1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
2: \usepackage{psfig,epsfig}
3: \textheight=23.cm
4: \textwidth=15.cm
5: %\usepackage{CJK}
6: \topskip 1cm
7: \leftskip -1cm
8: \def\baselinestretch{1.6}
9: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%% define enviroment %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
10: \def\bs{$\backslash$} \def\bslp{\baselineskip}
11: \def\spg{\setcounter{page}} \def\seq{\setcounter{equation}}
12: \def\bd{\begin{document}} \def\ed{\end{document}}
13: \def\emp{\end{minipage}} \def\bmp{\begin{minipage}}
14: \def\bcc{\begin{center}} \def\ecc{\end{center}} \def\npg{\newpage}
15: \def\beq{\begin{equation}} \def\eeq{\end{equation}} \def\hph{\hphantom}
16: \def\hs{\hskip} \def\vs{\vskip} \def\hf{\hfill} \def\ej{\vfill\eject}
17: \def\cl{\centerline} \def\ob{\obeylines} \def\ls{\leftskip}
18:
19: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
20: \begin{document}
21:
22:
23: \vs 4cm
24: \centerline{\LARGE On the Stability of Rapidity Gap Analysis}
25:
26: \vs 0.5cm
27: \centerline{\large Liao Hongbo \ \ \ Wu Yuanfang}
28:
29: \centerline{Institute of Particle Physics, Huazhong Normal University, Wuhan 430079 China}
30:
31: \vs 3cm
32: \centerline{\bf Abstract}
33:
34: \qquad
35: It is argued that the newly introduced moments of rapidity gaps for the
36: event-by-event fluctuations depends on the number of events and multiplicity.
37: The interesting ones of them are unstable under ISR energies of h-h collisions.
38: The instability get well improved when multiplicity increases.
39:
40: \newpage
41:
42: \qquad
43: In recent decade, the event-by-event fluctuations become more and more
44: important in multiparticle production and relativistic heavy ion collisions.
45: This is partly due to the fact that the large local multiplicity fluctuations have been
46: observed in all kind of collisions~\cite{wolfram} and that
47: the appearance of new state of matter, Quark Gluon Plasma (QGP), predicted by QCD, will
48: definitely associate with large energy density fluctuations~\cite{qgp}. How to measure
49: the fluctuations turn to be a powerful tool in probing the QGP phase transition.
50: However, in the market at present, there is no good suggested measure for the
51: purpose. In order to measure first the event-by-event fluctuations of low multiplicity
52: samples, such as those in h-h collisions under ISR energies, R.C.Hwa and Q.Zhang newly
53: introduced the rapidity gap analysis~\cite{hwa1} after a long exploration for the
54: end~\cite{hwa2}. Though it has been used to analyze experimental data ~\cite{wang}, the
55: efficiency of the method for low energies of h-h collisions has not been seriously checked.
56: In this letter, we are going to study the efficiency of the method.
57:
58: \qquad The rapidity gap is defined by the difference of rapidity of two neighbor particles
59: in an event,
60:
61: \begin{equation}
62: x_{i}=X_{i+1}-X_{i},
63: \hs 1cm i=0,\cdots,N,
64: \end{equation}
65:
66: \noindent where $X_i$ is the cumulant variable of rapidity of $i$th particle, which is free of the
67: influence of energy conservation in rapidity distribution~\cite{cumu} and is uniformly
68: distributed from $0$ to $1$. $N$ is the total number of particles in the event.
69: The set $S_{e}$ of $N+1$ number: $S_{e}=\{x_{i}\mid i=0,\cdots,N\}$ provides information of
70: rapidity distribution of all particles in the event. A quantitative character of single event
71: therefore can be estimated by the moments of its rapidity gaps:
72:
73: \begin{equation}
74: G_{q}=\frac{1}{N+1}\sum_{i=0}^{N}x_{i}^q,
75: \end{equation}
76:
77: \noindent or:
78:
79: \begin{equation}
80: H_{q}=\frac{1}{N+1}\sum_{i=0}^{N}(1-x_{i})^{-q},
81: \end{equation}
82:
83: \noindent where moment order $q$ is an integer. $G_{q}$ and $H_{q}$ vary from event to event.
84: R. C. Hwa and Q. Zhang suggest the simplest moments of them:
85:
86: \begin{equation}
87: s_{q}=-\langle G_{q}\ln G_{q}\rangle,
88: \end{equation}
89:
90: \noindent and
91:
92: \begin{equation}
93: \sigma_{q}=\langle H_{q}\ln H_{q}\rangle
94: \end{equation}
95:
96: \noindent as the descriptions of event-by-event fluctuations of the sample.
97: Here, $\rangle\dots\langle$ is the average over all the events in the sample.
98: However, according to this description, the statistical fluctuations,
99: which we are not interested in, are included.
100: In order to reduce the statistic fluctuations, they further suggested the same estimation
101: for pure statistical sample as
102:
103: \begin{equation}
104: s_{q}^{st}=-\langle G_{q}^{st}\ln G_{q}^{st}\rangle,
105: \end{equation}
106:
107: \noindent and
108:
109: \begin{equation}
110: \sigma_{q}^{st}=\langle H_{q}^{st}\ln H_{q}^{st}\rangle
111: \end{equation}
112:
113: \noindent and defined
114:
115: \begin{equation}
116: S_{q}=\frac{s_{q}}{s_{q}^{st}},
117: \end{equation}
118:
119: \noindent and
120:
121: \begin{equation}
122: \Sigma_{q}=\frac{\sigma_{q}}{\sigma_{q}^{st}}
123: \end{equation}
124:
125: \noindent as interesting measure of event-by-event fluctuations of the sample,
126: {\it i.e.}, so called the measure of erraticity in terms of rapidity gaps.
127:
128: \qquad From the definition of rapidity gaps above, it is clear that the rapidity gaps will be
129: large (small) and vary violently (smoothly) from event to event if the multiplicity of
130: the event is very low (high), such as h-h collisions
131: under (above) ISR energies. Since rapidity gap $x_i$ is less than $1$, event moments
132: $G_{q} \ll 1$ and $H_{q} \gg 1$. The measure of $\Sigma_{q}$ is simply the amplification of
133: $S_{q}$. The higher the moment order is, the bigger are the time of the amplification.
134: In this case, a stable measure of $\Sigma_{q}$ requires much larger
135: number of events than that of $S_{q}$ so that the fine structure of $H_{q}$ in the sample can
136: be completely demonstrated. Moreover, for $H_q$, only those events with multiplicity
137: $N \ge q+1$ are available for the average. It makes the measure of $\Sigma_q$ even more unstable
138: in comparison to $S_{q}$ in the same sample. How the measures of $S_q$ and $\Sigma_q$
139: depend on the number of events and multiplicity and how to get the stable measures of
140: $S_q$ and $\Sigma_q$ are the questions that we are going to answer in this letter.
141:
142: \qquad The simplest way of the investigation is to simulate a statistical sample, where
143: the number of events and multiplicities are all controllable. It is enough for us to estimate
144: the $s_{q}^{st}$ and $\sigma_{q}^{st}$ of the sample. The cumulent variables of rapidities of
145: a statistical event with multiplicity $N$ are constructed by $N$ random number
146: $X_{1}^{\prime}, \cdots, X_{N}^{\prime}$ which is uniformly distributed in [0, 1].
147: Here the distribution of multiplicity is taken from h-h collisions of NA22 experiments as
148: an example. Then according to Eqs.(6)-(7),
149: $s_{q}^{st}$ and $\sigma_{q}^{st}$ can be calculated.
150:
151: \qquad Firstly, the dependency of $s_{q}^{st}$ on the number of events is presented in fig.1,
152: where the number of events are $10,000$, $20,000$, $\cdots$, $70,000$ and moment order is
153: from $q=1$ to $8$. In these range of number of events, the behavior of all orders'
154: $\ln s_{q}^{st}$ are very stable. This results tell us that the measure of $S_q$ are
155: stable in experimentally allowed number of events even if the multiplicity is low.
156:
157: \qquad Then, let's turn to the same dependency of $\sigma_{q}^{st}$. The results is
158: given in Fig.2(a), (b) and (c) for the orders of moment $q=1, 2, 3$ respectively.
159: It is clear from the results that the higher order of moment is, the larger are the number
160: of events for a stable measure of $\sigma_{q}^{st}$. For $q=1$, a stable measure can be
161: reached at about $N_{event}=100,000$, while for $q=2$, $N_{event}$ has to go up to $500,000$,
162: for $q=3$, $N_{event}=1,500,000$ is out of the range of all experiments. Therefore, the
163: measure of $\sigma_{q}^{st}$ is rather unstable in experimentally reachable number of
164: events if multiplicity is low.
165:
166: \qquad In order to improve the measure of $\sigma_{q}^{st}$, we slightly increase
167: multiplicity from above $1-25$ to $11-35$ under same multiplicity distribution as NA22 for all
168: corresponding multiplicities.
169: The results are provided in Fig.3. Now for moment order $q$ from $1$ to $5$, the measures of
170: $\sigma_{q}^{st}$ are all stable at number of events only about $10,000$.
171: The stability of $\sigma_{q}^{st}$ get well improved by slightly increasing multiplicity.
172:
173: \qquad From the discussions and MC results of statistical sample above, the suggested measure
174: of $S_{q}$ for rapidity gaps is stable even under ISR collision energies.
175: However, as already pointed out in ~\cite{hwa1} that $S_{q}$ is essentially $1$,
176: and therefore not very interesting. Unfortunately, another suggested measure of rapidity gaps
177: $H_q$ is unstable under
178: ISR collision energies. But the instability gets well improved by increasing multiplicity of
179: events in the sample. It means that the measure is applicable for h-h collisions above the ISR
180: energies or for heavy ion collisions
181:
182:
183: \newpage
184: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
185: \itemsep=-1mm
186:
187: \bibitem{wolfram}E. A. De Wolf, I. M. Dremin and W. Kittel, {\it Phys. Rep.}
188: {\bf 270}, 1(1996).
189:
190: \bibitem{qgp} L. Van Hove, {\it Z. Phys.} {\bf C21}, 93 (1984);
191: J. Kapusta and A. Vischer, {\it Phys. Rev.}, {\bf C52}, 2725 (1995).
192:
193: \bibitem{wang}Wang Shaoshun and Wu Chong, {\it Phys. Lett.}{\bf B505}, 43(2001).
194:
195: \bibitem{hwa1} Rudolph C. Hwa and Qing-hui Zhang. {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D62}, 014003(2000).
196:
197: \bibitem{hwa2} Rudolph C. Hwa,{\it Acta Phys. polon.} {\bf B27}, 1789$-$1900(1996);
198: Z. Cao and Rudolph C. Hwa, {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D61}, 074011(2000).
199:
200: \bibitem{cumu} W. Ochs, {\it Z. Phys. C}{50} {339}{1991}; A. Bia\l as and M. Gazdzichi,
201: {\it Phys. Lett. B252}, 483(1990).
202:
203:
204: \end{thebibliography}
205:
206: \vs 3cm
207: {\bf Figure Captions}
208: \begin{itemize}
209:
210: \vs 1cm
211: \item[\bf Fig.~1] $\ln s_{q}^{st}$ ${\sl vs.}$ $N_{event}$ for different order of moments $q$.
212:
213:
214: \vs 1cm
215: \item[\bf Fig.~2] $\ln \sigma_{q}^{st}$ ${\sl vs.}$ $N_{event}$ for different order of moments
216: $q$.
217:
218:
219: \vs 1cm
220: \item[\bf Fig.~3] $\ln \sigma_{q}^{st}$ ${\sl vs.}$ $N_{event}$ for different order of moments
221: $q$ after shifting multiplicity $n$ to $11-35$, where the full circles, open circles, full
222: squares, open squares and full triangles represent $q=1, 2, 3, 4, 5$ respectively.
223:
224: \end{itemize}
225:
226: \end{document}
227:
228:
229:
230:
231:
232:
233:
234:
235:
236:
237: