1: \documentclass[11pt]{article}
2: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
3: \usepackage{a4}
4: \usepackage{psfig}
5: \usepackage{epsfig}
6: \usepackage{epsf}
7: \usepackage{rotating}
8: \usepackage{citesort}
9: \usepackage{amssymb}
10: \usepackage{graphicx}
11: %
12: \setlength{\textwidth}{15.5cm}
13: \setlength{\textheight}{21.2cm}
14: \addtolength{\topmargin}{-2.cm}
15: \addtolength{\oddsidemargin}{-15mm}
16: \addtolength{\evensidemargin}{ -15mm}
17: \def\baselinestretch{1.1}
18: %
19: \def\lsim{\raise0.3ex\hbox{$\;<$\kern-0.75em\raise-1.1ex\hbox{$\sim\;$}}}
20: \def\gsim{\raise0.3ex\hbox{$\;>$\kern-0.75em\raise-1.1ex\hbox{$\sim\;$}}}
21:
22: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
23: % Our definitions
24: \newcommand{\vecc}[1]{\mbox{\boldmath $#1$}}
25: \newcommand{\vR}{\vecc{R}}
26: \newcommand{\Li}{\mbox{Li}_2}
27: \newcommand{\matr}[1]{\mbox{#1}}
28: \newcommand{\eV}{\matr{eV} }
29: \newcommand{\MeV}{\matr{MeV} }
30: \newcommand{\GeV}{\matr{GeV} }
31: \def\CCSNO{\mbox{\rm CC-SNO} }
32: \def\ESSNO{\mbox{\rm ES-SNO} }
33: \def\NCSNO{\mbox{\rm NC-SNO} }
34: \newcommand{\boron}{\mbox{${}^8$B\ }}
35: \newcommand{\fluxunit}{\mbox{$10^6$ cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ }}
36:
37: % --------------- abbreviated journal names -------------------------
38: \def\ap#1#2#3{ { Ann. Phys. (NY) }{\bf #1} (19#2) #3}
39: \def\arnps#1#2#3{ { Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. }{\bf #1} (19#2) #3}
40: \def\npb#1#2#3{ { Nucl. Phys. }{\bf B #1} (19#2) #3}
41: \def\npbps#1#2#3{ { Nucl. Phys. }(Proc. Suppl.){\bf B #1} (19#2) #3}
42: \def\plb#1#2#3{ { Phys. Lett. }{\bf B #1} (19#2) #3}
43: \def\prd#1#2#3{ { Phys. Rev. }{\bf D #1} (19#2) #3}
44: \def\prep#1#2#3{ { Phys. Rep. }{\bf #1} (19#2) #3}
45: \def\prl#1#2#3{ { Phys. Rev. Lett. }{\bf #1} (19#2) #3}
46: \def\ptp#1#2#3{ { Prog. Theor. Phys. }{\bf #1} (19#2) #3}
47: \def\rmp#1#2#3{ { Rev. Mod. Phys. }{\bf #1} (19#2) #3}
48: \def\zpc#1#2#3{ { Zeit. f\"ur Physik }{\bf C #1} (19#2) #3}
49: \def\mpla#1#2#3{ { Mod. Phys. Lett. }{\bf A #1} (19#2) #3}
50: \def\sjnp#1#2#3{ { Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. }{\bf #1} (19#2) #3}
51: \def\yf#1#2#3{ { Yad. Fiz. }{\bf #1} (19#2) #3}
52: \def\nc#1#2#3{ { Nuovo Cim. }{\bf #1} (19#2) #3}
53: \def\jetpl#1#2#3{ { JETP Lett. }{\bf #1} (19#2) #3}
54: \def\ibid#1#2#3{ {\it ibid. }{\bf #1} (19#2) #3}
55: %
56: \begin{document}
57: %
58: \begin{flushright}
59: {\small
60: CERN-TH-2002-170\\
61: IFUM-716/FT\\
62: FTUAM-02-378
63: }
64: \end{flushright}
65: %
66:
67:
68: \begin{center}
69: { \Large \bf Determination of Neutrino mixing parameters after
70: SNO oscillation evidence}\\[0.2cm]
71:
72:
73: {\large P.~Aliani$^{a\star}$, V.~Antonelli$^{a\star}$,
74: R.~Ferrari$^{a\star}$, M.~Picariello$^{a\star}$,
75: E.~Torrente-Lujan$^{abc\star}$
76: \\[2mm]
77: $^a$ {\small\sl Dip. di Fisica, Univ. di Milano} and
78: {\small\sl INFN Sezione di Milano, \\ Via Celoria 16, Milano, Italy}\\
79: $^b$ {\small\sl Dept. Fisica Teorica C-XI,
80: Univ. Autonoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain,}\\
81: $^c$ {\small\sl CERN TH-Division, CH-1202 Geneve}\\
82: }
83:
84: \end{center}
85:
86: \begin{abstract}
87: An updated analysis of all available neutrino oscillation evidence
88: in Solar experiments (SK day and night spectra, global rates from
89: Homestake, SAGE and GALLEX)
90: including the latest $SNO CC$ and $NC$ data
91: is presented.
92: Assuming that the shape of the SNO CC energy spectrum is undistorted
93: and using the information provided by SNO we obtain, for the fraction of
94: electron neutrinos remaining in the solar beam at energies $\gsim 5$ MeV:
95: $$\phi_{CC}/\phi_{NC}=0.34^{+0.05}_{-0.04},$$
96: which is nominally $\sim 13\sigma$ away from the standard value ($\sim 1.8\pm 0.1$).
97: The fraction of oscillating neutrinos
98: which into active ones is computed to be:
99: $$
100: %\frac{\Phi_{NC}-\Phi_{CC}}{\Phi_{SSM}-\Phi_{CC}}=0.92^{+0.39}_{-0.20}
101: (\Phi_{NC}-\Phi_{CC})/(\Phi_{SSM}-\Phi_{CC})=0.92^{+0.39}_{-0.20}
102: $$
103: nearly $5\sigma$ deviations from the pure sterile oscillation case. The data is
104: still compatible with an important fraction of sterile component in the
105: solar beam (up to 20\% of the total).
106:
107: In the framework of two active neutrino oscillations we determine individual
108: neutrino mixing parameters and their errors in the region of no spectrum
109: distortion ($\Delta\langle T_e\rangle <1\%$),
110: we obtain
111: $$
112: \Delta m^2= 4.5^{+2.7}_{-1.4}\times 10^{-5} \eV^2,\quad \tan^2\theta= 0.40^{+0.10}_{-0.08}.
113: $$
114: This is in agreement with the best $\chi^2$ solution in the LMA region.
115:
116: \vspace{0.3cm}
117: PACS:
118: \vspace{0.7cm}
119:
120: {\scriptsize \noindent
121: $\star$ email: paul@lcm.mi.infn.it, vito.antonelli@mi.infn.it,
122: r.ferrari@mi.infn.it,
123: marco.picariello@mi.infn.it, torrente@cern.ch}
124: %
125:
126:
127: \end{abstract}
128:
129: \newpage
130:
131: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
132: %%\section{Introduction and Model Independent Results}
133:
134:
135:
136:
137:
138: {\bf 1.} Observation of neutral current neutrino interactions on deuterium in
139: the SNO experiment has been recently presented \cite{sno2002a,sno2002b}.
140: Using the NC, ES and CC reactions and assuming the ${}^8 B$ neutrino
141: shape predicted by the SSM, the electron and active non-electron component
142: of the solar flux at high energies ($\gsim $5 MeV) are obtained.
143: The non-electron component is found to be $\sim 5\sigma $ greater than
144: zero, the standard prediction, thus providing the strongest evidence so
145: far for flavour oscillation in the neutral lepton sector:
146: the agreement of the total flux, provided by the NC measurement
147: with the expectations
148: implies as a by-product the confirmation of the validity of the
149: SSM~\cite{turck,bpb2001,bp95}.
150:
151:
152:
153:
154:
155:
156: The $SNO$ experiment measures the \boron Solar neutrinos
157: via the reactions~\cite{SNO,Boger:2000bb,Barger:2001pf,Bahcall:2001hv,Bahcall:2001hv}:
158: 1) Charged Current (CC): $\nu_e + d\rightarrow 2 p+e^-$,
159: 2) Elastic Scattering (ES): $\nu_x + e^-\rightarrow \nu_x+e^-$.
160: 3) Neutral Current(NC): $\nu_x + d\rightarrow p+n+\nu_x$.
161: The first reaction is sensitive exclusively to electron neutrinos.
162: The second, the same as the one used in SuperKamiokande (SK),
163: is instead sensitive, with different efficiencies, to all flavours.
164: Finally the NC reaction is equally sensitive to all active neutrino
165: species.
166:
167: The results presented recently by $SNO$ on Solar neutrinos
168: \cite{sno2001}
169: confirm and are consistent with previous evidence from SK and other
170: experiments~\cite{homestake,Fukuda:1999rq,Fukuda:1998fd,Fukuda:1998fd,sage1999}.
171: The CC, ES and NC global and day and night
172: fluxes presented in Refs.~\cite{sno2002a,sno2002b}
173: , summarised in Table~\ref{tableratios},
174: are derived under
175: the assumption that the ${}^8 B$ spectral shape is not distorted from
176: the SSM prediction.
177: With this assumption the SNO collaboration checks
178: the hypothesis of non-oscillation, or zero $\phi_{\mu+\tau}$ flux.
179:
180: It would be advantageous to use this assumption of non-distortion
181: for several reasons. Not
182: only in general terms of simplicity and logical economy
183: but also because with it a much higher statistical
184: accuracy and power of prediction can be obtained (compare the total NC
185: fluxes obtained with and without the distortion hypothesis obtained in
186: \cite{sno2002a}).
187: Using these fluxes is appropriate for the calculation of constraints
188: on mixing parameters in theoretical models where such spectrum distortion is
189: negligible, this is true in particular for ample regions of oscillation
190: space favoured by all previous data (with or without previous SNO CC data).
191:
192: Usually, the best fit to the data has been routinely obtained
193: in the LMA region
194: (see \cite{torrente2001} and references therein),
195: the qualitative explanation for that being the fact
196: that just in that region the observed rather undistorted SK spectrum can
197: be optimally adjusted.
198: The spectrum distortion of the oscillating solutions for SNO in the LMA region
199: has been explicitly found to be negligible \cite{Bahcall:1996bw}.
200: Quantitavely,
201: the main information content of the shape of the observable spectrum is
202: summarised by the first moment of the distribution, the average
203: spectrum energy.
204: For the SSM case and in absence of oscillations, it is
205: found in Ref.\cite{Bahcall:1996bw} that the average kinetic energy
206: $\langle T_e\rangle=7.658\pm 0.006$ MeV.
207: This has to be compared
208: with the expected value for a typical,
209: non distorting, LMA oscillating
210: solution $\langle T_e\rangle=7.654$ MeV
211: and with the far values of the distorted
212: SMA (7.875 MeV) and VAC (8.361 MeV) solutions.
213:
214:
215:
216:
217: In this work we present an up-to-date analysis of all available Solar neutrino
218: evidence including latest SNO results in the most simple framework.
219: First we will reobtain some model independent results which put in a
220: quantitative basis the extent of the deviations with respect to the
221: standard non-oscillating case and the relative importance of active/sterile
222: oscillations.
223: Second we will obtain allowed areas in parameter space in the framework of
224: active two neutrino oscillations from a standard statistical analysis. Individual
225: values for $\Delta m^2$ and $\tan^2\theta$ with error estimation will be
226: obtained from the analysis of marginal likelihoods.
227: In this statistical analysis we include all available data from SK, Homestake
228: and Gallium experiments. From SNO we include the latest results on global
229: day and night fluxes, we make use in particular of: a) the total ${}^8\rm B$ flux
230: as measured by the NC reaction and b) the electron neutrino day-night global
231: asymmetry.
232: The main conclusion of our analysis to be presented below is that it is already possible to
233: determine at present active two neutrino oscillation parameters with relatively
234: good accuracy.
235:
236:
237: \vspace{0.4cm}
238: {\bf 2.} Different quantities can be defined in order to make the evidence for
239: disappearance and appearance of the neutrino flavours explicit.
240: Letting alone the SNO data, from the three fluxes measured by SNO is possible to
241: define two useful ratios, deviations of these ratios with respect to their
242: standard value are powerful tests for occurrence of new physics.
243: Here we compute the
244: values for $\phi_{CC}/\phi_{ES}$ and
245: $\phi_{CC}/\phi_{NC}$ being specially careful with the treatment of the
246: correlations on the uncertitudes, the inclusion or not of these correlations
247: can affect significantly their results (see table II in Ref.\cite{sno2002a}).
248: For the first ratio, from the value from SNO rates\cite{sno2002a} we obtain
249: $$ \frac{\phi_{CC}}{\phi_{ES}}=0.73^{+0.10}_{-0.07}, $$
250: a value which is $\sim$ 2.7 $\sigma$ away from the no-oscillation expectation value of one.
251: The ratio of CC and NC fluxes gives the fraction of electron neutrinos remaining
252: in the solar neutrino beam, our value is:
253: $$\frac{\phi_{CC}}{\phi_{NC}}=0.34^{+0.05}_{-0.04},$$
254: this value is nominally many standard deviations ($\sim 13 \sigma$) away from the
255: standard model case ($\phi_{CC}/\phi_{NC}=1.88 \pm 0.08$
256: from Ref.\cite{Bahcall:1996bw}).
257:
258: Finally, if in addition to SNO data we consider the
259: flux predicted by the solar standard mode one can define,
260: following Ref.\cite{Barger:2001zs}, the
261: quantity $\sin^2\alpha$, the fraction of
262: ''oscillation neutrinos which oscillated into active ones'', again using
263: the SNO data and fully applying systematic correlations
264: (see table 2 in Ref.~\cite{sno2002a}), we find the
265: following result:
266: $$
267: \sin^2\alpha=\frac{\Phi_{NC}-\Phi_{CC}}{\Phi_{SSM}-\Phi_{CC}}=0.92^{+0.39}_{-0.20}.
268: $$
269: The SSM flux is taken as the ${}^8\rm B$ flux predicted in Ref.\cite{bpb2001}.
270: Note that, although consistent with it, this result differs significantly from the number obtained in
271: Ref.\cite{Barger:2001zs}, this is due to the introduction of
272: systematic correlations in our calculation.
273: The central value is clearly below one (only-active oscillations).
274: Although electron neutrinos are still allowed to oscillate into
275: sterile neutrinos the hypothesis of transitions to {\em only} sterile
276: neutrinos is rejected at nearly $5\sigma$, this significance would be reduced if we consider applying
277: a 1-sided analysis to avoid non-physical values.
278:
279:
280:
281:
282:
283: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
284: %\section{Methods and statistical procedures}
285:
286: \vspace{0.4cm}
287: {\bf 3.} Our determination of neutrino oscillations in Solar
288: and Earth matter and of the expected signal in each experiment follows
289: the standard methods found in the literature~\cite{torrente}.
290: As is explained in detail in Ref.\cite{torrente2001},
291: for this analysis
292: we completely solve numerically the neutrino equations of evolution for all
293: the oscillation parameter space.
294: The survival probabilities for an electron neutrino, produced in the
295: Sun, to arrive at the Earth are calculated in three steps.
296: The propagation from the production point to sun's surface is computed
297: numerically in all the parameter range
298: using the electron number density $n_e$ given by the
299: BPB2001 model~\cite{bpb2001} averaging over the production point.
300: The propagation in vacuum from the Sun surface to the Earth is computed
301: analytically. The averaging over the annual variation of the orbit
302: is also exactly performed using simple Bessel functions.
303: To take the Earth matter effects into account, we adopt a
304: spherical model of the Earth density and chemical composition.
305: In this model, the Earth is divided in eleven radial density
306: zones~\cite{earthprofile}, in each of which a polynomial
307: interpolation is used to obtain the electron density.
308: The gluing of the neutrino propagation in the three different
309: regions is performed exactly using an evolution operator
310: formalism~\cite{torrente}.
311: The final survival probabilities are obtained from the corresponding
312: (non-pure) density matrices built from the evolution operators in
313: each of these three regions.
314: The night quantities are obtained using appropriate weights
315: which depend on the neutrino impact parameter and the
316: sagitta distance from neutrino trajectory to the Earth center,
317: for each detector's geographical location.
318:
319: The expected signal in each detector is obtained by convoluting neutrino
320: fluxes, oscillation probabilities, neutrino cross sections and detector
321: energy response functions. We have used
322: neutrino-electron elastic cross sections which include radiative
323: corrections~\cite{sirlin1994}.
324: Neutrino cross sections on deuterium needed for the computation of the
325: SNO measurements are taken from~\cite{nakamura2001}.
326: Detector effects are summarised by the respective response functions,
327: obtained by taking into account both the energy resolution and the detector
328: efficiency.
329: The resolution function for SNO is that given in~\cite{sno2002a,sno2002b,snohowto}.
330: We obtained the energy resolution function for SK using the data
331: presented in~\cite{Nakahata:1999pz,skthesis,sakurai}.
332: The effective threshold efficiencies, which take into account the live
333: time for each experimental period, are incorporated into our
334: simulation program. They are obtained from~\cite{Fukuda:2001nj}.
335:
336:
337: The statistical significance of the neutrino oscillation hypothesis
338: is tested with a standard $\chi^2$ method which is explained in
339: detail in Ref.\cite{torrente2001}.
340: Our present analysis is based on the consideration of the
341: following $\chi^2$ quantity made of three well differentiated pieces:
342: \begin{eqnarray}
343: \chi^2_{\rm }&=& \chi^2_{\rm glob}+\chi^2_{\rm spec-sk}+\chi^2_{\rm SNO }.
344: \end{eqnarray}
345: The contribution of SNO to the $\chi^2$ is given by
346: \begin{eqnarray}
347: \chi^2_{\rm SNO }&=&
348: \left( \frac{\alpha - \alpha^{\rm th}}{\sigma_\alpha}\right)^2+
349: \left( \frac{A_e^{th} -A_e^{exp} }{\sigma_A}\right)^2,
350: \label{chiall}
351: \end{eqnarray}
352: We have introduced the flux normalisation factor $\alpha$
353: with respect to the SNO NC flux whose central and error values are
354: given in Table~\ref{tableratios}. This flux normalisation will be used
355: below as a scale factor for the SK spectrum.
356: The
357: quantity $A_e$ is the asymmetry on the day and night electron
358: neutrino rates
359: extracted from the SNO CC, ES and NC data, imposing the condition
360: $A_{tot}=A_{e+\mu\tau}\equiv 0$, as predicted by active-only models \cite{sno2002b}.
361: The strong anticorrelation of $A_e$ and $A_{tot}$ makes the
362: imposition of this constraint useful, thus reducing greatly the uncertainties
363: with respect to the raw $A_{CC}$.
364:
365:
366:
367: The definition of the $\chi^2_{\rm glob}$ function is the following:
368: %
369: \begin{eqnarray}
370: \chi^2_{\rm glob}&=& ({\vR^{\rm th}-\vR^{\rm exp}})^T
371: \left (\sigma^{2}\right )^{-1} ({\vR^{\rm th}-\vR^{\rm exp}})
372: \label{chi1}
373: \end{eqnarray}
374: %
375: where $\sigma^2$ is the full covariance matrix made up of two terms,
376: $\sigma^2=\sigma^2_{\rm unc}+\sigma^2_{\rm cor}$.
377: The diagonal matrix $\sigma^2_{\rm unc}$ contains the theoretical,
378: statistical and uncorrelated errors while $\sigma^2_{\rm cor}$ contains
379: the correlated systematic uncertainties.
380: The ${\vR}^{\rm th,exp}$ are length 2 vectors containing
381: the theoretical and experimental data normalised to the SSM
382: expectations.
383: The $2\times 2$ correlation matrix have been computed using standard
384: techniques~\cite{lisimatrix,Goswami:2000wb}.
385: We have used data on the total event rates measured at Homestake
386: experiment, at the gallium experiments SAGE~\cite{sage,sage1999},
387: GNO~\cite{gno2000} and GALLEX~\cite{gallex}
388: (see Table~(\ref{tableratios}) for an explicit list of results and
389: references).
390: For the purposes of this work it is enough to summarise all the
391: gallium experiments in one single quantity by taking the weighted
392: average of their rates.
393:
394:
395:
396: For the analysis of the SK energy spectrum,
397: following closely the procedure assumed by the SK
398: collaboration~\cite{Fukuda:2001nk,Fukuda:2001nj},
399: we consider a $\chi^2$ function:
400: %
401: \begin{eqnarray}\label{chi2}
402: \chi^2_{\rm spec}&=&\sum_{d,n} ({\alpha \vR^{\rm th}-\vR^{\rm exp}})^t
403: \left (\sigma^{2}_{\rm unc}+\delta_{\rm cor} \sigma^{2}_{\rm cor}\right )^{-1}
404: ({\alpha \vR^{\rm th}-\vR^{\rm exp}})+\chi^2_\delta\, .
405: \end{eqnarray}
406: %
407: Where the vectors of data and expectations \vR are defined as before.
408: We have introduced the SNO NC flux normalisation factor $\alpha$
409: given above and the correlation
410: parameter $\delta_{\rm cor}$
411: is assumed to be constrained by the last term in the sum:
412: $\chi^2_\delta= (\delta_{\rm cor} - \delta_{\rm cor}^{\rm th})^2/\sigma_\delta^2$.
413: The complete variance matrix is not a constant quantity.
414: It is obtained from combining the statistical variances with systematic
415: uncertainties and dependent on this correlation parameter.
416: For each day and night spectrum the corresponding 19$\times$19 block
417: correlation matrices are conservatively constructed assuming full
418: correlation among energy
419: bins
420: The components of the variance matrix are given by standard expressions
421: \cite{torrente2001} in terms of
422: statistic errors, bin-correlated and uncorrelated uncertainties.
423: The data and errors for individual energy
424: bins for SK spectrum has been obtained from Ref.~\cite{Fukuda:2001nj}.
425: % The information from other SK results as the global
426: % day night asymmetry is already contained to a large
427: % extent in the previous quantities and
428: % does not change the results to be presented on
429: % continuation~\cite{Fukuda:2001nk,Fukuda:1999rq}.
430: Other information from the SK results, such as the global day-night asymmetries,
431: is to a large extent already contained in the above-mentioned quantities. It is therefore
432: not included in our analysis and does not change the results presented further on.
433:
434: \vspace{0.4cm}
435: {\bf 4.} To test a particular oscillation hypothesis against the parameters of the best fit
436: and obtain allowed regions in parameter space we perform a
437: minimisation of the four dimensional function
438: $\chi^2(\Delta m^2,\tan^2\theta,\alpha,\delta_{\rm cor})$.
439: For $\delta_{\rm cor}=\delta_{\rm cor}^{\rm min},\alpha=\alpha_{\rm min}$,
440: a given point in the oscillation parameter space is allowed if
441: the globally subtracted quantity fulfils the condition
442: $\Delta \chi^2=\chi^2 (\Delta m^2, \theta)-\chi_{\rm min}^2<\chi^2_n(CL)$.
443: Where $\chi^2_{n=4}(90\%,95\%,...)=7.78,9.4,...$ are the quantiles for
444: four degrees of freedom.
445: The $\chi^2$ summation now contains 41 bins in total: 3 from
446: the global rates and SNO asymmetry
447: and 2$\times$19 bins for the SK day and night spectrums.
448:
449:
450: The results are shown in Fig.\ref{f1}(left) where we have generated acceptance
451: contours in $\Delta m^2$ and $\tan^2\theta$.
452: In Table~(\ref{table2})
453: we present the best fit parameters or local minima
454: obtained from the minimisation of the $\chi^2$ function given in
455: Eq.~(\ref{chi1}).
456: Also shown are the values of $\chi^2_{\rm min}$ per degree of freedom
457: ($\chi^2/n$) and the goodness of fit (g.o.f.) or significance level of each
458: point (definition of SL as in Ref.~\cite{pdg}).
459: In Fig.\ref{f1}(right) we superimpose the global signal expected in the KamLAND
460: experiment from reactor electron antineutrinos. We observe that at the most
461: favoured regions obtained before, the KamLAND expected signal is situated at
462: a intermediate region where high sensibility to both mass squared and mixing angle
463: parameters is found. The experiment expects around $50\%$
464: of the non-oscillation signal, in this region it would suffice to reach a total
465: error of $5-10\%$ (a quantity reachable after one year of
466: data taking) in the measurement to be able to confirm the SNO results.
467:
468: In order to obtain concrete values for the individual oscillation parameters and
469: estimates for their uncertainties, it is preferable
470: to study the marginalized parameter constraints.
471: It is justified to convert $\chi^2$ into likelihood
472: using the expression ${\cal L}=e^{-\chi^2/2}$, this normalised marginal
473: likelihood is plotted
474: in Figs.~(\ref{f2}) for each of the oscillation parameters $\Delta m^2$ and $\tan^2\theta$.
475: For $\tan^2\theta$ we observe that the likelihood function is concentrated in a
476: region $0.2<\tan^2\theta<1$ with a clear maximum at $\tan^2\theta\sim 0.4$.
477: The situation for $\Delta m^2$ is similar.
478: Values for the parameters are extracted by fitting one- or two-sided
479: Gaussian distributions to any
480: of the peaks. In the case of the angle distribution the goodness of fit of the
481: Gaussian fit is excellent (g.o.f $>99.9\%$) even at far tail distances thus
482: justifying the consistency of the procedure. The goodness of Gaussian fit to
483: the distribution in squared mass, although somewhat smaller, is still good.
484: The values for the parameters appear in Table~\ref{table2}. They are
485: fully consistent and very similar to the values obtained from simple
486: $\chi^2$ minimisation.
487:
488:
489:
490:
491: %%% \section{Conclusions}\label{sec:conclusions}
492:
493: In summary,
494: in this work we have present an up-to-date analysis of all available Solar neutrino
495: evidence including latest SNO results in the most simple framework.
496: The direct measurement via $NC$ reaction on deuterium of $\phi_{^{8}{\rm B}}$ combined with the
497: $CC$ results has confirmed the neutrino oscillation hypothesis to $30\sigma$ according to
498: our estimate.
499: We have obtained the allowed area in parameter space
500: and individual
501: values for $\Delta m^2$ and $\tan^2\theta$ with error estimation
502: from the analysis of marginal likelihoods.
503: We have shown that it is already possible to
504: determine at present active two neutrino oscillation parameters with relatively
505: good accuracy.
506: The KamLAND and specially the near future long baseline experiments will have
507: a clear chance of first, confirming present mixing parameters obtained from
508: solar originated neutrinos and second, measuring first and second generation
509: mass and mixing parameters under laboratory-controlled conditions.
510:
511:
512:
513:
514: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
515: %\subsection*{Acknowledgements}
516: {\bf Acknowledgements.}
517: % It is a pleasure to thank R. Ferrari for many enlightening discussions and
518: % for his encouraging support without which this work would have not been
519: % possible.
520: We acknowledge the financial support of
521: the Italian MIUR, the Spanish CYCIT funding agencies
522: and the CERN Theoretical Division.
523: The numerical calculations have been performed in the computer farm of
524: the Milano University theoretical group.
525:
526:
527: \newpage
528:
529: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
530:
531:
532: %\cite{Ahmad:2002jz}
533: %\bibitem{Ahmad:2002jz}
534: \bibitem{sno2002a}
535: Q.~R.~Ahmad {\it et al.} [SNO Collaboration],
536: %``Direct evidence for neutrino flavor transformation from neutral-current interactions in the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory,''
537: arXiv:nucl-ex/0204008.
538: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0204008;%%
539:
540: %\cite{Ahmad:2002ka}
541: %\bibitem{Ahmad:2002ka}
542: \bibitem{sno2002b}
543: Q.~R.~Ahmad {\it et al.} [SNO Collaboration],
544: %``Measurement of day and night neutrino energy spectra at SNO and constraints on neutrino mixing parameters,''
545: arXiv:nucl-ex/0204009.
546: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0204009;%%
547:
548: %\bibitem{snohowto}
549: Q.~R.~Ahmad {\it et al.} [SNO Collaboration],
550: ``HOWTO use the SNO solar Neutrino Spectral data'', http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/sno.
551:
552: %\cite{Turck-Chieze:te}
553: \bibitem{turck}
554: %%\bibitem{Turck-Chieze:te}
555: S.~Turck-Chieze,
556: %``Review Of Solar Models And Helioseismology,''
557: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 91} (2001) 73.
558: %%CITATION = NUPHZ,91,73;%%
559:
560: %\cite{Adelberger:1998qm}
561: %%\bibitem{Adelberger:1998qm}
562: E.~G.~Adelberger {\it et al.},
563: %``Solar fusion cross-sections,''
564: Rev.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ {\bf 70} (1998) 1265
565: [arXiv:astro-ph/9805121].
566: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 9805121;%%
567:
568: %\cite{Brun:1998qk}
569: %%\bibitem{Brun:1998qk}
570: A.~S.~Brun, S.~Turck-Chieze and P.~Morel,
571: %``Standard Solar Models in the Light of New Helioseismic Constraints: I The Solar Core,''
572: arXiv:astro-ph/9806272.
573: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 9806272;%%
574:
575: %\cite{Bahcall:2001nu}
576: %%\bibitem{Bahcall:2001nu}
577: \bibitem{bpb2001}
578: J.~N.~Bahcall, M.~H.~Pinsonneault and S.~Basu,
579: %``Solar models: Current epoch and time dependences, neutrinos, and helioseismological properties,''
580: Astrophys.\ J.\ {\bf 555}, 990 (2001)
581: [arXiv:astro-ph/0010346].
582: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0010346;%%
583:
584: \bibitem{bp95}
585: J.N. Bahcall and M.H. Pinsonneault, Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf 67} (1995) 781.
586:
587: \bibitem{SNO}
588: J.~R.~Klein [SNO Collaboration],
589: {\it In *Venice 1999, Neutrino telescopes, vol. 1* 115-125}.
590:
591: A.~B.~McDonald [SNO Collaboration],
592: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 77} (1999) 43.
593:
594: %\cite{Boger:2000bb}
595: \bibitem{Boger:2000bb}
596: J.~Boger {\it et al.} [SNO Collaboration],
597: %``The Sudbury Neutrino Observatory,''
598: Nucl.\ Instrum.\ Meth.\ A {\bf 449} (2000) 172
599: [arXiv:nucl-ex/9910016].
600: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 9910016;%%
601:
602:
603:
604: \bibitem{homestake}
605: R. Davis, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 32 (1994) 13.
606: B.T. Cleveland et al., (HOMESTAKE Coll.) \npbps{38}{95}{47}.
607: B.T. Cleveland et al., (HOMESTAKE Coll.) Astrophys. J. 496 (1998) 505-526.
608:
609: %\cite{Fukuda:1999ua}
610: \bibitem{Fukuda:1999ua}
611: Y.~Fukuda {\it et al.} [Super-Kamiokande Collaboration],
612: %``Measurement of the solar neutrino energy spectrum using neutrino electron scattering,''
613: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 82}, 2430 (1999)
614: [arXiv:hep-ex/9812011].
615: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9812011;%%
616:
617: %\cite{Fukuda:1999rq}
618: \bibitem{Fukuda:1999rq}
619: Y.~Fukuda {\it et al.} [Super-Kamiokande Collaboration],
620: %``Constraints on neutrino oscillation parameters from the measurement of day-night solar neutrino fluxes at Super-Kamiokande,''
621: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 82}, 1810 (1999)
622: [arXiv:hep-ex/9812009].
623: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9812009;%%
624:
625: \bibitem{sage1999} J.N. Abdurashitov et al. (SAGE Coll.)
626: Phys. Rev. Lett. 83(23) (1999)4686.
627:
628: % \bibitem{langacker1}
629: % P. Langacker. Talk given at 4th Intl. Conf. on
630: % Physics Beyond the Standard Model, Lake Tahoe, CA, 13-18 Dec. 1994,
631: % hep-ph/9503327; Published in Trieste HEP Cosmol.1992:0487-522.
632: % {\em Ibid.}, \npbps{77}{99}{241}, hep-ph/9811460.
633: % {\em Ibid.}., Talk given at 1th Int. Workshop on
634: % Weak Interactions and neutrinos (WIN99), Cape Town, SA,
635: % 24-30 Jan 1999, hep-ph/9905428.
636:
637: % \bibitem{RAMOND2} P. Ramond, hep-ph/9809401, \npbps{77}{99}{3}.
638: % % neutrinos: a glimpse beyond the standard model.
639: % %To appear in the proceeding of the Neutrino'98 conference (see
640: % %Ref.\protect\cite{nu98}).
641:
642: % \bibitem{wilczek1}
643: % F. Wilczek, hep-ph/9809509, \npbps{77}{99}{511}.
644: % % Beyond the standard Model: this time for real.
645:
646: % \bibitem{bilenky98} S.M. Bilenky et al.
647: % Summary of the Europhysics neutrino Oscillation Workshop
648: % Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 7-9 Sep 1998,
649: % hep-ph/9906251.
650: % S.M. Bilenky, C. Giunti and C.W. Kim, hep-ph/9902462,
651: % Int.J.Mod.Phys.{\bf A15}(2000) 625.
652:
653:
654: %\cite{Aliani:2001ba}
655: \bibitem{torrente2001}
656: P.~Aliani, V.~Antonelli, M.~Picariello and E.~Torrente-Lujan,
657: %``Solar neutrino experiments and Borexino perspectives,''
658: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 110}, 361 (2002)
659: [arXiv:hep-ph/0112101].
660: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0112101;%%
661: P.~Aliani, V.~Antonelli, M.~Picariello and E.~Torrente-Lujan,
662: %``Global analysis of solar neutrino oscillation evidence including SNO and implications for Borexino,''
663: arXiv:hep-ph/0111418.
664: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0111418;%%
665:
666: \bibitem{torrentereview}
667: %\cite{Torrente-Lujan:1999kr}
668: %%\bibitem{Torrente-Lujan:1999kr}
669: E.~Torrente-Lujan,
670: %``A review on neutrino physics, mass and oscillations,''
671: arXiv:hep-ph/9902339.
672: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9902339;%%
673: %\cite{Khalil:2000af}
674: %\bibitem{Khalil:2000af}
675: S.~Khalil and E.~Torrente-Lujan,
676: %``Neutrino mass and oscillation as probes of physics beyond the standard model,''
677: J.\ Egyptian Math.\ Soc.\ {\bf 9}, 91 (2001)
678: [arXiv:hep-ph/0012203].
679: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0012203;%%
680:
681: % \bibitem{fiorentini}
682: % %\cite{fiorentini}
683: % G. Fiorentini, F. L. Villante, B. Ricci,
684: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0109275] .
685: % %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0109275;%%
686:
687: %\cite{Ahmad:2001an}
688: \bibitem{sno2001}
689: %\bibitem{sno2001} Q.R. Ahmad et al. (SNO Coll.) nucl-ex/0106015.
690: Q.~R.~Ahmad {\it et al.} [SNO Collaboration],
691: %``Measurement of the charged of current interactions produced by B-8 solar neutrinos at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory,''
692: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 87} (2001) 071301
693: [arXiv:nucl-ex/0106015].
694: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0106015;%%
695:
696:
697:
698: %\cite{Barger:2001pf}
699: \bibitem{Barger:2001pf}
700: V.~Barger, D.~Marfatia and K.~Whisnant,
701: %``Piecing the solar neutrino puzzle together at SNO,''
702: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 509} (2001) 19
703: [arXiv:hep-ph/0104166].
704: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0104166;%%
705:
706: %\cite{Bahcall:2001hv}
707: \bibitem{Bahcall:2001hv}
708: J.~N.~Bahcall, P.~I.~Krastev and A.~Y.~Smirnov,
709: %``Solar neutrinos: Global analysis and implications for SNO,''
710: JHEP {\bf 0105} (2001) 015
711: [arXiv:hep-ph/0103179].
712: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0103179;%%
713:
714: %\cite{Fukuda:1998fd}
715: \bibitem{Fukuda:1998fd}
716: Y.~Fukuda {\it et al.} [Super-Kamiokande Collaboration],
717: %``Measurements of the solar neutrino flux from Super-Kamiokande's first 300 days,''
718: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 81}, 1158 (1998)
719: [Erratum-ibid.\ {\bf 81}, 4279 (1998)]
720: [arXiv:hep-ex/9805021].
721: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9805021;%%
722:
723: % %\cite{Poon:2001ee}
724: % \bibitem{poon}
725: % A.~W.~Poon [SNO Collaboration],
726: % %``Neutrino observations from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory,''
727: % arXiv:nucl-ex/0110005.
728: % %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0110005;%%
729:
730: % %\cite{torino}
731: % \bibitem{torino}
732: % M. V. Garzelli, C. Giunti
733: % arXiv:hep-ph/0111254.
734: % %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0111254;%%
735:
736: %\cite{Barger:2001zs}
737: \bibitem{Barger:2001zs}
738: V.~Barger, D.~Marfatia and K.~Whisnant,
739: %``Unknowns after the SNO charged-current measurement,''
740: arXiv:hep-ph/0106207.
741: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0106207;%%
742:
743: % %\cite{Fogli:2001vr}
744: % \bibitem{Fogli:2001vr}
745: % G.~L.~Fogli, E.~Lisi, D.~Montanino and A.~Palazzo,
746: % %``Model-dependent and independent implications of the first Sudbury Neutrino Observatory results,''
747: % Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64} (2001) 093007
748: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0106247].
749: % %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0106247;%%
750:
751: % %%%\cite{Krastev:2001tv}
752: % \bibitem{Krastev:2001tv}
753: % P.~I.~Krastev and A.~Y.~Smirnov,
754: % %``Global analysis with SNO: Toward the solution of the solar neutrino problem,''
755: % arXiv:hep-ph/0108177.
756: % %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0108177;%%
757:
758: % %\cite{Bahcall:2001zu}
759: % \bibitem{Bahcall:2001zu}
760: % J.~N.~Bahcall, M.~C.~Gonzalez-Garcia and C.~Pena-Garay,
761: % %``Global analysis of solar neutrino oscillations including SNO CC measurement,''
762: % JHEP {\bf 0108}, 014 (2001)
763: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0106258];
764: % %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0106258;
765: % J.~N.~Bahcall, M.~C.~Gonzalez-Garcia and C.~Pena-Garay,
766: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0111150]
767: % %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0111150;
768:
769: % %\cite{Bandyopadhyay:2001fb}
770: % \bibitem{Bandyopadhyay:2001fb}
771: % A.~Bandyopadhyay, S.~Choubey, S.~Goswami and K.~Kar,
772: % %``Three generation neutrino oscillation parameters after SNO,''
773: % arXiv:hep-ph/0110307.
774: % %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0110307;%%
775:
776: % %\cite{Choubey:2001bi}
777: % \bibitem{Choubey:2001bi}
778: % S.~Choubey, S.~Goswami and D.~P.~Roy,
779: % %``Energy independent solution to the solar neutrino anomaly including the SNO data,''
780: % arXiv:hep-ph/0109017.
781: % %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0109017;%%
782:
783: % %\cite{Bandyopadhyay:2001aa}
784: % \bibitem{Bandyopadhyay:2001aa}
785: % A.~Bandyopadhyay, S.~Choubey, S.~Goswami and K.~Kar,
786: % %``Impact of the first SNO results on neutrino mass and mixing,''
787: % Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 519} (2001) 83
788: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0106264].
789: % %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0106264;%%
790:
791: \bibitem{gno2000} M. Altmann et al. (GNO Coll.)
792: Phys. Lett. B490 (2000) 16-26.
793:
794: \bibitem{gallex}
795: P. Anselmann et al., GALLEX Coll., \plb{285}{92}{376}.
796: W. Hampel et al., GALLEX Coll., \plb{388}{96}{384}.
797: T.A. Kirsten, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 40 (1998) 85-99.
798: W. Hampel et al., (GALLEX Coll.) \plb{447}{99}{127}.
799: M. Cribier, \npbps{70}{99}{284}.
800: W. Hampel et al., (GALLEX Coll.) \plb{436}{98}{158}.
801: W. Hampel et al., (GALLEX Coll.) \plb{447}{99}{127}.
802:
803: % %\cite{Hagner:2001sc}
804: % \bibitem{Hagner:2001sc}
805: % T.~Hagner [BOREXINO Collaboration],
806: % %``Status report on BOREXINO and results of the muon background measurements at CERN,''
807: % Part.\ Nucl.\ Lett.\ {\bf 104}, 90 (2001).
808: % %%CITATION = 00287,104,90;%%
809:
810: % %%\cite{Bilenky:2001tf}
811: % \bibitem{Bilenky:2001tf}
812: % S.~M.~Bilenky, T.~Lachenmaier, W.~Potzel and F.~von Feilitzsch,
813: % %``Implications of the SNO and the Homestake results for the BOREXINO experiment,''
814: % arXiv:hep-ph/0109200.
815: % %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0109200;%%
816:
817: % %\cite{Arpesella:2001iz}
818: % \bibitem{Arpesella:2001iz}
819: % C.~Arpesella {\it et al.} [BOREXINO Collaboration],
820: % %``Measurements of extremely low radioactivity levels in BOREXINO,''
821: % arXiv:hep-ex/0109031.
822: % %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0109031;%%
823:
824: % %\cite{Meroni:2001zj}
825: % \bibitem{Meroni:2001zj}
826: % E.~Meroni,
827: % %``Borexino and its physics program,''
828: % Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 100}, 42 (2001).
829: % %%CITATION = NUPHZ,100,42;%%
830:
831: \bibitem{torrente}
832: E. Torrente-Lujan, \prd{59}{99}{093006}.
833: %%%%%%%%hep-ph/9807361.
834: E. Torrente-Lujan,\prd{59}{99}{073001}.
835: %%hep-ph/9807371
836: E. Torrente-Lujan, \plb{441}{98}{305}.
837: %%%%%%hep-ph/9807426.
838: V.B. Semikoz, E. Torrente-Lujan,\npb{556}{99}{353}.
839: E.~Torrente-Lujan,Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf B494} (2000) 255 [hep-ph/9911458].
840: %%CITATION = NUPHZ,87,504;%%
841: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9912225;%%
842: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9911458;%%
843: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D60,085003;%%
844: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9809376;%%
845: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9807426;%%
846: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9807371;%%
847: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9807361;%%
848: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9707429;%%
849: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9604218;%%
850: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9505209;%%
851:
852: \bibitem{earthprofile}
853: %\cite{Mocioiu:2000st}
854: %%\bibitem{Mocioiu:2000st}
855: I.~Mocioiu and R.~Shrock,
856: %``Matter effects on neutrino oscillations in long baseline experiments,''
857: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62} (2000) 053017
858: [arXiv:hep-ph/0002149].
859: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0002149;%%
860:
861: A. Dziewonski, in {\em The Encyclopedia of Solid Earth Geophysics},
862: edited by D.E James (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York 1989).
863:
864: \bibitem{sirlin1994} J. Bahcall, M. Kamionkowski, A. Sirlin, Phys. Rev. D51 (1995) 6146.
865:
866: \bibitem{nakamura2001}
867: %\cite{Nakamura:2001vp}
868: S.~Nakamura, T.~Sato, V.~Gudkov and K.~Kubodera,
869: %``Neutrino reactions on deuteron,''
870: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 63} (2001) 034617
871: [arXiv:nucl-th/0009012].
872: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0009012;%%
873:
874: \bibitem{skthesis}
875: H. Ishino, Ph. D. thesis, University of Tokio,1999.
876:
877: M. Nakahata et al. (SK Coll.), Nucl. Instrum. Methods 46 (1998) 301.
878:
879: %\cite{Nakahata:1999pz}
880: \bibitem{Nakahata:1999pz}
881: M.~Nakahata {\it et al.} [Super-Kamiokande Collaboration],
882: %``Calibration of Super-Kamiokande using an electron linac,''
883: Nucl.\ Instrum.\ Meth.\ A {\bf 421}, 113 (1999)
884: [arXiv:hep-ex/9807027].
885: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9807027;%%
886:
887: \bibitem{sakurai} N. Sakurai, Ph.D. Thesis, Dec. 2000 {\em
888: Constraints of the neutrino oscillation parameters from 1117 day
889: observation of soloar neutrino day and night
890: spectra in Super-Kamiokande}.
891:
892: \bibitem{lisimatrix}
893: %\cite{Fogli:1994nn}
894: %%\bibitem{Fogli:1994nn}
895: G.~L.~Fogli and E.~Lisi,
896: %``Standard solar model uncertainties and their correlations in the analysis of the solar neutrino problem,''
897: Astropart.\ Phys.\ {\bf 3} (1995) 185.
898: %%CITATION = APHYE,3,185;%%
899:
900: %\cite{Goswami:2000wb}
901: \bibitem{Goswami:2000wb}
902: S.~Goswami, D.~Majumdar and A.~Raychaudhuri,
903: %``Solar neutrino rates, spectrum, and its moments: An MSW analysis in the light of Super-Kamiokande results,''
904: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63} (2001) 013003
905: [arXiv:hep-ph/0003163].
906: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0003163;%%
907:
908: %\cite{Fukuda:2001nk}
909: \bibitem{Fukuda:2001nk}
910: S.~Fukuda {\it et al.} [Super-Kamiokande Collaboration],
911: %``Constraints on neutrino oscillations using 1258 days of Super-Kamiokande solar neutrino data,''
912: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 86}, 5656 (2001)
913: [arXiv:hep-ex/0103033].
914: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0103033;%%
915:
916: %\cite{Fukuda:2001nj}
917: \bibitem{Fukuda:2001nj}
918: S.~Fukuda {\it et al.} [SKamiokande Collaboration],
919: %``Solar B-8 and hep neutrino measurements from 1258 days of Super-Kamiokande data,''
920: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 86}, 5651 (2001)
921: [arXiv:hep-ex/0103032].
922: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0103032;%%
923:
924: \bibitem{sage}
925: A.I. Abazov et al. (SAGE Coll.), \prl{67}{91}{3332}.
926: D.N. Abdurashitov et al. (SAGE Coll.), \prl{77}{96}{4708}.
927: J.N. Abdurashitov et al., (SAGE Coll.), Phys. Rev. {\bf C60} (1999) 055801;
928: astro-ph/9907131.
929: J.N. Abdurashitov et al., (SAGE Coll.), \prl{83}{99}{4686}; astro-ph/9907113.
930:
931: %\cite{Groom:in}
932: \bibitem{pdg}
933: D.~E.~Groom {\it et al.} [Particle Data Group Collaboration],
934: %``Review Of Particle Physics,''
935: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 15} (2000) 1.
936: %%CITATION = EPHJA,C15,1;%%
937:
938: \bibitem{chooznew}
939: M. Apollonio et al. (CHOOZ coll.), hep-ex/9907037,\plb{466}{99}{415}.
940: M. Apollonio {\it et al.}, \plb{420}{98}{397}.
941:
942: F.~Boehm {\it et al.},Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D62} (2000) 072002 [hep-ex/0003022].
943:
944: \bibitem{mena}
945: %\cite{Burguet-Castell:2001uw}
946: %%\bibitem{Burguet-Castell:2001uw}
947: J.~Burguet-Castell and O.~Mena,
948: arXiv:hep-ph/0108109.
949: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0108109;%%
950:
951: \bibitem{cl1999}
952: K. Lande (For the Homestake Coll.) Nucl. Phys. B(Proc. Suppl.)77(1999)13-19.
953:
954: % \bibitem{Faid}
955: % J.N. Bahcall, P.I. Krastev and E. Lisi, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 55}, 494 (1997);\\
956: % B.\ Fa{\"\i}d, G.L.\ Fogli, E.\ Lisi and D.\ Montanino, Astropart.\
957: % Phys.\ {\bf 10}, 93 (1999).
958:
959: %\cite{Creminelli:2001ij}
960: %%\bibitem{Creminelli:2001ij}
961: %%P.~Creminelli, G.~Signorelli and A.~Strumia,
962: %%%``Frequentist analyses of solar neutrino data,''
963: %%JHEP {\bf 0105}, 052 (2001)
964: %%[arXiv:hep-ph/0102234].
965: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0102234;%%
966:
967: %%%%%%%%%%%%%% other analysis
968:
969: % %\cite{Berezinsky:2001se}
970: % \bibitem{berezinsky2001}
971: % V.~Berezinsky,
972: % %``Exact analysis of the combined data of SNO and Super-Kamiokande,''
973: % arXiv:hep-ph/0108166.
974: % %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0108166;%%
975:
976:
977: %\cite{Bahcall:1996ha}
978: %%\bibitem{Bahcall:1996ha}
979: \bibitem{Bahcall:1996bw}
980: Y.~Fukuda {\it et al.} [Super-Kamiokande Collaboration],
981: %``Constraints on neutrino oscillation parameters from the measurement of day-night solar neutrino fluxes at Super-Kamiokande,''
982: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 82}, 1810 (1999)
983: [arXiv:hep-ex/9812009].
984: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9812009;%%
985:
986: J.~N.~Bahcall, P.~I.~Krastev and E.~Lisi,
987: %``Neutrino oscillations and moments of electron spectra,''
988: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 55}, 494 (1997)
989: [arXiv:nucl-ex/9610010].
990: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 9610010;%%
991:
992: %\cite{Bahcall:1996bw}
993: %\bibitem{Bahcall:1996bw}
994: J.~N.~Bahcall and E.~Lisi,
995: %``Tests of electron flavor conservation with the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory,''
996: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 54}, 5417 (1996)
997: [arXiv:hep-ph/9607433].
998: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9607433;%%
999:
1000: %\cite{Bahcall:1996qv}
1001: %\bibitem{Bahcall:1996qv}
1002: J.~N.~Bahcall, E.~Lisi, D.~E.~Alburger, L.~De Braeckeleer, S.~J.~Freedman and J.~Napolitano,
1003: %``Standard Neutrino Spectrum from $~8$B Decay,''
1004: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 54}, 411 (1996)
1005: [arXiv:nucl-th/9601044].
1006: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9601044;%%
1007:
1008:
1009: \end{thebibliography}
1010:
1011: \newpage
1012:
1013:
1014:
1015:
1016: \begin{table}[p]
1017: \centering
1018: \scalebox{0.8}{
1019: \begin{tabular}{|l|c|c|}
1020: \hline\vspace{0.1cm}
1021: Experiment [Ref.] & $S_{SSM}$ & $S_{Data}/S_{SSM}\ (\pm 1\sigma)$
1022: \\[0.1cm]\hline
1023: SK (1258d) \protect\cite{Fukuda:2001nk} & $2.32\pm 0.03\pm 0.08 $ & $ 0.451\pm 0.011$ \\[0.1cm]
1024: Cl \protect\cite{cl1999} & $2.56\pm 0.16\pm 0.16 $ & $0.332\pm 0.056$ \\[0.1cm]
1025: SAGE \protect\cite{sage1999,sage} & $67.2\pm 7.0 \pm 3.2 $ & $0.521\pm 0.067$ \\[0.1cm]
1026: GNO-GALLEX \protect\cite{gno2000,gallex} & $ 74.1\pm 6.7\pm 3.5 $ & $0.600\pm 0.067$ \\[0.1cm]
1027: SNO data\protect\cite{sno2002a,sno2002b}: & & \\[0.2cm]
1028: \CCSNO & $ 1.76\pm 0.06\pm 0.09$ & $0.348\pm 0.020$ \\[0.1cm]
1029: \ESSNO & $ 2.39\pm 0.24\pm 0.12$ & $0.473\pm 0.053$ \\[0.1cm]
1030: \NCSNO & $ 5.09\pm 0.44\pm 0.45$ & $1.008\pm 0.125$ \\[0.1cm]
1031: $A_e (A_{TOT}\equiv 0)$ \protect\cite{sno2002b} & $+0.070\pm 0.052$ & \\[0.1cm]
1032: \hline
1033: \end{tabular}
1034: }
1035: \caption{\small
1036: Summary of data used in this work.
1037: The observed signal ($S_{SSM}$) and ratios $S_{Data}/S_{SSM}$
1038: with respect to the BPB2001 model are reported.
1039: The SK and SNO rates are in \fluxunit units.
1040: The Cl , SAGE and GNO-GALLEX measurements are in SNU units.
1041: %.}
1042: In this work we use the combined results of SAGE and GNO-GALLEX:
1043: $S_{\rm Ga}/S_{\rm SSM}$ ($\rm Ga\equiv SAGE$+GALLEX+GNO)=$0.579\pm 0.050 $.
1044: The SSM \boron total flux is taken from the BPB2001 model~\protect\cite{bpb2001}:
1045: $\phi_{\nu}(\boron)=5.05 (1^{+0.20}_{-0.16}) \times 10^6$ cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$
1046: .}
1047: \label{tableratios}
1048: \end{table}
1049:
1050:
1051:
1052:
1053:
1054: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1055: \begin{table}[p]
1056: \begin{center}
1057: \scalebox{0.95}{
1058: \begin{tabular}{lllll}
1059: Method & & & & \\
1060: \hline
1061: & & & & \\
1062: A) Minimum LMA & $\Delta m^2=5.44\times 10^{-5}\ \eV^2$ & $\tan^2\theta=0.40$ & $\chi_{m}^2$ = 30.8& g.o.f.: 80\% \\
1063: & & & & \\
1064: B) From Fit & $\Delta m^2= 4.5^{+2.7}_{-1.4}\times 10^{-5} \eV^2$ & $\tan^2\theta=0.40^{+0.10}_{-0.08}$ & & \\
1065: & & & & \\
1066: \hline
1067: \end{tabular}
1068: }
1069: \caption{\small
1070: Mixing parameters:
1071: A) Best fit in the LMA region and B)
1072: from fit to marginal likelihood distributions.}
1073: \label{table2}
1074: \end{center}
1075: \end{table}
1076:
1077:
1078:
1079:
1080:
1081: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1082: \begin{figure}[p]
1083: \centering
1084: \begin{tabular}{ll}
1085: \psfig{file=w1.ps,width=8cm} &
1086: \psfig{file=w3.ps,width=8cm}
1087: \end{tabular}
1088: \caption{\small
1089: (Left)
1090: Allowed areas in the two neutrino parameter space.
1091: The point with error bars corresponds to best
1092: the results from fit to marginal likelihoods.
1093: The coloured areas are the allowed regions at
1094: 90, 95, 99 and 99.7\% CL relative to the absolute minimum.
1095: The region above the upper thick line is excluded by the
1096: reactor experiments \protect\cite{chooznew}.
1097: (Right) Superimposed to the figure on the right, KamLAND constant
1098: signal contours normalized to the non-oscillation
1099: expectation. Contours, from inside to outwards,
1100: respectively at 0.4,0.5,0.6,0.7 and 0.8.
1101: }
1102: \label{f1}
1103: \end{figure}
1104:
1105:
1106: \begin{figure}[p]
1107: \centering
1108: \begin{tabular}{ll}
1109: \psfig{file=w2a.ps,width=8cm,height=6cm} &\hspace{-1.5cm}
1110: \psfig{file=w2b.ps,width=8cm,height=6cm}
1111: \end{tabular}
1112: \caption{\small
1113: Marginalized likelihood distributions for each of the
1114: oscillation parameters $\Delta m^2$ (right), $\tan^2 \theta$ (left)
1115: app
1116: The specific signature of electron antineutrinos in proton
1117: containing materials is the inverse beta decay process:
1118: $\overline{\nu}_e+p\to n+e^{+}$, which produces
1119: almost isotropical monoenergetic positrons with a relatively high
1120: cross section. Antineutrino events would contribute to the
1121: background to forward-peaked neutrino solar events.
1122: earing in the $\chi^2$ fit.
1123: The curves are in arbitrary units with normalization to the
1124: maximum height.
1125: Dashed lines delimit $\pm 1\sigma$ error regions around the maximum.}
1126: \label{f2}
1127: \end{figure}
1128:
1129:
1130:
1131: \end{document}
1132:
1133:
1134:
1135:
1136:
1137: