1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

4: \documentstyle[12pt,a41,epsfig,portland,rotating]{article}

5: \newcommand{\COM}{C\!\!\!\!\mbox{\small I}}

6: \newcommand{\ra}{\rightarrow}

7: \newcommand{\la}{\leftarrow}

8: \newcommand{\E}{\rm E}

9: \newcommand{\A}{\mbox{\wedge}}

10: \newcommand{\Li}{\mbox{Li}}

11: \newcommand{\SN}{\mbox{S}}

12: \newcommand{\Sf}{\mbox{S}_{1,2}}

13: \newcommand{\M}{\mbox{\rm\bf M}}

14: \newcommand{\N}{\mbox{\rm\bf N}}

15: \newcommand{\Mvec}{\mbox{\rm\bf M}}

16: \newcommand{\Nvec}{\mbox{\rm\bf N}}

17: \newcommand{\tra}{\mbox{Li}_{4}\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)}

18: \newcommand{\que}{\stackrel{\rm ?}{=}}

19: \newcommand{\Df}{\stackrel{\tiny\rm Def}{=}}

20: \newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}

21: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}

22: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}

23: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}

24: \newcommand{\ab}{\overline{\alpha}_s}

25: \newcommand{\gmat}{\mbox{\boldmath $\gamma$}}

26: \newcommand{\gap}{\stackrel{>}{\sim}}

27: \newcommand{\lap}{\stackrel{<}{\sim}}

28: \newcommand{\fem}{$f_2^{em}$}

29: \newcommand{\lam}{$\Lambda$}

30: \newcommand{\qsq}{$Q^2$}

31: \newcommand{\alsq}{$\alpha_s(Q^2)$}

32: \newcommand{\dals}{$\delta \alpha_s$}

33: \newcommand{\pbinv}{pb^{-1}}

34: \newcommand{\lsim}{\raisebox{-0.07cm}{$\, \stackrel{<}{{\scriptstyle

35: \sim}}\, $}}

36: \newcommand{\gsim}{\raisebox{-0.07cm}{$\, \stackrel{>}{{\scriptstyle

37: \sim}}\, $}}

38: %\newcommand{\gsim}{\stackrel{>}{\sim}}

39: %\newcommand{\lsim}{\stackrel{<}{\sim}}

40: \newcommand{\EM}{{\rm E-}}

41: \newcommand{\dfeq}{\stackrel{\scriptsize =}{\scriptsize df}}

42: \newcommand{\als}{\alpha_s}

43: \newcommand{\aqu}{\langle Q^2 \rangle}

44: \newcommand\pB{[\mbox{pb}]}

45: \newcommand\MSbar{$\overline{\mbox{MS}}$}

46: \newcommand\order{{\cal O}}

47: \newcommand\mat{{\cal M}}

48: \newcommand\ds{\displaystyle}

49: \newcommand\MeV{\,\mbox{MeV}}

50: \newcommand\GeV{\,\mbox{GeV}}

51: \newcommand\TeV{\,\mbox{TeV}}

52: \newcommand\secu{\,\mbox{sec}}

53: \newcommand\kvec{\mbox{\boldmath $k$}}

54: \newcommand\MT{Morfin and Tung}

55: \newcommand\CALL{{\cal L}}

56: \newcommand\KG{\kappa_G}

57: \newcommand\KA{\kappa_A}

58: \newcommand\LG{\lambda_G}

59: \newcommand\LA{\lambda_A}

60: \newcommand\PD{\not p}

61: \newcommand\MP{M^2_{\Phi}}

62: \newcommand\B{\beta}

63: \newcommand\XL{\log \left| \frac{1 + \B}{1 - \B} \right |}

64: \newcommand\SM{\frac{\hat{s}}{M_{\Phi}^2}}

65: \newcommand\SMM{\frac{\hat{s}^2}{M_{\Phi}^4}}

66: \newcommand\SMMM{\frac{\hat{s}^3}{M_{\Phi}^6}}

67: \newcommand\SMMMM{\frac{\hat{s}^4}{M_{\Phi}^8}}

68: \newcommand\BC{\beta^2 \cos^2 \theta}

69: \newcommand\CB{\beta^2 \cos^2 \theta}

70: \newcommand\CBB{\beta^4 \cos^4 \theta}

71: \newcommand\CBBB{\beta^6 \cos^6 \theta}

72: \newcommand\CBBBB{\beta^8 \cos^8 \theta}

73: \newcommand\SH{\hat{s}}

74: \newcommand\uh{\hat{u}}

75: \newcommand\thh{\hat{t}}

76: \newcommand\sh{\hat{s}}

77: \newcommand\ea{\varepsilon_1}

78: \newcommand\eb{\varepsilon_2}

79: \newcommand\Ea{\epsilon_1}

80: \newcommand\Eb{\epsilon_2}

81: \newcommand\ch{{\rm{ch}}}

82: \newcommand\shh{{\rm{sh}}}

83: \newcommand\thhh{{\rm{th}}}

84: \newcommand\st{\sin^2 \theta}

85: \newcommand\BR{\left(1 - \CB \right)}

86: \newcommand\ka{\kappa_1}

87: \newcommand\kb{\kappa_2}

88: \newcommand\kap{\kappa_1'}

89: \newcommand\kbp{\kappa_2'}

90: \newcommand\xx{\tilde{x}}

91: \newcommand\AAA{\alpha_1}

92: \newcommand\AB{\alpha_2}

93: \newcommand\ONE{\mbox{\boldmath $1$}}

94: \newcommand\evec{\mbox{\boldmath $e$}}

95: \newcommand\Lvec{\mbox{\boldmath $L$}}

96: \newcommand\Rvec{\mbox{\boldmath $R$}}

97: \newcommand\Kvec{\mbox{\boldmath $K$}}

98: \newcommand\Pvec{\mbox{\boldmath $P$}}

99: \newcommand\Uvec{\mbox{\boldmath $U$}}

100: \newcommand\Vvec{\mbox{\boldmath $V$}}

101: \newcommand\GAM{\mbox{\boldmath $\gamma$}}

102: \newcommand\bx{\overline{x}}

103: \newcommand\by{\overline{y}}

104: \newcommand\FFA{\mbox{$\widetilde{F}^a$}}

105: \newcommand{\CLra}{{C_{L,q}^{N(1)}\over C_{L,g}^{N(1)}}}

106: \newcommand{\bCLra}{{\bar C_{L,q}^{N(1)}\over \bar C_{L,g}^{N(1)}}}

107: \newcommand{\CLrb}{{C_{L,q}^{N(2)} \over C_{L,g}^{N(1)}}}

108: \newcommand{\CLrc}{{C_{L,g}^{N(2)} \over C_{L,g}^{N(1)}}}

109: \newcommand{\Gqqa}{\gamma_{qq}^{N(0)}}

110: \newcommand{\Gqga}{\gamma_{qg}^{N(0)}}

111: \newcommand{\Ggqa}{\gamma_{gq}^{N(0)}}

112: \newcommand{\Ggga}{\gamma_{gg}^{N(0)}}

113: \newcommand{\Gqqb}{\gamma_{qq}^{N(1)}}

114: \newcommand{\Gqgb}{\gamma_{qg}^{N(1)}}

115: \newcommand{\Ggqb}{\gamma_{gq}^{N(1)}}

116: \newcommand{\Gggb}{\gamma_{gg}^{N(1)}}

117: \newcommand{\CLqa}{C_{L,q}^{N(1)}}

118: \newcommand{\CLga}{C_{L,g}^{N(1)}}

119: \newcommand{\CLqb}{C_{L,q}^{N(2)}}

120: \newcommand{\CLgb}{C_{L,g}^{N(2)}}

121: \newcommand{\Cq}{C_{2,q}^{N(1)}}

122: \newcommand{\Cg}{C_{2,g}^{N(1)}}

123: \newcommand{\bb}{{\beta_1 \over \beta_0}}

124: \newcommand{\ZqqNT}{Z_{qq}^{(T)N(1)}}

125: \newcommand{\ZqgNT}{Z_{qg}^{(T)N(1)}}

126: \newcommand{\ZgqNT}{Z_{gq}^{(T)N(1)}}

127: \newcommand{\ZggNT}{Z_{gg}^{(T)N(1)}}

128: \newcommand{\ZqqT}{Z_{qq}^{(T)(1)}}

129: \newcommand{\ZqgT}{Z_{qg}^{(T)(1)}}

130: \newcommand{\ZgqT}{Z_{gq}^{(T)(1)}}

131: \newcommand{\ZggT}{Z_{gg}^{(T)(1)}}

132: \newcommand{\dZqqNT}{\Delta Z_{qq}^{(T)N(1)}}

133: \newcommand{\dZqgNT}{\Delta Z_{qg}^{(T)N(1)}}

134: \newcommand{\dZgqNT}{\Delta Z_{gq}^{(T)N(1)}}

135: \newcommand{\dZggNT}{\Delta Z_{gg}^{(T)N(1)}}

136: \newcommand{\dZqqT}{\Delta Z_{qq}^{(T)(1)}}

137: \newcommand{\dZqgT}{\Delta Z_{qg}^{(T)(1)}}

138: \newcommand{\dZgqT}{\Delta Z_{gq}^{(T)(1)}}

139: \newcommand{\dZggT}{\Delta Z_{gg}^{(T)(1)}}

140: %

141: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

142: %

143: \newcounter{lin}

144: \newcommand{\lin}{\addtocounter{lin}{1}\thelin}

145: %

146: 

147: \begin{document}

148: \begin{titlepage}

149: 

150: \begin{flushleft}

151: DESY 01--087 \hfill {\tt hep-ph/0203155} \\

152: February  2002 \\

153: %\today \\

154: \end{flushleft}

155: \sloppy

156: 

157: \vspace{3cm}

158: \noindent

159: \begin{center}

160: {\LARGE\bf QCD Analysis of Polarized Deep Inelastic}\\

161: 

162: \vspace*{2mm}

163: \noindent

164: {\LARGE\bf Scattering Data and

165: Parton Distributions }

166: \end{center}

167: \begin{center}

168: 

169: \vspace{4cm}

170: {\large Johannes Bl\"umlein and Helmut B\"ottcher}

171: 

172: \vspace{2cm}

173: {\it 

174: Deutsches Elektronen Synchrotron, DESY}\\

175: 

176: \vspace{3mm}

177: {\it  Platanenallee 6, D--15738 Zeuthen, Germany}\\

178: %%\today

179: 

180: \vspace{2cm}

181: \end{center}

182: \begin{abstract}

183: \noindent

184: A QCD analysis of the world data on polarized deep inelastic scattering 

185: is presented in leading and next-to-leading order. New parameterizations 

186: are derived for the quark and gluon distributions for the kinematic range

187: $x~\epsilon~[10^{-9},1],~Q^2~\epsilon~[1,10^6]~\GeV^2$. The extrapolation

188: far outside the domain of the current measurements is given both to allow

189: for applications at higher values of $Q^2$ and to be able to calculate

190: integral properties of the present distributions.

191: The values of

192: $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$ and $\alpha_s(M_z)$ are determined. Emphasis is put on

193: the derivation of the fully correlated $1\sigma$ error bands for these

194: distributions, which are also given in terms of parameterizations and are

195: directly applicable to determine experimental errors of other polarized 

196: observables. The impact of the variation of both the renormalization and 

197: factorization scales on  the value of $\alpha_s$ is studied. Finally we

198: perform a factorization--scheme invariant QCD analysis based on the 

199: observables $g_1(x,Q^2)$ and $d g_1(x,Q^2)/d \log(Q^2)$ in 

200: next-to-leading order, which is compared to the standard analysis. A 

201: series of low moments of parton densities, accounting for error 

202: correlation, are given to allow for comparison with results from lattice

203: simulations.

204: \end{abstract}

205: 

206: \end{titlepage}

207: 

208: \newpage

209: \sloppy

210: 

211: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

212: %       Introduction

213: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

214: \section{Introduction}

215: \label{sec:intro}

216: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

217: 

218: \vspace*{1mm}

219: \noindent

220: The nature of the short-distance structure of polarized nucleons is one

221: of the central questions of present day hadron physics. Nucleons are

222: composite fermions and their spin should be obtained as a superposition

223: of the spins and angular momenta of its constituents, the quarks and 

224: gluons. At large enough space-like 4-momentum transfers $-q^2 = Q^2$ and 

225: large energy transfer $\nu = 2 p.q/M$, with $p$ and $M$ the nucleon 

226: 4-momentum and mass, the QCD--improved parton model applies. A 

227: QCD analysis at leading twist level allows to determine the polarized

228: parton densities and the QCD scale     $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$ up to

229: next-to-leading order (NLO)~[1--3].

230: The distribution functions

231: derived can be used to calculate other leading twist hard scattering 

232: cross sections of polarized nucleons.

233: 

234: During the recent years the remarkable growth of deep inelastic scattering

235: data off polarized targets~[4--13]

236: %%~\cite{EMCp}--\cite{E80130}

237: allows to perform 

238: a detailed analysis. Here the different systematic effects of the data

239: have to be taken into account. Previous analyzes

240: %~\cite{ABFR}-\cite{GRSV}

241: [14--16]~\footnote{%

242: In \cite{LEAD} another factorization scheme is referred to.

243: For a list of older parameterizations see~\cite{OLDER}.} present

244: parameterizations only for the central values of the parton distributions.

245: It is, however, desirable to derive at the same time parameterizations 

246: of the polarized parton densities and those of their $1\sigma$ error, 

247: taking into account all error correlations being available. With these

248: parameterizations at hand it becomes possible to give estimates on the

249: uncertainty of the measurement of other hard scattering processes of

250: polarized targets w.r.t. the knowledge of the parton densities. In the 

251: analysis the polarized parton distributions are first determined at a 

252: reference scale $Q_0^2$. The aforementioned parameterizations are found 

253: evolving both the central values and their

254: errors from this scale to all scales

255: $Q^2$ of interest, which we choose as $1 \GeV^2  \leq Q^2 \leq 10^6 

256: \GeV^2$ for $x = Q^2/2p.q~\epsilon~[10^{-9},1]$, and are given in form of

257: fast and accurate grid interpolations.

258: 

259: Unlike the case in most of the

260: previous analyzes the QCD  analysis performed in the

261: present paper determines the QCD--scale $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$ along with the

262: parameters of the parton densities at the initial scale $Q_0^2$. Moreover,

263: positivity constraints are not imposed from the beginning but first left

264: to the fit. A systematic investigation of the $\chi^2$--profiles during

265: the analysis showed, which of the parameters of the parton densities

266: have enough sensitivity to be measured from the current polarized

267: deep-inelastic scattering world data. In this context it turns out that

268: the current inclusive data do not yet allow to pin down the flavor

269: structure of the sea quarks. Therefore we are going to use flavor

270: $SU(3)$ in the current analysis and leave a refinement to a further

271: analysis including as well semi--inclusive data.\footnote{The latter

272: analysis can only be performed if the relevant            fragmentation

273: functions are known, cf.~\cite{GR}.}

274: As the subsequent

275: analysis shows, the small-$x$ behavior of the parton densities cannot

276: be reliably fixed using the current data. Special dynamical 

277: effects~\cite{SX,BV1}

278: may be present at smaller values of $x \lsim 5 \cdot 10^{-3}$ than

279: currently probed, however, reliable estimates cannot be given at present

280: due to the lack of calculations on higher order resummed corrections

281: in this kinematic range. Therefore we present two sets of parameterizations

282: which could be both accommodated to the present data.

283: 

284: The standard analysis is performed using the $\overline{\rm MS}$

285: factorization and renormalization scheme. In this way two independent

286: scales, $\mu^2_f$ and $\mu_R^2$, are introduced into the parton densities.

287: The observables, $g_1^p(x,Q^2)$ and $g_1^n(x,Q^2)$, are independent of

288: these scales which leads to two associated (matrix--valued) 

289: renormalization group equations for the Wilson--coefficients and parton

290: densities,  which are the evolution equations. Referring to

291: also other observables, as e.g. the slopes $\partial g_1^{p,n}(x,Q^2)/

292: \partial \log Q^2$, it is possible to each order in the coupling constant

293: $a_s =\alpha_s/(4\pi)$ to formulate {\sf physical} evolution equations

294: \cite{FP,DLY} of observables itself, which removes the dependence on

295: $\mu^2_f$. This method of analysis is conceptually of high interest

296: in future analyzes, having precise measurements of the respective

297: observables at the scale $Q^2_0$ at hand. Then the {\it only} parameter 

298: to be fitted is $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$. We also perform this 

299: factorization--scheme independent analysis in next-to-leading order to 

300: check the stability of the fitted values of $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$.

301: 

302: Currently the measurement of also the moments of polarized

303: parton densities on the lattice become more precise~[23--25].

304: %~\cite{QCDSF,SESAM,LHSE}.

305: Yet a series

306: of systematic and algorithmic effects has to be studied in detail, but 

307: one may expect that direct comparison between the moments of parton 

308: densities being extracted out of the world  data and the lattice results

309: will be possible in the future. This comparison has to include the

310: proper treatment of errors both on the side of the lattice calculations

311: and the perturbative analysis.

312: This usually includes correlated propagation of the experimental errors

313: through the evolution equations. To allow for comparisons with results 

314: from lattice calculations we provide a set of lowest moments of parton

315: densities and their combinations including their errors in the present

316: analysis.

317: 

318: The paper is organized as follows. In sections~2 and 3 the standard and

319: the factorization--scheme independent analyzes to next-to-leading order

320: are described. A summary on the experimental data used in the present 

321: analysis is given in section~4. Section~5 contains the details on the 

322: parameterizations of the parton densities and that of their 

323: $1\sigma$  errors. In Section~6

324: the results of the standard and factorization--scheme

325: independent analysis on the parton densities and their errors at the 

326: scale $Q_0^2$ as well as their evolution throughout the kinematic

327: range of the parameterization $1 \leq Q^2 \leq 10^6 \GeV^2$ are presented

328: and the respective values of $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$ and $\alpha_s(M_Z^2)$

329: are given and are discussed w.r.t the choice of the renormalization

330: and factorization scales. The covariance matrices of the parameters

331: determined in the QCD  fits are provided.  In section~7 a series

332: of values of the lower moments of the parton densities and their errors, 

333: suitable

334: for comparisons with results of lattice simulations, are calculated.

335: Section~8 contains the conclusions. An appendix provides informations

336: on the numerical parameterization of different sets of polarized parton

337: densities and their errors.

338: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

339: %       Standard QCD Analysis

340: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

341: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

342: \section{Standard Analysis}

343: \label{sec:sta}

344: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

345: 

346: \vspace{2mm}

347: \noindent

348: The twist--2 contributions to the structure function $g_1(x,Q^2)$ can

349: be represented in terms of a {\sc Mellin} convolution of the polarized 

350: parton densities $\Delta f_i$ and the coefficient functions $\Delta C_i^A$ 

351: by

352: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

353: \begin{eqnarray}

354: \label{eqg1}

355: g_1(x,Q^2)&=& \frac{1}{2}   \sum_{j=1}^{N_f} e_j^2 \int_{x}^1

356: {dz \over z} \Bigg [ { 1 \over N_f}\, \Delta \Sigma

357: \left({x \over z},\mu_f^2\right) \Delta C_q^S

358: \left(z,{Q^2 \over \mu_f^2}\right) 

359: %\!+\!\Delta f_g\left({x \over z},\mu_f^2\right) 

360:  + \Delta G\left({x \over z},\mu_f^2\right)

361: \nonumber\\[2ex]

362: &&~~~~~~~~~~

363: \times \Delta C^G\left(z,{Q^2 \over \mu_f^2}\right)

364: + \Delta   {q_j}^{NS}\left({x \over z},\mu_f^2\right)

365: \Delta C_q^{NS}\left(z,{Q^2 \over \mu_f^2}\right) \Bigg ]~,

366: \end{eqnarray}

367: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

368: where $e_j$ denotes the charge of the $j$th quark flavor and $N_f$ 

369: is the number of flavors. The scale $\mu_f$ denotes the

370: factorization scale which is introduced to remove the collinear

371: singularities from the partonic structure functions. In addition the

372: above quantities are dependent on the renormalization scale $\mu_r$ of

373: the strong coupling constant $a_s(\mu_r^2) = g_s^2(\mu_r^2)/(16 \pi^2)$.

374: The structure function $g_1(x,Q^2)$, as a physical observable, is

375: independent of the choice of both scales. The parton densities and the

376: coefficient functions are dependent on these scales and obey corresponding

377: renormalization group equations.

378: 

379: The singlet and non--singlet parton densities which occur in 

380: Eq.~(\ref{eqg1}) are expressed by the individual flavor contributions as

381: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

382: \begin{eqnarray}

383: \label{eqfS}

384: \Delta \Sigma\left(z,\mu_f^2\right)&=&\sum_{i=1}^{N_f}

385: \Bigg[\Delta f_{q_i}\left(z,\mu_f^2\right)+

386: \Delta f_{\bar q_i}\left(z,\mu_f^2\right)\Bigg]\,,

387: \end{eqnarray}

388: and

389: \begin{eqnarray}

390: \label{eqfNS}

391: \Delta   {q_i}^{NS}\left(z,\mu_f^2\right)&=&

392: \Delta f_{q_i}\left(z,\mu_f^2\right)+

393: \Delta f_{\bar q_i}\left(z,\mu_f^2\right)

394: -{1 \over N_f} \Delta \Sigma\left(z,\mu_f^2\right)\,,

395: \end{eqnarray}

396: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

397: respectively, where $f_{q_i}$ denotes the polarized quark distribution

398: of the $i$th flavor.

399: 

400: The running coupling constant is obtained as the solution of 

401: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

402: \begin{eqnarray}

403: \label{eqarun}

404: \frac{d a_s(\mu_r^2)}{d \log(\mu_r^2)}  = - \beta_0 a_s^2(\mu_r^2)

405: - \beta_1 a_s^3( \mu_r^2) + O(a_s^4)~,

406: \end{eqnarray}

407: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

408: where the coefficients of the $\beta$--function are given by

409: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

410: \begin{eqnarray}

411: \label{eqbeta}

412: \beta_0 &=&  \frac{11}{3} C_A - \frac{4}{3} T_F N_f~, \nonumber\\

413: \beta_1 &=&  \frac{34}{3} C_A^2 - \frac{20}{3} C_A T_F N_f -

414: 4 C_F T_F N_f~,

415: \end{eqnarray}

416: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

417: in the $\overline{\rm MS}$--scheme. Here $C_A = 3, T_F = 1/2, C_F =4/3$

418: and $N_f$ denotes the number of active flavors. In the QCD  fit to the

419: data we extract $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}^{(4)}$ and choose $N_f = 4$ in 

420: Eq.~(\ref{eqbeta}) whereas only the three light flavors are used to 

421: represent $g_1(x,Q^2)$,~Eq.~(\ref{eqg1}). The expression for

422: $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}^{\overline{\rm MS}}$ is given by

423: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

424: \begin{eqnarray}

425: \label{eqlam}

426: \Lambda_{\rm QCD}^{\overline{\rm MS}} 

427: = \mu_r \exp \left\{-\frac{1}{2} \left[

428: \frac{1}{\beta_0 a_s(\mu_r^2)} - \frac{\beta_1}{\beta_0^2} \log

429: \left(\frac{1}{\beta_0 a_s(\mu_r^2)} + \frac{\beta_1}{\beta_0}\right)

430: \right]\right\}.

431: \end{eqnarray}

432: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

433: Subsequently we will also compare the values of $a_s$ at the mass scale 

434: of the $Z$-boson, $a_s(M_Z^2)$. This is obtained matching the values of

435: $a_s$ at the charm-- and

436: bottom--quark threshold $M_c = 1.4 \GeV$,

437: $M_b = 4.5 \GeV$ using Eq.~(\ref{eqlam})

438: for the value of $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}^{\overline{\rm MS}}$.

439: 

440: The change of the parton densities with respect to the factorization 

441: scale $\mu_f^2 = Q^2$

442: is described by  (matrix--valued)  renormalization group equations,

443: the evolution equations, which read

444: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

445: \begin{eqnarray}

446: \label{eqNSE}

447: \frac{\partial \Delta f_{q_i}^{\rm NS}(x,Q^2)}{\partial \log Q^2} &=&

448: P_{NS}^-(x,a_s) \otimes \Delta f_{q_i}^{\rm NS}(x,Q^2)\;, \\

449: \label{eqSIE}

450: \frac{\partial}{\partial \log Q^2} \left(\begin{array}{c} 

451: \Delta \Sigma(x,Q^2) \\ \Delta G(x,Q^2) \end{array} \right)

452: &=& \Pvec(x,a_s) \otimes

453: \left(\begin{array}{c} 

454: \Delta \Sigma(x,Q^2) \\ \Delta G(x,Q^2) \end{array} \right),

455: \end{eqnarray}

456: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

457: with

458: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

459: \begin{eqnarray}

460: \label{eqNSP}

461: P_{\rm NS}^-(x,a_s) &=& a_s P_{\rm NS}^{(0)}(x)

462: + a_s^2 P_{\rm NS}^{-(1)}(x) + {\cal{O}}(a_s^3)\;, \\

463: \label{eqSIP}

464: \Pvec(x,a_s) &\equiv&  \left(\begin{array}{cc}

465: P_{qq}(x,Q^2) & P_{qg}(x,Q^2) \\ P_{gq}(x,Q^2) & P_{gg}(x,Q^2) 

466: \end{array} \right) = a_s \Pvec^{(0)}(x) + a_s^2 \Pvec^{(1)}(x) +

467: {\cal{O}}(a_s^3)\;,

468: \end{eqnarray}

469: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

470: and $\otimes$ the {\sc Mellin} convolution

471: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

472: \begin{eqnarray}

473: \label{eqmeco}

474: [A \otimes B](x) = \int_0^1 dx_1 dx_2 \delta(x-x_1 x_2)

475: A(x_1) B(x_2)\;.

476: \end{eqnarray}

477: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

478: The polarized coefficient functions and anomalous dimensions were 

479: calculated in~[1-3]

480: %\cite{COEF,SPLIT}

481: to next-to-leading order. 

482: 

483: The evolution equations (\ref{eqNSE},\ref{eqSIE}) may be rewritten

484: changing the evolution variable $\log(Q^2)$ into $a_s$ using

485: Eq.~(\ref{eqarun}):

486: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

487: \begin{eqnarray}

488: d \log(Q^2) = -\frac{da_s}{\beta_0 a_s^2+\beta_1 a_s^3}~.

489: \end{eqnarray}

490: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

491: 

492: We solve the evolution equations in {\sc Mellin}--$N$ space. For this

493: purpose a {\sc Mellin}--transformation

494: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

495: \begin{eqnarray}

496: \label{eqMEL}

497: %\Mvec[f](N) = \int_0^1 dx x^{N-1} f(x),~~N~\epsilon~{\bf N}

498: \Mvec[f](N) = \int_0^1 dx x^{N-1} f(x),~~N~\epsilon~\Nvec

499: \end{eqnarray}

500: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

501: of the equations is carried out under which the {\sc Mellin} convolution

502: $\otimes$ turns into the ordinary product. After the transformation was

503: performed the argument $N$ is analytically continued to the complex

504: plane. The principle way of solution of the Eqs.~(\ref{eqNSE},\ref{eqSIE}) 

505: is described in the literature in detail, see \cite{FP,GRV,BV1},

506: which we summarize briefly. For the non--singlet case the solution to

507: NLO is

508: given by

509: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

510: \begin{eqnarray}

511: \label{eqNSS}

512: \Delta q^{\rm NS}_i(N,a_s) = \left(\frac{a_s}{a_0}\right)

513: ^{-P_{\rm NS}^{(0)}/\beta_0} \left[1 - \frac{1}{\beta_0}(a_s-a_0)

514: \left(P_{\rm NS}^{-(1)} - \frac{\beta_1}{\beta_0} P_{\rm NS}^{(0)}\right)

515: \right] \Delta q^{\rm NS}_i(N,a_0)~,

516: \end{eqnarray}

517: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

518: where $a_s = a_s(Q^2), a_0 = a_s(Q_0^2)$.  The singlet solution reads

519: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

520: \begin{eqnarray}

521: \label{eqSIS}

522: \left(\begin{array}{c} \Delta \Sigma(N,a_s) \\ \Delta G(N,a_s)

523: \end{array} \right)

524: = \left[ \ONE + a_s \Uvec_1(N)\right] \Lvec(N,a_s,a_0) \left[\ONE -

525: a_0 \Uvec_1(N)\right]

526: \left(\begin{array}{c} \Delta \Sigma(N,a_0) \\ \Delta G(N,a_0)

527: \end{array} \right)~.

528: \end{eqnarray}

529: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

530: Here the leading order evolution matrix $\Lvec$ is given by

531: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

532: \begin{eqnarray}

533: \label{eqLOS}

534: \Lvec(a_s,a_0,N) = \evec_-(N) \left(\frac{a_s}{a_0}\right)^{-r_-(N)}

535:                  + \evec_+(N) \left(\frac{a_s}{a_0}\right)^{-r_+(N)}~,

536: \end{eqnarray}

537: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

538: with eigenvalues of the LO singlet evolution matrix

539: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

540: \begin{eqnarray}

541: \label{eqLOEVA}

542: r_{\pm} =  \frac{1}{\beta_0} \left [ tr(\Pvec^{(0)}) \pm \sqrt{

543: tr(\Pvec^{(0)})^2 - det_2(\Pvec^{(0)})}\right]

544: \end{eqnarray}

545: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

546: and the eigenvectors

547: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

548: \begin{eqnarray}

549: \label{eqLOEVE}

550: \evec_{\pm} = \frac{\Pvec^{(0)}/\beta_0 - r_\mp \ONE}{r_\pm - r_\mp}~.

551: \end{eqnarray}

552: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

553: The       matrix

554: $\Uvec_1(N)$ is given by

555: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

556: \begin{eqnarray}

557: \label{eqUNLO}

558: \Uvec_1(N) = - \evec_- \Rvec_1 \evec_- - \evec_+ \Rvec_1 \evec_+

559: + \frac{\evec_+ \Rvec_1 \evec_-}{r_- -r_+ -1} 

560: + \frac{\evec_- \Rvec_1 \evec_+}{r_+ -r_- -1}

561: \end{eqnarray}

562: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

563: with 

564: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

565: \begin{eqnarray}

566: \Rvec_1 = [\Pvec^{(1)} - (\beta_1/\beta_0) \Pvec^{(0)}]/\beta_0~.

567: \end{eqnarray}

568: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

569: The input distributions $\Delta q^{\rm NS}_i(N,a_0), \Delta \Sigma(N,a_0)$

570: and  $\Delta G(N,a_0)$, see section~5, are evolved to the scale

571: $Q^2$, respectively to the coupling $a_s(Q^2)$. The inverse {\sc

572: Mellin}--transform to $x$--space is performed by a contour integral in

573: the complex plane around all singularities, which can be written as

574: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

575: \begin{eqnarray}

576: \label{invers}

577: f_{\rm TH}(x) = \frac{1}{\pi} \int_0^{\infty} dz~{\sf Im} \left[

578: \exp(i\phi) x^{-c(z)} f_{\rm TH}[c(z)]\right ]

579: \end{eqnarray}

580: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

581: applying symmetry properties of the integrand. In practice an integral 

582: along the path $c(z) = c_1 + \rho[\cos(\phi) + i \sin(\phi)]$, with 

583: $c_1 = 1.1, \rho \ge 0$

584: and $\phi = (3/4) \pi$ can be used. 

585: The upper bound on $\rho$ is to be chosen by sufficient

586: numerical convergence of the integral~(\ref{invers}). The theoretical

587: prediction $f_{\rm TH}(x)$ for the respective observables depends on the

588: parameters of the parton distributions chosen at the starting scale

589: $Q_0^2$ and on $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$. These parameters are determined by

590: a fit to the data using the $\chi^2$--method, see section~6.

591: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

592: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

593: %       Scheme Invariant Evolution

594: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

595: \section{Scheme Invariant Evolution of Polarized Structure Functions}

596: \label{sec:si}

597: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

598: 

599: \vspace{2mm}

600: \noindent

601: In the foregoing section we investigated the QCD evolution of the

602: polarized structure function $g_1(x,Q^2)$ at the level of twist--2

603: using the conventional picture of the QCD improved parton model. This

604: requires choices of the non--perturbative partonic input distributions at

605: a starting scale $Q_0^2$. One outcome of the analysis is that some of

606: the distributions are still very difficult to determine by a fit to

607: the polarized

608: deep inelastic data. This particularly applies to the polarized

609: gluon and

610: sea--quark densities. 

611: 

612: The scaling violations of deep inelastic structure functions, i.e.

613: their $Q^2$--behavior, are properties of observables, and do thus 

614: {\it not} depend on particular representations, as scheme--dependent

615: decompositions, which occur applying the parton model. Instead referring

616: to the latter one might wish to eliminate the scheme dependence as

617: occurring due to mass factorization all together and describe the

618: evolution of polarized structure functions based on {\it observables}

619: only. As a consequence, no parton distributions would even emerge in

620: this description, and choices of the parameterization of less constraint

621: input densities can

622: be avoided.\footnote{After having carried out the analysis projections

623: onto the various parton--densities, including the gluon density, in

624: {\it whatever} factorization scheme, the $\overline{\rm MS}$ scheme or

625: other schemes

626: \cite{ALTA,LEAD},

627:  are possible  including the

628: respective experimental errors.}

629: 

630: Up to NLO the evolution of the structure function $g_1(x,Q^2)$ is

631: described by one non--singlet~(\ref{eqNSE}) and the coupled singlet

632: evolution equations~(\ref{eqSIE}). Instead of Eq.~(\ref{eqNSE}) one may

633: use the scheme--invariant equation based on the non--singlet

634: structure function     $g_1^{\rm NS}(x,Q^2)$

635: %---------------------------------------------------------------------

636: \begin{eqnarray}

637: \label{eqNS1}

638: \frac{\partial g_1^{\rm NS}(x,Q^2)}{\partial t} = K^{\rm NS}(a,x)

639:   \otimes      g_1^{\rm NS}(x,Q^2)

640: \end{eqnarray}

641: %---------------------------------------------------------------------

642: with\footnote{Note that the splitting functions and coefficient functions

643: are expressed in such a way that all evolution equations refer to

644: logarithmic variations in $Q^2$ and $a(Q^2)$ is used as the coupling

645: constant.}

646: %---------------------------------------------------------------------

647: \begin{eqnarray}

648: \label{eqKNS1}

649: K^{\rm NS}(a,x) = \frac{a}{2}\left\{P^{\rm NS}_0(x) + 

650: a\left[P_1^{\rm NS}(x)

651: - \frac{\beta_1}{\beta_0} P_0^{\rm NS}(x) - \beta_0 c_{q,1}(x)\right]

652: \right\}~.

653: \end{eqnarray}

654: %---------------------------------------------------------------------

655: Here the evolution variable is chosen as

656: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

657: \begin{equation}

658: \label{eqT}

659: t=-{2 \over \beta_0} \ln\left({a_s(Q^2) \over a_s(Q_0^2)}\right)~.

660: \end{equation}

661: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

662: 

663: For the singlet--evolution two observables have to be selected to form

664: the factorization--scheme invariant evolution equations. In case of

665: the polarized structure functions a natural choice is to use the 

666: flavor--singlet part of $g_1(x,Q^2)$ and its partial derivation w.r.t. 

667: $t$.~\footnote{Evolution equations of this type have been discussed before

668: in Ref.~\cite{FP}. In the unpolarized case one may consider the pair

669: $F_2(x,Q^2), F_L(x,Q^2)$ as well, which has been considered in detail in

670: Ref.~\cite{DLY}. For similar approaches, partly derived only for the

671: small-$x$ domain, see~\cite{SIO}. Corresponding evolution equations

672: for time--like virtualities, which describe fragmentation in a 

673: factorization--scheme invariant way, were given in \cite{DLY}.}

674: The singlet evolution equation reads (taking the {\sc Mellin} transform)

675: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

676: \begin{equation}

677: \label{eqevo2}

678: {\partial \over \partial t}\left( \begin{array}{c}

679: F^N_A\\

680: {F^N_B}

681: \end{array} \right) =

682: -{1 \over 4}  {\bf K}_S^{g_1}(N)

683: \left( \begin{array}{c}

684: F^N_A\\

685: {F^N_B}

686: \end{array} \right)  =

687: -{1 \over 4}

688: \left( \begin{array} {cc}

689: K^N_{AA} & K^N_{AB}\\

690: K^N_{BA} & K^N_{BB}

691: \end{array} \right)

692: \left( \begin{array}{c}

693: F^N_A\\

694: {F^N_B}

695: \end{array} \right)~,

696: %\end{displaymath}

697: \end{equation}

698: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

699: with $F_A = g_1(N,Q^2), F_B = \partial g_1(N,Q^2)/\partial t$.

700: The {\sf physical} evolution kernels are given in leading order by

701: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

702: \begin{equation}

703: \label{eqG21}

704: \begin{array}{rclcrcl}

705: K_{22}^{N(0)}&=&0~, & \hspace{.5cm}&

706: K_{2d}^{N(0)}&=&-4~, \nonumber \nonumber \\ \\

707: K_{d2}^{N(0)}&=&\displaystyle{{1 \over 4} \Bigg(\Gqqa \Ggga-\Gqga 

708: \Ggqa\Bigg)}~, & \hspace{.5cm}&

709: K_{dd}^{N(0)}&=&\displaystyle{\Gqqa+\Ggga }~.\nonumber

710: \nonumber 

711: \end{array}

712: \end{equation}

713: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

714: In next-to-leading order they read

715: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

716: \begin{eqnarray}

717: \label{eqG22}

718: K_{22}^{N(1)}&=&0~,

719: \\[2ex]

720: K_{2d}^{N(1)}&=&0~,

721: \\[2ex]

722: K_{d2}^{N(1)}&=&{1 \over 4} \Bigg[\Ggga \Gqqb+\Gggb \Gqqa -\Gqgb 

723: \Ggqa -\Gqga \Ggqb\Bigg]

724: \nonumber\\[2ex]

725: && -{\beta_1 \over 2 \beta_0} \Bigg(\Gqqa \Ggga-\Ggqa \Gqga\Bigg)

726:    +{\beta_0 \over 2} \Cq \Bigg(\Gqqa+\Ggga-2 \beta_0\Bigg)

727: \nonumber\\[2ex]

728: &&-{\beta_0 \over 2} {\Cg \over \Gqga} \Bigg[(\Gqqa)^2-\Gqqa\Ggga+2 

729: \Gqga\Ggqa-2 \beta_0 \Gqqa\Bigg]

730: \nonumber\\[2ex]

731: &&-{\beta_0 \over 2} \Bigg(\Gqqb-{\Gqqa \Gqgb \over \Gqga} \Bigg)~,

732: \\[2ex]

733: \label{eqG23}

734: K_{dd}^{N(1)}&=&\Gqqb+\Gggb-\bb \Bigg(\Gqqa+\Ggga \Bigg)

735: \nonumber\\[2ex]

736: && -{2 \beta_0 \over \Gqga} \Bigg[ \Cg \Big(\Gqqa - \Ggga-2 

737: \beta_0\Big)-\Gqgb\Bigg]

738:   +4 \beta_0 \Cq -2 \beta_1~.

739: \end{eqnarray}

740: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

741: Here $\gamma_{ij}^{N(0,1)}$ denotes the polarized deep--inelastic

742: anomalous dimensions

743: %---------------------------------------------------------------------

744: \begin{eqnarray}

745: \gamma_{ij}(a,N) &=& \sum_{k=0}^\infty a^{k+1} \gamma_{i,j}^{(k)}(N)~,\\

746: \gamma_{ij}^{N(0,1)} &=& - 2 \int_0^1 dz z^{N-1} P_{ij}^{(0,1)}(z)~,

747: \end{eqnarray}

748: %---------------------------------------------------------------------

749: and $C_{2,q(g)}^{N(1)}$ is the {\sc Mellin}--transform of the Wilson 

750: coefficients

751: %---------------------------------------------------------------------

752: \begin{eqnarray}

753: C_{2,k}^{N(1)} &=& \int_0^1 dz z^{N-1} C_{2,k}^{(1)}(z)~.

754: \end{eqnarray}

755: %---------------------------------------------------------------------

756: For this combination in next-to-leading order the evolution depends on 

757: two evolution kernels only.

758: 

759: The kernels $K^{\rm NS}$ and ${\bf K}_{\rm S}^{g_1}$ are factorization

760: scheme--invariant quantities. Their analytic structure in $z$--space

761: is difficult to obtain due to the inverse {\sc Mellin}--convolutions

762: of inverse coefficient functions being required. Already in the case of

763: the inverse of the leading order splitting function $P_{gq}(z)$

764: a rather complicated expression is found~\cite{BK}. Therefore we

765: perform all computations in {\sc Mellin}--$N$ space, where the

766: physical evolution kernels are polynomials out of anomalous dimensions and

767: coefficient functions. Their analytic continuation to complex values

768: of $N$ can be performed using the respective representations of harmonic

769: sums at high numerical precision, cf.~\cite{MEL}. In the unpolarized case

770: approximate representations were also obtained in \cite{NV}.

771: 

772: The advantage of studying factorization--scheme invariant evolution 

773: equations both in the non--singlet and the singlet case is that the

774: input distributions are observables. Although the present world 

775: statistics is too low, future high statistics measurements  may provide 

776: accurate input densities $g_1(x,Q^2_0)$ and $dg_1(x,Q^2_0)/dt$. In this

777: case the {\sf only} parameter to be measured analyzing the scaling

778: violations of $g_1(x,Q^2)$ is

779: $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$. At present the solution of the physical evolution

780: equations in the polarized case cannot yet take full advantage of the

781: method, since the respective observables are not yet measured well enough

782: at typical input scales $Q_0^2$. This different formulation, however,

783: leads to an alternative view on the data in extracting 

784: $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$, as different input densities, $g_1(x,Q^2_0)$ and 

785: $dg_1(x,Q^2_0)/dt$, are fitted as compared to $\Delta \Sigma(x,Q_0^2)$

786: and $\Delta G(x,Q_0^2)$ in the standard analysis. A comparison of the

787: values of $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$ obtained in both analyzes may indicate

788: the stability of the determination of the QCD--parameter.

789: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

790: %       Data

791: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

792: \section{Data}

793: \label{sec:dat}

794: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

795: 

796: \vspace{2mm}

797: \noindent

798: The remarkable growth of experimental data on inclusive polarized deep 

799: inelastic scattering of leptons off nucleons over the last years allows

800: to perform  refined QCD analyzes of polarized structure functions in 

801: order to reveal the spin--dependent partonic structure of the nucleon.

802: For the QCD analysis presented in the present paper the following data 

803: sets are used:

804: the EMC proton data \cite{EMCp}, the E142 neutron data \cite{E142n},

805: the HERMES neutron data \cite{HERMn}, the E154 neutron data \cite{E154n},

806: the SMC proton and deuteron data \cite{SMCpd}, the E143 proton and 

807: deuteron data \cite{E143pd}, the HERMES proton data \cite{HERMp}, the 

808: E155 deuteron data \cite{E155d}, and the E155 proton data 

809: \cite{E155p}\footnote{Earlier data from Ref.~\cite{E80130} are not 

810: considered.}. The number of the published

811: data points above $Q^2 = 1.0~\GeV^2$ for the different data sets are

812: summarized in Table~1 for both the asymmetry data, i.e. $g_1/F_1$ or

813: $A_1$, and data on $g_1$ together with the $x-$ and $Q^2$--ranges

814: for the different experiments.\footnote{All corrections to the data

815: are assumed to be carried out, including the QED radiative corrections

816: \cite{RC1,RC2}.}

817: There are 435 data points for asymmetry data, a number which exceeds

818: the number of data points for $g_1$ data by  a factor of two. We

819: therefore are utilizing the asymmetry data which are expected to give

820: a better statistical accuracy. 

821: 

822: The QCD fits are performed on the polarized structure function 

823: $g_1(x,Q^2)$ which has to be evaluated from the asymmetry data. 

824: Experimentally cross section

825: asymmetries for longitudinally polarized lepton scattering off

826: longitudinally polarized nucleons are measured

827: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

828: \begin{equation}

829: A_{||} = \frac 

830: {\sigma^{\uparrow\uparrow} - \sigma^{\uparrow\downarrow}}

831: {\sigma^{\uparrow\uparrow} + \sigma^{\uparrow\downarrow}}~.

832: \end{equation}

833: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

834: 

835: \noindent

836: The arrow--combination $\uparrow\uparrow$($\uparrow\downarrow$) denotes

837: parallel(anti--parallel) spin orientation of the lepton and the nucleon. 

838: The ratio of structure functions $g_1/F_1$ and the longitudinal virtual 

839: photon asymmetry $A_1$ are related to $A_{||}$ by

840: 

841: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

842: \begin{eqnarray}

843: \frac{g_1}{F_1}

844: & = & \frac{1}{(1 + \gamma^2)} \left[ \frac{A_{||}}{D} + 

845: (\gamma - \eta) A_2 \right], \\

846: A_1     & = & \frac{A_{||}}{D} - \eta A_2~,

847: \end{eqnarray} 

848: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

849: 

850: \noindent

851: and the relation between $g_1/F_1$ and $A_1$ is

852: 

853: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

854: \begin{equation}

855: \frac{g_1}{F_1} 

856: = \frac{1}{(1 + \gamma^2)} \left[ A_1 + \gamma A_2 \right].

857: \end{equation}

858: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

859: 

860: \noindent

861: Here $A_2$ is the transverse virtual photon asymmetry and

862: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

863: \begin{eqnarray}

864:  D &=& \frac{1-(1-y)\epsilon}{1+\epsilon R(x,Q^2)}~,\\

865: \epsilon &=& \frac{4(1-y)-\gamma^2 y^2}{2y^2+4(1-y)+\gamma^2 y^2}~,\\

866:  \gamma &=& \frac{2Mx}{\sqrt{Q^2}}~,    \\

867:  \eta &=& \frac{\epsilon \gamma y}{1-\epsilon(1-y)}~.

868: \end{eqnarray}

869: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

870: $D$ denotes the virtual photon depolarization factor, $\epsilon,

871: \gamma$ and $\eta$ are kinematic factors, $y=Q^2/(Sx)$ 

872: is the Bjorken variable, with $S = M^2 + 2 M E_e$, $M$ the nucleon mass,

873: $E_e$ the electron energy in the target rest frame,

874: and $R(x,Q^2) = \sigma_L/\sigma_T$.

875: For $R(x,Q^2)$ the SLAC parameterization $R_{1990}$ \cite{R1990} is used 

876: by most of the experiments. At the time of the EMC experiment this 

877: parameterization was not available yet and $R$ was assumed to be $Q^2$ 

878: independent. The SMC collaboration adopted a combination of $R_{1990}$ 

879: (for $x > 0.12$) and a parameterization derived by the NMC collaboration 

880: \cite{RNMC} (for $x < 0.12$). In the E155 experiment a recent SLAC 

881: parameterization for $R$ \cite{RE143} was used. The changes in the data  

882: caused by using the different $R$ parameterizations are not significant and 

883: stay within the experimental errors\footnote{The EMC proton data, where

884: the biggest impact is expected, change by a few percent only, see 

885: Ref.~\cite{AAC}.}.

886: 

887: The magnitude of $A_2$ has been measured by SMC \cite{SMCA2}, 

888: E154 \cite{EE154}, and E143 \cite{E143pd} and 

889: found to be small. To a good

890: approximation its contribution to $g_1/F_1$ and $A_1$ which is being

891: further suppressed by the kinematic factors $\gamma$ and $\eta$ can be

892: neglected. Nevertheless, E143 and E154

893:  have exploited their

894: measurements, E155 has approximated this contribution by $g_2^{\rm

895: WW}(x,Q^2)$ through the Wandzura--Wilczek

896: expression \cite{WW},\footnote{Note that this relation holds also in the

897: presence of quark--

898: \cite{BT}

899:  and target--mass corrections~\cite{BT,PR%

900: }. Related

901: integral relations for twist--3 contributions  and structure functions

902: with electro--weak couplings were derived in Refs.~\cite{BT,BLKO}.

903: Recently these relations have been found to hold also for diffractive

904: scattering,~\cite{BR}.} which is calculated from the measured structure

905: function $g_1(x,Q^2)$ in the approximation that twist--2 contributions

906: are dominant:

907: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

908: \begin{eqnarray}

909:  g_2^{\rm WW}(x,Q^2) = -g_1(x,Q^2) + \int_x^1 \frac{dz}{z} g_1(z,Q^2)~.

910: \end{eqnarray}

911: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

912: HERMES has accounted for the $A_2$ contribution to the proton data by

913: using a fit based on existing measurements \cite{HERMp}. 

914: To obtain $g_1(x,Q^2)$ one has to multiply the ratio

915: $g_1(x,Q^2)/F_1(x,Q^2)$ with the unpolarized structure function

916: $F_1(x,Q^2)$ which can be calculated from the usually measured

917: unpolarized structure function $F_2(x,Q^2)$ by

918: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

919: \begin{equation}

920: F_1(x,Q^2) = \frac {(1+\gamma^2)}{2x(1+R(x,Q^2)}F_2(x,Q^2)~.

921: \end{equation}

922: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

923: 

924: \noindent

925: For all data sets we are using the SLAC $R_{1990}(x,Q^2)$ 

926: \cite{R1990} and the NMC $F_2(x,Q^2)$ parameterization \cite{F2NMC} to

927: perform this calculation.

928: 

929: The data sets used contain both statistical and systematic errors except 

930: the SMC data set which is given with statistical errors only. It is known 

931: that the systematic errors are partly correlated which would lead to an 

932: overestimation of the errors when added in quadrature with the statistical 

933: ones and hence to a reduction of the $\chi^2$ value in the minimization 

934: procedure. To treat all data sets on the same footing we decided to use the 

935: statistical errors only. 

936: However, we allow for a relative normalization shift between the 

937: different data sets within the normalization uncertainties quoted 

938: by the experiments. Thereby we are 

939: taking into account the main systematic uncertainties coming from the 

940: measurements of the luminosity and  the beam and target polarization. 

941: The normalization shift for each data set enters as an additional term in 

942: the $\chi^2$--expression which then reads

943: 

944: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

945: \begin{equation}

946: \chi^2 = \sum_{i=1}^{n^{exp}} \left [ 

947:          \frac {(N_i - 1)^2}

948:                {(\Delta N_i)^2} + 

949:          \sum_{j=1}^{n^{data}} 

950:          \frac {(N_i g_{1,j}^{data} - g_{1,j}^{theor})^2}

951:                {(\Delta g_{1,j}^{data})^2} 

952:          \right ],

953: \end{equation}

954: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

955: 

956: \noindent

957: where the sums run over all data sets and in each data set over all data 

958: points. The minimization of the $\chi^2$ value above to determine the best 

959: parameterization of the polarized parton distributions is done using the 

960: program {\tt MINUIT} \cite{MINUIT}. Only fits giving a positive definite

961: covariance matrix at the end have been accepted in order to be able to 

962: calculate the fully correlated $1\sigma$ error bands.

963: %

964: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

965: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

966: %       Parameterization and Errors

967: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

968: \section{Parameterizations of the Polarized Parton Distributions and 

969: their Errors}

970: \label{sec:par-err}

971: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

972: \subsection{Parameterization of the Parton Densities}

973: \label{subsec:parcho}

974: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

975: 

976: \vspace{2mm}

977: \noindent

978: The shape chosen for the parameterization of the polarized parton 

979: distributions in $x$--space at the input scale of $Q^2_0 = 4.0~\GeV^2$ is

980: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

981: \begin{equation}

982: \label{param}

983: x\Delta f_i(x,Q_0^2) = \eta_i A_i x^{a_i} (1 - x)^{b_i}

984: \left(1 + \gamma_i x + \rho_i x^{\frac{1}{2}}\right)~.

985: \end{equation}

986: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

987: 

988: \noindent

989: The term $x^{a_i}$ controls the low--$x$ behavior of the parton densities

990: and $(1 - x)^{b_i}$ that at large values of $x$. The remainder polynomial

991: factor accounts for the additional medium--$x$ degrees of freedom.

992: The normalization constants $A_i$

993: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

994: \begin{equation}

995: \label{anorm}

996: A_i^{-1} = \left( 1 + \gamma_i\frac{a_i}{a_i+b_i+1} \right)

997:                B(a_i,b_i+1) + \rho_i B\left(a_i+\frac{1}{2},b_i+1\right)

998: \end{equation}

999: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1000: 

1001: \noindent

1002: are

1003: chosen such that the

1004: $\eta_i$ are the first moments of $\Delta q_i(x,Q_0^2)$,

1005: $\eta_i =\int_0^1dx \Delta q_i(x,Q_0^2)$. Here $B(a,b)$ is the 

1006: Euler Beta--function being related to the $\Gamma$--function by

1007: 

1008: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1009: \begin{equation}

1010: B(a,b) = \frac {\Gamma(a) \Gamma(b)} {\Gamma(a+b)}~.

1011: \end{equation}

1012: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1013: In the present approach the QCD--evolution equations are solved in

1014: {\sc Mellin}--$N$ space as described in section~\ref{sec:sta}.

1015: The {\sc Mellin}--transform of the parton densities is performed and

1016: {\sc Mellin}--N moments are calculated for complex arguments $N$~:

1017: 

1018: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1019: \begin{eqnarray}

1020: \label{MNmom}

1021: \Mvec[ \Delta f(x,Q_0^2)](N) & = & \int_0^1 x^{N-1} \Delta f(x,Q^2_0) dx

1022: \nonumber\\ &=&

1023: \eta_i A_i 

1024:                      \left( 1 + \gamma_i\frac{N-1+a_i}{N+a_i+b_i} \right)

1025:                      B(N-1+a_i,b_i+1)  \nonumber \\ 

1026:                    &   & \nonumber \\

1027:            &   & + \rho_i B\left(N+a_i-\frac{1}{2},b_i+1\right)~.

1028: \end{eqnarray}

1029: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1030: 

1031: \noindent

1032: As seen from Eq.~(\ref{param}) there are five parameters for each parton

1033: distribution. To meet both the quality of the present data and the 

1034: reliability of the fitting program the number of parameters has to be 

1035: reduced. 

1036: Assuming $SU(3)$ flavor symmetry and  a flavor symmetric sea one only

1037: has to derive one general polarized sea--quark distribution. The

1038: first moments of the polarized valence distributions $\Delta u_v$ and 

1039: $\Delta d_v$ can be fixed by the $SU(3)$ parameters $F$ and $D$ as 

1040: measured

1041: in neutron and hyperon $\beta$--decays according to the relations~:

1042: 

1043: \vspace*{-0.75cm}

1044: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1045: \begin{eqnarray}

1046: \eta_{u_v} - \eta_{d_v} & = & F + D~,           \\

1047: \eta_{u_v} + \eta_{d_v} & = & 3F - D~.

1048: \end{eqnarray}

1049: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1050: 

1051: \noindent

1052: A re-evaluation of $F$ and $D$ was performed in Ref.~\cite{AAC} on the

1053: basis of updated $\beta$--decay constants \cite{PDGOLD} leading to

1054: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1055: \begin{eqnarray}

1056: \eta_{u_v} &=& ~~0.926 \pm 0.014~, \\

1057: \eta_{d_v} &=& -0.341 \pm 0.018~.

1058: \end{eqnarray}

1059: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1060: Given 

1061: the present accuracy of the data a number of parameters is set to zero, 

1062: namely $\rho_{u_v} = \rho_{d_v} = 0$, $\gamma_{\bar q} = 

1063: \rho_{\bar q} = 0$, and $\gamma_G = \rho_G = 0$. This choice reduces the 

1064: number of parameters to be fitted for each polarized parton density to 

1065: three. In addition the QCD parameter $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$ is to be

1066: determined. 

1067: We allow for a relative normalization shift between the different data

1068: sets within the normalization uncertainties quoted by the

1069: experiments. These normalization shifts were fitted once and then

1070: fixed afterwards. 

1071: %No assumptions have been made concerning the 

1072: 

1073: The polarized parton densities to be determined are chosen to be 

1074: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1075: \begin{eqnarray}

1076: \Delta u_v(x) &=& \Delta u(x) - \Delta \overline{u}(x)~, \nonumber\\

1077: \Delta d_v(x) &=& \Delta d(x) - \Delta \overline{d}(x)~, \nonumber\\

1078: \frac{1}{6}\Delta \overline{Q}(x) &=& \Delta \overline{q}(x) =

1079: \Delta \overline{u}(x) =

1080: \Delta \overline{d}(x) = \Delta {s}(x)

1081:  = \Delta \overline{s}(x)~, \nonumber\\ 

1082: {\rm and}~\Delta G(x)~.

1083: \end{eqnarray}

1084: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1085: Twelve parameters representing the parton densities are determined in the

1086: fit. These are~: for $\Delta u_v$: $a_{u_v}$, $b_{u_v}$, and 

1087: $\gamma_{u_v}$,

1088: for $\Delta d_v$: $a_{d_v}$, $b_{d_v}$, and $\gamma_{d_v}$, for 

1089: $\Delta \overline{Q}$: $\eta_{\bar q}$, $a_{\bar q}$, and $b_{\bar q}$, 

1090: and

1091: for $\Delta G$: $\eta_G$, $a_G$, and $b_G$. Note that $\eta_{\bar q}$

1092: represents the first moment of the total quark sea. Starting off with 

1093: these parameters the analysis shows, however, that the four parameters 

1094: $\gamma_{u_v}$, $\gamma_{d_v}$, $b_{\bar q}$, and $b_G$ turn out to 

1095: have very large errors at $\chi^2_{\rm min}$. Altering them within the

1096: error range does not lead to a significant change of $\chi^2$, which

1097: shows that they are badly constrained by the inclusive data used in the

1098: analysis. We, therefore, fixed these parameters at their values obtained

1099: at the end of the fit and consider them as outer model-parameters. 

1100: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1101: It is not expected that the small--$x$ behavior of the polarized gluon

1102: and the sea--quarks is much different. To achieve this

1103: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1104: it turned out that the small--$x$ slopes of the gluon and the sea--quarks

1105: are to be related like $a_G = a_{\bar q} + C$, with $C = 0.5~...~1.0$.

1106: We therefore decided to fix one of the parameter relative to the other.

1107: %to either $c = 1$ ({\tt ISET=1,3}) or $c=0.6$ ({\tt ISET=2,4}).

1108: In fixing the high--$x$ slopes $b_G$ and $b_{\bar q}$ we adopted a

1109: relation as derived from the unpolarized parton densities, namely

1110: $b_{\bar q} / b_G {\rm (pol)} = b_{\bar q} / b_G {\rm (unpol)}$ (see

1111: e.g. Ref. \cite{GRV}). Both relations together are suited to lead to

1112: positivity for $\Delta G$ and $\Delta {\bar q}$.  

1113: \footnote%

1114: {For a discussion of positivity of parton densities see \cite%

1115: {POSI}.}

1116: No positivity constraint was assumed for $\Delta u_v$ and $\Delta d_v$.

1117: After this the statistical measurement is only applied to the remaining

1118: seven parameters which describe the parton densities and to

1119: $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$. 

1120: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1121: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1122: \subsection{Error Calculation}

1123: \label{subsec:errcal}

1124: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1125: 

1126: \vspace{2mm}

1127: \noindent

1128: The evolved polarized parton densities and structure functions are linear

1129: functions of the input densities. 

1130: Let $f(x,Q^2;a_i|_{i=1}^k)$ be the 

1131: evolved density at $Q^2$ depending on the parameters $a_i|_{i=1}^k$. Then 

1132: its correlated error as given by Gaussian error propagation is

1133: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1134: \begin{equation}

1135: \label{error}

1136: \Delta f(x,Q^2) = \left[ \sum_{i=1}^k 

1137:                 \left( \frac{\partial f}{\partial a_i} \right)^2 C(a_i,a_i) 

1138:                 + \sum_{i\neq j=1}^k 

1139:                 \left( \frac{\partial f}{\partial a_i}

1140:                 \frac{\partial f}{\partial a_j} \right) C(a_i,a_j) 

1141:                 \right]^{\frac{1}{2}},

1142: \end{equation}

1143: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1144: 

1145: \noindent

1146: where $C(a_i,a_j)$ are the elements of the covariance matrix determined

1147: in the QCD  analysis at the scale $Q_0^2$. The gradients

1148: $\partial f/\partial a_i$ at this scale can be calculated analytically,

1149: except for $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$.

1150: Their value at $Q^2$ is calculated by evolution. The general form of the 

1151: derivative of the {\sc Mellin} moment $\Mvec [f(a)](N)$ w.r.t.

1152: the parameter $a$ is 

1153: 

1154: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1155: \begin{equation}

1156: \frac {\partial \Mvec [f(a)](N)}{\partial a} = F(a) 

1157: \times \Mvec [f(a)](N)

1158: \end{equation}

1159: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1160: 

1161: \noindent

1162: for complex values of $N$. Here we give the relevant expressions for 

1163: $F(a)$ as the normalized gradients w.r.t. the parameters being varied in 

1164: the final fit, which are finally two parameters per distribution. For the

1165: polarized parton distributions $\Delta u_v$ and $\Delta d_v$ one obtains

1166: 

1167: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1168: \begin{eqnarray}

1169: \label{grad_N_1}

1170: F(a_i)    & = & \psi(N-1+a_i) - \psi(N+a_i+b_i) \nonumber \\ 

1171:             &   & + \left( \frac{\gamma_i(b_i+1)}

1172:                     {(N+a_i+b_i)(N+a_i+b_i+\gamma_i(N-1+a_i))} \right) 

1173: \nonumber \\

1174:             &   & -\; \psi(a_i) + \psi(a_i+b_i+1) - 

1175:                   \left( \frac{\gamma_i(b_i+1)}

1176:                          {(a_i+b_i+1)(a_i+b_i+1+\gamma_ia_i)} \right) \;,

1177:           \\

1178: F(b_i)    & = & \psi(b_i+1) - \psi(N+a_i+b_i) \nonumber \\

1179:             &   & - \left( \frac{\gamma_i(N-1+a_i)}

1180:                     {(N+a_i+b_i)(N+a_i+b_i+\gamma_i(N-1+a_i))} \right) 

1181: \nonumber \\

1182:             &   & -\; \psi(b_i+1) + \psi(a_i+b_i+1) + 

1183:                   \left( \frac{\gamma_ia_i}

1184:                          {(a_i+b_i+1)(a_i+b_i+1+\gamma_ia_i)} \right) \;,

1185: \end{eqnarray}

1186: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1187: 

1188: \noindent

1189: whereas for $\Delta {\bar q}$ and $\Delta G$

1190: 

1191: \vspace*{-0.5cm}

1192: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1193: \begin{eqnarray}

1194: F(\eta_i) & = & \frac{1}{\eta_i} \;,           \\

1195: \label{grad_N_2}

1196: F(a_i)    & = & \psi(N-1+a_i) - \psi(N+a_i+b_i) - \psi(a_i) + 

1197:                   \psi(a_i+b_i+1)~.

1198: \end{eqnarray}

1199: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1200: 

1201: \noindent

1202: Here $\psi(z) = d/dz(\log\Gamma(z))$ denotes the {\sc Euler} 

1203: $\psi$-function. The gradients evolved in {\sc Mellin} space are then

1204: transformed back to $x$ space and are used according to Eq.~(\ref{error}).

1205: To obtain the gradients for the error calculation of the polarized 

1206: structure functions $g_1^p$ and $g_1^n$, which are composed of the

1207: polarized parton densities the expressions above, 

1208: Eqs.~(\ref{grad_N_1}--\ref{grad_N_2}) 

1209: have to be multiplied with the corresponding Wilson

1210: coefficient functions.

1211: 

1212: This yields the errors as far as the QCD parameter $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$ is

1213: fixed and regarded as uncorrelated. The inclusion of the QCD parameter

1214: is performed easiest by numerical methods due to non--linear and 

1215: iterative aspects in the calculation of $\alpha_s(Q^2,\Lambda_{\rm QCD})$.

1216: The respective gradients are calculated performing the evolution

1217: both for $\Lambda \pm \delta$, with $\delta \ll \Lambda$

1218: 

1219: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1220: \begin{equation}

1221: \frac {\partial f(x,Q^2,\Lambda)}{\partial \Lambda} = 

1222:        \frac {f(x,Q^2,\Lambda + \delta)-f(x,Q^2,\Lambda -

1223: \delta)}{2\delta}  

1224: \end{equation}

1225: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1226: 

1227: \noindent

1228: using  values for $\delta \sim  10~\MeV$ in the present analysis.

1229: 

1230: Finally we also present the gradients at the input scale $Q_0^2$ in

1231: $x$-space for completeness, also w.r.t. the parameters being fixed

1232: in the final analysis~:

1233: 

1234: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1235: \begin{equation}

1236: \label{grad_x_1}

1237: \frac{\partial \Delta q_i}{\partial \eta_i} = 

1238:         \frac{1}{\eta_i} \Delta q_i \;, \quad

1239: \frac{\partial \Delta q_i}{\partial a_i} = 

1240: \left( \log(x) - \frac{1}{T}\frac{\partial T}{\partial a_i} \right)

1241: \Delta q_i \;, \nonumber 

1242: \end{equation}

1243: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1244: 

1245: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1246: \begin{equation}

1247: \frac{\partial \Delta q_i}{\partial b_i} = 

1248: \left( \log(1-x) - \frac{1}{T}\frac{\partial T}{\partial b_i} \right)

1249: \Delta q_i \;, \quad

1250: \frac{\partial \Delta q_i}{\partial \gamma_i} = 

1251: \left( \frac{x}{1+\gamma_i x+\rho_i x^{\frac{1}{2}}} - \frac{1}{T} 

1252: \frac{\partial T}{\partial \gamma_i} \right) 

1253: \Delta q_i \;, \nonumber

1254: \end{equation}

1255: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1256: 

1257: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1258: \begin{equation}

1259: \frac{\partial \Delta q_i}{\partial \rho_i} = 

1260: \left( \frac{x^{\frac{1}{2}}}{1+\gamma_i x+\rho_i x^{\frac{1}{2}}} - 

1261: \frac{1}{T} \frac{\partial T}{\partial \rho_i} \right) 

1262: \Delta q_i \;, \nonumber

1263: \end{equation}

1264: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1265: 

1266: \noindent

1267: with

1268: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1269: \begin{eqnarray}

1270: \label{grad_x_T}

1271: T & = &  B(a_i,b_i+1) \left( 1 + \frac{\gamma_i a_i}{1+a_i+b_i} \right)

1272: + \gamma_i  B\left(a_i+\frac{1}{2},b_i+1\right)\;,  \\

1273: \frac{\partial T}{\partial a_i} & = & \left[\psi(a_i) - \psi(a_i+b_i+1)

1274: \right] 

1275:          B(a_i,b_i+1) \left( 1 + \frac{\gamma_i a_i}{1+a_i+b_i} \right) 

1276:          +

1277:          B(a_i,b_i+1)

1278:     \\

1279:   &   & \times \left( \frac{\gamma_i a_i}{(1+a_i+b_i)^2} \right) 

1280:         + \left[\psi(a_i+\frac{1}{2})-\psi(a_i+b_i+\frac{3}{2})\right] 

1281:           \rho_i  B\left(a_i+\frac{1}{2},b_i+1\right)\;, \\

1282: \frac{\partial T}{\partial b_i} & = & 

1283: \left[\psi(b_i+1)-\psi(a_i+b_i+1)\right]

1284:          B(a_i,b_i+1) \left( 1 + \frac{\gamma_i a_i}{1+a_i+b_i} \right) -

1285:          B(a_i,b_i+1)

1286: \nonumber \\

1287:   &   & \times \left( \frac{\gamma_i a_i}{(1+a_i+b_i)^2} \right)

1288:         + \left[\psi(b_i+1)-\psi(a_i+b_i+\frac{3}{2}) \right]

1289:           \rho_i  B\left(a_i+\frac{1}{2},b_i+1\right)\;,  \\

1290: \frac{\partial T}{\partial \gamma_i} & = &  B(a_i,b_i+1)

1291: \left( \frac{a_i}{1+a_i+b_i} \right)\;,           \\

1292: \frac{\partial T}{\partial \rho_i}   & = &  

1293: B\left(a_i+\frac{1}{2},b_i+1\right)\;.

1294: \end{eqnarray}

1295: %------------------------------------------------------------------------

1296: 

1297: \noindent

1298: Both approaches have been used at the input scale and delivered the

1299: same error contours.

1300: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1301: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1302: %       Results of QCD Analysis

1303: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1304: \section{Results of the QCD Analysis}

1305: \label{sec:qcda}

1306: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1307: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1308: \subsection{Standard QCD Analysis}

1309: \label{sec:qcdastd}

1310: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1311: 

1312: \vspace{2mm}

1313: \noindent

1314: In the fitting procedure we started with the 13 parameters selected, i.e.

1315: three parameters for each of the four polarized parton distribution and 

1316: $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$ to be determined. For this set of parameters the

1317: sea--quark distribution was assumed to be described according to 

1318: $SU(3)$ flavor symmetry. This assumption is justified for an 

1319: {\it inclusive} data analysis, which we aim on in     this paper, given

1320: the present accuracy of the data, which may be refined in the forthcoming

1321: by

1322: including also semi--inclusive data, which  become more and more precise.

1323: Analyzing the constraints of the

1324: different parameters at $\chi^2_{\rm min}$, it turns out that the

1325: deep--inelastic scattering data do not constrain the four parameters 

1326: $\gamma_{u_v}$, $\gamma_{d_v}$, $b_{\bar{q}}$, and $b_G$ sufficiently

1327: well, since rather large errors for these quantities are obtained.

1328: In the further procedure we fixed these parameters at their values

1329: obtained in the first minimization and chose the ratio

1330: $b_{\overline{q}}/b_G$ as in the unpolarized case~\cite{GRVr}.

1331: Let us note that the latter choice is one possible option. The lack of

1332: constraining power of the present data on the polarized parton densities

1333: has to be stressed, however. Only more precise data in this range

1334: can improve the situation in the future. In the fit we found some tendency

1335: towards a harder  distribution for the  gluon,

1336: although being not significant given

1337: the errors obtained for the large--$x$ parameters.

1338: It also turns out that the small--$x$ parameter for the gluon and the

1339: sea--quark distribution take essentially values which are shifted

1340: relative to each  other as $\alpha_G = \alpha_S + c$ with $c \sim 0.5

1341: \ldots 1$, with some preference according to the value of 

1342: $\chi^2_{\rm min}$. This lead to values of 

1343: $c = 0.9, 0.6$ in LO ({\tt ISET=1,2}) and

1344: $c = 0.9, 0.5$ for the NLO parameterizations ({\tt ISET = 3,4}),

1345: cf. Appendix~1.

1346: 

1347: The final minimization was carried out under the above conditions and 

1348: determined the remaining eight parameters with their $1\sigma$ errors and

1349: the corresponding covariance matrix elements. Only fits ending with

1350: a positive--definite covariance matrix were accepted. The values and 

1351: errors of these parameters along with those parameters fixed in the

1352: parameterization, cf.~section~5, are summarized for both values of $c$

1353: in LO and NLO in table~2 for the parameters of the non--perturbative

1354: input distributions. The results on $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$ are discussed

1355: separately in section~6.2. The starting scale of the evolution was

1356: chosen as $Q^2_0 = 4 \GeV^2$. The covariance matrix elements for the

1357: LO and NLO fits, from which  the parameterizations {\tt ISET=1...4}

1358: are derived, are given in tables~3--6.

1359: 

1360: In Figures~1--4 the fitted parton distribution functions in leading and

1361: next-to-leading order for all sets of            parameterizations and

1362: their 1$\sigma$ errors are presented at the starting scale 

1363: $Q_0^2$.            The positivity bounds as e.g. obtained referring to

1364: the unpolarized distributions~\cite{GRVr} hold either for the central

1365: value itself or well within the present error bands.

1366: The current data constrain the up-valence distribution at best,

1367: followed by the down-valence, sea-quark, and gluon distributions.

1368: Our leading order results deviate from previous parameterizations

1369: \cite{AAC,GRSV}

1370: somewhat at lower values of $x$. Except for the gluon distribution this

1371: deviation is much

1372:  less in next-to-leading order, taking into account the

1373: experimental 1$\sigma$ errors.  In the  range $x~\epsilon~[10^{-3},1]$

1374: the polarized up--valence and gluon distributions are positive within

1375: errors,

1376: while the sea--quark and

1377: the down-valence densities are negative at the reference scale $Q_0^2

1378: = 4 \GeV^2$, the latter

1379: except in a small range at very large $x$.

1380: 

1381: In Figure~5 the NLO polarized gluon densities of {\tt ISET =3,4}, are

1382: compared to the unpolarized gluon distribution of Ref.~\cite{GRVr},

1383: to which the error of the gluon density as determined

1384: by the H1 experiment~\cite{H1} is overlaid  symmetrically in the range

1385:    $x > 0.1$. Both error contours illustrate the current

1386: margin of the positivity constraint for the gluon density,

1387:                   which is well covered.

1388: 

1389: The polarized structure function $xg_1^p(x.Q^2)$ measured in the interval

1390: $3.0~\GeV^2 < Q^2 < 5.0~\GeV^2$, Figure~6, using the world asymmetry data

1391: is well described by our QCD NLO curve and the $1\sigma$ error band. We

1392: also compare to corresponding representations of the parameterizations

1393: \cite{AAC,GRSV}, which are compatible within the present errors.

1394: 

1395: Looking at the $Q^2$ dependence of the structure function

1396: $g_1(x,Q^2)$ in intervals of $x$ gives insight to the scaling violations 

1397: in           the spin sector. As in the unpolarized case the presence of

1398: scaling violations

1399: are expected to manifest in a slope changing with $x$. The world

1400: proton data on $g_1(x,Q^2)$ have been plotted in such a way in

1401: Figure~7 and confronted with the QCD NLO curves of the present

1402: analysis  and its $1\sigma$ error bands. Corresponding curves of the

1403: parameterizations \cite{AAC,GRSV} are also shown.

1404: Slight but non-significant differences between the different analyzes are

1405: observed in the intervals at           low values of $x$.

1406: However, the data are well covered within the

1407: errors by all three analyzes. The current statistics in the low--$x$

1408: range is still rather low.

1409: 

1410: In Figures~8--11 the scaling violations of the individual polarized

1411: momentum densities are depicted in the range $x~\epsilon~[10^{-3},1],~~

1412: Q^2~\epsilon~[1,10^4]~\GeV^2$ choosing the NLO distributions of 

1413: {\tt ISET=3} as an example. The up-valence distribution $x\Delta u_v$,

1414: Figure~8,

1415: evolves towards smaller values of $x$ and the peak around $x \sim 0.25$

1416: becomes more flat in the evolution from $Q^2=1 \GeV^2$ to $Q^2 = 10^4

1417: \GeV^2$. The distribution is positive within the errors. Statistically 

1418: this distribution is constrained best among all others. The down-valence

1419: distribution $x \Delta d_v$, Figure 9,

1420: remains negative in the same range, although it is

1421: less constraint by the present data than the up-valence density. 

1422: Also here the

1423: evolution is towards smaller values of $x$ and structures at larger

1424: $x$ flatten out. The momentum density of the polarized gluon

1425: $x \Delta G$, Figure~10,

1426:  is positive in the depicted range for $Q^2 \geq 4~\GeV^2$,

1427: but becomes slightly

1428: negative for smaller values of $x$ at $Q^2 \sim 1~\GeV^2$.

1429: Also in  this  case        the evolution moves the shape towards

1430: lower values of $x$ and flattens the distribution. The error band

1431: becomes more uniformly. The sea--quark distribution 

1432: $x \Delta \overline{q}$, Figure~11,

1433:  is negative in the kinematic range shown

1434: for $Q^2 \leq 10 \GeV^2$ and remains negative within errors for $x \leq

1435: 5 \cdot 10^-2$ up to $Q^2 = 10^4 \GeV^2$, but changes sign for

1436: larger values of $x$. The minimum of the distribution at $Q^2 = 1 \GeV^2$

1437: around $x \sim 0.1$ moves to $x \sim 0.01$ at $Q^2 = 10^4 \GeV^2$. At

1438: the same time a maximum at $x \sim 0.1$ occurs.

1439: 

1440: In the present analysis the structure functions $g_1^{p,n}(x,Q^2)$

1441: were parameterized in the twist--2 approximation at next-to-leading order.

1442: As the data may contain higher twist terms         as well it is of

1443: interest to look for the potential effect of these contributions.

1444: At present the size of twist--4 contributions in deep--inelastic

1445: scattering data is widely unknown both in the unpolarized and polarized

1446: case\footnote{For a recent analysis of gluon induced contributions

1447: in the unpolarized case see Ref.~\cite{BRRZ}.}. Due to this we use

1448: the following phenomenological ans\"atze for a higher twist term~:

1449: %-------------------------------------------------------------------

1450: \begin{eqnarray}

1451: \label{eqHT1}

1452: h_{\rm I}(x,Q^2) &=& 1 + \frac{A}{Q^2} x^\alpha (1-x)^\beta~, \\

1453: \label{eqHT2}

1454: h_{\rm II}(x,Q^2) &=& 1 + \frac{1}{Q^2} \left[A + B x + C x^2\right]~,

1455: \end{eqnarray}

1456: %-------------------------------------------------------------------

1457: which are used multiplicatively with $g_1(x,Q^2)$. We compare these

1458: fit results with the NLO parameterization {\tt ISET = 4} in Figure~12.

1459: Both ans\"atze yield results of similar size and deviate from the

1460: NLO curves at small values of $Q^2$, however, they are fully consistent

1461: with the NLO results within the

1462: 1$\sigma$ error (hatched area). This shows that the present data

1463: do not contain significant higher twist contributions in the range

1464: $Q^2 > 1 \GeV^2$ and a NLO analysis can be carried out. This is also

1465: reflected by the observed logarithmic scaling violations, Figures~7, 12,

1466: and the measurement of the QCD scale $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$, to which we

1467: turn now.

1468: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1469: \subsection{{\boldmath $ \Lambda_{QCD}$} and {\boldmath %

1470: $\alpha_s(M_z)$}}

1471: \label{sec:lamals}

1472: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1473: 

1474: \vspace{2mm}

1475: \noindent

1476: In the QCD analysis we parameterized the strong coupling constant 

1477: $\alpha_s$ in terms of four massless flavors determining 

1478: $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}^{(4)\rm \overline{MS}}$. The NLO result fitting the 

1479: asymmetry data, $g_1/F_1$ or $A_1$, is

1480: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------

1481: \begin{eqnarray}

1482: \Lambda_{\rm QCD}^{(4)\rm \overline{MS}} &=& 235 \pm 53 \;

1483: ({\rm stat})\; \MeV,~~{\tt ISET =3}, \\

1484: \Lambda_{\rm QCD}^{(4)\rm \overline{MS}} &=& 240 \pm 60 \;

1485: ({\rm stat})\; \MeV,~~{\tt ISET =4},

1486: \end{eqnarray}

1487: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------

1488: identifying both the factorization and renormalization scales with $Q^2$. 

1489: The stability of the NLO result was investigated by changing both scales 

1490: to values different of $Q^2$. Since the present range in $Q^2$ probed in 

1491: polarized deep inelastic scattering is still rather low we vary $Q^2$ only

1492: by factors of 2 and keep the other scale at $Q^2$. The following variations 

1493: are obtained:

1494: 

1495: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------

1496: \begin{eqnarray}

1497: \Delta \Lambda_{\rm QCD}^{(4)\rm \overline{MS}} =

1498: \begin{array}{c} +  61 \\ -\;47 \end{array} \;~{\rm (fac)}

1499: \begin{array}{c} -  61 \\ + \;114 \end{array} \;~{\rm (ren)} \; \MeV,

1500: ~~{\tt ISET = 3}~,

1501: \nonumber   \\

1502: \Delta \Lambda_{\rm QCD}^{(4)\rm \overline{MS}} =

1503: \begin{array}{c} +  58 \\ -\;45 \end{array} \;~{\rm (fac)}

1504: \begin{array}{c} -  66 \\ + \;123 \end{array} \;~{\rm (ren)} \; \MeV,

1505: ~~{\tt ISET = 4}~.

1506: \nonumber

1507: \end{eqnarray}

1508: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------

1509: 

1510: \noindent

1511: These results can be expressed in terms of $\alpha_s(M_Z^2)$:

1512: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------

1513: \begin{eqnarray}

1514: \alpha_s(M_Z^2) = 0.113 \begin{array}{c} + 0.004 \\ - 0.004

1515: \end{array}  

1516: {\rm (stat)}

1517: \begin{array}{c} + 0.004 \\ - 0.004 \end{array}{\rm (fac)}

1518: \begin{array}{c} + 0.008 \\ - 0.005 \end{array}{\rm (ren)}~,

1519: ~~{\tt ISET =3},

1520: \nonumber \\

1521: \alpha_s(M_Z^2) = 0.114 \begin{array}{c} + 0.004 \\ - 0.005

1522: \end{array}  

1523: {\rm (stat)}

1524: \begin{array}{c} + 0.004 \\ - 0.004 \end{array}{\rm (fac)}

1525: \begin{array}{c} + 0.008 \\ 

1526: - 0.006 \end{array}{\rm (ren)},~~{\tt ISET =4}~.

1527: \nonumber

1528: \end{eqnarray}

1529: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------

1530: Combining the errors these values

1531: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------

1532: \begin{eqnarray}

1533: \alpha_s(M_Z^2) = 0.113 \begin{array}{c} + 0.010 \\ - 0.008~,

1534: \end{array}  \\

1535: \alpha_s(M_Z^2) = 0.114 \begin{array}{c} + 0.010 \\ - 0.009~,

1536: \end{array}  

1537: \end{eqnarray}

1538: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------

1539: can be compared with results from other QCD analyzes of polarized 

1540: inclusive deep--inelastic scattering data

1541: 

1542: \vspace*{-0.25cm}

1543: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------

1544: \begin{eqnarray}

1545: {\rm E154}~\cite{E154QCD}: \quad \alpha_s(M_Z^2) & = & 0.108 -

1546: 0.116\,, \quad {\rm bad \,~for} \ge 0.120~,  \nonumber \\

1547: {\rm SMC}~\cite{SMCQCD}: \quad \alpha_s(M_Z^2) & = & 0.121 \pm 0.002

1548: {\rm (stat)} \pm 0.006 {\rm (syst+theor)}~, \nonumber \\

1549: {\rm ABFR}~\cite{ABFR}: \quad \alpha_s(M_Z^2) & = & 0.120

1550: \begin{array}{c} + 0.004 \\ - 0.005 

1551: \end{array} {\rm (exp)}

1552: \begin{array}{c} + 0.009 \\ - 0.006 \end{array} {\rm (theor)}~,

1553: \end{eqnarray}

1554: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------

1555: 

1556: \noindent

1557: and with the value of the current world average 

1558: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------

1559: \begin{eqnarray}

1560:  \alpha_s(M_Z^2) = 0.118 \pm 0.002~~\cite{PDG}~.

1561: \end{eqnarray}

1562: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------

1563: The results of the present analysis are consistent within 1$\sigma$

1564: although our result and that of E154~\cite{E154QCD} lead to a 

1565: somewhat lower central value for $\alpha_s(M_Z^2)$. In the scheme--invariant 

1566: analysis, which allows for an alternative view, a minor shift for 

1567: $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}^{(4)\rm \overline{MS}}$ down by $12\;\MeV$ was 

1568: found leading to a central value of $\alpha_s(M_Z^2) = 0.113$ with 

1569: statistical and the renormalization scale dependent errors of the same 

1570: size as quoted above. Still more systematic effects have to be 

1571: investigated in the future. Here we see a main point in studying further 

1572: the unpolarized structure function $F_1(x,Q^2)$, the denominator function

1573: in the expression for the spin asymmetry. In our analysis it was obtained

1574: from parameterizations of $F_2$~\cite{F2NMC} and $R$~\cite{R1990} 

1575: measurements which themselves are subject to systematic uncertainties.

1576: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1577: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1578: \subsection{Scheme-Invariant Analysis}

1579: \label{sec:qcdsi}

1580: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1581: 

1582: \vspace{2mm}

1583: \noindent

1584: A factorization--scheme invariant QCD analysis in next--to--leading

1585: order based on the observables $g_1(x,Q^2)$ and $\partial g_1(x,Q^2) /

1586: \partial t$ for the  proton has been performed, where $t$ is the

1587: evolution variable defined in Eq.~(\ref{eqT}), see section~\ref{sec:si}. 

1588: If compared to the standard analysis these two observables take the roles

1589: of $\Delta \Sigma(x,Q^2)$ and $\Delta G(x,Q^2)$.

1590: Such an analysis has, in principle,  the advantage of direct experimental

1591: control over the input densities since they are {\it measurable} 

1592: quantities.

1593: In this way no ansatz for

1594: $\Delta G$ is necessary and the only free parameter to be determined

1595: is $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$. Unfortunately, the quality of the present data

1596: does not yet allow an experimental

1597: determination of the slope $\partial g_1(x,Q^2) /

1598: \partial t$ accurate enough to be used as input density. In the

1599: present analysis this  slope

1600: has been derived  fitting the world data as described in section~3.

1601: In the singlet analysis the initial distributions are $g_1^S(x,Q^2_0)$

1602: and                                                   

1603: $\partial g_1^S(x,Q^2_0)/\partial t$. The latter quantity is depicted

1604: in Figure~13 as a function of $x$ together with the corresponding

1605: slopes at higher values of $Q^2$.

1606: This slope has a rather involved shape and it requires precise

1607: data in the range of the input scale $Q_0^2$ on $g_1(x,Q^2)$ 

1608: to determine the slope experimentally in the future.

1609: The QCD analysis performed lead to

1610: a downward shift of $12~\MeV$ for

1611: $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$ which yields a similar result

1612: for $\alpha_s(M_Z^2)$ as obtained in the standard analysis, 

1613: see section~ 6.2.

1614: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1615: \section{Moments of Polarized Parton Distributions}

1616: \label{sec:moments}

1617: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1618: 

1619: \vspace{2mm}

1620: \noindent

1621: In recent lattice simulations~[23--25]

1622: %~\cite{QCDSF,SESAM,LHSE}

1623: low moments for the

1624: polarized parton densities $\Delta u_v, \Delta d_v$, and $\Delta u -

1625: \Delta d$ were determined. These moments are 

1626: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1627: \begin{eqnarray}

1628: \langle x^{n+1} \rangle_{\Delta f} = \int_0^1 x^{n+1} \left[\Delta f(x)

1629: + (-1)^{(n+1)} \Delta

1630: \overline{f}(x)\right] dx  = \Mvec[\Delta f(x)](n) 

1631: + (-1)^{(n+1)}

1632: \Mvec[\Delta \overline{f}(x)](n)~,

1633: \end{eqnarray}

1634: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1635: for $n=-1,0,1$.

1636: The results of the simulation are presented at a scale $\mu^2 =1/a^2

1637: \sim 4~\GeV^2$, where $a$ denotes the lattice spacing. The values of

1638: these lattice moments may be compared with the moments being obtained

1639: in the present analysis. Moreover we also present the respective

1640: moments for the sea--quark and gluon distributions and

1641: include their $1\sigma$  error.

1642: Moments of structure functions or parton distributions

1643: based on a data analysis are only constrained in the range of the

1644: respective measurements. No definite statement can be made on the

1645: behavior of the (non-perturbative) parton distributions outside the

1646: range being explored.\footnote{Note that before 1992 the strong growth

1647: of the structure function $F_2(x,Q^2)$, later found even at very low 

1648: scales $Q^2 \sim 2 \GeV^2$, came as a surprise~\cite{DIS92}. Likewise,

1649: at  present  the unpolarized gluon and sea--quark

1650: distributions at large values of $x$ are widely unknown.} Reliably

1651: precise estimates neither for the range of very low~\cite{SX} nor

1652: large $x$ are available currently. Due to this the value and error

1653: of the moments given below is that derived from the current experimental

1654: constraints. Nonetheless we study which contribution of the moments

1655: is determined by the range in which measurements exist.

1656: 

1657: In Table~7 the moments of the NLO parton densities and some of their

1658: combinations, being derived in the present analysis, and their $1\sigma$

1659: errors are given. We also compare to the respective values obtained

1660: integrating only over the kinematic range in which data are measured

1661: and quote the value below and above the kinematic range for the

1662: moments of the NLO parton densities {\tt ISET=3,4}.

1663: The determination of the error of the moments requires in general

1664: a correlated error propagation through the evolution equations, if the

1665: reference scale $Q^2$ is not the input scale $Q_0^2$. As the lattice 

1666: calculations provide measurements for a series of moments at the starting

1667: scale chosen in the present analysis the formulae given in section~5.2.

1668: apply directly. Whereas the estimated uncertainty for the distributions

1669: {\tt ISET = 3,4} for the unmeasured large-$x$ range $x > 0.85$ is small,

1670: it is quite significant for the lowest moment for the small--$x$ range,

1671: $x < 0.02$. For the up--quark distributions and their

1672: combinations the present correlated 1$\sigma$  errors are about 10\%

1673: for the lowest moments, and reach about 30\% for the down quark, and

1674: 25\% for the sea quarks. Depending on the parameterization the

1675: lowest moment of the polarized gluon distribution is found to have an

1676: error of 50\% and more. Towards higher moments the errors grow, but the

1677: small--$x$ uncertainties become less significant. The first three

1678: moments of the distributions $\Delta u_v(x), \Delta d_v(x)$ and

1679: $\Delta u(x) - \Delta d(x)$ can be compared with lattice results~[23--25],

1680: with some caution. Only for a part of these values continuum 

1681: extrapolations were yet performed. Still further study is required

1682: to safely determine and quantify systematic errors.

1683: While for the distribution $\Delta u - \Delta d$ the moment for $n=-1$

1684: comes out to be too small in the lattice measurements, it is somewhat

1685: too large for the moments $n=0,1$. We quote for the lowest

1686: moment an error, which is obtained due to all correlated parameters

1687: in the fit. On the other hand, the central value given is the axial

1688: charge $g_A$, which is much more precisely determined by other 

1689: measurements. It is yet difficult  to see a systematic trend in

1690: the lattice values comparing to the moments found in the present 

1691: analysis. Given the fact, that higher moments are

1692: more difficult to measure the agreement of the first two moments within

1693: the errors determined in the present analysis is quite good.

1694: 

1695: We also compare the first moments in NLO with other recent analyzes, see 

1696: table~8. Although some of the numbers, particularly for the gluon and

1697: sea--quark distributions look different they agree perfectly within

1698: the  1$\sigma$ errors derived in our analysis.

1699: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1700: %       Conclusions

1701: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1702: \section{Conclusions}

1703: \label{sec:conc}

1704: %\input{conclu}

1705: 

1706: \vspace{2mm}

1707: \noindent

1708: We have performed a QCD analysis of the inclusive polarized 

1709: deep--inelastic charged lepton--nucleon scattering world

1710: data to next--to--leading order and derived    parameterizations of

1711: polarized parton distributions at a starting scale $Q_0^2$ together with

1712: the QCD--scale $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$. The  analysis was performed using the

1713: $\chi^2$--method to determine the parameters of the problem in a fit

1714: to the data. 

1715: A new aspect in comparison with previous analyzes is that

1716: we determine also the fully correlated errors of the parton densities and

1717: the QCD scale in leading and next--to--leading order.

1718: Due to the fact that not all shape parameters of the

1719: parton densities can be measured at sufficient accuracy using the

1720: present data, we derived two sets of parameterizations, which mainly 

1721: differ in the low--$x$  behavior of the gluon densities.  Detailed

1722: comparisons were performed to the results obtained in other recent

1723: prameterizations~\cite{AAC, GRSV}. The previous results are widely

1724: compatible with the present parameterizations within the current 

1725: 1$\sigma$ error bands.

1726: Since we used the {\sc Mellin}--method to solve the evolution equations

1727: the Gaussian error propagation of the parameters of the input densities

1728: through the evolution was possible in analytic form.

1729: Both the central values and the 1$\sigma$ errors of the

1730: parton densities are made available in form of a numerical

1731: parameterizations in the kinematic range $x~\epsilon~[10^{-9},1],~~

1732: Q^2~\epsilon~[1,10^6]~\GeV^2$.  These distributions can be used 

1733: in the numerical calculations for polarized high--energy scattering

1734: processes at hadron-- and $ep$--colliders. Moreover, due to the fact

1735: that parameterizations of the errors are available, error estimates

1736: of these quantities are possible w.r.t. the present knowledge of

1737: parton densities. These parameterizations are available as fast

1738: {\tt FORTRAN}--routines which makes their application possible

1739: in Monte Carlo simulations.

1740: 

1741: The current experimental data allow to measure the QCD scale 

1742: $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}$ with a statistical error of $\delta \Lambda = \pm

1743: 60 \MeV$, and $\delta \alpha_s(M_Z^2) \pm 0.004$. 

1744: Since at present only a next-to-leading order analysis

1745: can be carried out the variations in the renormalization and 

1746: factorization scales induce yet large systematic errors. Combining

1747: all errors one obtains for the two scenarios ({\tt ISET = 3,4})

1748: $\alpha_s(M_Z^2) = 0.113 \pm {\footnotesize \begin{array}{c} 0.010\\

1749: 0.008 \end{array}}$ and

1750: $\alpha_s(M_Z^2) = 0.114 \pm {\footnotesize \begin{array}{c} 0.010\\

1751: 0.009 \end{array}}$, respectively. The theoretical error due to the

1752: present renormalization and factorization scale uncertainties can be

1753: further reduced in a three--loop analysis, for which the anomalous

1754: dimensions have still to be calculated.

1755: We also

1756: performed for the first time a factorization scheme--invariant

1757: QCD analysis based on $g_1(x,Q^2)$ and $\partial g_1(x,Q^2)/\partial

1758: \log Q^2$ which lead to a small shift of $12 \MeV$ in $\Lambda_{\rm

1759: QCD}$ only. This novel way of analysis which is based on the scaling

1760: violations of {\it observables} directly may show its full strengths

1761: in later analyzes based on the even higher statistics of future

1762: experiments. In this analysis factorization scale uncertainties do not

1763: occur.

1764: 

1765: The results of the present analysis may be compared to recent lattice

1766: results calculating the first few moments of the distributions

1767: $\Delta u_v(x,Q^2)$, $\Delta d_v(x,Q^2)$, and $\Delta (u_v-d_v)(x,Q^2)$ 

1768: and their respective errors. We also present the respective moments

1769: of $\Delta \overline{q}(x,Q^2)$ and $\Delta G(x,Q^2)$ for which lattice

1770: results do not exist at present. Both on the side of the lattice 

1771: measurements and the extraction of the distribution functions from deep 

1772: inelastic scattering data the errors improved during recent years and the

1773: values became closer. However, more work has yet to be done in the future

1774: on systematic effects and even more precise experimental data would be 

1775: welcome to perform an essential test of QCD also in this field at a 

1776: higher precision than possible at present.

1777: 

1778: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------

1779: 

1780: \vspace{2mm}

1781: \noindent

1782: {\bf Acknowledgment}.~This work was supported in part by EU contract

1783: FMRX-CT98-0194 (DG 12 - MIHT). For discussions in an early phase of this

1784: work we would like to thank Andreas Vogt. For discussions we thank

1785: W.-D. Nowak. We thank Stefano Forte and Giovanni Ridolfi for recalculating 

1786: the first moments from their previous analyzes in the $\overline{\rm MS}$ 

1787: scheme. For discussion on recent lattice results we thank S.~Capitani, 

1788: K.~Jansen, and G.~Schierholz.

1789: 

1790: \vspace{2mm}

1791: \noindent

1792: 

1793: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1794: %Appendix

1795: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1796: \newpage

1797: %\input{app1}

1798: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1799: \section{Appendix: The {\tt FORTRAN}-code for the parton densities and

1800: their errors}

1801: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1802: 

1803: \vspace{2mm}

1804: \noindent

1805: A fast {\tt FORTRAN} program is available to represent the polarized

1806: parton densities $x\Delta u_v(x,Q^2)$, $x\Delta d_v(x,Q^2)$, $x\Delta

1807: G(x,Q^2)$, and $x\Delta \bar{q}(x,Q^2)$ and the polarized structure

1808: functions $xg_1^p(x,Q^2)$ and $xg_1^n(x,Q^2)$ in leading and

1809: next-to-leading order in the $\overline{\rm MS}$--scheme together with

1810: the parameterizations of their $1\sigma$  errors.      The

1811: following ranges in $x$ and $Q^2$ are covered:   

1812: 

1813: \vspace*{-0.15cm}

1814: 

1815: \begin{center}

1816: $10^{-9} < x < 1 \quad , \quad 1~\GeV^2 < Q^2 < 10^6~\GeV^2.$

1817: \end{center} 

1818: 

1819: \vspace*{-0.15cm}

1820: 

1821: \noindent

1822: The polarized distributions are the result of a fit to the world data

1823: on spin asymmetries, i.e. $A_1^{p,n,d}$ or $g_1/F_1^{p,n,d}$, as

1824: described in the paper. 

1825: The {\tt SUBROUTINE PPDF} returns the values of the polarized

1826: distributions, always multiplied with $x$, at a given point in

1827: $x$ and $Q^2$ by interpolating the data on specified grids. The

1828: interpolation in $x$ is done by cubic splines and in $Q^2$ by a

1829: linear interpolation in $\log\,(Q^2)$.~\footnote{We thank S.~Kumano and

1830: M.~Miyama of the AAC--collaboration for allowing us to use their 

1831: interpolation routines.}

1832: 

1833: The parton distributions are evaluated by

1834: \begin{center}

1835: {\tt 

1836: SUBROUTINE PPDF(ISET, X, Q2, UV, DUV, DV, DDV, GL, DGL, SEA, DSEA, G1P,%

1837: DG1P,G1N,DG1N)}

1838: \end{center}

1839: All non-integer variables are of the type {\tt REAL*8}. The calling

1840: routine has to contain the {\tt COMMON/INTINI/ IINI}. Before the first 

1841: call to {\tt SUBROUTINE PPDF} the initialization is set by {\tt IINI = 0}.

1842: The values of the parameter {\tt ISET} are:

1843: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------

1844: \begin{eqnarray}

1845: {\tt ISET = 1} & & {\rm ~~LO},~~~\alpha_G = \alpha_S+0.9 \nonumber\\

1846: {\tt ISET = 2} & & {\rm ~~LO},~~~\alpha_G = \alpha_S+0.6 \nonumber\\

1847: {\tt ISET = 3} & & {\rm NLO},~~~\alpha_G = \alpha_S+1.0 \nonumber\\

1848: {\tt ISET = 4} & & {\rm NLO},~~~\alpha_G = \alpha_S+0.5 \nonumber

1849: \end{eqnarray}

1850: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------

1851: The parameters {\tt X, Q$^2$/GeV$^2$} are $x$ and $Q^2$. The momentum

1852: densities of the polarized up- and down valence quarks, gluons and

1853: the sea quarks are {\tt UV, DV, GL, SEA}, with ${\tt SEA}~=~x\Delta

1854: u_s = x\Delta d_s = x\Delta \overline{u} = x\Delta \overline{d}

1855: = x\Delta s = x\Delta \overline{s}$. Correspondingly, {\tt DUV}

1856: is the $1\sigma$  error of {\tt UV} etc. and {\tt G1P} and {\tt G1N}

1857: are the values of the electromagnetic structure functions $g_1^p$

1858: and $g_1^n$.

1859: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1860: 

1861: \noindent

1862: The program can be received on request via e-mail to 

1863: {\tt Johannes.Bluemlein@desy.de} or {\tt Helmut.Boettcher@desy.de} or

1864: from {\tt http://www-zeuthen.desy.de/$\sim$hboett/ppdf.uu.gz}.

1865: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1866: \newpage

1867: 

1868: 

1869: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1870: %Tables

1871: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1872: \section{Tables}

1873: \label{sec:tab}

1874: 

1875: \vspace*{2mm} \noindent

1876: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1877: %\input{table1}

1878: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1879: %

1880: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.3}

1881: %

1882: %\footnotesize

1883: \normalsize

1884: \begin{center}

1885: \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|r|r|c|}

1886: \hline \hline 

1887: %           &            &            &               &        & \\

1888: Experiment & $x$--range & $Q^2$--range  & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{number

1889: of data points} & Ref. \\ \cline{4-5}

1890:            &            & [$\GeV^2$]     

1891:            & $g_1/F_1$ or $A_1$ & \multicolumn{1}{c|}{$g_1$} & \\

1892: %           &            &            &               &        & \\

1893: \hline \hline

1894: E143(p)       & 0.027 -- 0.749 & 1.17 -- 9.52  &  82 &  28 & 

1895: \cite{E143pd} \\ 

1896: HERMES(p)     & 0.028 -- 0.660 & 1.13 -- 7.46  &  39 &  39 &

1897: \cite{HERMp} \\ 

1898: E155(p)       & 0.015 -- 0.750 & 1.22 -- 34.72 &  24 &  24 &

1899: \cite{E155p} \\ 

1900: SMC(p)        & 0.005 -- 0.480 & 1.30 -- 58.0  &  59 &  12 &

1901: \cite{SMCpd} \\ 

1902: EMC(p)        & 0.015 -- 0.466 & 3.50 -- 29.5  &  10 &  10 &

1903: \cite{EMCp} \\ 

1904: \hline

1905: proton        &                &               & 214 & 113 & \\

1906: \hline \hline

1907: E143(d)       & 0.027 -- 0.749 & 1.17 -- 9.52  &  82 &  28 &

1908: \cite{E143pd} \\ 

1909: %HERMES(d)     & 0.028 -- 0.660 & 1.00 -- 7.55  &  19 &  19 &

1910: %\cite{HERMd} \\

1911: E155(d)       & 0.015 -- 0.750 & 1.22 -- 34.79 &  24 &  24 &

1912: \cite{E155d} \\ 

1913: SMC(d)        & 0.005 -- 0.479 & 1.30 -- 54.8  &  65 &  12 &

1914: \cite{SMCpd} \\ 

1915: \hline

1916: deuteron      &                &               & 171 &  64 & \\

1917: \hline \hline

1918: E142(n)       & 0.035 -- 0.466 & 1.10 -- 5.50  &  30 &   8 &

1919: \cite{E142n} \\ 

1920: %E143(n)       & 0.027 -- 0.749 & 1.17 -- 9.52  &  82 &  28 & \\ 

1921: HERMES(n)     & 0.033 -- 0.464 & 1.22 -- 5.25  &   9 &   9 &

1922: \cite{HERMn} \\ 

1923: E154(n)       & 0.017 -- 0.564 & 1.20 -- 15.0  &  11 &  17 &

1924: \cite{E154n}/\cite{E154QCD} \\ 

1925: %E155(n)       & 0.015 -- 0.750 & 1.22 -- 34.79 &  24 &  & \\ 

1926: %SMC(n)        & 0.005 -- 0.480 & 1.30 -- 48.7  &  12 &  12 & \\ 

1927: \hline

1928: neutron       &                &               &  50 &  34 & \\

1929: \hline \hline

1930: total         &                &               & 435 & 211 & \\  

1931: \hline \hline            

1932: \end{tabular}

1933: \end{center}

1934: \normalsize

1935: 

1936: \vspace{2mm}

1937: \noindent

1938: \begin{center}

1939: {\sf Table~1: Published data points above $Q^2 = 1.0~\GeV^2$.}

1940: \end{center}

1941: %

1942: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1}

1943: %

1944: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1945: \newpage

1946: %\input{table21}

1947: %

1948: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.3}

1949: %

1950: %\footnotesize

1951: \begin{center}

1952: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c||c|c|c|c|}

1953: \hline \hline

1954:            & \multicolumn{4}{c||}{Scenario 1} & 

1955:              \multicolumn{4}{c|}{Scenario 2} \\

1956: \hline

1957:            & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{LO} & \multicolumn{2}{c||}{NLO} & 

1958:              \multicolumn{2}{c|}{LO} & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{NLO} \\

1959:            & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{{\tt ISET=1}} & \multicolumn{2}{c||}

1960:            {{\tt ISET=3}} & 

1961:              \multicolumn{2}{c|}{{\tt ISET=2}} & \multicolumn{2}{c|}

1962:              {{\tt ISET=4}} \\

1963: \cline{2-9} 

1964:            & value & error & value & error & value & error & value & error \\ 

1965: \hline \hline

1966: $\Lambda_{QCD}^{(4)}, \MeV$ & 203 & 120 & 235 & 53 & 195 & 143 & 240 & 60 \\

1967: \hline \hline

1968: $\eta_{u_v}$      &  0.926 & fixed &  0.926 & fixed & 0.926 & fixed &

1969: 0.926 & fixed \\

1970: $a_{u_v}$         &  0.197 & 0.013 &  0.294 & 0.035 & 0.199 & 0.013 &

1971: 0.271 & 0.029 \\

1972: $b_{u_v}$         &  2.403 & 0.107 &  3.167 & 0.212 & 2.416 & 0.107 &

1973: 3.070 & 0.175 \\

1974: $\gamma_{u_v} (*)$ & 21.34 & fixed & 27.22  & fixed & 21.34 & fixed &

1975: 27.22 & fixed \\

1976: \hline \hline

1977: $\eta_{d_v}$      & -0.341 & fixed & -0.341 & fixed & -0.341 & fixed &

1978: -0.341 & fixed  \\

1979: $a_{d_v}$         &  0.190 & 0.049 &  0.254 & 0.111 & 0.182 & 0.046 &

1980: 0.325 & 0.125 \\

1981: $b_{d_v}$         &  3.240 & 0.884 &  3.420 & 1.332 & 3.209 & 0.895 &

1982: 3.925 & 1.129 \\

1983: $\gamma_{d_v} (*)$ & 30.80 & fixed & 19.06  & fixed & 30.80 & fixed &

1984: 19.06 & fixed \\

1985: \hline \hline

1986: $\eta_{sea}$      & -0.353 & 0.054 & -0.447 & 0.082 & -0.314 & 0.053 &

1987: -0.435 & 0.061\\

1988: $a_{sea}$         &  0.367 & 0.048 &  0.424 & 0.062 & 0.428 & 0.055 &

1989: 0.285 & 0.048 \\

1990: $b_{sea} (*)$     &  8.51  & fixed &  8.93  & fixed & 8.51 & fixed &

1991: 8.93 & fixed \\

1992: \hline \hline

1993: $\eta_G$          &  1.281 & 0.816 &  1.026 & 0.554 & 1.043 & 0.938 &

1994: 0.931 & 0.679 \\

1995: \cline{2-9}

1996: $a_{G}$           & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{$a_{sea} + 0.9$} &  

1997:                     \multicolumn{2}{c||}{$a_{sea} + 1.0$}& 

1998:            \multicolumn{2}{c|}{$a_{sea} + 0.6$} &  

1999:                     \multicolumn{2}{c|}{$a_{sea} + 0.5$} \\

2000: \cline{2-9}

2001: $b_{G} (*)$       &  5.91  & fixed &  5.51  & fixed & 5.91 & fixed &

2002: 5.51 & fixed \\

2003: \hline \hline

2004: $\chi^2$ / NDF    & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{1.02}  &

2005:                     \multicolumn{2}{c||}{0.90} & 

2006:                     \multicolumn{2}{c|}{1.04}  &

2007:                     \multicolumn{2}{c||}{0.93} \\

2008: \hline \hline

2009: \end{tabular}

2010: \end{center}

2011: \normalsize

2012: 

2013: \vspace*{2mm}

2014: \noindent

2015: {\sf Table~2: Parameter values in LO and NLO 

2016: ($\overline{\rm MS}$) of the $7+1$

2017: parameter fit based on the world asymmetry data for both

2018: scenarios. The $(*)$ marks those parameters which were fixed 

2019: after the first minimization

2020: since the present data do not constrain these parameters well enough

2021: (see text).   

2022:  }

2023: %

2024: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1}

2025: %

2026: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2027: \newpage

2028: %\input{table3}

2029: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2030: %

2031: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.3}

2032: %

2033: \begin{center}

2034: %

2035: \begin{tabular}{||c||c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c||}

2036: \hline \hline

2037: \multicolumn{9}{||c||}{LO}\\

2038: \hline \hline

2039: %        &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  \\

2040:         & $\Lambda_{QCD}^{(4)}$ & $a_{u_v}$ & $b_{u_v}$ & $a_{d_v}$ & $b_{d_v}$ & $\eta_{sea}$ & $a_{sea}$ & $\eta_G$ \\

2041: %        &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  \\

2042: \hline \hline

2043:  $\Lambda_{QCD}^{(4)}$ &  1.43E-2 &  &  &  &  &  &  &  \\

2044: \hline

2045:  $a_{u_v}$    & -2.05E-5 &  1.80E-4 &  &  &  &  &  &  \\

2046: \hline

2047:  $b_{u_v}$    & -9.07E-5 &  3.91E-4 &  1.15E-2 &  &  &  &  &  \\

2048: \hline

2049:  $a_{d_v}$    &  1.10E-4 &  1.03E-5 & -2.40E-3 &  2.43E-3 &  &  &  &  \\

2050: \hline

2051:  $b_{d_v}$    & -4.65E-5 & -7.92E-3 & -6.86E-3 &  5.48E-3 &  7.82E-01 &  &  &  \\

2052: \hline

2053:  $\eta_{sea}$ &  1.02E-4 & -4.46E-4 & -2.84E-3 &  9.85E-4 &  2.82E-2 &  2.94E-3 &  &  \\

2054: \hline

2055:  $a_{sea}$    & -4.31E-5 &  1.58E-4 &  1.33E-3 & -5.96E-4 & -9.32E-3 & -2.58E-4 &  2.29E-3 &  \\

2056: \hline

2057:  $\eta_G$     & -1.03E-3 &  2.02E-3 &  1.58E-2 & -2.78E-3 & -1.61E-1 & -1.59E-2 &  9.56E-3 &  6.65E-1 \\

2058: \hline

2059: \hline

2060: \end{tabular} 

2061: \end{center}

2062: %

2063: \normalsize

2064: \vspace*{+2mm}

2065: \noindent

2066: {\sf Table~3: The covariance matrix for the $7+1$ parameter LO fit

2067: (scenario 1, {\tt ISET = 1}) based on the world asymmetry data.} 

2068: %

2069: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.0}

2070: %

2071: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2072: 

2073: \vspace*{2cm}

2074: %\input{table4}

2075: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2076: %

2077: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.3}

2078: %

2079: %\footnotesize

2080: \begin{center}

2081: \begin{tabular}{||c||c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c||}

2082: \hline \hline

2083: \multicolumn{9}{||c||}{NLO}\\

2084: \hline \hline 

2085: %        &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  \\

2086:         & $\Lambda_{QCD}^{(4)}$ & $a_{u_v}$ & $b_{u_v}$ & $a_{d_v}$ & $ b_{d_v}$ & $\eta_{sea}$ & $a_{sea}$ & $\eta_G$ \\

2087: %        &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  \\

2088: \hline \hline

2089:  $\Lambda_{QCD}^{(4)}$ &  2.81E-3 &  &  &  &  &  &  & \\

2090: \hline

2091:  $a_{u_v}$    &  2.71E-5 &  1.22E-3 &  &  &  &  &  & \\

2092: \hline

2093:  $b_{u_v}$    & -1.30E-4 &  5.10E-3 &  4.50E-2 &  &  &  &  & \\

2094: \hline

2095:  $a_{d_v}$    & -3.35E-4 & -5.17E-4 & -3.23E-3 &  1.23E-2 &  &  &  & \\

2096: \hline

2097:  $b_{d_v}$    & -6.22E-4 & -1.27E-2 &  4.65E-2 &  8.29E-2 &  1.78E-0 &  &  & \\

2098: \hline

2099:  $\eta_{sea}$ & -5.30E-5 & -2.13E-3 & -1.12E-2 &  5.19E-3 &  4.74E-2 &  6.77E-3 &  & \\

2100: \hline

2101:  $a_{sea}$    & -4.85E-6 &  9.07E-4 &  4.49E-3 & -3.78E-3 & -2.98E-2 & -2.39E-3 &  3.82E-3 & \\

2102: \hline

2103:  $\eta_G$     &  4.03E-4 &  1.41E-2 &  6.71E-2 & -3.07E-2 & -2.22E-1 & -3.78E-2 &  1.90E-2 &  3.07E-1 \\

2104: \hline

2105: \hline

2106: \end{tabular} 

2107: \end{center}

2108: %

2109: \normalsize

2110: \vspace{+2mm}

2111: \noindent

2112: {\sf Table~4: The covariance matrix for the $7+1$ parameter NLO fit

2113: (scenario 1, {\tt ISET = 3}) based on the world asymmetry data.} 

2114: %

2115: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.0}

2116: %

2117: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2118: \newpage

2119: %\input{table51}

2120: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2121: %

2122: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.3}

2123: %

2124: \begin{center}

2125: %

2126: \begin{tabular}{||c||c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c||}

2127: \hline \hline

2128: \multicolumn{9}{||c||}{LO}\\

2129: \hline \hline

2130: %        &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  \\

2131:         & $\Lambda_{QCD}^{(4)}$ & $a_{u_v}$ & $b_{u_v}$ & $a_{d_v}$ & $b_{d_v}$ & $\eta_{sea}$ & $a_{sea}$ & $\eta_G$ \\

2132: %        &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  \\

2133: \hline \hline

2134:  $\Lambda_{QCD}^{(4)}$ &  2.05E-2 &  &  &  &  &  &  &  \\

2135: \hline

2136:  $a_{u_v}$    &  1.25E-4 &  1.76E-4 &  &  &  &  &  &  \\

2137: \hline

2138:  $b_{u_v}$    & -1.37E-3 &  3.42E-4 &  1.15E-2 &  &  &  &  &  \\

2139: \hline

2140:  $a_{d_v}$    & -5.57E-4 &  1.89E-6 & -2.19E-3 &  2.14E-3 &  &  &  &  \\

2141: \hline

2142:  $b_{d_v}$    &  9.62E-3 & -7.84E-3 & -1.29E-3 &  4.74E-3 &  8.00E-01 &  &  &  \\

2143: \hline

2144:  $\eta_{sea}$ &  4.37E-4 & -4.34E-4 & -2.88E-3 &  1.01E-3 &  2.73E-2 &  2.86E-3 &  &  \\

2145: \hline

2146:  $a_{sea}$    & -5.78E-4 &  6.91E-5 &  4.56E-4 & -3.73E-4 & -2.16E-3 &  3.98E-4 &  3.06E-3 &  \\

2147: \hline

2148:  $\eta_G$     &  9.43E-4 &  1.91E-3 &  1.54E-2 & -1.85E-3 & -1.55E-1 & -1.38E-2 &  2.97E-3 &  8.80E-1 \\

2149: \hline

2150: \hline

2151: \end{tabular} 

2152: \end{center}

2153: %

2154: \normalsize

2155: \vspace*{+2mm}

2156: \noindent

2157: {\sf Table~5: The covariance matrix for the $7+1$ parameter LO fit

2158: (scenario 2, {\tt ISET = 2}) based on the world asymmetry data.} 

2159: %

2160: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.0}

2161: %

2162: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2163: 

2164: \vspace*{2cm}

2165: %\input{table61}

2166: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2167: %

2168: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.3}

2169: %

2170: %\footnotesize

2171: \begin{center}

2172: \begin{tabular}{||c||c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c||}

2173: \hline \hline

2174: \multicolumn{9}{||c||}{NLO}\\

2175: \hline \hline 

2176: %        &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  \\

2177:         & $\Lambda_{QCD}^{(4)}$ & $a_{u_v}$ & $b_{u_v}$ & $a_{d_v}$ & $ b_{d_v}$ & $\eta_{sea}$ & $a_{sea}$ & $\eta_G$ \\

2178: %        &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  &  \\

2179: \hline \hline

2180:  $\Lambda_{QCD}^{(4)}$ &  3.55E-3 &  &  &  &  &  &  & \\

2181: \hline

2182:  $a_{u_v}$    &  3.09E-4 &  8.50E-4 &  &  &  &  &  & \\

2183: \hline

2184:  $b_{u_v}$    &  1.08E-3 &  3.88E-3 &  3.06E-2 &  &  &  &  & \\

2185: \hline

2186:  $a_{d_v}$    &  1.88E-3 &  2.66E-4 & -8.80E-4 &  1.56E-2 &  &  &  & \\

2187: \hline

2188:  $b_{d_v}$    &  1.74E-2 & -7.57E-3 & -1.34E-2 &  9.03E-2 &  1.27E-0 &  &  & \\

2189: \hline

2190:  $\eta_{sea}$ &  5.77E-4 & -9.03E-4 & -5.32E-3 &  3.26E-3 &  3.84E-2 &  3.74E-3 &  & \\

2191: \hline

2192:  $a_{sea}$    & -5.33E-4 &  6.81E-4 &  3.68E-3 & -2.28E-3 & -2.56E-2 & -9.06E-4 &  2.34E-3 & \\

2193: \hline

2194:  $\eta_G$     & -8.19E-3 &  1.17E-2 &  5.61E-2 & -3.95E-2 & -3.74E-1 & -2.37E-2 &  1.51E-2 &  4.61E-1 \\

2195: \hline

2196: \hline

2197: \end{tabular} 

2198: \end{center}

2199: %

2200: \normalsize

2201: \vspace{+2mm}

2202: \noindent

2203: {\sf Table~6: The covariance matrix for the $7+1$ parameter NLO fit

2204: (scenario 2, {\tt ISET=4}) based on the world asymmetry data.} 

2205: %

2206: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.0}

2207: %

2208: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2209: \newpage

2210: %\input{momtab}

2211: \small

2212: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2213: %

2214: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.3}

2215: %

2216: \begin{center}

2217: \begin{tabular}{|l|r|r|c|r|c|r|r|}

2218: \hline \hline 

2219: %           &      &       &                &       &                \\

2220: \multicolumn{1}{|l|}{ }&

2221: \multicolumn{1}{c|}{ }&

2222: \multicolumn{2}{c|}{\tt ISET=3 }&

2223: \multicolumn{2}{c|}{\tt ISET=4 } &

2224: \multicolumn{2}{c|}{ lattice results   } \\

2225: \cline{3-8}

2226: \multicolumn{1}{|c|}{%Distribution

2227: }& 

2228: \multicolumn{1}{ c|}{$n$} &

2229: \multicolumn{1}{ c|}{value} &

2230: \multicolumn{1}{ c|}{value out} &

2231: \multicolumn{1}{ c|}{value} &

2232: \multicolumn{1}{ c|}{value out} &

2233: \multicolumn{1}{ c|}{QCDSF    } &

2234: \multicolumn{1}{ c|}{LHPC/    } \\

2235: \multicolumn{1}{|c|}{            }&

2236: \multicolumn{1}{ c|}{   } &

2237: \multicolumn{1}{ c|}{     } &

2238: \multicolumn{1}{ c|}{of range } &

2239: \multicolumn{1}{ c|}{     } &

2240: \multicolumn{1}{ c|}{of range } &

2241: \multicolumn{1}{ c|}{         } &

2242: \multicolumn{1}{ c|}{SESAM    } \\

2243: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2244: \hline\hline

2245: $\Delta u_v$  &--1 & $0.926 \pm 0.071$

2246:                    & {\footnotesize $0.191|4\EM4$}

2247:                    & $0.926 \pm 0.062$

2248:                    & {\footnotesize $0.207|4\EM4$}

2249:                    & 0.889(29)

2250:                    & 0.860(69)

2251: \\

2252: %------

2253:               &  0 & $0.163 \pm 0.014$

2254:                    & {\footnotesize $0.001|3\EM4$}

2255:                    & $0.160 \pm 0.011$

2256:                    & {\footnotesize $0.001|4\EM4$}

2257:                    & 0.198(8)

2258:                    & 0.242(22)

2259: \\

2260: %------

2261:               &  1 & $0.055 \pm 0.006$

2262:                    & {\footnotesize $1\EM5|3\EM4$}

2263:                    & $0.055 \pm 0.005$

2264:                    & {\footnotesize $1\EM5|3\EM4$}

2265:                    & 0.041(9)

2266:                    & 0.116(42)

2267: \\

2268: %------

2269:               &  2 & $0.024 \pm 0.003$

2270:                    & {\footnotesize $0|3\EM4$}

2271:                    & $0.024 \pm 0.003$

2272:                    & {\footnotesize $0|3\EM4$}

2273:                    &

2274:                    &

2275: \\

2276: %------

2277: \hline

2278: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2279: $\Delta d_v$  &--1 & $-0.341 \pm 0.123$

2280:                    & {\footnotesize $-0.104|$-$7\EM5$}

2281:                    & $-0.341 \pm 0.103$

2282:                    & {\footnotesize $-0.086|$-$3\EM5$}

2283:                    & -0.236(27)

2284:                    & -0.171(43)

2285: \\

2286: %------

2287:               &  0 & $-0.047 \pm 0.021$

2288:                    & {\footnotesize $-5\EM4|$-$6\EM5$}

2289:                    & $-0.049 \pm 0.017$

2290:                    & {\footnotesize $-5\EM4|$-$3\EM5$}

2291:                    & -0.048(3)

2292:                    & -0.029(13)

2293: \\

2294: %------

2295:               &  1 & $-0.015 \pm 0.009$

2296:                    & {\footnotesize $-1\EM5|$-$5\EM5$}

2297:                    & $-0.015 \pm 0.007$

2298:                    & {\footnotesize $-1\EM5|$-$2\EM5$}

2299:                    & -0.028(2)

2300:                    &  0.001(25)

2301: \\

2302: %------

2303:               &  2 & $-0.006 \pm 0.005$

2304:                    & {\footnotesize $0|$-$5\EM5$}

2305:                    & $-0.006 \pm 0.004$

2306:                    & {\footnotesize $0|$-$2\EM5$}

2307:                    &

2308:                    &

2309: \\

2310: %------

2311: \hline

2312: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2313: $\Delta u$--$\Delta d$

2314:               &--1 & $1.267  \pm 0.142$

2315:                    & {\footnotesize  $0.295|5\EM4$}

2316:                    & $1.267  \pm 0.121$

2317:                    & {\footnotesize  $0.293|5\EM4$}

2318:                    &  1.14(3)

2319:                    &  1.031(81)

2320: \\

2321: %------

2322:               &  0 & $0.210  \pm 0.025$

2323:                    & {\footnotesize  $0.001|4\EM4$}

2324:                    & $0.209 \pm 0.021$

2325:                    & {\footnotesize  $0.001|4\EM4$}

2326:                    &  0.246(9)

2327:                    &  0.271(25)

2328: \\

2329: %------

2330:               &  1 & $0.070 \pm 0.011 $

2331:                    & {\footnotesize $2\EM5|4\EM4$}

2332:                    & $0.069  \pm 0.009$

2333:                    & {\footnotesize $2\EM5|4\EM4$}

2334:                    &  0.069(9)

2335:                    &  0.115(49)

2336: \\

2337: %------

2338:               &  2 & $0.030 \pm 0.006 $

2339:                    & {\footnotesize $0|3\EM4$}

2340:                    & $0.030  \pm 0.004$

2341:                    & {\footnotesize $0|3\EM4$}

2342:                    &

2343:                    &

2344: \\

2345: %------

2346: \hline

2347: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2348: $\Delta u$

2349:               &--1 & $0.851  \pm 0.075$

2350:                    & {\footnotesize  $0.152|4\EM4$}

2351:                    & $0.854  \pm 0.066$

2352:                    & {\footnotesize  $0.158|4\EM4$}

2353:                    &

2354:                    &

2355: \\

2356: %------

2357:               &  0 & $0.160  \pm 0.014$

2358:                    & {\footnotesize  $8\EM4|3\EM4$}

2359:                    & $0.158 \pm 0.012$

2360:                    & {\footnotesize  $8\EM4|4\EM4$}

2361:                    &

2362:                    &

2363: \\

2364: %------

2365:               &  1 & $0.055 \pm 0.006 $

2366:                    & {\footnotesize $1\EM5|3\EM4$}

2367:                    & $0.055  \pm 0.005$

2368:                    & {\footnotesize $1\EM5|3\EM4$}

2369:                    &

2370:                    &

2371: \\

2372: %------

2373:               &  2 & $0.024 \pm 0.003 $

2374:                    & {\footnotesize $0|3\EM4$}

2375:                    & $0.024  \pm 0.003$

2376:                    & {\footnotesize $0|3\EM4$}

2377:                    &

2378:                    &

2379: \\

2380: %------

2381: \hline

2382: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2383: $\Delta d$

2384:               &--1 & $-0.415 \pm 0.124$

2385:                    & {\footnotesize  -$0.144|$-$7\EM5$}  

2386:                    & $-0.413  \pm 0.104$

2387:                    & {\footnotesize -$0.135|$-$3\EM5$}

2388:                    &

2389:                    &

2390: \\

2391: %------

2392:               &  0 & $-0.050  \pm 0.022$

2393:                    & {\footnotesize -$7\EM4|$-$6\EM5$}

2394:                    & $-0.051 \pm 0.017$

2395:                    & {\footnotesize -$7\EM4|$-$3\EM5$}

2396:                    &

2397:                    &

2398: \\

2399: %------

2400:               &  1 & $-0.015 \pm 0.009 $

2401:                    & {\footnotesize -$1\EM5|$-$5\EM5$}

2402:                    & $-0.015  \pm 0.007$

2403:                    & {\footnotesize -$1\EM5|$-$2\EM5$}

2404:                    &

2405:                    &

2406: \\

2407: %------

2408:               &  2 & $-0.006 \pm 0.005 $

2409:                    & {\footnotesize $0|$-$5\EM5$}

2410:                    & $-0.006  \pm 0.004$

2411:                    & {\footnotesize $0|$-$2\EM5$}

2412:                    &

2413:                    &

2414: \\

2415: \hline

2416: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2417: $\Delta \overline{q}$

2418:               &--1 & $-0.074 \pm 0.017$

2419:                    & {\footnotesize -$0.04|0$}

2420:                    & $-0.072 \pm 0.015$

2421:                    & {\footnotesize -$0.048|0$}

2422:                    &

2423:                    &

2424: \\

2425: %------

2426:               &  0 & $-0.003 \pm 0.001$

2427:                    & {\footnotesize -$2\EM4|0$}

2428:                    & $-0.002 \pm 5\EM4$

2429:                    & {\footnotesize -$2\EM4|0$}

2430:                    &

2431:                    &

2432: \\

2433: %------

2434:               &  1 & $-4\EM4 \pm 1\EM4$

2435:                    & {\footnotesize $0|0$}

2436:                    & $-2\EM4 \pm 6\EM5$

2437:                    & {\footnotesize $0|0$}

2438:                    &

2439:                    &

2440: \\

2441: %------

2442:               &  2 & $-8\EM5 \pm 2\EM5$

2443:                    & {\footnotesize $0|0$}

2444:                    & $-4\EM5 \pm 1\EM5$

2445:                    & {\footnotesize $0|0$}

2446:                    &

2447:                    &

2448: \\

2449: %------

2450: \hline

2451: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2452: $\Delta G$  &--1 & $ 1.026 \pm 0.549$

2453:                    & {\footnotesize $0.04|1\EM5$}

2454:                    & $0.931 \pm 0.669$

2455:                    & {\footnotesize $0.191|0$}

2456:                    &

2457:                    &

2458: \\

2459: %------

2460:               &  0 & $0.184 \pm 0.103$

2461:                    & {\footnotesize $5\EM4|1\EM5$}

2462:                    & $0.100 \pm 0.075$

2463:                    & {\footnotesize $0.002|0$}

2464:                    &

2465:                    &

2466: \\

2467: %------

2468:               &  1 & $0.050 \pm 0.028$

2469:                    & {\footnotesize $1\EM5|1\EM5$}

2470:                    & $0.022 \pm 0.017$

2471:                    & {\footnotesize $2\EM5|0$}

2472:                    &

2473:                    &

2474: \\

2475: %------

2476:               &  2 & $0.017 \pm 0.010$

2477:                    & {\footnotesize $0|1\EM5$}

2478:                    & $0.006 \pm 0.005$

2479:                    & {\footnotesize $0|0$}

2480:                    &

2481:                    &

2482: \\

2483: %------

2484: \hline

2485: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2486: \hline

2487: \end{tabular}

2488: \end{center}

2489: \normalsize

2490: 

2491: \vspace{2mm}

2492: \noindent

2493: {\sf Table~7: Moments of the NLO parton densities and their

2494: combinations for the parameterizations {\tt ISET=3,4} at $Q^2 =

2495: 4~\GeV^2$. The value

2496: of the respective moment integrating only outside the $x$--range in which

2497: currently deep--inelastic scattering data are measured, $0.02 < x < 0.85$,

2498: are given for comparison (lower$|$upper~part). The errors are the 

2499: $1\sigma$ correlated errors derived

2500: in the present analysis form the polarization asymmetry world data.

2501: The values of corresponding lattice measurements, cf.~\cite{LHSE}, 

2502: are shown for comparison. For $n=0,1$ for the values of the QCDSF

2503: collaboration no continuum extrapolation was performed.}

2504: %

2505: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1}

2506: %

2507: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2508: %\input{table7}

2509: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.3}

2510: %

2511: \begin{center}

2512: \begin{tabular}{|l|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|}

2513: \hline \hline 

2514: %           &      &       &                &       &                \\

2515: \multicolumn{1}{|c|}{Distribution}&

2516: \multicolumn{1}{ c|}{{\tt ISET=3}}&

2517: \multicolumn{1}{ c|}{{\tt ISET=4}}&

2518: \multicolumn{1}{ c|}{ABFR~\cite{ABFR}}&

2519: \multicolumn{1}{ c|}{GRSV~\cite{GRSV}}&

2520: \multicolumn{1}{ c|}{AAC~\cite{AAC}}\\

2521: \hline\hline

2522: $\Delta u_v$  & $0.926 \pm 0.071$

2523:               & $0.926 \pm 0.062$

2524: &                & 0.9206      & 0.9278      \\

2525: $\Delta d_v$  &    

2526: $-0.341 \pm 0.123$

2527: &$-0.341 \pm 0.103$

2528: &                & --0.3409      & --0.3416

2529: \\

2530: $\Delta u                      $

2531: & $0.851 \pm 0.075$

2532: & $0.854 \pm 0.066$

2533: & $\eta_u =~~0.692$  &  0.8593      &   0.8399   \\

2534: $\Delta d                      $

2535: & $-0.415 \pm 0.124$

2536: & $-0.413 \pm 0.104$

2537: & $\eta_d= -0.418$               & --0.4043      & --0.4295   \\

2538: $\Delta \overline{q}$

2539: &       $-0.074  \pm 0.017$ &   $-0.072 \pm 0.015$

2540: & 

2541: &--0.0625 &--0.0879    \\

2542: $\Delta G  $  & $1.026  \pm 0.549$

2543: &       $0.931 \pm 0.669$

2544: &     $1.262$    & 0.6828    &  0.8076      \\

2545: \hline\hline

2546: \end{tabular}

2547: \end{center}

2548: \normalsize

2549: 

2550: \vspace{2mm}

2551: \noindent

2552: {\sf Table~8: Comparison of the first moments of the polarized parton

2553: densities in NLO in the $\overline{\rm MS}$ scheme

2554: at $Q^2= 4\GeV^2$ for different sets of recent parton

2555: parameterizations. For the ABFR-analysis~\cite{ABFR} the values

2556: $\eta_{u,d}$ are the first moments of $\Delta u + \Delta \overline{u}$

2557: and

2558: $\Delta d + \Delta \overline{d}$, respectively, and

2559: $\Delta s + \Delta \overline{s} = -0.081$.

2560: }

2561: %

2562: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1}

2563: %

2564: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2565: 

2566: \newpage

2567: 

2568: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2569: %Figures

2570: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2571: \section{Figures}

2572: \label{sec:fig}

2573: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2574: %\input{fig1}

2575: %\input{fig1a}

2576: %\input{fig2}

2577: %\input{fig2a}

2578: %\input{figII}

2579: \begin{figure}[htb]

2580: \begin{center}

2581: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=14.0cm]{pdf_comp_A1_lo_8pN.eps} 

2582: \end{center}

2583: \caption{\label{dqlo}

2584: LO polarized parton distributions at the input scale $Q_0^2 = 4.0~\GeV^2$,

2585: {\tt ISET = 1},

2586: (solid line) compared to results obtained by GRSV (dashed--dotted

2587: line) \cite{GRSV} and AAC (dashed line) \cite{AAC}. The shaded areas

2588: represent the fully correlated $1\sigma$ error bands calculated by 

2589: Gaussian error propagation. The dark

2590: dotted lines indicate the positivity bounds

2591: choosing the distributions \cite{GRV} for reference.

2592: }

2593: \end{figure}

2594: %--------------------------------------

2595: \newpage

2596: %--------------------------------------

2597: \begin{figure}[tbp]

2598: \begin{center}

2599: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=14.0cm]{pdf_comp_A1_lo_8pS1.eps}

2600: \end{center}

2601: \caption[xx]{\label{dqloB}

2602: LO polarized parton distributions at the input scale $Q_0^2 = 4.0~\GeV^2$,

2603: {\tt ISET=2},

2604: (solid line) compared to results obtained by GRSV (dashed--dotted

2605: line) \cite{GRSV} and AAC (dashed line) \cite{AAC}. The shaded areas

2606: represent the fully correlated $1\sigma$ error bands calculated by 

2607: Gaussian error propagation. The dark

2608: dotted lines correspond to the positivity

2609: bounds according to the parameterization~\cite{GRV}. }

2610: \end{figure}

2611: %--------------------------------------

2612: \newpage

2613: %--------------------------------------

2614: \begin{figure}[htb]

2615: \begin{center}

2616: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=14.0cm]{pdf_comp_A1_nlo_8pN.eps}

2617: \end{center}

2618: \caption{\label{dqnlo}

2619: NLO polarized parton distributions at the input scale 

2620: $Q_0^2 = 4.0~\GeV^2$, {\tt ISET=3},

2621: (solid line) compared to results obtained by GRSV (dashed--dotted

2622: line) \cite{GRSV} and AAC (dashed line) \cite{AAC}. The shaded areas

2623: represent the fully correlated $1\sigma$ error bands calculated by 

2624: Gaussian error propagation. The dark

2625: dotted lines correspond to the positivity

2626: bounds choosing \cite{GRV} for reference.}

2627: \end{figure}

2628: %--------------------------------------

2629: \newpage

2630: %--------------------------------------

2631: \begin{figure}[htb]

2632: \begin{center}

2633: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=14.0cm]{pdf_comp_A1_nlo_8pS1.eps}

2634: \end{center}

2635: \caption{\label{dqnloB}

2636: NLO polarized parton distributions at the input scale 

2637: $Q_0^2 = 4.0~\GeV^2$, {\tt ISET=4},

2638: (solid line) compared to results obtained by GRSV (dashed--dotted

2639: line) \cite{GRSV} and AAC (dashed line) \cite{AAC}. The shaded areas

2640: represent the fully correlated $1\sigma$ error bands calculated by 

2641: Gaussian error propagation. The dark

2642: dotted lines indicate the positivity

2643: bound if reference is taken to the distributions \cite{GRV}.}

2644: \end{figure}

2645: %--------------------------------------

2646: \newpage

2647: %--------------------------------------

2648: \begin{figure}[htb]

2649: \begin{center}

2650: %\includegraphics[angle=0, width=14.0cm]{gluon_5_A1_nlo_8p.eps}

2651: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=14.0cm]{figII.eps}

2652: \end{center}

2653: \caption{\label{dqnloA}

2654: NLO polarized momentum  distribution for the gluon  at the input scale 

2655: $Q_0^2 = 5.0~\GeV^2$

2656: for {\tt ISET=3} (BB1, dashed line) and {\tt ISET =4} 

2657: (BB2, dash-dotted line)  with 1$\sigma$ error bands shown (shaded

2658: areas). The solid line corresponds to the unpolarized distribution

2659: \cite{GRV}. To the latter we added the experimental error of the

2660: unpolarized gluon distribution as determined in the H1 

2661: experiment~\cite{H1} (hatched area), see also [48]. 

2662: }

2663: \end{figure}

2664: %--------------------------------------

2665: \newpage

2666: %--------------------------------------

2667: \begin{figure}[htb]

2668: \begin{center}

2669: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=14.0cm]{g1p_spec_fromA1_nlo_A1_8pN.eps}

2670: \end{center}

2671: \caption{\label{xg1p}

2672: The structure function $xg_1^p$ measured in the interval $3.0~\GeV^2 <

2673: Q^2 < 5.0~\GeV^2$ as function of $x$. The structure function

2674: $g_1^p(x,Q^2)$ has been derived from the

2675: world asymmetry data. The error bars shown are the statistical errors

2676: only.

2677: The distribution is well 

2678: described by our QCD NLO curve {\tt ISET=3}

2679: (solid line) at $Q^2 = 4.0~\GeV^2$ and

2680: its fully correlated $1\sigma$ error band calculated by Gaussian error

2681: propagation (shaded area). Also shown are the QCD NLO

2682: curves at the same value of $Q^2$  obtained by AAC (dotted line) 

2683: \cite{AAC} and  GRSV (dashed line) \cite{GRSV} for comparison.}

2684: \end{figure}

2685: %--------------------------------------

2686: \newpage

2687: %--------------------------------------

2688: \begin{figure}[htb]

2689: \begin{center}

2690: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=14.0cm]{g1pvsq2_nlo_A1_JBL_ERR_8pN.eps}

2691: \end{center}

2692: \caption{\label{g1pvsq2}

2693: The polarized structure function $g_1^p$ as function of $Q^2$ in

2694: intervals of $x$. The error bars shown are the statistical and

2695: systematic uncertainties added in quadrature. The data are well

2696: described by our QCD NLO curves (solid lines), {\tt ISET=3},

2697: and its fully correlated

2698: $1\sigma$ error bands calculated by Gaussian error propagation (shaded

2699: area). The values of $C(x)$ are given in parentheses.

2700: Also shown  are the QCD NLO curves obtained by

2701: AAC (dashed lines) \cite{AAC} and GRSV (dashed--dotted lines) 

2702: \cite{GRSV} for comparison.}

2703: \end{figure}

2704: %--------------------------------------

2705: \newpage

2706: %--------------------------------------

2707: \begin{figure}[htb]

2708: \begin{center}

2709: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=14.0cm]{pdf_evol_A1_nlo_uv_8pN.eps}

2710: \end{center}

2711: \caption{\label{evol_uv}

2712: The polarized parton distribution $x\Delta u_v$, {\tt ISET=3},

2713: evolved up to values of

2714: $Q^2 = 10,000~\GeV^2$ (solid lines) compared to results

2715: obtained by GRSV (dashed--dotted lines) \cite{GRSV} and AAC (dashed

2716: lines) \cite{AAC}. The shaded areas represent the fully correlated

2717: $1\sigma$ error bands from our analysis calculated by Gaussian error

2718: propagation.}

2719: \end{figure}

2720: %--------------------------------------

2721: \newpage

2722: %--------------------------------------

2723: \begin{figure}[htb]

2724: \begin{center}

2725: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=14.0cm]{pdf_evol_A1_nlo_dv_8pN.eps}

2726: \end{center}

2727: \caption{\label{evol_dv}

2728: The polarized parton distribution $x\Delta d_v$, {\tt ISET = 3},

2729: evolved up to

2730: values of $Q^2 = 10,000~\GeV^2$ (solid lines) compared to results

2731: obtained by GRSV (dashed--dotted lines) \cite{GRSV} and AAC (dashed

2732: lines) \cite{AAC}. The shaded areas represent the fully correlated

2733: $1\sigma$ error bands from our analysis calculated by Gaussian error

2734: propagation.}

2735: \end{figure}

2736: %--------------------------------------

2737: \newpage

2738: %--------------------------------------

2739: \begin{figure}[htb]

2740: \begin{center}

2741: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=14.0cm]{pdf_evol_A1_nlo_gl_8pN.eps}

2742: \end{center}

2743: \caption{\label{evol_gl}

2744: The polarized parton distribution $x\Delta G$, {\tt ISET = 3},

2745: evolved up to 

2746: values of $Q^2 = 10,000~\GeV^2$ (solid lines) compared to results

2747: obtained by GRSV (dashed--dotted lines) \cite{GRSV} and AAC (dashed

2748: lines) \cite{AAC}. The shaded areas represent the fully correlated

2749: $1\sigma$ error bands from our analysis calculated by Gaussian error

2750: propagation.}

2751: \end{figure}

2752: %--------------------------------------

2753: \newpage

2754: %--------------------------------------

2755: \begin{figure}[htb]

2756: \begin{center}

2757: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=14.0cm]{pdf_evol_A1_nlo_qb_8pN.eps}

2758: \end{center}

2759: \caption{\label{evol_qb}

2760: The polarized parton distribution $x\Delta {\bar q}$, {\tt ISET =3},

2761: evolved up to 

2762: values of $Q^2 = 10,000~\GeV^2$ (solid lines) compared to results

2763: obtained by GRSV (dashed--dotted lines) \cite{GRSV} and AAC (dashed

2764: lines) \cite{AAC}. The shaded areas represent the fully correlated

2765: $1\sigma$ error bands from our analysis calculated by Gaussian error

2766: propagation.}

2767: \end{figure}

2768: %--------------------------------------

2769: \newpage

2770: %--------------------------------------

2771: \begin{figure}[tbp]

2772: \begin{center}

2773: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=14.0cm]{g1pvsq2_nlo_A1_JBLHT_ERR_8pS1.eps}

2774: \end{center}

2775: \caption[xx]{Model fit to potential power corrections in $g_1(x,Q^2)$

2776: as extracted from the world polarization asymmetry data in the present

2777: analysis (see text). Dashed line: model I, Eq.~(\ref{eqHT1}); 

2778: dotted line: model II, Eq.~(\ref{eqHT2}). 

2779: The full lines correspond to the parameterization

2780: ({\tt ISET=4}) in the present analysis, to which the corresponding

2781: power correction model induces a perturbation. The shaded area 

2782: corresponds to the $1\sigma$ correlated error.}

2783: \end{figure}

2784: %--------------------------------------

2785: \newpage

2786: %--------------------------------------

2787: \begin{figure}[htb]

2788: \begin{center}

2789: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=14.0cm]{g1pdg1s_A1_dg1s.eps}

2790: \end{center}

2791: \caption{\label{dg1dt} The evolution of $\partial xg_1^S(x,Q^2) /

2792: \partial t$, the slope of the polarized structure function

2793: $xg_1^p(x,Q^2)$ of the proton (singlet contribution) with respect to 

2794: $t = -2 / \beta_0 \ln(\alpha_s(Q^2) / \alpha_s(Q_0^2))$ \cite{DLY}. The

2795: slope was determined from a fit to  $g_1^p(x,Q^2)$, see text.}

2796: \end{figure}

2797: %\input{fig3}

2798: %\input{fig4}

2799: %\input{fig5}

2800: %\input{fig6}

2801: %\input{fig7}

2802: %\input{fig8}

2803: %\input{fig10a}

2804: %\input{fig9}

2805: \newpage

2806: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2807: %Bibliography

2808: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2809: %\input{biblio}

2810: \clearpage

2811: \portrait

2812: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

2813: %

2814: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

2815: %

2816: %[1]

2817: \bibitem{SPLIT}

2818: R. Mertig and W.L. van Neerven, Z. Phys. {\bf C70} (1996) 637,\\

2819: W. Vogelsang, Phys. Rev. {\bf D54} (1996) 2023.

2820: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2821: %

2822: %[2]

2823: \bibitem{FP}

2824: see e.g.~:

2825: W.~Furmanski and R.~Petronzio, Z. Phys. {\bf C11} (1982) 293 and 

2826: references therein.

2827: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2828: %

2829: %[3]

2830: \bibitem{COEF}

2831: W.L. van Neerven and E.B. Zijlstra, 

2832: Nucl.Phys. {\bf B417} (1994) 61, E: {\bf B426} (1994) 245.

2833: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2834: %

2835: %[4]

2836: \bibitem{EMCp}

2837: J.~Ashman et al., EMC collaboration, Phys. Lett. {\bf B206} (1988) 364;

2838: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B328} (1989) 1.

2839: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2840: %

2841: %[5]

2842: \bibitem{E142n}

2843: P.L.~Anthony et al., E142, Phys. Rev. {\bf D54} (1996) 6620.

2844: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2845: %

2846: %[6]

2847: \bibitem{HERMn}

2848: K.~Ackerstaff et al., HERMES collaboration, Phys. Lett. {\bf B404} (1997)

2849:  383.

2850: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2851: %

2852: %[7]

2853: \bibitem{E154n}

2854: K.~Abe et  al., E154, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 79} (1997) 26.

2855: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2856: %

2857: %[8]

2858: \bibitem{SMCpd}

2859: B.~Adeva et al., SMC collaboration, Phys. Rev. {\bf D58} (1998) 112001.

2860: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2861: %

2862: %[9]

2863: \bibitem{E143pd}

2864: K.~Abe et al., E143, Phys. Rev. {\bf D58} (1998) 120003.

2865: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2866: %

2867: %[10]

2868: \bibitem{HERMp}

2869: A.~Airapetian et al., HERMES collaboration, Phys. Lett. {\bf B442} (1998)

2870:  484; \\

2871: D.~Hasch, PhD thesis, Humboldt-Univ. Berlin, (1999) and 

2872: DESY-THESIS-2000-032.

2873: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2874: %

2875: %[11]

2876: \bibitem{E155d}

2877: P.L.~Anthony et al., E155, Phys. Lett. {\bf B463} (1999) 339.

2878: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2879: %

2880: %[12]

2881: \bibitem{E155p}

2882: P.L.~Anthony et al., E155, Phys. Lett. {\bf B493} (2000) 19.

2883: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2884: %

2885: %[13]

2886: \bibitem{E80130}

2887: M.J.~Alguard et al., E80, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 37} (1976) 1261. \\

2888: G.~Baum et al., E130, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 51} (1983) 1135.

2889: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2890: %

2891: %[14]

2892: \bibitem{ABFR}

2893: G.~Altarelli et al., Nucl. Phys. {\bf B496} (1997) 337; Acta Phys. Pol.

2894: {\bf B29} (1998) 1145;\\

2895: S. Forte, M. Mangano, and G. Ridolfi, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B602} (2001) 585.

2896: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2897: %

2898: %[15]

2899: \bibitem{AAC}

2900: Y.~Goto et al., AAC collaboration, Phys. Rev. {\bf D62} (2000) 034017.

2901: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2902: %

2903: %[16]

2904: \bibitem{GRSV}

2905: M.~Gl\"uck et al., Phys. Rev.. {\bf D63} (2001) 094005.

2906: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2907: %

2908: %[17]

2909: \bibitem{LEAD}

2910: E. Leader, A. Sidorov, and D. Stamenov, {\tt hep-ph/0111267}.

2911: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2912: %

2913: %[18]

2914: \bibitem{OLDER}

2915: H.-Y. Cheng and S.-N. Lai, Phys. Rev. {\bf D41} (1990) 91;\\

2916: S. Gupta, J. Pasupathy, and J. Szwed, Z. Phys. {\bf C46} (1990) 111; \\

2917: M. Gl\"uck, E. Reya, and W. Vogelsang, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B329} (1990) 347;

2918: \\

2919: P. Chiappetta and G. Nardulli, Z. Phys. {\bf C51} (1991) 435;\\

2920: K. Sridhar and E. Leader, Phys. Lett. {\bf B295} (1992) 283;\\

2921: H.-Y. Cheng and C. F. Wai, Phys. Rev. {\bf D46} (1992) 125;\\

2922: D. de Florian et al., Phys. Lett. {\bf B319} (1993) 285;

2923: Phys. Rev. {\bf D51} (1995) 37;\\

2924: P. Chiappetta et al., Z. Phys. {\bf C59} (1993) 629;\\

2925: P. Nadolsky, Z. Phys. {\bf C63} (1994) 601;\\

2926: S.J. Brodsky, M. Burkhardt, and I. Schmidt, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B441}

2927: (1995) 197;\\

2928: C. Bourrely and J. Soffer, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B445} (1995) 341; Phys. Rev.

2929: {\bf D51} (1995) 2108;\\

2930: F. Buccella and J. Soffer, Mod. Phys. Lett. {\bf A8} (1993) 225;

2931: Europhys. Lett. {\bf 24} (1993) 165;\\

2932: Phys. Rev. {\bf D48} (1993) 5456;\\

2933: C. Bourrely et al., Z. Phys. {\bf C62} (1994) 431;\\

2934: F. Buccella et al., Z. Phys. {\bf C38} (1995) 631; Nuovo Cim.

2935: {\bf A109} (1996) 159;\\

2936: G. Ladinsky, {\sf A collection of polarized partyon densities}, in:

2937: ~Proc. Workshop on the Prospects of Spin Physics at HERA, DESY 95--200,

2938: Eds.~J. Bl\"umlein and W.-D. Nowak, pp.~285; {\tt hep-ph/9601287};

2939: \\

2940: J. Bl\"umlein, ibid. pp. 179, {\tt hep-ph/9508387};\\

2941: H.-Y. Cheng, H. H. Liu, and C.-Y. Wu, Phys. Rev. {\bf D53}

2942: (1996) 2380;\\

2943: T. Gehrmann and W.J. Stirling, Z. Phys. {\bf C75} (1995) 461;

2944: Phys. Rev. {\bf D53} (1996) 6100;\\

2945: R. Ball, S. Forte, and G. Ridolfi, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B444} (1995) 287;

2946: Phys. Lett. {\bf B378} (1996) 255;\\

2947: M. Gl\"uck et al., Phys. Rev. {\bf D53} (1996) 4775;\\

2948: D. de Florian, O. Sampayo, and R. Sassot, Phys. Rev. {\bf D57} (1998) 

2949: 5803;\\

2950: L.E. Gordon, M. Goshtasbpour, and G.P. Ramsey, Phys. Rev. {\bf D58}

2951: (1998) 094017;\\

2952: D. Ghosh, S. Gupta, D. Indumathi, Phys. Rev. {\bf D62} (2000) 094012.

2953: C. Bourrely, J. Soffer, and  F. Buccella, {\tt hep-ph/0109160}, Eur. Phys.

2954: J. {\bf C} in print.

2955: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2956: %

2957: %[10]

2958: \bibitem{GR}

2959: M. Gl\"uck and E. Reya, {\tt hep-ph/0203063}; \\

2960: HERMES collaboration, in preparation.

2961: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2962: %

2963: %[20]

2964: \bibitem{SX}

2965: J. Bl\"umlein and A. Vogt, Phys. Lett.~{\bf B381} (1996) 296; 

2966: {\bf B386} (1996) 350; Acta Phys. Pol. {\bf B28} (1997) 577; \\

2967: J. Bartels, B. Ermolaev, and M. Ryskin, Z. Phys. {\bf C72} (1996) 627; \\

2968: Y. Kiyo, J. Kodaira, and H. Tochimura, Z. Phys. {\bf C74} (1997) 631;\\

2969: J. Bl\"umlein and A. Vogt,

2970: Phys. Rev. 

2971: {\bf D57} (1998) R1;\\

2972: J. Bl\"umlein and W.L. van Neerven, Phys. Lett. {\bf B450} (1999) 412;

2973: \\

2974: J. Bl\"umlein, V. Ravindran, W.L. van Neerven, and A. Vogt, 

2975: {\tt hep-ph/9806368}, in: Proceedings of DIS98, Brussels, eds. Gh.

2976: Coremans and R. Rosen, (World Scientific, Singapore, 1998), pp.~216;\\

2977: J. Bl\"umlein, in: Proc. Ringberg Workshop:~{\sf New Trends in HERA

2978: Physics}, Lecture Notes in Physics {\bf Vol. 546} (Springer, Berlin,

2979: 2000), pp.~42, {\tt hep-ph/9909449}.

2980: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2981: %

2982: %[21]

2983: \bibitem{BV1}

2984: J. Bl\"umlein and A. Vogt, Phys. Rev. {\bf D58} (1998) 014020.

2985: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2986: %

2987: %[22A]

2988: \bibitem{ALTA}

2989: G. Altarelli and G. Ross, Phys. Lett.

2990: {\bf B212   } (1988) 391;\\

2991: G. Altarelli and B. Lampe,  Z. Phys.

2992: {\bf C47    } (1990) 315;\\

2993: A. Efremov, and O.Teryaev, Dubna preprint E2-88-287;\\

2994: R.D. Carlitz, J.C. Collins and A.H. Mueller, Phys. Lett.

2995: {\bf B214   } (1988) 229.

2996: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

2997: %

2998: %[22]

2999: \bibitem{DLY}

3000: J. Bl\"umlein, V. Ravindran, and W.L. van Neerven, Nucl. Phys. 

3001: {\bf B586} (2000) 349; Acta Phys. Pol. {\bf B29} (1998) 2581;

3002: {\tt hep-ph/0101235}.

3003: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

3004: %

3005: %[23]

3006: \bibitem{QCDSF}

3007: M. G\"ockeler et al., QCDSF collaboration, Phys. Rev. {\bf D53} (1996)

3008: 2317; Phys. Lett. {\bf B414} (1997) 340; {\tt hep-ph/9711245};

3009: Phys. Rev. {\bf D63} (2001) 074506;\\

3010: S. Capitani et al., Nucl. Phys. (Proc. Suppl.) {\bf B79} (1999) 548.

3011: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

3012: %

3013: %[24]

3014: \bibitem{SESAM}

3015: S. G\"usken et al., SESAM  collaboration, {\tt hep-lat/9901009}.

3016: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

3017: %

3018: %[25]

3019: \bibitem{LHSE}

3020: D. Dolgov et al., LHPC and SESAM collaborations, {\tt hep-lat/0201021}.

3021: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

3022: %

3023: %[26]

3024: \bibitem{GRV}

3025: M. Gl\"uck, E. Reya, and A. Vogt, Z. Phys. {\bf C48} (1990) 471.

3026: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

3027: %

3028: %[27]

3029: \bibitem{SIO}

3030: M. Gl\"uck and E. Reya, Phys. Rev. {\bf D25} (1982) 1211;\\

3031: G. Grunberg, Phys. Rev. {\bf D29} (1984) 2315;\\

3032: S. Catani, Z. Phys. {\bf C75} (1997) 665;\\

3033: R. Thorne, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B512} (1998) 323;\\

3034: J. Bl\"umlein and A. Vogt, unpublished.

3035: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

3036: %

3037: %[28]

3038: \bibitem{BK}

3039: L. Baulieu and C. Kounnas, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B155} (1979) 429.

3040: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

3041: %

3042: %[29]

3043: \bibitem{MEL}

3044: J. Bl\"umlein and S. Kurth, {\tt hep-ph/9708388};

3045: Phys. Rev. {\bf D60} (1999) 014018;\\

3046: J. Vermaseren, Int. J. Mod. Phys. {\bf A14} (1999) 2037;\\

3047: J. Bl\"umlein, {\tt hep-ph/003100}, Comp. Phys. Commun. {\bf 133} 

3048: (2000) 76.

3049: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

3050: %

3051: %[30]

3052: \bibitem{NV}

3053: W.L. van Neerven and A. Vogt, Phys. Lett. {\bf B490} (2000) 111.

3054: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

3055: %

3056: %[31]

3057: \bibitem{RC1}

3058: I. Akushevich et al., Acta. Phys. Pol. {\bf B28} (1997) 563.

3059: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

3060: %

3061: %[32]

3062: \bibitem{RC2}

3063: D. Bardin, J. Bl\"umlein, O. Christova, and L. Kalinovskaya,

3064: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B506} (1997) 295; {\tt hep-ph/9609399};\\

3065: D. Bardin et al., Acta Phys. Pol. {\bf B28} (1997) 511;\\

3066: A. Arbuzov et al., Comput. Phys. Commun. {\bf 94} (1996) 128;\\

3067: J. Bl\"umlein and H. Kawamura, DESY 02--16.

3068: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

3069: %

3070: %[33]

3071: \bibitem{R1990}

3072: L.W.~Withlow et al., Phys. Lett {\bf B250} (1990) 193.

3073: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

3074: %

3075: %[34]

3076: \bibitem{RNMC}

3077: M.~Arneodo et al.,  NMC collaboration, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B483} (1997) 3.

3078: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

3079: %

3080: %[35]

3081: \bibitem{RE143}

3082: K.~Abe et al., E143, Phys. Lett. {\bf B452} (1999) 194.

3083: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

3084: %

3085: %[36]

3086: \bibitem{SMCA2}

3087: D.~Adams et al., SMC collaboration, Phys. Lett. {\bf B336} (1994) 125.

3088: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

3089: %

3090: %[37]

3091: \bibitem{EE154}

3092: K.~Abe et al. (E154)), Phys. Lett. {\bf B404} (1997) 377.

3093: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

3094: %

3095: %[38]

3096: \bibitem{WW}

3097: S.~Wandzura, F.~Wilczek, Phys. Lett. {\bf B72} (1977) 195.

3098: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

3099: %

3100: %[39]

3101: \bibitem{BT}

3102: J.~Bl\"umlein and A.~Tkabladze, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B553} 1999) 427;

3103: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B} (Proc. Suppl.) {\bf 79} (1999) 427.

3104: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

3105: %

3106: %[40]

3107: \bibitem{PR%

3108: }           %

3109: A.~Piccione and G. Ridolfi, Nucl. Phys.    

3110: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B513} (1998) 301.

3111: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

3112: %

3113: %[40]

3114: \bibitem{BLKO}

3115: J.~Bl\"umlein and N.~Kochelev, Phys. Lett. {\bf B381} (1996) 296;

3116: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B498} (1997) 285.

3117: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

3118: %

3119: %[41]

3120: \bibitem{BR}

3121: J.~Bl\"umlein and D.~Robaschik, Phys. Lett. {\bf B517} (2001) 222;

3122: {\tt hep-ph/0202077}.

3123: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

3124: %

3125: %[42]

3126: \bibitem{F2NMC}

3127: M.~Arneodo et al. (NMC), Phys. Lett. {\bf B364} (1995) 107.

3128: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

3129: %

3130: %[43]

3131: \bibitem{MINUIT}

3132: F.~James, CERN Program Library, Long Writeup D506.

3133: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

3134: %

3135: %[44]

3136: \bibitem{GRVr}

3137: M. Gl\"uck, E. Reya, and A. Vogt, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C5} (1998) 461.

3138: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

3139: %

3140: %[44A]

3141: %

3142: %[45]

3143: \bibitem{H1}

3144: C. Adloff et al., H1 collaboration, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C21} (2001) 33.

3145: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

3146: %

3147: %[46]

3148: \bibitem{CTEQ}

3149: J.~Pumplin et al, CTEQ group, {\tt hep-ph/0201195}.

3150: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

3151: %

3152: %[47]

3153: \bibitem{PDGOLD}

3154: Particle Data Group,     

3155: Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C3} (1998) 1.

3156: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

3157: \bibitem{POSI}

3158: G. Altarelli, S. Forte, and G. Ridolfi, Nucl. Phys.

3159:     {\bf B543} (1998) 277.%                                              m

3160: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

3161: %

3162: %[48]

3163: \bibitem{E154QCD}

3164: K.~Abe et al. (E154), Phys. Lett. {\bf B405} (1997) 180.

3165: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

3166: %

3167: %[49]

3168: \bibitem{SMCQCD}

3169: B.~Adeva et al. (SMC), Phys. Rev. {\bf D58} (1998) 112002.

3170: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

3171: %

3172: %[50]

3173: \bibitem{PDG}

3174: Particle Data Group, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C15} (2000) 91.

3175: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

3176: %

3177: %[51]

3178: \bibitem{BRRZ}

3179: J. Bl\"umlein, V. Ravindran, J. Ruan, and W. Zhu, 

3180: Phys. Lett. {\bf B504} (2001) 235.

3181: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

3182: %

3183: %[52]

3184: \bibitem{DIS92}

3185: For discussions see contributions to DIS92, Proceedings of the

3186: 1992 Zeuthen Workshop on Elementary Particle Theory, {\sf Deep Inelastic

3187: Scattering}, eds.~J. Bl\"umlein and T.~Riemann, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B}

3188: (Proc. Suppl.) {\bf 29A}.

3189: %----------------------------------------------------------------------

3190: %

3191: \end{thebibliography}

3192: %

3193: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3194: \end{document}

3195: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3196: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3197: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

3198: