1: \documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
2:
3: \usepackage{latexsym}
4: %\usepackage{showkeys} %%%% for draft mode %%%%
5: \usepackage[small,hang,bf]{caption} %%%%%%% nice captions %%%%%%
6:
7: \topmargin 0cm
8: \textwidth 182mm
9: \textheight 245mm
10: \hoffset -2.4cm
11: \voffset -1.2cm
12: \topskip 0mm
13:
14: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%% personal commands %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
15:
16: \newcommand{\nc}{\newcommand}
17:
18: \nc{\be}[1]{\begin{equation}\mbox{$\label{#1}$}}
19: \nc{\bea}[1]{\begin{eqnarray} \mbox{$\label{#1}$}}
20: \nc{\Section}[2]{\section{#2}\label{#1}}
21: \nc{\Bibitem}[1]{\bibitem{#1}}
22: \nc{\Label}[1]{\label{#1}}
23:
24: \nc{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}
25: \nc{\ee}{\end{equation}}
26:
27: \nc{\bdm}{\begin{displaymath}}
28: \nc{\edm}{\end{displaymath}}
29: \nc{\dpsty}{\displaystyle}
30: \nc{\bc}{\begin{center}}
31: \nc{\ec}{\end{center}}
32: \nc{\ba}{\begin{array}}
33: \nc{\ea}{\end{array}}
34: \nc{\bab}{\begin{abstract}}
35: \nc{\eab}{\end{abstract}}
36: \nc{\btab}{\begin{tabular}}
37: \nc{\etab}{\end{tabular}}
38: \nc{\bit}{\begin{itemize}}
39: \nc{\eit}{\end{itemize}}
40: \nc{\ben}{\begin{enumerate}}
41: \nc{\een}{\end{enumerate}}
42: \nc{\bfig}{\begin{figure}}
43: \nc{\efig}{\end{figure}}
44:
45: \nc{\arreq}{&\!=\!&}
46: \nc{\arrmi}{&\!-\!&}
47: \nc{\arrpl}{&\!+\!&}
48: \nc{\arrap}{&\!\!\!\approx\!\!\!&}
49: \nc{\non}{\nonumber}
50: \nc{\align}{\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!&&}
51:
52: \def\lsim{\; \raise0.3ex\hbox{$<$\kern-0.75em
53: \raise-1.1ex\hbox{$\sim$}}\; }
54: \def\gsim{\; \raise0.3ex\hbox{$>$\kern-0.75em
55: \raise-1.1ex\hbox{$\sim$}}\; }
56:
57: \nc{\DOT}{\hspace{-0.08in}{\bf .}\hspace{0.1in}}
58: \nc{\Laada}{\hbox {$\sqcap$ \kern -1em $\sqcup$}}
59: \nc\loota{{\scriptstyle\sqcap\kern-0.55em\hbox{$\scriptstyle\sqcup$}}}
60: \nc\Loota{{\sqcap\kern-0.65em\hbox{$\sqcup$}}}
61: \nc\laada{\Loota}
62: \nc{\qed}{\hskip 3em \hbox{\BOX} \vskip 2ex}
63: \def\Re{{\rm Re}\hskip2pt}
64: \def\Im{{\rm Im}\hskip2pt}
65: \nc{\real}{{\rm I \! R}}
66: \nc{\Z}{{\sf Z \!\!\! Z}}
67: \nc{\complex}{{\rm C\!\!\! {\sf I}\,\,}}
68: \def\bigid{\leavevmode\hbox{\small1\kern-3.8pt\normalsize1}}
69: \def\id{\leavevmode\hbox{\small1\kern-3.3pt\normalsize1}}
70: %\nc{\id}{{\bf 1}}
71: %\nc{\id}{{1\!\!1}}
72: \nc{\slask}{\!\!\!/}
73: \nc{\bis}{{\prime\prime}}
74: \nc{\pa}{\partial}
75: \nc{\na}{\nabla}
76: \nc{\ra}{\rangle}
77: \nc{\la}{\langle}
78: \nc{\goto}{\rightarrow}
79: \nc{\swap}{\leftrightarrow}
80:
81: \nc{\EE}[1]{ \mbox{$\cdot10^{#1}$} }
82: \nc{\abs}[1]{\left|#1\right|}
83: \nc{\at}[2]{\left.#1\right|_{#2}}
84: \nc{\norm}[1]{\|#1\|}
85: \nc{\abscut}[2]{\Abs{#1}_{\scriptscriptstyle#2}}
86: \nc{\vek}[1]{{\rm\bf #1}}
87: \nc{\integral}[2]{\int\limits_{#1}^{#2}}
88: \nc{\inv}[1]{\frac{1}{#1}}
89: \nc{\dd}[2]{{{\partial #1}\over{\partial #2}}}
90: \nc{\ddd}[2]{{{{\partial}^2 #1}\over{\partial {#2}^2}}}
91: \nc{\dddd}[3]{{{{\partial}^2 #1}\over
92: {\partial #2 \partial #3}}}
93: \nc{\dder}[2]{{{d #1}\over{d #2}}}
94: \nc{\ddder}[2]{{{d^2 #1}\over{d {#2}^2}}}
95: \nc{\dddder}[3]{{d^2 #1}\over
96: {d #2 d #3}}
97: \nc{\dx}[1]{d\,^{#1}x}
98: \nc{\dy}[1]{d\,^{#1}y}
99: \nc{\dz}[1]{d\,^{#1}z}
100: \nc{\dl}[1]{\frac{d\,^{#1}l}{(2\pi)^{#1}}}
101: \nc{\dk}[1]{\frac{d\,^{#1}k}{(2\pi)^{#1}}}
102: \nc{\dq}[1]{\frac{d\,^{#1}q}{(2\pi)^{#1}}}
103:
104: \nc{\bfT}{{\bf T }}
105: \def\GeV{{\rm\ GeV}}
106: \def\MeV{{\rm\ MeV}}
107: \def\keV{{\rm\ keV}}
108: \def\TeV{{\rm\ TeV}}
109:
110: \nc{\cA}{{\cal A}}
111: \nc{\cB}{{\cal B}}
112: \nc{\cD}{{\cal D}}
113: \nc{\cE}{{\cal E}}
114: \nc{\cG}{{\cal G}}
115: \nc{\cH}{{\cal H}}
116: \nc{\cL}{{\cal L}}
117: \nc{\cO}{{\cal O}}
118: \nc{\cT}{{\cal T}}
119: \nc{\cN}{{\cal N}}
120: %
121: %----------------------Math commands, almost general -------------
122: \nc{\rvac}[1]{|{\cal O}#1\rangle}
123: \nc{\lvac}[1]{\langle{\cal O}#1|}
124: \nc{\rvacb}[1]{|{\cal O}_\beta #1\rangle}
125: \nc{\lvacb}[1]{\langle{\cal O}_\beta #1 |}
126: \nc{\bb}{\bar{\beta}}
127: \nc{\bt}{\tilde{\beta}}
128: \nc{\ctH}{\tilde{\cal H}}
129: \nc{\chH}{\hat{\cal H}}
130: %
131: %---------------------- swedish characters ---------------------------
132: \nc{\1}{\aa}
133: \nc{\2}{\"{a}}
134: \nc{\3}{\"{o}}
135: \nc{\4}{\AA}
136: \nc{\5}{\"{A}}
137: \nc{\6}{\"{O}}
138: %
139: %---------------------- greek characters ---------------------------
140: \nc{\al}{\alpha}
141: \nc{\g}{\gamma}
142: \nc{\Del}{\Delta}
143: \nc{\e}{\textrm{e}}
144: \nc{\eps}{\epsilon}
145: \nc{\lam}{\lambda}
146: \nc{\Om}{\Omega}
147: \nc{\ve}{\varepsilon}
148: \nc{\mn}{{\mu\nu}}
149: \nc{\vp}{\varphi}
150:
151: %
152: %---------------------------- Journals -------------------------
153: %
154: \nc{\advp}[3]{{\it Adv.\ in\ Phys.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
155: \nc{\annp}[3]{{\it Ann.\ Phys.\ (N.Y.)\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
156: \nc{\apl}[3]{{\it Appl. Phys. Lett. }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
157: \nc{\apj}[3]{{\it Ap.\ J.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
158: \nc{\apjl}[3]{{\it Ap.\ J.\ Lett.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
159: \nc{\app}[3]{{\it Astropart.\ Phys.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
160: \nc{\cmp}[3]{{\it Comm.\ Math.\ Phys.\ }{{ \bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
161: \nc{\cqg}[3]{{\it Class.\ Quant.\ Grav.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
162: \nc{\epl}[3]{{\it Europhys.\ Lett.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
163: \nc{\ijmp}[3]{{\it Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
164: \nc{\ijtp}[3]{{\it Int.\ J.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
165: \nc{\jmp}[3]{{\it J.\ Math.\ Phys.\ }{{ \bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
166: \nc{\jpa}[3]{{\it J.\ Phys.\ A\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
167: \nc{\jpc}[3]{{\it J.\ Phys.\ C\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
168: \nc{\jap}[3]{{\it J.\ Appl.\ Phys.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
169: \nc{\jpsj}[3]{{\it J.\ Phys.\ Soc.\ Japan\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
170: \nc{\lmp}[3]{{\it Lett.\ Math.\ Phys.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
171: \nc{\mpl}[3]{{\it Mod.\ Phys.\ Lett.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
172: \nc{\ncim}[3]{{\it Nuov.\ Cim.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
173: \nc{\np}[3]{{\it Nucl.\ Phys.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
174: \nc{\pr}[3]{{\it Phys.\ Rev.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
175: \nc{\pra}[3]{{\it Phys.\ Rev.\ A\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
176: \nc{\prb}[3]{{\it Phys.\ Rev.\ B\ }{{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}}
177: \nc{\prc}[3]{{\it Phys.\ Rev.\ C\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
178: \nc{\prd}[3]{{\it Phys.\ Rev.\ D\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
179: \nc{\prl}[3]{{\it Phys\ Rev.\ Lett.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
180: \nc{\pl}[3]{{\it Phys.\ Lett.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
181: \nc{\prep}[3]{{\it Phys\. Rep.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
182: \nc{\prsl}[3]{{\it Proc.\ R.\ Soc.\ London\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
183: \nc{\ptp}[3]{{\it Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
184: \nc{\ptps}[3]{{\it Prog\ Theor.\ Phys.\ suppl.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
185: \nc{\physa}[3]{{\it Physica\ A\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
186: \nc{\physb}[3]{{\it Physica\ B\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
187: \nc{\phys}[3]{{\it Physica\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
188: \nc{\rmp}[3]{{\it Rev.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
189: \nc{\rpp}[3]{{\it Rep.\ Prog.\ Phys.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
190: \nc{\sjnp}[3]{{\it Sov.\ J.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
191: \nc{\spjetp}[3]{{\it Sov.\ Phys.\ JETP\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
192: \nc{\yf}[3]{{\it Yad.\ Fiz.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
193: \nc{\zetp}[3]{{\it Zh.\ Eksp.\ Teor.\ Fiz.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
194: \nc{\zp}[3]{{\it Z.\ Phys.\ }{{\bf #1} {(#2)} {#3}}}
195: \nc{\ibid}[3]{{\sl ibid.\ }{{\bf #1} {#2} {#3}}}
196:
197:
198: % ------------------------ local commands -----------------------
199:
200: \nc{\rf}[1]{(\ref{#1})}
201: \nc{\nn}{\nonumber \\*}
202: \nc{\bfB}{\bf{B}}
203: \nc{\bfv}{\bf{v}}
204: \nc{\bfx}{\bf{x}}
205: \nc{\bfy}{\bf{y}}
206: \nc{\vx}{\vec{x}}
207: \nc{\vy}{\vec{y}}
208: \nc{\oB}{\overline{B}}
209: \nc{\oI}{\overline{I}}
210: \nc{\oR}{\overline{R}}
211: \nc{\rar}{\rightarrow}
212: \nc{\ti}{\times}
213: \nc{\slsh}{\hskip-5pt/}
214: \nc{\sm}{Standard~Model~}
215: \nc{\MP}{M_{\rm Pl}}
216: \nc{\tp}{t_{\rm Pl}}
217: \def\mes#1{{d^3{#1}\over (2\pi )^3}}
218: %\renc{\min}{p_{\rm min}}
219: %\renc{\max}{p_{\rm max}}
220: \nc{\pmin}{p_{\rm min}}
221: \nc{\pmax}{p_{\rm max}}
222: \nc{\fo}{f_0}
223: \nc{\foi}{f_{0,i}\,}
224: \nc{\fop}{f_0^P}
225: \nc{\fou}{f_0^U}
226: \def\sepand{\rule{14cm}{0pt}\and}
227: \nc{\eff}{{\rm eff}}
228: \nc{\MT}{M_{\rm T}}
229: \nc{\ML}{M_{\rm L}}
230: \nc{\kk}{\vek{k}}
231: \nc{\pp}{{\rm p}}
232: \nc{\pt}{\partial_t}
233: \nc{\half}{{1\over 2}}
234: \nc{\w}{\omega}
235: \nc{\uhat}{\hat{U}_\w}
236:
237: \nc{\etal}{\mbox{\it et al.}}
238: \nc{\ie}{{\it i.e. }}
239: \nc{\eg}{{\it e.g. }}
240: \nc{\trh}{T_{\rm RH}}
241: \nc{\vo}{\varphi_\omega}
242: \nc{\G}{\tilde{G}}
243: \nc{\ansatz}{{\it Ansatz }}
244: \nc{\cm}{{\rm cm}}
245:
246:
247: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
248:
249: \begin{document}
250:
251:
252: \title{{\hfill {{\small TURKU-FL-P40-02
253: }}\vskip 1truecm}
254: {\LARGE Limits on Q-ball size due to gravity}
255: \vspace{-.2cm}}
256:
257: \author{{\sc Tuomas Multam\"aki\footnote{email: tuomul@utu.fi}}\\
258: and\\
259: {\sc Iiro Vilja\footnote{email: vilja@utu.fi}}\\
260: \\{\sl\small Department of Physics, University of Turku, FIN-20014, FINLAND}}
261:
262:
263: \date{May 28, 2002}
264:
265:
266: \maketitle
267: \thispagestyle{empty} %%%%%%%% no page no. on title page %%%%%%%%%
268:
269: \abstract{
270: Solitonic scalar field configurations are studied in a theory coupled
271: to gravity. It is found that non-topological solitons, Q-balls,
272: are present in the theory. Properties of gravitationally self coupled
273: Q-balls are studied by
274: analytical and numerical means. Analytical arguments show that,
275: unlike in the typical flat space scenario,
276: the size of Q-balls is ultimately limited by gravitational effects.
277: Even though the largest Q-balls are very dense, their radii are still much
278: larger than the corresponding Schwarzschild radii.
279: Gravity can also act as a stabilising mechanism for otherwise energetically
280: unstable Q-balls.
281: }
282:
283: \setlength{\captionmargin}{30pt}
284:
285: \newpage
286: \setcounter{page}{1} %%%%%%%%%%% start from page 1. %%%%%%%%%%
287:
288: \section{Introduction}
289:
290: Various field theories can support stable non-topological solitons
291: \cite{leepang}, Q-balls \cite{coleman}, which
292: are coherent scalar
293: condensates that carry a conserved charge, typically a $U(1)$ charge.
294: Due to charge conservation, the Q-ball configuration is the ground state
295: in the sector of fixed charge.
296: Q-balls may have physical importance because the
297: supersymmetric extensions of the Standard Model have
298: scalar potentials that are suitable for Q-balls to exist in the theory.
299: In particular, lepton or baryon number carrying Q-balls
300: are present in the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) due
301: to the existence of flat directions in the scalar sector
302: of the theory \cite{kusenko405,misha418,kari538,kari425}.
303:
304: Q-balls can be cosmologically significant in various ways.
305: Stable (or long living) Q-balls are natural candidates
306: for dark matter \cite{misha418} and their decay offers
307: a way to understand the baryon to dark matter ratio
308: \cite{kari538} as well as the baryon asymmetry of the universe
309: \cite{kari538,kari425}. Q-balls can also protect the baryons
310: from electroweak sphalerons \cite{kari425} and may
311: be an important factor in considering the stability of
312: neutron stars \cite{wreck}.
313:
314: For Q-balls to be cosmologically significant, one needs
315: to have a mechanism that creates them in the early
316: stages of the evolution of the universe. Q-balls can be efficiently created
317: in the early universe from an Affleck-Dine (AD) condensate
318: \cite{misha418,kari538}. This process has been
319: studied by numerical simulations \cite{kasuya1}-\cite{3dsims}
320: where both the gauge- and gravity-mediated SUSY breaking scenarios
321: were considered. In both cases, Q-balls with various charges
322: have been seen to form from the condensate.
323: Also collisions of Q-balls have been considered in various
324: potentials \cite{kasuya2,colli}.
325:
326: A large Q-ball is a very dense object and hence
327: its coupling to the gravitational field may be remarkable. In the present
328: paper we study these aspects of Q-ball solutions \ie we are interested in
329: the gravitational coupling of scalar configurations. Some such considerations
330: have also been studied with reference to Q-stars \cite{lynn}.
331:
332: The present paper is organised as follows: In Chapter 2 we briefly review the
333: properties of Q-balls in flat space and study analytically the
334: gravitationally coupled system. In Chapter 3 special attention is
335: given to gravitationally coupled thin-walled Q-ball configurations.
336: Numerical results are presented in Chapter 4. The paper is
337: concluded in Chapter 5.
338:
339:
340: \section{Theoretical considerations}
341: \subsection{Preliminaries: Q-balls in flat space}
342:
343: Consider a field theory with a U(1) symmetric scalar potential,
344: $V(|\phi|)$, with a global minimum at $\phi=0$. The complex scalar field
345: $\phi$ carries a unit quantum number with respect to the $U(1)$-symmetry.
346: The charge and energy of a field configuration $\phi$
347: in D dimensions are \cite{leepang}
348: \be{charge}
349: Q={1\over i}\int (\phi^*\dot\phi-\phi\dot\phi^*)d^Dx
350: \ee
351: and
352: \be{energy}
353: E=\int [|\dot{\phi}|^2+|\nabla\phi|^2+V(\phi^*\phi)]d^Dx.
354: \ee
355: The Q-ball solution is the minimum energy configuration
356: in the sector of fixed charge. A Q-ball is stable
357: against radiative decays into $\phi$-scalars if condition
358: \be{stabcond}
359: E<mQ,
360: \ee
361: where $m$ is the mass of the $\phi$-scalar, holds. It is then
362: energetically favourable to store charge in a Q-ball rather
363: than in the form of free scalars.
364:
365: Finding the minimum energy is straightforward and
366: the Q-ball solution can be shown to be of the form
367: \cite{leepang,coleman}
368: \be{ansatz}
369: \phi(x,t)=e^{i\omega t}\varphi(r),
370: \ee
371: where $\varphi(x)$ is now time independent and real, $\omega$ is
372: the Q-ball frequency (for most cases $|\omega|\in[0,m]$).
373: The charge of a Q-ball with spherical symmetry in D-dimensions is
374: given by
375: \be{sphercharge}
376: Q=2\omega\int \phi(r)^2 d^Dr
377: \ee
378: and the equation of motion at a fixed $\omega$ is
379: \be{eom}
380: {d^2\phi\over dr^2}+{D-1\over r}{d\phi\over dr}=\phi{\partial
381: U(\phi^2)\over\partial\phi^2}-\omega^2\phi.
382: \ee
383: To find the Q-ball solution we must solve (\ref{eom}) with
384: the boundary conditions $\phi'(0)=0,\ \phi(\infty)=0$.
385:
386: The solution of Eq. (\ref{eom}) depends crucially on the shape of
387: the potential. Flat potentials, which are essentially constant over
388: wide range of field $\varphi$ give rise to the relation $E \propto Q^{3/4}$
389: \cite{dvali417}, whereas in a wide class of more general potentials
390: the energy-charge relations is linear, $E \propto Q$ \cite{leepang,coleman}.
391: However, any Q-ball solution in a potential which is bounded from below,
392: asymptotically increases faster than $\varphi^2$ and has a global minimum
393: at the origin, approaches the thin-wall limit when $\omega$ becomes small
394: enough. At the thin-wall limit any potential then leads to the linear relation
395: between energy and charge.
396:
397:
398: \subsection{Field equations for gravitationally coupled Q-ball}
399:
400: Supposing that the space time has a maximally symmetric subspace $S^2$, \ie
401: the configuration is spherically symmetric, the metric tensor can be written
402: in the form
403: \be{metric}
404: g_{\mu\nu} = {\rm diag}(B,-A,-r^2,-r^2 \sin^2\theta),
405: \ee
406: where $A$ and $B$ are positive functions of time and radial coordinate \cite{wein}.
407: A complex scalar field $\phi$ coupled to gravity is then described by the
408: action
409: \be{action}
410: S[\phi, A, B] = -\frac 1{16\pi G}\int d^4x \sqrt{AB}\,{\cal R} +
411: \int d^4x \sqrt{AB}\left(\partial_\mu\phi^\dagger\partial^\mu\phi -
412: V(\phi^\dagger\phi)\right ),
413: \ee
414: where ${\cal R}$ is the Ricci curvature scalar, $V(\phi^\dagger\phi)$ is the
415: scalar potential and $G=1/M_{Pl}^2$. By varying the action one obtains
416: the well known Einstein equations together with the equation of motion
417: for the scalar field. They read for the spherically symmetric system in
418: the contracted form as
419: \bea{ceq}
420: %\begin{array}{c}
421: -{B''\over 2 A} + {B'\over 4 A}\left ( {A'\over A} + {B'\over A} \right )
422: - {B'\over A r} + {\ddot A\over 2 A} -
423: {\dot A\over 4 A}\left ( {\dot A\over A} + {\dot B\over A} \right ) =
424: - 4\pi G (\rho +3 P)B,\nonumber\\
425: {B''\over 2 B} - {B'\over 4 B}\left ( {A'\over A} + {B'\over A} \right )
426: - {A'\over A r} - {\ddot A\over 2 B} +
427: {\dot A\over 4 B}\left ( {\dot A\over A} + {\dot B\over A} \right ) =
428: - 4\pi G (\rho - P)A,\nonumber\\
429: -1 + \frac 1A - {r\over 2 A}
430: \left({A'\over A} - {B'\over B}\right )= -4\pi G (\rho -P)r^2,\\
431: - {\dot A\over rA} = -4\pi G\left(\dot\phi^\dagger\phi' + \phi'^\dagger
432: \dot\phi\right ),\nonumber\\
433: \phi'' + \phi' \frac 1{r^2} \sqrt{\frac AB}{\partial\over \partial r}\left (
434: r^2\sqrt{\frac BA}\right ) - A{\partial V\over \partial \phi^\dagger} =
435: \frac AB \left ( \ddot\phi + \dot\phi \sqrt{\frac BA}{\partial\over \partial t}
436: \sqrt{\frac AB}\right ),\nonumber
437: %\end{array}
438: \eea
439: where the energy density $\rho$ and pressure $P$ are given by
440: \bea{rhojaP}
441: \rho = \frac 1B |\dot\phi|^2 + \frac 1A |\phi'|^2 + V,\nonumber\\
442: P= \frac 1B |\dot\phi|^2 + \frac 1A |\phi'|^2 - V.
443: \eea
444: The total energy $E_{\rm tot}$ of the Q-ball, including the gravitational
445: energy, is still given by the formula
446: \be{Etot}
447: E_{\rm tot} = \int d^3x\rho,
448: \ee
449: whereas the energy of the scalar configuration without the gravitational
450: contribution, $E_{\rm s}$, can be defined as
451: \be{Es}
452: E_{\rm s} = \int d^3x\, \sqrt {AB}\rho.
453: \ee
454: Of course, $E_{\rm tot}$ is the true energy of the configuration, but $E_{\rm s}$
455: is comparable to the corresponding flat space configuration, as will be shown.
456: In the presence of gravity also the formula for the charge of the Q-ball
457: is modified and is now given by
458: \be{q1}
459: Q= -i\omega\int d^3x\sqrt {AB}\left ( \phi^\dagger\dot\phi - \dot\phi^\dagger\phi\right ),
460: \ee
461: which differs from the flat space formula by the measure factor $\sqrt {AB}$.
462:
463: From the set of equations (\ref{ceq}) one can see that the {\it Ansatz} (\ref{ansatz})
464: for the scalar field is still applicable. The right hand side of the equation
465: for $R_{tr}$ then vanishes, implying that $A$ is independent on time.
466: Then, as usual, we can without a loss of generality assume that also $B$
467: is time independent. The new set of equations now reads as
468: \bea{eqs}
469: -{B''\over 2 A} + {B'\over 4 A}\left ( {A'\over A} + {B'\over A} \right )
470: - {B'\over A r} = - 4\pi G (\rho +3 P)B,\nonumber\\
471: {B''\over 2 B} - {B'\over 4 B}\left ( {A'\over A} + {B'\over A} \right )
472: - {A'\over A r}= - 4\pi G (\rho - P)A,\\
473: -1 + \frac 1A - {r\over 2 A}
474: \left({A'\over A} - {B'\over B}\right )= -4\pi G (\rho -P)r^2\nonumber
475: \eea
476: and
477: \be{phieq}
478: \varphi'' + \varphi' \frac 1{r^2} \sqrt{\frac AB}{\partial\over \partial r}\left (
479: r^2\sqrt{\frac BA}\right ) - AV'_\omega(B,\varphi) = 0\nonumber.
480: \ee
481: The $\omega$-dependent potential $V_\omega$ is defined as
482: \be{vo}
483: V_\omega(B,\varphi)= \frac 12 V(\varphi^2) - \frac 12 {\omega^2\over B} \varphi^2
484: \ee
485: and $V'_\w$ denotes a derivate of the potential with respect the field $\varphi$.
486: The charge of a Q-ball is now given by
487: \be{q2}
488: Q=8\pi\omega\int_0^\infty dr\, r^2\sqrt {A(r)B(r)}\, \varphi^2.
489: \ee
490:
491: Like in the flat case, a necessary but not a sufficient condition for the
492: existence of Q-balls is that the $\omega$-dependent potential
493: has a non-zero minimum $\varphi_+$ with $V_\omega(B,\varphi_+)<V_\omega(B,0)$
494: \footnote{From now on we suppose, that $V_\omega(0)=0$. We can also choose,
495: without a loss of generality, the central values of $A$ and $B$ to be $A(0)=B(0)=1$.
496: In addition, for finite energy field configurations $A(\infty ) = 1$.}.
497: As usual, this restricts the values of $\omega$, but it also constrains the
498: function $B$, because $V_\omega$ depends explicitly on it. The allowed values
499: for $\omega$ are hence restricted to be larger than a critical, non-negative value
500: of $\omega_c$, {\it i.e.} $\omega > \omega_c$. The critical value, $\w_c$, is
501: determined by the set of equations
502: \bea{oc}
503: \begin{array}{ccc}
504: V_{\omega_c}(1,\varphi_c) & = & 0,\\
505: V'_{\omega_c}(1,\varphi_c) & = & 0.
506: \end{array}
507: \eea
508:
509: The equations for $A$ and $B$ (\ref{eqs}) can be easily solved
510: in terms of $\rho$ and $P$:
511: \be{eqforA}
512: \left ({r\over A}\right )' = 1 - 8\pi G r^2\rho,
513: \ee
514: \be{eqforB}
515: {B'\over B} + {A'\over A} = 8\pi G A r(\rho+P).
516: \ee
517: These equations can not, however, be integrated straightforwardly because both
518: $\rho$ and $P$ are dependent on $A$, $B$ and the field $\varphi$. Therefore our
519: aim in the following sections is twofold:
520: In the next section we study the equations and their solutions by utilising
521: analytical approximations in order to gain an understanding of their fundamental
522: properties. To verify these results, Eqs. (\ref{eqs}) are studied numerically
523: in Section \ref{NR}.
524:
525:
526: \section{The thin-wall limit and gravity}
527:
528: If the $\omega$-dependent potential $V_\omega$ is such that it fulfils the
529: conventional thin-wall requirements, \ie the height of the barrier is much
530: larger than the difference between minima, the field forms a bubble of radius $R$.
531: Inside the bubble the value of the field is essentially constant and
532: outside virtually zero with only a
533: thin transition region separating them. The metric components $A$ and $B$ are, however,
534: not constants, but monotonic functions inside the bubble. Thus, one has to
535: determine their behaviour directly from Eqs. (\ref{eqforA}) and (\ref{eqforB}).
536: To determine the properties of such a configuration, it is useful to consider
537: the effective action
538: \be{ea}
539: S_\omega = 4\pi \int_0^\infty dr\,r^2\sqrt {A(r)B(r)}\, \left (
540: \frac 1{2A(r)}\varphi'(r)^2 + V_\omega(B(r),\varphi(r))\right ),
541: \ee
542: from which the equation of motion for $\varphi$, Eq. (\ref{phieq}), emerges.
543: Applying the usual thin-wall approach to the action (\ref{ea}), leads to some complications
544: due to the presence of gravity. From Eq. (\ref{oc}) we see that two separate
545: sub-cases need to considered, depending on whether the potential $V$ is monotonic
546: or it has a non-zero local minimum. Defining $\varphi_+$ by
547: \be{maxeq}
548: V'_{\omega_c}(1,\varphi_+)=0,\ V''_{\omega_c}(1,\varphi_+) < 0,
549: \ee
550: \ie $\varphi_+$ determines the location of barrier maximum,
551: we can now make difference between type I and type II thin-wall Q-balls.
552: A thin-wall solution is classified as type I if
553: $V_{\omega_c}(1,\varphi_+)\simeq
554: \omega_c^2 \varphi_c^2$ and type II if $V_{\omega_c}(1,\varphi_+) \gg
555: \omega_c^2 \varphi_c^2$, where $\varphi_c$ is determined by Eqs. (\ref{oc}).
556: Type I thin-wall hence corresponds to a monotonically increasing
557: potential $V$ whereas type II thin-wall solutions appear when the potential
558: has a non-zero local minimum such that it is nearly degenerate with minimum at
559: $\varphi=0$.
560:
561: In both cases we assume that inside the bubble $\varphi$ is essentially
562: constant. Its value $\varphi_\omega$ is determined
563: by equation
564: \be{phio}
565: V'_\omega(B(R),\varphi_\omega)=0.
566: \ee
567: Note that even though $B(r)$ is varying inside the bubble, the change
568: is relatively small which justifies our approximation, $B(r)\approx B(R)$.
569:
570: The value of $S_\omega$ inside the bubble is hence given by
571: \be{inside}
572: S_{\omega,in} = 4\pi \int_0^R dr\, r^2\sqrt {AB}\, V_\omega(B(r),\varphi(r)).
573: \ee
574: Note, that now $\omega > \omega_c$ and thus $V_\omega(B(r),\varphi(r))<0$
575: and $E_{\omega, in}$ is negative.
576: Note also that due to Eq. (\ref{phio}), $\varphi_\omega$ depends
577: on the bubble radius $R$.
578: This negative contribution to $E_\omega$ should be balanced by the
579: surface term. If $A(R)$ and $B(R)$ differ only little from unity, the wall
580: contribution can be approximated by
581: \be{wall}
582: S_{\omega, wall} \simeq 4\pi\sigma R^2,
583: \ee
584: where the surface tension is determined by varying the action with the
585: degenerated potential $V_\omega$. In practice this means that, as a first
586: approximation, we set $\omega=\omega_c,\ B=A=1$, and we finally end up with the
587: usual formula for the surface tension:
588: \be{sigma}
589: \sigma \simeq \int _0^{\varphi_c} \sqrt {2V_{\omega_c}(1, \varphi)}\ d\varphi.
590: \ee
591: Therefore the effective action, reads out as
592: \be{twa}
593: S_\omega = S_{\omega,in} + S_{\omega, wall}.
594: \ee
595: The difference between Eq. (\ref{twa}) and the usual thin-wall case lies in the
596: explicit dependence of Eq. (\ref{twa}) on the metric components $A$ and $B$.
597: The next step is then to solve $A$ and $B$ from Eqs. (\ref{eqforA}) and
598: (\ref{eqforB}). Note, that in this approximation the energy density
599: \be{rho2}
600: \rho = \frac {\omega^2}B |\varphi|^2 + \frac 1A |\varphi'|^2 + V(\varphi^2)
601: \ee
602: is virtually constant inside the bubble, where one can also neglect the
603: derivative term.
604:
605: From this point on the two bubble types corresponding to the different
606: types of thin-wall potentials differ from each other
607: and are discussed separately.
608:
609: \subsection{Type I thin-wall solution}
610:
611: For the type I solution the terms $\frac{\omega^2}B |\varphi|^2$
612: and $V(\varphi^2)$ are essentially equal. The relative variation of $\rho$
613: is also small and hence it is essentially constant.
614: %We emphasise, that this is in contrast to the effective potential
615: %$V_\omega(B(R),\varphi_\omega)$ which is the difference
616: %of the very same terms leading to a strong cancellation near $\varphi_\omega$.
617: We can thus integrate $A$ out from Eq. (\ref{eqforA}) and obtain
618: \be{A}
619: A(r)={1\over 1-{8 \pi\over 3} G \rho r^2}={1\over 1-{16 \pi\over 3} G
620: V(\varphi_\omega^2) r^2}.
621: \ee
622: Next we note that within the same approximation $\rho + P = \frac {2 \omega^2}B |\varphi|^2
623: + \frac 2A |\varphi'|^2 \simeq \frac {2 \omega^2}B |\varphi|^2$
624: and Eq. (\ref{eqforB}) can be rewritten as
625: \be{eqforB2}
626: B' + \frac {A'}A B = 16\pi G \omega^2 \varphi^2 A r,
627: \ee
628: which can be solved in the the leading order of $G$,
629: \be{B1}
630: B(r) = 1 + {8\pi\over 3}G V(\varphi_\omega^2) r^2.
631: \ee
632:
633: We are now able to write down the equations determining the gravitationally coupled thin-wall
634: solution for the Q-balls. We use the solution given above for $B(r)$, solve the relation
635: between $R$ and $\varphi_\omega$ using (\ref{phio}) and calculate $R$ from
636: ${d E_\omega\over dR} = 0$. So, in addition to Eqs. (\ref{A}) and (\ref{B1}),
637: we have equations
638: \be{set}
639: V'_\omega(B(R),\varphi_\omega)=0,\, 4\pi R^2 \sqrt {A(R)B(R)}\,V_\omega(B(R),\varphi_\omega) + 8\pi\sigma R=0,
640: \ee
641: which determine the value of $\omega$ as well as $R$ and the corresponding value
642: of the field, $\varphi_\omega$.
643: Using these values for $\omega$, $R$ and $\varphi_\omega$
644: we may also calculate the corresponding
645: charge $Q$ from Eq. (\ref {q2}). If $A$ and $B$ do not differ too much from
646: unity we simply obtain
647: \be{q3}
648: Q={8\pi\over 3} \omega \varphi_\omega^2 R^3,
649: \ee
650: where we have neglected the contribution from the wall.
651:
652: The new features of the gravitationally coupled Q-balls arise due to the non-trivial
653: dependence of the energy inside the bubble to the bubble radius $R$.
654: Suppose that $\omega$ is close enough $\omega_c$. The scale factor $B(R)$ is
655: a monotonically increasing function, and it may happen that at some point the
656: effective $\omega$-parameter $\omega(R)=\omega/\sqrt {B(R)}$ becomes too small
657: and the Eqs. (\ref{set}) cannot be satisfied.
658: Because $R$ and $\varphi_\omega$ depend implicitly on $\omega$, we are now able to
659: define another critical value of $\omega$, $\omega_G$, as the smallest value where a
660: solution of Eqs. (\ref{set}) can be found. Thus when gravity effects are taken into
661: account, Q-balls seem to exist only if $\omega > \omega_G$ which, on the other hand,
662: implies maximal a radius $R_{max}$ and maximal charge $Q_{max} = {8\pi\over 3} \omega_G
663: \varphi_{\omega_G}^2R_{max}^3$. The only other possibility is, that the singular
664: point of $A(R)$ is hit first. That, however, would mean that such a configuration would
665: collapse and form a black hole and hence such Q-balls are not possible either.
666: Clearly, the critical values $\omega_{\rm min}$, $R_{max}$ and $Q_{max}$ depend explicitly
667: on the shape of the potential and to proceed further one has to define it more precisely.
668:
669: To see explicitly how the Q-ball charge is constrained, we study a simple example potential.
670: The model potential, $V$, is constant, $m^4$, for $\varphi<\varphi_1$,
671: expect near the origin where it tends
672: to zero as $\varphi^2$. The exact behaviour near the origin is not important in
673: our analysis. For values $\varphi > \varphi_1$ the potential increases rapidly,
674: \eg $V \sim \varphi^n$ where the power $n$ is sufficiently large.
675:
676: Near $\w_G$, the minimum of $V_\w$ is essentially $\varphi_1$.
677: The metric components are approximately given by
678: \bea{Iequs}
679: A(R) & = & 1+{16\pi\over 3}G V(\varphi_1^2)R^2\nonumber\\
680: B(R) & = & 1+{8\pi\over 3} G V(\varphi_1^2)R^2\nonumber
681: \eea
682: where we have dropped terms higher or equal to $\cO(G^2)$.
683: Within the same approximation, we get from Eq. (\ref{set})
684: an equation for $R$:
685: \be{rcube}
686: {2\pi G m^4\over 3} R^3(3m^4-\w^2\varphi_1^2)+{1\over 2}R(m^4-\w^2\varphi_1^2)+
687: 2\sigma = 0.
688: \ee
689: Only one of the roots of the cubic equation (\ref{rcube}) is physical
690: and is increasing with decreasing $\w$ until the critical point, $\w=\w_G$,
691: where the discriminant of the equation vanishes. The maximal value of
692: $R$ is
693: \be{Imaxr}
694: R_{max}=\Big({3\sigma\over 2\pi G m^4(3m^4-\w_G^2\varphi_1^2)}\Big)^{1/3}.
695: \ee
696: The corresponding charge and energy of the configuration are
697: \bea{Ieandq}
698: Q_{max} & \approx & 2({\varphi_1\over m})^2{1\over m^2G}\\
699: E_{max} & \approx & 2 {\varphi_1\over m} {1\over m G},
700: \eea
701: where we have assumed that $\w_G^2\varphi_1^2\approx m^4$
702: and used the approximation $\sigma \sim m^2 \varphi_1$.
703: The energy to charge ratio of the maximal Q-ball is $E_{max}/mQ_{max}=m/\vo$.
704: In order to see that our approximation is valid, we note that
705: $Gm^4R_{max}^2\sim (\varphi_1/\MP)^{2/3}\ll 1$.
706:
707: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
708:
709:
710:
711: \subsection{Type II thin-wall solution}
712:
713: For the type II solution the fine tuning $V_\omega(B,\phi)\simeq 0$ is not needed
714: in order to reach the thin wall limit because a large barrier exists even
715: without the $\omega^2\phi^2$ -term. Now, indeed,
716: $\omega^2\varphi_\omega^2 \gg V(\varphi_\omega^2)$ and we write an effective
717: energy density as $\rho = (1 + \kappa ) \omega^2 \varphi^2$, where
718: $\kappa$ is assumed to be a constant. Instead of equation (\ref{A}) we now write
719: \be{A2}
720: A(r)={1\over 1-{8 \pi\over 3} G \rho r^2}=
721: {1\over 1-{8 \pi\over 3} G (1+\kappa )\omega^2\varphi^2 r^2}
722: \ee
723: and from Eq. (\ref{eqforB2}) we obtain by integrating
724: \be{B2}
725: B(r) = 1 + {8\pi\over 3}G (2-\kappa) \omega^2\varphi^2 r^2.
726: \ee
727: The difference between type I and II solutions
728: is that in the type I solution, $A$ increases near the origin twice as fast as
729: $B$ whereas for the type II solution the roles are reversed: $B$ increases roughly twice
730: as fast as $A$ whenever $\kappa \ll 1$.
731:
732: Due to exactly same reason as before, a minimal $\omega$ appears together with a
733: maximal bubble radius, charge and energy in this case as well. Generally, they can again be
734: found solving Eqs. (\ref{set}), (\ref{A2}) and (\ref{B2}) and searching for the smallest possible
735: $\omega$. However, the procedure is strongly dependent on the explicit form of the
736: potential $V$ as it was in the case of type I solutions.
737:
738: Therefore, as an example, we again proceed by studying a simple potential
739: \be{pot1}
740: V(\varphi^2)= \lambda \varphi^2\left ( (\varphi - M)^2 + \epsilon M^2\right ),
741: \ee
742: where $M$ is a mass scale and $\epsilon \ll 1$ is a small positive parameter
743: lifting the non-zero minimum up from $V=0$. Note, that the quadratic term
744: near the origin reads as $\lambda(1+\epsilon )M^2 \varphi^2$, so that the mass
745: of a single quantum is given by $m^2 \simeq \lambda M^2$. Calculating the
746: surface energy, we find that $\sigma = \sqrt \lambda M^3/6$.
747: The set of equations (\ref{set}) reads now as:
748: \bea{eset}
749: \lambda (\vo -M)(2\vo - M)-{\omega^2\over B(R)}+\omega_c^2 & = & 0,\\
750: \sqrt{A(R)B(R)}\Big(\lambda \vo^2(\vo - M)^2 + (\omega_c^2-{\w^2\over B(R)}) \vo^2\Big)+{2\sigma\over R} & = & 0,
751: \eea
752: where $\omega_c^2 = \lambda \epsilon M^2$.
753:
754: Evidently $\w_G$ is close to $\w_c$ and $\vo$ is close to $M$, which allows
755: us to write $\vo=M$ and $\w=\w_c$ wherever no explicit difference
756: appears in the formulae. Expanding in the first power of $G$ we arrive at an
757: equation for the bubble radius,
758: \be{IIrequ}
759: R^3-{3(\w^2/\w_c^2-1)\over 8\pi G\w_c^2M^2(2-\kappa)}R+{3\sigma\over 2\pi G \w_c^4M^4(2-\kappa)}=0.
760: \ee
761: Following the same arguments as in the type I case, we can solve for $R_{max}$ and $\w_G$:
762: \bea{IIrm}
763: R_{max} & = & \Big({\sqrt{\lambda}\over 4\pi(2-\kappa)}{\MP^2\over M\w_c^4}\Big)^{1/3}\\
764: \w_G^2 & = & \w_c^2\Big(1+2((2-\kappa)\pi {M^4\over \MP^2\w_c^2})^{1/3})\label{cd1}.
765: \eea
766: The approximations we made in the process of deriving the above equations
767: constrain the acceptable range of parameter values, $M\ll\sqrt{\MP\w_c}$. If this
768: condition is not satisfied our results are not valid and the equations need to be
769: solved numerically.
770:
771: The maximal charge and energy of a Q-ball in this scenario are
772: \bea{IIqande}
773: Q_{max} & \approx & {2\sqrt{\lambda}\over 3(2-\kappa)} {M\MP^2\over \w_c^3}\\
774: E_{max} & \approx & {2\sqrt{\lambda}\over 3(2-\kappa)}{M\MP^2\over\w_c^2}.
775: \eea
776: The energy to charge ratio, $E_{max}/mQ_{max}=\w_c/m=\sqrt{\epsilon}/\ll 1$,
777: indicates that the maximal Q-ball is energetically stable.
778:
779:
780:
781: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
782:
783:
784: \section{Numerical Results}\label{NR}
785:
786: Next we turn to look at some numerical results obtained by computer simulations.
787: We concentrate ourselves to the two different potentials, one with a flat plateau
788: and one with a nearly degenerate minimum.
789: The flat potential allows type I thin wall Q-ball solutions near the critical case.
790: Such potentials are hence called type I potentials. The other type of
791: potential is the one given by Eq. (\ref{pot1}), leading to the type II thin-walls
792: solutions and are therefore called type II potentials.
793: Note, that both of these potential types are represented, {\it e.g.}, in the MSSM,
794: where the potential arising from gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking is clearly
795: a type I potential whereas gravity mediated supersymmetry breaking typically
796: leads to a type II potential.
797:
798: From the simulations we have learned, however, that the thin wall limit is
799: exceptionally difficult to study by simulation due to an extreme fine tuning
800: required
801: from the initial value of the field inside the bubble. This fine tuning is
802: much more severe in the gravitationally coupled case, because here one is not attempting
803: to find just the field value, but also a corresponding value of $\omega$.
804: Therefore the simulations are concentrated to the thick-wall end of the parameter
805: space, \ie to larger $\omega$. At best we are able to to see some
806: hints of the beginning thin-wall behaviour. Also, in order to clearly demonstrate
807: the observed behaviour of the solutions, we use large mass
808: scales in the potential, since otherwise the true thin-wall solution is needed.
809:
810:
811: \subsection{Type I potential}
812:
813: We begin with a potential
814: \be{numpotI}
815: V(\varphi^2) = \left \{
816: \begin{array}{lll}
817: m^2\varphi^2, & |\varphi | < \varphi_0\\
818: m^2\varphi^2_0, & \varphi_0 < |\varphi| < \varphi_1\\
819: m^2 \varphi^2_0 + \epsilon (\varphi^4 - \varphi^4_1), & \varphi_1 < \varphi
820: \end{array} \right.
821: \ee
822: where $m^2$ determines the curvature at the origin, $\epsilon$ is a small
823: positive number and $0 < \varphi_0\ll\varphi_1$. To ensure that the minimum is
824: in the region $\varphi > \varphi_1$ and $\omega$ is larger that the critical
825: value, we have to require $m^2 > \omega^2 > 2\epsilon \varphi^2_1$ and
826: $4\epsilon (m^2 \varphi^2_0 - \epsilon \varphi^4_1) < \omega^4$, respectively.
827: This potential resembles the flat one discussed in the context of thin-wall
828: configurations.
829: As an example we choose $m = \varphi_0 = 10^{-3}\MP,\
830: \varphi_1^4 = \frac 12 10^{-8}\MP^4$, and $\epsilon = 10^{-4}$.
831: For these values, the critical
832: $\omega$ equals $\omega_c = \sqrt 2 \times 10^{-1} m$ and the critical field value
833: is just $\varphi_1$.
834: The configuration is studied for several values of $\omega$ in order
835: to demonstrate the dependence of the solution on $\w$. Hence, we take
836: $\omega/m = 0.5,\ 0.4,\ 0.3,\ 0.2$ and $0.142$.
837: In Fig. \ref{kuva1}a we have plotted the field configuration of
838: $\varphi$ and in Fig. \ref{kuva2}b the ratio $(B(r)-1)/(A(r)-1)$
839: for these values. Furthermore, in Fig. \ref{kuva2} we have plotted
840: the corresponding energy of the free quanta $m Q$,
841: total energy $E_{\rm tot}$ and scalar field energy $E_{\rm s}$
842: as a function of $r$ for the largest Q-ball corresponding $\omega/m=0.142$.
843: Note that in Fig. \ref{kuva2}, the energy of the free quanta is
844: scaled by a factor of ten, \ie $E_{\rm tot},\ E_{\rm s}\ll mQ$.
845:
846: \begin{figure}[ht]
847: \leavevmode
848: \centering
849: \vspace*{62mm}
850: \begin{picture}(0,0)(0,490)
851: \special{psfile=fieldI.ps voffset=525 hoffset= -220
852: vscale=40 hscale=30
853: angle=-90}
854: \put(-110,308){$\scriptstyle r m$}
855: \put(-215,410){$\scriptstyle \varphi/m$}
856: \put(-50,460){(a)}
857: \special{psfile=ABI.ps voffset=525 hoffset= 0
858: vscale=40 hscale=30
859: angle=-90}
860: \put(110,308){$\scriptstyle r m$}
861: \put(7,410){$\scriptstyle {B-1\over A-1}$}
862: \put(170,460){(b)}
863: \end{picture}
864: \caption{(a) The field profile as function of radial coordinate. (b) The ratio of
865: metric components $(B-1)/(A-1)$. In the both figures curves represent values
866: $\omega/m= 0.5$ (the shortest curve), $0.4,\ 0.3,\ 0.2$ and $0.142$ (the longest curve).
867: \label{kuva1}
868: }
869: \end{figure}
870:
871: \begin{figure}[ht]
872: \leavevmode
873: \centering
874: \vspace*{55mm}
875: \begin{picture}(0,0)(0,490)
876: \special{psfile=fminI.ps voffset=518 hoffset=-180 vscale=35
877: hscale=45 angle=-90}
878: \put(-10,325){$\scriptstyle r m$}
879: \put(-180,420){$\scriptstyle E/m$}
880: \end{picture}
881: \caption{The scaled energy of free quanta $0.1\times mQ/m$ (solid line), the total energy
882: $E_{\rm tot}/m$ (dashed line)
883: and the scalar field energy $E_{\rm s}/m$ (dotted line) inside radius $r m$.}\label{kuva2}
884: \end{figure}
885:
886:
887: Evidently, for large $\omega$, the profile of $\varphi$ is thick-walled. However,
888: from the figure it is clear that when $\omega$ decreases the configuration tends towards
889: the thin-wall case. This is also reflected by the fact that the ratio $(B(r)-1)/(A(r)-1)$
890: decreases along with decreasing $\omega$. Indeed, according to our analysis of
891: the type I thin-wall configurations, inside the bubble the ratio should approach
892: $\frac 12$.
893: As can bee seen from Fig. \ref{kuva2} the energy difference between
894: $E_{\rm tot}$ and $E_{\rm s}$
895: is already for $\omega/m=0.142$ about 7\% and evidently it is increasing with
896: increasing Q-ball size. It should be noted, that the critical $\omega$ which
897: is now $\omega_c/m \simeq 0.1414$, is already quite close to the
898: smallest value used in plotting the figure. In the large Q-ball limit, however,
899: the configuration is extremely sensitive to the value of $\omega$.
900:
901:
902: \subsection{Type II potential}
903:
904: \begin{figure}[ht]
905: \leavevmode
906: \centering
907: \vspace*{62mm}
908: \begin{picture}(0,0)(0,490)
909: \special{psfile=fieldII.ps voffset=525 hoffset= -220
910: vscale=40 hscale=30
911: angle=-90}
912: \put(-110,308){$\scriptstyle r m$}
913: \put(-215,410){$\scriptstyle \varphi/m$}
914: \put(-50,460){(a)}
915: \special{psfile=ABII.ps voffset=525 hoffset= 0
916: vscale=40 hscale=30
917: angle=-90}
918: \put(110,308){$\scriptstyle r m$}
919: \put(7,410){$\scriptstyle {B-1\over A-1}$}
920: \put(170,460){(b)}
921: \end{picture}
922: \caption{(a) The field profile as function of radial coordinate. (b) The ratio of
923: metric components $(B-1)/(A-1)$. In the both figures curves represent values
924: $\omega/m = 0.5,\ 0.4,\ 0.3$ and $0.261$.
925: \label{kuva3}
926: }
927: \end{figure}
928:
929: For numerical studies of potential (\ref{pot1}) we choose
930: $\lambda=1$, $M=0.0316\MP $ and $\epsilon = 10^{-3}$.
931: In Fig. \ref{kuva3}a we have plotted the field configuration
932: corresponding to several different values of
933: $\omega/m = 0.5,\ 0.4,\ 0.3,\ 0.261$.
934: The ratio $(B(r)-1)/(A(r)-1)$, which inside the bubble equals $(2-\kappa)/(1+\kappa)$, is presented
935: in Fig. \ref{kuva3}b. Moreover,
936: we now also present in Fig. \ref{kuva4} the energies $E_{\rm tot}$ and $E_{\rm s}$
937: as function of the charge $Q$. For these values of $m,\lambda$ and $\epsilon$ the
938: critical $\omega$ is simply given by $\omega_c^2 = 10^{-3}m^2$. Note,
939: that this time
940: the smallest $\omega$ we are able to calculate is $\omega = 0.261\, m$ which is
941: significantly bigger that the critical $\omega \simeq 0.0316\, m$.
942: % or even the minimal $\omega_G$ calculated from (\ref{cd1}), $\omega_G \simeq 0.0341\, m$.
943: This reflects the
944: fact, that the thin-wall type behaviour begins at much larger ratio $\omega /\omega_c$
945: for a type II potential that for a type I potential. From Fig. \ref{kuva3}b one can also
946: read that
947: the effective parameter $\kappa$ inside the bubble for small $\omega$ is
948: about 0.07. The difference between total and scalar field energies, for the largest plotted
949: balls $Q=4.8\times 10^3$, is about 13\%.
950:
951:
952: \begin{figure}[ht]
953: \leavevmode
954: \centering
955: \vspace*{55mm}
956: \begin{picture}(0,0)(0,490)
957: \special{psfile=qmII.ps voffset=518 hoffset=-180 vscale=35
958: hscale=45 angle=-90}
959: \put(-10,325){$\scriptstyle Q$}
960: \put(-180,420){$\scriptstyle E/m$}
961: \end{picture}
962: \caption{The total energy $E_{\rm tot}/m$ (solid line)
963: and the scalar field energy $E_{\rm s}/m$ (dotted line) as function of the
964: charge $Q$. The smallest $Q$ corresponds to $\omega/m=0.995$ whereas the largest one
965: corresponds to $\omega/m=0.261$. The straight line is the $E=mQ$ curve.}\label{kuva4}
966: \end{figure}
967:
968:
969: \section{Discussion and Conclusions}
970:
971: In this paper we have considered the effects of gravity on Q-ball type
972: scalar field configurations. Including the effects of gravity leaves
973: the flat space Q-ball \ansatz valid; one still has a spherically symmetric
974: solution whose complex phase rotates uniformly with time.
975: The geometry of space-time is modified from the flat case, which
976: gives a contribution to the charge and energy of the configuration.
977:
978: From the analytical and numerical work it is evident that the effects
979: of gravity can give a large contribution to the Q-ball energy.
980: However, in order for the contribution to be significant,
981: either the free quanta of the Q-ball scalar field need to be extremely heavy
982: or the charge of the Q-ball needs to be very large. The gravitational
983: contribution is strongly dependent on the details of the potential
984: and needs, in general, to be computed numerically.
985:
986: Interesting points are raised by the analytical analysis. The analytical
987: work is concentrated on the
988: thin-wall limit, in order to gain an understanding of the properties
989: of large Q-balls for which gravitational effects are more likely to be
990: significant. In the thin-wall limit, analytical considerations reveal that
991: the maximal size of Q-balls is ultimately limited by gravity.
992: The non-trivial geometry inside the Q-ball limits the size of Q-balls
993: for any potential that allows for Q-ball solutions. The physical
994: reasoning behind this is simple. In equilibrium, the rotation of the complex phase
995: generates an outward pressure which prevents the Q-ball
996: from collapsing due to gravitational forces. In the ordinary thin-wall limit,
997: the Q-ball frequency tends a critical value $\w_c$, while the
998: charge the Q-ball becomes larger and larger. If gravity is included in the
999: scenario, it is evident that at some point the Q-ball becomes too large
1000: to be balanced by the internal pressure. Hence, there exists another
1001: critical value, $\w_G>\w_c$, corresponding to the maximally large Q-ball.
1002:
1003: The limit on the maximal Q-ball size due to the gravitational effects
1004: is an interesting point raised by this analysis.
1005: The two example potentials discussed approximately correspond to
1006: the potentials associated with gauge (type I) and gravity (type II)
1007: mediated supersymmetry breaking.
1008: Using typical values for the variables, $m\sim 100\GeV$, $\varphi_1\sim M\sim 10^{15}\GeV$,
1009: and approximating $\w_c\sim m$, estimates for the maximum charge, energy and radius are:
1010: $Q_{max}\sim 10^{60},\ E_{\max}\sim 10^{49}\GeV,\ R_{max}\sim 10^{13}\GeV^{-1}\sim 0.1\cm$ (type I) and $Q_{max}\sim 10^{34},\ E_{max}\sim 10^{36}\GeV,\ R_{max}\sim 1\GeV^{-1}$ (type II). In both cases, the Schwarzschild radius of a corresponding black hole is still
1011: much smaller than that of the Q-ball.
1012: Gravity will clearly not have a very significant role
1013: to play in a cosmological setting for Q-balls in the gauge mediated scenario.
1014: In the gravity mediated scenario the limit is much lower and may be significant.
1015: It is interesting to note that, in order for the primordial Q-balls
1016: to act as a self-interacting dark matter candidate \cite{kusespe},
1017: one typically has to consider Q-balls with very large charges \cite{siqdm}.
1018:
1019: Since the gravitational contribution to the Q-ball energy is negative,
1020: it is possible that gravity can render an otherwise energetically unstable
1021: Q-ball stable. This behaviour was also confirmed by the numerical work,
1022: where is was observed that the negative energy of the gravitational field
1023: could stabilise a large enough Q-ball.
1024: One can then envision a cosmological scenario where Q-balls are unstable,
1025: and hence do not exist, unless their charge is large enough for the
1026: gravitational effects to stabilise them. A primordial Q-ball distribution
1027: formed at a large energy scale would then leave behind only stable, super heavy
1028: relic Q-balls.
1029:
1030:
1031:
1032:
1033: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1034:
1035: \section*{Acknowledgements}
1036: This work has been partly supported by the Magnus Ehrnrooth Foundation.
1037: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1038:
1039: \begin{thebibliography}{X}
1040: \bibitem{leepang} T. D. Lee and Y. Pang, \pr{221}{1992}{251.}
1041: \bibitem{coleman} S. Coleman, \np{B262}{1985}{263}.
1042: \bibitem{kusenko405} A. Kusenko, \pl{B405}{1997}{108}.
1043: \bibitem{misha418} A. Kusenko and M. Shaposhnikov, \pl{B418}{1998}{46}.
1044: \bibitem{kari538} K. Enqvist and J. McDonald, \np{B538}{1999}{321}.
1045: \bibitem{kari425} K. Enqvist and J. McDonald, \pl{B425}{1998}{309}.
1046: \bibitem{wreck} A. Kusenko \etal, \pl{B423}{1998}{104}.
1047: \bibitem{kasuya1} S. Kasuya and M. Kawasaki, \prd{61}{2000}{041301}.
1048: \bibitem{kasuya2} S. Kasuya and M. Kawasaki, \prd{62}{2000}{023512}.
1049: \bibitem{2dsims} K. Enqvist, A. Jokinen, T. Multam\"aki and I. Vilja,
1050: \prd{63}{2001}{083501}.
1051: \bibitem{3dsims} T. Multam\"aki and I. Vilja, hep-ph/0203195,
1052: {\it to appear in Phys. Lett. B}.
1053: \bibitem{colli} M. Axenides \etal, \prd{61}{2000}{085006};
1054: R. A. Battye and P. M. Sutcliffe, \np{B590}{2000}{329};
1055: T. Multam\"aki and I. Vilja, \pl{B482}{2000}{161};
1056: T. Multam\"aki and I. Vilja, \pl{B484}{2000}{283}.
1057: \bibitem{lynn} B. W. Lynn, \np{B321}{1989}{465}.
1058: \bibitem{dvali417} G. Dvali, A. Kusenko and M. Shaposhnikov, \pl{B417}{1998}{99}.
1059: \bibitem{wein} See \eg S. Weinberg, {\it Gravitation and Cosmology}, Wiley, 1972.
1060: \bibitem{kusespe} A. Kusenko and P. Steinhardt, \prl{87}{2001}{141301}.
1061: \bibitem{siqdm} K. Enqvist \etal, \pl{B526}{2002}{9}.
1062:
1063: \end{thebibliography}
1064:
1065: \end{document}
1066:
1067: \begin{figure}[ht]
1068: \leavevmode
1069: \centering
1070: \vspace*{52mm}
1071: \special{psfile=histplot.ps voffset=40 hoffset=-140 vscale=35
1072: hscale=35 angle=-90}
1073: \caption{The number of the charge maxima for $x\approx 10^5$ at
1074: $\tau=3\times 10^5$.}\label{histplot}
1075: \end{figure}
1076:
1077:
1078: \begin{figure}[ht]
1079: \leavevmode
1080: \centering
1081: \vspace*{52mm}
1082: \special{psfile=beta.ps voffset=40 hoffset=-140 vscale=35
1083: hscale=35 angle=-90}
1084: \caption{$m\beta$ as function of $\tau$, $x\approx 10^5$.}\label{statfig}
1085: \end{figure}
1086:
1087:
1088: \newpage
1089:
1090: \begin{figure}
1091: \leavevmode
1092: \centering
1093: \vspace*{50mm}
1094: \special{psfile=i7.1.05e12.ps voffset=50 hoffset=0 vscale=50
1095: hscale=50 angle=180}
1096: \special{psfile=i8.8.2e11.ps voffset=50 hoffset=220 vscale=50
1097: hscale=50 angle=180}
1098: \caption{$x\approx 1$: $\tau=875\, (\rho^c_{\varphi}=10^{12}),\ 1000\,
1099: (\rho^c_{\varphi}=8\times10^{11})$.}\label{fig1}
1100: \end{figure}
1101:
1102: \begin{figure}
1103: \leavevmode
1104: \centering
1105: \vspace*{50mm}
1106: \special{psfile=i15.ps voffset=50 hoffset=0 vscale=50
1107: hscale=50 angle=180}
1108: \special{psfile=i16.ps voffset=50 hoffset=220 vscale=50
1109: hscale=50 angle=180}
1110: \caption{$x\approx 1$: $\tau=1875,\ 2000\, (\rho^c_{\varphi}=10^{11})$.}\label{fig2}
1111: \end{figure}
1112:
1113: \begin{figure}
1114: \leavevmode
1115: \centering
1116: \vspace*{50mm}
1117: \special{psfile=i18.ps voffset=50 hoffset=-8 vscale=50
1118: hscale=50 angle=180}
1119: \special{psfile=i24.ps voffset=50 hoffset=212 vscale=50
1120: hscale=50 angle=180}
1121: \caption{$x\approx 1$: $\tau=2250,\ 3000\,(\rho^c_{\varphi}=10^{11})$.}\label{fig3}
1122: \end{figure}
1123:
1124: \newpage
1125:
1126: \begin{figure}
1127: \leavevmode
1128: \centering
1129: \vspace*{50mm}
1130: \special{psfile=i2.ps voffset=50 hoffset=0 vscale=50
1131: hscale=50 angle=180}
1132: \special{psfile=i4.ps voffset=50 hoffset=220 vscale=50
1133: hscale=50 angle=180}
1134: \caption{$x\approx 10^5$: $\tau=1500\, (\rho^c_{\varphi}=2\times10^{6}),\ 3000\,
1135: (\rho^c_{\varphi}=3\times10^{7})$.}\label{fig4}
1136: \end{figure}
1137:
1138: \begin{figure}
1139: \leavevmode
1140: \centering
1141: \vspace*{50mm}
1142: \special{psfile=i6.ps voffset=50 hoffset=-8 vscale=50
1143: hscale=50 angle=180}
1144: \special{psfile=i7.ps voffset=50 hoffset=212 vscale=50
1145: hscale=50 angle=180}
1146: \caption{$x\approx 10^5$: $\tau=4500,\ 5250\, (\rho^c_{\varphi}=8\times10^{8})$.}\label{fig5}
1147: \end{figure}
1148:
1149: \begin{figure}
1150: \leavevmode
1151: \centering
1152: \vspace*{50mm}
1153: \special{psfile=i10.ps voffset=50 hoffset=-16 vscale=50
1154: hscale=50 angle=180}
1155: \special{psfile=i20.ps voffset=50 hoffset=204 vscale=50
1156: hscale=50 angle=180}
1157: \caption{$x\approx 10^5$: $\tau=7500,\ 1.5\times 10^{4}\, (\rho^c_{\varphi}=8\times 10^{8})$.}
1158: \label{fig6}
1159: \end{figure}
1160:
1161: \end{document}
1162:
1163:
1164:
1165:
1166:
1167:
1168:
1169:
1170: