline$~$
2317: \epsfxsize=2.5in
2318: \epsffile{pipi3.ps}
2319: \newline $~$
2320: \newline $~$\newline $~$
2321: \newline $~$\newline $~$
2322: \newline $~$
2323: \centerline{(b)}}
2324: \begin{center}
2325: Fig.~3.12 (a) The Simplest Diagrams (b) $\pi-\pi$ Scattering via
2326: Pomeron Exchange.
2327: \end{center}
2328:
2329: Having discussed the diagrams that generate the flavor anomaly
2330: in the previous subsection it will be helpful, at this point,
2331: to give the structure of the
2332: diagrams contributing to $U_L$. Apart from the substitution
2333: of a quark/antiquark pair for a gluon, these are essentially the
2334: diagrams discussed in \cite{arw011}.
2335: The simplest diagrams have the form shown in Fig.~3.13.
2336: \begin{center}
2337: \leavevmode
2338: \epsfxsize=2.3in
2339: \epsffile{tmom1n.ps}
2340:
2341: Fig.~3.13 One of the Simplest Diagram Contributing to $U_L$.
2342: \end{center}
2343: As illustrated schematically in Fig.3.14, if the hatched lines
2344: are placed on-shell the diagram of Fig.~3.13 reduces
2345: to a triangle diagram containing the anomaly.
2346: \begin{center}
2347: \parbox{1.4in}{
2348: \begin{center}
2349: \leavevmode
2350: \epsfxsize=1.1in
2351: \epsffile{tmom1na.ps}
2352: \end{center}
2353: }
2354: \parbox{1.8in}{
2355: \leavevmode
2356: \epsfxsize=1.7in
2357: \epsffile{anomp1.ps}
2358: }
2359: \parbox{0.9in}{\begin{center}{\large U(1) Anomaly}\end{center}}
2360: \newline
2361: \parbox{4in}{
2362: \leavevmode
2363: \epsfxsize=3.8in
2364: \epsffile{anomp2.ps}
2365: }
2366: \end{center}
2367: \begin{center}
2368: Fig.~3.14 Producing the U(1) Anomaly.
2369: \end{center}
2370: A crucial feature of this reduction is that the ``anomaly pole'' is integrated
2371: over and so, as illustrated, is manifest
2372: as a $\delta$-function that factorizes the transverse momentum dependence of
2373: the wee gluon interaction and the ``parton interaction''
2374: of the quarks and massive gluons. To give more details of this
2375: reduction we will need the kinematics used to discuss
2376: the full diagrams of Fig.~3.12(a).
2377:
2378: Let us first assume that (schematically) the diagrams of Fig.~3.12(a)
2379: are generated by full feynman diagrams involving local
2380: axial currents. In the
2381: next subsection we will expose the subtleties which imply that
2382: this can not be the case. This will lead directly to an
2383: amended procedure, which we then follow. We would like
2384: each $F_i$ amplitude to be an anomaly pole amplitude derived, in principle,
2385: from underlying diagrams within which, a loop integration
2386: is restricted to the region (\ref{intr01}). In this region
2387: a light-cone momentum circulates which is essentially
2388: the corresponding external (pion) momentum. This momentum is ``large''
2389: compared to the zero mass of the gluons. The central idea would
2390: be that, in the combined regge and mass-shell
2391: limit, the dominant contribution to the full amplitude
2392: is obtained from this region of integration.
2393: We would argue that the
2394: internal large light-cone momenta will combine with
2395: the external regge limit to produce similar results to a multi-regge limit
2396: in that we will be allowed to treat all the massless gluons as if they
2397: were exchanged in a regge kinematic regime. As a result many propagators
2398: will be placed on-shell, including those that reduce the $F$ -
2399: amplitude to an effective triangle diagram that
2400: contains the flavor anomaly as described in the previous sub-section.
2401: Similarly, within the $U$ - amplitude lines will be
2402: placed on-shell by both the external regge limit and the internal
2403: ``regge limit'' of the
2404: massless gluons such that the triangle diagrams appear that
2405: contain the (U(1)) anomaly. As with the flavor anomaly,
2406: the internal integration can be restricted to a light-cone region
2407: such that the anomaly interaction is separated out.
2408:
2409: Provided the massless gluon configurations reduce to transverse
2410: momentum diagrams as we have just described we would expect, a priori,
2411: that the violation of gauge invariance associated with isolating
2412: the anomaly pole will produce the
2413: logarithmic scaling divergence discussed in subsection 3.2.
2414: We would
2415: expect this divergence to occur separately for all odd-signature
2416: massless gluon combinations, since interactions which iterate this
2417: divergence are absent in this case. Therefore, in
2418: the ``dominant'' (divergent) contribution from diagrams of
2419: the form of Fig.~3.12(a), all the massless gluons
2420: should carry zero transverse momentum. This, in turn, would appear to
2421: self-consistently justify keeping only the anomaly pole part of the
2422: $F$ and $U$ amplitudes.
2423:
2424: \subhead{3.5 Dynamical Isolation of the Anomaly Pole }
2425:
2426: As we saw in Section 2, the light-like kinematic
2427: configurations in which the
2428: anomaly pole appears in the triangle diagram are extremely special.
2429: Consequently, as we noted above, isolating it's occurrence within larger
2430: diagrams is very non-trivial. In particular,
2431: if we use the full uncut diagram of Fig. 3.6
2432: as an axial current coupling, except that
2433: the internal loop integration is restricted
2434: to the region (\ref{intr01}), then we have
2435: the following problem with the above schematic procedure. When the
2436: uncut diagram appears as part of a much bigger diagram, as it should do in
2437: the diagrams of Fig.~3.12(a),
2438: the integration restriction is not actually sufficient to induce the regge
2439: kinematics we want. Even if it were, the light-like
2440: momentum configurations produced by multigluon
2441: transverse momentum divergences,
2442: although very close to those in which the anomaly pole
2443: appears, would not be quite what is needed.
2444:
2445: These problem are caused because when the diagram that gives
2446: the pion coupling of Fig.~3.5(a) is a component of a larger diagram,
2447: the light-cone
2448: momentum denoted by $\tilde{k}^{'-}$ in Fig.~3.15(a)
2449: should be integrated over.
2450: \begin{center}
2451: \leavevmode
2452: \epsfxsize=5in
2453: \epsffile{inflcn.ps}
2454:
2455: Fig.~3.15 (a) $\tilde{k}^{'-} = 0$ (b) The $\tilde{P}^{'+}
2456: \to \infty$ Coupling.
2457: \end{center}
2458: The presence of this
2459: momentum has two effects. First it gives a mass $ \sim
2460: \tilde{k}^{'-} k_1^+$ to the quark/antiquark pair that prevents
2461: the appearance of the pion anomaly pole. Secondly, if it flows
2462: through any of the massless gluon propagators, it will combine with the
2463: light-like momentum flowing in from the $U$ amplitude to remove
2464: the transverse momentum divergence of the
2465: massless gluon state.
2466:
2467: To remove these problems we make the momentum
2468: restriction that $\tilde{k}^{'-} = 0$, i.e. $\tilde{k}^{'-}$
2469: is not integrated over.
2470: This will allow us to follow explicitly the schematic
2471: procedure outlined in the previous subsection.
2472: In effect, though, it is this restriction that generates
2473: the logarithmic transverse momentum
2474: divergences which are the cornerstone of our dynamics. Within this
2475: presentation, it may therefore appear artificial and perhaps even
2476: unphysical at first sight.
2477: However, this restriction would automatically
2478: appear if the current was not a simple local operator but was instead a
2479: non-local current component that originates from a further external
2480: infinite momentum limit as illustrated in Fig.~3.15(b). (As would
2481: be exactly the case if we used multi-regge theory
2482: to first obtain the pion as a spacelike reggeized state.)
2483: In this case, the axial
2484: current component is an effective point coupling
2485: derived by placing an intermediate quark state
2486: on-shell, via an integration over $\tilde{k}^{'-}$.
2487: (Using the $\tilde{k}^{'-}$ - integration for this
2488: purpose leaves intact the full loop integration generating the anomaly.)
2489:
2490: Probably, the feature that local axial currents are not only not needed
2491: but are not wanted in our formalism is a deep matter of principle.
2492: It seems to be essential that our pion be extracted as a wee-parton
2493: component of additional infinite momentum external states.
2494: (Effectively exploiting the ``triviality of the infinite
2495: momentum vacuum'' to the maximum.)
2496: The additional external states should be vector particles with the
2497: appropriate polarizations to induce an axial current vertex.
2498: It is interesting (and perhaps also a deep feature of our procedure) that
2499: the quantum numbers involved imply these particles could
2500: actually be $W's$ and the $ Z^0$.
2501:
2502: Although it would be a more complicated calculation,
2503: there would be other advantages in making the further infinite momentum
2504: limit part of our discussion. In particular it would eliminate the
2505: need to appeal to the
2506: phase-space restriction involved in generating the anomaly pole to justify
2507: placing the hatched lines of the anomaly generating diagrams on-shell.
2508: Indeed, it should now be clear that if we want to proceed systematically
2509: we can not really avoid multi-regge theory and
2510: we are paying a heavy price by trying to do so.
2511: If we simply studied the limit producing the
2512: multi-regge amplitude of Fig.~3.16
2513: \begin{center}
2514: \leavevmode
2515: \epsfxsize=4.5in
2516: \epsffile{wzsc.ps}
2517:
2518: Fig.~3.16 A Multi-Regge Amplitude.
2519: \end{center}
2520: no questionable procedures would be necessary.
2521: The appearance of the reduced
2522: triangle diagram in the coupling of the external $W$ and $Z_0$ states
2523: would be (complicated but) straightforward in principle.
2524: The anomaly (or pion) pole would directly appear in conjunction with
2525: the transverse momentum divergences.
2526: The one subtlety that would remain
2527: would be the interplay between the ultra-violet
2528: and infra-red contributions of both the chiral and
2529: U(1) anomalies. However, we will not elaborate on this here.
2530:
2531: It is important to note that, in this paper,
2532: we will isolate the anomaly pole (in principle by a
2533: phase-space restriction)
2534: in all the anomaly subdiagrams within our amplitudes.
2535: In \cite{arw98} we proposed
2536: starting with initial states that had effectively the same
2537: wee gluon content as the pions we create via the anomaly pole. However, we
2538: then allowed them to scatter into arbitrary multi-reggeon states and
2539: argued that the anomaly interactions generate
2540: an overall logarithmic infra-red divergence that
2541: selects the allowed physical states and amplitudes.
2542: In the present discussion, we will
2543: require pion poles in both the initial and final states. Nevertheless, for
2544: subtle reasons the overall divergence will remain logarithmic.
2545:
2546: As a final point, before we proceed to the
2547: construction of actual amplitudes, we
2548: note that that we will impose a cut-off in all
2549: transverse momenta. This has a dual purpose. Firstly, to obtain contributions
2550: from ``relatively simple'' (gauge-dependent) feynman diagrams
2551: to gauge-invariant transverse momentum diagrams (that have contributions,
2552: of course, from
2553: many feynman diagrams). Secondly we will want to exploit the infra-red scaling
2554: properties of multigluon
2555: transverse momentum diagrams that lead to infra-red divergences
2556: as discussed in the above sub-section.
2557: Our final results will be presented
2558: entirely in terms of transverse momentum diagrams or, at a later stage,
2559: reggeon diagrams.
2560:
2561: \subhead{3.6 Light-Cone Momenta and Lorentz Frames}
2562:
2563: Light-cone momenta are clearly a central feature of our discussion.
2564: In discussing the various components of diagrams of the form of
2565: Fig.~3.12(a) we will need to allow for a variety of light-cone
2566: momenta, both externally and as integration
2567: variables. In particular, to introduce the triple-regge U(1) anomaly
2568: interaction the wee gluons in an outgoing pion must be associated with
2569: a light-cone whose space direction is orthogonal to that of the incoming
2570: wee gluon light-cone. To describe this
2571: we will need to introduce some new light-cone
2572: notation. In addition we will need to introduce a set of Lorentz frames in
2573: which the various external momenta take specific forms.
2574:
2575: We begin in what we will call the ``finite momentum frame'' ${\cal F}_L$
2576: for the left-hand
2577: part of Fig.~3.12(a). In this frame we write
2578: $$
2579: \eqalign{p_1 ~&=~{k}^{1^+}~+~{q}^{1^-} \cr
2580: &=~{k}_{1^-}~+~{q}_{1^+} \cr
2581: &=({k \over \sqrt{2}},{k \over \sqrt{2}},0,0)~
2582: +~({q \over \sqrt{2}},- {q \over \sqrt{2}},0,0 )}
2583: \auto\label{kin1l}
2584: $$
2585: The notation is straightforward in that ${k}^{1^+}$ is
2586: a vector with raised
2587: index component along the light-cone defined by the
2588: positive $\{1\}$ - axis (and all other othogonal components are
2589: zero). Simiilarly ${q}^{1^-}$ is a vector with raised
2590: index component along the light-cone defined by the
2591: negative $\{1\}$ - axis.
2592: The same vectors can be labeled via lowered index components as usual.
2593: We similarly write
2594: $$
2595: \eqalign{p_2 ~&=~- ~{k}^{2^+}~-~{q}^{2^-} \cr
2596: ~&=~- ~{k}_{2^-}~-~{q}_{2^+} \cr
2597: &= ~- ({k \over \sqrt{2}},0,{k \over \sqrt{2}},0)
2598: ~-~({q \over \sqrt{2}},0,-{q \over \sqrt{2}},0)}
2599: \auto\label{kin2l}
2600: $$
2601: where now ${k}^{2^+}$ is a vector with raised
2602: index component along the light-cone defined by the
2603: positive $\{2\}$ - axis while ${q}^{2^-}$ is a vector with raised
2604: index component along the light-cone defined by the
2605: negative $\{2\}$ - axis.
2606: Since
2607: $$
2608: p_1^2 ~= ~p_2^2~=~2kq
2609: \auto\label{kin21l}
2610: $$
2611: we see that
2612: $$
2613: q \to 0 ~~\implies ~~p_1^2 ,~ p_2^2 ~\to ~0
2614: \auto\label{kin021l}
2615: $$
2616:
2617: In the ``infinite momentum frame'' ${\cal F}_I$,
2618: in which we will consider the
2619: complete scattering process, the momenta $p_1$ and $p_2$ are obtained from
2620: their finite momentum frame forms by applying a boost $a_z(\zeta)$ along
2621: the $z$-axis. If $C=cosh \zeta$ and $S=sinh \zeta$ then
2622: $$
2623: p_1 ~=~ (C ~{k +q \over \sqrt{2}},{k -q\over \sqrt{2}},0,S~{k+q \over \sqrt{2}})
2624: \auto\label{kin3l}
2625: $$
2626: and
2627: $$
2628: p_2 ~=~ - (C~ {k +q \over \sqrt{2}},0,
2629: {k -q \over \sqrt{2}},S~{k+q \over \sqrt{2}})
2630: \auto\label{kin4l}
2631: $$
2632:
2633: Similarly, in the ``finite momentum frame'' ${\cal F}_R$
2634: the momenta entering the right-hand
2635: part of Fig.~3.12(a) have the form
2636: $$
2637: \eqalign{p_3 ~&=~{k}^{2^+}~+~{q}^{2^-} \cr
2638: &=({k \over \sqrt{2}},0,{k \over \sqrt{2}},0)
2639: ~+~({q \over \sqrt{2}},0,{- q \over \sqrt{2}},0)}
2640: \auto\label{kin5}
2641: $$
2642: and
2643: $$
2644: \eqalign{p_4 ~&=~-~{k}^{1^+}~-~{q}^{1^-} \cr
2645: &=~- ({k \over \sqrt{2}},{k \over \sqrt{2}},0,0)
2646: ~-~({q \over \sqrt{2}},-{q \over \sqrt{2}},0,0)}
2647: \auto\label{kin6}
2648: $$
2649: and so we also have
2650: $$
2651: p_3^2 ~= ~p_4^2~=~2kq
2652: \auto\label{kin21r}
2653: $$
2654:
2655: For the right-hand momenta, however, the infinite momentum frame ${\cal F}_I$
2656: is reached from
2657: the finite momentum frame ${\cal F}_R$
2658: by applying a boost $a_z(-\zeta)$ along
2659: the $z$-axis. ${\cal F}_R$ is therefore reached from ${\cal F}_L$ by a boost
2660: $a_z(-2 \zeta)$. In ${\cal F}_I$
2661: $$
2662: p_3 ~=~ (C ~{k +q \over \sqrt{2}},0,{k-q \over \sqrt{2}},
2663: -S~{k+q \over \sqrt{2}})
2664: \auto\label{kin3r}
2665: $$
2666: and
2667: $$
2668: p_4 ~=~- (C~ {k +q \over \sqrt{2}},{k-q \over \sqrt{2}},0,
2669: -S~{k+q \over \sqrt{2}})
2670: \auto\label{kin4r}
2671: $$
2672: Evaluating all momenta in ${\cal F}_I$ we have
2673: $$
2674: s~=~(p_1+p_3)^2 = ~(p_2+p_4)^2
2675: ~\centerunder{$\longrightarrow$}{\raisebox{-5mm}{
2676: $q \to 0$}}
2677: ~~(C^2 + S^2)k^2 ~
2678: \centerunder{$\sim$}{\raisebox{-5mm}{
2679: $C \to \infty$}} ~2C^2 k^2
2680: \auto\label{kin5r}
2681: $$
2682: $$
2683: t~=~(p_1+p_2)^2 ~\centerunder{$\longrightarrow$}{\raisebox{-5mm}{
2684: $q \to 0$}}
2685: ~ ~- k^2 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2686: \auto\label{kin6r}
2687: $$
2688: Therefore, we now have three external momentum scales, in addition to one
2689: mass scale, in our discussion, i.e.
2690: $$
2691: q^2 ~~<< ~~ M_C^2~~<< ~~ k^2 ~~ << s
2692: \auto\label{sca3}
2693: $$
2694: The mass-shell limit is now $q\to 0$ and the regge limit
2695: $ s/t \to \infty$ is obtained as $C \to \infty$. In the following we will
2696: combine these limits by taking
2697: $$
2698: q ~\sim ~1 / C ~\to ~0 ~, ~~~ ~~ q~C ~>> M_C
2699: \auto\label{sca4}
2700: $$
2701:
2702: \subhead{3.7 Constructing Amplitudes}
2703:
2704: To construct amplitudes corresponding to the diagrams of
2705: Fig.~3.12(a) we proceed as outlined in the above subsections.
2706: We first consider Fig.~3.5 as a one
2707: loop feynman diagram within $F_1$ and ignore the hatches.
2708: We consider the analagous diagram within $F_2$
2709: and connect the two diagrams with
2710: the $U_L$ diagram of Fig.~3.13 to obtain the
2711: full diagram shown in Fig.~3.17.
2712: \begin{center}
2713: \leavevmode
2714: \epsfxsize=4in
2715: \epsffile{tmom2n.ps}
2716:
2717: Fig.~3.17 Connecting the $F_1$ and $F_2$ Amplitudes.
2718: \end{center}
2719: (The double-dashed line carries zero-momentum within the
2720: anomaly configuration that will be discussed later.)
2721: If we then treat this diagram as a subdiagram and join it
2722: with it's own reflection we obtain a complete diagram
2723: of the form shown in Fig.~3.12(a). The
2724: left and right-hand subdiagrams will be
2725: joined only by the exchanged
2726: gluons (three massless and one massive), which will carry finite transverse
2727: momentum (in all three Lorentz frames). The relevant parts of the
2728: left and right-hand subdiagrams
2729: will have analagous forms in the ${\cal F}_L$ and ${\cal F}_R$ frames,
2730: respectively, and will be in a relative regge limit in the
2731: ${\cal F}_I$ frame. The combination of the regge limit with the phase
2732: space retrictions we impose will, as anticipated,
2733: place a large number of lines on-shell such that
2734: the central quark loop within $U_L$ reduces
2735: to a triangle diagram as illustrated schematically in Fig.~3.14. The crucial
2736: element will be, of course, that this diagram also contains the anomaly
2737: pole.
2738: To understand this we must determine all the effective vertices that are
2739: produced by the reduction to transverse momentum integrals.
2740:
2741: To discuss the diagram of Fig.~3.17, we will begin in the
2742: ${\cal F}_L$ frame and as we evaluate each part of the diagram we will
2743: discuss the effect of transforming to the ${\cal F}_I$ frame.
2744: In the ${\cal F}_L$ frame
2745: $p_1$ and $p_2$ are given, respectively, by (\ref{kin1l}) and (\ref{kin2l}).
2746: We direct the large light-cone momenta $k^{1^+} $ and
2747: $k^{2^+}$ through the diagram as shown and restrict
2748: the integration in both $F_i$ diagrams
2749: to the momentum region corresponding to (\ref{intr01}). Note that
2750: $$
2751: \eqalign{k^{1^+}~-~k^{2^+} ~&= ~({k \over \sqrt{2}},{k \over \sqrt{2}},0,0)~
2752: -~({k \over \sqrt{2}},0,{k \over \sqrt{2}},0)\cr
2753: &=~(0,{k \over \sqrt{2}},-{k \over \sqrt{2}},0)}
2754: \auto\label{splk}
2755: $$
2756: is a spacelike momentum lying in the $\{x,y\}$ - plane.
2757: We introduce notation for all the loop
2758: momenta of Fig.~3.17 in Fig.~3.18.
2759: We show only that part of the
2760: diagram involving $F_1$ and part of $U_L$. The part containing $F_2$
2761: can obviously be discussed analagously.
2762: The hatched lines are those placed on-shell
2763: by longitudinal momentum integrations and each
2764: of the hatches is labeled by the index for the momentum involved.
2765: We discuss each integration separately as follows.
2766: \begin{center}
2767: \leavevmode
2768: \epsfxsize=4in
2769: \epsffile{tmom3n.ps}
2770:
2771: Fig.~3.18 Notation for Fig.~3.17.
2772: \end{center}
2773:
2774: \subhead{3.8 The Massless Gluons}
2775:
2776: Provided the loop momentum $p$ in the
2777: lower part of Fig.~3.18 is much less than $k_{1^+}$ (as will be the case
2778: in the anomaly pole contribution we will extract)
2779: the $k_i'$ - integrations over
2780: the momenta of the vertical
2781: massless gluon exchanges can be reduced to transverse momentum diagrams
2782: by placing the hatched fermion lines on-shell. We can illustrate this
2783: (very well-known) procedure as follows.
2784: Using conventional light-cone co-ordinates, which in the notation of
2785: subsection 3.6 correspond to
2786: light-cone vectors ${k'}^{1^+}$ and ${k'}^{1^-}$, we can write
2787: $$
2788: \eqalign{&\int d^4k_1'd^4k_2'~~ \bigg\{{\gamma^{\mu}
2789: ~\gamma \cdot (k_1' - k^{1^+} + q^{1^-})
2790: ~\gamma^{\nu}~\gamma \cdot (k_2' - k^{1^+} + q^{1^-})
2791: ~\gamma^{\tau}
2792: \over (k_1' - k^{1^+} + q^{1^-})^2
2793: ~(k_2' - k^{1^+} + q^{1^-})^2}\biggr\} ~~\otimes\cr
2794: & \biggl\{{\gamma_{\mu}~
2795: \gamma \cdot (p - k_1' - q^{1^-})~ \gamma_{\nu}
2796: ~\gamma \cdot (p - k_2' - q^{1^-})~ \gamma_{\tau} \over
2797: (p - k_1' - q^{1^-})^2 ~
2798: (p - k_2' - q^{1^-})^2}\biggr\}~ {1 \over
2799: (k_1'- \tilde{k}'_1)^2 (k_2' - k_1')^2 (k_2' + q^{1^-})^2 }\cr
2800: & \sim
2801: \biggl\{\gamma^{\mu}~{\int {dk_1'}^- \gamma_+ k^{1^+} \over
2802: ({k_1'}^- k^{1^+} + \cdots )^2 }~\gamma^{\nu}~
2803: {\int {dk_2'}^- \gamma_+ k^{1^+} \over
2804: ({k_2'}^- k^{1^+} + \cdots )^2}~\gamma^{\tau}\biggr\}\cr
2805: &~~~~~~~\otimes
2806: ~\biggl\{\gamma_{\mu}~{\int {dk_1'}^+ \gamma_+ p^+ \over
2807: ({k_1'}^+ p^{+} + \cdots )^2} ~\gamma_{\nu}~
2808: {\int {dk_2'}^+ \gamma_+ p^{+} \over
2809: ({k_1'}^+ p^{+} + \cdots )^2}~\gamma_{\tau}\biggr\}\cr
2810: &~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\times ~\int d^2k_{1\perp}'d^2k_{2\perp}'~~ {1
2811: \over {(k_{1\perp}'- \tilde{k}_{1\perp}'})^2
2812: (k_{2\perp}' - k_{1\perp}')^2 (k_{2\perp}')^2 }\cr
2813: &\sim ~~ \gamma^+ \otimes \gamma_+
2814: ~~ \int d^2k_{1\perp}'d^2k_{2\perp}'d^2k_{3\perp}'
2815: ~~{\delta^2(\tilde{k}'_{1\perp} ~-~ \sum_i k_{i\perp})
2816: \over {(k_{1\perp}'- \tilde{k}_{\perp}'})^2
2817: (k_{2\perp}' - k_{1\perp}')^2 (k_{2\perp}')^2 } }
2818: \auto\label{3mg}
2819: $$
2820: which is a transverse state of the kind discussed in
2821: subsection 3.2. This illustrates how the integrals (\ref{rdve}) arise.
2822: Also the $\gamma^+~ (~= \gamma_-)$ factor is the effective vertex appearing
2823: in Fig.~3.7.
2824:
2825: (\ref{3mg}) is, as anticipated, infra-red divergent. As we discussed
2826: at length in subsection 3.2, if the three gluon state carries color
2827: all of the divergences will exponentiate in higher orders. If it
2828: carries color zero the only divergence which will not exponentiate is the
2829: the overall divergence that potentially occurs when $\tilde{k}'_{1\perp}$
2830: is integrated over and the $k'_{i\perp}$ are scaled uniformly to zero.
2831: If this divergence is present and we isolate it's contribution, the
2832: massless multigluon propagators will contribute only at zero momentum
2833: and there will be no effect in transforming their contribution from
2834: the ${\cal F}_L$ frame to the ${\cal F}_I$ frame. (While the contribution
2835: of the anomaly amplitudes to which the multigluon states couple
2836: will depend on the small light-cone momentum $q^{1^-}$, the contribution
2837: of the transverse propagators and interactions will be independent of
2838: this momentum.)
2839: To discuss the exact nature of the divergence we must include
2840: the effective vertices provided by the anomaly amplitudes and the
2841: contribution of the quark/antiquark state.
2842:
2843: For the reasons
2844: discussed in subsection 3.5, we do not integrate over $\tilde{k'}_1^-$ and so
2845: at $\tilde{k'}_{1\perp} = 0$
2846: the effective vertex provided by the $F_1$ amplitude will be the anomaly pole
2847: amplitude of (\ref{Fan1}). In frame ${\cal F}_I$ we will use
2848: (\ref{bay5}) which gives the pion coupling
2849: after the current momentum factor has been removed. In the present notation
2850: the full effective vertex provided by the $F_1$ amplitude is then
2851: (without the current momentum factor)
2852: $$
2853: \tilde{k}_2~~{\hbox{\Large $\epsilon$}_{\sigma\delta 3 - }~
2854: (k^{1^+})^{\sigma} (q^{1^-})^{\delta} \over q^2}
2855: ~~\sim ~~ \tilde{k}_2~ {\bigl[~k~q~C ~ \bigr] \over M_C^2~q^2}
2856: \auto\label{bay51}
2857: $$
2858: which, when $qC$ is kept finite, gives a finite pion pole residue.
2859: Note that, since this vertex is independent of $\tilde{k'}_{1\perp}$,
2860: it will not affect the divergence at $\tilde{k'}_{1\perp} = 0$ . This
2861: is a crucial consequence of the absence of a vector Ward identity for
2862: the anomaly pole contribution.
2863:
2864: In the regge limit, the $q''_{1}, q''_2$ and $q''_3$ integrations
2865: will, in analogy with (\ref{3mg}), be reduced to
2866: transverse momentum integrals in
2867: the $\{x,y\}$ - plane by placing on-shell the labelled hatched lines.
2868: ($q''_3$ is the momentum of the horizontal massless gluon line attached
2869: to the bottom of the diagram.)
2870: Since the ${\cal F}_L$, ${\cal F}_I$ and ${\cal F}_R$
2871: frames differ only by boosts acting
2872: in the $\{z,t\}$ - plane, the $q''_{j}$ transverse momentum
2873: integrations will be the same in each of the frames we discuss and will
2874: produce the same infra-red divergence.
2875: If we continue to work in the ${\cal F}_L$ frame the combination
2876: of the $k_i'$ and $q_j''$ longitudinal integrations generates the effective
2877: vertices shown in Fig.~3.19.
2878: \begin{center}
2879: \leavevmode
2880: \epsfxsize=5in
2881: \epsffile{tmom9n.ps}
2882:
2883: Fig.~3.19 Massless Gluon Effective Vertices.
2884: \end{center}
2885: We will combine these vertices to obtain the anomaly amplitude produced by
2886: the $U_L$ loop shortly.
2887:
2888: \subhead{3.9 Quark Transverse Momentum Integrals}
2889:
2890: The reduction to transverse integrals of the quark loop integrations,
2891: over $\tilde{k}_1$ in Fig.~3.18
2892: and over $\tilde{k}_2$ in the lower part of Fig.~3.17, is not straightforward.
2893: This reduction should be responsible for
2894: placing all of the hatched massive vector propagators on-shell. However, the
2895: light-cone momenta flowing along these lines ($q^{1^-}$ and $q^{2^-}$)
2896: is small (and zero on mass-shell) in ${\cal F}_L$, although it is finite
2897: in ${\cal F}_I$. Apparently, therefore, there is no regge limit kinematics
2898: for us to exploit. Nevertheless, we need to place the relevant
2899: lines on-shell, both to
2900: obtain a gauge-invariant result in which we understand the exponentiation
2901: of infra-red divergences, and to utilize the anomaly couplings.
2902:
2903: In the full multi-regge limit of Fig.~3.16 the
2904: $p_i$ momenta would be initially taken spacelike and (as we remarked earlier)
2905: quark transverse integrals would be obtained naturally.
2906: Assuming a reggeized pion
2907: appears, the multi-regge amplitude will contain corresponding asymptotic
2908: dependence on invariant subenergies. This dependence
2909: should disappear as the scalar pions are placed
2910: on mass-shell at $p_i^2 = 0, ~i=1,..,4$
2911: and the on-shell amplitude should factorize out
2912: straightforwardly. Even though the full multi-regge amplitude
2913: is independent of the subenergies (at $p_i^2=0$) it is obtained by asymptotic
2914: expansion around infinite subenergies. Correspondingly, any
2915: transverse integrals that are involved should be initially
2916: obtained at infinite subenergies. In effect, we are attempting to obtain
2917: these integrals directly at zero subenergies by appealing only to properties
2918: of the anomaly poles generating the pions.
2919:
2920: In fact, even with the kinematic constraints
2921: we have imposed, we will be able to place all the massive
2922: gluon lines on-shell (and so, consistently use the anomaly
2923: couplings). The result will be formally the same as carrying
2924: out the large subenergy limit but only a limited range of transverse
2925: momenta will be involved. The discontinuity that is (effectively) taken
2926: will be that of an unphysical pseudothreshold (at zero subenergy), rather
2927: than a physical normal threshold. Presumably (although we will not
2928: attemt to prove this) the unphysical chirality
2929: transition involved in the anomaly pole couplings can be
2930: viewed as producing this contribution. (In the last Section we
2931: described the relationship between an unphysical singularity and
2932: the anomaly pole and in
2933: \cite{arw011} we emphasized that triple-regge anomaly interactions
2934: are due to unphysical multiple
2935: discontinuities containing pseudothresholds.)
2936:
2937: As we have already noted, our discussion of the effective
2938: vertex of Fig.~3.10 applies directly to the placing on-shell of
2939: the upper (massive gluon)
2940: line associated with the $\tilde{k}_1^{1^+}$ - integration in Fig~3.18.
2941: The $\tilde{k}_1^{1^-}$ - integration associated with the lower on-shell line
2942: is very similar and massive gluon exchange
2943: must again be involved. To see this we must establish which
2944: $\gamma$ matrix couplings appear at the vertices. In fact,
2945: these couplings are almost entirely determined by the requirement that
2946: the anomaly be present in the reduced $U_L$ diagram.
2947: The complete $\gamma$ - matrix
2948: structure of Fig.~3.17 that is not included in Fig.~3.19
2949: is shown in Fig.~3.20.
2950: The top and bottom trios of $\gamma$ - matrices in the initial
2951: figure are those due to the effective vertices of $F_1$ and $F_2$
2952: that are analagous to Fig.~3.10 together with the resulting propagator
2953: components. We specifically choose the $\{3\}$ component for both the $F_1$
2954: and $F_2$ external currents. This choice, together with the choice of the
2955: space directions for the large light-cone
2956: momenta of $p_1$ and $p_2$, determines the relative structure of the
2957: trios. The appearance of the $\gamma_{3^{\pm}}$ - matrices is a
2958: direct consequence of the regge limit.
2959: \begin{center}
2960: \leavevmode
2961: \epsfxsize=5.3in
2962: \epsffile{tmom12n.ps}
2963:
2964: Fig.~3.20 The $\gamma$ - Matrix Structure
2965: Generating the $\gamma_5$ - vertex.
2966: \end{center}
2967: The upper inset in Fig.~3.20 shows how the identity (\ref{3ga})
2968: generates a $\gamma_5$ - interaction. The participating $\gamma_{1^+}$
2969: and $\gamma_{2^+}$ matrices have to be produced by the longitudinal
2970: momentum integrals (via massive gluon exchange), as we discuss below.
2971: The remaining $\gamma_{1}$
2972: and $\gamma_{2}$ matrices are needed to allow
2973: the reduction of the remaining product to the unit matrix (plus terms that
2974: give zero when contracted with the massless gluon vertices),
2975: as the lower inset illustrates.
2976: It is not
2977: difficult to see that the requirement of a $\gamma_5$ - interaction,
2978: together with a non-zero reduction of the remaining matrix product
2979: determines the complete structure of Fig.~3.20.
2980:
2981: In Fig.~3.21 we have isolated the $\gamma$-matrix structure and the relevant
2982: momenta for the quark loops that couple $F_1$ and $F_2$ in Fig.~3.17.
2983: Each of the $\gamma$-matrices in Fig.~3.21 is either a vertex
2984: component of a massive gluon propagator or is a numerator component of
2985: a quark propagator. Although the $\gamma$-matrices contract,
2986: as we have already discussed,
2987: the corresponding momentum factors remain. We ignore the loop momentum
2988: $p$ since it will be set to zero by the generation of the U(1) anomaly pole.
2989: Also, since
2990: $\tilde{k}'_{1 \perp} = \tilde{k}'_{2 \perp} = 0$ after the transverse
2991: momentum divergence is extracted,
2992: we first ignore both of these momenta.
2993: \begin{center}
2994: \leavevmode
2995: \epsfxsize=4in
2996: \epsffile{tmom21n.ps}
2997:
2998: Fig.~3.21 The Quark Loops (a) $\gamma$-matrices (b) Momenta
2999: \end{center}
3000:
3001: The $\tilde{k}_1^+$ integration is given by (\ref{msh1}) while
3002: the $\tilde{k}_1^-$ integration has the form
3003: $$
3004: \int {d \tilde{k}_1^-~(\tilde{k}_1^+\gamma_+ + q^{2^-}\cdot \gamma_+)
3005: \over 2\tilde{k}_1^+ \tilde{k}_1^- +2 q^{2^-}\cdot\tilde{k}_1
3006: -~\tilde{k}_{1\perp}^2~ -~M_C^2 }~
3007: \times ~ \cdots ~~~\sim ~~ \gamma_+ ~ \times ~ \cdots
3008: \auto\label{msh12}
3009: $$
3010: The two integrations give, respectively,
3011: $$
3012: 2\tilde{k}_1^+\tilde{k}_1^- + 2\tilde{k}_1\cdot q^{1^-}~
3013: = ~\tilde{k}_{1\perp}^2~ +~M_C^2
3014: \auto\label{msh11}
3015: $$
3016: and
3017: $$
3018: 2\tilde{k}_1^+\tilde{k}_1^- + 2\tilde{k}_1 \cdot q^{2^-}~
3019: = ~\tilde{k}_{1\perp}^2~ +~M_C^2
3020: \auto\label{msh121}
3021: $$
3022: In the ${\cal F}_I$
3023: frame, $q^{1^-}$ and $ q^{2^-}$ are boosted to become almost the same
3024: light-like momentum $q^{3^+}$, i.e.
3025: $$
3026: q^{1^-} ~\sim~ (Cq,-q,0,Sq)~~
3027: \centerunder{$\sim$}{\raisebox{-4mm}{$q\to 0$}}
3028: ~~
3029: q^{3^+}~, ~~~~ q^{2^-} ~\sim~ (Cq,0,-q,Sq)~~
3030: \centerunder{$\sim$}{\raisebox{-4mm}{$q\to 0$}} ~~q^{3^+}
3031: \auto\label{all}
3032: $$
3033: and so (\ref{msh11}) and (\ref{msh121})
3034: have a common solution as $q\to 0$ (which is why a pseudothreshold
3035: is involved) with
3036: $$
3037: \tilde{k}_1^+ \sim \tilde{k}_1^- \sim\tilde{k}_{13}~~ \sim ~ ~
3038: {M^2_C \over C~q}
3039: ~, ~~~~~\tilde{k}^2_{12}
3040: ~~\centerunder{$<$}{\raisebox{-1mm}{$\sim$}}~~ M^2_C
3041: \auto\label{csol}
3042: $$
3043: Incorporating
3044: all the remaining momentum factors given by the $\gamma$-matrices of
3045: Fig.~3.21(a) (together with a factor of $M_C^{-2}$ from the additional
3046: exchanged gluon propagator)
3047: the $\tilde{k}_{1\perp}$ transverse momentum integral has the form
3048: $$
3049: \eqalign{ & {1 \over M_C^2}~\int d^2\tilde{k}_{1\perp}
3050: ~\{F_1~ \hbox{numerator}\}
3051: \times \{\hbox{antiquark numerator}\}
3052: \times \{\hbox{gluon numerator} \} \cr
3053: &~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\times \{\hbox{quark numerator}\}
3054: ~\big/~\{ \hbox{propagator denominator}\}^2 \cr
3055: & =~
3056: {1 \over M_C^2}~\int {d^2\tilde{k}_{1\perp}
3057: ~\tilde{k}_{12}~\tilde{k}_{12}~ (\tilde{k}_{12} + q)~
3058: k^{1^+} \over \bigl(\tilde{k}_{1}^2 \bigr)^2 } }
3059: \auto\label{qti11}
3060: $$
3061: $$
3062: \sim ~ {q ~ k^{1^+} \over M_C^2}~
3063: \biggl\{\int_{|\tilde{k}_{13}| \sim {M_C^2 \over Cq}}~d\tilde{k}_{13}
3064: \biggr\} ~\biggl\{\int_{{M_C^2 \over C~q}~
3065: \centerunder{${\scriptscriptstyle < }$}{\raisebox{-1mm}{$
3066: {\scriptscriptstyle \sim} $}} |\tilde{k}_{12}|
3067: \centerunder{${\scriptscriptstyle <}$}{\raisebox{-1mm}{${\scriptscriptstyle
3068: \sim}$}}~ M_C}~ {d\tilde{k}_{12}\over \tilde{k}_{12}^2 }\biggr\}
3069: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
3070: $$
3071: $$
3072: \sim {q ~ k^{1^+} \over M_C^2} ~\biggl\{{M_C^2 \over Cq }\biggr\}
3073: ~\biggl\{{Cq \over M_C^2}\biggr\}
3074: ~~~\sim {q ~ k^{1^+} \over M_C^2}~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
3075: \auto\label{qti1}
3076: $$
3077: which gives a finite answer in the ${\cal F}_I$ frame when $k^{1^+}
3078: \sim C \to \infty$, with $Cq$ kept finite. Note that the part of
3079: the integrand in (\ref{qti11}) that does not vanish when $q=0$ is odd
3080: with respect to $\tilde{k}_{12}$ and hence integrates to zero.
3081: If this were not the case, the combination of light-cone momentum factors
3082: from each fast quark numerator would give an amplitude
3083: increasing like $C^4 \sim s^2$.
3084:
3085: Conversely, if we obtain only finite results of the form of
3086: (\ref{qti1}) for each transverse momentum
3087: integral, we will not obtain any increasing behavior as $s\to \infty$.
3088: To obtain the maximally increasing amplitude, we must consider the
3089: $\tilde{k'}_{1\perp}$ dependence in more detail. If, for example, we
3090: direct $\tilde{k'}_{1}$
3091: so that in the $\tilde{k}_{1\perp}$ integral we
3092: substitute $\tilde{k'}_{12}$ for $\tilde{k}_{12}$ in the antiquark
3093: numerator in (\ref{qti1}), this will give
3094: $$
3095: {q ~k^{1^+}\over M_C^2}~~\to ~~
3096: {\tilde{k'}_{12} ~k^{1^+}\over M_C^2 } ~~ \sim ~~k~C ~~
3097: ~\centerunder{$\to$}{\raisebox{-4mm}{$C \to \infty$}} ~~\infty
3098: \auto\label{qti01}
3099: $$
3100: Alternatively we can keep the $\tilde{k'}_{12}$
3101: dependence of one of the denominators giving
3102: $$
3103: \int {d \tilde{k}_{12} ~\tilde{k}_{12}
3104: \over ( \tilde{k}_{12}
3105: - \tilde{k'}_{12})^2 }
3106: ~~~\centerunder{$\sim$}{\raisebox{-5mm}{$\tilde{k'}_{12} \to 0$}}
3107: ~~~\int {d\tilde{k}_{12} ~\tilde{k'}_{12}
3108: \over \tilde{k}_{12}^2}
3109: \auto\label{qti2}
3110: $$
3111: which again leads to (\ref{qti01}). If we keep the contribution of
3112: the form of (\ref{qti1}) from the $\tilde{k}_{2\perp}$ integral
3113: we will obtain a factor of $C$ from the left subdiagram (of Fig.~3.17).
3114: Treating the transverse integrals from the right subdiagram
3115: in an analagous manner will give an amplitude increasing like $C^2 \sim s$.
3116:
3117: Obviously we could also keep the factor of $q$ in the
3118: $\tilde{k}_{1\perp}$ integral and keep non-leading $\tilde{k'}_{21}$
3119: behavior in the $\tilde{k}_{2\perp}$ integral. Either way
3120: we gain one power of the energy while reducing the degree
3121: of divergence of either the $\tilde{k'}_{1\perp}$
3122: or the $\tilde{k'}_{2\perp}$ integration. We will see that we can not
3123: obtain a further power of the energy by
3124: reducing the degree of divergence of all the $\tilde{k'}_{\perp}$ integrals
3125: since there will then be no overall transverse divergence.
3126: To see this we must consider
3127: the final part of the diagram that we have not yet discussed in detail.
3128:
3129: \subhead{3.10 The U(1) Anomaly Amplitude and the Infra-Red Divergence}
3130:
3131: As illustrated in Fig.~3.22(a), combining Fig.~3.19 and Fig.~3.20 produces
3132: a triangle of $\gamma$-matrices which has the appropriate structure to
3133: give the anomaly.
3134: \begin{center}
3135: \leavevmode
3136: \epsfxsize=5.5in
3137: \epsffile{tmom20.ps}
3138:
3139: Fig.~3.22 (a) The Triangle (b) Momenta in ${\cal F}_L $
3140: (c) Momenta in ${\cal F}_I$ .
3141: \end{center}
3142: The large light-cone momenta $k^{1^+}$ and $k^{2+}$ flow in and out of
3143: the $\gamma_5$ vertex and do not enter the triangle diagram.
3144: As shown in Fig.~3.22(b) the external
3145: momenta that flow through the diagram in ${\cal F}_L$ are $q^{1^-}$ and
3146: $q^{2^-}$ together with the $\tilde{k}'_i$ and the $q''_j$
3147: (all of which
3148: are zero in the infra-red divergence configuration for the massless gluons,
3149: when the mass-shell limit is taken).
3150: In \cite{arw01} we discussed, at length, momentum
3151: configurations of this kind which produce the anomaly pole. For our
3152: present purposes it is simplest to go straight to the ${\cal F}_I$ frame.
3153: In this frame the timelike components of $p_1$ and $p_2$
3154: that are $O(q)$ in the ${\cal F}_L$ frame are boosted to give
3155: the finite light-like momentum $q^{3^+} \sim C q$, as in (\ref{all}),
3156: which then flows through the diagram
3157: as in Fig.~3.22(c). In this last figure we have dropped
3158: the small (transverse) momenta along lines where the finite light-like
3159: momentum flows. If we define
3160: $\tilde{q}_{3\perp}$ to be the (small) momentum transverse to
3161: $q^{3^+}$ that is flowing through the (double) dashed vertical line then
3162: $$
3163: \tilde{q}_{3\perp} = (\tilde{k'}_1 + \tilde{k'}_2)_{3\perp} - \tilde{q'}
3164: \auto\label{q3p}
3165: $$
3166: where $\tilde{q'} = {q''}_2 + {q''}_3 $. Comparison with
3167: the momentum configration (\ref{k+k-2})
3168: shows that the anomaly ``$\delta$-function amplitude'' has the form
3169: $$
3170: (q^{3^+})^2 ~ \tilde{q}_{3}~ \delta(\tilde{q}_{3\perp}^2)
3171: \auto\label{q3pa}
3172: $$
3173: which sets to zero momentum the double-dashed line.
3174:
3175: The $\delta$-function in (\ref{q3pa}) couples the $q_i''$ and
3176: $\tilde{k'}_j$ infra-red divergences. As we saw above, these
3177: divergences are also modified by the need to obtain non-zero
3178: quark transverse momentum integrals.
3179: To consider the remaining divergence we
3180: keep only the scaling infra-red divergence from each massless multigluon
3181: state which, as discussed in subsection 3.2, is the only divergence that
3182: survives high-order exponentiation.
3183: The overall divergence that remains then has the form
3184: $$
3185: \eqalign{ & \int d^2 \tilde{q'}_{\perp}
3186: \{\hbox{multigluon scaling amplitude}\}\cr
3187: & \int d^2 \tilde{k'}_{1\perp}d^2 \tilde{k'}_{2\perp}
3188: \{\hbox{multigluon scaling amplitude}\}^2 \{\hbox{anomaly} \}
3189: \{\hbox{quark momentum} \} \cr
3190: & \int d^2 \tilde{k'}_{3\perp}d^2 \tilde{k'}_{4\perp}
3191: \{\hbox{multigluon scaling amplitude}\}^2
3192: \{\hbox{anomaly} \} \{\hbox{quark momentum} \}
3193: }
3194: $$
3195: $$
3196: \eqalign{ \sim ~ \int {d^2 \tilde{q'}_{\perp} \over \tilde{q'}^2_{\perp}}
3197: ~&\int {d^2 \tilde{k'}_{1\perp}d^2 \tilde{k'}_{2\perp}
3198: \over \tilde{k'}^2_{1\perp} \tilde{k'}^2_{2\perp} }
3199: ~\delta\bigl(~( \tilde{q'}_{\perp} -
3200: \tilde{k'}_{1\perp}- \tilde{k'}_{2\perp})^2~ \bigr)
3201: ~( \tilde{q'}_{\perp} -
3202: \tilde{k'}_{1\perp}- \tilde{k'}_{2\perp})~ \tilde{k'}_{12} \cr
3203: & \int {d^2 \tilde{k'}_{3\perp}d^2 \tilde{k'}_{4\perp}
3204: \over \tilde{k'}^2_{3\perp} \tilde{k'}^2_{4\perp} }
3205: ~\delta\bigl(~( \tilde{q'}_{\perp} -
3206: \tilde{k'}_{3\perp}- \tilde{k'}_{4\perp})^2~ \bigr)
3207: ~( \tilde{q'}_{\perp} -
3208: \tilde{k'}_{3\perp}- \tilde{k'}_{4\perp}) ~ \tilde{k'}_{32}\cr
3209: \sim ~ \int {d^2 \tilde{q'}_{\perp} \over \tilde{q'}^2_{\perp}}&
3210: }
3211: \auto\label{ovdi}
3212: $$
3213: which is a simple logarithmic divergence as we anticipated.
3214: We will not attempt to
3215: prove that this divergence can not be canceled by other diagrams that we
3216: have not discussed.
3217:
3218: \subhead{3.11 The Physical Scattering Amplitude}
3219:
3220: We keep as the physical scattering amplitude
3221: the coefficient of the divergence (\ref{ovdi}) - the divergence being
3222: factorized off as a ``condensate'' that is to be part of the definition
3223: of a physical pion state. (We have discussed how this is consistent
3224: for reggeon states in \cite{arw01}.) The physical amplitude is then
3225: given by
3226: $$
3227: \eqalign{& \prod_i\{F_i~ \hbox{anomaly pole amplitude}\}~
3228: \{\hbox {quark $\tilde{k'}_{i\perp}$ integrals}\}\cr
3229: & \times ~~\prod_{j=L,R} \{U_j~ \hbox{anomaly amplitude} \}
3230: ~\{\hbox{massive gluon propagator}\} }
3231: \auto\label{phamp0}
3232: $$
3233: and so combining (\ref{bay51}), (\ref{qti1}), (\ref{qti2}) and (\ref{q3pa})
3234: we obtain
3235: $$
3236: \eqalign{&\biggl(~{k~ C~q \over M_C^2~q^2}~ \biggr)^4~
3237: \biggl(~{(kC)\over M_C^2}~{(kCq) \over M_C^2 }~\biggr)^2~
3238: ~\biggl(~qC~\biggr)^4~
3239: ~~{1 \over t + M_C^2 }\cr
3240: &~~~~~= ~\bigl(~{1 \over q^2}~\bigr)^4~
3241: \bigl[~{C^2~q^2 \over M_C^2}~ \bigr]^4 ~~
3242: \bigl[~{s~q^2 \over M_C^4}~ \bigr]~~
3243: \bigl[~{t \over M_C^2}~ \bigr]^2~~
3244: \bigl[~{s \over t+M_C^2}~ \bigr]
3245: }
3246: \auto\label{phamp}
3247: $$
3248: We have reorganized the result into the separate square brackets because
3249: each represents a different physical effect, as we now briefly discuss.
3250:
3251: The factor of $(1/q^2)^4$ in (\ref{phamp}) is, of course, the contribution
3252: of the four pion poles.
3253: All but the last two square brackets are finite constants
3254: when the limit $1/q \sim C \to \infty$ and so the pion
3255: scattering amplitude we obtain is (up to a normalization factor, of course)
3256: $$
3257: A(s,t)~=~ \bigl[~{t \over M_C^2}~ \bigr]^2~~
3258: \bigl[~{s \over t+M_C^2}~ \bigr]
3259: \auto\label{psca}
3260: $$
3261: It might be tempting to interpret the first factor
3262: as related to the Adler zeroes that should occur at zero four momentum
3263: for each pion. However, our analysis has been carried through with
3264: the constraint that $k^2~ (= -t) ~>> M_C^2$ and so (\ref{psca}) can not
3265: be used at $t=0$. Because of the $\epsilon$-tensor that appears
3266: in the current coupling, it is the transverse (with respect to the regge
3267: limit) component of each of the $p_i$ that contributes to the factor
3268: of $t$. It is natural, therefore, that
3269: if the pions aquire a mass $m_{\pi}$ we will have, when all
3270: pions are on-shell,
3271: $$
3272: \bigl[~{t \over M_C^2}~ \bigr]^2 ~\to~
3273: \bigl[~O \bigl( ~{m_{\pi}^2 \over M_C^2}\bigr)~\bigr]^2
3274: \auto\label{mpi}
3275: $$
3276:
3277: The massive SU(2) singlet gluon reggeizes in higher-orders, with an
3278: infra-red finite trajectory $\alpha_g(t)$ that satisfies
3279: $\alpha_g(M_C^2)=1$. Also, since we consider the exchange of
3280: four transverse momentum gluons,
3281: when we add all diagrams only the even signature
3282: amplitude will survive. (Indeed, it is argued in \cite{arw01} that
3283: only even signature exchanges can couple via the anomaly.)
3284: Therefore, as we add all diagrams and go to
3285: higher-orders we anticipate that we will have
3286: $$
3287: \bigl[~{s \over t+M_C^2}~ \bigr] ~\to~ \bigl[~{s^{\alpha_g(t)} ~+~
3288: (-s)^{\alpha_g(t)}
3289: \over t+M_C^2}~ \bigr]
3290: \auto\label{hor}
3291: $$
3292: and so there will be no pole at $t+M_C^2=0$. Nevertheless, reggeized gluon
3293: exchange will provide the leading contribution to the pomeron.
3294: It is interesting, of course, that only
3295: the quark (or the antiquark) carries the light-like momentum of the pion
3296: that produces the high-energy behavior. This is determined by the
3297: generation of the anomaly pole via an internal light-cone
3298: momentum, and we comment further
3299: on this below.
3300:
3301: The factor of
3302: $$
3303: \bigl[~{s~q^2 \over M_C^4}~ \bigr]
3304: \auto\label{osed}
3305: $$
3306: is off-shell energy dependence that could be naturally canceled
3307: by off-shell propagators. Finally, we note that
3308: the factor of
3309: $$
3310: \bigl[~{C^2~q^2 \over M_C^2}~ \bigr]^4
3311: \auto\label{wpd}
3312: $$
3313: is a wee gluon contribution, with $Cq$ being the boosted longitudinal
3314: momentum of wee gluons that in the finite momentum frame have
3315: vanishing momentum, orthogonal to the fast quark. In higher-orders
3316: this contribution will
3317: include sums of $|M^0_N|^2 $ integrals as factors,
3318: where $M^0_N$ appears in (\ref{cld})
3319: and contains diagrams of the form illustrated in Fig.~3.3. To say more
3320: about this factor it is probably necessary to decouple the mass-shell
3321: and regge limits by performing the full multi-regge calculation
3322: discussed above.
3323:
3324: \subhead{3.12 The Parton Amplitude and Color Confinement }
3325:
3326: We have emphasized that the exponentiation of infra-red
3327: divergences already selects color zero transverse momentum states but that
3328: this is not confinement because color zero massless
3329: multigluon states still contribute
3330: at zero $Q^2$. However, if the complete set of physical amplitudes is
3331: defined via the presence of the overall infra-red divergence we have
3332: described then
3333: there will be both confinement and chiral symmetry breaking. This is because
3334: the massless multigluon
3335: states will contribute only via the condensate and the initial
3336: and final states must be Goldstone bosons for the divergence to be present.
3337: Although we have not kept color factors we can make the following
3338: comments about how color confinement is realized.
3339:
3340: In the original diagrams of the form of Fig.~3.12(a)
3341: the color factors have all of the
3342: complexity of the $\gamma$-matrix structure
3343: illustrated in Figs.~3.20 and 3.22. After removal of the color singlet
3344: divergent gluons, however,
3345: the remaining amplitude necessarily describes SU(2) color zero scattering.
3346: In this amplitude, we can interpret the flavor anomaly as unlocking the
3347: quark content of a pion via a dynamical fluctuation of the Dirac sea
3348: (i.e. the zero momentum chirality transition). This fluctuation produces a
3349: ``hard'' quark carrying all the
3350: light-cone momentum together with a wee gluon condensate
3351: and an antiquark. The antiquark carries only a soft momentum and
3352: is also, essentially, a ``wee parton''. It
3353: has been produced out of
3354: the Dirac sea via a chirality transition that is compensated for by
3355: the (effectively classical) background gluon field.
3356:
3357: The full amplitude can be represented, as in Fig.~3.23(a),
3358: by simple massive gluon exchange between the fast quarks.
3359: This ``parton interaction''
3360: produces all the transverse momentum that is exchanged.
3361: The quark/gluon coupling is not, however, a normal perturbative
3362: interaction. Although, as illustrated in Fig.~3.23(b),
3363: it can be computed (``semi''-)perturbatively.
3364: \begin{center}
3365: \parbox{3.8in}{
3366: \begin{center}
3367: \leavevmode
3368: \epsfxsize=3.5in
3369: \epsffile{tmom22na.ps}
3370: \end{center}
3371: }
3372: \parbox{1.4in}{
3373: \epsfxsize=1.3in
3374: \epsffile{tmom22nb.ps}
3375: }
3376:
3377: (a) \hspace{2.5in} (b)$~~~~~~~~~~~~~~$
3378:
3379: Fig.~3.23 (a) The Parton Amplitude (b) The Parton Interaction.
3380: \end{center}
3381: Accompanying
3382: the hard quark interaction, there is a soft interaction in which
3383: the slow antiquark, ultimately, is absorbed into the condensate. It is replaced
3384: by another antiquark produced out of the condensate. The production
3385: and absorption being mediated by a further
3386: zero momentum quark chirality transition
3387: (shown as the double-dashed line).
3388: During the interaction (which we have redrawn
3389: compared to earlier figures to make its structure
3390: more transparent) color and
3391: spin structure, but not momentum, is fed
3392: into the fast quark/gluon coupling (the massive
3393: gluons can carry SU(2) color). The spin structure input
3394: transforms this coupling from a vector
3395: to an axial vector coupling. This being made possible by the chirality
3396: transition of the zero momentum quark.
3397: The input of color into the fast quark interaction helps
3398: convert the odd-signature single gluon exchange to even signature.
3399:
3400: An outgoing fast quark carries color, which is neutralized by a
3401: (condensate produced) soft antiquark. The Dirac sea
3402: completes the confinement by locking the pairs back
3403: into a massless Goldstone boson pion
3404: via a final zero momentum chirality transition of the soft antiquark
3405: that is accompanied
3406: by the disappearance of the background ``classical gluon field''.
3407: Apparently then, in the infinite momentum frame, a physical pion
3408: contains a hard elementary quark plus a color compensating
3409: ``unphysical antiquark'' that is described by an antiquark field, but with the
3410: Dirac sea shifted. Conversely the quark/antiquark constituents of a pion
3411: can not be liberated without an accompanying gluon field that is responsible
3412: for moving the Dirac sea back to it's perturbative location.
3413: That the dynamical participation of the Dirac sea frees and confines
3414: infinite momentum frame quarks (and also modifies interactions)
3415: in this manner is natural if
3416: in a finite momentum pion the
3417: quarks are confined by a non-perturbative adjustment of the Dirac sea,
3418: as proposed by Gribov\cite{vg1}. Since no strong force between quarks
3419: is involved, Dokshitzer\cite{dok} has called this ``soft and gentle
3420: confinement''. He has argued for some time that
3421: significant experimental evidence for this form of confinement is provided by
3422: the momentum properties of multihadron production. Since there appears to be
3423: very little momentum reordering in the transition from quarks to pions,
3424: confinement must take place in a soft and gentle manner. A readjustment of the
3425: Dirac sea of the soft quarks/antiquarks that combine with the hard quarks
3426: to form hadrons should have just this property.
3427:
3428: \subhead{3.13 The Supercritical Pomeron}
3429:
3430: In higher-orders more massive gluons will be exchanged and more wee
3431: \newline quark/antiquark pairs will input additional structure into the
3432: interaction. An example of a coupling that will produce two pomeron exchange
3433: is shown in Fig.~3.24(a).
3434: We also expect to find vertices, of the form shown in Fig.~3.24(b),
3435: which include a pair of massive gluons produced by a wee gluon interaction
3436: only.
3437: \begin{center}
3438: \leavevmode
3439: \epsfxsize=3.3in
3440: \epsffile{tmom26.ps}
3441:
3442: Fig.~3.24 (a) A Two Pomeron Vertex (b) A Supercritical Vertex?
3443: \end{center}
3444: To have the axial vector structure for the anomaly,
3445: the produced gluon represented by the diagonal element can not have the
3446: polarization to be exchanged in the scattering process. The wee gluon
3447: interaction can, however, take place sufficiently far across the rapidity
3448: axis that it leads to particle pole interactions within pomeron
3449: vertices, just
3450: as is expected in the supercritical pomeron phase\cite{arw91}.
3451: Since the pomeron is also exchange degenerate with the reggeized gluon,
3452: all features of Supercritical RFT appear to be present.
3453:
3454: \newpage
3455:
3456: \mainhead{4. DISCUSSION}
3457:
3458: The analysis of this paper demonstrates clearly how
3459: (at least the zero momentum part of) the spectral
3460: flow of the Dirac sea, which does not enter in standard
3461: perturbation theory, enters the (multi-)regge region interactions
3462: that describe the scattering of bound states.
3463: The manifestation of this spectral flow is
3464: the chirality transition that a
3465: zero momentum propagator undergoes in producing the anomaly pole.
3466: While we had formulated
3467: the basic physics of this phenomenon in our previous papers, we had been
3468: unable to find a simple starting point to begin to calculate amplitudes
3469: in a sufficiently well-defined way. In the new approach presented in this
3470: paper the wee gluon content of Goldstone bosons, produced by the flavor
3471: anomaly, provides this starting point. The
3472: rotation of the wee gluons during the scattering process introduces,
3473: essentially, the triple-regge kinematics
3474: needed for the U(1) anomaly interactions to appear.
3475: As we noted in \cite{arw01},
3476: because of chirality conservation the anomaly interactions
3477: cancel, even when the kinematics allow their presence,
3478: if the scattering states are elementary quarks or gluons. In contrast, since
3479: the initial wee gluon coupling of
3480: the pion pole involves a chirality transition, there is no reason
3481: for the chirality transitions to cancel in the subsequent scattering.
3482:
3483: As has become apparent,
3484: our ``new approach'' is
3485: not actually logically separate from the multi-regge formalism used in
3486: our previous papers. Rather it is, essentially,
3487: a short-cut that reproduces multi-regge results without doing the full
3488: calculation. The basic idea we have used
3489: is that the internal light cone momenta
3490: of the flavor anomaly couplings introduce all the large light-cone momenta
3491: needed, in addition to the elastic scattering regge limit,
3492: and so this avoids the introduction of complicated multi-regge limits.
3493: This has enabled us to keep the kinematics ``relatively'' simple. However,
3494: we have had to supplement our analysis with additional constraints that
3495: appear artificial but really just introduce features that would be provided
3496: directly by an underlying multi-regge limit.
3497: The ``axial currents'' to which our Goldstone bosons have coupled
3498: are not local currents but rather
3499: effective local current components that would be
3500: produced by a non-local infinite momentum
3501: interaction. Such current components appear naturally within
3502: a multi-regge amplitude.
3503:
3504: We have described the formation of amplitudes
3505: in terms of transverse momentum
3506: diagrams that can be thought of, initially, as originating from
3507: particular feynman diagrams. However, many of the
3508: integration regions in the feynman diagrams are
3509: cut-off, or even removed altogether. Again multi-regge theory
3510: provides the underlying justification.
3511: To have all the necessary anomaly effects present
3512: the initial diagrams must be extremely
3513: complicated. Remarkably, though, after infra-red divergences are extracted
3514: and the anomaly contributions isolated, almost all of the
3515: complexity disappears and the physical pion scattering amplitude
3516: has the very simple structure we have described.
3517: Although we have not discussed combining diagrams to obtain explicit
3518: color and signature factors it is clear that, in first approximation,
3519: the pomeron is a regge pole with
3520: the same trajectory as a massive, reggeized, gluon
3521: just as we anticipated in our multi-regge work.
3522:
3523: It is amusing (and there may also be deeper implications)
3524: that a complete calculation of the multi-regge
3525: S-Matrix would not be necessary to obtain our results. It would be
3526: sufficient to calculate the eight-point amplitude for
3527: $W^{\pm}$ and $Z^0$ vector mesons in which the scattering of
3528: reggeized pions occurs. The reggeized pion scattering amplitude could be
3529: factorized out and the on-shell amplitude we discuss would be obtained
3530: by continuing this amplitude from a spacelike to a light-like pion
3531: mass. In the language of the present paper this implies
3532: that the wee gluon structure of a pion is best understood if it is obtained
3533: as a wee parton component of an infinite momentum, elementary, vector meson!
3534:
3535: We believe that in the multi-regge framework the existence
3536: of a reggeon condensate in color superconducting QCD
3537: would clearly be a derived result. In addition,
3538: reggeized Goldstone bosons
3539: would be the only composite states obtained. The arguments of
3540: \cite{arw98} imply that if the initial reggeon states are
3541: color zero Goldstone bosons the overall logarithmic divergence
3542: will produce final states only of this kind. That is, there should be
3543: a completeness relation. In this case,
3544: the condensate (or rather the
3545: infra-red divergences and anomalies that produce it) can be said
3546: to be responsible for confinement and chiral symmetry breaking.
3547: Conversely, the quark content of a pion or nucleon is ``liberated''
3548: only if it is accompanied by an (effectively classical) gluon
3549: background ``condensate''
3550: that is associated with a shift of the (zero momentum
3551: part of) the Dirac sea. The implication being that, at infinite momentum,
3552: quarks are locked inside a hadron by a relatively simple spectral flow of the
3553: Dirac sea. This form of confinement would have a natural connection
3554: with the finite momentum Dirac sea confinement proposed by Gribov\cite{vg1}.
3555:
3556: As we have described in more detail in
3557: other places\cite{arw98,arw93}, we expect that
3558: SU(3) color is obtained by critical pomeron behavior\cite{cri}
3559: that randomizes the
3560: SU(2) direction of the condensate within SU(3), while
3561: also decoupling the massive reggeized gluon, as it becomes massless. Thus
3562: providing complete SU(3) confinement.
3563: The shifting of the Dirac sea that produces confinement
3564: then becomes a completely dynamical part of the pomeron, and hadrons, that
3565: has no simple ``classical'' component.
3566: With the better understanding and explicit calculational ability that
3567: the results of this paper demonstrate, we should
3568: be able to directly identify the higher-order superconducting
3569: pion amplitudes with those of supercritical RFT and so establish
3570: the connection
3571: between the critical pomeron\cite{cri} and QCD. A further implication
3572: will be that the physical states of QCD (or
3573: rather those that scatter via the physical pomeron) are
3574: either chiral symmetry breaking Goldstone bosons (pions) or contain, as a
3575: component, a two quark state that is a Goldstone boson in the color
3576: superconducting theory (nucleons). Conversely,
3577: the very nature of the pomeron will be determined by chiral symmetry breaking.
3578:
3579: A basic implication of our general program has always been that
3580: the regge limit of QCD, including those properties that are a consequence of
3581: confinement and chiral symmetry breaking,
3582: would be reachable by essentially perturbative
3583: calculations - with the dynamical participation of the Dirac sea being
3584: the only extra ingredient. The results of this
3585: paper emphasize this implication. According to our results,
3586: the only non-perturbative element in color superconducting
3587: high-energy amplitudes is the wee-gluon condensate which can be directly
3588: understood as a consequence of the all-orders summation of transverse
3589: momentum infra-red divergences that couple via anomalies
3590: (together with the introduction of ultra-violet cut-offs). We should note that
3591: the condensate is associated with wee gluon configurations that have the
3592: same quantum numbers as the winding number current. Although, as with
3593: the currents we use to obtain the flavor anomaly, they are really
3594: infinite momentum local current components that result from
3595: non-local interactions. Nevertheless,
3596: there could be a parallel with the Schwinger model where the existence
3597: of a condensate can be obtained either by summing diagrams\cite{fr} or via
3598: non-perturbative topological contributions\cite{nm}.
3599: However, the topology would
3600: have to be in the infinite momentum frame. (Perhaps a winding number for
3601: Wilson loop operators in the transverse plane - this might give a direct
3602: analogy with the Schwinger model.)
3603:
3604: We have emphasized that, in order to
3605: construct high-energy superconducting QCD as we described,
3606: it is necessary to introduce cut-offs both in the transverse momenta
3607: and in the internal momenta of diagrams that generate anomalies.
3608: In effect, these
3609: cut-offs regulate the relative infra-red/ultraviolet
3610: spectral flow of the Dirac sea that is due to the chiral
3611: and U(1) anomalies.
3612: That all cut-offs can be
3613: consistently removed, and the necessary critical behavior
3614: retained, is a highly non-trivial requirement which, as we have discussed
3615: elsewhere\cite{arw93,arw00},
3616: is likely to significantly restrict the quark content of QCD.
3617: However, it is possible (if not likely) that the very existence of a hadron
3618: S-Matrix within QCD requires that asymptotic freedom, and the
3619: consequent perturbation theory, have the
3620: maximal applicability. Since parton model cross-sections rise asymptotically,
3621: this is likely to imply that all physical
3622: cross-sections must
3623: rise asymptotically. The critical pomeron is well-known
3624: to be the only description of such cross-sections that satisfies all
3625: ($s$- and $t$-channel) unitarity properties. Consequently, the occurrence of
3626: the critical pomeron in QCD may actually be a necessary requirement for
3627: the existence of a hadron S-Matrix.
3628:
3629: The non-perturbative formulation of a gauge theory is generally presumed
3630: to be via some form of euclidean functional integral. In this
3631: framework color confinement (as it is usually formulated and studied)
3632: is completely disjoint from perturbation theory. In fact, the general
3633: expectation is that there will be a ``non-perturbative'' pomeron that is
3634: crucially dependent on confinement and, as such, is
3635: far removed from perturbation theory. However,
3636: the regge region involves a mixture of large light-cone and
3637: small transverse momenta and so appears only in Minkowski space.
3638: As a consequence, if the
3639: euclidean path integral is the starting point, detailed properties of the
3640: pomeron can only be determined by a complete non-perturbative solution of the
3641: theory from which Minkowski space hadron scattering amplitudes can be
3642: extracted and the regge limit taken.
3643: Something that seems unlikely to be possible for a very long time to come.
3644: Indeed, given that a complete non-perturbative solution of QCD has been
3645: found, the pomeron would probably be one of the last things to be studied.
3646: Note that, since light-cone momentum regions become all-important as
3647: the continuation to Minkowski space is made, the very existence of
3648: this continuation is likely to be contingent on the existence
3649: of (unitarity?) boundedness properties in the regge region.
3650:
3651: We would like to emphasize that there is no guarantee that
3652: a Minkowski region unitary S-Matrix can be derived from a
3653: non-perturbative euclidean
3654: path integral - particularly given the complexity\cite{vg} of the,
3655: large field, unphysical
3656: degrees of freedom that are present. (Indeed a commonly agreed
3657: procedure to definitively eliminate these degrees of freedom has
3658: not yet been found.) The demonstrated perturbative unitarity\cite{gth} is
3659: only a formal property since infra-red divergences prevent
3660: the existence of a finite S-Matrix. There is certainly no understanding of
3661: how the unitarity properties of the perturbative theory might translate
3662: into unitarity with respect to a non-perturbative
3663: physical spectrum that manifests confinement
3664: and chiral symmetry breaking. Indeed it is our strong belief that the regge
3665: region must play a special role
3666: in unraveling this relationship within QCD.
3667: Since small transverse momenta are involved,
3668: the physical properties of confinement and
3669: chiral symmetry breaking must be evident in the t-channel unitarity condition.
3670: Conversely, if asymptotic freedom has
3671: maximal applicability, the involvement of large momenta should imply
3672: that the pomeron is not too far from perturbation theory.
3673: Therefore, the (multi-)
3674: regge region should provide a unique possibility
3675: to understand the relationship between perturbation theory and the physical
3676: states appearing in the unitarity condition.
3677:
3678: If the regge limit of QCD can be constructed by the essentially
3679: perturbative methods we describe then
3680: the unitarity properties of massive quark and gluon reggeon
3681: diagrams translates into similar properties for the pomeron and hadron
3682: reggeon diagrams. The unitarity of the critical pomeron will be clearly
3683: related to the original perturbative unitarity of quarks and gluons.
3684: Indeed it could also be that, since the construction
3685: stays so close to perturbation
3686: theory, the problem of eliminating large field unphysical degrees
3687: of freedom will have been avoided.
3688:
3689: \newpage
3690:
3691: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
3692:
3693: \bibitem{gpt} V.~N.~Gribov, I.~Ya.~Pomeranchuk and K.~A.~Ter-Martirosyan,
3694: {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf 139B}, 184 (1965).
3695:
3696: \bibitem{arw91} A.~R.~White, {\it Int. J. Mod. Phys.} {\bf A6}, 1859 (1991).
3697:
3698: \bibitem{arw00} A.~R.~White, ``The Past and Future of S-Matrix Theory'',
3699: hep-ph/0002303, published in ``Scattering'', edited
3700: by E.~R.~Pike and P.~Sabatier (Academic Press, 2002).
3701:
3702:
3703: \bibitem{fkl} V.~S.~Fadin, E.~A.~Kuraev and L.~N.~Lipatov, {\it Sov. Phys.
3704: JETP} {\bf 45}, 199 (1977).
3705:
3706: \bibitem{bs} J.~B.~Bronzan and R.~L.~Sugar, {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D17},
3707: 585 (1978), this paper organizes into reggeon diagrams the results from
3708: H.~Cheng and C.~Y.~Lo, Phys. Rev. {\bf D13}, 1131 (1976),
3709: {\bf D15}, 2959 (1977).
3710:
3711: \bibitem{fs} V.~S.~Fadin and V.~E.~Sherman, Sov. Phys. JETP {\bf 45},
3712: 861 (1978).
3713:
3714: \bibitem{fl} V.~S.~Fadin and L.~N.~Lipatov, {\it Nucl. Phys.} {\bf B477},
3715: 767 (1996) and further references therein.
3716:
3717: \bibitem{jb} J.~Bartels, {\it Z. Phys.} {\bf C60}, 471 (1993) and further
3718: references therein.
3719:
3720: \bibitem{arw93} A.~R.~White, {\it Int. J. Mod. Phys.} {\bf A8}, 4755 (1993).
3721:
3722: \bibitem{cri} A.~A.~Migdal, A.~M.~Polyakov and K.~A.~Ter-Martirosyan,
3723: {\it Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.} {\bf 67}, 84 (1974);
3724: H.~D.~I.~Abarbanel and J.~B.~Bronzan, {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D9}, 2397 (1974).
3725:
3726: \bibitem{arw84} A.~R.~White, {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D29}, 1435 (1984).
3727:
3728: \bibitem{arw80} A.~R.~White, CERN preprint TH.2976 (1980). A summary of this
3729: paper is presented in the Proceedings of the
3730: XVIth Rencontre de Moriond, Vol.~2 (1981).
3731:
3732: \bibitem{arw011} A.~R.~White, hep-ph/0205036 - to be published in
3733: {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D}.
3734:
3735: \bibitem{arw01} A.~R.~White, {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D63} 016007, (2001)
3736:
3737: \bibitem{arw98} A.~R.~White, {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D58}, 074008 (1998),
3738: {\it Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl.} {\bf B96}, 277 (2001); see
3739: also Lectures in the Proceedings of the Theory Institute on Deep-Inelastic
3740: Diffraction, Argonne National Laboratory (1998).
3741:
3742: \bibitem{gw} P.~Goddard and A.~R.~White, {\it Nucl. Phys.} {\bf B17}, 1, 45
3743: (1970).
3744:
3745: \bibitem{gth1} G.~'t~Hooft, in Recent Developments in Gauge Theories, ed.
3746: G.~'t~Hooft et al. (Plenum, N.Y., 1980)
3747:
3748: \bibitem{cg} S.~Coleman and B.~Grossman, {\it Nucl. Phys. }
3749: {\bf B203}, 205 (1982).
3750:
3751: \bibitem{bfsy} T.~Banks, Y.~Frishman, A.~Schwimmer and S.~Yankielowicz,
3752: {\it Nucl. Phys.} {\bf B177}, 157 (1981).
3753:
3754: \bibitem{hor} J.~Horejsi, {\it Czech. J. of Physics}
3755: {\bf B35}, 820 (1984).
3756:
3757: \bibitem{ach} N.~N.~Achasov, {\it Phys. Letts.} {\bf B287}, 213 (1992).
3758:
3759: \bibitem{kog} J.~B.~ Kogut, M.~A.~Stephanov, D.~Toublan,
3760: J.~J.~M.~ Verbaarschot and A.~Zhitnitsky, {\it Nucl. Phys.} {\bf B582},
3761: 477 (2000).
3762:
3763: \bibitem{vg} V.~N.~Gribov, {\it Nucl. Phys.} {\bf B139}, 1 (1978),
3764: G.~'t Hooft, {\it Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl.} {\bf B74}, 413 (1999).
3765:
3766: \bibitem{gth} G. 't Hooft, {\it Nucl. Phys.} {\bf B33}, 173 (1971).
3767:
3768: \bibitem{awb} S.~l.~Adler and W.~B.~Bardeen, {\it Phys. Rev.}
3769: {\bf 182} 1517-1536 (1969).
3770:
3771: \bibitem{fl0} V.~S.~Fadin and L.~N.~Lipatov, {\it Nucl. Phys.} {\bf B406},
3772: 259 (1993).
3773:
3774: \bibitem{asen} A.~Sen, {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D27} 2997 (1983) and
3775: unpublished work on non-abelian gauge theories.
3776:
3777: \bibitem{kms} R.~Kirschner, L.~Mankiewicz, A.~Schafer and L.~Szymanowski
3778: {\it Z. Phys.} {\bf C74}, 501 (1997). A more general
3779: reference for light-cone $\gamma$-matrix and co-ordinate manipulations is
3780: S.~J.~Brodsky and G.~P.~Lepage,
3781: {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D22}, 2157 (1980).
3782:
3783: \bibitem{vg1} V.~N.~Gribov, {\it Eur. Phys. J.} {\bf C10}, 71, 91 (1999).
3784:
3785: \bibitem{dok} Yu.~L.~Dokshitzer, {\it Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond.}
3786: {\bf A359}, 309 (2001).
3787:
3788: \bibitem{fr} Y.~Frishman, {\it Springer Lecture Notes in Physics. Vol.}
3789: {\bf 32}, (1975); G.~T.~Bodwin and E.~Kovacs,
3790: {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D35}, 3198 (1987).
3791:
3792: \bibitem{nm} N.~S.~Manton, {\it Ann. Phys.} {\bf 159} 220 (1985); see also
3793: G.~S.~ Danilov, I.~T.~Dyatlov and V.~Yu.~Petrov, hep-th/9512049
3794: and references therein.
3795:
3796: \end{thebibliography}
3797:
3798: \end{document}
3799: