1: \documentclass{elsart}
2: \usepackage{amssymb}
3: \usepackage{bm}
4: \usepackage{graphics}
5: \usepackage{rotating}
6: \begin{document}
7: \begin{frontmatter}
8: \begin{flushright}\normalsize HU-EP-02/14\\
9: \vskip 1cm
10: \end{flushright}
11: \title{
12: Radiative M1-decays of heavy-light
13: mesons in the relativistic quark model}
14: \author[hu]{D. Ebert},
15: \author[hu,scc]{R. N. Faustov},
16: \author[hu,scc]{V. O. Galkin}
17: \address[hu]{Institut f\"ur Physik, Humboldt--Universit\"at zu Berlin,
18: Invalidenstr.110, D-10115 Berlin, Germany}
19: \address[scc]{Russian Academy of Sciences, Scientific Council for
20: Cybernetics, Vavilov Street 40, Moscow 117333, Russia}
21:
22: \begin{abstract}
23: Radiative magnetic dipole decays of heavy-light vector mesons into
24: pseudoscalar mesons $V\to P\gamma$ are considered within the
25: relativistic quark model. The light quark is treated completely
26: relativistically, while for the heavy quark the $1/m_Q$
27: expansion is used. It is found that relativistic effects result in
28: a significant reduction of decay rates. Comparison with previous
29: predictions and recent experimental data is presented.
30: \end{abstract}
31:
32: \begin{keyword}
33: % keywords here, in the form: keyword \sep keyword
34: radiative decays \sep bottom and charmed mesons \sep relativistic
35: bound state dynamics \sep heavy quarks
36: % PACS codes here, in the form: \PACS code \sep code
37: \PACS 13.40.Hq \sep 13.20.He \sep 13.20.Fc \sep 12.39.Ki
38: \end{keyword}
39: \end{frontmatter}
40:
41: In this letter we consider radiative magnetic dipole (M1) transitions
42: of the ground state vector ($V$) heavy-light mesons to the
43: pseudoscalar ($P$) ones, $V\to P\gamma$ (in quark model notations,
44: $1^3S_1\to 1^1S_0+\gamma$). For this purpose,
45: we use the relativistic quark model based on the quasipotential
46: approach in quantum field theory. Recently, this model has been successfully
47: applied for the description of different properties of the heavy-light
48: mesons, such as their mass spectra \cite{egf} and rare radiative
49: decays \cite{efg}. Our analysis showed that the light quark in the
50: heavy-light mesons should be treated completely relativistically, while for
51: the heavy quark it is useful to apply the expansion in powers
52: of the inverse heavy quark mass $1/m_Q$, which considerably simplifies
53: calculations. The first and sometimes second order corrections in
54: $1/m_Q$ are also important for the heavy-light meson decay
55: description. Analogously, for the radiative decay calculations
56: considered here, the
57: $1/m_Q$ expansion is carried out up to the
58: second order, and the light quark is treated completely relativistically
59: (i.~e. without the unjustified expansion in inverse powers of the light
60: quark mass). It follows from the obtained results that the
61: relativistic effects give substantial contributions to the
62: calculated decay rates.
63:
64: The radiative $V\to P\gamma$ decay rate is given by \cite{gf}
65: \begin{equation}
66: \label{eq:dr}
67: \Gamma=\frac{\omega^3}{3\pi}\left|{\bm{\mathcal M}}\right|^2,
68: \quad {\rm where} \quad \omega=\frac{M_V^2-M_P^2}{2M_V},
69: \end{equation}
70: $M_V$ and $M_P$ are the vector and pseudoscalar meson masses. The matrix
71: element of the magnetic moment $\bm{\mathcal M}$ is defined by
72: \begin{equation}
73: \label{eq:magm}
74: {\bm{\mathcal M}}=-\frac{i}2\left[\frac{\partial}{\partial{\bf
75: \Delta}}\times\left<P\left|{\bf J}(0)\right|V\right>\right]_{\bf\Delta =0},
76: \qquad {\bf \Delta}={\bf P}-{\bf Q},
77: \end{equation}
78: where $\left<P\left|J_\mu(0)\right|V\right>$ is the matrix element of the
79: electromagnetic current between initial vector ($V$) and final
80: pseudoscalar ($P$) meson states with momenta ${\bf Q}$ and ${\bf
81: P}$ respectively.
82:
83: We use the relativistic quark model for the calculation of the matrix
84: element of the magnetic moment $\bm{\mathcal M}$ (\ref{eq:magm}). In
85: our model a meson is described by the wave
86: function of the bound quark-antiquark state, which satisfies the
87: quasipotential equation of the Schr\"odinger type in
88: the center-of-mass frame \cite{egf}:
89: \begin{equation}
90: \label{quas}
91: {\left(\frac{b^2(M)}{2\mu_{R}}-\frac{{\bf
92: p}^2}{2\mu_{R}}\right)\Psi_{M}({\bf p})} =\int\frac{d^3 q}{(2\pi)^3}
93: V({\bf p,q};M)\Psi_{M}({\bf q}),
94: \end{equation}
95: where the relativistic reduced mass
96: is
97: \begin{equation}
98: \mu_{R}=\frac{M^4-(m^2_1-m^2_2)^2}{4M^3},
99: \end{equation}
100: and
101: $b^2(M)$ denotes
102: the on-mass-shell relative momentum squared
103: \begin{equation}
104: {b^2(M) }
105: =\frac{[M^2-(m_1+m_2)^2][M^2-(m_1-m_2)^2]}{4M^2}.
106: \end{equation}
107: Here $m_{1,2}$ and $M$ are quark masses
108: and a heavy-light meson mass, respectively.
109:
110: The kernel
111: $V({\bf p,q};M)$ in Eq.~(\ref{quas}) is the quasipotential operator of
112: the quark-antiquark interaction. It is constructed with the help of the
113: off-mass-shell scattering amplitude, projected onto the positive
114: energy states. An important role in this construction is played
115: by the Lorentz-structure of the confining quark-antiquark interaction
116: in the meson. In
117: constructing the quasipotential of the quark-antiquark interaction
118: we have assumed that the effective
119: interaction is the sum of the usual one-gluon exchange term and the mixture
120: of vector and scalar linear confining potentials.
121: The quasipotential is then defined by
122: \cite{mass}
123: \begin{equation}
124: \label{qpot}
125: V({\bf p,q};M)=\bar{u}_1(p)\bar{u}_2(-p){\mathcal V}({\bf p}, {\bf
126: q};M)u_1(q)u_2(-q),
127: \end{equation}
128: with
129: $${\mathcal V}({\bf p},{\bf q};M)=\frac{4}{3}\alpha_sD_{ \mu\nu}({\bf
130: k})\gamma_1^{\mu}\gamma_2^{\nu}
131: +V^V_{\rm conf}({\bf k})\Gamma_1^{\mu}
132: \Gamma_{2;\mu}+V^S_{\rm conf}({\bf k}),$$
133: where $\alpha_s$ is the QCD coupling constant, $D_{\mu\nu}$ is the
134: gluon propagator in the Coulomb gauge
135: and ${\bf k=p-q}$; $\gamma_{\mu}$ and $u(p)$ are
136: the Dirac matrices and spinors.
137: The effective long-range vector vertex is
138: given by
139: \begin{equation}
140: \Gamma_{\mu}({\bf k})=\gamma_{\mu}+
141: \frac{i\kappa}{2m}\sigma_{\mu\nu}k^{\nu}, \qquad k^\nu=(0,{\bf k}),
142: \end{equation}
143: where $\kappa$ is the Pauli interaction constant characterizing the
144: nonperturbative anomalous chromomagnetic moment of quarks. Vector and
145: scalar confining potentials in the nonrelativistic limit reduce to
146: \begin{equation}\label{vconf}
147: V^V_{\rm conf}(r)=(1-\varepsilon)(Ar+B),\qquad
148: V^S_{\rm conf}(r) =\varepsilon (Ar+B),
149: \end{equation}
150: reproducing
151: \begin{equation}
152: V_{\rm conf}(r)=V^S_{\rm conf}(r)+
153: V^V_{\rm conf}(r)=Ar+B,
154: \end{equation}
155: where $\varepsilon$ is the mixing coefficient.
156:
157: The quasipotential for the heavy quarkonia,
158: expanded in $p^2/m^2$, can be found in Ref.~\cite{mass} and for
159: heavy-light mesons in \cite{egf}.
160: All the parameters of
161: our model, such as quark masses, parameters of the linear confining potential,
162: mixing coefficient $\varepsilon$ and anomalous
163: chromomagnetic quark moment $\kappa$, were fixed from the analysis of
164: heavy quarkonium spectra \cite{mass} and radiative decays \cite{gf}.
165: The quark masses
166: $m_b=4.88$ GeV, $m_c=1.55$ GeV, $m_s=0.50$ GeV, $m_{u,d}=0.33$ GeV and
167: the parameters of the linear potential $A=0.18$ GeV$^2$ and $B=-0.30$ GeV
168: have the usual quark model values.
169: In Ref.~\cite{fg} we have considered the expansion of the matrix
170: elements of weak heavy quark currents between pseudoscalar and vector
171: meson ground states up to the second order in inverse powers of
172: the heavy quark
173: masses. It has been found that the general structure of the leading,
174: first,
175: and second order $1/m_Q$ corrections in our relativistic model is in accord
176: with the predictions of HQET. The heavy quark symmetry and QCD impose rigid
177: constraints on the parameters of the long-range potential in our model.
178: The analysis
179: of the first order corrections \cite{fg} fixes the value of the
180: Pauli interaction
181: constant $\kappa=-1$. The same value of $\kappa$ was found previously
182: from the fine splitting of heavy quarkonia ${}^3P_J$- states
183: \cite{mass}.
184: The value of the parameter characterizing the mixing of
185: vector and scalar confining potentials, $\varepsilon=-1$,
186: was found from the comparison of the second order ($1/m_Q^2$)
187: corrections in our model \cite{fg} with the same order contributions in HQET.
188: This value is very close to the one determined from considering radiative
189: decays of heavy quarkonia \cite{gf}, especially the M1-decays
190: (e.~g. the calculated decay rate of $J/\Psi\to \eta_c\gamma$ can be
191: brought in accord with the experiment only with the above value of
192: $\varepsilon$).
193:
194: \begin{figure}
195: \centering
196: \includegraphics{fig1.eps}
197: \caption{Lowest order vertex function $\Gamma^{(1)}$
198: corresponding to Eq.~(\ref{gam1}). Radiation only from one quark is shown.}
199: \label{fig:1}
200: \end{figure}
201: \begin{figure}
202: \centering
203: \includegraphics{fig2.eps}
204: \caption{ Vertex function $\Gamma^{(2)}$
205: corresponding to Eq.~(\ref{gam2}). Dashed lines represent the interaction
206: operator ${\mathcal V}$ in Eq.~(\ref{qpot}). Bold lines denote the
207: negative-energy part of the quark propagator. As on Fig.~\ref{fig:1},
208: radiation only from one quark is shown.}
209: \label{fig:2}
210: \end{figure}
211:
212: In the quasipotential approach, the matrix element of the electromagnetic
213: current $J_\mu$ between the states of a vector $V$ meson
214: and a pseudoscalar $P$ meson has the form \cite{f}
215: \begin{equation}
216: \label{mxet}
217: \langle P \vert J_\mu (0) \vert V\rangle
218: =\int \frac{d^3p\, d^3q}{(2\pi )^6} \bar \Psi_{P\, {\bf P}}({\bf
219: p})\Gamma _\mu ({\bf p},{\bf q})\Psi_{V\, {\bf Q}}({\bf q}),
220: \end{equation}
221: where $\Gamma _\mu ({\bf p},{\bf
222: q})$ is the two-particle vertex function and $\Psi_{V,P}$ are the
223: meson wave functions projected onto the positive energy states of
224: quarks and boosted to the moving reference frame.
225: The contributions to $\Gamma$ come from Figs.~1 and 2.
226: The contribution $\Gamma^{(2)}$ is the consequence of the
227: projection onto the positive-energy states. Note that the form
228: of the relativistic corrections resulting from the vertex function
229: $\Gamma^{(2)}$ explicitly depends on the Lorentz structure of the
230: $q\bar q$-interaction. Thus the vertex function is given by
231: \begin{equation}
232: \label{eq:gam}
233: \Gamma_\mu({\bf p},{\bf q})=\Gamma_\mu^{(1)}({\bf p},{\bf q})+
234: \Gamma_\mu^{(2)}({\bf p},{\bf q})+ \cdots ,
235: \end{equation}
236: where
237: \begin{equation}\label{gam1}
238: \Gamma_\mu ^{(1)}({\bf p},{\bf q})=e_1\bar
239: u_1(p_1)\gamma_\mu
240: u_1(q_1)(2\pi)^3\delta({\bf p}_2-{\bf q}_2) +(1\leftrightarrow 2),
241: \end{equation}
242: and
243: \begin{eqnarray}\label{gam2}
244: \!\!\! \Gamma_\mu^{(2)}({\bf p},{\bf q})&=&e_1\bar u_1(p_1)\bar
245: u_2(p_2) \biggl\{{\mathcal V}({\bf p}_2-{\bf q}_2)\frac{\Lambda_1^{(-)}(k_1')}{
246: \epsilon_1(k_1')+ \epsilon_1(q_1)}\gamma_1^0\gamma_{1\mu}
247: \nonumber\\
248: & & + \gamma_{1\mu}
249: \frac{\Lambda_1^{(-)}({k}_1)}{ \epsilon_1(k_1)+\epsilon_1(p_1)}
250: \gamma_1^0{\mathcal V}({\bf p}_2-{\bf q}_2)
251: \biggr\}u_1(q_1) u_2(q_2) +(1\leftrightarrow 2).
252: \end{eqnarray}
253: Here $e_{1,2}$ are the quark charges, ${\bf k}_1={\bf p}_1-{\bf\Delta};
254: \quad {\bf k}_1'={\bf
255: q}_1+{\bf\Delta};\quad {\bf\Delta}={\bf P}-{\bf Q}$;
256: \[
257: \Lambda^{(-)}(p)={\epsilon(p)-\bigl( m\gamma ^0+\gamma^0({\bf
258: \bm{\gamma} p})\bigr) \over 2\epsilon (p)}, \qquad \epsilon(p)=
259: \sqrt{p^2+m^2}.
260: \]
261: It is important to note that the wave functions entering the current
262: matrix element (\ref{mxet}) cannot be both in the rest frame.
263: In the initial $V$ meson rest frame, the final $P$ meson is moving with the recoil
264: momentum ${\bf \Delta}$. The wave function
265: of the moving $P$ meson $\Psi_{P\,{\bf\Delta}}$ is connected
266: with the wave function in the rest frame
267: $\Psi_{P\,{\bf 0}}\equiv \Psi_{P}$ by the transformation \cite{f}
268: \begin{equation}
269: \label{wig}
270: \Psi_{P\,{\bf\Delta}}({\bf p})
271: =D_1^{1/2}(R_{L_{\bf\Delta}}^W)D_2^{1/2}(R_{L_{\bf\Delta}}^W)
272: \Psi_{P\,{\bf 0}}({\bf p}),
273: \end{equation}
274: where $R^W$ is the Wigner rotation, $L_{\bf\Delta}$ is the Lorentz boost
275: from the rest frame to a moving one, and $D^{1/2}(R)$ is
276: the rotation matrix in the spinor representation.
277:
278: We substitute the vertex functions $\Gamma^{(1)}$ and $\Gamma^{(2)}$
279: given by Eqs.~(\ref{gam1}) and (\ref{gam2})
280: in the decay matrix element (\ref{mxet}) and take into account the wave
281: function transformation (\ref{wig}). To simplify calculations we
282: note that the mass of the heavy-light mesons $M_{V,P}$ is large (due
283: to presence of the heavy quark $M_{V,P}\sim m_Q$)
284: and carry out the expansion in inverse powers of this mass up to the
285: second order. Then we calculate the matrix element of the magnetic
286: moment operator (\ref{eq:magm}) and get\\
287: (a) for the vector potential
288: \begin{eqnarray}
289: \label{eq:muv}
290: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
291: {\bm{\mathcal M}}_V& =& \int \frac{d^3 p}{(2\pi)^3}\bar \Psi_P({\bf
292: p}) \frac{e_1}{2\epsilon_1(p)}\Biggl\{\bm{\sigma}_1+
293: \frac{(1-\varepsilon)(1+2\kappa)[{\bf p}\times[\bm{\sigma}_1\times
294: {\bf p}]]}{2\epsilon_1(p)
295: [\epsilon_1(p) +m_1]} \cr\cr
296: &&
297: +\frac{(1-\varepsilon)(1+\kappa)[{\bf p}\times[\bm{\sigma}_2\times
298: {\bf p}]]}{\epsilon_1(p)
299: [\epsilon_2(p) +m_2]}\cr\cr
300: &&-\frac{\epsilon_2(p)}{M_V}\left(1+(1-\varepsilon)
301: \frac{M_V-\epsilon_1(p)-\epsilon_2(p)}{\epsilon_1(p)}\right)i\left[{\bf
302: p}\times \frac{\partial}{\partial{\bf p}}\right] \cr\cr
303: && +\frac1{2M_V}\left[{\bf p}\times\left[{\bf p}\times\left(\frac{\bm{\sigma}_1}
304: {\epsilon_1(p)+m_1}
305: -\frac{\bm{\sigma}_2}{\epsilon_2(p)+m_2}\right)\right]\right]
306: \Biggr\}\Psi_V({\bf p}) +(1\leftrightarrow 2),\nonumber\\
307: \end{eqnarray}
308: (b) for the scalar potential
309: \begin{eqnarray}
310: \label{eq:mus}
311: \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
312: {\bm{\mathcal M}}_S& =& \int \frac{d^3 p}{(2\pi)^3}\bar \Psi_P({\bf
313: p}) \frac{e_1}{2\epsilon_1(p)}\Biggl\{\left(1+
314: \varepsilon\;
315: \frac{\epsilon_1(p)+\epsilon_2(p)-M_V}{\epsilon_1(p)}\right)
316: \cr\cr
317: &&\times \left(\bm{\sigma}_1- \frac{\epsilon_2(p)}{M_V}i\left[{\bf
318: p}\times\frac{\partial}{\partial{\bf p}}\right] \right)
319: - \frac{\varepsilon\;[{\bf p}\times[\bm{\sigma}_1\times {\bf p}]]}{2\epsilon_1(p)
320: [\epsilon_1(p) +m_1]} \cr\cr
321: && +\frac1{2M_V}\left[{\bf p}\times\left[{\bf p}\times\left(\frac{\bm{\sigma}_1}
322: {\epsilon_1(p)+m_1}
323: -\frac{\bm{\sigma}_2}{\epsilon_2(p)+m_2}\right)\right]\right]
324: \Biggr\}\Psi_V({\bf p}) +(1\leftrightarrow 2).\nonumber\\
325: \end{eqnarray}
326: Note that the last terms in Eqs.~(\ref{eq:muv}), (\ref{eq:mus}) result
327: from the wave function transformation (\ref{wig}) from the moving
328: reference frame to the rest one. It is easy to see that in the
329: limit $p/m\to 0$ the usual nonrelativistic expression for the magnetic
330: moment follows.
331:
332: Since we are interested in radiative transitions of the
333: vector mesons to the pseudoscalar mesons it is possible to evaluate
334: spin matrix elements
335: using the relation $\left<\bm{\sigma}_1\right>=-
336: \left<\bm{\sigma}_2\right>$. Then assuming one quark to be
337: light $q$ and the other one $Q$ to be heavy and further expanding
338: Eqs.~(\ref{eq:muv}), (\ref{eq:mus}) in the inverse powers of the heavy
339: quark mass $m_Q$ up to the second order corrections to the leading
340: contribution we get\\
341: (a) for the purely vector potential ($\varepsilon=0$)
342: \begin{eqnarray}
343: \label{eq:muvex}
344: {{\mathcal M}}_V& =&\frac{e_q}{2m_q}\Biggl\{\left<\frac{m_q}
345: {\epsilon_q(p)}\right>-\frac{m_q}3\left<\frac{{\bf
346: p}^2}{\epsilon_q(p)[\epsilon_q(p)+m_q]}\left(\frac1{\epsilon_q(p)}+
347: \frac1{M_V}\right)\right>\cr\cr
348: && +\frac{(1+\kappa)m_q}{3}\left<\frac{{\bf p}^2}{\epsilon_q^2(p)}
349: \left(\frac2{\epsilon_q(p)+m_q}-\frac1{m_Q}\right)\right>
350: -\frac{m_q}{6M_Vm_Q}\left<\frac{{\bf p}^2}
351: {\epsilon_q(p)} \right>\Biggr\}\cr\cr
352: &&- \frac{e_Q}{2m_Q}\Biggl\{1-\frac{2\left<{\bf
353: p}^2\right>}{3m_Q^2}+\frac{1+\kappa}3 \left<\frac{{\bf p}^2}{m_Q}\left(
354: \frac1{m_Q} -\frac2{\epsilon_q(p)+m_q}\right)\right>\cr\cr
355: &&-\left<\frac{{\bf p}^2}{6M_V}\left(\frac1{m_Q}+\frac2{\epsilon_q(p)
356: +m_q} \right)\right>\Biggr\},
357: \end{eqnarray}
358: (b) for the purely scalar potential ($\varepsilon=1$)
359: \begin{eqnarray}
360: \label{eq:musex}
361: {{\mathcal M}}_S& =&\frac{e_q}{2m_q}\Biggl\{2\left<\frac{m_q}
362: {\epsilon_q(p)}\right>-\left<\frac{m_q(M_V-m_Q)}{\epsilon_q^2(p)}
363: \right>-\frac{m_q}{6M_Vm_Q}\left<\frac{{\bf p}^2}
364: {\epsilon_q(p)} \right>\cr\cr
365: && +\frac{m_q}{2}\left<\frac{{\bf p}^2}{\epsilon_q^2(p)}
366: \left(\frac1{m_Q}-\frac2{3[\epsilon_q(p)+m_q]}- \frac{2\epsilon_q(p)}
367: {3M_V[\epsilon_q(p)+m_q]} \right)\right>\Biggr\}
368: \cr\cr
369: &&- \frac{e_Q}{2m_Q}\Biggl\{2-\frac{M_V-\left<\epsilon_q(p)\right>}{m_Q}-
370: \frac{\left<{\bf p}^2\right>}{6m_Q}\left(
371: \frac1{m_Q} +\frac1{M_V}\right)\cr\cr
372: &&-\frac1{3M_V}\left<\frac{{\bf p}^2}{\epsilon_q(p)
373: +m_q}\right>\Biggr\}.
374: \end{eqnarray}
375: Here $\left<\cdots\right>$ denotes the matrix element between radial
376: meson wave functions. For these matrix element calculations we use the
377: wave functions of heavy-light mesons obtained in Ref.~\cite{egf}. It
378: is important to note that
379: in this reference while calculating the heavy-light meson mass spectra
380: only the heavy quark was treated using the $1/m_Q$
381: expansion but the light quark was treated completely
382: relativistically.
383:
384: The values of decay rates of mesons with open flavour calculated on
385: the basis of Eqs.~(\ref{eq:dr}),
386: (\ref{eq:muvex}), (\ref {eq:musex}) are displayed in Table~\ref{tab:1}. In
387: the second column ($\Gamma^{\rm NR}$) we give predictions for
388: decay rates obtained in
389: the nonrelativistic approximation ($p/m\to 0$) for both heavy and
390: light quarks. In the third ($\Gamma^V$) and fourth ($\Gamma^S$) columns
391: we show the results
392: obtained for the purely vector and scalar confining potentials,
393: respectively. And in the last column ($\Gamma$) we present predictions
394: for the mixture of vector and scalar confining potentials
395: (\ref{vconf}) with the mixing parameter $\varepsilon=-1$. As seen from
396: this Table relativistic effects significantly influence the
397: predictions. Their inclusion results in a significant reduction of
398: decay rates ($\Gamma^{\rm NR}/\Gamma = 2\div 4.5$). Both relativistic
399: corrections to the heavy quark and the relativistic treatment of the
400: light quark play an important role. The dominant decay modes of $D^*$
401: mesons are the strong decay $D^*\to D\pi$, which is considerably
402: suppressed by the phase space, and the electromagnetic decay $D^*\to
403: D\gamma$. The corresponding branching ratios are known already for a
404: long time and listed in PDG tables \cite{pdg}. However, the total
405: decay rates of $D^*$ mesons were not measured until recently. In
406: Ref.~\cite{cleoG} CLEO collaboration reported the first measurement of
407: the $D^{*+}$ decay width $\Gamma(D^{*+})=96\pm 4\pm
408: 22$~keV. Combining this value with the measured $BR(D^{*+}\to
409: D^+\gamma)=(1.6 \pm 0.4)\%$ \cite{pdg}, the following experimental
410: value of the decay rate can be obtained: $\Gamma(D^{*+}\to D^+\gamma)=
411: (1.5\pm 0.6)$~keV. Our model prediction is in agreement with this
412: experimental value. However, the experimental errors are still large
413: in order to discriminate the relativistic and nonrelativistic results.
414: In the case of $B$ mesons the pion emission is kinematically
415: forbidden, so the dominant
416: decay mode is electromagnetic decay $B^*\to B\gamma$. None of $B^*$
417: widths has been measured yet. We also present our predictions for the
418: radiative decay rate of $B_c^*$ meson, which consists of two heavy
419: quarks ($b$ and $c$). Therefore the expressions (\ref{eq:muvex}) and
420: (\ref{eq:musex}) can be further expanded in inverse powers of both
421: quark masses up to the second order.
422:
423:
424:
425: \begin{table}
426: %\begin{center}
427: \caption{Radiative decay rates of mesons with an open flavour (in keV).}
428: \label{tab:1}
429: \centering
430: \begin{tabular}{ccccc}
431: \hline
432: Decay& $\Gamma^{\rm NR}$ & $\Gamma^V$ & $\Gamma^S$&$\Gamma$\\
433: \hline
434: $D^{* \pm}\to D^{\pm}\gamma$& 2.08& 0.60& 0.28 &1.04\\
435: $D^{* 0}\to D^{0}\gamma$& 37.0& 14.3& 17.4 &11.5\\
436: $D_s^*\to D_s\gamma$& 0.36&0.13&0.08& 0.19\\
437: $B^{* \pm}\to B^{\pm}\gamma$& 0.89&0.24&0.29&0.19\\
438: $B^{* 0}\to B^0\gamma$& 0.27&0.087& 0.101& 0.070 \\
439: $B_s^*\to B_s\gamma$& 0.132&0.064&0.074&0.054\\
440: $B_c^*\to B_c\gamma$& 0.073&0.048&0.066&0.033\\
441: \hline
442: \end{tabular}
443:
444: % \end{center}
445: \end{table}
446:
447: In Table~\ref{tab:2} we compare our predictions for radiative decay
448: rates of vector heavy-light mesons with other theoretical results. We
449: show the predictions obtained in quark models
450: \cite{iv,oh,gr}, in the framework of heavy quark effective theory (HQET)
451: combined with vector meson dominance (VMD) hypothesis \cite{cfn} and in QCD
452: sum rules \cite{dn,adip,zyh}. These predictions vary quite
453: significantly from each other. Our predictions are in rough
454: agreement with the quark model calculations of Ref.~\cite{oh}, with
455: HQET+VMD results of Ref.~\cite{cfn} and with some of the predictions
456: of the QCD sum rules.~\footnote{The QCD sum rule results \cite{dn} for the
457: $D^*$ decays were obtained using the $1/m_c$ expansion, which could
458: be inaccurate due to the large value of the $1/m_c$ corrections.} It
459: is important to
460: note that in our calculations we do not need to introduce the anomalous
461: electromagnetic moment of the light quark as it is done in
462: Ref.~\cite{gr}, where it was found that its value should be rather
463: large ($\sim 0.5$) in order to get agreement with the experimental
464: (CLEO) value for $D^{*+}\to D^+\gamma$ decay rate.~\footnote{In
465: Table~\ref{tab:2} we show predictions of Ref.~\cite{gr} for the
466: value of anomalous electromagnetic quark moment equal to zero.}
467: The large value of the
468: anomalous electromagnetic moment is not justified phenomenologically (see
469: e.~g. Refs.~\cite{hs,gf}). The other differences of our calculations
470: from those of Ref.~\cite{gr} are the Lorentz structure of the confining
471: potential and a more comprehensive account of
472: relativistic effects. In particular, the relativistic transformation
473: of the meson wave function from the rest frame to a moving one given
474: by Eq.~(\ref{wig}) is missing in Ref.~\cite{gr}.
475:
476: \begin{sidewaystable}
477: %\begin{table}
478: \caption{Comparison of different theoretical predictions for
479: radiative decays of heavy-light mesons (in keV).}
480: \label{tab:2}
481: \centering
482: \begin{tabular}{ccccccccc}
483: \hline
484: &\multicolumn{4}{c}{Quark models}&HQET+VMD&\multicolumn{3}{c}{QCD sum
485: rules}\\
486: Decay& our&\cite{iv}&\cite{oh}&\cite{gr}&
487: \cite{cfn} &\cite{dn} &\cite{adip}& \cite{zyh}\\
488: \hline
489: $D^{* \pm}\to D^{\pm}\gamma$&1.04&0.36 &1.72 &0.050
490: &$0.51\pm0.18$ & $0.09^{+0.40}_{-0.07}$ &1.5& $0.23\pm0.1$\\
491: $D^{* 0}\to D^{0}\gamma$&11.5& 17.9& 7.18& 7.3&$16.0\pm7.5$
492: &$3.7\pm1.2$& 14.4& $12.9\pm2$\\
493: $D_s^*\to D_s\gamma$& 0.19&0.118& &0.101
494: &$0.24\pm0.24$ & & &$0.13\pm0.05$\\
495: $B^{* \pm}\to B^{\pm}\gamma$&0.19&0.261& 0.272&0.084&
496: $0.22\pm0.09$ &$0.10\pm0.03$& 0.63& $0.38\pm0.06$\\
497: $B^{* 0}\to B^0\gamma$& 0.070&0.092 &0.064&0.037&
498: $0.075\pm0.027$ & $0.04\pm0.02$& 0.16&$0.13\pm0.03$\\
499: $B_s^*\to B_s\gamma$&0.054 & &0.051&0.035& & & &$0.22\pm0.04$\\
500: \hline
501: \end{tabular}
502: % \end{table}
503: \end{sidewaystable}
504:
505:
506: In Table~\ref{tab:3} we present the comparison of our results with the
507: predictions of different quark models \cite{eq,gklt,ful} for the
508: rates of the radiative M1-transitions ($1^3S_1\to
509: 1^1S_0+\gamma$) in the heavy-heavy $B_c$ meson. There we also give the
510: predicted values of the photon energy, which is determined by the mass
511: splitting of the vector and pseudoscalar ground states. In previous
512: calculations \cite{eq,gklt,ful} the
513: nonrelativistic expression for the matrix element of the magnetic
514: moment was used. We see that even in the heavy-heavy $B_c$ meson
515: inclusion of the relativistic effects results in considerable
516: reduction of the radiative M1-decay rate. As can be seen from
517: Table~\ref{tab:1}, this reduction is evoked by significant
518: contributions of relativistic effects for the $c$ quark, since
519: it is not heavy enough, as well as by the special choice of the mixture of
520: vector and scalar confining potentials in our model (\ref{vconf}).
521:
522: \begin{table}
523: \centering
524: \caption{Comparison of theoretical predictions for the radiative
525: $B^*_c\to B_c\gamma$ decay.}
526: \label{tab:3}
527: \begin{tabular}{ccccc}
528: \hline
529: & our& \cite{eq} &\cite{gklt} &\cite{ful}\\
530: \hline
531: Photon Energy (MeV) & 61 & 72 & 64 & 55 \\
532: $\Gamma(B^*_c\to B_c\gamma)$ (eV) & 33 & 135 & 60 & 59 \\
533: \hline
534: \end{tabular}
535: \end{table}
536:
537: In summary we calculated radiative M1-decay rates of mesons with
538: open flavour in the framework of the relativistic quark model. In our
539: analysis the light quark was treated relativistically, while for the
540: heavy quark the $1/m_Q$ expansion was carried out up
541: to the second order. Relativistic consideration of
542: the light quark, relativistic heavy quark corrections as well as
543: Lorentz-structure of the confining potential
544: considerably influence the predictions. We
545: find that only the mixture of vector and scalar
546: confining potentials (\ref{vconf}), with the mixing coefficient fixed
547: previously from quarkonium radiative decays \cite{gf} and weak decays
548: of heavy-light mesons \cite{fg}, is in agreement with recent CLEO data
549: for the $D^{*+}\to D^+\gamma$ decay rate. More precise measurement of
550: this decay rate and the measurement of radiative M1-decays of other
551: heavy-light mesons will be crucial for testing the relativistic quark
552: dynamics.
553:
554: The authors express their gratitude to M. M\"uller-Preussker and V. Savrin
555: for support and discussions. We are grateful to S. Narison for the
556: useful comment on the QCD sum rule results.
557: Two of us (R.N.F and V.O.G.)
558: were supported in part by the {\it Deutsche
559: Forschungsgemeinschaft} under contract Eb 139/2-1, {\it
560: Russian Foundation for Fundamental Research} under Grant No.\
561: 00-02-17768 and {\it Russian Ministry of Education} under Grant
562: No. E00-3.3-45.
563:
564: \begin{thebibliography}{00}
565: \bibitem{egf} D. Ebert, V. O. Galkin and R. N. Faustov, Phys. Rev. D
566: {57} (1998) {5663}; {59} (1999) 019902 (Erratum).
567: \bibitem{efg} D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov, V. O. Galkin and H. Toki, Phys. Lett. B 495
568: (2000) 309; Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 054001.
569: \bibitem{gf} V. O. Galkin and R. N. Faustov, Yad. Fiz. {44} (1986) 1575
570: [Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. {44} (1986) 1023].
571: \bibitem{mass} D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov and V. O. Galkin, Phys. Rev. D
572: {62} (2000) 034014.
573: \bibitem{fg} R. N. Faustov and V. O. Galkin, Z. Phys. C {66} (1995)
574: {119}.
575: \bibitem{f} R. N. Faustov, Phys. Lett. B {33} (1970) 422; Nuovo
576: Cimento A {69} (1970) 37.
577: \bibitem{pdg} Paticle Data Group, D. E. Gromm et al., Eur. Phys. J. C
578: 15 (2000) 1.
579: \bibitem{cleoG} CLEO Collaboration, A. Anastassov et al., Phys. Rev. D
580: 65 (2002) 032003.
581: \bibitem{iv} M. A. Ivanov and Yu. M. Valit, Z. Phys. C 67 (1995) 633.
582: \bibitem{oh} A. Hiorth \"Orsland and H. H\"ogaasen, Eur. Phys. J. C 9
583: (1999) 503.
584: \bibitem{gr} J. L. Goity and W. Roberts, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001)
585: 094007.
586: \bibitem{cfn} P. Colangelo, F. De Fazio and G. Nardulli, Phys. Lett. B
587: 316 (1993) 555.
588: \bibitem{dn} H. G. Dosch and S. Narison, Phys. Lett. B 368 (1996) 163.
589: \bibitem{adip} T. M. Aliev, D. A. Demir, E. Iltan and N. K. Pak,
590: Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 857.
591: \bibitem{zyh} S.-L. Zhu, Z.-S. Yan and W.-Y. P. Hwang,
592: Mod. Phys. Lett. A 12 (1997) 3027.
593: \bibitem{hs} V. A. Khoze and M. A. Shifman, Sov. Phys. Usp. 26 (1983) 387.
594: \bibitem{eq} E. J. Eichten and C. Quigg, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 5845.
595: \bibitem{gklt} S. S. Gershtein, V. V. Kiselev, A. K. Likhoded and
596: A. V. Tkabladze, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 3613.
597: \bibitem{ful} L. P. Fulcher, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 074006.
598:
599: \end{thebibliography}
600:
601: \end{document}