1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}

2: \usepackage{a4wide}

3: \usepackage{graphicx}

4: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}

5: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}

6: \newcommand{\ba}{\begin{eqnarray}}

7: \newcommand{\ea}{\end{eqnarray}}

8: \begin{document}

9: \begin{flushright}

10: LU-TP 02-24\\

11: TTP02-08

12: \end{flushright}

13: \vspace{0.5cm}

14: 

15: \thispagestyle{empty}

16: \begin{center}

17: {\Large\bf Exploring Light-Cone Sum Rules 

18: for Pion and Kaon Form Factors }

19: \vskip 1.5true cm

20: 

21: {\large\bf

22: Johan~Bijnens$\,^{a}$ and Alexander~Khodjamirian$\,^{b\,*)}$}~

23: \vskip 1true cm

24: 

25: {\it$^a$ Department of Theoretical Physics, Lund University,\\

26: S\"olvegatan 14A, S - 223 62 Lund, Sweden}\\

27: \vspace{0.3cm}

28: {\it$^b$ Institut f\"ur Theoretische Teilchenphysik, Universit\"at

29: Karlsruhe,\\  D-76128 Karlsruhe, Germany } \\

30: 

31: \end{center}

32: 

33: \vskip 1.0true cm

34: \begin{abstract}

35: \noindent

36: 

37: We analyze the higher-twist effects and the $SU(3)$-flavour symmetry breaking 

38: in the correlation functions used to calculate form factors of

39: pseudoscalar mesons in the QCD light-cone sum rule approach.

40: It is shown that the Ward identities for these correlation functions yield

41: relations between twist-4 two- and three-particle distribution

42: amplitudes. In addition to the

43: relations already obtained from the QCD equations of motions,

44: we have found a new one. With the help of these relations, the 

45: twist-4 contribution to the light-cone sum rule 

46: for the pion electromagnetic form factor is reduced to a very simple 

47: form. Simultaneously, we correct a sign error in the earlier calculation.

48: The updated light-cone sum rule prediction for the pion 

49: form factor at intermediate 

50: momentum transfers is compared with the recent Jefferson Lab data. 

51: Furthermore, from the correlation functions with strange-quark currents 

52: the kaon electromagnetic form factor and  the $K\to \pi$ weak transition

53: form factors are predicted with  $O(m_s)\sim O(m_K^2)$

54: accuracy.

55: 

56: 

57: \end{abstract}

58: 

59: \vspace{1cm}

60: \noindent $^{*)}${\small \it on leave from Yerevan Physics 

61: Institute, 375036 Yerevan, Armenia} 

62: 

63: \newpage

64: 

65: 

66: 

67: \section{Introduction}

68: 

69: An accurate knowledge of the pion and kaon light-cone distribution amplitudes

70: (DA) introduced in the studies of hard exclusive processes in QCD 

71: \cite{exclusive}

72: is important for various frameworks

73: where these DA are being used. Among the most topical

74: applications one could mention the calculations 

75: of exclusive semileptonic

76: and hadronic $B$-meson transitions into pions and kaons using pQCD \cite{pQCD},

77: QCD factorization \cite{BBNS} or light-cone sum rules \cite{LCSRB}.

78: Although there are definite

79: indications that at the normalization scale of $O(1 \mbox{GeV})$ 

80: the leading twist 2 pion DA is already quite close 

81: to its  asymptotic shape, one still encounters a large uncertainty of the

82: nonasymptotic part. Moreover, very little is known about nonasymptotic 

83: $SU(3)$-flavour asymmetry in the twist 2 kaon DA.

84: 

85: 

86: One of the promising ways to study DA 

87: is to employ  vacuum-to-pion or vacuum-to-kaon 

88: correlation functions  of light-quark currents.

89: At high virtualities, using the operator-product expansion (OPE) 

90: near the light-cone, these correlation functions are expressed in terms

91: of DA. On the other hand, the same correlation functions are  

92: related, via dispersion relations, 

93: to the observable form factors of pions and kaons 

94: with the contributions of excited hadronic states 

95: approximated by  quark-hadron duality. In the resulting relations, 

96: known as {\em light-cone sum rules} (LCSR) \cite{LCSR}, the 

97: experimental data on form factors can be used 

98: to yield nontrivial constraints on DA.

99: The LCSR for the pion electromagnetic (e.m.) form factor

100: was derived in Refs.~\cite{BH,BKM} and for the $\gamma^*\gamma\pi^0$ 

101: form factor in Ref.~\cite{AKpi}. In order to further 

102: increase the accuracy of these sum rules one has to gain a better

103: control over higher-twist effects in the OPE. 

104: In the case of the pion form factors

105: the most important subleading contribution to the LCSR is of twist 4. 

106: The kaon e.m. form factor which so far was not analyzed in the LCSR

107: framework, demands also inclusion of the twist 3 effects proportional 

108: to $m_s$.   

109: 

110: The aim of this paper is twofold. First, we analyse the higher-twist effects in the vacuum-to-pion and vacuum-to-kaon correlation functions.

111: We demonstrate that a new useful tool is provided by standard 

112: Ward identities for the conserved e.m. and axial (in the chiral limit) 

113: currents. Simultaneously, we correct a sign error in the previous 

114: calculation of the twist 4 term and update the LCSR prediction for the 

115: pion e.m. form factor. Second, we include $SU(3)$-flavour symmetry 

116: breaking effects at $O(m_s)\sim O(m_K^2)$  in the correlation functions. 

117: We calculate the twist 3 part and 

118: obtain LCSR for the kaon e.m. and $K\to \pi$  weak transition 

119: form factors at intermediate spacelike momentum transfers.

120: 

121: 

122: The plan of the paper is as follows. In Sect.~\ref{Sect2} we introduce

123: a generic correlation function, which yields LCSR for the pion,

124: kaon, and $K\to \pi$ form factors for different flavour combinations

125: of light-quark currents.

126: The correlation function

127: is then calculated with twist 4 accuracy including first-order

128: in quark mass terms. In Sect.~\ref{Sect3} we derive the Ward identities

129: in the chiral limit and demonstrate that they lead

130: to relations between two- and three-particle DA of twist 4.

131: In Sect.~\ref{Sect4} the

132: numerical results for the pion form factor are presented

133: with a corrected twist 4 contribution. A comparison 

134: of our prediction is made with the recent data

135: on the pion e.m. form factor obtained at CEBAF.

136: Sect.~\ref{Sect5}  contains LCSR

137: results for the kaon electromagnetic form factor, and Sect. \ref{Sect6}

138: deals with the $K\to \pi$ weak transition form factor.

139: We summarize our conclusions in Sect.~\ref{Conclusions}.

140: The appendices contain the expansion of the quark propagator in

141: App.~\ref{AppA}, the definitions of the DA and their asymptotic expansions

142: in App.~\ref{AppB} and in App.~\ref{AppC} the $\alpha_S$ corrections

143: to the twist 2 LCSR obtained in Ref.~\cite{BKM}.

144: 

145: \section{Correlation functions}

146: \label{Sect2}

147: 

148: As a starting point, we introduce a generic correlation function: 

149: \be

150: T_{\mu\nu}(p,q)\! = i\!\int\! d^4 x \,e^{iqx}

151: \langle 0| T\{\left(\bar{q}_2(0)\gamma_\mu\gamma_5 q_1(0)\right)

152: \left( e_1\bar{q}_1(x)\gamma_\nu q_1'(x)\!+e_2\bar{q}_2'(x)\gamma_\nu q_2(x)

153: )\right\}\! |P(p)\rangle\,,

154: \label{2:cor}

155: \ee

156: where, in order to obtain the LCSR for the pion e.m. form factor  

157: the following quark-flavour combination has to be taken: 

158: $q_1=q_1'=u$, $q_2=q_2'=d$. In this case the on-shell hadronic state  

159: $P=\pi^+$, and $e_1=e_u=2/3$, $e_2=e_d=-1/3$ are the quark e.m. 

160: charges in the units of $e$. To calculate the kaon e.m. form factor, 

161: one simply has to replace $d\to s$ and $\pi^+\to K^+$ in the above. 

162: There are two other, 

163: physically interesting correlation functions yielding two independent 

164: LCSR for the $K\to \pi$ weak transition form factors obtained 

165: from  Eq.~(\ref{2:cor}) at $q_1=s$, $q_1'=u$, $q_2=d$, $P=\pi^+$,

166: $e_1=1$, $e_2=0$ and at $q_1=d$, $q_2=u$, $q_2'=s$, $e_1=0$, $e_2=1$, 

167: $P=K^0$. Summarizing, if one calculates the correlation

168: function (\ref{2:cor}) the result can easily be adjusted to any of

169: the flavour combinations listed above. 

170: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

171: \begin{figure}

172: \begin{center}

173: \includegraphics[width=0.9\textwidth]{fig1FKpi.ps}

174: \end{center}

175: \caption{

176: {\it Diagrams corresponding (a) to the

177: leading-order of the correlation function (\ref{2:cor});

178: (b) to the contributions of twist 3,4 quark-antiquark-gluon

179: DA. Solid, dashed, wavy lines and ovals represent quarks, gluons,  

180: external currents and pseudoscalar meson DA, respectively.}

181: \label{fig1}}

182: \end{figure}

183: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

184: If the external 4-momenta squared $q^2$ and $(p-q)^2$ are spacelike

185: and large, the operator product in the 

186: correlation function (\ref{2:cor}) can be expanded near the light-cone

187: in terms of pion or kaon DA of increasing twists. One may then 

188: retain a few first 

189: terms in this expansion, having in mind that higher twists are suppressed

190: by inverse powers of $Q^2=-q^2$ and/or $|(p-q)^2|$ (for a more detailed

191: discussion see e.g. Refs.~\cite{BKM,CK}).   

192: There are two leading-order diagrams obtained from the two terms 

193: in Eq.~(\ref{2:cor}) by contracting the quark fields 

194: $q_1$ with $\bar{q}_1$ and $q_2$ with $\bar{q}_2$, respectively

195: and replacing them by the free-quark propagators. 

196: The first diagram proportional to $e_1$ is depicted in Fig.~\ref{fig1}a. 

197: The second diagram, proportional to $e_2$  is obtained from the first 

198: one by changing the direction of the quark line and replacing  

199: the quark-flavour indices $1\leftrightarrow 2$. 

200: The next-to-leading approximation for the

201: quark propagator generates 

202: the diagram in Fig.~\ref{fig1}b (and its $\sim e_2$ counterpart) 

203: which brings three-particle quark-antiquark-gluon

204: DA of twist 3 and 4 into the game. This diagram is calculated

205: using the first-order in gluon field term in the light-cone 

206: expansion of the quark propagator given in App.~\ref{AppA}.    

207: We systematically retain all terms of  $O(m_q)\sim O(m_P^2)$ 

208: in order to be able to account for $SU(3)$ breaking effects 

209: in the LCSR for the kaon form factors. At the same time, the $O(m_q^2)$ 

210: contributions arising, e.g. from the denominators of quark propagators are 

211: neglected.

212: 

213: The result for the correlation function (\ref{2:cor}) 

214: obtained to twist 4 accuracy reads

215: \ba

216: T_{\mu\nu}(p,q) = if_P\int\limits_0^1 du \Big\{

217: T_1(Q^2,s,u) p_\mu p_\nu + 

218: T_2(Q^2,s,u) p_\mu q_\nu + T_3(Q^2,s,u) q_\mu p_\nu 

219: \nonumber

220: \\

221: + T_4(Q^2,s,u)q_\mu q_\nu + T_5(Q^2,s,u)g_{\mu\nu}

222: \Big \}

223: \label{2:Ti}

224: \ea

225: with

226: \ba

227: \lefteqn{T_1(Q^2,s,u)=\frac{2u\left[e_1\varphi_P(u)-

228: e_2\varphi_P(\bar{u})\right]}{\bar{u}Q^2-us+\bar{u}u m_P^2}}

229: \nonumber

230: \\

231: &&+\frac{1}{(\bar{u}Q^2-us+\bar{u}u m_P^2)^2}\Bigg\{

232: \frac{4f_{3P}}{f_P}\int\limits^{u}{\cal D}\alpha_i

233: \left[e_1m_{q_1}\varphi_{3P}(\alpha_i)-

234: e_2m_{q_2}\varphi_{3P}(\bar{\alpha_i})\right]

235: \nonumber

236: \\

237: &&

238: -2u\Bigg(4\left[e_1g_{1P}(u)-e_2g_{1P}(\bar{u})\right]

239: -4\left[e_1G_{2P}(u)-e_2G_{2P}(\bar{u})\right]-

240: 2u\left[e_1g_{2P}(u)+e_2g_{2P}(\bar{u})\right]

241: \nonumber

242: \\

243: &&+\int\limits^{u}{\cal D}\alpha_i

244: \Big[(1-2v)\left(2[e_1\varphi_{\perp P}(\alpha_i)+

245: e_2\varphi_{\perp P}(\bar{\alpha_i})]

246: +\left[e_1\varphi_{\parallel P}(\alpha_i)+e_2\varphi_{\parallel P}(\bar{\alpha_i})\right] \right)

247: \nonumber

248: \\

249: &&

250: -2[e_1\widetilde{\varphi}_{\perp P}(\alpha_i)

251: -e_2\widetilde{\varphi}_{\perp P}(\bar{\alpha_i})]

252: -[e_1\widetilde{\varphi}_{\parallel P}(\alpha_i) 

253: -e_2\widetilde{\varphi}_{\parallel P}(\bar{\alpha_i})] 

254: \Big]\Bigg)\Bigg\}\,,

255: \label{T1}

256: \ea

257: \ba

258: \lefteqn{

259: T_2(Q^2,s,u)= -\frac{e_1\varphi_P(u)-e_2\varphi_P(\bar{u})}{\bar{u}Q^2

260: -us+\bar{u}u m_P^2}}

261: \nonumber

262: \\

263: &&

264: +\frac{1}{(\bar{u}Q^2-us+\bar{u}u m_P^2)^2}\Bigg\{

265: \frac{\mu_P}{3}\left[e_1m_{q_1}\varphi_{\sigma P}(u)-

266: e_2m_{q_2}\varphi_{\sigma P}(\bar{u})\right]

267: \nonumber

268: \\

269: &&+4\left[ e_1g_{1P}(u)-e_2g_{1P}(\bar{u})\right]

270: - 4\left[ e_1G_{2P}(u)-e_2G_{2P}(\bar{u})\right]- 

271: 4u\left[e_1 g_{2P}(u)+e_2g_{2P}(\bar{u})\right]

272: \nonumber

273: \\

274: &&

275: +\int\limits^{u}{\cal D}\alpha_i

276: \Bigg[4(1-v)\left[e_1\varphi_{\perp P}(\alpha_i)

277: +e_2\varphi_{\perp P}(\bar{\alpha_i})\right]+

278: (1-2v)\left[e_1\varphi_{\parallel P}(\alpha_i)

279: +e_2\varphi_{\parallel P}(\bar{\alpha_i})\right]

280: \nonumber

281: \\

282: &&

283: -4(1-v)\left[e_1\widetilde{\varphi}_{\perp P}(\alpha_i)

284: -e_2\widetilde{\varphi}_{\perp P}(\bar{\alpha_i})\right]-

285: \left[e_1\widetilde{\varphi}_{\parallel P}(\alpha_i)

286: -e_2\widetilde{\varphi}_{\parallel P}(\bar{\alpha_i})

287: \right] \Bigg]\Bigg\}\,,

288: \label{T2}

289: \ea

290: \ba

291: \lefteqn{T_3(Q^2,s,u)= -\frac{e_1\varphi_P(u)-e_2\varphi_P(\bar{u})}{\bar{u}Q^2-us+\bar{u}u m_P^2}}

292: \nonumber

293: \\

294: &&

295: +\frac{1}{(\bar{u}Q^2-us+\bar{u}u m_P^2)^2}\Bigg\{

296: \frac{-\mu_P}{3}\left[e_1m_{q_1}\varphi_{\sigma P}(u)

297: -e_2m_{q_2}\varphi_{\sigma P}(\bar{u})\right]

298: \nonumber

299: \\

300: &&

301: +4\left[e_1g_{1P}(u)-e_2g_{1P}(\bar{u})\right]

302: - 4\left[e_1G_{2P}(u)-e_2G_{2P}(\bar{u})\right]

303: - 4u\left[e_1g_{2P}(u)+e_2g_{2P}(\bar{u})\right]

304: \nonumber

305: \\

306: &&+

307: \int\limits^{u}{\cal D}\alpha_i

308: \Bigg[-4v\left[e_1\varphi_{\perp P}(\alpha_i)+

309: e_2\varphi_{\perp P}(\bar{\alpha_i})\right]

310: +(1-2v)\left[e_1\varphi_{\parallel P}(\alpha_i)+

311: e_2\varphi_{\parallel P}(\bar{\alpha_i})\right]

312: \nonumber

313: \\

314: &&-4v\left[e_1\widetilde{\varphi}_{\perp P}(\alpha_i)

315: -e_2\widetilde{\varphi}_{\perp P}(\bar{\alpha_i})\right]-

316: \left[

317: e_1\widetilde{\varphi}_{\parallel P}(\alpha_i)

318: -e_2\widetilde{\varphi}_{\parallel P}(\bar{\alpha_i})\right] 

319: \Bigg]\Bigg\}\,,

320: \label{T3}

321: \ea

322: \ba

323: &&T_4(Q^2,s,u)= 4\frac{\left[e_1g_{2P}(u)+

324: e_2g_{2P}(\bar{u})\right]}{(\bar{u}Q^2-us+\bar{u}u m_P^2)^2}\,,

325: \label{T4}

326: \ea

327: \ba

328: \lefteqn{ T_5(Q^2,s,u)=-\frac{Q^2+s+(u-\bar{u})m_P^2

329: }{2(\bar{u}Q^2-us+\bar{u}u m_P^2)}

330: \left[e_1\varphi_P(u)-e_2\varphi_P(\bar{u})\right]}

331: \nonumber

332: \\

333: &&

334: +\frac{\mu_P}{(\bar{u}Q^2-us+\bar{u}u m_P^2)}

335: \left[e_1m_{q_1}\varphi_{p P}(u)-e_2m_{q_2}\varphi_{p P}(\bar{u})\right]

336: \nonumber

337: \\

338: &&+\frac{Q^2+s+(u-\bar{u})m_P^2

339: }{2(\bar{u}Q^2-us+\bar{u}u m_P^2)^2}

340: \Bigg\{4\left[e_1g_{1P}(u)-e_2g_{1P}(\bar{u})\right]

341: -4\left[e_1 G_{2P}(u)-e_2G_{2P}(\bar{u}) \right]

342: \nonumber

343: \\ 

344: &&+\int\limits^{u}{\cal D}\alpha_i

345: \Bigg[(1-2v)\left[e_1\varphi_{\parallel P}(\alpha_i)+

346: e_2\varphi_{\parallel P}(\bar{\alpha_i})\right]-

347: \left[e_1\widetilde{\varphi}_{\parallel P}(\alpha_i)

348: -e_2\widetilde{\varphi}_{\parallel P}(\bar{\alpha_i})\right] \Bigg]

349: \Bigg\} 

350: \,,

351: \label{T5}

352: \ea

353: where $s=(p-q)^2$; $\bar{u}=1-u$; $\alpha_i=\alpha_1,\alpha_2,

354: 1-\alpha_1-\alpha_2$; $\bar{\alpha}_i= \alpha_2,\alpha_1,1-\alpha_1-\alpha_2$ 

355: and 

356: $$

357: \int\limits^{u}{\cal D}\alpha_i\equiv 

358: \int\limits_0^u d\alpha_1

359: \int\limits_0^{1-u}\frac{d\alpha_2}{1-\alpha_1-\alpha_2},~

360: v=\frac{u-\alpha_1}{1-\alpha_1-\alpha_2}\,. 

361: $$

362: In the above, $\varphi_P$ is a generic notation for the 

363: twist 2 DA of a pseudoscalar meson 

364: $P=\pi$ or $K$, whereas $\varphi_{pP}$, $\varphi_{\sigma P}$,

365: $\varphi_{3P}$ and $g_{1P}$, $g_{2P}$,  $\varphi_{\perp P,~\parallel P}$,

366: $\tilde{\varphi}_{\perp P,~\parallel P}$ are, respectively, DA of twist 

367: 3 and 4. Their definitions taken from Ref.~\cite{BF} 

368: (see also Ref.~\cite{Ball})  

369: are collected in App.~\ref{AppB}. The decay constant $f_P$ of $P$ is 

370: defined as

371: $\langle 0 \mid \bar{q}_2\gamma_\mu \gamma_5 q_1\mid P(p)\rangle=if_Pp_\mu$.

372: Furthermore, $\mu_P=m_P^2/(m_{q_1}+m_{q_2})$ is 

373: the twist 3 DA normalization factor and

374: $

375: G_{2P}(u)=\int_0^u dv g_{2P}(v)\,.

376: $  

377: In the case of nonstrange quarks, $q_1=q_1'=u$, $q_2=q_2'=d$, both chiral 

378: and isospin symmetry limits can safely be adopted.

379: In this limit the $u,d$ quark 

380: masses as well as the pion mass are neglected and

381: DA are either symmetric or antisymmetric 

382: (see App.~\ref{AppB}) \footnote{The type of symmetry is established

383: applying $G$-parity transformation to the underlying matrix elements.},

384: with respect to the replacements 

385: $u \leftrightarrow \bar{u}$, or  $\alpha_1\leftrightarrow

386: \alpha_2$. In this  case the twist 3 parts in 

387: Eqs.~(\ref{T1})--(\ref{T5}) vanish and the 

388: combination of quark charges 

389: $e_1-e_2=e_u-e_d=1$ factorizes out. The resulting expression for $T_1$

390: coincides with the one obtained in Ref.~\cite{BH} 

391: except that the signs of the terms containing the 

392: twist 4 quark-gluon DA $\varphi_{\perp P,\,\parallel P}$

393: are opposite.  The same discrepancy in signs  

394: is found in the expressions for $T_i$ obtained  

395: in the chiral limit in Ref.~\cite{Belyaev}

396: comparing them with  Eqs.~(\ref{T1})-(\ref{T5}). 

397: In the next section we will demonstrate that Eqs.~(\ref{T1})-(\ref{T5})

398: are fully consistent with the relations obtained from QCD equations of 

399: motion. Finally, we note that the twist 3 terms 

400: in Eqs.~(\ref{T1})-(\ref{T5}) are new.

401: 

402: \section{Ward Identities}

403: \label{Sect3}

404: 

405: Multiplying the correlation function (\ref{2:cor})

406: by the four-momentum $q$ one obtains

407: \ba

408: \label{WIvector}

409: q^\nu T_{\mu\nu} = -\int\! d^4 x \,e^{iqx}

410: \Bigg(\langle 0| T\{\bar{q}_2(0)\gamma_\mu\gamma_5 q_1(0)

411: \frac{\partial}{\partial x_\nu}\Big( 

412: e_1\bar{q}_1(x)\gamma_\nu q_1'(x)

413: %\nonumber

414: %\\

415: +e_2\bar{q}_2'(x)\gamma_\nu q_2(x)\Big)\}

416: |P(p)\rangle 

417: \nonumber

418: \\

419: -\delta(x_0) \langle 0|

420: [\bar{q}_2(0)\gamma_\mu\gamma_5 q_1(0), (e_1\bar{q}_1(0,\vec{x})\gamma_0 

421: q_1'(0,\vec x)+e_2\bar{q}_2'(0,\vec x)\gamma_0 q_2(0,\vec x))]

422: |P(p)\rangle\Bigg )

423: \;,

424: \ea

425: where the second term containing equal-time current 

426: commutators originates from the differentiation 

427: of the $\theta(x_0)$ in the T-product of currents.

428: For the conserved vector currents $q_1=q_1'$ and $q_2=q_2'$ 

429: the first term on the r.h.s. of Eq.~(\ref{2:cor}) vanishes.

430: For the second term the standard commutation relations for the 

431: equal-time current densities can be employed, e.g., in the case of 

432: the pion:

433: \ba

434: \Big[\bar{d}(0)\gamma_\mu\gamma_5 u(0), \Big(e_u\bar{u}(0,\vec{x})\gamma_0

435: u(0,\vec x)+e_d\bar{d}(0,\vec{x})\gamma_0 d(0,\vec{x})\Big)\Big]=

436: \delta^{(3)}(\vec x) \bar{d}(0,\vec{x})\gamma_\mu\gamma_5 u(0,\vec{x})\,,

437: \ea

438: yielding for the correlation function the Ward identity

439: \ba

440: q^\nu T_{\mu\nu}=i f_\pi p_\mu\,.

441: \label{WI}

442: \ea

443: In the chiral limit $m_{q_1}=m_{q_2}=0$ the 

444: axial-vector current 

445: is also conserved. Hence,  we get an additional relation

446: \ba

447: \label{WIaxial}

448: (p-q)^\mu T_{\mu\nu}^{} = -i f_\pi p_\nu\,.

449: \ea

450: The above Ward identities are valid for arbitrary $q$ and $p$.

451: This circumstance allows one

452: to get relations between various pion DA by substituting Eq.~(\ref{2:Ti})

453: in l.h.s. of Eqs.~(\ref{WI}),(\ref{WIaxial}).

454: 

455: Here we will only concentrate on the  chiral limit, so that 

456: both Eqs. (\ref{WI}) and (\ref{WIaxial}) are valid and $p^2=0$.

457: It is easy to check that the r.h.s. of these equations are saturated by 

458: the twist-2 contribution to their l.h.s. 

459: Hence, the Ward identities (\ref{WI}) and (\ref{WIaxial}) 

460: yield nontrivial relations between two- and three-particle DA of twist

461: 4. Note that in the chiral limit 

462: different twists are separated by dimensions, therefore 

463: contributions to the correlation function with twist higher than 4 neglected 

464: in our calculation are unimportant\footnote{

465: In fact, we also neglect four-particle Fock components of twist 4

466: in the light-cone expansion of the matrix elements. This is 

467: consistent with the approximation adopted in deriving the relations 

468: from QCD equations of motion \cite{BF}.}. 

469: Using

470: \be

471: \frac{2q.p}{(q-up)^4} = \frac{\partial}{\partial u}\frac{1}{(q-up)^2}

472: \quad\mbox{and}\quad

473: \frac{q^2}{(q-up)^4} = 

474: \frac{1}{(q-up)^2}+u\frac{\partial}{\partial u}\frac{1}{(q-up)^2}\,,

475: \ee

476: together with partial integration in $u$,

477: rewriting all twist 4 contributions in Eqs. (\ref{WI}) and

478: (\ref{WIaxial}) as $\int_0^1du\frac{1}{(p-uq)^2}F(u)$

479: and then extracting $F(u)=0$, one obtains the following relations:

480: \ba

481: g_{2\pi}(u) &=&\int\limits^{u}{\cal D}\alpha_i

482: (\left(\varphi_{\perp\pi}(\alpha_i)-(1-2v)

483:  \widetilde\varphi_{\perp\pi}(\alpha_i)\right)\;,

484: \label{WIA}

485: \ea

486: \ba

487: G_{2\pi}(u) &=& \frac{u}{2}g_{2\pi}(u)-\frac{1}{2}\int\limits^{u}{\cal D}\alpha_iv

488: \left(\varphi_{\perp\pi}(\alpha_i)+\widetilde\varphi_{\perp\pi}(\alpha_i)\right)\;,

489: \label{WIB}

490: \ea

491: \ba

492: g_{1\pi}(u) &=& G_{2\pi}(u)+\frac{1}{2}u\bar{u}g_{2\pi}^\prime(u)

493: \nonumber\\&&-\frac{1}{4}\int\limits^{u}{\cal D}\alpha_i

494: \left[

495: (1-2v)\left(\varphi_{\parallel\pi}(\alpha_i)+2\varphi_{\perp\pi}(\alpha_i)\right)

496: -\widetilde\varphi_{\parallel\pi}(\alpha_i)-2\widetilde\varphi_{\perp\pi}(\alpha_i)

497: \right]\,,

498: \label{WIC}

499: \ea

500: where $g_{2\pi}^\prime(u)=\partial g_2(u)/\partial u$.

501: We notice that the above expressions can be used to rewrite in the chiral limit

502: ($P=\pi$) the twist 4 part of the correlation function (\ref{2:Ti})

503: using only one DA $g_{2\pi}$ and its derivative over $u$, so that

504: \ba 

505: T_{\mu\nu} = if_\pi\int_0^1 du \Bigg\{

506: \frac{1}{\bar{u}Q^2-us}\Big(2up_\mu p_\nu-q_\mu p_\nu-p_\mu q_\nu-

507: (q\cdot p)g_{\mu\nu}\Big)\varphi_\pi(u)

508: \nonumber\\

509: +\frac{2}{(\bar{u}Q^2-us)^2}

510: \Bigg\{p_\mu p_\nu \Big(2u^2g_{2\pi}(u)-2u^2\bar u g_{2\pi}^\prime(u)\Big)

511: +(p_\mu q_\nu+q_\mu p_\nu)(-2ug_{2\pi}(u)+u\bar u g_{2\pi}^\prime(u))

512: \nonumber\\

513: +(p_\mu q_\nu-q_\mu p_\nu+2q_\mu q_\nu)g_{2\pi}(u)

514: +g_{\mu\nu}\left[\left (2Q^2+(q.p)(1+2u)\right) g_{2\pi}(u)

515: - (q.p)\, u\bar u g_{2\pi}^\prime(u)  \right]\Bigg\}\,.

516: \label{finalT}

517: \ea

518: 

519: The relations (\ref{WIA}) and (\ref{WIB}) can also be obtained 

520: using the technique of QCD equations of motion \cite{BF}. 

521: The starting objects in this case 

522: are the derivatives of quark-antiquark operators expressed via 

523: quark-antiquark-gluon operators, e.g.:

524: \be

525: \label{BFrel}

526: \frac{\partial}{\partial x_\mu}

527: \left\langle 0|\overline{d}(0)\gamma_\mu\gamma_5 u(x)|\pi^+(p)

528: \right\rangle = i\!\int_0^1\! \alpha d\alpha \left\langle 0|

529: \overline{d}(0)\gamma_\mu\gamma_5 x_\lambda G^{\lambda \mu}(\alpha x)u(x)

530: |\pi^+(p) \right\rangle

531: \ee

532: and 

533: \be

534: \label{Bijrel}

535: \frac{\partial}{\partial x_\nu}

536: \left\langle 0|\overline{d}(0)\gamma_\mu \gamma_\beta\gamma_\nu\gamma_5

537:  u(x)| \pi^+(p)\right\rangle

538: =i\!\int_0^1 \!\alpha d\alpha \left\langle 0|

539: \overline{d}(0)\gamma_\mu\gamma_\beta\gamma_\nu\gamma_5 

540: x_\lambda G^{\lambda \nu}(\alpha x)u(x)

541: |\pi^+(p) \right\rangle,

542: \ee

543: where $G_{\mu\nu}=g_sG^a_{\mu\nu}(\lambda_a/2)$,

544: $tr\lambda_a\lambda_b=2\delta^{ab}$.

545: The relations derived from Eq.~(\ref{BFrel}) are

546: \ba

547: g_{1\pi}(u) &=& \frac{u}{2}g_{2\pi}(u)-G_{2\pi}(u)+\frac{1}{2}

548: \int\limits^{u}{\cal D}\alpha_i

549: v\left(\varphi_{\parallel\pi}(\alpha_i)-2\varphi_{\perp\pi}(\alpha_i)\right)\,,

550: \label{bf1}

551: \ea

552: and its $u\leftrightarrow \bar{u}$ equivalent:

553: \ba

554: g_{1\pi}(u) &=& -\frac{\bar{u}}{2}g_{2\pi}(u)-G_{2\pi}(u)-\frac{1}{2}

555: \int\limits^{u}{\cal D}\alpha_i

556: (1-v)\left(\varphi_{\parallel\pi}(\alpha_i)-

557: 2\varphi_{\perp\pi}(\alpha_i)\right)\;.

558: \label{bf2}

559: \ea

560: Combining Eqs.~(\ref{bf1}) and (\ref{bf2}) 

561: one gets the two relations obtained in Ref.~\cite{BF}.

562: Eq.~(\ref{Bijrel}) which was also used in Ref.~\cite{Belyaev} yields

563: \ba

564: g_{1\pi}(u) &=& -\frac{u}{2}g_{2\pi}(u)+G_{2\pi}(u)+\frac{1}{2}

565: \int\limits^{u}{\cal D}\alpha_i

566: v\left(\varphi_{\parallel\pi}(\alpha_i)+2\widetilde\varphi_{\perp\pi}(\alpha_i)\right)\;,

567: \label{Bel}

568: \ea

569: and 

570: \ba

571: g_{1\pi}(u) &=& \frac{\bar{u}}{2}g_{2\pi}(u)+G_{2\pi}(u)+\frac{1}{2}

572: \int\limits^{u}{\cal D}\alpha_i

573: (1-v)\left(-\varphi_{\parallel\pi}(\alpha_i)+2\widetilde\varphi_{\perp\pi}(\alpha_i)

574: \right)\,.

575: \label{Bij}

576: \ea

577: Combining Eq.~(\ref{Bel}) and Eq.~(\ref{Bij})

578: with Eqs.~(\ref{bf1}) and (\ref{bf2}), after simple

579: algebra one  indeed reproduces the relations obtained from Ward identities,

580: but only  two of them, Eqs.~(\ref{WIA}) and (\ref{WIB}).

581: The relation (\ref{WIC}), the only one involving

582: the DA $\widetilde\varphi_{\parallel \pi}$ is new and was not obtained 

583: using equations of motion.

584: Note that the observed consistency between the relations derived from Ward

585: identities and from QCD equations of motion provides an independent 

586: check of our result for the correlation function. Indeed,

587: taking the correlation function calculated in Ref.~\cite{Belyaev}

588: with different signs at the terms with $\varphi_{\perp\pi,\parallel

589: \pi}$ we obtain a contradiction between the two types of relations.  

590:  

591:  

592: If the  chiral symmetry is violated, $m_q \sim m_P^2\neq 0$, 

593: the Ward identity (\ref{WI}) based on the conservation 

594: of the e.m. current is still valid, but the relations 

595: following from this identity are more complicated, 

596: mixing DA of twist 2,3 and 4 and not allowing  

597: to reduce the twist 4 part to an integral over 

598: a single DA.

599: The corresponding analysis goes beyond the scope of this paper. 

600: 

601: \section{Updated prediction for the pion e.m. form factor}

602: \label{Sect4}

603: 

604: The LCSR for the pion e.m. form factor was originally derived in

605: Ref.~\cite{BH}. Let us briefly outline the procedure. 

606: The part of the correlation function (\ref{2:Ti})

607: (in the chiral limit) proportional to $ \sim p_\mu p_\nu $ 

608: was matched to the hadronic dispersion relation 

609: in the variable $s=(p-q)^2$, that is, in the channel of the axial-vector current:

610: \be

611: if_\pi\int\limits_0^1 du T_1(Q^2,s,u) = 

612: \frac{2if_\pi F_\pi(Q^2)}{-s}+ 

613: \int\limits_{s_0^h}^\infty \frac{\rho^h(s')ds'}{s'-s}\,.

614: \label{disp1}

615: \ee

616: In this relation, the first term on the r.h.s. is the ground-state

617: contribution of the pion where $f_\pi=132 $ MeV and 

618: $F_\pi(Q^2)$ is the pion e.m.

619: form factor defined in the standard way:

620: \be

621: F_\pi(Q^2)(2p-q)_\nu =\langle\pi^+(p-q)\mid j^{em}_\nu \mid \pi^+(p)\rangle\,,

622: \ee

623: $j^{em}_\nu$ being the quark e.m. current.

624: The contributions of the $a_1$ meson and excited states

625: with $J^P=O^-,1^+$ form the spectral

626: density $\rho^h$ which is estimated as usual, with the help

627: of quark-hadron duality:

628: \be

629: \rho^h(s) \Theta(s-s_0^h)=\frac{if_\pi}{\pi} \int\limits_0^1 du\, 

630: \mbox{Im}_s T_1(Q^2,s,u)\Theta(s-s_0^\pi)\,,

631: \label{dual}

632: \ee

633: where the effective threshold

634: parameter $s_0^{\pi}=0.7$ GeV$^2$ is determined from the

635: SVZ sum rule \cite{SVZ} for the correlator of two 

636: $\bar{u}\gamma_\mu\gamma_5d$ currents.

637: Representing the l.h.s of Eq.~(\ref{disp1}) in a form of the 

638: dispersion integral: 

639: \be

640: \int\limits_0^1 du\, T_1(Q^2,s,u)=\frac1\pi

641: \!\int\limits_0^{\infty}\! \frac{ds'}{s'-s} 

642: \int\limits_0^1\!du\, \mbox{Im}_{s'} T_1(Q^2,s',u)\,,

643: \label{disp2}

644: \ee

645: using Eq.~(\ref{dual}) and performing the Borel transformation ,

646: $(p-q)^2\to M^2$, we obtain the resulting sum rule:

647: \be

648: F_\pi(Q^2) =\frac{1}{2\pi}\int\limits_{0}^{s_0^{\pi}}\!ds\, e^{-s/M^2}

649: \!\int\limits_{0}^1du~\mbox{Im}_s T_1(Q^2,s,u)\,.

650: \label{lcsr}

651: \ee

652: In the twist-2 approximation one has \cite{BH}: 

653: \be

654: F_\pi^{(2)}(Q^2)=\int_{u_0^\pi}^1 du~\varphi_\pi(u,\mu)

655: \exp\left( -\frac{\bar{u}Q^2}{uM^2}\right)\,.

656: \label{LCSRpitw2}

657: \ee

658: In the above $u_0^\pi= Q^2/(s_0^{\pi}+Q^2)$ and we have indicated

659: the dependence of the DA $\varphi_\pi$

660: on the normalization scale $\mu$.

661: 

662: The LCSR  (\ref{lcsr}) was further improved in

663: Ref.~\cite{BKM} where the

664: $O(\alpha_s)$ contribution to the twist 2 part

665: was calculated by taking into account the perturbative gluon 

666: exchanges between the quark lines in the diagram of Fig.~\ref{fig1}a.

667: For convenience we present in App.~\ref{AppC} the explicit expression

668: for $F_\pi^{(2,\alpha_s)}(Q^2)$ 

669: which has to be added to the r.h.s. of Eq.~(\ref{LCSRpitw2}).

670: Recall that this contribution provides the  

671: $\sim \alpha_s/Q^2$ asymptotic behavior \cite{exclusive} of the form

672: factor. As explained in detail in Ref.~\cite{BKM} the  form factor

673: obtained from LCSR includes both  

674: the hard-scattering and soft (end-point) contributions.

675: 

676: Our main update of the sum rule for $F_\pi(Q^2)$ concerns

677: the twist 4 term for which a new, corrected expression is 

678: obtained from  Eq.~(\ref{finalT}):

679: \begin{equation}

680: F_\pi^{(4)}(Q^2)= \int\limits ^1_{u_0^\pi}du \frac{\varphi^{(4)}_\pi(u,\mu)}{uM^2}

681: \exp\left( -\frac{\bar{u}Q^2}{uM^2}\right) + \frac{u_0^\pi\varphi^{(4)}_\pi

682:   (u_0^\pi,\mu)

683: }{Q^2}e^{-s_0^\pi/M^2}\,,

684: \label{tw4res}

685: \end{equation}

686: where 

687: \be

688: \varphi^{(4)}_\pi(u,\mu)= 2u\left(g_{2\pi}(u,\mu)-

689: \bar{u}g'_{2\pi}(u,\mu)\right)\,.

690: \label{phi4}

691: \ee

692: 

693: The second term on the r.h.s. of Eq.~(\ref{tw4res}) is a `surface term'

694: originating after the continuum  subtraction as

695: explained in Ref.~\cite{BKM}. In the same paper the factorizable 

696: twist 6 contribution to LCSR was calculated:  

697: \be

698: F_\pi^{(6)}(Q^2)=\frac{4\pi\alpha_sC_F}{3f_\pi^2Q^4}

699: \langle 0\!\mid\bar{q}q \mid \!0\rangle^2 

700: \ee

701: in terms of the quark condensate density (see Ref.~\cite{BKM} for 

702: the diagrams and other details concerning this contribution).

703: Note that the twist 6 term is numerically very

704: small starting from $Q^2 = 1$~GeV$^2$ which is 

705: therefore a natural lower boundary of the LCSR 

706: validity region~\footnote{Recent work on the pion and kaon form factors 

707: at low momentum transfers can be found in Ref.~\cite{lowenergy}.}.

708: 

709: 

710: We turn now to the numerical calculation of the pion form factor,

711: \be

712: F_\pi(Q^2)=F_\pi^{(2)}(Q^2)+ F_\pi^{(2,\alpha_s)}(Q^2)+

713: F_\pi^{(4)}(Q^2)+F_\pi^{(6)}(Q^2)\,,

714: \label{contrib}

715: \ee

716: where twist 2,4 and the factorizable twist-6 contributions to LCSR

717: are added together. In our numerical evaluation of Eq.~(\ref{contrib}), 

718: following Ref.~\cite{BKM} we take $ 0.8 < M^2 < 1.5 $ GeV$^2$ and adopt the variable

719: normalization scale $\mu^2_u =(1-u)Q^2+u M^2$

720: of the light-cone DA. The same scale is adopted for the 

721: normalization of $\alpha_s$. For the latter  

722: the two-loop running is used with $\bar{\Lambda}^{(3)}=340$ MeV 

723: corresponding to $\alpha_s(\mbox{1 GeV})=0.48$. For the twist 2 pion DA  

724: we take the asymptotic form $\varphi_\pi(u)=6u(1-u)$.  

725: The influence of nonasymptotic corrections will be discussed later.

726: Concerning  the twist 4 pion DA we actually

727: need only one of them, $g_{2\pi}$. Interestingly,

728: in first order of the conformal expansion \cite{BF} 

729: this DA does not contain nonasymptotic contributions.

730: Using the asymptotic form of $g_{2\pi}(u)$ presented in App.~\ref{AppB}

731: one obtains a compact expression:

732: \be

733: \varphi^{(4)}_\pi(u,\mu)=\frac{20}3\delta^2_\pi(\mu)u\bar{u}(1-u(7-8u))\,.

734: \label{phi41}

735: \ee

736: The nonperturbative parameter 

737: $\delta^2_\pi\simeq $ 0.2 GeV$^2$

738: determining the vacuum-to-pion matrix element of the 

739: quark-antiquark-gluon current (see definition in App.~\ref{AppB}) 

740: was estimated from various 2-point QCD

741: sum rules in Ref.~\cite{delta}. To assess the 

742: theoretical uncertainty, we have recalculated $\delta^2_\pi$ 

743: using 

744: the diagonal sum rule for two quark-antiquark-gluon currents

745: which is less dependent on the variations of quark and gluon condensates.

746: The result, in agreement with Ref.~\cite{delta}, is

747: \be

748: \delta^2_\pi( 1 \mbox{GeV})=0.17 \pm 0.05~\mbox{GeV}^2\, 

749: \label{delta}

750: \ee

751: obtained with 

752: $ \langle 0\!\!\mid \!\bar{q}q \!\mid \!\!0\rangle=

753: (-240\pm 10~\mbox{MeV})^3$ 

754: and $\langle 0 \!\!\mid \!(\alpha_s/\pi)G^a_{\mu\nu}G^{a\mu\nu}\!\mid \!\!0 \rangle

755: =0.012 \pm 0.006~\mbox{GeV}^4$. 

756: 

757: Our prediction for the pion e.m. form factor given by  Eq.~(\ref{contrib}) is 

758: plotted in Fig.~\ref{fig2}, calculated with the 

759: asymptotic pion DA at a typical value 

760: of $ M^2=1$ GeV$^2$, and at 

761: $\mu=\mu_u$ and $\delta^2_\pi= 0.17~\mbox{GeV}^2$.

762: %%%%%%%%% Figure:piformftw%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

763: \begin{figure}[t]

764: \begin{center}

765: \includegraphics[height=0.6\textwidth]{fig2FKpi.ps}

766: \end{center}

767: \caption{ {\it Pion e.m. form factor obtained from LCSR

768: with the asymptotic pion DA (solid) including  the 

769: twist 2 leading-order (long-dashed), twist 2 $O(\alpha_s)$

770: (short-dashed), twist 4 (dash-dotted) and 

771: factorizable twist 6  (dotted) contributions.}

772: \label{fig2}}

773: \end{figure}

774: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

775: Importantly, the corrected

776: twist 4 contribution is about two times larger than 

777: estimated before \cite{BH,BKM}. Note that at $Q^2\to \infty$

778: the twist 4 term given by Eq.~(\ref{tw4res})

779: has the same $\sim 1/Q^4$ asymptotic behavior

780: as the twist 2 contribution (\ref{LCSRpitw2})

781: \footnote{Contributions nonvanishing or growing  

782: with  $Q^2$ are absent in LCSR. Such anomalous contributions 

783: emerge 

784: in QCD sum rules based on the local condensate expansion

785: \cite{IofSmil,Rad82} making the latter not applicable at 

786: $Q^2 \gg 1$ GeV$^2$.},

787: but has one extra power of $1/M^2$. This can be seen

788: explicitly by rewriting Eq.~(\ref{tw4res}), with the help of 

789: Eq.~(\ref{phi41}), in the form of a dispersion integral 

790: with the integration variable $s=Q^2\bar{u}/u$:

791: \be

792: \label{eq:38}

793: F_\pi^{(4)}(Q^2)=\frac{40}{3}\delta^2(\mu)\int\limits_0^{s_0^\pi}

794: ds e^{-s/M^2}\frac{Q^8}{(Q^2+s)^6}\left( 1-\frac{9s}{Q^2}+\frac{9s^2}{Q^4}-

795: \frac{s^3}{Q^6}\right)\,,

796: \ee

797: yielding at $Q^2 \to \infty$  

798: \be

799: F_\pi^{(4)}(Q^2) \sim \frac{40\delta^2 M^2}{3 Q^4}\left(1-e^{-s_0^\pi/M^2}\right)\,,

800: \label{tw4as}

801: \ee

802: to be compared with the corresponding limit of 

803: Eq.~(\ref{LCSRpitw2}):

804: \be

805: F_\pi^{(2)}(Q^2) \sim \frac{6M^4}{Q^4}\left(1-\left(1+\frac{s_0^\pi}{M^2}

806: \right)e^{-s_0^\pi/M^2}\right)\,.

807: \label{tw2as}

808: \ee

809: Although the twist 4 term has indeed an extra suppression 

810: factor $\delta^2/M^2$ as compared with the twist 2 term, the 

811: overall numerical coefficients in Eqs.~(\ref{tw4as}) and (\ref{tw2as})

812: are of the same order at $M^2\sim $ 1 GeV$^2$.

813: 

814: %%%%%%%%% Figure:piformfvsdata%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

815: \begin{figure}[t]

816: \begin{center}

817: \includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{fig3FKpi.ps}

818: \end{center}

819: \caption{ {\it The pion e.m. form factor calculated from 

820: LCSR in comparison with the 

821: Jefferson Lab data \cite{Volmer} shown with points

822: (the experimental error and the model uncertainty 

823: are added in quadratures). 

824: The solid line corresponds to the asymptotic 

825: pion DA, dashed  lines indicate the estimated 

826: overall theoretical uncertainty ; the dash-dotted

827: line is calculated with the CZ model \cite{CZ84}

828: of the pion DA. }

829: \label{fig3}}

830: \end{figure}

831: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

832: 

833: 

834: The LCSR approach allows one to estimate 

835: the theoretical uncertainty of the predicted form factor. 

836: We did it in the following way. 

837: First of all, $M^2$ and $\delta^2_\pi$  

838: were varied within allowed intervals. 

839: Furthermore, in order to investigate the sensitivity to the 

840: choice of the renormalization scale 

841: our calculation was repeated at two fixed scales $Q^2$ and 

842: $M^2$ adopting the variation of the results as a theoretical uncertainty.

843: Finally, accounting for the missing twist $\geq $6 terms we 

844: assume that the absence of the latter introduces 

845: an additional uncertainty equal to $\pm F_\pi^{(6)}(Q^2)$. 

846: All abovementioned  variations of the LCSR prediction for $F_\pi(Q^2)$ 

847: are then added linearly which is a rather conservative approach.

848: 

849: In Fig.~\ref{fig3} we plot $F_\pi(Q^2)$, 

850: calculated with 

851: the asymptotic pion DA and at $M^2=1$ GeV$^2$. 

852: The resulting uncertainty of the form factor indicated in this figure is about 

853: $\pm (20\div 30)\%$ at $Q^2 \geq 1 GeV^2$. 

854: At  $Q^2 <$ 1 GeV$^2$ the uncertainty grows revealing the 

855: inapplicability of LCSR for small momentum transfers. 

856: In the region $2.0\leq Q^2 <10$ GeV$^2$ our prediction for the 

857: pion e.m. form factor with the asymptotic pion DA can be fitted

858: to the following simple formula:

859: \be

860: Q^2F_\pi(Q^2)= (0.0735\div 0.2016)+\frac{0.7908\div 0.9340}{Q^2}-\frac{0.8496\div1.2068}{Q^4},

861: \ee

862: (all numbers in GeV$^2$),

863: where the correlated intervals take into account 

864: the total uncertainty.

865: 

866: The accuracy of the LCSR prediction (\ref{contrib}) can be 

867: improved further by including 

868: various higher-twist corrections (due to twist-4 multiparticle and twist

869: 6 DA) which were not yet analyzed. However, 

870: the smallness of the factorizable twist 6 term indicates that these effects 

871: are most probably numerically unimportant. In addition,

872: it is desirable to improve also the perturbative expansion

873: of the correlation function calculating  

874: the $O(\alpha_s)$ term of twist 4 and the  

875: $O(\alpha_s^2)$ term of  twist 2. An attempt to account for 

876: the latter was made in Ref.~\cite{BKM} by matching LCSR 

877: to the NLO perturbative calculation \cite{Melic}. 

878: 

879: 

880: Finally, in Fig.~\ref{fig3} we compare  

881: our numerical prediction with the 

882: recent accurate data on $F_\pi(Q^2)$ obtained 

883: from the pion electroproduction 

884: at Jefferson Lab \cite{Volmer} at $Q^2= 0.6 \div 1.65 $ GeV$^2$,

885: in the region which only partly overlaps 

886: with the LCSR validity region $Q^2>1$ GeV$^2$.    

887: We find that within theoretical uncertainties and experimental errors

888: the form factor calculated with the asymptotic pion DA $\varphi_\pi(u)$

889: is consistent with data \footnote{

890: LCSR predictions also agree with older measurements 

891: of $F_\pi(Q^2)$ at $Q^2=1\div 6$ GeV$^2$ which however have  

892: large experimental errors.}. 

893: 

894: With $F_\pi(Q^2)$ accurately measured at the whole 

895: region $Q^2=1\div 10$ GeV$^2$  

896: it should in principle be possible to constrain/fit the nonasymptotic

897: part of $\varphi_\pi(u)$ determined  by the coefficients 

898: $a_n$ in the expansion over Gegenbauer polynomials (see App.~\ref{AppB}).

899: Taking into account the complete expansion one obtains

900: \be

901: F_\pi(Q^2)= [F_\pi(Q^2)]_{as} + 

902: \sum\limits_{n=1}^{\infty}a_{2n}(\mu_0)f_{2n}(Q^2,\mu,\mu_0)\,,

903: \label{fit}

904: \ee

905: where the first term on the r.h.s. is the form factor calculated 

906: with the asymptotic DA and in the sum each $a_{2n}$ is 

907: multiplied by a calculable function:

908: \be

909: f_{2n}(Q^2,\mu,\mu_0)=

910: 6\left(\frac{\alpha_s(\mu)}{\alpha_s(\mu_0)}\right)^{-\gamma_n^{(0)}/\beta_0}

911: \int_{u_0^\pi}^1du~u \bar u C_{2n}^{3/2}(u - \bar u)

912: \exp\left( -\frac{\bar{u}Q^2}{uM^2}\right)+...\,.

913: \label{fn}

914: \ee

915: In the above, $\mu_0\sim $ 1 GeV is a certain low scale, 

916: and  the anomalous dimensions $\gamma_n$ of

917: the renormalization factors are given in Appendix \ref{AppB}.

918: For brevity, the $O(\alpha_s)$-correction to Eq.~(\ref{fn})

919: is denoted by ellipses. 

920: 

921: A direct fit of all $a_n$ from Eq.~(\ref{fit}) is of course not 

922: a realistic task. In fact, using the arguments of the conformal partial

923: wave expansion, one expects that the coefficients are decreasing 

924: with $n$, $a_{2n+2}<a_{2n}$. Based on these arguments, 

925: the form of $\varphi_\pi(u)$ usually  discussed in the literature involves

926: one ($a_2$) or two ($a_2,a_4$) nonzero coefficients neglecting the rest. 

927: Having adopted a certain simple ansatz for $\varphi_\pi(u)$ one 

928: is then able to constrain or even fit the coefficients from

929: Eq.~(\ref{fit}). However, the current data \cite{Volmer} are sufficient to 

930: constrain only the simplest ansatz with a single nonzero coefficient

931: $a_2$. This can be seen from Fig.~\ref{fig4}

932: where $f_2$ and $f_4$ in Eq.~(\ref{fn}) are plotted

933: in comparison with $F_\pi^{as}$. Due to 

934: different signs of $f_2$ and $f_4$ at $Q^2\leq 3$ GeV$^2$ 

935: it is difficult to distinguish the form of $\varphi_\pi$

936: with $a_2\neq 0$ from the one where both $a_2,a_4\neq 0$. 

937: E.g. one obtains equally good fits to the experimental 

938: data shown in Fig.~(\ref{fig3}) 

939: with $a_2(1\mbox{GeV})=0.05$, $a_4(1\mbox{GeV})=-0.30$ 

940: as with $a_2(1\mbox{GeV}) = 0.25, a_4(1\mbox{GeV}) = 0$.  

941: If we impose that all $a_{n> 2}=0$ in Eq.~(\ref{fit})

942: the coefficient $a_2$ can be fitted to the following 

943: interval consistent with zero:

944: \be

945: a_2(1\mbox{GeV})=0.24 \pm 0.14  \pm 0.08\,,  

946: \ee

947: where the first error reflects our estimated theoretical

948: uncertainty whereas the second one corresponds to the experimental errors.

949: One needs data at larger $Q^2$ to resolve more complicated 

950: patterns of nonasymptotic coefficients in $\varphi_\pi$. 

951: 

952: 

953: %%%%%%%%% Figure:a2a4coeff%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

954: \begin{figure}[t]

955: \begin{center}

956: \includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth,angle=0]{fig4FKpi.ps}

957: \end{center}

958: \caption{ {\it Graphical illustration to Eq.(\ref{fit}). 

959: The pion e.m. form factor obtained from LCSR

960: with the asymptotic pion DA (solid line) and 

961: the coefficients at $a_2(1 GeV)$(long-dashed) and $a_4(1 GeV)$ 

962: (short-dashed). }

963: \label{fig4}}

964: \end{figure}

965: 

966: 

967: \section{The kaon electromagnetic form factor }

968: \label{Sect5}

969: 

970: The LCSR for the charged kaon e.m. form factor can be

971: easily obtained from the correlation function (\ref{T1}),

972: substituting  $P=K^+$, $e_1=e_u=+2/3$, 

973: $e_2= e_s=-1/3$, $m_{q_1}=0$, $m_{q_2}=m_s$.

974: We will systematically retain all $O(m_s) \sim O(m_K^2)$ 

975: effects which are numerous, in general. At the 

976: purely kinematical level one has to account for 

977: $p^2=m_K^2$ in the 

978: correlation function. Furthermore, the s-quark propagator

979: produces a chirally non-invariant part proportional to 

980: $m_s$ which brings the twist 3 contribution into the 

981: game (the $m_s^2$  in the denominator of the quark propagator

982: is neglected, being a higher-order effect). Finally, in the 

983: light-cone DA there are 

984: SU(3)-flavour symmetry ($SU(3)_{fl}$) violating corrections of three

985: types. First, the normalization factors, determining 

986: the quark-antiquark vacuum-to kaon matrix elements 

987: in the local limit $x=0$ differ from the corresponding 

988: factors for the pionic matrix elements, e.g. 

989: $f_K \neq f_\pi$. Secondly, the nonasymptotic parts

990: of the kaon DA are asymmetric with respect 

991: to the interchange of quark and antiquark 

992: fields, with a  larger average momentum fraction of the strange quark. 

993: At the twist 2 level this effect manifests itself

994: in the nonvanishing odd coefficients 

995: of the Gegenbauer expansion (\ref{phipi}):

996: $a_1^K, a_3^K, ... \sim m_s \neq 0 $. 

997: For the higher twist DA the $SU(3)_{fl}$ violating 

998: asymmetries  were not studied 

999: yet, and in our numerical calculation we will 

1000: neglect them. On the other hand, we will take into account 

1001: the so-called meson-mass corrections to the twist 4 DA investigated 

1002: and worked out in Ref.~\cite{Ball}. These

1003: effects include the mixing of nonasymptotic 

1004: parts of twist 2,3 and 4 DA beyond the chiral limit. 

1005: The corresponding expressions are presented in App.~\ref{AppB}.     

1006: 

1007: Apart from $SU(3)_{fl}$ violating corrections listed above 

1008: the derivation of the LCSR for the 

1009: kaon e.m. form factor repeats the procedure for the pion

1010: outlined in the previous section.

1011: The result reads:

1012: \be

1013: F_K(Q^2)=F_K^{(2)}(Q^2)+ F_K^{(2,\alpha_s)}(Q^2)

1014: + F_K^{(3)}(Q^2) + F_K^{(4)}(Q^2)+F_K^{(6)}(Q^2)\,,

1015: \label{contribK}

1016: \ee

1017: where the twist 2 contribution is  

1018: \be

1019: F_K^{(2)}(Q^2)=\int\limits _{u_0^K}^1du~\left( \frac23 \varphi_K(u,\mu)+

1020: \frac13 \varphi_K(\bar{u},\mu)\right)

1021: \exp\left( -\frac{\bar{u}Q^2}{uM^2}+\frac{um_K^2}{M^2}\right)\,.

1022: \label{LCSRKtw2}

1023: \ee

1024: The DA $\varphi_K(u,\mu)$ is defined as in Eq.~(\ref{varphi}),

1025: with $q_1=u$ and $q_2=s$, so that $\bar{u}$ is the momentum 

1026: fraction of the $s$ quark. In the above, the lower limit  

1027: $u_0^K$ is related to the duality threshold

1028: in the kaon channel $s_0^K$  by the equation 

1029: $s_0^K=\bar{u}_0^K(Q^2/u_0^K+m_K^2)$ which should be solved

1030: with $O(m_K^2)$ accuracy.

1031: The $O(\alpha_s)$ correction to the twist 2 contribution 

1032: has been calculated in Ref.~\cite{BKM} 

1033: in the chiral limit. To obtain $F_K^{(2,\alpha_s)}$

1034: we replace $\varphi_\pi$ by $\varphi_K$

1035: in the expression for $F_\pi^{(2,\alpha_s)}$ 

1036: given in App.~\ref{AppC}. In addition, there are $SU(3)_{fl}$ 

1037: violating corrections in the hard amplitude. 

1038: Note that the first-order in $m_s$ 

1039: corrections are absent due to chirality. 

1040: Nevertheless, indirectly,  $O(m_s)$  contributions 

1041: will appear due to purely kinematical terms $O(p^2=m_K^2)$. 

1042: To obtain these terms one has to recalculate the 

1043: $O(\alpha_s)$ diagrams retaining $p^2 \neq 0$, which 

1044: is beyond the task of this paper. 

1045: 

1046: The twist 3 and 4 terms in Eq.~(\ref{contribK})

1047: can be cast in the same form

1048: as the twist 4 contribution to the pion form factor:  

1049: \ba

1050: F_K^{(3,4)}(Q^2)= \int\limits ^1_{u_0^K}du 

1051: \frac{\varphi^{(3,4)}_K(u,\mu)}{uM^2}

1052: \exp\left( -\frac{\bar{u}Q^2}{uM^2} +\frac{u m_K^2}{M^2}\right) 

1053: \nonumber

1054: \\

1055: + \left(\frac1{Q^2+s_0^K}+\frac{(Q^2-s_0^K)m_K^2}{

1056: (Q^2+s_0^K)^3} \right)\varphi^{(3,4)}_K (u_0^K,\mu)

1057: e^{-s_0^K/M^2 +m_K^2/M^2}\,,

1058: \label{tw4resK}

1059: \ea

1060: where  

1061: \be

1062: \varphi^{(3)}_K(u,\mu)= \frac{2 m_s f_{3K}}{3f_Ku} 

1063: \int\limits^{u}{\cal D}\alpha_i \varphi_{3K}(\alpha_i)

1064: \label{phiK3}

1065: \ee

1066: and 

1067: \ba

1068: \varphi^{(4)}_K(u,\mu)= 

1069: -\frac{1}3\Bigg(4\left[2g_{1K}(u)+g_{1K}(\bar{u})\right]

1070: -4\left[2G_{2K}(u)+G_{2K}(\bar{u})\right]-

1071: 2u\left[2g_{2K}(u)-g_{2K}(\bar{u})\right]

1072: \nonumber

1073: \\

1074: +\int\limits^{u}{\cal D}\alpha_i

1075: \Bigg[(1-2v)\left(2[2\varphi_{\perp K}(\alpha_i)-

1076: \varphi_{\perp K}(\bar{\alpha_i})]

1077: +\left[2\varphi_{\parallel K}(\alpha_i)-\varphi_{\parallel K}(\bar{\alpha_i})\right] \right)

1078: \nonumber

1079: \\

1080: \!\!\!\!\!-2\left[2\widetilde{\varphi}_{\perp K}(\alpha_i)+

1081: \widetilde{\varphi}_{\perp K}(\bar{\alpha}_i)\right]\!-\!

1082: \left[2\widetilde{\varphi}_{\parallel K}(\alpha_i)

1083: +\widetilde{\varphi}_{\parallel K}(\bar{\alpha}_i)\right]\!\Bigg]\Bigg).

1084: \ea

1085: In the surface term in Eq.~(\ref{tw4resK})

1086: only $O(m_K^2)$ terms are

1087: taken into account in accordance with our approximation.

1088: Since the twist 3 contribution to the correlation function 

1089: is proportional to $m_s$ it is  consistent to use 

1090: the $SU(3)_{fl}$ limit of the twist 3 DA, in particular 

1091: $\varphi_{3K}=\varphi_{3\pi}$ in Eq.~(\ref{phiK3}).  

1092: Finally, for simplicity we adopt $SU(3)_{fl}$ limit for the 

1093: numerically small twist 6 factorizable term.

1094: 

1095: In Fig.~\ref{fig5}  we plot the kaon e.m. form factor calculated

1096: with the following choice of parameters:

1097: 

1098: a) the twist 2 DA 

1099: is taken with $a_1^K(\!\mbox{1 GeV})=-0.17$ (as estimated 

1100: from the 2-point sum rule in Ref.~\cite{CZ84}) and neglecting all 

1101: higher Gegenbauer coefficients (in particular $a_2^K=0$), 

1102: that is, maximally close to the asymptotic regime; 

1103: 

1104: b) $s_0^K=1.2$ GeV$^2$ is determined from the two-point 

1105: QCD sum rules for $f_K$ \cite{Pivovarov}. Importantly,

1106: $s_0^K$ is larger than $s_0^\pi$ reflecting

1107: heavier states in the kaon channel; 

1108: 

1109: c) for the strange quark mass we adopt  an interval $m_s(1 \mbox{GeV})=150 \pm 50$ 

1110: MeV; 

1111: 

1112: d) the parameters of twist 3,4 kaon DA taken in 

1113: the $SU(3)_{fl}$ limit\footnote{ As noted above 

1114: this is only consistent for the 

1115: twist 3 part of the sum rule. The accuracy of the 

1116: twist 4 part can be improved further if one determines the 

1117: nonperturbative parameters entering the kaon twist 3,4 DA

1118: from the corresponding two-point sum rules in the kaon channel 

1119: taking into account $SU(3)_{fl}$ violation, a task for future work.}:

1120: $f_{3K}(1 \mbox{GeV})=f_{3\pi}(1 \mbox{GeV})=0.0035$ GeV$^2$, 

1121: $\delta^2_K(1 \mbox{GeV})=\delta^2_\pi(1 \mbox{GeV})=0.17 \pm 0.05$

1122: GeV$^2$ (see Eq.~(\ref{delta})), $\omega_{3K}(1 \mbox{GeV})= 

1123: \omega_{3\pi}(1 \mbox{GeV})=-2.88$,

1124: $\epsilon_{4K}(1 \mbox{GeV})=\epsilon_{\pi}(1 \mbox{GeV})=0.5$ 

1125: \cite{BF,Ball}. The typical accuracy of all parameters except

1126: $\delta_\pi^2$ is about 50\%. We also use $f_K = 1.22 f_\pi$.

1127: %%%%%%%%% Figure:Kformf%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1128: \begin{figure}[t]

1129: \begin{center}

1130: \includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth,angle=0]{fig5FKpi.ps}

1131: \end{center}

1132: \caption{ {\it  

1133: The  LCSR prediction for the 

1134: charged kaon  e.m. form factor $F_K(Q^2)$ 

1135: (solid line) in comparison with the pion 

1136: form factor obtained

1137: with the asymptotic pion DA (dashed line) 

1138: at $M^2= 1$ GeV $^2$. }

1139: \label{fig5}}

1140: \end{figure}

1141: 

1142: Comparing the LCSR prediction for the  pion and kaon form factors 

1143: calculated at $M^2=1$ GeV$^2$ 

1144: we observe a noticeable $SU(3)_{fl}$ violating difference.

1145: The ratio $F_K(Q^2)/F_\pi(Q^2)$ approaches 1.5 at $Q^2\sim10$ GeV$^2$.

1146: A closer look at Eq.~(\ref{LCSRKtw2})

1147: reveals that this difference 

1148: originates from an interplay of two opposite effects. The  

1149: $SU(3)_{fl}$ asymmetry due to $a_1\neq 0 $ in $\varphi_K(u)$ 

1150: tends to suppress the kaon 

1151: form factor because in the larger contribution (corresponding to the 

1152: u-quark interacting with the virtual photon)

1153: $\varphi_K(u)<\varphi_\pi(u)$ in the end-point integration region $u_0^K< u< 1$. 

1154: On the other hand, the fact that the duality threshold for the kaon is higher, 

1155: $s_{0K}>s_{0\pi}$, implies that 

1156: the end-point region for the kaon form factor is itself larger, thereby

1157: increasing $F_K$. Numerically, the latter effect 

1158: turns out to be more important. Interestingly, the twist 3 contribution 

1159: which is entirely an $SU(3)_{fl}$ violating effect is 

1160: negligibly small, so that the $m_s$ uncertainty is unimportant. 

1161: Note that in the ratio of kaon and pion form factors   

1162: some theoretical uncertainties (e.g., due to $M^2$- and

1163: scale-dependence) cancel leaving 

1164: the major uncertainty in the Gegenbauer coefficient $a_1$. The unaccounted $SU(3)_{fl}$ 

1165: violating effects in higher twists can presumably be neglected

1166: within the present accuracy. If the kaon e.m. form factor is measured

1167: one would then be able to constrain/fit $a_1$. 

1168: 

1169: Our final comment in this section concerns

1170: the neutral kaon e.m. form factor. It can be easily 

1171: calculated from the same LCSR (\ref{contribK})

1172: if one replaces $u$-quark by $d$-quark in the initial correlation

1173: function, having in mind that DA of $K^0$ and $K^+$ are equal due to

1174: isospin symmetry. In particular, the leading twist 2 

1175: contribution is obtained replacing the u-quark charge 

1176: 2/3 in Eq.~(\ref{LCSRKtw2}) by the d-quark charge -1/3. As a result

1177: $F_{K^0}(Q^2)$ is a pure $SU(3)_{fl}$ violating effect proportional to the integral 

1178: over the difference $\varphi_K(u)-\varphi_K(\bar{u})$. 

1179: The numerical result is small : 

1180: $Q^2F_{K^0}(Q^2)= 0.05-0.09$ GeV$^2$, (at $1< Q^2<10$ GeV$^2$) implying that 

1181: the measurement of this form factor is a difficult task. 

1182:  

1183: We conclude that the LCSR method allows to systematically account  for

1184: $SU(3)_{fl}$ breaking effects in the kaon form factors, and that 

1185: these effects revealed by the ratio 

1186: of $K^+$ and $\pi^+$ form factors are predicted to be quite noticeable.

1187: 

1188: 

1189: \section{The $K\to \pi$ form factor}  

1190: \label{Sect6}

1191: 

1192: As a final application of LCSR in this paper we consider 

1193: the $K\to \pi$ form factor

1194: $f^+_{K\pi}$ defined as 

1195: \be

1196: \langle \pi^-(p-q) \mid \bar{s}\gamma_\mu 

1197: u \mid K^0(p)\rangle =2f^+_{K\pi}(q^2) p_\mu -

1198: (f^+_{K\pi}(q^2) - f^-_{K\pi}(q^2))q_\mu  \,.

1199: \ee

1200: As explained in Sect.~2 this form factor can  

1201: be calculated from the correlation 

1202: function (\ref{2:cor}) in two different ways, either 

1203: from the vacuum-to-pion or from the vacuum-to-kaon 

1204: correlation functions.

1205: Both calculations are  valid only at 

1206: sufficiently large  spacelike momentum

1207: transfer $Q^2\geq $ 1 GeV$^2$, whereas 

1208: the  form factor $f^+_{K\pi} $ is measurable only 

1209: at timelike momenta where the LCSR method is not applicable, 

1210: e.g., at $0 < q^2 < (m_K-m_\pi)^2$ 

1211: in the $K_{e3}$ decays, or at 

1212: $(m_K+m_\pi)^2 < q^2 <m_\tau^2$ in $\tau \to K\pi \nu$ 

1213: decays.

1214: 

1215: Nevertheless, one is able to use the fact that 

1216: LCSR obtained for two different settings yield 

1217: one and the same physical parameter and derive 

1218: useful constraints on the light-cone DA of the pion 

1219: and kaon involved in both sum rules. To explain

1220: the idea we explicitly write down the LCSR

1221: obtained from the vacuum-to-pion correlator:

1222: \be

1223: f_{K\pi}^+(Q^2)=\frac{f_\pi}{f_K}\int_{u_0^K}^1

1224: du~\varphi_\pi(u,\mu)\exp\left( 

1225: -\frac{\bar{u}Q^2}{uM^2}+\frac{m_K^2}{M^2}\right) + ...\,.

1226: \label{LCSRKpi1}

1227: \ee

1228: Using instead the vacuum-to-kaon correlator, one gets 

1229: \be

1230: f_{K\pi}^+(Q^2)=\frac{f_K}{f_\pi}\int_{u_0^\pi}^1

1231: du~\varphi_K(\bar{u},\mu)

1232: \exp\left( -\frac{\bar{u}Q^2}{uM^2}-\frac{\bar{u}m_K^2}{M^2}\right)+...

1233: \,,

1234: \label{LCSRKpi2}

1235: \ee

1236: In the region $1<Q^2 < 3$  GeV$^2$ and at $M^2\sim 1 $ GeV$^2$ 

1237: both sum rules are valid and the higher twist 

1238: and $O(\alpha_s)$ contributions denoted by ellipses

1239: are small, so that we may neglect them for the sake of simplicity.

1240: Equating (\ref{LCSRKpi1}) and (\ref{LCSRKpi2})

1241: in this region one may constrain the nonasymptotic

1242: coefficients. In particular, the rate of $SU(3)_{fl}$

1243: breaking  asymmetry in the kaon DA $\varphi_K$ can be estimated if 

1244: the pion DA $\varphi_\pi$ is determined with a sufficient accuracy.

1245: 

1246: As a numerical illustration, in Fig.\ref{fig6}

1247: we compare the r.h.s. of Eqs.~(\ref{LCSRKpi1})

1248: and (\ref{LCSRKpi2}) calculated respectively 

1249: with the asymptotic pion DA 

1250: and with the kaon DA adopted in our calculation of $F_K$

1251: in the previous section,

1252: that is with $a_1(1 \mbox{GeV})=-0.17$ and all $a_{n>1}=0$.

1253: The resulting agreement of two different sum rules 

1254: is nontrivial and ensures confidence in the whole procedure 

1255: and especially in the choice of duality thresholds in both pion and 

1256: kaon channels. Note that the agreement is violated if we put $a_1=0$.

1257: 

1258: 

1259: %%%%%%%%% Figure:Kpiformf%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

1260: \begin{figure}[t]

1261: \begin{center}

1262: \includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth,angle=0]{fig6FKpi.ps}

1263: \end{center}

1264: \caption{ {\it  

1265: The $K\to \pi$ form factor at spacelike region 

1266: calculated with twist 2 accuracy:

1267: from Eq.~(\ref{LCSRKpi1}) with the asymptotic

1268: pion DA (solid) and  from Eq.~(\ref{LCSRKpi2})

1269: with the kaon DA including the $SU(3)_{fl}$ 

1270: violating correction  $\sim a_1$ (dashed) and 

1271: at $a_1=0$ (dash-dotted).}

1272: \label{fig6}}

1273: \end{figure}

1274: 

1275: 

1276: \section{Conclusions} 

1277: \label{Conclusions}

1278: 

1279: In this paper, we have studied 

1280: the correlation functions of light-quark currents used 

1281: to derive the LCSR for the pion and kaon form factors.

1282: We have demonstrated that the Ward identities

1283: for these correlators yield relations between DA of twist 4, 

1284: a new alternative to using the QCD equation of motions.

1285: On the phenomenological side, we have corrected

1286: the expression for the twist 4 contribution to the LCSR for the pion 

1287: form factor. The form factor calculated 

1288: with the purely asymptotic pion DA is generally consistent 

1289: with the recent Jefferson Lab data. On the other hand, 

1290: constraining the nonasymptotic part of the pion twist 2 DA in terms

1291: of separate Gegenbauer coefficients 

1292: demands more data at intermediate momentum transfers, $1 <Q^2 <10$ GeV$^2$

1293: and largely depends on the particular ansatz adopted for this DA. 

1294: A recent study of a similar problem for the 

1295: $\gamma^* \gamma ^* \to \pi^0$ form factor  can be found in 

1296: Ref.~\cite{Diehletal}.

1297: 

1298: We have presented the first LCSR prediction

1299: for the kaon e.m. form factor and demonstrated

1300: that within the sum rule approach the $SU(3)_{fl}$ violating difference between kaon

1301: and pion form factors is systematically calculable in powers of the strange quark mass. 

1302: It has been shown that a useful complementary information

1303: concerning the kaon DA can be obtained  

1304: from the comparison of two independent sum rules for the 

1305: $K \to \pi$ form factor. In general, our results support the point of view that 

1306: LCSR for the pion and kaon form factors combined with sufficiently precise 

1307: data on these form factors represent a very useful tool 

1308: for probing the pion and kaon light-cone

1309: distribution amplitudes.

1310: 

1311: 

1312: \section*{Acknowledgments}

1313: 

1314: The authors thank Patricia Ball, Vladimir Braun and Johann K\"uhn 

1315: for useful 

1316: discussions and comments. The work of A.K. is supported 

1317: by BMBF (Bundesministerium

1318: f\"ur Bildung und Forsching). He also

1319: acknowledges the support of STINT (Swedish Foundation

1320: for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education) 

1321: during his visit to the Lund University where this project was 

1322: initiated. The work of JB is supported by the Swedish Research Council

1323: and by TMR, EC--Contract No.

1324: ERBFMRX--CT980169 (EURODAPHNE)

1325: 

1326: 

1327: 

1328: %\section*{Appendix A}

1329: %\app

1330: \appendix

1331: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\Alph{section}\arabic{equation}}

1332: \section{Light-cone expansion of the quark propagator}

1333: \setcounter{equation}{0}

1334: \label{AppA}

1335: 

1336: The expansion of the quark propagator with a nonzero mass 

1337: $m$ near the light-cone $(x_1-x_2)^2=0$ reads 

1338: (see e.g. Ref.~\cite{BBKR}): 

1339: \ba

1340: S(x_1,x_2,m)&&\equiv -i\langle 0 | T \{q(x_1)\bar{q}(x_2)\}| 0 \rangle

1341: \nonumber

1342: \\

1343: &&=\int\frac{d^4k}{(2\pi)^4}e^{-ik(x_1-x_2)}\Bigg\{

1344: \frac{\not\!k +m}{k^2-m^2}

1345: %\nonumber

1346: %\\

1347: %&&

1348: -\int\limits_0^1 dv\, G^{\mu\nu}(vx_1+(1-v)x_2)

1349: \nonumber

1350: \\

1351: &&

1352: \times \Big[ \frac12 \frac {\not\!k +m}{(k^2-m^2)^2}\sigma_{\mu\nu} -

1353: \frac1{k^2-m^2}v(x_1-x_2)_\mu \gamma_\nu \Big]\Bigg\}\,, 

1354: \ea

1355: with $G^{\mu\nu}= g_sG_{\mu\nu}^a(\lambda^a/2)$, 

1356: $\mbox{Tr}(\lambda^a\lambda^b)=2\delta^{ab}$. 

1357: At $m=0$, after  the integration over $k$ this expression

1358: reduces to the propagator 

1359: derived in Ref.~\cite{BB8889}, (see also Ref.~\cite{BKM}): 

1360: \ba

1361: S(x_1,x_2,0)

1362: =\frac{\not\!x_1-\not\!x_2}{2\pi^2[(x_1-x_2)^{2}]^2}  

1363: -\frac{1}{16\pi^2(x_1-x_2)^2}

1364: \int\limits_0^1 dv\, G^{\mu\nu}(vx_1+(1-v)x_2)

1365: \nonumber

1366: \\

1367: \times \Big[(\not\!x_1-\not\!x_2)\sigma_{\mu \nu} -4iv(x_1-x_2)_\mu

1368: \gamma_\nu\Big]\,.

1369: \ea

1370: 

1371: 

1372: 

1373: %\appende

1374: %\appende

1375: 

1376: %\section*{Appendix B}

1377: %\app

1378: \section{Light-cone distribution amplitudes}

1379: \setcounter{equation}{0}

1380: \label{AppB}

1381: 

1382: 

1383: The light-cone DA 

1384: of the pseudoscalar meson $P=\pi,K$ are defined according to 

1385: Refs.~\cite{BF,Ball}. The 

1386: matrix element of the axial-vector bilocal operator  

1387: is expanded around the light-cone ($x_1^2=x_2^2=(x_1-x_2)^2=0$): 

1388: %

1389: %

1390: \begin{eqnarray}

1391: \langle 0| \bar{q}_2(x_2) \gamma_{\mu} \gamma_5 q_1(x_1) | P(p) \rangle 

1392: &=& f_P \int\limits_0^1 du e^{-iupx_1-i\bar{u}px_2}\Big\{

1393: i p_{\mu} \left(\varphi_{P}(u) + (x_1-x_2)^2 g_{1P}(u) \right)

1394: \nonumber \\

1395: && +\left((x_{1} -x_{2})_\mu- 

1396: \frac{p_{\mu}(x_1-x_2)^2}{p(x_1-x_2)}\right)g_{2P}(u)\Big\} \,,

1397: \label{varphi}

1398: \end{eqnarray}

1399: %

1400: %

1401: retaining the leading twist 2 DA  $\varphi_P(u)$ and 

1402: the twist~4 DA $g_{1P}(u)$ and $g_{2P}(u)$,

1403: where  $u$ is the light-cone momentum fraction of the quark $q_1$.

1404: From the local limit  of Eq.~(\ref{varphi})

1405: one has the following normalization conditions:

1406: \be

1407: \int_0^1 du \,\varphi_P(u) =1\,,~~~~

1408: \int_0^1 du \,g_{2P}(u)=0\,.

1409: \ee

1410: The twist~3 quark-antiquark DA $\varphi_{p P}$ and 

1411: $\varphi_{\sigma P}$

1412: and the quark-antiquark-gluon DA $\varphi_{3P}$ are defined as follows:

1413: \begin{eqnarray}

1414: \langle 0|\bar{q}_2(x_2) i\gamma_5 q_1(x_1)|P(p)\rangle\!\! &=&\!\! 

1415: f_P \mu_P\!\int\limits_0^1 \!du\, e^{-iupx_1-i\bar{u}px_2} \varphi_{p

1416:   P}(u)\;,

1417: \nonumber \\

1418: \langle 0|\bar{q}_2(x_2) \sigma_{\alpha\beta}\gamma_5 q_1(x_1)|P(p)\rangle 

1419: \!\!&=&\!\! \frac{i f_P \mu_P}{6}\left(

1420: 1-\frac{m_P^2}{\mu_P^2}\right)

1421: \Big[p_\alpha (x_1-x_2)_\beta\! -\! 

1422: p_\beta (x_1 - x_2)_\alpha\Big]

1423: \nonumber \\

1424: \times\int\limits_0^1\! du\, e^{-iupx_1-i\bar{u}px_2} 

1425: \varphi_{\sigma P}(u)\;,

1426: \end{eqnarray}

1427: where $\mu_P = m_P^2/(m_{q_1}+m_{q_2})$, and 

1428: \ba 

1429: &&\langle 0 |\bar{q}_2(x_2)

1430: \sigma_{\mu\nu}\gamma_5 G_{\alpha\beta}(vx_1 +\bar{v}x_2) q_1(x_1)

1431: | P(p) \rangle 

1432: =if_{3P}\Big[(p_\alpha p_\mu g_{\beta\nu}-p_\beta p_\mu g_{\alpha\nu})

1433: \nonumber\\

1434: &&-(p_\alpha p_\nu g_{\beta\mu}-p_\beta p_\nu g_{\alpha\mu})\Big]

1435: \int{\cal D}\alpha_i\,\varphi_{3P}(\alpha_i,\mu)

1436: e^{-i\alpha_1px_1-i\alpha_2 px_2 -i\alpha_3(vpx_1+\bar{v}px_2)}\,,

1437: \label{tw3matr}

1438: \ea

1439: all these DA being normalized to unity.

1440: Furthermore, the  quark-antiquark-gluon twist~4 DA are defined by 

1441: the following matrix elements:

1442: %

1443: %

1444: \begin{eqnarray}

1445: &&\langle 0| \bar{q}_2(x_2)\gamma_\mu \gamma_5 G_{\alpha\beta}(vx_1+\bar{v}x_2)

1446: q_1(x_1) |P(p)\rangle = f_P \int\! {\cal D}\alpha_i  

1447: e^{-i\alpha_1 px_1-i\alpha_2px_2 -i\alpha_3(vpx_1+\bar{v}px_2)}

1448: \nonumber

1449: \\

1450: &&\times \Big\{ p_\mu \frac{p_\alpha (x_1-x_2)_\beta-p_\beta

1451: (x_1-x_2)_\alpha}{p(x_1-x_2)}\varphi_{\parallel P}(\alpha_i) 

1452: %\nonumber \\

1453: + ( g^\perp_{\mu\alpha}p_\beta  - g^\perp_{\mu\beta}p_\alpha)

1454: \varphi_{\perp P}(\alpha_i)\Big\}\,, 

1455: \label{tw431}

1456: \end{eqnarray}

1457: %

1458: \begin{eqnarray}

1459: &&\langle 0| \bar{q}_2(x_2)\gamma_\mu i\widetilde{G}_{\alpha\beta}(vx_1+\bar{v}x_2)

1460: q_1(x_1) |P(p)\rangle = f_P \int\! {\cal D}\alpha_i  

1461: e^{-i\alpha_1 px_1-i\alpha_2px_2 -i\alpha_3(vpx_1+\bar{v}px_2)}

1462: \nonumber

1463: \\

1464: &&\times \Big\{ p_\mu \frac{p_\alpha (x_1-x_2)_\beta-p_\beta

1465: (x_1-x_2)_\alpha}{p(x_1-x_2)}\widetilde{\varphi}_{\parallel P}(\alpha_i) 

1466: %\nonumber \\

1467: + ( g^\perp_{\mu\alpha}p_\beta  - g^\perp_{\mu\beta}p_\alpha)

1468: \widetilde{\varphi}_{\perp P}(\alpha_i)\Big\}\,, 

1469: \label{tw432}

1470: \end{eqnarray}

1471: where $\widetilde G_{\alpha\beta}= \frac 12 \epsilon_{\alpha\beta\rho\lambda}

1472: G^{\rho\lambda}$ and the following  abbreviations are used: 

1473: $${\cal D} \alpha_i = d\alpha_1d\alpha_2d\alpha_3

1474: \delta \left(1\!-\! \alpha_1\! -\! \alpha_2 \!-\! \alpha_3 \right)

1475: ~~\mbox{and}~~ 

1476: g_{\alpha\beta}^\perp = g_{\alpha\beta} - 

1477: \frac{(x_1-x_2)_\alpha p_\beta + (x_1-x_2)_\beta p_\alpha}{p(x_1-x_2)} ~\,.

1478: $$

1479: 

1480: The distribution amplitudes are constructed \cite{BF}

1481: using the formalism of the conformal expansion. The most familiar example is  

1482: the  twist 2 DA \cite{exclusive}

1483: %

1484: %

1485: \begin{equation}

1486: \varphi_P(u,\mu ) = 6 u \bar u \left[ 1 + 

1487: \sum_{n=1}a_{n}^P(\mu) C_{n}^{3/2}(u - \bar u) \right],

1488: \label{phipi}

1489: \end{equation}

1490: %

1491: %

1492: where the  expansion 

1493: goes in Gegenbauer polynomials $~C_{n}^{3/2}$, 

1494: the first four polynomials being

1495: %

1496: %

1497: \begin{eqnarray}

1498: C_1^{3/2}(x) &=& 3x\,,~~~

1499: %\nonumber \\

1500: C_2^{3/2}(x) = -\frac{3}{2}(1-5 x^2)\,,

1501: \nonumber \\

1502: C_3^{3/2}(x) &=& -\frac{5}{2}x(3 -7x)\,,~~~

1503: %\nonumber \\

1504: C_4^{3/2}(x) = \frac{15}{8}(1-14x^2+ 21x^4)\,.

1505: \end{eqnarray}

1506: %

1507: %

1508: The scale-dependence is given in the leading order  by

1509: \begin{equation} 

1510: a_n^{P}(\mu_2)=\left[L(\mu_2,\mu_1)\right]^{-\gamma_n^{(0)}/\beta_0}

1511: a_n^{P}(\mu_1)~,

1512: \label{anom}

1513: \end{equation}

1514: where $L(\mu_2,\mu_1)=\alpha_s(\mu_2)/\alpha_s(\mu_1)$, 

1515: $\beta_0=11- \frac23 N_F$ and the anomalous dimensions are

1516: \begin{equation}

1517: \gamma_{n}^{(0)}=C_F\left[3 +\frac{2}{(n+1)(n+2)}-4\left(\sum_{k=1}^{n+1}

1518: \frac1k\right)\right]\,.

1519: \label{gamman}

1520: \end{equation}

1521: For the pion, 

1522: the coefficients $a_n^\pi$ vanish at odd $n$ in the isospin 

1523: symmetry limit.

1524: 

1525: The twist 3 and ~4 DA have been derived in Ref.~\cite{BF}

1526: using QCD equations of motion and conformal expansion.

1527: In Ref.~\cite{Ball} the meson mass correction have 

1528: been worked out. We present here the explicit 

1529: expression for these DA to next-to-leading 

1530: accuracy in the conformal spin, including the meson mass 

1531: corrections

1532: (as explained in more detail in \cite{BF,Ball}) 

1533: and using the original notations of Ref.~\cite{BF}.

1534: Note that $SU(3)_{fl}$ violating nonasymptotic

1535: corrections to these DA (analogous to $a_1\neq 0$ for $\varphi_K$) 

1536: are still missing and have to be worked out in future.  

1537: 

1538: The twist 3 DA of the pseudoscalar meson, to next-to-leading order in conformal spin read:

1539: %

1540: \ba

1541: \qquad \varphi_{p P}(u)\!\!\!&=& \!\!1+ 

1542: \left(30\frac{f_{3P}}{\mu_P f_P} -\frac{5}2\frac{m_P^2}{\mu_P^2}

1543: \right)C_2^{1/2}(2u-1)

1544: \nonumber 

1545: \\

1546: \!\!\!&&\!\!+

1547: \left(-3\frac{f_{3P}\omega_{3P}}{\mu_P f_P} -\frac{27}{20}\frac{m_P^2}{\mu_P^2}(1+6a_2^P)

1548: \right)C_4^{1/2}(2u-1)\,,

1549: \\

1550: \qquad \varphi_{\sigma P}(u)\!\!\! &=& \!\!6u\bar u 

1551: \Bigg\{1\!+\!\Big(5\frac{f_{3P}}{\mu_P f_P}(1\!-\!\frac1{10}\omega_{3P}) 

1552: %\nonumber

1553: %\\

1554: -\frac{7}{20}\frac{m_P^2}{\mu_P^2}(1\!+\!\frac{12}{7}a_2^P)\Big)

1555: C_2^{3/2}(2u\!-\!1)\!\Bigg\},

1556: \\

1557: \varphi_{3P}(\alpha_i)\!\!\!&=&\!\! 360\alpha_1 \alpha_2\alpha_3^2\left(1+

1558: \frac{\omega_{3P}}{2}(7\alpha_3-3)\right)\,.

1559: \ea

1560: The nonperturbative parameter $f_{3P}$ is given by 

1561: the matrix element which corresponds to the local limit in  Eq.~(\ref{tw3matr}).

1562: The second parameter $\omega_{3P}$ determining the nonasymptotic 

1563: parts of twist 3 DA is defined with the following matrix element

1564: (up to higher twist corrections):

1565: \be

1566: \langle 0 |\bar{q}_2\sigma_{\mu\lambda}\gamma_5

1567: [D_\beta,G_{\alpha\lambda}] q_1-

1568: \frac37 \partial_\beta\bar{q}_2\sigma_{\mu\lambda}\gamma_5

1569: G_{\alpha\lambda} q_1

1570: |P(p)\rangle= \frac{3}{14}f_{3P}\omega_{3P}p_\alpha p_\beta p_\mu\,. 

1571: \ee

1572: The scale dependence of the twist 3 parameters is given by:

1573: \begin{eqnarray}

1574: \mu_{P}(\mu_2) = \left[L(\mu_2,\mu_1)\right]

1575: ^{-\frac{4}{\beta_0}}\mu_{P}(\mu_1)\,,~~~

1576: f_{3P}(\mu_2) = \left[L(\mu_2,\mu_1)\right]^

1577: {\frac{1}{\beta_0}\left(\frac{7 C_F}{3}+N_c\right)}

1578: f_{3P}(\mu_1)\,,

1579: \\

1580: (f_{3P}\omega_{3P})(\mu_2) = 

1581: \left[L(\mu_2,\mu_1)\right]^{\frac{1}{\beta_0}\left(\frac{7 C_F}{6}+\frac{10N_c}{3}\right)}

1582: (f_{3P}\omega_{3P})(\mu_1)\,.

1583: \end{eqnarray}

1584: Finally, the four twist 4 three-particle DA defined in

1585: Eq.~(\ref{tw431}), (\ref{tw432}) are:

1586: \begin{eqnarray}

1587: \!\!\!\varphi_{\parallel P}(\alpha_i)\!\! &=& \!\!\!120(\delta_P^2 \epsilon_P-

1588: \frac{9}{20}a_{2}^Pm_P^2)(\alpha_1-\alpha_2)\alpha_1\alpha_2\alpha_3 \,,

1589: \nonumber \\

1590: \!\!\!\varphi_{\perp P}(\alpha_i)\!\! &=&\!\!\! 30 (\alpha_1-\alpha_2)

1591: \alpha_3^2 \left[\frac{\delta^2_P }{3} +2\delta^2_P \epsilon_P

1592: (1-2\alpha_3)+\frac{9}{40}a_{2}^Pm_P^2(1-\alpha_3)\right] ,

1593: \nonumber \\

1594: \!\!\!\widetilde \varphi_{\parallel P} (\alpha_i) 

1595: \!\!&=&\!\! - 120 \delta_P^2 \alpha_1\alpha_2 \alpha_3

1596: \left[ \frac{1}{3} + \epsilon_P(1-3\alpha_3) \right],

1597: \nonumber \\

1598: \!\!\!\widetilde \varphi_\perp(\alpha_i)\!\! &=&\! \!\!30 \alpha_3^2

1599: \left[\left(\frac{\delta_P^2 }{3} + 

1600: 2 \delta_P^2 \epsilon_P(1-2\alpha_3)\right)\!(1\!-\!\alpha_3)

1601: \!+\!\frac{9}{40}a_2^Pm_P^2

1602: (\alpha_1^2+\alpha_2^2-4\alpha_1\alpha_2)\right]\!,

1603: \label{tw43p}

1604: \end{eqnarray}

1605: normalized as 

1606: \be

1607: \int\! {\cal D}\alpha_i \varphi_{\parallel P}(\alpha_i)=

1608: \int\! {\cal D}\alpha_i \varphi_{\perp P}(\alpha_i)=0\,,

1609: ~~-\!\!\int\! {\cal D}\alpha_i \widetilde\varphi_{\parallel P}(\alpha_i)=

1610: \int\! {\cal D}\alpha_i \widetilde\varphi_{\perp P}(\alpha_i)=

1611: \frac{\delta_P^2}{3}\,.

1612: \ee

1613: The corresponding two-particle DA have the following expressions:

1614: \begin{eqnarray}

1615: g_{1P}(u) =\frac{5}2\delta_P^2u^2\bar{u}^2+

1616: \Bigg\{ \frac{f_{3P}

1617: m_P^2}{4f_P\mu_P }

1618: \Big[30(1-2u\bar{u})-\omega_{3P}\left(3-u\bar{u}(27-56u\bar{u})\right)\Big]

1619: \nonumber

1620: \\

1621: +\frac{m_P^2}{320}\Big[5(25-29u\bar{u})-12a_2^P\Big(1-5u\bar{u}

1622: (19-52u\bar{u})\Big)\Big]\Bigg\}u\bar{u}

1623: \nonumber

1624: \\

1625: +\frac{1}{2}(\delta_P^2\epsilon\!-\!\frac{9}{20}a_2^Pm_P^2)

1626: \Big[ 2u^3(10\!-\!15u\!+\!6u^2)\ln u\! +\!

1627: 2\bar{u}^3(10\!-\!15\bar{u}\!+\!6\bar{u}^2)\ln\bar{u}

1628: \!+\!u\bar{u}(2\!+\!13u\bar{u})\Big]

1629: \label{tw4g1}

1630: \end{eqnarray}

1631: %

1632: %

1633: \begin{eqnarray}

1634: g_{2P}(u)= \Bigg[

1635: \frac{10}{3}\delta^2_P+

1636: m_P^2\left(1+\frac98a_2^P(1\!-\!7u\bar{u})\right)\!-\!

1637: \frac{f_{3P}m_P^2}{f_P\mu_P }\left(10\!-\!\omega_{3P}(1\!-\!7u\bar{u})\right)

1638: \Bigg]\bar u u(u\!-\!\bar u)\,. 

1639: \label{tw4g2}

1640: \end{eqnarray}

1641: The nonperturbative parameter $\delta^2_P$ is defined as 

1642: %

1643: \begin{equation}

1644: \langle 0 |\bar{q}_2\widetilde{G}_{\alpha\mu}\gamma^\alpha q_1

1645: |P(p) \rangle=-i\delta^2_P f_P p_\mu \,,

1646: \label{delta1}

1647: \end{equation}

1648: with the scale-dependence:

1649: \begin{eqnarray}

1650: \delta^2_P(\mu_2) = \left[L(\mu_2,\mu_1)\right]

1651: ^{\frac{8C_F}{3\beta_0}}\delta^2_P(\mu_1)\,,

1652: \end{eqnarray}

1653: whereas the second parameter $\epsilon_P$  

1654: determining the nonasymptotic corrections has the 

1655: following definition in terms of a local matrix element 

1656: (up to twist 5 corrections)\cite{BF,Ball}:

1657: \be

1658: \langle 0 |\bar{q}_2[D_\mu,\widetilde{G}_{\nu\xi}]\gamma^\xi q_1-

1659: \frac49\partial_\mu\bar{q}_2\widetilde{G}_{\nu\xi}\gamma^\xi q_1

1660: |P(p)\rangle= -\frac{8}{21}f_P\delta_P^2\epsilon_P\left(p_\mu 

1661: p_\nu-\frac14m_P^2g_{\mu\nu}\right)\,.

1662: \ee

1663: The corresponding scale dependence is :

1664: \be

1665: (\delta_P^2\epsilon_P)(\mu_2) = 

1666: \left[L(\mu_2,\mu_1)\right]

1667: ^{\frac{10N_c}{3\beta_0}}(\delta^2_P\epsilon_P)(\mu_1)\,.

1668: \ee

1669: 

1670: 

1671: \section{Radiative Corrections to the Twist 2 Pion Form Factor}

1672: \setcounter{equation}{0}

1673: \label{AppC}

1674: 

1675: Here, for completeness, we present the formula for the radiative correction

1676: to the twist 2 part of the sum rule for the pion form factor

1677: obtained in Ref.~\cite{BKM}:  

1678: 

1679: \begin{equation}

1680:  F^{(2,~\alpha_s)}_{\pi}(Q^2) = \int\limits_{0}^1 \!du\, \varphi_{\pi}(u, \mu) 

1681: \Bigg[ \Theta(u-u_0){ \cal F}_{\rm soft}(u,M^2,s_0)+

1682:        \Theta(u_0-u){ \cal F}_{\rm hard}(u,M^2,s_0)\Bigg],

1683: \label{3:NLO}

1684: \end{equation}

1685: %

1686: where

1687: %

1688: %

1689: \begin{eqnarray}

1690: \lefteqn{

1691: {\cal F}_{\rm soft}(u,M^2,s_0)=

1692: }

1693: \nonumber\\ 

1694: &=&\frac{\alpha_s}{4\pi}C_F \Bigg \{

1695: \exp \left( - \frac{\bar uQ^2}{u M^2} \right)

1696: \Bigg[ 

1697: \!-9 + \frac{\pi^2}{3} + 3\ln \frac{Q^2}{\mu^2} 

1698: + 3\ln\frac{\bar u Q^2}{u \mu^2}

1699: -\ln^2 \frac{Q^2}{\mu^2} - \ln^2 \frac{\bar u Q^2}{u \mu^2}\Bigg]

1700: \nonumber \\

1701: && +

1702: \int\limits_{\bar u Q^2/u}^{s_0} \frac{ds\, Q^2 e^{-s/M^2}}{u (Q^2+s)^3}

1703: \Bigg[ 5s +Q^2\left(1+2\ln \frac{-\rho}{\mu^2}\right)

1704: +2\left(\frac{Q^2}{\bar u}+ s \right)\ln \frac{-\rho}{s}

1705: \nonumber \\

1706: && + \frac{2Q^2}{u}\left(\frac{Q^2+s}{s} +\frac{2M^2+Q^2+s}{M^2}

1707: \ln\frac{-\rho}{s} \right)\ln\frac{-\rho}{\mu^2} \Bigg]

1708: \nonumber

1709:  \\

1710: && +  \int\limits_0^{\bar u Q^2/u} \frac{ds\, Q^2 e^{-s/M^2}}{u \bar u (Q^2+s)^3}

1711: \Bigg[ 2u \left(Q^2-s+s\ln\frac{s}{\mu^2}\right)

1712: +\Bigg(-Q^2 + 5s+2(Q^2-s)\ln\frac{s}{\mu^2} 

1713: \nonumber

1714: \\

1715: &&

1716: \!-\frac{s(Q^2+s)}{M^2} \left(-3+2 \ln\frac{s}{\mu^2} \right)\Bigg)

1717: \ln\frac{\rho}{\mu^2}\Bigg] 

1718: + 2\frac{u_0^2}{u^2} e^{-s_0/M^2}

1719: \ln\frac{-\rho_0}{\mu^2}\ln \frac{u-u_0}{\bar u_0}\Bigg\}\,,

1720: \label{3:soft2}

1721: \end{eqnarray}

1722: %

1723: %

1724: and

1725: %

1726: %

1727: \begin{eqnarray}

1728: \lefteqn{{\cal F}_{\rm hard}(u,M^2,s_0) =}

1729: \nonumber\\

1730: &=& \frac{\alpha_s}{4\pi}C_F \Bigg\{

1731: \int\limits_0^{s_0}\frac{ds\, Q^2e^{-s/M^2}}{\bar u(Q^2+s)^3} 

1732: \Bigg[ 2\left(Q^2 -s +s \ln\frac{s}{\mu^2}\right)

1733: +\frac{1}{u }\Bigg(

1734: -Q^2 + 5s+2(Q^2-s)\ln\frac{s}{\mu^2}

1735: \nonumber

1736: \\

1737: &&-\frac{s (Q^2+s)}{M^2}

1738: \left(-3+2 \ln\frac{s}{\mu^2}\right) \Bigg)\ln\frac{\rho}{\mu^2}\Bigg] 

1739: - \frac{u_0\bar u_0}{u \bar u}e^{-s_0/M^2}

1740: \left(2\ln\frac{s_0}{\mu^2}-3\right)

1741: \ln\frac{\rho_0}{\mu^2} \Bigg\}.   

1742: \label{3:hard2}

1743: \end{eqnarray}

1744: %

1745: %

1746: Here $\rho = \bar u Q^2 - us$ and $\rho_0 = \bar u Q^2 - us_0= (1-u/u_0)Q^2$. 

1747: 

1748: 

1749: 

1750: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

1751: 

1752: \bibitem{exclusive}

1753: G.~P.~Lepage and S.~J.~Brodsky,

1754: %``Exclusive Processes In Quantum Chromodynamics: Evolution Equations For

1755: %Hadronic Wave Functions And The Form-Factors Of Mesons,''  

1756:  Phys.\ Lett.\  {\bf 87B} (1979) 359; 

1757: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B87,359;%%

1758: %G.~P.~Lepage and S.~J.~Brodsky,

1759: %``Exclusive Processes In Perturbative Quantum Chromodynamics,''

1760:  Phys.\ Rev.\  {\bf D22} (1980) 2157;\\

1761: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D22,2157;%%

1762: A.~V.~Efremov and A.~V.~Radyushkin,

1763: %``Factorization And Asymptotical Behavior Of Pion Form-Factor In QCD,''

1764: Phys.\ Lett.\  {\bf B94} (1980) 245; 

1765: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B94,245;%%

1766: %A.~V.~Efremov and A.~V.~Radyushkin,

1767: %``Asymptotical Behavior Of Pion Electromagnetic Form-Factor In QCD,''

1768: Theor.\ Math.\ Phys.\  {\bf 42} (1980) 97;\\

1769: %% English version of  Teor.Mat.Fiz.42:147-166,1980 

1770: %%CITATION = TMPHA,42,97;%%

1771: V.~L.~Chernyak and A.~R.~Zhitnitsky,

1772: %``Asymptotic Behavior Of Hadron 

1773: %Form-Factors In Quark Model. (In Russian),''

1774: JETP Lett.\  {\bf 25} (1977) 510; 

1775: %V.~L.~Chernyak and A.~R.~Zhitnitsky,

1776: %``Asymptotics Of Hadronic Form-Factors In The Quantum Chromodynamics. 

1777: %(In Russian),''

1778:  Sov.\ J.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\  {\bf 31} (1980) 544;\\ 

1779: %%CITATION = JTPLA,25,510;%%

1780: %%CITATION = SJNCA,31,544;%%

1781: %\cite{Farrar:1979aw}

1782: %\bibitem{Farrar:1979aw}

1783: G.~R.~Farrar and D.~R.~Jackson,

1784: %``The Pion Form-Factor,''

1785: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 43} (1979) 246.

1786: %%CITATION = PRLTA,43,246;%%

1787: 

1788: 

1789: \bibitem{pQCD}

1790: A.~Szczepaniak, E.~M.~Henley and S.~J.~Brodsky,

1791: %``Perturbative QCD Effects In Heavy Meson Decays,''

1792: Phys.\ Lett.\  {\bf B243} (1990) 287;\\

1793: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B243,287;%%

1794: Y.~Y.~Keum, H.~N.~Li and A.~I.~Sanda,

1795: %``Penguin enhancement and B $\to$ K pi decays in perturbative QCD,''

1796: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63} (2001) 054008;\\

1797: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0004173].

1798: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0004173;%%

1799: C.~D.~Lu, K.~Ukai and M.~Z.~Yang,

1800: %``Branching ratio and CP violation of B $\to$ pi pi decays in perturbative  QCD approach,''

1801: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63} (2001) 074009;\\

1802: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0004213].

1803: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0004213;%%

1804: S.~J.~Brodsky,

1805: %``QCD aspects of exclusive B decays,''

1806: hep-ph/0104153, in *Ise-Shima 2001, B physics and CP violation*, 229-234. 

1807: %CITATION = HEP-PH 0104153;%%

1808: 

1809: \bibitem{BBNS}

1810: M.~Beneke, G.~Buchalla, M.~Neubert and C.~T.~Sachrajda,

1811: %``{QCD} factorization for B $\to$ pi pi decays: Strong phases and CP  violation in the heavy quark limit,''

1812: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 83} (1999) 1914;

1813: %[hep-ph/9905312].

1814: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9905312;%%

1815: %M.~Beneke, G.~Buchalla, M.~Neubert and C.~T.~Sachrajda,

1816: %``QCD factorization in B $\to$ pi K, pi pi decays and extraction of  Wolfenstein parameters,''

1817: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 606} (2001) 245.

1818: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0104110].

1819: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0104110;%%

1820: 

1821: \bibitem{LCSRB}

1822: V.~M.~Belyaev, A.~Khodjamirian and R.~R\"uckl,

1823: %``QCD calculation of the B $\to$ pi, K form-factors,''

1824: Z.\ Phys.\  {\bf C60} (1993) 349;\\

1825: %[hep-ph/9305348].

1826: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9305348;%%

1827: A.~Khodjamirian, R.~R\"uckl, S.~Weinzierl and O.~Yakovlev,

1828: %``Perturbative QCD correction to the B --> pi transition form factor,''

1829: Phys.\ Lett.\  {\bf B410} (1997) 275;\\

1830: %[hep-ph/9706303].

1831: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9706303;%%

1832: E.~Bagan, P.~Ball and V.~M.~Braun,

1833: %``Radiative corrections to the decay B --> pi e nu and 

1834: %the heavy quark limit,''

1835:  Phys.\ Lett.\  {\bf B417} (1998) 154;\\

1836: %[hep-ph/9709243].

1837: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9709243;%%

1838: P.~Ball,

1839: %``B $\to$ pi and B $\to$ K transitions from 

1840: %{QCD} sum rules on the light-cone,''

1841: JHEP {\bf 9809} (1998) 005;\\

1842: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9802394].

1843: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9802394;%%

1844: A.~Khodjamirian,

1845: %``B $\to$ pi pi decay in QCD,''

1846: Nucl.\ Phys.\  {\bf B605} (2001) 558.

1847: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0012271;%%

1848: 

1849: \bibitem{LCSR}

1850: I.~I.~Balitsky, V.~M.~Braun and A.~V.~Kolesnichenko,

1851: %``Radiative Decay Sigma+ $\to$ P Gamma In Quantum Chromodynamics,''

1852: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 312} (1989) 509;\\

1853: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B312,509;%%

1854: V.~M.~Braun and I.~E.~Filyanov,

1855: %``QCD Sum Rules In Exclusive Kinematics And Pion Wave Function,''

1856: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 44} (1989) 157;\\

1857: %[Sov.\ J.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\  {\bf 50} (1989) 511.1989\ YAFIA,50,818].

1858: %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C44,157;%%

1859: V.~L.~Chernyak and I.~R.~Zhitnitsky,

1860: %``B Meson Exclusive Decays Into Baryons,''

1861: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 345} (1990) 137.

1862: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B345,137;%%

1863: 

1864: \bibitem{BH}

1865: V.~Braun and I.~Halperin,

1866: %``Soft Contribution To The Pion Form-Factor From Light Cone QCD Sum Rules,''

1867: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 328} (1994) 457.

1868: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9402270].

1869: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9402270;%%

1870: 

1871: \bibitem{BKM}

1872: V.~M.~Braun, A.~Khodjamirian and M.~Maul,

1873: %``Pion form factor in QCD at intermediate momentum transfers,''

1874: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 61} (2000) 073004.

1875: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9907495].

1876: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9907495;%%

1877: 

1878: \bibitem{AKpi}

1879: A.~Khodjamirian,

1880: %``Form factors of gamma* rho $\to$ pi and gamma* gamma $\to$ pi0 transitions  and light-cone sum rules,''

1881: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 6} (1999) 477.

1882: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9712451].

1883: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9712451;%%

1884: 

1885: \bibitem{CK}

1886: P.~Colangelo and A.~Khodjamirian,

1887: %``QCD sum rules: A modern perspective,''

1888: hep-ph/0010175, in the Boris Ioffe Festschrift

1889: 'At the Frontier of Particle Physics / Handbook of QCD', ed. by

1890: M. Shifman (World Scientific, Singapore, 2001), p. 1495. 

1891: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0010175;%%

1892: 

1893: \bibitem{BF}

1894: V.~M.~Braun and I.~E.~Filyanov,

1895: %``Conformal Invariance And Pion Wave Functions Of Nonleading Twist,''

1896: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 48} (1990) 239.

1897: %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C48,239;%%

1898: 

1899: \bibitem{Ball}

1900: P.~Ball,

1901: %``Theoretical update of pseudoscalar meson distribution amplitudes of 

1902: % higher twist: The nonsinglet case,''

1903: JHEP{\bf 9901} (1999) 010.

1904: %[hep-ph/9812375].

1905: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9812375;%%

1906: 

1907: \bibitem{Belyaev}

1908: V.~M.~Belyaev,

1909: %``Pi - A1 electromagnetic form-factors and light cone QCD sum rules,''

1910: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 65} (1995) 93.

1911: %[hep-ph/9404279].

1912: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9404279;%%

1913: 

1914: \bibitem{SVZ}

1915: M.~A.~Shifman, A.~I.~Vainshtein and V.~I.~Zakharov,

1916: %``QCD And Resonance Physics: Applications,''

1917: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 147} (1979) 385, 448.

1918: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B147,448;%%

1919: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B147,385;%%

1920: 

1921: \bibitem{lowenergy}

1922: J.~Bijnens and P.~Talavera,

1923: %``Pion and kaon electromagnetic form factors,''

1924: JHEP {\bf 0203} (2002) 046;\\

1925: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0203049].

1926: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0203049;%%

1927: P.~Post and K.~Schilcher,

1928: %``K(l3) form factors at order p**6 in chiral perturbation theory,''

1929: hep-ph/0112352;\\

1930: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0112352;%%

1931: J.~Bijnens, G.~Colangelo and P.~Talavera,

1932: %``The vector and scalar form factors of the pion to two loops,''

1933: JHEP {\bf 9805} (1998) 014.

1934: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9805389].

1935: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9805389;%%   

1936: 

1937: 

1938: 

1939: \bibitem{delta}

1940: V.L.~Chernyak, A.R.~Zhitnitsky and I.R.~Zhitnitsky;

1941: Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. {\bf 38} (1983) 645;\\

1942: %%CITATION = SJNCA,38,645;%%

1943: V.A.~Novikov, M.A.~Shifman, A.I.~Vainshtein, M.B.~Voloshin and V.I.~Zakharov,

1944: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B237} (1984) 525.

1945: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B237,525;%%

1946: 

1947: 

1948: 

1949: \bibitem{IofSmil} 

1950: B.~L.~Ioffe and A.~V.~Smilga,

1951: %``Meson Widths And Form-Factors At

1952: %Intermediate Momentum Transfer In Nonperturbative QCD,''

1953: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 216} (1983) 373.

1954: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B216,373;%%

1955: 

1956: 

1957: \bibitem{Rad82}

1958: %\bibitem{Nesterenko:1982gc}

1959: V.~A.~Nesterenko and A.~V.~Radyushkin,

1960: %``Sum Rules And Pion Form-Factor In QCD,''

1961: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 115} (1982) 410.

1962: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B115,410;%% 410. 

1963: 

1964: \bibitem{Volmer}

1965: J.~Volmer {\it et al.}  [The Jefferson Lab F(pi) Collaboration],

1966: %``Measurement of the charged pion electromagnetic form factor,''

1967: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 86} (2001) 1713.

1968: %[nucl-ex/0010009].

1969: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0010009;%%

1970: 

1971: \bibitem{CZ84}

1972: V.L.~Chernyak and A.R.~Zhitnitsky,

1973: Phys. Rept. {\bf 112} (1984) 173.

1974: %%CITATION = PRPLC,112,173;%%

1975: 

1976: \bibitem{Melic}

1977: B.~Melic, B.~Nizic and K.~Passek,

1978: %``Complete next-to-leading order perturbative {QCD} prediction for the pion  form factor,''

1979: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60} (1999) 074004.

1980: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9802204].

1981: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9802204;%%

1982: 

1983: \bibitem{Pivovarov} 

1984: N.~V.~Krasnikov and A.~A.~Pivovarov,

1985: %``The Use Of Finite Energy Sum Rules For The Description Of Resonances In QCD,''

1986: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 112} (1982) 397;\\

1987: %[Sov.\ J.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\  {\bf 35} (1982) 744.1982\ YAFIA,35,1270].\\

1988: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B112,397;%%

1989: A.~A.~Ovchinnikov and A.~A.~Pivovarov,

1990: %``The Calculation Of The Leading M(S) Corrections To The Pcac Relation For The K Meson,''

1991: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 163} (1985) 231.

1992: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B163,231;%%

1993: 

1994: \bibitem{Diehletal}

1995: M.~Diehl, P.~Kroll and C.~Vogt,

1996: %``The annihilation of virtual photons into pseudoscalar mesons,''

1997: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 22} (2001) 439.

1998: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0108220].

1999: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0108220;%%

2000: 

2001: \bibitem{BBKR}

2002: V.~M.~Belyaev, V.~M.~Braun, A.~Khodjamirian and R.~Ruckl,

2003: %``D* D pi and B* B pi couplings in QCD,''

2004: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 51} (1995) 6177.

2005: %[hep-ph/9410280].

2006: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9410280;%%

2007: 

2008: \bibitem{BB8889}

2009: I.I.~Balitsky and V.M.~Braun,

2010: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B311} (1989) 541.

2011: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B311,541;%%

2012: 

2013: \end{thebibliography}

2014: 

2015: \end{document}

2016: 

2017: