1:
2: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
3: \documentclass[12pt]{iopart}
4: \usepackage{times}
5: \usepackage{graphicx}
6: \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{0.833}
7:
8: \begin{document}
9:
10: \title{Spacetime Structure of Massive Gravitinos }
11: \author{M.\ Kirchbach$^a$ and D.\ V.\ Ahluwalia$^{a,b}$}
12:
13: \address{$a.$ Theoretical Physics Group\\
14: Facultad de F\'isica, Universidad Aut\'onoma de Zacatecas, \\
15: A. P.\ C-600, ZAC-98062, M\'exico \\
16: $b.$ Inter-University Center for Astronomy and Astrophysics (IUCAA)\\
17: Post Bag 4, Ganeshkhind, Pune, India 411 007}
18: \begin{abstract}
19: The talk presents an {\em ab initio\/} construct
20: of the spacetime structure underlying
21: massive gravitinos. We argue that single spin interpretation
22: of massive gravitino is untenable, and that a spin measurement
23: in the rest frame for an unpolarized ensemble of massive gravitinos,
24: would yield the results $3/2^-$ with probability
25: one half, and $1/2$ with probability one half.
26: The latter is distributed uniformly, i.e. as 1/4,
27: among the two spin-$1/2^+$ and spin-1/2$^-$ states of opposite parities.
28: {}From that we draw the conclusion that the massive gravitino
29: should be interpreted as a particle of multiple spin. We expect that a
30: natural extension of this work to finite-range gravity shall endow
31: the graviton with spins 0, 1, and 2 components.
32: \end{abstract}
33: % Leave the next line commented out!
34: % \maketitle
35:
36:
37:
38: %............................ definitions ...............
39: \def\beq{\begin{eqnarray}}
40: \def\eeq{\end{eqnarray}}
41:
42:
43:
44: \def\A{{\mathcal A}^\mu}
45: \def\W{{\mathcal W}_\mu}
46: %.......................
47:
48: %............................ definitions ...............
49: \def\beq{\begin{eqnarray}}
50: \def\eeq{\end{eqnarray}}
51:
52: %....................................... Various boldface symbols
53:
54: \def\s{\mbox{\boldmath$\displaystyle\mathbf{\sigma}$}}
55: \def\S{\mbox{\boldmath$\displaystyle\mathbf{\Sigma}$}}
56: \def\J{\mbox{\boldmath$\displaystyle\mathbf{J}$}}
57: \def\K{\mbox{\boldmath$\displaystyle\mathbf{K}$}}
58: \def\P{\mbox{\boldmath$\displaystyle\mathbf{P}$}}
59: \def\p{\mbox{\boldmath$\displaystyle\mathbf{p}$}}
60: \def\hp{\mbox{\boldmath$\displaystyle\mathbf{\widehat{\p}}$}}
61: \def\x{\mbox{\boldmath$\displaystyle\mathbf{x}$}}
62: \def\0{\mbox{\boldmath$\displaystyle\mathbf{0}$}}
63: \def\bv{\mbox{\boldmath$\displaystyle\mathbf{\varphi}$}}
64: \def\hbv{\mbox{\boldmath$\displaystyle\mathbf{\widehat\varphi}$}}
65:
66:
67: \def\bl{\mbox{\boldmath$\displaystyle\mathbf{\lambda}$}}
68: \def\bl{\mbox{\boldmath$\displaystyle\mathbf{\lambda}$}}
69: \def\br{\mbox{\boldmath$\displaystyle\mathbf{\rho}$}}
70: \def\bfhh{\mbox{\boldmath$\displaystyle\mathbf{(1/2,0)\oplus(0,1/2)}\,\,$}}
71:
72: \def\mn{\mbox{\boldmath$\displaystyle\mathbf{\nu}$}}
73: \def\amn{\mbox{\boldmath$\displaystyle\mathbf{\overline{\nu}}$}}
74:
75: \def\mne{\mbox{\boldmath$\displaystyle\mathbf{\nu_e}$}}
76: \def\amne{\mbox{\boldmath$\displaystyle\mathbf{\overline{\nu}_e}$}}
77: \def\rlh{\mbox{\boldmath$\displaystyle\mathbf{\rightleftharpoons}$}}
78:
79: %\def\lp{\mbox{\boldmath$\displaystyle\mathbf{\lambda(\p)}$}}
80: %\def\rp{\mbox{\boldmath$\displaystyle\mathbf{\rho(\p)}$}}
81:
82: \def\wm{\mbox{\boldmath$\displaystyle\mathbf{W^-}$}}
83: \def\hh{\mbox{\boldmath$\displaystyle\mathbf{(1/2,1/2)}$}}
84: \def\h00h{\mbox{\boldmath$\displaystyle\mathbf{(1/2,0)\oplus(0,1/2)}$}}
85: \def\znbb{\mbox{\boldmath$\displaystyle\mathbf{0\nu \beta\beta}$}}
86: %.......................
87:
88:
89: %........................................................
90:
91:
92: %........................................................
93:
94:
95: \section{Introduction}
96: \label{Intro}
97: This talk is adapted from our recent
98: works \cite{ak,ka}. The goal is to
99: review new insights into the spacetime properties of massive gravitinos.
100: We examine the nature of the spinor-vector $\psi^\mu$ that
101: appears in supersymmetric theories as a fermionic gauge field, the
102: so called gravitino, and show that its single-spin interpretation is
103: unjustified. Rather, this particle represents itself as a multispin
104: object.
105: The presentation is organized as follows.
106:
107: In the next Section we briefly outline the construction
108: of the Dirac $(1/2,0)\oplus (0,1/2)$ representation space.
109: Section 3 is devoted to the massive gravitino.
110: There we show that the so called auxiliary conditions to the spinor-vector
111: $\psi^\mu$ are nothing but defining conditions for the subspace
112: of $\psi^\mu$ that carries the maximal spin of $3/2^-$ in the rest frame.
113: In particular, we derive an equation for $\psi^\mu\gamma_\mu$ showing
114: that the latter auxiliary condition is not arbitrary at all and
115: can not be set equal to zero unconditionally.
116: We suggest sets of such defining--``auxiliary''-- conditions
117: for each one of the spin-1/2$^-$ and spin-1/2$^+$ rest-frame sectors
118: of $\psi^\mu$ and show that none of them is more or less physical than
119: the other two. From that we derive the conclusion about the multi-spin
120: character of the massive gravitino.
121: The talk ends with a brief outlook.
122:
123:
124: \section{Dirac's $\h00h$ representation space}
125: \label{sect:sv}
126:
127: In this section we outline a general new procedure for obtaining
128: the Dirac equation that relies on nothing more but
129: the boost operators {\em and\/}
130: a phase relationship between right and left handed Weyl spinors
131: at rest.
132: We begin with the rest-frame spinors
133: and boost them using the following boosts
134: \beq
135: \kappa^{\left(\frac{1}{2},0\right)\oplus\left(0,\frac{1}{2}\right)
136: }
137: =
138: \kappa^{\left(\frac{1}{2},0\right)}
139: \oplus
140: \kappa^{\left(0,\frac{1}{2}\right)}\,,
141: \eeq
142: with
143: \beq
144: \kappa^{\left(\frac{1}{2},0\right)}&=&
145: \exp\left(+\,
146: \frac{\s}{2}\cdot\bv\right)= \sqrt{\frac{E+m}{2\,m}}
147: \left(1_2+\frac{\s\cdot\p}{E+m}\right)
148: \,,\label{br}\\
149: \kappa^{\left(0,\frac{1}{2}\right)}&=&
150: \exp\left(-\,
151: \frac{\s}{2}\cdot\bv\right)= \sqrt{\frac{E+m}{2\,m}}
152: \left(1_2-\frac{\s\cdot\p}{E+m}\right)
153: \,.\label{bl}
154: \eeq
155: In Eqs.~(\ref{br}) and (\ref{bl}) the boost parameter is defined as:
156: \beq
157: \cosh(\varphi)=\frac{E}{m},\quad
158: \sinh(\varphi)=\frac{\vert\p\vert}{m},\quad
159: {\hbv}
160: =\frac{\p}{\vert \p\vert}\,.
161: \eeq
162: The boosts take a particle at rest to a particle
163: moving with momentum $\p$ in the ``boosted frame.''
164: We use the notation in which
165: $1_n$ and $0_n$ represent
166: $n\times n$ identity and null matrices, respectively.
167: The remaining symbols carry their usual contextual meaning.
168: We define the spin-$1/2$ helicity operator:
169: $
170: \S=({\s}/{2})\cdot\widehat{\p},
171: $
172: where $\widehat{\p} = {\p}/\vert {\p}\,\vert$, and
173: $\p=\vert \p\,\vert ( \sin(\theta)\cos(\phi),
174: \sin(\theta)\sin(\phi),
175: \cos(\theta))$.
176: Its positive and negative
177: helicity states are:
178: \beq
179: && h^+= N
180: \left(
181: \begin{array}{c}
182: \cos(\theta/2) \exp(-i \phi/2)\\
183: \sin(\theta/2) \exp(i \phi/2)
184: \end{array}
185: \right),\nonumber\\
186: && h^-= N
187: \left(
188: \begin{array}{c}
189: \sin(\theta/2) \exp(-i \phi/2)\\
190: -\cos(\theta/2) \exp(i \phi/2)
191: \end{array}
192: \right)\,.\label{h}
193: \eeq
194: The rest-frame $(1/2,0)\oplus(0,1/2)$ spinors are then chosen to be:
195: \beq
196: && u_{+1/2}(\0)=
197: \left(
198: \begin{array}{c}
199: h^+\\
200: h^+
201: \end{array}
202: \right)\,,\quad u_{-1/2}(\0)=
203: \left(
204: \begin{array}{c}
205: h^-\\
206: h^-
207: \end{array}
208: \right)\,,\nonumber\\
209: && v_{+1/2}(\0)=
210: \left(
211: \begin{array}{c}
212: h^+\\
213: -h^+
214: \end{array}
215: \right)\,,\quad
216: v_{-1/2}(\0)=
217: \left(
218: \begin{array}{c}
219: h^-\\
220: -h^-
221: \end{array}
222: \right).
223: \eeq
224: The choice of the phases made in writing down these spinors
225: has been determined by the demand of parity covariance \cite{Ah3}.
226: The boosted spinors, $u_{\pm 1/2}(\p\,)$ and $v_{\pm 1/2}(\p\,)$
227: are obtained by applying the boost operator
228: $\kappa^{\left(\frac{1}{2},0\right)\oplus\left(0,\frac{1}{2}\right)
229: }$ to the above spinors, yielding:
230: \beq
231: && u_{+1/2}(\p\,)=
232: \frac{N} {\sqrt{2 m ( m +E)}}
233: \left(
234: \begin{array}{c}
235: \exp(-i \phi/2) (m+\vert \p\,\vert +E) \cos(\theta/2)\\
236: \exp(i \phi/2) (m+\vert \p\,\vert +E) \sin(\theta/2)\\
237: \exp(-i \phi/2) (m-\vert \p\,\vert +E) \cos(\theta/2)\\
238: \exp(i \phi/2) (m-\vert \p\,\vert +E) \sin(\theta/2)\\
239: \end{array}
240: \right)\,,\nonumber\\
241: && u_{-1/2}(\p\,)=
242: \frac{N}{\sqrt{2 m ( m +E)}}
243: \left(
244: \begin{array}{c}
245: \exp(-i \phi/2) (m-\vert \p\,\vert +E) \sin(\theta/2)\\
246: -\exp(i \phi/2) (m-\vert \p\,\vert +E) \cos(\theta/2)\\
247: \exp(-i \phi/2) (m+\vert \p\,\vert +E) \sin(\theta/2)\\
248: -\exp(i \phi/2) (m+\vert \p\,\vert +E) \cos(\theta/2)\\
249: \end{array}
250: \right)\,,\nonumber\\
251: && v_{+1/2}(\p\,)=
252: \frac{N }{\sqrt{2 m ( m +E)}}
253: \left(
254: \begin{array}{c}
255: \exp(-i \phi/2) (m+\vert \p\,\vert +E) \cos(\theta/2)\\
256: \exp(i \phi/2) (m+\vert \p\,\vert +E) \sin(\theta/2)\\
257: -\exp(-i \phi/2) (m-\vert \p\,\vert +E) \cos(\theta/2)\\
258: -\exp(i \phi/2) (m-\vert \p\,\vert +E) \sin(\theta/2)\\
259: \end{array}
260: \right)\,,\nonumber\\
261: && v_{-1/2}(\p\,)=
262: \frac{N }{\sqrt{2 m ( m +E)}}
263: \left(
264: \begin{array}{c}
265: \exp(-i \phi/2) (m-\vert \p\,\vert +E) \sin(\theta/2)\\
266: -\exp(i \phi/2) (m-\vert \p\,\vert +E) \cos(\theta/2)\\
267: -\exp(-i \phi/2) (m+\vert \p\,\vert +E) \sin(\theta/2)\\
268: \exp(i \phi/2) (m+\vert \p\,\vert +E) \cos(\theta/2)\\
269: \end{array}
270: \right)\,.\label{uv}
271: \eeq
272: These satisfy the orthonormality and
273: completeness relations (in standard notation):
274: \beq
275: && \bar u_h(\p\,)\, u_{h^\prime}(\p\,) = +2 N^2
276: \delta_{h {h^\prime}}\,,
277: \quad
278: \bar v_h(\p\,)\, v_{h^\prime}(\p\,) = -2 N^2
279: \delta_{h {h^\prime}}\,,\label{5}\\
280: && \frac{1}{2 N^2}
281: \left[\sum_{h=\pm 1/2}
282: u_{h}(\p\,) \bar u_h(\p\,) -
283: \sum_{h=\pm 1/2} v_{h}(\p\,) \bar v_h(\p\,)\right] = 1_4\,.\label{1}
284: \eeq
285:
286: In order to obtain the wave equation satisfied by the $u_h(\p\,)$ and
287: $v_h(\p\,)$ spinors we first note that
288: \footnote{This part of the calculation
289: is best done if one starts with the momenta in the Cartesian co-ordinates,
290: and takes the ``axis of spin quantization'' to be the
291: z-axis.}
292: \beq
293: \frac{1}{2 N^2}
294: \left[\sum_{h=\pm 1/2}
295: u_{h}(\p\,) \bar u_h(\p\,) +
296: \sum_{h=\pm 1/2} v_{h}(\p\,) \bar v_h(\p\,)\right]\equiv
297: \frac{\gamma_\mu p^\mu }{m}\,,\label{2}
298: \eeq
299: where we defined,
300: \beq
301: \gamma_0=\left(\begin{array}{cc}
302: 0_2 & I_2 \\
303: I_2 & 0_2
304: \end{array}\right)\,,\quad
305: \gamma_i=\left(\begin{array}{cc}
306: 0_2 & \sigma_i \\
307: -\sigma_i & 0_2
308: \end{array}\right)\,.
309: \eeq
310: Adding/subtracting Eqs. (\ref{1}) and (\ref{2}), yields:
311: \beq
312: \frac{1}{2 N^2}
313: \sum_{h=\pm 1/2}
314: u_{h}(\p\,) \bar u_h(\p\,) =
315: \frac{\gamma_\mu p^\mu + m 1_4}{2 m}\,,\label{3}\\
316: \frac{1}{2 N^2}
317: \sum_{h=\pm 1/2} v_{h}(\p\,) \bar v_h(\p\,)
318: =
319: \frac{\gamma_\mu p^\mu - m 1_4}{2 m}\,,\label{4}
320: \eeq
321: respectively.
322: Multiplying Eq. (\ref{3}) from the right by $u_{h^\prime}(\p\,)$, and
323: Eq. (\ref{4}) by $v_{h^\prime}(\p\,)$, and using Eqs. (\ref{5}),
324: immediately yields the well known momentum-space Dirac equation
325: for the $(1/2,0)\oplus(0,1/2)$ representation space,
326: \beq
327: \left(\gamma_\mu p^\mu \pm m 1_4\right)\psi_h(\p\,)=0\,.\label{deq}
328: \eeq
329: In Eq. (\ref{deq}), the minus sign
330: is to be taken for, $\psi_h(\p\,) = u_{h}(\p\,)$, and
331: the plus sign for, $\psi_h(\p\,) = v_{h}(\p\,)$.
332: The essential element to note in regard to the derivation of
333: Eq. (\ref{deq}) is that it follows directly from the explicit expressions
334: for the $u_h(\p\,)$ and $v_h(\p\,)$.
335:
336:
337:
338: \section{Spacetime properties of massive gravitino}
339: A massive gravitino is described by
340: $\psi^\mu$.
341: As far as its spacetime properties are
342: concerned, it transforms as a finite dimensional non-unitary
343: representation of the Lorentz group,
344: \beq
345: \psi^\mu:\quad
346: \underbrace{
347: \left[\left(\frac{1}{2},0\right)\oplus\left(0,\frac{1}{2}\right)\right]
348: }_{\mbox{\sc Spinor}\;\mbox{\sc Sector}}
349: \otimes
350: \underbrace{
351: \left(\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2}\right)
352: }_{\mbox{\sc Vector}\;\mbox{\sc Sector}}\,. \label{rs}
353: \eeq
354: The unitarily transforming physical states are built upon
355: this structure \cite{sw}.
356:
357: \vspace*{1truecm}
358: \begin{figure}
359: %\begin{center}
360: \hspace{-0.2cm}
361: \includegraphics[width=8cm,height=16cm]{RSN.ps}
362: \hspace{-.2cm}
363: \includegraphics[width=8cm,height=16cm]{RSD.ps}
364: \vspace{-4.0cm}
365: \caption{Summary of the data on $N$ and $\Delta$ resonances.
366: The breaking of the mass degeneracy for each of the clusters
367: at about $5\%$ may in fact be an artifact of the data analysis,
368: as has been suggested by H\"ohler \cite{gh}.
369: The filled circles represent known resonances, while
370: the sole empty circle corresponds to a prediction.}
371: %\end{center}
372: \end{figure}
373:
374:
375: We enumerate two circumstances that motivate us to take
376: an {\em ab initio\/} look at this representation space.
377:
378: \begin{enumerate}
379:
380: \item
381: For the vector sector, it has recently been called to
382: attention that
383: the Proca description of the $(1/2,1/2)$ representation space is
384: incomplete \cite{ak}. An {\em ab initio\/} construction of this
385: sector reveals that the St\"uckelberg contribution to the propagator,
386: so important for the renormalization of the gauge theories with
387: massive bosons \cite{v}, is found to naturally reside in the
388: $(1/2,1/2)$ representation space.
389:
390:
391: \item
392: At the same time, the properties of the
393: $(1/2,1/2)$, along with that of
394: the $(1/2,0)\oplus(0,1/2)$, representation space determine the
395: structure of
396: $\psi^\mu $. In order to impose a single-spin, i.e., spin $3/2$,
397: interpretation on the latter, the lower spin-$1/2^+$ and
398: spin-$1/2^-$ components of $\psi^\mu$ are considered as redundant,
399: unphysical, states that are claimed to be excluded from consideration
400: by means of the two supplementary conditions:
401: $\gamma_\mu\psi^\mu(x)=0$, and $\partial_\mu \psi^\mu(x)=0$,
402: respectively. However, this time-honored
403: framework was questioned by a recent empirical observation
404: regarding the $N$ and $\Delta $ resonances \cite{mk}.
405: The available data on high-spin resonances
406: reveal an unexpected and systematic clustering
407: in terms of the $(j/2, j/2)\otimes \lbrack (1/2,0)\oplus (0,1/2)\rbrack $
408: representations with $j=1,3$ and $5$ {\em without\/} imposition of the
409: supplementary conditions.
410: For the $N$ and $\Delta$ resonances these results are summarized in
411: Figure 1. For example, in the standard theoretical
412: framework $N(1440)$, $N(1535)$, $\Delta(1620)$ and $\Delta(1750)$
413: should have been absent. Experimental data shows them to be
414: present at statistically significant level.\footnote{The $N(1440)$, $N(1535)$,
415: $\Delta(1620)$ carry four star status, while at present $\Delta(1750)$
416: simply has a one star significance \cite{pdg}.}
417:
418: \end{enumerate}
419:
420:
421:
422:
423: In regard to the latter of the two enumerated circumstances, we take
424: the position that any solution of the QCD Lagrangian for particle
425: resonances must carry well-defined transformation properties when looked
426: upon from different inertial frames. This forces these resonances to
427: belong to one, or the other, of various representation spaces of the
428: Lorentz group. For this reason the data on particle resonances
429: may furnish hints on physical interpretation of various
430: Lorentz group representations that one needs in gauge theories, or theories
431: of supergravity.
432:
433:
434:
435: For exploring the spacetime structure of massive gravitinos
436: the charge conjugation properties play an important role.
437: Under the operation of charge conjugation,
438: one may choose the spinor sector to behave as a Dirac object, and implement
439: the Majorana nature of the massive gravitino at the level of the
440: Fock space. This is standard, see, e.g., Ref. \cite{Moroi}. Or, from the
441: very beginning choose the spinor sector to behave as a Majorana object.
442: Since we wish to stress certain non-trivial aspects
443: of massive gravitino that do not -- at least qualitatively -- depend
444: on this choice, we shall here treat the spinor sector to be of Dirac
445: type.
446:
447: Very nature of our {\em ab initio} look at the representation
448: space defined in Eq. (\ref{rs}), obliges us to present
449: sufficient pedagogic details so that by the end of the
450: lecture much that is needed to form an opinion on the arrived results
451: is readily available. At the same time, length constraints of this
452: manuscript would prevent us from delving into subtle details which are,
453: for present, of secondary importance (but have been studied and are
454: planned to be presented elsewhere).
455:
456:
457: We shall work in the momentum space.
458: The notation will be essentially that introduced in Ref. \cite{ak}.
459:
460:
461: \subsection{${(1/2,1/2)}$ Representation space --
462: An ab initio construct}
463:
464: We have constructed in Section \ref{sect:sv} the spinorial sector entering
465: $\psi^\mu $ in Eq.~(\ref{rs}).
466: Therefore, our next task is to construct the $(1/2,1/2)$ representation space.
467: As such, now we introduce the rest-frame vectors for the $(1/2,1/2)$
468: representation space,
469: \beq
470: && \xi_1(\0\,) = h^+\otimes h^+\,,\\
471: && \xi_2(\0\,) =
472: \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left( h^+\otimes h^- + h^- \otimes h^+\right) \,,\\
473: && \xi_3(\0\,) = h^-\otimes h^-\,,\\
474: && \xi_4(\0\,) =
475: \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left( h^+\otimes h^- - h^- \otimes h^+\right) \,.
476: \eeq
477: The boosted vectors are thus:
478: $
479: \xi_\zeta(\p\,)= \kappa^{\left(\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2}\right)}
480: \xi_\zeta(\0\,), \zeta=1,2,3,4,
481: $
482: \beq
483: && \xi_1(\p\,)
484: = \frac{ N^2}{2}
485: \left(
486: \begin{array}{c}
487: 2 \exp(-i \phi) \cos^2(\theta/2) \\
488: \sin(\theta) \\
489: \sin(\theta) \\
490: 2 \exp(i \phi) \sin^2(\theta/2)
491: \end{array}
492: \right)\,,\nonumber\\
493: && \xi_2(\p\,)
494: = \frac{ N^2}{\sqrt{2} m }
495: \left(
496: \begin{array}{c}
497: \exp(-i \phi) E \sin(\theta) \\
498: - \left(\vert \p \,\vert + E \cos(\theta)\right) \\
499: \vert \p \,\vert - E \cos(\theta) \\
500: - \exp(i \phi) E \sin(\theta)
501: \end{array}
502: \right)\,,\nonumber\\
503: && \xi_3(\p\,)
504: = \frac{ N^2}{2}
505: \left(
506: \begin{array}{c}
507: 2 \exp(-i \phi) \sin^2(\theta/2) \\
508: - \sin(\theta) \\
509: - \sin(\theta) \\
510: 2 \exp(i \phi) \cos^2(\theta/2)
511: \end{array}
512: \right)\,,\nonumber\\
513: && \xi_4(\p\,)
514: = \frac{ N^2}{\sqrt{2} m }
515: \left(
516: \begin{array}{c}
517: \exp(-i \phi) \vert \p\,\vert \sin(\theta) \\
518: - \left( E + \vert \p \,\vert \cos(\theta)\right) \\
519: E - \vert \p \,\vert \cos(\theta) \\
520: - \exp(i \phi) \vert \p\,\vert \sin(\theta)
521: \end{array}
522: \right)\,.\label{xi}
523: \eeq
524: Here $\kappa^{(1/2,1/2)}=\kappa^{(1/2,0)}\otimes \kappa^{(0,1/2)}$.
525:
526: In the notation of Ref.
527: \cite{ak},\footnote{In the cited work
528: we presented the $(1/2,1/2)$ representation
529: space in its parity realization. Here, the presentation
530: is in terms of helicity realization. The two descriptions have mathematically
531: similar but physically
532: distinct structures, which, e.g., show up
533: in their different behavior under the operation of
534: Parity.} these satisfy the orthonormality and
535: completeness relations, along with a new wave equation.
536: The orthonormality and
537: completeness relations are:
538: \beq
539: && \overline{\xi}_\zeta(\p\,)
540: \xi_{\zeta^\prime}(\p\,) = -\,N^4\, \delta_{\zeta\zeta^\prime}
541: \,,\quad \zeta=1,2,3
542: \,,\nonumber \\
543: && \overline{\xi}_\zeta(\p\,) \xi_{\zeta^\prime}(\p\,) =
544: +\,N^4\,\delta_{\zeta\zeta^\prime}\,,\quad \zeta=4\,,\nonumber\\
545: && \frac{1}{N^4}
546: \left[ \xi_4(\p\,) \overline{\xi}_4(\p\,)
547: - \sum_{\zeta=1,2,3}
548: \xi_\zeta(\p\,) \overline{\xi}_\zeta(\p\,)\right] = 1_4\,,
549: \label{1/21/2_complt}
550: \eeq
551: where
552: \beq
553: \overline{\xi}_\zeta(\p\,) \equiv \xi_\zeta(\p\,)^\dagger
554: \lambda_{00}\,,
555: \eeq
556: with
557: \beq
558: \lambda_{00} = \left(
559: \begin{array}{cccc}
560: -1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
561: 0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \\
562: 0 & -1 & 0 & 0\\
563: 0 & 0 & 0 & -1
564: \end{array}
565: \right)\,.
566: \eeq
567:
568:
569:
570: The parity operator for the $(1/2,1/2)$ representation space is:
571: \beq
572: {\mathcal P} = \lambda_{00}\, \exp[i \alpha]\,
573: \,{\mathcal R}\,,\quad && {\mathcal R}:
574: \{\theta \rightarrow
575: \pi-\theta, \phi\rightarrow \pi + \phi\}\nonumber\\
576: && \alpha = \mbox{a real number}\,,
577: \eeq
578: while the helicity operator for this space is, $\J\cdot\widehat{{\bf p}}$,
579: with $\J$ given by:
580: \beq
581: J_x=\frac{1}{2}
582: \left(
583: \begin{array}{cccc}
584: 0 & 1 & 1 & 0 \\
585: 1 & 0 & 0 & 1\\
586: 1 & 0 & 0 & 1\\
587: 0 & 1 &1 & 0
588: \end{array}
589: \right), & &
590: J_y=\frac{1}{2}
591: \left(
592: \begin{array}{cccc}
593: 0 & -i & -i & 0 \\
594: i & 0 & 0 & -i \\
595: i & 0 & 0 & -i\\
596: 0 & i & i & 0
597: \end{array}
598: \right),\,\nonumber\\
599: &&J_z=
600: \left(
601: \begin{array}{cccc}
602: 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
603: 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
604: 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\\
605: 0 & 0 & 0 & -1
606: \end{array}
607: \right)\,.
608: \eeq
609:
610:
611: \vskip 1cm
612: We now must take a small definitional detour towards
613: the notion of the dragged Casimirs for spacetime symmetries.
614: It arises in the following fashion. The second Casimir operator, $C_2$,
615: of the Poincar\'e group is defined as the square of the Pauli-Lubanski
616: pseudovector:
617: \beq
618: {\mathcal W}^\mu = \frac{1}{2}\epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma} M_{\nu\rho}
619: P_\sigma\,,
620: \eeq
621: where $\epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}$ is the standard Levi-Civita symbol
622: in four dimensions, while $M_{\mu\nu}$ denote generators of the Lorentz
623: group,
624: \beq
625: M_{0i}= K_i\,,\quad M_{ij}= \epsilon_{ijk} J^k\,,
626: \eeq
627: where each of the $i,j,k$ runs over $1,2,3$.
628: The $P_\mu$ are generators of the spacetime translations. In general, these
629: have non-vanishing commutators with $M_{\mu\nu}$,
630: \beq
631: [P_\mu,\, M_{\rho\sigma}] = i
632: \left(\eta_{\mu\rho} P_\sigma - \eta_{\mu\sigma} P_\rho\right)\,.\label{6}
633: \eeq
634: On using Eq. (\ref{6}), we rewrite $C_2$ as
635: \beq
636: C_2 &=& \frac{1}{4}
637: \epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}
638: \epsilon_{\mu\lambda\kappa\zeta} M_{\nu\rho}
639: M^{\lambda\kappa} P_\sigma P^\zeta
640: \nonumber\\
641: && \qquad+\left[\frac{i}{4}
642: \epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma} \epsilon_{\mu\lambda\kappa\zeta}
643: M_{\nu\rho} {\eta_\sigma}^\lambda P^\kappa P^\zeta
644: +
645: \frac{i}{4}
646: \epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma} \epsilon_{\mu\kappa\lambda\zeta}
647: M_{\nu\rho}
648: {\eta_\sigma}^\kappa P^\lambda P^\zeta\right]\,.
649: \label{drg}
650: \eeq
651:
652: \vskip 1cm
653: The squared bracket vanishes due to antisymmetry
654: of the Levi-Civita symbol. As such, the space-time translation operators
655: entering the definition of $C_2$ can be moved to the very right.
656: This observation allows for introducing the dragged Casimir
657: $\widetilde{C}_2$ as an operator with the same
658: form as $C_2$ -- the difference being that
659: the commutator in Eq.~(\ref{6})
660: is now set to zero [as is appropriate for finite dimensional
661: $SU_R(2)\otimes SU_L(2)$ representations]. Consequently,
662: while $C_2$ and $\widetilde{C}_2$ carry same invariant eigenvalues when
663: acting upon momentum eigenstates, their commutators with the Lorentz group
664: generators are no longer identical.\footnote{To avoid confusion, note that
665: $\widetilde{C}_2$ is defined in the $SU_R(2)\otimes SU_L(2)$; while
666: $C_2$ is defined in the Poincar\'e group.}
667: For the $(1/2,0)\oplus(0,1/2)$ representation space,
668: $[\widetilde{C_2},\,\J^{\,2}] $
669: vanishes.
670: For the $(1/2,1/2)$ representation space,
671: $[\widetilde{C_2},\,\J^{\,2}] $
672: does not vanish (except when acting upon rest states),
673: and equals $ -\,4\,i \, E\, \P\cdot \K$. This leads to
674: the fact that while the former representation space is endowed with
675: a well-defined spin, the latter is not:
676:
677: % ...... PLB: Please do not remove the quoted text ....
678: \begin{quote}
679:
680: As an immediate application, $\widetilde{C}_2$ for the
681: $(1/2,1/2)$ representation space
682: bifurcates this space into two sectors.
683: The three states $\xi_\zeta(\p\,) $ with $\zeta=1,2,3$
684: are associated with the $\widetilde{C}_2$ eigenvalue,
685: $-\, 2\, m^2$; while
686: the, $\zeta=4$, corresponds to eigenvalue zero.
687:
688: Thus, all the $\xi_\zeta(\p\,)$, except for the rest frame, cease
689: to be eigenstates of the $(1/2,1/2)$'s $\J^{\,2}$ and
690: do not carry definite spins.
691: This contrasts with the situation for the $(1/2,0)\oplus(0,1/2)$
692: representation space, where the $\psi_h(\p)$ are eigenstates of the
693: corresponding $\J^{\,2}$.
694:
695: \end{quote}
696:
697: \vskip 1cm
698:
699: %.........................................
700:
701: Now in order that the $\xi_\zeta(\p\,)$ carry the standard
702: contravariant Lorentz index, we introduce
703: a rotation in the $(1/2,1/2)$ representation space via
704: \cite{ak}:
705: \beq
706: S=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}
707: \left(
708: \begin{array}{cccc}
709: 0 & i & -i & 0 \\
710: -i & 0 & 0 & i \\
711: 1 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\
712: 0 & i & i & 0
713: \end{array}
714: \right)\, .
715: \eeq
716: Then, the $(1/2,1/2)$ representation space is spanned by four Lorentz
717: vectors:
718: \beq
719: {\mathcal A}^\mu_\zeta(\p\,)=
720: S^{\mu\alpha} \left[\xi_\zeta(\p\,)\right]_\alpha
721: \,, \quad\zeta=1,2,3,4\,,
722: \label{s_transf_vec}
723: \eeq
724: and the superscript $\mu$ is the standard Lorentz index.
725: Note that the ${\mathcal W}^\mu$'s by themselves are $4\times 4$ matrices
726: in Lorentz index space, i.e. ${\mathcal W}^\mu_{\nu\eta }$.
727: Following the procedure established
728: in Sec. II, they can be shown to
729: satisfy a new wave equation \cite{ak},
730: \beq
731: \left(\Lambda_{\mu\nu}
732: p^\mu p ^\nu \pm m^2 I_4\right) {\mathcal A}_\zeta(\p\,)=0\,,
733: \eeq
734: where the plus sign is to be taken for, $\zeta=1,2,3$, while the
735: minus sign belongs to, $\zeta=4$.
736: The $\Lambda_{\mu\nu}$
737: matrices are: $\Lambda_{00}=\mbox{diag}(1,-1,-1,-1)$,
738: $\Lambda_{11}=\mbox{diag}(1,-1,1,1)$, $\Lambda_{22}=\mbox{diag}(1,1,-1,1)$,
739: $\Lambda_{33}=\mbox{diag}(1,1,1,-1)$, and
740: \beq
741: && \Lambda_{01}=
742: \left(\begin{array}{cccc}
743: 0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \\
744: 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
745: 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\\
746: 0 & 0 & 0 & 0
747: \end{array}\right),\,\,
748: \Lambda_{02}=
749: \left(\begin{array}{cccc}
750: 0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \\
751: 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
752: 1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\
753: 0 & 0 & 0 & 0
754: \end{array}\right), \,\,
755: \Lambda_{03}=
756: \left(\begin{array}{cccc}
757: 0 & 0 & 0 & -1 \\
758: 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
759: 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\\
760: 1 & 0 & 0 & 0
761: \end{array}\right), \,\,\nonumber\\
762: && \Lambda_{12}=
763: \left(\begin{array}{cccc}
764: 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
765: 0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \\
766: 0 & -1 & 0 & 0\\
767: 0 & 0 & 0 & 0
768: \end{array}\right), \,\,
769: \Lambda_{13}=
770: \left(\begin{array}{cccc}
771: 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
772: 0 & 0 & 0 & -1 \\
773: 0 & 0 & 0 & 0\\
774: 0 & -1 & 0 & 0
775: \end{array}\right),\,\,\nonumber\\
776: &&\Lambda_{23}=
777: \left(\begin{array}{cccc}
778: 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
779: 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
780: 0 & 0 & 0 & -1\\
781: 0 & 0 & -1 & 0
782: \end{array}\right)\,.
783: \eeq
784: The remaining $\Lambda_{\mu\nu}$ are obtained from the above
785: expressions by noting: $ \Lambda_{\mu\nu} =
786: \Lambda_{\nu\mu}$. Parenthetically, we note that the S-transformed
787: $\lambda_{00}$ equals $\Lambda_{00}$ and is nothing but the standard
788: spacetime metric (for flat spacetime).
789:
790: The massive (1/2,1/2) propagators that
791: follow from the completeness relation within the (1/2,1/2)
792: representation space in Eq.~(\ref{1/21/2_complt})
793: read (in the notations of Eq.~(\ref{s_transf_vec}))
794: \begin{eqnarray}
795: \lbrack {\mathcal A}_4 (\vec{p}\, )\bar {{\mathcal A}}_4 (\vec{p})
796: \Lambda_{00}\rbrack_{\mu\nu}
797: &=& {{p_\mu p_\nu}\over m^2}\, ,
798: \label{Proc}\\
799: -\sum_{\zeta=1}^{3}
800: { \lbrack {\mathcal A}_\zeta (\vec{p}\, )
801: \bar{{\mathcal A}}_\zeta(\vec{p}\, )\Lambda_{00}\rbrack _{\mu\nu} }
802: &=&
803: g_{\mu\nu} -{{p_\mu p_\nu}\over m^2}\, .
804: \label{Stueck}
805: \end{eqnarray}
806: One immediately realizes that the massive (1/2,1/2) propagator
807: contains both the St\"uckelberg (\ref{Proc}) and the Proca (\ref{Stueck})
808: terms \cite{v}.
809:
810: This feature of the completeness relation within the
811: (1/2,1/2) representation space appears quite appealing to us
812: as it leads to a well behaved propagator of a massive gauge
813: boson as arising in a spontaneously broken local gauge theory.
814: Within the context of the scenario presented above,
815: the Proca sector is characterized by vanishing of $p^\mu {\mathcal A}_\mu=0$,
816: while the St\"uckelberg sector is characterized by vanishing
817: of $p^\mu\widetilde {{\mathcal W}}_\mu=0$ (see Table I).
818:
819: It can also be seen that $\xi_\zeta(\p\,)$, for $\zeta=1,2,3$,
820: coincide with the solutions of Proca framework (and are divergence-less);
821: whereas $\xi_4(\p\,)$, that gives the St\"uckelberg contribution to the
822: propagator, lies outside the Proca framework:\footnote{We define the
823: dragged Pauli-Lubanski
824: pseudovector, ${\widetilde{\W}}$, in a manner parallel to the introduction
825: of the dragged second Casimir operator.}
826:
827:
828: {\small
829: \begin{center}
830:
831: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|}\hline
832: $\zeta$ &
833: $p_\mu \A (\p ) $ &
834: ${\widetilde{\W}}^{(1/2,1/2)}\A (\p ) $ &
835: $\lambda_\tau $ & Remarks\\
836: \hline\hline
837: $1,2,3$ & $= 0$ & $\ne0$ & $ 2 $ & Proca Sector\\
838: \hline
839: $4$ & $\ne 0$ & $= 0$ & $ 0 $ & St\"uckelberg Sector\\ \hline
840: \end{tabular}
841: \end{center}
842: }
843: In the above table we have introduced the $\lambda_\tau$ via the
844: equation:
845: \beq
846: \widetilde{C}_2^{(1/2,1/2)}{\mathcal A}(\p) = - \,\lambda_\tau \, m^2\,
847: {\mathcal A}(\p )\,.
848: \eeq
849:
850:
851:
852:
853: \subsection{Construction of spinor vector:
854: Massive gravitino}
855:
856:
857: We now wish to present the basis vectors for the representation
858: space defined by Eq. (\ref{rs}) in a language
859: which is widely used \cite{Moroi}. This would allow the present analysis
860: to be more readily available, and also bring out the
861: relevant similarities and differences with the
862: framework of Rarita and Schwinger \cite{RS}.
863:
864:
865: In writing down the basis spinor-vectors,
866: we will use the fact that in the $(1/2,1/2)$
867: representation space the charge conjugation is implemented by
868: \beq
869: {\mathcal C}^{(1/2,1/2)}:\quad{\mathcal A}(\p) \rightarrow
870: \left[{\mathcal A}(\p)\right]^\ast\,.
871: \eeq
872: In the $(1/2,0)\oplus(0,1/2)$
873: representation space the charge conjugation operator is
874: $
875: {\mathcal C}^{(1/2, 0)\oplus(0,1/2)}:\quad i \gamma^2 K\,,
876: $
877: where $K$ complex conjugates the spinor to its right. Then,
878: we obtain:
879: \beq
880: {\mathcal C}^{(1/2, 0)\oplus(0,1/2)}:{\Bigg\{}\begin{array}{l}
881: u_{+1/2}(\p) \rightarrow - v_{-1/2} (\p)\,,
882: u_{-1/2}(\p) \rightarrow v_{+1/2}(\p)\,,\\
883: v_{+1/2}(\p ) \rightarrow u_{-1/2}(\p) \,,
884: v_{-1/2}(\p ) \rightarrow - u_{+1/2}(\p)\,.
885: \end{array}
886: \eeq
887:
888: In the spirit outlined, the massive gravitino lives in a
889: space spanned by sixteen spinor-vectors defined in items
890: {\bf A}, {\bf B}, {\bf C} below:
891:
892: \begin{enumerate}
893: \item[{\bf A.}]
894: Of these,
895: eight spinor-vectors have $\widetilde{C}_2$ -- but not $\J^{\,2}$ --
896: eigenvalues, $-\, \frac{15}{4}\,m^2 $. These can be
897: further subdivided
898: into particle,
899: \beq
900: \psi_a^\mu(\p):
901: \cases{
902: & $\psi^\mu_1(\p) = u_{+1/2} (\p) \otimes \A_1 (\p)$\,,\cr
903: &$\psi^\mu_2(\p) = \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\, u_{+1/2} (\p) \otimes \A_2(\p)
904: + \sqrt{\frac{1}{3}}\, u_{-1/2} (\p) \otimes \A_1(\p)$\,
905: ,\cr
906: & $\psi^\mu_3(\p) = \sqrt{\frac{1}{3}}\, u_{+1/2} (\p) \otimes \A_3(\p)
907: + \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\, u_{-1/2} (\p ) \otimes \A_2(\p)$\,
908: ,\cr
909: & $\psi^\mu_4(\p) = u_{-1/2} (\p) \otimes \A_3(\p)$\,,\cr }\nonumber
910: \eeq
911: and antiparticle sectors:
912: \beq
913: [\psi_a^\mu(\p)]^{\mathcal C}:
914: \cases{
915: & $\psi^\mu_5(\p) = -v_{-1/2} (\p) \otimes \left[\A_1(\p)\right]^\ast$\,,\cr
916: & $\psi^\mu_6(\p) = - \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\, v_{-1/2}( \p) \otimes
917: \left[\A_2 (\p)\right]^\ast
918: + \sqrt{\frac{1}{3}}\, v_{+1/2} (\p) \otimes \left[\A_1(\p)
919: \right]^\ast$
920: \,,\cr
921: & $\psi^\mu_7(\p) = - \sqrt{\frac{1}{3}}\, v_{-1/2} (\p) \otimes
922: \left[\A_3(\p)\right]^\ast
923: + \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\, v_{+1/2} (\p) \otimes
924: \left[\A_2(\p)\right]^\ast$
925: \,,\cr
926: & $\psi^\mu_8 (\p ) = v_{+1/2} (\p ) \otimes \lbrack\A_3 (\p )\rbrack^\ast
927: $\,.\cr}
928: \nonumber
929: \eeq
930: Here,
931: $[\psi_\tau^\mu(\p)]^{\mathcal C} = {\mathcal C}^{(1/2,0)\oplus(0,1/2)}
932: \otimes{\mathcal C}^{(1/2,1/2)} \,\psi_\tau^\mu(\p )$,
933: $\tau=a,b,c$.
934:
935:
936:
937:
938:
939: \item[{\bf B.}]
940: Four spinor-vectors have $\widetilde{C}_2$ -- but not $\J^{\,2}$ --
941: eigenvalues, $-\, \frac{3}{4}\,m^2 $:
942: \beq
943: \psi_b^\mu (\p):
944: \cases{
945: & $\psi^\mu_9(\p) = \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\, u_{-1/2} (\p ) \otimes \A_1 (\p)
946: - \sqrt{\frac{1}{3}}\, u_{+1/2} (\p ) \otimes \A_2(\p)$\,,
947: \cr
948: & $\psi^\mu_{10}(\p) = \sqrt{\frac{1}{3}}\, u_{-1/2}( \p) \otimes \A_2(\p)
949: - \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\, u_{+1/2} (\p )\otimes \A_3(\p)$\,,
950: \cr}\nonumber
951: \eeq
952: \beq
953: [\psi_b^\mu(\p)]^{\mathcal C}:
954: \cases{
955: & $\psi^\mu_{11}(\p) = \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\, v_{+1/2}( \p )\otimes
956: \left[\A_1(\p)\right]^\ast
957: + \sqrt{\frac{1}{3}}\, v_{-1/2}( \p) \otimes
958: \left[\A_2(\p) \right]^\ast$\,,
959: \cr
960: & $\psi^\mu_{12}(\p) = \sqrt{\frac{1}{3}}\, v_{+1/2} (\p)
961: \otimes \left[\A_2(\p)\right]^\ast
962: + \sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}\, v_{-1/2} (\p) \otimes
963: \left[\A_3(\p)\right]^\ast$\,.\cr}\nonumber
964: \eeq
965:
966: \item[{\bf C.}]
967: Another set of four spinor-vectors with $\widetilde{C}_2$ --
968: but not $\J^{\,2}$ --
969: eigenvalues, $-\, \frac{3}{4}\,m^2 $:
970: \beq
971: \psi_c^\mu(\p):
972: \cases{ &
973: $\psi^\mu_{13}(\p) = u_{+1/2} (\p) \otimes \A_4(\p)$\,,\cr
974: & $\psi^\mu_{14}(\p ) = u_{-1/2} (\p) \otimes \A_4(\p)$\,,
975: \cr} \nonumber
976: \eeq
977:
978: \beq
979: [\psi_c^\mu\p]^{\mathcal C}:
980: \cases{
981: & $\psi^\mu_{15}(\p) = - v_{-1/2} (\p)
982: \otimes \left[\A_4(\p )\right]^\ast$\,,\cr
983: & $\psi^\mu_{16}(\p) = v_{+1/2} (\p) \otimes \left[\A_4(\p)\right]^\ast$
984: \,.\cr}
985: \nonumber
986: \eeq
987: \end{enumerate}
988:
989: We have evaluated $\gamma_\mu\psi^\mu(\p)$, $p_\mu\psi^\mu(\p)$, and
990: $\widetilde{\mathcal W}^{(1/2,1/2)}_\mu \psi^\mu(\p)$,
991: for all of the above sixteen
992: spinor vectors. The $p_\mu\psi^\mu(\p)$, when transformed to the configuration
993: space, tests the divergence of $\psi^\mu(x)$.
994:
995:
996: For $\eta=1,4,5,8$,
997: $\gamma_\mu\psi^\mu (\p )$ identically vanishes. Requiring it
998: to vanish for $\eta=2,3,6,7$ results in
999: $E^2=\vert \p\,\vert^2 + m^2$.
1000:
1001: The $\tau=b,c$ sectors, if (wrongly) imposed with the
1002: vanishing of, $\gamma_\mu\psi^\mu(\p)$
1003: and $p_\mu\psi^\mu(\p)$, results in kinematically acausal
1004: dispersion relation (i.e., in $E^2\ne\vert \p\,\vert^2 + m^2$).
1005: This could be the source of the well-known
1006: problems of the Rarita-Schwinger framework
1007: as noted in works
1008: of Johnson and Sudarshan \cite{Sud}, and those of Velo and Zwanziger
1009: \cite{vz}. In this context one may wish to recall
1010: that interactions can induce transitions between
1011: different $\tau$ sectors.
1012:
1013:
1014: The analysis for all the $\tau$ sectors of the
1015: $\psi^\mu (\p )$ can be summarized in the following
1016: table:
1017: %!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
1018: % PLB: Please do not move the table away from this location !!!
1019: %!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
1020:
1021: \begin{center}
1022: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}\hline
1023: $\tau$ &
1024: $p_\mu \psi^\mu(\p) $ &
1025: $\gamma_\mu\psi^\mu(\p) $ &
1026: $\widetilde{{\mathcal W}}^{(1/2,1/2)}_\mu \psi^\mu(\p)$ &
1027: $ \lambda_\tau $& $\beta_\tau$ &$\alpha_\tau$ & Remarks
1028: \\ \hline\hline
1029: $a$ & ${\small = 0}$ & ${\small =0}$ & ${\small \ne 0}$
1030: & ${\small 15/4}$ & ${\small 2}$ &${\small 1}$ & Rarita-Schwinger Sector\\
1031: \hline
1032: $b$ & ${\small = 0}$ & ${\small \ne 0}$ & ${\small \ne 0}$ &
1033: ${\small 3/4}$&$ {\small 2}$ & ${\small -2}$ & {}\\ \hline
1034: $c$ & ${\small \ne 0}$ &
1035: ${\small \ne 0}$ & ${\small =0}$ & ${\small 3/4 }$&
1036: ${\small 0}$&${\small 0}$&{} \\ \hline
1037: \end{tabular}
1038: \end{center}
1039:
1040:
1041: The table clearly illustrates that there is no particular reason --
1042: except (the unjustified)
1043: insistence that each particle of nature be associated with a
1044: definite spin --
1045: to favor one $\tau$ sector over the other.
1046: Each of the $\tau$ sectors
1047: is endowed with specific properties.
1048: The Rarita-Schwinger sector
1049: has no more, or no less, physical significance
1050: than the other two sectors. While, for instance, the
1051: Rarita-Schwinger sector can be characterized by vanishing of the
1052: $p_\mu \psi^\mu(\p) $ and
1053: $\gamma_\mu\psi^\mu(\p) $; the $\tau=c$ sector
1054: is uniquely characterized by vanishing of
1055: $\widetilde{{\mathcal W}}^{(1/2,1/2)}_\mu \psi^\mu(\p)$. The $\tau=b$ sector
1056: allows for vanishing of $p_\mu \psi^\mu(\p) $ only.
1057:
1058: Except for the rest frame, the $\psi^\mu_\tau(\p)$, in general,
1059: are not eigenstates
1060: of the $\J^{\,2}$ for representation space (\ref{rs}).
1061: Instead, the three $\tau$ sectors of the representation space
1062: under consideration
1063: correspond to the following inertial-frame independent values of the
1064: associated dragged second Casimir invariant:
1065: \beq
1066: \widetilde{C}_2^{[(1/2,0)\oplus(0,1/2)]\otimes(1/2,1/2)} \psi_\tau
1067: (\p)=
1068: -\, m^2\, \lambda_\tau \,\psi_\tau (\p)\,.
1069: \label{def_cond}
1070: \eeq
1071: Note that the latter equation is a matrix equation in the Lorentz index
1072: space. For this reason the index $\mu$ of the spinor-vector does not show up.
1073: Yet, $\psi_\tau(\p )$ is still the vector spinor and should not be confused
1074: with an ordinary Dirac spinor.
1075: Also there is no summation over the index $W^2$-sector index $\tau$.
1076: In fact, the defining Eq.~(\ref{def_cond}) of the
1077: various $\widetilde{C}_2^{[(1/2,0)\oplus(0,1/2)]\otimes(1/2,1/2)}$
1078: sectors of $\psi^\mu (\p) $ translates into an equation for
1079: $\gamma_\mu \psi^\mu_\tau (\p )$.
1080: To establish it, we note that
1081: $\widetilde{C}_2^{[(1/2,0)\oplus(0,1/2)]\otimes(1/2,1/2)}$ is given
1082: as the squared sum of the (dragged) Pauli-Lubanski pseudovectors
1083: ${\widetilde W}^{(1/2,0)\oplus(0,1/2)}$ and ${\widetilde W}^{(1/2,1/2)}$.
1084: In other words, one has
1085: \begin{equation}
1086: \widetilde{C}_2^{[(1/2,0)\oplus(0,1/2)]\otimes(1/2,1/2)}\psi_\tau (\p ) =
1087: \left({{\widetilde W}^{(1/2,0)\oplus(0,1/2)}+ \widetilde W}^{(1/2,1/2)}
1088: \right)^2\,\psi_\tau (\p ).
1089: \label{B_D}
1090: \end{equation}
1091: The action of $\widetilde{C}_2^{[(1/2,0)\oplus(0,1/2)]\otimes(1/2,1/2)}$
1092: upon $\psi_\tau (\p)$
1093: (with $\tau =a,b,c$) takes the form
1094: \begin{eqnarray}
1095: \widetilde{C}_2^{
1096: [(1/2,0)\oplus(0,1/2)]
1097: \otimes(1/2,1/2)
1098: }\psi_\tau(\p) &= &
1099: {\Big(}(
1100: \widetilde{C}_2^ { (1/2,0)\oplus(0,1/2)}+
1101: \widetilde {C}_2^{(1/2,1/2)} \nonumber\\
1102: &+& 2 {\widetilde W}_{\beta}^{(1/2,0)\oplus(0,1/2)}
1103: {\widetilde W}^\beta\, ^{(1/2,1/2)} {\Big)}
1104: \psi_\tau (\p ) \,
1105: \nonumber\\
1106: &=&\left( -m^2 {1\over 2}\left({1\over 2}+1\right)
1107: -m^2\beta_\tau
1108: -m^2\alpha_\tau\right)\psi_\tau (\p) \,
1109: \nonumber\\
1110: &=& -m^2\lambda_\tau \psi_\tau(\p )\, , \quad \beta_\tau =0, 2\, .
1111: \label{B_D_1}
1112: \end{eqnarray}
1113: The latter equation shows that the values of
1114: $\alpha_\tau $ and $\beta_\tau $, which in turn determine the
1115: eigenvalues of $2 {\widetilde W}^\beta\, ^{(1/2,1/2)}
1116: {\widetilde W}_{\beta}^{(1/2,0)\oplus(0,1/2)}$ and
1117: $ {\widetilde C} ^{(1/2,1/2)}$
1118: with respect to $\psi_\tau(\p\, ) $
1119: are well suited to
1120: label the various $\widetilde{C}_2^{[(1/2,0)\oplus(0,1/2)]\otimes(1/2,1/2)} $
1121: sectors.
1122: Indeed, one can replace Eq.~(\ref{def_cond}) by
1123: \begin{eqnarray}
1124: 2 {\widetilde W}^\beta\, ^{(1/2,1/2)}
1125: {\widetilde W}_\beta ^{(1/2,0)\oplus(0,1/2)}
1126: \psi_\tau (\p)
1127: &=&-m^2\alpha_\tau \psi_\tau (\p)\, ,\nonumber\\
1128: &&\alpha_\tau =\lambda_\tau - \beta_\tau -{3\over 4}\, .
1129: \label{Start}
1130: \end{eqnarray}
1131: Insertion of the explicit expression for
1132: ${\widetilde W}^{(1/2,0)\oplus(0,1/2)} $ into (\ref{Start})
1133: and usage of the Dirac equation leads to
1134: \begin{eqnarray}
1135: 2{\widetilde W}_\nu^{(1/2,1/2)}
1136: \left( -{1\over 4} \gamma_5
1137: \lbrack p\!\!\!/ , \gamma^\nu \rbrack_- \right)
1138: \psi_\tau (\p ) &=& -m^2 \alpha_\tau \psi_\tau (\p), \nonumber\\
1139: {\widetilde W}_\nu^{(1/2,1/2)}\gamma_5\left(p\!\!\!/\gamma^\nu -
1140: \gamma^\nu p\!\!\!/\right) \psi_\tau (\p)
1141: &=& 2m^2\alpha_\tau \psi_\tau (\p\, ) \nonumber\\
1142: {\widetilde W}_\nu^{(1/2,1/2)}\gamma_5
1143: \left( 2g^{\alpha\nu}p_\lambda -2\gamma^\nu p\!\!\!/\right)
1144: \psi _\tau (\p) &=&2m^2\alpha_\tau \psi_\tau (\p)
1145: \nonumber\\
1146: {\widetilde W}^{(1/2,1/2)}\cdot p \gamma_5 \psi_\tau (\p) +
1147: {\widetilde W}^{(1/2,1/2)}\cdot \gamma
1148: \gamma_5 m\, \, \psi_\tau (\p) &=& m^2 \alpha_\tau \psi_\tau (\p )
1149: \nonumber\\
1150: \left( {\widetilde W}^{(1/2,1/2)}\cdot p +{\widetilde W}^{(1/2,1/2)}
1151: \cdot \gamma\right)
1152: \gamma_5 m\,\, \psi_\tau (\p) &=& m^2 \alpha_\tau \psi_\tau (\p)
1153: \label{Step1}
1154: \end{eqnarray}
1155: In taking Lorentz contraction of both sides
1156: of the last equation with $\gamma^\epsilon$ and
1157: in accounting for ${\widetilde W}^{(1/2,1/2)}\cdot p=0$,
1158: one arrives at the following
1159: equation for the $\gamma\cdot \psi_\tau (\p) $ spinor
1160: \begin{eqnarray}
1161: {1\over {m\alpha_\tau}}\gamma^\epsilon
1162: \left( {\widetilde W}^{(1/2,1/2)}_{\epsilon \eta }\cdot \gamma\gamma_5 \right)
1163: \psi_\tau ^\eta (\p) &=&
1164: \gamma\cdot \psi_\tau (\p) \, .
1165: \label{Step2}
1166: \end{eqnarray}
1167: The non-relativistic counterpart of Eq.~(\ref{Step2}) reads
1168: \begin{equation}
1169: (1+{2\over \alpha_\tau })\s \cdot { \psi}_\tau (\0) =0\, .
1170: \label{einblick}
1171: \end{equation}
1172: {}For $\alpha_{a}=1$ one finds
1173: $\s\cdot { \psi}_a(\0)=0$ (corresponding to $\gamma\cdot \psi_a=0$)
1174: while for $\alpha_{b}=-2$, where the numerical factor in
1175: (\ref{einblick}) vanishes, one encounters
1176: $\s\cdot { \psi}_{b}(\0) \not=0$
1177: (corresponding to $\gamma\cdot \psi_{b}\not= 0$).
1178: In our opinion, the troubles with the supplementaary conditions
1179: in the Rarita-Schwinger framework is that after gauging, the full equation
1180: (\ref{Step2}) does not reduce any longer to $\gamma\cdot \psi(\p )$.
1181:
1182:
1183:
1184:
1185: For each one of the $\tau$ sectors,
1186: the $\lambda_\tau $, $\beta_\tau $, and $\alpha_\tau $ are given in the
1187: table above.
1188: Stated differently,
1189: the boosted $\tau=b,c$ sectors do not carry spin one half. Similarly,
1190: the, $\tau=a$, sector is not a spin three half sector. The
1191: consequence is that the boosted
1192: $\tau=b,c$ sector, in particular, should not be treated as
1193: a Dirac representation space.
1194: The correct wave equation for $\psi^\mu (\p )$ is:
1195: \beq
1196: \left[ \left(
1197: \gamma_\mu p^\mu \pm m I_4\right)
1198: \right]
1199: \otimes \left(\Lambda_{\mu\nu}
1200: p^\mu p ^\nu \pm m^2 I_4\right)_{\eta \epsilon}\psi^\epsilon (\p )
1201: =0\,.
1202: \eeq
1203:
1204: In the standard Rarita-Schwinger
1205: framework $\partial_\mu\psi^\mu(x)$ and
1206: $\gamma_5 \gamma_\mu\psi^\mu(x)$ do indeed behave as Dirac spinors,
1207: and do indeed satisfy the Dirac equation. However, they
1208: are not identical to the $\tau=b,c$ sectors (which do not
1209: carry a characterization in terms of spin one half).
1210: If one (mistakenly) makes this identification, and sets
1211: $\partial_\mu\psi^\mu(x)$ and
1212: $\gamma_5 \gamma_\mu\psi^\mu(x)$ to zero, one introduces an
1213: element of kinematic acausality.
1214: The {\it covariant\/} quantum numbers that are appropriate for labeling the
1215: basis vectors of the spinor-vector
1216: (and consequently for carrying out the quantization procedure) are
1217: \beq
1218: \vert \lambda_\tau\, \beta_\tau \, h \rangle\, ,
1219: \eeq
1220: where $h$ is the eigenvalue of the
1221: helicity ($\J \cdot\hat{ \p} $ ) operator in the $\tau$ sector under
1222: consideration.
1223:
1224:
1225: \subsection{Interpretation of the massive gravitino as a particle of
1226: multiple spin}
1227:
1228: If one is to respect the mathematical completeness of the
1229: spinor-vector representation space associated with $\psi^\mu(x)$, the
1230: Rarita-Schwinger framework cannot be considered to describe
1231: the full physical content of the representation space associated with
1232: a massive gravitino.
1233: This circumstance is akin to Dirac's
1234: observation that a part of a representation space [which would have
1235: violated the completeness of the $(1/2,0)\oplus (0,1/2)$]
1236: cannot be ``projected out'' without introducing certain
1237: mathematical inconsistencies, and loosing its physical content (i.e.
1238: antiparticles, or particles).
1239: Further, the same qualitative remarks
1240: apply to the $(1/2,1/2)$ representation space when in the
1241: Proca framework one only confines to the divergence-less vectors.
1242: The ``projecting out'' of the divergence-full vector, throws away
1243: the St\"uckelberg contribution to the
1244: propagator, and in addition leaves the $(1/2,1/2)$
1245: representation space
1246: mathematically incomplete.
1247: Now, we suggest that for the representation space defined by
1248: Eq. (\ref{rs}), one needs to consider all three $\tau$ sectors
1249: of $\psi^\mu(x)$
1250: as physical, and necessary for its mathematical consistency.
1251: The suggested framework already carries consistency
1252: with the known data on the $N$ and $\Delta$ resonances, and asks
1253: that massive gravitino be considered as an object that is better described by
1254: the eigenvalues of the dragged
1255: second Casimir operator. In its rest frame it
1256: is endowed with a spin three half,
1257: and two spin half, components.
1258: A spin measurement for unpolarized ensemble of massive gravitinos
1259: at rest would yield the results $3/2$ with probability one half, and
1260: $1/2$ with probability one half. The latter probability
1261: is distributed uniformly, i.e. as
1262: one quarter, over each of the, $\tau=b$, and, $\tau=c$, sectors.
1263:
1264: \section{ Outlook}
1265: The systematic and self-contained
1266: description of the spacetime structure of fundamental
1267: particles presented in this talk calls for a more detailed
1268: analysis of the consequences of the multi-spin character of
1269: the massive gravitino for the renormalizability
1270: of supergravity and the phenomenology of the early universe.
1271: We also conjectured in \cite{adk} that gauge bosons of a
1272: quantum theory of gravity shall have a well pronounced
1273: multi-spin character.
1274: In particular, the above considerations suggest that a
1275: natural extension of this work to finite-range gravity
1276: shall endow the graviton with spins 0, 1, and 2 components,
1277: a possibility that has been partly entertained only very recently in
1278: \cite{mv,bg}.
1279:
1280: \section*{Acknowledgments}
1281: Work supported by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y
1282: Tecnolog\'ia (CONACyT, Mexico) under grant number 32067-E.
1283: The organizers of Beyond02 deserve special thanks for having
1284: created that pervading friendly atmosphere which makes scientific events
1285: so stimulating.
1286:
1287:
1288:
1289: \section*{References}
1290:
1291: \begin{thebibliography}{9}
1292:
1293:
1294: \bibitem{ak}
1295: D.\ V.\ Ahluwalia and M.\ Kirchbach, Mod.\ Phys.\ Lett.\
1296: {\bf A16}, 1377 (2001).
1297:
1298:
1299: \bibitem{ka}
1300: M.\ Kirchbach and D.\ V.\ Ahluwalia,
1301: %``Spacetime structure of massive gravitino,''
1302: Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf B529}, 124 (2002).
1303:
1304:
1305:
1306: \bibitem{Ah3}
1307: D.\ V.\ Ahluwalia, Found.\ Phys.\ {\bf 29}, 527 (1998).
1308:
1309:
1310: \bibitem{sw}
1311: S.\ Weinberg, {\em The quantum
1312: theory of fields, Vol. I and III\/} (Cambridge University Press,
1313: Cambridge, 1995 and 2000).
1314:
1315:
1316: \bibitem{v}
1317: M.\ Veltman, Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ {\bf A15}, 4557 (2000).
1318:
1319:
1320:
1321:
1322: \bibitem{mk}
1323: M.\ Kirchbach, Mod.\ Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf A12}, 2373 (1997);\\
1324: M.\ Kirchbach, Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf A689}, 157c (2001);\\
1325: M.\ Kirchbach, M.\ Moshinsky, and Yu.\ F.\ Smirnov,
1326: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D64 }, 114005 (2001).
1327:
1328:
1329: \bibitem{pdg}
1330: Particle Data Group, Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\, {\bf C15}, 1 (2000).
1331:
1332:
1333: \bibitem{Moroi}
1334: T.\ Moroi, Ph.\ D.\ thesis (Tohoku University, Japan, 1995),
1335: {\tt hep-ph/9503210}.
1336:
1337: \bibitem{RS}
1338: W.\ Rarita and J.\ Schwinger, Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 60}, 61 (1941).
1339:
1340: \bibitem{Sud} K.\ Johnson and E.\ C.\ G.\ Sudarshan,
1341: Ann.\ Phys.\ (N.\ Y.\ ){\bf 13}, 126 (1961)
1342:
1343:
1344: \bibitem{vz}
1345: G.\ Velo and D.\ Zwanzinger, Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 186}, 1337 (1969).
1346:
1347: \bibitem{gh}
1348: G. H\"ohler, in {\em Pion-Nucleon Scattering\/}
1349: (Springer Publishers, Heidelberg, 1983), Landolt-B\"ornstein
1350: Vol. I/9b2, Ed. H. Schopper.
1351:
1352:
1353: \bibitem{adk}
1354: D.\ V.\ Ahluwalia, N.\ Dadhich, and M.\ Kirchbach,
1355: ``On the spin of gravitational bosons,''
1356: gr-qc/0205072.
1357:
1358:
1359: \bibitem{mv}
1360: M.\ Visser, Gen.\ Rel.\ Grav.\ {\bf 30}, 1717 (1998).
1361:
1362:
1363: \bibitem{bg}
1364: S.\ V.\ Babak, L.\ P.\ Grishchuk,
1365: ``Finite-Range Gravity and Its Role in Gravitational Waves,
1366: Black Holes and Cosmology,''
1367: gr-qc/0209006.
1368:
1369:
1370: \end{thebibliography}
1371:
1372:
1373:
1374:
1375:
1376: \end{document}
1377:
1378:
1379:
1380: