1: % GC 08/14/02
2: \documentclass[10pt,preprintnumbers,nofootinbib,aps]{revtex4}
3: %\documentclass[twocolumn,10pt,preprintnumbers,nofootinbib,aps]{revtex4}
4: \usepackage{epsfig}
5:
6: \def\Dirac#1{#1\hskip-5.5pt/ \hskip 1.pt}
7: \def\dslash{\Dirac\partial}
8: \def\dbar#1{\frac{d^4 #1}{(2\pi)^4}}
9:
10: \setlength{\topmargin}{0 cm}
11: \setlength{\textheight}{22 cm}
12: %\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.5}
13:
14: \begin{document}
15:
16:
17: \title{
18: Axial Vector Current and Coupling of the Quark in the Instanton Model }
19:
20: \author{G. W. Carter}
21:
22: \affiliation{
23: Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-1560}
24:
25: \date{27 August 2002}
26:
27: \begin{abstract}
28: We compute the axial vector current, form factor, and coupling for quarks
29: in the instanton liquid model with two light flavors.
30: Non-local current corrections are derived, as required by the effective
31: 't Hooft interaction.
32: We obtain a pion-mediated axial form factor and an axial coupling which,
33: when simply applied in the non-relativistic limit for constituent quarks,
34: matches the experimental value to within a few percent, both in and out of
35: the chiral limit.
36: \end{abstract}
37: \preprint{NT@UW-02-027}
38: \maketitle
39:
40: \section{Introduction}
41:
42: The axial coupling constant of the nucleon, deduced from measurements
43: of neutron beta decay, is known to be
44: $| G_A/G_V | = 1.2670 \pm 0.0035$ \cite{PDG} in vacuum.
45: Strict chiral invariance would have this ratio be unity, and the substantial
46: difference suggests a deviation in excess of current quark mass effects.
47: Thus it has long been argued that the increase in $G_A$ is a
48: result of the spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking that characterizes
49: the QCD vacuum.
50:
51: Although additional chiral-invariant meson-nucleon couplings can remedy
52: this problem in the linear sigma model \cite{Lee}, a more fundamental
53: explanation is warranted.
54: The issue is complicated by the difficulties experienced by lattice
55: QCD practitioners \cite{BOS}, in that such calculations tend to yield
56: values significantly lower than experiment.
57: Possible explanations have recently centered on finite-size effects
58: \cite{Jaffe}, although the specific physics is unresolved \cite{Cohen}.
59:
60: One might also try to deduce the nucleon's axial coupling by studying
61: that of a constituent quark, denoted in this paper as $g_A$.
62: In the non-relativistic limit,
63: \begin{equation}
64: G_A = \frac{5}{3} g_A \,,
65: \label{nrratio}
66: \end{equation}
67: but incomplete knowledge of the quark wave function leaves the
68: relativistic corrections unknown.
69: However there has been considerable success in treating the nucleon
70: as massive constituent quarks \cite{GellMann},
71: and if the deviation of $G_A$ from unity is in fact due to chiral forces the
72: constituent approach should encompass the relevant physics.
73: At the quark level chiral symmetry also demands an axial coupling of unity,
74: which generates an excess of nucleon axial charge when Eq.~(\ref{nrratio}) is
75: directly applied.
76: Studies addressing this predict negative corrections
77: of ${\cal O}(1)$ to $g_A$, using the MIT bag model \cite{CJJT},
78: in the large-$N_c$ limit \cite{Weinberg,
79: BSL}, or via perturbative corrections \cite{Duck}.
80:
81: In this paper we consider corrections to $g_A$ from instantons.
82: The Instanton Liquid Model (ILM), in which the QCD vacuum is populated by
83: classical gauge configurations \cite{BPST,CDG},
84: dynamically generates the constituent quark mass
85: and has consistently led to phenomenological success when applied to problems
86: related to spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking \cite{SS,Diakonov}.
87: As detailed below, we find a 25\% reduction in the axial coupling from
88: instantons, with only slight sensitivity to the chiral limit.
89: This is in excellent agreement with experiment if
90: corrections to Eq.~(\ref{nrratio}) are small.
91:
92: To determine the axial coupling we will first carefully analyze the axial
93: current.
94: Since instanton-induced interactions between quarks are non-local, the
95: currents associated with conserved quantities are non-trivial.
96: Next, given the necessity of pions in axial phenomena, meson correlation
97: functions are briefly reviewed.
98: We then derive the axial current and verify the importance of the pion
99: pole in the axial form factor, $h_A(q^2)$.
100: Finally, the leading corrections to the coupling $g_A$ are computed, taking
101: into account multi-instanton effects and substantial
102: non-local vertex corrections.
103: In the chiral limit we find $g_A = 0.73$ and estimate
104: that with a physical pion mass $g_A = 0.77$.
105: With naive application of Eq.~(\ref{nrratio}), these correspond to a
106: nucleon axial couping of 1.22 and 1.28, respectively.
107:
108: \section{Non-Locality and Conserved Currents}
109:
110: The effects of an instanton liquid background are most economically encoded
111: in an effective quark action \cite{DP2}.
112: Taking the exact zero-mode solutions to the Dirac equation
113: and isolating them as the dominant low-energy effects leads to a
114: $2 N_f$-quark vertex function \cite{tHooft},
115: similar to the Nambu--Jona-Lasinio model of QCD \cite{NJL,VL,Klevansky}.
116: A well-studied simplification of this model, chiral Random Matrix Theory, has
117: shown that chiral symmetry breaking via random overlap integrals
118: reproduces Dirac eigenvalue correlations as computed on the lattice
119: \cite{BMSVW}.
120: Thus such an approach seems to indeed contain the essence of
121: non-perturbative QCD.
122: Furthermore, the ILM relies on only two parameters: the instanton density
123: and average instanton size.
124: Both of these were phenomenologically fixed long ago with the vacuum
125: energy density and chiral condensate
126: \cite{Shuryak,DP2} and measured on the lattice \cite{HN}.
127: These parameters determine the diluteness of the instanton liquid, the
128: ratio of the average size to inter-instanton spacing, to be about 1/3, a
129: somewhat small parameter which allows for perturbative treatment of the
130: instanton-induced vertex.
131:
132: The Eulcidean effective action for $N_f$ flavors in the chiral
133: limit is written \cite{Diakonov},
134: \begin{equation}
135: S = -\int\!d^4x \; \psi^{\dagger}(x) i\dslash \psi(x)
136: + i \lambda \int \! dU\;d^4z\;\prod_f^{N_f} \Big[ - d^4x_f\;d^4y_f\;
137: \psi_f^{\dagger}(x_f) i\dslash \Phi(x_f-z,U) \tilde\Phi(y_f-z,U) i\dslash
138: \psi^f(y_f)\Big],
139: \label{oldsint}
140: \end{equation}
141: where $U$ is the
142: instanton's $2\times N_c$ color/spin orientation matrix and $z$ is its
143: position.
144: The $\Phi(x)$ is the zero mode solution for fermions in the
145: field of one instanton, and its Fourier transform is the form factor,
146: \begin{equation}
147: f(p) = 2 x \left[
148: I_1(x)K_0(x)-I_0(x)K_1(x)+\frac{1}{x}I_1(x)K_1(x) \right]_{x=p\rho/2}\,,
149: \label{ffac}
150: \end{equation}
151: which provides a natural momentum cutoff of scale $\rho^{-1}$.
152: We have left out additional (quarkless) $\lambda$ terms which relate
153: this coupling
154: constant, which is in fact a Lagrange multiplier, to the instanton density,
155: $N/V$.
156:
157: Because of non-locality Eq.\,(\ref{oldsint}) is not invariant under
158: symmetry transformations.
159: Since bulk observables are often insensitive to this problem it is
160: usually ignored, however when addressing currents the dependence is crucial.
161: A literature exists in which non-local interactions are modified to be
162: invariant \cite{Schwinger,Terning,BKN,BB,PB, GBR,ADT}
163: and we follow the same procedure here.
164: Taking the non-local four-fermion interaction as the starting point, it
165: then becomes a matter of multiplying each quark operator by a
166: path-ordered exponential in the background of a source gauge field
167: $a_\mu$, replacing the Euclidean quark fields as:
168: \begin{eqnarray}
169: \psi(x) &\rightarrow& W(z,x)\psi(x), \nonumber\\
170: \psi^{\dagger}(x) &\rightarrow& \psi^{\dagger}(x)\gamma_0 W(x,z)
171: \gamma_0 \,, \nonumber
172: \end{eqnarray}
173: with the operator \cite{Schwinger}
174: \[
175: W(x,y) = {\cal P}{\rm exp} \left(
176: - i\int^y_x\! ds_{\mu} a^a_{\mu} T^a\right).
177: \]
178: As has been pointed out in the cited works, the operators $W(x,y)$ must be
179: path-ordered and the choice of path integrated over is not unique.
180: However, we are primarily concerned with the longitudinal currents,
181: for which results are independent of any particular choice of path \cite{PB}.
182:
183: Thus we write the modified action as
184: \begin{eqnarray}
185: S &=& -\int\!d^4x \; \psi^{\dagger}(x) i\dslash \psi(x)
186: \nonumber\\ &&
187: + i \lambda \int dU\;d^4z\;\prod_f^{N_f} \Big[- d^4x_f\;d^4y_f\;
188: \psi_f^{\dagger}(x_f)
189: \gamma_0 W(x_f,z) \gamma_0 i\dslash \Phi(x_f-z) \Phi^{\dagger}(y_f-z)
190: i\dslash W(z,y_f) \psi^f(y_f)\Big] .
191: \label{sint}
192: \end{eqnarray}
193: We now concentrate on the case of two light quarks, $N_f=2$.
194:
195: The Noether currents can be evaluated directly from the action.
196: In momentum space,
197: \[
198: j_\mu^a(q) = \left.-\frac{\delta S}{\delta a_\mu^a(q)}\right|_{a_\mu^a=0} .
199: \]
200: We thus have, after Fourier transforming the fields and averaging over colors,
201: \begin{equation}
202: j_\mu(q) = \int \dbar{p}\, \psi^{\dagger}(p) \gamma_\mu T \psi(p+q)
203: + j_\mu^L(q) + j_\mu^R(q),
204: \end{equation}
205: where the left-handed non-local term is
206: \begin{eqnarray}
207: j_\mu^L(q) &=&
208: \frac{\lambda(2\pi\rho)^4}{N_c^2-1} \epsilon^{f_1f_2} \epsilon_{g_1g_2}
209: \left(\delta^{i_1}_{j_1}\delta^{i_2}_{j_2} - \frac{1}{N_c}
210: \delta^{i_1}_{j_2}\delta^{i_2}_{j_1}\right)
211: \int
212: d^4z d^4x \dbar{p_1}\dbar{p_2}\dbar{k_1}\dbar{k_2}\dbar{p'}
213: \nonumber\\ &&
214: \times \int_x^z ds_\mu e^{-iq\cdot s}
215: \Big\{ e^{-ix\cdot(p_1-p')-iz\cdot(p'+p_2-k_1-k_2) }
216: \left[\psi_L^\dagger(p_1)
217: \gamma_0T\gamma_0\right]_{f_1i_1}\psi_L^{g_1j_1}(k_1) f(p')f(k_1)
218: \nonumber\\ && \quad
219: - e^{ix\cdot(k_1-p')-iz\cdot(p_1+p_2-p'-k_2) }
220: \psi^\dagger_{Lf_1i_1}(p_1)\left[T \psi_L(k_1)\right]^{g_1j_1}
221: f(p_1)f(p')
222: \Big\}
223: \psi^\dagger_{Lf_2i_2}(p_2) \psi_L^{g_2j_2}(k_2) f(p_2) f(k_2) \,,
224: \end{eqnarray}
225: and the right-handed $j_\mu^R(q)$ is similar defined.
226: Group indices have been suppressed; note that these are carried
227: by the operators $T$.
228: The instanton or anti-instanton at the core of each vertex naturally
229: splits the quark fields into right- or left-handed spinors,
230: $\psi_{R/L} = \frac{1}{2}(1\pm\gamma_5)\psi$.
231: Since we are only concerned here with spin structures of the identity
232: matrix or $\gamma_5$, the decomposition is trivial.
233: Carrying out the spatial integrations, we have
234: \begin{eqnarray}
235: &&j_\mu^L(q) =
236: \frac{q_\mu}{q^2}
237: \frac{i\lambda(2\pi\rho)^4}{N_c^2-1} \epsilon^{f_1f_2} \epsilon_{g_1g_2}
238: \left(\delta^{i_1}_{j_1}\delta^{i_2}_{j_2} - \frac{1}{N_c}
239: \delta^{i_1}_{j_2}\delta^{i_2}_{j_1}\right)
240: \int \dbar{p_1}\dbar{p_2}\dbar{k_1}\dbar{k_2}
241: \delta(p_1+p_2-k_1-k_2+q)
242: \nonumber\\ && \quad \times
243: \left\{ \left[\psi_L^\dagger(p_1) \gamma_0T\gamma_0\right]_{f_1i_1}
244: \psi_L^{g_1j_1} (k_1) \left[f(p_1)-f(p_1+q)\right] f(k_1) -
245: \psi^{\dagger}_{Lf_1i_1}(p_1)
246: \left[T \psi_L(k_1)\right]^{g_1j_1} f(p_1)\left[f(k_1)-f(k_1-q)\right] \right\}
247: \nonumber\\ && \quad \times
248: \psi^{\dagger}_{Lf_2i_2}(p_2)\psi_L^{g_2j_2}(k_2) f(p_2)f(k_2)
249: \, .
250: \label{currl}
251: \end{eqnarray}
252:
253: In the event of spontaneous symmetry breaking, quark operators which
254: overlap with the condensate can be paired into loops \cite{BB,CD2}.
255: When chiral symmetry is broken an effective quark mass is generated,
256: dependent on four-momentum $p=\sqrt{p_\mu p_\mu}$ as
257: \[
258: M(p) = M f(p)^2\,.
259: \]
260: The constant $M$ is the solution to a gap equation
261: obtained by minimization with respect to the coupling $\lambda$ \cite{DP1},
262: \begin{equation}
263: \frac{N}{V} = 4 N_c \int \dbar{p} \frac{M(p)^2}{p^2+M(p)^2}\,,
264: \label{gapeq}
265: \end{equation}
266: and the constant $N/V = (200\,{\rm MeV})^4$ is the instanton density.
267: With the phenomenological $\rho = 1/3$ fm, one finds $M = 345$ MeV.
268: In this case the current, Eq.~(\ref{currl}), reduces to
269: \begin{eqnarray}
270: &&j_\mu^L(q) =
271: -i\frac{q_\mu}{q^2} \int \dbar{p}\, \psi^\dagger_L(p)
272: \Bigg\{ M(p+q) \gamma_0T\gamma_0 - M(p) T
273: \nonumber\\ && \quad
274: + \frac{\lambda(2\pi\rho)^4}{N_c} f(p) f(p+q) \int \dbar{k}
275: f(k) \frac{M(k)}{k^2+M(k)^2} {\rm Tr} \left[ f(k+q)
276: \frac{1-\gamma_5}{2}\gamma_0T
277: \gamma_0 - f(k-q) T
278: \frac{1-\gamma_5}{2} \right] \Bigg\} \psi_L(p+q)
279: ,
280: \label{gencurr}
281: \end{eqnarray}
282: where the trace is over spin only.
283:
284: Further reduction of this still-unwieldy expression requires specifying
285: a particular current and associated group elements $T$.
286: The simplest example is the quark number current, $B_\mu$, where $T=\openone$:
287: \begin{equation}
288: B_\mu(q) = \int\dbar{p}\, \psi^\dagger(p) \left\{\gamma_\mu
289: - i\frac{q_\mu}{q^2} \left[ M(p+q) - M(p)\right] \right\}
290: \psi(p+q) \,.
291: \label{qnum}
292: \end{equation}
293: As $q\rightarrow 0$, this becomes \cite{CD1,GBR}
294: \[
295: B_\mu(0) = \int\dbar{p} \,
296: \psi^\dagger(p) \left( \gamma_\mu - i \frac{d M(p)}{dp_\mu} \right)
297: \psi(p) \,.
298: \]
299: It is easy now to see that the $q$-dependent term in Eq.~(\ref{qnum}),
300: a result of the non-locality of the interaction,
301: is necessary for current conservation.
302: With Eq.~(\ref{qnum}) and the Dirac equation,
303: \begin{equation}
304: \left[ \Dirac{p} - iM(p)\right]\psi(p) = 0 \,,
305: \label{diraceqn}
306: \end{equation}
307: we see the standard cancellation ensues and
308: \begin{equation}
309: q_\mu B_\mu(q) = 0 \,.
310: \end{equation}
311: This is the simplest illustration of the more general rule, which becomes
312: more complicated when the axial isovector current is considered.
313: But before analyzing this, we review the pion's derivation in
314: the ILM.
315:
316: \section{\label{mesons}Meson Correlation Functions}
317:
318: The pion's role in axial charge currents has been long established.
319: To be made explicit in the ILM, one must sum all ladder diagrams using
320: the 't Hooft vertex, a series shown in Fig.~\ref{pi_fig}.
321: This was originally done in Ref.~\cite{DP3}, although the advent of the
322: effective action (\ref{sint}) has since made this procedure simpler.
323:
324: In the chiral limit, one finds the expected pole in the pion propagator
325: as $q^2\rightarrow 0$.
326: Furthermore, the use of non-local corrections to the axial currents has
327: been shown to produce the required transversality in the mesonic
328: current and properly relate the pion decay and renormalization
329: constants \cite{BB}.
330: Following the results of these cited works,
331: we have the pion correlation function of Fig.~\ref{pi_fig},
332: \begin{eqnarray}
333: \Pi_\pi^{AB}(q^2) &=& \int\dbar{p} \langle \left( \psi^\dagger(p)
334: \tau^A \gamma_5 \psi(p+q) \right)
335: \left( \psi^\dagger(p+q) \tau^B \gamma_5 \psi(p) \right) \rangle
336: \nonumber\\ &=&
337: -\frac{\delta^{AB}}{4 N_c^2} \left( \frac{1}{i\lambda} -
338: \frac{2}{N_c M^2}\int \dbar{p}
339: \frac{ M(p)M(p+q) \left[ p\cdot(p+q) + M(p)M(p+q)\right]}
340: {\left(p^2+M(p)^2\right)\left[(p+q)^2+M(p+q)^2\right] } \right)^{-1} .
341: \end{eqnarray}
342: The gap equation (\ref{gapeq}) can be written \cite{CD1}
343: \begin{equation}
344: \frac{1}{i\lambda} = \frac{2}{N_cM^2}\int\dbar{p}\frac{M(p)^2}{p^2+M(p)^2},
345: \end{equation}
346: and one finds, upon expanding in small $q^2$,
347: \begin{eqnarray}
348: \Pi_\pi^{AB}(q^2) &=& - \frac{\delta^{AB}}{4 N_c q^2}
349: \left( \frac{1}{M^2}\int\dbar{p}\frac{M(p)^2-\frac{1}{2}pM(p)M'(p)
350: +\frac{1}{4}p^2M'(p)^2 }{\left[p^2+M(p)^2\right]^2 }\right)^{-1}
351: \nonumber\\
352: &\equiv& -\frac{g_{\pi qq}^2}{q^2}\delta^{AB} .
353: \end{eqnarray}
354: The coupling constant is determined thusly by the compositeness
355: condition \cite{Weinberg2} and,
356: with the standard instanton parameters listed above, we find
357: $g_{\pi qq} = 3.78$.
358: The pion and other channels were analyzed in an NJL model with alternative
359: form factors
360: by Plant and Birse, who found $g_{\pi qq} = 3.44$ for the pion and the
361: sigma parameters $g_{\sigma q q}= 3.51$ and
362: $m_\sigma = 443$ MeV \cite{PB}.
363: This required extracting the sigma pole, and instead of repeating this
364: procedure or fitting the sigma correlation function \cite{Hutter} we will
365: simply scale our pion-quark coupling in a similar manner to obtain
366: $g_{\sigma q q}= 3.86$.
367: These two channels will be sufficient in the following analysis of the
368: axial properties of the quark.
369:
370: \begin{figure}[tb]
371: \epsfig{file=pi_fig.ps, width=104mm}
372: \caption{
373: The series of instanton ladder diagrams summed to obtain meson correlation
374: functions.
375: }\label{pi_fig}
376: \end{figure}
377:
378: \section{Axial Current and Form Factor}
379:
380: We now address the axial isovector current.
381: A key experimental quantity is the matrix element of the current,
382: $A_\mu^a(p_2-p_1)$, taken with initial and final state nucleons of
383: momenta $p_1$ and $p_2$.
384: Here we compute the analogous quantity with quark fields:
385: \begin{equation}
386: \langle \psi(p_2) \vert A_\mu^a(q) \vert \psi(p_1) \rangle =
387: u^\dagger(p_2) \frac{\tau^a}{2}\left[ \gamma_\mu\gamma_5 g_A(q^2)
388: + q_\mu \gamma_5 h_A(q^2)
389: \right] u(p_1) \,,
390: \label{axialdecomp}
391: \end{equation}
392: where the $u^\dagger(p_2)$ and $u(p_1)$ are the Euclidean spinor solutions
393: of the Dirac equation for free quarks, and $q=p_2-p_1$.
394: We are ultimately interested in the limit of $p_1=p_2=0$, or on-shell
395: quarks at zero momentum transfer, with
396: the constant $g_A = g_A(0)$ the axial coupling.
397: First we consider $h_A(q^2)$, the axial form factor.
398: With a nonzero $g_A$ and current conservation, it is clear in the chiral
399: limit that $h_A(q^2)$ has a pole at $q^2=0$, identified as the pion.
400: Through explicit construction, we will show this pole is manifest in the
401: ILM.
402:
403: Inserting
404: $T = \gamma_5\tau/2$ into Eq.~(\ref{gencurr}),
405: we have bare and single instanton (and anti-instanton) contributions in
406: \begin{eqnarray}
407: A^a_{\mu}(q)_{\ref{ha_fig}a}
408: &=& \int\dbar{p}\,\psi^\dagger(p) \frac{\tau^a}{2}\gamma_\mu\gamma_5
409: \psi(p+q) + i \frac{q_\mu}{q^2}\int\dbar{p}\,\psi^\dagger(p)\frac{\tau^a}{2}
410: \gamma_5 \Bigg\{ M(p+q)+M(p)
411: \nonumber\\ &&
412: - \frac{2i\lambda(2\pi\rho)^4}{N_c}
413: f(p)f(p+q)\int\dbar{k} f(k) \left[f(k+q)+f(k-q)\right]
414: \frac{M(k)}{k^2+M(k^2)} \Bigg\} \psi(p+q) \,.
415: \label{axone}
416: \end{eqnarray}
417: Graphically, this is Fig.~\ref{ha_fig}a.
418:
419: Clearly, no amount of labor will reveal this to be a conserved current;
420: as the appearance of the chiral Goldstone boson is a multi-instanton effect,
421: so too is axial vector current conservation.
422: Pion tadpoles, as rendered in Figs.~\ref{ha_fig}b and \ref{ha_fig}c,
423: are necessary to remove the finite divergence of $A_\mu^a$.
424: The first is a bare current insertion, the second the non-local piece.
425: Their sum is
426: \begin{equation}
427: A^a_{\mu}(q)_{\ref{ha_fig}b+\ref{ha_fig}c}
428: = -\frac{q_\mu}{q^2}\frac{2\lambda(2\pi\rho)^4}{N_c}
429: \int\dbar{p} f(p)f(p+q) \,
430: \psi^\dagger(p) \frac{\tau^a}{2}\gamma_5 \psi(p+q)
431: \int\dbar{k} f(k)\left[f(k+q)+f(k-q)\right]\frac{M(k)}{k^2+M(k)^2} \,.
432: \end{equation}
433: This cancels the final term in Eq.~(\ref{axone}) and the full current is
434: \begin{equation}
435: A_\mu^a(q) = \int\dbar{p}\,\psi^\dagger(p)
436: \left\{ \gamma_\mu
437: + \frac{q_\mu}{q^2} \left[ iM(p)+iM(p+q) \right]\right\}
438: \gamma_5\frac{\tau^a}{2} \psi(p+q) \,.
439: \label{axcurrent}
440: \end{equation}
441: The first term is the bare axial coupling, unity with the definition
442: of Eq.~(\ref{axialdecomp}), and the second is
443: the pion pole carried by the axial form factor,
444: \begin{equation}
445: h_A(q^2) = -i\frac{M(p+q)+M(p)}{q^2} \,.
446: \end{equation}
447: Note that at long wavelength the leading divergent part of the form factor
448: is the non-local,
449: quark level version of the classic nucleon result, $h_A(q^2)= -2iM_N/q^2$.
450: The pion pole similarly couples separately to each constituent quark.
451:
452: It is now clear, with the Dirac equation (\ref{diraceqn}), that
453: \begin{equation}
454: q_\mu A_\mu^a(q) = 0 \,.
455: \end{equation}
456: Equivalently, with the propagator,
457: \[
458: S(p)= \frac{\Dirac{p}+iM(p)}{p^2+M(p)^2} \,,
459: \]
460: the Ward-Takahashi Identity is satisfied,
461: \begin{equation}
462: q_\mu \Gamma_{\mu 5}^a = - \frac{\tau^a}{2} \left[
463: \gamma_5 S(p+q)^{-1} + S(p)^{-1}\gamma_5 \right].
464: \end{equation}
465:
466: \begin{figure}[tb]
467: \epsfig{file=ha_fig.ps, width=80mm}
468: \caption{
469: Diagrams contributing to the axial form factor, $h_A(q^2)$. Circled
470: crosses are current insertions and the dashed line denotes a pion.
471: }\label{ha_fig}
472: \end{figure}
473:
474: \section{Axial Coupling Constant}
475:
476: The axial form factor involved the effects of multiple instantons, with
477: pions transferring $t$-channel momentum.
478: Similar propagation in the $s$-channel contributes to the
479: axial coupling constant.
480: While still dominant, the pion is not the only relevant resonance in
481: this channel.
482: Since the sigma's coupling constant is of comparable size, and its mass is
483: only slightly greater than that of a constituent quark, its effects will
484: also be taken into account.
485: Higher resonances, such as the $\rho$ and $A_1$ vectors, are both substantially
486: heavier and have quark-meson couplings a mere third of the scalar and
487: pseudoscalar \cite{PB,Hutter}.
488: With the leading contributions of order $g_{iqq}^2$, these are safely
489: ignored.
490:
491: In Eq.~(\ref{axcurrent}) we have seen that the bare
492: $g_A$ is unity.
493: To this we first add the pion contribution of Fig.~\ref{ga_fig}a, which is
494: \begin{equation}
495: g_A^{\ref{ga_fig}a,\pi} =
496: - \frac{g_{\pi q q}^2 }{2M} \int\dbar{p} \frac{M(p)}{p^2}
497: \frac{p^2+2 M(p)^2}{[p^2+M(p)^2]^2} \,.
498: \label{pion1}
499: \end{equation}
500: After evaluation, the identical sigma contribution differs only
501: by the coupling constant and massive propagator in the integrand,
502: \begin{equation}
503: g_A^{\ref{ga_fig}a,\sigma} =
504: - \frac{g_{\sigma q q}^2 }{2M} \int\dbar{p} \frac{M(p)}{p^2+m_\sigma^2}
505: \frac{p^2+2 M(p)^2}{[p^2+M(p)^2]^2} \,.
506: \label{sigma1}
507: \end{equation}
508: These expressions evaluate to $-0.102$ and $-0.0425$,
509: respectively when we take the parameters described in Section \ref{mesons}.
510:
511: The non-local contributions couple the axial current directly to the
512: four-quark vertex, as shown in Fig.~\ref{ga_fig}c.
513: With an internal pion, we find
514: \begin{equation}
515: g_A^{\ref{ga_fig}b,\pi} =
516: \frac{3 g_{\pi q q}^2 }{4M} \int\dbar{p} \frac{M'(p)} {p[p^2+M(p)^2]}\,,
517: \end{equation}
518: and for the sigma,
519: \begin{equation}
520: g_A^{\ref{ga_fig}b,\sigma} =
521: \frac{g_{\sigma q q}^2 }{4M} \int\dbar{p} \frac{pM'(p)}
522: {(p^2+m_\sigma^2)[p^2+M(p)^2]}\,.
523: \end{equation}
524: Numerically, we obtain $-0.101$ and $-0.0236$ for these corrections.
525: Note that both numbers are comparable to those of Fig.~\ref{ga_fig}a,
526: {\em i.e.} the non-local corrections are not suppressed in any systematic
527: way.
528:
529: In the chiral limit, we therefore find
530: \[
531: g_A = 1 - 0.102 -0.0425 - 0.101 - 0.0236 = 0.73 \,,
532: \]
533: in excellent agreement with the non-relativistically deduced value.
534:
535: The vector current, to which the axial coupling is compared experimentally,
536: receives no contributions from the non-local vertices.
537: Furthermore, a critical sign difference in the numerator as compared
538: to Eqs.~(\ref{pion1}) and (\ref{sigma1}) leads to a finite but very small
539: contribution
540: from each diagram, summing to only two percent of the bare coupling.
541: Thus we can ignore such instanton effects in the coupling $g_V$ and
542: take it to be unity.
543:
544: In order to estimate the correction from finite current quark masses,
545: we assume larger masses for the internal meson propagators.
546: With the physical pion mass, $m_\pi = 138$ MeV, the instanton
547: calculations of Hutter \cite{Hutter} generate a sigma mass of
548: $m_\sigma = 540$ MeV.
549: Reevaluating, we naturally find a deduction in these subtractions,
550: \[
551: g_A = 1 - 0.079 -0.036 - 0.094 - 0.021 = 0.77 \,.
552: \]
553: However, this is a mere 5\% increase compared to the chiral limit, and
554: in fact places the result extremely close to the pseudo-experimental value.
555:
556: We are ultimately interested in the nucleon axial coupling, and in
557: the non-relativistic limit we find
558: \begin{equation}
559: G_A = \frac{5}{3} g_A = \left\{
560: \begin{array}{cl}
561: 1.22 & \mbox{for $m_\pi=0$} \\
562: 1.28 & \mbox{for $m_\pi=140$ MeV}
563: \end{array}\right. .
564: \end{equation}
565: The physical value, $G_A = 1.2670$ \cite{PDG}\footnote{
566: Our convention differs from that reported by the Particle Data Group
567: by an overall sign.
568: }, lies in between.
569: \begin{figure}[tb]
570: \epsfig{file=ga_fig.ps, width=83mm}
571: \caption{
572: Diagrams contributing to the axial coupling constant, $g_A$. Circled
573: crosses are current insertions and dashed lines denote a either
574: a pion or sigma meson propagator.
575: }\label{ga_fig}
576: \end{figure}
577:
578: \section{Conclusions}
579:
580: Through an analysis of current conservation in the instanton liquid model,
581: we found that terms arising from the non-locality of the 't Hooft vertex
582: were central to maintaining the symmetries of the theory.
583: This can be thought of as a correction for the truncation of quark basis
584: states, for we have isolated the zero modes and removed them from
585: the dynamics.
586: Reintroducing the symmetries to the volume of this extended interaction
587: vertex via path-ordered exponentials recovers the symmetries, as has been
588: noted by other authors some time ago \cite{Terning,BKN}.
589: A general form of current corrections has been computed here, followed
590: by specialization to the axial iso-vector case.
591:
592: After these modifications the pion pole appears as a $t$-channel
593: quark-antiquark correlation, governing each constituent quark's axial
594: form factor and maintaining current conservation.
595: Similar multi-instanton corrections, when applied with $s$-channel
596: chiral mesons, lead to an axial coupling constant of the quark of
597: $g_A = 0.73$.
598: In the non-relativistic limit this
599: corresponds to a nucleon coupling of $G_A = 1.22$, within four percent
600: of the experimental value.
601: Away from the chiral limit, when the pion is set to its physical mass,
602: agreement improves to within one percent.
603: These numbers are obtained with the two standard
604: inputs of the instanton vacuum, the number density and average size,
605: and no additional parameters.
606: While there are additional corrections from vector mesons, the significantly
607: lower coupling constants and higher masses render them negligible.
608: However, the non-local current terms lead to contributions comparable to
609: the local ones and cannot be disregarded.
610:
611: Our results suggest that the ILM contains the primary
612: effects which lead to the observed vacuum axial coupling of 1.267.
613: Given that this variance from unity is a likely result of spontaneous
614: chiral symmetry breaking, a central result of the ILM, it is not surprising
615: that instantons contribute favorably.
616: It is, however, noteworthy in its implication that relativistic
617: wave function corrections to the constituent quark are nearly negligible.
618:
619: \begin{acknowledgments}
620: I thank T. Sch\"afer and G. Miller for useful conversations.
621: This work was supported by US-DOE grant DE-FG03-97ER4014.
622: \end{acknowledgments}
623:
624: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
625:
626: \bibitem{PDG}
627: D.~E.~Groom {\it et al.} [Particle Data Group Collaboration],
628: %``Review of particle physics,''
629: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 15}, 1 (2000).
630: %%CITATION = EPHJA,C15,1;%%
631:
632: \bibitem{Lee}
633: B.~W.~Lee,
634: {\it Chiral Dynamics} (Gordon and Breach, NY, 1972).
635:
636: \bibitem{BOS}
637: T.~Blum, S.~Ohta, and S.~Sasaki,
638: %``Domain wall fermion calculation of nucleon g(A)/g(V),''
639: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 94}, 295 (2001),
640: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0011011],
641: and references therein.
642: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0011011;%%
643:
644: \bibitem{Jaffe}
645: R.~L.~Jaffe,
646: %``Delocalization of the axial charge in the chiral limit,''
647: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 529}, 105 (2002).
648: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0108015].
649: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0108015;%%
650:
651: \bibitem{Cohen}
652: T.~D.~Cohen,
653: %``The extraction of the axial coupling from finite volume systems: The long and short of it,''
654: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 529}, 50 (2002).
655: % [arXiv:hep-lat/0112014].
656: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0112014;%%
657:
658: \bibitem{GellMann}
659: M.~Gell-Mann,
660: %``A Schematic Model Of Baryons And Mesons,''
661: Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf 8}, 214 (1964).
662: %%CITATION = PHLTA,8,214;%%
663:
664: \bibitem{CJJT}
665: A.~Chodos, R.~L.~Jaffe, K.~Johnson, and C.~B.~Thorn,
666: %``Baryon Structure In The Bag Theory,''
667: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 10}, 2599 (1974).
668: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D10,2599;%%
669:
670: \bibitem{Weinberg}
671: S.~Weinberg,
672: %``The Axial Vector Coupling Of The Quark,''
673: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 67}, 3473 (1991).
674: %%CITATION = PRLTA,67,3473;%%
675:
676: \bibitem{BSL}
677: W.~Broniowski, A.~Steiner, and M.~Lutz,
678: %``N(c) counting rules and the axial vector coupling constant of the constituent quark,''
679: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 71}, 1787 (1993).
680: % [arXiv:hep-ph/9304292].
681: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9304292;%%
682:
683: \bibitem{Duck}
684: I.~Duck,
685: %``Radiative Corrections To The Nucleon Axial Vector Coupling Constant In The Chiral Soliton Quark Model,''
686: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 47}, 1751 (1993).
687: %%CITATION = PHRVA,C47,1751;%%
688:
689: \bibitem{BPST}
690: A.~A.~Belavin, A.~M.~Polyakov, A.~S.~Shvarts, and Y.~S.~Tyupkin,
691: %``Pseudoparticle Solutions Of The Yang-Mills Equations,''
692: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 59}, 85 (1975).
693: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B59,85;%%
694:
695: \bibitem{CDG}
696: C.~G.~Callan, R.~F.~Dashen, and D.~J.~Gross,
697: %``The Structure Of The Gauge Theory Vacuum,''
698: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 63}, 334 (1976).
699: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B63,334;%%
700:
701: \bibitem{SS}
702: T.~Sch\"afer and E.~V.~Shuryak,
703: %``Instantons in QCD,''
704: Rev.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ {\bf 70}, 323 (1998),
705: % [hep-ph/9610451],
706: and references therein.
707: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9610451;%%
708:
709: \bibitem{Diakonov}
710: D.~Diakonov,
711: %``Chiral-symmetry breaking by instantons,''
712: arXiv:hep-ph/9602375.
713: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9602375;%%
714:
715: \bibitem{DP2}
716: D.~Diakonov and V.~Y.~Petrov,
717: %``Instanton Based Vacuum From Feynman Variational Principle,''
718: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 245}, 259 (1984).
719: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B245,259;%%
720:
721: \bibitem{tHooft}
722: G.~'t Hooft,
723: %``Computation Of The Quantum Effects Due To A Four-Dimensional Pseudoparticle,''
724: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 14}, 3432 (1976)
725: [Erratum-ibid.\ D {\bf 18}, 2199 (1978)].
726: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D14,3432;%%
727:
728: \bibitem{NJL}
729: Y.~Nambu and G.~Jona-Lasinio,
730: %``Dynamical Model Of Elementary Particles Based On An Analogy With Superconductivity. I,''
731: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 122}, 345 (1961).
732: %%CITATION = PHRVA,122,345;%%
733:
734: \bibitem{VL}
735: V.~G.~Vaks and A.~I.~Larkin,
736: Zh.\ Eksp.\ Teor.\ Fiz.\ {\bf 40}, 282 (1961).
737:
738: \bibitem{Klevansky}
739: S.~P.~Klevansky,
740: %``The Nambu-Jona-Lasinio Model Of Quantum Chromodynamics,''
741: Rev.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ {\bf 64}, 649 (1992).
742: %%CITATION = RMPHA,64,649;%%
743:
744: \bibitem{BMSVW}
745: M.~E.~Berbenni-Bitsch, S.~Meyer, A.~Schafer, J.~J.~M.~Verbaarschot,
746: and T.~Wettig,
747: %``Microscopic universality in the spectrum of the lattice Dirac operator,''
748: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 80}, 1146 (1998).
749: % [arXiv:hep-lat/9704018].
750: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9704018;%%
751:
752: \bibitem{Shuryak}
753: E.~V.~Shuryak,
754: %``The Role Of Instantons In Quantum Chromodynamics. 1. Physical Vacuum,''
755: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 203}, 93 (1982).
756: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B203,93;%%
757:
758: \bibitem{HN}
759: A.~Hasenfratz and C.~Nieter,
760: %``Instanton content of the SU(3) vacuum,''
761: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 439}, 366 (1998).
762: % [arXiv:hep-lat/9806026].
763: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9806026;%%
764:
765: \bibitem{Schwinger}
766: J.~S.~Schwinger,
767: %``On Gauge Invariance And Vacuum Polarization,''
768: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 82}, 664 (1951).
769: %%CITATION = PHRVA,82,664;%%
770:
771: \bibitem{Terning}
772: J.~Terning,
773: %``Gauging nonlocal Lagrangians,''
774: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 44}, 887 (1991).
775: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D44,887;%%
776:
777: \bibitem{BKN}
778: J.~W.~Bos, J.~H.~Koch, and H.~W.~Naus,
779: %``Currents And Ward-Takahashi Identities For Nonlocal Quantum Field Theories,''
780: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 44}, 485 (1991).
781: %%CITATION = PHRVA,C44,485;%%
782:
783: \bibitem{BB}
784: R.~D.~Bowler and M.~C.~Birse,
785: %``A Nonlocal, Covariant Generalization Of The Njl Model,''
786: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 582}, 655 (1995).
787: % [arXiv:hep-ph/9407336].
788: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9407336;%%
789:
790: \bibitem{PB}
791: R.~S.~Plant and M.~C.~Birse,
792: %``Meson properties in an extended non-local NJL model,''
793: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 628}, 607 (1998).
794: % [arXiv:hep-ph/9705372].
795: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9705372;%%
796:
797: \bibitem{GBR}
798: B.~Golli, W.~Broniowski, and G.~Ripka,
799: %``Solitons in a chiral quark model with non-local interactions,''
800: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 437}, 24 (1998).
801: % [arXiv:hep-ph/9807261].
802: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9807261;%%
803:
804: \bibitem{ADT}
805: I.~V.~Anikin, A.~E.~Dorokhov, and L.~Tomio,
806: %``Pion distribution amplitude within the instanton model,''
807: Phys.\ Atom.\ Nucl.\ {\bf 64}, 1329 (2001)
808: [Yad.\ Fiz.\ {\bf 64}, 1405 (2001)].
809: %%CITATION = PANUE,64,1329;%%
810:
811: \bibitem{CD2}
812: G.~W.~Carter and D.~Diakonov,
813: %``The nonperturbative color Meissner effect in a two-flavor color superconductor,''
814: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 582}, 571 (2000).
815: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0001318].
816: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0001318;%%
817:
818: \bibitem{DP1}
819: D.~Diakonov and V.~Y.~Petrov,
820: %``A Theory Of Light Quarks In The Instanton Vacuum,''
821: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 272}, 457 (1986).
822: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B272,457;%%
823:
824: \bibitem{CD1}
825: G.~W.~Carter and D.~Diakonov,
826: %``Light quarks in the instanton vacuum at finite baryon density,''
827: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 016004 (1999).
828: % [arXiv:hep-ph/9812445].
829: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9812445;%%
830:
831: \bibitem{DP3}
832: D.~Diakonov and V.~Y.~Petrov,
833: %``Meson Current Correlation Functions In Instanton Vacuum,''
834: Sov.\ Phys.\ JETP {\bf 62}, 431 (1985)
835: [Zh.\ Eksp.\ Teor.\ Fiz.\ {\bf 89}, 751 (1985)].
836: %%CITATION = SPHJA,62,431;%%
837:
838: \bibitem{Weinberg2}
839: S.~Weinberg,
840: %``Elementary Particle Theory Of Composite Particles,''
841: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 130}, 776 (1963).
842: %%CITATION = PHRVA,130,776;%%
843:
844: \bibitem{Hutter}
845: M.~Hutter,
846: %``Instantons and meson correlation functions in QCD,''
847: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 74}, 131 (1997).
848: % [arXiv:hep-ph/9501245].
849: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9501245;%%
850:
851: \end{thebibliography}
852: \end{document}
853: