1: \documentstyle[12pt,epsf]{article}
2: \voffset-.3in \textwidth6.5in \textheight9in
3: \evensidemargin0pt \oddsidemargin0pt \topmargin0pt
4: \newcommand{\gtap}{\;{\raise.3ex\hbox{$>$\kern-.75em\lower1ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}\;}
5: \newcommand{\ltap}{\;{\raise.3ex\hbox{$<$\kern-.75em\lower1ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}\;}
6:
7: \begin{document}
8:
9: \begin{titlepage}
10:
11: \hspace*{\fill}\parbox[t]{4.4cm}
12: {hep-ph/0202205 \\
13: Fermilab-Pub-01/389-T \\
14: ILL-(TH)-02-1 \\ \\
15: \today} \vskip2cm
16: \begin{center}
17: {\Large \bf Measuring the top-quark Yukawa coupling \\[7pt]
18: at hadron colliders via $t\bar th$, $h\to W^+W^-$} \\
19: \medskip
20: \bigskip\bigskip\bigskip
21: {\large {\bf F.~Maltoni}$^1$,
22: {\bf D.~Rainwater}$^2$,
23: and {\bf S.~Willenbrock}$^1$} \\
24: \bigskip
25: $^{1}$ Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign \\
26: 1110 West Green Street, Urbana, IL\ \ 61801 \\
27: \medskip
28: $^{2}$Theoretical Physics Department, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory \\
29: Batavia, IL\ \ 60510 \\
30: \end{center}
31: \bigskip\bigskip\bigskip
32:
33: \vspace{.5cm}
34:
35: \begin{abstract}
36: We study the signal and background for the process $t\bar th$, $h\to W^+W^-$
37: at the LHC and a 100 TeV VLHC. Signals are studied in two-, three-, and
38: four-lepton final states. We find a statistical uncertainty in the top-quark
39: Yukawa coupling at the LHC of $16\%, 8\%, 12\%$ for $m_h = 130, 160, 190$ GeV,
40: respectively. The statistical uncertainty at the VLHC is likely to be
41: negligible in comparison with the systematic uncertainty.
42: \end{abstract}
43:
44: \vfil
45:
46: \end{titlepage}
47:
48: \section{Introduction}%
49: \label{sec:intro}
50:
51: One of the primary quests of present and future colliders is the search for
52: the Higgs boson. Precision electroweak data indicate that the mass of the
53: Higgs boson lies in the range 114 GeV $< m_h \ltap$ 200 GeV
54: \cite{:2001xw,Abbaneo:2001ix}. Such a Higgs boson may be discovered in Run II
55: of the Fermilab Tevatron \cite{Carena:2000yx}, and it cannot escape the CERN
56: Large Hadron Collider (LHC) \cite{ATLAS,CMS}.
57:
58: Once a Higgs boson is discovered, it will be important to measure its couplings
59: to other particles to establish whether these couplings are those of a
60: standard-model Higgs boson, or those of a Higgs boson from an extended Higgs
61: sector, such as a two-Higgs-doublet model. For example, the minimal
62: supersymmetric standard model requires the presence of two Higgs doublets to
63: cancel gauge anomalies and to generate masses for both up- and down-type
64: quarks \cite{Carena:2000yx}. There are many other models that employ an
65: extended Higgs sector as well. The coupling of the Higgs boson to other
66: particles will be measured by studying the various production processes and
67: decay modes of the Higgs boson \cite{ATLAS,Zeppenfeld:2000td}.
68:
69: In this paper we study the feasibility of measuring the Yukawa coupling of the
70: Higgs boson to the top quark via the associated production of the Higgs boson
71: with a top-quark pair ($t\bar th$) \cite{Ng:1984jm,Kunszt:1984ri}, followed by
72: the decay $h\to W^+W^-$
73: \cite{Lee:1977yc,Rizzo:1980gz,Keung:1984hn},\footnote{For $m_h \le 2M_W$, one
74: or both of the $W$ bosons is virtual.} as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:ggtth}. This
75: decay mode has a branching ratio in excess of $10\%$ for $m_h \gtap 120$ GeV,
76: and is the dominant decay mode of the Higgs boson for $m_h \gtap 135$ GeV
77: \cite{Carena:2000yx}. We study this process at the LHC ($\sqrt s =14$ TeV)
78: with both low-luminosity and high-luminosity running. We also consider a
79: $\sqrt s=$ 100 TeV Very Large Hadron Collider (VLHC) in order to judge the
80: merits of increased energy. We omit a study at the Tevatron since, even with 30
81: fb$^{-1}$ of integrated luminosity, the number of signal events is less than
82: unity once branching ratios are included.
83:
84: Let us compare the measurement of the top-quark Yukawa coupling via $t\bar th$,
85: $h\to W^+W^-$ with other methods for measuring this Yukawa coupling. A less
86: direct way to measure the top-quark Yukawa coupling at a hadron collider is to
87: produce the Higgs boson via gluon fusion \cite{Georgi:1978gs}. In the standard
88: model this process is dominated by a top-quark loop, but if there are other
89: heavy colored particles that couple to the Higgs boson (such as squarks), they
90: too contribute to the amplitude, complicating the extraction of the top-quark
91: Yukawa coupling. The process $gg\to h$, $h\to W^+W^-$, will be accessible at
92: the LHC \cite{ATLAS,Glover:1988fn,Barger:1990mn,Dittmar:1996ss}, and perhaps
93: also at the Tevatron \cite{Han:1998ma,Han:1998sp}, for some range of
94: Higgs-boson masses. The ratio of $gg\to h$, $h\to W^+W^-$ and $t\bar th$, $h\to
95: W^+W^-$ is a good probe of additional contributions to the $gg\to h$ amplitude
96: beyond that of the top quark, as $BR(h\to W^+W^-)$ and many systematic
97: uncertainties cancel.
98:
99: An $e^+e^-$ linear collider of sufficient energy and luminosity could also
100: measure the top-quark Yukawa coupling via $t\bar th$, $h\to W^+W^-$. A machine
101: of energy somewhat greater than $m_h + 2m_t$ would be required in order to
102: overcome the phase space suppression near threshold. In particular, a $\sqrt
103: s = 500$ GeV machine would not be adequate for Higgs-boson masses above 130
104: GeV. We are not aware of any studies of this process at a linear collider.
105:
106: \begin{figure}[tb]
107: \begin{center}
108: \vspace*{0cm} \hspace*{0cm} \epsfxsize=5cm \epsfbox{fig1.eps} \vspace*{0cm}
109: \end{center}
110: \caption{A representative Feynman diagram for associated production of the
111: Higgs boson and a $t\bar t$ pair, followed by the decay $h\to W^+W^-$.}
112: \label{fig:ggtth}
113: \end{figure}
114:
115: For a Higgs boson of mass $\ltap 135$ GeV, the dominant decay mode is $h\to
116: b\bar b$. Such is the case for the lightest Higgs boson of the minimal
117: supersymmetric standard model, which has a mass less than about 130 GeV
118: \cite{Carena:2000yx,Haber:1991aw,Okada:1991vk,Ellis:1991nz}. The measurement
119: of the top-quark Yukawa coupling via $t\bar th$ in this decay mode at the LHC
120: has been studied elsewhere
121: \cite{ATLAS,Dai:1993gm,Beneke:2000hk,Drollinger:2001ym}.\footnote{This process
122: might also be accessible at the Tevatron \cite{Goldstein:2001bp}, but only a
123: crude measurement of the Yukawa coupling could be made.} The ratio of $t\bar
124: th$, $h\to b\bar b$ and $t\bar th$, $h\to W^+W^-$ is a good measure of the
125: ratio of the Yukawa coupling of the $b$ quark and the coupling of the Higgs
126: boson to $W$ bosons, as $\sigma(t\bar th)$ and many systematic uncertainties
127: cancel.
128:
129: In Section~\ref{sec:signal} we discuss the signal for $t\bar th$, $h\to
130: W^+W^-$, as well as the backgrounds. We consider final states with two, three,
131: and four leptons. In Section~\ref{sec:calc} we discuss the details of the
132: calculations. In Section~\ref{sec:results} we present the numerical results
133: for the number of signal and background events and discuss uncertainties. We
134: draw conclusions in Section~\ref{sec:conclusions}.
135:
136: \section{Signal and backgrounds}%
137: \label{sec:signal}
138:
139: We assume that the Higgs boson has been discovered and its branching ratio
140: into $W^+W^-$ is known (or is assumed to have the standard-model value). The
141: extraction of the top-quark Yukawa coupling then requires a measurement of the
142: cross section for $t\bar th$, $h\to W^+W^-$. The total cross section is given
143: in Table~\ref{tab:totalcs} for a variety of Higgs-boson masses.
144:
145: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
146: \begin{table}[p]
147: \caption{Total cross section (fb) for $t\bar th$, $h\to W^+W^-$ at the LHC and
148: a VLHC of $\sqrt{s}=100$ TeV.}
149: \medskip
150: \addtolength{\arraycolsep}{0.1cm}
151: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.4}
152: \begin{center} \begin{tabular}[4]{c|ccc}
153: \hline \hline
154: & \multicolumn{3}{c}{$\sigma(t\bar th)BR(h\to W^+W^-)$} \\[1pt]
155: $m_h$ (GeV) & 130 & 160 & 190
156: \\
157: \hline
158: LHC & 110 & 180 & 90 \\[7pt]
159: VLHC & 6800 & 12200 & 6700 \\[7pt]
160: \hline \hline
161: \end{tabular}
162: \end{center}
163: \label{tab:totalcs}
164: \end{table}
165: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
166:
167: After the top quarks decay, the final state is $W^+W^-W^+W^-b\bar b$. This
168: can be divided into different cases, depending on how many $W$ bosons decay
169: leptonically. To reduce backgrounds that do not contain top quarks, we
170: require that both $b$ jets are tagged, with an efficiency $\epsilon_b =$ 60\%
171: (50\% at high luminosity).\footnote{Since we require two $b$ tags, any
172: improvement in the $b$-tagging efficiency would be magnified.} We also include
173: a lepton identification and reconstruction efficiency $\epsilon_\ell =$ 85\%.
174: We do not require that either of the top quarks are reconstructed, since the
175: principal backgrounds also contain top quarks. For a similar reason, we do not
176: require any missing transverse momentum. We also do not require that the
177: Higgs boson be reconstructed, which would be difficult due to the loss of
178: neutrinos from leptonic $W$ decays. A trigger lepton of $p^T>$ 20 GeV (30 GeV
179: at high luminosity) is required. The cuts made to simulate the acceptance and
180: resolution of the detector are given in Table~\ref{tab:detectorcuts}.
181:
182: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
183: \begin{table}[p]
184: \caption{Cuts applied to simulate the acceptance and resolution of the
185: detector at the LHC at low luminosity and at high luminosity (in
186: parentheses). The high-luminosity cuts are also used for the VLHC.}
187: \medskip
188: \addtolength{\arraycolsep}{0.1cm}
189: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.4}
190: \begin{center}
191: \begin{tabular}[4]{ccc}
192: \hline\hline
193: $j$ &$p^T> 15 \,(30)$ GeV& $|\eta|< 4.5$\\[5pt]
194: $b$ &$p^T> 15 \,(30)$ GeV& $|\eta|< 2.5$\\[5pt]
195: $l$ &$p^T> 10$ GeV & $|\eta|< 2.5$\\
196: \hline
197: \multicolumn{3}{c}{Trigger lepton: $p^T > 20 \,(30)$ GeV}\\[5pt]
198: \multicolumn{3}{c}{$\Delta R_{ij}>0.4$}\\[5pt]
199: \hline
200: \hline
201: \end{tabular}
202: \end{center}
203: \label{tab:detectorcuts}
204: \end{table}
205: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
206:
207: We consider three different cases for the final state, depending on whether
208: there are two, three, or four leptonic decays of the $W$ bosons in the signal
209: $W^+W^-W^+W^-b\bar b$. Each case is discussed separately below.
210:
211: \subsection{$\ell^\pm\ell^\pm$}
212:
213: First consider the case where two $W$ bosons decay leptonically. The signal
214: consists of $2\ell + 2b + 4j$. To eliminate the background
215: $t\bar t + 4j$, we require that the leptons have the same sign. The
216: backgrounds are:
217: \begin{itemize}
218: \item $t\bar tW^\pm jj$, where the $W$ decays leptonically and the top quark
219: of the same sign decays semileptonically. We require that the di-jet invariant
220: mass lie within 25 GeV of the $W$ mass. This captures most of the signal
221: events.
222: \item $t\bar t\ell^+\ell^-jj$, where one lepton is missed, and the top quark
223: of the same sign as the detected lepton decays semileptonically. A lepton is
224: considered missed if it has $p^T<10$ GeV or $|\eta|>2.5$.\footnote{If the
225: missed lepton has 1 GeV $<p^T<10$ GeV and is within a cone of $\Delta R<0.2$
226: from a detected lepton, then the detected lepton does not pass the isolation
227: criteria and the event is rejected.}
228: \item $t\bar tW^+W^-$, where one $W$ decays leptonically and a top quark of the
229: same sign decays semileptonically.
230: \item $t\bar tt\bar t$, where the leptons come from the semileptonic decay of
231: same-sign top quarks. We demand that two and only two jets are $b$ tagged.
232: We accept events with four or more non-$b$-tagged jets.
233: \end{itemize}
234:
235: \subsection{$3\ell$}
236:
237: Next consider the case where three $W$ bosons decay leptonically. The signal
238: is $3\ell + 2b + 2j $. Similar backgrounds are present as in
239: the two-lepton case:
240: \begin{itemize}
241: \item $t\bar tW^\pm jj$, where the $W$ and both top quarks decay
242: semileptonically. We require that the di-jet invariant mass lie within 25 GeV
243: of the $W$ mass.
244: \item $t\bar t\ell^+\ell^-$, where both leptons are detected and one of the
245: top quarks decays semileptonically. We suppress this background by requiring
246: that there are no same-flavor, opposite-sign dileptons within 10 GeV of the
247: $Z$ mass.
248: \item $t\bar tW^+W^-$, where both $W$'s decay leptonically and one top quark
249: decays semileptonically, or both top quarks decay semileptonically and one $W$
250: decays leptonically.
251: \item $t\bar tt\bar t$, where three of the top quarks decay semileptonically.
252: We demand that two and only two jets are $b$ tagged. We accept events with two
253: or more non-$b$-tagged jets.
254: \end{itemize}
255:
256: \subsection{$4\ell$}
257:
258: Finally, consider the case where all four $W$ bosons decay leptonically. The
259: signal is $4\ell + 2b $. The same backgrounds are present
260: as in the three-lepton case, with the exception of $t\bar tW^\pm jj$:
261: \begin{itemize}
262: \item $t\bar t\ell^+\ell^-$, where both leptons are detected and both
263: top quarks decays semileptonically. We suppress this background by requiring
264: that there are no same-flavor, opposite-sign dileptons within 10 GeV of the
265: $Z$ mass.
266: \item $t\bar tW^+W^-$, where both $W$'s decay leptonically and both top quarks
267: decay semileptonically.
268: \item $t\bar tt\bar t$, where all four top quarks decay semileptonically.
269: We demand that two and only two jets are $b$ tagged. We accept events with
270: zero or more non-$b$-tagged jets.
271: \end{itemize}
272:
273: There will also be backgrounds from processes not involving top quarks, such
274: as non-resonant $W^\pm W^\pm+6j$ and $W^\pm Z+6j$ (with one of the leptons from
275: the $Z$ decay missed) in the $\ell^\pm \ell^\pm$ final state, and $W^\pm
276: \ell^+\ell^-+4j$ in the $3\ell$ final state. We expect such backgrounds to be
277: small due to the requirement of double $b$ tagging, in the same way that
278: non-resonant $W^\pm +4j$ is a small background to $t\bar t$ (with double $b$
279: tagging) \cite{Beneke:2000hk}. Any such background could be suppressed by
280: demanding the reconstruction of a top quark in the final state.
281:
282: Requiring one or more $b$ tags instead of two yields a significant increase in
283: the number of signal events. However, non-resonant backgrounds such as those
284: described above may become significant. We refrain from pursuing such an
285: analysis in this paper.
286:
287: \section{Calculations}%
288: \label{sec:calc}
289:
290: All calculations are performed at leading order with the code MADGRAPH
291: \cite{Stelzer:1994ta}, using the CTEQ4L parton distribution functions
292: \cite{Lai:1997mg} and $\alpha_s(M_Z) = 0.119$ with one-loop running.\footnote{
293: The factorization and renormalization scales are chosen as follows: i) $t\bar
294: th$: $\mu_F = \mu_R =(2m_t+m_h)/2$; ii) $t\bar tW^\pm jj$: $\mu_F =
295: (2m_t+M_W)/2$, $\mu_R = \mu_F$ for two factors of $\alpha_s$ and $p^T$ of each
296: radiated jet for each of the other two factors; iii) $t\bar t\ell^+\ell^-$:
297: $\mu_F = \mu_R = (2m_t+m_{\ell\ell})/2$; iv) $t\bar tW^+W^-$: $\mu_F = \mu_R =
298: m_t+M_W$; v) $t\bar tt\bar t$: $\mu_F = \mu_R = 2m_t$. For $t\bar th$, the
299: one-loop running top-quark Yukawa coupling is evaluated at $\mu_R = m_h$.} The
300: code HDECAY (Version 2.0) \cite{Djouadi:1998yw} is used to calculate $BR(h\to
301: W^+W^-)$, except for $m_h>2 M_W$, where HDECAY uses the narrow-width
302: approximation for the $W$ bosons. We find that $\Gamma(h\to l\bar\nu\bar
303: l\nu)$ is less than the narrow-width approximation $\Gamma(h\to
304: W^+W^-)BR(W^-\to l\bar\nu)BR(W^+\to\bar l\nu)$, by as much as 9\% near
305: threshold. For $m_h=130,160,190$ GeV, $BR(h\to W^+W^-)=30,92,79\%$,
306: respectively.
307:
308: Spin correlations between production and decay processes are maintained in all
309: calculations. The top quarks are constrained to be nearly on-shell, but the
310: $W$ bosons can be off shell. We also checked each calculation by using the
311: narrow-width approximation for the top quarks and ignoring the spin correlation
312: between production and decay. Good agreement was obtained.
313:
314: The background $t\bar tW^\pm jj$ is sufficiently complicated that it requires
315: approximation. We first calculate the ratio $t\bar tW^\pm jj/t\bar tW^\pm$
316: for stable top quarks and $W$ bosons, with the acceptance cuts of
317: Table~\ref{tab:detectorcuts} applied to the two jets. We then calculate
318: $t\bar tW^\pm$ with all particles decaying to final-state quarks and leptons,
319: and multiply by this ratio.
320:
321: There are subtleties in the calculation of the background $t\bar
322: t\ell^+\ell^-jj$ where one lepton is missed, and the top quark of the same
323: sign as the detected lepton decays semileptonically. First, one must take
324: care to implement the top-quark width in a manner than ensures gauge
325: invariance of the amplitude. We use the ``overall factor scheme''
326: \cite{Kauer:2001sp}. Second, the lepton mass must be maintained in the
327: calculation to regulate the divergence when the missed lepton is collinear
328: with an observed lepton.\footnote{This is only relevant if the missed lepton
329: has $p_T < 1$ GeV; otherwise, the observed lepton does not pass the isolation
330: cut mentioned in a previous footnote.} We used the muon mass to perform the
331: calculation; to obtain the result for electrons, we scale the cross section by
332: a factor $\ln(m_\mu/m_e)$ since the divergence is logarithmic. This avoids
333: problems with gauge invariance at very low dilepton invariant mass. Third, we
334: approximate $t\bar t\ell^+\ell^-jj$ by calculating $t\bar t\ell^+\ell^-$ with
335: all particles decaying to final-state quarks and leptons, and then multiplying
336: by the ratio $t\bar t\ell^+\ell^- jj/t\bar t\ell^+\ell^-$. Rather than
337: calculating this ratio, we approximate it from the ratio $t\bar tW^\pm jj/t\bar
338: tW^\pm$ calculated above, since these two ratios entail QCD radiation from
339: very similar subprocesses.
340:
341: In the $t\bar tt\bar t$ background we demand two and only two $b$-tagged jets.
342: This helps reduce this background, which has four $b$ quarks in the final
343: state. If only two of these $b$ quarks are within the acceptance of the
344: detector, we multiply by $\epsilon_b^2$; if three are within the acceptance,
345: we multiply by $3\epsilon_b^2(1-\epsilon_b)$; and if all four are within the
346: acceptance, we multiply by $6\epsilon_b^2(1-\epsilon_b)^2$.
347:
348: \section{Results}%
349: \label{sec:results}
350:
351: The number of signal and background events with 30 fb$^{-1}$ of integrated
352: luminosity at the LHC are given in Table~\ref{tab:backgroundslow} for $m_h =
353: 130, 160, 190$ GeV. The low-luminosity cuts of Table~\ref{tab:detectorcuts}
354: have been applied. The two-, three-, and four-lepton final states are
355: considered individually. In each case, the signal-to-background ratio is of
356: order unity, but the number of signal events is not large. The dominant
357: backgrounds are $t\bar tW^\pm jj$ and $t\bar t\ell^+\ell^-$; the background
358: $t\bar tW^+W^-$ is comparatively small, and $t\bar tt\bar t$ is negligible.
359:
360: We give in Table~\ref{tab:backgroundshigh} the number of signal and background
361: events with 300 fb$^{-1}$ of integrated luminosity at the LHC. The
362: high-luminosity cuts of Table~\ref{tab:detectorcuts} have been applied. The
363: number of events is increased due to the factor of ten increase in integrated
364: luminosity, but this is partially compensated by the decreased acceptance.
365:
366: Table~\ref{tab:backgroundsvlhc} gives the number of events at a 100 TeV VLHC
367: with 300 fb$^{-1}$ of integrated luminosity.\footnote{Preliminary results for
368: the VLHC were reported in Ref.~\cite{Baur:2002ka}.} The high-luminosity cuts of
369: Table~\ref{tab:detectorcuts} have been applied. The increased energy results
370: in many more events than at the LHC with the same integrated luminosity. The
371: signal-to-background ratio remains of order unity. All four sources of
372: background are comparable at the VLHC.
373:
374: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
375: \begin{table}[p]
376: \caption{The number of signal and background events in 30 fb$^{-1}$ of
377: integrated luminosity at the LHC for $t\bar th$, $h\to W^+W^-$ in the two-,
378: three-, and four-lepton final states. The low-luminosity cuts of
379: Table~\ref{tab:detectorcuts} are applied. The background $t\bar t\ell^+\ell^-$
380: has two additional jets in the dilepton case only. Throughout the table, $\ell$
381: denotes a summation over $e$ and $\mu$. $B$ is the total number of background
382: events.}
383:
384: \addtolength{\arraycolsep}{0.1cm}
385: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.2}
386: \medskip
387: \begin{center} \begin{tabular}[4]{c|ccc|cccc|c}
388: \hline \hline & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{$t\bar th$} &
389: \multicolumn{4}{c|}{backgrounds}
390: \\[1pt]
391: $m_h$ (GeV) & 130 & 160 & 190 & $t\bar tW^\pm jj$ & $t\bar t\ell^+\ell^-(jj)$
392: & $t\bar tW^+W^-$ & $t\bar tt\bar t$ & $B$
393: \\
394: \hline
395: $2\ell$ & 6.4 & 15 & 8.3& 10 & 1.9& 0.86 & 1.6 & 14\\[7pt]
396: $3\ell$ & 3.8 & 8.8 & 4.7& 2.4& 4.9& 0.49&0.75& 8.5\\[7pt]
397: $4\ell$ & 0.38& 0.67& 0.34& --- & 0.67 & 0.036& 0.009 & 0.72 \\[7pt]
398: \hline \hline
399: \end{tabular}
400: \end{center}
401: \label{tab:backgroundslow}
402: \end{table}
403: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
404: \begin{table}[p]
405: \caption{Same as Table~\ref{tab:backgroundslow}, except the high-luminosity
406: cuts of Table~\ref{tab:detectorcuts} are applied, and 300 fb$^{-1}$ of
407: integrated luminosity are collected at the LHC.}
408:
409: \addtolength{\arraycolsep}{0.1cm}
410: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.2}
411: \medskip
412: \begin{center} \begin{tabular}[4]{c|ccc|cccc|c}
413: \hline \hline & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{$t\bar th$} &
414: \multicolumn{4}{c|}{backgrounds} &
415: \\[1pt]
416: $m_h$ (GeV)& 130 & 160 & 190 & $t\bar tW^\pm jj$ & $t\bar t\ell^+\ell^-(jj)$ &
417: $t\bar tW^+W^-$ & $t\bar tt\bar t$ & $B$
418: \\
419: \hline
420: $2\ell$ & 8.1 & 24 & 16 & 19 & 3.2 &2.1 & 4.2 & 29 \\[7pt]
421: $3\ell$ & 12 & 27 & 16 & 4.6& 17 &1.8 & 3.6 & 27 \\[7pt]
422: $4\ell$ &2.1 & 3.8 & 2.0 & --- & 3.9 &0.21& 0.20& 4.3\\[7pt]
423: \hline \hline
424: \end{tabular}
425: \end{center}
426: \label{tab:backgroundshigh}
427: \end{table}
428: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
429: \begin{table}[p]
430: \caption{Same as Table~\ref{tab:backgroundshigh}, except at the VLHC ($\sqrt s
431: = 100$ TeV). The high-luminosity cuts of Table~\ref{tab:detectorcuts} are
432: applied, and 300 fb$^{-1}$ of integrated luminosity are collected.}
433:
434: \addtolength{\arraycolsep}{0.1cm}
435: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.2}
436: \medskip
437: \begin{center} \begin{tabular}[4]{c|ccc|cccc|c}
438: \hline \hline & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{$t\bar th$} &
439: \multicolumn{4}{c|}{backgrounds} &
440: \\[1pt]
441: $m_h$ (GeV) & 130 & 160 & 190 & $t\bar tW^\pm jj$ & $t\bar t\ell^+\ell^-(jj)$
442: & $t\bar tW^+W^-$ & $t\bar tt\bar t$ & $B$
443: \\
444: \hline
445: $2\ell$ & 370& 1100& 840& 440& 360& 140& 1065 & 2005\\[7pt]
446: $3\ell$ & 500& 1200& 780& 100& 640& 130& 640 & 1510\\[7pt]
447: $4\ell$ & 85 & 160 & 91& --- &140 & 15& 72 & 227 \\[7pt]
448: \hline \hline
449: \end{tabular}
450: \end{center}
451: \label{tab:backgroundsvlhc}
452: \end{table}
453: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
454:
455: There are three sources of uncertainty in the extraction of the top-quark
456: Yukawa coupling from the measured cross section: statistical, systematic, and
457: theoretical. The statistical uncertainty in the measured cross section is
458: $\sqrt{S+B}/S$, where $S$ and $B$ are the number of signal and background
459: events, respectively. Since the cross section is proportional to the square
460: of the Yukawa coupling, the statistical uncertainty in the measurement of the
461: Yukawa coupling is half that of the cross section. We show in
462: Figs.~\ref{fig:precisionlow} and \ref{fig:precisionhigh} the statistical
463: uncertainty $\delta y_t/y_t$ at the low- and high-luminosity LHC, respectively.
464: The statistical uncertainty from the two- and three-lepton final states are
465: given separately, as well as the statistical uncertainty from the sum of the
466: two channels, combined in quadrature. The statistical uncertainty in the
467: four-lepton final state is much greater, due to the dearth of signal events.
468: Combining the low- and high-luminosity runs at the LHC in quadrature yields a
469: statistical uncertainty in the measurement of the Yukawa coupling of $16\%,
470: 8\%, 12\%$ for $m_h = 130, 160, 190$ GeV, respectively.
471:
472: The systematic uncertainty arises from our ability to measure and calculate
473: the backgrounds. Since the signal is not separated from the backgrounds by
474: kinematics, an accurate knowledge of the backgrounds is essential. It is
475: beyond the scope of this work to attempt to estimate the systematic
476: uncertainty in the measurement of the backgrounds; an uncertainty of $20\%$ or
477: less is desired in order to match the statistical uncertainty.
478:
479: The dominant background in the three- and four-lepton final states is $t\bar
480: t\ell^+\ell^-$. This background could be estimated by measuring $t\bar tZ$,
481: $Z\to \ell^+\ell^-$, and extrapolating away from the $Z$ resonance. This
482: background is absent altogether if all opposite-sign leptons are of different
483: flavor (e.g., $\mu^+\mu^+e^-$ or $\mu^+\mu^+e^-e^-$), but the number of events
484: of this type is sufficiently small that the statistical uncertainty in the
485: cross section increases when one considers only these events.
486:
487: The dominant background in the two-lepton final state is $t\bar tW^\pm jj$. It
488: is likely that our calculation overestimates this background, because, using
489: the cuts of Table~\ref{tab:detectorcuts}, each of the two jets can lie near the
490: soft and collinear regions of phase space where perturbation theory overshoots
491: the true cross section \cite{Rainwater:1996vq}. This background could be
492: estimated by measuring the cross section for $W^\pm jj$ invariant masses far
493: from the Higgs mass, and then extrapolating. This is nontrivial, as it
494: assumes that one can correctly identify the $W^\pm jj$ system with good
495: efficiency.
496:
497: The theoretical uncertainty stems from the uncertainty in the subprocess cross
498: section $gg,q\bar q\to t\bar th$ and the uncertainty in the parton
499: distribution functions. The subprocess cross section has been calculated at
500: next-to-leading order in the strong interaction \cite{Beenakker:2001rj}. The
501: dependence of the cross section on the common factorization and
502: renormalization scales is relatively mild at the LHC, varying by about $10\%$
503: as the scale is varied from half to twice its central value of
504: $\mu_R=\mu_F=(2m_t+m_h)/2$. The largest uncertainty in the parton
505: distribution functions is from the gluons. The gluon-gluon luminosity is known
506: to about $10\%$ accuracy at the LHC \cite{Huston:1998jj}, and will be measured
507: via $gg\to t\bar t$. Hence the total theoretical uncertainty in the cross
508: section is about $15\%$. This is adequate in comparison with the statistical
509: uncertainty.
510:
511: The statistical uncertainty in $\delta y_t/y_t$ at the VLHC from the sum of
512: the two- and three-lepton final states is $3.3\%, 1.6\%, 2.2\%$ for $m_h = 130,
513: 160, 190$ GeV. This is negligible compared with the likely systematic
514: uncertainty. Thus the measurement of the top-quark Yukawa coupling at the VLHC
515: would be limited almost entirely by the systematic uncertainty.
516:
517: The background $t\bar tt\bar t$ is negligible at the LHC, but it is
518: significant at the VLHC; it is the largest background in the two-lepton final
519: state, and one of the two largest backgrounds in the three-lepton final state.
520: This background has two additional jets in the final state compared with the
521: signal, so it could be reduced by vetoing events with extra jets. For example,
522: vetoing events with two extra jets (but not one) reduces the $t\bar tt\bar t$
523: background at the VLHC to 500, 170, 21 in the two-, three, and four-lepton
524: final states, respectively. While this does not decrease the statistical
525: uncertainty (which is negligible in any case), it may be relevant to control
526: the systematic uncertainty.
527:
528: The process $t\bar th$, $h\to ZZ$ may also be accessible at the VLHC. If both
529: $Z$ bosons decay leptonically, the Higgs-boson mass could be reconstructed,
530: which would reduce the backgrounds.
531:
532:
533: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
534: \begin{figure}[p]
535: \begin{center}
536: \vspace*{-2cm}
537: \hspace*{-.5cm}
538: \epsfxsize=13cm % you change here to modify the size
539: \epsfbox{precision1.ps}
540: \vspace*{-.5cm}
541: \end{center}
542: \caption{The statistical uncertainty in the top-quark Yukawa coupling, $\delta
543: y_t/y_t$, from $t\bar th$, $h\to W^+W^-$ at the low-luminosity LHC (30
544: fb$^{-1}$ of integrated luminosity). Results for the two- and three-lepton
545: final states, as well as their sum, are shown.} \label{fig:precisionlow}
546: \end{figure}
547: %
548: \begin{figure}[p]
549: \begin{center}
550: \vspace*{-1cm}
551: \hspace*{-.5cm}
552: \epsfxsize=13cm % you change here to modify the size
553: \epsfbox{precision2.ps}
554: \vspace*{-.5cm}
555: \end{center}
556: \caption{Same as Fig.~\ref{fig:precisionlow}, but at the high-luminosity LHC
557: (300 fb$^{-1}$ of integrated luminosity).} \label{fig:precisionhigh}
558: \end{figure}
559: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
560:
561:
562: \section{Conclusions}%
563: \label{sec:conclusions}
564:
565: We have studied the measurement of the top-quark Yukawa coupling to the Higgs
566: boson via $t\bar th$, $h\to W^+W^-$ at the LHC. A signal is available in the
567: two- and three-lepton final states, and the signal to background ratio is of
568: order unity. Combining both channels, and assuming 30 fb$^{-1}$ of integrated
569: luminosity at low luminosity and 300 fb$^{-1}$ at high luminosity, we find a
570: statistical uncertainty in the measurement of the Yukawa coupling $\delta
571: y_t/y_t$ of $16\%, 8\%, 12\%$ for $m_h = 130, 160, 190$ GeV, respectively.
572:
573: The statistical uncertainty in the Yukawa coupling would be negligible at a
574: 100 TeV VLHC. Thus the uncertainty in the Yukawa coupling would be dominated
575: by the systematic uncertainty.
576:
577: \section*{Acknowledgments}
578:
579: \indent\indent We are grateful to T.~Stelzer for extensive assistance and
580: advice. We are also grateful for conversations and correspondence with
581: U.~Baur, M.~Dittmar, K.~Jacobs, T.~Liss, S.~Nikitenko, K.~Pitts, J.~Strologas,
582: and G.-P.~Yeh. We thank the organizers of the Snowmass 2001 workshop and the
583: Aspen Center for Physics, where part of this work was conducted. This work was
584: supported in part by the U.~S.~Department of Energy under contract
585: No.~DOE~DE-FG02-91ER40677.
586:
587: \begin{thebibliography}{99}%
588:
589: \bibitem{:2001xw} LEP Higgs Working Group for Higgs boson searches
590: Collaboration, LHWG-NOTE-2001-03,
591: %``Search for the standard model Higgs boson at LEP,''
592: arXiv:hep-ex/0107029.
593: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0107029;%%
594:
595: \bibitem{Abbaneo:2001ix}
596: D.~Abbaneo {\it et al.} [ALEPH Collaboration],
597: %``A combination of preliminary electroweak measurements and constraints
598: %on the standard model,''
599: arXiv:hep-ex/0112021.
600: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0112021;%%
601:
602: \bibitem{Carena:2000yx}
603: M.~Carena {\it et al.}, ``Report of the Tevatron Higgs working group,''
604: hep-ph/0010338.
605: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0010338;%%
606:
607: \bibitem{ATLAS} ATLAS Technical Design Report, Vol.~II, CERN/LHCC/99-15 (1999).
608:
609: \bibitem{CMS} CMS Collaboration, Technical Proposal, CERN/LHCC/94-38 (1994).
610:
611: \bibitem{Zeppenfeld:2000td}
612: D.~Zeppenfeld, R.~Kinnunen, A.~Nikitenko and E.~Richter-Was,
613: %``Measuring Higgs boson couplings at the LHC,''
614: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62}, 013009 (2000) [arXiv:hep-ph/0002036].
615: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0002036;%%
616:
617: \bibitem{Ng:1984jm}
618: J.~N.~Ng and P.~Zakarauskas,
619: %``A QCD Parton Calculation Of Conjoined Production Of Higgs Bosons And Heavy
620: %Flavors In P Anti-P Collision,''
621: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 29}, 876 (1984).
622: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D29,876;%%
623:
624: \bibitem{Kunszt:1984ri}
625: Z.~Kunszt,
626: %``Associated Production Of Heavy Higgs Boson With Top Quarks,''
627: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 247}, 339 (1984).
628: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B247,339;%%
629:
630: \bibitem{Lee:1977yc}
631: B.~W.~Lee, C.~Quigg and H.~B.~Thacker,
632: %``The Strength Of Weak Interactions At Very High-Energies And The Higgs
633: %Boson Mass,''
634: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 38}, 883 (1977).
635: %%CITATION = PRLTA,38,883;%%
636:
637: \bibitem{Rizzo:1980gz}
638: T.~G.~Rizzo,
639: %``Decays Of Heavy Higgs Bosons,''
640: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 22}, 722 (1980).
641: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D22,722;%%
642:
643: \bibitem{Keung:1984hn}
644: W.~Y.~Keung and W.~J.~Marciano,
645: %``Higgs Scalar Decays: H $\to$ W+- X,''
646: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 30}, 248 (1984).
647: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D30,248;%%
648:
649: \bibitem{Georgi:1978gs}
650: H.~M.~Georgi, S.~L.~Glashow, M.~E.~Machacek and D.~V.~Nanopoulos,
651: %``Higgs Bosons From Two Gluon Annihilation In Proton-Proton Collisions,''
652: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 40}, 692 (1978).
653: %%CITATION = PRLTA,40,692;%%
654:
655: \bibitem{Glover:1988fn}
656: E.~W.~Glover, J.~Ohnemus and S.~S.~Willenbrock,
657: %``Higgs Boson Decay To One Real And One Virtual W Boson,''
658: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 37}, 3193 (1988).
659: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D37,3193;%%
660:
661: \bibitem{Barger:1990mn}
662: V.~D.~Barger, G.~Bhattacharya, T.~Han and B.~A.~Kniehl,
663: %``Intermediate Mass Higgs Boson At Hadron Supercolliders,''
664: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 43}, 779 (1991).
665: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D43,779;%%
666:
667: \bibitem{Dittmar:1996ss}
668: M.~Dittmar and H.~Dreiner,
669: %``How to find a Higgs boson with a mass between 155-GeV to 180-GeV at the
670: % LHC,''
671: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 55}, 167 (1997) [arXiv:hep-ph/9608317].
672: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9608317;%%
673:
674: \bibitem{Han:1998ma}
675: T.~Han and R.~J.~Zhang,
676: %``Extending the Higgs boson reach at upgraded Tevatron,''
677: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 82}, 25 (1999) [arXiv:hep-ph/9807424].
678: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9807424;%%
679:
680: \bibitem{Han:1998sp}
681: T.~Han, A.~S.~Turcot and R.~J.~Zhang,
682: %``Exploiting h $\to$ W* W* decays at the upgraded Fermilab Tevatron,''
683: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 59}, 093001 (1999) [arXiv:hep-ph/9812275].
684: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9812275;%%
685:
686: \bibitem{Haber:1991aw}
687: H.~E.~Haber and R.~Hempfling,
688: %``Can the mass of the lightest Higgs boson of the minimal supersymmetric
689: %model be larger than m(Z)?,''
690: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 66}, 1815 (1991).
691: %%CITATION = PRLTA,66,1815;%%
692:
693: \bibitem{Okada:1991vk}
694: Y.~Okada, M.~Yamaguchi and T.~Yanagida,
695: %``Upper bound of the lightest Higgs boson mass in the minimal supersymmetric
696: %standard model,''
697: Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ {\bf 85}, 1 (1991).
698: %%CITATION = PTPKA,85,1;%%
699:
700: \bibitem{Ellis:1991nz}
701: J.~Ellis, G.~Ridolfi and F.~Zwirner,
702: %``Radiative corrections to the masses of supersymmetric Higgs bosons,''
703: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 257}, 83 (1991).
704: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B257,83;%%
705:
706: \bibitem{Dai:1993gm}
707: J.~Dai, J.~F.~Gunion and R.~Vega,
708: %``Using b tagging to detect t anti-t Higgs production with Higgs $\to$ b
709: %anti-b,''
710: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 71}, 2699 (1993) [hep-ph/9306271].
711: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9306271;%%
712:
713: \bibitem{Beneke:2000hk}
714: M.~Beneke {\it et al.}, ``Top quark physics,'' hep-ph/0003033, in
715: ``Proceedings of the Workshop on Standard Model Physics at the LHC,''
716: eds.~G.~Altarelli and M.~Mangano, CERN 2000-004.
717: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0003033;%%
718:
719: \bibitem{Drollinger:2001ym}
720: V.~Drollinger, T.~Muller and D.~Denegri,
721: %``Searching for Higgs bosons in association with top quark pairs in
722: %the H0 $\to$ b anti-b decay mode,''
723: arXiv:hep-ph/0111312.
724: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0111312;%%
725:
726: \bibitem{Goldstein:2001bp}
727: J.~Goldstein, C.~S.~Hill, J.~Incandela, S.~Parke, D.~Rainwater and D.~Stuart,
728: %``p anti-p $\to$ t anti-t H: A discovery mode for the Higgs boson at the
729: %Tevatron,''
730: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 86}, 1694 (2001) [hep-ph/0006311].
731: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0006311;%%
732:
733: \bibitem{Stelzer:1994ta}
734: T.~Stelzer and W.~F.~Long,
735: %``Automatic generation of tree level helicity amplitudes,''
736: Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\ {\bf 81}, 357 (1994)
737: [hep-ph/9401258].
738: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9401258;%%
739:
740: \bibitem{Lai:1997mg}
741: H.~L.~Lai {\it et al.},
742: %``Improved parton distributions from global analysis of recent deep
743: %inelastic scattering and inclusive jet data,''
744: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 55}, 1280 (1997) [hep-ph/9606399].
745: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9606399;%%
746:
747: \bibitem{Djouadi:1998yw}
748: A.~Djouadi, J.~Kalinowski and M.~Spira,
749: %``HDECAY: A program for Higgs boson decays in the standard model and its
750: %supersymmetric extension,''
751: Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\ {\bf 108}, 56 (1998)
752: [hep-ph/9704448].
753: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9704448;%%
754:
755: \bibitem{Kauer:2001sp}
756: N.~Kauer and D.~Zeppenfeld,
757: %``Finite-width effects in top quark production at hadron colliders,''
758: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 014021 (2002) [arXiv:hep-ph/0107181].
759: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0107181;%%
760:
761: \bibitem{Baur:2002ka}
762: U.~Baur {\it et al.},
763: %``Physics at future hadron colliders,''
764: arXiv:hep-ph/0201227.
765: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0201227;%%
766:
767: \bibitem{Rainwater:1996vq}
768: D.~Rainwater, D.~Summers and D.~Zeppenfeld,
769: %``Multijet structure of high E(T) hadronic collisions,''
770: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 55}, 5681 (1997) [arXiv:hep-ph/9612320].
771: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9612320;%%
772:
773: \bibitem{Beenakker:2001rj}
774: W.~Beenakker, S.~Dittmaier, M.~Kramer, B.~Plumper, M.~Spira and P.~M.~Zerwas,
775: %``Higgs radiation off top quarks at the Tevatron and the LHC,''
776: hep-ph/0107081.
777: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0107081;%%
778:
779: \bibitem{Huston:1998jj}
780: J.~Huston, S.~Kuhlmann, H.~L.~Lai, F.~I.~Olness, J.~F.~Owens, D.~E.~Soper and
781: W.~K.~Tung,
782: %``Study of the uncertainty of the gluon distribution,''
783: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 58}, 114034 (1998) [arXiv:hep-ph/9801444].
784: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9801444;%%
785:
786: \end{thebibliography}
787:
788: \end{document}
789: