1: \documentclass{ws-p8-50x6-00}
2:
3: %\usepackage{epsfig}
4:
5: % put your own definitions here:
6: \newcommand{\lsim}{\raisebox{-0.5mm}{$\stackrel{<}{\scriptstyle{\sim}}$}}
7: \newcommand{\gsim}{\raisebox{-0.5mm}{$\stackrel{>}{\scriptstyle{\sim}}$}}
8: \newcommand{\qsq}{\mbox{$Q^2$}}
9: \newcommand{\pom}{I\!\!P}
10: \newcommand{\reg}{{I\!\!R}}
11: \newcommand{\xpom}{x_{\pom}}
12:
13: \newcommand{\bet} {$\beta$}
14: \newcommand{\wsq} {$W^2$}
15: \newcommand{\ttt} {$t$}
16:
17: \newcommand{\fdfourf} {$F_2^{D(4)} (Q^2, x_{I\!\!P} , \beta , t)$}
18: \newcommand{\fdthree} {$F_2^{D(3)}$}
19: \newcommand{\fdthreef} {$F_2^{D(3)} (Q^2, x_{I\!\!P} , \beta )$}
20: \newcommand{\fdtwo} {$F_2^{D(2)} (Q^2,\beta)$}
21: \newcommand{\ftwo} {$F_2 (Q^2,x)$}
22:
23: \newcommand{\nbinv}{\mbox{${\rm nb^{-1}}$}}
24: \newcommand{\pbinv}{\mbox{${\rm pb^{-1}}$}}
25: \newcommand{\fbinv}{\mbox{${\rm fb^{-1}}$}}
26:
27: \newcommand{\fnrs}{Chercheur Qualifi\'e FNRS}
28:
29: \newcounter{fig:gluon}
30: \newcounter{fig:diag}
31: \newcounter{fig:jpsi}
32: \newcounter{fig:rho}
33:
34: % choix articles classique
35: \def\Journal#1#2#3#4{{#1} {\bf #2} (#3) #4}
36:
37: \def\NCA{\em Nuovo Cimento}
38: \def\NIM{\em Nucl. Instrum. Methods}
39: \def\NIMA{{\em Nucl. Instrum. Methods} {\bf A}}
40: \def\NPB{{\em Nucl. Phys.} {\bf B}}
41: \def\PLB{{\em Phys. Lett.} {\bf B}}
42: \def\PRL{\em Phys. Rev. Lett.}
43: \def\PRD{{\em Phys. Rev.} {\bf D}}
44: \def\ZPC{{\em Z. Phys.} {\bf C}}
45: \def\EPJ{{\em Eur. Phys. J.} {\bf C}}
46:
47: % add words to TeX's hyphenation exception list
48: %\hyphenation{author another created financial paper re-commend-ed Post-Script}
49:
50: \begin{document}
51:
52: \title{Diffractive Physics at HERA}
53:
54: \author{L. Favart}
55: \address{\fnrs \\
56: Universit\'e Libre de Bruxelles,
57: 1050 Brussels, Belgium \\
58: {\it lfavart@ulb.ac.be}}
59:
60: % typeset front matter
61: \maketitle
62:
63: \abstracts{
64: A great interest for diffraction has been generated these last years
65: by the HERA data. They give us the first opportunity to understand
66: high energy diffractive physics in terms of a fundamental theory, i.e.
67: QCD.
68: A review of the main results from H1 and ZEUS in this field is presented
69: and the relation with the proton structure function at small x-Bjorken
70: values is discussed.
71: }
72:
73: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
74: \section*{Introduction}
75: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
76:
77: Presently, one of the most important tasks in particle physics is the
78: understanding of the strong force.
79: For this purpose, the Quantum Chromodynamics theory (QCD)
80: seems to be the best candidate.
81: An important characteristic of this theory is that the
82: coupling constant $\alpha_S$ is larger than 1 when the interaction
83: between the different actors, quarks and gluons, does not take place at
84: distances small enough.
85: This means that to be calculable within a
86: perturbative approach, the interaction between these constituents
87: requires the presence in the process of a ``hard''
88: scale, i.e. a large transverse momentum or a large mass.
89: \\
90:
91: The lepton beam of the high energy $e-p$ collider
92: HERA (reaching an energy in the center of mass system $\sqrt s = 300$ GeV)
93: is a prolific source of photons in a large virtuality range
94: such that the study of $\gamma^* p$ interactions provides a completely new
95: and deep insight into the QCD dynamics.
96: \\
97:
98: A major discovery at HERA is the observation of the strong rise of
99: the total cross section at high energy in the deep inelastic scattering
100: (DIS) i.e.\ $\gamma^* p$ interactions with large $Q^2$ values
101: (\qsq\ being the negative of the squared four-momentum of the exchanged photon).
102: This is inconsistent with the case of the photoproduction ($Q^2 \simeq 0$),
103: which shows a soft dependence in the total hadronic
104: energy, $W$, similar to the hadron-hadron interaction case
105: and well described by the Regge phenomenological theory.
106: \\
107:
108: \hspace{-0.8cm}
109: \begin{minipage}{0.48\textwidth}
110: \stepcounter{figure}
111: \setcounter{fig:gluon}{\value{figure}}
112: HERA is thus a unique device to test QCD in the perturbative
113: regime and to study the transition between perturbative and non-perturbative
114: domains.
115: One of the remarkable successes of this theory
116: is the correct prediction of the evolution of
117: the proton structure function with $Q^2$, for $Q^2 > 1$~GeV$^2$,
118: now measured with a very good acuracy\cite{f2}.
119: This evolution allows the extraction of the gluon density in the
120: proton, which is not directly measurable.
121: The fast rise of the gluon density for decreasing $x$, shown
122: in Fig.~\arabic{fig:gluon} reflects the fast rise of the cross section with
123: $W$.
124: \end{minipage}
125:
126: \vspace{-6.50cm}
127: \hspace{0.45\textwidth}
128: \begin{minipage}{0.48\textwidth}
129: \epsfig{file=figures/h_gluon.eps,width=0.98\textwidth}
130: \small{Figure~\arabic{fig:gluon}. The gluon density in the proton
131: measured by H1 as a function of $x$, for different values of \qsq.}
132: \\
133: \end{minipage}
134:
135: The other main window opened at HERA for the understanding of the strong force
136: is the study of diffractive interaction.
137: Diffraction has been successfully described,
138: already more than 30 years
139: ago, via the introduction of an exchanged object carrying the vacuum quantum
140: numbers, called the Pomeron ($\pom$).
141: Whilst Regge-based models give a unified description of all pre-HERA
142: diffractive data, this approach is not linked to an underlying
143: fundamental theory.
144: \\
145:
146: \hspace{-8.0mm}
147: \begin{minipage}[h]{0.48\textwidth}
148: \stepcounter{figure}
149: \setcounter{fig:diag}{\value{figure}}
150: The second major result at HERA is the observation that $8 - 10 \%$ of
151: the events in the deep inelastic regime ($Q^2 > 1$~GeV$^2$) present
152: the charateristics of diffractively produced events\cite{diffr_1992}, i.e. a
153: large rapidity gap (LRG) without hadronic activity between the
154: two hadronic low mass sub-systems, $X$ and $Y$,
155: as illustrated in Fig.~\arabic{fig:diag}.The gaps being significantly
156: larger than implied by particle density
157: fluctuation during the hadroni-
158: \end{minipage}
159: \hspace{0.5 cm}
160: \begin{minipage}[h]{0.48\textwidth}
161: \vspace{0.3cm}
162: \epsfig{file=figures/diff_1.eps,angle=270,width=0.98\textwidth}
163: \small{Figure~\arabic{fig:diag}. Sketch of the diffractive $e-p$ interaction}
164: \vspace*{2mm}
165: \\
166: \end{minipage}
167: sation process, these events
168: are attributed to ``hard" diffraction, i.e. to the exchange of a
169: colourless object at the proton vertex, for the first time observed in a
170: hard regime. HERA offers a unique possibility to study the nature of
171: diffraction and determine the Pomeron structure in terms of QCD.
172:
173:
174: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
175: \section{Inclusive DIS cross section and partonic structure of the Pomeron}
176: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
177:
178:
179: The hard diffractive cross section can be defined by four kinematic variables
180: conveniently chosen as \qsq , $\xpom$ , \bet\ and \ttt, where
181: \ttt \ is the squared
182: four-momentum transfer to the proton, and $\xpom$ \ and \bet\ are defined as
183: \begin{center}
184: \begin{equation}
185: \xpom \simeq \frac{Q^2 + M_X^2}{Q^2 + W^2 }
186: \qquad
187: \beta \simeq \frac{Q^2 }{Q^2 + M_X^2} ; \label{eq:kin}
188: \end{equation}
189: \end{center}
190: $\xpom$ can be interpreted as the fraction of the
191: proton momentum carried by the exchanged
192: Pomeron and \bet\ is the fraction of the exchanged momentum carried by
193: the quark struck by the photon.
194: These variables are related to the Bjorken $x$ scaling variable
195: by the relation $x = \beta \cdot \xpom$.
196:
197: Experimentally, the \ttt\ variable is usually not measured or is integrated over.
198: In analogy with non-diffractive DIS scattering, the measured cross section
199: is expressed in the form of a three-fold diffractive structure function
200: \fdthreef :
201: %
202: \begin{equation}
203: \frac { {\rm d}^3 \sigma \ (e p \rightarrow e X Y) }
204: { {\rm d}Q^2 \ {\rm d}\xpom \ {\rm d}\beta}
205: = \frac {4 \pi \alpha^2} {\beta Q^4}
206: \ (1 - y + \frac {y^2}{2} )
207: \ F_2^{D(3)} (Q^2, \xpom , \beta) ,
208: \label{eq:fdthreefull}
209: \end{equation}
210: %
211: where $y$ is the usual scaling variable, with
212: $ y \simeq W^2 / s$.
213: Conveniently, \fdthree \ is factorised in the form
214: $F_2^{D(3)} (Q^2, \xpom , \beta ) =
215: f_{\pom/p} (\xpom ) \cdot F_2^D (Q^2, \beta)$,
216: assuming that the $\pom$ flux $ f_{\pom/p} (\xpom)$ is independent
217: of the $\pom$ structure $F_2^D (Q^2, \beta)$,
218: by analogy with the hadron structure functions, \bet\ playing the role
219: of Bjorken $x$. The $\pom$ flux is parametrized in a Regge inspired
220: form. Including the reggeon ($\reg$) trajectory
221: in addition to the Pomeron,
222: a good description of the data is obtained throughout
223: the measured kinematic domain ($6.5<Q^2<800$ GeV$^2$ $\xpom < 0.05$
224: and $0.01<\beta<0.9$)\cite{f2d}.
225: \\
226:
227: The reggeon contribution gets larger for increasing values of
228: $\xpom$, which correspond to smaller energy (for given \qsq\ and \bet\
229: values).
230: It also gets larger for smaller values of \bet, which is consistent with
231: the expected decrease with \bet\ of the reggeon structure function, following
232: the meson example, whereas the Pomeron structure function is observed to
233: be approximately flat in \bet.
234: The comparision of \fdtwo\ with the inclusive proton structure function,
235: \ftwo,
236: shows that the dynamic is different in the Pomeron and in the proton
237: (see Fig.~\ref{fig:f2d}) for large \bet\ values.
238: By analogy to the QCD evolution of the proton structure function,
239: one can attempt to extract the partonic structure of the Pomeron
240: from the \qsq \ evolution of \fdtwo.
241: The extracted distributions\cite{f2d} are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:gluond}
242: separately for the gluon
243: and the singlet quark components as a function of $z$, the Pomeron
244: momentum fraction carried by the parton entering the hard interaction.
245: This distribution shows the dominance of gluons up to the high $z$ values
246: in the Pomeron partonic structure.
247: \\
248:
249: \begin{figure}[htb] \unitlength 1mm
250: %\vspace{-4.2cm}
251: \epsfig{file=figures/h_f2f2d_beta.eps,width=0.49\textwidth}
252: \epsfig{file=figures/h_f2f2d_beta_2.eps,width=0.49\textwidth}
253: \caption{
254: The \fdthree diffractive structure function measurement as a function
255: of $Q^2$ for different values of $\xpom$ in two bins in \bet. The
256: inclusive proton structure function,
257: \ftwo\, is overlayed for the same \qsq\ values and
258: $ x = \beta \cdot \xpom$.
259: }
260: \label{fig:f2d}
261: \end{figure}
262:
263: \begin{figure}[htb] \unitlength 1mm
264: %\vspace{-4.2cm}
265: \epsfig{file=figures/h_pdf_f2d.eps,width=0.9\textwidth}
266: %\vspace{-0.5cm}
267: \caption{
268: Quark (singlet) and gluon densities in the $\pom$ extracted from the QCD
269: fit of \fdthree as a function of $z$.}
270: \label{fig:gluond}
271: \end{figure}
272:
273:
274: The dominance of hard gluons in the Pomeron is confirmed by various
275: analyses of the diffractive hadronic final
276: state (jet production, energy flow, particle spectra and multiplicities,
277: and event shape) providing a global consistent picture of
278: diffraction\cite{hadfin,mult,jets}.
279: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
280:
281: \section{Exclusive diffractive final states}
282: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
283: \begin{figure}[htb] \unitlength 1mm
284: \begin{center}
285: \epsfig{file=figures/hz_vm_sig_w.eps,width=0.85\textwidth}
286: \end{center}
287: \caption{Diffractive cross sections as a function of the $\gamma^*-p$
288: system energy for various vector mesons in photoproduction together
289: with the total photoproduction cross section.
290: }
291: \vspace{-0.5cm}
292: \label{fig:vm}
293: \end{figure}
294:
295: During these last
296: decades, our knowledge of the hadronic structure has progressed a lot,
297: mostly with the study of the inclusive inelastic reactions. The study of
298: exclusive reactions will probably be dominant in the coming years, in
299: this field, as they allow us to go one step deeper in our understanding
300: of the hadronic structure. In particular they give access to
301: momenta and helicity correlations of the hadron structure.
302: \\
303:
304: Furthermore, the exclusive elastic vector meson production and the
305: deeply virtual Compton scattering (DVCS) studies:
306: $\gamma^* p \rightarrow X p$, where the hadronic system $X$ consists
307: only in a vector meson ($\rho, \omega,...$) or a photon (DVCS),
308: provide a very
309: interesting way to test the mechanism of diffraction and our
310: understanding of the Pomeron structure.
311: \\
312:
313: Fig.~\ref{fig:vm} summarizes the $W$ dependence of various
314: elastic exclusive vector meson photo-production\cite{vm},
315: together with the total photoproduction cross section\cite{totsig}.
316: The light mesons ($\rho, \omega$ and $\phi$) show a soft dependence in $W$,
317: equivalent to that of the total cross section dependence,
318: while this energy dependence is much steeper
319: for $J/\psi$ production.
320: This regime change is interpreted as being due to the presence of a hard scale
321: in the process, the (high) charm
322: quark mass, making the $J/\psi$ meson smaller than the
323: confinement scale ($\sim 1 fm$).
324: \stepcounter{figure}
325: \setcounter{fig:jpsi}{\value{figure}}
326: In this case, it is natural to attempt a perturbative QCD description
327: of the process,
328: where the photon fluctuates into a quark-antiquark pair
329: and the exchanged Pomeron is modeled by a pair of gluons.
330: This leads, in a first approximation, to a cross section proportional
331: to the gluon density squared, which is in good agreement
332: (full line) with the data (points) shown on
333: Fig.~\arabic{fig:jpsi}.
334: \stepcounter{figure}
335: \setcounter{fig:rho}{\value{figure}}
336:
337: \hspace{-0.8cm}
338: \begin{minipage}[h]{0.48\textwidth}
339: \vspace{0.4cm}
340: \epsfig{file=figures/z_jpsi_w.eps,height=6.0cm}
341: \small{Figure~\arabic{fig:jpsi}. Exclusive $J/\psi$ cross section in
342: photoproduction and DIS Diffractive cross sections as a function of $W$.}
343: \\
344: \end{minipage}
345: \hspace{0.3cm}
346: \begin{minipage}[h]{0.48\textwidth}
347: \epsfig{file=figures/H1prelim-02-015.fig2.eps,height=6.0cm}
348: \small{Figure~\arabic{fig:rho}. Exclusive $\rho$ in DIS for different
349: $Q^2$ values.}
350: \\
351: \end{minipage}
352:
353: This figure also shows the agreement of the 2 gluons exchange model
354: with measurement of exclusive $J/\psi$ production in the DIS regime,
355: where a second hard scale, \qsq\ is present.
356: As illustrated on Fig.~\arabic{fig:rho}, a modification of the $W$
357: dependence also occurs for the elastic $\rho$ production
358: when the $Q^2$ increases, which highlights the appearance of \qsq\
359: as a hard scale for a light vector meson production.
360: \\
361:
362: \begin{figure}[btp]
363: \setlength{\unitlength}{1.0cm}
364: \begin{picture}(12.0,8.0)
365: \put(2.0,0.){\epsfig{file=figures/hv_univers.eps,width=0.75\textwidth}}
366: \put(3.5,1.3){\epsfig{file=figures/hv_univers_r.eps,width=3.5cm}}
367: \end{picture}
368: \caption{H1 and ZEUS measurements of the $\gamma p \rightarrow VM p$
369: total cross sections as a function of (\qsq\ + $M^2_V$)/4
370: for $\rho, \omega, \phi, J/\psi$ and $\Upsilon$ vector meson elastic
371: production, at the fixed value of $W$ = 75 GeV.
372: The insert presents the distance of the points to the fitted curve.
373: }
374: \label{fig:univers}
375: \end{figure}
376:
377: It is remarkable to see that the different vector meson
378: cross sections present a universal behaviour as a function of the
379: variable $Q^2 + M_V^2$, where $M_V$ is the vector meson mass, as
380: shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:univers} for $W$ = 75 GeV.
381: The cross sections were scaled by SU(4) factors, according to the
382: quark content of the vector mesons\cite{vm}.
383: This indicates that this variable choice seems to be a good scale to
384: describe the vector meson production in a universal way, and that the
385: cross section is at the first order not sensitive to the quark
386: flavour (which would probably not be valid at lower energy).
387: \\
388:
389: However, the exclusive $\Upsilon$ cross section seems to be too high
390: for this universal behaviour. In fact, the cross section measurement
391: does not agree with simple QCD predictions.
392: This is due to the fact that
393: the transition from a virtual photon coming from an electron
394: to an on shell particle forces the fractional momenta of the two
395: gluons involved to be unequal.
396: Therefore, in the cross section expression, the gluon density cannot just be
397: squared, but two different $x$ values have to be considered.
398: When such skewing effects are included the agreement with
399: QCD can be found again.
400: This effect becomes important at high \qsq\ values or high vector meson
401: masses. To include such effects in the cross section calculations, the
402: very powerfull formalism of Generalised Parton Distributions (GPD) has
403: been introduced\cite{GPD}.
404: \\
405:
406: \begin{figure}[btp]
407: \setlength{\unitlength}{1.0cm}
408: \begin{picture}(12.0,6.0)
409: \put(-0.2,0.){\epsfig{file=figures/sig_gp_w.eps,width=0.45\textwidth}}
410: \put(5.5,0.25){\epsfig{file=figures/McD_F_q2_new.eps,width=0.53\textwidth}}
411: \end{picture}
412: \caption{The H1 DVCS cross section measurement as a function of $W$
413: (left) and of \qsq\ (right). The measurement is compared to
414: dipole model (DD) and QCD predictions (FFS for LO and right plot at
415: NLO with different GPD inputs).
416: }
417: \label{fig:dvcs}
418: \end{figure}
419: For vector meson production GPD appear
420: quadratically in the cross section expression.
421: A unique feature of DVCS is that they appear linearly in the
422: interference term with the purely QED Bethe-Heitler process.
423: Compared to vector meson production, DVCS is theoretically simpler
424: (fully calculable)
425: because the composite meson in the final state is replaced by
426: the photon, thus avoiding large uncertainties due to the
427: unknown meson wave functions.
428: Therefore the DVCS measurement
429: offers a particularly suitable channel to extract GPD.
430: The first cross section measurement\cite{dvcs}, shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:dvcs}
431: as a function of $W$ and $Q^2$, is in good agreement with the
432: perturbative QCD prediction\cite{Freund} and provides the first
433: constrains on GPDs\cite{Ferrare}.
434:
435: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
436: \section*{Conclusion}
437: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
438:
439: HERA experiments have produced a large amount of results in diffraction,
440: which allow confrontations with QCD predictions,
441: when one of the hard scales \qsq, the quark mass or \ttt \
442: (not reported in this summary) is present in the process.
443: \\
444:
445: The QCD analysis of the total diffractive cross section,
446: assuming factorisation into a Pomeron flux in the proton,
447: shows that the corresponding parton distributions
448: favors the dominance of hard gluons in the Pomeron.
449: This is confirmed by the analysis
450: of inclusive final states and of jet production.
451: \\
452:
453: For the case of exclusive final state production, in the presence of a
454: hard scale the transition from soft to hard regime is observed as in
455: inclusive DIS.
456: Models based on the fluctuation of the photon in a quark-antiquark pair which
457: subsequently exchange a pair of gluons with the proton parton successfully
458: reproduce the enhanced energy dependence for the $J/\psi$ production and
459: for the $\Upsilon$ when skewed effects are included. The DVCS cross
460: section, the only fully calculable diffractive process,
461: has been measured for the first time and is in good agreement
462: with QCD predictions.
463:
464: \begin{thebibliography}{9}
465: %%%%%%%% Structure Functions %%%%%%%%%%%%
466: \bibitem{f2}
467: H1 Collab., C. Adloff et al.,
468: %``Deep-Inelastic Inclusive ep Scattering at Low $x$ and a Determination
469: % of $\alpha_{s}$",
470: \Journal{\EPJ}{21}{2001}{33-61}, \\
471: ZEUS Collab., J.Breitweg et al.
472: % ZEUS Results on the Measurement and Phenomenology of F_2 at Low x and
473: % Low Q^2
474: \Journal{\EPJ}{7}{1999}{609-630}.
475:
476: %%%%%%%% LRG %%%%%%%%%%%%
477: \bibitem{diffr_1992}
478: H1 Collab., T. Ahmed et al.,
479: \Journal{\NPB}{429}{1994}{477}, \\
480: ZEUS Collab., M. Derrick et al.,
481: \Journal{\PLB}{315}{1993}{481}.
482:
483: %%%%%%%% F2^D %%%%%%%%%%%%
484: \bibitem{f2d}
485: P. Laycock, Proceedings of the DIS2002 Workshop, to be
486: published Acta Physica Polonica B,\\
487: F.-P.\ Schilling, Proceedings of the DIS2002 Workshop, to be
488: published Acta Physica Polonica B,\\
489: H1 Collab., C. Adloff et al.,
490: % ``Inclusive Measurement of Diffractive Deep-Inelastic $ep$
491: % Scattering",
492: \Journal{\ZPC}{76}{1997}{613-629}, \\
493: ZEUS Collab., J. Breitweg et al.
494: % Measurement of the Diffractive Structure Function F_2^D(4) at HERA
495: % DESY 97-184 (September 1997)
496: \Journal{\EPJ}{1}{1998}{81-96}.
497:
498: \bibitem{hadfin}
499: H1 Collab., C. Adloff et al.,
500: % ``Hadron Production in Diffractive Deep Inelastic Scattering",
501: \Journal{\PLB}{B428} {1998} {206}.\\
502: ZEUS Collab., S. Chekanov et al.
503: % Properties of hadronic final states in diffractive deep inelastic
504: % scattering at HERA
505: \Journal{\PRD}{65}{2002}{052001}.
506:
507: \bibitem{mult}
508: H1 Collab., C. Adloff et al.
509: % Multiplicity Structure of Hadronic Final States in Diffractive
510: % Deep-Inelastic Scattering at HERA,
511: \Journal{\EPJ}{5}{1998}{439-452}.
512:
513: \bibitem{jets}
514: H1 Collab., C. Adloff et al.
515: % {\it Diffractive Dijet Production at HERA},
516: \Journal{\EPJ}{6}{1999}{421-436} \\
517: ZEUS Collab., J. Breitweg et al.
518: %{\it Diffractive Dijet Cross Sections in Photoproduction at HERA},
519: \Journal{\EPJ}{5}{1998}{41-56}.
520:
521: %%%%%%%% VM %%%%%%%%%%%%
522: \bibitem{vm}
523: H1 Collab., C. Adloff et al.,
524: %``Measurement of elastic electroproduction of $\phi$ mesons at HERA",
525: \Journal{\PLB}{483}{2000}{360-372}
526: and ref. therein, \\
527: ZEUS Collab., J.Breitweg et al.
528: % Measurement of the Spin-Density Matrix Elements in Exclusive
529: % Electroproduction of Rho^0 Mesons at HERA
530: \Journal{\EPJ}{12}{2000}{393-410}.
531:
532: %%%%%%%% Total cross section %%%%%%%%%%%%
533: \bibitem{totsig}
534: H1 Collab., S. Aid et al.,
535: \Journal{\ZPC}{69}{1995}{27-38},\\
536: ZEUS Collab., M. Derrick et al.,
537: \Journal{\ZPC}{63}{1994}{391-408}.
538:
539: \bibitem{GPD}
540: X.~Ji,
541: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 78} (1997) 610, [hep-ph/9603249].
542: \\
543: A.~V.~Radyushkin,
544: %``Nonforward parton distributions,''
545: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D 56} (1997) 5524, [hep-ph/9704207].
546:
547: \bibitem{dvcs}
548: H1 Collab., C. Adloff et al.,
549: % ``Measurement of deeply virtual Compton scattering at HERA",
550: \Journal{\PLB}{517}{2001}{47}.
551:
552: \bibitem{Freund}
553: A. Freund and M. Mc Dermott,
554: % ``A detailed next-to-leading order QCD analysis of deeply virtual
555: % Compton scattering observables",
556: \Journal{\EPJ}{23}{2002}{651-674} and [hep-ph/0111472].
557:
558: \bibitem{Ferrare}
559: L. Favart, Proceedings of the QCD-N'02 Workshop, to be published in
560: Nucl. Phys. A and [hep-ex/0106067].
561:
562: \end{thebibliography}
563: \end{document}
564:
565: