1: \documentstyle[aps,prl,epsf,floats,rotating]{revtex}
2:
3: \newcommand{\nn}{\nonumber}
4: \newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}
5: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}
6: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}
7: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}
8: \newcommand{\ben}{\begin{eqnarray*}}
9: \newcommand{\een}{\end{eqnarray*}}
10:
11: \newcommand{\simlt}{\stackrel{<}{{}_\sim}}
12: \newcommand{\simgt}{\stackrel{>}{{}_\sim}}
13: \newcommand{\sing}{$^1\!S_0$ }
14: \newcommand{\btau}{\mbox{\boldmath$\tau$}}
15: \newcommand{\bsig}{\mbox{\boldmath$\sigma$}}
16:
17: \newcommand{\dt}{\partial_t}
18:
19: \newcommand{\kf}{k_{\rm F}}
20: \newcommand{\wt}{\widetilde}
21: \newcommand{\kt}{\widetilde k}
22: \newcommand{\pt}{\widetilde p}
23: \newcommand{\qt}{\widetilde q}
24: \newcommand{\wh}{\widehat}
25:
26: \newcommand{\dens}{\rho}
27: \newcommand{\edens}{{\cal E}}
28: \newcommand{\order}[1]{{\cal O}(#1)}
29:
30: \newcommand{\psihat}{\widehat\psi}
31: \newcommand{\xvec}{{\bf x}}
32: \newcommand{\dagphan}{{\phantom{\dagger}}}
33: \newcommand{\kvec}{{\bf k}}
34: \newcommand{\kpvec}{{\bf k}'}
35: \newcommand{\ak}{a^\dagphan_\kvec}
36: \newcommand{\akdag}{a^\dagger_\kvec}
37: \newcommand{\akv}[1]{a^\dagphan_{\kvec_{#1}}}
38: \newcommand{\akdagv}[1]{a^\dagger_{\kvec_{#1}}}
39: \newcommand{\akp}{a^\dagphan_{\kvec'}}
40: \newcommand{\akpdag}{a^\dagger_{\kvec'}}
41: \newcommand{\akpv}[1]{a^\dagphan_{\kvec'_{#1}}}
42: \newcommand{\akpdagv}[1]{a^\dagger_{\kvec'_{#1}}}
43:
44: \def\vec#1{{\bf #1}}
45: \def\D0{D\O}
46:
47: \newcommand{\nab}{\overrightarrow{\nabla}}
48: \newcommand{\nabsq}{\overrightarrow{\nabla}^{2}\!}
49: \newcommand{\nabl}{\overleftarrow{\nabla}}
50: \newcommand{\galnab}{\tensor{\nabla}}
51: \newcommand{\psid}{{\psi^\dagger}}
52: \newcommand{\idt}{{i\partial_t}}
53:
54: \newcommand{\epsl}{\not\!\epsilon}
55: \newcommand{\psl}{\not\!p}
56: \newcommand{\ksl}{\not\!k}
57: \newcommand{\lsl}{\not l}
58: \newcommand{\vsl}{\not\!v}
59: \newcommand{\zsl}{\not\!z}
60: %\tightenlines
61:
62: \begin{document}
63:
64: \twocolumn[\hsize\textwidth\columnwidth\hsize\csname@twocolumnfalse\endcsname
65:
66: \title{The Leading Particle Effect from Heavy-Quark Recombination}
67:
68: \author{Eric Braaten and Yu Jia }
69:
70: \address{Physics Department, Ohio State University, Columbus,
71: OH 43210}
72:
73: \author{Thomas Mehen }
74:
75: \address{Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham NC 27708}
76: \address{Jefferson Laboratory, 12000 Jefferson Ave. Newport News VA 23606}
77:
78: \date{\today}
79:
80: \maketitle
81:
82: {\tighten
83: \begin{abstract}
84:
85: The leading particle effect in charm hadroproduction is an enhancement of the cross section for a
86: charmed hadron $D$ in the forward direction of the beam when the beam hadron has a valence parton
87: in common with the $D$. The large $D^+/D^-$ asymmetry observed by the E791 experiment is an
88: example of this phenomenon. We show that the heavy-quark recombination mechanism provides an
89: economical explanation for this effect. In particular, the $D^+/D^-$ asymmetry can be fit
90: reasonably well using a single parameter whose value is consistent with a recent determination
91: from charm photoproduction.
92:
93: \end{abstract} }
94:
95: \vspace{0.33 in} ]\narrowtext
96:
97: Fixed-target hadroproduction experiments have observed large asymmetries in the production of
98: charmed mesons and baryons\cite{Aitala:1996hf,Garcia:2001xj,Aitala:2000rd,Adamovich:1998mu}. These
99: asymmetries are commonly known as the ``leading particle effect'', since charmed hadrons having a
100: valence parton in common with the beam hadron are produced in greater numbers than other charmed
101: hadrons in the forward region of the beam. For example, the E791 experiment \cite{Aitala:1996hf}, in
102: which a $500~{\rm GeV}$ $\pi^-(\overline{u}d)$ beam is incident on a nuclear target, observes a
103: substantial excess of $D^-(\overline{c}d)$ over $D^+(c\overline{d})$ when the charmed mesons are
104: produced with large momentum along the direction of the $\pi^-$ beam. The asymmetry,
105: \bea
106: \alpha[D^+] = {d\sigma[D^-]-d\sigma[D^+] \over d\sigma[D^-]+d\sigma[D^+]} \, ,
107: \eea
108: is as large as $\sim 0.7$ for the most forward $D$ mesons measured. Asymmetries in the
109: production of charmed baryons have also been observed
110: \cite{Garcia:2001xj,Aitala:2000rd,Adamovich:1998mu}.
111:
112: In contrast with the large experimental asymmetries, perturbative QCD predicts
113: that the asymmetries should be very small. The QCD factorization theorem for heavy particle
114: production \cite{Collins:1985gm} states that the cross section for producing a $D$ meson
115: in the collision of two hadrons can be written as
116: \bea\label{fact}
117: d\sigma &&[h h^\prime \rightarrow D + X] \\
118: &&= \sum_{i,j} f_{i/h} \otimes f_{j/h^\prime} \otimes
119: d{\hat \sigma}(i j \rightarrow c \overline{c} +X) \otimes D_{c\rightarrow D} \, ,\nn
120: \eea
121: where $f_{i/h}$ is the distribution function for the parton $i$ in the hadron $h$, $d{\hat \sigma}(i j
122: \rightarrow c \overline{c} +X)$ is the parton cross section and $D_{c\rightarrow D}$ is the fragmentation
123: function for a $c$ quark hadronizing into a $D$ meson. The corrections to Eq.~(\ref{fact}) are suppressed
124: by powers of $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}/m_c$ or $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}/p_\perp$. A study of $O(\Lambda_{\rm QCD}/m_c)$
125: corrections to charm production can be found in Ref. \cite{Brodsky:1987cv}. The leading order (LO) diagrams
126: for $gg\rightarrow c\overline{c}$ and $q\overline{q} \rightarrow c\overline{c}$ produce $c$ and
127: $\overline{c}$ quarks symmetrically. The $c$ and $\overline{c}$ fragment independently into $D$ and
128: $\overline{D}$ mesons, and charge conjugation invariance requires that $D_{c\rightarrow D} =
129: D_{\overline{c}\rightarrow \overline{D}}$. Therefore, LO perturbative QCD predicts no asymmetry between $D$
130: and $\overline{D}$ mesons. Asymmetries are generated at next-to-leading order (NLO)
131: \cite{Nason:1989zy,Beenakker:1988bq,Beenakker:1990ma,Frixione:1994nb}, but they are too small by an order
132: of magnitude or more to account for the experimentally observed asymmetries.
133:
134: Thus, charm asymmetries are interesting because they probe the power corrections to Eq.~(\ref{fact}). Most
135: attempts to explain the leading particle effect have employed phenomenological models of hadronization. One
136: explanation is the ``beam drag effect''\cite{Norrbin:1998bw} in which charm quarks hadronize into charmed
137: mesons by the decay of a color string connected to partons in the beam remnant. Calculations of the beam
138: drag effect employ the Lund string fragmentation model \cite{Sjostrand:1986ys}, as implemented in the
139: PYTHIA Monte Carlo\cite{Sjostrand:2001yu}. Predictions for the asymmetries are sensitive to the model for
140: the beam remnant, as well as other parameters in PYTHIA. These models can be tuned to fit data if one uses
141: a large charm quark mass and gives the partons intrinsic transverse momentum of $\sim 1\,{\rm
142: GeV}$\cite{Aitala:1996hf}. Another class of models \cite{Vogt:1995fs} are based on the possibility of
143: intrinsic charm in the nucleon \cite{Brodsky:1980pb}. These models are sensitive to the poorly determined
144: intrinsic charm structure function as well as the model of the beam remnant and predict smaller
145: asymmetries than are experimentally observed.
146:
147: In this letter we show that the leading particle effect can be explained quantitatively and economically
148: by the heavy-quark recombination mechanism introduced in Ref.~\cite{Braaten:2001bf}. This mechanism has
149: already been applied to charm asymmetries in fixed-target photoproduction experiments in
150: Ref.~\cite{Braaten:2001uu}, where it was shown that the charm asymmetries observed in the experiments E687
151: and E691 at Fermilab can be fit well with just one free parameter. Here we apply the heavy-quark
152: recombination mechanism to the much larger asymmetries observed in the E791 hadroproduction experiment.
153:
154: \begin{figure}[!t]
155: \centerline{\epsfysize=4.5truecm \epsfbox[100 550 350 700]{lpe_fig1.ps} }
156: {\tighten
157: \caption[1]{Example of a diagram for $c\overline{q}$ recombination into a $D$ meson. Single lines are
158: light quarks, double lines are heavy quarks and the shaded blob is the $D$ meson.}
159: \label{lo} }
160: \end{figure}
161:
162: In the heavy-quark recombination mechanism, a heavy quark or antiquark recombines with a light
163: parton that participates in the hard-scattering process rather than a spectator parton from the
164: beam or target. A nonperturbative parameter that characterizes the probability for the light
165: parton to bind to the heavy quark to form a meson sets the overall normalization of the cross
166: section. Since the asymmetry is generated in the hard process, the dependence of the asymmetry on
167: kinematic variables is calculable within perturbative QCD. Therefore, heavy-quark recombination
168: provides a simpler and more predictive explanation for the asymmetries than conventional
169: hadronization models.
170:
171: An example of a Feynman diagram contributing to this process is depicted in Fig.~\ref{lo}.
172: A light antiquark $\overline{q}$ participates in a hard-scattering process which produces
173: a $c$ and $\overline{c}$. The outgoing $\overline{q}$ emerges from the hard-scattering process
174: with momentum that is soft in the rest frame of the outgoing $c$ quark,
175: and the $c$ and $\overline{q}$ then bind to form a $D$ meson. There is an analogous
176: process in which a light quark combines with a $\overline{c}$ to form a $\overline{D}$ meson.
177: We emphasize that heavy-quark recombination is not taken into account by higher order
178: perturbative QCD corrections to the fragmentation contribution. The NLO correction includes a parton
179: subprocess $\overline{q}g\rightarrow \overline{q}c\overline{c}$ that is similar to the parton
180: subprocess of the diagram in Fig.~\ref{lo}. However, for most of the phase space the outgoing
181: $\overline{q}$ hadronizes into a jet that is distinct from the jets containing the $c$ and
182: $\overline{c}$. When the $\overline{q}$ has small momentum in the $c$ rest frame, nonperturbative
183: effects can bind the $c$ and $\overline{q}$ and enhance the cross section. This enhancement, which is
184: not present in the NLO perturbative calculation, is accounted for by heavy-quark recombination.
185:
186: The heavy-quark recombination contribution to the $D$ meson cross section is:
187: \bea
188: d{\hat\sigma}[D] = d{\hat\sigma}[\overline{q} g\rightarrow(c\overline{q})^n + \overline{c}]\,
189: \rho[(c \overline{q})^n \rightarrow D] \, .
190: \eea
191: This cross section must be convolved with parton distributions for the $\overline{q}$ and $g$ in the
192: colliding hadrons. The symbol $(c\overline{q})^n$ indicates that the $\overline{q}$ has momentum
193: $O(\Lambda_{\rm QCD})$ in the rest frame of the $c$ and that the $(c\overline{q})^n$ has the color and
194: angular momentum quantum numbers specified by $n$. $d{\hat\sigma}(\overline{q}
195: g\rightarrow(c\overline{q})^n+\overline{c})$ is calculable in perturbative QCD, while $\rho[(c
196: \overline{q})^n \rightarrow D]$ is a nonperturbative factor proportional to the probability for the
197: $(c\overline{q})^n$ to evolve into a state including the $D$ meson.
198:
199: A detailed description of the calculation of $d{\hat\sigma}[\overline{q}
200: g\rightarrow(c\overline{q})^n+\overline{c}]$ can be found in Ref.~\cite{Braaten:2001bf}. In this
201: letter, we summarize the most important features. In most regions of phase space, the heavy quark
202: recombination contribution is power-suppressed relative to the fragmentation contribution in
203: Eq.~(\ref{fact}) in accord with the factorization theorems of QCD. Let $\theta$ be the angle between
204: the incoming $\overline{q}$ and the outgoing $D$ meson in the parton center-of-momentum frame. At
205: $\theta=\pi/2$, the ratio of the parton cross sections for heavy-quark recombination and LO
206: gluon-gluon fusion is
207: \begin{eqnarray}\label{sup}
208: \left.
209: {d \hat{\sigma}[\overline{q}g \rightarrow (c\overline{q})(^1S^{(1)}_0) +\overline{c}] \over
210: d \hat{\sigma}[g g\rightarrow \overline{c} c]}\right|_{\theta = \pi/2}
211: &\approx &\, {256\,\pi\, \over 567} \alpha_s {m_c^2 \over p_\perp^2+m_c^2}, \nonumber \\
212: \nonumber \\
213: \left. {d \hat{\sigma}[\overline{q}g \rightarrow (c\overline{q})(^3S^{(1)}_1) +\overline{c}]
214: \over d \hat{\sigma}[g g\rightarrow \overline{c} c]}\right|_{\theta = \pi/2}
215: &\approx &\, {256\,\pi\, \over 189} \alpha_s {m_c^2 \over p_\perp^2+m_c^2}. \nn
216: \end{eqnarray}
217: Using the expected scaling $\rho \sim \Lambda_{\rm
218: QCD}/m_c$, we find that heavy-quark recombination is an $O(\Lambda_{\rm QCD} m_c/p_\perp^2)$ power
219: correction for $p_\perp \gg m_c$.
220: However, the heavy-quark recombination cross section is strongly peaked when the $D$ is
221: produced in the forward region of the incoming $\overline{q}$. At $\theta = 0$,
222: the ratio of the parton cross sections is
223: \begin{eqnarray}
224: \left.
225: {d \hat{\sigma}[\overline{q}g \rightarrow (c\overline{q})(^1\!S^{(1)}_0,^3\!S^{(1)}_1) +
226: \overline{c}] \over d \hat{\sigma}[g g \rightarrow \overline{c} c]}\right|_{\theta = 0}
227: \approx{256\,\pi\, \over 81} \alpha_s. \nonumber
228: \end{eqnarray}
229: Thus, there is no kinematic suppression factor when the $(c\overline{q})^n$ is produced in the
230: forward region of the incoming $\overline{q}$. Heavy-quark recombination provides a natural
231: explanation for the leading particle effect because in the forward region, the cross section for a
232: $D(\overline{D})$ meson carrying a $\overline{q}(q)$ that matches a valence parton in the beam is
233: larger than that of other charmed mesons since valence quark structure functions are larger
234: than sea quark structure functions.
235:
236: If the $(c\overline{q})^n$ hadronizes into a $D$ meson and nothing else, the $(c\overline{q})^n$
237: must be in a color-singlet state with the same flavor and angular momentum quantum numbers as the
238: $D$. This contribution to $\rho[(c\overline{q})^n \rightarrow D]$
239: is proportional to the square of a moment of the
240: $D$ meson light-cone wavefunction and it scales as $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}/m_c$.
241: However one should also allow for nonperturbative transitions in which the $(c\overline{q})^n$
242: hadronizes into states including additional soft hadrons in the rest frame of the $D$.
243: The inclusive parameter $\rho[(c\overline{q})^n \rightarrow D]$, which includes
244: these additional contributions, is still expected to scale like $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}/m_c$.
245: Furthermore, the $(c\overline{q})^n$ can have
246: different color and angular momentum quantum numbers than the $D$ meson in the final
247: state. Since the momentum of the light quark is $O(\Lambda_{\rm
248: QCD})$, amplitudes for production of $(c\overline{q})^n$ with $L>0$ are suppressed relative to
249: S-waves by powers of $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}/m_c$ or $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}/p_\perp$. The heavy-quark
250: recombination contribution to $D$ meson production thus contains four free parameters:
251: \bea\label{para}
252: \rho_1^{\rm sm} = \rho[c\overline{d}(^1S_0^{(1)})\rightarrow D^+],
253: \rho_1^{\rm sf} = \rho[c\overline{d}(^3S_1^{(1)}) \rightarrow D^+], \\
254: \rho_8^{\rm sm} = \rho[c\overline{d}(^1S_0^{(8)})\rightarrow D^+],
255: \rho_8^{\rm sf} = \rho[c\overline{d}(^3S_1^{(8)}) \rightarrow D^+]. \nn
256: \eea
257: Here the superscript $\rm sm$ stands for spin-matched and $\rm sf$ stands for spin-flipped.
258: (Nonperturbative transitions in which the light quark flavor of the $(c\overline{q})^n$ differs from
259: that of the $D$ are suppressed in the large $N_c$ limit of QCD and will be ignored in this analysis.)
260: Heavy-quark symmetry relates the four parameters appearing in the production of $D^{*+}$ to the four
261: parameters in Eq.~(\ref{para}). Parameters for $D^-$ and $D^0$ production can be related using charge
262: conjugation and isospin symmetry. The color-octet contributions are analogous to the color-octet
263: production matrix elements that play a prominent role in the theory of quarkonium
264: production\cite{Bodwin:1994jh}. If the $\overline{d}$ appearing in Eq.~(\ref{para}) were a heavy
265: antiquark, the parameters $\rho_1^{\rm sf},\rho_8^{\rm sm}$ and $\rho_8^{\rm sf}$ would be suppressed by
266: powers of $v$, where $v$ is the typical velocity of the antiquark in the bound state. However, the
267: $\overline{d}$ is light, so $v\sim 1$ and there is no apparent suppression of these parameters.
268:
269: In photoproduction, the $O(\alpha \,\alpha_s^2)$ color-octet and color-singlet heavy-quark
270: recombination cross sections have the same functional form, so the cross section depends only on linear
271: combinations of color-singlet and color-octet parameters of the form $\rho_1+\rho_8/8$. The best fit to
272: fixed-target photoproduction asymmetries in Ref.~\cite{Braaten:2001uu} yielded $\rho_1^{\rm
273: sm}+\rho_8^{\rm sm}/8 = 0.15$. Including the $\rho^{\rm sf}$ parameters does not improve the fit unless
274: $\rho_1^{\rm sf}+\rho_8^{\rm sf}/8$ is negative, which is unphysical. In the case of fixed target
275: hadroproduction, the color-octet and color-singlet cross sections have different functional forms, so
276: the asymmetries depend on all four parameters. However, we find that the asymmetries measured by the
277: E791 experiment can be fit rather well by the single parameter $\rho_1^{\rm sm}$. In this analysis,
278: we only include $\rho_1^{\rm sm}$ and set the other parameters to zero.
279:
280: There are two contributions to the heavy-quark recombination cross section for a $D$ meson:
281: \bea
282: &a)& \quad \sum_n d{\hat\sigma}[\overline{q} g\rightarrow(c\overline{q})^n+\overline{c}]\,
283: \rho[(c \overline{q})^n \rightarrow D] ,\\
284: &b)& \quad \sum_{q,n} d{\hat \sigma}[q g\rightarrow (\overline{c}q)^n+c]\,
285: \rho_n[(\overline{c}q)^n \rightarrow \overline{D}] \otimes D_{c \rightarrow D}.\nn
286: \eea
287: In process $a)$, a light antiquark recombines with a $c$ to form a $D$ meson. In process $b)$, a
288: $\overline{c}$ participates in the recombination process, and a $D$ meson is produced via
289: fragmentation from the $c$ quark which does not recombine. For $D^\pm$ production, process $b)$
290: partially dilutes the asymmetry generated by $a)$. We take $m_c=1.5 \,{\rm GeV}$ and set the
291: renormalization and factorization scales to be $\sqrt{p_\perp^2+m_c^2}$. The parton distributions are
292: GRV 98 LO \cite{Gluck:1998xa} for the nucleon and GRV-P LO \cite{Gluck:1991ey} for the pion. The E791
293: experiment uses a target consisting mostly of carbon, so the nucleon structure function is an isospin
294: symmetric linear combination of proton and neutron. We use the one-loop expression for $\alpha_s$
295: with 4 active flavors and $\Lambda_{\rm QCD}= 200\,{\rm MeV}$. We include only the LO fragmentation
296: diagrams. If the NLO corrections are approximated by including a K factor, then $\rho_1^{\rm sm}$
297: should be multiplied by the same K factor to obtain the same asymmetry. We use the Petersen
298: parametrization for $D_{c\rightarrow D}$ with $\epsilon =0.06$ and the fragmentation probabilities are
299: determined from data in Ref. \cite{Gladilin:1999pj}. Contributions to the $D$ cross section from
300: feeddown from $D^*$ decay are included. Feeddown from other excited $D$ meson states is expected to be
301: small.
302:
303: \begin{figure}[!t]
304: \centerline{\epsfysize=8.5truecm \begin{turn}{270} \epsfbox{lpe_fig2a.ps}
305: \end{turn} }
306: \centerline{\epsfysize=8.5truecm \begin{turn}{270} \epsfbox{lpe_fig2b.ps}
307: \end{turn} }
308: \vspace{0.25 in}
309: {\tighten
310: \caption[1]{
311: The asymmetry variable $\alpha[D^+]$ vs. $x_F$ and $p_\perp^2$. The data points are the measurements of
312: E791 and the solid line is our prediction with $\rho^{\rm sm}_1 = 0.06$. }
313: \label{asym}}
314: \end{figure}
315:
316: The predictions for $\alpha[D^+]$ as a function of $x_F$ and $p_\perp^2$ are compared to the E791 data in
317: Fig.~\ref{asym}. A least squares fit to all the data yields $\rho^{\rm sm}_1=0.06$. The $p_\perp$ dependence
318: is described very well by the heavy-quark recombination mechanism. The $x_F$ distribution is described well
319: for $x_F>0.2$, while our calculation underpredicts the asymmetry in the region $0.0 < x_F < 0.2$. It is
320: possible to obtain a better fit to the asymmetry in this region if one allows nonvanishing values of
321: $\rho_1^{\rm sf}$, $\rho_8^{\rm sm}$ and $\rho_8^{\rm sf}$. While we expect heavy-quark recombination to
322: dominate in the forward region, other $O(\Lambda_{\rm QCD}/m_c)$ corrections to fragmentation may be important
323: near $x_F = 0$ and could also account for the discrepancy. A systematic analysis of all $O(\Lambda_{\rm
324: QCD}/m_c)$ corrections to $D$ cross sections is needed to address this issue, but this is beyond the scope of
325: this paper. Although $\alpha$ was not measured at large negative $x_F$, it must be positive in this region in
326: accord with our prediction because of the leading particle effect associated with the target nucleons.
327:
328: The value of $\rho_1^{\rm sm}$ extracted from the fits is consistent with the scaling $\rho_1^{\rm sm}
329: \sim O(\Lambda_{\rm QCD}/m_c)$. A lower bound on $\rho_1^{\rm sm} $ can be obtained by assuming that
330: $\rho_1^{\rm sm}[(c\overline{q})^n\rightarrow D]$ is saturated by a final state consisting of only the
331: $D$. Then $\rho_1^{\rm sm}$ is proportional to the square of a moment of the $D$ light-cone
332: wavefunction which can be bounded using heavy-quark effective theory arguments\cite{Korchemsky:2000qb}.
333: This value is smaller than the lower bound $\rho_1^{\rm sm}= 0.15$ from photoproduction fits
334: \cite{Braaten:2001uu}. However, the uncertainty in this extraction due to higher order perturbative
335: corrections and $O(\Lambda_{\rm QCD}/m_c)$ nonperturbative corrections could easily be a factor of 2.
336: Furthermore, the fits in Ref.~\cite{Braaten:2001uu} used E687 data that was not corrected for
337: efficiencies because of correlations between the measured asymmetries and the production model used in
338: the Monte Carlo for simulating the trigger\cite{Frabetti:1996vi}. Given all these uncertainties, we
339: regard the values of $\rho_1^{\rm sm}$ extracted from hadroproduction and photoproduction to be
340: consistent.
341:
342: It would be interesting to extend the analysis of this paper to asymmetries measured in
343: experiments with different beams and for different charmed hadrons, particularly charmed baryons.
344: Baryon asymmetries could be generated by a process similar to that of Fig.~\ref{lo} with the light
345: antiquark replaced by a light quark. There is an attractive force between the $c$ and $q$ when
346: their color state is the $\overline{3}$ of $SU(3)$ that can enhance the cross section in this
347: channel. It is natural to expect the $(cq)^n$ diquark to hadronize to a state with a charmed
348: baryon. The SELEX collaboration has measured $\Lambda_c^{\pm}$ asymmetries in experiments with
349: $\pi^-, \Sigma^-$ and $p$ beams \cite{Garcia:2001xj}. The $\Lambda_c^+$ and $\Lambda_c^-$ both
350: have a valence quark that matches one of the valence quarks of the $\pi^-$, while only the
351: $\Lambda_c^+$ has a valence quark in common with the $p$ and $\Sigma^-$. Therefore, heavy-quark
352: recombination predicts that $\Lambda_c^{\pm}$ asymmetries are much greater for $p$ and $\Sigma^-$
353: beams than for a $\pi^-$ beam. This prediction is in agreement with SELEX measurements, which find
354: $\alpha[\Lambda_c^-] \approx 1$ for $p$ and $\Sigma^-$ beams and $\alpha[\Lambda_c^-]\approx 0.2$
355: for $\pi^-$ beams.
356:
357: We thank J. Appel for comments on this paper. E.B. and Y.J. are supported in part by Department of
358: Energy grant DE-FG02-91-ER4069. T.M. is supported in part by DOE grants DE-FG02-96ER40945 and
359: DE-AC05-84ER40150. T.M also acknowledges the hospitality of the University of California at San
360: Diego Theory Group.
361:
362: \begin{references}
363:
364: %\cite{Aitala:1996hf}
365: \bibitem{Aitala:1996hf}
366: E.~M.~Aitala {\it et al.} [E791 Collaboration],
367: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 371}, 157 (1996) ; {\it ibid}. {\bf 411}, 230 (1997);
368: G.~A.~Alves {\it et al.} [E769 Collaboration],
369: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 72}, 812 (1994); {\it ibid}. {\bf 77}, 2392 (1996);
370: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D49,4317;%%
371: M.~Adamovich {\it et al.} [BEATRICE Collaboration],
372: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 495}, 3 (1997);
373: M.~Adamovich {\it et al.} [WA82 Collaboration],
374: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 305}, 402 (1993).
375:
376: %\cite{Garcia:2001xj}<br>
377: \bibitem{Garcia:2001xj}
378: F.~G.~Garcia {\it et al.} [SELEX Collaboration],
379: %``Hadronic production of Lambda/c from 600-GeV/c pi-, Sigma- and p beams,''
380: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 528}, 49 (2002).
381: %%[arXiv:hep-ex/0109017].<br>
382: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0109017;%%
383:
384: %\cite{Aitala:2000rd}
385: \bibitem{Aitala:2000rd}
386: E.~M.~Aitala {\it et al.} [E791 Collaboration],
387: %``Asymmetries in the production of Lambda/c+ and Lambda/c- baryons in 500-GeV/c pi- nucleon interactions,''
388: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 495}, 42 (2000).
389: %[arXiv:hep-ex/0008029].
390: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0008029;%%
391:
392: %\cite{Adamovich:1998mu}
393: \bibitem{Adamovich:1998mu}
394: M.~I.~Adamovich {\it et al.} [WA89 Collaboration],
395: %``Charge asymmetries for D, D/s and Lambda/c production in Sigma- nucleus interactions at 340-GeV/c,''
396: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 8}, 593 (1999).
397: %[arXiv:hep-ex/9803021].
398: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9803021;%%
399:
400: %\cite{Collins:1985gm}
401: \bibitem{Collins:1985gm}
402: J.~C.~Collins, D.~E.~Soper and G.~Sterman,
403: %``Heavy Particle Production In High-Energy Hadron Collisions,''
404: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 263}, 37 (1986).
405:
406: %\cite{Brodsky:1987cv}
407: \bibitem{Brodsky:1987cv}
408: S.~J.~Brodsky, J.~F.~Gunion and D.~E.~Soper,
409: %``The Physics Of Heavy Quark Production In Quantum Chromodynamics,''
410: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 36}, 2710 (1987).
411: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D36,2710;%%
412:
413: %\cite{Nason:1989zy}
414: \bibitem{Nason:1989zy}
415: P.~Nason, S.~Dawson and R.~K.~Ellis,
416: %``The One Particle Inclusive Differential Cross-Section For Heavy Quark Production In Hadronic Collisions,''
417: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 327}, 49 (1989)
418: [Erratum-ibid.\ B {\bf 335}, 260 (1989)].
419:
420: %\cite{Beenakker:1988bq}
421: \bibitem{Beenakker:1988bq}
422: W.~Beenakker, H.~Kuijf, W.~L.~van Neerven and J.~Smith,
423: %``QCD Corrections To Heavy Quark Production In P Anti-P Collisions,''
424: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 40}, 54 (1989).
425: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D40,54;%%
426:
427: %\cite{Beenakker:1990ma}
428: \bibitem{Beenakker:1990ma}
429: W.~Beenakker, W.~L.~van Neerven, R.~Meng, G.~A.~Schuler and J.~Smith,
430: %``QCD Corrections To Heavy Quark Production In Hadron-Hadron Collisions,''
431: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 351}, 507 (1991).
432: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B351,507;%%
433:
434: %\cite{Frixione:1994nb}
435: \bibitem{Frixione:1994nb}
436: S.~Frixione, M.~L.~Mangano, P.~Nason and G.~Ridolfi,
437: %``Charm and bottom production: Theoretical results versus experimental data,''
438: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 431}, 453 (1994).
439: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B431,453;%%
440:
441: %\cite{Norrbin:1998bw}
442: \bibitem{Norrbin:1998bw}
443: E.~Norrbin and T.~Sj\"{o}strand,
444: %``Production mechanisms of charm hadrons in the string model,''
445: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 442}, 407 (1998).
446: %%[arXiv:hep-ph/9809266].
447: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9809266;%%
448:
449: %\cite{Sjostrand:1986ys}
450: \bibitem{Sjostrand:1986ys}
451: H.-U.~Bengtsson and T.~Sj\"{o}strand, Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\ {\bf 46}, 43 (1987).
452:
453: %\cite{Sjostrand:2001yu}
454: \bibitem{Sjostrand:2001yu}
455: T.~Sjostrand, L.~Lonnblad and S.~Mrenna,
456: %``PYTHIA 6.2: Physics and manual,''
457: hep-ph/0108264.
458: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0108264;%%
459:
460: %\cite{Vogt:1995fs}
461: \bibitem{Vogt:1995fs}
462: R.~Vogt and S.~J.~Brodsky,
463: %``Charmed Hadron Asymmetries in the Intrinsic Charm Coalescence Model,''
464: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 478}, 311 (1996).
465: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9512300].
466: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9512300;%%
467:
468: %\cite{Brodsky:1980pb}
469: \bibitem{Brodsky:1980pb}
470: S.~J.~Brodsky, P.~Hoyer, C.~Peterson and N.~Sakai,
471: %``The Intrinsic Charm Of The Proton,''
472: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 93}, 451 (1980).
473: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B93,451;%%
474:
475: %\cite{Braaten:2001bf}
476: \bibitem{Braaten:2001bf}
477: E.~Braaten, Y.~Jia and T.~Mehen,
478: %``B production asymmetries in perturbative QCD,''
479: hep-ph/0108201.
480: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0108201;%%
481:
482: %\cite{Braaten:2001uu}
483: \bibitem{Braaten:2001uu}
484: E.~Braaten, Y.~Jia and T.~Mehen,
485: %``Charm anticharm asymmetries in photoproduction from perturbative recombination,''
486: hep-ph/0111296.
487: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0111296;%%
488:
489: %\cite{Bodwin:1994jh}
490: \bibitem{Bodwin:1994jh}
491: G.~T.~Bodwin, E.~Braaten and G.~P.~Lepage,
492: %``Rigorous QCD analysis of inclusive annihilation and production of heavy quarkonium,''
493: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 51}, 1125 (1995)
494: [Erratum-ibid.\ D {\bf 55}, 5853 (1995)].
495: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9407339].
496: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9407339;%%
497:
498: %\cite{Gluck:1998xa}
499: \bibitem{Gluck:1998xa}
500: M.~Gluck, E.~Reya and A.~Vogt,
501: %``Dynamical parton distributions revisited,''
502: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 5}, 461 (1998).
503: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9806404].
504: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9806404;%%
505:
506: %\cite{Gluck:1991ey}
507: \bibitem{Gluck:1991ey}
508: M.~Gluck, E.~Reya and A.~Vogt,
509: %``Pionic parton distributions,''
510: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 53}, 651 (1992).
511: %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C53,651;%%
512:
513: %\cite{Gladilin:1999pj}
514: \bibitem{Gladilin:1999pj}
515: L.~Gladilin, hep-ex/9912064.
516: %%CITATION = HEP_EX 9912064;%%
517:
518: %\cite{Ackerstaff:1998as}
519: \bibitem{Ackerstaff:1998as}
520: K.~Ackerstaff {\it et al.} [OPAL Collaboration],
521: %``Determination of the production rate of D*0 mesons and of the ratio V/(V+P) in Z0 $\to$ c anti-c decays,''
522: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 5}, 1 (1998).
523: %[arXiv:hep-ex/9802008].
524: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9802008;%%
525:
526: %\cite{Korchemsky:2000qb}
527: \bibitem{Korchemsky:2000qb}
528: G.~P.~Korchemsky, D.~Pirjol and T.~Yan,
529: %``Radiative leptonic decays of $B$ mesons in QCD,''
530: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 61}, 114510 (2000).
531: %[hep-ph/9911427].
532: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9911427;%%
533:
534: %\cite{Frabetti:1996vi}
535: \bibitem{Frabetti:1996vi}
536: P.~L.~Frabetti {\it et al.} [E687 Collaboration],
537: %``Charm - anti-charm asymmetries in high-energy photoproduction,''
538: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 370}, 222 (1996).
539: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B370,222;%%
540:
541:
542: \end{references}
543:
544: \end{document}
545:
546:
547:
548:
549:
550: