1: \documentclass[fleqn,twoside]{article}
2: \usepackage{espcrc2,epsf,epsfig,psfrag,graphicx}
3: % if you want to include PostScript figures
4: \usepackage{graphicx}
5: % if you have landscape tables
6: \usepackage[figuresright]{rotating}
7: % put your own definitions here:
8: \newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}
9: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}
10: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}
11: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}
12: \def\simlt{\buildrel < \over {_{\sim}}}
13: \def\simgt{\buildrel > \over {_{\sim}}}
14: \newcommand{\ttbs}{\char'134}
15: \newcommand{\AmS}{{\protect\the\textfont2
16: A\kern-.1667em\lower.5ex\hbox{M}\kern-.125emS}}
17:
18: % add words to TeX's hyphenation exception list
19: \hyphenation{author another created financial paper re-commend-ed Post-Script}
20:
21: % declarations for front matter
22: \title{Neutrino Mass Models}
23:
24: \author{S. F. King\address[MCSD]{Department of Physics and Astronomy, \\
25: University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, U.K.}%
26: \thanks{PPARC Senior Research Fellow.}}
27:
28: \begin{document}
29:
30: \begin{abstract}
31: I review promising approaches to neutrino mass models,
32: focussing on three neutrino
33: patterns of neutrino masses and mixing angles,
34: and the corresponding Majorana mass matrices.
35: I discuss the see-saw mechanism, and show how it may be applied
36: in a very natural way to give a neutrino mass hierarchy with
37: large atmospheric and solar angles by assuming
38: single right-handed neutrino dominance.
39: A theoretical framework for understanding quark and lepton
40: (including neutrino) masses and mixing angles
41: based on SUSY, GUTs and Family symmetry is then described,
42: and sample models which involve single right-handed neutrino
43: dominance are discussed.
44: \vspace{1pc}
45: \end{abstract}
46:
47: % typeset front matter (including abstract)
48: \maketitle
49:
50: \section{INTRODUCTION}
51:
52: Recent SNO results \cite{Hallin} when combined
53: with other solar neutrino data especially that of Super-Kamiokande
54: \cite{Smy} strongly favour the large mixing angle (LMA) MSW solar solution
55: \cite{Smirnov,Lisi,Valle} with three active light neutrino states, and
56: $\theta_{12} \approx \pi/6$,
57: $\Delta m_{21}^2\approx 5\times 10^{-5}{\rm eV}^2$.
58: The atmospheric neutrino data is consistent with
59: maximal $\nu_{\mu}- \nu_{\tau}$ neutrino mixing \cite{Shiozawa}
60: $\theta_{23} \approx \pi/4$
61: with $|\Delta m_{32}^2|\approx 2.5\times 10^{-3}{\rm eV}^2$
62: and the sign of $\Delta m_{32}^2$ undetermined.
63: The CHOOZ experiment limits $\theta_{13} \simlt 0.2$
64: over the favoured atmospheric range \cite{Apollonio:1999ae}.
65:
66: In this talk I concentrated on promising approaches rather than
67: attempting a model survey \cite{Altarelli:2002hx}.
68: Unfortunately I did not have time
69: to discuss alternative approaches based on large extra
70: dimensions or R-parity violating supersymmetry.
71: Similarly I only considered three active neutrinos.
72: If the LSND signal \cite{Drexlin} is confirmed by
73: MiniBoone \cite{Tayloe} then this may herald an era of non-standard
74: neutrino physics. Fortunately such ideas were fully discussed in
75: \cite{Valle}.
76:
77: In the remainder I introduce neutrino masses and mixing
78: angles, show how to construct the MNS matrix,
79: classify Majorana mass matrices, review the see-saw mechanism,
80: explain single right-handed neutrino dominance, motivate
81: SUSY, GUTs and Family symmetry approaches and discuss models
82: which involve all these ideas.
83:
84:
85: \section{NEUTRINO MASSES AND MIXING ANGLES}
86:
87: The minimal neutrino sector required to account for the
88: atmospheric and solar neutrino oscillation data consists of
89: three light physical neutrinos with left-handed flavour eigenstates,
90: $\nu_e$, $\nu_\mu$, and $\nu_\tau$, defined to be those states
91: that share the same electroweak doublet as the left-handed
92: charged lepton mass eigenstates.
93: Within the framework of three--neutrino oscillations,
94: the neutrino flavor eigenstates $\nu_e$, $\nu_\mu$, and $\nu_\tau$ are
95: related to the neutrino mass eigenstates $\nu_1$, $\nu_2$, and $\nu_3$
96: with mass $m_1$, $m_2$, and $m_3$, respectively, by a $3\times3$
97: unitary matrix called the MNS matrix $U_{MNS}$
98: \cite{Maki:1962mu,Lee:1977qz}
99: \begin{equation}
100: \left(\begin{array}{c} \nu_e \\ \nu_\mu \\ \nu_\tau \end{array} \\ \right)=
101: \left(\begin{array}{ccc}
102: U_{e1} & U_{e2} & U_{e3} \\
103: U_{\mu1} & U_{\mu2} & U_{\mu3} \\
104: U_{\tau1} & U_{\tau2} & U_{\tau3} \\
105: \end{array}\right)
106: \left(\begin{array}{c} \nu_1 \\ \nu_2 \\ \nu_3 \end{array} \\ \right)
107: \; .
108: \end{equation}
109:
110: Assuming the light neutrinos are Majorana,
111: $U_{MNS}$ can be parameterized in terms of three mixing angles
112: $\theta_{ij}$ and three complex phases $\delta_{ij}$.
113: A unitary matrix has six phases but three of them are removed
114: by the phase symmetry of the charged lepton Dirac masses.
115: Since the neutrino masses are Majorana there is no additional
116: phase symmetry associated with them, unlike the case of quark
117: mixing where a further two phases may be removed.
118: The MNS matrix may be parametrised by
119: a product of three complex Euler rotations,
120: \begin{equation}
121: U_{MNS}=U_{23}U_{13}U_{12}
122: \end{equation}
123: where
124: \begin{equation}
125: U_{23}=
126: \left(\begin{array}{ccc}
127: 1 & 0 & 0 \\
128: 0 & c_{23} & s_{23}e^{-i\delta_{23}} \\
129: 0 & -s_{23}e^{i\delta_{23}} & c_{23} \\
130: \end{array}\right)
131: \end{equation}
132:
133: \begin{equation}
134: U_{13}=
135: \left(\begin{array}{ccc}
136: c_{13} & 0 & s_{13}e^{-i\delta_{13}} \\
137: 0 & 1 & 0 \\
138: -s_{13}e^{i\delta_{13}} & 0 & c_{13} \\
139: \end{array}\right)
140: \end{equation}
141:
142: \begin{equation}
143: U_{12}=
144: \left(\begin{array}{ccc}
145: c_{12} & s_{12}e^{-i\delta_{12}} & 0 \\
146: -s_{12}e^{i\delta_{12}} & c_{12} & 0\\
147: 0 & 0 & 1 \\
148: \end{array}\right)
149: \end{equation}
150:
151:
152: where $c_{ij} = \cos\theta_{ij}$ and $s_{ij} = \sin\theta_{ij}$.
153: Note that the allowed range of the angles is
154: $0\leq \theta_{ij} \leq \pi/2$.
155: Since we have assumed that the neutrinos are Majorana,
156: there are two extra phases, but only one combination
157: $\delta = \delta_{13}-\delta_{23}-\delta_{12}$
158: affects oscillations.
159:
160: Ignoring phases, the relation between
161: the neutrino flavor eigenstates $\nu_e$, $\nu_\mu$, and $\nu_\tau$ and
162: the neutrino mass eigenstates $\nu_1$, $\nu_2$, and $\nu_3$
163: is just given as a product of three Euler rotations as
164: depicted in Fig.\ref{angles}.
165:
166:
167: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
168: \begin{figure}[t]
169: %\centering
170: %%\epsfysize=12cm
171: \includegraphics[width=0.46\textwidth]{angles.eps}
172: \vspace*{-4mm}
173: \caption{A graphical illustration of the MNS mixing angles.
174: This figure ignores the phases
175: so that the MNS matrix is constructed
176: as a product of three Euler rotations $U_{MNS}=R_{23}R_{13}R_{12}$.
177: The atmospheric angle is $\theta_{23} \approx \pi/4$,
178: the CHOOZ angle is $\theta_{13} \simlt 0.2$, and the solar angle is
179: $\theta_{12} \approx \pi/6$. }
180: \label{angles}
181: \vspace*{-2mm}
182: \end{figure}
183: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
184:
185:
186:
187: There are basically two
188: patterns of neutrino mass squared orderings
189: consistent with the atmospheric and solar data as shown in
190: Fig.\ref{fig1}.
191:
192: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
193: \begin{figure}[t]
194: %\centering
195: %%\epsfysize=12cm
196: \includegraphics[width=0.46\textwidth]{slide1.eps}
197: \vspace*{-4mm}
198: \caption{Alternative neutrino mass
199: patterns that are consistent with neutrino
200: oscillation explanations of the atmospheric and solar data.
201: The absolute scale of neutrino masses is not
202: fixed by oscillation data
203: and the lightest neutrino mass may vary from 0.0-0.6 eV.}
204: \label{fig1}
205: \vspace*{-2mm}
206: \end{figure}
207: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
208:
209: It is clear that neutrino oscillations, which
210: only depend on $\Delta m_{ij}^2\equiv m_i^2-m_j^2$,
211: gives no information about the absolute value of the neutrino mass squared
212: eigenvalues $m_i^2$ in Fig\ref{fig1}.
213: Recent results from the 2df galaxy redshift survey
214: indicate that $\sum m_i <1.8 {\rm eV} (95\%C.L.)$
215: under certain mild assumptions \cite{Elgaroy:2002bi,Hannestad}.
216: Combined with the solar and atmospheric oscillation data
217: this brackets the heaviest neutrino mass to be
218: in the approximate range 0.04-0.6 eV. The fact that the mass of the
219: heaviest neutrino is known to within an order of magnitude represents
220: remarkable progress in neutrino physics over recent years.
221:
222: \section{CONSTRUCTING THE MNS MATRIX}
223:
224: From a model building perspective the neutrino
225: and charged lepton masses are given by the eigenvalues
226: of a complex charged lepton mass matrix
227: $m^E_{LR}$ and a complex symmetric neutrino Majorana matrix
228: $m_{LL}$, obtained by diagonalising these mass
229: matrices,
230: \beq
231: V^{E_L}m^E_{LR}{V^{E_R}}^{\dagger}=
232: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
233: m_e & 0 & 0 \\
234: 0 & m_{\mu} & 0 \\
235: 0 & 0 & m_{\tau}
236: \end{array}
237: \right)
238: \label{diag1}
239: \eeq
240: \beq
241: V^{\nu_L}m_{LL}{V^{\nu_L}}^T=
242: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
243: m_1 & 0 & 0 \\
244: 0 & m_2 & 0 \\
245: 0 & 0 & m_3
246: \end{array}
247: \right)
248: \label{diag2}
249: \eeq
250: where $V^{E_L}$, $V^{E_R}$, $V^{\nu_L}$ are unitary tranformations
251: on the left-handed charged lepton fields $E_L$, right-handed charged
252: lepton fields $E_R$, and left-handed neutrino fields $\nu_L$
253: which put the mass matrices into diagonal form with real
254: eigenvalues.
255:
256: The MNS matrix is then constructed by
257: \beq
258: U_{MNS}=V^{E_L}{V^{\nu_L}}^{\dagger}
259: \label{MNS}
260: \eeq
261:
262: The MNS matrix is constructed in Eq.\ref{MNS} as a product
263: of a unitary matrix from the charged lepton sector $V^{E_L}$
264: and a unitary matrix from the neutrino sector ${V^{\nu_L}}^{\dagger}$.
265: Each of these unitary matrices may be parametrised by its own
266: mixing angles and phases analagous to the MNS parameters.
267: As shown in \cite{King:2002nf} the MNS matrix can be expanded
268: in terms of neutrino and charged lepton mixing angles and phases
269: to leading order in the charged lepton mixing angles which
270: are assumed to be small,
271: \bea
272: s_{23}e^{-i\delta_{23}}
273: & \approx &
274: s_{23}^{\nu_L}e^{-i\delta_{23}^{\nu_L}}
275: -\theta_{23}^{E_L}
276: c_{23}^{\nu_L}e^{-i\delta_{23}^{E_L}}
277: \label{chlep23}
278: \\
279: \theta_{13}e^{-i\delta_{13}}
280: & \approx &
281: \theta_{13}^{\nu_L}e^{-i\delta_{13}^{\nu_L}}
282: -\theta_{13}^{E_L}c_{23}^{\nu_L}e^{-i\delta_{13}^{E_L}} \nonumber \\
283: & + &
284: \theta_{12}^{E_L}s_{23}^{\nu_L}e^{i(-\delta_{23}^{\nu_L}-\delta_{12}^{E_L})}
285: \label{chlep13}
286: \\
287: s_{12}e^{-i\delta_{12}}
288: & \approx &
289: s_{12}^{\nu_L}e^{-i\delta_{12}^{\nu_L}}
290: +\theta_{23}^{E_L}s_{12}^{\nu_L}e^{-i\delta_{12}^{\nu_L}}
291: \nonumber \\
292: & + & \theta_{13}^{E_L}
293: c_{12}^{\nu_L}s_{23}^{\nu_L}e^{i(\delta_{23}^{\nu_L}-\delta_{13}^{E_L})}
294: \nonumber \\
295: & - & \theta_{12}^{E_L}
296: c_{23}^{\nu_L}c_{12}^{\nu_L}e^{-i\delta_{12}^{E_L}}
297: \label{chlep12}
298: \eea
299: Clearly $\theta_{13}$
300: receives important contributions not just from $\theta_{13}^{\nu_L}$,
301: but also from the charged lepton angles
302: $\theta_{12}^{E_L}$, and $\theta_{13}^{E_L}$.
303: In models where $\theta_{13}^{\nu_L}$ is
304: extremely small, $\theta_{13}$ may originate almost entirely from
305: the charged lepton sector.
306: Charged lepton contributions could also be important in models
307: where $\theta_{12}^{\nu_L}=\pi /4$, since charged lepton mixing angles
308: may allow consistency with the LMA MSW solution.
309: Such effects are important for the inverted hierarchy model
310: \cite{King:2001ce,King:2002nf}.
311:
312: \section{NEUTRINO MAJORANA MASS MATRICES}
313:
314: For many (but not all) purposes it is convenient to forget about the
315: division between charged lepton and neutrino mixing angles and
316: work in a basis where the charged lepton mass matrix is diagonal.
317: Then the MNS angles and phases simply correspond to the neutrino ones.
318: In this special basis the mass matrix is given from Eq.\ref{diag2} and
319: Eq.\ref{MNS} as
320: \beq
321: m_{LL}=
322: U_{MNS}
323: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
324: m_1 & 0 & 0 \\
325: 0 & m_2 & 0 \\
326: 0 & 0 & m_3
327: \end{array}
328: \right)
329: U_{MNS}^T
330: \label{mLLnu}
331: \eeq
332: For a given assumed form of $U_{MNS}$ and set of neutrino masses
333: $m_i$ one may use Eq.\ref{mLLnu} to ``derive'' the form of the neutrino
334: mass matrix $m_{LL}$, and this results in the candidate
335: mass matrices in Table \ref{table1} \cite{Barbieri:1998mq}.
336:
337: In Table \ref{table1} the mass matrices are classified into two types:
338:
339: Type I - small neutrinoless double beta decay
340:
341: Type II - large neutrinoless double beta decay
342:
343: They are also classified into the limiting cases consistent with the
344: mass squared orderings in Fig.\ref{fig1}:
345:
346: A - Normal hierarchy $m_1^2,m_2^2\ll m_3^2$
347:
348: B - Inverted hierarchy $m_1^2 \approx m_2^2 \gg m_3^2$
349:
350: C - Approximate degeneracy $m_1^2\approx m_2^2\approx m_3^2$
351:
352: Thus according to our classification there is only one neutrino
353: mass matrix consistent with the normal neutrino mass hierarchy which
354: we call Type IA, corresponding to the leading order neutrino masses
355: of the form $m_i=(0,0,m)$. For the inverted hierarchy there are two
356: cases, Type IB corresponding to $m_i=(m,-m,0)$ or Type IIB
357: corresponding to $m_i=(m,m,0)$. For the approximate degeneracy cases
358: there are three cases, Type IC correponding to $m_i=(m,-m,m)$
359: and two examples of Type IIC corresponding to either
360: $m_i=(m,m,m)$ or $m_i=(m,m,-m)$.
361:
362: At present experiment allows any of the matrices in Table
363: \ref{table1}. In future it will be possible to uniquely specify the
364: neutrino matrix in the following way:
365:
366: 1. Neutrinoless double beta effectively measures the 11 element
367: of the mass matrix $m_{LL}$ corresponding to
368: \beq
369: \beta \beta_{0\nu}\equiv \sum_iU_{ei}^2m_i
370: \eeq
371: and is clearly capable of resolving Type I from Type II cases
372: according to the bounds given in Table \ref{table1} \cite{Pascoli:2002xq}.
373: There has been a recent claim of a signal in neutrinoless double
374: beta decay correponding to $\beta \beta_{0\nu}=0.11-0.56$ eV at 95\% C.L.
375: \cite{Klapdor-Kleingrothaus:2001ke}.
376: However this claim has been criticised by two groups
377: \cite{Feruglio:2002af}, \cite{Aalseth:2002dt} and in turn this
378: criticism has been refuted \cite{Klapdor-Kleingrothaus:2002kf}.
379: Since the Heidelberg-Moscow experiment has almost reached its full
380: sensitivity, we may have to wait for a next generation experiment
381: such as GENIUS \cite{genius} which is capable
382: of pushing down the sensitivity to 0.01 eV to resolve this question.
383:
384: 2. A neutrino factory will measure the sign of $\Delta m_{32}^2$
385: and resolve A from B.
386:
387: 3. Tritium beta decay experiments are sensitive to C
388: since they
389: measure the ``electron neutrino mass'' defined by
390: \beq
391: |m_{\nu_e}|\equiv \sum_i|U_{ei}|^2|m_i|.
392: \eeq
393: For example the KATRIN \cite{katrin} experiment has a proposed sensitivity of
394: 0.35 eV. As already mentioned the galaxy power spectrum combined with
395: solar and atmospheric oscillation data already limits the degenerate
396: neutrino mass to be less than about 0.6 eV, and this limit is also
397: expected to improve in the future. Also it is worth mentioning that
398: in future it may be possible to measure neutrino masses from
399: gamma ray bursts using time of flight techniques in principle down to
400: 0.001 eV \cite{Choubey:2002bh}.
401:
402: Type IIB and C involve small fractional
403: mass splittings $|\Delta m_{ij}^2| \ll m^2$ which are unstable
404: under radiative corrections \cite{Ellis:1999my}, and even the most
405: natural Type IC case is difficult to implement
406: \cite{Barbieri:1999km},\cite{Chankowski:2001fp}.
407: Types IA and IB seem to be the most natural
408: and later we shall focus on the normal hierarchy Type IA,
409: \beq
410: m_{LL} \sim \left(
411: \begin{array}{ccc}
412: 0 & 0 & 0 \\
413: 0 & 1 & 1\\
414: 0 & 1 & 1 \\
415: \end{array}
416: \right)\frac{m}{2}
417: \label{hier}
418: \eeq
419: However even Type IA models appear to have some remaining naturalness
420: problem since
421: $m_3 \sim \sqrt{|\Delta m_{32}^2|}\sim 5.10^{-2}$ eV and
422: $m_2 \sim \sqrt{|\Delta m_{21}^2|}\sim 7.10^{-3}$ eV,
423: compared to the natural expectation $m_2 \sim m_3$.
424: The question may be phrased
425: in technical terms as one of understanding why
426: the sub-determinant of the mass matrix in Eq.\ref{hier} is small:
427: \beq
428: det \left(
429: \begin{array}{cc}
430: m_{22} & m_{23}\\
431: m_{23} & m_{33} \\
432: \end{array}
433: \right)\ll m^2.
434: \label{det}
435: \eeq
436:
437:
438: \section{THE SEE-SAW MASS MECHANISM}
439:
440: Before discussing the see-saw mechanism it is worth first reviewing
441: the different types of neutrino mass that are possible. So far we
442: have been assuming that neutrino masses are Majorana masses of the form
443: \beq
444: m_{LL}\overline{\nu_L}\nu_L^c
445: \label{mLL}
446: \eeq
447: where $\nu_L$ is a left-handed neutrino field and $\nu_L^c$ is
448: the CP conjugate of a left-handed neutrino field, in other words
449: a right-handed antineutrino field. Such Majorana masses are possible
450: to qsince both the neutrino and the antineutrino
451: are electrically neutral and so
452: Majorana masses are not forbidden by electric charge conservation.
453: For this reason a Majorana mass for the electron would
454: be strictly forbidden. Majorana neutrino masses ``only''
455: violate lepton number conservation.
456: If we introduce right-handed neutrino fields then there are two sorts
457: of additional neutrino mass terms that are possible. There are
458: additional Majorana masses of the form
459: \beq
460: M_{RR}\overline{\nu_R}\nu_R^c
461: \label{MRR}
462: \eeq
463: where $\nu_R$ is a right-handed neutrino field and $\nu_R^c$ is
464: the CP conjugate of a right-handed neutrino field, in other words
465: a left-handed antineutrino field. In addition there are
466: Dirac masses of the form
467: \beq
468: m_{LR}\overline{\nu_L}\nu_R.
469: \label{mLR}
470: \eeq
471: Such Dirac mass terms conserve lepton number, and are not forbidden
472: by electric charge conservation even for the charged leptons and
473: quarks.
474:
475: In the Standard Model Dirac mass terms for charged leptons and quarks
476: are generated from Yukawa couplings
477: to a Higgs doublet whose vacuum expectation value gives the Dirac
478: mass term. Neutrino masses are zero in the Standard Model because
479: right-handed neutrinos are not present, and also
480: because the Majorana mass terms in Eq.\ref{mLL}
481: require Higgs triplets in order to be generated at the renormalisable
482: level (although non-renormalisable operators can be written down
483: \cite{Valle}). Higgs triplets are phenomenologically
484: disfavoured so the simplest way to generate neutrino masses
485: from a renormalisable theory is to introduce right-handed neutrinos.
486: Once this is done then the types of neutrino mass discussed
487: in Eqs.\ref{MRR},\ref{mLR} (but not Eq.\ref{mLL} since we
488: have not introduced Higgs triplets)
489: are permitted, and we have the mass matrix
490: \begin{equation}
491: \left(\begin{array}{cc} \overline{\nu_L} & \overline{\nu^c_R}
492: \end{array} \\ \right)
493: \left(\begin{array}{cc}
494: 0 & m_{LR}\\
495: m_{LR}^T & M_{RR} \\
496: \end{array}\right)
497: \left(\begin{array}{c} \nu_L^c \\ \nu_R \end{array} \\ \right)
498: \label{matrix}
499: \end{equation}
500: Since the right-handed neutrinos are electroweak singlets
501: the Majorana masses of the right-handed neutrinos $M_{RR}$
502: may be orders of magnitude larger than the electroweak
503: scale. In the approximation that $M_{RR}\gg m_{LR}$
504: the matrix in Eq.\ref{matrix} may be diagonalised to
505: yield effective Majorana masses of the type in Eq.\ref{mLL},
506: \beq
507: m_{LL}=m_{LR}M_{RR}^{-1}m_{LR}^T
508: \label{seesaw}
509: \eeq
510: This is the see-saw mechanism \cite{seesaw,seesaw2}. It not only generates
511: Majorana mass terms of the type $m_{LL}$, but also naturally makes them
512: smaller than the Dirac mass terms by a factor of $m_{LR}/M_{RR}\ll 1$.
513: One can think of the heavy right-handed neutrinos as being integrated
514: out to give non-renormalisable Majorana operators suppressed
515: by the heavy mass scale $M_{RR}$.
516:
517: In a realistic model with three left-handed neutrinos and
518: three right-handed neutrinos the Dirac masses $m_{LR}$
519: are a $3\times 3$ (complex) matrix and the heavy Majorana masses $M_{RR}$
520: form a separate $3\times 3$ (complex symmetric) matrix.
521: The light effective Majorana
522: masses $m_{LL}$ are also a $3\times 3$ (complex symmetric) matrix and
523: continue to be given from Eq.\ref{seesaw} which
524: is now interpreted as a matrix product. From a model building
525: perspective the fundamental parameters which must be input
526: into the see-saw mechanism are the Dirac mass matrix $m_{LR}$ and
527: the heavy right-handed neutrino Majorana mass matrix $M_{RR}$.
528: The light effective left-handed Majorana mass
529: matrix $m_{LL}$ arises as an output according to the
530: see-saw formula in Eq.\ref{seesaw}. The goal of see-saw model
531: building is therefore to choose input see-saw matrices
532: $m_{LR}$ and $M_{RR}$ that will give rise to one of the successful
533: matrices $m_{LL}$ in Table \ref{table1}.
534:
535:
536: \section{SINGLE RIGHT HANDED NEUTRINO DOMINANCE}
537:
538: We now show how the input see-saw matrices can be simply chosen to
539: give the Type IA matrix in Eq.\ref{hier}, with the property of a
540: naturally small sub-determinant in Eq.\ref{det} using a mechanism
541: first suggested in \cite{King:1998jw}.
542: The idea was developed in \cite{King:1999cm} where it was called
543: single right-handed neutrino dominance (SRHND) . SRHND was first successfully
544: applied to the LMA MSW solution in \cite{King:2000mb}.
545:
546: The SRHND mechanism is most simply described
547: assuming three right-handed neutrinos
548: in the basis where the right-handed neutrino mass matrix is diagonal
549: although it can also be developed in other bases
550: \cite{King:1999cm,King:2000mb}. In this basis we write the input
551: see-saw matrices as
552: \begin{equation}
553: M_{RR}=
554: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
555: X' & 0 & 0 \\
556: 0 & X & 0 \\
557: 0 & 0 & Y
558: \end{array}
559: \right)
560: \label{seq1}
561: \end{equation}
562: \begin{equation}
563: m_{LR}=
564: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
565: a' & a & d \\
566: b' & b & e \\
567: c' & c & f
568: \end{array}
569: \right)
570: \label{dirac}
571: \end{equation}
572: In \cite{King:1998jw} it was suggested that one of the right-handed neutrinos
573: may dominante the contribution to $m_{LL}$ if it is lighter than
574: the other right-handed neutrinos.
575: The dominance condition was subsequently generalised to
576: include other cases where the right-handed neutrino may be
577: heavier than the other right-handed neutrinos but dominates due to its larger
578: Dirac mass couplings \cite{King:1999cm}.
579: In any case the dominant neutrino may be taken to be the third one
580: without loss of generality. Assuming SRHND then Eqs.\ref{seesaw},
581: \ref{seq1}, \ref{dirac} give
582: \beq
583: m_{LL}
584: \approx
585: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
586: \frac{d^2}{Y}
587: & \frac{de}{Y}
588: & \frac{df}{Y} \\
589: .
590: & \frac{e^2}{Y}
591: & \frac{ef}{Y} \\
592: . & . & \frac{f^2}{Y}
593: \end{array}
594: \right)
595: \label{one}
596: \eeq
597: If the Dirac mass couplings satisfy the condition
598: $d\ll e\approx f$ \cite{King:1998jw}
599: then the matrix in Eq.\ref{one} resembles the Type IA matrix in
600: Eq.\ref{hier}, and furthermore has a naturally small sub-determinant as in
601: Eq.\ref{det}. The neutrino mass
602: spectrum consists of one neutrino with mass $m_3\approx (e^2+f^2)/Y$
603: and two approximately
604: massless neutrinos \cite{King:1998jw}. The atmospheric angle is
605: $\tan \theta_{23} \approx e/f$ \cite{King:1998jw}.
606: It was pointed out that small perturbations from
607: the sub-dominant right-handed neutrinos can then lead to a small
608: solar neutrino mass splitting \cite{King:1998jw}.
609:
610: It was subsequently shown how to
611: account for the LMA MSW solution with a large solar angle
612: \cite{King:2000mb} by careful consideration of the sub-dominant contributions.
613: One of the examples considered in \cite{King:2000mb} is when the
614: right-handed neutrinos dominate sequentially,
615: \beq
616: \frac{|e^2|,|f^2|,|ef|}{Y}\gg
617: \frac{|xy|}{X} \gg
618: \frac{|x'y'|}{X'}
619: \label{srhnd}
620: \eeq
621: where $x,y\in a,b,c$ and $x',y'\in a',b',c'$.
622: Assuming SRHND with sequential sub-dominance as in
623: Eq.\ref{srhnd}, then Eqs.\ref{seesaw}, \ref{seq1}, \ref{dirac} give
624: \beq
625: m_{LL}
626: \approx
627: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
628: \frac{a^2}{X}+\frac{d^2}{Y}
629: & \frac{ab}{X}+ \frac{de}{Y}
630: & \frac{ac}{X}+\frac{df}{Y} \\
631: .
632: & \frac{b^2}{X}+\frac{e^2}{Y}
633: & \frac{bc}{X}+\frac{ef}{Y} \\
634: .
635: & .
636: & \frac{c^2}{X}+\frac{f^2}{Y}
637: \end{array}
638: \right)
639: \eeq
640: where the contribution from the first right-handed neutrino may be
641: neglected according to Eq.\ref{srhnd}.
642: This was show to lead to a full neutrino mass hierarchy
643: \beq
644: m_1^2\ll m_2^2\ll m_3^2
645: \eeq
646: and, ignoring phases, the solar angle only depends
647: on the sub-dominant couplings and is given by
648: $\tan \theta_{12} \approx a/(c_{23}b-s_{23}c)$ \cite{King:2000mb}.
649: The simple requirement for large solar angle is then $a\sim b-c$
650: \cite{King:2000mb}. Including phases the solar angle is given by
651: the analagous result \cite{King:2002nf}
652: \beq
653: \tan \theta_{12}\approx
654: \frac{|a|}{c_{23}|b|\cos \phi_b' -s_{23}|c|\cos \phi_c'}
655: \eeq
656: where the phases $\phi_b',\phi_c'$ are defined in \cite{King:2002nf}.
657: A related phase analysis which pointed out the importance of phases
658: for determining the solar angle was given in \cite{Lavignac:2002gf}.
659: One also obtains the interesting bound on the angle $\theta_{13}$,
660: \cite{King:2002nf,Lavignac:2002gf,Akhmedov:1999uw,Feruglio:2002af}
661: \beq
662: \theta_{13}\simgt \frac{m_2}{m_3} \sim 0.1
663: \eeq
664: which implies that $\theta_{13}$ should be just below the CHOOZ limit
665: \cite{Vissani:1998xg}, and there is therfore a good chance
666: that this angle could be observed at MINOS or CNGS.
667:
668: \section{SUSY, GUTs AND FAMILY SYMMETRIES}
669:
670: One of the exciting things about the discovery of neutrino masses
671: and mixing angles is that this provides additional information
672: about the flavour problem - the problem of understanding the origin
673: of three families of quarks and leptons and their masses and mixing
674: angles (Fig.\ref{fig3}). Solutions to the flavour
675: problem typically involve introducing a Family symmetry
676: $G_{{\rm Family}}$,
677: which unifies the three families as shown in Fig.\ref{fig3}.
678:
679: In the framework of the see-saw mechanism, new physics beyond the
680: standard model is required to violate lepton number and generate
681: right-handed neutrino masses which are typically around the
682: GUT scale. This is also exciting since it implies that
683: the origin of neutrino masses is also related to some
684: GUT symmetry group $G_{{\rm GUT}}$, which unifies the
685: fermions within each family as shown in Fig.\ref{fig3}.
686:
687: It is well known that such large mass scales can only be stabilised by
688: assuming a TeV scale N=1 SUSY which cancels the quadratic divergences
689: of the Higgs mass, and in turn SUSY enables the gauge couplings to
690: meet at the GUT scale to give a self-consistent unification picture.
691:
692: Putting these ideas to together we are suggestively led to a framework of
693: new physics beyond the standard model based on N=1 SUSY with commuting
694: GUT and Family symmetry groups,
695: \beq
696: G_{{\rm GUT}}\times G_{{\rm Family}}
697: \label{symmetry}
698: \eeq
699: There are many possible candidate GUT and Family symmetry groups
700: some of which are listed in Table \ref{table2}. Unfortunately the
701: model dependence does not end there, since the details of the symmetry
702: breaking vacuum plays a crucial role in specifying the model and
703: determining the masses and mixing angles, resulting in many models
704: \cite{Altarelli:2002hx,examples}.
705:
706: Another complication is that the masses and mixing angles determined
707: in some high energy theory must be run down to low energies using
708: the renormalisation group equations (RGEs)
709: \cite{Babu:1993qv,Antusch:2002ek}.
710: Large radiative corrections are seen \cite{Ellis:1999nk}
711: when the see-saw parameters are tuned,
712: since the spectrum is sensitive to small changes in the parameters.
713: In natural models based on SRHND the parameters are not tuned,
714: since the hierarchy and large atmospheric and
715: solar angles arise naturally as discussed in the previous section.
716: Therefore in SRHND models the radiative
717: corrections to neutrino masses and mixing angles are only expected
718: to be a few per cent, and this has been verified numerically
719: \cite{King:2000hk}.
720:
721: In the next section we give two examples of models with the symmetry structure
722: of Eq.\ref{symmetry} which incorporate SRHND.
723:
724:
725:
726: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
727: \begin{figure}[t]
728: %\centering
729: %%\epsfysize=12cm
730: \includegraphics[width=0.46\textwidth]{slide2.eps}
731: \vspace*{-4mm}
732: \caption{{\small The fermion masses are here represented by a lego plot.
733: We have multiplied the masses of the bottom, charm and tau by $10$,
734: the strange and muon by $10^2$, the up and down
735: by $10^3$, the electron by $10^4$ to make the lego blocks visible.
736: It is natural to assume a normal neutrino
737: hierarchy. We have multiplied the third neutrino mass by
738: $10^{11}$ and the second neutrino mass by $10^{12}$ to make the
739: lego blocks visible. This underlines how incredibly light the neutrinos are.
740: The symmetry groups $G_{{\rm GUT}}$ and $G_{{\rm Family}}$ act
741: in the directions indicated.}}
742: \label{fig3}
743: \vspace*{-2mm}
744: \end{figure}
745: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
746:
747: \section{TWO EXAMPLES}
748:
749: \subsection{$SU(5)_{{\rm GUT}}\times U(1)_{{\rm Family}}$}
750: A simple example assigns $U(1)_{{\rm Family}}$ charges to
751: $SU(5)_{{\rm GUT}}$ multiplets labelled by a family index,
752: $\overline{5_i}=(L_i,D^c_i)$, ${10_i}=(Q,U^c_i,E^c_i)$, $1_i=N^c_i$,
753: as follows \cite{Altarelli:1998ns}:
754: \beq
755: \overline{5_i}=(3,0,0), \ \ {10_i}=(3,2,0), \ \ 1_i=(1,-1,0)
756: \eeq
757: Note that three right-handed neutrinos have been added by hand.
758: This results in the neutrino see-saw matrices \cite{Altarelli:1998ns}
759: \beq
760: m_{LR}\sim
761: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
762: \lambda^4 & \lambda^2 & \lambda^3 \\
763: \lambda & \lambda & 1 \\
764: \lambda & \lambda & 1
765: \end{array}
766: \right)
767: \label{mLR1}
768: \eeq
769: \beq
770: M_{RR}\sim
771: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
772: \lambda^2 & 1 & \lambda \\
773: 1 & \lambda^2 & \lambda \\
774: \lambda & \lambda & 1
775: \end{array}
776: \right)
777: \label{MRR1}
778: \eeq
779: where $\lambda \approx 0.22$ is assumed to be of order the Cabibbo angle.
780: Although the three right-handed neutrinos are roughly degenerate,
781: this model has SRHND since
782: the third right-handed neutrino dominates
783: due to its larger Dirac mass couplings.
784: A large atmospheric angle is given from
785: the large entry in the 23 position of the ``lop-sided'' neutrino mass matrix
786: $\tan \theta_{23} \approx e/f \sim 1$.
787: The solar angle is $\tan \theta_{12}\sim a/(b-c) \sim \lambda$
788: which may be interpreted as either LMA or SMA MSW.
789: The quark mass matrices are given by
790: \beq
791: m_{LR}^D\sim
792: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
793: \lambda^6 & \lambda^3 & \lambda^3 \\
794: \lambda^5 & \lambda^2 & \lambda^2 \\
795: \lambda^3 & 1 & 1
796: \end{array}
797: \right)
798: \label{mDLR1}
799: \eeq
800: \beq
801: m_{LR}^U\sim
802: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
803: \lambda^6 & \lambda^5 & \lambda^3 \\
804: \lambda^5 & \lambda^4 & \lambda^2 \\
805: \lambda^3 & \lambda^2 & 1
806: \end{array}
807: \right)
808: \label{mULR1}
809: \eeq
810: The down mass matrix only has
811: large unphysical right-handed mixing with small physical
812: left-handed quark mixing angles.
813: The mass and mixing relations are:
814: \beq
815: V_{us}\sim \lambda, \ \ V_{ub}\sim \lambda^3, \ \ V_{cb}\sim \lambda^2
816: \eeq
817: \beq
818: m_u:m_c:m_t=\lambda^6:\lambda^4:1
819: \eeq
820: \beq
821: m_d:m_s:m_b=\lambda^6:\lambda^2:1
822: \eeq
823:
824:
825:
826: \subsection{$SO(10)_{{\rm GUT}}\times SU(3)_{{\rm Family}}$}
827: In this model \cite{King:2001uz},
828: the three families are unified as triplets under
829: $SU(3)_{{\rm Family}}$, and $16's$ under $SO(10)_{{\rm GUT}}$.
830: Further symmetries are assumed to ensure that
831: the vacuum alignment leads to a universal form of Dirac mass matrices
832: for the neutrinos, charged leptons and quarks \cite{King:2001uz},
833: \beq
834: m_{LR}\sim
835: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
836: \epsilon^8 & \epsilon^3 & \epsilon^3 \\
837: -\epsilon^3 & \epsilon^2 & \epsilon^2 \\
838: -\epsilon^3 & \epsilon^2 & 1
839: \end{array}
840: \right)
841: \label{mLR2}
842: \eeq
843: where $\epsilon \approx 0.05$ and the expansion parameter for the
844: down quarks and charged leptons is assumed to be larger
845: $\overline{\epsilon} \approx 0.15$.
846:
847: The neutrino see-saw matrices are \cite{King:2001uz},
848: \beq
849: m_{LR}\sim
850: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
851: \epsilon^8 & \lambda_{\nu}\epsilon^3 & \lambda_{\nu}\epsilon^3 \\
852: -\lambda_{\nu}\epsilon^3 & a_{\nu}\epsilon^2
853: & a_{\nu}\epsilon^2+\lambda'_{\nu}\epsilon^3 \\
854: -\lambda_{\nu}\epsilon^3 & a_{\nu}\epsilon^2+\lambda'_{\nu}\epsilon^3 & 1
855: \end{array}
856: \right)
857: \label{mLR3}
858: \eeq
859: where $\lambda_{\nu}, \lambda'_{\nu}, a_{\nu}$ are order one parameters.
860: \beq
861: M_{RR}\sim
862: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
863: \epsilon_{\nu}^4 & 0 & \epsilon_{\nu}^2 \\
864: 0 & \epsilon_{\nu}^3 & \epsilon_{\nu}^3 \\
865: \epsilon_{\nu}^2 & \epsilon_{\nu}^3 & 1
866: \end{array}
867: \right)
868: \label{MRR2}
869: \eeq
870: In this model the first right-handed neutrino dominates because
871: the expansion parameter $\epsilon_{\nu}$ is very small so it is very light,
872: leading to SRHND with sequential sub-dominance as in Eq.\ref{srhnd}.
873: The strong hierarchy tends to predict the LOW solution, although
874: LMA MSW is also possible \cite{King:2001uz}.
875: The results in section 6 apply after re-ordering the columns to make the
876: first right-handed neutrino the dominant one,
877: \begin{equation}
878: m_{LR}=
879: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
880: d & a & a' \\
881: e & b & b' \\
882: f & c & c'
883: \end{array}
884: \right)
885: \label{dirac2}
886: \end{equation}
887: The atmospheric angle is given from section 6 by
888: $\tan \theta_{23} \approx e/f$ where the $SU(3)_{{\rm Family}}$
889: symmetry ensures
890: accurate equality $e=f=-\lambda_{\nu}\epsilon^3$.
891: The solar angle is given from section 6 by
892: $\tan \theta_{12} \sim a/(b-c)\sim -\lambda_{\nu}/\lambda'_{\nu}\sim 1$
893: where the $SU(3)_{{\rm Family}}$ symmetry
894: leads to a cancellation of the leading order terms and a large solar
895: angle. The quark mass matrices are
896: \beq
897: m^U_{LR}\sim
898: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
899: \epsilon^8 & \lambda_{U}\epsilon^3 & \lambda_{U}\epsilon^3 \\
900: -\lambda_{U}\epsilon^3 & \epsilon^2
901: & \epsilon^2 \\
902: -\lambda_{U}\epsilon^3 & \epsilon^2 & 1
903: \end{array}
904: \right)
905: \label{mULR2}
906: \eeq
907: \beq
908: m^D_{LR}\sim
909: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
910: \overline{\epsilon}^8 & \lambda_{D}\overline{\epsilon}^3
911: & \lambda_{D}\overline{\epsilon}^3 \\
912: -\lambda_{D}\overline{\epsilon}^3 & \overline{\epsilon}^2
913: & \overline{\epsilon}^2 \\
914: -\lambda_{D}\overline{\epsilon}^3 & \overline{\epsilon}^2 & 1
915: \end{array}
916: \right)
917: \label{mDLR2}
918: \eeq
919: where $\lambda_{U}, \lambda_{D}$ are order one parameters,
920: which provides a very good description of the quark masses
921: and mixing angles \cite{King:2001uz}.
922: The fact that the first right-handed neutrino dominates
923: is the key which allows
924: large neutrino mixing angles to arise from a universal form of mass
925: matrix with only small off-diagonal entries.
926:
927: \section{CONCLUSIONS}
928:
929: I have reviewed promising approaches to neutrino mass models,
930: focussing on three neutrino
931: patterns of neutrino masses and mixing angles,
932: and the corresponding Majorana mass matrices classified
933: in Table 1. I also reviewed the see-saw mechanism which at the
934: present time looks like the most elegant explanation of small neutrino masses.
935: If the see-saw mechanism for understanding the neutrino
936: spectrum looks good, with SRHND it looks even better.
937: With SRHND the neutrino hierarchy appears very naturally, and
938: large atmospheric and solar angles are understood in terms
939: of simple analytic relations between Dirac mass elements.
940: I described an attractive
941: theoretical framework for understanding quark and lepton
942: (including neutrino) masses and mixing angles
943: based on SUSY, GUTs and Family symmetry. Two
944: examples of such models were discussed which implement
945: the see-saw mechanism using SRHND, where the relations responsible
946: for large atmospheric and solar angles could be understood
947: in terms of symmetries.
948:
949:
950: \begin{thebibliography}{9}
951:
952: \bibitem{Hallin}
953: A. Hallin, these proceedings.
954:
955: \bibitem{Smy}
956: M. Smy, these proceedings.
957:
958: \bibitem{Smirnov}
959: A, Smirnov, these proceedings.
960:
961: \bibitem{Lisi}
962: E. Lisi, these proceedings.
963:
964: \bibitem{Valle}
965: J. W. F. Valle, these proceedings.
966:
967: \bibitem{Shiozawa}
968: M.Shiozawa, these proceedings.
969:
970: %\cite{Apollonio:1999ae}
971: \bibitem{Apollonio:1999ae}
972: M.~Apollonio {\it et al.}
973: [CHOOZ Collaboration],
974: %``Limits on neutrino oscillations from the CHOOZ experiment,''
975: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 466} (1999) 415
976: [arXiv:hep-ex/9907037].
977: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9907037;%%
978:
979: \cite{Altarelli:2002hx}
980: \bibitem{Altarelli:2002hx}
981: For a recent review see: G.~Altarelli and F.~Feruglio,
982: %``Theoretical models of neutrino masses and mixings,''
983: arXiv:hep-ph/0206077.
984: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0206077;%%
985:
986: \bibitem{Drexlin}
987: G. Drexlin, these proceedings.
988:
989: \bibitem{Tayloe}
990: R. Tayloe, these proceedings.
991:
992: %\cite{Maki:1962mu}
993: \bibitem{Maki:1962mu}
994: Z.~Maki, M.~Nakagawa and S.~Sakata,
995: %``Remarks On The Unified Model Of Elementary Particles,''
996: Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ {\bf 28} (1962) 870.
997: %%CITATION = PTPKA,28,870;%%
998:
999: %\cite{Lee:1977qz}
1000: \bibitem{Lee:1977qz}
1001: B.~W.~Lee, S.~Pakvasa, R.~E.~Shrock and H.~Sugawara,
1002: %``Muon And Electron Number Nonconservation In A V-A Six Quark Model,''
1003: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 38} (1977) 937
1004: [Erratum-ibid.\ {\bf 38} (1977) 1230].
1005: %%CITATION = PRLTA,38,937;%%
1006:
1007: %\cite{Elgaroy:2002bi}
1008: \bibitem{Elgaroy:2002bi}
1009: O.~Elgaroy {\it et al.},
1010: %``A new limit on the total neutrino mass from the 2dF
1011: galaxy redshift survey,''
1012: arXiv:astro-ph/0204152.
1013: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0204152;%%
1014:
1015: \bibitem{Hannestad}
1016: S. Hannestad, these proceedings.
1017:
1018: %\cite{King:2002nf}
1019: \bibitem{King:2002nf}
1020: S.~F.~King,
1021: %``Constructing the large mixing angle MNS matrix in see-saw models with right-handed neutrino dominance,''
1022: arXiv:hep-ph/0204360.
1023: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0204360;%%
1024:
1025: %\cite{King:2001ce}
1026: \bibitem{King:2001ce}
1027: S.~F.~King and N.~N.~Singh,
1028: %``Inverted hierarchy models of neutrino masses,''
1029: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 596} (2001) 81
1030: [arXiv:hep-ph/0007243].
1031: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0007243;%%
1032:
1033: %\cite{Barbieri:1998mq}
1034: \bibitem{Barbieri:1998mq}
1035: R.~Barbieri, L.~J.~Hall, D.~R.~Smith, A.~Strumia and N.~Weiner,
1036: %``Oscillations of solar and atmospheric neutrinos,''
1037: JHEP {\bf 9812} (1998) 017
1038: [arXiv:hep-ph/9807235].
1039: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9807235.
1040:
1041: %\cite{Pascoli:2002xq}
1042: \bibitem{Pascoli:2002xq}
1043: S.~Pascoli and S.~T.~Petcov,
1044: %``The SNO solar neutrino data, neutrinoless double-beta decay and neutrino mass spectrum,''
1045: arXiv:hep-ph/0205022.
1046: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0205022;%%
1047:
1048: %\cite{Klapdor-Kleingrothaus:2001ke}
1049: \bibitem{Klapdor-Kleingrothaus:2001ke}
1050: H.~V.~Klapdor-Kleingrothaus, A.~Dietz, H.~L.~Harney and I.~V.~Krivosheina,
1051: %``Evidence for neutrinoless double beta decay,''
1052: Mod.\ Phys.\ Lett.\ A {\bf 16} (2001) 2409
1053: [arXiv:hep-ph/0201231].
1054: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0201231;%%
1055:
1056: %\cite{Feruglio:2002af}
1057: \bibitem{Feruglio:2002af}
1058: F.~Feruglio, A.~Strumia and F.~Vissani,
1059: %``Neutrino oscillations and signals in beta and 0nu 2beta experiments,''
1060: arXiv:hep-ph/0201291.
1061: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0201291;%%
1062:
1063: %\cite{Aalseth:2002dt}
1064: \bibitem{Aalseth:2002dt}
1065: C.~E.~Aalseth {\it et al.},
1066: %``Comment on 'Evidence for neutrinoless double beta decay',''
1067: arXiv:hep-ex/0202018.
1068: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0202018;%%
1069:
1070: %\cite{Klapdor-Kleingrothaus:2002kf}
1071: \bibitem{Klapdor-Kleingrothaus:2002kf}
1072: H.~V.~Klapdor-Kleingrothaus,
1073: %``Reply to a comment of article 'Evidence for neutrinoless double beta decay',''
1074: arXiv:hep-ph/0205228.
1075: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0205228;%%
1076:
1077: \bibitem{genius}
1078: O.Cremonesi, these proceedings.
1079:
1080: \bibitem{katrin}
1081: Ch.Weinheimer, these proceedings.
1082:
1083: %\cite{Choubey:2002bh}
1084: \bibitem{Choubey:2002bh}
1085: S.~Choubey and S.~F.~King,
1086: %``Gamma ray bursts as probes of neutrino mass, quantum gravity and dark energy,''
1087: arXiv:hep-ph/0207260.
1088: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0207260;%%
1089:
1090: %\cite{Ellis:1999my}
1091: \bibitem{Ellis:1999my}
1092: J.~R.~Ellis and S.~Lola,
1093: %``Can neutrinos be degenerate in mass?,''
1094: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 458} (1999) 310
1095: [arXiv:hep-ph/9904279].
1096: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9904279;%%
1097:
1098: %\cite{Barbieri:1999km}
1099: \bibitem{Barbieri:1999km}
1100: R.~Barbieri, L.~J.~Hall, G.~L.~Kane and G.~G.~Ross,
1101: %``Nearly degenerate neutrinos and broken flavour symmetry,''
1102: arXiv:hep-ph/9901228.
1103: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9901228;%%
1104:
1105: %\cite{Chankowski:2001fp}
1106: \bibitem{Chankowski:2001fp}
1107: P.~H.~Chankowski, A.~Ioannisian, S.~Pokorski and J.~W.~Valle,
1108: %``Neutrino unification,''
1109: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 86} (2001) 3488
1110: [arXiv:hep-ph/0011150].
1111: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0011150;%%
1112:
1113:
1114: \bibitem{seesaw}
1115: M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond and R. Slansky in Sanibel Talk,
1116: CALT-68-709, Feb 1979, and in {\it Supergravity} (North Holland,
1117: Amsterdam 1979);
1118: T. Yanagida in {\it Proc. of the Workshop on Unified Theory and
1119: Baryon Number of the Universe}, KEK, Japan, 1979.
1120:
1121: \bibitem{seesaw2}
1122: R.~N.~Mohapatra and G.~Senjanovic,
1123: %``Neutrino Mass And Spontaneous Parity Nonconservation,''
1124: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 44} (1980) 912;
1125: %%CITATION = PRLTA,44,912;%%
1126: J.~Schechter and J.~W.~Valle,
1127: %``Neutrino Decay And Spontaneous Violation Of Lepton Number,''
1128: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 25} (1982) 774.
1129: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D25,774;%%
1130:
1131: %\cite{King:1998jw}
1132: \bibitem{King:1998jw}
1133: S.~F.~King,
1134: %``Atmospheric and solar neutrinos with a heavy singlet,''
1135: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 439} (1998) 350
1136: [arXiv:hep-ph/9806440].
1137: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9806440;%%
1138:
1139: %\cite{King:1999cm}
1140: \bibitem{King:1999cm}
1141: S.~F.~King,
1142: %``Atmospheric and solar neutrinos from single right-handed neutrino dominance and U(1) family symmetry,''
1143: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 562} (1999) 57
1144: [arXiv:hep-ph/9904210].
1145: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9904210;%%
1146:
1147: %\cite{King:2000mb}
1148: \bibitem{King:2000mb}
1149: S.~F.~King,
1150: %``Large mixing angle MSW and atmospheric neutrinos from single right-handed neutrino dominance and U(1) family symmetry,''
1151: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 576} (2000) 85
1152: [arXiv:hep-ph/9912492].
1153: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9912492;%%
1154:
1155: %\cite{Lavignac:2002gf}
1156: \bibitem{Lavignac:2002gf}
1157: S.~Lavignac, I.~Masina and C.~A.~Savoy,
1158: %``Large solar angle and seesaw mechanism: A bottom-up perspective,''
1159: arXiv:hep-ph/0202086.
1160: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0202086;%%
1161:
1162: %\cite{Akhmedov:1999uw}
1163: \bibitem{Akhmedov:1999uw}
1164: E.~K.~Akhmedov, G.~C.~Branco and M.~N.~Rebelo,
1165: %``Linking solar and long baseline terrestrial neutrino experiments,''
1166: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 84} (2000) 3535
1167: [arXiv:hep-ph/9912205].
1168: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9912205;%%
1169:
1170: %\cite{Vissani:1998xg}
1171: \bibitem{Vissani:1998xg}
1172: F.~Vissani,
1173: %``Large mixing, family structure, and dominant block in the neutrino mass matrix,''
1174: JHEP {\bf 9811} (1998) 025
1175: [arXiv:hep-ph/9810435].
1176: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9810435;%%
1177:
1178: \bibitem{examples}
1179: C.~H.~Albright and S.~M.~Barr,
1180: %``Fermion masses in SO(10) with a single adjoint Higgs field,''
1181: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 58}, 013002 (1998);
1182: N.~Irges, S.~Lavignac and P.~Ramond,
1183: %``Predictions from an anomalous U(1) model of Yukawa hierarchies,''
1184: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 58}, 035003 (1998);
1185: Z.~Berezhiani and A.~Rossi,
1186: %``Grand unified textures for neutrino and quark mixings,''
1187: JHEP {\bf 9903}, 002 (1999);
1188: R. Barbieri, P. Creminelli and A. Romanino,
1189: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B559} (1999) 17, hep-ph/9903460;
1190: T.~Ohlsson and G.~Seidl,
1191: %``A flavor symmetry model for bilarge leptonic mixing and the lepton masses,''
1192: arXiv:hep-ph/0206087;
1193: H.~Fritzsch and Z.~z.~Xing,
1194: %``Mass and flavor mixing schemes of quarks and leptons,''
1195: Prog.\ Part.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf 45} (2000) 1
1196: [arXiv:hep-ph/9912358];
1197: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9912358;%%
1198: W.~Grimus and L.~Lavoura,
1199: %``Softly broken lepton numbers and maximal neutrino mixing,''
1200: JHEP {\bf 0107} (2001) 045
1201: [arXiv:hep-ph/0105212];
1202: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0105212;%%
1203: E.~K.~Akhmedov, G.~C.~Branco, F.~R.~Joaquim and J.~I.~Silva-Marcos,
1204: %``Neutrino masses and mixing with seesaw mechanism and universal breaking of extended democracy,''
1205: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 498} (2001) 237
1206: [arXiv:hep-ph/0008010];
1207: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9812475;%%
1208: R.~Kuchimanchi and R.~N.~Mohapatra,
1209: %``Bimaximal neutrino mixing from a local SU(2) horizontal symmetry,''
1210: arXiv:hep-ph/0207110;
1211: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0207110;%%
1212: J.~C.~Pati,
1213: %``Confronting the conventional ideas of grand unification with fermion masses, neutrino oscillations and proton decay,''
1214: arXiv:hep-ph/0204240;
1215: S.~F.~King and M.~Oliveira,
1216: %``Neutrino masses and mixing angles in a realistic string-inspired model,''
1217: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63} (2001) 095004
1218: [arXiv:hep-ph/0009287];
1219: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0009287;%%
1220: M.~Hirsch and S.~F.~King,
1221: %``Leptogenesis with single right-handed neutrino dominance,''
1222: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64} (2001) 113005
1223: [arXiv:hep-ph/0107014];
1224: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0107014;%%
1225: T.~Blazek and S.~F.~King,
1226: %``Muon anomalous magnetic moment and tau $\to$ mu gamma in a realistic string-inspired model of neutrino masses,''
1227: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 518} (2001) 109
1228: [arXiv:hep-ph/0105005].
1229: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0105005;%%
1230:
1231:
1232:
1233: %\cite{Babu:1993qv}
1234: \bibitem{Babu:1993qv}
1235: K.~S.~Babu, C.~N.~Leung and J.~Pantaleone,
1236: %``Renormalization of the neutrino mass operator,''
1237: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 319} (1993) 191
1238: [arXiv:hep-ph/9309223].
1239: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9309223;%%
1240:
1241: %\cite{Antusch:2002ek}
1242: \bibitem{Antusch:2002ek}
1243: S.~Antusch and M.~Ratz,
1244: %``Supergraph techniques and two-loop beta-functions for renormalizable and non-renormalizable operators,''
1245: arXiv:hep-ph/0203027;
1246: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0203027;%%
1247: S.~Antusch, M.~Drees, J.~Kersten, M.~Lindner and M.~Ratz,
1248: %``Neutrino mass operator renormalization revisited,''
1249: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 519} (2001) 238
1250: [arXiv:hep-ph/0108005];
1251: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0108005;%%
1252: S.~Antusch, M.~Drees, J.~Kersten, M.~Lindner and M.~Ratz,
1253: %``Neutrino mass operator renormalization in two Higgs doublet models and the MSSM,''
1254: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 525} (2002) 130
1255: [arXiv:hep-ph/0110366].
1256: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0110366;%%
1257:
1258: %\cite{Ellis:1999nk}
1259: \bibitem{Ellis:1999nk}
1260: J.~R.~Ellis, G.~K.~Leontaris, S.~Lola and D.~V.~Nanopoulos,
1261: %``Neutrino textures in the light of Super-Kamiokande data and a realistic string model,''
1262: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 9} (1999) 389
1263: [arXiv:hep-ph/9808251].
1264: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9808251;%%
1265:
1266: %\cite{King:2000hk}
1267: \bibitem{King:2000hk}
1268: S.~F.~King and N.~N.~Singh,
1269: %``Renormalisation group analysis of single right-handed neutrino dominance,''
1270: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 591} (2000) 3
1271: [arXiv:hep-ph/0006229].
1272: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0006229;%%
1273:
1274: %\cite{Altarelli:1998ns}
1275: \bibitem{Altarelli:1998ns}
1276: G.~Altarelli and F.~Feruglio,
1277: %``A simple grand unification view of neutrino mixing and fermion mass matrices,''
1278: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 451} (1999) 388
1279: [arXiv:hep-ph/9812475].
1280: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9812475;%%
1281:
1282: %\cite{King:2001uz}
1283: \bibitem{King:2001uz}
1284: S.~F.~King and G.~G.~Ross,
1285: %``Fermion masses and mixing angles from SU(3) family symmetry,''
1286: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 520} (2001) 243
1287: [arXiv:hep-ph/0108112];
1288: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0108112;%%
1289: G.~G.~Ross and L.Velasco-Sevila,
1290: %``Symmetries and fermion masses,''
1291: arXiv:hep-ph/0208218.
1292: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0208218;%%
1293:
1294:
1295:
1296:
1297:
1298:
1299:
1300:
1301:
1302:
1303:
1304: \end{thebibliography}
1305:
1306: \begin{table*}[htb]
1307: {\small
1308: \caption{Leading order low energy neutrino Majorana mass matrices
1309: $m_{LL}$ consistent with large atmospheric and solar mixing angles,
1310: classified according to the rate of neutrinoless double beta decay
1311: and the pattern of neutrino masses.}
1312: \label{table1}
1313: \newcommand{\m}{\hphantom{$-$}}
1314: \newcommand{\cc}[1]{\multicolumn{1}{c}{#1}}
1315: \renewcommand{\tabcolsep}{2pc} % enlarge column spacing
1316: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.2} % enlarge line spacing
1317: \begin{tabular}{@{}|c|c|c|}
1318: \hline
1319: \hline
1320: & Type I & Type II \\
1321: & Small $\beta \beta_{0\nu}$ & Large $\beta \beta_{0\nu}$ \\
1322: \hline
1323: \hline
1324: & & \\
1325: A & $\beta \beta_{0\nu}\simlt 0.0082$ eV & \\
1326: Normal hierarchy & & \\
1327: $m_1^2,m_2^2\ll m_3^2$ &
1328: $\left(
1329: \begin{array}{ccc}
1330: 0 & 0 & 0 \\
1331: 0 & 1 & 1\\
1332: 0 & 1 & 1 \\
1333: \end{array}
1334: \right)\frac{m}{2}$ & -- \\
1335: & & \\
1336: \hline
1337: & & \\
1338: B & $\beta \beta_{0\nu}\simlt
1339: 0.0082$ eV & $\beta \beta_{0\nu}\simgt 0.0085$ eV\\
1340: Inverted hierarchy & & \\
1341: $m_1^2\approx m_2^2\gg m_3^2$ &
1342: $\left(
1343: \begin{array}{ccc}
1344: 0 & 1 & 1 \\
1345: 1 & 0 & 0\\
1346: 1 & 0 & 0 \\
1347: \end{array}
1348: \right)\frac{m}{\sqrt{2}}$ &
1349: $\left(
1350: \begin{array}{ccc}
1351: 1 & 0 & 0 \\
1352: 0 & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2}\\
1353: 0 & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2} \\
1354: \end{array}
1355: \right)m$
1356: \\
1357: & & \\
1358: \hline
1359: & & \\
1360: C & &
1361: $\beta \beta_{0\nu}\simgt 0.035$ eV \\
1362: Approximate degeneracy & & diag(1,1,1)m\\
1363: $m_1^2\approx m_2^2\approx m_3^2$ &
1364: $\left(
1365: \begin{array}{ccc}
1366: 0 & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \\
1367: \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2}\\
1368: \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2} \\
1369: \end{array}
1370: \right)m$ &
1371: $\left(
1372: \begin{array}{ccc}
1373: 1 & 0 & 0 \\
1374: 0 & 0 & 1\\
1375: 0 & 1 & 0 \\
1376: \end{array}
1377: \right)m$\\
1378: & & \\
1379: \hline
1380: \hline
1381: \end{tabular}\\[2pt]
1382: }
1383: \end{table*}
1384:
1385: \begin{table*}[htb]
1386: \caption{Some candidate GUT and Family symmetry groups.}
1387: \label{table2}
1388: \newcommand{\m}{\hphantom{$-$}}
1389: \newcommand{\cc}[1]{\multicolumn{1}{c}{#1}}
1390: \renewcommand{\tabcolsep}{2pc} % enlarge column spacing
1391: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.2} % enlarge line spacing
1392: \begin{tabular}{@{}|c||c|}
1393: \hline
1394: \hline
1395: $G_{{\rm GUT}}$ & $G_{{\rm Family}}$\\
1396: \hline
1397: \hline
1398: $E_6$ & $SU(3)$ \\
1399: $SO(10)$ & $SU(2)$ \\
1400: $SU(5)$ & $U(1)$ \\
1401: $SU(5)\times U(1)$ & $Z_N$\\
1402: $SU(3)^3$ & $O(3)\times O(3)$ \\
1403: $SU(4)\times SU(2)\times SU(2)$ & $SO(3)$ \\
1404: $SU(3)\times SU(2)\times SU(2) \times U(1)$ & $S(3)\times S(3)$\\
1405: $SU(3)\times SU(2) \times U(1) \times U(1)$ & $S(3)$ \\
1406: \hline
1407: $SU(3)\times SU(2)\times U(1)$ & {\rm Nothing}\\
1408: \hline
1409: \hline
1410: \end{tabular}\\[2pt]
1411: \end{table*}
1412:
1413: \end{document}
1414:
1415:
1416:
1417:
1418:
1419:
1420:
1421:
1422:
1423:
1424:
1425:
1426:
1427:
1428:
1429:
1430:
1431:
1432:
1433: