1: %
2: % gDA.tex
3: %
4: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
5: % "Leading-twist two gluon distribution amplitude
6: % and exclusive processes
7: % involving $\eta$ and $\eta'$ mesons"
8: %
9: % K. Passek
10: %
11: % Exclusive Processes at High Momentum Transfer,
12: % Jefferson Lab Workshop, May 15-18,2002
13: %
14: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
15:
16: \documentclass{ws-procs9x6}
17:
18: \newcommand{\req}[1]{(\ref{#1})}
19:
20: \newcommand{\muR}{\mu_{R}^{2}}
21: \newcommand{\muF}{\mu_{F}^{2}}
22: \newcommand{\muO}{\mu_{0}^{2}}
23: \newcommand{\eps}{\epsilon}
24: \newcommand{\etaS}{\widetilde{\eta}_1}
25: \newcommand{\etaO}{\widetilde{\eta}_8}
26: \newcommand{\EtaS}{\eta_1}
27: \newcommand{\EtaO}{\eta_8}
28:
29: \newcommand{\ovl}[1]{\overline{#1}}
30: \def\nbn{{n}\overline{n}}
31: \def\qbq{{q}\overline{q}}
32: \def\sbs{{s}\overline{s}}
33: \def\cbc{{c}\overline{c}}
34: \def\ubu{{u}\overline{u}}
35: \def\dbd{{d}\overline{d}}
36: \newcommand{\sla}{\hspace*{-0.20cm}/}
37:
38: \begin{document}
39:
40: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
41: \title{Leading-twist two gluon distribution amplitude
42: and exclusive processes involving $\eta$ and $\eta'$ mesons}
43:
44: \author{K. PASSEK}
45:
46:
47:
48: \address{Fachbereich Physik, Universit\"at Wuppertal, 42097
49: Wuppertal, Germany $^a$\\
50: E:mail: passek@theorie.physik.uni-wuppertal.de\\[0.1cm]
51: {\bf (May, 2002)} $^b$%\footnotemark[2]
52: }
53:
54: \maketitle
55: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
56:
57: \footnotetext[1]{On leave of absence from the
58: Rudjer Bo\v{s}kovi\'{c} Institute, Zagreb, Croatia.}
59: \footnotetext[2]{Talk presented at the workshop on Exclusive Processes at
60: High Momentum Transfer, Jefferson Lab, Newport News, Virginia, 15-18 May 2002.}
61:
62: \abstracts{
63: I briefly review the formalism for
64: treating the leading-twist
65: two-gluon states appearing in processes
66: which involve $\eta$ and $\eta'$ mesons.
67: The constraints on the size of the lowest order
68: Gegenbauer coefficients of the two-gluon distribution amplitude
69: are obtained from the fit to the
70: $\eta$ and $\eta'$ transition form factor data.
71: The results are applied to
72: $\chi \rightarrow \eta \eta (\eta' \eta')$ decays
73: and deeply virtual electroproduction of
74: $\eta$ and $\eta'$ mesons.
75: }
76:
77: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
78: \section{Introduction}
79: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
80:
81: The description of the hard exclusive processes
82: involving light mesons
83: is based on the factorization of the short-
84: and long-distance dynamics and the application
85: of the perturbative QCD\cite{sHSA}.
86: The former is represented by the
87: process-dependent and perturbatively calculable
88: elementary hard-scattering amplitude,
89: in which meson is replaced by its (valent) Fock states,
90: while the latter is described by
91: the process-independent meson distribution
92: amplitude (DA),
93: which encodes the soft physics.
94: %which represents the probability of finding
95: %the corresponding Fock state in a meson.
96: %Although, the DA
97: %is essentially a nonperturbative quantity,
98: %its evolution can be treated perturbatively.
99: The lowest Fock state of flavour-nonsinglet mesons
100: consists of quark and antiquark, while
101: for flavour-singlet meson the two-gluon state
102: appears additionally.
103: In this paper I give a status report on work of Ref. [2],
104: and discuss the proper treatment and the importance of
105: these two-gluon states.
106:
107: %In order
108: %to make connection with physical meson states
109: %the proper $\eta$-$\eta'$ mixing scheme
110: %has to be adopted.
111: On the basis of recent results\cite{Leutwyleretc,FeldmannKS98etc}
112: on $\eta$ and $\eta'$ mixing, we adopt the following
113: representation of $\eta$ and $\eta'$ in a
114: octet-singlet basis:
115: \begin{eqnarray}
116: |\eta\phantom{'}\rangle &=& \cos{\theta_8}\, |\widetilde{\eta}_8\rangle
117: - \sin{\theta_1}\, |\widetilde{\eta}_1\rangle
118: \, ,
119: \nonumber \\
120: |\eta'\rangle &=& \sin{\theta_8}\, |\widetilde{\eta}_8\rangle
121: + \cos{\theta_1}\, |\widetilde{\eta}_1\rangle
122: \, ,
123: \label{eq:OSbasis}
124: \end{eqnarray}
125: where the pure octet ($\etaO$) and singlet ($\etaS$)
126: states are given by
127: \begin{eqnarray}
128: \left| \etaS \right> & = &
129: \frac{f_1}{2 \sqrt{6}} \left[
130: \phi_1(x) \big| (u \bar{u} + d \bar{d} + s \bar{s})/\sqrt{3} \big>
131: + \phi_g(x) \left| gg \right> \right]
132: \, ,
133: \label{eq:FsEta1} \nonumber \\
134: \left| \etaO \right> &=&
135: \frac{f_8}{2 \sqrt{6}} \;
136: \phi_8(x) \big| (u \bar{u} + d \bar{d} - 2 s \bar{s})/\sqrt{6} \big>
137: \, ,
138: \label{eq:FsEta8}
139: \end{eqnarray}
140: and higher Fock states are neglected.
141: In this representation, the mixing dependence is solely
142: embedded in the $\theta_8$ and $\theta_1$ angles, while
143: in more general approach different distribution amplitudes
144: $\phi_8^P$ and $\phi_1^P$ could be assumed for $P=\eta,\eta'$.
145: The numerical values\cite{FeldmannKS98etc}
146: $f_8 = 1.26 f_\pi$, $f_1 = 1.17 f_\pi$,
147: $\theta_8 = -21.2^\circ$, and $\theta_1=-9.2^\circ$ are used in this
148: work.
149: %
150: Alternatively, one could use the recently
151: suggested quark-flavour basis\cite{FeldmannKS98etc},
152: but the analysis of DA evolution
153: is more straightforward in the above given octet-singlet basis.
154:
155: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
156: \section{Two gluon distribution amplitude and
157: the transition form factor for the flavour-singlet meson}
158: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
159:
160: Employing for this section
161: more transparent notation $\phi_q \equiv \phi_1$,
162: the DA evolution equation for $\etaS$
163: takes the matrix form
164: \begin{equation}
165: \muF \frac{\partial}{\partial \muF}
166: \left(
167: \begin{array}[c]{c}
168: \phi_q(x,\muF) \\[0.2cm]
169: \phi_g(x,\muF)
170: \end{array}
171: \right)=
172: V(x,u,\alpha_S(\muF)) \, \otimes \,
173: \left(
174: \begin{array}[c]{c}
175: \phi_q(u,\muF) \\[0.2cm]
176: \phi_g(u,\muF)
177: \end{array}
178: \right)
179: \, ,
180: \label{eq:evDA}
181: \end{equation}
182: where $\otimes$ denotes the usual convolution symbol.
183: The kernel $V$ is 2x2 matrix with a well defined expansion in
184: $\alpha_S$.
185: The evolution of the flavour-singlet pseudoscalar meson
186: distribution amplitude (DA)
187: has been investigated in a number of papers%
188: \cite{Terentev81,gDAev,Ohrndorf81}.
189: Most of the results\cite{Terentev81,gDAev} are in agreement
190: up to differences in conventions.
191: On the other hand, the consistent set of
192: conventions has to be used in calculation of both
193: the hard-scattering and the distribution amplitude,
194: and these are not easy to extract from the literature.
195:
196: Following the recent analysis of the pion
197: transition form factor\cite{MelicNP01},
198: we have performed a detailed next-to-leading order (NLO) analysis of
199: the $\etaS$ transition form factor taking into account
200: both hard-scattering and perturbatively calculable DA
201: part, and this enabled us to fix and test the convention
202: we are using, and to make a connection with other conventions.
203:
204: The hard-scattering amplitude
205: one obtains by evaluating
206: the $\gamma^* + \gamma \rightarrow q \overline{q}$
207: and
208: $\gamma^* + \gamma \rightarrow gg$
209: amplitudes which we denote by
210: $T_{q \bar{q}}(u,Q^2)$ and $T_{gg}(u,Q^2)$, respectively.
211: Owing to the fact that final state quarks and gluons are taken to be
212: massless and onshell,
213: $T_{q \bar{q}}$ and $T_{gg}$ contain collinear singularities,
214: which have to be factorized out in order to obtain
215: the finite quantities $T_{H,q \bar{q}}$ and $T_{H,gg}$:
216: \begin{eqnarray}
217: T(u,Q^2) &=&
218: %\Big(
219: %T_{q \bar{q}}(u,Q^{2}) \quad
220: %T_{gg}(u,Q^{2}) \Big)
221: %\nonumber \\ &=&
222: \Big(
223: T_{H,q \bar{q}}(x,Q^{2},\muF) \quad
224: T_{H,gg}(x,Q^{2},\muF) \Big)
225: \otimes Z^{-1}(x,u,\muF)
226: \, .
227: \label{eq:etaT}
228: \end{eqnarray}
229: On the other hand, the unrenormalized quark and gluon
230: distribution amplitudes $\phi_q(u)$ and $\phi_g(u)$
231: are defined in terms of
232: $\langle 0 |\bar{\Psi}(-z) \gamma^+ \gamma_5 \Omega \Psi(z)
233: | \etaS \rangle$%
234: and
235: $\langle 0 |G^{+ \alpha}(-z) \, \Omega \,
236: \tilde{G}^{\: \: \: +}_{\alpha}(z)| \etaS \rangle$, respectively.
237: %are defined by
238: %\begin{eqnarray}
239: % \Phi_q (u) &=& \int \frac{dz^-}{2 \pi} e^{i(u-(1-u))(P z)}
240: % \left< 0 \left|
241: % \bar{\Psi}(-z) \, \frac{\gamma^+ \gamma_5}{2\sqrt{2}}
242: % \, \Omega \, \Psi(z)
243: % \right| \etaS \right>%_{(z^+=z_{\perp}=0)}
244: % ,
245: %\label{eq:unPhiqgenLB}
246: %\nonumber \\
247: % \Phi_g (u) &=& \frac{-i}{2 (n \cdot P)} \int \frac{dz^-}{2 \pi}
248: %e^{i(u-(1-u)) (P z)}
249: % \left< 0 \left|
250: %G^{+ \alpha}(-z) \, \Omega \, \tilde{G}^{\: \: \: +}_{\alpha}(z)
251: % \right| \etaS \right>%_{(z^+=z_{\perp}=0)}
252: % ,
253: %\label{eq:unPhiggenLB}
254: %\label{eq:unPhiLB}
255: %\end{eqnarray}
256: %where $P=[P^+,0,\vec{0}_{\perp}]$ and
257: %$n$ is the four vector defined by
258: %$n=[0,1,\vec{0}_{\perp}]$.
259: The renormalization introduces the mixing of these
260: quark and gluon composite operators
261: and
262: \begin{equation}
263: \phi(u) =
264: \left(
265: \begin{array}[c]{c}
266: \phi_q(u) \\
267: \phi_g(u)
268: \end{array}
269: \right) =
270: Z(u,x,\muF) \otimes
271: \left(
272: \begin{array}[c]{c}
273: \phi_q(x,\muF) \\[0.2cm]
274: \phi_g(x,\muF)
275: \end{array}
276: \right)
277: \, .
278: \label{eq:etaPhiZPhi}
279: \end{equation}
280: We note that $Z$ represents a 2x2 matrix.
281: Perturbation theory cannot be used for a direct evaluation of
282: $\Phi(u)$, but replacing $|\etaS\rangle$
283: by $|q \overline{q}\rangle$ or $|gg\rangle$
284: enables us to obtain the perturbatively calculable DA part
285: and to determine matrix $Z$.
286: Finally, the $\etaS$ transition form factor is
287: given by
288: \begin{equation}
289: F_{\gamma^* \gamma \etaS}(Q^{2}) = \frac{f_1}{2 \sqrt{6}} \,
290: T(u,Q^{2}) \, \otimes \, \phi(u)
291: = \frac{f_1}{2 \sqrt{6}} \,
292: T_H(x,Q^{2},\muF) \, \otimes \, \phi(u,\muF)
293: .
294: \label{eq:etffCF1}
295: \end{equation}
296: Hence, the singularities, which appear in the calculation of
297: the hard-scattering \req{eq:etaT} and the
298: DA part \req{eq:etaPhiZPhi}
299: should cancel, and we have used this requirement to
300: check the consistency of our calculation.
301: %The finite hard-scattering amplitude
302: %$T_{H,q\overline{q}}(x,Q^2,\muF)$ is up to the colour
303: %factor the same as in the pion case\cite{MelicNP01},
304: %while it can be shown that $x$-dependence of
305: %$T_{H,gg}(x,Q^2,\muF)$ is in agreement with the results of
306: %deeply virtual Compton scattering\cite{DVCS}.
307:
308: By differentiating \req{eq:etaPhiZPhi}
309: with respect to $\muF$ one obtains
310: the DA evolution equation \req{eq:evDA}
311: with evolution potential $V$ expressed in terms of $Z$
312: $ V = -Z^{-1} \, \otimes \, \left( \muF
313: \partial/\partial \muF \, Z
314: \right) $.
315: The solutions of the leading-order (LO) evolution equation
316: are given by
317: \begin{eqnarray}
318: \phi_q(x,\muF) &=& 6 x (1-x)
319: \left[ 1
320: + \sum_{n=2}^{\infty}{}'
321: {\ B_n^{q}(\muF)} \: C_n^{3/2}(2 x -1) \right]
322: \nonumber \\[0.1cm]
323: \phi_g(x,\muF) &=& x^2 (1-x)^2
324: \sum_{n=2}^{\infty}{}'
325: { B_n^{g}(\muF)} \: C_{n-1}^{5/2}(2 x -1)
326: \, ,
327: \label{eq:DAres}
328: \end{eqnarray}
329: where
330: \begin{eqnarray}
331: { B_n^q(\muF)} & = &
332: B_n^+(\mu_0^2)
333: \left( \frac{\alpha_S(\mu_0^2)}{\alpha_S(\muF)} \right)^{%
334: \frac{ \gamma_{+}^n}{\beta_0}} +
335: { \rho_n^-} \, B_n^-(\mu_0^2)
336: \left( \frac{\alpha_S(\mu_0^2)}{\alpha_S(\muF)} \right)^{%
337: \frac{ \gamma_{-}^n}{\beta_0}}
338: \nonumber \\[0.1cm]
339: { B_n^q(\muF)} & = &
340: {\rho_n^+} \, B_n^+(\mu_0^2)
341: \left( \frac{\alpha_S(\mu_0^2)}{\alpha_S(\muF)} \right)^{%
342: \frac{\gamma_{+}^n}{\beta_0}} +
343: B_n^-(\mu_0^2)
344: \left( \frac{\alpha_S(\mu_0^2)}{\alpha_S(\muF)} \right)^{%
345: \frac{ \gamma_{-}^n}{\beta_0}}
346: \, .
347: \end{eqnarray}
348: The coefficients $B_n^{\pm}(\mu_0^2)$, i.e.,
349: $B_n^{q,(g)}(\mu_0^2)$, represent nonperturbative input at
350: scale $\mu_0^2$, while
351: $\gamma^{\pm}_n
352: = 1/2 \left[
353: \left( \gamma^{qq}_n+ \gamma^{gg}_n \right)
354: \pm \sqrt{ \left( \gamma^{qq}_n- \gamma^{gg}_n \right)^2
355: +4 \gamma^{qg}_n \gamma^{gq}_n }
356: \right]$
357: and
358: \begin{equation}
359: \rho_{n}^+ =
360: 6 \; \frac{\gamma^{gq}_n}{\gamma^+_n - \gamma^{gg}_n}
361: \, ,
362: \qquad
363: \rho_{n}^- =
364: \frac{1}{6}\; \frac{\gamma^{qg}_n}{\gamma^-_n - \gamma^{qq}_n}
365: \,
366: \label{eq:rho}
367: \end{equation}
368: are defined in terms of anomalous dimensions
369: $\gamma^{qq}_n=\gamma_n^{(0)}$\cite{MelicNP01},
370: $\gamma^{gg}_n$\cite{Terentev81},
371: \begin{equation}
372: \gamma^{qg}_n = \sqrt{n_f C_F} \;
373: \frac{n (n+3)}{3 (n+1) (n+2)}
374: \qquad
375: \gamma^{gq}_n = \sqrt{n_f C_F} \;
376: \frac{12}{ (n+1) (n+2)}
377: \, .
378: \label{eq:andim}
379: \end{equation}
380: The DA $\phi_q$ is normalized to 1,
381: %i.e., $ \int_0^1 dx \; \phi_q(x, \muF)=1$,
382: but, since
383: %$\phi_g(x, \muF)=-\phi_g(1-x, \muF)$ and
384: $ \int_0^1 dx \; \phi_g(x, \muF)=0 $,
385: there is no such natural way to normalize
386: $\phi_g$.
387: It is important to emphasize that any change of the
388: normalization of the gluon DA
389: is accompanied by the corresponding change
390: in the hard-scattering part.
391: Namely, for $\phi_g \rightarrow \sigma \, \phi_g$,
392: the projection of $gg$ state on the $\etaS$ state,
393: which can be derived from the definition of the
394: gluon distribution amplitude,
395: gets modified by factor $1/\sigma$, i.e.,
396: \begin{equation}
397: \frac{i}{2} \;
398: \eps^{\mu \nu \alpha \beta} \;
399: \frac{n_{\alpha} P_{\beta}}{n\cdot P} \;
400: \frac{1}{x(1-x)}
401: \rightarrow
402: \frac{1}{\sigma} \; \frac{i}{2} \;
403: \eps^{\mu \nu \alpha \beta} \;
404: \frac{n_{\alpha} P_{\beta}}{n\cdot P} \;
405: \frac{1}{x(1-x)}
406: \, ,
407: \label{eq:gg}
408: \end{equation}
409: and, thus, the hard-scattering amplitude changes
410: while the physical quantity ($F_{\gamma* \gamma \etaS}$, in this case)
411: remains independent of the choice of convention.
412: %On the other hand,
413: By inspecting Eqs. (\ref{eq:DAres}-\ref{eq:rho}),
414: it is easy to see
415: that the change of the normalization
416: of $\phi_g$ can be translated into the change
417: of the off-diagonal anomalous dimensions
418: \begin{equation}
419: \gamma_n^{qg} \rightarrow \frac{1}{\sigma} \gamma_n^{qg}
420: \qquad
421: \gamma_n^{gq} \rightarrow \sigma \, \gamma_n^{gq}
422: \label{eq:anch}
423: \end{equation}
424: and
425: of the coefficient
426: $B_n^{-}(\mu_0^2) \rightarrow \sigma B_n^{-}(\mu_0^2)$.
427: The former can be easily understood in the ``operator''
428: language, i.e., by considering the impact of the change
429: of the normalization of the gluon operator
430: on the anomalous dimensions.
431: Hence, by employing \req{eq:anch} along with \req{eq:andim}
432: and \req{eq:gg}, we can consistently change our conventions in order to
433: compare our results with other calculations from the literature.
434: For historical reasons (comparison with the forward case),
435: in what follows $\sigma=\sqrt{n_f/C_F}$ is used.
436: %We return to notation $B_n^1 \equiv B_n^q$.
437:
438:
439: \section{Applications}
440:
441: Using the mixing scheme defined in Eq. \req{eq:OSbasis},
442: we have obtained the NLO leading-twist prediction
443: for the $\eta$ and $\eta'$ transition form factors.
444: For the treatment of $\phi_8(x,\muF)$, we use the well-known
445: LO result for the flavour-nonsinglet meson
446: distribution amplitude\cite{sHSA,MelicNP01}.
447: We truncate the Gegenbauer series at $n=2$, and fit our results
448: to the experimental data\cite{exptff}.
449: The fits are carried through with $\mu_R=Q/\sqrt{2}$ and $\mu_F=Q$,
450: with $\alpha_S$ evaluated from the two-loop expression with $n_f=4$ and
451: $\Lambda^{(4)}_{\overline{MS}}=305$ MeV.
452: For $Q^2\geq 2$ GeV$^2$ and $\mu_0=1$ GeV, the results of the fits read
453: \begin{equation}
454: B_2^8(\muO) = -0.04 \pm 0.04 \quad
455: B_2^1(\muO) = -0.08 \pm 0.04 \quad
456: B_2^g(\muO) = 9 \pm 12
457: \, .
458: \label{eq:fit81g}
459: \end{equation}
460: The existing experimental data and their quality allow us
461: to obtain not more than a constraint on the value of $B_2^g$.
462: As expected, we have observed a strong correlation between $B_2^1$ and $B_2^g$.
463: The quality of the fit is shown in Fig. \ref{f:etff}.
464:
465: \begin{figure}[th]
466: \centerline{\epsfxsize=3.in\epsfbox{figgDA.eps}}
467: \caption{$\eta$ (below) and $\eta'$ (above) transition form factors.
468: The shaded area corresponds to the in Eq. \protect\req{eq:fit81g}
469: given range for $B_2^1(\muO)$ and $B_2^g(\muO)$.}
470: \label{f:etff}
471: \end{figure}
472:
473: As a first application of the above
474: given results, we have analyzed the
475: $\chi_{c0}\to \eta\eta, \, \eta'\eta'$ decays.
476: Following previous work\cite{BolzKS96etc},
477: we take
478: $\chi_{c0}$ as a non-relativistic $\cbc$ bound state,
479: and obtain the decay amplitudes
480: for $\cbc \to (q\overline{q})(q\overline{q})$
481: and $\cbc \to (gg)(gg)$.
482: %For the factorization scale we have checked two values: $2 m_c$ and $m_c$.
483: %The ratio $\Gamma_{\eta' \eta'}/\Gamma_{\eta \eta}$ represents
484: %a suitable quantity for investigation of the
485: %sensitivity to the gluon contributions.
486: The ratio $\Gamma_{\eta' \eta'}/\Gamma_{\eta \eta}$
487: is suitable for investigating the
488: sensitivity %of the results
489: to the gluon contributions.
490: Despite possibly large value of $B_2^g$,
491: we have observed only modest dependence
492: %of the ratio
493: on the variations of $B_1$ and $B_g$
494: in the allowed range \req{eq:fit81g}
495: (up to 20 \% difference).
496:
497: Finally, I report on our result for the
498: two gluon contribution to the deeply virtual
499: electroproduction of $\eta$, $\eta'$ mesons.
500: In this case, the subprocess amplitudes
501: $q + \gamma^*_L \rightarrow (q \overline{q}) + q$
502: and
503: $q + \gamma^*_L \rightarrow (gg) + q$
504: have to be evaluated.
505: Our result for the former amplitude $H^{P(q)}_{0+,0+}$ is in agreement with
506: the results from the literature\cite{HuangK00,DVEM}.
507: In terms of subprocess Mandelstam variables
508: ($\hat{s}$,$\hat{u}$,$\hat{t}=t$), the latter amplitude
509: reads
510: \begin{equation}
511: H^{P(g)}_{0+,0+}
512: = \frac{4\pi\alpha_s}{Q} \, \frac{C_F}{N_C}
513: \frac{1}{2} \frac{1}{\sqrt{n_f}}
514: \frac{Q \sqrt{- \hat{u} \hat{s}}}{Q^2+\hat{s}}
515: \int_0^1 d\tau \frac{\phi_g(\tau)}{\tau (1-\tau)} \;
516: \frac{t}{\hat{u} \hat{s}} \;
517: \left(\frac{1}{\tau}-\frac{1}{1-\tau}\right)
518: .
519: \label{eq:Hg}
520: \end{equation}
521: In deeply virtual electroproduction
522: of mesons (DVEM), the limit $t \rightarrow 0$ has to
523: be considered.
524: For $t=0$ and $\hat{s}+\hat{u}=-Q^2$,
525: our result \req{eq:Hg} gives $H^{P(g)}_{0+,0+}= 0$.
526: We conclude that the two-gluon contribution is suppressed.
527:
528: \section{Conclusions}
529:
530: We have performed
531: a detailed analysis of the proper
532: inclusion of the two gluon states in the
533: (octet-singlet scheme based)
534: description
535: of the hard exclusive processes involving $\eta$ and $\eta'$
536: mesons.
537: Normalization and conventions have been fixed
538: and discrepancies found in the literature have been resolved.
539: From the fit of the $\eta$, $\eta'$ transition form factors
540: to experimental data, we have obtained
541: the range for the
542: $B_2^1$, $B_2^g$ and $B_2^8$ coefficients of the
543: $\phi_1$, $\phi_g$ and $\phi_8$ DAs, respectively. Expected strong
544: correlation between $B_2^1$ and $B_2^g$ has been observed.
545: The results have been applied to
546: $\chi_{c0} \rightarrow \eta \eta (\eta' \eta')$ decay,
547: where only a moderate dependence on %$B_2^1$ and
548: $B_2^g$ has been found.
549: For DVEM, the
550: $\gamma^* q \rightarrow (gg) q$ subprocess
551: has been found to be suppressed for small
552: momentum transfer $t$.
553: We conclude that for considered processes
554: the theoretical and experimental
555: uncertainties do not allow further restriction of the
556: parameter range since only a modest
557: dependence on the value of $B_2^g$ has been
558: observed.
559: This contrasts the findings
560: for $\eta' g^* g^*$ vertex\cite{AliP00}.
561:
562: \section*{Acknowledgments}
563: This work is supported by Deutsche Forschungs Gemeinschaft
564: and partially supported by the Ministry of Science and Tech.,
565: Croatia (No. 0098002).
566:
567:
568: \begin{thebibliography}{0}
569:
570: \bibitem{sHSA}
571: S.J. Brodsky and G.P. Lepage
572: in {\em Perturbative QCD}, ed. A.H. Mueller
573: (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989), and references therein.
574:
575: \bibitem{KrollP02}
576: P. Kroll, K. Passek-Kumeri\v{c}ki,
577: {\em ``The two-gluon components of the $\eta$ and $\eta'$ mesons
578: to leading-twist accuracy''},
579: WU B 02-02, work in progress [Oct 2002: see hep-ph/0210045].
580:
581: \bibitem{Leutwyleretc}
582: H.~Leutwyler,
583: %``On the 1/N-expansion in chiral perturbation theory,''
584: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 64}, 223 (1998).
585: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9709408].
586: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9709408;%%
587: %R.~Kaiser and H.~Leutwyler,
588: %``Large N(c) in chiral perturbation theory,''
589: %Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 17}, 623 (2000).
590: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0007101].
591: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0007101;%%
592:
593: \bibitem{FeldmannKS98etc} %used
594: T.~Feldmann, P.~Kroll and B.~Stech,
595: %``Mixing and decay constants of pseudoscalar mesons,''
596: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 58}, 114006 (1998);
597: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9802409].
598: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9802409;%%
599: %T.~Feldmann, P.~Kroll and B.~Stech,
600: %``Mixing and decay constants of pseudoscalar mesons: The sequel,''
601: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 449}, 339 (1999).
602: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9812269].
603: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9812269;%%
604:
605: \bibitem{Terentev81}
606: M.~V.~Terentev,
607: %``Factorization In Exclusive Processes. Form-Factor Of Singlet
608: %Mesons In Quantum Chromodynamics,''
609: Sov.\ J.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf 33}, 911 (1981);
610: %[Yad.\ Fiz.\ {\bf 33}, 1692 (1981)].
611: %%CITATION = SJNCA,33,911;%%
612: \bibitem{gDAev}
613: M.~A.~Shifman and M.~I.~Vysotsky,
614: %``Form-Factors Of Heavy Mesons In QCD,''
615: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 186}, 475 (1981);
616: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B186,475;%%
617: V.~N.~Baier and A.~G.~Grozin,
618: %``Meson Wave Functions With Two Gluon States,''
619: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 192}, 476 (1981);
620: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B192,476;%%
621: %V.~N.~Baier and A.~G.~Grozin,
622: %``Hard Hadron Processes In QCD. (In Russian),''
623: %Fiz.\ Elem.\ Chast.\ Atom.\ Yadra {\bf 16}, 5 (1985),
624: %[Sov. J. Part. Nucl. {\bf 16}, 1 (1985) ].
625: %%CITATION = FECAA,16,5;%%
626: %\bibitem{BaierG85a}
627: %V.~N.~Baier and A.~G.~Grozin,
628: %%``Gluonic Contributions To The Exclusive Amplitudes,''
629: %Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 29}, 161 (1985).
630: %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C29,161;%%
631: %\bibitem{BlumleinGR97}
632: %J.~Bl\"{u}mlein, B.~Geyer and D.~Robaschik,
633: %``Twist-2 light-ray operators: Anomalous dimensions and evolution
634: %equations,''
635: %in *Hamburg/Zeuthen 1997, Deep inelastic scattering off polarized
636: %targets, Physics with polarized protons at HERA* 196-209,
637: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9711405].
638: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9711405;%%
639: %A.~V.~Belitsky and D.~M\"{u}ller,
640: %``Next-to-leading order evolution of twist-two conformal operators:
641: %The abelian case,''
642: %Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 527}, 207 (1998)
643: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9802411].
644: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9802411;%%
645: A.~V.~Belitsky, D.~M\"{u}ller, L.~Niedermeier and A.~Sch\"{a}fer,
646: %``Evolution of non-forward parton distributions in next-to-leading
647: %order: Singlet sector,''
648: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 546}, 279 (1999).
649: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9810275].
650: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9810275;%%
651: \bibitem{Ohrndorf81}
652: T.~Ohrndorf,
653: %``The Q**2 Dependence Of The Flavor Singlet Pseudoscalar Meson Wave
654: %Function In QCD,''
655: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 186}, 153 (1981).
656: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B186,153;%%
657:
658: \bibitem{MelicNP01}
659: B.~Meli\'{c}, B.~Ni\v{z}i\'{c} and K.~Passek,
660: %``BLM scale for the pion transition form factor,''
661: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 053020 (2002).
662: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0107295].
663: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0107295;%%
664:
665: %\bibitem{DVCS}
666: %A.~V.~Belitsky and D.~M\"{u}ller,
667: %``Predictions from conformal algebra for the deeply virtual Compton
668: %scattering,''
669: %Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 417}, 129 (1998);
670: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9709379].
671: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9709379;%%
672: %L.~Mankiewicz, G.~Piller, E.~Stein, M.~Vanttinen and T.~Weigl,
673: %``NLO corrections to deeply-virtual Compton scattering,''
674: %Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 425}, 186 (1998);
675: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9712251].
676: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9712251;%%
677: %X.~D.~Ji and J.~Osborne,
678: %``One-loop corrections and all order factorization in deeply
679: %virtual Compton scattering,''
680: %Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 58}, 094018 (1998).
681: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9801260].
682: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9801260;%%
683:
684: \bibitem{exptff}
685: J.~Gronberg {\it et al.} [CLEO Collaboration],
686: %``Measurements of the meson photon transition form factors of light
687: %pseudoscalar mesons at large momentum transfer,''
688: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 57}, 33 (1998);
689: %[arXiv:hep-ex/9707031].
690: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9707031;%%
691: M.~Acciarri {\it et al.} [L3 Collaboration],
692: %``Measurement of eta'(958) formation in two-photon collisions at
693: %LEP1,''
694: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 418}, 399 (1998).
695: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B418,399;%%
696:
697: \bibitem{BolzKS96etc}
698: J.~Bolz, P.~Kroll and G.~A.~Schuler,
699: %``Colour-octet contributions to exclusive charmonium decays,''
700: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 392}, 198 (1997);
701: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9610265].
702: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9610265;%%
703: %J.~Bolz, P.~Kroll and G.~A.~Schuler,
704: %``Higher Fock states and power counting in exclusive P-wave
705: %quarkonium decays,''
706: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 2}, 705 (1998) and references therein.
707: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9704378].
708: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9704378;%%
709:
710: %\bibitem{BaierG82}
711: %V.~N.~Baier and A.~G.~Grozin,
712: %``Certain exclusive processes in QCD taking into account
713: % two-gluon states,''
714: %Yad. Fiz. {\bf 35}, 1021 (1982)
715: %[Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. {\bf 35}, 596 (1982)].
716:
717: \bibitem{HuangK00} %used
718: H.~W.~Huang and P.~Kroll,
719: %``Large momentum transfer electroproduction of mesons,''
720: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 17}, 423 (2000).
721: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0005318].
722: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0005318;%%
723:
724: \bibitem{DVEM} %used
725: L.~Mankiewicz, G.~Piller and T.~Weigl,
726: %``Hard exclusive meson production and nonforward parton
727: %distributions,''
728: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 5}, 119 (1998);
729: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9711227].
730: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9711227;%%
731: M.~Vanderhaeghen, P.~A.~Guichon and M.~Guidal,
732: %``Deeply virtual electroproduction of photons and mesons on the
733: %nucleon: Leading order amplitudes and power corrections,''
734: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 094017 (1999).
735: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9905372].
736: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9905372;%%
737:
738: \bibitem{AliP00}
739: A.~Ali and A.~Y.~Parkhomenko,
740: %``The eta' g* g* vertex with arbitrary gluon virtualities in the
741: %perturbative QCD hard scattering approach,''
742: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 074020 (2002).
743: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0012212].
744: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0012212;%%
745:
746: \end{thebibliography}
747: \end{document}
748:
749:
750:
751:
752:
753: