1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
2:
3: \usepackage{cite}
4: \usepackage{amssymb,amsmath}
5: \usepackage{epsf}
6: \usepackage{graphics}
7:
8: \def\mprp{\mbox{\tiny $\bot$}}
9: \def\mprl{\mbox{\tiny $\|$}}
10: \def\th{\mbox{th}}
11:
12: \title{\vspace*{-20mm}
13: \begin{flushright}
14: {\normalsize Yaroslavl State University\\
15: Preprint YARU-HE-02/09\\
16: hep-ph/0210029} \\[10mm]
17: \end{flushright}
18: General amplitude of the $n$ -- vertex\\
19: one-loop process in a strong magnetic field}
20:
21: \author{A. V. Kuznetsov, N. V. Mikheev, D. A. Rumyantsev \\[3mm]
22: {\small\it Division of Theoretical Physics,
23: Yaroslavl State (P.G.~Demidov) University,} \\
24: {\small\it Sovietskaya 14, 150000 Yaroslavl, Russian Federation}\\
25: {\small\tt E-mail: avkuzn@uniyar.ac.ru, mikheev@uniyar.ac.ru, rda@uniyar.ac.ru}
26: }
27:
28: \date{}
29:
30: \begin{document}
31:
32: \maketitle
33:
34: \thispagestyle{empty}
35:
36: \begin{abstract}
37:
38: \baselineskip=18pt
39:
40: A general analysis of the $n$-vertex loop amplitude in
41: a strong magnetic field is performed, based on the asymptotic form of
42: the electron propagator in the field.
43: As an example, the photon-neutrino processes are considered, where
44: one vertex in the amplitude is of a general type, and the other vertices are
45: of the vector type. It is shown, that for odd numbers
46: of vertices only the $SV_1 \ldots V_{n-1}$ amplitude grows linearly
47: with the magnetic field strength, while for even numbers of vertices
48: the linear growth takes place only in the amplitudes $PV_{1} \ldots V_{n-1}$,
49: $VV_{1} \ldots V_{n-1}$ and $AV_{1} \ldots V_{n-1}$.
50: The general expressions for the amplitudes of the processes
51: $\gamma \gamma \to \nu \bar\nu$ (in the framework of the model with the
52: effective $\nu \nu e e$ -- coupling of a scalar type) and
53: $\gamma \gamma \to \nu \bar\nu \gamma$ (in the framework of the Standard
54: Model) for arbitrary energies of particles are obtained.
55: A comparison with existing results is performed.
56: \end{abstract}
57:
58: \vfill
59:
60: \begin{center}
61: {\sl Talk presented at the 12th International Seminar \\
62: ``Quarks-2002'', \\
63: Valday and Novgorod, Russia, June 1-7, 2002}
64: \end{center}
65:
66: \newpage
67:
68: \section{Introduction}
69:
70: Nowadays, there exists a growing interest to astrophysical objects, where
71: the strong magnetic fields with the strength
72: $B>B_e$ can be generated $(B_e = m^2/e \simeq 4.41 \cdot 10^{13}$ Gs~\footnote{
73: We use natural units in which $c = \hbar = 1$, $m$ is the electron mass,
74: $e > 0$ is the elementary charge.} is the so-called critical field value).
75:
76: The influence of a strong external field on quantum processes is interesting
77: because it catalyses the processes, it changes the kinematics and it
78: induces new interactions. It is especially important to investigate
79: the influence of external field on the loop quantum processes where
80: only electrically neutral particles in the initial and the final states
81: are presented, such as neutrinos, photons and hypotetical
82: axions, familons and so on.
83: The external field influence on these loop processes is provided by the
84: sensitivity of the charged virtual fermion to the field and by the
85: change of the photon dispersion properties and, therefore,
86: the photon kinematics.
87:
88: The research of the loop processes of this type has a rather long history.
89: The two-vertex loop processes (the photon polarization operator in an
90: external field, the decays $\gamma\to\nu\bar{\nu}$, $\nu\to\nu\gamma$ and
91: so on) were studed in the
92: papers~\cite{Tsai:1974,Shabad:88,Skobelev:1995,Gvozdev:1996,Ioannisian:1997}.
93: The general expression for the two-vertex loop amplitude $j \to f \bar f
94: \to j'$ in the homogeneous magnetic and in the crossed field was obtaned in
95: the paper~\cite{Borovkov:1999}, where all combinations of
96: scalar, pseudoscalar, vector and axial-vector interactions
97: of the generalized currents $j,\,j'$ with fermions were considered.
98:
99: A loop process with three vertices is also intresting for theoreticians.
100: For example, the photon splitting in a magnetic
101: field $\gamma \to \gamma \gamma$ is forbidden
102: in vacuum.
103: The review~\cite{Papanian:1986} and the recent
104: papers~\cite{Adler:1996,Baier:1996,
105: Baier:1997,Chistyakov:1998,Kuznetsov:1999} were devoted to this process.
106: One more three-vertex loop process is the conversion of the photon pair
107: into the neutrino pair, $\gamma\gamma\to\nu\bar{\nu}$. This process
108: is interesting as a possible
109: channel of stellar cooling. A detailed list of references on
110: this process can be found in our paper~\cite{Kuznetsov:2002a}.
111:
112: It is well-known (the so-called Gell-Mann theorem~\cite{Gell-Mann:1961}),
113: that for massless neutrinos, for both photons on-shell and in the local
114: limit of the standard-model weak interaction, the process
115: $\gamma\gamma\to\nu\bar{\nu}$ is forbidden.
116: Because of this, the four-vertex loop process
117: with an additional photon $\gamma\gamma\to\nu\bar{\nu}\gamma$ was considered
118: by some authors.
119: In spite of the extra factor $\alpha$, this process has the
120: probability larger than the two-photon process.
121: The process $\gamma\gamma\to\nu\bar{\nu}\gamma$ was studied both in
122: vacuum (from the first paper~\cite{VanHieu:1963} to
123: the recent Refs.~\cite{Dicus:1997,
124: Dicus:1999,Abada:1999a,Abada:1999b,Abada:1999c}),
125: and under the stimulating influence of a strong magnetic
126: field~\cite{Loskutov:1987,Skobelev:2001,Kuznetsov:2002b}.
127:
128: So, the calculation of the amplitude of the $n$-vertex loop
129: quantum processes ($\gamma \gamma \to \nu \bar\nu$,
130: $\gamma \gamma \to \gamma \nu \bar\nu$,
131: the axion and familon processes
132: $\gamma \gamma \to \gamma a$, $\gamma \gamma \to \gamma \varPhi$
133: and so on) in a strong magnetic field is important, because
134: these results can be useful for astrophysical applications.
135:
136: The paper is organized as follows. A
137: general analysis of the $n$-vertex one-loop process amplitude in a strong
138: magnetic field is performed in Section 2.
139: The amplitude, in which the one vertex is of a general type
140: (scalar $S$, pseudoscalar $P$, vector $V$ or axial-vector $A$), and
141: the other vertices are of the vector type (contracted with photons),
142: is calculated in Section 3.
143: This amplitude is the main result of the paper.
144: The analitical expressions for the amplitudes of the processes
145: $\gamma \gamma \to \nu \bar\nu$ and $\gamma \gamma \to \nu \bar\nu \gamma$
146: are presented in Sections 4 and 5.
147:
148: \section{General analysis of the $n$-vertex one-loop processes in a strong
149: magnetic field}
150:
151: We use the effective Lagrangian for the interaction of the generalized
152: currents $j$ with electrons in the form:
153: %
154: \begin{eqnarray}
155: {\cal L}(x) \, = \, \sum \limits_{i} g_i
156: [\bar {\psi_e}(x) \Gamma_i \psi_e(x)] j_i,
157: \label{eq:L}
158: \end{eqnarray}
159: \noindent
160: where the generic index $i = S, P, V, A $ numbers the matrices
161: $\Gamma_i$, e.g.
162: $\Gamma_S = 1, \, \Gamma_P = \gamma_5, \, \Gamma_V = \gamma_{\alpha},
163: \, \Gamma_A = \gamma_{\alpha} \gamma_5 $,
164: $j$ is the corresponding quantum object (the current or the photon
165: polarisation vector),
166: $g_i$ are the coupling constants.
167: In particular, for the electron - photon interaction we have
168: $g_V = e,\,\Gamma_V = \gamma_{\alpha},\,j_{V\alpha}(x) = A_\alpha(x)$.
169:
170: \begin{figure}[htb]
171:
172: \epsffile[100 541 413 701]{n-v_fig1.eps}
173:
174: \vspace{10mm}
175:
176: \caption{The Feynman diagram for the n-vertex process in a strong magnetic field.}
177: \label{fig:loop1}
178:
179: \end{figure}
180:
181: A general amplitude of the process, corresponding to the effective
182: Lagrangian (\ref{eq:L}), is described by fig.~\ref{fig:loop1}.
183: In the strong field limit, after integration over the coordinates,
184: the amplitude takes the form
185: %
186: \begin{eqnarray}
187: {\cal M}_n \simeq
188: \frac{i \,(-1)^n \,e B}{(2 \pi)^3}
189: \exp \! \left (-\frac{R_{\mprp n}}{2eB}\right )
190: \int d^2 p_{\mprl} \, \mbox{Tr} \, \big \{\prod \limits^{n}_{k=1} g_k
191: \Gamma_k j_k S_{\mprl}(p-Q_k) \big \},
192: \label{eq:M2}
193: \end{eqnarray}
194:
195: \noindent
196: where $d^2 p_{\mprl} = dp_0 dp_z$, $S_{\mprl}(p) = \Pi_{-} ((p\gamma)_{\mprl} + m)/(p_{\mprl}^2 - m^2)$
197: is the asymptotic form of the electron propagator in the limit
198: $eB /\vert m^2 - p_{\mprl}^2 \vert \gg 1$,
199: $$R_{\mprp 2} = q_{\mprp 1}^2, \quad R_{\mprp 3} = q_{\mprp 1}^2 +
200: q_{\mprp 2}^2 + (q_1 \varphi \varphi q_2) + i(q_1 \varphi q_2),$$
201: %
202: $$R_{\mprp n}(n\ge 3) = \sum \limits^{n-1}_{k=1} Q_{\mprp k}^2 -
203: \sum \limits^{n-1}_{k=2} \sum \limits^{k-1}_{j=1} \left [(Q_k \varphi
204: \varphi Q_j) + i(Q_k \varphi Q_j)\right ],$$
205: %
206: $$ \quad Q_k = \sum \limits^{k}_{i=1}
207: q_i, \quad Q_n = 0,$$
208: %
209: $q_{\mprl}^2 = (q \tilde \varphi \tilde \varphi q)$,
210: $q_{\mprp}^2 = (q \varphi \varphi q)$,
211: $\varphi_{\alpha \beta} = F_{\alpha \beta} /B$
212: is the dimensionless field tensor,
213: ${\tilde \varphi}_{\alpha \beta} = \frac{1}{2} \varepsilon_{\alpha \beta
214: \mu \nu} \varphi_{\mu \nu}$ is the dual tensor,
215: and the indices of the four-vectors and tensors standing inside the
216: parentheses are contracted consecutively, e.g.
217: $(a \varphi b) = a_\alpha \varphi_{\alpha \beta} b_\beta$.
218:
219: As is seen from Eq.~(\ref{eq:M2}), the amplitude depends only on the longitudinal
220: components of the momenta, if the magnetic field strength is
221: the maximal physical parameter
222: $e B \gg q_{\mprp}^2, q_{\mprl}^2$.
223:
224: \section{The photons processes}
225:
226: Let the vertices $\Gamma_1 \ldots \Gamma_{n-1}$ are of the vector type, and
227: the vertex $\Gamma_n$ is arbitrary.
228: It can be shown that in the limit $q_{\mprp}^2 \ll e B $, for odd numbers
229: of vertices, only the $S V_1 \ldots V_{n-1}$ amplitude grows linearly
230: with the magnetic field strength, while for even numbers of vertices
231: the linear growth takes place only in the amplitudes $PV_{1} \ldots V_{n-1}$,
232: $VV_{1} \ldots V_{n-1}$ and $AV_{1} \ldots V_{n-1}$.
233:
234: It should be noted, that in the amplitude~(\ref{eq:M2})
235: the projecting operators $\Pi_-$ separate out
236: the photons of only one polarization $(\perp)$ of the two
237: possible (in Adler's notation~\cite{Ad71})
238: %
239: \begin{eqnarray}
240: \varepsilon^{(\mprl)}_{\alpha}
241: = \frac{\varphi_{\alpha\beta} q_{\beta}}{\sqrt{(q\varphi \varphi q)}},
242: \qquad
243: \varepsilon^{(\mprp)}_{\alpha}
244: = \frac{\widetilde \varphi_{\alpha\beta} q_{\beta}}
245: {\sqrt{(q \widetilde \varphi \widetilde \varphi q)}}.
246: \label{eq:vect}
247: \end{eqnarray}
248: %
249:
250: \noindent
251: As can be deduced from the corresponding analysis, the calculation of
252: any type of the amplitude can be reduced to
253: the evaluation of the scalar integrals
254: %
255: \begin{eqnarray}
256: S_{n}(Q_{1 \mprl},\ldots ,Q_{n \mprl}) = \int \, \frac{d^2 p_{\mprl}}{(2\pi)^2} \,
257: \prod \limits^{n}_{i=1} \frac{1}{(p - Q_i)^2_{\mprl} - m^2 + i\varepsilon}.
258: \label {eq:s1}
259: \end{eqnarray}
260:
261: Notice that the use of the standart method of Feynman parametrization
262: in calculation of the integrals~(\ref{eq:s1}) can be non-optimal,
263: because the number of integrations grows.
264: For example, if $n=3$, the double integral~(\ref{eq:s1})
265: is transformed into the integral over the two Feynman variables.
266: If $n=4$, the double integral~(\ref{eq:s1})
267: is transformed into the integral over the three Feynman variables and so on.
268: Here we suggest another way.
269: By integrating~(\ref{eq:s1}) over $dp_0dp_z$, we obtain
270: \begin{eqnarray}
271: S_{n}(Q_{1 \mprl},\ldots ,Q_{n \mprl}) =
272: \, \frac{i}{8m^2\pi}
273: \sum \limits^{n}_{i=1} \underset{l \ne i}{\sum \limits^{n}_{l=1}}
274: \, \left [ H \left (\frac{d_{il}^2}{4m^2} \right) + 1 \right ]
275: Re \, \bigg \{ \underset{k \ne i,l}
276: {\prod \limits^{n}_{k=1}} \frac{1}{Y_{ilk}} \bigg \} ,
277: \label {eq:s4}
278: \end{eqnarray}
279: \noindent
280:
281: where
282: \begin{displaymath}
283: Y_{ilk} = (d_{lk} d_{ik}) \, + \, i (d_{lk} \tilde \varphi d_{ik})
284: \sqrt{\frac{4m^2}{d_{il}^2} - 1}, \quad
285: d_{il}^{\alpha} = Q_{\mprl \, i}^{\alpha} - Q_{\mprl \, l}^{\alpha}.
286: \end{displaymath}
287:
288: The function $H(z)$ is defined by the expressions
289: \begin{eqnarray}
290: &&H(z) = \frac{1}{2\sqrt{-z(1 - z)}}
291: \ln{\frac{\sqrt{1 - z} + \sqrt{-z}}{\sqrt{1 - z} - \sqrt{-z}}} - 1,\quad z<0,
292: \nonumber \nonumber \\
293: &&H(z) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{z(1 - z)}}
294: \arctan{\sqrt{\frac{z}{1 - z}}} - 1,\quad 0<z<1,
295: \nonumber \nonumber \\
296: &&H(z) = - \frac{1}{2\sqrt{z(z - 1)}}
297: \ln{\frac{\sqrt{z} + \sqrt{z - 1}}{\sqrt{z} - \sqrt{z - 1}}}
298: - 1 + \frac{i\pi}{2\sqrt{z(z - 1)}} ,\quad z>1,
299: \nonumber
300: \end{eqnarray}
301: \noindent
302:
303: and it has the asymptotics
304: %
305: \begin{eqnarray}
306: &&H(z) \simeq \frac{2}{3}z + \frac{8}{15}z^2 + \frac{16}{35}z^3, \quad |z| \ll 1,
307: \label {eq:s5}
308: \end{eqnarray}
309: %
310: \begin{eqnarray}
311: &&H(z) \simeq -1 - \frac{1}{2z}\ln{4|z|}, \quad |z| \gg 1.
312: \label {eq:s6}
313: \end{eqnarray}
314:
315: \section{The process $\gamma \gamma \to \nu \bar\nu$}
316:
317: Let us apply the results obtained to the calculation of some
318: quantum processes. For the amplitude of the process
319: $\gamma \gamma \to \nu \bar\nu$ in the framework of the model with the
320: effective $\nu \nu e e$ -- coupling of a scalar type we obtain from
321: Eqs.~(\ref{eq:M2}),~(\ref{eq:s1}),~(\ref{eq:s4})
322: %
323: \begin{eqnarray}
324: {\cal M}_{3}^s \,& = &\,
325: \frac{2\alpha}{\pi} \, \frac{B}{B_e} \, g_{s} \, j_s \, m
326: \, \frac{(q_1 \widetilde \varphi \varepsilon^{(1)})
327: (q_2 \widetilde \varphi \varepsilon^{(2)})}
328: {4m^2 [(q_1 q_3)^2_{\mprl} - q^2_{1\mprl} q^2_{3\mprl}] +
329: q^2_{1\mprl} q^2_{2\mprl} q^2_{3\mprl}} \times
330: \nonumber \nonumber \\
331: &\times &\, \left \{ \left [q^2_{1\mprl} q^2_{3\mprl} -
332: 2m^2 (q^2_{3\mprl} + q^2_{1\mprl} - q^2_{2\mprl})\right ]
333: H \left (\frac{q_{1\mprl}^2}{4m^2} \right ) \right. \, +
334: \nonumber \nonumber \\
335: & + & \, \left [q^2_{2\mprl} q^2_{3\mprl} -
336: 2m^2 (q^2_{3\mprl} + q^2_{2\mprl} - q^2_{1\mprl})\right ]
337: H \left (\frac{q_{2\mprl}^2}{4m^2} \right ) \, +
338: \nonumber \nonumber \\
339: & + & \, \left. q^2_{3\mprl}(4m^2 -q^2_{3\mprl})
340: H \left (\frac{q_{3\mprl}^2}{4m^2} \right ) -
341: 2q^2_{3\mprl}(q_1q_2)_{\mprl} \, \right \},
342: \label{eq:MS3}
343: \end{eqnarray}
344:
345: \noindent
346: where $g_s = - 4 \; \zeta \; G_{\mbox{\normalsize{F}}}/\sqrt{2}$
347: is the effective $\nu \nu e e$ -- coupling constant in the
348: left-right-symmetric extension of the Standard Model,
349: $\zeta$ is the small mixing angle of the charged $W$ bosons,
350: $j_s = [\bar \nu_e(p_1) \nu_e(-p_2)]$ is Fourier transform
351: of the scalar neutrino current, $q_3 = p_1 + p_2$
352: is the neutrino pair momentum.
353:
354: Substituting the photon polarization vector $\varepsilon^{(\mprp)}_{\alpha}$
355: from Eq.~(\ref{eq:vect}) into~(\ref{eq:MS3})
356: and using~(\ref{eq:s5}) and~(\ref{eq:s6}), we obtain the asymptotics:
357:
358: \begin{itemize}
359: \item[a)]
360: at low photon energies, $\omega_{1,2} \lesssim m$
361: %
362: \begin{eqnarray}
363: {\cal M}_{3}^{s} \simeq \frac{8 \alpha}{3 \pi} \,
364: \frac{G_{\mbox{\normalsize{F}}}}{\sqrt{2}}\,
365: \frac{\zeta}{m}\;\frac{B}{B_e}\,
366: \left [\bar\nu_e (p_1) \, \nu_e (- p_2) \right ]\,
367: \sqrt{q_{1\mprl}^2 q_{2\mprl}^2} ;
368: \label{eq:M<}
369: \end{eqnarray}
370:
371: \item[b)]
372: at high photon energies, $\omega_{1,2} \gg m$, in the leading log
373: approximation:
374: %
375: \begin{eqnarray}
376: {\cal M}_{3}^{s} \simeq \frac{16 \alpha}{\pi} \,
377: \frac{G_{\mbox{\normalsize{F}}}}{\sqrt{2}}\,
378: \zeta\;\frac{B}{B_e}\,m^3 \,
379: \left [\bar\nu_e (p_1) \, \nu_e (- p_2) \right ]\,
380: \frac{1}{\sqrt{q_{1\mprl}^2 q_{2\mprl}^2}}\,
381: \ln \frac{\sqrt{q_{1\mprl}^2 q_{2\mprl}^2}}{m^2}.
382: \label{eq:M>}
383: \end{eqnarray}
384:
385: \end{itemize}
386: These expressions coincide with the results obtained in the
387: paper~\cite{Kuznetsov:2002a}.
388: %
389:
390: \section{The process $\gamma \gamma \to \nu \bar\nu \gamma $}
391:
392: The process of this type, where one initial photon is virtual, namely, the
393: photon conversion into neutrino pair on nucleus
394: was considered, in the framework of the Standard Model,
395: in the papers~\cite{Skobelev:2001, Kuznetsov:2002b}.
396: This process can be studied by using the amplitude of the transition
397: $\gamma \gamma \to \nu \bar\nu \gamma $, which can be obtained from
398: Eq.~(\ref{eq:M2}) in the form:
399: %
400: \begin{eqnarray}
401: {\cal M}_{4}^{VA} \,& = &\, - \,
402: \frac{8 i e^3}{\pi^2} \, \frac{B}{B_e} \,
403: \frac{G_{\mbox{\normalsize{F}}}}{\sqrt{2}} \, m^2 \times
404: \nonumber \nonumber \\
405: &\times & (q_1 \widetilde \varphi \varepsilon^{(1)})
406: (q_2 \widetilde \varphi \varepsilon^{(2)})
407: (q_3 \widetilde \varphi \varepsilon^{(3)})
408: [g_V (j\widetilde \varphi q_4) +
409: g_A (j\widetilde \varphi \widetilde \varphi q_4)] \times
410: \nonumber \nonumber \\
411: &\times & \frac{1}{D} \left \{ I_4(q_{1\mprl},q_{2\mprl},q_{3\mprl})
412: + I_4(q_{2\mprl},q_{1\mprl},q_{3\mprl}) +
413: I_4(q_{1\mprl},q_{3\mprl},q_{2\mprl}) \right \},
414: \label{eq:MVA4}
415: \end{eqnarray}
416:
417: \noindent
418: where
419: $g_V,\;g_A$ are the vector and axial-vector constants of the effective
420: $\nu \nu e e$ Lagrangian of the Standard Model,
421: $g_V = \pm 1/2 + 2 \sin^2 \theta_W, \; g_A = \pm 1/2$,
422: here the upper signs correspond to the electron neutrino, and
423: lower signs correspond to the muon and tau neutrinos;
424: $j_{\alpha} = [\bar \nu_e(p_1) \gamma_{\alpha} (1 + \gamma_5) \nu_e(-p_2)]$
425: is the Fourier transform of the neutrino current;
426: $q_4 = p_1 + p_2$ is the neutrino pair momentum;
427: $$D = (q_1q_2)_{\mprl}(q_3q_4)_{\mprl} + (q_1q_3)_{\mprl}(q_2q_4)_{\mprl} +
428: (q_1q_4)_{\mprl}(q_2q_3)_{\mprl}.$$
429:
430: The formfactor $I_4 (q_{1 \mprl} ,q_{2 \mprl} ,q_{3 \mprl})$ is expressed
431: in terms of the integrals~(\ref{eq:s1}),~(\ref{eq:s4})
432: \begin{eqnarray}
433: &&I_4 (q_{1 \mprl}, q_{2 \mprl}, q_{3 \mprl}) \, = \,
434: S_3 (q_{1 \mprl} + q_{2 \mprl}, q_{4 \mprl},0) + S_3 (q_{1 \mprl}, q_{4 \mprl},0) +
435: \nonumber \nonumber \\
436: && + S_3 (q_{1 \mprl} + q_{2 \mprl}, q_{1 \mprl},0) +
437: S_3 (q_{2 \mprl} - q_{3 \mprl}, q_{2 \mprl},0) +
438: \nonumber \nonumber \\
439: && + [6 m^2 - (q_1 + q_2)_{\mprl}^2 - (q_2 - q_3)_{\mprl}^2]
440: S_4 (q_{1 \mprl}, q_{1 \mprl}+q_{2 \mprl}, q_{4 \mprl},0).
441: \end{eqnarray}
442:
443: Using the asymptotics of the functions $H(z)$, we obtain
444: \begin{itemize}
445: \item[a)]
446:
447: at low photon energies, $\omega_{1,2,3} \ll m$
448: %
449: \begin{eqnarray}
450: &&{\cal M}_{4}^{VA} \, \simeq \,
451: - \frac{2 e^3}{15\pi^2} \, \frac{B}{B_e} \,
452: \frac{G_{\mbox{\normalsize{F}}}}{\sqrt{2}} \, \frac{1}{m^4} \times
453: \nonumber \nonumber \\
454: &&\times (q_1 \widetilde \varphi \varepsilon^{(1)})
455: (q_2 \widetilde \varphi \varepsilon^{(2)})
456: (q_3 \widetilde \varphi \varepsilon^{(3)})
457: [g_V (j\widetilde \varphi q_4) +
458: g_A (j\widetilde \varphi \widetilde \varphi q_4)],
459: \label{eq:I_4_low}
460: \end{eqnarray}
461:
462: which is in agreement with the result of the
463: paper~\cite{Kuznetsov:2002b};
464: %
465: \item[b)]
466: at high photon energies, $\omega_{1,2,3} \gg m$, in the leading log
467: approximation we obtain:
468: %
469: \begin{eqnarray}
470: &&{\cal M}_{4}^{V,A} \, \simeq \,
471: - \frac{8 e^3}{3\pi^2} \, \frac{G_{\mbox{\normalsize{F}}}}{\sqrt{2}} \,
472: \frac{B}{B_e} \, m^4 \times
473: \nonumber \nonumber \\
474: &&\times (q_1 \widetilde \varphi \varepsilon^{(1)})
475: (q_2 \widetilde \varphi \varepsilon^{(2)})
476: (q_3 \widetilde \varphi \varepsilon^{(3)})
477: [g_V (j\widetilde \varphi q_4) +
478: g_A (j\widetilde \varphi \widetilde \varphi q_4)] \times
479: \nonumber \nonumber \\
480: &&\times \frac{1}{q^2_{1 \mprl}q^2_{2 \mprl}q^2_{3 \mprl}q^2_{4 \mprl}}
481: \ln \frac{\sqrt{q_{1 \mprl}^2 q_{2 \mprl}^2 q_{3 \mprl}^2}}{m^3}.
482: \label{eq:I_4_hig}
483: \end{eqnarray}
484: %
485: \end{itemize}
486: To the best of our knowledge, this result is obtained for the first time.
487:
488: \section{Conclusions}
489:
490: We have obtained the general expressions~(\ref{eq:MS3}) and~(\ref{eq:MVA4}) for
491: the amplitudes of the processes
492: $\gamma \gamma \to \nu \bar\nu$ (in the framework of the model with the
493: effective $\nu \nu e e$ coupling of a scalar type) and
494: $\gamma \gamma \to \nu \bar\nu \gamma$ (in the framework of the Standard Model)
495: for arbitrary energies of particles.
496: A comparison with the existing results has been performed.
497:
498: \bigskip
499:
500: {\bf Acknowledgements}
501:
502: We express our deep gratitude to the organizers of the
503: Seminar ``Quarks-2002'' for warm hospitality.
504:
505: This work was supported in part by the Russian Foundation for Basic
506: Research under the Grant No.~01-02-17334
507: and by the Ministry of Education of Russian Federation under the
508: Grant No.~E00-11.0-5.
509:
510: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
511: \newpage
512:
513: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
514: %
515: \bibitem{Tsai:1974}
516: W.-Y. Tsai,
517: Phys. Rev. {\bf D 10}, 2699 (1974).
518: %
519: \bibitem{Shabad:88}
520: A. E. Shabad, Tr. Fiz. Inst. Akad. Nauk SSSR
521: {\bf 192}, 5 (1988).
522: %
523: \bibitem{Skobelev:1995}
524: V. V. Skobelev, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. {\bf 108}, 3 (1995)
525: [JETP {\bf 81}, 1 (1995)].
526: %
527: \bibitem{Gvozdev:1996}
528: A. A. Gvozdev, N. V. Mikheev, L. A. Vassilevskaya,
529: Phys. Rev. {\bf D 54}, 5674 (1996).
530: %
531: \bibitem{Ioannisian:1997}
532: A. N. Ioannisian, G. G. Raffelt,
533: Phys. Rev. {\bf D 55}, 7038 (1997).
534: %
535: \bibitem{Borovkov:1999}
536: M. Yu. Borovkov, A. V. Kuznetsov, N. V. Mikheev,
537: Yad. Fiz. {\bf 62}, 1714 (1999)
538: [Phys. At. Nucl. {\bf 62}, 1601 (1999)].
539: %
540: \bibitem{Papanian:1986}
541: V. O. Papanian, V. I. Ritus, Tr. Fiz. Inst. Akad. Nauk SSSR
542: {\bf 168}, 120 (1986).
543: %
544: \bibitem{Adler:1996}
545: S. L. Adler, C. Schubert,
546: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 77}, 1695 (1996).
547: %
548: \bibitem{Baier:1996}
549: V. N. Baier, A. I. Milstein and R. Zh. Shaisultanov,
550: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 77}, 1691 (1996).
551: %
552: \bibitem{Baier:1997}
553: V. N. Baier, A. I. Milstein and R. Zh. Shaisultanov, Zh. Eksp. Teor.
554: Fiz. {\bf 111}, 52 (1997)
555: %
556: \bibitem{Chistyakov:1998}
557: M. V. Chistyakov, A. V. Kuznetsov, N. V. Mikheev,
558: Phys. Lett. {\bf B 434}, 67 (1998).
559: %
560: \bibitem{Kuznetsov:1999}
561: A. V. Kuznetsov, N. V. Mikheev, M. V. Chistyakov,
562: Yad. Fiz. {\bf 62}, 1638 (1999)
563: [Phys. At. Nucl. {\bf 62}, 1535 (1999)].
564: %
565: \bibitem{Kuznetsov:2002a}
566: A. V. Kuznetsov, N. V. Mikheev, D. A. Rumyantsev,
567: Yad. Fiz. {\bf 66}, (2003) (in press).
568: %
569: \bibitem{Gell-Mann:1961}
570: M. Gell-Mann,
571: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 6}, 70 (1961).
572: %
573: \bibitem{VanHieu:1963}
574: Nguen Van Hieu, E. P. Shabalin,
575: Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. {\bf 44}, 1003 (1963)
576: [JETP {\bf 17}, 681 (1963)].
577: %
578: \bibitem{Dicus:1997}
579: D. A. Dicus, W. W. Repko,
580: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 79}, 569 (1997).
581: %
582: \bibitem{Dicus:1999}
583: D. A. Dicus, C. Kao, W. W. Repko,
584: Phys. Rev. {\bf D 59}, 013005 (1999).
585: %
586: \bibitem{Abada:1999a}
587: A. Abada, J. Matias, R. Pittau,
588: Phys. Rev. {\bf D 59}, 013008 (1999).
589: %
590: \bibitem{Abada:1999b}
591: A. Abada, J. Matias, R. Pittau,
592: Nucl. Phys. {\bf B 543}, 255 (1999).
593: %
594: \bibitem{Abada:1999c}
595: A. Abada, J. Matias, R. Pittau,
596: Phys. Lett. {\bf B 450}, 173 (1999).
597: %
598: \bibitem{Loskutov:1987}
599: Yu. M. Loskutov, V. V. Skobelev,
600: Theor. Mat. Phys. {\bf 70}, 303 (1987).
601: %
602: \bibitem{Skobelev:2001}
603: V. V. Skobelev, Zh. Eksp. Teor.
604: Fiz. {\bf 120}, 786 (2001)
605: [JETP {\bf 93}, 685 (2001)].
606: %
607: \bibitem{Kuznetsov:2002b}
608: A. V. Kuznetsov and N. V. Mikheev,
609: Pis'ma v ZhETF {\bf 75}, 531 (2002)
610: [JETP Letters {\bf 75}, 441 (2002)].
611: %
612: \bibitem{Ad71}
613: S. L. Adler, {\it Ann. Phys. N.Y.} {\bf 67} (1971) 599.
614: %
615: \end{thebibliography}
616: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
617: \end{document}
618: