1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %% This is an example file for the Hirschegg Proceedings in
3: %Latex %%
4: %% with the standard style-file
5: %article.class; %%
6: %% Please use the here defined textwidth and height and also the
7: %%
8: %% command redefinitions for \section and
9: %\subsection; %%
10: %% format the title page as given here; all other Latex commands
11: %%
12: %% are available as usual
13: %%
14: %%
15: %%
16: %% PLEASE note that your contribution will be collected as a
17: %%
18: %% postscript file via the
19: %web-from: %%
20: %% http://theory.gsi.de/hirschegg/Submit-Proc.html
21: %%
22: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
23: \documentclass[12pt]{article}\pagestyle{empty}
24: %%
25: \textwidth=14cm \textheight=20cm \topmargin=0cm \oddsidemargin=1cm
26: %%
27: \let\section=\subsection \let\subsection=\subsubsection
28: %%
29: \renewcommand\thesubsection{\arabic{subsection}}
30: %%
31: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
32: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Start here your own paper
33: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
34: \usepackage{graphicx}
35:
36: \begin{document}
37: \begin{center}
38: {\large \bf Statistical coalescence model}\\[2mm]
39: {\large \bf of $J/\psi$ production at the SPS and RHIC}\\[5mm]
40: Mark I. Gorenstein \\[5mm]
41: {\small \it Bogolyubov Institute for Theoretical Physics,
42: Kiev, Ukraine\\
43: Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik, Universit\"at Frankfurt,
44: Germany
45: \\[8mm] }
46: \end{center}
47:
48:
49: \begin{abstract}\noindent
50: A recently developed statistical coalescence model of the
51: $J/\psi$
52: production is presented.
53: The NA50 data on the $J/\psi$ suppression pattern and the transverse mass
54: spectra in Pb+Pb collisions at the SPS are analyzed. The model predictions
55: for the RHIC energies are formulated. The measurements of $J/\psi$ in
56: Au+Au collisions at RHIC
57: are crucial for disentangling the different scenarios of
58: charmonia formation.
59: \end{abstract}
60:
61:
62: \section{Introduction}
63: The experimental studies of
64: nucleus-nucleus
65: (A+A) collisions at the
66: SPS and RHIC
67: provide a rich information on hadron observables (multiplicities and
68: momentum spectra). An extensive experimental program is motivated by a
69: possibility to create a new state of matter -- the quark gluon plasma
70: (QGP) -- in a laboratory.
71: Any theoretical description of the QGP requires a macroscopic approach:
72: statistical mechanics to describe the static properties of the matter
73: and hydrodynamics to describe the system evolution.
74: The equilibrium hadron gas (HG) model describes remarkably well
75: the hadron multiplicities measured
76: in Pb+Pb and Au+Au collisions at top SPS ($\sqrt{s}=17$~GeV per
77: nucleon pair) \cite{HG} and
78: RHIC ($\sqrt{s}=130$~GeV) \cite{HG1} energies,
79: where the creation of QGP is expected.
80:
81: The HG model assumes the
82: following formula for the hadron thermal multiplicities
83: in the grand canonical ensemble (g.c.e.):
84: \begin{equation}\label{stat}
85: N_j~=~\frac{d_j~V}{2\pi^2} ~
86: \int_0^{\infty}p^2dp~\left[\exp\left(
87: \frac{\sqrt{p^2+m_{j}^2} - \mu_j}{T}\right)~\pm~1\right]^{-1}~,
88: \end{equation}
89: where $V$ and $T$ are the system volume and temperature, respectively,
90: $m_j$ and $d_j$ denote particle masses and
91: degeneracy
92: factors.
93: The particle chemical
94: potential $\mu_j$ in Eq.(\ref{stat})
95: is defined as
96: %\begin{equation}\label{mui}
97: $\mu_j=b_j\mu_B+s_j\mu_S+c_j\mu_C$~,
98: %\end{equation}
99: where $b_j,s_j,c_j$ denote the baryonic number strangeness and
100: charm of particle $j$. The baryonic chemical potential $\mu_B$
101: regulates the baryonic density of the HG system whereas
102: strange $\mu_S$ and charm $\mu_C$ chemical potentials should be found
103: from the requirement of zero value for the total strangeness and charm
104: in the system (in our consideration we neglect small effects
105: of a non-zero electrical chemical potential).
106: The total multiplicities $N_j^{tot}$ in the HG model
107: include the resonance decay
108: contributions:
109: \begin{equation}\label{dec}
110: N_j^{tot}~=~N_j ~+~\sum_R Br(R \rightarrow j) N_R~,
111: \end{equation}
112: where $Br(R \rightarrow j)$ are the corresponding decay
113: branching ratios.
114: The hadron yield ratios $N_j^{tot}/N_i^{tot}$
115: in the g.c.e. are the functions of $T$ and $\mu_B$ and are
116: independent of the volume parameter $V$.
117:
118: The temperature parameters extracted from fitting the multiplicity data
119: are approximately the same for the SPS and RHIC energies:
120: $T=170\pm 10$~MeV \cite{HG,HG1}.
121: This value is close to an
122: estimate of the temperature
123: $T_c$ for the QGP--HG transition
124: obtained in Lattice QCD simulations at zero baryonic
125: density (see e.g. \cite{Karsch}).
126: One may therefore argue that QGP formed at the early stage of
127: A+A reaction hadronizes into
128: a locally equilibrated HG,
129: and the chemical composition of this hadron gas is weakly affected by the
130: subsequent hadron rescatterings.
131: %Therefore, at the SPS and RHIC the so-called ``chemical freeze-out''
132: %is rather close to (or even coincide with) the hadronization transition.
133:
134: \section{ Statistical coalescence model of $J/\psi$
135: production}
136: The production of charmonium states $J/\psi$ and $\psi^{\prime}$ have been
137: measured in A+A
138: collisions at CERN SPS over the last 15 years by the NA38 and NA50
139: Collaborations.
140: These studies were mainly motivated by the theoretical suggestion
141: \cite{Satz1} to use
142: $J/\psi$ meson as a probe for deconfinement in A+A
143: collisions.
144:
145: Recently the thermal model \cite{Ga1}
146: and the statistical coalescence model (SCM) \cite{Br1,Go}
147: (see also \cite{Go1,Go2,Go3})
148: for the charmonium production in
149: A+A collisions were formulated.
150: The total $J/\psi$ multiplicity, $N_{J/\psi}^{tot}$, in
151: the thermal model \cite{Ga1}
152: is given by Eq.~(\ref{dec}),
153: where $N_{J/\psi}$, $N_{\psi^{\prime}}$, $N_{\chi_1}$, $N_{\chi_2}$
154: are calculated according to Eq.(\ref{stat}) and $Br(\psi^{\prime})\cong
155: 0.54$, $Br(\chi_1)\cong 0.27$, $Br(\chi_2)\cong 0.14$ are the decay
156: branching ratios of the excited charmonium states into $J/\psi$.
157: The thermal model \cite{Ga1} predicts that at high collision energies the
158: $J/\psi$ to $\pi$ ratio is independent of $\sqrt{s}$ and the number of
159: nucleon participants $N_p$.
160: This is because both
161: $\langle J/\psi \rangle$ and $\langle \pi \rangle$
162: multiplicities
163: are proportional to the system volume and
164: the hadronization temperature
165: is expected to be approximately constant
166: at high collision energies.
167:
168: The SCM
169: \cite{Br1,Go} assumes that charmonium states
170: are formed at the hadronization stage.
171: This is similar to the thermal model \cite{Ga1}.
172: However, in the SCM the charmonium states are
173: produced via a coalescence of
174: $c$ and $\overline{c}$ (anti)quarks created
175: by the hard parton collisions at the early
176: stage of A+A reaction.
177: The number of created $c\overline{c}$
178: pairs, $N_{ c\overline{c}}$, in hard parton collisions, differs
179: in general
180: from the result
181: expected in the equilibrium HG.
182: One needs then a {\it charm enhancement} factor
183: $\gamma_c$ \cite{Br1}\footnote{
184: This is formally analogous to the
185: introduction of the {\it strangeness suppression} factor $\gamma_s < 1$
186: \cite{Raf1}
187: in the HG model.}
188: to
189: adjust the thermal HG results to the required
190: average number, $\langle N_{c\overline{c}} \rangle $, of $c\overline{c}$
191: pairs.
192: The open charm hadron yield
193: is enhanced
194: by a factor $\gamma_c$ and charmonium
195: yield by a factor $\gamma_c^2$ in comparison
196: with the equilibrium HG predictions.
197: This leads to a difference between
198: the thermal model and SCM predictions for charmonia multiplicities.
199:
200: The canonical ensemble (c.e.) formulation of the SCM
201: is \cite{Go}:
202: \begin{equation}\label{Ncc1}
203: \langle N_{c\overline{c}}\rangle~=~\frac{1}{2}~
204: \gamma_c~N_O~\frac{I_1(\gamma_c N_O)}{I_0(\gamma_cN_O)}~
205: +~\gamma_c^2~N_{H}~,
206: \end{equation}
207: where $N_{H}$ and $N_O$
208: are the HG
209: multiplicities of all particles with hidden and open charm, respectively.
210: The canonical suppression factor $I_1/I_0$ in Eq.(\ref{Ncc1})
211: is due to the exact charm conservation (see e.g., \cite{ce},
212: $I_0$ and $I_1$ are the modified Bessel functions).
213:
214: If $\langle N_{c\overline{c}}\rangle$ is known, Eq.(\ref{Ncc1}) can be
215: used
216: to find the charm enhancement
217: factor $\gamma_c$ and calculate then the $J/\psi$ multiplicity:
218: \begin{equation}\label{Npsi}
219: \langle J/\psi \rangle~= ~\gamma_c^2~N_{J/\psi}^{tot}~,
220: \end{equation}
221: where $N_{J/\psi}^{tot}$ is the total (thermal plus excited charmonium
222: decays) HG $J/\psi$ multiplicity.
223:
224: Note that the second term in the right-hand side of Eq.(\ref{Ncc1}) gives
225: only a tiny
226: correction to the first term, i.e. most of the created
227: $c\overline{c}$ pairs are transformed into the open charm hadrons.
228: Eqs.(\ref{Ncc1},\ref{Npsi}) lead then to:
229: \begin{equation}\label{Npsi1}
230: \langle J/\psi \rangle~\cong~
231: \langle N_{c\overline{c}}\rangle~~
232: \frac{ N_{J/\psi}^{tot}}{(N_O/2)^2}~, ~~~
233: \langle N_{c\overline{c}}\rangle << 1~;
234: \end{equation}
235: \begin{equation}\label{Npsi2}
236: \langle J/\psi \rangle~\cong~
237: \langle N_{c\overline{c}}\rangle^2~
238: \frac{ N_{J/\psi}^{tot}}{(N_O/2)^2}~, ~~~
239: \langle N_{c\overline{c}}\rangle >> 1~.
240: \end{equation}
241:
242: Eq.(\ref{Ncc1}) assumes an exact conservation of
243: $N_c-N_{\bar{c}}\equiv 0$
244: and `statistical fluctuations' of
245: $N_{c\overline{c}}\equiv (N_c+N_{\bar{c}})/2$ numbers.
246: A more accurate treatment with `dynamical' (Poisson-like) distribution
247: of
248: $N_{c\overline{c}}$ leads to \cite{Go2}:
249: \begin{equation}\label{Jpsi}
250: \langle J/\psi \rangle ~ \cong~
251: \langle N_{c\bar{c}} \rangle~
252: \left( 1 + \langle N_{c\bar{c}}\rangle \right)~
253: \frac{N_{J/\psi}^{tot}}{(N_O/2)^2} ~.
254: \end{equation}
255: Eq.(\ref{Jpsi}) coincides with Eqs.(\ref{Ncc1},\ref{Npsi}) at both
256: $\langle N_{c\overline{c}}\rangle << 1$ and $\langle
257: N_{c\overline{c}}\rangle >> 1$ limits (see
258: Eqs.(\ref{Npsi1},\ref{Npsi2})). This is because at
259: $\langle N_{c\overline{c}}\rangle << 1$ the probabilities to create
260: zero, $P(0)\cong 1- \langle N_{c\overline{c}}\rangle$, and one,
261: $P(1)\cong \langle N_{c\overline{c}}\rangle$, $c\overline{c}$ pairs
262: are only
263: important. On the other hand, at $\langle N_{c\overline{c}}\rangle >> 1$
264: the statistical and dynamical
265: fluctuations of $N_{c\overline{c}}$ both obey the Poisson
266: law distribution.
267:
268: \section{ $J/\psi$ suppression in Pb+Pb collisions at the
269: SPS}
270: The centrality dependence of $\langle N_{c\bar{c}} \rangle$
271: in A+B nucleus-nucleus collisions can
272: be calculated in Glauber's approach,
273: $\langle N_{c\bar{c}} \rangle (b) = \sigma^{NN}_{c\bar{c}} T_{AB}(b)$,
274: where $b$ is the impact parameter,
275: $T_{AB}(b)$ is the nuclear overlap function and
276: $\sigma^{NN}_{c\bar{c}}$ is the $c\bar{c}$ production cross section
277: for nucleon-nucleon collisions. As discussed in Ref.\cite{Go1},
278: the deconfined medium can substantially modify charm production
279: at the SPS, i.e.,
280: $\sigma^{NN}_{c\bar{c}}$ in A+B collisions can be different from
281: the corresponding cross section measured in a nucleon-nucleon collision
282: experiment. The present analysis treats $\sigma^{NN}_{c\bar{c}}$
283: at the SPS energy as
284: a free parameter. Its value is fixed by fitting the NA50 data.
285:
286: In the NA50 experiments \cite{NA50} the Drell-Yan muon pair multiplicity
287: (either
288: measured
289: or calculated from the minimum bias data) is used as a reference for
290: the $J/\psi$ ``suppression pattern''.
291: The number of Drell-Yan pairs is also proportional to the number of
292: primary
293: nucleon-nucleon collisions:
294: $\langle DY' \rangle (b) = \sigma^{NN}_{DY'} T_{AB}(b)$,
295: where $\sigma^{NN}_{DY'}$ is the nucleon-nucleon
296: production cross section of $\mu^+ \mu^-$
297: Drell-Yan pairs. The prime means that the pairs should satisfy
298: the kinematical conditions of the NA50 spectrometer.
299: As the Drell-Yan cross section is isospin dependent, an average value
300: is used:
301: $\sigma^{NN}_{DY'}=\sigma^{AB}_{DY'}/(AB)$.
302: For the case of Pb+Pb collisions,
303: $A=B=208$ and
304: $\sigma^{PbPb}_{DY'} = 1.49 \pm 0.13 $ $\mu$b \cite{NA50}.
305:
306: The quantity to be studied is the ratio
307: \begin{eqnarray}\label{Rb}
308: & & R_{DY}(b) ~ \equiv ~ \frac{\eta B^{J/\psi}_{\mu\mu} \langle J/\psi
309: \rangle (b)}
310: {\langle DY' \rangle (b)} \\
311: & =& ~
312: \eta ~B^{J/\psi}_{\mu\mu}~
313: \frac{\sigma^{NN}_{c\bar{c}}}{\sigma^{NN}_{DY'}}~~
314: \frac{\left( 1 + \sigma^{NN}_{c\bar{c}} T_{AB}(b) \right)}{N_p(b)}~~
315: \frac{n_{J/\psi}^{tot}(T,\mu_B) n_B(T,\mu_B)}{(n_O(T,\mu_B)/2)^2}~.
316: \nonumber
317: \end{eqnarray}
318: $B^{J/\psi}_{\mu\mu}\cong 0.0588$ is the
319: decay probability of $J/\psi$ into $\mu^+\mu^-$.
320: Only the fraction $\eta$ of $\mu^+\mu^-$ pairs
321: satisfying the kinematical conditions
322: of the NA50 spectrometer
323: can be registered.
324: We treat $\eta$ in Eq.(\ref{Rb}) as one more model free parameter.
325:
326:
327: In the NA50 experiment, the neutral transversal energy $E_T$ of produced
328: particles
329: was used to measure centrality of the collisions. This variable,
330: however, provides a reliable measure of the centrality only if it does
331: not exceed a certain maximum value: $E_T < 100$ GeV
332: (see Ref.\cite{Go2}).
333: The average number of participants is a linear function of the
334: transversal energy, $\overline{N}_p =E_T/q$,
335: in the domain $E_T < 100$~GeV ($q\cong0.274$~GeV).
336: At $E_T > 100$~GeV the number of
337: $\overline{N}_p$
338: does not change essentially as $E_T$ grows. Therefore, the data at $E_T >
339: 100$ GeV do not represent a centrality dependence of the $J/\psi$
340: suppression pattern
341: but rather its dependence on fluctuations of the
342: stopping energy at approximately {\it fixed} number of participants.
343: The influence of such fluctuations on $J/\psi$ multiplicity can be
344: studied
345: in the framework of the SCM model \cite{Ko}.
346: %
347: \begin{center}
348: \includegraphics[width=8cm,height=7cm,angle=0]{Fig1.eps}\\
349: \parbox{14cm}
350: % {\centerline
351: {\footnotesize
352: Fig.~1:
353: The dependence of the $J/\psi$ to Drell-Yan ratio on the
354: transversal energy. The normal nuclear suppression curve is obtained at
355: $\sigma_{abs}=6.4$~mb. The SCM lines are calculated using
356: Eq.(\ref{Rb}). The
357: vertical line shows the applicability domain of
358: the SCM, $N_p>100$.
359: }
360: \end{center}
361: %
362: %
363: The SCM fit of the NA50 data with Eq.(\ref{Rb}) is shown in Fig.~1
364: (see Refs.~\cite{Go2,Ko} for details).
365: The model parameters are:
366: \begin{equation}\label{param}
367: \sigma^{NN}_{c\bar{c}}~\cong~35.7~\mu\mbox{b} ~,~~~\eta~\cong~0.13 ~,
368: \end{equation}
369: with $T$ and $\mu_B$ fixed by hadron yield data.
370: The model requires rather large enhancement for the open charm
371: production (up to a factor of about $3.5$ within the rapidity window of
372: the NA50 spectrometer).
373: A direct measurement of the open charm in Pb+Pb at CERN SPS by NA60
374: would allow to test this prediction.
375:
376:
377: The SCM does not describe the NA50 data
378: at small values of
379: $E_T$ (the peripheral collisions with $E < 27$~GeV).
380: This can be also seen from the $\psi'$ data.
381: For $T\cong 170$~MeV the value of the thermal
382: ratio is
383: $\langle \psi^{\prime} \rangle /\langle J/\psi \rangle
384: \cong 0.04$.
385: This is in agreement with data in Pb+Pb collisions at SPS for
386: $N_p>100$, but is in contradiction with data in p+p, p+A and very
387: peripheral A+A collisions.
388: % \cite{psi'}.
389: This fact was first noticed in Ref.~\cite{psi'1}.
390:
391: \section{$J/\psi$ enhancement in A+A Collisions at the RHIC}
392: The number of directly produced
393: $c\overline{c}$ pairs at the RHIC energies
394: can be estimated
395: in the pQCD approach and
396: used then as the input for the SCM.
397: The pQCD calculations for ${c\overline{c}}$ production
398: cross sections were
399: first done in Ref.\cite{comb}.
400: For the cross section
401: $\sigma(pp\rightarrow
402: c\overline{c})$ of the charm production in p+p collisions we use
403: the results presented in Ref.\cite{ruusk}.
404: This leads to the value of
405: $\sigma(pp\rightarrow
406: c\overline{c})~\cong 0.35$~mb at $\sqrt{s}=200$~GeV
407: and the $\sqrt{s}$-dependence of the cross section
408: for $\sqrt{s}=10\div200$~GeV is parameterized
409: as \cite{Go3}:
410: \begin{equation}\label{pert1}
411: \sigma(pp\rightarrow c\overline{c})~=~\sigma_0~\cdot
412: \left(1- \frac{M_{0}}{\sqrt{s}}\right)^{\alpha}~
413: \left(\frac{\sqrt{s}}{M_{0}}\right)^{\beta}~,
414: \end{equation}
415: with $\sigma_0 \cong 3.392 $~$\mu$b, $M_{0}\cong 2.984$~GeV,
416: $\alpha \cong 8.185$ and $\beta \cong 1.132$.
417:
418: The number of produced $c\overline{c}$
419: pairs in A+A collisions is proportional to
420: the number of primary N+N collisions, $N_{coll}^{AA}$,
421: which in turn is proportional to $N_p^{4/3}$ \cite{eskola}:
422: \begin{equation}\label{pert}
423: \langle N_{c\overline{c}} \rangle~ = ~N_{coll}^{AA}(N_p)~
424: \frac{\sigma(pp\rightarrow c\overline{c})}{\sigma_{NN}^{inel}}~
425: \cong ~ C~ \sigma(pp\rightarrow c\overline{c})~N_p^{4/3}~,
426: \end{equation}
427: where $\sigma_{NN}^{inel}\cong 30$~mb is the inelastic N+N cross sections,
428: $C\cong 11$~barn$^{-1}$.
429:
430: The results of the SCM can be studied analytically
431: according to Eqs.(\ref{Npsi1},\ref{Npsi2})
432: in the limiting cases of small and large numbers of
433: $\langle N_{c\overline{c}}\rangle$.
434: For
435: $N_{c\overline{c}}<<1$
436: one finds:
437: \begin{equation}\label{lim1}
438: R~
439: \equiv~\frac{\langle J/\psi \rangle}
440: {\langle N_{c\overline{c}}\rangle}~
441: \cong~ \frac{4 N_{J/\psi}^{tot}}{N_O^2}~\sim~\frac{1}{V}~\sim~
442: \frac{1}{\langle \pi \rangle} ~\sim~
443: \left(\sqrt{s}\right)^{-1/2}~N_p^{-1}~,
444: \end{equation}
445: where we use the energy dependence of the
446: pion multiplicity per nucleon participant
447: $\langle \pi \rangle/N_p \propto (\sqrt{s})^{1/2}$ \cite{Ga}
448: which approximately works in the SPS--RHIC energy region.
449: The behavior (\ref{lim1}) corresponds to
450: the $J/\psi$ suppression: the ratio $R$
451: decreases with increasing of both $\sqrt{s}$ and $N_p$.
452: This takes place at the SPS: this energy is still
453: too ``low''
454: as $\langle N_{c\overline{c}}\rangle <1$ even in the most central Pb+Pb
455: collisions. However, the behavior of the $J/\psi$ to $N_{c\overline{c}}$
456: ratio is changed dramatically
457: at the RHIC energies \cite{Go3} (see Fig.~2 and Ref.~\cite{Go3} for
458: details).
459: %
460: \begin{center}
461: \mbox{
462: \parbox{6.0cm}{
463: \includegraphics[width=6cm]{Fig2.eps}}
464: \parbox{6.0cm}{
465: \vspace*{-0.0cm}\includegraphics[width=6cm]{Fig3.eps}}
466: }
467: \parbox{14cm}
468: {\footnotesize
469: Fig. 2. Left:
470: The energy dependence of the $\langle J/\psi \rangle$ to
471: $\langle N_{c\overline{c}}\rangle$
472: ratio in central Au+Au collisions.
473: Points are the predictions of the SCM
474: for the RHIC energies: $\sqrt{s}=56, 130, 200$~GeV.
475: Right:
476: The $N_p$-dependence of the $\langle J/\psi \rangle$ to
477: $\langle N_{c\overline{c}}\rangle $
478: ratio. The lines are the predictions of the SCM. The dashed line
479: corresponds
480: to $\sqrt{s}=56$~GeV (the $J/\psi$ {\it suppression}),
481: the solid line corresponds
482: to $\sqrt{s}=200$~GeV (the $J/\psi$ {\it enhancement}).
483: }
484: \end{center}
485: %
486: %
487: In central Au+Au collisions
488: at $\sqrt{s}=200$~GeV the expected value of $\langle N_{c\overline{c}}
489: \rangle$
490: is essentially larger than unit. For $\langle
491: N_{c\overline{c}}\rangle >>1$
492: one finds ($\beta\cong 1.1$):
493: \begin{equation}\label{lim2}
494: R~
495: \equiv~\frac{\langle J/\psi \rangle}{\langle N_{c\overline{c}}\rangle }~
496: \cong~ \frac{2
497: \langle
498: N_{c\overline{c}}\rangle}{N_O}~\sim~\frac{\langle
499: N_{c\overline{c}}\rangle }{V}~\sim~
500: \frac{\langle N_{c\overline{c}}\rangle }{\langle \pi \rangle} ~\sim~
501: (\sqrt{s})^{\beta
502: -1/2}~N_p^{1/3}~.
503: \end{equation}
504:
505: %Eqs.~(\ref{lim1},\ref{lim2}) reveal a remarkable feature
506: %of the SCM: the $J/\psi$ to $\langle N_{c\overline{c}}\rangle $
507: %ratio reveal both the $J/\psi$ {\it suppression} (\ref{lim1}))
508: %and $J/\psi$ {\it enhancement} (\ref{lim2}) behaviors.
509: %The measurements in Au+Au collisions at RHIC give a unique possibility
510: %to check these predictions.
511: %The results of the SCM for the $J/\psi$
512: %to $\langle N_{c\overline{c}}\rangle $ ratio are presented in
513: %Figs.~2 and 3.
514: %Both the suppression (the dashed line in Fig.~3) and enhancement
515: %(the solid lines in Figs.~2 and 3) behaviors are clearly seen.
516:
517:
518: \section{The $m_T$-spectra of $J/\psi$ and $\psi^{\prime}$
519: and QGP hadronization}
520: In Ref.\cite{BGG} we formulated the hypothesis
521: that the kinetic freeze-out of $J/\psi$ and $\psi^{\prime}$ mesons takes
522: place directly at hadronization.
523: The effect of rescattering in the hadronic phase was recently studied
524: within
525: a ``hydro + cascade'' approach \cite{BD,Sh}.
526: A+A collisions are considered there to proceed in three stages:
527: hydrodynamic QGP
528: expansion (``hydro''),
529: transition from QGP to HG (``switching'')
530: and the stage of hadronic rescatterings and resonance decays
531: (``cascade'').
532: The switching from hydro to cascade takes place at $T=T_c$, where the
533: spectrum of hadrons leaving the surface of the QGP--HG transition is taken
534: as an input for the subsequent cascade calculations.
535: The results of Refs.~\cite{BD,Sh} suggest that
536: the transverse momentum spectra of $\Omega$ is only weakly affected during
537: the cascade stage \footnote{The corresponding calculation for charmonia
538: are not yet performed within this model.} and give therefore a
539: straightforward
540: measure of the collective hydro velocity at the `switching' surface
541: $T=T_c$.
542: In Ref.~\cite{GBG} we
543: demonstrated that
544: in Pb+Pb collisions at 158~A$\cdot$GeV the $m_T$-spectra of $\Omega^{\pm}$
545: \cite{Omega} can be explained
546: simultaneously with the $m_T$-spectra of $J/\psi$ and $\psi^{\prime}$
547: mesons
548: \cite{mt}
549: using the same set
550: of the hadronization parameters.
551: %$T\cong 170$~MeV, $\overline{v}_T\cong
552: %0.2$.
553:
554: Assuming the fluid freeze-out at constant temperature $T$,
555: the transverse mass spectrum of
556: $i$-th hadron species in cylindrically symmetric
557: and longitudinally boost invariant fluid expansion
558: equals approximately to (see Ref.~\cite{GBG} for further references and
559: details):
560: \begin{equation}\label{hydro1}
561: \frac{dN_i}{m_T dm_T}~
562: %\sim~m_T~
563: % K_1\left(\frac{m_T (1+\frac{1}{2} \overline{v}_T^2)}{T}\right)~
564: %I_0\left(\frac{p_T\overline{v}_T}{T}\right)~
565: \propto ~
566: %\left(m_T\right)^{1/2}~
567: \sqrt{m_T}~
568: \exp\left(-~\frac{m_T (1+\frac{1}{2}\overline{v}_T^2)}{T}\right)
569: ~I_0\left(\frac{p_T\overline{v}_T}{T}\right)~,
570: \end{equation}
571: where $m_T=(m_i^2+p_T^2)^{1/2}$ and $\overline{v}_T$ is the average
572: transverse flow velocity.
573: \begin{center}
574: \includegraphics[width=10cm,height=9cm,angle=0]{Fig4.eps}\\
575: \parbox{14cm}
576: %
577: {\footnotesize
578: Fig.~3:
579: The $m_T$-spectra
580: measured
581: at midrapidity in Pb+Pb at 158~A$\cdot$GeV
582: by WA97 \cite{Omega} for $\Omega$
583: and by NA50 \cite{mt} for $J/\psi$ and $\psi^{\prime}$
584: are presented (in arbitrary units) versus $m_T-m$.
585: The solid lines correspond to Eq.(\ref{hydro1}) with
586: $T=170$~MeV and $\overline{v}_T=0.19$.
587: }
588: %}
589: \end{center}
590: %
591: %
592: %\vspace{0.3cm}
593: In Fig.~3 we present the fit with Eq.(\ref{hydro1}) of the measured
594: $m_T$-spectra.
595: The temperature is fixed as $T=170$~MeV and $\overline{v}_T$
596: is considered as a free parameter. The shapes of all spectra are
597: simultaneously reproduced
598: at $\overline{v}_T= 0.19\pm 0.02$.
599:
600:
601:
602: \section{ Conclusions}
603: %\begin{itemize}
604: %\item
605: Statistical hadronization of the
606: QGP is probably an important
607: source of $J/\psi$ production \cite{Ga1}.
608: Within the SCM \cite{Br1,Go} the NA50 data
609: on the $J/\psi$ production in Pb+Pb at 158~A$\cdot$GeV can be fitted
610: \cite{Go2}
611: (see Fig.~1)
612: for central collisions $N_p>100$.
613: A large enhancement of the open
614: charm over an extrapolation from the p+p data
615: is however required \cite{Go2,Go1}.
616: A direct measurement of the open charm in Pb+Pb at CERN SPS by NA60
617: would allow to test the SCM selfconsistency.
618: %\item
619:
620: The SCM predicts that the $J/\psi$ {\it suppression}
621: at the SPS
622: %and in peripheral Au+Au collisions at lower RHIC energy
623: should be changed into the $J/\psi$
624: {\it enhancement} in central
625: Au+Au collisions at the RHIC energies \cite{Go3} (see Fig.~2).
626: %\item
627:
628: The shapes of $m_T$-spectra for $\Omega$, $J/\psi$ and $\psi^{\prime}$ are
629: simultaneously reproduced \cite{GBG} (see Fig.~3)
630: in the hydrodynamical picture of the QGP hadronization with
631: $T=170$~MeV, $\overline{v}_T=0.19\pm 0.02$.
632: This supports the hypothesis that
633: formation and the kinetic freeze--out of charmonia occurs
634: at the hadronization \cite{BGG}.
635:
636: %\end{itemize}
637:
638:
639:
640: \vspace{0.3cm}
641: {\bf Acknowledgments.}
642: {\small I am thankful to K.A.~Bugaev, M. Ga\'zdzicki,
643: W.~Greiner, A.P.~Kostyuk, L.~McLerran and H.~St\"ocker for fruitful
644: collaboration. I am also
645: thankful to F.~Becattini, L.~Bravina, P.~Braun-Munzinger, J.~Cleymans,
646: A.~Dumitru, L.~Gerland, D.~Kharzeev, I.N.~Mishustin, G.C.~Nayak,
647: K.~Redlich, Yu.M.~Sinyukov, J.~Stachel, D.~Teaney and Nu Xu for
648: comments and discussions.
649: The financial support from the Humboldt Foundation is acknowledged.
650: The research described in this publication was made possible in part by
651: Award \# UP1-2119 of the U.S. Civilian Research and Development
652: Foundation for the Independent States of the Former Soviet Union
653: (CRDF) and INTAS grant 00-00366}.
654:
655: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
656: \itemsep=0cm
657: \bibitem{HG}
658: J. Cleymans and H. Satz, Z. Phys. {\bf C57} (1993) 135;
659: J. Sollfrank, M.~Ga\'zdzicki, U. Heinz and J. Rafelski, Z. Phys. {\bf C61}
660: (1994) 659;
661: P.~Braun-Munzinger, I.~Heppe and J.~Stachel,
662: %``Chemical equilibration in Pb + Pb collisions at the SPS,''
663: Phys. Lett. {\bf B465} (1999) 15;
664: %[nucl-th/9903010];\\
665: G.~D.~Yen and M.~I.~Gorenstein,
666: %``The analysis of particle multiplicities in Pb + Pb collisions at CERN
667: % SPS within hadron gas models,''
668: Phys. Rev. {\bf C59} (1999) 2788;
669: %[nucl-th/9808012].
670: F.~Becattini {\it et al}.,
671: % J.~Cleymans, A.~Keranen, E.~Suhonen and K.~Redlich,
672: %``Features of particle multiplicities and strangeness production in
673: % central heavy ion collisions between 1.7-A-GeV/c and 158-A-GeV/c,''
674: %hep-ph/0002267.
675: Phys. Rev. {\bf C64} (2001) 024901.
676: \bibitem{HG1}
677: N. Xu and M. Kaneta, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A698},
678: (2002) 306;
679: P.~Braun-Munzinger {\it et al}.,
680: %D. Magestro, K. Redlich and J.~Stachel,
681: %hep-ph/0105229.
682: Phys. Lett. {\bf B518} (2001) 41;
683: W. Frolkowski, W. Broniowski and M. Michalec, Acta Phys. Pol. {\bf B33}
684: (2002) 761.
685: \bibitem{Karsch}
686: %M. Oevers {\it et al}.,
687: %F. Karsch, E. Laermann and P. Schmidt,
688: %{\it Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl.} {\bf 73} (1999) 465;\\
689: F. Karsch,
690: Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. {\bf 83-84} (2000) 14.
691: \bibitem{Satz1}
692: T. Matsui and H. Satz, {\it Phys. Lett.} {\bf B178} (1986) 416.
693: \bibitem{Ga1}
694: M. Ga\'zdzicki and M.I. Gorenstein, Phys. Rev. Lett.
695: {\bf 83} (1999) 4009.
696: \bibitem{Br1}
697: P. Braun-Munzinger and J. Stachel, Phys. Lett. {\bf B490}
698: (2000) 196.
699: \bibitem{Go}
700: M.I. Gorenstein,
701: % {\it et al}.,
702: A.P. Kostyuk, H. St\"ocker and W. Greiner,
703: Phys. Lett. {\bf B498} (2001) 277, J. Phys {\bf G27}
704: (2001) L47.
705: \bibitem{Go2}
706: A.P. Kostyuk,
707: % {\it et al}.,
708: M.I. Gorenstein, H. St\"ocker and W. Greiner,
709: hep-ph/0110269.
710: \bibitem{Go1}
711: A.P. Kostyuk, M.I. Gorenstein and W. Greiner,
712: Phys. Lett. {\bf B519} (2001) 207.
713: \bibitem{Go3}
714: M.I. Gorenstein {\it et al}.,
715: hep-ph/0012292,
716: Phys. Lett. {\bf B524} (2002) 265.
717: \bibitem{Raf1}
718: J. Rafelski, Phys. Lett. {\bf B62} (1991) 333.
719: \bibitem{ce}
720: J. Rafelski and M. Danos, Phys. Lett. {\bf B97} 279
721: (1980);
722: K.~Redlich and L.~Turko, Z. Phys. {\bf C5} (1980) 541;
723: J.~Cleymans, K.~Redlich and E.~Suhonen,
724: Z. Phys. {\bf C51} (1991) 137;
725: M.I.~Gorenstein, M.~Ga\'zdzicki and W.~Greiner,
726: Phys. Lett. {\bf B483} (2000) 60.
727: %\bibitem{pdg}
728: %Particle Data Group,
729: %``Review of particle physics,''
730: %Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C15} (2000) 1.
731: \bibitem{NA50}
732: M.C.~Abreu {\it et al.,} (NA50),
733: Phys. Lett. {\bf B410} (1997) 327, {\bf B410} (1997) 337,
734: {\bf B477} (2000) 28
735: {\bf B450} (1999) 456.
736: \bibitem{Ko}
737: A.P. Kostyuk {\it et al}.,
738: % M.I. Gorenstein, H. St\"ocker and W. Greiner,
739: (in preparation).
740: %\bibitem{psi'}
741: %M. Gonin {\it et al., Presented at 3rd International
742: %Conference on Physics and Astrophysics of QGP} 1997 PRINT-97-208
743: \bibitem{psi'1}
744: H. Sorge, E. Shuryak and I. Zahed, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 79}
745: (1997) 2775.
746: \bibitem{comb}
747: B.L. Combridge, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B151} (1979) 429.
748: \bibitem{ruusk}
749: P.L. McGaghey {\it et al.},
750: % E. Quack, P.V. Ruuskanen, R.~Vogt
751: %and X.-N. Wang,
752: Int. J. Mod. Phys. {\bf A10} (1995) 2999.
753: \bibitem{Ga}
754: M. Ga\'zdzicki, private communication.
755: %
756: \bibitem{eskola}
757: K.J. Eskola, K. Kajantie and J. Lindfors
758: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B323} (1989) 37.
759: %
760: \bibitem{BGG}
761: K. A. Bugaev, M. Ga\'zdzicki and M. I. Gorenstein,
762: Phys. Lett. {\bf B523} (2001) 255;
763: K. A. Bugaev, nucl-th/0112016.
764: %
765: \bibitem{BD}
766: S. Bass and A. Dumitru, Phys. Rev. {\bf C61} (2000) 064909.
767: %
768: \bibitem{Sh}
769: D. Teaney, J. Lauret and E.V. Shuryak, nucl-th/0110037.
770: %
771: \bibitem{GBG}
772: M.I. Gorenstein, K.A. Bugaev and M. Ga\'zdzicki,
773: hep-ph/0112197.
774: %
775: \bibitem{Omega}
776: F. Antinori {\it et al}., (WA97), J. Phys. {\bf G27} (2001) 375.
777: %
778: \bibitem{mt}
779: M.C. Abreu {\it et al}., (NA50), Phys. Lett. {\bf B499} (2001) 85.
780: %
781: %\bibitem{Heinz}
782: %E. Schnedermann, J. Sollfrank and U. Heinz,
783: %Phys. Rev. {\bf C48} (1993) 2462.
784: %
785: %\bibitem{Omega1}
786: %E. Anderson et al., (WA97), Phys. Lett. {\bf B433} (1998) 209.
787:
788: \end{thebibliography}
789: \end{document}
790:
791:
792:
793: \begin{figure}[h]
794: \begin{center}
795: \includegraphics[height=7.6cm]{Fig1.eps}
796: \caption{The centrality dependence of the $J/\psi$ suppression...
797: }
798: \end{center}
799: \end{figure}
800:
801:
802:
803:
804: \begin{figure}[h]
805: \begin{center}
806: \includegraphics[height=7.6cm]{Fig2.eps}
807: \caption{The energy dependence of the $J/\psi$ to
808: $\langle N_{c\overline{c}}\rangle $
809: ratio in central Au+Au collisions.
810: Points are the predictions of the SCM
811: for the RHIC energies: $\sqrt{s}=56, 130, 200$~GeV.
812: %The ratio $R$ increases by a factor of
813: %about 3 ($J/\psi$ {\it enhancement}) in the region of RHIC energies.
814: %$\sqrt{s}=56\div 200$~GeV.
815: }
816: \end{center}
817: \end{figure}
818:
819: \begin{figure}[h]
820: \begin{center}
821: \includegraphics[height=7.6cm]{Fig3.eps}
822: \caption{The $N_p$-dependence of the $J/\psi$ to
823: $\langle N_{c\overline{c}}\rangle $
824: ratio. The lines are the predictions of the SCM. The dashed line
825: corresponds
826: to $\sqrt{s}=56$~GeV (the $J/\psi$ {\it suppression}),
827: the solid line corresponds
828: to $\sqrt{s}=200$~GeV (the $J/\psi$ {\it enhancement}).
829: }
830: \end{center}
831: \end{figure}
832:
833: \vspace{0.3cm}
834: \begin{figure}[h]
835: \begin{center}
836: \includegraphics[height=10.0cm]{Fig4.eps}
837: \caption{ The $m_T$ spectra, $dN/m_Tdm_T$,
838: in arbitrary units
839: are presented versus $m_T-m$. The points are the data measured
840: at midrapidity
841: in Pb+Pb at the SPS 158~A$\cdot$GeV
842: by WA97 \cite{Omega} for $\Omega$ (upper sets)
843: and by NA50 \cite{Jpsi} for $J/\psi$ and $\psi^{\prime}$
844: (lower sets). The solid lines correspond to Eq.~(\ref{hydro1}) with
845: $T=T_c=170$~MeV and $\overline{v}_T=0.2$.}
846: \end{center}
847: \end{figure}
848:
849:
850: \end{document}
851:
852:
853: