1: \documentstyle[12pt,epsfig]{article}
2: %\textwidth 16cm
3: %\textheight 23.5cm
4: %\topmargin -1cm
5: %\oddsidemargin 6mm
6: %\evensidemargin 6mm
7:
8: %\documentclass[12pt,a4]{article}
9: \textheight 239mm
10: \textwidth 165mm
11: \hoffset -2.0cm
12: \voffset -2.0cm
13: \pagestyle{plain}
14: \pagenumbering{arabic}
15: \setcounter{page}{1}
16:
17:
18:
19: %
20: %\def \simple {\baselineskip= \normalbaselineskip}
21: %\def \medio {\baselineskip= 1.5 \normalbaselineskip}
22: %\def \doble {\baselineskip= 2 \normalbaselineskip}
23: %
24: \def \as {\alpha_s}
25: \def \gl {\tilde{g}}
26: \def \ms {{\overline{\mbox{MS}}}}
27: \def \dr {{\overline{\mbox{DR}}}}
28: %
29: \newcommand{\cita} [1] {$^{\hbox{\scriptsize \cite{#1}}}$}
30: %
31: \newcommand{\prepr}[1] {\begin{flushright} {\bf #1}
32: \end{flushright} \vskip 1.5cm}
33: %
34: \newcommand{\titul}[1] {\begin{center}{\large\bf #1 } \end{center}\vskip 1.cm}
35: %
36: \newcommand{\autor}[1] {\begin {center} {\large \lineskip .5em #1 }
37: \end {center} }
38: %
39: \newcommand{\lugar}[1] {\begin{center} {\it #1} \end{center}}
40: %
41: \newcommand{\abstr}[1] {{\begin{center} \vskip .5cm {\bf Abstract
42: \vspace{0pt}} \end{center}}\begin{quote} #1
43: \end{quote}}
44: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
45: \newcommand{\z}{&&\hspace*{-1cm}}
46: \newcommand{\ep}{\varepsilon}
47: \newcommand{\vph}{\varphi}
48: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}
49: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}
50: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
51:
52: \begin{document}
53:
54: % Title
55: \begin{center}
56: {\Large \bf
57: The structure functions $F_2^c$ and $F_L^c$\\
58: in the framework of the $k_T$ factorization
59: } \\
60:
61: \vspace{4mm}
62:
63:
64: % author/address
65: %Author's name\\
66: A.V. Kotikov$^a$,~~ A.V. Lipatov$^b$,~~ G. Parente$^c$,~~ N.P. Zotov$^d$
67:
68: \vspace{4mm}
69: %Author's institute \\
70: % and address\\
71: {}$^a$~BLThPh, JINR,
72: %Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics\\
73: %Joint Institute for Nuclear Research\\
74: 141980 Dubna, Russia,\\
75:
76: {}$^b$~Dep. of Physics, MSU,
77: %Department of Physics \\
78: %M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University\\
79: 119899 Moscow, Russia,\\
80:
81: {}$^c$~
82: %Dep.
83: %%Departamento
84: %de F\'\i sica de Part\'\i culas,
85: Univ.
86: %Universidade
87: de Santiago de Compostela,
88: 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain,\\
89:
90: {}$^d$~INP, MSU,
91: %D.V. Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics \\
92: %M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University\\
93: 119899 Moscow, Russia
94: \end{center}
95:
96:
97: % Abstract
98: \begin{abstract}
99: %
100: We present
101: the perturbative parts of the structure functions
102: $F_2^c$ and $F_L^c$ for a gluon target having nonzero transverse
103: momentum squared at order $\alpha _s$.
104: The results of the double convolution (with respect to the Bjorken variable
105: $x$ and the
106: transverse momentum) of the perturbative part and the unintegrated
107: gluon densities are compared with HERA experimental data for
108: $F_2^c$.
109: The contribution from $F_L^c$ structure function ranges $10\div30\%$
110: of that of $F_2^c$ at the HERA kinematical range.
111: % of HERA experiments.
112: \end{abstract}
113:
114:
115: %\newpage
116:
117: \pagestyle{plain}
118: %\medio
119: \section{Introduction} \indent
120:
121: Recently there have been important new data on the charm structure function
122: (SF) $F_2^c$, of the proton from the H1 \cite{H1} and ZEUS \cite{ZEUS}
123: Collaborations at HERA, which have probed the small-$x$ region down to
124: $x=8\times 10^{-4}$ and $x=2\times 10^{-4}$, respectively. At these values
125: of $x$, the charm contribution to the total proton SF, $F_2^p$, is found
126: to be around $25\%$, which is a considerably larger fraction than that found
127: by the European Muon Collaboration at CERN \cite{EMC} at
128: %samewhat
129: larger $x$, where it was only $\sim 1\%$ of $F_2^p$. Extensive
130: theoretical analyses
131: in recent years have generally served to confirm that
132: %the bulk of
133: the
134: $F_2^c$ data can be described through perturbative generation of charm
135: within QCD (see, for example, the review in Ref. \cite{CoDeRo} and references
136: therein).
137:
138: We note,
139: %however,
140: that perhaps more relevant analyses of the HERA data, where
141: the $x$ values are quite small, are those based on BFKL dynamics
142: \cite{BFKL},
143: % (see discussions in the review of Ref. \cite{Kwien} and references
144: %therein),
145: because the leading $ln(1/x)$ contributions are summed. The basic
146: dynamical quantity in BFKL approach is the unintegrated gluon distribution
147: $\vph_g(x,k^2_{\bot})$
148: \footnote{Hereafter
149: $p^{\mu}$ and $k^{\mu}$ are the hadron and the gluon 4-momentums,
150: respectively,
151: and $q^{\mu}$ is the photon 4-momentum.}
152: %$\Phi(x_B,k^2_t)$
153: ($f_g$ is the (integrated) gluon distribution multiplied
154: by $x$ and $k_{\bot}$ is the transverse momentum)
155: \begin{eqnarray}
156: f_{g}(x,Q^2) ~=~ f_{g}(x,Q^2_0) + \int^{Q^2}_{Q^2_0} dk^2_{\bot}
157: %\frac{dk^2_{\bot}}{k^2_{\bot}}
158: \; \vph_g(x,k^2_{\bot}),
159: \label{1.1}
160: \end{eqnarray}
161: which satisfies the BFKL equation.
162: %Notice that the
163: The integral is divergent at the lower limit and it leads
164: to the necessity to use the difference $f_{g}(x,Q^2) - f_{g}(x,Q^2_0)$
165: with some nonzero $Q^2_0$.
166:
167:
168: Then, in the BFKL-like approach (hereafter the $k_t$-factorization
169: approach \cite{CaCiHa,CoEllis} is used)
170: the SFs $F^c_{2,L}(x,Q^2)$ are driven at small
171: $x$ by gluons and are related in the following way to the unintegrated
172: distribution $\vph_g(x,k^2_{\bot})$:
173: \begin{eqnarray}
174: F^c_{2,L}(x,Q^2) ~=~\int^1_{x} \frac{dz}{z} \int dk^2_{\bot}
175: %\frac{dk^2_{\bot}}{k^2_{\bot}}
176: \; C^g_{2,L}(z,Q^2,m_c^2,k^2_{\bot})~ \vph_g(x/z, k^2_{\bot}),
177: \label{d1}
178: %\nonumber
179: \end{eqnarray}
180:
181: The functions $C^g_{2,L}(x,Q^2,m_c^2,k^2_{\bot})$
182: may be regarded as the structure
183: functions of
184: the off-shell gluons with virtuality $k^2_{\bot}$ (hereafter we call them as
185: {\it hard structure functions}\footnote{This
186: notation reflects the fact that structure functions
187: $F_{2,L}^c$ connect with the functions $C_{2,L}^g$ at the same form
188: as cross-sections connect with hard ones (see \cite{CaCiHa,CoEllis}).}).
189: They are described by the quark box (and
190: crossed box) diagram contribution to the photon-gluon interaction
191: (see Fig. 1 in \cite{KoLiPaZo}).
192:
193: The purpose of the paper is to present the results for
194: %calculate
195: these hard SF
196: $C^g_{2,L}(x,Q^2,m_c^2,k^2_{\bot})$ and to analyze experimental data for
197: $F^c_{2}(x,Q^2)$ by applying Eq. (\ref{d1}) with different sets of
198: unintegrated gluon densities (see Ref. \cite{LiZo,Andersson})
199: and to give predictions for the longitudinal SF $F^c_{L}(x_B,Q^2)$.
200: %$F_{L}(x,Q^2)$.\\
201:
202: It is instructive to note that
203: the results should be
204: similar to those of the
205: photon-photon scattering process.
206: The corresponding QED contributions have been calculated many years ago
207: in Ref. \cite{BFaKh} (see also the beautiful review in Ref. \cite{BGMS}).
208: Our results
209: have been calculated independently in \cite{KoLiPaZo}
210: (based on approaches of \cite{KaKo,KoTMF})
211: and they are in full agreement with
212: %Ref.
213: %on
214: \cite{BFaKh}.
215: However, we hope
216: that our formulas which are given in a
217: %have essentially
218: simpler form
219: %and we hope that they will
220: could be useful for others.
221: %in other analyses.\\
222:
223:
224:
225:
226: \section{Hard structure functions} \indent
227: %
228:
229: The gluon polarization tensor (hereafter
230: the indices $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are connected with gluons),
231: which gives the main contribution at high energy limit, has the form:
232: %to the polarization tensor we are interested in (see below)
233: \bea
234: \hat P^{\alpha\beta}_{BFKL}~=~
235: \frac{k_{\bot}^{\alpha}k_{\bot}^{\beta}}{k_{\bot}^2}
236: ~=~\frac{x^2}{-k^2}
237: p^{\alpha}p^{\beta}~=~ -\frac{1}{2}
238: \frac{1}{\tilde \beta^4} \left[\tilde \beta^2 g^{\alpha \beta}
239: -12 bx^2 \frac{q^{\alpha}q^{\beta}}{Q^2} \right],
240: %(k=xp+k_t)
241: \label{1dd}
242: \eea
243: where $\tilde \beta^2=1-4bx^2,~~b=-k^2/Q^2 \equiv k_{\bot}^2/Q^2 >0.$
244:
245: Contracting the corresponding photon projectors, we have:
246: \begin{eqnarray}
247: \z C^g_{2}(x) =
248: %e_c^2 \; \frac{\alpha_s(Q^2)}{4\pi}\; x
249: \frac{{\cal K}}{\tilde \beta^2 }
250: \;
251: \left[
252: f^{(1)}_{BFKL} +
253: \frac{3}{2\tilde \beta^2}\; f^{(2)}_{BFKL} \right],~
254: % \label{3}\\
255: C^g_{L} (x) =
256: %e_c^2 \; \frac{\alpha_s(Q^2)}{4\pi}\; x
257: \frac{{\cal K}}{\tilde \beta^2 }
258: \;
259: \left[
260: 4bx^2 f^{(1)}_{BFKL} +
261: \frac{(1+2bx^2)}{\tilde \beta^2}\; f^{(2)}_{BFKL} \right]
262: %\nonumber
263: \label{3}\\
264: \z f^{(1)}_{BFKL} =
265: \frac{1}{\tilde\beta^4}
266: \left[ \tilde \beta^2 f^{(1)} ~-~
267: 3bx^2 \tilde f^{(1)}\right],~~~
268: f^{(2)}_{BFKL} ~=~
269: \frac{1}{\tilde\beta^4}
270: \left[ \tilde \beta^2 f^{(2)} ~-~
271: 3bx^2 \tilde f^{(2)} \right],
272: %&=&
273: \nonumber
274: \end{eqnarray}
275: where the normalization factor
276: ${\cal K} = e_c^2 \; \alpha_s(Q^2)/(4\pi)\; x$,
277: ~$a=m^2_c/Q^2$~, $e_c=2/3$ is charm quark charge
278: and
279: \begin{eqnarray}
280: f^{(1)} &=& -2 \beta \Biggl[ 1 - \biggl(1-2x(1+b-2a) \; [1-x(1+b+2a)]
281: \biggr) \; f_1
282: \nonumber \\
283: &+& (2a-b)(1-2a)x^2 \; f_2 \Biggr],
284: \label{5}\\
285: f^{(2)} &=& 8x\; \beta \Biggl[(1-(1+b)x)
286: -2x \biggl(bx(1-(1+b)x)(1+b-2a) + a\tilde \beta^2 \biggr)\; f_1
287: \nonumber \\
288: &+& bx^2(1-(1+b)x) (2a-b) \; f_2 \Biggr],
289: \label{6} \\
290: \tilde f^{(1)} &=& - \beta \Biggl[ \frac{1-x(1+b)}{x}
291: -2 \biggl(x(1-x(1+b))(1+b-2a) +a \tilde \beta^2 \biggr) \; f_1
292: \nonumber \\
293: &-& x(1-x(1+b))(1-2a) \; f_2 \Biggr],
294: \label{5dd}\\
295: \tilde f^{(2)} &=& 4 \; \beta ~(1-(1+b)x)^2 \Biggl[2
296: - (1+2bx^2)\; f_1
297: %\nonumber \\ &-&
298: -bx^2 \; f_2 \Biggr],
299: \label{6dd}
300: \end{eqnarray}
301: with
302: $$
303: %~~~~~~
304: \beta^2=1-\frac{4ax}{(1-(1+b)x)},~~~~~f_1=\frac{1}{\tilde \beta \beta} \;
305: \ln\frac{1+\beta \tilde \beta}{1-\beta \tilde \beta},
306: ~~~~~f_2=\frac{-4}{1-\beta^2 \tilde \beta^2}$$
307:
308:
309: For the important regimes when
310: $k^2= 0$, $m^2_c = 0$ and $Q^2 = 0$, the
311: %analyses are given in Appendix C.
312: results are coincided with ones of Refs. \cite{CaCiHa,Witten}.
313: Notice that our results in Eq. (\ref{3}) should
314: be also
315: agree with those in Ref. \cite{BMSS} but the direct comparison is
316: quite difficult because
317: the structure of their results is quite cumbersome (see Appendix A in
318: Ref. \cite{BMSS}).
319: %\\
320: We have found numerical agreement in the case of
321: $F_2(x,Q^2)$ for several types of unintegrated gluon distributions
322: (see Fig.4 in \cite{KoLiPaZo}).
323:
324: \section{Comparison with $F_2^c$ experimental data and
325: predictions for $F_L^c$ } \indent
326:
327: %\vskip 0.5cm
328: With the help of the results obtained in the previous Section
329: we have analyzed HERA data for SF $F_2^c$ from ZEUS \cite{ZEUS}
330: %andH1 \cite{H1}
331: collaboration.
332:
333: Notice that in Ref. \cite{CaCiHa}
334: the $k_{\bot}^2$-integral in the r.h.s. of Eq.(\ref{d1}) has been evaluated
335: using the BFKL results for the Mellin transform of the
336: unintegrated gluon distribution and the Wilson coefficient functions have
337: been calculated for the full perturbative series at asymptotically small
338: $x$ values. Since we would like to analyze experimental data for the SF
339: $F_2^c$, we have an interest to obtain results at quite broad range of
340: small $x$ values. For the reason we need in a parameterization
341: of unintegrated gluon distribution function.
342:
343: We consider two different parametrizations for the
344: unintegrated gluon distribution (see ~\cite{LiZo}):
345: %. Firstly, we use the parametrization
346: the Ryskin-Shabelski (RS) one ~\cite{RS}
347: and the Blumlein one
348: \cite{BL}.
349: \begin{figure}
350: %
351: %\vskip -1cm
352: \begin{center}
353: \vskip -1cm
354: %\epsfig{figure=f2ccZEUSx.eps,width=15cm,height=20cm}
355: %\epsfig{figure=f2ccZEUSx.eps,width=16cm,height=21.2cm}
356: \epsfig{figure=f2ccZEUSx.eps,width=16.5cm,height=21.8cm}
357: \end{center}
358: \vskip -1cm
359: \caption{The structure function $F_2^c(x,Q^2)$ as a function of $x$ for
360: different values of $Q^2$ compared to ZEUS data~\cite{ZEUS}.
361: Curves 1, 2 and 3 correspond to SF obtained
362: in the standard parton model with the GRV ~\cite{GRV}
363: gluon density at the leading order approximation and to SF
364: obtained in the $k_T$ factorization approach with RS~\cite{RS}
365: and Blumlein (at $Q_0^2 = 4$ GeV$^2$)~\cite{BL} parameterizations of
366: unintegrated gluon distribution.}
367: \end{figure}
368:
369: In Fig. 1
370: %and 2
371: we show the SF $F_2^c$ as a function $x$ for different values
372: of $Q^2$ in comparison with ZEUS \cite{ZEUS}
373: %and H1 \cite{H1}
374: experimental data.
375: %
376: We see that at large $Q^2$ ($Q^2 \geq 10$ GeV$^2$)
377: the SF $F_2^c$
378: obtained in the $k_T$ factorization approach is higher than the SF obtained
379: in the standard parton model with the GRV \cite{GRV}
380: %and MT ~\cite{MT}
381: gluon density at the LO approximation
382: (see curve 1)
383: and has a more rapid growth in comparison with the standard parton model
384: results, especially at $Q^2 \sim 130$ GeV$^2$~\cite{LZ}.
385: At $Q^2 \leq 10$ GeV$^2$ the predictions from
386: perturbative QCD (in GRV approach)
387: and those based on the $k_T$ factorization approach are very similar
388: \footnote{This fact is due to the quite large value of $Q^2_0=4$
389: GeV$^2$ chosen here.} and show a disagreement with data
390: below $Q^2 = 7$ GeV$^2$
391: %
392: \footnote{A similar disagreement with data at $Q^2 \leq 2$ GeV$^2$
393: has been observed for the complete structure function $F_2$
394: (see, for example, the discussion in Ref. \cite{Q2evo}
395: and reference therein).
396: We note that the insertion of higher-twist corrections in the framework
397: of usual perturbative QCD improves the agreement with data
398: (see Ref. \cite{HT}) at quite low values of $Q^2$.}.
399: %
400: Unfortunately the available experimental data do not permit yet
401: to distinguish
402: %so far
403: the $k_T$ factorization effects from
404: those due to boundary conditions~\cite{RS}.
405:
406: The
407: %difference between the
408: results for the SF $F_L^c$ obtained in perturbative QCD and
409: from the $k_T$ factorization approach are quite similar to the $F_2^c$ case
410: discussed above.
411: The ratio $ R^c = F_L^c/F_2^c$ is
412: shown in Fig. 2. We see that $ R^c \approx 0.1 \div 0.3 $ in a wide
413: region of $Q^2$.
414: The estimation of $R^c$ is very close to the results for $R=F_L/(F_2-F_L)$
415: ratio (see Refs. \cite{KoPaFL}-\cite{CCFRr}).
416: We would like to note that these values of $ R^c $
417: contradict the estimation
418: obtained in Refs.~\cite{ZEUS, H1}. The effect of $ R^c $
419: on the corresponding differential cross-section
420: should be considered in the extraction of $F_2^c$
421: from future more precise measurements.
422:
423: \begin{figure}
424: %\begin{center}
425: \vskip -1cm
426: %\epsfig{figure=RccZEUSx.eps,width=17cm,height=20cm}
427: \epsfig{figure=RccZEUSx.eps,width=17.5cm,height=20.8cm}
428: %\epsfig{figure=RccZEUSx.eps,width=15cm,height=17cm}
429: %\end{center}
430: \vskip -0.5cm
431: \caption{The ratio $R^c = F_L^c(x,Q^2)/F_2^c$ as a function of $x$
432: for different values of $Q^2$.
433: Curves 1, 2 and 3 are as in Fig. 1.}
434: \label{fig8}
435: \end{figure}
436:
437: For the ratio $ R^c $ we found quite flat $x$-behavior at low $x$
438: in the low $Q^2$ region (see Fig. 2), where approaches based on perturbative
439: QCD and on $k_T$ factorization give similar predictions
440: (see Fig 1).
441: %$Q^2 \leq 60$ GeV$^2$.
442: It is in agreement with the corresponding behaviour of the ratio
443: $R=F_L/(F_2-F_L)$ (see Ref. \cite{KoPaFL}) at quite large values of $\Delta_P$
444: \footnote{The behaviour is in agreement with previous studies
445: \cite{TMF,KoPaFL}. Note that
446: at small values of $\Delta_P$, i.e. when $x^{-\Delta_P} \sim Const$,
447: the ratio $R$ has got strong negative NLO corrections
448: (see Refs. \cite{Keller,resum})
449: and tends to zero at $x \to 0$ after some resummation done in \cite{resum}.}
450: ($\Delta_P > 0.2-0.3$).
451: The low $x$ rise of $ R^c $ at high $Q^2$ disagrees with early
452: calculations \cite{KoPaFL} in the framework of perturbative QCD.
453: It could be due to the small $x$ resummation, which is important at high $Q^2$
454: (see Fig 1).
455: We plan to study this effect in future.
456: % on $R$ .
457:
458: \vspace{-0.3cm}
459: \section{Conclusions} \indent
460:
461: We have presented
462: %performed
463: the results for
464: %calculation of
465: the perturbative
466: parts of the SFs
467: %structure functions
468: $F_2^c$ and $F_L^c$ for a gluon target
469: having nonzero momentum squared, in the process
470: of photon-gluon fusion.
471:
472: We have applied the
473: results in the framework of $k_T$ factorization approach
474: to the analysis of
475: present data for the charm contribution to $F_2$
476: %($F_2^c$)
477: and we have given the predictions for $F_L^c$.
478: The analysis has been performed with
479: two parameterizations of unintegrated gluon
480: distributions for comparison. We have found good agreement
481: of our results
482: %, obtained with RS and BFKL parametrizations of
483: %unintegrated gluons distributions at $Q_0^2 = 4$ GeV$^2$,
484: with experimental HERA data for $F_2^c$,
485: except at low $Q^2$ ($Q^2 \leq 7$ GeV$^2$)
486: \footnote{It must be noted that the cross section of inelastic $c\bar c-$
487: and $b\bar b-$pair photoproduction at HERA are described by the
488: Blumlein parametrization at a smaller value of $Q_0^2$ ($Q_0^2 = 1$ GeV$^2$)
489: (see \cite{LiZo}).}.
490: We have also obtained
491: quite large contribution of the SF $F_L^c$ at low $x$ and
492: high $Q^2$ ($Q^2 \geq 30$ GeV$^2$).
493:
494:
495: We would like to note the good agreement between our results for $F_2^c$
496: and the ones obtained in Ref. \cite{Jung} by Monte-Carlo studies. Moreover, we
497: have also good agreement with fits of H1 and ZEUS data for $F_2^c$
498: (see recent reviews in Ref. \cite{Wolf} and references therein)
499: based on perturbative
500: QCD calculations. But unlike to these fits,
501: our analysis uses universal unintegrated gluon distribution, which gives
502: in the simplest way the main contribution to the cross-section in the
503: high-energy limit.
504:
505: It could be also very useful to evaluate the complete $F_2$ itself and
506: the derivatives of $F_2$ with respect to the
507: logarithms of $1/x$ and $Q^2$ with our expressions using the unintegrated
508: gluons.
509: %We are considering to present this work and also the predictions for
510: %$F_L$ in a forthcoming article.
511:
512: The consideration of the SF $F_2$ in the framework of the leading-twist
513: approximation of perturbative QCD (i.e. for ``pure'' perturbative QCD)
514: leads to very good agreement (see Ref. \cite{Q2evo} and references therein)
515: with HERA
516: data at low $x$ and $Q^2 \geq 1.5$ GeV$^2$. The agreement improves
517: at lower $Q^2$ when higher twist terms are
518: taken into account \cite{HT}. As
519: it has been studied in Refs. \cite{Q2evo,HT}, the SF $F_2$ at low
520: $Q^2$ is sensitive to the
521: small-$x$ behavior of quark distributions.
522: Thus, our future
523: analysis of $F_2$ in a broader $Q^2$ range in the framework
524: of $k_T$ factorization
525: should require the incorporation of parametrizations for unintegrated
526: quark densities, introduced recently (see Ref. \cite{Ryskin} and references
527: therein).
528:
529: The
530: %study of the complete
531: SF $F_L$ is
532: %should also be
533: very interested too (see \cite{KoLiZo}).
534: The structure function $F_L$ depends strongly on the gluon distribution
535: (see, for example, Ref. \cite{CSI...,method}), which in turn is determined
536: \cite{Prytz} by the derivative $dF_2/d\ln Q^2$. Thus, in the framework of
537: perturbative QCD at low $x$ the relation between $F_L$, $F_2$ and
538: $dF_2/d\ln Q^2$ could be violated by non-perturbative contributions,
539: which were expected to be important in the $F_L$ case (see Refs.
540: \cite{BaCoPe,PaKoKri}).
541: The application in \cite{KoLiZo} of present analysis to $F_L$ gives a
542: ``non pure'' perturbative QCD predictions for the structure function
543: %that should be compared
544: which are in good agreement with
545: data \cite{CCFRr} and with the ``pure'' perturbative results of
546: Ref. \cite{KoPaFL}, that determines a small value of nonperturbative
547: corrections to SF $F_L$ at low $x$ and quite large $Q^2$ values.
548:
549: %
550: %
551: %\vspace{1cm}
552: %\hspace{1cm} \Large{} {\bf Acknowledgments} \vspace{0.5cm}
553:
554: %\normalsize{}
555: \vskip 0.2cm
556: %
557: {\bf Acknowledgments.}~~Authors
558: would like to express their sincerely thanks to the Organizing
559: Committee of the XVIth International Workshop ``High Energy Physics
560: and Quantum Field Theory'' for the kind invitation,
561: the financial support
562: at such remarkable Conferences, and
563: for fruitful discussions.
564: %The study is supported in part by the RFBR grant 02-02-17513.
565:
566: %One of the authors (A.V.K.)
567: A.V.K. was supported in part
568: by Alexander von Humboldt fellowship and INTAS grant N366.
569: G.P. acknowledges the support of Galician research funds
570: (PGIDT00 PX20615PR) and Spanish CICYT (FPA2002-01161).
571: N.P.Z. also acknowledge the support of Royal Swedish Academy of
572: Sciences.
573:
574: %\vskip -1cm
575: \vspace{-0.5cm}
576: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
577:
578: %\medio
579:
580: \bibitem{H1} H1 Coll.: S. Aid et al.,
581: Z.Phys. C72 (1996) 593; Nucl.Phys. B545 (1999) 21.
582: \vspace{-0.2cm}
583: %%
584: \bibitem{ZEUS} ZEUS Coll.: J. Breitweg et al.,
585: Phys.Lett. B407 (1997)402;
586: %
587: %\bibitem{ZEUS2} ZEUS Collab.: J. Breitweg et al.,
588: Eur.Phys.J. C12 (2000)35.
589: %
590: %\bibitem{H1c} H1 Collab.: S. Adloff et al., Paper submitted to ICHEP2000,
591: %Osaka, Japan, Abstract 984.
592: \vspace{-0.2cm}
593: %
594: \bibitem{EMC} EM Coll.: J.J. Aubert et al.,
595: Nucl.Phys. B213 (1983) 31;
596: Phys.Lett. B94 (1980) 96;
597: %Phys. Lett.
598: B110 (1983) 72.
599: \vspace{-0.2cm}
600: %
601: \bibitem{CoDeRo} A.M. Cooper-Sarkar et al.,
602: %, R.C.E. Devenish and A. De Roeck,
603: Int.J.Mod.Phys. A13 (1998) 3385.
604: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9712301;%%
605: \vspace{-0.2cm}
606: %
607: \bibitem{BFKL} L.N. Lipatov, Sov.J.Nucl.Phys.
608: 23 (1976) 338;
609: E.A. Kuraev et al.,
610: %, L.N. Lipatov and V.S. Fadin,
611: Sov.Phys.JETP 44 (1976) 443, 45 (1977) 199;
612: Ya.Ya. Balitzki, L.N. Lipatov, Sov.J.Nucl.Phys.
613: 28 (1978) 822;
614: L.N. Lipatov, JETP 63 (1986) 904.
615: \vspace{-0.2cm}
616: %
617: \bibitem{CaCiHa} S. Catani et al.,
618: %M. Ciafaloni and F. Hautmann,
619: Phys.Lett. B242 (1990) 97;
620: Nucl.Phys. B366 (1991) 135.
621: %S. Catani, Preprint DFF 254-7-96 (hep-ph/9608310).
622: \vspace{-0.2cm}
623: %
624: \bibitem{CoEllis} J.C. Collins, R.K. Ellis,
625: Nucl.Phys. B360 (1991) 3;
626: E.M. Levin et al.,
627: %M.G. Ryskin, Yu.M. Shabelskii, A.G. Shuvaev,
628: Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 53 (1991) 657.
629: \vspace{-0.2cm}
630: %
631: %\bibitem{LRSS}
632: %E.M. Levin et al.,
633: %%M.G. Ryskin, Yu.M. Shabelskii and A.G. Shuvaev,
634: %Sov.J.Nucl.Phys. 53 (1991) 657.
635: %
636: %
637: \bibitem{KoLiPaZo}
638: A.V. Kotikov et al.,
639: %, A.V.~Lipatov, G. Parente and N.P.Zotov,
640: Preprint US-FT/7-01
641: (hep-ph/0107135).
642: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0107135;%%
643: \vspace{-0.2cm}
644: %
645: \bibitem{LiZo} A. V. Lipatov et al.,
646: %and N.P. Zotov,
647: Mod.Phys.Lett. A15 (2000) 695;
648: % A. V. Lipatov, V.A. Saleev and N.P. Zotov, Mod. Phys. Lett.
649: % {\bf A15} (2000)
650: 1727.
651: \vspace{-0.2cm}
652: %
653: \bibitem{Andersson} Bo Andersson et al., hep-ph/0204115.
654: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0204115;%%
655: \vspace{-0.2cm}
656: %
657: \bibitem{BFaKh} V.N. Baier et al.,
658: %, V.S. Fadin and V.A. Khose,
659: JETP 50 (1966) 156;
660: % (in Russian);
661: %\\
662: %V.N. Baier, V.M. Katkov and V.S. Fadin,
663: %Relativistic electron radiation, Moscow, Atomizdat, 1973;
664: %(in Russian);
665: V.G. Zima, Yad.Fiz. 16 (1972) 1051.
666: \vspace{-0.2cm}
667: %
668: \bibitem{BGMS} V.M. Budnev et al.,
669: %, I.F. Ginsburg, G.V. Meledin and V.G. Serbo,
670: Phys.Rept. 15 (1975) 181.
671: \vspace{-0.2cm}
672: %
673: \bibitem{KaKo} D.I. Kazakov, A.V. Kotikov,
674: Theor.Math.Phys. 73 (1987) 1264;
675: %%CITATION = TMPHA,73,1264;%%
676: Nucl.Phys. B307 (1988) 721;
677: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B307,721;%%
678: Nucl.Phys. B345 (1990) 299.
679: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B345,299;%%
680: \vspace{-0.2cm}
681: %
682: %
683: \bibitem{KoTMF}
684: A.V. Kotikov,
685: Theor.Math.Phys. 78 (1989) 134;
686: %%CITATION = TMPHA,78,134;%%
687: Phys.Lett. B375 (1996) 240;
688: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9512270;%%
689: %
690: %\bibitem{DEM} A.V. Kotikov,
691: Phys.Lett.
692: B254 (1991) 158;
693: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B254,158;%%
694: Phys.Lett.
695: B259 (1991) 314;
696: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B259,314;%%
697: Phys.Lett. B267 (1991) 123;
698: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B267,123;%%
699: in: {\it Proc. of the XXXV
700: Winter School}, Repino, S'Peterburg, 2001 (hep-ph/0112347).
701: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0112347;%%
702: \vspace{-0.2cm}
703: %
704: \bibitem{Witten} E. Witten,
705: Nucl.Phys. B104 (1976) 445;
706: M. Gluck, E. Reya,
707: Phys.Lett. B83 (1979) 98;
708: %
709: %\bibitem{SMT}
710: F.M. Steffens et al.,
711: %W. Melnitchouk, and A.W. Thomas,
712: %preprint ADP-99-14/T357 (hep-ph/9903441)
713: Eur.Phys.J. C11 (1999) 673.
714: \vspace{-0.2cm}
715: %
716: \bibitem{BMSS} G. Bottazzi et al.,
717: %G. Marchesini, G.P. Salam, and M. Scorletti,
718: %hep-ph/9702223.
719: JHEP 9812 (1998) 011.
720: \vspace{-0.2cm}
721: %
722: %\bibitem{CaCiHa2} S. Catani, M. Ciafaloni, and F. Hautmann, Preprint
723: %CERN - TH.6398/92, in Proceeding of the Workshop on Physics at HERA
724: %(Hamburg, 1991), v.2, p.690;\\
725: %S. Catani, Preprint DFF 254-7-96 (hep-ph/9608310).
726: %
727: \bibitem{RS} M.G.~Ryskin, Yu.M.~Shabelski, Z.Phys. C61
728: (1994) 517; C66 (1995) 151.
729: \vspace{-0.2cm}
730: %
731: \bibitem{BL} J. Blumlein,
732: Preprints DESY 95-121 (hep-ph/9506403); DESY 95-125 (hep-ph/9506446).
733: \vspace{-0.2cm}
734: %
735: \bibitem{GRV} M. Gluck et al.,
736: %, E. Reya, and A. Vogt,
737: Z. Phys. C67 (1995) 433.
738: \vspace{-0.2cm}
739: %
740: \bibitem{LZ} A.V. Lipatov, N.P. Zotov, {\it in} Proc. of the 8th Int.
741: Workshop
742: %on Deep InelasticScattering,
743: DIS 2000 (2000), World Scientific, p. 157.
744: \vspace{-0.2cm}
745: %%
746: \bibitem{Q2evo} A.V. Kotikov, G. Parente,
747: Nucl.Phys. B549 (1999) 242;
748: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9807249;%%
749: %Nucl.Phys.(Proc.Suppl.) 99A (2001) 196 (hep-ph/0010352);
750: hep-ph/0010352;
751: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0010352;%%
752: {\it in} Proc. of the Int. Conference PQFT98 (1998), Dubna
753: (hep-ph/9810223);
754: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9810223;%%
755: {\it in} Proc. of the 8th Int. Workshop on Deep Inelastic
756: Scattering, DIS 2000 (2000), Liverpool, p. 198
757: (hep-ph/0006197);
758: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0006197;%%
759: Preprint US-FT/3-02 (hep-ph/0207276).
760: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0207276;%%
761: \vspace{-0.2cm}
762: %
763: %
764: \bibitem{HT} A.V. Kotikov, G. Parente,
765: %hep-ph/0106175
766: {\it in} Proc. Int. Seminar Relativistic Nuclear Physics and Quantum
767: Chromodynamics (2000), Dubna
768: (hep-ph/0012299);
769: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0012299;%%
770: {\it in} Proc. of the 9th Int. Workshop on Deep Inelastic
771: Scattering, DIS 2001 (2001), Bologna (hep-ph/0106175).
772: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0106175;%%
773: \vspace{-0.2cm}
774: %
775: %
776: \bibitem{KoPaFL} A.V. Kotikov, JETP 80 (1995) 979;
777: %%CITATION = JTPHE,80,979;%%
778: A.V. Kotikov, G. Parente,
779: {\it in} Proc. Int. Workshop on Deep Inelastic
780: Scattering
781: %and Related Phenomena
782: (1996), Rome, p. 237
783: (hep-ph/9608409);
784: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9608409;%%
785: Mod.Phys.Lett. A12 (1997) 963;
786: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9605207;%%
787: JETP 85 (1997) 17;
788: %%CITATION = JTPHE,85,17;%%
789: hep-ph/9609439.
790: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9609439;%%
791: \vspace{-0.2cm}
792: %
793: %\bibitem{H1FL} H1 Coll.: S. Aid et al., Phys.Lett. B393 (1997) 452
794: %H1 Collab.: D. Eckstein,
795: %{\it in} Proc. Int. Workshop on Deep Inelastic
796: %Scattering, (2001), Bologna;\\
797: %H1 Collab.: M.Klein,
798: %{\it in} Proc. of the 9th Int. Workshop on Deep Inelastic
799: %Scattering, DIS 2001 (2001), Bologna.
800: %\vspace{-0.2cm}
801: %
802: \bibitem{Thorne} R.S. Thorne,
803: Phys.Lett. B418 (1998) 371.
804: \vspace{-0.2cm}
805: %
806: \bibitem{CCFRr} H1 Coll.: S. Aid et al., Phys.Lett. B393 (1997) 452;
807: CCFR/NuTeV Coll.: U.K. Yang et al., hep-ex/0010001;
808: %{\it in} Proc. Int. Conference on High Energy Physics (2000) Osaka, Japan
809: %(hep-ex/0010001);\\
810: %CCFR/NuTeV Collab.:
811: A. Bodek, hep-ex/00105067
812: %{\it in} Proc. of the 9th Int. Workshop
813: % on Deep Inelastic
814: %Scattering, DIS 2001 (2001), Bologna (hep-ex/00105067).
815: \vspace{-0.2cm}
816: %
817: \bibitem{TMF} A.V. Kotikov et al.,
818: %V.I. Vovk et al.,
819: %A.V. Kotikov, and S.I. Maximov,
820: Theor. Math. Phys. {\bf 84} (1990) 744;
821: %%CITATION = TMPHA,84,744;%%
822: %A.V. Kotikov et al.,
823: %S.I. Maximov, and I.S. Parobij,
824: Theor. Math. Phys. {\bf 111} (1997) 442;
825: %%CITATION = TMPHA,111,442;%%
826: A.V.~Kotikov, Phys. Atom. Nucl. 56 (1993) 1276;
827: %%CITATION = PANUE,56,1276;%%
828: %
829: %\bibitem{JeKoPa}
830: L.~L.~Jenkovszky et al.,
831: %A.~V.~Kotikov and F.~Paccanoni,
832: Sov.\ J.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf 55} (1992) 1224;.
833: %%CITATION = SJNCA,55,1224;%%
834: JETP Lett.\ {\bf 58} (1993) 163;
835: %%CITATION = JTPLA,58,163;%%
836: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 314}(1993) 421.
837: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B314,421;%%.
838: \vspace{-0.2cm}
839: %
840: \bibitem{Keller} S. Keller et al.,
841: %M. Miramontes, G. Parente, J. S\'anchez-Guill\'en, and O.A. Sampayo,
842: Phys.Lett. B270 (1990) 61;
843: L.H. Orr, W.J. Stirling, Phys.Rev.Lett. B66 (1991) 1673;
844: E. Berger, R. Meng, Phys.Lett. B304 (1993) 318.
845: \vspace{-0.2cm}
846: %
847: \bibitem{resum}
848: A.V. Kotikov, JETP Lett. 59 (1994) 1; Phys.Lett. B338 (1994) 349.
849: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B338,349;%%
850: \vspace{-0.2cm}
851: %
852: \bibitem{Jung} H. Jung, Nucl.Phys.(Proc.Suppl.) 79 (1999) 429.
853: \vspace{-0.2cm}
854: %
855: \bibitem{Wolf} G. Wolf, Preprint DESY 01-058 (hep-ex/0105055).
856: %L. Gladilin and I. Redoldo, to appear in ``The THERA Book''
857: %(hep-ph/0105126).
858: \vspace{-0.2cm}
859: %
860: \bibitem{Ryskin} M.A. Kimber et al.,
861: %A.D. Martin, and M.G. Ryskin,
862: %Preprint IPPP/01/05, DCPT/01/10 (hep-ph/0101348).
863: Phys.Rev. D63 (2001) 114027.
864: \vspace{-0.2cm}
865: %
866: %
867: \bibitem{KoLiZo}
868: S. Catani and F. Hautmann,
869: Nucl.Phys. {\bf B427} (1994) 475;
870: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9405388;%%
871: A.V. Kotikov et al.,
872: %A.V.~Lipatov and N.P.Zotov,
873: hep-ph/0207226.
874: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0207226;%%
875: \vspace{-0.2cm}
876: %
877: \bibitem{CSI...} A.M. Cooper-Sarkar et al.,
878: %G. Ingelman, R.G. Roberts and D.H. Saxon,
879: Z.Phys. C39 (1988) 281;
880: A.V. Kotikov, G. Parente, in: {\it Proc. of
881: Madrid Workshop on Low x Physics} (1997) pp. 71-76
882: (hep-ph/9710252).
883: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9710252;%%
884: \vspace{-0.2cm}
885: %
886: \bibitem{method} A.V. Kotikov, Phys.Atom.Nucl. 57 (1994) 133;
887: %%CITATION = PANUE,57,133;%%
888: Phys.Rev. D49 (1994) 5746.
889: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D49,5746;%%
890: \vspace{-0.2cm}
891: %
892: \bibitem{Prytz} K. Prytz, Phys.Lett. B311 (1993) 286;
893: A.V. Kotikov, JETP Lett. 59 (1994) 667;
894: %%CITATION = JTPLA,59,667;%%
895: A.V. Kotikov, G. Parente, Phys.Lett. B379 (1996) 195.
896: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9512410;%%
897: \vspace{-0.2cm}
898: %
899: \bibitem{BaCoPe} J. Bartels et al.,
900: %, K.Golec-Biernat, and K. Peters,
901: Eur.Phys.J. C17 (2000) 121;
902: \vspace{-0.2cm}
903: %
904: \bibitem{PaKoKri}
905: A.V.~ Kotikov at al.,
906: %G.~ Parente and J.~ Sanchez Guillen,
907: Z. Phys. C58 (1993) 465;
908: %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C58,465;%%
909: G.~Parente et al.,
910: %A.V.~Kotikov and V.G.~Krivokhizhin,
911: Phys.Lett. B333 (1994) 190;
912: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9405290;%%
913: A.V. Kotikov, V.G. Krivokhijine, Dubna preprint E2-2001-190
914: (hep-ph/0108224);
915: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0108224;%%
916: in: {\it Proc. of the XVIth International Workshop
917: ``High Energy Physics and Quantum Field Theory``} (2001), Moscow;
918: (hep-ph/0206221);
919: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0206221;%%
920: in: {\it Proc. of the Int.
921: Workshop ``Renormalization Group 2002''} (2002), High Tatras, Slovakia
922: (hep-ph/0207222).
923: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0207222;%%
924: in: {\it Proc. of the X Int. Workshop on Deep Inelastic Scattering
925: (DIS2002)} (2002), Cracow
926: (hep-ph/0208188).
927: \vspace{-0.2cm} %
928: \end{thebibliography}
929:
930: %\newpage
931:
932: %\vspace{0.5cm}
933:
934: %\hspace{1cm} {\Large{\bf Figure captions}} \vspace{0.5cm}
935:
936:
937: \end{document}
938:
939: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0208188;%%
940:
941:
942:
943:
944:
945:
946:
947:
948:
949:
950:
951:
952:
953:
954:
955: