1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: % INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS PUBLISHING %
3: % %
4: % `Preparing an article for publication in an Institute of Physics %
5: % Publishing journal using LaTeX' %
6: % %
7: % LaTeX source code `ioplau2e.tex' used to generate `author %
8: % guidelines', the documentation explaining and demonstrating use %
9: % of the Institute of Physics Publishing LaTeX preprint files %
10: % `iopart.cls, iopart12.clo and iopart10.clo'. %
11: % %
12: % `ioplau2e.tex' itself uses LaTeX with `iopart.cls' %
13: % %
14: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
15: %
16: %
17: % First we have a character check
18: %
19: % ! exclamation mark " double quote
20: % # hash ` opening quote (grave)
21: % & ampersand ' closing quote (acute)
22: % $ dollar % percent
23: % ( open parenthesis ) close paren.
24: % - hyphen = equals sign
25: % | vertical bar ~ tilde
26: % @ at sign _ underscore
27: % { open curly brace } close curly
28: % [ open square ] close square bracket
29: % + plus sign ; semi-colon
30: % * asterisk : colon
31: % < open angle bracket > close angle
32: % , comma . full stop
33: % ? question mark / forward slash
34: % \ backslash ^ circumflex
35: %
36: % ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
37: % abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
38: % 1234567890
39: %
40: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
41: %
42: \documentclass{iopart}
43: \usepackage{epsfig}
44: \newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}
45: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}
46: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}
47: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}
48: \def\simlt{\buildrel < \over {_{\sim}}}
49: \def\simgt{\buildrel > \over {_{\sim}}}
50: \newcommand{\ttbs}{\char'134}
51: \newcommand{\AmS}{{\protect\the\textfont2
52: A\kern-.1667em\lower.5ex\hbox{M}\kern-.125emS}}
53: \newcommand{\lesssim}{\raisebox{0.3mm}{\em $\, <$}
54: \hspace{-3.3mm} \raisebox{-1.8mm}{\em $\sim \,$}}
55: \newcommand{\gtrsim}{\raisebox{0.3mm}{\em $\, >$}
56: \hspace{-3.3mm} \raisebox{-1.8mm}{\em $\sim \,$}}
57: % Uncomment next line if AMS fonts required
58: %\usepackage{iopams}
59: \begin{document}
60:
61: \title{Phenomenological and Cosmological Implications of Neutrino Oscillations}
62:
63: \author{S. F. King}
64:
65: \address{Department of Physics and Astronomy, \\
66: University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, U.K.}
67:
68: \begin{abstract}
69: I discuss the implications of neutrino oscillations for
70: neutrino mass patterns and mass matrices, and for neutrinoless double beta
71: decay. I then go on to discuss the implications for
72: cosmological relic density and dark matter, the
73: galaxy structure limits on neutrino mass, nucleosynthesis, supernovae,
74: cosmic rays and gamma ray bursts.
75: \end{abstract}
76:
77: %Uncomment for PACS numbers title message
78: %\pacs{00.00, 20.00, 42.10}
79:
80: % Uncomment for Submitted to journal title message
81: %\submitto{\JPA}
82:
83: % Comment out if separate title page not required
84: %\maketitle
85:
86: \section{Introduction}
87: Recent SNO results \cite{biller} when combined
88: with other solar neutrino data especially that of Super-Kamiokande
89: strongly favour the large mixing angle (LMA) MSW solar solution
90: \cite{choubey,Smirnov:2002in}
91: with three active light neutrino states, and
92: $\theta_{12} \approx \pi/6$,
93: $\Delta m_{21}^2\approx 5\times 10^{-5}{\rm eV}^2$.
94: The atmospheric neutrino data \cite{kajita} is consistent with
95: maximal $\nu_{\mu}- \nu_{\tau}$ neutrino mixing
96: $\theta_{23} \approx \pi/4$
97: with $|\Delta m_{32}^2|\approx 2.5\times 10^{-3}{\rm eV}^2$
98: and the sign of $\Delta m_{32}^2$ undetermined.
99: The CHOOZ experiment limits $\theta_{13} \simlt 0.2$
100: over the favoured atmospheric range \cite{Apollonio:1999ae}.
101:
102: In this talk I shall briefly discuss some of the phenomenological and
103: cosmological implications of these results.
104:
105: \section{Phenomenological Implications}
106: \subsection{Neutrino Masses and Mixing Angles}
107: The minimal neutrino sector required to account for the
108: atmospheric and solar neutrino oscillation data consists of
109: three light physical neutrinos with left-handed flavour eigenstates,
110: $\nu_e$, $\nu_\mu$, and $\nu_\tau$, defined to be those states
111: that share the same electroweak doublet as the left-handed
112: charged lepton mass eigenstates.
113: Within the framework of three--neutrino oscillations,
114: the neutrino flavor eigenstates $\nu_e$, $\nu_\mu$, and $\nu_\tau$ are
115: related to the neutrino mass eigenstates $\nu_1$, $\nu_2$, and $\nu_3$
116: with mass $m_1$, $m_2$, and $m_3$, respectively, by a $3\times3$
117: unitary matrix called the MNS matrix $U_{MNS}$
118: \cite{Maki:1962mu,Lee:1977qz}
119: \begin{equation}
120: \left(\begin{array}{c} \nu_e \\ \nu_\mu \\ \nu_\tau \end{array} \\ \right)=
121: \left(\begin{array}{ccc}
122: U_{e1} & U_{e2} & U_{e3} \\
123: U_{\mu1} & U_{\mu2} & U_{\mu3} \\
124: U_{\tau1} & U_{\tau2} & U_{\tau3} \\
125: \end{array}\right)
126: \left(\begin{array}{c} \nu_1 \\ \nu_2 \\ \nu_3 \end{array} \\ \right)
127: \; .
128: \end{equation}
129:
130: Assuming the light neutrinos are Majorana,
131: $U_{MNS}$ can be parameterized in terms of three mixing angles
132: $\theta_{ij}$ and three complex phases $\delta_{ij}$.
133: A unitary matrix has six phases but three of them are removed
134: by the phase symmetry of the charged lepton Dirac masses.
135: Since the neutrino masses are Majorana there is no additional
136: phase symmetry associated with them, unlike the case of quark
137: mixing where a further two phases may be removed.
138:
139: There are basically two
140: patterns of neutrino mass squared orderings
141: consistent with the atmospheric and solar data as shown in
142: Fig.\ref{fig1}.
143:
144: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
145:
146: \begin{figure}
147: \begin{center}
148: \epsfxsize=10cm
149: \epsfysize=5cm
150: \epsfbox{slide1.eps}
151: \end{center}
152: \caption{\label{fig1}
153: Alternative neutrino mass
154: patterns that are consistent with neutrino
155: oscillation explanations of the atmospheric and solar data.}
156: \end{figure}
157:
158:
159: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
160: \begin{table*}[htb]
161: {\small
162: \caption{Leading order low energy neutrino Majorana mass matrices
163: $m_{LL}$ consistent with large atmospheric and solar mixing angles,
164: classified according to the rate of neutrinoless double beta decay
165: and the pattern of neutrino masses.}
166: \label{table1}
167: \newcommand{\m}{\hphantom{$-$}}
168: \newcommand{\cc}[1]{\multicolumn{1}{c}{#1}}
169: \renewcommand{\tabcolsep}{2pc} % enlarge column spacing
170: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.2} % enlarge line spacing
171: \begin{tabular}{@{}|c|c|c|}
172: \hline
173: \hline
174: & Type I & Type II \\
175: & Small $\beta \beta_{0\nu}$ & Large $\beta \beta_{0\nu}$ \\
176: \hline
177: \hline
178: & & \\
179: A & $\beta \beta_{0\nu}\simlt 0.0082$ eV & \\
180: Normal hierarchy & & \\
181: $m_1^2,m_2^2\ll m_3^2$ &
182: $\left(
183: \begin{array}{ccc}
184: 0 & 0 & 0 \\
185: 0 & 1 & 1\\
186: 0 & 1 & 1 \\
187: \end{array}
188: \right)\frac{m}{2}$ & -- \\
189: & & \\
190: \hline
191: & & \\
192: B & $\beta \beta_{0\nu}\simlt
193: 0.0082$ eV & $\beta \beta_{0\nu}\simgt 0.0085$ eV\\
194: Inverted hierarchy & & \\
195: $m_1^2\approx m_2^2\gg m_3^2$ &
196: $\left(
197: \begin{array}{ccc}
198: 0 & 1 & 1 \\
199: 1 & 0 & 0\\
200: 1 & 0 & 0 \\
201: \end{array}
202: \right)\frac{m}{\sqrt{2}}$ &
203: $\left(
204: \begin{array}{ccc}
205: 1 & 0 & 0 \\
206: 0 & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2}\\
207: 0 & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2} \\
208: \end{array}
209: \right)m$
210: \\
211: & & \\
212: \hline
213: & & \\
214: C & &
215: $\beta \beta_{0\nu}\simgt 0.035$ eV \\
216: Approximate degeneracy & & diag(1,1,1)m\\
217: $m_1^2\approx m_2^2\approx m_3^2$ &
218: $\left(
219: \begin{array}{ccc}
220: 0 & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \\
221: \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2}\\
222: \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2} \\
223: \end{array}
224: \right)m$ &
225: $\left(
226: \begin{array}{ccc}
227: 1 & 0 & 0 \\
228: 0 & 0 & 1\\
229: 0 & 1 & 0 \\
230: \end{array}
231: \right)m$\\
232: & & \\
233: \hline
234: \hline
235: \end{tabular}\\[2pt]
236: }
237: \end{table*}
238:
239: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
240:
241: \subsection{Neutrino Mass Matrices}
242: In the flavour basis (in which the charged lepton mass matrix is diagonal),
243: for a given assumed form of $U_{MNS}$ and set of neutrino masses
244: $m_i$ one may ``derive'' the form of the neutrino
245: mass matrix $m_{LL}$, and this results in the candidate
246: mass matrices in Table \ref{table1} \cite{Barbieri:1998mq,Altarelli:gu}.
247: In Table \ref{table1} the mass matrices are classified into two types:
248:
249: Type I - small neutrinoless double beta decay
250:
251: Type II - large neutrinoless double beta decay
252:
253: They are also classified into the limiting cases consistent with the
254: mass squared orderings in Fig.\ref{fig1}:
255:
256: A - Normal hierarchy $m_1^2,m_2^2\ll m_3^2$
257:
258: B - Inverted hierarchy $m_1^2 \approx m_2^2 \gg m_3^2$
259:
260: C - Approximate degeneracy $m_1^2\approx m_2^2\approx m_3^2$
261:
262: Thus according to our classification there is only one neutrino
263: mass matrix consistent with the normal neutrino mass hierarchy which
264: we call Type IA, corresponding to the leading order neutrino masses
265: of the form $m_i=(0,0,m)$. For the inverted hierarchy there are two
266: cases, Type IB corresponding to $m_i=(m,-m,0)$ or Type IIB
267: corresponding to $m_i=(m,m,0)$. For the approximate degeneracy cases
268: there are three cases, Type IC correponding to $m_i=(m,-m,m)$
269: and two examples of Type IIC corresponding to either
270: $m_i=(m,m,m)$ or $m_i=(m,m,-m)$.
271:
272: At present experiment allows any of the matrices in Table
273: \ref{table1}. In future it will be possible to uniquely specify the
274: neutrino matrix in the following way:
275:
276: 1. Neutrinoless double beta effectively measures the 11 element
277: of the mass matrix $m_{LL}$ corresponding to
278: \beq
279: \beta \beta_{0\nu}\equiv \sum_iU_{ei}^2m_i
280: \eeq
281: and is clearly capable of resolving Type I from Type II cases
282: according to the bounds given in Table \ref{table1} \cite{Pascoli:2002xq}.
283: There has been a recent claim of a signal in neutrinoless double
284: beta decay correponding to $\beta \beta_{0\nu}=0.11-0.56$ eV at 95\% C.L.
285: \cite{Klapdor-Kleingrothaus:2001ke}.
286: However this claim has been criticised by two groups
287: \cite{Feruglio:2002af}, \cite{Aalseth:2002dt} and in turn this
288: criticism has been refuted \cite{Klapdor-Kleingrothaus:2002kf}.
289: Since the Heidelberg-Moscow experiment has almost reached its full
290: sensitivity, we may have to wait for a next generation experiment
291: such as GENIUS which is capable
292: of pushing down the sensitivity to 0.01 eV to resolve this question.
293:
294: 2. A neutrino factory will measure the sign of $\Delta m_{32}^2$
295: and resolve A from B.
296:
297: 3. Tritium beta decay experiments are sensitive to C
298: since they
299: measure the ``electron neutrino mass'' defined by
300: \beq
301: |m_{\nu_e}|\equiv \sum_i|U_{ei}|^2|m_i| \leq 2.2 {\rm eV} (95\% C.L.)
302: \label{tritium}
303: \eeq
304: where the current laboratory limit is shown \cite{Bonn:rz}.
305: The prospects for improving on this bound are good:
306: for example the KATRIN experiment has a proposed sensitivity of
307: 0.35 eV.
308:
309: Model building based on the different neutrino mass matrices
310: in Table \ref{table1} was discussed separately at this meeting
311: \cite{graham} and will not be considered further here.
312:
313:
314:
315:
316:
317: \section{Cosmological Implications}
318:
319: \subsection{Cosmological relic density and dark matter}
320:
321: In the early universe neutrinos were in thermal equilibrium with
322: photons, electrons and positrons. When the universe cooled to temperatures
323: of order 1 MeV the neutrinos decoupled, leading to a present day number
324: density similar to photons. If neutrinos have mass they contribute
325: to the mass density of the universe, leading to the constraint
326: \beq
327: \sum_i m_i\leq 28 \ {\rm eV}
328: \eeq
329: corresponding to
330: \beq
331: \Omega_{\nu}h^2\leq 0.3
332: \eeq
333: in the standard notation where $\Omega_{\nu}$ is the ratio of
334: the energy density in neutrinos to the critical energy density
335: of the universe (corresponding to a flat universe),
336: and $h=H/100{\rm km}/{\rm Mpc}/{\rm s}$ is the scaled Hubble parameter.
337:
338: From the current tritium limit on the elctron neutrino mass
339: in Eq.\ref{tritium} together with the atmospheric and solar mass splittings
340: we have a stronger constraint
341: \beq
342: 0.05 \ {\rm eV}\leq \sum_i m_i\leq 6.6 \ {\rm eV}
343: \eeq
344: corresponding to the range
345: \beq
346: 0.0005\leq \Omega_{\nu}h^2\leq 0.07
347: \eeq
348: which implies that neutrinos cannot be regarded as the dominant component
349: of dark matter, but make up between 0.1\% and 14\% of the mass-energy of the
350: universe.
351:
352: \subsection{Galaxy structure limits on neutrino mass}
353:
354: Recent results from the 2df galaxy redshift survey
355: indicate that
356: \beq
357: \sum_i m_i <1.8 \ {\rm eV} (95\%C.L.)
358: \eeq
359: under certain mild assumptions \cite{Elgaroy:2002bi}.
360: This bound arises from the fact that the galaxy power spectrum
361: is reduced on small distance scales (large wavenumber) as the
362: amount of hot dark matter increases. Thus
363: excessive amounts of free-streaming hot dark matter would
364: lead to galaxies being less clumped than they appear to be on
365: small distance scales.
366:
367: However as discussed in \cite{Hannestad:2002iz} such bounds suffer
368: from parameter degeneracies due to a restricted parameter space,
369: and a more robust bound is
370: \beq
371: \sum_i m_i <3 \ {\rm eV} (95\%C.L.)
372: \eeq
373: Combined with the solar and atmospheric oscillation data
374: this brackets the heaviest neutrino mass to be
375: in the approximate range 0.04-1 eV. The fact that the mass of the
376: heaviest neutrino is known to within an order of magnitude represents
377: remarkable progress in neutrino physics over recent years.
378: This implies that neutrinos make up less than about 7\%
379: of the total mass-energy of the universe, which is a stronger limit than
380: that quoted in the previous sub-section.
381:
382:
383: \subsection{Nucleosynthesis}
384:
385: The number of light ``neutrino species'' $N_{\nu}$ (or any light species)
386: affects the freeze-out temperature of weak processes which determine the
387: neutron to proton ratio, and successful nucleosynthesis leads to
388: the constraints on $N_{\nu}$ as shown in Figure \ref{fig2}.
389:
390: The limit on $N_{\nu}$ applies also to sterile neutrinos, but they
391: need to be produced during the time when nucleosynthesis was taking
392: place, and the only way to produce them is via neutrino oscillations.
393: This leads to strong limits on sterile-active neutrino mixing angles
394: which tend to disfavour the LSND region, as shown in Figure \ref{fig3}.
395: Note that these limits assume that the lepton asymmetry is not
396: anomalously large \cite{Volkas:2000ei}.
397:
398: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
399:
400: \begin{figure}
401: \begin{center}
402: \epsfxsize=7cm
403: \epsfysize=5cm
404: \epsfbox{cfo24.eps}
405: \end{center}
406: \caption{\label{fig2} The distribution in the number of ``neutrino species''
407: (from \cite{Kainulainen:2002pu}).}
408: \end{figure}
409:
410:
411: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
412:
413: \begin{figure}
414: \begin{center}
415: \epsfxsize=7cm
416: \epsfysize=5cm
417: \epsfbox{EKTfig.eps}
418: \end{center}
419: \caption{\label{fig3} BBN constraints on active-sterile mixing parameters
420: (from \cite{Kainulainen:2002pu}).}
421: \end{figure}
422:
423:
424: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
425:
426: \subsection{Supernovae}
427:
428: It is well known that 99\% of the energy of a supernova is emitted
429: in the form of neutrinos, so one might hope that by studying supernovae
430: one can learn something about neutrino physics. Indeed studies of the
431: neutrino arrival times over a 10s interval from
432: SN1987A in the Small Magellanic Cloud have led to the
433: mass bound \cite{Loredo:2001rx}
434: \beq
435: m_{\nu_e}\leq 6-20 {\rm eV}
436: \eeq
437: The LMA MSW parameter range may also have some observable
438: consequences for SN1987A \cite{valle,Minakata:2001cd}.
439:
440: However it should be remarked that Supernova physics
441: has difficulties simulating explosions, and understanding how the spinning
442: neutron star remnant is kick-started.
443:
444: \subsection{Cosmic Rays}
445:
446: It has been a long standing puzzle why ultra high energy (UHE) cosmic rays
447: are apparently observed beyond the Greisen-Zatsepin-Kuzmin (GZK) cutoff
448: of $5\times 10^{19}$ GeV. The problem is that such cosmic rays
449: appear to arrive isotropically, which would imply an extragalactic
450: origin, whereas neither protons nor neutrons of such energies
451: could have originated from more than 50 Mpc away due to their scattering
452: off the cosmic background photons which would excite a delta resonance
453: if the energy exceeds $5\times 10^{19}$ GeV.
454: Yet despite this, several groups have reported handfuls of events
455: above the GZK cut-off, for example the AGASA data shown in
456: Figure \ref{fig4}. Also shown in this figure is
457: the prediction of a Z-burst model which was invented to explain
458: how the GZK cut-off could be overcome \cite{Gelmini:2002xy}.
459: The basic idea of the Z-burst model is that UHE neutrinos
460: can travel much further, and scatter off the relic background
461: neutrinos to produce Z bosons within 50 Mpc.
462: Neutrino mass is required to increase the Z production rate, so
463: UHE cosmic rays and neutrino mass are linked in this model.
464:
465: Reecently data from Fly's Eye, Yakutsk and expecially HiRes
466: have brought into question whether the GZK cut-off is being exceeded
467: at all. A recent analysis based on these data
468: suggests that there might be no problem with the GZK cut-off
469: \cite{Bahcall:2002wi}. On the other hand Fly's Eye and HiRes establish
470: the cosmic ray energy from observing the fluorescence of Nitrogen
471: molecules using a rather dated technique.
472: The issue should be resolved soon by the Pierre Auger
473: Observatory, which can both measure the shower's pattern on
474: the Earth's surface, and the fluorescence of the shower in the air.
475:
476:
477: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
478:
479: \begin{figure}
480: \begin{center}
481: \epsfxsize=5cm
482: \epsfysize=5cm
483: \epsfbox{spectrum.eps}
484: \end{center}
485: \caption{\label{fig4} Scaled $E^3$ spectrum of cosmic rays. The solid
486: line is the prediction of the Z-burst model of \cite{Gelmini:2002xy}
487: (from \cite{Kainulainen:2002pu}).}
488: \end{figure}
489:
490: \begin{figure}
491: \begin{center}
492: \epsfxsize=5cm
493: \epsfysize=5cm
494: \epsfbox{fig_Fly_norm.eps}
495: \end{center}
496: \caption{\label{fig5} Recent data on cosmic rays
497: (from \cite{Bahcall:2002wi}) which shows that the GZK cut-off
498: might be respected after all.}
499: \end{figure}
500:
501: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
502:
503: \begin{figure}
504: \begin{center}
505: \epsfxsize=10cm
506: \epsfysize=7cm
507: \epsfbox{tvsenew.eps}
508: \end{center}
509: \caption{\label{fig6} Time delays plotted against the neutrino energy.
510: The downward sloping solid curve in each panel results from
511: the effect of neutrino mass dominating at low energy, while the
512: upward sloping solid curves are due to quantum gravity effects
513: dominating at high energy (from \cite{Choubey:2002bh}).}
514: \end{figure}
515:
516:
517: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
518:
519: \subsection{Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs)}
520:
521: GRBs are distant ($z\sim 1$), energetic and enigmatic.
522: According to the fireball model (for a review see \cite{Ghisellini:2001jr})
523: GRBs may result from the core collapse of a very massive supernova
524: to a compact, rotating black hole. The energy is emitted in beamed
525: relativistic fireball jets which are expected to contain copious
526: neutrino fluxes. GRBs can thus be regarded as a high intensity, high
527: energy neutrino beam with a cosmological baseline.
528:
529: In some models of quantum gravity \cite{Ellis:1999sf} neutrinos of
530: mass $m$ obey the dispersion relation
531: \beq
532: p^2c^2\approx E^2(1-\xi\frac{E}{E_{QG}})-m^2c^4
533: \eeq
534: where $E_{QG}$ is the scale of quantum gravity. A consequence
535: of this dispersion relation is that the effects of both quantum
536: gravity and neutrino mass will cause time delays in the arrival
537: times of neutrinos compared to low energy massless photons,
538: as shown in Figure \ref{fig6}. Using the millisecond time
539: structure of GRBs it may be possible to measure neutrino masses
540: from time of flight delays, in principle down to
541: 0.001 eV \cite{Choubey:2002bh}. However this estimate assumes
542: complete understanding of GRBs, and large enough event rates,
543: and in practice there are many theoretical and experimental
544: challenges to be overcome.
545:
546: \section{Conclusions}
547:
548: Future neutrino oscillation experiments, will give precious
549: information about the mass squared splittings
550: $\Delta m_{ij}^2\equiv m_i^2-m_j^2$, mixing angles, and
551: CP violating phase. KATRIN and GENIUS will tell us about the
552: absolute scale and nature of neutrino mass. We have seen that
553: cosmology and astrophysics
554: is also sensitive to the absolute values of neutrino masses.
555: In the coming years there should be a fascinating interplay between
556: neutrino physics on Earth and in the Heavens.
557:
558:
559: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
560: \section*{References}
561: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
562:
563: \bibitem{biller}
564: S. Biller, these proceedings.
565:
566: \bibitem{choubey}
567: S. Choubey, in these proceedings.
568:
569: %\cite{Smirnov:2002in}
570: \bibitem{Smirnov:2002in}
571: .~Y.~Smirnov,
572: %``Solar neutrinos: Interpretation of results,''
573: arXiv:hep-ph/0209131.
574: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0209131;%%
575:
576: \bibitem{kajita}
577: T. Kajita, these proceedings.
578:
579: % \cite{Apollonio:1999ae}
580: \bibitem{Apollonio:1999ae}
581: M.~Apollonio {\it et al.} [CHOOZ Collaboration],
582: %``Limits on neutrino oscillations from the CHOOZ experiment,''
583: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 466}, 415 (1999)
584: [arXiv:hep-ex/9907037].
585: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9907037;%%
586:
587: % \cite{Maki:1962mu}
588: \bibitem{Maki:1962mu}
589: Z.~Maki, M.~Nakagawa and S.~Sakata,
590: %``Remarks On The Unified Model Of Elementary Particles,''
591: Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ {\bf 28} (1962) 870.
592: %%CITATION = PTPKA,28,870;%%
593:
594: \bibitem{Lee:1977qz}
595: B.~W.~Lee, S.~Pakvasa, R.~E.~Shrock and H.~Sugawara,
596: %``Muon And Electron Number Nonconservation In A V-A Six Quark Model,''
597: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 38} (1977) 937
598: [Erratum-ibid.\ {\bf 38} (1977) 1230].
599: %%CITATION = PRLTA,38,937;%%
600:
601: %\cite{Barbieri:1998mq}
602: \bibitem{Barbieri:1998mq}
603: R.~Barbieri, L.~J.~Hall, D.~R.~Smith, A.~Strumia and N.~Weiner,
604: %``Oscillations of solar and atmospheric neutrinos,''
605: JHEP {\bf 9812} (1998) 017
606: [arXiv:hep-ph/9807235].
607: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9807235.
608:
609: %\cite{Altarelli:gu}
610: \bibitem{Altarelli:gu}
611: G.~Altarelli and F.~Feruglio,
612: %``Neutrino Masses And Mixings: A Theoretical Perspective,''
613: Phys.\ Rept.\ {\bf 320} (1999) 295.
614: %%CITATION = PRPLC,320,295;%%
615:
616: %\cite{Pascoli:2002xq}
617: \bibitem{Pascoli:2002xq}
618: S.~Pascoli and S.~T.~Petcov,
619: %``The SNO solar neutrino data, neutrinoless double-beta decay and neutrino mass spectrum,''
620: arXiv:hep-ph/0205022.
621: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0205022;%%
622:
623: %\cite{Klapdor-Kleingrothaus:2001ke}
624: \bibitem{Klapdor-Kleingrothaus:2001ke}
625: H.~V.~Klapdor-Kleingrothaus, A.~Dietz, H.~L.~Harney and I.~V.~Krivosheina,
626: %``Evidence for neutrinoless double beta decay,''
627: Mod.\ Phys.\ Lett.\ A {\bf 16} (2001) 2409
628: [arXiv:hep-ph/0201231].
629: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0201231;%%
630:
631: %\cite{Feruglio:2002af}
632: \bibitem{Feruglio:2002af}
633: F.~Feruglio, A.~Strumia and F.~Vissani,
634: %``Neutrino oscillations and signals in beta and 0nu 2beta experiments,''
635: arXiv:hep-ph/0201291.
636: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0201291;%%
637:
638: %\cite{Aalseth:2002dt}
639: \bibitem{Aalseth:2002dt}
640: C.~E.~Aalseth {\it et al.},
641: %``Comment on 'Evidence for neutrinoless double beta decay',''
642: arXiv:hep-ex/0202018.
643: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0202018;%%
644:
645: %\cite{Klapdor-Kleingrothaus:2002kf}
646: \bibitem{Klapdor-Kleingrothaus:2002kf}
647: H.~V.~Klapdor-Kleingrothaus,
648: %``Reply to a comment of article 'Evidence for neutrinoless double beta decay',''
649: arXiv:hep-ph/0205228.
650: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0205228;%%
651:
652: %\cite{Bonn:rz}
653: \bibitem{Bonn:rz}
654: J.~Bonn {\it et al.},
655: %``Limits On Neutrino Masses From Tritium Beta Decay,''
656: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 110} (2002) 395.
657: %%CITATION = NUPHZ,110,395;%%
658:
659: \bibitem{graham}
660: G. Ross, these proceedings.
661:
662: %\cite{Elgaroy:2002bi}
663: \bibitem{Elgaroy:2002bi}
664: O.~Elgaroy {\it et al.},
665: %``A new limit on the total neutrino mass from the 2dF
666: galaxy redshift survey,''
667: arXiv:astro-ph/0204152.
668: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0204152;%%
669:
670: %\cite{Hannestad:2002iz}
671: \bibitem{Hannestad:2002iz}
672: S.~Hannestad,
673: %``Neutrino physics from cosmological observations,''
674: arXiv:astro-ph/0208567.
675: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0208567;%%
676:
677: %\cite{Kainulainen:2002pu}
678: \bibitem{Kainulainen:2002pu}
679: K.~Kainulainen and K.~A.~Olive,
680: %``Astrophysical and cosmological constraints on neutrino masses,''
681: arXiv:hep-ph/0206163.
682: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0206163;%%
683:
684: \cite{Volkas:2000ei}
685: \bibitem{Volkas:2000ei}
686: R.~R.~Volkas and Y.~Y.~Wong,
687: %``Further studies on relic neutrino asymmetry generation. I: The adiabatic Boltzmann limit, non-adiabatic evolution, and the classical harmonic oscillator analogue of the quantum kinetic equations,''
688: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62} (2000) 093024
689: [arXiv:hep-ph/0007185].
690: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0007185;%%
691:
692: %\cite{Loredo:2001rx}
693: \bibitem{Loredo:2001rx}
694: T.~J.~Loredo and D.~Q.~Lamb,
695: %``Bayesian analysis of neutrinos observed from supernova SN 1987A,''
696: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65} (2002) 063002
697: [arXiv:astro-ph/0107260].
698: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0107260;%%
699:
700: \bibitem{valle}
701: J.W.F. Valle, in these proceedings.
702:
703: %\cite{Minakata:2001cd}
704: \bibitem{Minakata:2001cd}
705: H.~Minakata, H.~Nunokawa, R.~Tomas and J.~W.~Valle,
706: %``Probing supernova physics with neutrino oscillations,''
707: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 542} (2002) 239
708: [arXiv:hep-ph/0112160].
709: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0112160;%%
710:
711: %\cite{Gelmini:2002xy}
712: \bibitem{Gelmini:2002xy}
713: G.~Gelmini and G.~Varieschi,
714: %``Cosmic rays above the ankle from Z-bursts with 0.07-eV relic neutrinos,''
715: arXiv:hep-ph/0201273.
716: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0201273;%%
717:
718: %\cite{Bahcall:2002wi}
719: \bibitem{Bahcall:2002wi}
720: J.~N.~Bahcall and E.~Waxman,
721: %``Has the GZK cutoff been discovered?,''
722: arXiv:hep-ph/0206217.
723: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0206217;%%
724:
725: %\cite{Choubey:2002bh}
726: \bibitem{Choubey:2002bh}
727: S.~Choubey and S.~F.~King,
728: %``Gamma ray bursts as probes of neutrino mass, quantum gravity and dark energy,''
729: arXiv:hep-ph/0207260.
730: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0207260;%%
731:
732: %\cite{Ghisellini:2001jr}
733: \bibitem{Ghisellini:2001jr}
734: G.~Ghisellini,
735: %``Gamma ray bursts: some facts and ideas,''
736: arXiv:astro-ph/0111584.
737: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0111584;%%
738:
739: %\cite{Ellis:1999sf}
740: \bibitem{Ellis:1999sf}
741: J.~R.~Ellis, N.~E.~Mavromatos, D.~V.~Nanopoulos and G.~Volkov,
742: %``Gravitational-recoil effects on fermion propagation in space-time foam,''
743: Gen.\ Rel.\ Grav.\ {\bf 32} (2000) 1777
744: [arXiv:gr-qc/9911055].
745: %%CITATION = GR-QC 9911055;%%
746:
747: \end{thebibliography}
748: \end{document}
749:
750:
751:
752:
753:
754:
755:
756: