1: \documentstyle[prl,aps,epsfig,floats]{revtex}
2: %\documentclass[10pt]{elsart}
3:
4: %\usepackage{epsfig}
5: %\usepackage{espcrc2}
6:
7: \newcommand{\dfrac}{\displaystyle \frac}
8: \newcommand{\btodpn}{B^0\rightarrow D^{*-}p\bar{n}}
9:
10:
11: \begin{document}
12: %
13: \draft
14: \twocolumn[\hsize\textwidth\columnwidth\hsize\csname
15: @twocolumnfalse\endcsname
16:
17: %\begin{frontmatter}
18: \title{Possible Hints and Search for Glueball Production in Charmless Rare $B$
19: Decays}
20:
21: \author{Chun-Khiang Chua, Wei-Shu Hou and Shang-Yuu Tsai\\}
22: \address{Department of Physics, National Taiwan University,
23: Taipei, Taiwan 10764, R.O.C.}
24: \date{\today}
25: \maketitle
26:
27: \begin{abstract}
28:
29: Recent data on $B\to p\bar pK$, $K^0 \pi\pi$ and $KK\bar K$
30: hint at a $\sim 2.3$ GeV object recoiling against a kaon.
31: This could be the narrow state observed in $J/\psi \to \gamma\xi$.
32: Nonobservation in $p\bar p$ annihilation implies
33: ${\cal B}(\xi \to p\bar p) \sim$ few $\times 10^{-3}$,
34: consistent with $\eta_c$ and $J/\psi$ decays,
35: but there are actual hints in $p\bar p \to \phi\phi$
36: and $pp\to p\pi^+\pi^-\pi^+\pi^-p$.
37: Simple modeling shows
38: ${\cal B}(B \to \xi K){\cal B}(\xi \to p\bar p) \sim 1\times 10^{-6}$,
39: appearing as a spike in the $p\bar p$ spectrum,
40: with $\sim$ 30 events per 100 fb$^{-1}$;
41: modes such as $KK_sK_s$, $K\phi\phi$, $K4\pi$ ($Kf_2\pi\pi$)
42: etc. should be explored.
43: The underlying dynamics of $g^*\to g\xi$ is analogous to
44: $g^*\to g\eta^\prime$ or gluon fragmentation.
45: Discovery of sizable $B\to \xi K$ could be useful for CP violation studies.
46:
47: \end{abstract}
48:
49: \pacs{PACS numbers:
50: 13.25.Hw, %Decays of bottom mesons
51: 13.40.Gp, %Electromagnetic form factors
52: 14.20.Dh %Protons and neutrons
53: }]
54: %\begin{keyword}
55: %\PACS 13.25.Hw\sep 13.40.Gp\sep 14.20.Dh
56: %\end{keyword}
57: %\end{frontmatter}
58: %
59: %\preprint{\vbox{\hbox{}}}
60: %
61: %\preprint{\vbox{\hbox{}}}
62: %
63: %\preprint{\vbox{\hbox{}}}
64: %
65:
66: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
67:
68: %\section{Introduction}\label{Intro}
69:
70: The existence of glueballs as bound states of gluons,
71: the gauge bosons of QCD, has been conjectured ever since the advent of
72: QCD as the fundamental theory of the strong interaction.
73: Alas, it is a unique feature of {\it nonabelian} gauge theories
74: that has yet to be unequivocally tested.
75: The main obstacle to identifying glueballs is their possible
76: $q\bar q$ admixture, which allows the candidates
77: to hide in the richness of $q\bar q$ resonances.
78: %
79: Advances in lattice gauge theories suggest the lowest lying glueballs to be
80: the $0^{++}$ scalar with $m_G \sim$ 1.4--1.8 GeV
81: and $2^{++}$ tensor with $m_\xi \sim$ 1.9--2.3~GeV,
82: %lying in the mass range of 1.4--1.8 GeV and 1.9--2.3~GeV,
83: while the $0^{-+}$ glueball $P$ is another 150 MeV heavier \cite{Morning}.
84: %We denote these glueballs as $G$, $\xi$ and $P$, respectively.
85:
86: Radiative $J/\psi\to \gamma gg \to \gamma+$hadrons decay
87: is a prime hunting ground for glueballs.
88: The narrow state $\xi$ with width 23 MeV,
89: called $f_J(2220)$ by the Particle Data Group (PDG) \cite{PDG},
90: was discovered \cite{mrk3} by the MARK~III experiment in such decays.
91: The BES collaboration confirmed \cite{Bai} the $\xi$ signal in
92: $J/\psi \to \gamma\pi^+\pi^-$, $\gamma K^+K^-$,
93: $\gamma K_S^0K_S^0$, $\gamma p\bar p$ at
94: $(5.6\pm 2.7)\times 10^{-5}$, $(3.3\pm 2.0) \times 10^{-5}$,
95: $(2.7\pm 1.4)\times 10^{-5}$, $(1.5\pm 0.8)\times 10^{-5}$, respectively,
96: as well as $J/\psi \to \gamma\pi^0\pi^0 \sim (4.5\pm 2.9)\times 10^{-5}$,
97: where errors have been combined conservatively.
98: Null results in $\gamma\gamma \to \xi$ search \cite{twophoton}
99: strengthen the glueball interpretation.
100:
101: The $\xi\to p\bar p$ mode stimulated scans of
102: $p\bar p$ annihilation around 2230 MeV,
103: resulting in the limits of
104: $p\bar p\to K_S^0K_S^0$, $\phi\phi$, $\pi^0\pi^0$, $\eta\eta
105: < 7.5\times 10^{-5}$, $6\times 10^{-5}$~\cite{Evangelista},
106: $6\times 10^{-5}$, $4\times 10^{-5}$~\cite{Amsler},
107: respectively.
108: Combining with the BES result, one finds \cite{Amsler}
109: that ${\cal B}(\xi \to p\bar p) \lesssim 5\times~10^{-3}$,
110: and
111: \begin{eqnarray}
112: {\cal B}(J/\psi \to \gamma\xi) & \gtrsim & 2.9\times~10^{-3},
113: \label{gammaxi}
114: % \\ \label{xipp}
115: \end{eqnarray}
116: which seems to support the glueball interpretation.
117: However, the nonobservation in quite a few $p\bar p$ annihilation modes
118: has lead to doubt \cite{Close01} of the very existence of $\xi$.
119:
120: With this impasse, it is desirable to open up
121: new avenues for exploration.
122: The charmless $b\to sg^*$ process could be \cite{AS2,HHH}
123: viable ground for glueball search.
124: This was stimulated in part by the CLEO observation of large
125: $B\to \eta^\prime K \sim 8\times 10^{-5}$ \cite{JimS} and
126: $\eta^\prime + X_s \gtrsim 6\times 10^{-4}$ \cite{Browder},
127: which were interpretted \cite{AS,HT} as related to the large glue content
128: of $\eta^\prime$ via the gluon anomaly.
129: The $b\to sg^*$ transition, followed by the anomaly inspired
130: effective $g^*\to g\eta^\prime$ coupling, could account for \cite{Browder,HT}
131: the semi-inclusive $m_{X_s}$ spectrum.
132: Replacing $\eta^\prime$ by a glueball may be even
133: more effective \cite{AS2,HHH}.
134: %The exclusive $B\to \eta^\prime K$ modes have recently been confirmed
135: %by B Factory experiments \cite{Paoti},
136: %while the inclusive studies are picking up \cite{etapX}.
137: In this Letter we point out possible hints for
138: $B\to \xi K$ decay in the $B\to p\bar pK$, $K_S \pi^+\pi^-$
139: and $K^+ K^+K^-$ modes newly observed by Belle,
140: and discuss directions for further study.
141:
142:
143: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
144: \begin{figure}[b!]
145: \begin{center}
146: \epsfig{figure=xi_K_fig1.eps,width=3.5in}
147: \end{center}
148: \caption{Spectra for $B \to$ (a) $p\bar pK$;
149: (b) $K\pi\pi$ ($m_{K\pi} > 2$ GeV);
150: (c) $K_S\pi\pi$; (d) $K_SK\bar K$; and
151: (e), (f) for $KK\bar K$ vs. $m_{K\bar K}^{\rm min}$,
152: $m_{K\bar K}^{\rm max}$ ($m_{K\bar K}^{\rm min} > 1.1$ GeV),
153: respectively.}
154: \label{spectra}
155: \end{figure}
156: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
157:
158:
159: Let us first present the case for charmless $B$ decays.
160: %
161: The $B\to p\bar pK$ decay \cite{ppK} is the
162: first ever charmless {\it baryonic} mode to be observed.
163: While modeling the $m_{p\bar p}$ spectrum
164: by a QCD motivated threshold enhancement,
165: we noted a hint for a $\sim 2.3$ GeV peak.
166: The data (fitted ${\cal B}$) and our modeling \cite{CHT} are
167: plotted in Fig.~1(a).
168: Threshold enhancement is apparent, in line with our prediction \cite{rhopn}
169: for $B\to \rho p\bar n$ before the discovery of $B\to p\bar pK$.
170: However, some excess $\sim$ 7--10 events is noticeable in the third,
171: i.e. 2.2--2.4 GeV bin \cite{Minzu},
172: amounting to $\sim 0.6$--$1\times 10^{-6}$ in rate,
173: which we could not accommodated in our simple threshold model.
174: Motivated by this, we find evidence in
175: a few (but not all) other 3-body channels as well.
176:
177: The $B\to K^+\pi^+\pi^-$ mode
178: observed by Belle \cite{Khh} is plotted in Fig. 1(b),
179: with a cut of $m_{K^+\pi^-} > 2$ GeV to suppress background.
180: Despite some activity above 2~GeV,
181: there is not much excess at 2.2--2.3~GeV.
182:
183: The $B\to K_S\pi^+\pi^-$, $K_SK^+K^-$ modes,
184: also observed by Belle \cite{HC},
185: are plotted in Figs. 1(c) and (d), respectively.
186: The spectrum for $m_{\pi^+\pi^-} >$ 2 GeV is very clean, with
187: a striking cluster at 2.3 GeV, albeit with only 5 events.
188: The $m_{K^+K^-}$ spectrum has $\sim$ 2 events in the same region
189: (but a prominent cluster at $\sim 1.95$ GeV).
190: In all, ${h^+h^-}$ has about 7 events, and folding in efficiencies,
191: we find the average over $K_S\pi^+\pi^-$, $K_SK^+K^-$ rates in
192: the cluster region is $\sim 2.5\times 10^{-6}$.
193: The comparison with $p\bar pK$ case is consistent with
194: the BES observation.
195:
196: Turning to $B\to K^+K^+K^-$ \cite{Khh},
197: we plot $m_{K^+K^-}^{\rm min}$ and $m_{K^+K^-}^{\rm max}$
198: (for $m_{K^+K^-}^{\rm min} > 1.1$ GeV) spectra in Figs. 1(e) and (f).
199: The $m_{K^+K^-}^{\rm min}$ spectrum above 2 GeV is
200: quite sizable and rich with structure,
201: like Fig. 1(b) amplified but with much less background.
202: This decay is expected to arise solely from the $b\to ss\bar s$ penguin.
203: One has $\sim$ 10 events each
204: at 2.3, 2.45 and 2.65 GeV,
205: and $\sim$ 20 events at 1.9--2.15 GeV,
206: the latter similar to $K_SK^+K^-$.
207: For $m_{K^+K^-}^{\rm max}$ one has $\sim$ 11, 14, 6 events
208: respectively at 2.1, 2.45 and 2.65 GeV,
209: but no 2.3 GeV cluster.
210: Folding in efficiencies, we find a rate of 1.7 to 3.4 $\times 10^{-6}$,
211: again consistent with BES and with $K_Sh^+h^-$.
212: We caution, however, that identical particle effects,
213: reflected in two possible $K^+K^-$ pairings, smear the plots.
214:
215:
216: To summarize,
217: there is some evidence for a 2.2--2.3 GeV ``state" recoiling
218: against a kaon in $p\bar pK$, $K_Sh^+h^-$ and $K^+K^+K^-$ channels,
219: which could be the $\xi$ glueball candidate.
220: The $\sim$ 2.45 or 2.65 GeV objects might be the pseudoscalar $P$
221: (or a scalar excitation \cite{Morning});
222: there is also some excess in these regions for $p\bar pK$ %\cite{Ptopp}
223: (Fig. 1(a)).
224: The absence in $K^+\pi^+\pi^-$ is worrisome,
225: but, besides larger background (hence extra cut),
226: there are also amplitude level complications,
227: such as a slower fall-off in $m_{\pi\pi}$ vs. $m_{p\bar p}$,
228: the tree contribution (in contrast to $K_Sh^+h^-$),
229: and multiple interfering resonances.
230: We conclude that glueballs may emerge in
231: higher statistics studies of charmless rare $B$ decays,
232: and wish to survey what we know about, and how to
233: gain access to, such glueballs.
234:
235:
236: The $J/\psi \to \gamma K^+K^-$, $\gamma K_S^0K_S^0$
237: numbers from BES \cite{Bai} are
238: slightly below MARK III results\cite{mrk3},
239: while the $p\bar p$ number is just below the bound of $2\times 10^{-5}$.
240: But the $\pi^+\pi^-$ number is $\sim$ factor 3 {\it above}
241: the MARK III bound of $2\times 10^{-5}$.
242: Since there are two structures adjacent to the $\pi^+\pi^-$ peak
243: in BES data, the actual rate is probably smaller.
244: If the 2.2--2.3 GeV ``signal" in
245: $B\to p\bar pK$, $K_Sh^+h^-$ and $K^+K^+K^-$ is due to the $\xi$,
246: our discussion above indicates that
247: $J/\psi \to \gamma\pi^+\pi^-$, $\gamma K^+K^- \sim (3$--$4)\times 10^{-5}$
248: would be more consistent,
249: hence $J/\psi \to \gamma K_S^0K_S^0\sim (1.5$--2)$\times 10^{-5}$,
250: slightly lower than BES.
251: The BES result for
252: $J/\psi \to \gamma\pi^0\pi^0$ \cite{Bai}
253: is almost twice larger than implied by their
254: $J/\psi \to \gamma\pi^+\pi^-$, and was not used
255: in the PDG estimate \cite{PDG} of $J/\psi \to \gamma\pi\pi$.
256:
257: An intriguing recent result has come from CLEO.
258: Based on 61.3 pb$^{-1}$ data $\cong$ 1.45 million $\Upsilon(1S)$ mesons,
259: CLEO reports \cite{Upsilon} 1, 1, 2 events
260: within $\pm 34$ MeV of 2234 MeV in
261: $\Upsilon \to \gamma\pi^+\pi^-$, $\gamma K^+K^-$, $\gamma p\bar p$,
262: respectively, with background expected at 0.12, 0.21, 0.28;
263: a {\it lower bound} of
264: $\Upsilon \to \gamma\xi \to \gamma p\bar p > 0.5\times 10^{-6}$ is obtained.
265: CLEO chose to drop this by allowing for larger background.
266: However, scaling \cite{Upsilon}
267: the BES $J/\psi \to \gamma p\bar p$ result by
268: $(Q_b^2m_c^2\Gamma_{J/\psi}/Q_c^2m_b^2\Gamma_{\Upsilon}) \sim 0.04$ gives
269: $\Upsilon \to \gamma p\bar p = (0.6\pm 0.3)\times 10^{-6}$,
270: right in the ballpark.
271: We mention that CLEO has just finished \cite{JimA} taking
272: 1.3 fb$^{-1}$ data on the $\Upsilon(1S)$, i.e. a 21-fold increase,
273: and we may see the $\xi$ popping up in radiative $\Upsilon$ decays,
274: with 10 to 40 events in the $\pi^+\pi^-$, $K^+K^-$ and $p\bar p$
275: (and other) modes in the near future.
276:
277:
278: It is the $p\bar p$ annihilation experiments which
279: cast doubt on the existence of $\xi$.
280: These experiments were stimulated by the BES observation of $\xi \to p\bar p$
281: to scan around 2230 MeV,
282: before CERN Lower Energy Antiproton Ring (LEAR) shutdown in 1996.
283: The results were all negative.
284: The conservative conclusion is that
285: $\xi \to \pi^+\pi^-$, $K^+K^-$, $K_S^0K_S^0$, $p\bar p$,
286: $\phi\phi$, $\pi^0\pi^0$, $\eta\eta$ are all $\lesssim 1\%$.
287: But, together with the {\it narrow} $\Gamma_\xi \sim 20$ MeV,
288: the stated doubt \cite{Close01} grew with time.
289: We offer a critique of the situation.
290:
291: First,
292: two body decays of $\xi\lesssim 1\%$ is not surprising.
293: The $\eta_c$ and $J/\psi$ decays via $gg$ and $ggg$, and their
294: $p\bar p$ rates are 0.12\% and 0.21\% \cite{PDG}, respectively.
295: If the $\xi$ is the $2^{++}$ two-gluon glueball, having
296: ${\cal B}(\xi\to p\bar p) \sim $ few $\times 10^{-3}$ %(cf. Eq. (2))
297: seems just right.
298: Second,
299: a 20 MeV width for a lowest lying 2.2--2.3 GeV two-gluon glueball
300: is also not unreasonable.
301: On one hand, the ``$\sqrt{\rm OZI}$" rule \cite{Hou:1996qk},
302: i.e. taking the geometric mean of
303: the few MeV width of $\eta_c$ (scaled down to 2 GeV)
304: and the few hundred MeV width of a typical 2 GeV meson
305: gives 10--50 MeV.
306: On the other hand, the near ideal mixing of
307: $f_2(1270)$--$f_2^\prime(1525)$ system implies \cite{HK} that
308: the relevant lowest lying glueball, the $\xi$,
309: would be relatively free of $q\bar q$ content,
310: hence the above narrowness argument holds.
311: Third,
312: the lower bound of Eq. (1) is not unreasonable if $\xi$ is really a glueball,
313: but the large ${\cal B}(J/\psi \to \gamma\xi)$ is a bit overstated.
314: It arises from combining
315: the BES result on $J/\psi \to \pi^0\pi^0$ \cite{Bai}
316: with the nonobservation of $p\bar p \to \pi^0\pi^0$ \cite{Amsler}.
317: As we noted, the BES result for $\pi^0\pi^0$
318: is likely a factor of 2 to 3 too large.
319:
320: With these points,
321: it should be clear that $\xi$ is still viable.
322: We now argue that there is in fact some evidence coming from
323: $p\bar p$ annihilation or $pp$ collisions.
324:
325: Although the JETSET experiment did not observe
326: a narrow $\xi$ in $p\bar p \to \phi\phi$ channel,
327: they did find \cite{Evangelista} a broad structure just above threshold.
328: In fact, further partial wave analysis \cite{Palano}
329: found $2^{++}$ dominance, and a resonance behavior in $2^+_{D0}$
330: ($D$-wave with $\phi\phi$ spin zero):
331: a Breit-Wigner structure with phase motion vs. $2^+_{D2}$,
332: consistent with $m \cong 2231$ MeV and $\Gamma \cong 70$ MeV.
333: From Fig.~6 of Ref.~\cite{Palano},
334: comparing $2^+_{D0}$ with $2^+_{D2}$, $2^+_{S2}$ waves,
335: we note that it may be better to fit with {\it two} Breit-Wigner resonances
336: (or one resonance with a broad underlying structure).
337: We believe the JETSET data does not preclude
338: a narrow resonance at 2.2 GeV.
339:
340: There is another hint in central hadron production.
341: The empirical ``$dP_T$" glueball filter \cite{Close} is
342: defined as the difference between the transverse momenta of
343: e.g. the outgoing protons in $pp \to p X p$;
344: $dP_T \to 0$ enhances glueball probability of $X$.
345: Using data from WA102 experiment with $X = \pi^+\pi^-\pi^+\pi^-$,
346: it was shown that the $f_1(1285)$ prominent for larger $dP_T$
347: all but disappeared for $dP_T < 0.2$ GeV,
348: while the glueball candidate $f_0(1500)$ is retained.
349: From Fig. 3(c) of Ref. \cite{Close}, however, we find
350: a remarkable single-bin (2320--2340 MeV) spike, absent for $dP_T > 0.2$ GeV,
351: but popping up for $dP_T < 0.2$ GeV.
352: {\it With $\simeq 100$ events on $\simeq 360$,
353: it constitutes a $>5\sigma$ fluctuation}.
354: The detector resolution is $\sim 12$ MeV \cite{WA102}
355: hence the spike seems genuine.
356: A broader structure exists at 2430 MeV.
357: Subsequent spin analysis (Fig. 3(f) of second paper of Ref. \cite{WA102})
358: also show a ``spike" at 2240--2280 MeV,
359: and a broader structure at 2400 MeV,
360: all in the $2^{++}$ channel of $f_2\pi\pi$.
361: By analogy with the
362: large $\eta_c\to \eta^{(\prime)}\pi\pi \sim (4$--5)\% \cite{PDG},
363: $\xi \to f_2\pi\pi$ could be a major decay mode.
364: These features should be investigated further.
365:
366:
367: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
368: \begin{table}[t!]
369: \caption{
370: Branching ratios ($\times 10^{-6}$) of the
371: $\bar B\to \xi K^-$, $p\bar pK^-$, $p\bar p\bar K^0$
372: and $p\bar p \pi^-$ modes with $\Gamma_\xi=23$~MeV.
373: %and take $\phi_3=90^\circ$.
374: The first two numbers for ${\mathcal B}(p\bar pK^-)$ correspond to
375: the upper and the lower curves of Fig.~\ref{spectra}~(a) [16],
376: respectively.
377: }
378: \begin{center}
379: \begin{tabular}{cccc}
380: $f_{B\xi K}$ & $0$ & $0.014~(0.015)$ & $-0.014~(-0.016)$ \\
381: ${\mathcal B}(B^-\to \xi K^-)$ & $0$ & $220~(260)$ & $240~(300)$ \\
382: \hline
383: ${\mathcal B}(B^-\to p\bar pK^-)$ & $3.4~(3.3)$ & \multicolumn{2}{c}{$4.3$}\\
384: \hline
385: ${\mathcal B}(\bar B^0\to p\bar p\bar K^0)$ & $3.3~(0.5)$ & $4.1~(1.4)$ &
386: $4.1~(1.5)$ \\
387: ${\mathcal B}(B^-\to p\bar p\pi^-)$ & $2.1~(2.1)$ & $2.1~(2.1)$ &
388: $2.1~(2.1)$ \\
389: \end{tabular}
390: \end{center}
391: \end{table}
392: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
393:
394:
395: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
396: \begin{figure}[t!]
397: \vspace{-1cm}
398: \begin{center}
399: \epsfig{figure=xi_K_fig2.eps,width=3in,height=4.5in}
400: \end{center}
401: \caption{Modeling of $\bar B\to p\bar pK^-$, $p\bar p \bar K {}^0$ and
402: $p\bar p\pi^-$ spectra with $\xi$ spike.
403: For illustration we plot the $\Gamma_\xi=70$~MeV case.
404: The upper (lower) curves correspond to the upper (lower)
405: one in Fig. 1 (a) (from Ref. [16]).
406: }
407: \label{xiK}
408: \end{figure}
409: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
410:
411:
412: We now turn to simple modeling of the $B\to p\bar pK$ ``bump"
413: assuming a $2^{++}$ glueball state.
414: That is, we have a $B\to \xi K(\pi)$ transition
415: governed by
416: \begin{equation}
417: {G_F \over \sqrt{2}} V_{tb}V_{ts(d)}^* \, f_{B\xi K(\pi)} \,
418: \varepsilon^*_{\mu\nu} \, p_B^\mu p_{K(\pi)}^\nu,
419: \end{equation}
420: where we factor out the quark mixing factor appropriate for the
421: underlying $b\to s(d)$ penguin,
422: The $\xi \to p\bar p$ transition is governed by
423: %\begin{equation}
424: $-g_1^{\xi p\bar p} \, \varepsilon_{\mu\nu}
425: \bar u \gamma^\mu p_{\bar p}^\nu v$,
426: %\end{equation}
427: where a less effective $p_{p}^\mu p_{\bar p}^\nu$ term is dropped.
428: For given $\Gamma_\xi$, $g_1^{\xi p\bar p}$ is fixed by
429: ${\cal B}(\xi \to p\bar p)\sim 5\times~10^{-3}$.
430: Together with the fits in Fig. 1(a), $f_{B\xi K}$ is fixed
431: (its sign determines interference; we ignore relative strong phase)
432: to reproduce ${\mathcal B}(B\to p\bar pK)=4.3\times10^{-6}$.
433: %We obtain $g_1^{\xi p\bar p}=0.15$, up to a simple scaling if other value of
434: %${\cal B}(\xi \to p\bar p)$ is used.
435: The results for the
436: $\bar B\to \xi K^-,\,p\bar pK^-,\,p\bar p\bar K^0$ and
437: $p\bar p \pi^-$ modes are given in Table I for $\Gamma_\xi = 23$ MeV,
438: and their spectra in Fig.~2 for
439: $\Gamma_\xi =70$ MeV for sake of illustration.
440: The $p\bar p\bar K^0$ case depends on the threshold dynamics,
441: while the $\xi$ is far less prominent in $p\bar p \pi^-$
442: because it is tree dominant.
443:
444:
445:
446: The underlying dynamics of $B\to \xi K$ is rather
447: analogous to that proposed for $B\to \eta^\prime K$ and $\eta^\prime X_s$.
448: We have factored out in Eq. (2) $G_F/\sqrt{2}$ and
449: the $V_{tb}V_{ts}^*$ quark mixing factor coming from the penguin loop,
450: as illustrated in Fig. 3.
451: The $g^*\to g\xi$ coupling is the heavy blob,
452: similar to $g^*\to g\eta^\prime$ via the gluon anomaly \cite{AS,HT},
453: which gives rise to the glue-content of $\eta^\prime$.
454: As argued in Ref. \cite{HHH} (see also \cite{AS2}) for the case of $P$,
455: the production of a {\it bona fide} glueball in a similar fashion
456: may be even more effective.
457: How the $sg\bar q$ system evolves into a kaon is not of concern
458: here since $B \to \eta^\prime K$ is observed \cite{Browder},
459: and its large strength, recently confirmed by both
460: Belle and BaBar \cite{Paoti}, is still not explained by theory.
461: Thus, it is plausible that $B\to \xi K > B \to \eta^\prime K$
462: and could be $\gtrsim 10^{-4}$.
463: There has been some perturbative arguments for $1/q^2$ damping
464: of the effective $g^*g\xi$ vertex \cite{Ali},
465: but since nonperturbative effects
466: --- which generate $m_\xi^2 \gg m_\rho^2$ ---
467: are bound to enter, we advocate \cite{HT} to leave the case open.
468: Note that several authors have suggested \cite{fragment} to search for
469: glueballs in gluon fragmentation.
470: The $g^*\to g\xi$ process advocated here can be viewed as
471: such, {\it but at only a few GeV energy}.
472: This illustrates further the futility to
473: discard the $g^*g\xi$ vertex by perturbative arguments.
474:
475:
476: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
477: \begin{figure}[t!]
478: \centerline{{\epsfxsize3in \epsffile{BxiK.eps}}
479: }
480: \caption{Illustration for $B\to \xi K$ underlying dynamics. }
481: \label{dGdqVrhopi}
482: \end{figure}
483: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
484:
485:
486: One uniquely interesting feature for studying
487: glueball production in charmless $B$ decays is
488: the potential it offers for studying $CP$ violation \cite{AS2,HT}.
489: On one hand, the penguin loop implies sensitivity for
490: new physics beyond the Standard Model,
491: e.g. via the dipole $bsg$ coupling.
492: On the other hand, if $B\to \xi K$ is really at
493: a few $\times 10^{-4}$ and $\xi$ is a narrow state,
494: one could accumulate a large number of modes
495: and gain in statistics.
496: $CP$ asymmetries could be at 10--30\% level even if
497: new physics contributes only 10\% in amplitude \cite{AS2,HT}.
498:
499: From our survey,
500: additional search modes are: $B\to KK_SK_S$,
501: $K\phi\phi$, $K4\pi$ (e.g. $Kf_2\pi\pi$),
502: and perhaps $p\bar p K_2^*$, beyond the ones given in Fig. 1.
503: Semi-inclusive studies,
504: i.e. $B \to \xi(\to p\bar p,\ \mbox{etc.}) + X_s$, can also be considered.
505: One can also search for other glueballs such as $P$ and $G$,
506: e.g. $B\to PK$, $GK$ via $P\to \eta^{(\prime)}\pi\pi$, $K\bar K\pi$.
507: At the same time, the $\eta^\prime$ study, both exclusive and inclusive,
508: including $CP$ violation effects, should be pursued further.
509:
510:
511: In summary,
512: we find indication for a narrow state in
513: $B\to p\bar pK$, $K_S\pi\pi$ and $K^+K^+K^-$
514: recoiling against a kaon.
515: This could be the $2^{++}$ glueball candidate
516: found in radiative $J/\psi$ decays with
517: mass supported by lattice calculations,
518: and with tantalizing hints in $p\bar p \to \phi\phi$
519: and $pp \to p\pi^+\pi^-\pi^+\pi^-\bar p$.
520: Glueballs may emerge in the study of charmless rare $B$ decays,
521: with confirming evidence from $\Upsilon \to \gamma p\bar p$.
522: Search for $\xi$ (and $P$) in
523: $B\to p\bar pK$, $K^+K^+K^-$, $K_Sh^+h^-$, $K^+K_SK_S$,
524: $K\phi\phi$, $K4\pi$ should be vigorously pursued,
525: with an eye towards uncovering new physics sources of $CP$ violation.
526:
527:
528: \acknowledgments
529:
530: We thank J. Alexander, Y.B. Hsiung, H.C. Huang, A.~Palano
531: and M.Z. Wang for discussions,
532: and partial support from the
533: NSC of R.O.C., the MOE CosPA project,
534: and the BCP topical program of NCTS.
535:
536:
537: %\appendix
538:
539: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
540:
541: \bibitem{Morning}
542: C.J.~Morningstar and M.J.~Peardon,
543: %``The glueball spectrum from an anisotropic lattice study,''
544: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 034509 (1999).
545: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9901004;%%
546:
547: \bibitem{PDG}
548: D.E.\ Groom {\it et al.} (Particle Data Group),
549: %``Review of particle physics,''
550: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 15}, 1 (2000).
551: %%CITATION = EPHJA,C15,1;%%
552:
553: \bibitem{mrk3}
554: R.M.~Baltrusaitis {\it et al.} (MARK-III Collaboration),
555: %``Observation Of A Narrow K Anti-K State In J / Psi Radiative Decays,''
556: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 56}, 107 (1986).
557: %%CITATION = PRLTA,56,107;%%
558:
559: \bibitem{Bai}
560: J.Z.~Bai {\it et al.} (BES Collaboration),
561: %``Studies Of Xi (2230) In J / Psi Radiative Decays,''
562: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 76}, 3502 (1996);
563: %%CITATION = PRLTA,76,3502;%%
564: {\it ibid}.\ {\bf 81}, 1179 (1998).
565: %%CITATION = PRLTA,81,1179;%%
566: %\cite{Evangelista:1997be}
567:
568: \bibitem{twophoton}
569: R.~Godang {\it et al.} (CLEO Collaboration),
570: %``Limit on the two-photon production of the glueball candidate fJ(2220)
571: % at CLEO,''
572: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 79}, 3829 (1997);
573: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9703009;%%
574: M.S.~Alam {\it et al.} (CLEO Collaboration),
575: %``Further search for the two-photon production of the glueball candidate
576: % fJ(2220),''
577: {\it ibid.}\ {\bf 81}, 3328 (1998);
578: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9805033;%%
579: M.~Acciarri {\it et al.} (L3 Collaboration),
580: %``K0(S) K0(S) final state in two-photon collisions and implications for
581: % glueballs,''
582: Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf B501}, 173 (2001);
583: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0011037;%%
584: K. Benslama {\it et al.} (CLEO Collaboration), hep-ex/0204019.
585: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0204019;%%
586:
587:
588: \bibitem{Evangelista}
589: C.~Evangelista {\it et al.} (JETSET Collaboration),
590: %``Measurement of the anti-p p $\to$ K(S) K(S) reaction from 0.6-GeV/c
591: % to 1.9-GeV/c,''
592: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 56}, 3803 (1997);
593: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9707041;%%
594: %``Study of the reaction anti-p p $\to$ Phi Phi from 1.1-GeV/c to 2.0-GeV/c,''
595: {\it ibid}.\ D {\bf 57}, 5370 (1998).
596: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9802016;%%
597:
598: \bibitem{Amsler}
599: C.~Amsler {\it et al.} (Crystal Barrel Collaboration),
600: %``A High Resolution Search For The Tensor Glueball Candidate Xi(2230),''
601: Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf B520}, 175 (2001).
602: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B520,175;%%
603:
604: \bibitem{Close01}
605: F.E.~Close,
606: %``Light hadron spectroscopy: Theory and experiment,''
607: hep-ph/0110081,
608: talk at the Lepton-Photon Conference, Rome, July 2001
609: (World Scientific).
610: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0110081;%%
611:
612: \bibitem{AS2}
613: D.~Atwood and A.~Soni,
614: %``Desperately seeking non-standard phases via direct CP violation in
615: % b $\to$ s g* process,''
616: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 79}, 5206 (1997).
617: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9706512;%%
618:
619: \bibitem{HHH}
620: X.G.~He, W.S.~Hou and C.S.~Huang,
621: %``Implications for B $\to$ eta K and B $\to$ glueball + K modes from
622: % observed large B $\to$ eta' K + X,''
623: Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf B429}, 99 (1998).
624: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9712478;%%
625:
626: \bibitem{JimS}
627: B.H.~Behrens {\it et al.} (CLEO Collaboration),
628: %``Two-body B meson decays to eta and eta': Observation of B $\to$ eta' K,''
629: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 80}, 3710 (1998).
630: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9801012;%%
631:
632: \bibitem{Browder}
633: T.E.~Browder {\it et al.} (CLEO Collaboration),
634: %``Observation of high momentum eta' production in B decay,''
635: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 81}, 1786 (1998).
636: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9804018;%%
637:
638: \bibitem{AS}
639: D.~Atwood and A.~Soni,
640: %``B $\to$ eta' + X and the QCD anomaly,''
641: Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf B405}, 150 (1997).
642: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9704357;%%
643:
644: \bibitem{HT}
645: W.S.~Hou and B.~Tseng,
646: %``Enhanced b $\to$ s g decay, inclusive eta' production,
647: % and the gluon anomaly,''
648: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 80}, 434 (1998).
649: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9705304;%%
650:
651: \bibitem{ppK}
652: K.~Abe {\it et al.} (Belle Collaboration),
653: %``Observation of B+- $\to$ p anti-p K+-,''
654: hep-ex/0202017, to appear in Phys. Rev. Lett.
655: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0202017;%%
656:
657: \bibitem{CHT}
658: C.K.~Chua, W.S.~Hou and S.Y.~Tsai,
659: hep-ph/0204185.
660:
661: \bibitem{rhopn}
662: C.K.~Chua, W.S.~Hou and S.Y.~Tsai,
663: %``Prediction of three-body B0 $\to$ rho- p anti-n, pi- p anti-n
664: % decay rates,''
665: Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf B528}, 233 (2002).
666: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0108068;%%
667:
668: \bibitem{Minzu}
669: These events cluster $\gtrsim 2.2$ GeV in a narrower range than indicated;
670: M.Z. Wang, private communication.
671:
672: \bibitem{Khh}
673: K.~Abe {\it et al.} (Belle Collaboration),
674: %``Study of three-body charmless B decays,''
675: hep-ex/0201007, to appear in Phys. Rev. D.
676: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0201007;%%
677:
678: \bibitem{HC} H.C. Huang,
679: Belle talk at XXXVII{\it th} Rencontres de Moriond
680: ``{\it Electroweak Interactions and Unified Theories}",
681: March 2002, Les Arcs, France.
682:
683: %\bibitem{Ptopp}
684: %Given that the proton is spin-1/2,
685: %comparable $\xi \to p\bar p$ and $P \to p\bar p$ rates is reasonable.
686:
687: \bibitem{Upsilon}
688: G.~Masek {\it et al.} (CLEO Collaboration),
689: %``Further experimental studies of two-body radiative Upsilon decays,''
690: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 072002 (2002).
691: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0201005;%%
692:
693: \bibitem{JimA}
694: J. Alexander, private communication.
695:
696: \bibitem{Hou:1996qk}
697: See, e.g. W.S.~Hou,
698: %``Glueballs: Charmonium decay and anti-p p annihilation,''
699: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 55}, 6952 (1997).
700: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9610411].
701: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9610411;%%
702:
703: \bibitem{HK}
704: W.S.~Hou and C.Y.~Ko,
705: %``Massiveness of glueballs as origin of the OZI rule,''
706: hep-ph/9708314 (unpublished).
707: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9708314;%%
708:
709: \bibitem{Palano}
710: A. Palano, talk at
711: Workshop on Hadron Spectroscopy - Frascati-INFN, 8-12, 1999.
712: See also the minireview on non-$q\bar q$ mesons by C. Amsler
713: in Ref. \cite{PDG}.
714:
715: \bibitem{Close}
716: F.E.~Close and A.~Kirk,
717: %``A glueball q anti-q filter in central hadron production,''
718: Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf B397}, 333 (1997).
719: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9701222;%%
720:
721: \bibitem{WA102}
722: D.~Barberis {\it et al.} (WA102 Collaboration),
723: %``A study of the centrally produced pi+ pi- pi+ pi- channel
724: % in p p interactions at 450-GeV/c,''
725: Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf B413}, 217 (1997);
726: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9707021;%%
727: %``A spin analysis of the 4pi channels produced in
728: % central p p interactions at 450-GeV/c,''
729: {\it ibid}.\ {\bf B471}, 440 (2000).
730: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9912005;%%
731:
732: \bibitem{Paoti}
733: K.~Abe {\it et al.} (Belle Collaboration),
734: %``Measurement of the branching fraction for B $\to$ eta' K and search for
735: % B $\to$ eta' pi+,''
736: Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf B517}, 309 (2001);
737: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0108010;%%
738: B.~Aubert {\it et al.} (BABAR Collaboration),
739: %``Measurements of the branching fractions of exclusive charmless $B$ meson
740: % decays with $\eta^\prime$ or $\omega$ mesons,''
741: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 87}, 221802 (2001).
742: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0108017;%%
743:
744: \bibitem{Ali} A.L. Kagan and A.A. Petrov, hep-ph/9707354 (unpublished);
745: see A.~Ali and A.Y.~Parkhomenko,
746: %``The eta' g* g* vertex with arbitrary gluon virtualities in
747: % the perturbative QCD hard scattering approach,''
748: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 074020 (2002), for more references.
749: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0012212;%%
750:
751: \bibitem{fragment}
752: P.~Roy, K.~Sridhar,
753: %``A new proposal for glueball exploration in hard gluon fragmentation,''
754: JHEP {\bf 9907}, 013 (1999);
755: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9902400;%%
756: H.~Spiesberger, P.M.~Zerwas,
757: %``Gluon fragmentation to gluonium,''
758: Phys. Lett. {\bf B481}, 236 (2000);
759: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0003148;%%
760: P.~Minkowski, W.~Ochs,
761: %``Gluon fragmentation into glueballs and hybrid mesons,''
762: {\it ibid.} {\bf B485}, 139 (2000).
763: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0003125;%%
764:
765: \end{thebibliography}
766:
767: %
768:
769: \end{document}
770:
771:
772:
773:
774:
775: