1: \documentclass{appolb}
2: \usepackage{epsfig}
3: \usepackage{graphicx}
4: % epsfig package included for placing EPS figures in the text
5: %------------------------------------------------------
6: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
7: % %
8: % BEGINNING OF TEXT %
9: % %
10: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
11: \begin{document}
12: % \eqsec % uncomment this line to get equations numbered by (sec.num)
13: \title{
14: Polarization of Prompt $J/\psi$ and $\Upsilon(nS)$
15: %%%%%%%%%%The Paper Title comes Here...%
16: \thanks{Presented at
17: the X International Workshop on Deep Inelastic Scattering (DIS2002),
18: Cracow, Poland, 30 April - 4 May 2002.
19: }%
20: % you can use '\\' to break lines
21: }
22: \author{Jungil Lee
23: %%%%%%%%%%Put here the name(s) of the Author(s)
24: \address{HEP Division, Argonne National Laboratory,
25: \\9700 S. Cass Avenue, Argonne, Illinois 60439, U.S.A.}
26: %\and
27: %the Name(s) of other Author(s)
28: %\address{and their affiliation}
29: }
30: \maketitle
31: \begin{abstract}
32: %Here comes the abstract
33: We review predictions, based on the nonrelativistic QCD factorization
34: framework, for the polarizations of prompt $J/\psi$'s and $\Upsilon(nS)$'s
35: produced at the Fermilab Tevatron. We also discuss the effect of
36: relativistic corrections on the theoretical prediction for the
37: polarization of prompt $J/\psi$'s at the Tevatron.
38: \end{abstract}
39: \PACS{13.85.Ni, 13.88.+e, 12.38.Bx, 13.87.Fh, 14.80.Ly}
40: %=================================
41: \section{Introduction}
42: \vspace{-10cm}\hspace{8cm}{ANL-HEP-CP-02-045}
43:
44: \vspace{9.8cm}
45: %=================================
46: The nonrelativistic QCD~(NRQCD) factorization approach has been developed
47: to describe inclusive quarkonium production and decay~\cite{BBL}.
48: It is the first effective field theory providing infrared-finite predictions
49: of the hadronic decay rates of $P$-wave quarkonium~\cite{BBL-p}.
50: It also explains
51: large-$p_T$ $S$-wave charmonium production at the Tevatron~\cite{BF-frag}.
52: The theory introduces several nonperturbative color-octet
53: matrix elements~(ME's). It also includes color-singlet ME's.
54: These are equivalent to the heavy-quark wave function at the origin
55: and it's derivatives, which appear in the color-singlet model.
56: The ME's are universal and fitted
57: to the CDF data at the Tevatron~\cite{cho}.
58: The universality of the ME's has been tested in various experimental
59: situations~\cite{test}(A recent review can be found in Chap. 9
60: of Ref.~\cite{RUNII}).
61: A remarkable prediction of the NRQCD is that the
62: $S$-wave quarkonium produced in the $p\bar{p}$ collision
63: should be transversely polarized at sufficiently large $p_T$~\cite{CW}.
64: This prediction is based on the dominance of gluon fragmentation
65: into quarkonium in quarkonium
66: production at large $p_T$~\cite{BF-frag} and on the approximate heavy-quark
67: spin symmetry of NRQCD~\cite{BBL}.
68: Recent measurements at the Tevatron by the CDF Collaboration do not confirm
69: this prediction~\cite{psipol-cdf}.
70: However, the experimental uncertainties are large.
71:
72: In this proceedings, we review predictions, based on the NRQCD
73: factorization framework, for the polarizations of prompt
74: $J/\psi$'s~\cite{psipol} and $\Upsilon(nS)$'s
75: produced at the Tevatron~\cite{upspol}.
76: As a possible source of depolarizing contributions to the prompt
77: $J/\psi$ production at large $p_T$,
78: we consider the relativistic corrections to the gluon fragmentation
79: into $J/\psi$. Finally, we summarize recent developments in the
80: application of NRQCD to low-energy supersymmetry.
81: %=================================
82: \section{Polarization of prompt $J/\psi$}
83: %=================================
84: \begin{figure}
85: \begin{tabular}{ll}
86: \raisebox{2.05ex}{\includegraphics[width=6cm]{psipol.ps}}&
87: \includegraphics[width=5.6cm]{upspol.ps}
88: \\[-5cm]
89: \hspace{1.2cm}(a)&
90: \hspace{1.2cm}(b)
91: \\[5cm]
92: \end{tabular}
93: \caption{Polarization variable $\alpha$ vs. $p_T$
94: (a) for prompt $J/\psi$~\cite{psipol} and (b) $\Upsilon(1S)$~\cite{upspol}
95: compared to CDF data.}
96: \end{figure}
97: A convenient measure of the polarization is the variable
98: $\alpha = (\sigma_T-2\sigma_L)/(\sigma_T+2\sigma_L)$,
99: where $\sigma_T$ and $\sigma_L$ are the transverse
100: and longitudinal components of the cross section, respectively.
101: The variable $\alpha$ is fitted to the angular distribution~(%
102: $\propto 1 + \alpha \cos^2\theta$)
103: of the positive lepton with respect to the
104: $J/\psi$ momentum in the hadron center-of-momentum frame.
105: The polarizations of the $\psi'$'s and direct $J/\psi$'s~($J/\psi$'s that
106: do not come from decays) produced
107: at the Tevatron are predicted to be transverse~\cite{psi2pol,psipol}.
108: The CDF measurement does not show the predicted tendency, but the
109: error bars are too large to draw any definitive conclusions~\cite{psipol-cdf}.
110: CDF also measured the polarization of prompt $J/\psi$'s with
111: a data that is larger than that of $\psi'$ by about a factor 100.
112: The prompt signal is composed of
113: direct $J/\psi$'s~(60\%) and $J/\psi$'s that come from decays of
114: the higher charmonium states $\chi_{c1}$~(15\%), $\chi_{c2}$~(15\%),
115: and $\psi'$~(10\%). The contribution from the radiative decays of
116: $\chi_{cJ}$'s
117: decreases, but does not eliminate the transverse polarization at large
118: transverse momentum~\cite{psipol}.
119: In Fig.~1(a) the theoretical prediction of the polarization parameter $\alpha$
120: for prompt $J/\psi$'s
121: is shown as a band along with the CDF data~\cite{psipol}.
122: While the prediction is in good agreement with the data in the moderate-$p_T$
123: region, it disagrees with the data in the bin at the largest $p_T$.
124: However, the discrepancies with the
125: theoretical predictions are significant only for the bin at the largest
126: $p_T$, and so a definitive conclusion must await the higher statistics
127: measurements that will be possible in Run II of the Tevatron.
128: %=================================
129: \section{Polarization of $\Upsilon(nS)$}
130: %=================================
131: The CDF Collaboration also measured the polarization
132: of inclusive $\Upsilon(1S)$ in Run IB of the Tevatron~\cite{upspol-cdf}.
133: The results for the $p_T$ bins from 2 to 20 GeV and
134: from 8 to 20 GeV are both consistent with
135: no polarization. Since the cross section falls rapidly with $p_T$,
136: this indicates that there is little if any polarization
137: for $p_T$'s below about 10 GeV.
138: Quantitative calculations of the
139: polarization for inclusive $\Upsilon(nS)$ mesons
140: are carried out~\cite{upspol} by using ME's for direct bottomonium
141: production, which have been recently determined
142: from an analysis of data from Run IB at the Tevatron~\cite{B-F-L}.
143: There are more feed-down channels than for prompt $J/\psi$,
144: but the generalization to inclusive $\Upsilon(nS)$ production is
145: straightforward~\cite{upspol}.
146: The theoretical prediction for the polarization of
147: $\Upsilon(1S)$~($\alpha=0.13\pm 0.18$ in the $p_T$ bin from 8 to 20 GeV)
148: is consistent
149: with the recent measurement by the CDF Collaboration
150: in the $p_T$ bin from 8 to 20 GeV~\cite{upspol}.
151: It is also predicted that the transverse polarization of $\Upsilon(1S)$
152: should increase steadily for $p_T$ greater than about 10 GeV~(See Fig. 1(b))
153: and that the $\Upsilon(2S)$ and $\Upsilon(3S)$
154: should be even more strongly transversely polarized~\cite{upspol}.
155: %=================================
156: \section{Relativistic corrections to the fragmentation process}
157: %=================================
158: The CDF measurement of the polarization of prompt $J/\psi$'s
159: disagrees with the NRQCD prediction in the large-$p_T$ region.
160: Since the production rate is dominated by gluon fragmentation
161: in this region, it may be worthwhile to check the size of corrections that
162: are neglected in the available predictions for the fragmentation process.
163: There are many effects that could change the quantitative prediction
164: for $\alpha$, such as next-to-leading order QCD corrections.
165: The QCD correction for the color-octet spin-triplet
166: channel has been calculated~\cite{BL-nlo} but other
167: next-to-leading order corrections are, as yet, uncalculated.
168: The virtual gluon fragmentation that originates from light-quark fragmentation
169: also contributes to the large transverse polarization~\cite{BL-mu}.
170:
171: It is known that there are large $v^2$ corrections to various charmonium
172: decay rates~\cite{BP}.~(Recently, the $v^4$ correction factors for
173: $S$-wave states have been calculated~\cite{BP}.)
174: If there are also large $v^2$ corrections to
175: the gluon fragmentation into $J/\psi$, then the prediction of the
176: prompt $J/\psi$ may change significantly.
177: The fragmentation probability is estimated by
178: integrating the fragmentation functions $D_n(z)$~(
179: $n=8$ for octet) over the longitudinal fraction $z$~\cite{v2frag}:
180: %-----------------
181: \begin{eqnarray}
182: %-----------------
183: \int_0^1 dz \;D_8(^3S_1)(z)&\approx&(1-0.54\;v^2/0.3)
184: \int_0^1 dz \; D_8^{\rm{LO}}(z),
185: %-----------------
186: \end{eqnarray}
187: %-----------------
188: where the superscript LO denotes the limit $v\to 0$.
189: For charmonium, $v^2\approx 0.3$. The large negative correction~(%
190: $\approx 0.54$) to the color-octet spin-triplet fragmentation
191: should increase the numerical value of the octet matrix element by
192: about a factor $2$. The phenomenological consequences of this correction
193: require further study.
194: %=================================
195: \section{SUSY NRQCD}
196: %=================================
197: One of the exciting new developments in quarkonium physics is its
198: application to low-energy supersymmetry.
199: In Ref.~\cite{sb}, it was proposed that
200: a light bottom squark $\tilde{b}$ with a mass similar to or less than
201: the mass of the $b$ quark
202: may provide a solution to the puzzle that the $b$ production rate
203: measured at the Tevatron is two to three times greater than the
204: theoretical prediction from quantum chromodynamics~\cite{bb}.
205: If the $\tilde{b}$ is lighter than the $b$,
206: one may observe $\tilde{b}\tilde{b}^*$
207: pairs in $\Upsilon$~\cite{sbsb-u} and $\chi_b$~\cite{sbsb-c} decays.
208: Furthermore, forthcoming high-statistics data from the
209: CLEO Collaboration offer possibilities of discovery or significant
210: new bounds on the existence and masses of supersymmetric particles
211: through the search for the monochromatic photon that is emitted from
212: the radiative decay of the $\Upsilon$ into $S$-wave sbottomonium~(%
213: a $\tilde{b}\tilde{b}^*$ bound state)~\cite{sbonium}.
214: \\
215: \\
216:
217: We acknowledge enjoyable collaborations
218: on the work presented here
219: with Eric~Braaten~(Sec.~2-3),
220: \mbox{Geoffrey}~T.~Bodwin~(Sec.~4-5), and~Edmond~L.~Berger~(Sec.~5)
221: and we thank them for their valuable comments.
222: Work in the High Energy Physics Division at Argonne National Laboratory
223: is supported by
224: the U.~S.~Department of Energy, Division of High Energy Physics, under
225: Contract No.~W-31-109-ENG-38.
226: %===============================
227: \newpage
228: %===============================
229: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
230: %----------------
231: % test
232: %----------------
233: \bibitem{BBL}
234: G.T.~Bodwin, E.~Braaten, G.P.~Lepage,
235: Phys.\ Rev.\ \textbf{D51}, 1125 (1995);
236: \textbf{55}, 5853(E) (1997).
237: \bibitem{BBL-p}
238: G.T.~Bodwin, E.~Braaten, G.P.~Lepage,
239: Phys.\ Rev.\ \textbf{D46}, 1914 (1992); \textbf{46}, 3703 (1992).
240: \bibitem{BF-frag}
241: E.~Braaten, S.~Fleming,
242: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 74}, 3327 (1995).
243:
244: \bibitem{cho} P. Cho, A.K. Leibovich, Phys. Rev. \textbf{D53}, 150 (1996);
245: 6203 (1996).
246: \bibitem{test}
247: M. Cacciari, M. Kr\"{a}mer, Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{76}, 4128 (1996);
248: P. Ko, J. Lee, H.S. Song, Phys. Rev. \textbf{D53}, 1409 (1996);
249: \textbf{D54}, 4312 (1996); Phys. Lett. \textbf{B395}, 107 (1997);
250: C.S.~Kim, \textit{et al.}, Phys. Rev. \textbf{D55}, 5429 (1997);
251: J. Amundson, S. Fleming, I. Maksymyk, \textbf{D56}, 5844 (1997);
252: K. Cheung, W.-Y. Keung, T. Yuan, Phys. Rev. \textbf{76}, 877 (1996);
253: P. Cho, Phys. Lett. \textbf{B368}, 171 (1996);
254: S. Baek, \textit{et al.}, Phys. Lett. \textbf{B389}, 609 (1996);
255: Phys. Rev. \textbf{D55}, 6839 (1997); hep-ph/9804455.
256: \bibitem{RUNII}
257: K.~Anikeev \textit{et al.},
258: Report of the working group on B physics
259: at the Tevatron: "Run II and beyond", hep-ph/0201071.
260:
261: \bibitem{CW}
262: P.~Cho, M.B.~Wise,
263: Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf B346}, 129 (1995).
264: \bibitem{psipol-cdf}
265: T.~Affolder {\it et al.}, CDF Collaboration,
266: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 85}, 2886 (2000).
267: \bibitem{psi2pol}
268: M.~Beneke, I.Z.~Rothstein,
269: Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf B372}, 157 (1996); {\bf 389}, 769~(E) (1996);
270: M.~Beneke, M.~Kramer,
271: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D55}, 5269 (1997);
272: A.K.~Leibovich,
273: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D56}, 4412 (1997).
274: %----------------
275: % psi pol
276: %----------------
277: \bibitem{psipol}
278: E. Braaten, B.A. Kniehl, J. Lee, Phys. Rev. \textbf{D62}, 094005 (2000);
279: B.A. Kniehl, J. Lee, Phys. Rev. \textbf{D62}, 114027 (2000).
280: %----------------
281: % upsilon pol
282: %----------------
283: \bibitem{upspol}
284: E. Braaten, J. Lee, Phys. Rev. \textbf{D63}, 071501~(R) (2001).
285: \bibitem{upspol-cdf}
286: D.~Acosta {\it et al.}, CDF Collaboration,
287: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 88}, 161802 (2002).
288: \bibitem{B-F-L}
289: E. Braaten, A.K. Leibovich, S. Fleming,
290: Phys. Rev. \textbf{D63} 094006 (2001).
291:
292: %----------------
293: % NLO fragmentation function
294: %----------------
295: \bibitem{BL-nlo}
296: E.~Braaten, J.~Lee,
297: %``Next-to-leading order calculation of the color octet (3)S(1) gluon
298: % fragmentation function for heavy quarkonium,''
299: Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf B586}, 427 (2000);
300: J. Lee, hep-ph/0009111.
301:
302: \bibitem{BL-mu}
303: E.~Braaten, J.~Lee,
304: %``Fragmentation functions for lepton pairs,''
305: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D65}, 034005 (2002).
306: %----------------
307: % relativistic corrections
308: %----------------
309: \bibitem{BP}
310: G.T.~Bodwin, A.~Petrelli,
311: hep-ph/0205210 and references therein.
312: \bibitem{v2frag} G.T. Bodwin, J. Lee, unpublished.
313: %----------------
314: % sbottomonium
315: %----------------
316: \bibitem{sb}
317: E.L.~Berger, B.W.~Harris, D.E.~Kaplan, Z.~Sullivan, T.M.~Tait, C.E.M.~Wagner,
318: Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{86}, 4231 (2001).
319: \bibitem{bb}
320: S.~Frixione, M.L.~Mangano, P.~Nason, G.~Ridolfi,
321: Adv.\ Ser.\ Direct.\ High Energy Phys.\ {\bf 15}, 609 (1998);
322: P.~Nason {\it et al.},
323: hep-ph/0003142.
324: \bibitem{sbsb-u}E.L. Berger, L. Clavelli, Phys. Lett. \textbf{B512}, 115 (2001).
325: \bibitem{sbsb-c}E.L. Berger, J. Lee, Phys. Rev. \textbf{D65}, 114003 (2002).
326: \bibitem{sbonium}E.L. Berger, G.T. Bodwin, J. Lee, hep-ph/0206115.
327: \end{thebibliography}
328: %===============================
329:
330:
331: %===============================
332: \end{document}
333: