1: \documentstyle[prd,aps,preprint,tighten,epsfig]{revtex}
2:
3: \begin{document}
4:
5: \draft
6:
7: \title{Can the Lepton Flavor Mixing Matrix Be Symmetric?}
8: \author{\bf Zhi-zhong Xing}
9: \address{CCAST (World Laboratory), P.O. Box 8730, Beijing 100080, China \\
10: and \\
11: Institute of High Energy Physics, P.O. Box 918 (4),
12: Beijing 100039, China
13: \footnote{Mailing address} \\
14: ({\it Electronic address: xingzz@mail.ihep.ac.cn}) }
15: \maketitle
16:
17: \begin{abstract}
18: Current neutrino oscillation data indicate that the $3\times 3$ lepton
19: flavor mixing matrix $V$ is likely to be symmetric about its
20: $V_{e3}$-$V_{\mu 2}$-$V_{\tau 1}$ axis. This off-diagonal symmetry
21: corresponds to three pairs of {\it congruent} unitarity triangles
22: in the complex plane. Terrestrial matter effects can substantially
23: modify the genuine $CP$-violating parameter and off-diagonal
24: asymmetries of $V$ in realistic long-baseline experiments of neutrino
25: oscillations.
26: \end{abstract}
27:
28: \pacs{PACS number(s): 14.60.Pq, 13.10.+q, 25.30.Pt}
29:
30: \newpage
31:
32: \section{Introduction}
33:
34: The observed anomalies of atmospheric \cite{ATM} and solar \cite{SUN}
35: neutrinos strongly suggest that neutrinos be massive and lepton
36: flavors be mixed. In the framework of three charged leptons
37: and three active neutrinos,
38: the phenomena of flavor mixing and $CP$ violation are described by a
39: unitary matrix $V$, which relates the neutrino mass eigenstates
40: $(\nu_1, \nu_2, \nu_3)$ to the neutrino flavor eigenstates
41: $(\nu_e, \nu_\mu, \nu_\tau)$:
42: \begin{equation}
43: \left ( \matrix{
44: \nu_e \cr
45: \nu_\mu \cr
46: \nu_\tau \cr} \right )
47: = \left ( \matrix{
48: V_{e1} & V_{e2} & V_{e3} \cr
49: V_{\mu 1} & V_{\mu 2} & V_{\mu 3} \cr
50: V_{\tau 1} & V_{\tau 2} & V_{\tau 3} \cr} \right )
51: \left ( \matrix{
52: \nu_1 \cr
53: \nu_2 \cr
54: \nu_3 \cr} \right ) .
55: % (1)
56: \end{equation}
57: The unitarity of $V$ represents two sets of normalization and
58: orthogonality conditions:
59: \begin{eqnarray}
60: \sum_i \left ( V_{\alpha i} V^*_{\beta i} \right )
61: & = & ~ \delta_{\alpha\beta} \; ,
62: \nonumber \\
63: \sum_\alpha \left ( V_{\alpha i} V^*_{\alpha j} \right )
64: & = & ~ \delta_{ij} \; ,
65: % (2)
66: \end{eqnarray}
67: where Greek and Latin subscripts run over $(e, \mu, \tau)$ and
68: $(1,2,3)$, respectively.
69: If neutrinos are Dirac particles, a full parametrization of $V$
70: requires four independent parameters --
71: three mixing angles and one $CP$-violating phase, for example.
72: If neutrinos are Majorana particles, however, two additional
73: $CP$-violating phases need be introduced for a complete parametrization
74: of $V$. In both cases, $CP$ and $T$ violation in normal neutrino
75: oscillations depends only upon a single rephasing-invariant parameter
76: ${\cal J}$ \cite{Jarlskog}, defined through
77: \begin{equation}
78: {\rm Im} \left ( V_{\alpha i} V_{\beta j} V^*_{\alpha j}
79: V^*_{\beta i} \right ) = {\cal J} \sum_{\gamma, k}
80: \left (\epsilon_{\alpha\beta\gamma} \epsilon_{ijk} \right ) \; ,
81: % (3)
82: \end{equation}
83: where $(\alpha, \beta, \gamma)$ and $(i,j,k)$ run respectively
84: over $(e, \mu, \tau)$ and $(1,2,3)$. A major goal of the future long-baseline
85: neutrino oscillation experiments is to measure $|V_{\alpha i}|$ and
86: ${\cal J}$ as precisely as possible \cite{LBL}. Once the matrix elements
87: of $V$ are determined to a good degree of accuracy, a stringent test of
88: its unitarity will become available.
89:
90: As a straightforward consequence of the unitarity of $V$, two
91: interesting relations can be derived from the normalization conditions
92: in Eq. (2):
93: \begin{eqnarray}
94: |V_{e 2}|^2 - |V_{\mu 1}|^2 & = & |V_{\mu 3}|^2 - |V_{\tau 2}|^2
95: \nonumber \\
96: & = & |V_{\tau 1}|^2 - |V_{e 3}|^2 \equiv \Delta_{\rm L} \; ,
97: % (4)
98: \end{eqnarray}
99: and
100: \begin{eqnarray}
101: |V_{e 2}|^2 - |V_{\mu 3}|^2 & = & |V_{\mu 1}|^2 - |V_{\tau 2}|^2
102: \nonumber \\
103: & = & |V_{\tau 3}|^2 - |V_{e 1}|^2 \equiv \Delta_{\rm R} \; .
104: % (5)
105: \end{eqnarray}
106: The off-diagonal asymmetries $\Delta_{\rm L}$ and $\Delta_{\rm R}$ characterize
107: the geometrical structure of $V$ about its $V_{e1}$-$V_{\mu 2}$-$V_{\tau 3}$
108: and $V_{e 3}$-$V_{\mu 2}$-$V_{\tau 1}$ axes, respectively. If
109: $\Delta_{\rm L} = 0$ held, $V$ would be symmetric about the
110: $V_{e1}$-$V_{\mu 2}$-$V_{\tau 3}$ axis. Indeed the counterpart of
111: $\Delta_{\rm L}$ in the quark sector is very small
112: (of order $10^{-5}$ \cite{Xing95}); i.e., the $3\times 3$ quark mixing
113: matrix is almost symmetric about its $V_{ud}$-$V_{cs}$-$V_{tb}$ axis.
114: An exactly symmetric flavor mixing matrix may hint at an underlying
115: flavor symmetry, from which some deeper understanding of the fermion mass
116: texture can be achieved \cite{FXreview}. In this sense, the tiny
117: off-diagonal asymmetry of the quark flavor mixing matrix is likely to arise
118: from a slight breakdown of certain flavor symmetries of quark mass matrices.
119:
120: The purpose of this paper is to examine whether the lepton flavor mixing
121: matrix $V$ is really symmetric or not. In section II, we find that current
122: neutrino oscillation data strongly favor $\Delta_{\rm R} =0$; i.e.,
123: $V$ is possible to be symmetric about its $V_{e 3}$-$V_{\mu 2}$-$V_{\tau 1}$
124: axis. It remains too early to get any phenomenological constraints on
125: $\Delta_{\rm L}$, unless very special assumptions are made. In section III,
126: we point out that the off-diagonal symmetry $\Delta_{\rm R}=0$ corresponds
127: to three pairs of {\it congruent} unitarity triangles in the complex plane.
128: Taken realistic long-baseline experiments of neutrino oscillations into
129: account, the terrestrial matter effects on ${\cal J}$, $\Delta_{\rm L}$ and
130: $\Delta_{\rm R}$ are briefly discussed in section IV.
131: Section V is devoted to some further discussions about possible
132: implications of $\Delta_{\rm R}=0$ on specific textures of lepton mass
133: matrices. Finally we summarize our main results in section VI.
134:
135: \section{Off-diagonal Symmetry}
136:
137: Current experimental data \cite{ATM,SUN} strongly favor the hypothesis that
138: atmospheric and solar neutrino oscillations are dominated by
139: $\nu_\mu \rightarrow \nu_\tau$ and $\nu_e \rightarrow \nu_\mu$ transitions,
140: respectively. Thus their mixing factors
141: $\sin^2 2\theta_{\rm atm}$ and $\sin^2 2\theta_{\rm sun}$ have rather simple
142: relations with the elements of the lepton flavor mixing matrix $V$.
143: The mixing factor associated with the CHOOZ (or Palo Verde) reactor
144: neutrino oscillation experiment \cite{CHOOZ}, denoted as
145: $\sin^2 2\theta_{\rm chz}$, is also a simple function of $|V_{\alpha i}|$
146: in the same hypothesis.
147: The explicit expressions of $\sin^2 2\theta_{\rm sun}$,
148: $\sin^2 2\theta_{\rm atm}$ and $\sin^2 2\theta_{\rm chz}$ read as
149: follows:
150: \begin{eqnarray}
151: \sin^2 2\theta_{\rm sun} & = & 4 |V_{e1}|^2 |V_{e2}|^2 \; ,
152: \nonumber \\
153: \sin^2 2\theta_{\rm atm} & = & 4 |V_{\mu 3}|^2
154: \left ( 1 - |V_{\mu 3}|^2 \right ) \; ,
155: \nonumber \\
156: \sin^2 2\theta_{\rm chz} & = & 4 |V_{e3}|^2
157: \left ( 1 - |V_{e3}|^2 \right ) \; .
158: % (6)
159: \end{eqnarray}
160: An analysis of the Super-Kamiokande data on atmospheric neutrino
161: oscillations \cite {ATM} yields $0.88 \leq \sin^2 2\theta_{\rm atm} \leq 1.0$
162: and $1.6 \times 10^{-3} ~ {\rm eV}^2 \leq \Delta m^2_{\rm atm}
163: \leq 4.0 \times 10^{-3} ~ {\rm eV}^2$ at the $90\%$ confidence level.
164: Corresponding to $\Delta m^2_{\rm chz} > 2.0 \times 10^{-3} ~ {\rm eV}^2$,
165: $\sin^2 2\theta_{\rm chz} < 0.18$ can be drawn from the CHOOZ
166: experiment \cite{CHOOZ}. We restrict ourselves to the large-angle
167: Mikheyev-Smirnov-Wolfenstein (MSW) solution to the solar neutrino
168: problem \cite{MSW}, as it gives the best global fit of present data. At the
169: $99\%$ confidence level, $0.56 \leq \sin^2 2\theta_{\rm sun} \leq 0.99$
170: and $2.0 \times 10^{-5} ~ {\rm eV}^2 \leq \Delta m^2_{\rm sun} \leq
171: 5.0 \times 10^{-4} ~ {\rm eV}^2$ have been obtained \cite{LMA}.
172:
173: With the help of Eqs. (2) and (6), one may express
174: $|V_{e1}|^2$, $|V_{e2}|^2$, $|V_{e3}|^2$ and $|V_{\mu 3}|^2$ in terms
175: of $\theta_{\rm sun}$, $\theta_{\rm atm}$ and $\theta_{\rm chz}$:
176: \begin{eqnarray}
177: |V_{e1}|^2 & = & \frac{1}{2} \left ( \cos^2\theta_{\rm chz}
178: \pm \sqrt{\cos^4\theta_{\rm chz} - \sin^2 2\theta_{\rm sun}} \right ) \; ,
179: \nonumber \\
180: |V_{e2}|^2 & = & \frac{1}{2} \left ( \cos^2\theta_{\rm chz}
181: \mp \sqrt{\cos^4\theta_{\rm chz} - \sin^2 2\theta_{\rm sun}} \right ) \; ,
182: \nonumber \\
183: |V_{e3}|^2 & = & \sin^2 \theta_{\rm chz}
184: ~ {\rm or} ~ \cos^2 \theta_{\rm chz} \; ,
185: \nonumber \\
186: |V_{\mu 3}|^2 & = & \sin^2 \theta_{\rm atm}
187: ~ {\rm or} ~ \cos^2 \theta_{\rm atm} \; .
188: % (7)
189: \end{eqnarray}
190: Without loss of generality, three mixing angles ($\theta_{\rm sun}$,
191: $\theta_{\rm atm}$ and $\theta_{\rm chz}$) can all be arranged to lie
192: in the first quadrant. Then we need only adopt the solution
193: $|V_{e3}|^2 = \sin^2 \theta_{\rm chz}$ \cite{Xing02}, in accord with
194: $\sin^2 2\theta_{\rm chz} < 0.18$. We may also express
195: $|V_{\tau 3}|^2$ in terms of $\theta_{\rm atm}$
196: and $\theta_{\rm chz}$, once the normalization relation
197: $|V_{e3}|^2 + |V_{\mu 3}|^2 + |V_{\tau 3}|^2 =1$ is taken into account.
198: It turns out that useful experimental constraints are achievable for
199: those matrix elements in the first row and in the third column of $V$.
200: However, it is impossible to get any constraints on the other four
201: matrix elements of $V$, unless some special assumptions are made
202: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
203: \footnote{Allowing the Dirac-type $CP$-violating phase of $V$ to vary between
204: 0 and $\pi$, Fukugita and Tanimoto \cite{Tanimoto} have presented the
205: numerical ranges of all nine $|V_{\alpha i}|$ by use of current neutrino
206: oscillation data. This rough construction of the lepton flavor mixing matrix
207: is actually unable to shed light on its off-diagonal asymmetries and
208: $CP$-violating features.}.
209: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
210: This observation means that it remains too early to get any instructive
211: information on the off-diagonal asymmetry $\Delta_{\rm L}$ from current
212: neutrino oscillation experiments, but it is already possible to examine
213: whether $\Delta_{\rm R} =0$ coincides with current data and what its
214: implications can be on leptonic $CP$ violation and unitarity triangles.
215:
216: To see whether $\Delta_{\rm R} =0$ is compatible with the present data of
217: solar, atmospheric and reactor neutrino oscillations, we simply set
218: $|V_{e2}|^2 = |V_{\mu 3}|^2$ in Eq. (7) and then obtain
219: \begin{equation}
220: \sin^2 2\theta^{(\pm)}_{\rm sun} \; =\; \sin^2 2\theta_{\rm atm} -
221: \left ( 1 \pm \sqrt{1 - \sin^2 2\theta_{\rm atm}} \right )
222: \left ( 1 - \sqrt{1 - \sin^2 2\theta_{\rm chz}} \right ) \; .
223: % (8)
224: \end{equation}
225: As $\sin^2 2\theta_{\rm chz} < 0.18$ \cite{CHOOZ}, the second term on
226: the right-hand side of Eq. (8) serves as a small correction to the
227: leading term $\sin^2 2\theta_{\rm atm}$. The difference between
228: $\sin^2 2\theta^{(+)}_{\rm sun}$ and $\sin^2 2\theta^{(-)}_{\rm sun}$
229: is therefore insignificant. Indeed $\sin^2 2\theta_{\rm chz} =0$
230: leads definitely to $\sin^2 2\theta^{(+)}_{\rm sun} =
231: \sin^2 2\theta^{(-)}_{\rm sun} = \sin^2 2\theta_{\rm atm}$,
232: as a straightfoward result of $\Delta_{\rm R} =0$. Allowing
233: $\sin^2 2\theta_{\rm atm}$ to vary in the experimental range
234: $0.88 \leq \sin^2 2\theta_{\rm atm} \leq 1.0$,
235: we plot the numerical dependence of $\sin^2 2\theta^{(\pm)}_{\rm sun}$ on
236: $\sin^2 2\theta_{\rm chz}$ in Fig. 1. One can observe that the
237: values of $\sin^2 2\theta^{(\pm)}_{\rm sun}$ predicted from Eq. (8) are
238: consistent very well with current experimental data. Thus
239: we conclude that a vanishing or tiny off-diagonal asymmetry of $V$ about
240: its $V_{e3}$-$V_{\mu 2}$-$V_{\tau 1}$ axis is strongly favored.
241:
242: \section{Unitarity triangles}
243:
244: Let us proceed to discuss possible implications of $\Delta_{\rm R} =0$ on
245: the leptonic unitarity triangles. It is known that six orthogonality
246: relations of $V$ in Eq. (2) correspond to six triangles in the complex
247: plane \cite{FXreview}, as illustrated
248: in Fig. 2. These six triangles totally have eighteen different sides and nine
249: different inner angles. Unitarity requires that all six triangles have the
250: same area amounting to ${\cal J}/2$, where ${\cal J}$ is just the
251: rephasing-invariant measure of leptonic $CP$ violation defined in Eq. (3).
252:
253: Now that the off-diagonal asymmetries $\Delta_{\rm L}$ and $\Delta_{\rm R}$
254: describe the geometrical structure of $V$, they must have direct relations with
255: the unitarity triangles in the complex plane. Indeed it is easy to show that
256: $\Delta_{\rm L} =0$ or $\Delta_{\rm R} =0$ corresponds to the congruence
257: between two unitarity triangles; i.e.,
258: \begin{eqnarray}
259: \Delta_{\rm L} = 0 & ~~~~ \Longrightarrow ~~~~ &
260: \triangle_e \; \cong \; \triangle_1 \; ,
261: \nonumber \\
262: && \triangle_\mu \; \cong \; \triangle_2 \; ,
263: \nonumber \\
264: && \triangle_\tau \; \cong \; \triangle_3 \; ;
265: % (9)
266: \end{eqnarray}
267: and
268: \begin{eqnarray}
269: \Delta_{\rm R} = 0 & ~~~~ \Longrightarrow ~~~~ &
270: \triangle_e \; \cong \; \triangle_3 \; ,
271: \nonumber \\
272: && \triangle_\mu \; \cong \; \triangle_2 \; ,
273: \nonumber \\
274: && \triangle_\tau \; \cong \; \triangle_1 \; .
275: % (10)
276: \end{eqnarray}
277: As $\Delta_{\rm R} =0$ is expected to be rather close to reality, we
278: draw the conclusion that the unitarity triangles $\triangle_e$
279: and $\triangle_3$ must be approximately congruent with each other.
280: A similar conclusion can be drawn for the unitarity triangles
281: $\triangle_\mu$ and $\triangle_2$ as well as $\triangle_\tau$ and
282: $\triangle_1$. The long-baseline experiments of neutrino oscillations
283: in the near future will tell whether an approximate congruence exists
284: between $\triangle_e$ and $\triangle_1$ or between $\triangle_\tau$ and
285: $\triangle_3$. A particularly interesting possibility would be
286: $\Delta_{\rm L} \approx \Delta_{\rm R} \approx 0$; i.e., only two of
287: the six unitarity triangles are essentially distinct.
288:
289: Next we examine how large the area of each unitarity triangle
290: (i.e., ${\cal J}/2$) can maximally be in the limit $\Delta_{\rm R} =0$,
291: in which $V$ is parametrized as follows:
292: \begin{equation}
293: V \; = \; \left ( \matrix{
294: c_x c_z & s_x c_z & s_z \cr
295: - c_x s_x s_z - c_x s_x e^{-i\delta} &
296: - s^2_x s_z + c^2_x e^{-i\delta} &
297: s_x c_z \cr
298: - c^2_x s_z + s^2_x e^{-i\delta} &
299: - c_x s_x s_z - c_x s_x e^{-i\delta} &
300: c_x c_z \cr } \right )
301: \left ( \matrix{
302: e^{i\rho} & 0 & 0 \cr
303: 0 & e^{i\sigma} & 0 \cr
304: 0 & 0 & 1 \cr} \right ) \; ,
305: % (11)
306: \end{equation}
307: where $s_x \equiv \sin\theta_x$, $c_z \equiv \cos\theta_z$, and so on.
308: The merit of this phase choice is that the Dirac-type $CP$-violating
309: phase $\delta$ does not appear in the effective mass term of the neutrinoless
310: double beta decay \cite{FX01}, which depends only upon the Majorana phases
311: $\rho$ and $\sigma$. Without loss of generality, one may arrange the
312: mixing angles $\theta_x$ and $\theta_z$ to lie in the first
313: quadrant. Three $CP$-violating phases ($\delta, \rho, \sigma$) can take
314: arbitrary values from 0 to $2\pi$. Clearly
315: ${\cal J} = c^2_x s^2_x c^2_z s_z \sin\delta$ holds. With the help of
316: Eq. (6) or (7), we are able to figure out the relations between
317: $(\theta_x, \theta_z)$ and $(\theta_{\rm sun}, \theta_{\rm chz})$. The
318: result is
319: \begin{eqnarray}
320: \sin^2 2\theta_x & = & \frac{4 \sin^2 2\theta_{\rm sun}}
321: {\left ( 1 + \sqrt{1 - \sin^2 2\theta_{\rm chz}} \right )^2} \; ,
322: \nonumber \\
323: \sin^2 2\theta_z & = & \sin^2 2\theta_{\rm chz} \; .
324: % (12)
325: \end{eqnarray}
326: Then we obtain
327: \begin{equation}
328: {\cal J}_{(\pm)} \; =\; \frac{\sqrt{2}}{4} ~
329: \sin^2 2\theta^{(\pm)}_{\rm sun} \sin\delta ~
330: \frac{\sqrt{1- \sqrt{1 - \sin^2 2\theta_{\rm chz}}}}
331: {1 + \sqrt{1 - \sin^2 2\theta_{\rm chz}}} \; ,
332: % (13)
333: \end{equation}
334: where $\sin^2 2\theta^{(\pm)}_{\rm sun}$ has been given in Eq. (8).
335: Again the difference between ${\cal J}_{(+)}$ and ${\cal J}_{(-)}$
336: is insignificant. If $\delta =0$ or $\pi$ held, we would arrive at
337: ${\cal J}_{(\pm)} =0$. In general, however, $CP$ symmetry is expected to
338: break down in the lepton sector. For illustration, we plot the numerical
339: dependence of ${\cal J}_{(\pm)}/\sin\delta$
340: on $\sin^2 2\theta_{\rm chz}$ in Fig. 3, where the experimentally allowed
341: values of $\sin^2 2\theta_{\rm atm}$ are used. It is obvious that the
342: upper bound of ${\cal J}_{(\pm)}$ (when $\delta = \pi/2$) can be as large as
343: a few percent, only if $\sin^2 2\theta_{\rm chz} \geq 0.01$. This result
344: implies that leptonic $CP$ and $T$ violation might be observable in the future
345: long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiments.
346:
347: \section{Matter effects}
348:
349: In realistic long-baseline experiments of neutrino oscillations, the
350: terrestrial matter effects must be taken into account \cite{Barger}. The
351: pattern of neutrino oscillations in matter can be expressed in the same form
352: as that in vacuum, however, if we define the {\it effective} neutrino
353: masses $\tilde{m}_i$ and the {\it effective} lepton flavor mixing matrix
354: $\tilde{V}$ in which the terrestrial matter effects are already
355: included \cite{Xing00}. Note that $\tilde{m}_i$ are functions of
356: $m_j$, $|V_{ej}|$ and $A$; and $\tilde{V}_{\alpha i}$ are functions of
357: $m_j$, $V_{\beta j}$ and $A$, where $A$ is the matter parameter and its
358: magnitude depends upon the neutrino beam energy $E$ and the background density
359: of electrons $N_e$. The analytically exact relations between
360: $(\tilde{m}_i, \tilde{V}_{\alpha i})$ and $(m_i, V_{\alpha i})$ can be
361: found in Ref. \cite{Xing00}, if $N_e$ is assumed to be a constant.
362: In analogy to the definitions of
363: ${\cal J}$, $\Delta_{\rm L}$ and $\Delta_{\rm R}$,
364: the {\it effective} $CP$-violating parameter
365: $\tilde{\cal J}$ and off-diagonal asymmetries $\tilde{\Delta}_{\rm L}$ and
366: $\tilde{\Delta}_{\rm R}$ can be defined as follows:
367: \begin{equation}
368: {\rm Im} \left ( \tilde{V}_{\alpha i} \tilde{V}_{\beta j}
369: \tilde{V}^*_{\alpha j} \tilde{V}^*_{\beta i} \right ) =
370: \tilde{\cal J} \sum_{\gamma, k}
371: \left (\epsilon_{\alpha\beta\gamma} \epsilon_{ijk} \right ) \; ,
372: % (14)
373: \end{equation}
374: where $(\alpha, \beta, \gamma)$ and $(i,j,k)$ run respectively
375: over $(e, \mu, \tau)$ and $(1,2,3)$;
376: \begin{eqnarray}
377: |\tilde{V}_{e 2}|^2 - |\tilde{V}_{\mu 1}|^2 & = &
378: |\tilde{V}_{\mu 3}|^2 - |\tilde{V}_{\tau 2}|^2
379: \nonumber \\
380: & = & |\tilde{V}_{\tau 1}|^2 - |\tilde{V}_{e 3}|^2 \equiv
381: \tilde{\Delta}_{\rm L} \; ,
382: % (15)
383: \end{eqnarray}
384: and
385: \begin{eqnarray}
386: |\tilde{V}_{e 2}|^2 - |\tilde{V}_{\mu 3}|^2 & = &
387: |\tilde{V}_{\mu 1}|^2 - |\tilde{V}_{\tau 2}|^2
388: \nonumber \\
389: & = & |\tilde{V}_{\tau 3}|^2 - |\tilde{V}_{e 1}|^2 \equiv
390: \tilde{\Delta}_{\rm R} \; .
391: % (16)
392: \end{eqnarray}
393: It is then interesting to examine possible departures of $(\tilde{\cal J},
394: \tilde{\Delta}_{\rm L}, \tilde{\Delta}_{\rm R})$ from
395: $({\cal J}, \Delta_{\rm L}, \Delta_{\rm R})$ in a concrete
396: experimental scenario.
397:
398: To illustrate, we compute $\tilde{\cal J}$, $\tilde{\Delta}_{\rm L}$ and
399: $\tilde{\Delta}_{\rm R}$ using the typical inputs $\theta_x = 40^\circ$,
400: $\theta_z = 5^\circ$ and $\delta = 90^\circ$, which yield
401: ${\cal J} = 0.021$, $\Delta_{\rm L} = 0.166$ and $\Delta_{\rm R} =0$ in
402: vacuum. The neutrino mass-squared differences are taken to be
403: $\Delta m^2_{21} = \Delta m^2_{\rm sun} = 5\times 10^{-5} ~ {\rm eV}^2$
404: and $\Delta m^2_{31} = \Delta m^2_{\rm atm} = 3\times 10^{-3} ~ {\rm eV}^2$.
405: The explicit formulas relevant to our calculation have been given in
406: Ref. \cite{Xing00}.
407: We plot the numerical dependence of $\tilde{\cal J}/{\cal J}$,
408: $\tilde{\Delta}_{\rm L}$ and $\tilde{\Delta}_{\rm R}$ on the matter
409: parameter $A$ in Fig. 4, where both the cases of neutrinos
410: ($+A$) and antineutrinos ($-A$) are taken into account. One can see
411: that the off-diagonal symmetry $\Delta_{\rm R}=0$ in vacuum can
412: substantially be spoiled by terrestrial matter effects. The deviation
413: of $\tilde{\Delta}_{\rm L}$ from $\Delta_{\rm L}$ and that of
414: $\tilde{\cal J}$ from ${\cal J}$ are remarkably large,
415: if $A > 10^{-5} ~ {\rm eV}^2$.
416:
417: As emphasized in Ref. \cite{Xing01}, there exists the simple reversibility
418: between the fundamental neutrino mixing parameters in vacuum and their
419: effective counterparts in matter. The former can therefore be expressed
420: in terms of the latter, allowing more straightforward extraction of the
421: genuine lepton mixing quantities (including ${\cal J}$, $\Delta_{\rm L}$ and
422: $\Delta_{\rm R}$) from a variety of long-baseline neutrino oscillation
423: experiments. If $|V_{\alpha i}|$ are determined to a very high degree of
424: accuracy, it will be possible to test the unitarity of $V$ \cite{FXreview}
425: and establish leptonic $CP$ violation through the non-zero area of six
426: unitarity triangles \cite{Smirnov} even in the absence of a direct
427: measurement of ${\cal J}$.
428:
429: \section{Further discussions}
430:
431: If $\Delta_{\rm R}=0$ really holds,
432: one may wonder whether this off-diagonal symmetry of $V$
433: hints at very special textures of the neutrino
434: mass matrix $M_\nu$ and (or) the charged lepton mass matrix $M_l$.
435: In the following, we take two simple but
436: instructive examples to illustrate possible implications of
437: $\Delta_{\rm R}=0$ on $M_l$ and $M_\nu$.
438:
439: \begin{center}
440: {\bf Example A}
441: \end{center}
442:
443: In no conflict with current data on atmospheric \cite{ATM},
444: solar \cite{SUN} and reactor \cite{CHOOZ} neutrino oscillations,
445: a remarkably simplified form of $V$ with $\Delta_{\rm R} =0$
446: and $\delta =\rho =\sigma =0$ is
447: \begin{equation}
448: {\bf V} \; =\; \left ( \matrix{
449: \displaystyle\frac{c}{\sqrt{2}} &
450: \displaystyle\frac{c}{\sqrt{2}} &
451: s \cr\cr
452: - \displaystyle\frac{1+s}{2} &
453: \displaystyle\frac{1-s}{2} &
454: \displaystyle\frac{c}{\sqrt{2}} \cr\cr
455: \displaystyle\frac{1-s}{2} &
456: - \displaystyle\frac{1+s}{2} &
457: \displaystyle\frac{c}{\sqrt{2}} \cr} \right ) \; ,
458: % (17)
459: \end{equation}
460: where $s\equiv \sin\theta \ll 1$ and
461: $c\equiv \cos\theta \approx 1$ \cite{X00}.
462: In the flavor basis where $M_l$ is diagonal, $M_\nu$ can be given as
463: \begin{eqnarray}
464: M_\nu & = & {\bf V} \left ( \matrix{
465: m_1 & 0 & 0 \cr
466: 0 & m_2 & 0 \cr
467: 0 & 0 & m_3 \cr} \right ) {\bf V}^{\rm T}
468: \nonumber \\
469: & = & m_1 {\bf N}_1 ~ + ~ m_2 {\bf N}_2 ~ + ~ m_3 {\bf N}_3 \; ,
470: % (18)
471: \end{eqnarray}
472: where symmetric matrices ${\bf N}_1$, ${\bf N}_2$ and ${\bf N}_3$ read
473: \begin{eqnarray}
474: {\bf N}_1 & = & \left ( \matrix{
475: \displaystyle\frac{c^2}{2} &
476: - \displaystyle\frac{c (1+s)}{2\sqrt{2}} &
477: \displaystyle\frac{c (1-s)}{2\sqrt{2}} \cr\cr
478: &
479: \displaystyle\frac{(1+s)^2}{4} &
480: - \displaystyle\frac{1-s^2}{4} \cr\cr
481: &
482: &
483: \displaystyle\frac{(1-s)^2}{4} \cr} \right ) \; ,
484: \nonumber \\
485: \nonumber \\
486: {\bf N}_2 & = & \left ( \matrix{
487: \displaystyle\frac{c^2}{2} &
488: \displaystyle\frac{c (1-s)}{2\sqrt{2}} &
489: - \displaystyle\frac{c (1+s)}{2\sqrt{2}} \cr\cr
490: &
491: \displaystyle\frac{(1-s)^2}{4} &
492: - \displaystyle\frac{1-s^2}{4} \cr\cr
493: &
494: &
495: \displaystyle\frac{(1+s)^2}{4} \cr} \right ) \; ,
496: \nonumber \\
497: \nonumber \\
498: {\bf N}_3 & = & \left ( \matrix{
499: s^2 &
500: ~~~~~ \displaystyle\frac{cs}{\sqrt{2}} ~~~~~ &
501: ~~~ \displaystyle\frac{cs}{\sqrt{2}} ~~ \cr\cr
502: &
503: \displaystyle\frac{c^2}{2} &
504: \displaystyle\frac{c^2}{2} \cr\cr
505: &
506: &
507: \displaystyle\frac{c^2}{2} \cr} \right ) \; .
508: % (19)
509: \end{eqnarray}
510: The texture of $M_\nu$ is rather complicated, hence it is
511: difficult to observe any hidden flavor symmetry associated
512: with lepton mass matrices.
513:
514: \begin{center}
515: {\bf Example B}
516: \end{center}
517:
518: The result of $M_\nu$ in Example A will become simpler, if
519: $s =0$ is further taken (i.e., $\bf V$ is of the bi-maximal mixing
520: form \cite{Barger2}).
521: In this special case, however, simple textures of $M_l$ and $M_\nu$
522: can be written out in a more general flavor basis.
523: It is easy to show that $M_l$ and $M_\nu$ of the
524: following textures lead to $\bf V$ with $s=0$:
525: \begin{eqnarray}
526: M_l & = & \frac{C_l~}{2} \left [ \left ( \matrix{
527: 0 & 0 & 0 \cr
528: 0 & 1 & 1 \cr
529: 0 & 1 & 1 \cr} \right ) + \left ( \matrix{
530: \delta_l & 0 & 0 \cr
531: 0 & 0 & \varepsilon_l \cr
532: 0 & \varepsilon_l & 0 \cr} \right ) \right ] \; ,
533: \nonumber \\
534: M_\nu & = & \frac{C_\nu}{2} \left [ \left ( \matrix{
535: 1 & 0 & 0 \cr
536: 0 & 1 & 0 \cr
537: 0 & 0 & 1 \cr} \right ) + \left ( \matrix{
538: 0 & \varepsilon_\nu & 0 \cr
539: \varepsilon_\nu & 0 & 0 \cr
540: 0 & 0 & \delta_\nu \cr} \right ) \right ] \; ,
541: % (20)
542: \end{eqnarray}
543: where $\delta_{l,\nu}$ and $\varepsilon_{l,\nu}$ are small perturbative
544: parameters \cite{FX96}.
545: In the limit $\delta_{l,\nu} =\varepsilon_{l,\nu} =0$,
546: $M_l$ has the $S(2)_{\rm L} \times S(2)_{\rm R}$ symmetry and
547: $M_\nu$ displays the $S(3)$ symmetry \cite{FTY}.
548: The perturbative corrections in $M_l$ allow electron and muon to
549: acquire their masses:
550: \begin{equation}
551: \{ m_e ~, ~ m_\mu ~, ~ m_\tau \} \; =\; \frac{C_l}{2}
552: \{ |\delta_l| ~, ~ |\varepsilon_l| ~, ~ 2 + \varepsilon_l \} \; .
553: % (21)
554: \end{equation}
555: We then arrive at $C_l = m_\mu + m_\tau \approx 1.88$ GeV,
556: $|\varepsilon_l| = 2m_\mu/(m_\mu + m_\tau) \approx 0.11$ and
557: $|\delta_l| = 2m_e/(m_\mu + m_\tau) \approx 5.4 \times 10^{-4}$.
558: The perturbative corrections in $M_\nu$ make three neutrino masses
559: non-degenerate:
560: \begin{equation}
561: \{ m_1, m_2, m_3 \} \; =\; C_\nu \{ 1+\varepsilon_\nu,
562: 1-\varepsilon_\nu, 1+\delta_\nu \} \; .
563: % (22)
564: \end{equation}
565: As a result, $|\varepsilon_\nu|/|\delta_\nu| \approx
566: \Delta m^2_{\rm sun}/(2\Delta m^2_{\rm atm}) \sim 10^{-2}$ for the
567: large-angle MSW solution to the solar neutrino problem.
568:
569: Examples A and B illustrate how the off-diagonal symmetry of $V$
570: ($\Delta_{\rm R} =0$) can be reproduced from specific textures of
571: lepton mass matrices.
572:
573: \section{Summary}
574:
575: In view of current experimental data on solar and atmospheric neutrino
576: oscillations, we have discussed the geometrical structure of the
577: $3\times 3$ lepton flavor mixing matrix $V$. We find that the present data
578: strongly favor the off-diagonal symmetry of $V$ about its
579: $V_{e3}$-$V_{\mu 2}$-$V_{\tau 1}$ axis. This symmetry, if really exists,
580: will correspond to three pairs of congruent unitarity
581: triangles in the complex plane. It remains too early to tell whether $V$
582: is symmetric or not about its $V_{e1}$-$V_{\mu 2}$-$V_{\tau 3}$ axis.
583: A brief analysis of terrestrial matter effects on the
584: universal $CP$-violating parameter and off-diagonal asymmetries of $V$
585: has also been made. We expect that future long-baseline experiments of
586: neutrino oscillations can help establish the texture of the
587: lepton flavor mixing matrix, from which one could get some insights into
588: the underlying flavor symmetries responsible for the charged lepton and
589: neutrino mass matrices.
590:
591: \acknowledgments{This work was supported in part by the
592: National Natural Science Foundation of China.}
593:
594: \newpage
595: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
596:
597: \bibitem{ATM} Super-Kamiokande Collaboration, Y. Fukuda {\it et al.},
598: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 467}, 185 (1999);
599: S. Fukuda {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 85}, 3999 (2000).
600:
601: \bibitem{SUN} Super-Kamiokande Collaboration, S. Fukuda {\it et al.},
602: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 86}, 5651 (2001);
603: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 86}, 5656 (2001);
604: SNO Collaboration, Q.R. Ahmad {\it et al.},
605: Phys. Rev. Lett {\bf 87}, 071301 (2001).
606:
607: \bibitem{Jarlskog} C. Jarlskog, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 55}, 1839 (1985).
608:
609: \bibitem{LBL} For a review with extensive references, see:
610: P. Fisher, B. Kayser, and K.S. McFarland, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.
611: {\bf 49}, 481 (1999);
612: M. Aoki {\it et al.}, hep-ph/0112338.
613:
614: \bibitem{Xing95} Z.Z. Xing, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 51}, 3958 (1995);
615: Nuovo Cim. A {\bf 109}, 115 (1996);
616: J. Phys. G {\bf 23}, 717 (1997).
617:
618: \bibitem{FXreview} H. Fritzsch and Z.Z. Xing,
619: Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. {\bf 45}, 1 (2000).
620:
621: \bibitem{CHOOZ} CHOOZ Collaboration, M. Apollonio {\it et al.},
622: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 420}, 397 (1998);
623: Palo Verde Collaboration, F. Boehm {\it et al.},
624: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 84}, 3764 (2000).
625:
626: \bibitem{MSW} S.P. Mikheyev and A.Yu. Smirnov, Yad. Fiz. (Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.)
627: {\bf 42}, 1441 (1985);
628: L. Wolfenstein, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 17}, 2369 (1978).
629:
630: \bibitem{LMA} G.L. Fogli, E. Lisi, D. Montanino, and A. Palazzo,
631: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 64}, 093007 (2001);
632: J.N. Bahcall, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, and C. Pena-Garay,
633: JHEP {\bf 0108}, 014 (2001);
634: P.I. Krastev and A.Yu. Smirnov, hep-ph/0108177;
635: P. Aliani, V. Antonelli, M. Picariello, and E. Torrente-Lujan,
636: hep-ph/0111418.
637:
638: \bibitem{Xing02} Z.Z. Xing, hep-ph/0202034; to appear in Phys. Rev. D.
639:
640: \bibitem{Tanimoto} M. Fukugita and M. Tanimoto,
641: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 515}, 30 (2001).
642:
643: \bibitem{FX01} H. Fritzsch and Z.Z. Xing, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 517}, 363 (2001).
644:
645: \bibitem{Barger} V. Barger, K. Whisnant, S. Pakvasa, and R.J. Phillips,
646: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 22}, 2718 (1980);
647: H.W. Zaglauer and K.H. Schwarzer, Z. Phys. C {\bf 40}, 273 (1988);
648: T.K. Kuo and J. Pantaleone, Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf 61}, 937 (1989).
649:
650: \bibitem{Xing00} Z.Z. Xing, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 487}, 327 (2000);
651: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 63}, 073012 (2001).
652:
653: \bibitem{Xing01} Z.Z. Xing, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 64}, 073014 (2001).
654:
655: \bibitem{Smirnov} Y. Farzan and A.Yu. Smirnov, hep-ph/0201105.
656:
657: \bibitem{X00} Z.Z. Xing, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 61}, 057301 (2000);
658: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 63}, 057301 (2001).
659:
660: \bibitem{Barger2} See, e.g., V. Barger, S. Pakvasa, T.J. Weiler, and
661: K. Whisnant, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 437}, 107 (1998); and references therein.
662:
663: \bibitem{FX96} H. Fritzsch and Z.Z. Xing, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 372}, 265 (1996);
664: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 440}, 313 (1998); Phys. Rev. D {\bf 61}, 073016 (2000).
665:
666: \bibitem{FTY} M. Fukugita, M. Tanimoto, and T. Yanagida,
667: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 57}, 4429 (1998);
668: K. Kang and S.K. Kang, hep-ph/9802328.
669:
670:
671: \end{thebibliography}
672:
673: \newpage
674:
675: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Fig. 1 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
676: \begin{figure}
677: \vspace{-1.cm}
678: \epsfig{file=fig1.ps,bbllx=1cm,bblly=4cm,bburx=20cm,bbury=32cm,%
679: width=15cm,height=22cm,angle=0,clip=}
680: \vspace{-1.5cm}
681: \caption{Dependence of $\sin^2 2\theta^{(\pm)}_{\rm sun}$ on
682: $\sin^2 2\theta_{\rm chz}$, where
683: $0.88 \leq \sin^2 2\theta_{\rm atm} \leq 1.0$ has been input.}
684: \end{figure}
685: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
686:
687: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Fig. 2 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
688: \begin{figure}
689: %\vspace{3cm}
690: \epsfig{file=fig2.ps,bbllx=1cm,bblly=8cm,bburx=20cm,bbury=32cm,%
691: width=15cm,height=22cm,angle=0,clip=}
692: \vspace{-6.7cm}
693: \caption{Unitarity triangles of the lepton flavor mixing matrix in the
694: complex plane. Each triangle is named by the Greek or
695: Latin subscript that does not manifest in its three sides.}
696: \end{figure}
697: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
698:
699: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Fig. 3 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
700: \begin{figure}
701: \vspace{-2.2cm}
702: \epsfig{file=fig3.ps,bbllx=1cm,bblly=4cm,bburx=20cm,bbury=32cm,%
703: width=15cm,height=22cm,angle=0,clip=}
704: \vspace{-1.5cm}
705: \caption{Dependence of ${\cal J}_{(\pm)}/\sin\delta$ on
706: $\sin^2 2\theta_{\rm chz}$, where
707: $0.88 \leq \sin^2 2\theta_{\rm atm} \leq 1.0$ has been input.}
708: \end{figure}
709: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
710:
711: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Fig. 3 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
712: \begin{figure}
713: \vspace{-2.2cm}
714: \epsfig{file=fig4.ps,bbllx=1cm,bblly=4cm,bburx=20cm,bbury=32cm,%
715: width=13cm,height=20cm,angle=0,clip=}
716: \vspace{-0.2cm}
717: \caption{Illustrative plots for terrestrial matter effects on
718: ${\cal J}$, $\Delta_{\rm L}$ and $\Delta_{\rm R}$ associated with
719: neutrinos ($+A$) and antineutrinos ($-A$), where
720: $\Delta m^2_{21} = 5\times 10^{-5} ~{\rm eV}^2$,
721: $\Delta m^2_{31} = 3\times 10^{-3} ~{\rm eV}^2$,
722: $\theta_x = 40^\circ$, $\theta_z = 5^\circ$ and
723: $\delta = 90^\circ$ have typically been input.}
724: \end{figure}
725: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
726:
727:
728: \end{document}
729: