1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: \documentclass[a4,12pt]{article}
3: \usepackage{graphicx,psfrag,feynmp,amssymb,cite,multirow}
4: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
5:
6: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
7: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}
8: \newcommand{\cita} [1] {$^{\hbox{\scriptsize \cite{#1}}}$}
9: %
10: \newcommand{\prepr}[1] {\begin{flushright} {\bf #1} \end{flushright} \vskip 1.cm}
11: %
12: \newcommand{\titul}[1] {\boldmath \begin{center}{\Large {\bf #1 } } \end{center}
13: \vskip 0.8cm}
14:
15: \newcommand{\autor}[1] {\begin{center} {\bf \lineskip .3cm #1 }
16: \end{center} }
17:
18: \newcommand{\lugar}[1] {\begin{center} {\normalsize \bf \it #1 } \end{center}}
19: %
20: \newcommand{\abstr}[1] {{\begin{center} \vskip .5cm {\bf \large Abstract
21: \vspace{0pt}} \end{center}}\begin{quote} \small #1
22: \end{quote}}
23: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
24: \topmargin=-10mm
25: \textheight=225mm
26: \textwidth=170mm
27: %\baselineskip 1.5\baselineskip
28: %\double
29: %\hoffset -0.65in
30: \def \baselinestretch{1.0}
31: \oddsidemargin=-6mm
32: \evensidemargin=-6mm
33: \newcounter{muni}
34: \newenvironment{remunerate}{\begin{list}
35: { {\bf \arabic{muni}.}}{\usecounter{muni}
36: \setlength{\leftmargin}{3pt}\setlength{\itemindent}{17pt}}}{\end{list}}
37: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
38: \pagestyle{plain}
39: \begin{document}
40: \begin{fmffile}{feynmangraphs}
41: \hbadness=10000
42: \pagenumbering{arabic}
43: \begin{titlepage}
44:
45: \prepr{hep-ph/0205176\\
46: \hspace{30mm} KIAS--P02033 \\
47: \hspace{30mm} KEK--TH--824 \\
48: \hspace{30mm} May 2002}
49: %
50:
51: \begin{center}
52: \titul{\bf $R$ Parity violating enhancement of $B_u^+\to \ell^+\nu$ and
53: $B_c^+\to \ell^+\nu$}
54:
55:
56: \autor{A.G.\ Akeroyd$^{\mbox{1}}$\footnote{akeroyd@kias.re.kr},
57: S.\ Recksiegel$^{\mbox{2}}$\footnote{stefan@post.kek.jp} }
58: \lugar{ $^{1}$ Korea Institute for Advanced Study,
59: 207-43 Cheongryangri-dong,\\ Dongdaemun-gu,
60: Seoul 130-012, Republic of Korea}
61:
62: \lugar{ $^{2}$ Theory Group, KEK, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0801, Japan }
63:
64: \end{center}
65:
66: \vskip2.0cm
67:
68: \begin{abstract}
69: \noindent{We study the decays $B^+_u\to \ell^+\nu$ and
70: $B^+_c\to \ell^+\nu$ in the context of the Minimal Supersymmetric
71: Standard Model (MSSM) with explicit $R$ parity violation. We
72: analyse the correlation between the two decays and show that
73: branching ratios (BRs) for $B^+_c\to \ell^+\nu$ may be of order
74: 5\% (over 40\% in one case), without violating current bounds
75: on $B^+_u\to \ell^+\nu$. Although $B_c$ mesons are inaccessible at the
76: $e^+e^-$ $B$ factories, such large BRs for $B^+_c\to \ell^+\nu$ would possibly
77: be within experimental observability at LEP and the Tevatron Run II,
78: with much larger yields expected at the hadronic $B$ factories.
79: We also update some earlier bounds on products of $R$ parity violating
80: couplings in the light of new experimental results.}
81:
82: \end{abstract}
83:
84: \vskip1.0cm
85: %{\bf PACS index : }
86: \vskip1.0cm
87: {\bf Keywords : Rare decay, R parity violation}
88: \end{titlepage}
89: \thispagestyle{empty}
90: \newpage
91:
92: \pagestyle{plain}
93: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\arabic{footnote} }
94: \setcounter{footnote}{0}
95:
96: \section{Introduction}
97:
98: Theoretical studies of rare decays of $b$ quarks have attracted
99: increasing attention since the start of the physics programme at the
100: $B$ factories at KEK and SLAC. Both $B$ factories
101: are performing admirably and in excess of 60 fb$^{-1}$
102: of data has been accumulated by each experiment.
103: The much anticipated measurement of
104: $\sin2\phi_1$ has established CP violation in the $B$ system
105: \cite{Abe:2001xe, Aubert:2001nu}, while more recently
106: evidence for CP violation in $B_d\to \pi^+\pi^-$ has been reported
107: \cite{Abe:2002qq}.
108:
109: Many rare decays will be observed for the first time
110: over the next few years, and measurements of their branching ratios
111: (BRs) will be sensitive probes of models beyond the Standard Model (SM).
112: In this paper we are concerned with the so far unobserved decays
113: $B^+_u\to \ell^+\nu$ and
114: $B^+_c\to \ell^+\nu$, where $\ell^+=e^+,\mu^+,\tau^+$ (and charged conjugates).
115: In the SM these purely leptonic decays proceed via annihilation of the
116: $B$ meson to a virtual $W$, and offer the possibility of measuring the
117: decay constant $f_B$. However, in the SM the rates are helicity
118: suppressed, and thus the largest BRs are for $\ell^+=\tau^+$.
119: The first measurement of BR$(B^+_u\to \tau^+\nu_{\tau}$) is
120: expected at {\sc Belle} and {\sc BaBar}, while the SM BR$(B^+_u\to \ell^+\nu)$
121: for $\ell^+=e^+,\mu^+$ is below the experimental sensitivity.
122: $B_c$ mesons cannot be produced at the $e^+e^-$ $B$ factories operating
123: at the $\Upsilon(4S)$, but their search is possible at hadronic machines
124: (Tevatron Run II, LHC-B, BTeV). Although
125: BR$(B^+_c\to \ell^+\nu)$ is considerably larger than the
126: corresponding BR for $B^+_u$, the suppressed cross--section for
127: $B_c$ production and the larger backgrounds at hadron colliders
128: render isolation of these these decays very challenging, assuming the
129: BRs of the SM.
130:
131: In models beyond the SM there can be sizeable enhancements from
132: new particles, which may bring some of these decays within experimental
133: observability. In particular charged Higgs bosons ($H^\pm$)
134: \cite{Hou:1992sy,Du:1997pm} and SUSY particles with $R$ parity violating
135: interactions \cite{Guetta:1997fw,Baek:1999ch}, can both contribute at the
136: tree--level. We study the prediction for BR$(B^+_u\to \ell^+\nu)$
137: and BR$(B^+_c\to \ell^+\nu)$ in the MSSM with lepton violating
138: trilinear couplings $\lambda_{ijk}$ and $\lambda'_{ijk}$. In particular,
139: we examine the correlation between these decays and show that
140: by allowing a second $\lambda'$ coupling to be non--zero, the correlation
141: observed by previous authors can be avoided.
142: The BR$(B^+_c\to \ell^+\nu)$ can be enhanced to the level of
143: 5\% (over 40\% in one case) without violating the bounds on BR$(B^+_u\to \ell^+\nu)$.
144: BRs of this magnitude may be in reach at the Tevatron Run II and LEP,
145: with plentiful yields at LHC-B and BTeV.
146:
147: Our work is organised as follows: In section 2 we give a brief
148: introduction to the $B_c$ meson. In section 3 we introduce the
149: annihilation decays $B^+_u,B^+_c\to \ell^+\nu$, while section 4
150: examines the additional contributions to the decays in the MSSM with
151: $R$ Parity violation. Section 5 presents the numerical results
152: for the BRs and section 6 contains our conclusions.
153:
154: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
155: \boldmath
156: \section{The $B_c$ meson}\unboldmath
157: The $B_c$ meson is the last SM meson to be discovered
158: \cite{Gershtein:1994jw,Gershtein:1997qy}. It is
159: unique in the sense that it is composed of two heavy quarks of different
160: flavour. It possesses no strong or electromagnetic annihilation
161: decay channels because it carries open flavour.
162: Its mass and lifetime have been estimated by
163: non--relativistic potential models and perturbative QCD
164: \cite{Brambilla:2001fw}, which predict $M_{B_c}\approx 6.2$ GeV
165: and $\tau_{B_c}\approx 0.5 {\rm ps}$.
166: Due to its mass it cannot be produced at the
167: $e^+e^-$ $B$ factories running at the $\Upsilon(4S)$. It can, however,
168: be produced at LEP and the Tevatron, which both
169: searched in the channels $B_c\to J/\psi \ell\nu_\ell, J/\psi \pi$.
170: LEP reported a few candidate events but claimed no signal
171: \cite{Ackerstaff:1998zf,Abreu:1996nz,Barate:1997kk}.
172: The Tevatron Run I produced the first experimental evidence for the
173: $B_c$ meson, with a sample of 20 $B_c\to J/\psi \ell\nu_\ell$ events
174: corresponding to a background fluctuation of $4.8\sigma$,
175: \cite{Abe:1998wi,Abe:1998fb}. The measured mass and lifetime
176: were $6.4 \pm 0.4 GeV$ and $0.46^{+0.18}_{-0.16}\pm 0.03 ps$,
177: respectively, in agreement with the theoretical predictions.
178: This is the only experimental information on
179: the $B_c$ meson, and hence the SM predictions for its BRs
180: have not been verified. Large deviations from the SM rates
181: are still permitted by experiment.
182:
183: Although measurements with a precision comparable to the
184: $B_u$ and $B_d$ systems are not expected in the near future,
185: if new physics could affect the $B_c$ rates significantly
186: without contradicting existing measurements in other systems,
187: these effects could be tested at the upcoming hadronic
188: $B$ machines where the $B_c$ meson accounts for approximately
189: $10^{-3}$ of the inclusive cross-section for all beauty hadrons.
190:
191: Possible decay channels for the $B_c$ meson are:
192: %
193: \begin{itemize}
194: \item[{(i)}] $c$ quark spectator, with $\overline b$ quark weak decay:
195: e.g.\ $B_c\to J/\psi \ell\nu_\ell, J/\psi \pi$
196: \item[{(ii)}] $\overline b$ quark spectator, with $c$ quark weak decay
197: \item[{(iii)}] Annihilation decays: $B_c\to \ell\nu_\ell,\overline qq'$
198: \end{itemize}
199:
200: In the SM, (i) and (ii) are expected to amount to around $90\%$ of
201: the width, with the remaining $10\%$ coming from the annihilation decays.
202: The latter is a much larger fraction than in the case of $B_u$ decays.
203: From now on we will concentrate on leptonic annihilation decays.
204:
205: \boldmath
206: \section{The decays $B^+_u\to \ell^+\nu_\ell$ and $B^+_c\to \ell^+\nu_\ell$} \unboldmath
207:
208: In the SM, the purely leptonic decays of $B_u^+$ and $B_c^+$ proceed via
209: annihilation to a $W$ boson in the $s$-channel. The decay rate is given by
210: (where $q=u$ or $c$):
211: \begin{equation}
212: \Gamma(B^+_q\to \ell^+\nu_\ell)={G_F^2 m_{B_q} m_l^2 f_{B_q}^2\over 8\pi}
213: |V_{qb}|^2 \left(1-{m_l^2\over m^2_{B_q}}\right)^2
214: \end{equation}
215: Due to helicity suppression, the rate is proportional to $m^2_l$
216: and one expects:
217: \begin{equation}
218: BR(B^+_q\to \tau^+\nu_{\tau}):BR(B^+_q\to \mu^+\nu_{\mu})
219: :BR(B^+_q\to e^+\nu_{e})=m^2_{\tau}:m^2_{\mu}:m^2_e
220: \end{equation}
221: These decays are relatively much more important for $B_c$
222: than $B_u$ due to the enhancement factor $|V_{cb}/V_{ub}|^2
223: (f_{B_c}/ f_{B_u})^2$.
224: Searches have already been carried out for some of these decays.
225: The current experimental limits and SM predictions are presented
226: in Table \ref{explimits}.
227: \begin{table}\begin{center}
228: \begin{tabular} {|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline
229: Decay & SM Prediction & CLEO & {\sc Belle} & LEP / Tevatron \\ \hline
230: $B_u^+\to e^+\nu_e$ & $9.2\times 10^{-12}$ & $\le 1.5\times 10^{-5}$
231: \cite{Artuso:1995ar}&
232: $\le 4.7\times 10^{-6}$\cite{BELLE:2001} & $\otimes$ \\ \hline
233: $B_u^+\to \mu^+\nu_{\mu}$ & $3.9\times 10^{-7}$ &
234: $\le 2.1\times 10^{-5}$ \cite{Artuso:1995ar}
235: & $\le 6.5\times 10^{-6}$ \cite{BELLE:2001} & $\otimes$ \\ \hline
236: $B_u^+\to \tau^+\nu_{\tau}$ & $8.7\times 10^{-5}$
237: & $\le 8.4\times 10^{-4}$ \cite{Browder:2000qr} & $\otimes$
238: & $\le 5.7\times 10^{-4}$ \cite{Acciarri:1996bv} / $\otimes$ \\ \hline
239: $B_c^+\to e^+\nu_e$ & $2.5\times 10^{-9}$ & $\times$
240: & $\times$ & $\otimes$ \\ \hline
241: $B_c^+\to \mu^+\nu_{\mu}$ & $1.1\times 10^{-4}$
242: & $\times$ & $\times$ & $\otimes$ \\ \hline
243: $B_c^+\to \tau^+\nu_{\tau} $ & $2.6\times 10^{-2}$
244: & $\times$ & $\times$ & (see text) / $\otimes$ \\ \hline
245: \end{tabular}\end{center}
246: \caption{SM predictions and current experimental limits from various machines. \label{explimits}}
247: \end{table}
248: %
249: ``$\times$'' signifies that a search cannot be carried out since the
250: $B_c$ meson is kinematically inaccessible at the $B$ factories
251: CLEO, {\sc Belle} and {\sc BaBar}. The symbol ``$\otimes$'' signifies that no
252: search has yet been performed, although in principle one could
253: have been carried out. This particularly applies to
254: LEP and the Tevatron which can produce both $B_u$ and $B_c$ mesons
255: but have not searched for the majority of the annihilation channels.
256: CLEO and the $B$ factories have already reported strong limits on
257: $B^+_u\to \ell^+\nu$ decays for $\ell^+=e^+,\mu^+$. The best limit on
258: $B^+_u\to \tau^+\nu$ decays comes from the L3 collaboration.
259: In the search for $B^+_u\to \tau^+\nu$ at LEP
260: \cite{Acciarri:1996bv,Abreu:1999xe,Barate:2000rc}
261: there is a sizeable contribution from $B^+_c\to \tau^+\nu$,
262: which has the same experimental signature
263: \cite{Mangano:1997md}. Thus the experimental limit constrains
264: the BR of an admixture of $B_u$ and $B_c$, and the effective
265: limit on the process $B^+_c\to \tau^+\nu$ depends strongly on
266: the conversion probability $b\to B_c$
267: (0.02\%--0.1\%) \cite{Mangano:1997md}. For lower estimates
268: of the conversion probability, the present experimental limit
269: puts a bound of the order of the SM width on $B^+_c\to \tau^+\nu$.
270: Therefore future, more precise bounds on $B^+_u\to \tau^+\nu$
271: from high energy machines and/or a better knowledge of the
272: $b\to B_c$ conversion probability will start to put meaningful
273: constraints on BR$(B^+_c\to \tau^+\nu)$.
274:
275: Neither the LEP collaborations nor
276: the Tevatron Run I searched for the channels $B^+_u\to {e/\mu}^+\nu$
277: and no limits whatsoever exist for $B_c^+\to \ell^+\nu$.
278: While neither LEP nor Tevatron Run I could be competitive with the
279: $B$ factories in setting bounds for $B^+_u\to e/\mu^+\nu$, attempts to
280: measure this quantity could actually pick up a signal from
281: $B^+_c\to e/\mu^+\nu$.
282: In the next section we shall show that in SUSY models with
283: $R$ parity violation, the decays $B^+_c\to \ell^+\nu$
284: may be enhanced sufficiently to bring them within experimental
285: sensitivity of both LEP and Tevatron, thereby motivating
286: a search in these channels. More specifically, assuming an
287: optimistic $b\to B_c$ conversion probability of $\approx 0.1\%$,
288: a measurement that gives a limit of $10^{-4}$ on the
289: $B^+_u\to e/\mu^+\nu$ channels may be able to detect
290: $B^+_c\to e/\mu^+\nu$ BRs of ${\cal O}(5\%)$.
291:
292:
293: \boldmath
294: \section{$B^+_u, B^+_c\to \ell^+\nu_\ell$ in SUSY models with $R$ parity violation}
295: \unboldmath
296:
297: Due to the current meagre experimental information on the decays
298: of $B_c$ mesons, future measurements of their BRs may be a test of
299: models beyond the SM. It is entirely
300: possible that its BRs are very different from the SM predictions.
301: The expected yield of $B_c$ mesons from Run II at the Tevatron is $10^6$,
302: increasing to $10^9$ at LHC-B and BTeV \cite{Anikeev:2001rk,Ball:2000ba}.
303: These machines will provide
304: the first opportunity to study the $B_c$ meson in detail.
305:
306: New physics contributions to the decays have been studied by a few
307: authors. \cite{Hou:1992sy} considered the effects of $H^\pm$
308: on the decays $B^+_u\to \ell^+\nu_\ell$, while \cite{Du:1997pm} extended this
309: analysis to the case of $B^+_c\to \ell^+\nu_\ell$. In both cases the $H^\pm$
310: contribution modifies the SM prediction by a factor $R$ where:
311: \begin{equation} \label{Rdef}
312: R=1-\tan^2\beta(M_{B_q}/M_{H^\pm})^2
313: \end{equation}
314: %Hence the rates for $B^+_u\to \ell^+\nu_\ell$ and $B^+_c\to \ell^+\nu_\ell$
315: %are correlated.
316:
317:
318: Since the SM predictions for
319: $B^+_u \to e^+\nu_e/ \mu^+\nu_\mu$ are already very small
320: (see Table \ref{explimits}), the $H^\pm$ contribution
321: cannot enhance them to current experimental observability.
322: On the other hand, the $H^\pm$ contribution can saturate the
323: current experimental bounds on $B_u^+\to \tau^+\nu_{\tau}$.
324: The DELPHI search for $B_u^+\to \tau^+\nu_{\tau}$ constrains
325: $\tan\beta/M_{H^\pm} \le 0.46GeV^{-1}$
326: ($90\%$ c.l.) which strengthens to $\tan\beta/M_{H^\pm}
327: \le 0.42GeV^{-1}$ if the $B_c$ contribution is included \cite{Abreu:1999xe}.
328: L3 (who neglects the $B_c$ contribution) \cite{Acciarri:1996bv}
329: obtains $\tan\beta/M_{H^\pm}\le 0.38GeV^{-1}$,
330: which would become stronger if the $B_c$ contribution were
331: included in their analysis. The $B$ factories with $>100$ fb$^{-1}$
332: will be sensitive to BRs of the order of the SM prediction and thus the first
333: measurement of $B_u^+\to \tau^+\nu_{\tau}$ is expected, unless its BR is
334: suppressed by some new physics contribution ($H^\pm$ or otherwise).
335:
336: The MSSM with $R$ Parity violating trilinear couplings predicts extra
337: contributions to $B^+_q\to \ell^+\nu$ from tree level
338: slepton or squark exchange. It has been shown that these contributions
339: can be sizeable \cite{Baek:1999ch}.
340: The $R$ parity violating superpotential is given by
341: \begin{equation}
342: W_{R}={1\over 2}\lambda_{ijk}L_iL_jE^c_k+\lambda'_{ijk}L_iQ_jD^c_k
343: +{1\over 2}\lambda''_{ijk}U^c_iD^c_jD^c_k
344: \end{equation}
345:
346: Here we do not consider the bilinear term $\mu_iL_iH_2$ since $\mu_i$ are
347: constrained to be very small by neutrino masses \cite{Hirsch:2000ef}.
348: Their contribution to $b$ decays
349: will be heavily suppressed compared to that from the trilinear couplings.
350:
351: The simplest approach to $R$ parity violating phenomenology is
352: to assume that a single $R$ parity violating coupling in the
353: {\sl weak basis} is dominant with all others negligibly small. It was shown
354: that such an approach leads to several non-zero $R$ parity violating
355: couplings in the {\sl mass basis} \cite{Agashe:1995qm}:
356: %
357: \begin{equation} \label{mixing}
358: \bar\lambda'_{ijk}=\lambda'_{imn}U_{Ljm}D^*_{Rnk}
359: \end{equation}
360:
361: Where $\lambda'_{imn}$ represents the weak basis couplings
362: and $\bar\lambda'_{ijk}$ the mass basis.
363: In the SM, the left handed up--type and down type quark mixing matrices
364: $U_L$ and $D_L$ form the Kobayashi--Maskawa matrix $V_{KM}$.
365: The right handed down type quark mixing matrix $D_R$ is unobservable in the
366: SM, and therefore the generation mixing in the $R$ parity violating couplings
367: (\ref{mixing}) is a new observable. Limits on $R$ parity violating couplings
368: depend strongly on assumptions on the absolute quark mixing \cite{Agashe:1995qm,Dreiner:1997uz}.
369:
370: We follow a frequently used approach and assume all the quark mixing to lie
371: in the up type sector. Thus $U_{Lij}=V^{KM}_{ij}$ and the above equation
372: simplifies to:
373:
374: \begin{equation}
375: \bar\lambda'_{ijk}=\lambda'_{imn}V^{\rm KM}_{jm}\delta_{kn}.
376: \end{equation}
377: This results in 3 non-zero $\bar\lambda'_{ijk}$.
378:
379: In order to have $R$ parity violating contributions to the decays $B^+_q\to \ell^+\nu_\ell$ one must
380: assume at least two non-zero trilinear terms in the weak basis.
381: The possible contributions are shown in Figure \ref{feynmandiags}.
382:
383: \begin{figure}
384: \begin{center}
385: \begin{fmfgraph*}(150,100)
386: \fmfleft{i1,i2} \fmfright{o1,o2}
387: \fmf{fermion,label=$q_{(j)}$}{i1,v1}
388: \fmf{fermion,label=$\bar b_{(3)}$,label.side=right}{v1,i2}
389: \fmf{fermion,label=$\bar \ell_{(l)}$,label.side=left}{o1,v2}
390: \fmf{fermion,label=$\nu_{(n)}$,label.side=left}{v2,o2}
391: \fmf{dashes,label=$\tilde \ell_{(i)}$}{v1,v2}
392: \fmflabel{$\lambda'^*_{ij3}$}{v1}
393: \fmflabel{$\lambda_{inl}$}{v2}
394: \fmfdot{v1,v2}
395: \end{fmfgraph*}
396: \hspace{1cm}
397: \begin{fmfgraph*}(150,100)
398: \fmfleft{i1,i2} \fmfright{o1,o2}
399: \fmf{fermion,label=$q_{(j)}$,label.side=left}{i1,v1}
400: \fmf{fermion,label=$\bar b_{(3)}$,label.side=left}{v2,i2}
401: \fmf{fermion,label=$\bar \ell_{(l)}$}{o1,v1}
402: \fmf{fermion,label=$\nu_{(n)}$}{v2,o2}
403: \fmf{dashes,label=$\tilde d_{(i)}$}{v1,v2}
404: \fmflabel{$\lambda'^*_{lji}$}{v1}
405: \fmflabel{$\lambda'_{n3i}$}{v2}
406: \fmfdot{v1,v2}
407: \end{fmfgraph*}
408: \end{center}
409: \caption{$R$ parity violating contributions to $B^+_q\to \ell_l^+\nu_n$. \label{feynmandiags}
410: Left: slepton exchange in the $s$--channel ($\sim\lambda_{inl}\lambda'^*_{ij3}$)
411: Right: squark exchange in the $t$--channel ($\sim\lambda'_{n3i}\lambda'^*_{lji}$).
412: Note that all four vertices conserve baryon number and violate lepton number,
413: this results in two fermion lines originating from (ending in) the upper
414: (lower) vertex of the right diagram.}
415: \end{figure}
416:
417: The $s$--channel contributions ($\sim\lambda\lambda'$)
418: are dominant and will from now on be considered exclusively.
419: Unlike the $H^\pm$ case, there is no $m_l$ Yukawa coupling
420: suppression for these contributions and thus large enhancements for
421: BR($B_u^+/B_c^+\to l^+\nu$) for all lepton flavours are possible.
422:
423: It was shown in \cite{Baek:1999ch} that the $\lambda\lambda'$ mediated
424: contributions to the decay $B_q\to \ell\nu_\ell$ have the following couplings:
425: \begin{equation}
426: B^q_{ln}={\sqrt 2\over 4G_FV_{qb}}\sum_{i,j=1}^3{2\over
427: m^2_{\tilde \ell_i}}V_{qj}\lambda_{inl}\lambda'^*_{ij3},
428: \end{equation}
429: %
430: where $m_{\tilde \ell_i}$ is the mass of the slepton.
431: For $q=u,c$ one has the explicit values:
432: \begin{eqnarray}
433: B^u_{ln} &=& \sum^3_{i=1}\lambda_{inl} \left(1689 \lambda'^*_{i13}
434: + 384 \lambda'^*_{i23} + 1.52 \lambda'^*_{i33}\right) \nonumber \\
435: B^c_{ln} &=& \sum^3_{i=1}\lambda_{inl} \left(32.7 \lambda'^*_{i13}
436: + 144 \lambda'^*_{i23} + 6.1 \lambda'^*_{i33}\right)
437: \end{eqnarray}
438: (With $m_{\tilde \ell_i}=100 \,GeV$ and PDG--values for the CKM matrix elements.)
439:
440: Using this approach, \cite{Baek:1999ch} showed that the upper
441: limits on $B_u^+\to \ell^+\nu$ constrain several combinations of
442: $\lambda\lambda'$ each. They assumed a single non--zero $\lambda$ and
443: $\lambda'$ each in the weak basis. In this approach, the same couplings
444: mediate $B_u^+\to \ell^+\nu$ and $B_c^+\to \ell^+\nu$, and therefore the
445: experimental limits on $B_u^+\to \ell^+\nu$ induce limits on the
446: corresponding $B_c\to \ell\nu$ channels which are not yet
447: experimentally constrained. Maximum values
448: of BR$(B_c^+\to \ell^+\nu_\ell)\approx 1\%$ were obtained. While
449: confirming the other results of \cite{Baek:1999ch}, in their approach we
450: obtain maximum values of BR$(B_c^+\to \ell^+\nu)\approx 0.1\%$ only.
451: %\ref{XXX} {\bf FIX ME}
452: %This overestimation was due to a typographical error,
453: %and the authors of \cite{Baek:1999ch} have subsequently confirmed our
454: %substantially smaller results.
455: % We do however, precisely reproduce their results when wrongly using
456: % $B^u_{ln}$ instead of $B^c_{ln}$ in the expression for BR$(B_c\to \ell\nu_\ell)$.
457:
458: We will show that
459: in the minimal extension of this approach, i.e.\ 3 non--zero $R$ parity
460: couplings in the weak basis, this correlation can be dramatically
461: reduced, resulting in much larger BRs for $B_c\to \ell\nu_\ell\gg1\%$.
462:
463: \section{Numerical results}
464:
465: In Table \ref{couplingsandBRs} we give our results for the possible
466: decay fractions
467: \begin{equation}
468: {\cal F}\equiv \Gamma(B^+_c\to\ell^+_l\nu_n)/\Gamma_{\rm tot}^{SM}.
469: \end{equation}
470: for the decays $B^+_c\to\ell^+_l\nu_n$.
471: A value of ${\cal F}=100\%$ means that the BRs are 50\% for the combined SM channels
472: and 50\% for the $R$ parity violating contribution to the annihilation decay
473: in question; for small ${\cal F}$, ${\cal F}$ corresponds to a branching ratio.
474: We consider only the $R$--parity violating
475: contribution. The SM and charged Higgs $R$--parity
476: conserving MSSM contributions (which can be up to 20 times as large
477: as the SM contribution) is negligible except for
478: $B^+_c\to\tau^+_l\nu_\tau$, which can reach up to 40\% for maximum
479: allowed $R$ (eq.\ \ref{Rdef}).
480:
481: \begin{table}\begin{center}
482: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}
483: \hline
484: Channel & Couplings used & $\lambda_{inl}$ & $\lambda'_{i13}$ & $\lambda'_{i23}$ &
485: ${\cal F}_{\rm opt}(\%)$ & ${\cal F}_{\rm con}(\%)$ \\
486: \hline
487: \multirow{6}{2.2cm}{$B^+_c\to e^+_l\nu_n$}
488: &$\lambda_{121} \lambda'_{1j3}$ & 0.05 & 0.02 & -0.088 & 13.77 & 0.004 \\
489: &$\lambda_{131} \lambda'_{1j3}$ & 0.06 & 0.02 & -0.088 & 19.82 & 3.305 \\
490: &$\lambda_{211} \lambda'_{2j3}$ & 0.05 & -0.041 & 0.18 & 57.53 & 0.003 \\
491: &$\lambda_{231} \lambda'_{2j3}$ & 0.06 & -0.041 & 0.18 & 82.85 & 3.305 \\
492: &$\lambda_{311} \lambda'_{3j3}$ & 0.06 & -0.045 & 0.20 & 102.2 & 0.003 \\
493: &$\lambda_{321} \lambda'_{3j3}$ & 0.06 & -0.045 & 0.20 & 102.2 & 0.004 \\
494: \hline
495: \multirow{6}{2.2cm}{$B^+_c\to \mu^+_l\nu_n$}
496: &$\lambda_{122} \lambda'_{1j3}$ & 0.05 & 0.02 & -0.088 & 13.76 & 0.001 \\
497: &$\lambda_{132} \lambda'_{1j3}$ & 0.06 & 0.02 & -0.088 & 19.81 & 4.953 \\
498: &$\lambda_{212} \lambda'_{2j3}$ & 0.05 & -0.041 & 0.18 & 57.50 & 0.004 \\
499: &$\lambda_{232} \lambda'_{2j3}$ & 0.06 & -0.041 & 0.18 & 82.80 & 4.953 \\
500: &$\lambda_{312} \lambda'_{3j3}$ & 0.06 & -0.045 & 0.20 & 102.2 & 0.004 \\
501: &$\lambda_{322} \lambda'_{3j3}$ & 0.06 & -0.045 & 0.20 & 102.2 & 0.001 \\
502: \hline
503: \multirow{6}{2.2cm}{$B^+_c\to \tau^+_l\nu_n$}
504: &$\lambda_{123} \lambda'_{1j3}$ & 0.05 & 0.02 & -0.088 & 11.65 & 4.193 \\
505: &$\lambda_{133} \lambda'_{1j3}$ & 0.004 & 0.02 & -0.088 & 0.075 & 0.075 \\
506: &$\lambda_{213} \lambda'_{2j3}$ & 0.05 & -0.041 & 0.18 & 48.68 & 2.796 \\
507: &$\lambda_{233} \lambda'_{2j3}$ & 0.06 & -0.041 & 0.18 & 70.09 & 70.09 \\
508: &$\lambda_{313} \lambda'_{3j3}$ & 0.004 & -0.045 & 0.20 & 0.385 & 0.385 \\
509: &$\lambda_{323} \lambda'_{3j3}$ & 0.06 & -0.045 & 0.20 & 86.54 & 4.193 \\
510: \hline
511: \end{tabular}\end{center}
512: \caption{Couplings and possible ${\cal F}\equiv \Gamma(B^+_c\to\ell^+_l\nu_n)/\Gamma_{\rm tot}^{SM}$.
513: \label{couplingsandBRs}
514: ${\cal F}_{\rm opt}$: respecting single coupling bounds but ignoring the bounds from $B_d\to\ell^+\ell'^-$,
515: ${\cal F}_{\rm con}$: respecting the bounds from $B_d\to\ell^+\ell'^-$.
516: PDG--values and $m_{\tilde \ell_i}=100 \,GeV$ have been used for the
517: numerical parameters.}
518: \end{table}
519:
520: The second to fourth columns give the values for the $R$--parity violating
521: couplings used in obtaining the optimistic
522: ${\cal F}_{\rm opt}$. While
523: respecting single coupling bounds and the limits on $B^+_u\to\ell^+_l\nu_n$,
524: some of the combinations $\lambda_{inl} \lambda'_{i13}$ used would violate the
525: bounds given by the experimental limits for $B_d\to\ell^+\ell'^-$. This could
526: easily be avoided by allowing a fourth $R$--parity violating coupling to become
527: non--zero which can induce a cancellation analogous to the
528: $B^+_u\to\ell^+_l\nu_n$ case. We show the resulting
529: ${\cal F}_{\rm opt}$
530: in the fifth column of Table \ref{couplingsandBRs}.
531:
532: Even when not demanding an additional cancellation and instead directly
533: respecting the bounds from $B_d\to\ell^+\ell'^-$, some of the combinations
534: can give quite respectable ${\cal F}$s (in one case up to 70\%) for
535: $B^+_c\to\ell^+_l\nu_n$. These conservative ${\cal F}_{\rm con}$
536: are shown in the rightmost column.
537: The larger surviving ${\cal F}$s of ${\cal O}(5\%)$ involve products of
538: $R$ parity violating couplings that are constrained by decays
539: involving one $\tau$ and one first or second generation lepton.
540: Since the experimental limits on these channels are typically
541: more than two orders of magnitude weaker than the ones involving
542: only first and second generation leptons, they imply less restrictive
543: bounds.
544:
545: The largest ${\cal F}_{\rm con}$ in the rightmost column of Table \ref{couplingsandBRs}
546: ($\lambda_{233} \lambda'_{2j3}$ inducing an
547: ${\cal F}_{\rm con}$ for $B^+_c\to\tau^+_l\nu_\tau$
548: of 70\%) is not constrained by purely leptonic decays of the $B_d$.
549: The potential bound for $\lambda_{233} \lambda'_{213}$ would come
550: from the decay $B_d\to\tau^+\tau^-$. For this decay no experimental
551: limits exist as yet,\footnote{{\sc BaBar} anticipates a sensitivity
552: at the level of $10^{-3}$ with a full dataset of $300fb^{-1}$.}
553: but it is estimated \cite{Grossman:1997qj,Guetta:1998fw}
554: that a limit of $1.5 \times 10^{-2}$ could be extracted from LEP
555: missing energy measurements. This limit would impose a bound of
556: $\lambda_{233} \lambda'_{213} < 3.0 \times 10^{-3}$, which is
557: smaller than the product of the single bounds $(5.4 \times 10^{-3})$,
558: but still does not further restrict our results involving this combination.
559:
560: In finding ${\cal F}_{\rm con}$ we have used the results of \cite{Jang:1997jy}, updating
561: the bounds according to the new experimental limits for $B_d\to\ell^+\ell'^-$
562: \cite{BELLE:2001}.\footnote{While finalising this work, a paper appeared
563: \cite{Saha:2002kt} that also attempts to update some of these bounds.
564: The authors of that paper, however, do not use the latest $B$ factory limits
565: \cite{BELLE:2001} which are considerably stricter than the ones that they employ.}
566: % Furthermore in many cases their ``previous bounds'' are less strict than even the
567: %``previous bounds'' (!) in JSL
568: %
569: The updated bounds are
570: \begin{itemize}
571: \item $1.46 \times 10^{-5}$ instead of $4.6 \times 10^{-5}$
572: for the combinations inducing $B_d\to e^+e^-$ \\ (i.e.\
573: $\lambda_{121} \lambda'_{213}, \lambda_{121} \lambda'_{231},
574: \lambda_{131} \lambda'_{313}, \lambda_{131} \lambda'_{331}$)
575: \item $1.79 \times 10^{-5}$ instead of $4.6 \times 10^{-5}$
576: for the combinations inducing $B_d\to e^\pm\mu^\mp$ \\ (i.e.\
577: $\lambda_{121} \lambda'_{113}, \lambda_{121} \lambda'_{131},
578: \lambda_{121} \lambda'_{231}, \lambda_{122} \lambda'_{213},
579: \lambda_{132} \lambda'_{313}, \lambda_{132} \lambda'_{331},
580: \lambda_{231} \lambda'_{313}, \lambda_{231} \lambda'_{331}$)
581: \item $9.76 \times 10^{-6}$ instead of $2.4 \times 10^{-5}$
582: for the combinations inducing $B_d\to \mu^+\mu^-$ \\ (i.e.\
583: $\lambda_{122} \lambda'_{113}, \lambda_{122} \lambda'_{131},
584: \lambda_{232} \lambda'_{313}, \lambda_{232} \lambda'_{331}$)
585: \end{itemize}
586: The other bounds are unchanged, because there are no new limits
587: for channels involving $\tau$ leptons or purely leptonic $B_s$ decays.
588:
589: A more conservative approach that takes into account experimental uncertainties
590: in the input parameters is adopted in \cite{Dreiner:2001kc}. While using the
591: same CLEO limits on $B_d\to\ell^+\ell'^-$, they obtain weaker bounds on the
592: products of the $R$ parity violating couplings than \cite{Jang:1997jy,Baek:1999ch}.
593: If we were to follow the approach of \cite{Dreiner:2001kc}, the above bounds
594: would weaken and the allowed ${\cal F}$s would become even larger.
595:
596: For completeness we also update the bounds on combinations of
597: a single non--zero $\lambda$ and $\lambda'$ each as derived in \cite{Baek:1999ch}.
598: The new {\sc Belle} limits \cite{BELLE:2001} on $B^-_d\to e/\mu^-\nu$ change the bounds to
599: \begin{itemize}
600: \item $4.10 \times 10^{-5}$ instead of $7.3 \times 10^{-5}$
601: for the combinations
602: $\lambda_{131} \lambda'_{113}, \lambda_{231} \lambda'_{213}$
603: \item $1.81 \times 10^{-4}$ instead of $3.2 \times 10^{-4}$
604: for the combinations
605: $\lambda_{131} \lambda'_{123}, \lambda_{131} \lambda'_{323},
606: \lambda_{231} \lambda'_{223}, \lambda_{231} \lambda'_{323}$
607: \item $1.14 \times 10^{-2}$ instead of $2.0 \times 10^{-2}$
608: for the combination
609: $\lambda_{231} \lambda'_{233}$
610: \item $4.82 \times 10^{-5}$ instead of $8.7 \times 10^{-5}$
611: for the combinations
612: $\lambda_{132} \lambda'_{113}, \lambda_{232} \lambda'_{213}$
613: \item $2.12 \times 10^{-4}$ instead of $3.8 \times 10^{-4}$
614: for the combinations
615: $\lambda_{132} \lambda'_{123}, \lambda_{132} \lambda'_{323},
616: \lambda_{232} \lambda'_{223}$
617: \end{itemize}
618: Again, the the bounds on combinations that induce decays involving
619: $\tau$ leptons remain unchanged.
620:
621: We would like to emphasise that the cancellation we employ to
622: respect the experimental bounds on $B^+_u\to\ell^+_l\nu_n$ is
623: not a very finely tuned one, e.g.\ let us look at the second line
624: of Table \ref{couplingsandBRs}. For the values quoted,
625: $\lambda_{131} = 0.06, \lambda'_{113} = 0.02$ and
626: $\lambda'_{123} = -0.088$, the BR$(B^+_u\to e^+_l\nu_\tau)$
627: induced by this combination completely vanishes. In general,
628: there are areas in the $\lambda'_{113}-\lambda'_{123}$ plane where
629: the individual contributions from these couplings interfere
630: destructively. We show this behaviour in the left part of Figure
631: \ref{valleys}.
632:
633: To respect the most recent {\sc Belle} bound, we have to
634: reduce BR$(B^+_u\to e^+_l\nu_\tau)$ to less than $4.7 \times 10^{-6}$.
635: To achieve this, $\lambda'_{123}$ could vary in the interval
636: $[-0.091,-0.085]$. By defining the amount of fine tuning
637: required for a certain cancellation as the width of the allowed
638: interval over the distance of its middle from the origin,
639: this corresponds to a 7\% fine tuning. For the ${\cal F}$s in the rightmost
640: column (which employ smaller $R$--parity violating couplings to respect
641: the $B_d\to\ell^+\ell'^-$ bounds), the fine tuning is even less severe.
642: For our example of the second
643: line, $\lambda'_{123}$ can then vary in the interval $[-0.039,-0.033]$
644: which corresponds to a 17\% fine tuning.
645: The region in parameter space for which the desired cancellation
646: can occur, is therefore rather large. We illustrate this
647: in the right hand part of Figure \ref{valleys}.
648: In general we find that the channels with
649: ${\cal F}_{\rm con}\approx 5\%$ in Table \ref{couplingsandBRs} require a fine
650: tuning of $\approx 15\%$; for the ${\cal F}(B^+_c\to\tau^+\nu_\tau)=70\%$
651: we require a fine tuning of $4\%$.
652: %
653: \begin{figure}
654: \begin{center}
655: \psfrag{113}{$\lambda'_{113}$} \psfrag{123}{$\lambda'_{123}$}
656: \psfrag{BR}{}\psfrag{optimistic}{\tiny choice for ${\cal F}_{\rm opt}$}
657: \psfrag{conservative}{\tiny choice for ${\cal F}_{\rm con}$}
658: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{valley3d.eps}
659: \psfrag{123}{$\lambda'_{123}$}\psfrag{BR}{$\log_{10}BR(B^+_u\to\ell^+_l\nu_n)$}
660: \psfrag{ExpLimit}{\small Exp.\ limit} \psfrag{Interval}{\small Allowed interval}
661: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{valley2d.eps}
662: \end{center}
663: \vspace*{-.5cm}
664: \caption{Cancellation in BR$(B^+_u\to\ell^+_l\nu_n)$. Left: BR against
665: the $R$ parity violating couplings $\lambda'_{113}$ and $\lambda'_{123}$.
666: Right: BR against $\lambda'_{123}$ ($\lambda'_{113}=8.17\times 10^{-3}$),
667: indicating the experimental limit for BR$(B^+_u\to\ell^+_l\nu_n)$
668: and the allowed range for $\lambda'_{123}$. ($\lambda_{131} = 0.06$)}
669: \label{valleys}
670: \end{figure}
671:
672:
673: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
674:
675:
676: \section{Conclusions}
677: Purely leptonic decays of $B_d$, $B_u$, $B_s$ and $B_c$ mesons
678: are helicity (and in the neutral case also loop) suppressed
679: in the SM with BRs typically smaller than
680: $10^{-10}$ for first generation leptons. Only
681: BR$(B^+_c\to\tau^+\nu_\tau)$ is expected to have a BR of ${\cal O}(3\%)$.
682: Combinations of two $R$ parity violating couplings can mediate
683: these decays without helicity suppression, and the experimental limits on
684: $B_{d/s}\to\ell^+\ell'^-$ and $B^+_u\to\ell^+_l\nu_{l'}$ induce
685: bounds on products of $R$ parity violating couplings that are
686: much stricter than the products of the individual bounds.
687: Since a single pair of non--zero couplings in the weak basis
688: can induce both $B^+_u\to\ell^+_l\nu_{l'}$ and
689: $B^+_c\to\ell^+_l\nu_{l'}$, these decays are correlated, and
690: the rather strict experimental bounds on $B^+_u\to\ell^+_l\nu_{l'}$
691: induce maximum BRs for the experimentally unconstrained decay channels
692: $B^+_c\to\ell^+_l\nu_{l'}$ of ${\cal O}(0.1\%)$ for the first
693: two generation leptons.
694:
695: In this paper we have shown that in the minimal extension of
696: this two parameter approach, i.e.\ allowing three $R$ parity
697: violating couplings to be non--zero, the correlation between
698: the decays $B^+_u\to\ell^+_l\nu_{l'}$ and
699: $B^+_c\to\ell^+_l\nu_{l'}$ is relaxed and the bounds on
700: the former decay do not restrict the latter anymore.
701: When directly respecting the bounds on products of two couplings
702: from $B_{d/s}\to\ell^+\ell'^-$ decays (``conservative approach''),
703: we obtain BRs of ${\cal O}(5\%)$ for channels involving first
704: and second generation leptons. Assuming an analogous cancellation
705: in the neutral $B$ meson leptonic decays by employing an additional
706: non--zero $R$ parity violating coupling (``optimistic approach''),
707: the partial width of these channels can even be of the order
708: of the total SM--width of the $B_c$ meson. For decays involving
709: $\tau$ leptons, the bounds from $B_{d/s}\to\ell^+\ell'^-$ are
710: so weak that even when respecting these bounds, ${\cal O}(1)$
711: BRs are possible.
712:
713: \vspace{20mm}
714: \begin{center}
715: {\large\bf Acknowledgements}
716: \end{center}
717:
718: The authors wish to thank F.\ Borzumati, Y.\ Okada and M.\ Yamaguchi
719: for useful discussions.
720: S.R.\ was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS).
721:
722: \renewcommand{\theequation}{B.\arabic{equation}}
723: \setcounter{equation}{0}
724:
725: \newpage
726:
727: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
728:
729: %\cite{Abe:2001xe}
730: \bibitem{Abe:2001xe}
731: K.~Abe {\it et al.} [Belle Collaboration],
732: %``Observation of large CP violation in the neutral B meson system,''
733: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 87}, 091802 (2001).
734: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0107061;%%
735:
736: %\cite{Aubert:2001nu}
737: \bibitem{Aubert:2001nu}
738: B.~Aubert {\it et al.} [BaBar Collaboration],
739: %`Observation of CP violation in the B0 meson system,''
740: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 87}, 091801 (2001).
741: %[hep-ex/0107013].
742: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0107013;%%
743:
744: %\cite{Abe:2002qq}
745: \bibitem{Abe:2002qq}
746: K.~Abe {\it et al.} [Belle Collaboration],
747: %``Measurement of CP-violating asymmetries in B0 $\to$ pi+ pi- decays,''
748: hep-ex/0204002.
749: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0204002;%%
750:
751: %\cite{Hou:1992sy}
752: \bibitem{Hou:1992sy}
753: W.~S.~Hou,
754: %``Enhanced charged Higgs boson effects in B- $\to$ tau anti-neutrino,
755: %mu anti-neutrino and b $\to$ tau anti-neutrino + X,''
756: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 48}, 2342 (1993).
757: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D48,2342;%%
758:
759: %\cite{Du:1997pm}
760: \bibitem{Du:1997pm}
761: D.~S.~Du, H.~Y.~Jin and Y.~D.~Yang,
762: %``Probe new physics in leptonic B/c decays at CERN LHC,''
763: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 414}, 130 (1997).
764: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9705261].
765: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9705261;%%
766:
767: %\cite{Guetta:1997fw}
768: \bibitem{Guetta:1997fw}
769: D.~Guetta and E.~Nardi,
770: %``Searching for new physics in rare B $\to$ tau decays,''
771: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 58}, 012001 (1998).
772: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9707371].
773: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9707371;%%
774:
775: %\cite{Baek:1999ch}
776: \bibitem{Baek:1999ch}
777: S.~W.~Baek and Y.~G.~Kim,
778: %``Constraints on the R-parity violating couplings from B+- $\to$ l+- nu decays,''
779: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 077701 (1999).
780: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9906385].
781: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9906385;%%
782:
783: \bibitem{Gershtein:1994jw}
784: S.~S.~Gershtein, V.~V.~Kiselev, A.~K.~Likhoded and A.~V.~Tkabladze,
785: %``Physics of B(c) mesons,''
786: Phys.\ Usp.\ {\bf 38}, 1 (1995)
787: [Usp.\ Fiz.\ Nauk {\bf 165}, 3 (1995)].
788: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9504319].
789: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9504319;%%
790:
791: %\cite{Gershtein:1997qy}
792: \bibitem{Gershtein:1997qy}
793: S.~S.~Gershtein, V.~V.~Kiselev, A.~K.~Likhoded, A.~V.~Tkabladze, A.~V.~Berezhnoi and A.~I.~Onishchenko,
794: %``Theoretical status of the B/c meson,''
795: hep-ph/9803433.
796: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9803433;%%
797:
798: %\cite{Brambilla:2001fw}
799: \bibitem{Brambilla:2001fw}
800: N.~Brambilla, Y.~Sumino and A.~Vairo,
801: %``Quarkonium spectroscopy and perturbative QCD: A new perspective,''
802: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 513}, 381 (2001).
803: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0101305].
804: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0101305;%%
805:
806: %\cite{Ackerstaff:1998zf}
807: \bibitem{Ackerstaff:1998zf}
808: K.~Ackerstaff {\it et al.} [OPAL Collaboration],
809: %``Search for the B/c meson in hadronic Z0 decays,''
810: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 420}, 157 (1998).
811: %[arXiv:hep-ex/9801026].
812: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9801026;%%
813:
814: %\cite{Abreu:1996nz}
815: \bibitem{Abreu:1996nz}
816: P.~Abreu {\it et al.} [DELPHI Collaboration],
817: %``Search for the B/c meson,''
818: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 398}, 207 (1997).
819: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B398,207;%%
820:
821: %\cite{Barate:1997kk}
822: \bibitem{Barate:1997kk}
823: R.~Barate {\it et al.} [ALEPH Collaboration],
824: %``Search for the B/c meson in hadronic Z decays,''
825: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 402}, 213 (1997).
826: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B402,213;%%
827:
828: %\cite{Abe:1998wi}
829: \bibitem{Abe:1998wi}
830: F.~Abe {\it et al.} [CDF Collaboration],
831: %``Observation of the B/c meson in p anti-p collisions
832: %at s**(1/2) = 1.8-TeV,''
833: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 81}, 2432 (1998).
834: %[arXiv:hep-ex/9805034].
835: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9805034;%%
836:
837: %\cite{Abe:1998fb}
838: \bibitem{Abe:1998fb}
839: F.~Abe {\it et al.} [CDF Collaboration],
840: %``Observation of B/c mesons in p anti-p collisions at s**(1/2) = 1.8-TeV,''
841: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 58}, 112004 (1998).
842: %[arXiv:hep-ex/9804014].
843: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9804014;%%%
844:
845: %\cite{Artuso:1995ar}
846: \bibitem{Artuso:1995ar}
847: M.~Artuso {\it et al.} [CLEO Collaboration],
848: %``A Search for B $\to$ lepton anti-lepton-neutrino,''
849: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 75}, 785 (1995).
850: %%CITATION = PRLTA,75,785;%%
851:
852: %\cite{BELLE:2001}
853: \bibitem{BELLE:2001}
854: BELLE--CONF--0127, http://belle.kek.jp/conferences/LP01-EPS/.
855:
856: %\cite{Browder:2000qr}
857: \bibitem{Browder:2000qr}
858: T.~E.~Browder {\it et al.} [CLEO Collaboration],
859: %``A search for B $\to$ tau nu,''
860: Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 16S1B}, 636 (2001).
861: %[arXiv:hep-ex/0007057].
862: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0007057;%%
863:
864: %\cite{Acciarri:1996bv}
865: \bibitem{Acciarri:1996bv}
866: M.~Acciarri {\it et al.} [L3 Collaboration],
867: %``Measurement of D/s- $\to$ tau- anti-nu/tau and a new limit
868: %for B- $\to$ tau- anti-nu/tau,''
869: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 396}, 327 (1997).
870: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B396,327;%%
871:
872: %\cite{Abreu:1999xe}
873: \bibitem{Abreu:1999xe}
874: P.~Abreu {\it et al.} [DELPHI Collaboration],
875: %``Upper limit for the decay B- $\to$ tau- anti-nu/tau and
876: %measurement of the b $\to$ tau anti-nu/tau X branching ratio,''
877: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 496}, 43 (2000).
878: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B496,43;%%
879:
880: %\cite{Barate:2000rc}
881: \bibitem{Barate:2000rc}
882: R.~Barate {\it et al.} [ALEPH Collaboration],
883: %``Measurements of BR(b $\to$ tau- anti-nu/tau X) and
884: %BR(b $\to$ tau- anti-nu/tau D*+- X) and upper limits on
885: %BR(B- $\to$ tau- anti-nu/tau) and
886: %BR(b $\to$ s nu anti-nu),''
887: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 19}, 213 (2001).
888: %[arXiv:hep-ex/0010022].
889: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0010022;%%
890:
891: \bibitem{Mangano:1997md}
892: M.~L.~Mangano and S.~R.~Slabospitsky,
893: %``The contribution of B/c mesons to the search for B+ $\to$
894: %tau+ nu/tau decays at LEP,''
895: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 410}, 299 (1997).
896: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9707248].
897: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9707248;%%
898:
899: %\cite{Anikeev:2001rk}
900: \bibitem{Anikeev:2001rk}
901: K.~Anikeev {\it et al.},
902: ``B physics at the Tevatron: Run II and beyond'',
903: hep-ph/0201071.
904: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0201071;%%
905:
906: %\cite{Ball:2000ba}
907: \bibitem{Ball:2000ba}
908: P.~Ball {\it et al.},
909: ``B decays at the LHC'',
910: hep-ph/0003238.
911: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0003238;%%
912:
913: %\cite{Hirsch:2000ef}
914: \bibitem{Hirsch:2000ef}
915: M.~Hirsch, M.~A.~Diaz, W.~Porod, J.~C.~Romao and J.~W.~Valle,
916: %``Neutrino masses and mixings from supersymmetry with bilinear R-parity violation: A theory for solar and atmospheric neutrino oscillations,''
917: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62}, 113008 (2000).
918: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0004115].
919: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0004115;%%
920:
921: %\cite{Agashe:1995qm}
922: \bibitem{Agashe:1995qm}
923: K.~Agashe and M.~Graesser,
924: %``$R$-Parity Violation in Flavor Changing Neutral Current Processes and Top Quark Decays,''
925: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 54}, 4445 (1996).
926: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9510439].
927: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9510439;%%
928:
929: %\cite{Dreiner:1997uz}
930: \bibitem{Dreiner:1997uz}
931: H.~K.~Dreiner,
932: %``An introduction to explicit R-parity violation,''
933: hep-ph/9707435.
934: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9707435;%%
935:
936: %\cite{Grossman:1997qj}
937: \bibitem{Grossman:1997qj}
938: Y.~Grossman, Z.~Ligeti and E.~Nardi,
939: %``B $\to$ tau+ tau- (X) decays: First constraints and phenomenological implications,''
940: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 55}, 2768 (1997).
941: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9607473].
942: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9607473;%%
943:
944: %\cite{Guetta:1998fw}
945: \bibitem{Guetta:1998fw}
946: D.~Guetta and E.~Nardi,
947: %``Searching for new physics in rare B $\to$ tau decays,''
948: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 58}, 012001 (1998).
949: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9707371].
950: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9707371;%%
951:
952: %\cite{Jang:1997jy}
953: \bibitem{Jang:1997jy}
954: J.~H.~Jang, J.~K.~Kim and J.~S.~Lee,
955: %``Constraints on the R-parity and lepton flavor violating couplings from B0 decays to two charged leptons,''
956: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 55}, 7296 (1997).
957: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9701283].
958: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9701283;%%
959:
960: %\cite{Saha:2002kt}
961: \bibitem{Saha:2002kt}
962: J.~P.~Saha and A.~Kundu,
963: %``Constraints on R-parity violating supersymmetry from leptonic and semileptonic tau, B_d and B_s decays,''
964: hep-ph/0205046.
965: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0205046;%%
966:
967: %\cite{Dreiner:2001kc}
968: \bibitem{Dreiner:2001kc}
969: H.~K.~Dreiner, G.~Polesello and M.~Thormeier,
970: %``Bounds on broken R-parity from leptonic meson decays,''
971: hep-ph/0112228.
972: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0112228;%%
973:
974: \end{thebibliography}
975:
976: \end{fmffile}
977:
978: \end{document}
979:
980: