1: \documentclass[12pt]{iopart}
2: \usepackage{graphicx}
3: \usepackage[dvips]{pstcol}
4: \usepackage{pst-node}
5: \usepackage{pst-plot}
6: \usepackage{pst-coil}
7: \usepackage{subfigure}
8: %\renewcommand{\thesubfigure}{\thefigure.\alph{subfigure}}
9: \begin{document}
10: \title{CP violating asymmetries in the flavour changing single top quark production }
11: \author{A T Alan, A Senol and A T Tasci}
12: \address{Department of Physics, Abant Izzet Baysal University, 14280 G\"{o}lk\"{o}y, Bolu, Turkey}
13: \ead{alan@ibu.edu.tr}
14: \date{\today}
15: \begin{abstract}\\CP violating effects in the single top quark production via
16: flavour changing neutral current (FCNC) reactions
17: $e^+e^-\rightarrow t\bar{q}$ and $e^+e^-\rightarrow \bar{t}q$
18: (here $q$ refers to charm and up quarks) are studied. The
19: effective Lagrangian description of the FCNC interactions is used.
20: A numerical analysis is performed for some next linear colliders.
21: CP violating asymmetries for the number of $q$ and $\bar{q}$
22: quarks are obtained to be of order $10^{-2}-10^{-3}$ depending on
23: the CM energy.
24: \end{abstract}
25:
26: %\maketitle
27: \section{Introduction}
28: One of the major goals of the next linear colliders (NLC) will be
29: searching for flavour changing processes. Within the standard
30: model (SM) these processes occur at the one-loop level and are
31: unobservably small \cite{1}. Thus any signal of such reactions
32: will be a clear evidence of new physics beyond the SM. The top
33: quark with its large mass seems to play the leading role to
34: provide useful information on new physics. Searching for CP
35: violation in top sector seems especially promising \cite{top}. For
36: detailed analyzes of CP asymmetries in single top production
37: within the minimal supersymmetric model (MSSM) see \cite{2}. On
38: the flavour changing top-charm (or top-up) transitions, there are
39: lots of theoretical studies in the literature. Two popular models
40: allowing such transitions are multi-Higgs-Douplet models \cite{3}
41: and Supersymmetry \cite{4}. Another possible manifestation of
42: these kind of new interactions in the top sector is to alter its
43: couplings to the other known particles, which is called as
44: effective Lagrangian description \cite{5,6}. In this approach,
45: deviations from the SM for the flavour changing vertices are
46: described by a linear effective Lagrangian containing a series of
47: effective operators whose coefficients are suppressed by power of
48: $1/\Lambda$, where $\Lambda$ is a high mass scale up to which the
49: effective theory is assumed to hold. For the flavour changing
50: processes, the lowest dimension gauge invariant operators built
51: from SM fields are dimension six, but after spontaneous symmetry
52: breaking the effective Lagrangian induces the dimension five
53: operators \cite{5},
54: \begin{eqnarray}
55: {\cal L} & = & ee_q\bar t {i\sigma_{\mu\nu}q^\nu\over
56: \Lambda}
57: (\kappa_\gamma-i\tilde\kappa_\gamma\gamma_5)c A^\mu \\
58: & & +{g\over 2\cos\theta_W}\bar t\left[
59: \gamma_\mu(v_Z-a_Z\gamma_5)+ {i\sigma_{\mu\nu}q^\nu\over
60: \Lambda}(\kappa_Z-i\tilde\kappa_Z\gamma_5)\right] cZ^\mu
61: +h.c.\,,\nonumber \end{eqnarray} where $q$ is the momentum of the
62: exchanged gauge boson, $\theta_W$ is the Weinberg angle, $e$ and
63: $g$ denote the gauge couplings relative to $U(1)$ and $SU(2)$
64: symmetries respectively, $e_q$ denotes the electric charge of
65: up-type quarks, $A^{\mu}$ and $Z^{\mu}$ the fields of the photon
66: and $Z$ boson.
67:
68: In this paper, we investigate the CP asymmetries in the FCNC
69: single top quark production. More precisely, we consider the two
70: CP conjugate flavour changing processes $e^+e^-\rightarrow t\bar{q}$ and
71: $e^+e^-\rightarrow \bar{t}q$ (here q refers to charm or up
72: quarks). For numerical evaluations, the parameters of the three
73: high energy linear colliders (LC) LEP II, TESLA and CLIC are used
74: \cite{7,8}.
75: \section{Derivation of the CP violating asymmetry}
76: Considering only the CP violating $\tilde{\kappa}_{\gamma}$ and
77: $\tilde{\kappa}_{Z}$ terms in the effective Lagrangian, contribution of the CP conserving couplings to the asymmetry are less than 0.3 \%,
78: the top decays
79: $t\rightarrow q\gamma$ and $t\rightarrow q Z$ are written as
80:
81: \begin{eqnarray}
82: \Gamma(t\rightarrow q\gamma)&=&\frac{\alpha
83: e_q^2\tilde{\kappa}_{\gamma}^2}{\Lambda^2m_t^3}\left(m_t^2-m_q^2\right)^3~,
84: \end{eqnarray}
85: \begin{eqnarray}
86: \Gamma(t\rightarrow
87: qZ)&=&\frac{g_z^2\left(m_t^2-M_Z^2\right)^2}{32\pi
88: \Lambda^2m_t^3M_Z^2}\\
89: &\times&\left[\left(m_t^2+2M_Z^2\right)\left[(a_Z^q)^2+(v_Z^q)^2\right]\Lambda^2+\tilde{\kappa}_Z^2M_Z^2\left(2m_t^2+M_Z^2\right)\right]\nonumber~
90: \end{eqnarray}
91: where $a_Z^q=\frac{1}{2}$ and
92: $v_Z^q=\frac{1}{2}-\frac{4}{3}\sin^2\theta_W$.
93:
94: By using the 95 $\%$ C.L. limits
95: of $BR(t\rightarrow q\gamma)<0.032$ and $BR(t\rightarrow q
96: Z)<0.33$ \cite{9}, we obtain that while $\tilde{\kappa}_{\gamma}$ is real, $\tilde{\kappa}_{Z}$ is pure imaginary and the
97: restrictions on the couplings are as follows:
98: \begin{eqnarray}\label{eq3}
99: |\tilde{\kappa}_{\gamma}|<0.28& ~~\mathrm{and}~~
100: &|\mathrm{Im}\tilde{\kappa}_{Z}|<0.58~.
101: \end{eqnarray}
102: In obtaining these restrictions we have taken $\Lambda=m_t$.
103:
104: To estimate the possible size of the effect, we consider the
105: following CP-violating quantity :
106: \begin{eqnarray}
107: A_{CP}=\frac{\sigma(\bar{t}q)-\bar{\sigma}(t\bar{q})}{\sigma(\bar{t}q)+\bar{\sigma}(t\bar{q})}
108: \end{eqnarray}
109: where $\sigma(\bar{t}q)$ and $\bar{\sigma}(t\bar{q})$ are the
110: total cross sections for the processes $e^+e^-\rightarrow
111: \bar{t}q$ and $e^+e^-\rightarrow t\bar{q}$, respectively. The
112: total cross section for the process $e^+e^-\rightarrow \bar{t}q$
113: is obtained as
114: \begin{eqnarray*}
115: \sigma=\sigma_{\gamma}+\sigma_Z+\sigma_{int},
116: \end{eqnarray*}
117: where $\sigma_{\gamma}$, $\sigma_Z$ are the cross sections for $s$
118: channel $\gamma$ and $Z$ exchange processes, respectively.
119: $\sigma_{int}$ corresponds to the interference term of the
120: amplitude. These are given by
121:
122: \begin{eqnarray}
123: \sigma_{\gamma}&=&\frac{2\pi\alpha^{2}e_q^2\tilde{\kappa}_{\gamma}^2}{3\Lambda^2s^3}\left[s^3-3sm_t^4+2m_t^6\right]~,
124: \end{eqnarray}
125:
126: \begin{eqnarray}
127: \sigma_{Z}&=&\frac{1}{16\pi
128: s^2}\frac{g_z^4\left[(a_Z^e)^2+(v_Z^e)^2\right](m_t^2-s)^2}{24\left[(s-M_Z^2)^2+\Gamma_Z^2M_Z^2\right]}\nonumber\\
129: &\times&\left[(m_t^2 +2s)\left[(a_Z^q)^2+(v_Z^q)^2\right]
130: +\frac{(\mathrm{Im}\tilde{\kappa}_{Z})^2s}{\Lambda^2}(2m_t^2+s)\right]~,
131: \\\nonumber\\
132: \sigma_{int}&=&\frac{\alpha
133: e_q\tilde{\kappa}_{\gamma}g_z^2v_Z^e(m_t^2-s)^2}{12\Lambda^2s^2\left[(s-M_Z^2)^2+\Gamma_Z^2M_Z^2\right]}\nonumber\\
134: &\times&\left[3a_Z^qm_t\Lambda(M_Z^2-s)
135: +\mathrm{Im}\tilde{\kappa}_{Z}(2m_t^2+s)\Gamma_ZM_Z\right]~.
136: \end{eqnarray}
137: where $a_Z^e=-\frac{1}{2}$ and
138: $v_Z^e=-\frac{1}{2}+2\sin^2\theta_W$. The total cross section for
139: the CP conjugate process $e^+e^-\rightarrow t\bar{q}$ differs only
140: in the interference term, that is,
141: \begin{eqnarray*}
142: \bar{\sigma}_{\gamma}=\sigma_{\gamma}&~~~~&
143: \bar{\sigma}_{Z}=\sigma_{Z}
144: \end{eqnarray*}
145: and
146: \begin{eqnarray}
147: \bar{\sigma}_{int}&=&\frac{\alpha e_q
148: \tilde{\kappa}_{\gamma}g_z^2v_Z^e(m_t^2-s)^2}{12\Lambda^2s^2\left[(s-M_Z^2)^2+\Gamma_Z^2M_Z^2\right]}\nonumber\\
149: &\times&\left[3a_Z^qm_t\Lambda(s-M_Z^2)+\mathrm{Im}\tilde{\kappa}_{Z}
150: (2m_t^2+s)\Gamma_ZM_Z\right]~.
151: \end{eqnarray}
152: \section{Numerical results}
153: The CP asymmetries are evaluated for LEP II with $\sqrt{s}= 200$
154: GeV, TESLA with $\sqrt{s}= 500$ GeV and CLIC with $\sqrt{s}=$ 1
155: TeV. With the increasing CM energy, the ability of a collider to
156: probe the existence of FCNC couplings is improved. But the
157: sensitivity to these couplings scales with the integrated
158: luminosity $L$ approximately as $1/\sqrt{L}$. As an example in
159: figures \ref{fig.1a} and \ref{fig.1b} we display the sensitivity
160: to the couplings as a function of integrated luminosity at
161: $\sqrt{s}=500$ GeV. In \fref{fig.2} the asymmetry is displayed as
162: a function of the CM energy in the range of 200 - 1000 GeV. In
163: figures \ref{fig.3}, \ref{fig.4} and \ref{fig.5} the CP
164: asymmetries are shown also as a function of couplings
165: $\tilde{\kappa}_{\gamma}$ and Im$\tilde{\kappa}_{Z}$ for the CM
166: energies 200 GeV, 500 GeV and 1000 GeV, respectively. If these
167: couplings are saturated to their upper bounds given in equation
168: \eref{eq3}
169: the following values are obtained for three different $\Lambda$ values: \\
170:
171: \begin{tabular}{l|lll}
172: % after \\: \hline or \cline{col1-col2} \cline{col3-col4} ...
173: &$ \Lambda=175$ $\mathrm{GeV}$ & $\Lambda=500$ $\mathrm{GeV}$ &$\Lambda=1000$ $\mathrm{GeV}$
174: \\\hline
175: $\sqrt{s}=200~\mathrm{GeV}$ & $\mathrm{A}=1.84\times10^{-2}$ & $\mathrm{A}=1.39\times10^{-2}$ & $\mathrm{A}=7.95\times10^{-3}$ \\
176: $\sqrt{s}=500~\mathrm{GeV}$ & $\mathrm{A}=9.79\times10^{-3}$ & $\mathrm{A}=1.45\times10^{-2}$ & $\mathrm{A}=1.09\times10^{-2}$ \\
177: $\sqrt{s}=1000~\mathrm{GeV}$ &$ \mathrm{A}=3.22\times10^{-3}$ &$ \mathrm{A}=7.17\times10^{-3}$ & $\mathrm{A}=8.16\times10^{-3}$ \\
178: \end{tabular}
179: \\\\
180:
181:
182: The total cross section for the process $e^+e^-\rightarrow
183: t\bar{q}$, with $\sqrt{s}=500$ GeV, as a function of the couplings
184: is plotted in figure \ref{fig.6}. In all figures we have taken
185: $\Lambda=m_t$.
186: \section{Conclusions}
187: We have studied the CP asymmetries in single top production in
188: $e^+e^-$ collisions via FCNC couplings. We used a model
189: independent effective Lagrangian approach to describe these
190: couplings. In this description, the effects turn out to be of the
191: order of $10^{-2}$-$10^{-3}$. The total cross section for
192: $e^+e^-\rightarrow t\bar{q}$ is $\sim$ 330 fb which means $\sim$
193: $10^5$ events for TESLA with an integrated luminosity of 300
194: fb$^{-1}$. Therefore, an asymmetry of the order of $10^{-2}$ is to
195: be detectable at TESLA. Finally, similar discussions on the
196: observability of the asymmetries can be done for other future
197: linear colliders, e.g. for CLIC.
198: \ack{ This work was supported
199: in part by Abant Izzet Baysal University Research Fund.}
200:
201: \section*{References}
202:
203:
204: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
205:
206: \bibitem{1}
207:
208: Ganapathi V \etal 1983 \textit{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{D27} 579
209:
210: Buchm\"{u}ller W and Gronau M 1989 \textit{Phys. Lett.}
211: \textbf{B220} 641
212:
213: Fritzsch H 1989 \textit{Phys. Lett.} \textbf{B224} 423
214:
215: Huang C S, Wu X H and Zhu S H 1999 \textit{Phys. Lett.}
216: \textbf{B452} 143
217:
218: \bibitem{top}
219: Atwood D, Bar-Shalom S, Eilam G and Soni A 2001 \textit{Phys.
220: Rept.} \textbf{347} 1
221:
222: \bibitem{2}
223:
224: Bar-Shalom S, Atwood D and Soni A 1998 \textit{ Phys. Rev.}
225: \textbf{D57} 1495
226:
227: Christova E 1999 \textit{Int. J. Mod. Phys.} \textbf{A14} 1
228:
229: \bibitem{3}Atwood D, Reina L and Soni A 1997 \textit{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{D55} 3156
230:
231: Bar-Shalom S, Eilam G, Soni A and Wudka J 1997 \textit{Phys. Rev.
232: Lett.} \textbf{79} 1217
233:
234: \textit{ibid} 1998 \textit{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{D57} 2957
235:
236: \bibitem{4}Li C S, Oakes R J and Yang J M 1994 \textit{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{D49} 293
237:
238: Atwood D, Reina L and Soni A 1995 \textit{Phys. Rev. Lett.}
239: \textbf{75} 3800
240:
241: Bar-Shalom S, Atwood D, Eilam G, Mendel R R and Soni A 1996
242: \textit{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{D53} 1162
243:
244: Hou W S and Lin G L 1996 \textit{Phys. Lett.} \textbf{B379} 261
245:
246: Mahanta U and Ghosal A 1998 \textit{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{D57} 1735
247:
248: Bar-Shalom S, Eilam G and Soni A 1999 \textit{Phys. Rev.}
249: \textbf{D59} 055012
250:
251: Yu Z H \etal 2000 \textit{ Eur. Phys. J.} \textbf{C16} 541
252:
253: Chemtob M and Moreau G 1999 \textit{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{D59}
254: 116012
255:
256: \bibitem{5}
257: Han T and Hewett J L 19999 \textit{Phys. Rev.} \textbf{D60} 074015
258:
259: \bibitem{6}
260:
261:
262: Peccei R D and Zhang X 1990 \textit{Nucl. Phys.} \textbf{B337} 269
263:
264: Han T, Peccei R D and Zhang X 1995 \textit{Nucl. Phys. }
265: \textbf{B434} 527
266:
267: Han T, Whisnant K, Young B L and Zhang X 1997 \textit{Phys. Rev}
268: \textbf{D55} 7241
269:
270: Bar-Shalom S and Wudka J 1999 \textit{ Phys. Rev.} \textbf{D60}
271: 094016
272:
273: Tait T and Yuan C P 2001 \textit{ Phys. Rev.} \textbf{D63} 014018
274:
275: Alan A T and Senol A 2002 \textit{Europhys.Lett.} \textbf{59}
276: 669-673
277:
278:
279: \bibitem{7}
280: Assmann R W \etal 2000 \textit{The CLIC Study Team} CERN 2000-008
281:
282: \bibitem{8} \textit{TESLA Technical Design Report} (2001) DESY
283: 2001-011
284:
285: \bibitem{9}
286: Groom D E \etal 2000 \textit{Eur. Phys. J.} \textbf{C15} 1
287:
288:
289: \end{thebibliography}
290: \begin{figure}
291: \centering
292: \subfigure[]{\label{fig.1a}
293: \includegraphics[width=13.7cm]{kgl.eps}}
294: \vspace{0.5cm}\subfigure[]{\label{fig.1b}
295: \includegraphics[width=14cm]{kzl.eps}}
296: \caption{$95\%$ C.L. sensitivity to the FCNC couplings as a function of the integrated
297: luminosity for $\sqrt{s}=500$ GeV~.}
298: \end{figure}
299:
300: \newpage
301: \begin{figure}[b]
302: \includegraphics[width=15cm]{A_s.eps}
303: \caption{\label{fig.2} CP asymmetry as a function of the CM energy
304: with $\tilde{\kappa}_{\gamma}$=0.28 and
305: $\mathrm{Im}\tilde{\kappa}_{Z}$=0.58~.}
306: \end{figure}
307:
308: \begin{figure}
309: \centering
310: \includegraphics[width=12cm]{200_d_k.eps}
311: \caption{\label{fig.3}CP asymmetry as a function of
312: $\tilde{\kappa}_\gamma$ and $\mathrm{Im}\tilde{\kappa}_Z$ at
313: $\sqrt{s}=200$ GeV~.}
314: \end{figure}
315:
316: \begin{figure}
317: \centering
318: \includegraphics[width=12cm]{500_d_k.eps}
319: \caption{\label{fig.4}CP asymmetry as a function of
320: $\tilde{\kappa}_\gamma$ and $\mathrm{Im}\tilde{\kappa}_Z$ at
321: $\sqrt{s}=500$ GeV~.}
322: \end{figure}
323: \begin{figure}
324: \centering
325: \includegraphics[width=12cm]{1000_d_k.eps}
326: \caption{\label{fig.5}CP asymmetry as a function of
327: $\tilde{\kappa}_\gamma$ and $\mathrm{Im}\tilde{\kappa}_Z$ at
328: $\sqrt{s}=1000$ GeV~.}
329: \end{figure}
330: \begin{figure}
331: \centering
332: \includegraphics[width=13cm]{totcs.eps}
333: \caption{\label{fig.6}The total cross-section for
334: $e^+e^-\rightarrow t\bar{q}$, with $\sqrt{s}=500$ GeV, as a
335: function $\tilde{\kappa}_\gamma$ and
336: $\mathrm{Im}\tilde{\kappa}_Z$.}
337: \end{figure}
338: \end{document}
339: