1: \documentstyle[epsf,seceq,twoside]{ptptex}
2: \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{1.5cm}
3: \setlength{\evensidemargin}{-0.5cm}
4: \notypesetlogo %comment in if to eliminate PTPTeX logo
5: \markboth{% %header of odd-page
6: D. Ito et al.
7: }{% %header of even-page
8: Possible Evidence for a Chiral Particle $D_1^\chi$...}
9: \title{Possible Evidence for a Chiral Particle $D_1^\chi$,\\
10: Axial-Vector in the $D$ Meson System}
11: \author{%
12: Daiki {\sc Ito}, Muneyuki {\sc Ishida}$^*$, Shin {\sc Ishida},
13: Toshihiko {\sc Komada}$^{**}$\\
14: Hiroshi {\sc Tonooka} and Kenji {\sc Yamada}$^{**}$
15: }
16: \inst{%
17: Research Institute of Quantum Science,
18: College of Science and Technology\\
19: Nihon University, Tokyo 101-0062, Japan\\
20: $^*$Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology,
21: Tokyo 152-8551, Japan\\
22: $^{**}$Department of Engineering Science, Junior College Funabashi Campus \\
23: Nihon University, Funabashi 274-8501, Japan
24: }
25: %
26: \abst{%
27: In the covariant level-classification scheme of hadrons proposed recently,
28: the existence of ``chiral particles", scalar and axial-vector mesons
29: as the partners of the ground-state pseudo-scalar and vector mesons, respectively,
30: were predicted in the $D$ and $B$ meson systems, realizing a linear representation
31: of chiral symmetry.
32: In this work
33: we reanalyze the $D^*\pi$ mass spectra obtained through the $\Upsilon (4S)$ and $Z^0$ decays
34: to show a possibility for the $D_1^\chi$.
35: }
36: %\pacs{PACS Nos. : 12.40.Aa, 13.20.Jf, 13.20.-v}
37:
38: \begin{document}
39: \maketitle
40:
41: \setcounter{tocdepth}{4}
42:
43: \section{Introduction}
44:
45: The level classification of hadrons had been done rather successfully on the basis of the
46: non-relativistic quark model(NRQM) for these 4 decades. However, this non-relativistic
47: scheme seems now to be confronted with a serious difficulty: Recently existence\cite{sca,HK}
48: of the light-mass
49: iso-scalar scalar meson to be identified with $\sigma$\cite{rfsigma,rf555},
50: the chiral partner of the $\pi$ meson as a
51: Nambu-Goldstone boson, has been accepted widely\cite{2000}. Successively possible existence of the $\kappa$(900)
52: meson\cite{kappa}, iso-spinor scalar meson, has been pointed out. Then we are able to identify naturally the $\sigma$-meson
53: nonet\cite{rfmw} with the members $\{ \sigma (600),\kappa (900),a_0(980),f_0(980) \}$.
54:
55: The mass values $(\le$ 1GeV) of this scalar nonet are in the region of $q\bar q$ ground states in NRQM,
56: while there are no seats for scalars in this model. This has aroused recently a hot controversy on what the
57: quark configuration of $\sigma$ nonet is.
58:
59: On the other hand we have proposed a new level-classification scheme\cite{rfCLC,u12}, which has a relativistically covariant
60: framework and in conformity with the approximate chiral symmetry.
61: In this new classification scheme the ``chiral states", which are out of the framework of
62: the NRQM, are expected to exist in the lower mass region, and the $\sigma$-nonet
63: is naturally assigned as the $(q\bar q)$ relativistic $S$-wave chiral state. In the heavy-light quark meson system
64: it is expected that the approximate chiral symmetry on the light quark is valid, and the new level-classification scheme
65: anticipates existence of the chiral states\cite{hl}, scalar mesons and axial-vector mesons,
66: in addition to the conventional
67: pseudo-scalar and vector mesons, in the ground states. The purpose of this work is to investigate the possibility of
68: existence of the chiral axial-vector meson $D_1^\chi$ in the $D$ meson system by re-analyzing some experimental data
69: reported previously.\footnote{
70: Preliminary results of this work were reported at the conference Hadron 2001 at
71: Protvino.\cite{yamada}
72: }
73:
74:
75: \section{Experimental Data and Project for Reanalysis}
76:
77: \hspace*{-0.8cm} ({\it Experimental data to be analyzed})
78:
79: As the experimental data\cite{CLEO,DELPHI} to be re-analyzed we choose the mass spectra of $D^{*+}\pi^-$ system
80: obtained through the two processes,
81: \begin{eqnarray}
82: {\rm CLEO\ II} &:& e^++e^-\rightarrow \Upsilon (4S) \rightarrow D^{*+}\pi^- + \cdots ,\ \ \label{eq2a}\\
83: {\rm DELPHI} &:& e^++e^-\rightarrow Z^0 \rightarrow D^{*+}\pi^- + \cdots ,\ \ \label{eq2b}
84: \end{eqnarray}
85: which have at least a necessary statistical accuracy deserved to meaningful analysis.
86: We shall take the two kinds of CLEO data on the process Eq.~(\ref{eq2a}),
87: CLEO (a) and CLEO (b); the former are the restricted ones so as to stress relatively
88: the conventional axial-vector meson $D_1^0$, while the latter are all the relevant data.
89:
90: As the irrelevant backgrounds, which come from the other than decay processes of
91: the relevant resonant particles, the CLEO group set up the formula
92: \begin{eqnarray}
93: B.~G.~ &=& \alpha (\Delta M)^\beta \times
94: {\rm exp}(-\gamma_1(\Delta M)-\gamma_2(\Delta M)^2-\gamma_3(\Delta M)^3)\ ,
95: \ \ \label{eq3}\\
96: \Delta M &\equiv& M(D^*\pi)-(m_{D^*}+m_\pi ),\ \ \nonumber
97: \end{eqnarray}
98: with fitting parameters $\alpha ,\ \beta ,\ \gamma_1,\ \gamma_2 ,\ \gamma_3$ , while the DELPHI group
99: applies the similar formula to Eq.~(\ref{eq3}) with fitting parameters
100: $\alpha ,\ \beta ,\ \gamma_1$, setting $\gamma_2 =\gamma_3 =0$.
101: We shall apply the same formula to Eq.~(\ref{eq3}) with parameters
102: $\alpha ,\ \beta ,\ \gamma_1,\ \gamma_2,\ \gamma_3$ for the backgrounds,
103: taking into account the possible effects of intermediate $D_1^\chi$ production.
104:
105: \hspace*{-0.8cm} ({\it Relevant intermediate resonances})
106:
107: The conventional three $(c\bar q)-P$ wave mesons may contribute, as intermediate states,
108: to the final $D^{*+}\pi^-$ system with the respective angular momenta $l=0,1,2$ as
109: \begin{eqnarray}
110: D_1^* &\rightarrow& D^{*+} + \pi^-\ \ (S-{\rm wave})\ , \label{eq4a} \\
111: D_1 &\rightarrow& D^{*+} + \pi^-\ \ (D-{\rm wave})\ , \label{eq4b} \\
112: D_2^* &\rightarrow& D^{*+} + \pi^-\ \ (D-{\rm wave})\ , \label{eq4c}
113: \end{eqnarray}
114: where $D_1^*,\ D_1$ and $D_2^*$ have, respectively, ${}^{j_q}L_J={}^{1/2}P_1,\ {}^{3/2}P_1$ and ${}^{3/2}P_2$
115: $( {\mib j}_q={\mib S}_q+{\mib L}$ is the total amgular momentum of the light quark),
116: and the respective partial wave states in Eqs.~(\ref{eq4a},\ref{eq4b},\ref{eq4c}) are deduced from the heavy quark symmetry (HQS).
117: In this work, a possible contribution from, in addition to the above conventional resonances, the chiral axial-vector
118: meson $D_1^\chi$ is taken into account as
119: \begin{eqnarray}
120: D_1^\chi & \rightarrow & D^{*+} + \pi^- \ (S-{\rm wave})\ , \ \
121: \end{eqnarray}
122: where we inferred that the $S$-wave decay is dominant because of small $Q$-value.
123:
124: Out of the three resonances in Eqs~(\ref{eq4a},\ref{eq4b},\ref{eq4c}) the $D_1$ and the $D_2^*$,
125: decaying in the $D$-wave,
126: have comparatively a small decay width $\sim 20$ MeV, while $D_1^*$,
127: decaying in the $S$-wave, has a large width $\sim 300$ MeV,
128: reflecting the physical situation that all three resonances have small $Q$-value and that the width contains a
129: kinematical factor $\Gamma \propto P^{2l+1}$ ($P$ being relative momentum of the final system).
130:
131: Because of its large width the contribution of $D_1^*$ is difficult to be discriminated from the backgrounds and it
132: was treated as being included into the background in the original analysis by the experimental groups.
133: In this work we shall follow this prescription.
134:
135: Thus, in order to analyze the relevant mass spectra, we shall take into account the three resonances,
136: $D_1,\ D_2^*$ and $D_1^\chi$.
137:
138: \hspace*{-0.8cm} ({\it Method of analysis})
139:
140: We shall apply the VMW method in our relevant case, where the absolute amplitude squared is given by
141: \begin{eqnarray}
142: |M(s)|^2 &=& \sum_i | r_i \Delta_i (s) |^2 + {\rm B. G. }\ , \label{eq8}\\
143: \Delta_i & \equiv & \frac{-m_i\Gamma_i}{s-m_i^2 + i m_i\Gamma_i}\ .\nonumber
144: \end{eqnarray}
145: Here the summation on the suffix $i$ goes over the resonant particles $D_1,\ D_2^*$ and $D_1^\chi$,
146: $m_i(\Gamma_i)$ are their masses (widths), and $r_i$ represent their production strength.
147:
148: The relevant mass spectrum is given by
149: \begin{eqnarray}
150: \Gamma (s) &=& \frac{1}{2\sqrt s} \int
151: \frac{d^3{\mib P}_{D^*} d^3{\mib P}_\pi }{(2\pi )^3 2E_{D^*}(2\pi )^3 2E_\pi}\nonumber\\
152: & \times & (2\pi )^4\delta^{(4)} (P-P_{D^*}-p_\pi ) | M(s) |^2 \ ,\label{eq9}
153: \end{eqnarray}
154: where $s\equiv -(P_\mu )^2$, and $P_\mu$ being the total 4-momentum of relevant system.
155:
156: \hspace*{-0.8cm} ({\it Project for applying $\chi^2$-analysis})
157:
158: In order to obtain the least-$\chi^2$ solution on our relevant parameters, we set up the restrictions
159: on the values of resonance masses and widths as is collected in Table I.
160:
161: \begin{table}
162: \caption{Restricted regions of values of masses and widths (MeV).}
163: \begin{center}
164: \begin{tabular}{c|ccc}
165: \hline
166: & $D_1^\chi$ & $D_1$ & $D_2^*$ \\
167: \hline
168: $m$ & 2295-2320 & 2400-2450 & 2420-2480 \\
169: $\Gamma$ & 10-60 & 10-35 & 10-100 \\
170: \hline
171: \end{tabular}
172: \end{center}
173: \end{table}
174:
175: The regions for $D_1$ and $D_2^*$ are determined properly from the center values
176: and errors of respective resonances reported in PDG table. Concerning a possible
177: candidate for the chiral particle $D_1^\chi$, some excess structure over backgrounds
178: in the regions centered at $m\sim 2300$ MeV, (which is seen commonly through all
179: the three experimental data of CLEO (a) and (b), and of DELPHI) is identified as being
180: due to production of $D_1^\chi$. The restrictions on $D_1^\chi$ come simply from
181: inspection of this structure.
182:
183: We shall perform the two kinds of $\chi^2$-fitting of the mass spectra, the one with $D_1^\chi$
184: and the other without $D_1^\chi$ and compare with their results.
185:
186:
187: \section{Results of Analysis}
188:
189: The results of our analysis in both the cases, with $D_1^\chi$ and without $D_1^\chi$,
190: are shown in Fig.~1:\ \ \
191: The fitted curves in comparison with the data of CLEO (b), DELPHI and CLEO (a) are given,
192: respectively, in Fig.~1(a), (b) and (c) $[$ (d), (e) and (f) $]$
193: in the case with $D_1^\chi\ [$ without $D_1^\chi ]$.
194: The respective contributions from the $D_1^\chi$,
195: $D_1,\ D_2^*$ and B. G. are also shown.
196:
197: Actually we have made our analysis in the two steps(, taking into account the difference of statistical accuracy
198: of respective data): First fitting CLEO (b) and DELPHI commonly and secondly fitting CLEO (a) with the
199: fixed values of resonance mass and width obtained through the first fitting.
200:
201: \begin{figure}
202: \epsfysize=13. cm
203: \centerline{\epsffile{D1fig1.eps}}
204: \caption{Fitted curves in the case with (without) $D_1^\chi$ and experimental data
205: of CLEO (b) and DELPHI are shown, respectively, in (a) and (c) ( (b) and (d) ). }
206: \end{figure}
207:
208: \begin{figure}[t]
209: \epsfysize=6.5 cm
210: \centerline{\epsffile{D1fig2.eps}}
211: \caption{Fitted curves in the case with (without) $D_1^\chi$ are, for reference, given in comparison
212: with experimental data, CLEO(a), where the values of mass and width of relevant resonances are determined
213: in the analysis of CLEO(b) and DELPHI. }
214: \end{figure}
215:
216: The obtained values of mass and width of the relevant resonances are collected
217: in Table II.
218: \begin{table}
219: \caption{Fitted values of mass and width of resonances (in MeV)}
220: \begin{center}
221: \begin{tabular}{c|ccc}
222: \hline
223: & $D_1^\chi$ & $D_1$ & $D_2^*$ \\
224: \hline
225: $m$ & 2312 & 2421 & 2465 \\
226: $\Gamma$ & 23.03 & 30.73 & 42.54 \\
227: \hline
228: \end{tabular}
229: \end{center}
230: \end{table}
231: The values of $D_1$ and $D_2^*$ are close to those given in PDG table.
232:
233:
234: In Table III the values of $\chi^2$ and of
235: $\tilde\chi^2(\equiv \chi^2/{\rm No.\ of\ data\ points-No.\ of\ param.})$ in the
236: respective steps of fitting are also given.
237:
238: \begin{table}
239: \caption{Values of $\chi^2$ and $\tilde\chi^2$}
240: \begin{tabular}{l|c|c|c|c|c|c}
241: \hline
242: & \multicolumn{3}{c|}{(A) with $D_1^\chi$} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{(B) without $D_1^\chi$} \\
243: \hline
244: & CLEO (b) & DELPHI & CLEO (a) & CLEO (b) & DELPHI & CLEO (a) \\
245: \hline
246: $\tilde\chi^2$
247: & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\frac{\displaystyle 110}{\displaystyle (140-20)}=0.923$}
248: & $\frac{\displaystyle 80.6}{\displaystyle (70-8)}=1.30$
249: & \multicolumn{2}{c|}{$\frac{\displaystyle 119}{\displaystyle (140-16)}=0.957$}
250: & $\frac{\displaystyle 85.5}{\displaystyle (70-7)}=1.36$ \\
251: \hline
252: $\chi^2$ & 59.51 & 51.28 & & 66.41 & 52.25 & \\
253: \hline
254: \end{tabular}
255: \end{table}
256:
257:
258: Through the inspection of fitted curves in Fig.~1,
259: we may conclude that our results give some evidence for existence of $D_1^\chi$,
260: although there is no significant improvement on the reduced $\chi^2$ given in Table III.
261:
262:
263: \section{Concluding Remarks}
264:
265: We have made reanalysis of the $(D^{*+}\pi^-)$ mass spectra obtained through the processes Eqs.~(\ref{eq2a})
266: and (\ref{eq2b}), by applying the formulas Eqs.~(\ref{eq8}) and (\ref{eq9}).
267: As the intermediate resonant particles we have taken into account the $D_1^\chi$,
268: a new chiral axial-vector meson outside of the conventional level classification scheme.
269: As a result we have obtained a possible evidence for $D_1^\chi$ with $m=2312$ MeV and $\Gamma = 23.0$ MeV.
270: The obtained values of reduced $\chi$ square,
271: $\tilde\chi^2\equiv \chi^2/({\rm No.\ of\ data\ points- No.\ of\ param.})$, are\\
272: $\tilde\chi^2=110/(140-20)=0.923$ for the case with $D_1^\chi$
273: and
274: $119/(140-16)=0.957$ for the case without $D_1^\chi$, respectively.
275: However, the statistical accuracy of the relevant data is very poor.
276: It is required to have the more accurate data in order to get a definite conclusion.
277:
278: A possible evidence for another chiral particle $B_0^\chi$, scalar meson in the $B$ system, is also shown
279: by reanalysis of the $B\pi$ mass spectra through the decay process of $Z^0$-boson.
280: It will be given in a separate paper.\cite{B0chi}
281:
282:
283: \acknowledgement
284:
285: The authors should like to express their gratitude to Professors, K. Takamatsu and T. Tsuru,
286: for their useful discussions and encouragement.
287:
288:
289: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
290:
291: \bibitem{sca} R.~Delbourgo and M.~D.~Scadron, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 48} (1982), 765.
292: \bibitem{HK}T. Hatsuda and T. Kunihiro, Prog. Theor. Phys. {\bf 74} (1985), 765; Phys. Rep. {\bf 247} (1994), 221.
293: \bibitem{rfsigma} N. N. Achasov and G. N. Schestakov,
294: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 49} (1994), 5779.\\
295: R. Kaminski, L. Lesniak and J. -P. Maillet,
296: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 50} (1994), 3145.\\
297: N. A. Tornqvist, Z. Phys. C {\bf 68} (1995), 647.\\
298: N. A. Tornqvist and M. Roos, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 76} (1996), 1575.\\
299: M. Harada, F. Sannino and J. Schechter, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 54} (1996), 1991.
300: \bibitem{rf555} S. Ishida, M. Ishida, H. Takahashi, T. Ishida, K. Takamatsu
301: and T. Tsuru, Prog. Theor. Phys. {\bf 95} (1996), 745; {\bf 98} (1997), 1005.
302: \bibitem{2000}Proceedings on {\it Possible\ Existence\ of\ $\sigma$-Meson\ and\ Its\
303: Implications\ to\ Hadron\ Physics,\ YITP,\ Kyoto,\ 2000} (``$\sigma$-Meson 2000"),
304: Soryushiron Kenkyu (Kyoto) {\bf 102 } (2001), E1; KEK-proceedings/2000-4.
305: \bibitem{kappa} S. Ishida, M. Ishida, T. Ishida, K. Takamatsu and T. Tsuru,
306: Prog. Theor. Phys. {\bf 98} (1997), 159.
307: \bibitem{rfmw}
308: M. Ishida, Prog. Theor. Phys. {\bf 101} (1999), 661.
309: \bibitem{rfCLC} S. Ishida, M. Ishida and T. Maeda,
310: Prog. Theor. Phys. {\bf 104} (2000), 785.\\
311: S. Ishida, M. Ishida and T. Maeda, in {\it Proc.\ 8th\ Int.\
312: Conf.\ on\ Hadron\ Spectroscopy,\
313: Beijing,\ China,\ 24-28\ Aug.\ 1999} (Hadron 99); hep-ph/0002095.\\
314: S. Ishida and M. Ishida, in {\it Proc.\ Possible\ Existence\ of\ $\sigma$-Meson\ and\ Its\
315: Implications\ to\ Hadron\ Physics,\ YITP,\ Kyoto,\ 2000} ($\sigma$-Workshop),
316: Soryushiron Kenkyu (Kyoto) {\bf 102 } (2001), E1; KEK-proceedings/2000-4.
317: \bibitem{u12} S. Ishida and M .Ishida, Phys. Lett. {\bf B 539} (2002), 249.
318: \bibitem{hl} M. Ishida and S. Ishida, Prog. Theor. Phys. {\bf 106} (2001), 373.
319:
320: \bibitem{yamada} K. Yamada et al., in
321: {\it HADRON SPECTROSCOPY,
322: Proc. of the Ninth International Conference on Hadron Spectroscopy
323: , IHEP, Protvino, Russia, 2002}, ed. D. Amelin and A. M. Zaitsev,
324: AIP Conf. Proc. Vol. 619 (AIP, New York, 2002), p. 657;
325: hep-ph/0111110.
326: \bibitem{CLEO} CLEO collaboration, P. Avery et al., Phys. Lett. {\bf B331} (1994), 236.
327: \bibitem{DELPHI} DELPHI collaboration, P. Abreu et al., Phys. Lett. {\bf B426} (1998), 231.
328: \bibitem{B0chi}D.~Ito, M.~Ishida, S.~Ishida, T.~Komada, T.~Maeda and I.~Yamauchi, to be published.
329: \end{thebibliography}
330:
331: \end{document}
332:
333:
334:
335: