1: %\documentclass{article}

2: \documentclass[12pt]{article}

3: \usepackage{amssymb,graphicx}

4: 

5: 

6: 

7: %\setlength{\hoffset}{1.5in}

8: %\setlength{\voffset}{-1in}

9: %\setlength{\marginparsep}{0pt}

10: %\setlength{\marginparwidth}{0pt}

11: %\setlength{\textheight}{\paperheight}

12: %\addtolength{\textheight}{-1in}

13: %\setlength{\textwidth}{\paperwidth}

14: %\addtolength{\textwidth}{-1in}

15: %\setlength{\arraycolsep}{.13889em}

16: 

17: \newcommand{\eqref}[1]{(\ref{#1})}

18: \newcommand{\cL}{{\cal L}}

19: \newcommand{\cH}{{\cal H}}

20: \newcommand{\cA}{{\cal A}}

21: \newcommand{\sld}{\mbox{$\,\slash$ \hspace{-1.0em}$\nabla$}}

22: \renewcommand{\d}{\partial}

23: \newcommand{\dsl}{{\hat\delta}}

24: \newcommand{\nn}{\nonumber\\}

25: \newcommand{\tH}{\tilde{H}}

26: %\documentclass[aps,epsfig]{revtex}

27: %\usepackage{psfig,graphicx}

28: %\documentstyle[color,aps,eqsecnum,psfig,graphicx]{revtex}

29: 

30: 

31: 

32: %*******

33: %  [ ]

34: %\newcommand{\bibitem}{\bibitemtem}

35: \newcommand{\bibi}[1]{\bibitem[#1]{#1}}

36: %\newcommand{\bibi}[1]{\bibitem{}}

37: %\newcommand{\bibi}{\bibitem}

38: \newcommand{\eq}[1]{equation~(\ref{#1})}

39: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}

40: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}

41: \newcommand{\cc}{\cite}

42: %\newcommand{\lb}{\label}

43: \newcommand{\lb}[1]{\label{#1}\;\;\;\;[\mbox{{\tiny{#1}}}]}

44: \newcommand{\gsim}{\stackrel{>}{\sim}}  % >~

45: \newcommand{\lsim}{\stackrel{<}{\sim}} % <~

46: \newcommand{\phil}{\lag\varphi^0_x\rag_{V,j}}

47: \newcommand{\phim}{\lag \mid \overline{\varphi^\alpha} \mid\rag}

48: \newcommand{\PU}{\Phi_0}

49: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}

50: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}} 

51: \newcommand{\nonu}{\nonumber\\}

52: \def\eq#1{(\ref{#1})}

53: \def\hf{{1\over2}}

54: \def\ord{{\cal O}}

55: \def\la{\langle}

56: \def\ra{\rangle}

57: 

58: \def\nn{\nonumber\\}

59: \def\P{\Phi_0}

60: \def\A{{\bf A}}

61: \def\V{{\bf V}}

62: \def\G{{\bf G}}

63: \def\H{{\bf H}}

64: \def\C{{\bf C}}

65: \def\S{{\bf S}}

66: \def\WA{{\cal A}}

67: \def\k{{\bf k}}

68: \def\x{{\bf x}}

69: 

70: \newcommand{\p}{{\bf p}}

71: 

72: %\font\bfit = ecbi12

73: 

74: \def\lot{\ln{\Lambda\over T}}

75: \def\ltt{\left(\lot\right)^2}

76: \def\vavr#1{\overline{#1}^V}

77: \def\lag{\langle}

78: \def\rag{\rangle}

79: \def\addtext#1{{#1}}

80: \def\removetext#1{{}}

81: 

82: \def\at#1{\addtext{#1}}

83: \def\rt#1{\removetext{#1}}

84: 

85: 

86: \hoffset=0cm

87: \oddsidemargin=0pt

88: \textwidth=16cm

89: \headsep=0pt

90: \topmargin=0pt

91: \voffset=0pt

92: \headheight=0pt

93: \textheight=23.6cm

94: \pretolerance=100

95: \tolerance=5000

96: \emergencystretch=5mm

97: 

98: 

99: %********

100: %\oddsidemargin=-1cm

101: %\textwidth=18cm

102: %\headsep=0pt

103: %\topmargin=0pt

104: %\voffset=0pt

105: %\headheight=0pt

106: %\textheight=25cm

107: %\pretolerance=100

108: %\tolerance=5000

109: %\emergencystretch=5mm

110: %********

111: 

112: 

113: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\arabic{footnote}}

114: 

115: \begin{document}

116: \title{{Finite temperature spectral functions}\\ {of the linear $O(N)$-model 

117: at large $N$}\\ {applied to the $\pi -\sigma$ system}}

118: \author{

119: A. Patk{\'o}s$^{a }$\footnote{Dept. of Atomic Physics,

120: e-mail: patkos@ludens.elte.hu}, Zs. Sz{\'e}p$^{a

121: }$\footnote{ Dept. of Atomic Physics, 

122: e-mail: szepzs@cleopatra.elte.hu}

123: ~and~P. Sz{\'e}pfalusy$^{a,b }$\footnote{Dept. of Physics of Complex Systems, 

124: e-mail: psz@complex.elte.hu}

125: \\ $^{a}$E{\"o}tv{\"o}s University, H-1117 Budapest,

126: Hungary\\$^{b}$

127: Research Institute for Solid State Physics and Optics,\\

128:  H-1525, Budapest, Hungary}

129: 

130: \maketitle

131: \begin{abstract}

132: The thermal evolution of the spectral densities derivable from the 

133: two-point functions of the elementary  and the quadratic composite fields

134:  of the $O(N)$ model is studied in the isosinglet channel and in the broken

135: symmetry phase at infinite $N$. The results are applied

136: with realistic parameter values to the $N=4$ case. They provide

137: a reasonable description of the $\sigma$ meson at $T=0$. Threshold

138: enhancement is observed around $T\sim 1.07m_\pi$. For higher

139: temperatures the maximum of the  spectral function in the

140: single meson channel decreases and becomes increasingly

141: rounded. 

142: \end{abstract}

143: \section{Introduction}

144: There is increasing interest in finding signatures for the characterisation

145: of strongly interacting matter around the transition temperature from the

146: hadronic to the quark-gluon regime. Density and temperature induced

147: features of the 

148: correlations in the soft pion spectra is a frequently discussed issue. 

149: The majority of these pions comes from resonance decay. One expects that

150: temperature induced shifts in the position and width of the $\rho$ and 

151: $\sigma$ pole location is sensitively reflected in the spectra. 

152: 

153: The effects related to the variation of the location and the width of

154: the broad 

155: $\sigma$ resonance were investigated in the past decade systematically

156: \cite{hatsuda01}. The main theoretical framework of these investigations was 

157: the $O(4)$ linear sigma-model. Various reorganisations of the perturbative

158: series \cite{chiku98} were proposed for the self-energy 

159: calculations.  Despite of the rather large value of the nonlinear 

160: coupling $\lambda_R\approx{\cal O}(30-70)$, 

161: one loop calculations gave important qualitative hints for the 

162: enhancement of the spectral function in the $\sigma$-channel  near the 

163: two-pion threshold as the temperature approaches the transition region.

164: 

165: In the non-relativistic context it has been recognised long time ago that

166:   in scalar theories the hybridisation 

167: \cite{kondor74} of the two-point functions of the elementary and

168: quadratic composite fields play essential 

169: role in the determination of the elementary excitations 

170: in the whole temperature interval of the broken symmetry phase. 

171: Neutron scattering data on superfluid helium were successfully interpreted by

172: taking into account the hybridisation\cite{griffin93}.

173:    

174: Large $N$ techniques are known to account for this phenomenon

175: correctly, while ordinary perturbative approaches usually miss it

176: \cite{kondor74,szepfalusy76}.

177: 

178: An additional point in favour of the use of the large $N$ expansion

179: is that it leads to a second order transition point in agreement

180:  with  the well-known behaviour of the $O(N)$ model\cite{cooper97}. The

181: lowest order computations done with any 

182: (even optimised) version of the conventional perturbation theory yield a 

183: first order phase transition when the temperature is increased. 

184: 

185: Large $N$ techniques are extensively studied also

186: in connection with the out-of-equilibrium evolution and thermalisation 

187: of relativistic Bose-condensates

188: \cite{cooper94,boyan99,baacke00,berges01,aarts02}, though the

189: hybridisation in this respect did not receive till now much attention.

190: 

191: Our main goal with this investigation was to apply large $N$ techniques for

192: finding the finite temperature variation of the spectral function

193: in the elementary and quadratic composite isosinglet channels, which 

194: influences the $\pi -\pi$ 

195: correlations measured in heavy ion collisions to a large extent. For this

196: purpose the parametrisation of the linear $O(4)$-symmetric meson model is 

197: chosen to reproduce as

198: closely as possible the accepted zero temperature fit to the complex mass,

199: $M_\sigma -i\Gamma /2$ of this broad resonance \cite{tornquist02}.

200: 

201: In this Letter, after summarising the general formalism,

202: mostly the results of the chirally invariant limiting case will be discussed, 

203: where the pions are massless, since the main ideas 

204: can be presented in this case very transparently. Results relevant for the

205: case with explicit symmetry breaking will be presented shortly in the 

206: concluding part of the paper.

207:  

208: We shall work in the leading order large $N$ approximation

209: to the Schwinger-Dyson equations of the $O(4)$ model in the broken symmetry

210: phase. The effect of next-to-leading order corrections is the subject

211: of our ongoing research. 

212:         

213: \section{The model and its renormalised dynamical equations}

214: 

215: The Lagrangian density including a term reflecting explicit breaking of the

216: $O(N)$ symmetry is the following:

217: \be

218: L={1 \over

219: 2}[\partial_\mu\phi^a\partial^\mu\phi^a-m^2\phi^a\phi^a]-{\lambda\over

220: 24N} (\phi^a)^2(\phi^b)^2+\sqrt{N}h\phi^1.

221: \ee

222: The broken symmetry phase can be studied after an appropriate

223: shift, by introducing the symmetry breaking background:

224: \be

225: \phi^a\rightarrow (\sqrt{N}\Phi+\phi^1,\phi^i).

226: \ee

227: The quantum field representing the fluctuations of the order parameter

228: is termed $\sigma$, while the modes transversal to it are the Goldstone

229: pions.

230:   

231: The equation of state, which determines the absolute value of the condensate

232: comes from the requirement of the vanishing quantum expectation for the

233: coefficient of the term linear in $\phi^1$ in the shifted Lagrangian:

234: \be

235: \lag{\delta L\over \delta\phi^1}\rag =0=\sqrt{N}\Phi \Bigl

236: [m^2+{\lambda \over 6}\Phi^2+{\lambda\over

237: 6N}\lag(\phi^a)^2\rag-{h\over\Phi}\Bigr ].

238: \label{eqstate}

239: \ee

240: The quadratic fluctuations of the shifted fields are computed with an

241: accuracy ${\cal O}(N^1)$, therefore only the contribution of the pions

242: is retained.

243: Anticipating a non-zero Goldstone mass due to the explicit symmetry breaking

244: (which will be verified below) one finds the following relation 

245: connecting renormalised quantities (only contributions proportional to $N^0$ 

246: are kept):

247: \be

248: m_R^2+{\lambda_R\over 6}\Phi (T)^2+{\lambda_R\over

249:   96\pi^2}m_G^2(T)\ln{m_G^2(T)e\over M_0^2}+{\lambda_RT^2\over 12\pi^2}

250: \int_\frac{m_G(T)}{T}^\infty dy\frac{\sqrt{y^2-\frac{m_G^2(T)}{T^2}}}{e^y-1}=

251: {h\over\Phi (T)}.

252: \label{eqstate1}

253: \ee

254: Here the following renormalised couplings were introduced (momentum

255: cut-off was applied for the regularisation of some divergent integrals):

256: \be

257: {m^2\over\lambda}+{\Lambda^2\over 96\pi^2}-{m_R^2\over

258:   96\pi^2}\ln{e\Lambda^2\over M_0^2}=

259: {m^2_R\over\lambda_R},

260: \qquad {1\over\lambda} +{1\over 96\pi^2}\ln{e\Lambda^2\over

261: M_0^2}={1\over\lambda_R}. 

262: \label{renorm}

263: \ee

264: The issue of the normalisation point $M_0$ will be discussed below.

265: 

266: At leading order ($N=\infty$) the only contribution to the self-energy of the

267: Goldstone modes comes from the tadpole diagram. Therefore one has:

268: \be

269: G_G^{-1}(p)=p^2-m^2-{\lambda\over 6}\Phi^2(T)-{\lambda\over

270: 6N}\lag(\phi^a)^2\rag =p^2-{h\over\Phi (T)}.

271: \label{goldstone-prop}

272: \ee 

273: Here the sum representing the mass term was simplified

274: in view of the equation of state (\ref{eqstate}). This equation implies

275: that at $N=\infty$ the Goldstone particle is stable and its mass, 

276: $m_G^2(T)=h/\Phi (T)$ increases with the temperature.

277: 

278: With this identification the renormalised equation of state (\ref{eqstate1})

279: can be cast into a more practical form by eliminating

280: $m^2_R$ and $h$ in favour of the $T=0$ value of the condensate ($\Phi_0$) and

281: of the pion mass ($m_{G0}$):

282: \bea

283: &&

284: {\lambda_R\over 6}{\Phi_0^2\over m_{G0}^2} \left({m_{G0}^4\over m_G^4}-1\right)

285: +{\lambda_R\over 96\pi^2}\left[\left({m_G^2\over m_{G0}^2}-1\right)

286: \ln{m_{G0}^2e\over M_0^2}+{m_G^2\over m_{G0}^2}\ln{m_G^2\over m_{G0}^2}\right]

287: \nonumber\\

288: &+&{\lambda_R T^2\over 12\pi m_{G0}^2}\int_{m_G/T}^\infty dy

289: \sqrt{y^2-m_G^2/T^2}(e^y-1)^{-1}={m_G^2\over m_{G0}^2}-1.

290: \label{mgt}

291: \eea

292: This form makes it clear that after $\lambda_R$ and $ M_0/m_{G0}$ are

293: chosen in the process of 

294: renormalisation at $T=0$, one finds from this equation $m_G(T)/m_{G0}$

295: as a function of $T/m_{G0}$ if the physical input $\Phi_0^3/h

296: \equiv f_\pi^2/Nm_\pi^2$ is made.

297: 

298: The $\sigma$ propagator receives ${\cal O}(N^0)$ contribution from the

299: infinite iteration of the bubble diagrams $b(p)$, where on both lines  

300: Goldstone fields are propagating:

301: \be

302: G_H^{-1}(p)

303: =p^2-{h\over\Phi (T)}-{\lambda\over 3}\Phi^2(T){1\over 1-\lambda b(p)/6}.

304: \label{higgs-prop}

305: \ee

306: Without entering its derivation we give here also the expression for the 

307: leading large $N$ propagator of the quadratic composite field

308: $(\phi^a\phi^a-\lag(\phi^a)^2\rag)(\x ,t)$:

309: \be

310: F(p)={(p^2-h/\Phi (T))b(p)/6+\Phi^2(T)/3\over

311: (p^2-h/\Phi (T))(1-\lambda_Rb(p)/6)-\lambda_R\Phi^2(T)/3}.

312: \label{comp-quad}

313: \ee

314: It has the same denominator as $G_H(p)$ making explicit the hybridisation

315: of the two objects.

316: 

317: The bubble contribution with external momentum $p_0,{\bf p}$ is the sum 

318: of a zero temperature and a $T$-dependent part, $b(p)=b_0(p)+b_T(p_0,{\bf p})$,

319: which read as follows:

320: \be

321: b_0(p)={1\over 16\pi^2}\biggl(-\ln{e\Lambda^2\over M_0^2}+\ln{m_G^2\over 

322: M_0^2}-\sqrt{1-4m_G^2/p^2}\ln{\sqrt{1-4m_G^2/p^2}-1\over \sqrt{1-4m_G^2/p^2}+1}

323: \biggr),

324: \label{bubble0}

325: \ee

326: \begin{eqnarray}

327:   b_T(p) &=& \int\frac{d^3{\bf q}}{(2\pi)^3}

328:   \,\frac1{4\omega_1\omega_2}\,\left\{  (n_1+n_2)\left[

329:   \frac{1}{p_0-\omega_1-\omega_2 + i\epsilon} - 

330:   \frac{1}{p_0+\omega_1+\omega_2 + i\epsilon}\right]\right. \nonumber\\ 

331:   &&\left.-(n_1-n_2) \left[\frac{1}{p_0-\omega_1+\omega_2 + i\epsilon} - 

332:   \frac{1} {p_0+\omega_1-\omega_2 + i\epsilon} \right]\right\},

333: \label{bubbleT}

334: \end{eqnarray}

335: where $n_i=1/(\exp(\beta\omega_i)-1)$ and $\omega_1=({\bf q}^2+m_G^2)^{1/2},

336: \omega_2=(({\bf q}+{\bf p})^2+m_G^2)^{1/2}$. 

337: The first term in the expression of $b_0(p)$ is cancelled in the expression

338: of the $\sigma$ propagator by the divergence of the bare coupling $\lambda$

339: and the inverse propagator, expressed in terms of the renormalised quantities

340: is finite. Note, that $b_0(p)$ has to be evaluated with $m_G(T)$! 

341: 

342: The phenomenologically most interesting object is the

343:  spectral function of the order parameter field $\sigma$, defined as

344: \be

345: \rho_H (p_0,{\bf p},T)=-{1\over\pi}{\rm Im}G_H(p_0,{\bf p},T).

346: \ee

347: 

348: For non-zero $T$ $\rho_H$ has a singularity at $p_0=0$ due to the Bose-Einstein

349:  factor $n(\beta p_0/2)$. In the chiral limit $h=0$ 

350: this point coincides with the

351: two-pion threshold. In order to make the effects related to the physical 

352: excitations visible around this point

353: in Fig.\ref{h02point} we show $\rho_1 (p_0,0,T)T_c^2\equiv

354: (1-\exp (-p_0/2T))\rho_H(p_0,0,T)T_c^2$. The curves are drawn

355:  for various temperatures below $T_c$ and a representative value of 

356: $\lambda_R=310$. 

357: \begin{figure}[htbp]

358: \begin{center}

359: \includegraphics[width=9cm]{h02point.eps}

360: \end{center}

361: \caption{Temperature dependence of the modified spectral function 

362: $\rho_1$ in the $\sigma$ meson channel for $h=0$}

363: \label{h02point}

364: \end{figure}

365: 

366: The temperature dependence of the order parameter

367: needed for its evaluation is obtained from the equation of state which

368: simplifies in this case \cite{cooper97} to

369: \be

370: {\Phi^2(T)\over T_c^2}={1\over 12}\Bigl(1-{T^2\over T_c^2}\Bigr),

371: \qquad T_c^2=12\Phi_0^2.

372: \label{chiral-eqstate}

373: \ee

374: 

375: The shape of the spectral density

376:  starts with a broad bump at $T=0$ which is shifted towards lower frequencies

377:  when the temperature is increased. Already for $T=0$

378: $\rho_H$ has finite value at $p_0=0$, where its value 

379: is gradually increasing. At a temperature $T\sim 0.7T_c$ the bumpy structure

380: at finite $p_0$ completely disappears and a simple Lorentzian shape

381: develops with its maximum located at the threshold. 

382: 

383: 

384:  This evolution can be transparently interpreted if the temperature

385: dependent location of the physical pole of the $\sigma$

386: propagator is found. The physical pole is located in the lower half of the

387: complex $p_0$-plane, therefore one is faced

388: with the analytical continuation of $b_T(p)$ into the 

389: lower $p_0$-halfplane, since originally it is defined only in the upper 

390: halfplane by the Landau-prescription: $\epsilon >0$. As becomes clear,

391: this threshold enhancement

392: is the manifestation of the gradual chiral symmetry restoration as $T$ tends

393: to $T_c$.

394: 

395: 

396: \section{The physical quasiparticle excitation in the $\sigma$ channel}

397: 

398: Below we give some details concerning the temperature variation of the

399: excitation spectra and the interpretation of the spectral function with 

400: its help in the chiral limit ($h=0$). 

401: One starts with the analysis at $T=0$, where one fixes the renormalised

402: parameters $m_R^2, \lambda_R$, remaining after $h$ was set to zero. 

403: The renormalised mass is related to the size

404:  of the condensate (or in view of (\ref{chiral-eqstate}) to $T_c$) 

405: by the well-known equation: $-m_R^2/\Phi^2_0=\lambda_R/6$. 

406: 

407: $\lambda_R$ will be chosen from a range where one finds for $\Gamma /M_\sigma$

408: values which are the closest to the experimental one.  For this

409: we determine the $T=0$ pole of the

410: $\sigma$ propagator by looking for the zeros of $G_H^{-1}$ in terms of 

411: renormalised quantities:

412: \be

413: G_H^{-1}(p)=p^2-{\lambda_R\over 3}\Phi^2_0{1\over 1-\lambda_R\ln

414: (-p^2/M_0^2)/96\pi^2}=0.

415: \label{zeroTeq}

416: \ee

417: The physical solution at rest of this equation is parametrised  by putting

418: ${\bf p}=0, p_0=M_0\exp (-i\varphi_0), \pi /2>\varphi_0>0$. 

419: (One can find its mirror solution in the third quarter). The notation shows, 

420: that the absolute value of the pole is chosen for the normalisation point 

421: defined in (\ref{renorm}) and used in (\ref{bubble0}). If a physically

422: satisfactory

423: solution is found for some value $\lambda_R$ with this normalisation point, 

424: the renormalisation group invariance of (\ref{zeroTeq}) ensures that

425: for a different choice of $M_0$ the same ratio $\Gamma /M_\sigma$ is found

426: at some appropriately shifted value of $\lambda_R$. In this way 

427: the actual value of $\lambda_R$ cannot be said to be large or small!

428: 

429:  Since in view of

430: (\ref{eqstate1}) in the chiral limit one has a very simple equation for the

431: critical temperature, our

432: solution provides the mass $M_\sigma =M_0\cos\varphi_0$ and the

433: imaginary part 

434: $M_0\sin\varphi_0$ in proportion of the critical temperature. 

435: It is interesting to note that using for $\sqrt{N}\Phi=2\Phi$ the

436: experimental value of $f_\pi$,

437: eq.(\ref{chiral-eqstate}) gives $T_c=161$ MeV, while the lattice simulations 

438: yield $(173\pm 8)$ MeV \cite{karsch01}. The agreement is much better than

439: expected. The real and imaginary parts of the complex physical pole are

440: shown in Fig.\ref{T0-poles} as a function of $\lambda_R$.

441: 

442: \begin{figure}

443: \begin{center}

444: \includegraphics[width=9cm]{T0-poles.eps}

445: \end{center}

446: \caption{The imaginary and real parts of the physical poles at $T=0$ in the

447:   chiral limit and also for $h\neq 0$. Also shown is the logarithm of the

448: tachyon pole position in proportion to the mass of $\sigma$ for various 

449: temperatures below $T_c$ and for $h=0$}

450: \label{T0-poles}

451: \end{figure}

452: 

453: In addition to the physical zeros of the inverse propagator scalar

454: theories are known to have a tachyonic zero on the positive imaginary

455: axis $(p_0=iM_L)$ (see \cite{boyan99} and references therein), which makes the 

456: theory unstable. Therefore the

457: theory can be used as an effective theory until the physical scale $M_0$  

458: is acceptably smaller than $M_L$. The position of the tachyonic zero is also

459: found from (\ref{zeroTeq}). (The fact that the tachyonic pole shows up

460: also in $G_H$ not only in $F$ is a manifestation of hybridisation).

461: It is clear from Fig.\ref{T0-poles} that for

462: $\lambda_R\leq 400$ one has $M_L/M_0>4$ and the effective approach is

463: well justified. The representative value $\lambda_R=310$ corresponds

464: to a ratio $M_\sigma/\Gamma=1$ at $T=0$. The value of $M_\sigma$ is

465: estimated to be $7\Phi_0\sim 350$ MeV. 

466: 

467: At finite temperature we are interested in the

468: temperature dependence of the $\sigma$-pole at rest, therefore we set 

469: ${\bf p}=0$ in (\ref{bubbleT}).

470: The analytic continuation onto the lower plane can be carried out by

471: adding to the expression of $b_T$ valid in the upper halfplane a term

472:  which makes its imaginary part

473: continuous when one approaches the real $p_0$-axis either from the

474: upper or the lower halfplane:

475: \bea

476: b_T^{>}(p_0)&=&{1\over 8\pi^2}\int_0^\infty dx{1\over e^x-1}\Bigl[{1\over

477: z-x}-{1\over z+x}\Bigr], \qquad z={p_0\over 2T}, \qquad {\rm Im}~p_0>0, 

478: \nonumber\\

479: b_T^{<}(p_0)&=&b_T^{>}(p_0)-{i\over 4\pi}{1\over \exp

480: (z)-1},\qquad {\rm Im}~p_0<0,\qquad {\rm Re}~p_0>0 .

481: \label{bT-up-down}

482: \eea

483: 

484: The roots are parametrised the same way as in the $T=0$

485: case, $p_0=M(T)\exp (-i\varphi)$. After one determines   $\Phi (T)$ from

486: Eq.(\ref{chiral-eqstate}), from the complex equation

487: \bea

488: &&

489: 1-{\lambda_R\over 96\pi^2}\bigg(\ln{M^2(T)\over M^2_0}-i(2\varphi +\pi

490: )\bigg)-{\lambda_R \over 3}{\Phi^2(T)\over M^2(T)}e^{2i\varphi }

491: -{\lambda_R\over 6}b_T^>(p_0=Me^{-i\varphi})

492: \nonumber\\

493: &+&i{\lambda_R\over 24\pi

494: }{1\over \exp (M\exp (-i\varphi )/2T) -1}=0

495: \label{compleq}

496: \eea

497: one can find the complex pole as a function of the temperature.

498: All quantities are measured in units of $T_c\sim\Phi_0$.

499:  

500: Also at finite temperature one can study the tachyon  

501: solution in the upper halfplane using $b_T^>(iM_L)$. One might wonder if the 

502: temperature dependence of the tachyonic pole does not

503: restrict further the coupling range where the effective use of the

504: scalar theory is consistent. The broadening in Fig.\ref{T0-poles}

505:  of the line

506: corresponding to the tachyonic pole reflects the slight decrease of its

507: mass scale with increasing temperature. However, it is clear that in the 

508: region $\lambda_R<400$, where the effective approach is consistent for

509: $T=0$, the position of the tachyon pole is practically unchanged.

510: 

511: Similarly, one can look directly for physical roots along the negative 

512: imaginary axis. Then using $b_T^<$ from (\ref{bT-up-down}) one finds that 

513: above a well-defined $T_{imag}(\lambda_R)<T_c$ the physical pole becomes 

514: purely imaginary: $-iM(T)$. If $\mu\equiv M(T)/2T<<1$, for the highest 

515: occupied low frequency region, one can use the expansion of

516:  the Bose-Einstein factors appearing in the last two terms of (\ref{compleq})

517: with respect to the powers of $\mu$ and keep the leading terms:

518: \be

519: 1-{\lambda_R\over 48\pi^2}\ln {2T\mu\over M_0}+{\lambda_R\over

520: 3}{\Phi^2(T) \over 4T^2}{1\over \mu^2}-{\lambda_R\over 48\pi}{1\over \mu}=0.

521: \ee

522: This equation could have been derived directly, if one would have

523: applied from the beginning the same approximation in Eq.(\ref{bubbleT}).

524: Clearly, the region around the origin (the critical region) can be analysed

525: also directly with help of this simpler equation. Note that one has to go one

526: step beyond the classical approximation to achieve a consistent approach.

527: 

528: The general pattern of the trajectory of the physical pole with increasing

529: temperature was the following. The real part of its position started to

530: diminish when $T$ was raised. In this 

531: way the broad bump of the spectral function moves towards the origin, and

532: its width is increasing due to the slight increase of its imaginary part. 

533: Depending

534: on $\lambda_R$ the root reaches at some $T_{imag}<T_c$ the negative 

535: imaginary axis and collides with its mirror root arriving from the third 

536: quarter. Each one is joining smoothly the trajectory of one of the

537: pair of imaginary

538: roots which appear just at $T_{imag}$ and move opposite directions. 

539: We observe that the $\sigma$-bump gets lost in the background before

540: the temperature reaches $T_{imag}$. 

541: The root approaching the origin along the imaginary axis

542: produces in the spectral function a shrinking shape which becomes a

543: Lorentzian only very close to $T_c$. Eventually for $T=T_c$ it builds up 

544: a term proportional to $\delta (p_0)/p_0$.

545:  

546: We see that the complex pole of the 

547: $\sigma$-propagator qualitatively accounts for the behaviour of the

548: spectral function near and below the critical point as well.

549: Note that the other pole moving away from the origin along the imaginary axis

550: as well as the tachyon disappear from $G_H$ at $T_c$. They remain poles of $F$ 

551: only.

552: 

553: In the vicinity of the critical point, where the $\xi =T/8\pi\Phi^2(T)$

554: is the dominant length scale and the condition $p_0,|{\bf p}|<<T$ is 

555: fulfilled, one can derive an equation also for the soft modes with nonzero

556: momentum:

557: \be

558: -3i|{\bf p}|\xi {p_0^2-{\bf p}^2\over |{\bf p}|^2}\ln{p_0-|{\bf p}|

559: \over p_0+|{\bf p}|}

560: -{1\over 4\pi}{(p_0^2-{\bf p}^2)\xi \over T_c}\ln{p_0^2-{\bf p}^2\over T_c^2}

561: =1.

562: \ee

563: Its solution in the approximation, when on the left hand side only the

564: first term is retained exhibits the form of dynamical scaling \cite{ferrell67,

565: hohenberg77}: $p_0=|{\bf p}|^{\tilde z} f(|{\bf p}|\xi)$ with 

566: $\tilde z=1$.

567: The second term provides the leading correction to scaling. In $O(N)$ models,

568: the dynamical exponent $z=d/2$ has been obtained for finite $N$ on the basis 

569: of scaling and renormalisation group arguments, where in our case $d=3$

570: \cite{sasvari75,sasvari74,rajagopal93}. For the correct interpretation of the

571: situation it is important that there are two distinct hydrodynamical regions

572: in the $O(N)$ model for large $N$ \cite{sasvari75}. (The system studied in

573: \cite{sasvari75} can be regarded as a lattice regularised version of the

574: linear $\sigma$-model). In the true critical 

575: region $z=d/2$ is valid, in a precritical region $\tilde z=1-8S_d/Nd+

576: {\cal O}(1/N^2)$, where $S_d=2/\pi^2$ for $d=3$. The first region shrinks

577: when $N$ becomes large and completely disappears at $N=\infty$. Furthermore,

578: it has been found that $\tilde z$ agrees with the dynamical exponent 

579: determined for the quasiparticles, that is outside the hydrodynamical regime,

580: at least to ${\cal O}(1/N)$\cite{szepfalusy74}. Details of the application 

581: of this analysis to the present case will be published in our forthcoming

582: paper.

583: 

584: \section{The case of the explicit breaking of chiral symmetry}

585: 

586: Finally, we wish to discuss shortly the results of the application of

587: the leading large $N$ solution of the $O(N)$ model to the low lying

588: effective  $\pi -\sigma$ system 

589: where an explicit symmetry breaking is necessary.

590: 

591: Since in this case one cannot speak of any phase transition,

592: it is more sensible to look for the roots of $G_H^{-1}(p_0,0)$ in proportion to

593: $\Phi_0\equiv f_\pi /2$. The value $m^2_{G0}/\Phi_0^2\approx

594: 9.06$ is fixed by phenomenology and 

595: choosing $\lambda_R$ with the restriction $M_0/M_L\leq 4$, one can find the

596: zero temperature position of the $\sigma$-pole. In 

597: Fig.\ref{T0-poles} its real and imaginary parts are already 

598: shown as a function of $\lambda_R$ together with the results obtained for 

599: $h=0$. In the region of $\lambda_R$ allowed the ratio

600: $M_\sigma/\Gamma_\sigma$ moves away from the phenomenologically preferred

601: range ($M_\sigma=3.95 f_\pi, M_\sigma/\Gamma\sim 1.4$) 

602: emphasising the need for a next-to-leading order calculation.

603: 

604: 

605: \begin{figure}

606: \begin{center}

607: \includegraphics[width=7.5cm]{hn2point.eps}

608: \includegraphics[width=7.5cm]{hn4point.eps}

609: \end{center}

610: \caption{The spectral functions for the linear sigma model with

611:   realistic couplings and explicit symmetry breaking. On the left

612:   figure the imaginary part in the $\sigma$-channel, on the right the

613:   same for the composite channel is shown}

614: \label{h-spectral}

615: \end{figure}

616: 

617: Now $\Phi (T)$ is determined from (\ref{mgt}).

618: The spectral function of the single $\sigma$-channel

619: is shown in the left of Fig.\ref{h-spectral} for various values of the

620: temperature 

621: in the transition range $T=(0-1.2)m_{G0}$ with $\lambda_R=400$.

622:  The location of its

623: maximum at $T=0$ is correlated with the location of the $T=0$ pole. 

624: Maximal threshold enhancement \cite{hatsuda87} is observed in the close

625: neighbourhood of $1.074m_{G0}$ with the spectral function numerically 

626: exhibiting a cuspy form, with a very narrow

627: width. However, when the temperature is further increased, the

628: maximum is pulled away from the actual position of the threshold and a

629: broad rounded structure is seen. We return to the

630: detailed interpretation of this structure in terms of the pole

631: trajectories in a forthcoming publication.

632:      

633: As we have mentioned above also the spectral function

634: belonging to the propagator (\ref{comp-quad})

635: of the composite field  can be constructed to leading order in $N$.

636: The corresponding spectral function reflects the excitations in the composite

637: $(\phi^a)^2$ channel. Its temperature dependent deformation is displayed on

638: the right hand of Fig.\ref{h-spectral} for 

639: the same (realistic) parameters as used in case of $\rho_H$ above. 

640: Its behaviour is rather similar to the single meson spectral

641: function. No signal of any meson-meson bound state can be observed.

642: The only difference one notices is that for large frequencies this

643: function approaches a constant, which reflects mostly the large 

644: residuum of the tachyon pole in this propagator.

645: 

646: \section{Conclusions}

647: We have described the temperature dependence of the elementary

648: excitations of the $O(4)$ model in the leading order of the $1/N$

649: expansion. For the chirally symmetric case a very suggestive picture

650: of the complex pole evolution makes unique the interpretation of the

651: change of shape of the single-particle spectral function when the

652: temperature approaches the critical point. 

653: 

654: The restrictions on the range of the scalar self-coupling $\lambda_R$

655: arising from the requirement of keeping distance from the tachyonic pole,

656: for a fixed normalisation point $M_0$

657: prevent us in finding a fully realistic $\sigma$-particle mass at $T=0$

658: when the physical pion mass is the input. We have found that the

659: threshold enhancement in both the elementary and the composite spectral 

660: functions is maximal at some $T_{enh}<m_{G0}$.  

661: Beyond this temperature the cuspy maximum becomes rounded again. We believe

662: that this qualitative

663: feature remains valid when the next to leading order corrections will be

664: included.

665: 

666: \section*{Acknowledgement}

667: 

668: This research was supported by the Hungarian Research Fund (OTKA).

669: 

670:      

671: \begin{thebibliography}{9}

672: \bibitem{hatsuda01} for a recent review see, T. Hatsuda,

673: Nucl. Phys. {\bf A698} (2002) 243

674: \bibitem{chiku98}S. Chiku and T. Hatsuda, Phys. Rev. {\bf 58} (1998)

675:   076001

676: \bibitem{kondor74}P. Sz{\'e}pfalusy and I. Kondor, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.), {\bf 82} 

677: (1974) 1, L. Sasv\'ari and P. Sz{\'e}pfalusy, J. Phys. {\bf C7} (1974) 1061

678: \bibitem{griffin93}A. Griffin, Excitation in a Bose-Condensed Liquid, Cambridge

679: University Press, Cambridge, 1993

680: \bibitem{szepfalusy76}P. Sz{\'e}pfalusy, in {\it Critical Phenomena}, 

681: Lecture Notes in Physics {\bf 54}, eds. J. Bray and R.B. Jones, 

682: Springer 1976, p.112 

683: \bibitem{cooper97}F. Cooper, S.Habib, Y. Kluger and E. Mottola, 

684: Phys. Rev. {\bf 55} (1997) 6471 

685: \bibitem{cooper94} F. Cooper, S. Habib, Y. Kluger, E. Mottola, J.P. Paz

686:   and P.R. Anderson, Phys. Rev. {\bf D50} (1994) 2848

687: \bibitem{boyan99}D. Boyanovsky, H.J. de Vega, R. Holman and J. Salgado,

688:   Phys. Rev. {\bf D59} (1999) 125009

689: \bibitem{baacke00} J. Baacke and K. Heitmann, Phys. Rev. {\bf D62}

690:   (2000)  105022

691: \bibitem{berges01} J. Berges, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A699} (2002) 847

692: \bibitem{aarts02} G. Aarts, D. Ahrensmeier, R. Baier, J. Berges and

693:   J. Serreau, hep-ph/0201308

694: \bibitem{tornquist02} N.A. T{\"o}rnquist, hep-ph/0201171

695: \bibitem{karsch01}F. Karsch, E. Laermann and A. Peikert,

696:   Nucl. Phys. {\bf B605} (2001) 579

697: \bibitem{ferrell67} R.A. Ferrell, N. Menyh\'ard, H. Schmidt, F. Schwabl and

698: P. Sz{\'e}pfalusy, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 18} (1967) 891,

699: B. I. Halperin and P.C. Hohenberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 19} (1967) 700

700: \bibitem{hohenberg77} P.C. Hohenberg and B.I. Halperin, Rev. Mod. Phys. 

701: {\bf 49} (1977) 435

702: \bibitem{sasvari75} L. Sasv\'ari, F. Schwabl and P. Sz{\'e}pfalusy, Physica 

703: {\bf 81A} (1975) 108

704: \bibitem{sasvari74} L. Sasv\'ari and P. Sz{\'e}pfalusy, Physica {\bf 87A} 

705: (1977) 1

706: \bibitem{rajagopal93}K. Rajagopal and F. Wilczek, Nucl. Phys. {\bf 393} (1993)

707: \bibitem{szepfalusy74} P. Sz{\'e}pfalusy and L. Sasv\'ari, Acta Phys. Hung.

708: {\bf 37} (1974) 343

709: \bibitem{hatsuda87}T. Hatsuda and T. Kunihiro, Phys. Lett. {\bf B185} 

710: (1987) 304

711: \end{thebibliography}

712: \end{document}

713: 

714: 

715: 

716: 

717: 

718: 

719: 

720: 

721: 

722: 

723: 

724: 

725: 

726: 

727: 

728: 

729: 

730: 

731: 

732: 

733: 

734: 

735: 

736: 

737: 

738: 

739: 

740: 

741: 

742: 

743: 

744: 

745: 

746: 

747: 

748: 

749: 

750: 

751: 

752: 

753: 

754: 

755: 

756: 

757: 

758: 

759: 

760: 

761: 

762: 

763: 

764: 

765: