1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %% 2/5/2002
3: %% Proceedings Trim Size 8.5"x6" had change into Trim Size 9"x6".
4: %% This Latex2e file rewritten from various sources for use in the
5: %% preparation of the (smaller [9"x6"]) single-column proceedings
6: %% Volume, latest version by R. Sankaran with acknowledgements to
7: %% Susan Hezlet and Lukas Nellen.
8: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
9:
10: \documentclass{ws-procs9x6}
11: \newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}
12: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}
13: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}
14: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}
15: \def\simlt{\buildrel < \over {_{\sim}}}
16: \def\simgt{\buildrel > \over {_{\sim}}}
17: \begin{document}
18:
19: \title{String Inspired Neutrino Mass Models}
20:
21: \author{S. F. King}
22:
23: \address{Department of Physics and Astronomy, \\
24: University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, U.K.\\
25: E-mail: king@soton.ac.uk}
26:
27: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
28: % You may repeat \author \address as often as necessary %
29: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
30:
31: \maketitle
32:
33: \abstracts{I discuss a class of hierarchical neutrino mass models based on
34: the see-saw mechanism with single right-handed neutrino
35: dominance. I apply this mechanism to
36: a string inspired SUSY Pati-Salam model and indicate how it
37: may emerge from intersecting D-branes.}
38:
39: \section{Introduction}
40:
41: Recent SNO \cite{Jelley} results when combined
42: with other solar neutrino data especially that of Super-Kamiokande
43: strongly favour the large mixing angle (LMA) MSW solar solution
44: \cite{Smirnov} with three active light neutrino states, and
45: $\theta_{12} \approx \pi/6$,
46: $\Delta m_{21}^2\approx 5\times 10^{-5}{\rm eV}^2$
47: \cite{Smirnov}.
48: The atmospheric neutrino data is consistent with
49: maximal $\nu_{\mu}- \nu_{\tau}$ neutrino mixing
50: $\theta_{23} \approx \pi/4$
51: with $|\Delta m_{32}^2|\approx 2.5\times 10^{-3}{\rm eV}^2$
52: and the sign of $\Delta m_{32}^2$ undetermined.
53: The CHOOZ experiment limits $\theta_{13} \simlt 0.2$
54: over the favoured atmospheric range \cite{Smirnov}.
55:
56: The leading order Majorana mass matrix consistent with a neutrino
57: mass hierarchy and bi-large mixing angles is
58: \beq
59: m_{LL} \sim \left(
60: \begin{array}{ccc}
61: 0 & 0 & 0 \\
62: 0 & 1 & 1\\
63: 0 & 1 & 1 \\
64: \end{array}
65: \right)\frac{m}{2}
66: \label{hier}
67: \eeq
68: However since
69: $m_3 \sim \sqrt{|\Delta m_{32}^2|}\sim 5.10^{-2}$ eV and
70: $m_2 \sim \sqrt{|\Delta m_{21}^2|}\sim 7.10^{-3}$ eV,
71: compared to the natural expectation $m_2 \sim m_3$,
72: it remains a puzzle why there should be any hierarchy at all.
73: The question may be phrased
74: in technical terms as one of understanding why
75: the sub-determinant of the mass matrix is small:
76: \beq
77: det \left(
78: \begin{array}{cc}
79: m_{22} & m_{23}\\
80: m_{23} & m_{33} \\
81: \end{array}
82: \right)\ll m^2.
83: \label{det}
84: \eeq
85:
86:
87: \section{The see-saw mechanism with single right-handed neutrino dominance}
88:
89: The simplest way to generate neutrino masses
90: from a renormalisable theory is to introduce right-handed neutrinos.
91: Since the right-handed neutrinos are electroweak singlets
92: the Majorana masses of the right-handed neutrinos $M_{RR}$
93: may be orders of magnitude larger than the Dirac
94: masses $m_{LR}$. In the approximation that $M_{RR}\gg m_{LR}$
95: one obtains effective Majorana masses
96: \beq
97: m_{LL}=m_{LR}M_{RR}^{-1}m_{LR}^T
98: \label{seesaw}
99: \eeq
100: This is the see-saw mechanism \cite{seesaw,seesaw2}. It not only generates
101: Majorana mass terms of the type $m_{LL}$, but also naturally makes them
102: smaller than the Dirac mass terms by a factor of $m_{LR}/M_{RR}\ll 1$.
103: One can think of the heavy right-handed neutrinos as being integrated
104: out to give non-renormalisable Majorana operators suppressed
105: by the heavy mass scale $M_{RR}$. The goal of see-saw model
106: building is to choose input see-saw matrices
107: $m_{LR}$ and $M_{RR}$ that will give rise to Eq.\ref{hier}.
108:
109: We now show how the input see-saw matrices can be simply chosen to
110: give Eq.\ref{hier} with a
111: naturally small sub-determinant as in Eq.\ref{det}
112: and hence a natural neutrino mass
113: hierarchy using a mechanism
114: first suggested in \cite{King:1998jw}.
115: The idea was developed in \cite{King:1999cm} where it was called
116: single right-handed neutrino dominance (SRHND) . SRHND was first successfully
117: applied to the LMA MSW solution in \cite{King:2000mb}.
118: The most recent discussion of these ideas is in \cite{King:2002nf}.
119:
120: The SRHND mechanism is most simply described
121: assuming three right-handed neutrinos
122: in the basis where the right-handed neutrino mass matrix is diagonal
123: although it can also be developed in other bases
124: \cite{King:1999cm,King:2000mb}. In this basis we write the input
125: see-saw matrices as
126: \begin{equation}
127: M_{RR}=
128: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
129: X' & 0 & 0 \\
130: 0 & X & 0 \\
131: 0 & 0 & Y
132: \end{array}
133: \right), \ \
134: m_{LR}=
135: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
136: a' & a & d \\
137: b' & b & e \\
138: c' & c & f
139: \end{array}
140: \right)
141: \label{dirac}
142: \end{equation}
143: In \cite{King:1998jw} it was suggested that one of the right-handed neutrinos
144: may dominante the contribution to $m_{LL}$ if it is lighter than
145: the other right-handed neutrinos.
146: The dominance condition was subsequently generalised to
147: include other cases where the right-handed neutrino may be
148: heavier than the other right-handed neutrinos but dominates due to its larger
149: Dirac mass couplings \cite{King:1999cm}.
150: In any case the dominant neutrino may be taken to be the third one
151: without loss of generality. It was subsequently shown how to
152: account for the LMA MSW solution with a large solar angle
153: \cite{King:2000mb} by careful consideration of the sub-dominant contributions.
154: One of the examples considered in \cite{King:2000mb} is when the
155: right-handed neutrinos dominate sequentially,
156: \beq
157: \frac{|e^2|,|f^2|,|ef|}{Y}\gg
158: \frac{|xy|}{X} \gg
159: \frac{|x'y'|}{X'}
160: \label{srhnd}
161: \eeq
162: where $x,y\in a,b,c$ and $x',y'\in a',b',c'$.
163: Assuming SRHND with sequential sub-dominance as in
164: Eq.\ref{srhnd}, then Eqs.\ref{seesaw}, \ref{dirac} give
165: \beq
166: m_{LL}
167: \approx
168: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
169: \frac{a^2}{X}+\frac{d^2}{Y}
170: & \frac{ab}{X}+ \frac{de}{Y}
171: & \frac{ac}{X}+\frac{df}{Y} \\
172: .
173: & \frac{b^2}{X}+\frac{e^2}{Y}
174: & \frac{bc}{X}+\frac{ef}{Y} \\
175: .
176: & .
177: & \frac{c^2}{X}+\frac{f^2}{Y}
178: \end{array}
179: \right)
180: \label{one}
181: \eeq
182: where the contribution from the first right-handed neutrino have been
183: neglected, but the small sub-leading contributions $xy/X$ have been included.
184: If the Dirac mass couplings satisfy the condition
185: $d\ll e\approx f$ \cite{King:1998jw}
186: then the matrix in Eq.\ref{one} resembles Eq.\ref{hier}
187: and furthermore has a naturally small sub-determinant as in
188: Eq.\ref{det}. The neutrino mass
189: spectrum consists of a mass hierarchy $m_1^2\ll m_2^2\ll m_3^2$
190: where the heaviest neutrino has mass $m_3\approx (e^2+f^2)/Y$
191: \cite{King:1998jw}. The atmospheric angle is
192: $\tan \theta_{23} \approx e/f$ \cite{King:1998jw}.
193: Ignoring phases, the solar angle only depends
194: on the sub-dominant couplings and is given by
195: $\tan \theta_{12} \approx a/(c_{23}b-s_{23}c)$ \cite{King:2000mb}.
196: The simple requirement for large solar angle is then $a\sim b-c$
197: \cite{King:2000mb}. Including phases the solar angle is given by
198: an analagous result \cite{King:2002nf}.
199: A related phase analysis which pointed out the importance of phases
200: for determining the solar angle was given in \cite{Lavignac:2002gf}.
201: One also obtains the interesting bound on the angle $\theta_{13}$,
202: \cite{King:2002nf,Lavignac:2002gf,Akhmedov:1999uw,Feruglio:2002af}
203: $\theta_{13}\simgt \frac{m_2}{m_3} \sim 0.1$.
204: There is therefore a good chance
205: that this angle could be observed at MINOS or CNGS.
206: The importance of charged lepton contributions to the CHOOZ
207: angle is explicitly discussed in \cite{King:2002nf}.
208:
209: \section{A String Inspired Supersymmetric Pati-Salam Model}
210:
211: The motivation for considering the SUSY Pati-Salam gauge group \cite{PaSa}
212: rather than conventional SUSY GUT theories is two-fold. Firstly it
213: avoids the infamous doublet-triplet splitting problem
214: \cite{Antoniadis:1988cm}, and
215: secondly it may be easier to embed the gauge group directly into
216: a string theory \cite{Antoniadis:1990hb}.
217: The problem of fermion masses in such string-inspired Pati-Salam
218: models was first considered in \cite{King:fv}, and these ideas
219: were developed in detail in \cite{Allanach:1995sj}, \cite{Allanach:1995ch}.
220: The Pati-Salam gauge group \cite{PaSa},
221: supplemented by a $U(1)$ family symmetry, was first considered in
222: \cite{Allanach:1996hz},
223: \begin{equation}
224: SU(4)_{PS} \otimes SU(2)_L \otimes SU(2)_R\otimes U(1)_{{\rm Family}}
225: \end{equation}
226: with left (L) and right (R) handed
227: fermions transforming as $F_L\sim (4,2,1)$
228: and $F_R\sim ({4},1,2)$ and
229: the Higgs $h\sim (1,2,2)$ containing the two MSSM Higgs doublets,
230: \begin{equation}
231: {F^i_{L,R}}=
232: \left(\begin{array}{cccc}
233: {u} & {u} & {u} & {\nu} \\
234: {d} & {d} & {d} & {e^-}
235: \end{array} \right)_{L,R}^i, \
236: h=
237: \left(\begin{array}{cc}
238: {h_1}^0 & {h_2}^+ \\
239: {h_1}^- & {h_2}^0
240: \end{array} \right)
241: \end{equation}
242: We assume the symmetry breaking sector of the
243: minimal SUSY Pati-Salam model \cite{King:1997ia} with
244: further Higgs $H,\bar{H}$ transforming as
245: $H\sim (4,1,2)$, $\bar{H}\sim (\bar{4},1,2)$
246: and developing VEVs which break the Pati-Salam group,
247: while $\theta, \bar{\theta}$ are Pati-Salam singlets
248: and develop VEVs which break the $U(1)$ family symmetry.
249: We assume for convenience that all symmetry breaking
250: scales are at the GUT scale.
251:
252: We now consider how to describe quark and lepton (including neutrino)
253: masses and mixing angles, following \cite{King:2000ge}.
254: The assumed $U(1)_{{\rm Family}}$ charges are
255: \beq
256: F_i=(1,0,0), \ \ F^c_i=(4,2,0)
257: \eeq
258: which leads to the universal mass matrices
259: \beq
260: m_{LR}\sim
261: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
262: \epsilon^5 & \epsilon^3 & \epsilon \\
263: \epsilon^4 & \epsilon^2 & 1 \\
264: \epsilon^4 & \epsilon^2 & 1
265: \end{array}
266: \right), \
267: M_{RR}\sim
268: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
269: \epsilon^8 & \epsilon^6 & \epsilon^4 \\
270: \epsilon^6 & \epsilon^4 & \epsilon^2 \\
271: \epsilon^4 & \epsilon^2 & 1
272: \end{array}
273: \right)
274: \label{m1}
275: \eeq
276: where the $\epsilon$ is some expansion parameter.
277: The complete fermion mass operators have the form
278: \begin{equation}
279: (F^i {F}^c_j )h\left(\frac{H\bar{H}}{M^2}\right)^n
280: \left(\frac{\theta}{M}\right)^p
281: \end{equation}
282: where each factor of $H\bar{H}$ corresponds to a further expansion
283: parameter power $\delta$, with each element of the matrix having
284: different Clebsch factors, giving vertical mass splittings within a generation.
285: The resulting set of mass matrices, suppressing the numerical
286: Clebsch factors and order unity coefficients, are as follows:
287: \beq
288: m^{\nu}_{LR}\sim
289: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
290: \delta^3\epsilon^5 & \delta \epsilon^3 & \delta \epsilon \\
291: \delta^3 \epsilon^4 & \delta^2 \epsilon^2 & \delta \\
292: \delta^3 \epsilon^4 & \delta^2 \epsilon^2 & 1
293: \end{array}
294: \right), \
295: m^E_{LR}\sim
296: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
297: \delta \epsilon^5 & \delta \epsilon^3 & \delta \epsilon \\
298: \delta \epsilon^4 & \delta \epsilon^2 & \delta^2 \\
299: \delta \epsilon^4 & \delta \epsilon^2 & 1
300: \end{array}
301: \right)
302: \label{m2}
303: \eeq
304: \beq
305: m^{U}_{LR}\sim
306: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
307: \delta^3\epsilon^5 & \delta^2 \epsilon^3 & \delta^2 \epsilon \\
308: \delta^3 \epsilon^4 & \delta^2 \epsilon^2 & \delta^3 \\
309: \delta^3 \epsilon^4 & \delta^2 \epsilon^2 & 1
310: \end{array}
311: \right), \
312: m^D_{LR}\sim
313: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
314: \delta \epsilon^5 & \delta^2 \epsilon^3 & \delta^2 \epsilon \\
315: \delta \epsilon^4 & \delta \epsilon^2 & \delta^2 \\
316: \delta \epsilon^4 & \delta \epsilon^2 & 1
317: \end{array}
318: \right)
319: \label{m3}
320: \eeq
321: where $\epsilon \approx \delta \approx 0.22$.
322: An important role is played by ``Clebsch zeroes'' which forbid certain
323: leading order operators. For example Clebsch zeroes in the
324: 23 position forbid the leading 23 elements for the charged fermions
325: but allow a leading 23 element for the neutrinos with a Clebsch factor
326: 2 (not shown explicity).
327: The neutrino sector has SRHND with the third right-handed neutrino
328: dominating due to its large Dirac mass couplings which overcomes
329: the fact that the third right-handed neutrino is the heaviest one.
330: A large atmospheric angle is given from
331: the large entry in the 23 position of the ``lop-sided''
332: Dirac neutrino mass matrix
333: $\tan \theta_{23} \approx e/f \sim 1$, once the Clebsch factors
334: and order one coefficients are included.
335: The solar angle is $\tan \theta_{12}\sim a/(b-c) \sim 1$.
336: The neutrino mass hierarchy is consistent with the LMA MSW solution.
337: This model has also been shown to give successful thermal leptogenesis
338: since the dominant right-handed neutrino is the heaviest \cite{Hirsch:2001dg}.
339: It also predicts a large rate for
340: $\tau \rightarrow \mu \gamma$ partly due to large $\tan \beta \sim 50$
341: also due to the large 23 element of the neutrino Dirac mass matrix
342: which leads large 23 contributions to the slepton
343: mass matrix after renormalisation group running \cite{Blazek:2001zm}.
344:
345: The above model is not based on a unified gauge group, and therefore
346: apparently gauge unification cannot be implemented in such a model.
347: However from the point of view of string theory the gauge couplings
348: may be unified along with gravity at the string scale.
349: As recently discussed \cite{Everett:2002pm} the
350: Pati-Salam model may emerge from an intersecting
351: D-brane model as shown in Fig.\ref{fig2}. The assumed symmetry breaking is
352: \beq
353: U(4)_{PS}^{(1)}\times U(4)_{PS}^{(2)} \rightarrow U(4)_{PS}
354: \eeq
355: Higgs states are present which can lead to such a breaking.
356: The $U(1)$s are broken by the Green-Schwartz mechanism, but one
357: $U(1)$ remains. In fact the $U(1)$s make it hard to decouple the
358: exotics. In the limit that the radii of compactification satisfy
359: $R_2\ll R_1$ we have a ``single brane limit'' with approximate gauge
360: unification. The model predicts the soft mass sum rule
361: \beq
362: m_h^2+m_{F_3}^2+m_{F^c_3}^2=M_3^2
363: \eeq
364: where $m_h$ is the Higgs soft mass,
365: $m_{F^c_3}$ is the right-handed third family soft mass,
366: $m_{F_3}$ is the left-handed third family soft mass,
367: and $M_3$ is the gluino soft mass, all evaluated at the high energy
368: scale.
369:
370:
371: \begin{figure}[th]
372: %\epsfxsize=10cm %width of figure - will enlarge/reduce the figures
373: %\epsfbox{fig3.eps}
374: %\figurebox{2cm}{3cm}{} %to have a box alone
375: \centerline{\epsfxsize=2.5in\epsfbox{slide2.eps}}
376: \caption{A D-brane set from which the
377: SUSY Pati-Salam model may emerge.\label{fig2}}
378: \end{figure}
379:
380: \begin{thebibliography}{0}
381: \bibitem{Jelley}
382: N. Jelley, these proceedings.
383: \bibitem{Smirnov}
384: A. Smirnov, these proceedings.
385:
386: \bibitem{seesaw}
387: M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond and R. Slansky in Sanibel Talk,
388: CALT-68-709, Feb 1979, and in {\it Supergravity} (North Holland,
389: Amsterdam 1979);
390: T. Yanagida in {\it Proc. of the Workshop on Unified Theory and
391: Baryon Number of the Universe}, KEK, Japan, 1979.
392:
393: \bibitem{seesaw2}
394: R.~N.~Mohapatra and G.~Senjanovic,
395: %``Neutrino Mass And Spontaneous Parity Nonconservation,''
396: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 44} (1980) 912;
397: %%CITATION = PRLTA,44,912;%%
398: J.~Schechter and J.~W.~Valle,
399: %``Neutrino Decay And Spontaneous Violation Of Lepton Number,''
400: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 25} (1982) 774.
401: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D25,774;%%
402:
403: %\cite{King:1998jw}
404: \bibitem{King:1998jw}
405: S.~F.~King,
406: %``Atmospheric and solar neutrinos with a heavy singlet,''
407: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 439} (1998) 350
408: [arXiv:hep-ph/9806440].
409: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9806440;%%
410:
411: %\cite{King:1999cm}
412: \bibitem{King:1999cm}
413: S.~F.~King,
414: %``Atmospheric and solar neutrinos from single right-handed neutrino dominance and U(1) family symmetry,''
415: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 562} (1999) 57
416: [arXiv:hep-ph/9904210].
417: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9904210;%%
418:
419: %\cite{King:2000mb}
420: \bibitem{King:2000mb}
421: S.~F.~King,
422: %``Large mixing angle MSW and atmospheric neutrinos from single right-handed neutrino dominance and U(1) family symmetry,''
423: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 576} (2000) 85
424: [arXiv:hep-ph/9912492].
425: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9912492;%%
426:
427: %\cite{King:2002nf}
428: \bibitem{King:2002nf}
429: S.~F.~King,
430: %``Constructing the large mixing angle MNS matrix in see-saw models with right-handed neutrino dominance,''
431: arXiv:hep-ph/0204360.
432: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0204360;%%
433:
434: %\cite{Lavignac:2002gf}
435: \bibitem{Lavignac:2002gf}
436: S.~Lavignac, I.~Masina and C.~A.~Savoy,
437: %``Large solar angle and seesaw mechanism: A bottom-up perspective,''
438: arXiv:hep-ph/0202086.
439: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0202086;%%
440:
441: %\cite{Akhmedov:1999uw}
442: \bibitem{Akhmedov:1999uw}
443: E.~K.~Akhmedov, G.~C.~Branco and M.~N.~Rebelo,
444: %``Linking solar and long baseline terrestrial neutrino experiments,''
445: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 84} (2000) 3535
446: [arXiv:hep-ph/9912205].
447: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9912205;%%
448:
449: %\cite{Feruglio:2002af}
450: \bibitem{Feruglio:2002af}
451: F.~Feruglio, A.~Strumia and F.~Vissani,
452: %``Neutrino oscillations and signals in beta and 0nu 2beta experiments,''
453: arXiv:hep-ph/0201291.
454: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0201291;%%
455:
456: \bibitem{PaSa}
457: J. C. Pati, A. Salam, Phys. Rev. {\bf D10}, 275 (1974).
458:
459: %\cite{Antoniadis:1988cm}
460: \bibitem{Antoniadis:1988cm}
461: I.~Antoniadis and G.~K.~Leontaris,
462: %``A Supersymmetric SU(4) X O(4) Model,''
463: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 216} (1989) 333.
464: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B216,333;%%
465:
466: %\cite{Antoniadis:1990hb}
467: \bibitem{Antoniadis:1990hb}
468: I.~Antoniadis, G.~K.~Leontaris and J.~Rizos,
469: %``A Three Generation SU(4) X O(4) String Model,''
470: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 245} (1990) 161.
471: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B245,161;%%
472:
473: %\cite{King:fv}
474: \bibitem{King:fv}
475: S.~F.~King,
476: %``SU(4) X SU(2)-L X SU(2)-R As A Surrogate Susy Gut,''
477: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 325} (1994) 129
478: [Erratum-ibid.\ B {\bf 325} (1994) 538].
479: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B325,129;%%
480:
481: %\cite{Allanach:1995sj}
482: \bibitem{Allanach:1995sj}
483: B.~C.~Allanach and S.~F.~King,
484: %``Fermion masses in a supersymmetric SU(4) x SU(2)-L x SU(2)-R model,''
485: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 456} (1995) 57
486: [arXiv:hep-ph/9502219].
487: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9502219;%%
488:
489: %\cite{Allanach:1995ch}
490: \bibitem{Allanach:1995ch}
491: B.~C.~Allanach and S.~F.~King,
492: %``Neutrino Masses and Mixing Angles in a Supersymmetric SU(4)$ \otimes $SU(2)$_L \otimes $SU(2)$_R$ Model,''
493: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 459} (1996) 75
494: [arXiv:hep-ph/9509205].
495: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9509205;%%
496:
497: %\cite{Allanach:1996hz}
498: \bibitem{Allanach:1996hz}
499: B.~C.~Allanach, S.~F.~King, G.~K.~Leontaris and S.~Lola,
500: %``A new approach to Yukawa textures in supersymmetric unified models with gauged family symmetries,''
501: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 56} (1997) 2632
502: [arXiv:hep-ph/9610517].
503: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9610517;%%
504:
505: %\cite{King:1997ia}
506: \bibitem{King:1997ia}
507: S.~F.~King and Q.~Shafi,
508: %``Minimal supersymmetric SU(4) x SU(2)L x SU(2)R,''
509: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 422} (1998) 135
510: [arXiv:hep-ph/9711288].
511: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9711288;%%
512:
513: %\cite{King:2000ge}
514: \bibitem{King:2000ge}
515: S.~F.~King and M.~Oliveira,
516: %``Neutrino masses and mixing angles in a realistic string-inspired model,''
517: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63} (2001) 095004
518: [arXiv:hep-ph/0009287].
519: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0009287;%%
520:
521: %\cite{Hirsch:2001d}
522: \bibitem{Hirsch:2001dg}
523: M.~Hirsch and S.~F.~King,
524: %``Leptogenesis with single right-handed neutrino dominance,''
525: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64} (2001) 113005
526: [arXiv:hep-ph/0107014].
527: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0107014;%%
528:
529: %\cite{Blazek:2001zm}
530: \bibitem{Blazek:2001zm}
531: T.~Blazek and S.~F.~King,
532: %``Muon anomalous magnetic moment and tau $\to$ mu gamma in a realistic string-inspired model of neutrino masses,''
533: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 518} (2001) 109
534: [arXiv:hep-ph/0105005].
535: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0105005;%%
536:
537: %\cite{Everett:2002pm}
538: \bibitem{Everett:2002pm}
539: L.~L.~Everett, G.~L.~Kane, S.~F.~King, S.~Rigolin and L.~T.~Wang,
540: %``Supersymmetric Pati-Salam models from intersecting D-branes,''
541: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 531} (2002) 263
542: [arXiv:hep-ph/0202100].
543: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0202100;%%
544:
545:
546: \end{thebibliography}
547:
548:
549:
550: \end{document}
551:
552:
553:
554:
555:
556:
557:
558:
559: