1: %Reply from D.Treleani 01.07.02
2: %D.Treleani's version corrected 08.07.02
3: %Text made in Feb. 2002 with numerical calculations
4: %Rewritten in May 2002 with new numerical calculations
5: \documentstyle{article}
6: \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.2}
7: \textwidth 155mm
8: \textheight 240mm
9: \columnsep 38pt
10: \topmargin -30pt
11: \oddsidemargin 5pt
12: \pagestyle{empty}
13: \parsep 3pt plus 1pt minus 1pt
14: \title{\bf On the jet spectrum
15: in nucleus-nucleus interactions}
16: \author{M.A.Braun$^1$, E.G.Ferreiro$^2$, C.Pajares$^2$ and D.Treleani$^3$ \\
17: $^1$ Department of High
18: Energy Physics,
19: University of St. Petersburg,\\ 198904 St. Petersburg, Russia\\
20: $^2$ Departamento de Fisica de Particulas, Unicersidade de Santiago
21: de Compostela\\
22: 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain\\
23: $^3$ Dipartimento
24: di Fisica Teorica dell'Universit\`a di Trieste and INFN, Sezione di Trieste\\
25: Strada Costiera 11, Miramare-Grignano,
26: I-34014, Trieste, Italy }
27:
28: \date{}
29: \pagestyle{myheadings}
30: \def\beq{\begin{equation}}
31: \def\eeq{\end{equation}}
32: \def\noi{\noindent}
33: \begin{document}
34:
35: \maketitle
36: \vspace{1 cm}
37: \begin{abstract}
38: \noindent
39: We derive the inclusive transverse spectrum of minijets in nuclear collisions at
40: very high energies, by assuming that the nuclear $S$-matrix
41: factorizes as a product elastic
42: $S$-matrices of elementary partonic collisions.
43: Interference effects and, in particular, the
44: contribution of loop diagrams are fully taken into account in the derivation of the spectrum,
45: which is shown to coincide with the result already obtained by superposing
46: the elementary interactions incoherently. A quantitative
47: analysis confirms that the deformation induced by multiple collsions
48: is a large effect at RHIC and LHC energies, for transverse momenta $\sim$20 GeV.
49: \end{abstract}
50: \vspace{1 cm}
51:
52:
53: %\newpage
54:
55:
56: \section{Introduction}
57: The growing experimental activity in heavy-ion collision has stimulated
58: a renewed interest on the $p_T$ distributions of
59: secondaries in AB collisions. From the theoretical point of view a
60: special attractiveness presents the production of jets, which, in
61: principle, admits a study in the framework of perturbative QCD. In
62: fact theoretical predictions for the inclusive jet production in
63: $p\bar p$ collisions at 1800 GeV agree quite well with the
64: experimental data for jet transverse energies in the region
65: 50$\div$ 250 GeV/c\cite{Affolder:2001fa}. In
66: the region of lower jet transverse momenta,
67: the agreement is not as good and phenomenogical parameters need to be
68: introduced\cite{Eskola:1988yh}\cite{Eskola:2001rx}. In nuclear collisions the situation becomes
69: obviously much more complicated. There are several mechanisms
70: which influence the form of the jet spectrum and make it different
71: from the case of $p\bar p$. In the nucleus the partonic
72: distributions are changed, the produced jets may loose some energy
73: while passing through the thick nuclear matter, jets may
74: accumulate more transverse momentum by hard rescatterings. All
75: these different phenomena need to be disentangled to gain a
76: comprehensive understanding of the production mechanism.
77:
78:
79: In the present paper we focus on the effects of rescattering on
80: the transverse spectrum of minijets in nucleus-nucleus collisions.
81: The problem was studied in the past assuming that the total
82: inelastic hard cross-section can be obtained from the forward
83: scattering amplitude by substituting the partonic (elastic)
84: cross-sections for the forward parton-parton scattering
85: amplitude\cite{Calucci:1989hb}\cite{Calucci:1991sz}\cite{Accardi:2001ih},
86: similarly to the analogous case, where the
87: inelastic nucleus-nucleus cross section is expressed in terms of
88: the nucleon-nucleon total cross-sections
89: \cite{Bialas:1976ed, Pajares:1985}. As a
90: consequence, in the approach of Refs.
91: \cite{Calucci:1989hb}\cite{Calucci:1991sz}\cite{Accardi:2001ih}, the hard
92: nucleus-nucleus cross section is expressed as an incoherent
93: superposition of interactions between the partons of the nuclear
94: structures. Possible coherence effects are not included and, in
95: particular, the well known problem of loops, arising in the
96: Glauber approach to nucleus-nucleus collisions\cite{Boreskov:yt}, is completely
97: disregarded.
98:
99: The purpose of the present paper is to take interferences
100: into account and
101: include all loops in the evaluation of rescatterings in the
102: inclusive spectrum of minijet production in nucleus-nucleus
103: collisions. In our approach each colliding nucleus will be assumed
104: to consist of a variable number of partons, distributed both in
105: impact parameter and rapidity, while the nuclear $S$-matrix will
106: be assumed to factorize as a product of parton-parton
107: $S$-matrices. The inclusive cross-section for minijet production
108: will be derived without approximations, apart from the usual
109: disentangling of the longitudinal and transverse degrees of
110: freedom and, as we will show, the result will turn out to be
111: identical to the expression already obtained in
112: \cite{Calucci:1989hb}\cite{Calucci:1991sz}\cite{Accardi:2001ih} under the
113: incoherent no-loop approximation.
114:
115: As an application, in the second part of the paper we study the
116: $p_T$ distributions in central Pb-Pb collisions at nucleon-nucleon c.m energies of 200
117: and 6000 GeV, corresponding to the regimes at RHIC and LHC.
118: Since our aim is not to fit the existing data but rather to see
119: the influence of rescatterings, we compare our results
120: with the naive picture where each projectile parton is allowed to interact
121: with a single target parton only, weighted with the
122: partonic distributions of both nuclei, which are taken to be
123: identical to those of the proton. Rescattering effects
124: are obviously maximal at relatively small transverse momenta, where the
125: partonic cross-section is relatively large. For this reason we
126: concentrate our attention on the production of minijets with
127: transverse momenta up to 10 $\div$ 20 GeV/c. To make our picture
128: compatible with the existing experimental data in $p\bar p$
129: collisions at this momenta, we shall use an efective partonic
130: cross-sections taken from the lowest order pertubative QCD and
131: corrected by phenomenological parameters as in \cite{Eskola:1988yh}\cite{Eskola:2001rx}.
132:
133:
134:
135:
136: \section{Glauber theory for hard parton scattering}
137: We start by introducing the expression for the hard scattering
138: amplitude in terms of partonic interactions by following the philosophy of the Glauber
139: approach to nucleus-nucleus collisions. Hence we assume
140: 1) conservation of partonic longitudinal momenta
141: and impact parameters and 2) factorization of the $S$ matrix into the
142: product of elementary partonic $S$ matrices.
143:
144: The nucleus state $|A\rangle$ can be represented by a superposition
145: of states with a different number $n$ of partons, each characterized by its
146: scaling variable $x$ and impact parameter $b$. For brevity we denote
147: $z=\{x,b\}$. We also consider only one partonic flavour, although the generalization
148: to
149: different flavours $f$ is trivial.
150: With these notations one has
151: \beq
152: |A\rangle=\sum_{n}\int\prod_{i=1}^nd^3z_i\Psi_{A,n}(z_i)|n,z_i\rangle
153: \eeq
154: In the following we shall denote the phase space of the $n$-parton
155: configuration in nucleus A as
156: \beq
157: d\tau_A(n)=\prod_{i=1}^nd^3z_i
158: \eeq
159: For the nucleus A - nucleus B collision the $S$ matrix has the form
160: \[
161: \langle A'B'|S|AB\rangle= \sum_{n,l,n',l'}\int
162: d\tau_A(n)d\tau_A(n')d\tau_B(l)d\tau_B(l')\]\beq
163: \Psi_{A',n'}^*(z'_i)\Psi_{B',l'}^*(u'_j)
164: \Psi_{A,n}(z_i)\Psi_{B,l}(u_j) \langle
165: n',z'_i;l',u'_j|S|n,z_i;l,u_j\rangle \eeq
166: Here $u_j$ are the
167: partonic variables of the nucleus B, being $l$ the number of partons in a
168: given configuration. As stated, our first assumption is that
169: the $S$ matrix is diagonal in the basis $\{n,z_i;l,u_j\}$:
170: \beq
171: \langle n',z'_i;l',u'_j|S|n,z_i;l,u_j\rangle= \delta_{nn'}
172: \delta_{ll'}\prod_{i=1}^n\delta^3(z_i-z'_i)
173: \prod_{j=1}^l\delta^3(u_i-u'_i)S_{nl}(z_1,...z_n|u_1,...u_l) \eeq
174: Physically this assumption corresponds taking into account binary collisions only,
175: therefore conserving the number of partons in the hard process, which may be justified
176: arguing that in a hard interaction parton
177: production is damped by an extra power of the strong coupling
178: constant. We also assume that neither the longitudinal momentum
179: nor the impact parameter are changed in a hard collision, which are
180: basic assumptions in the Glauber approach. The range in $x$ and $p_{\perp}$
181: for which the treatment
182: can be applied is therefore restricted to the region where
183: longidudinal momenta are much higher as compared to the transferred momenta.
184: Under assumption (4) the $S$ matrix simplifies to
185: \beq \langle A'B'|S|AB\rangle= \sum_{n,l}\int d\tau_A(n)d\tau_B(l)
186: |\Psi_{A,n}(z_i)|^2|\Psi_{B,l}(u_j)|^2
187: S_{nl}(z_1,...z_n|u_1,...u_l) \eeq
188:
189: A second assumption intrinsic in the Glauber approach is that of factorization
190: of the $S$ matrix in (5)
191: into a product of elementary $S$ matrices for parton-parton scatterings
192: \beq
193: S_{nl}(z_1,...z_n|u_1,...u_l)=\prod_{i=1}^n\prod_{j=1}^ls_{ij}
194: \eeq
195: where $s_{ij}$ is the $S$ matrix for the collision of parton $i$ from
196: nucleus A with parton $j$ from nucleus B:
197: \beq
198: s_{ij}=1+ia(z_i,u_j)\equiv1+ia_{ij}
199: \eeq
200: $a$ being the parton-parton scattering amplitude.
201: Since we assume that no parton production takes place, $s_{ij}$
202: corresponds to purely elastic scatterings (or to binary reactions in the
203: multi-flavour case). Unitarity is therefore satisfied in its simplest form
204: \beq
205: (s_{ij})^*s_{ij}=1
206: \eeq
207: (in the multi-flavour case this is changed into a matrix condition in the
208: flavour space)
209:
210: To complete the picture we have to introduce the normalization
211: condition for the nuclear wave function, which
212: reads
213: \beq \sum_{n}\int d\tau_A(n)|\Psi_{A,n}(z_i)|^2=1
214: \eeq
215: As one observes the normalization condition does not limit
216: the parton population of a given nuclear configuration,
217: represented by a given term in the sum, it only restricts the
218: total probability of the different configurations to be unity. The
219: cross-section introduced in [4] - [6] corresponds to choosing the
220: distribution in the number of partons to be Poissonian:
221: \beq
222: w_n=\int d\tau(n)|\Psi_{A,n}(z_i)|^2=e^{-\langle n\rangle}
223: \frac{\langle n\rangle^n}{n!} \eeq
224: If one additionally assumes
225: that the the nuclear partonic wave function factorizes as
226: \beq
227: |\Psi_{A,n}(z_i)|^2=c_n\prod_{i=1}^n\Gamma(z_i) \eeq
228: one immediately gets
229: \beq c_n=\frac{1}{n!}e^{-\langle
230: n\rangle},\ \ \langle n\rangle=\int d^3z\Gamma(z) \eeq
231:
232: With the forward AB scattering amplitude defined by (5)- (7), we can
233: proceed to determine the relevant cross-sections. The total cross-section
234: is of course obtained from the imaginary part of the forward
235: $\langle AB|S-1|AB\rangle$. However we are not interested in the total
236: cross-section but rather in the total hard cross-section with large
237: momenta of observed partons. In the diagrammatic language this cross-section
238: corresponds to cutting the forward scattering amplitude through the
239: intermediate partonic propagators, with the restriction that the cut partons
240: should have a large transverse momentum component.
241:
242: One can standardly present all contributions to (5) - (7) in terms of
243: diagrams which show partonic interactions via the amplitudes $ia_{ij}$.
244: External partons correspond to those present in the colliding nuclei.
245: They are assumed to have small transverse momenta and to be distributed in
246: $x$ and $b$ according to $|\Psi_{A(B),n}|^2$. All diagrams can be separated
247: into tree diagrams and diagrams with loops. In the tree diagrams all
248: transferred momenta are small ("zero"), so that they are expressed through
249: the forward scattering amplitudes $ia_{ij}$. Loop diagrams involve
250: integrations over the intermediate parton momenta, which may be large.
251: So they cannot be expressed via the forward scattering amplitudes $ia_{ij}$
252: but rather involve these amplitudes at large transferred momenta.
253:
254: If one restricts oneself to the tree diagrams then the only way to find
255: intermediate partons with high transverse momenta is to cut the forward
256: scattering amplitudes $ia_{ij}$ converting them into the total (elastic)
257: partonic cross-section $\sigma^{el}$. According to the AGK rules,
258: the sum over all possible cuts gives the final hard cross-section in the form
259: $\langle AB|S-1|AB\rangle$ with $ia_{ij}$ substituted by $-\sigma^{el}_{ij}$
260: in (7). This latter formula was the starting point in the derivations in
261: \cite{Calucci:1989hb}\cite{Calucci:1991sz}\cite{Accardi:2001ih}.
262:
263: However loops give new contributions to the hard cross-sections,
264: since cutting the loop produces intermediate partons with large
265: transverse momenta. The result cannot be expressed in any simple
266: way via the partonic cross-sections $\sigma^{el}$, since it
267: involves partonic amplitudes at large momentum transfers.
268: Unfortunately it is easy to check that, at least perturbatively,
269: the loop contributions are dominant. The reason is that the
270: partonic amplitude $a$ is predominatly real (of order
271: $\alpha_s$, whereas its imaginary part (and $\sigma^{el}$) is of
272: the order $\alpha_s^2$ and thus supressed by a factor $\alpha_s$). As an explicit example,
273: let us compare the different contributions shown in Fig. 1. The external
274: lines of the interacting partons supply a factor $A^{1/3}$ or
275: $B^{1/3}$ each, due to the partonic densities in the nuclei. By
276: cutting the single scattering diagram $a$ one obtains a
277: contribution of order $(AB)^{1/3}\alpha^2_s$, while its iteration
278: $b$ gives a contribution of order $(AB)^{2/3}\alpha_s^4$. The contributions
279: of the cuts of the
280: Glauber-like diagrams $c$ and $d$ are of orders
281: $A^{1/3}B^{2/3}\alpha_s^4$ and $A^{2/3}B^{1/3}\alpha_s^4$. Tree
282: diagrams with 3 interactions, as diagram $e$ in the figure,
283: give a contribution of
284: order $(AB)^{2/3}\alpha_s^6$. The leading contribution of the loop diagram
285: $f$ is, on the contrary of order $(AB)^{2/3}\alpha^4$.
286: Since all 4 elementary amplitudes can now be taken uncut (and real) in that case,
287: this last
288: contribution is by far dominant, as compared to all connected diagrams,
289: and comparable to the iterated lowest order diagram. It can be
290: shown that a similar argument holds for any number of interacting partons: the
291: dominant contribution is given by iterations of the sum of the
292: lowest order diagrams plus loops. All other diagrams are suppressed by
293: a factor $\alpha_s^2$.
294:
295: As a consequence by substituting $ia$ by $-\sigma^{el}$, which is
296: the approximation used in \cite{Calucci:1989hb}\cite{Calucci:1991sz}\cite{Accardi:2001ih},
297: one only selects a limited,
298: sub-leading, set diagrams, the tree diagrams. Notice that the
299: situation is quite different as compared to the case of the
300: Glauber picture of AB scattering in terms of nucleons. In that
301: case the amplitude is in fact mainly imaginary and, in addition,
302: loops are likely to be suppressed by finite formation time
303: arguments. The inclusive hard cross-section, obtained in \cite{Calucci:1989hb}\cite{Calucci:1991sz}\cite{Accardi:2001ih} in
304: the tree diagram approximation, needs therefore to be re-derived
305: keeping the contribution of loops into account.
306:
307:
308: \section{Jet spectrum: general}
309: To find the spectrum of emitted jets we have to fix the final state
310: of one of the nuclei in a specific manner, in which one of the partons
311: appears with the observed wave function $\psi_{\alpha}(z)$.
312: The choice of the observed parton
313: is irrelevant, since the total wave
314: function of the nucleus is supposed to be symmetric in all the partons, so
315: we choose it to be the first one. Note that choosing the observed parton
316: to belong to nucleus A implies studying the spectrum in the direction of
317: nucleus A and conversely for nucleus B. In the following we study the former case, so we take
318: \beq
319: \Psi_{A',n}(z_1,z_2,...z_n)=
320: \sqrt{n}\psi(z_1)_{\alpha}\tilde{\Psi}_{A',n-1}(z_2,...z_n)
321: \eeq
322: The second factor represents the state of the remaining $n-1$ partons,
323: together with the observed one. The factor $\sqrt{n}$ is to adjust the
324: normalizations of the symmetrized wave functions $\Psi_n$ and
325: $\tilde{\Psi}_{n-1}$.
326: Using (13) we get the probability to observe a parton with wave
327: function
328: $\psi$ at a given impact parameter $\beta$ in the nucleus A-nucleus B
329: scattering as
330: \[
331: \frac {d\sigma_{\alpha}}{d^2\beta}=
332: \sum_{nl,n',l'}\sqrt{nn'}\sum_{A',B'}\int
333: d\tau'_A(n')d\tau'_B(l')
334: d\tau_A(n)d\tau_B(l)\]\[
335: \Psi_{A,n'}^*(z_i')\Psi_{B,l'}^*(u_i')
336: \Big[S^*_{n'l'}(z'_i|u'_j)-1\Big]\psi_{\alpha}(z_1')
337: \tilde{\Psi}_{A',n'-1}(z'_2,..z_n')\Psi_{B,l'}(u'_j)\]\beq
338: \psi^*_{\alpha}(z_1)\tilde{\Psi}_{A,n}^*(z_2,...z_n)
339: \Psi_{B',l}^*(u_j)\Big[S_{nl}(z_i|u_j)-1\Big]
340: \Psi_{A,n}(z_i)\Psi_{B,l}(u_j)
341: \eeq
342: The sum over all intermediate partonic states, with a given number of
343: partons, is done by using closure:
344: \beq
345: \sum_{A}\Psi_{A,n'}(z'_1,...z'_{n'})\Psi_{A,n}^*(z_1,...z_{n})
346: =\delta_{nn'}\prod_{i=1}\delta(z_1',..,z_n|z_1,...,z_n)
347: \eeq
348: where the $\delta$ function is a symmetrized product of
349: $\delta^3(z'_i-z_i)$.
350: We obtain
351: \[
352: \frac {d\sigma_{\alpha}}{d^2\beta}=
353: \sum_{nl}n\int dz_1dz'_1\psi_{\alpha}(z_1')\psi^*_{\alpha}(z_1)
354: d\tau_A(n-1)d\tau_B(l){\Psi_{A,n}}^*(z_1',z_2,...z_n)
355: \Psi_{A,n}(z_1,z_2,...z_n)|\Psi_{B,l}(u_j)|^2\]\beq
356: \Big[S^*_{nl}(z'_1,z_2,...z_n|u_1,...,u_l)-1\Big]
357: \Big[S_{nl}(z_1,z_2,...z_n|u_1,...u_l)-1\Big]
358: \eeq
359:
360: Notice that by summing over all possible observable states $\psi_{\alpha}$
361: one gets
362: \[\sum_{\alpha}\psi_{\alpha}(z_1')\psi_{\alpha^*}(z_1)=\delta(z_1'|z_1)\]
363: which implies
364: \[
365: \sum_{\alpha}\frac {d\sigma_{\alpha}}{d^2\beta}=
366: \sum_{nl}n\int
367: d\tau_A(n)d\tau_B(l)|\Psi_{A,n}|^2(z_i)
368: |\Psi_{B,l}(u_j)|^2\]\[
369: \Big[S^*_{nl}(z_1,z_2,...z_n|u_1,...,u_l)-1\Big]
370: \Big[S_{nl}(z_1,z_2,...z_n|u_1,...u_l)-1\Big]\]\[=
371: \sum_{nl}n\int
372: d\tau_A(n)d\tau_B(l)|\Psi_{A,n}|^2(z_i)
373: |\Psi_{B,l}(u_j)|^2\]\beq
374: \Big[2-S^*_{nl}(z_1,z_2,...z_n|u_1,...,u_l)
375: -S_{nl}(z_1,z_2,...z_n|u_1,...u_l)\Big]=
376: <n>\sigma_{AB}^{tot}
377: \eeq
378: The result is expected: the integrated inclusive cross-section gives
379: the total cross-section multiplied by the average multiplicity, which in our case
380: is obviously $<n>$. Since $<n>$ is supposed to grow with $A$
381: only linearly (or even less rapidly, if the EMC effect is taken into account)
382: the multiplicity does not grow faster then $A^1$.
383:
384:
385:
386: \section{Jet spectrum: non-trivial and geometric contributions}
387: The product of $S$ matrices in (16) generates 4 terms which we
388: rearrange as
389: \[
390: \Big[S^*_{nl}(z'_1,z_2,...z_n|u_1,...,u_l)
391: S_{nl}(z_1,z_2,...z_n|u_1,...u_l)-1\Big]\]\beq
392: -\Big[S^*_{nl}(z'_1,z_2,...z_n|u_1,...,u_l)-1\Big]
393: -\Big[S_{nl}(z_1,z_2,...z_n|u_1,...u_l)-1\Big]
394: \eeq
395: It is instructive to study the meaning of the three terms from the
396: point of view of the intermediate physical partonic states,
397: corresponding to cutting the whole diagram with partonic interactions
398: in the overall unitarity relation. In the second term
399: only conjugate amplitudes $[ia_{ij}]^*$ enter, which
400: means that this contribution corresponds to cut
401: the interaction diagram from the extreme right, namely to the right of all
402: partonic interactions. Conversely in the last term only the amplitudes $a_{ij}$ enter,
403: which corresponds
404: to cut the amplitude to the left of all partonic
405: integractions. In both cases the momenta of the intermediate partons
406: are convoluted with their initial distributions in the
407: colliding nuclei, which is
408: very narrow for geometrical reasons, so that also the resulting spectrum cannot be much
409: broader.
410:
411: To be more explicit, consider the third term in (18). Take the contribution from a
412: single interaction of the first
413: parton at impact parameter $b_1$ with some parton in B with its impact
414: parameter $c$. Since
415: we are interested in the distributions
416: of partons from nucleus A, as a function of the transverse momentum and at a fixed rapidity,
417: we take
418: \beq
419: \psi_{\alpha}(z_1)=e^{ipb_1}\delta(x_1-x)
420: \eeq
421: where $x$ and $p$ are the scaling variable and transverse momentum
422: of the observed parton. Then the integration over $b$ and $c$ will take the form
423: \beq
424: \int d^2b_1d^2c e^{ipb_1}\Psi_{A,n}(b_1,...)ia(b_1-c)|\Psi_{B,n}(c,..)|^2
425: \eeq
426: where we have suppressed all the variables, with the only exception of $b_1$ and $c$. The typical scale
427: of the partonic interaction is much smaller than the nuclear scale,
428: so to a good approximation one can rewrite (20) as the product
429: \beq
430: \int d^2b_1 e^{ipb_1}\Psi_{A,n}(b_1,...)|\Psi_{B,n}(b_1,..)|^2
431: \int d^2c ia(c)
432: \eeq
433: It is evident now that this expression is different from zero only for values
434: of $p$ of the order of the inverse of the nuclear radius, unless one assumes that
435: the nuclear distributions itself contains partons with high transverse momenta.
436:
437: The non-trivial part of the partonic distribution originated by the hard
438: collisions corresponds therefore to cutting the interaction diagram in between
439: hard collisions and thus is totally contained in the first term in (18).
440: Remarkably this contribution can be greatly simplified (differently with respect to
441: the last two terms in (18)).
442: In fact, using the factorization property (6)
443: we can write
444: \beq
445: S_{nl}(z_1,z_2,...|u_1,...u_l)=
446: \prod_{j=1}^ls_{1j}\prod_{i=2}^n\prod_{j=1}^ls_{ij}
447: \eeq
448: Due to the unitarity relation (8) the second product in (22) is cancelled by
449: its conjugate in the product $S^*S$ in (18), so that we get
450: \beq
451: S^*_{nl}(z'_1,z_2,...z_n|u_1,...,u_l)
452: S_{nl}(z_1,z_2,...z_n|u_1,...u_l)-1=
453: \prod_{j=1}^l[1+ia(z'_1,u_j)]^*[1+ia(z_1,u_j)]-1
454: \eeq
455:
456: Putting this expression into (16) we note that (23) does not depend on the
457: partonic variables $z_2,...z_n$ of nucleus A. Integrating over $z_2,...z_n$
458: and summing over $n$ one obtains the $\rho$ matrix of nucleus A as a function of the
459: nuclear partonic degrees of freedom:
460: \beq
461: \sum_n n\int d\tau_A(n-1)
462: \Psi_{A,n}^*(z_1',z_2,...z_n)
463: \Psi_{A,n}(z_1,z_2,...z_n)=\rho_A(z_1|z'_1)
464: \eeq
465: This relation in fact defines the nuclear $\rho$-matrix. As a consistency check one may notice
466: that, under the factorization assumption (11), at $z'_1=z_1$, (24) reduces
467: to $\Gamma(z_1)$.
468:
469: The contribution from the 1st term in (18) may therefore be written as
470: \beq
471: \frac {d\sigma_{\alpha}^{(1)}}{d^2\beta}=
472: \sum_{l}\int dz_1dz'_1\psi_{\alpha}(z_1')\psi^*_{\alpha}(z_1)\rho_A(z_1|z'_1)
473: d\tau_B(l)|\Psi_{B,l}(u_j)|^2
474: \Big\{\prod_{j=1}^l[1+ia(z'_1,u_j)]^*[1+ia(z_1,u_j)]-1\Big\}
475: \eeq
476:
477: \section{The hard spectrum}
478: To obtain a more explicit form of the spectrum
479: we make use of the factorization ansatz (11) for nucleus B:
480: \beq
481: |\Psi_{B,l}(u_j)|^2=\frac{1}{l!}e^{-\langle l\rangle}
482: \prod_{j=1}^l\Gamma(u_i)
483: \eeq
484: with
485: \beq
486: \langle l\rangle=\int d^3u\Gamma_B(u)
487: \eeq
488: We also assume for the parton distributions the factorized expression
489: \beq
490: \Gamma_B(u)=T_B(c) P_B(w)
491: \eeq
492: where $w$ and $c$ are the fractional momentum and transverse parton coordinate respectively.
493: The normalizations are
494: \beq
495: \int d^2bT_B(c)=1,\ \ \int dwP_B(w)=\langle l\rangle
496: \eeq
497: Expressing the wave function of the observed parton as in Eq.(19), we obtain
498: \[
499: (2\pi)^2\frac {d\sigma^{(1)}}{d^2\beta dy d^2p}=
500: \sum_{l}\frac{1}{l!}e^{-\langle l\rangle}
501: \int d^2b_1d^2b'_1e^{ip(b_1-b'_1)}\rho_A(x,b_1-\beta|x,b'_1-\beta)
502: \]\beq
503: \prod_{j=1}^ld^2c_jdw_jT_B(c_j)P_B(w_j)
504: \Big\{\prod_{j=1}^l[1+ia(z'_1,u_j)]^*[1+ia(z_1,u_j)]-1\Big\}
505: \eeq
506: with $z=(x,b)$ and $z'=(x,b')$.
507: Taking the origin in the center of nucleus B, so that the
508: partonic distribution in nucleus A becomes shifted by the overall impact
509: parameter $\beta$,
510: due to factorization, the integrations over $(w_j,c_j)$
511: give the $l$-th power of
512: \beq
513: J=\int d^2c dwT_B(c)P_B(w)[1+ia(x,w;b'_1-c)]^*[1+ia(x,w,b_1-c)]
514: \eeq
515: where the dependence of the scattering amplitude on the
516: transverse distance between the interacting partons is explicit. The different terms
517: in this integral are treated as in the standard Glauber derivation.
518: Let us consider the term with the product of two amplitudes. The distance
519: between the interacting partons
520: for hard interactions is very small as compared to the nuclear distances. So
521: using $r=b_1-c$ as a integration variable we find $c=b_1-r$ and
522: we can take the nuclear profile function out of the integral at
523: $c\simeq b_1$. We obtain
524: \beq
525: T_B(b_1)\int d^2rdwP_B(w)a^*(x,w;b'_1-b_1+r)a(x,w;r)\equiv
526: T_B(b_1)F_B(x,b'_1-b)
527: \eeq
528: where
529: \beq
530: F_B(x,b)=\int d^2rdwP_B(w)a^*(x,w;b+r)a(x,w;r)
531: =\int dwP_B(w)\int\frac{d^2p}{(2\pi)^2}I(p)e^{ipb}
532: \eeq
533: is the Fourier transform of the transverse momentum distribution
534: in the parton-parton interaction, averaged over the parton rapidity
535: distribution of nucleus B.
536: Note that at $b=0$ (33) gives the total cross-section for parton-parton
537: collisions (which coincides with the elastic cross-section), averaged
538: over the rapidities of the B-partons
539: \beq
540: \sigma^{tot}_B(x)=\sigma^{el}_B(x)=
541: \int dwP_B(w)\int d^2r |a(x,w;r)|^2
542: \eeq
543: The other terms in (31) are evaluated in a similar manner, the result is
544: \beq
545: J=\langle l\rangle+T_B(b_1)F_B(x,b'_1-b)-T_BF_B(x,0)
546: \eeq
547: Taking the $l$-th power of (35) and summing over all values of $l$ one gets
548: \[
549: \exp \Big( T_B(b_1)[F_B(x,b'_1-b_1)-F_B(x,0)]\Big)
550: \]
551: The term in (30) with unity gives unity after summation over $l$, so that the cross section
552: is expressed as
553: \[
554: (2\pi)^2\frac {d\sigma^{(1)}}{d^2\beta dy d^2p}=
555: \int d^2b_1d^2b'_1e^{ip(b_1-b'_1)}\rho_A(x,b_1-\beta|x,b'_1-\beta)
556: \]\beq
557: \Big\{e^{ T_B(b_1)[F_B(x,b'_1-b_1)-F_B(x,0)]}
558: -1\Big\}
559: \eeq
560: Introducing the integration variables $r=b'_1-b_1$ and $b=(1/2)(b'_1+b_1)$ and
561: keeping into account that $r$ is a small quantity on the nuclear scale, one obtains
562: \beq
563: (2\pi)^2\frac {d\sigma}{d^2\beta dy d^2p}=
564: \int d^2bd^2re^{ipr}\rho_A(x,b-\beta)
565: \Big\{e^{ T_B(b)[F_B(x,r)-F_B(x,0)]}
566: -1\Big\}
567: \eeq
568: Here $\rho_A(x,b)=T_A(b)P_A(x)$ is just the partonic distribution
569: of nucleus A.
570: Since $F_B(x,r)$ goes to zero as $r\to\infty$
571: the inclusive cross-section (37)
572: contains also a soft component of the spectrum, which in the expression
573: is represented by the term proportional to $\delta^2(p)$.
574: To remove it we subtract from the integrand its value at $r=\infty$.
575: Our final expression for the inclusive
576: cross-section is therefore
577: \beq
578: (2\pi)^2\frac {d\sigma}{d^2\beta dy d^2p}=
579: \int d^2bd^2re^{ipr}T_A(b-\beta)P_A(x)
580: \Big\{e^{ T_B(b)[F_B(x,r)-F_B(x,0)]}
581: -e^{-T_B(b)F_B(x,0)}\Big\}
582: \eeq
583:
584: The only trace in (38) of the nucleus A is in the term
585: $T_A(,b-\beta)P_A(x)$,
586: which appears as a weight factor for the different contributions from the various
587: parts of nucleus B. For central collisions one can separate it as
588: a nearly constant factor, so that the form of the spectrum should be
589: practically independent of A and, in particular, it coincides with the spectrum
590: in hadron-nucleus B collisions.
591:
592: As mentioned in the Introduction, this formula coincides with the
593: one obtained earlier in \cite{Calucci:1989hb}\cite{Calucci:1991sz}\cite{Accardi:2001ih}
594: in the tree-diagram approximation.
595: Remarkably, although dominant in the diagrammatic expansion of the
596: forward amplitude, as a consequence of unitarity and of the cutting
597: rules, there is no effect of loops to the inclusive cross section.
598:
599: Notice also that, upon integration over all $p$, one obtains from (38) the
600: total multiplicity of jets from nucleus A multiplied by the cross-section
601: at a given impact parameter (the latter quantity being very close
602: to unity for a heavy nucleus). The result coincides with the average number of
603: {\it wounded partons} of the nucleus
604: A \cite{Calucci:1989hb}\cite{Calucci:1991sz}\cite{Accardi:2001ih}\cite{Bialas:1976ed}\cite{Accardi:2000ry}. From (38) we find
605: \beq \frac {d\sigma}{d^2\beta dy}= \int
606: d^2bT_A(b-\beta)P_A(x)\Big\{1-e^{-T_B(b)F_B(x,0)}\Big\} \eeq
607:
608: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
609:
610: \section{Numerical results}
611: The distribution in rapidity and transverse momentum, Eq.(38), is obtained form the
612: elementary inclusive cross-section $I(u,w,;p)$
613: of two partons colliding
614: with fractional momenta $u$ and $w$. For the gluon- gluon scattering one has
615: \cite{Eskola:1988yh}\cite{Eskola:2001rx}
616: \beq
617: \frac{d\sigma}{dy d^2p}=\frac{9\alpha_s^2}{2p^4}
618: \int dy'dudw uG(u) wG(w)
619: \left(1-\frac{p^2}
620: {suw}\right)^3\delta\left(u-x-\frac{p^2}{sx'}\right)
621: \delta\left(w-x'-\frac{p^2}{sx}\right)
622: \eeq
623: with
624: \[ x=\frac{p}{\sqrt{s}}e^y,\ \ \ x'=\frac{p}{\sqrt{s}}e^{-y'}\]
625: the fractional momenta of the observed and recoiling gluons
626: and $G(u)$, $G(w)$ the distributions of the initial gluons, which we assume to
627: have a small transverse momentum component. Eq. (40) exhibits a kinematical
628: constraint between the
629: longitudinal and transverse momenta of the final gluons. In particular their
630: scaling variables are somewhat lower than those of the initial gluons.
631: Rigorously speaking this goes beyond the Glauber approximation,
632: which, as stated above, assumes the conservation of longitudinal momenta.
633: At large $s$ however the problem is felt only close to the limiting value
634: $p^2\sim p_{max}^2=suw/4$. For $p$ much smaller
635: than its limiting value, at $y'<0$ one can take $G(u)$ out of the
636: integral (40), at a value of momentum fraction corresponding to the momentum
637: of the observed gluon, $u=x$. The rest of the integral
638: can be transformed to the integration variable $w$. In the region $y'>0$
639: one can similarly take $G(w)$ out of the integral
640: and transform the integration to the variable $u$. In this way one obtains the
641: final cross-section in a quasi-Glauber form (see Appendix 1. for the details).
642: \beq
643: \frac{d\sigma}{dy d^2p}=\frac{9\alpha_s^2}{p^4}\Big[xG(x)
644: \int_{w_{min}} \frac{dw}{w}wG(w)
645: \left(1-\frac{p^2}
646: {sxw}\right)^2 +\Big(y\to -y\Big)\Big]
647: \eeq
648: where
649: \[w_{min}=\frac{p}{\sqrt{s}}(1+e^{-y})\]
650: We have checked that the approximations made in reducing (40) to (41) at
651: energies above 200 GeV
652: change the spectrum by no more than 10\% for $p<40$ GeV/c.
653: The two terms in (41) have evidently the meaning of the contributions from
654: the projectile and target partons.
655: At $y=0$ they are naturally equal.
656: To take into account the contribution of quarks, following
657: \cite{Eskola:1988yh}\cite{Eskola:2001rx}\cite{Pancheri:qg},
658: we introduce an effective parton density $P(x)$ and make the
659: substitution
660: \beq
661: xG(x)\to xP(x)=xG(x)+\frac{4}{9}[xQ(x)+x\bar{Q}(x)]
662: \eeq
663: Finally, to fit the existing experimental data, we multiply the cross-section by a
664: $K$-factor. With $K=3$ and the partonic
665: densities taken from \cite{Gluck:1998xa} we obtain a rather satisfactory
666: agreement with the experimental data on jet production on protons at 200 GeV
667: \cite{Albajar:1988tt}, as illustrated in Fig. 2.
668:
669: The actual expression of the elementary inclusive cross section entering in Eq.(33) is
670: \beq
671: I(x,w;p)=(2\pi)^2K\frac{9\alpha_s^2}{p^4}\left(1-\frac{p^2}
672: {sxw}\right)^2
673: \theta\Big(sxw-p^2(1+e^y)\Big)
674: \eeq
675: Of course the expression holds only for sufficiently high values
676: of the transferred momenta. So in the integral (33) we standardly
677: restrict the integration to $p>p_0$ where
678: $p_0$ is the infrared cutoff parameter.
679: We neglect the change in the initial nuclear parton distributions as
680: compared to the protonic ones (the EMC effect) and take $P_A(x)=AP(x)$
681: where $P(x)$ is the effective partonic distribution in the proton (42).
682: In our calculations we use the partonic densities of \cite{Gluck:1998xa} at the leading order.
683:
684: We restrict ourselves to the production of jets at center rapidity $y=0$.
685: To simplify the calculations we also consider central collisions ($\beta=0$)
686: of identical nuclei and take the nuclei as spheres of radius $R_A$ with a
687: constant density, so that
688: \beq
689: T_A(b)=\frac{2}{V_A}\sqrt{R_A^2-b^2}
690: \eeq
691: Then in (38) the integration over $b$ can be done explicitly and we get
692: \beq
693: (2\pi)^2\frac {d\sigma}{d^2\beta dy d^2p}=2xAP(x)
694: \int d^2re^{ipr}
695: \Big(Z(z)-Z(z_0)\Big)
696: \eeq
697: where
698: \beq
699: Z(z)=e^z\left(\frac{6}{z^3}-\frac{6}{z^2}+\frac{3}{z}\right)-1-\frac{6}{z^3}
700: \eeq
701: \beq
702: z(r)=\frac{3A}{2\pi R_A^2}(f(r)-f(0)),\ \ z_0=-\frac{3A}{2\pi R_A^2}f(0))
703: \eeq
704: and
705: \beq
706: f(r)=
707: \frac{9}{2} K\int d^2p' e^{ip'r}\theta ({p'}^2-p_0^2)
708: \int_{w_{min}} \frac{dw}{w}wP(w,{p'}^2)\frac{\alpha^2_s({p'}^2)}{{p'}^4}
709: \left(1-\frac{{p'}^2}
710: {sxw}\right)^2
711: \eeq
712: In (48) we have chosen the scales for $\alpha_s$ and $P(w)$
713: to be equal to the transverse momentum squared of the recoil parton (i.e.
714: to the square of the transverse momentum transferred to the observed jet).
715: The factor 2 in (45) takes into account jets produced by projectile and target
716: partons. For the running coupling constant we have taken
717: $\Lambda_{QCD}=0.3$ GeV/c with four flavours.
718:
719:
720: Some care is needed in determining the scale of the
721: initial partonic distribution $P(x)$. It is related to the momentum
722: transferred in the first collision. In the case of a single collision
723: the scale is of order $p^2$, the transverse momentum
724: squared of the observed jet. In case of multiple collisions the
725: scale may however be substantially smaller. In our calculations we separated the
726: single scattering contribution from the general expression (45), where we have taken
727: $P(x)$ at the scale $p^2$. In the remaining part, corresponding to double
728: and higher scatterings, we have taken $P(x)$ at the scale $p_0^2$.
729:
730: Even with the above simplifications the calculation of the final inclusive
731: distribution is far from trivial since it involves direct and inverse
732: Bessel transforms. We were able to obtain more or less stable results only for
733: values of $p$ not higher than $\sim$20 GeV/c, where,
734: fortunately, we
735: expect hard rescatterings to be most relevant.
736:
737: We have considered central Pb-Pb collisons at 200 and 6000 GeV, corresponding to
738: RHIC and LHC energies.
739: We have taken $p_0=2$ GeV/c in accordance with
740: the analysis of particle production data \cite{Albajar:1988tt}.
741: As for the K-factor we have considered values in the range 1 $\div$ 3.
742: As mentioned, at 200 GeV the value $K=3$ is favoured by the proton data \cite{Gluck:1998xa}.
743: The analysis in \cite{Eskola:2002kv} found that while $p_0$ does not
744: practically change with energy, the K-factor clearly diminishes
745: to values close to unity.
746:
747: In Figs. 3 and 4 we present our results in the form of ratios of the
748: distribution (45), with all rescatterings included, to the contribution of
749: the single scattering only (optical approximation). The latter is obviously
750: just the proton-proton distribution multiplied by a nuclear factor
751: \beq
752: F_A=\frac{9A^2}{8\pi R_A^2}
753: \eeq
754:
755:
756: \section {Conclusions}
757:
758: Given the very large energies in heavy ion collision at the LHC, a common
759: expectation is that
760: global features of the typical event will be within reach of
761: a perturbative QCD approach. It should nevertheless be emphasized the such a possibility is
762: far from trivial, the capability of
763: making statements on properties of an average inelastic event implying
764: qualitative improvements of present
765: understanding of strong interaction dynamics. In a typical heavy ion collision event
766: at the LHC several different mechanisms, originated by the complexity of the
767: interactions states, may play important roles giving rise to
768: a rather structured interaction, which needs to be brought to light to gain
769: the capability of making quantitative statements.
770:
771: While an exhaustive description of the whole interaction process, even if limited
772: to the hard component only, is still out of reach, various
773: features which are likely to play an important role are presently under extensive investigation
774: in the
775: literature\cite{Baier:1998kq}\cite{Wiedemann:2000za}\cite{Wiedemann:2000tf}\cite{Gyulassy:2000fs}.
776: The topic which we have addressed in the present paper
777: is that of multiparton interactions, where several
778: partons in the initial state are linked in a hard collision process, which is a
779: rather natural mechanism to consider in a very dense interacting system.
780: One of the reasons of interest is that such a process
781: is able to restore the local isotropy in transverse space of the
782: black disk limit of the interaction,
783: which is broken by a two parton initiated process at the lowest
784: orders in $\alpha_S$\cite{Accardi:2000ry}.
785:
786: Previous attempts to face this issue were based on a purely probabilistic description
787: of the hard component of the multiparton interaction, which has a solid
788: support for disconnected multiparton processes, while it has not such a
789: strong basis in the case of a connected multiparton collision. Within an incoherent
790: approach, interference effects
791: are in fact neglected altogether, which, in particular, implies disregarding all
792: off-diagonal contributions, namely ignoring the well known problem of loops in nucleus-nucleus
793: collisions, which give, on the contrary, the dominant contribution to the overall interaction
794: amplitude, as discussed in the first part of this paper. To approach
795: the problem we have studied the simplest case where only elastic partonic interactions
796: are taken into account and the overall nucleus-nucleus
797: $S$-matrix is factorized as a product of elementary parton-parton $S$-matrices.
798: In our approach production processes at the partonic level are therefore completely disregarded.
799: Since the complexity of the interaction is described by
800: the Glauber prescription of factorization of the $S$-matrix, any
801: amplitude for a $n$-parton interaction process is represented by a convolution
802: of two-partons
803: interaction amplitudes, so that the parton-nucleus amplitude
804: is expressed by a series of on shell rescattering terms.
805: Notice that, as in the case of the canonical Glauber approach to
806: hadron-nucleus collisions, this by no means implies a space-time ordering between different
807: interactions. It only implies that a connected $n$-body interaction process is well approximated
808: by a product of two-body interactions, which basically means that, in a dispersive
809: representation of the projectile-exchanged gluon amplitude,
810: the pole contribution is dominant. As for the quantitative relevance
811: of hard rescatterings, our numerical study confirms that, at transverse momenta
812: of $\sim$ 20 GeV, the
813: effects are large both at RHIC and LHC energies.
814:
815: The feature which, in our opinion, makes this approach interesting,
816: even if some non-secondary features, as energy loss, are not included in the picture
817: of the interaction,
818: is that it allows one to obtain,
819: without approximations, the inclusive transverse spectrum of minijets,
820: which is therefore an exact consequence of the
821: $S$-matrix considered.
822: This feature allows one to argue that the result
823: might represent a good starting point for the ambitious
824: program of accomplishing an exhaustive description
825: of hard spectra in nucleus-nucleus collisions.
826: \vskip.25in
827: {\bf Acknowledgment}
828: \vskip.15in
829: This work was partially supported by the RFFI Grant 01-02-17137 of Russia
830: and Italian Ministry of University and of
831: Scientific and Technological Researches (MURST) by the Grant COFIN2001.
832: \vskip.25in
833:
834:
835: \section {Appendix 1. Derivation of (41)}
836: Let us split the integration over $y'$ in (40) in two parts, $y'<0$ and
837: $y'>0$. Consider the part with $y'<0$. It corresponds to
838: observed gluons coming from the projectile. Integrating over $u$ we get for this
839: part
840: \beq
841: \left(\frac{d\sigma}{dy d^2p}\right)_{y'<0}=\frac{9\alpha_s^2}{p^4}
842: \int_{p/\sqrt{s}}\frac{dx'}{x'}\int dw uG(u)wG(w)
843: \left(1-\frac{p^2}{suw}\right)^3
844: \delta\left(w-x'-\frac{p^2}{sx}\right)
845: \eeq
846: with $u=x+p^2/(sx')$. Further integration over $x'$ gives
847: \beq
848: \left(\frac{d\sigma}{dy d^2p}\right)_{y'<0}=\frac{9\alpha_s^2}{p^4}
849: \int_{w_{min}}\frac{dw}{w} uG(u)wG(w)\frac{w}{w-p^2/(sx)}
850: \left(1-\frac{p^2}{suw}\right)^3
851: \eeq
852: where now
853: \beq
854: u=x\left(1+\frac{xp^2}{sw-p^2}\right)
855: \eeq
856: and $w_{min}$ is determined from the condition that $x'>p/\sqrt{s}$
857: which gives
858: \beq
859: w_{min}=\frac{p}{\sqrt{s}}+\frac{p^2}{xs}
860: \eeq
861:
862: Now we make our crucial approximation to neglect the second term in (53)
863: and put $u=x$. This leads directly to the first term in (41).
864:
865: The contribution from the region $y'>0$ is transformed in a similar manner.
866: Now we integrate over $w$ to get
867: \beq
868: \left(\frac{d\sigma}{dy d^2p}\right)_{y'>0}=\frac{9\alpha_s^2}{p^4}
869: \int^{p/\sqrt{s}}\frac{dx'}{x'}\int dw uG(u)wG(w)
870: \left(1-\frac{p^2}{suw}\right)^3
871: \delta\left(u-x-\frac{p^2}{sx'}\right)
872: \eeq
873: with $w=x'+p^2/(sx)$. Further integration over $x'$ gives
874: \beq
875: \left(\frac{d\sigma}{dy d^2p}\right)_{y'<0}=\frac{9\alpha_s^2}{p^4}
876: \int_{u_{min}}\frac{du}{u} uG(u)wG(w)\frac{u}{u-x}
877: \left(1-\frac{p^2}{suw}\right)**3
878: \eeq
879: Here
880: \beq
881: w=\frac{p^2}{sx}\left(1+\frac{x}{u-x}\right)
882: \eeq
883: and $u_{min}$ is determined from the condition $x'<p/\sqrt{s}$ to be
884: \beq
885: u_{min}=x+\frac{p}{\sqrt{s}}
886: \eeq
887: Again our approximation consists in neglecting the second term in (56). After
888: that we obtain the second term in (41).
889:
890: \section{Appendix 2. Fits to the existing jet data [7]}
891: The fits have the form
892: \beq
893: \frac{d\sigma}{dy dp}= \frac{A}{(p+p_0)^a},\ \frac{\mu{\rm b}}{\rm GeV/c}
894: \eeq
895: Here follows the table of the parameters with the corresponding values of
896: $\chi^2$
897:
898: \begin{center}
899: \begin {tabular}{|l|r|r|r|}
900: \hline
901: &200 GeV & 500 GeV & 900 GeV\\\hline
902: A & (0.977$\pm$0.047)E+10 & (1.00$\pm$ 0.97)E+10 &(1.00$\pm$ 0.98)E+10\\
903: a & 8.028$\pm$ 0.095 & 7.119$\pm$ 0.033 & 6.433$\pm$ 0.034 \\
904: $p_0$ & 4.14$\pm$ 0.32 & 5.83$\pm$ 0.22 & 8.50$\pm$ 0.28 \\
905: $\chi^2$& 3.84 & 5.514 & 16.4 \\\hline
906: A & (0.91$\pm$ 0.48)E+8 & (0.175$\pm$ 0.045)E+8 &(0.379$\pm$ 0.065)E+7\\
907: a & 6.68$\pm$ 0.23 & 5.383$\pm$ 0.096 & 4.402$\pm$ 0.068 \\
908: $p_0$ & 2.0 (fixed) & 2.0 (fixed)& 2.0 (fixed)\\
909: $\chi^2$& 4.54 & 10.87 & 33.6 \\\hline
910: \end{tabular}
911: \end{center}
912:
913: \section{Appendix 3. Details of the numerical calculation}
914: Integration over the angles transforms (45) and (48) in
915: \beq
916: \frac {d\sigma}{d^2\beta dy d^2p}=\frac{1}{\pi} xAP(x)
917: \int rdr{\rm J}_0(pr)
918: \Big(Z(z)-Z(z_0)\Big)
919: \eeq
920: and
921: \beq
922: f(r)=
923: 9\pi K\int_{p_0} p'dp'{\rm J}_0(p'r)\frac{\alpha^2_s({p'}^2)}{{p'}^4}
924: \int_{w_{min}} \frac{dw}{w}wP(w,{p'}^2)
925: \left(1-\frac{{p'}^2}{sxw}\right)^2
926: \eeq
927: where according to (40) and (41) at $y=0$ $x=p/\sqrt{s}$ and
928: \beq
929: w_{min}=\frac{2{p'}^2}{sx}=\frac{2{p'}^2}{p\sqrt{s}}
930: \eeq
931: One observes that the two integrations in (60) over $w$ y $p'$ do not decouple,
932: which makes the calculation rather complicated.
933:
934:
935: \section{Figure captions}
936:
937: 1. Diagrams illustrating the interactions of two partons from the projectile with two partons from the target.
938:
939: 2. Jet distributions in $p\bar p$ collisions at 200 GeV at center rapidity.
940: The lower curve is a fit to the experimental data [7]. The upper curve shows predictions from Eq. (41) with $K=3.0$.
941:
942: 3. Ratios of the total distributions to the single scattering contributions
943: (optical approximation) for central Pb-Pb collisions at 200 GeV and center
944: rapidity
945: calculated from(45) with $p_0=2$ GeV/c.
946:
947: 4. Ratios of the total distributions to the single scattering contributions
948: (optical approximation) for central Pb-Pb collisions at 6000 GeV and center
949: rapidity calculated from(45) at $y=0$ with $p_0=2$ GeV/c.
950:
951:
952:
953:
954:
955: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
956:
957: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
958:
959: %\cite{Affolder:2001fa}
960: \bibitem{Affolder:2001fa}
961: T.~Affolder {\it et al.} [CDF Collaboration],
962: %``Measurement of the inclusive jet cross section in anti-p p collisions at s**(1/2) = 1.8-TeV,''
963: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64}, 032001 (2001)
964: [Erratum-ibid.\ D {\bf 65}, 039903 (2002)]
965: [arXiv:hep-ph/0102074].
966: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0102074;%%
967:
968:
969: %\cite{Eskola:1988yh}
970: \bibitem{Eskola:1988yh}
971: K.~J.~Eskola, K.~Kajantie and J.~Lindfors,
972: %``Quark And Gluon Production In High-Energy Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions,''
973: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 323}, 37 (1989).
974: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B323,37;%%
975:
976:
977: %\cite{Eskola:2001rx}
978: \bibitem{Eskola:2001rx}
979: K.~J.~Eskola, K.~Kajantie and K.~Tuominen,
980: %``Heavy ion collision multiplicities and gluon distribution functions,''
981: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 700}, 509 (2002)
982: [arXiv:hep-ph/0106330].
983: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0106330;%%
984:
985:
986:
987: %\cite{Calucci:1989hb}
988: \bibitem{Calucci:1989hb}
989: G.~Calucci and D.~Treleani,
990: %``Mini - Jets: Cross-Section And Energy Distribution In Very High-Energy Nuclear Collisions,''
991: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 41}, 3367 (1990).
992: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D41,3367;%%
993:
994: %\cite{Calucci:1991sz}
995: \bibitem{Calucci:1991sz}
996: G.~Calucci and D.~Treleani,
997: %``Mini - jets: Transverse energy flow in very high-energy nuclear collisions,''
998: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 44}, 2746 (1991).
999: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D44,2746;%%
1000:
1001: %\cite{Accardi:2001ih}
1002: \bibitem{Accardi:2001ih}
1003: A.~Accardi and D.~Treleani,
1004: %``Minijet transverse spectrum in high-energy hadron nucleus collisions,''
1005: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64}, 116004 (2001)
1006: [arXiv:hep-ph/0106306].
1007: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0106306;%%
1008:
1009:
1010:
1011: %\cite{Bialas:1976ed}
1012: \bibitem{Bialas:1976ed}
1013: A.~Bialas, M.~Bleszynski and W.~Czyz,
1014: %``Multiplicity Distributions In Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions At High-Energies,''
1015: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 111}, 461 (1976).
1016:
1017: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B111,461;%%
1018:
1019: %\cite{Pajares:1985}
1020: \bibitem{Pajares:1985}
1021: C.Pajares and A.V.Ramallo, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 31}, 1985 (1975)
1022:
1023: %\cite{Boreskov:yt}
1024: \bibitem{Boreskov:yt}
1025: K.~G.~Boreskov and A.~B.~Kaidalov,
1026: %``Nucleus-Nucleus Scattering In The Glauber Approach,''
1027: Sov.\ J.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf 48}, 367 (1988)
1028: [Yad.\ Fiz.\ {\bf 48}, 575 (1988)].
1029: %%CITATION = SJNCA,48,367;%%
1030:
1031: %\cite{Accardi:2000ry}
1032: \bibitem{Accardi:2000ry}
1033: A.~Accardi and D.~Treleani,
1034: %``Hard parton rescatterings and minijets in nuclear collisions at LHC,''
1035: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63}, 116002 (2001)
1036: [arXiv:hep-ph/0009234].
1037: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0009234;%%
1038:
1039: %\cite{Pancheri:qg}
1040: \bibitem{Pancheri:qg}
1041: G.~Pancheri and Y.~N.~Srivastava,
1042: %``Low P(T) Jets And The Rise With Energy Of The Inelastic Cross-Section,''
1043: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 182}, 199 (1986).
1044: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B182,199;%%
1045:
1046: %\cite{Gluck:1998xa}
1047: \bibitem{Gluck:1998xa}
1048: M.~Gluck, E.~Reya and A.~Vogt,
1049: %``Dynamical parton distributions revisited,''
1050: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 5}, 461 (1998)
1051: [arXiv:hep-ph/9806404].
1052: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9806404;%%
1053:
1054: %\cite{Albajar:1988tt}
1055: \bibitem{Albajar:1988tt}
1056: C.~Albajar {\it et al.} [UA1 Collaboration],
1057: %``Production Of Low Transverse Energy Clusters In Anti-P P Collisions At S**(1/2) = 0.2-Tev To 0.9-Tev And Their Interpretation In Terms Of QCD
1058: Jets,''
1059: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 309}, 405 (1988).
1060: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B309,405;%%
1061:
1062: %\cite{Eskola:2002kv}
1063: \bibitem{Eskola:2002kv}
1064: K.~J.~Eskola and H.~Honkanen,
1065: %``A perturbative QCD analysis of charged-particle distributions in hadronic and nuclear collisions,''
1066: arXiv:hep-ph/0205048.
1067: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0205048;%%
1068:
1069: %\cite{Duke:1983gd}
1070: %\bibitem{Duke:1983gd}
1071: %D.~W.~Duke and J.~F.~Owens,
1072: %``Q**2 Dependent Parametrizations Of Parton Distribution Functions,''
1073: %Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 30}, 49 (1984).
1074: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D30,49;%%
1075:
1076: %\cite{Baier:1998kq}
1077: \bibitem{Baier:1998kq}
1078: R.~Baier, Y.~L.~Dokshitzer, A.~H.~Mueller and D.~Schiff,
1079: %``Medium-induced radiative energy loss: Equivalence between the BDMPS and Zakharov formalisms,''
1080: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 531}, 403 (1998)
1081: [arXiv:hep-ph/9804212].
1082: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9804212;%%
1083:
1084: %\cite{Wiedemann:2000za}
1085: \bibitem{Wiedemann:2000za}
1086: U.~A.~Wiedemann,
1087: %``Gluon radiation off hard quarks in a nuclear environment: Opacity expansion,''
1088: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 588}, 303 (2000)
1089: [arXiv:hep-ph/0005129].
1090: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0005129;%%
1091:
1092: %\cite{Wiedemann:2000tf}
1093: \bibitem{Wiedemann:2000tf}
1094: U.~A.~Wiedemann,
1095: %``Jet quenching versus jet enhancement: A quantitative study of the BDMPS-Z gluon radiation spectrum,''
1096: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 690}, 731 (2001)
1097: [arXiv:hep-ph/0008241].
1098: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0008241;%%
1099:
1100: %\cite{Gyulassy:2000fs}
1101: \bibitem{Gyulassy:2000fs}
1102: M.~Gyulassy, P.~Levai and I.~Vitev,
1103: %``Non-Abelian energy loss at finite opacity,''
1104: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 85}, 5535 (2000)
1105: [arXiv:nucl-th/0005032].
1106: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0005032;%%
1107:
1108:
1109:
1110:
1111: \end{thebibliography}
1112:
1113: \end{document}
1114:
1115: --=====================_7673127==_--
1116:
1117:
1118:
1119: