1: \section{The variable \protect\mttwo\ and its generalisation}
2: \label{MTX}
3:
4: The Cambridge \mttwo\ variable, proposed in \cite{Lester:1999tx},
5: can be used in analyses such as \cite{Allanach:2000kt},
6: where particles are pair-produced at hadronic colliders, and
7: decay semi-invisibly, as is the case in R-parity conserving SUSY.
8: This variable is used in symmetrical, two-body decays of supersymmetric particles,
9: where the LSP is unobserved, and so must be inferred from missing energy.
10:
11: \subsection{The properties of \protect\mttwo}
12:
13: For events in which the decay of a heavy object produces an unseen particle, such as
14: \begin{equation} \chgone \to \ntlone \pi^+ \label{MTX:chgdecay} \end{equation}
15: one can write the Lorentz invariant
16: \begin{equation} m_\chgone^2 = m_\pi^2 + m_\ntlone^2 +
17: 2 \Bigl[ E_T^\pi E_T^\ntlone \cosh(\Delta\eta)-{\bf p}_T^\pi\cdot{\bf p}_T^\ntlone \Bigr]
18: \label{MT2:MCHIDEF}\end{equation}
19: where ${\bf p}_T^\pi$ and ${\bf p}_T^\ntlone$ indicate pion and neutralino 2-vectors in the transverse plane, and
20: the transverse energies are defined by
21: \begin{equation}E_T^{\pi} = { \sqrt { ({\bf p}_T^{\pi}) {^2} + m_\pi^2 }}
22: \qquad \hbox{ and } \qquad {E_T^\ntlone} = { \sqrt{ ({\bf p}_T^\ntlone){^2} + m_\ntlone^2 } }\ .
23: \label{MT2:ETDEF}\end{equation}
24: Also \begin{equation}\eta=\half \log\biggl[\frac{E+p_z}{E-p_z}\biggr]\end{equation} is the true rapidity, so that
25: \begin{equation}\tanh\eta=p_z/E\ ,\qquad \sinh\eta=p_z/E_T\ ,\qquad \cosh\eta=E/E_T .\end{equation}
26:
27: In a hadron collider, only the transverse components of a missing particle's momentum
28: can be inferred, so it is useful to define the transverse mass,
29: \begin{equation}
30: m_T^2 ( {\bf p}^{\pi}_T, {\bf p}_T^\ntlone) \equiv { m_{\pi^+}^2 + m_\ntlone^2 +
31: 2 ( E_T^{\pi} E_T^\ntlone - {\bf p}_T^{\pi}\cdot{\bf p}_T^\ntlone ) }
32: \label{MT2:MTDEF}\end{equation}
33: which, because $\cosh(x)\geq 1$, is less than or equal to the mass of the lightest chargino, with equality
34: only when the rapidity difference between the neutralino and the pion, $\Delta\eta_{\ntlone\pi}$ is zero.
35: All other $\Delta\eta$ lead to $m_T<m_\chgone$, so if we knew the neutralino
36: momentum we could use $m_T$ to give an event by event lower bound on the lightest chargino mass.
37: $m_T$ was used in this way by UA1 \cite{Arnison:1983rp} in the measurement of the $W^\pm$ mass.
38:
39: In R-parity conserving SUSY events there are expected to be two unseen
40: LSPs.\footnote{Though there may also be other unseen particles -- see \appref{MT2GEN}.}
41: Since only the {\em sum} of the missing transverse momentum of the two neutralinos is known,
42: the variable
43: \begin{eqnarray}
44: m_{T2}^2 &\equiv& { \min_{\slashchar{{\bf q}}_T^{(1)} + \slashchar{{\bf q}}_T^{(2)} = {\bf \pmiss}_T }}
45: {\Bigl[ \max{ \{ m_T^2({\bf p}_T^{\pi^{(1)}}, \slashchar{{\bf q}}_T^{(1)}) ,\
46: m_T^2({\bf p}_T^{\pi^{(2)}} , \slashchar{{\bf q}}_T^{(2)}) \} } \Bigr]}
47: \qquad \label{MT2:MT2DEF}
48: \end{eqnarray}
49: is a lower bound on the transverse mass $m_T$
50: for events where two decays of the type \eqref{MTX:chgdecay} occur.
51: In \eqref{MT2:MT2DEF} we have been forced
52: to minimise over all consistent neutralino 2-momenta.
53: Note that $\slashchar{{\bf q}}_T^{(i)}$ is the hypothesised momentum
54: of the $i$th neutralino which need not be equal to its true momentum.
55:
56: \EPSFIGURE[tbh]{mtx_minimise.eps, width=15cm}{
57: A diagram demonstrating that the minimisation over some parameter of the maximum of two well-behaved functions
58: may occur either at {\bf (a)} a minimum value of one of them, or {\bf (b)} when they are equal,
59: or {\bf (c)} at the boundary of the domain. % ~/physics/susy/mt3/draw/
60: \label{MTX:MINIMISING}
61: }
62:
63: %To prove that \mttwo\ can indeed approach the chargino mass,
64: To find the range of values \mttwo\ may take we first
65: let $f_1=m_T^2({\bf p}_T^{\pi^{(1)}},~\slashchar{{\bf q}}_T^{(1)})$,
66: and $f_2=m_T^2({\bf p}_T^{\pi^{(2)}},~\slashchar{{\bf q}}_T^{(2)})$.
67: We then note that the minimum over a parameter $x$
68: of the maximum of $f_1(x)$ and $f_2(x)$ can occur at a local minimum, $f_{1(2)}^\prime(x^*)=0$,
69: provided $f_{1(2)}(x^*)>f_{2(1)}(x^*)$, as shown in \figref{MTX:MINIMISING}a.
70: Alternatively the minimum can occur when the functions cross one another
71: when $f_1=f_2$ (\figref{MTX:MINIMISING}b) or at a boundary (\figref{MTX:MINIMISING}c).
72: The parameter $x$ corresponds to the fraction of the the missing momentum
73: (in one of the transverse directions) which is assigned to each half of the event.
74: Since $f_1, f_2\to\infty$ as $x\to\pm\infty$ \figref{MTX:MINIMISING}c is not relevant to our minimisation problem.
75:
76: To see that case (a) cannot occur, consider the unconstrained minimisation
77: over $\slashchar{{\bf q}}_T$, of $m_T^2 ( {\bf p}^{\pi}_T,\ \slashchar{{\bf q}}_T)$.
78: Using the relationship
79: \begin{equation}\frac{\partial \slashchar{E}_T}{\partial \slashchar{q}_k}=\frac{\slashchar{q}_k}{\slashchar{E}_T}\ ,
80: \end{equation}
81: where $\slashchar{E}_T^2=\slashchar{{\bf q}}_T^2+m_\ntlone^2$, it is straightforward to show that,
82: \begin{equation}\frac{\partial m_T^2}{\partial \slashchar{q}_k}=2\left(E_T^\pi\frac{\slashchar{q}_k}
83: {\slashchar{E}_T}-p_k^\pi\right) \qquad k=1,2\ .\end{equation}
84: This means that at the minimum
85: \begin{equation} {\bf v}_T^\pi = \slashchar{{\bf u}}_T\ , \label{MTX:GLOBMIN}\end{equation}
86: where we introduce the notation ${\bf v}_T \equiv {\bf p}_T / E_T$, $\slashchar{{\bf u}}_T \equiv \slashchar{{\bf q}}_T / \slashchar{E}_T$.
87: where ${\bf p}_T$ and ${\bf v}_T$ represent the true transverse momentum and velocity of a particle,
88: while $\slashchar{{\bf q}}_T$ and $\slashchar{{\bf u}}_T$ are assigned by the minimisation.
89:
90: Using the basis ($t$,~$x$,~$y$) with the metric diag(1,-1,-1), one can write
91: \begin{equation} m_T^2 = (E_T^\mathrm{tot},{\bf p}_T^\mathrm{tot})\cdot(E_T^\mathrm{tot},{\bf p}_T^\mathrm{tot})\ ,
92: \label{MTX:MTLOR2} \end{equation}
93: where $E_T^\mathrm{tot}=E_T^\pi+\slashchar{E}_T$ and
94: ${\bf p}_T^\mathrm{tot}={\bf p}_T^\pi+\slashchar{{\bf q}}_T$.
95: This 1+2 dimensional Lorentz invariant can be evaluated in any frame boosted from the lab
96: in the transverse plane.
97: \eqref{MTX:GLOBMIN} has told us that at the unconstrained minimum the
98: transverse velocities ${\bf v}_T^\pi$ and $\slashchar{{\bf u}}_T$ are equal;
99: a statement necessarily true in all transverse frames, including the special one
100: in which both the transverse velocities (and associated momenta) are zero.
101: Evaluating \eqref{MTX:MTLOR2} in this frame, we find that the unconstrained minimum
102: %Now at the minimum \eqref{MTX:GLOBMIN} will apply in the lab frame,
103: %so it will always be possible to carry out a transverse boost into a frame
104: %where ${\bf v}_T^\pi = \slashchar{{\bf u}}_T=(0,0)$.
105: %In the boosted frame the RHS
106: of \eqref{MTX:MTLOR2} then becomes $(m_\pi+m_\ntlone,~0,~0)\cdot(m_\pi+m_\ntlone,~0,~0)$,
107: and we recover the expected result \begin{equation} m_T^\amin = m_\pi+m_\ntlone\ .\label{MTX:MTMIN} \end{equation}
108: We therefore conclude that the function $m_T^2$ has only one stationary value and it is the global minimum,
109: and is common to both sides of the event provided the same type of particles are emitted.
110: Thus when $f_1$ is minimum it cannot be greater than $f_2$,
111: and so the minimisation in \eqref{MT2:MT2DEF} forces $f_1=f_2$.
112: This could of course occur when {\em both} $f_1$ and $f_2$ are at their global minima,
113: in which case \mttwo\ takes its minimum value:
114: \begin{equation}\mttwo^\amin=m_\pi+m_\ntlone\label{MT2:MT2MIN}\ .\end{equation}
115:
116: To summarise, \mttwo\ is the minimum of $m_T^{(1)}$ subject to the two constraints $m_T^{(1)}=m_T^{(2)}$, and
117: ${\bf \pmiss}_T ^{(1)} + {\bf \pmiss}_T ^{(2)} = {\bf \pmiss}_T$.
118: The condition for the minimisation can be calculated by Lagrange multiplier methods, the result of which is that
119: the velocity vectors ${\bf \slashchar{u}}_T^{(1,2)}$
120: of the {\em assigned} neutralino momenta $\slashchar{{\bf q}}_T^{(1,2)}$ must satisfy
121: \begin{equation}
122: ({\bf \slashchar{u}}_T^{(1)}-{\bf v}_T^{\pi^{(1)}})\ \propto\ ({\bf \slashchar{u}}_T^{(2)}-{\bf v}_T^{\pi^{(2)}})\ .
123: \label{MTX:MTTWOCOND} \end{equation}
124:
125: To find the maximum of \mttwo\ over many events
126: we note that for each event the minimisation will select hypothesised momenta satisfying \eqref{MTX:MTTWOCOND}.
127: We now note events can occur in which the {\em true} transverse velocities of the neutralinos
128: were exactly those which were assigned by the minimisation, \ie\ they can satisfy
129: \begin{equation}
130: {\bf v}_T^{\ntlone(1)} = {\bf \slashchar{u}}_T^{(1)}, \qquad {\bf v}_T^{\ntlone(2)} = {\bf \slashchar{u}}_T^{(2)}\ .
131: \label{MT2:TRUEVEL}
132: \end{equation}
133: These events will have both hypothesised transverse masses equal not only to each other but also to
134: true transverse masses which would have been calculated if the neutralino momenta had been known:
135: \begin{equation}
136: m_T^{(i)} \left( {\bf p}^{\pi^{(i)}}_T, \slashchar{{\bf p}}_T^{\ntlone(i)} \right)=
137: m_T^{(i)} \left( {\bf p}^{\pi^{(i)}}_T, \slashchar{{\bf q}}_T^{(i)}\right)
138: \end{equation}
139: %This means that with a large number of events there will be {\em some} events where the maximum limit that can be put
140: %on the transverse masses will be that event's true transverse mass:
141: %\begin{equation}
142: %\mttwo=m_T^{(1)} ( {\bf p}^{\pi_1}_T, \slashchar{{\bf q}}_T^{(1)}) =
143: %m_T^{(2)} ( {\bf p}^{\pi_2}_T, \slashchar{{\bf q}}_T^{(2)}) =
144: %m_T^2 ( {\bf p}^{\pi_1}_T, \slashchar{{\bf p}}_T^{\chi_1}) =
145: %m_T^2 ( {\bf p}^{\pi_2}_T, \slashchar{{\bf p}}_T^{\chi_2})\ .
146: %\end{equation}
147: If events occur where, in addition to the transverse components of the neutralino momenta satisfying \eqref{MT2:TRUEVEL},
148: the rapidity differences satisfy $\eta_{\ntlone(1)}=\eta_{\pi(1)}$ and $\eta_{\ntlone(2)}=\eta_{\pi(2)}$,
149: then by \eqref{MT2:MCHIDEF} \mttwo\ will equal the true mass of the chargino.
150: Combining this with \eqref{MT2:MT2MIN} and recalling that
151: \mttwo\ cannot be greater than the chargino mass by construction,
152: we can see that the event-by event distribution of \mttwo\ can span the range
153: \begin{equation} m_\ntlone+m_\pi\ \leq\ \mttwo\ \leq\ m_\chgone \,\end{equation}
154: showing that \mttwo\ is sensitive to the $m_\chgone-m_\ntlone\equiv\DeltaMChi$ mass difference.
155:
156: The variable is equally applicable to two same-sign $\chgone$ decays so \mttwo\ signal events can be
157: defined as those having two $\cht_1^\pm \to \ntlone\ \pi^{\pm}$ decays with any combination of charges.
158:
159: \subsection{Generalisations of \protect\mttwo}
160: \label{MT2GEN}
161:
162: In our analysis we also wish to make use of the leptonic decays $\chgone\to\ntlone~\ell~\nu_\ell$ where $\ell\in e,\mu$.
163: We therefore generalise \mttwo\ to cases where more than two particles go undetected.
164:
165: \FIGURE[t]{
166: \begin{minipage}[b]{.41\linewidth}
167: \begin{center}
168: \epsfig{file=mtx.eps, height=7cm}\\
169: \hspace*{0.5cm}{\bf (a)}
170: \end{center}
171: \end{minipage}\hfill
172: \begin{minipage}[b]{.57\linewidth}
173: \begin{center}
174: \epsfig{file=mtxvschi.eps, height=7cm}\\
175: \hspace*{0.5cm}{\bf (b)}
176: \end{center}
177: \end{minipage}\hfill
178: \caption{
179: {\bf (a)} Simulations of $\mtx-m_\ntlone$ for $X=2,3,4$ using a simple
180: phase-space Monte-Carlo generator program for a pair of decays
181: $\squark\to\chgone q$ followed by $\chgone\to\ntlone~\pi$ or $\chgone\to\ntlone~e~\nu_e$.
182: As the number of invisible particles increases the proportion of events near the upper
183: limit decreases. The peak in $m_{T3}-m_\ntlone$ near the pion mass is explained in the text.
184: {\bf (b)} The distortion of $\mtx-m_\ntlone$ when the LSP mass is varied by $\pm$~10\%,
185: showing that $M_{TX}-m_\ntlone$ remains sensitive to the mass difference
186: $\DeltaMChi=m_\chgone-m_\ntlone$.
187: In this simulation $\DeltaMChi=0.845$~GeV, $m_\ntlone=161.6$~GeV, and the electron and neutrino mass
188: were neglected.
189: The normalisation is arbitrary.
190: \label{MTX:MTXPLOTS}
191: }}
192:
193: Consider events in which a chargino is produced and then decays to $\ntlone\ e\ \nu_e$.
194: If we expand the Lorentz invariant\begin{equation}
195: (m_\chgone)^2 = (p_\ntlone + p_e + p_\nu)^2
196: \end{equation}
197: we obtain three mass-squared terms for each of the decay particles and three cross-terms.
198: The cross-terms can each be written in the form
199: \begin{equation}
200: p_a \cdot p_b = E_T^{(a)}E_T^{(b)}\cosh(\Delta\eta_{ab})-{\bf p}_T^{(a)}\cdot{\bf p}_T^{(b)}\ .
201: \end{equation}
202: If the neutralino and neutrino transverse momenta were individually known
203: we could evaluate the transverse mass,
204: \begin{equation} m_T^2 = m_\ntlone^2 + m_e^2 +
205: 2\ \Bigl[ (E_T^e E_T^\chi - {\bf p}_T^e \cdot {\bf p}_T^\chi ) +
206: (E_T^\nu E_T^\chi - {\bf p}_T^\nu \cdot {\bf p}_T^\chi ) +
207: (E_T^e E_T^\nu - {\bf p}_T^e \cdot {\bf p}_T^\nu ) \Bigr]\ ,\label{MTX:MT3PART}\end{equation}
208: where the neutrino mass is assumed to be negligible.
209: $m_T$ will be equal to the \chgone\ mass in events where $\Delta\eta_{ab}=0$ for all pairs of
210: $e$, $\nu_e$, and \ntlone.
211:
212: In events with two leptonic chargino decays a variable like \mttwo\ can be defined
213: as in \eqref{MT2:MT2DEF} but using the three-particle definition of $m_T$ from \eqref{MTX:MT3PART}
214: and with the modified constraint,
215: \begin{equation}
216: {\bf q}_T^{\nu(1)} + {\bf q}_T^{\chi(1)} +{\bf q}_T^{\nu(2)} + {\bf q}_T^{\chi(2)} = \Ptmiss\ ,
217: \end{equation}
218: where the labels (1) and (2) indicate which chargino the particles were emitted from.
219: We call this variable $m_{T4}$ (or indeed \mtx\ where $X$ is the number of undetected particles).
220:
221: The conditions for the minimisation required to calculate $m_{T4}$ can be calculated
222: just as for \mttwo.
223: The Euler-Lagrange equations involving
224: \begin{equation}\frac{\partial (m_T^{(i)})^2}{\partial {\bf q}_T^{\nu(i)} }\qquad \mathrm{and} \qquad
225: \frac{\partial (m_T^{(i)})^2}{\partial {\bf q}_T^{\ntlone(i)} }\nonumber\end{equation}
226: show that the minimisation will select the invisible particles' momenta such that
227: ${\bf u}_T^{\ntlone(i)}={\bf u}_T^{\nu(i)}$.
228: The other E-L equations reproduce \eqref{MTX:MTTWOCOND} but with electrons replacing pions.
229:
230: This means that when calculating $m_{T4}$ one can replace the missing particles
231: from each chargino decay with a pseudo-particle with mass equal to the sum of the
232: masses of those invisible particles and proceed as for \mttwo.
233: In the case of leptonic chargino decay the mass of the neutrino can be safely neglected
234: in comparison to that of the \ntlone, and the constraint ${\bf u}_T^{\chi(i)}={\bf u}_T^{\nu(i)}$
235: is equivalent to ${\bf q}^{\nu(i)}_T=(0,0)$.
236:
237: The generalisation to \mtx\ for other values of $X$ is straightforward.
238: The distribution of $m_{T3}$ is shown in \figref{MTX:MTXPLOTS}a for events in which
239: one chargino decays to $\ntlone,e,\nu$ and another to $\ntlone,{\pi^+}$.
240: Unlike $m_{T2}$ and $m_{T4}$ it has a sharp peak at $m_{T3}=m_\ntlone+m_\pi$.
241: This occurs because the visible particles on each side of the event are different
242: and so the unconstrained minimum of the values of $m_T$ on each side of the event
243: are not equal as they are in the case of \mttwo\ and $m_{T4}$:
244: \begin{equation}
245: \min_{\slashchar{\bf q}_T^{(1)}} \left(m_T^{(1)}( {\bf p}^{\pi}_T, \slashchar{{\bf q}}_T^{(1)})\right)
246: \ =\ m_\pi + m_\ntlone\quad \ne\quad m_e + m_\ntlone\ =\
247: \min_{\slashchar{\bf q}_T^{(2)}} \left(m_T^{(2)}( {\bf p}^{e}_T, \slashchar{{\bf q}}_T^{(2)})\right)
248: \end{equation}
249: Some of the events can then fall into the category shown in \figref{MTX:MINIMISING}a,
250: producing a peak of events with $m_{T}=m_\ntlone+m_\pi$.
251:
252: The distribution over events of $m_{T4}$ will have fewer entries near the upper kinematic limit
253: ($m_{T4}=m_\chgone$) because when more particles go undetected an event at that limit must satisfy
254: a larger number of constraints.
255: For fully leptonic chargino decay, there are six constraints of the type $\Delta\eta=0$,
256: two ${\bf p}_T^{\nu(i)}=0$ and finally the modified constraint from \eqref{MTX:MTTWOCOND}.
257: This effect can be seen in \figref{MTX:MTXPLOTS}a for events where a total of two,
258: three and four invisible particles are produced.
259:
260: A further generalisation which we do not require here might be relevant in cases where
261: more than one {\em visible} particle is emitted from each mother.
262: For such decays, one would sum the full 4-momenta of the visible particles
263: from each decay as well as summing the masses of the invisible particles
264: from each side of the event and proceed as for \mttwo.
265:
266: \subsection{Uncertainties in \Ptmiss\ and $m_{\protect\ntlone}$}
267:
268: The sensitivity of \mtx\ to the estimated mass of the neutralino is shown in \figref{MTX:MTXPLOTS}b,
269: where 10\% (16~GeV) errors in $\chi$ result in similar {\em fractional} errors in \DeltaMChi\ \ie\
270: of a few tens of MeV. \mtx\ shows similar insensitivity to measurement uncertainties in the missing
271: transverse momentum vector.
272: This behaviour can be (at least partially) understood from the non-relativistic limit of \mttwo,
273: when the proportionality in \eqref{MTX:MTTWOCOND} becomes an equality and
274: \begin{equation} \mttwo^2-(m_\pi+m_\ntlone)^2 = \frac{1}{4 m_\pi m_\ntlone}
275: \left(m_\pi \Ptmiss - m_\ntlone {\bf p}_T^{\pi_1} - m_\ntlone {\bf p}_T^{\pi_2}\right)^2
276: + \mathcal{O}\left(({\bf v}_T\cdot {\bf v}_T)^2\right)\ . \label{AMSB:NONREL}\end{equation}
277: One can see that in \eqref{AMSB:NONREL} $m_\pi$ multiplies the missing momentum,
278: while $m_\ntlone$ multiplies the pion transverse momenta.