1: \documentstyle[12pt,epsfig]{article}
2: %%\hoffset=-1.5cm
3: %\voffset=2.cm
4:
5: \oddsidemargin=-8mm
6: \topmargin=-90pt
7: \textwidth=180mm
8: \columnsep=4mm
9: \textheight=61pc
10: \tolerance=1000
11:
12: \input epsf
13:
14: \newcommand{\frat}[2]{\frac{\textstyle #1}{\textstyle #2}}
15: \newcommand{\dmn}[2]{\mbox{$#1\!\cdot\! 10^{#2}\,$}}
16: \newcommand{\xmn}[2]{\mbox{$#1\!\times\! 10^{#2}\,$}}
17: \newcommand{\vf}[1]{\mbox{\boldmath $#1$}}
18: \newcommand{\nomer}[1]{\mbox{$\cal N$\hspace{-.5ex}\raisebox{.3ex}
19: {\underline{\tiny 0}$\!$} #1}}
20: \newcommand{\grpicture}[1]
21: {\epsfxsize=200pt
22: \hspace{10mm} \parbox{200pt}{\epsfbox{#1.ps}} \vspace{10mm}
23: }
24:
25: \begin{document}
26: \begin{center}
27: {\Large {\bf
28: Role of quark-instanton liquid interactions\\
29: in colour superconductivity phase}}\\
30: \vspace{0.5cm}
31: S. V. Molodtsov, G. M. Zinovjev$^\dagger$\\
32: \vspace{0.5cm}
33: {\small\it State Research Center,
34: Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics,
35: 117259, Moscow, RUSSIA}\\
36: $^\dagger$
37: {\small \it
38: Bogolyubov Institute for Theoretical Physics,\\
39: National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine,
40: UA-03143, Kiev, UKRAINE}
41: \end{center}
42: \vspace{0.5cm}
43: \begin{abstract}
44: The interaction of light quarks and instanton liquid is analyzed at finite
45: density of quark/baryon matter and in the phase of nonzero values of diquark
46: (colour) condensate. It is shown that instanton liquid perturbation produced
47: by such an interaction results in an essential increase of the critical value
48: of quark chemical potential $\mu_c$ which provokes the perceptible increase of
49: quark matter density around the expected onset of the colour
50: superconductivity phase.
51: \end{abstract}
52: \vspace{0.5cm}
53:
54: PACS: 11.15 Kc, 12.38-Aw
55: \\
56: \\
57: %\newpage
58: %\baselineskip 0.9cm
59: %\noindent
60:
61: \vspace{0.5cm}
62: \noindent
63: The intriguing history of studying the structure of strongly interacting matter
64: abounded in many interesting but somewhat contradictory phenomenological
65: results up to the advent of quantum chromodynamics (QCD). Since the time of its
66: discovery the possible existence of quark-gluon plasma (QGP) phase is one of
67: the most fundamental predictions of QCD. This phase is phenomenologically
68: understood as a matter state where quarks and gluons being under extreme
69: conditions of high temperature (T) and(or) quark/baryon density (driven by the
70: corresponding chemical potential $\mu$) are able to propagate relatively freely
71: over the considerable (of course, on the hadron scale) distances. Even the
72: simplest quantitative estimates of QGP physical characteristics were so
73: verisimilar that they allowed to launch the process of QGP experimental study
74: in ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions. And although the first series of
75: experiments at SPS CERN and AGS BNL have provided us with encouraging
76: results a new generation of experiments is necessary to make convincing
77: conclusions. The physical programme for new experimental research certainly
78: needs serious quantitative analysis of the QCD phase diagram.
79:
80: It seemed lattice QCD could be able to resolve the problem starting even on
81: the first theoretical principles. However, up to now this approach was
82: effective and apparently reliable in producing the results mainly around the
83: temperature axis of the ($\mu$---T)-plane and, unfortunately, relies on the
84: field theory formulation in imaginary time. Nevertheless, lattice QCD has
85: corroborated the phenomenological expectations that its phase structure is
86: quite rich \cite{karsh}. In particular, nowadays we know that the chiral
87: symmetry of initial QCD Lagrangian becomes broken and the quarks are getting
88: to be confined when the temperature decreases below a critical value. Moreover,
89: the lattice calculations show us that both physical phenomena result from the
90: corresponding phase transitions and their critical temperatures practically
91: coincide. The latter observation indicates that both fundamental phenomena
92: could be tightly knitted and it should heuristically play an important role to
93: illuminate the confinement mechanism.
94:
95: The features of the QCD matter at high baryon densities remains poorly
96: understood in spite of the recent splash of renewed activity \cite{0}. One of
97: the major theoretical reasons comes from serious technical difficulties of
98: lattice simulations with Monte-Carlo techniques due to the complex fermion
99: determinant in QCD at finite quark densities. From the phenomenological side
100: the recent experimental data are not very informative for developing the
101: theory along this direction. It is clear that present and future experiments with
102: heavy ions at higher and higher energies should produce the strong interacting
103: matter rather at higher temperature and closer to the temperature axis of the
104: ($\mu$---T)-plane. In such a situation the phenomenological treatment of
105: studying along the $\mu$-axis should basically rely on the astrophysical
106: observations of the compact stars. In the meantime, it was demonstrated that
107: the diquark pairing in colour anti-triplet attractive channel induced by the
108: instanton interaction vertex should be much more effective than an one-gluon
109: exchange and at sufficiently large quark/baryon densities and small T could
110: lead to colour superconductivity and a sophisticated picture of the QCD phase
111: diagram \cite{0}.
112:
113: The present paper continues our preceding one \cite{mz} where the light quark
114: interactions with the instanton liquid (IL) at nonzero values of quark/baryon
115: chemical potentials were investigated in the phase of broken chiral symmetry
116: within the improved method of calculating the generating function of the IL
117: theory \cite{we0}. The new treatment of the functional integral is mainly
118: related to an idea t take into account the IL back-reaction upon the quark presence
119: which was always considered negligible. In fact, this effect is pretty weak
120: and should manifest itself in the leading order of expansion in the effective
121: coupling. Nevertheless, it was qualitatively argued that the interaction of IL
122: and quarks could increase the quark matter density around the onset of
123: expected colour superconductivity. As known \cite{diakcar}, \cite{rapp} this
124: density occurred to be surprisingly small ($n_q\sim 0.062~{\mbox{fm}}^{-3}$)
125: and, hence, the diquark phase would come to play already at the density of
126: nuclear matter ($n_n\simeq 0.45~{\mbox{fm}}^{-3}$ and quark matter density is
127: taken to be three times larger than the conventional nuclear one).
128:
129: Here we obtain the quantitative estimate of the corresponding critical
130: chemical potential $\mu_c$ analyzing the system of the Gorkov equations for
131: the colour superconductor which we further calculate. We do not introduce any
132: simplification of the initial Lagrangian trying to deal with the 'exact'
133: four-quark interaction which is generated by (anti-)instantons. Such an
134: intention is simply compulsory because it is dictated by the precision of
135: problem where the effects of the IL perturbation are expected to be of the
136: same order of magnitude compared to the terms which could usually be
137: ignored.
138:
139: Let us point out that in the IL approach \cite{2} the generating
140: functional has the following factorized form $$ {\cal Z}~=~{\cal
141: Z}_g~\cdot~{\cal Z}_\psi~. $$ Here the first factor provides us
142: with information on the gluon condensate whereas the fermion
143: factor ${\cal Z}_\psi$ serves to describe the quark practice in
144: the instanton environment \cite{diakcar}, \cite{2}. In what
145: follows we use the notations of Ref. \cite{mz} where the
146: dimensionless variables (motivated by the form of interquark
147: interaction kernel) were introduced, for example, for the chemical
148: potential it looks like $\mu\to \mu\bar\rho/2$ and for the momenta
149: $k_i\bar\rho/2 \to k_i,~i=1, \dots, 4$ where $\bar\rho$ is the
150: average size of pseudoparticle (PP). The quark determinant ${\cal
151: Z}_\psi$ may be transformed with the auxiliary integration over
152: the parameter $\lambda$ to the following form (for the colour
153: $SU(3)$ group with the quarks of two flavours $N_f=2$):
154: \begin{eqnarray}
155: \label{1}
156: &&{\cal Z}_\psi\simeq\int d\lambda~\int D\psi^\dagger D\psi~\exp\left\{
157: n~V_4\left(\ln\frat{n\bar\rho^4}{\lambda~N}-1\right)\right\}
158: \times\nonumber\\
159: %[-.2cm]
160: %\\[-.25cm]
161: &&\times\exp\left\{\int \frat{dk}{\pi^4}~\sum_{f=1}^{2}\psi^\dagger_{f}(k)
162: ~2~(-\hat k-i\hat\mu)\psi_{f}(k)+V\right\}~,%\nonumber
163: \\
164: &&V=2\lambda~(\psi^{\dagger L}_1~L_1~\psi_1^{L})
165: (\psi^{\dagger L}_2~L_2~\psi_2^{L})+
166: 2\lambda~(\psi^{\dagger R}_1~R_1~\psi_1^{R})
167: (\psi^{\dagger R}_2~R_2~\psi_2^{R})~,\nonumber
168: \end{eqnarray}
169: where $\psi_f^{T}=(\psi_f^{R},\psi_f^{L}),~f=1,2$ are the quark
170: fields with the spinors of definite chirality,
171: $\psi_f^{L,R}=P_\pm~\psi_f,~P_\pm=\frat{1\pm\gamma_5}{2}$, $n$ is
172: the IL density, $V_4$ is 4-volume which the system occupies,
173: $\mu_\nu=({\vf 0},\mu)$ and $N$ is the normalizing factor. For
174: clarity we take it to be equal a unity but, in principle, it could
175: play a role of free model parameter. This factor is inessential
176: for the models with the fixed value of the packing fraction
177: parameter $n\bar\rho^4$ but in the model where it is admissible
178: for variation the weak logarithmic dependence on N appears. The
179: factors $2$ in Eq. (\ref{1}) come with making use of the
180: dimensionless variables. The term of four-fermion quark
181: interaction $V$ may be directly expressed with the chiral
182: components as $$(\psi^{\dagger L}_f~L_f~\psi_f^{L})= \int
183: \frat{dp_f dq_f}{\pi^8}~\psi^{\dagger L}_{f\alpha_f i_f}(p_f)~
184: L_{\alpha_f i_f}^{\beta_f j_f}(p_f,q_f;\mu)~\psi_f^{L\beta_f
185: j_f}(q_f)~,$$ it being known that for the right hand fields the
186: substitution $L \to R$ should be performed. The kernels
187: $L_{\alpha_f i_f}^{\beta_f j_f}$ are defined by the functions
188: $h_i,~i=1, \dots, 4$ and the zero modes (the solutions of the
189: Dirac equation with the chemical potential $\mu$ in the PP field)
190: \begin{eqnarray}
191: h_4(k_4,k;\mu)&=&\frat{\pi}{4 k}
192: \{(k-\mu-ik_4)[(2k_4+i\mu)f^{-}_{1}+i(k-\mu-ik_4)f^{-}_2]+\nonumber\\
193: &+&(k+\mu+ik_4)[(2k_4+i\mu)f^{+}_{1}-i(k+\mu+ik_4)f^{+}_2]\}~,\nonumber
194: \end{eqnarray}
195: \begin{eqnarray}
196: h_i(k_4,k;\mu)&=&\frat{\pi~k_i}{4 k^2}
197: \left\{(2k-\mu)(k-\mu-ik_4)f^{-}_{1}+(2k+\mu)(k+\mu+ik_4)f^{+}_1+
198: \right.\nonumber\\
199: &+&\left[2(k-\mu)(k-\mu-ik_4)-\frat{1}{k}(\mu+ik_4)[k_4^{2}+(p-\mu)^2]
200: \right]f^{-}_{2}+\nonumber\\
201: &+&\left.
202: \left[2(k+\mu)(k+\mu+ik_4)+\frat{1}{k}(\mu+ik_4)[k_4^{2}+(p+\mu)^2]
203: \right]f^{+}_{2}\right\}~,\nonumber
204: \end{eqnarray}
205: where $k=|{\vf k}|$ if the spatial components of 4-vector $k_\nu$ are
206: considered and
207: $$f_1^{\pm}=
208: \frat{I_1(z^\pm)K_0(z^\pm)-I_0(z^\pm)K_1(z^\pm)}
209: {z^\pm}~,\\
210: f_2^{\pm}=\frat{I_1(z^\pm)K_1(z^\pm)}{z^2_{\pm}}~,~~
211: z^\pm=\frat{\rho}{2}\sqrt{k_4^{2}+(k\pm\mu)^2}~,
212: $$
213: with the modified Bessel functions $I_i,~K_i~(i=0,1)$.
214: Let us introduce the scalar function $h(k_4,k;\mu)$ related to
215: three-dimensional component
216: $h_i(k_4,k;\mu)=h(k_4,k;\mu)~\frat{k_i}{k}~,i=1,2,3$
217: (we omit the arguments of functions $h_i$ when it does not mislead).
218: $$L_{\alpha i}^{\beta j}(p,q;\mu)=S^{i k}(p;\mu)
219: \epsilon^{k l}~U^{\alpha}_{l}~U^{\dagger\sigma}_{\beta}
220: \epsilon^{\sigma n}S^{+}_{n j}(q;-\mu)~,
221: $$
222: $S(p;\mu)=(p+i\mu)^{-}~h^{+}(p;\mu)~,~~
223: S^+(p;-\mu)=\stackrel{*}h\!\!{^{-}}(p;-\mu)(p+i\mu)^{+}$ where it is valid
224: for the conjugated function $\stackrel{*}h_\mu(p;-\mu)=h_\mu(p;\mu)$ and
225: $\epsilon$ is an antisymmetric matrix with $\epsilon_{12}=-\epsilon_{21}=1$.
226: Here $p^\pm$ and other similar designations are used for the four-vectors
227: spanned by $\sigma^\pm_{\nu}$-matrices,
228: $\sigma^{\pm}_\mu=(\pm i{\vf \sigma},1),$ (${\vf \sigma}$ is the three-vector
229: of the Pauli matrices), for example, $p^\pm=p^\nu\sigma^\pm_{\nu}$ and
230: $U$ is a matrix of rotations in the colour space.
231: The similar relations are valid for the right hand components
232: $$(\psi^{\dagger R}_f~R_f~\psi_f^{R})=
233: \int \frat{dp_f dq_f}{\pi^8}~\psi^{\dagger R}_{f\alpha_f i_f}(p_f)~
234: R_{\alpha_f i_f}^{\beta_f j_f}(p_f,q_f;\mu)~\psi_f^{R\beta_f j_f}(q_f)~,$$
235: with the kernel
236: $$R_{\alpha i}^{\beta j}(p,q;\mu)=T^{ik}(p;\mu)
237: \epsilon^{k l}~U^{\alpha}_{l}~U^{\dagger\sigma}_{\beta}
238: \epsilon^{\sigma n}T^{+}_{n j}(q;-\mu)~,
239: $$
240: where $T(p;\mu)=(p+i\mu)^{+}~h^{-}(p;\mu)~,~~
241: T^+(p;-\mu)=\stackrel{*}h\!\!{^{+}}(p;-\mu)(p+i\mu)^{-}$.
242: The components of matrices $(p+i\mu)^{\pm}$ and $h^{\mp}(p;\mu)$ commute
243: because the vector-function ${\vf h}(p)$ is spanned by the vector ${\vf p}$
244: only. Then the following identities are easily understood
245: $$T(p;\mu)=S^{+}(p;-\mu)~,~~T^+(p;-\mu)=S(p;\mu)~.$$
246: In what follows we omit the $\mu$-dependence of matrices $T,~T^+$ as the
247: chemical
248: potential enters the matrix $T$ being always positive and the matrix $T^+$
249: being negative only. Besides, two other identities would also be helpful
250: $$\sigma_2 T^{T}(p)\sigma_2=T^+(p)~,~~
251: \sigma_2 T^{+ T}(p)\sigma_2=T(p)~,
252: $$
253: where $T^T$ means a transposed matrix.
254:
255: Dealing with the following averages interesting to study the diquark
256: condensates (\ref{1})
257: $$
258: \langle\psi^{L,R}_{1\alpha i}(p)\psi^{L,R}_{2\beta j}(q)\rangle=
259: \epsilon_{12}~\epsilon_{\alpha\beta}~\pi^4~\delta(p+q)~F^{L,R}_{ij}(p)~,
260: $$
261: $$
262: \langle\psi^{L}_{f\alpha i}(p)\psi^{\dagger R}_{g\beta j}(q)\rangle=
263: \delta_{fg}~\delta_{\alpha\beta}~\pi^4~\delta(p-q)~G^{LR}_{ij}(p)~,
264: $$
265: and making use of the effective action of Eq. (\ref{1}) one may obtain the
266: Gorkov equations similar to ones treated in Ref. \cite{rapp}
267: \begin{eqnarray}
268: \label{2}
269: &&\left[G_{0}^{+}(p)\right]^{-1}~F^L(p)-\Sigma^R(p)~G^{LR~T}(-p)=0~,
270: \nonumber\\
271: &&\left[G_{0}^{+}(p)\right]^{-1}~G^{LR}(p)-
272: \Sigma^R(p)~F^{+R~T}(p)=1~,
273: \nonumber\\
274: [-.2cm]
275: \\[-.25cm]
276: &&\left[G_{0}^{-}(p)\right]^{-1}~F^R(p)-
277: \Sigma^L(p)~G^{RL~T}(-p)=0~,\nonumber\\
278: &&\left[G_{0}^{-}(p)\right]^{-1}~G^{RL}(p)-
279: \Sigma^L(p)~F^{+L~T}(p)=1~,\nonumber
280: \end{eqnarray}
281: where $\left[G_0^{\pm}(p)\right]^{-1}=-2~(p+i\mu)^\pm$ means the free Green
282: function, $\Sigma^{R}(p)=\Delta^{R}~T(p)~\epsilon~T^{T}(-p)$,
283: $\Sigma^{L}(p)=\Delta^{L}~T^{+}(p)~\epsilon~T^{+T}(-p)$ and
284: $\Delta^{L,R}$ denotes a gap. The form of $\Sigma$-matrices results from the
285: kernel structure of equations if averaging over colour orientations done
286: (remember that we consider colour stochastic ensemble). In order to complete
287: Eqs. (\ref{2}) we need the following gap equations
288: $$\epsilon \Delta^{R}=\frat{2\lambda}{N_c(N_c-1)}~
289: \int \frat{dq}{\pi^4} \left[T^{+}(q)~F^{R}(q)~T^{+T}(-q)-
290: T^{+}(-q)~F^{R~T}(q)~T^{+T}(q) \right]~,
291: $$
292: $$\epsilon \Delta^{L}=\frat{2\lambda}{N_c(N_c-1)}~
293: \int \frat{dq}{\pi^4} \left[T(q)~F^{L}(q)~T^{T}(-q)-
294: T(-q)~F^{L~T}(q)~T^{T}(q) \right]~.
295: $$
296: Apparently, the right hand sides of these equations are proportional $\epsilon$
297: because they are the differences a matrix and its transposed form. Similar
298: equations are valid for the conjugated matrices
299: \begin{eqnarray}
300: \label{3}
301: F^{+L~T}(p)&\left[G_{0}^{-}(p)\right]^{-1}&-G^{RL~T}(-p)~\Sigma^{+R}(p)=0~,
302: \nonumber\\
303: G^{RL}(p)&\left[G_{0}^{-}(p)\right]^{-1}&-
304: F^R(p)~\Sigma^{+R}(p)=1~,
305: \nonumber\\
306: [-.2cm]
307: \\[-.25cm]
308: F^{+R~T}(p)&\left[G_{0}^{+}(p)\right]^{-1}&-
309: G^{LR~T}(-p)~\Sigma^{+L}(p)=0~,\nonumber\\
310: G^{LR}(p)&\left[G_{0}^{+}(p)\right]^{-1}&-
311: F^L(p)~\Sigma^{+L}(p)=1~,\nonumber
312: \end{eqnarray}
313: with the corresponding gap equations
314: $$\epsilon \Delta^{+R}=\frat{2\lambda}{N_c(N_c-1)}~
315: \int \frat{dq}{\pi^4} \left[T^{T}(-q)~F^{+R~T}(q)~T(q)-
316: T^{T}(q)~F^{+R}(q)~T(-q) \right]~,
317: $$
318: $$\epsilon \Delta^{+L}=\frat{2\lambda}{N_c(N_c-1)}~
319: \int \frat{dq}{\pi^4} \left[T^{+T}(-q)~F^{+L~T}(q)~T^{+}(q)-
320: T^{+T}(q)~F^{+L}(q)~T^{+}(-q) \right]~,
321: $$
322: where $\Sigma^{+R}(p)=\Delta^{+R}~T^{+T}(-p)~\epsilon~T^{+}(p)$ and
323: $\Sigma^{+L}(p)=\Delta^{+L}~T^{T}(-p)~\epsilon~T(p)$.
324: In this paper we limit ourselves to treating the diquark condensate only.
325: However,
326: as known \cite{rapp} the mixed phase of nonzero values both chiral and colour
327: condensates could exist at $\mu_c\sim 300~{\mbox{MeV}}$ realizing the
328: transitional regime for the onset of colour superconducting phase. In order to
329: bring this phase to the play the equation system should be extended including
330: another averages as
331: $$
332: \langle\psi^{L,R}_{f\alpha i}(p)\psi^{\dagger L,R}_{g\beta j}(q)\rangle=
333: \delta_{fg}~\delta_{\alpha\beta}~\pi^4~\delta(p-q)~G^{LL,RR}_{ij}(p)~.
334: $$
335:
336: From the Eqs. (\ref{2}) and (\ref{3}) we find
337: \begin{eqnarray}
338: G^{LR}(p)&=&G_0^{+}(p)+G_0^{+}(p)~\Sigma^R(p)~F^{+R~T}(p)~,
339: \nonumber\\
340: F^{+R~T}(p)&=&G^{LR~T}(-p)~\Sigma^{+L}(p)~G_0^{+}(p)~.
341: \nonumber
342: \end{eqnarray}
343: With the auxiliary matrices $C^{+L}(p)=\Delta^{+L}~T^{+}(-p)~T(p)$,
344: $C^{R}(p)=\Delta^{R}~T(p)~T^{+}(-p)$ we may rewrite the matrices $\Sigma$ as
345: $$\Sigma^{+L}(p)=\epsilon~C^{+L}(p)~,~~\Sigma^{R}(p)=C^{R}(p)~\epsilon~.
346: $$
347: The identities for $T$-matrix mentioned above help to show the validity of
348: the relations
349: $$\epsilon~C^{+L~T}(-p)~\epsilon^T=C^{+L}(p)~,$$
350: $$\epsilon~C^{R~T}(-p)~\epsilon^T=C^{R}(p)~.$$
351: And for the Green function we have
352: $$G^{LR}(p)=G_0^{+}(p)+G_0^{+}(p)~C^{R}(p)~\epsilon~G^{LR~T}(-p)~\epsilon~
353: C^{+L}(p)~G_0^{+}(p)~.
354: $$
355: Combining the properties of $C$ matrices together with the identities for free
356: Green functions
357: $$\sigma_2~G_0^{\pm T}(p)~\sigma_2=~G_0^{\mp}(p)~,
358: $$
359: we are able to get the complete equation for calculating the function $G^{LR}$
360: in the form
361: $$\epsilon~G^{LR}(-p)~\epsilon^T=
362: G_0^{-}(-p)+G_0^{-}(-p)~C^{+L}(p)~G^{LR}(p)~C^{R}(p)~G_0^{-}(-p)~.$$
363: The vector-function ${\vf{ h}}(p)$ being spanned by the vector ${\vf{ p}}$
364: helps to conclude that all the matrices $G_0^{\pm}$, $C^{+L}$, $C^R$ commute
365: with each other. Then searching the solution for the Green function
366: $G^{LR}$ by iterating one finds immediately that the Green function commutes
367: with those matrices and finally obtains the equation to calculate it in the
368: form
369: $$G^{LR}(p)=[1+H(p)]~G_0^{+}(p)+H^2(p)~G^{LR}(p)~,$$
370: or
371: $$[1-H(p)]~G^{LR}(p)=G_0^{+}(p)~,
372: $$
373: where $H(p)=G_0^{+}(p)~C^R(p)~G_0^{-}(-p)~C^{+L}(p)$.
374:
375: The structure of matrices $H(p)$ allows us to conclude that their sum
376: $$H(p)+H(-p)=\alpha(p)~$$
377: and product
378: $$H(p)~H(-p)=\beta(p)~,$$
379: are proportional to the unity matrices (it is clear by definition that
380: $\alpha(-p)=\alpha(p),~\beta(-p)=\beta(p)$).
381:
382: Introducing notation $g_\nu=h_\nu(-p)$ we are able to present the functions
383: $\alpha(p)$ and $\beta(p)$ in the compact form as
384: $$\alpha(p)=4~\Delta^R~\Delta^{+L}~[-4~A(p)~(hg)+2~(p^2+\mu^2)~(h^2)~(g^2)]~,
385: $$
386: where
387: $$A(p)=(p^2+\mu^2)~(hg)-2i~\mu~p(g_4 h-h_4 g)~.
388: $$
389: and a scalar product is naturally defined $(hg)=\sum_{i=1}^4 h_i g_i$
390: together with the functions $(h^2)$ and $(g^2)$ squared. Getting the last term
391: of $A(p)$ we used the designation of scalar function ${\vf h}$ mentioned above
392: and for the function $\beta$ we have
393: $$\beta(p)=16~\left(\Delta^R\right)^2~
394: \left(\Delta^{+L}\right)^2~\left(p^2+\mu^2\right)^2~(h^2)^2~(g^2)^2~.
395: $$
396:
397: As both functions $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are spanned by the unit matrices the
398: solution for the Green function may be given in
399: $$G^{LR}(p)=\frat{G_0^{+}(p)~[1-H(-p)]}{1-\alpha(p)+\beta(p)}~.
400: $$
401: The gap equation then looks like
402: \begin{equation}
403: \label{gap}
404: \Delta^L=\frat{2\lambda}{N_c (N_c-1)}~\int\frat{dp}{\pi^4}~
405: \frat{\alpha(p)-2~\beta(p)}{\Delta^{+L}(1-\alpha(p)+\beta(p)}~.
406: \end{equation}
407: We are interested in the solution of the form
408: $\Delta^{R}=\Delta^{+L}=\Delta^{L}=\Delta^{+R}$ at $\lambda<0$,
409: which is dictated by the symmetries of four-quark interaction kernels. Let us
410: remember that any kernel for every quark sort traditionally carries the
411: imaginary unit factor $i$ \cite{2}, \cite{dp2}. The sign choice of $\lambda$
412: relies on this fact but, in principle, there is an alternative
413: $\Delta^{R}=\Delta^{+L}=-\Delta^{L}=-\Delta^{+R}$ for $\lambda>0$, if the
414: kernels are redefined. An analysis shows that the denominator of
415: Eq. (\ref{gap})
416: is always positive and, therefore, the solution of this equation does exist at
417: pretty large $\lambda$.
418:
419: The quark matter state at finite chemical potential is defined by
420: the saddle point of functional Eq. (\ref{1}) which we treat
421: further maintaining the first nonvanishing contribution which is
422: the figure-eight type diagram (see, for example, \cite{diakcar}),
423: $$I=2~(N_c-1)~\int\frat{dp}{\pi^4}~
424: \frat{\alpha(p)-2~\beta(p)}{1-\alpha(p)+\beta(p)}~. $$ In our
425: consideration this contribution to the generating functional
426: ($Z_\psi\sim e^{W}$) would occur to be
427: \begin{equation}
428: \label{GZ}
429: W=-n\bar\rho^4~\ln\lambda+\lambda~\langle Y\rangle~,
430: ~~\langle Y\rangle\simeq I~.
431: \end{equation}
432: For the simplest situation of constant IL density the saddle point equation
433: reads
434: $$n\bar\rho^4-\lambda~\langle Y\rangle=0~.
435: $$
436: Comparing it with the gap equation Eq. (\ref{gap}) one could notice the
437: peculiar feature which is very practical to keep numerical calculations under
438: control. The saddle point equation leads to the condition of gap independent
439: of $\mu$.
440:
441: It was demonstrated in Refs. \cite{we0}, \cite{we} that the quark
442: back-reaction upon IL could be perturbatively estimated by
443: studying the small variations of the IL parameters $\delta n$ and
444: $\delta \rho$ around their equilibrium values $n$ and $\bar\rho$.
445: Such variations could be incorporated by the IL theory if the
446: deformable (crumpled) (anti-)\-in\-stan\-tons of size $\rho$,
447: being the function of $x$ and $z$, i.e. $\rho\to\rho(x,z)$, are
448: treated as the saturating configurations of the functional
449: integral. Theoretically it is justified by developing the
450: variational principle which makes use the Ritz method based on the
451: multipole expansion of the deformation fields in the following
452: form
453: \begin{equation}
454: \label{5q} \rho(x,z)=\rho(z,z)+\frat{\partial\rho}{\partial
455: z_\mu}~y_\mu+\frat{\partial^2\rho}{\partial z_\mu \partial
456: z_\nu}~y_\mu~ y_\nu+\dots~,~~~~~y=x-z~.
457: \end{equation}
458: Then it is obvious the singular nature of the pseudoparticle
459: solution generates the necessary cut-off at the scale of average
460: instanton size.
461:
462: In principle, the instanton orientation in the colour space
463: should be treated in similar manner. However, it does not lead to
464: noticeable consequences while in the random instanton medium.
465: Although such a treatment turns out very informative if one
466: considers the polarization characteristics of the IL when the
467: probe colour charge is present.
468:
469: In addition, the variations of zero modes in the interaction
470: vertices of quark determinant at the transformation $\bar\rho \to
471: \bar\rho+\delta\rho$ should be taken into account. Then as the
472: output we have that for the long wave length excitations (for
473: example, $\pi$-mesons) the deformation field describes colour less
474: scalar excitations of IL with the mass gap $M$ of the order of
475: several hundreds MeV, $M^2=\frat{\nu}{\kappa}$ where
476: $\nu=\frat{b-4}{2}$, $b=\frat{11~N_c-2~N_f}{3}$, $\kappa$ is the
477: kinetic coefficient being derived within the quasi-classical
478: approach. $N_c$ and $N_f$ are the numbers of quark colours and
479: flavours, respectively. Our estimates give for this coefficient
480: value of a few single instanton actions $\beta=8\pi^2/g^2$, i.e.
481: $\kappa\sim c~\beta$ (with the factor $c\sim 1.5$ --- $6$
482: according to the ansatz taken for the saturating configurations)
483: \cite{we}.
484:
485: Then, besides the diagrams with four legs (see, the term $V$ in (\ref{1}))
486: the extra diagrams with the scalar field attached (relatively speaking, the
487: derivative in $\rho$ of the vertex function in which the variation of the
488: functions describing the zero mode
489: \begin{equation}
490: \label{4}
491: h_i\to h_i+\frat{\partial h_i}{\partial \rho}~\delta\rho~,~~
492: i=1, \dots, 4~,
493: \end{equation}
494: should be performed) are generated. Due to the diquark condensate presence
495: handling the Lagrangian is substantially simplified if one
496: restricts oneself with the leading contributions coming from the tadpole
497: diagrams. Indeed, the leading contributions come from the term $V$ and the
498: term shown in Fig. 1 where two vertices are linked with the propagator
499: $\frat{1}{M^2}$ of scalar field.
500:
501: \begin{figure}[htb]
502: %\grpicture{eight}
503: \centerline{\epsfig{file=1.eps,width=5.cm}} \vspace*{-.1 cm}
504: \caption{The diagram of tadpole approach (see, the text). The
505: solid (dashed) lines correspond to the fermion (scalar) field.}
506: \end{figure}
507:
508: Analyzing the modified Lagrangian it is easy to see that the form
509: of the Gorkov equations would be the same if everywhere $\Sigma$
510: is meant as an improved one $\Sigma+\delta\Sigma$ in which the
511: correction $\delta\Sigma$ is constructed with the modified
512: functions Eq. (\ref{4}). Moreover, the result for the Green
513: function is formally the same if the modified functions $\Sigma$
514: are meant. In particular, the form of gap equation is also
515: retained because its kernel includes again the differences of the
516: matrices which are constructed from the derivatives in $\rho$ of
517: matrices $T,~T^{+}$ and their transposed forms. This difference is
518: spanned by the unit vector as well. However, the following
519: substitutions $$\alpha(p)\to\alpha(p)+\delta\alpha(p)~,$$
520: $$\beta(p)\to\beta(p)+\delta\beta(p)~,$$ where
521: $$\delta\alpha(p)=J~\frat{\partial \alpha}{\partial\rho}~,$$
522: $$\delta\beta(p)=J~\frat{\partial \beta}{\partial\rho}~,$$ are
523: supposed to be performed and here $J$ is the contribution of
524: figure-eight type diagram with the scalar field propagator as an
525: external leg
526: $$J=\frat{2\lambda}{N_c(N_c-1)}~\frat{1}{n\bar\rho^4\kappa}
527: \frat{1}{4 M^2}~I~. $$ Let us mention that effectively a
528: dependence on the kinetic term $\kappa$ disappears (remember that
529: $M^2=\frat{\nu}{\kappa}$) and its precise value is not operative
530: in the approximation developed. The derivative of the figure-eight
531: type diagram which will shortly be necessary to proceed looks like
532: $$\frat{\partial I}{\partial \rho}=2~(N_c-1)~\int\frat{dp}{\pi^4}~
533: \left\{\frat{1-\beta(p)}{(1-\alpha(p)+\beta(p))^2}~\delta
534: \alpha(p)+ \frat{\alpha(p)-2}{(1-\alpha(p)+\beta(p))^2}~\delta
535: \beta(p)\right\}~. $$ And finally the modification of generating
536: functional should be accommodated bringing Eq. (\ref{GZ}) to the
537: form
538: $$W=-n\bar\rho^4~\left(\ln\frat{n\bar\rho^4}{\lambda}-1\right)+
539: \lambda~\langle Y\rangle~.$$ Then the new (if the variation of the
540: IL density is absorbed) equation to calculate the saddle point
541: reads
542: $$n\bar\rho^4-\lambda~(n\bar\rho^4)'\ln\frat{n\bar\rho^4}{|\lambda|}-
543: \lambda~\langle Y\rangle=0$$ and the IL density is \cite{we0}
544: \begin{equation}
545: \label{ilden}
546: n\bar\rho^4=\frat{\nu}{2\beta\xi^2}+
547: \left[\left(\frat{\nu}{2\beta\xi^2}\right)^2+
548: \frat{\left(\frat{\delta I}{\delta\rho}\right)^{'}}{\beta \xi^2}~
549: \frat{\Gamma(\nu+1/2)}{2\sqrt{\nu}~\Gamma(\nu)}
550: \right]^{1/2}~,
551: \end{equation}
552: where the prime available means the derivative in $\lambda$, the constant
553: $\xi^2=\frat{27}{4}\frat{N_c}{N_c^{2}-1} \pi^2$
554: is a measure of interaction in the stochastic ensemble of PPs with an average
555: size as\\
556: $\bar\rho\Lambda=\exp\left\{-\frat{2N_c}{2\nu-1}\right\}$.
557: The derivative in $\lambda$ of the figure-eight type diagram looks like
558: $$\left(\frat{\delta I}{\delta \rho}\right)^{'}=
559: 4~(N_c-1)\frat{\Delta^{'}}{\Delta}~
560: \int\frat{dp}{\pi^4}~\left\{
561: \frat{1+\alpha-6\beta+\alpha\beta+\beta^2}
562: {(1-\alpha+\beta)^3}~\delta \alpha+
563: \frat{-4+7\alpha+4\beta-\alpha\beta-\alpha^2}
564: {(1-\alpha+\beta)^3}~\delta \beta\right\}~
565: $$
566: and the derivative $\Delta^{'}$ is defined by the following equation
567: $$\frat{N_c (N_c-1)}{2\lambda^2}=\frat{2\Delta^{'}}{\Delta^3}
568: \int\frat{dp}{\pi^4}~
569: \frat{2\beta-2\beta^2+2\alpha\beta-\alpha^2}
570: {(1-\alpha+\beta)^2}~.
571: $$
572:
573: \begin{figure}[htb]
574: %\grpicture{diqmevtd}
575: \centerline{\epsfig{file=2.eps,width=6.8cm}} \vspace*{-.1 cm}
576: \caption{The saddle point $\lambda$ as the function of chemical
577: potential $\mu$ at $N_c=3$ and $N_f=2$. The solid lines correspond
578: to the phase of broken chiral symmetry (the lower one absorbs the
579: IL perturbation). The dashed lines correspond to the colour
580: superconductivity phase (the left hand one does not include the
581: tadpole contribution whereas the right hand one does).}
582: \end{figure}
583:
584:
585: Fig. 2 shows the results of calculating the parameter $\lambda$ (which is
586: proportional to the free energy within the precision of one loop approximation)
587: as the function of chemical potential at $N_c = 3, N_f = 2.$ The dashed lines
588: expose a behaviour in the phase of nonzero values of diquark condensate (the
589: left hand line (lower line) corresponds to the calculations if the quark
590: interaction with
591: IL is ignored) whereas the solid lines show the behaviours in the phase of
592: broken chiral symmetry (upper line for the quark interaction with IL ignored)
593: \cite{mz}. The saddle point parameter
594: $\lambda_1$ of Ref. \cite{mz} and that exploited in the present paper are
595: related as
596: $\lambda_1^{2}=-\frat{\lambda~n\bar\rho^4}{2(N_c-1)N_c}$.
597: The crossing points of the curves are fixing the onset of colour
598: superconducting phase. As mentioned above, actually, there is a transitional
599: region of mixed phase where both chiral and diquark condensates develop
600: nonzero magnitudes and the descent is not so steep. However, these details
601: are inessential for further discussion. What is more interesting to be noticed
602: comes from the crossing point of lower solid and dashed lines positioned
603: on the plot.
604:
605: \begin{figure}[htb]
606: %\grpicture{den1}
607: \centerline{\epsfig{file=3.eps,width=6.8cm}} \vspace*{-.1 cm}
608: \caption{The quark density being defined by the crossing point of
609: the upper solid and left hand dashed lines in Fig. 2. The solid
610: line corresponds to the stable phase and the dashed one
611: corresponds to the metastable one.}
612: \end{figure}
613:
614:
615: The first crossing point (along the $\mu$-axis) which corresponds
616: to the approach without the tadpole contributions included looks
617: to be slightly larger in magnitude than that obtained earlier
618: $\mu_c\simeq 300~{\mbox{MeV}}$ in Refs. \cite{diakcar},
619: \cite{rapp}. However, it does not signal about shifting the
620: critical point to larger values of $\mu$ in the approach dealing
621: with the initial Lagrangian. The IL parameters of various
622: approaches are sometimes slightly different and, in principle,
623: could be optimized fitting, for example, $\Lambda_{QCD}$. Thus,
624: the shift of $\mu_c$ value pointed out is well within a precision
625: of the IL theory. Regarding the second crossing point (when IL is
626: perturbed by quarks) the conclusion could be more indicative. Here
627: $\mu_c$ becomes significantly larger. The corresponding quark
628: matter densities as the functions of chemical potential for both
629: approaches are depicted in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4. Apparently, on both
630: plots the density values corresponding to the onset of colour
631: superconductivity phase are appreciably larger than the density of
632: normal nuclear matter. Perhaps, our result could be taken as a
633: general indication on the considerable role of supplementary
634: (insignificant on the instanton background) interactions of light
635: quarks. They are able to change the estimate of critical density
636: for colour diquark condensation drastically.
637:
638: \begin{figure}[htb]
639: %\grpicture{den2}
640: \centerline{\epsfig{file=4.eps,width=6.8cm}} \vspace*{-.1 cm}
641: \caption{The quark density being defined by the crossing point of
642: the lower solid and left hand dashed lines in Fig. 2. The solid
643: line corresponds to the stable phase and the dashed one
644: corresponds to the metastable one.}
645: \end{figure}
646:
647:
648: Now we would like to comment on the crossing point of upper dashed
649: and lower solid lines which is not shown in Fig. 2. It corresponds
650: the unrealistic values of $\mu$ and in that region the IL is
651: hardly applicable. One of the limits for IL approach coming from
652: the very large values of chemical potential points out that with
653: quark matter density increasing the average interquark distances
654: may become very small and the 'Coulomb' (perturbative) field
655: strengths would occur to be comparable with the (anti-)instanton
656: ones. Then the (anti-)instanton superposition is not a proper
657: configuration to saturate the functional integral. Thus, our
658: conclusion resulting from the approach developed gives a message
659: that the quark perturbation of IL leads the corresponding curves
660: to move apart inherent in the phases of nonzero values of diquark
661: and chiral condensates in Fig. 2. The 'chiral' curve becomes
662: steeper but 'diquark' curve is displaced to the larger values of
663: $\mu$ increasing its critical value. It looks like giving more
664: reliability to our understanding of the perturbative fields role
665: in the IL theory could provide us with more accurate appraisals
666: for the phenomena considered.
667:
668: \begin{figure}[htb]
669: %\grpicture{dencomtd}
670: \centerline{\epsfig{file=5.eps,width=6.8cm}} \vspace*{-.1 cm}
671: \caption{ The IL density for the approach at $N_c=3$ and $N_f=2$.
672: The solid line corresponds to the calculation in the phase of
673: broken chiral symmetry. Both dashed lines correspond to the
674: calculation in the phase of nonzero diquark condensate values.
675: The lower dashed line gives the estimate of IL density without the
676: tadpole contributions included. Regarding the upper dashed line
677: see the text.}
678: \end{figure}
679:
680:
681: Fig. 5 demonstrates the IL density as the function of $\mu$ when
682: the quark back-reaction is incorporated in the phase of broken
683: chiral symmetry (solid curve) and in the phase of nonzero values
684: of diquark condensate (dashed curve). It is interesting to notice
685: that the curves manifest the different character of quark
686: influence on IL. In the phase of broken chiral symmetry the
687: density is almost constant in the suitable interval of $\mu$
688: whereas in the colour superconducting phase quickly disappears. It
689: is remarkable that for the former the corresponding analogue of
690: the tadpole contribution $\left(\frat{\delta
691: I}{\delta\rho}\right)^{'}$ in Eq. (\ref{ilden}) is strictly
692: positive and, therefore, can lead to the increase of the IL
693: density (gluon condensate) which is truly insignificant and
694: demonstrates simply the approach sensitivity to the dynamical
695: quark mass variation \cite{mz}. In the latter case the sign of
696: tadpole contribution is changing. As seen from Fig. 5 it leads to
697: the drastic change of the IL density behaviour and the gluon
698: condensate is getting weaker. Strictly speaking this effect has
699: already been discussed in \cite{kerb}.
700:
701:
702:
703: \noindent The authors are partly supported by STCU \#P015c,
704: CERN-INTAS 2000-349, NATO~2000-PST.CLG 977482 Grants.
705:
706:
707:
708:
709: %\newpage
710: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
711: %-1
712: \bibitem{karsh}
713: F. Karsh, hep-lat/0103314.
714: %0
715: \bibitem{0}
716: K. Rajagopal, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A651}, 150 (1999);\\
717: M. Alford,
718: hep-ph/0110150.
719: %1
720: \bibitem{mz}
721: S. V. Molodtsov, G. M. Zinovjev, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) {\bf
722: B 106}, 471 (2002).
723: %2
724: \bibitem{we0}
725: S. V. Molodtsov, A. M. Snigirev, and G. M. Zinovjev, Phys. Atom.
726: Nucl. {\bf 65}, 229 (2002).
727: %3
728: \bibitem{diakcar}
729: G.W. Carter and D. I. Diakonov, Phys. Rew. {\bf D60}, 016004
730: (1999).
731: %4
732: \bibitem{rapp}
733: R. Rapp, T. Sch\"afer, E. V. Shuryak, and M. Velkovsky, Ann. Phys.
734: (N.Y.) {\bf 280}, 35 (2000).
735: %5
736: \bibitem{2}
737: D. I. Diakonov and V. Yu. Petrov, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B245}, 259
738: (1984);\\ D. I. Diakonov and V. Yu. Petrov, in {\it Hadronic
739: Matter under Extreme Conditions},\\ edited by V. Shelest and G.
740: Zinovjev (Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1986) p. 192; \\ D. I. Diakonov, V.
741: Yu. Petrov, and P. V. Pobylitsa, Phys. Lett. {\bf B226}, 471
742: (1989);\\ C. G. Callan, R. Dashen, and D. J. Gross, Phys. Rev.
743: {\bf D17}, 2717 (1978);\\ E.-M. Ilgenfritz and M.
744: M\"uller-Preussker, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B184}, 443 (1981);\\ T.
745: Sch\"afer and E. V. Shuryak, Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf 70}, 323 (1998).
746: %6
747: \bibitem{dp2}
748: D. I. Diakonov, M. V. Polyakov, and C. Weiss, Nucl. Phys. {\bf
749: B461}, 539 (1996);\\ D. I. Diakonov, hep-ph/9802298.
750: %7
751: \bibitem{we}
752: S. V. Molodtsov, A. M. Snigirev, and G. M. Zinovjev, Phys. Rev.
753: {\bf D60}, 056006 (1999);\\
754: S. V. Molodtsov, A. M. Snigirev, and G.M. Zinovjev, in
755: {\it Lattice Fermions and Structure\\ of the
756: Vacuum}, edited by V. Mitrjushkin and G. Schierholz, (Kluwer
757: Academic Publisher, \\
758: Dordrecht, The Netherlands 2000) p. 307;\\ S.
759: V. Molodtsov, A. M. Snigirev, and G. M. Zinovjev, Yad. Fiz. {\bf
760: 63}, 975 (2000).
761: \bibitem{kerb}
762: N. O. Agasyan, D. Ebert, E.-M. Ilgenfritz, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A637}
763: 135, (1998);\\ N. O. Agasyan, B. O. Kerbikov, V. I. Shevchenko,
764: Phys. Rep. {\bf 320}, 131 (1999);\\
765: D. Ebert, V. V. Khudyakov, K.
766: G. Klimenko, V. Ch. Zhukovsky, hep-ph/0106110;
767: \\
768: D. Ebert, V. V. Khudyakov, K. G. Klimenko, H. Toki,
769: V. Ch. Zhukovsky, hep-ph/0108185.
770: \end{thebibliography}
771: \end{document}
772:
773:
774: