1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: \documentclass[a4,12pt]{article}
3: \usepackage{graphicx,psfrag,amssymb,cite}
4: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
5:
6: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
7: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}
8: \newcommand{\cita} [1] {$^{\hbox{\scriptsize \cite{#1}}}$}
9: %
10: \newcommand{\prepr}[1] {\begin{flushright} {\bf #1} \end{flushright} \vskip 1.cm}
11: %
12: \newcommand{\titul}[1] {\boldmath \begin{center}{\Large {\bf #1 } } \end{center}
13: \vskip 0.8cm}
14:
15: \newcommand{\autor}[1] {\begin{center} {\bf \lineskip .3cm #1 }
16: \end{center} }
17:
18: \newcommand{\lugar}[1] {\begin{center} {\normalsize \bf \it #1 } \end{center}}
19: %
20: \newcommand{\abstr}[1] {{\begin{center} \vskip .5cm {\bf \large Abstract
21: \vspace{0pt}} \end{center}}\begin{quote} \small #1
22: \end{quote}}
23: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
24: \topmargin=-10mm
25: \textheight=225mm
26: \textwidth=170mm
27: %\baselineskip 1.5\baselineskip
28: %\double
29: %\hoffset -0.65in
30: \def \baselinestretch{1.0}
31: \oddsidemargin=-6mm
32: \evensidemargin=-6mm
33: \newcounter{muni}
34: \newenvironment{remunerate}{\begin{list}
35: { {\bf \arabic{muni}.}}{\usecounter{muni}
36: \setlength{\leftmargin}{3pt}\setlength{\itemindent}{17pt}}}{\end{list}}
37: %------------ der feynman slash ---------------
38: \makeatletter
39: \def\fmslash{\@ifnextchar[{\fmsl@sh}{\fmsl@sh[0mu]}}
40: \def\fmsl@sh[#1]#2{%
41: \mathchoice
42: {\@fmsl@sh\displaystyle{#1}{#2}}%
43: {\@fmsl@sh\textstyle{#1}{#2}}%
44: {\@fmsl@sh\scriptstyle{#1}{#2}}%
45: {\@fmsl@sh\scriptscriptstyle{#1}{#2}}}
46: \def\@fmsl@sh#1#2#3{\m@th\ooalign{$\hfil#1\mkern#2/\hfil$\crcr$#1#3$}}
47: \makeatother
48: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
49: \pagestyle{plain}
50: \begin{document}
51: \hbadness=10000
52: \pagenumbering{arabic}
53: \begin{titlepage}
54:
55: \prepr{hep-ph/0210376\\
56: \hspace{30mm} KIAS--P02071 \\
57: \hspace{30mm} KEK--TH--852 \\
58: \hspace{30mm} October 2002}
59: %
60:
61: \begin{center}
62: \titul{\bf Large enhancement of $D^\pm\to e^\pm\nu$
63: and $D^\pm_s \to e^\pm\nu$ in\\ $R$ Parity violating SUSY models}
64:
65:
66: \autor{A.G. Akeroyd$^{\mbox{1}}$\footnote{akeroyd@kias.re.kr},
67: S. Recksiegel$^{\mbox{2}}$\footnote{stefan@post.kek.jp} }
68: \lugar{ $^{1}$ Korea Institute for Advanced Study,
69: 207-43 Cheongryangri-dong,\\ Dongdaemun-gu,
70: Seoul 130-012, Republic of Korea}
71:
72: \lugar{ $^{2}$ Theory Group, KEK, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0801, Japan }
73:
74: \end{center}
75:
76: \vskip2.0cm
77:
78: \begin{abstract}
79: \noindent{The purely leptonic decays $D^\pm\to e^\pm\nu$
80: and $D^\pm_s\to e^\pm\nu$, for which no experimental
81: limits exist, are highly suppressed in the
82: Standard Model. Mere observation of these decays
83: at the $B$ factories BELLE/BaBar or forthcoming CLEO-c would be
84: a clear signal of physics beyond the SM. We show that $R$ parity violating
85: slepton contributions can give rise to
86: spectacular enhancements of the decay
87: rates, resulting in branching ratios as large as $5\times 10^{-3}$, which
88: strongly motivates a search in these channels.}
89:
90: \end{abstract}
91:
92: \vskip1.0cm
93: %{\bf PACS index : }
94: \vskip1.0cm
95: {\bf Keywords : \small Rare D decay}
96: \end{titlepage}
97: \thispagestyle{empty}
98: \newpage
99:
100: \pagestyle{plain}
101: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\arabic{footnote} }
102: \setcounter{footnote}{0}
103:
104: \section{Introduction}
105:
106: The wealth of new data from the $B$ factories BELLE and BaBar has
107: caused a great amount of phenomenological interest in $B$ decays in
108: recent years. Already the much anticipated measurement
109: of $\sin2\phi_1$ \cite{Abe:2001xe,Aubert:2001nu} has been
110: achieved, and many new results in the field of rare $B$ decays
111: (e.g. $b\to s\gamma$ \cite{Bertolini:1990if}
112: and $b\to d\gamma$ \cite{Akeroyd:2001cy}) are eagerly awaited.
113:
114: Less attention has been devoted to charmed ($D$) meson decays,
115: although the $B$ factories and forthcoming CLEO--c
116: promise the largest sample of charmed mesons to date.
117: $D$ mesons may be produced at the $B$ factories by
118: two mechanisms: i) Continuum $c\overline c$ production
119: and ii) Decay of $B$ mesons.
120: While the majority of $B$ decays involve some charmed particles,
121: it is difficult to extract charm data from these decays due to the high
122: multiplicity of particles in the final states. With the high luminosity
123: of the $B$ factories, however, a lot of $c\bar c$ pairs that subsequently
124: hadronize to $D$ mesons are produced directly in the
125: collision of the primary $e^+e^-$ beams. Both BELLE and BaBar will each
126: have about $5\times 10^{8}$ $c\overline c$ continuum events in the
127: anticipated data samples of $400$ fb$^{-1}$, thus providing
128: a rich testing ground for charm decays. At CLEO-c, prospects are
129: also very promising with the threshold production of $D$ mesons
130: offering distinct advantages over the $c\overline c$
131: continuum production at the $B$ factories, which compensates
132: for the lower luminosity of CLEO-c \cite{Shipsey:2002ye}.
133:
134: These experiments will have substantially increased
135: sensitivity to the purely leptonic decays of the charged $D^\pm$ mesons,
136: $D^\pm_s\to l^\pm\nu$ and $D^\pm\to l^\pm\nu$.
137: In the SM, such decays occur via $W^\pm$ annihilation in the $s$-channel
138: and provide an opportunity to measure the decay constants ($f_{D_s},f_D$)
139: for $D^\pm_s$ and $D^\pm$. Of these six leptonic decays, only
140: $D^\pm_s\to \tau^\pm\nu$ and $D^\pm_s\to \mu^\pm\nu$ have
141: been observed, from which $f_{D_s}$ is measured with an error $\sim 14\%$.
142: The $D^\pm$ decays are Cabbibo suppressed compared to $D^\pm_s$,
143: and none have been observed except for 1 event for $D^\pm\to \mu^\pm\nu$.
144: The $B$ factories and CLEO-c will offer improved measurements
145: of $D^\pm_s\to \tau^\pm\nu$ and $D^\pm_s\to \mu^\pm\nu$, which in turn
146: will significantly reduce the error in the current measurements of
147: $f_{D_s}$. Observation of $D^\pm\to \mu^\pm\nu$ (or the less accessible
148: $D^\pm\to \tau^\pm\nu$) will provide the first serious
149: measurement of $f_{D}$.
150:
151: In this paper we advocate searching for physics beyond the SM
152: through these decays. Of special interest are
153: $D^\pm_s\to e^\pm\nu$ and $D^\pm\to e^\pm\nu$
154: for which no experimental limits exist, but could readily be
155: searched for at the above experiments. In the SM
156: these are severely helicity suppressed by $m_e^2$ and have BRs of
157: order $10^{-7}$ and $10^{-9}$, respectively. Hence such decays
158: have been largely overlooked since (in the context of the SM) they
159: cannot offer a measurement of the decay constant with present
160: or upcoming data samples. However, the smallness of their BRs
161: enables these decays to play a new role of probing models beyond the SM.
162: We show that slepton contributions in the Minimal Supersymmetric
163: Standard Model (MSSM) with explicit $R$ parity violation
164: can enhance these BRs to $5\times 10^{-3}$,
165: a result which strongly motivates a search in these channels.
166: Although the effect of new physics in purely leptonic decays is
167: sometimes tainted by the uncertainty in the decay constant, the
168: tiny SM branching ratios for $D^\pm_s\to e^\pm\nu$ and $D^\pm\to e^\pm\nu$
169: assure that mere observation of these decays at the aforementioned
170: machines would be an unambiguous signal of physics beyond the SM.
171:
172: Our work is organised as follows. In section 2 we introduce the
173: $D^\pm$ meson annihilation decays. In section 3 we show how these decays can
174: be enhanced in $R$ parity violating SUSY models. Section 4 presents our
175: numerical results and section 5 contains our conclusions.
176:
177: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
178: \boldmath
179: \section{Annihilation $D^\pm$ meson decays.}
180: \unboldmath
181: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
182:
183: To date the primary interest in measuring the purely leptonic decays
184: $D^\pm/D^\pm_s\to l^\pm\nu_l$
185: has been to obtain information on the charged $D$ meson decay constants
186: \cite{Soldner-Rembold:2001zk}.
187: In the SM these decays proceed via annihilation to a $W^\pm$ in the
188: $s-$channel (see Fig.1). Due to helicity suppression, the rate is
189: proportional to $m^2_l$, and the phase space suppression is
190: particularly severe for $\tau^\pm\nu$. The BR is given by:
191: %
192: \begin{equation} \label{smrate}
193: \Gamma(D^+_q\to \ell^+\nu_\ell)={G_F^2 m_{D_q} m_l^2 f_{D_q}^2\over 8\pi}
194: |V_{cq}|^2 \left(1-{m_l^2\over m^2_{D_q}}\right)^2
195: \end{equation}
196:
197: %
198: \begin{figure} \begin{center}
199: \includegraphics[width=7cm]{wexchange.eps}
200: \caption{Leptonic $D_s$ decay in the Standard Model: $W$ exchange
201: \label{wexchange}}
202: \end{center} \end{figure}
203: %
204:
205: \begin{table}\begin{center}
206: \begin{tabular} {|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline
207: Decay & SM Prediction & Experiment \\ \hline
208: $D_d^+\to e^+\nu_e$ & $8.24\times 10^{-9}$ & $\times$ \\ \hline
209: $D_d^+\to \mu^+\nu_{\mu}$ & $3.50\times 10^{-4}$ &
210: $(8^{\,\,+16\,\,+5}_{\,\,\,\,-5\,\,\, -2}\,)
211: \times 10^{-4}$ \cite{Bai:cg}\\ \hline
212: $D_d^+\to \tau^+\nu_{\tau} $ & $9.25\times 10^{-4}$ & $\times$ \\ \hline
213: %
214: $D_s^+\to e^+\nu_e$ & $1.23\times 10^{-7}$ & $\times$ \\ \hline
215: $D_s^+\to \mu^+\nu_{\mu}$ & $5.22\times 10^{-3}$ &
216: $(5.3\pm 0.9\pm 1.2)\times 10^{-3}$ \cite{Soldner-Rembold:2001zk}\\ \hline
217: $D_s^+\to \tau^+\nu_{\tau}$ & $5.09\times 10^{-2}$ &
218: $(6.05\pm 1.04\pm 1.34\pm 0.22)\times 10^{-2}$ \cite{Soldner-Rembold:2001zk} \\ \hline
219: \end{tabular}\end{center}
220: \caption{SM predictions and current experimental limits. \label{explimits}}
221: \end{table}
222: \noindent
223: where $q=d$ or $s$. The SM predictions for the BRs and the current
224: experimental status of the various searches are shown in
225: Table 1.\footnote{Our numbers differ substantially --- especially
226: in the $\tau$ channels --- from the ones given e.g.\ in the BaBar
227: book. This is because the rate depends very strongly on the mass
228: of the $D$, for which we are using newer values. We also use
229: a different value for the decay constant of the $D_s$, see section
230: 4 for details.}
231: %
232: One can see that the decays involving $e^\pm\nu$ have tiny BRs, while
233: those involving $\mu^\pm\nu$ and $\tau^\pm\nu$ have BRs in the range
234: $10^{-2}\to 10^{-4}$. Of the six possible decays, only two have been
235: measured with any sort of accuracy, yielding a world average of
236: $f_{D_s}=264\pm 35$ MeV \cite{Soldner-Rembold:2001zk}.
237: Additionally there is a very imprecise
238: measurement of $D^\pm\to \mu^\pm\nu$ based on 1 observed event,
239: giving $f_{D_s}=300^{+180+80}_{-150-40}$ MeV \cite{Bai:cg}.
240: Of the three decays
241: which have not been searched for, $D^\pm_s\to e^\pm\nu$ and
242: $D^\pm\to e^\pm\nu$ have particularly clean signatures. With the
243: expected large samples of $D^\pm$ and $D^\pm_s$ mesons at BELLE, BaBar and
244: CLEO-c \cite{Shipsey:2002ye}, these experiments
245: should be sensitive to BR$\sim {\cal O} (10^{-4})$. CLEO-c aims to
246: accumulate 30 million $D^\pm$ events (6 million fully tagged)
247: and 1.5 million $D^\pm_s$ events (0.3 million fully tagged)
248: by the end of 2004. BELLE and BaBar expect $5\times 10^8$
249: $c\overline c$ continuum events by the end of 2005.
250: Mere observation of these decays would be an patent
251: signal of physics beyond the SM. In the next section we show that
252: SUSY particles
253: in $R$ parity violating extensions of the MSSM can enhance these decays to
254: experimental observability. Thus in addition to offering measurements
255: of the charged $D$ meson decay constants, the purely leptonic decays of
256: $D^\pm/D^\pm_s$ mesons assume a new role of probing physics beyond the SM.
257: In \cite{Shipsey:2002ye} CLEO-c is considering increasing the
258: selection efficiency of the $\mu$--channel by waiving the
259: $\mu$--tag requirement, stating
260: that no $e$--contamination is to be expected due to the small SM
261: rate of the respective channel. We strongly encourage also performing
262: an analysis with a muon identification tag, because the $e$--channel
263: can substantially
264: contribute to the total leptonic annihilation decay rate as will be
265: shown later in this paper.
266:
267: The related decays $D^\pm/D^\pm_s\to e^\pm\nu \gamma$, are known to have
268: larger BRs than $D^\pm/D^\pm_s\to e^\pm\nu$ in the SM
269: \cite{Burdman:1994ip,Korchemsky:1999qb}. This is because the
270: presence of a photon in the final state removes the helicity
271: suppression. The analysis of \cite{Korchemsky:1999qb} finds
272: BR$(D^\pm\to e^\pm\nu \gamma) \sim {\cal O} (10^{-4}\to 10^{-5})$
273: and BR$(D_s^\pm\to e^\pm\nu \gamma) \sim {\cal O} (10^{-3}\to 10^{-4}$)
274: The ``effective'' SM prediction for
275: BR$(D^\pm/D^\pm_s\to e^\pm\nu$) should include
276: the contribution from BR$(D^\pm/D^\pm_s\to e^\pm\nu \gamma$)
277: with a soft photon (i.e. one which cannot be detected experimentally),
278: whose infra-red singularity cancels with the radiative
279: corrections to BR($D^\pm/D^\pm_s\to e^\pm\nu$):
280: \begin{equation}
281: BR^{\rm eff}(D^\pm/D^\pm_s\to e^\pm\nu)=BR(D^\pm/D^\pm_s\to e^\pm\nu)
282: +BR(D^\pm/D^\pm_s\to e^\pm\nu\gamma)_{E_{\gamma}<E_{\rm res}}
283: \end{equation}
284: However, the soft photon contribution is only a small fraction of
285: the total rate for
286: BR($D^\pm/D^\pm_s\to e^\pm\nu \gamma$), and so
287: BR$^{\rm eff}(D^\pm/D_s^\pm\to e\nu$) would still
288: be below the expected experimental sensitivity of ${\cal O}(10^{-4})$.
289: Hence we suggest that observation of
290: BR$(D^\pm/D^\pm_s\to e^\pm\nu)\ge 10^{-4}$
291: could only be attributed to physics beyond the SM.
292:
293: We note that inclusive measurements of the
294: BR($D^\pm_s/D^\pm \to e^\pm +X$) have
295: been performed, to which any enhanced $D^\pm_s/D^\pm \to e^\pm\nu$ would have
296: contributed. However, the error in the measurements of
297: $D^\pm_s\to e^\pm +X$ \cite{Bai:1997un}
298: and $D^\pm\to e^\pm +X$ \cite{Abbiendi:1998ub}
299: still allow for contributions from $D^\pm_s/D^\pm \to e^\pm\nu$
300: of the order of a percent or more.
301:
302:
303: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
304: \boldmath
305: \section{$R$ parity violating contributions to $D^\pm,D_s^\pm\to \ell^\pm\nu$}
306: \unboldmath
307: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
308:
309: The main motivation for $R$ parity violating SUSY
310: \cite{Dreiner:1997uz,Allanach:1999ic}
311: is to account for the observed neutrino oscillations without
312: increasing the particle content of the MSSM
313: \cite{Aulakh:1982yn,Borzumati:2002bf}. The superpotential is given by:
314: %
315: \begin{equation} \label{potential}
316: W_{R}={1\over 2}\lambda_{ijk}L_iL_jE^c_k+
317: \lambda'_{ijk}L_iQ_jD^c_k+{1\over 2}\lambda''_{ijk}U^c_iD^c_jD^c_k
318: \end{equation}
319: %
320: Bilinear terms $\mu_iL_iH_2$ are also possible, but have
321: negligible impact on the annihilation decays we consider.
322: Since the $\lambda''_{ijk}U^c_iD^c_jD^c_k$ term
323: can mediate proton decay, it is customary to assume that
324: the $\lambda''$ couplings vanish due to some discrete symmetry
325: (e.g. baryon parity).
326: The simplest approach to $R$ parity violating phenomenology is
327: to assume that a single $R$ parity violating coupling
328: in the {\sl weak basis} $(\lambda'_{ijk}$)
329: is dominant with all others negligibly small.
330: It was shown that such an approach leads to several non-zero
331: $R$ parity violating couplings in the {\sl mass basis}
332: $(\bar\lambda'_{imn})$ due to quark mixing \cite{Agashe:1995qm}:
333: %
334: \begin{equation}
335: \bar\lambda'_{imn}=\lambda'_{ijk}V^{\rm KM}_{jm}\delta_{kn}
336: \end{equation}
337: Here we have assumed that all quark mixing lies in the up--type sector,
338: so that the mixing matrix is the usual Kobayashi--Maskawa matrix $V^{\rm KM}$.
339: This simplification avoids the appearance of the right--handed quark
340: mixing matrix and gives the most conservative limits
341: on the $R$ parity violating couplings, which would otherwise
342: be constrained more severely from the decay $K^\pm\to \pi^\pm\nu
343: \overline\nu$ \cite{Agashe:1995qm}. A realistic $R$ parity violating
344: model would have many non--zero couplings {\sl in the weak basis} and so
345: in general would have a very rich phenomenology
346: provided the couplings are not too small.
347:
348: It has been emphasised before that the purely leptonic decays
349: are very sensitive at tree level to
350: $R$ parity violating trilinear interactions,
351: and thus these decays constitute excellent probes of
352: the model e.g. the decays $B^\pm_{u,c}\to l^\pm\nu$
353: may be enhanced up to current experimental sensitivity
354: \cite{Baek:1999ch,Dreiner:2001kc,Akeroyd:2002cs,Akeroyd:2002gr}.
355: The relevant Feynman diagrams for the decays $D^\pm/D_s^\pm\to l^\pm \nu$
356: are depicted in Fig.~\ref{sparticleexchange}
357: and consist of $s$-- and $t$--channel exchange of sparticles.
358: %
359: %
360: \begin{figure} \begin{center}
361: \includegraphics[width=9cm]{sparticleexchange.eps}
362: \caption{Leptonic $D_s$ decay in $R$ parity violating models:
363: sparticle exchange
364: \label{sparticleexchange}}
365: \end{center} \end{figure}
366: %
367: These additional channels modify the SM rate (\ref{smrate}) by
368: \begin{equation}
369: m_l \quad\to\quad \left(1+{\cal A}^q_{ln}\right)m_l - (R+ {\cal B}^q_{ln})M_{D_q}\,,
370: \end{equation}
371: where $R_\ell=m_\ell M_{D_q} \tan^2\beta/M_{H^\pm}^2$
372: stems from $R$ parity conserving SUSY charged Higgs exchange
373: \cite{Hou:1992sy} which we will not consider further
374: since it is also proportional to the lepton mass and is
375: relatively unimportant for the lighter leptons on which we focus.
376: The $R$ parity violating SUSY contributions are given by:
377: \begin{eqnarray}
378: {\cal A}^q_{ln}&=&{\sqrt 2\over 4G_FV_{cq}}\sum_{i,j=1}^3{1\over
379: 2 m^2_{\tilde q_i}}V_{2j}\lambda'_{nqi}\lambda'^*_{lji},\\
380: {\cal B}^q_{ln}&=&{\sqrt 2\over 4G_FV_{cq}}\sum_{i,j=1}^3{2\over
381: m^2_{\tilde \ell_i}}V_{2j}\lambda_{inl}\lambda'^*_{ijq},
382: \end{eqnarray}
383: where $q=d,s$ for $D^+,D^+_s$, respectively. These formulae were derived in
384: \cite{Baek:1999ch} for leptonic decays of $B$ mesons.
385: The helicity suppressed contribution
386: from the ${\cal A}^q_{ln}$ term can be mediated by just one $\lambda'$
387: coupling (if $n=l$ and $q=j$), or by two different couplings
388: (if $n\ne l$ and/or $q\ne j$).
389: %\footnote{We will
390: %discuss a special case later on}
391: The dominant ${\cal B}^q_{ln}$ term
392: (which is not helicity suppressed) requires one non--zero $\lambda$
393: {\it and} one non--zero $\lambda'$. In the next section we will vary the
394: $R$ parity violating couplings inside their allowed ranges to determine
395: the obtainable BRs.
396:
397: The contribution of the $t$--channel diagrams has been considered
398: in \cite{Ledroit:1998} for $D^\pm_s\to \tau^\pm\nu$ and
399: $D^\pm_s\to \mu^\pm\nu$. Here only
400: single coupling limits were considered and
401: weak limits are derived for $\lambda'_{32k}$ and $\lambda'_{22k}$.
402: Analogous $t$--channel exchange diagrams also occur for the neutral
403: $D^0$ meson decays $D^0\to l^+_il^-_j$
404: \cite{Burdman:1995te},\cite{Burdman:2001tf}.
405: Strong upper limits ($<10^{-6}$) on
406: BR$(D^0\to e^+e^-,e^+\mu^-,\mu^+\mu^-$) have been obtained from
407: the Tevatron. These decays have no $s$--channel contributions of the
408: type $\lambda\lambda'$ due to the absence of the coupling
409: $\lambda'_{ijk}\tilde \nu_i u_j\overline u_k$ in the Lagrangian.
410: We wish to focus on the decays $D^\pm_s,D^\pm\to e^\pm\nu$, in particular the
411: helicity unsuppressed $s$--channel contributions mediated by
412: combinations of $\lambda\lambda'$.
413: Although these decays might be problematic at the Tevatron
414: due to the missing energy of $\nu$, they can be readily searched for
415: at the $e^+e^-$ machines BELLE, BaBar and CLEO-c.
416:
417:
418: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
419: \boldmath
420: \section{Numerical results}
421: \unboldmath
422: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
423: In our analysis we make use of the latest limits on the $R$
424: parity violating couplings $\lambda$ and $\lambda'$. Single coupling
425: bounds are listed in \cite{Allanach:1999ic}. Further input
426: parameters are $m_{D^\pm} = 1.8693\, {\rm GeV},\, \tau_{D^\pm}=1.051
427: \times 10^{-12} s,\, f_{D^\pm}= 0.2\, {\rm GeV}$ for the $D^\pm$ meson
428: and $m_{D_s^\pm} = 1.9685\, {\rm GeV},\, \tau_{D_s^\pm}=0.49 \times 10^{-12} s,
429: \, f_{D_s^\pm}= 0.25\, {\rm GeV}$ for the $D_s^\pm$. The parameters
430: for rare $\tau$ decays are taken from \cite{Saha:2002kt}.
431:
432: Many of the bounds on $R$ parity violating couplings relevant
433: for our analysis are of the same order of magnitude; the products
434: of these couplings are ${\cal O}(10^{-2})$ and can mediate
435: $D^\pm/D^\pm_s\to e^\pm\nu$ with BRs up to ${\cal O}(10^{-1})$.
436: However, most combinations
437: of $\lambda\lambda'$ which mediate $D^\pm/D^\pm_s\to e^\pm\nu$
438: would strongly contribute to the Kaon decays, $K^0\to e^+e^-,
439: e^\pm\mu^\mp,\mu^+\mu^-$, via $\tilde \nu$ exchange in the
440: $s$--channel \cite{Choudhury:1996ia}. The limits on such combinations
441: is ${\cal O}(10^{-7})$, which is
442: $10^5$ better than the product of the single coupling limits,
443: and at first sight would seem to rule out the possibility of
444: a sizably enhanced $D^\pm/D^\pm_s\to e^\pm\nu$
445: mediated by $\lambda\lambda'$ combinations.
446:
447: However, large BRs for $D^\pm/D^\pm_s\to e^\pm\nu$ can occur
448: if the neutrino is $\nu_{\tau}$. This is because
449: the corresponding decay in the Kaon sector would involve
450: a $\tau$ lepton in the final state, which is kinematically impossible.
451: The only possibility for a lepton flavour violating Kaon decay mediated
452: by these combinations of couplings would be
453: $K^0\to \ell^\pm\tau^{\mp*}\to \ell^\pm \ell'^\mp
454: \nu_{\tau}\nu_{\ell'}$. Here the additional suppression factors
455: (e.g.\ off--shell propagators, additional vertices)
456: easily weaken the limits on the relevant $\lambda\lambda'$
457: couplings to ${\cal O}(10^{-2})$ where the single coupling
458: bounds become more restrictive than the bounds from Kaon decays.
459: In addition the final state $e^\pm l^\mp \nu_{\tau}\nu_l$ has not
460: been searched for.
461:
462: Therefore the most promising combinations which enhance
463: $D^\pm\to e^\pm\nu_{\tau}$ and $D_s^\pm\to e^\pm\nu_{\tau}$
464: are $\lambda_{231}\lambda'_{221}$ and $\lambda_{231}\lambda'_{222}$
465: respectively.
466: For these combinations the use of the single coupling
467: bounds is justified.\footnote{Recently some new constraints on
468: these combinations
469: have been derived from considering 2 loop contributions to
470: neutrino masses \cite{Borzumati:2002bf}. These bounds are of the same
471: order of magnitude as the single coupling bounds, and so our results
472: are largely unaffected.} The single coupling
473: bounds $\lambda_{231}= 0.07$ and $\lambda'_{221}= 0.18$ (for
474: sparticle mass $100$ GeV) can induce
475: BR$(D^\pm\to e^\pm\nu_{\tau})= 1.251 \cdot 10^{-2}$. Although
476: as stated above, this combination of couplings is safe from rare Kaon
477: decay bounds, the same combination can induce the lepton flavour
478: violating $\tau$ decay $\tau^\pm\to e^\pm K^0_s$ \cite{Saha:2002kt}.
479:
480: \begin{figure}
481: \begin{center}
482: \includegraphics[width=15cm]{Ddcorrelationplot.eps}
483: \end{center}
484: \caption{Dependence of BR($D^\pm\to e^\pm\nu_\tau$) and BR($\tau^\pm\to e^\pm K^0_s$)
485: on the product of $\protect\fmslash R_p$ couplings $\left|\lambda_{231}\lambda'^*_{221}\right|$.
486: \label{Ddcorrelation}}
487: \end{figure}
488:
489: The dependence of BR($D^\pm\to e^\pm\nu_\tau$) and
490: BR($\tau^\pm\to e^\pm K^0_s$)
491: on the product of the $\fmslash R_p$ couplings
492: $\left|\lambda_{231}\lambda'^*_{221}\right|$
493: is shown in Fig.\ref{Ddcorrelation}.
494: The $x$-- and $y$--axes give the respective branching ratios and
495: $\left|\lambda_{231}\lambda'^*_{221}\right|$ is varied along the diagonal line.
496: The plot is logarithmic along both axes.
497: The experimental bound on BR($\tau^-\to e^-K_0$) prior to summer 2002
498: \cite{Hayes:1981bn}
499: (rightmost vertical dashed line) is less restrictive for
500: $\left|\lambda_{231}\lambda'^*_{221}\right|$, and therefore
501: for BR($D^\pm\to e^\pm\nu_\tau$),
502: than the product of the individual coupling bounds. The BR($D^\pm\to e^\pm\nu_\tau$)
503: attainable with the individual coupling bounds is indicated by the upper horizontal
504: dashed line. However, a much improved experimental bound on
505: BR($\tau^\pm\to e^\pm K^0_s$) has recently been published
506: \cite{Chen:2002ug}, and this limit is
507: indicated by the left vertical dashed line.\footnote{\cite{Saha:2002kt}
508: appeared shortly before the new bounds on BR($\tau^\pm\to e^\pm K^0_s$)
509: were released and therefore derives a rather weak bound
510: $\left|\lambda_{231}\lambda'^*_{212}\right|,
511: \left|\lambda_{231}\lambda'^*_{221}\right| < 4.7 \times 10^{-2}$,
512: which is less
513: restrictive than the single coupling limit. This limit improves to
514: $1.2 \times 10^{-3}$, an order of magnitude better than the single
515: coupling limit, with the new data from \cite{Chen:2002ug}.}
516: %
517: This new limit restricts the enhancement of
518: BR($D^\pm\to e^\pm\nu_\tau$) from $\fmslash R_p$ couplings quite
519: substantially;
520: only BRs of ${\cal O}(10^{-4})$ remain attainable, while the older bound
521: on lepton flavour violating $\tau$--decays allowed BRs of ${\cal O}(1\%)$.
522: CLEO-c expects 30 million $D^\pm$ events (6 million tagged), so even BRs of
523: ${\cal O}(10^{-4})$ or smaller could be observed. Alternatively, lack of
524: observation would further improve the limit on $\left|\lambda_{231}\lambda'^*_{221}\right|$.
525:
526: \begin{figure}
527: \begin{center}
528: \includegraphics[width=15cm]{Dscorrelationplot.eps}
529: \end{center}
530: \caption{Dependence of BR($D_s\to e\nu_\tau$) and BR($\tau\to e\eta$)
531: on the product of $\protect\fmslash R_p$ couplings $\left|\lambda_{231}\lambda'^*_{222}\right|$.
532: \label{Dscorrelation}}
533: \end{figure}
534:
535: The situation is much more favourable for $D_s^\pm\to e^\pm\nu_\tau$,
536: which is correlated with the less well measured $\tau^\pm\to e^\pm\eta$.
537: The single coupling bounds
538: $\lambda_{231}= 0.07$ and $\lambda'_{222}= 0.21$
539: give BR$(D_s^\pm\to e^\pm\nu_{\tau})= 1.391 \cdot 10^{-2}$.
540: The plot analogous to Fig.\ref{Ddcorrelation}
541: for the dependence of BR($D_s^\pm\to e^\pm\nu_\tau$) and
542: BR($\tau^\pm\to e^\pm\eta$) on the product of $\fmslash R_p$ couplings
543: $\left|\lambda_{231}\lambda'^*_{222}\right|$ is shown in
544: Fig.\ref{Dscorrelation}.
545: The current experimental bound on BR($\tau^\pm\to e^\pm\eta$)
546: \cite{Bonvicini:1997bw}
547: (vertical dashed line) restricts
548: $\left|\lambda_{231}\lambda'^*_{222}\right|$ (and therefore BR($D_s^\pm\to e^\pm\nu_\tau$))
549: slightly more than the product of the single coupling limits, indicated in the
550: top right hand corner of the graph.
551:
552: The lower horizontal dashed line indicates a hypothetical
553: limit on BR($D_s^\pm\to e^\pm\nu_\tau$) of $10^{-4}$ which seems realistic
554: in light of an expected number of 1.5 million $D_s$ events (0.3 million fully
555: tagged) after one year of running of CLEO-c.
556: This limit would restrict the product of couplings
557: $\left|\lambda_{231}\lambda'^*_{222}\right|$ about a factor of 10 better than
558: present experiments. To compete with this accuracy, the experimental limit
559: on BR($\tau^\pm\to e^\pm\eta$) would have to improve by about two orders of magnitude
560: which does not seem attainable in the current runs of the $B$ factories.
561: We therefore believe that even if searches for
562: $D^\pm/D_s^\pm\to e^\pm\nu_\tau$ do not
563: detect an enhancement in these channels, they would still be useful for setting
564: new limits on products of $\fmslash R_p$ couplings.
565:
566: The poorly measured decay $D^\pm\to \mu^\pm\nu$ may also be
567: enhanced by the combination $\lambda_{232}\lambda'_{221}$.
568: The current error allows for a sizeable enhancement over
569: the SM prediction of the order 3--6, depending on the value
570: of the decay constant.
571: The SM prediction currently lies at the lower end of the
572: experimentally allowed interval. If subsequent measurements
573: should tend towards the upper end of the current interval,
574: non--zero $R$ parity violating couplings would be a possible
575: explanation for this deviation.
576: SM--conform measurements on the other hand would allow for
577: better limits on $\lambda_{232}\lambda'_{221}$.
578: CLEO-c aims to measure the
579: BR($D^\pm\to \mu^\pm\nu$) to a precision of a few $\%$.
580: For the decays $D^\pm/D_s^\pm\to \tau^\pm\nu$ we do not find
581: sizably enhanced BRs.
582:
583: The decays $D^\pm\to \ell^\pm\nu$ and $D_s^\pm\to \ell^\pm\nu$ can also
584: be mediated by products of two $\lambda'$ couplings (right diagram in
585: Fig.\ref{sparticleexchange}), but because of the helicity suppression,
586: only the $\tau$--channel can receive a sizeable contribution. Even in
587: these cases, the $\fmslash R_p$ contributions can only become as large
588: as the uncertainties of the SM predictions. Therefore neither a large
589: enhancement, nor improvements of the limits are possible, except
590: for single coupling limits on $\lambda_{22k}'$ and
591: $\lambda_{32k}'$ as shown in \cite{Ledroit:1998}.
592:
593:
594: \section{Conclusions}
595: In the context of the MSSM we have studied the effects of
596: $R$ parity violating couplings ($\lambda,\lambda'$)
597: on the purely leptonic decays $D^\pm/D_s^\pm\to l^\pm\nu$.
598: We showed that slepton mediated contributions proportional
599: to combinations of the type $\lambda\lambda'$ can strongly
600: enhance the previously unmeasured decays $D^\pm/D_s^\pm\to e^\pm\nu$
601: to the sensitivity of current $B$ factories and forthcoming CLEO-c.
602: Maximum values for BR($D^\pm_s\to e^\pm\nu$) and BR($D^\pm\to e^\pm\nu$) of
603: $5\times 10^{-3}$ and $1\times 10^{-4}$ respectively
604: were found. Mere observation of these
605: decays would be an unequivocal signal of physics beyond the SM.
606: In simple $R$ parity violating models with a single dominant
607: $\lambda\lambda'$ combination, there would be a correlation with
608: the decays $\tau^\pm\to e^\pm K^0_S$ and $\tau^\pm\to e^\pm\eta$, which
609: would be similarly enhanced to the sensitivity of current and
610: planned experiments. Such correlated
611: signals would provide strong evidence for $R$ parity violating interactions.
612:
613:
614:
615:
616: \vspace{20mm}
617: \begin{center}
618: {\large\bf Acknowledgements}
619: \end{center}
620:
621: The authors wish to thank F.~Borzumati, S.~Pakvasa and B.~Yabsley,
622: for useful discussions and comments.
623: S.R.\ was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion
624: of Science (JSPS).
625:
626: \renewcommand{\theequation}{B.\arabic{equation}}
627: \setcounter{equation}{0}
628:
629: \newpage
630:
631: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
632:
633: %\cite{Abe:2001xe}
634: \bibitem{Abe:2001xe}
635: K.~Abe {\it et al.} [Belle Collaboration],
636: %``Observation of large CP violation in the neutral B meson system,''
637: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 87}, 091802 (2001).
638: %[arXiv:hep-ex/0107061].
639: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0107061;%%
640:
641: %\cite{Aubert:2001nu}
642: \bibitem{Aubert:2001nu}
643: B.~Aubert {\it et al.} [BaBar Collaboration],
644: %``Observation of CP violation in the B0 meson system,''
645: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 87}, 091801 (2001).
646: %[arXiv:hep-ex/0107013].
647: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0107013;%%
648:
649: %\cite{Bertolini:1990if}
650: \bibitem{Bertolini:1990if}
651: S.~Bertolini, F.~Borzumati, A.~Masiero and G.~Ridolfi,
652: %``Effects Of Supergravity Induced Electroweak Breaking On
653: %Rare B Decays And Mixings,''
654: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 353}, 591 (1991);
655: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B353,591;%%
656: %\cite{Hurth:2001et}
657: T.~Hurth,
658: %``Inclusive rare B decays,''
659: %in {\it Proc. of the 5th International Symposium on
660: %Radiative Corrections (RADCOR 2000) } ed. Howard E. Haber,
661: arXiv:hep-ph/0106050 and refs therein.
662: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0106050;%%
663:
664: %\cite{Akeroyd:2001cy}
665: \bibitem{Akeroyd:2001cy}
666: A.~G.~Akeroyd, Y.~Y.~Keum and S.~Recksiegel,
667: %``Effect of supersymmetric phases on the direct CP asymmetry
668: %of B $\to$ X/d gamma,''
669: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 507}, 252 (2001);
670: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0103008].
671: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0103008;%%
672: %\cite{Akeroyd:2001gf}
673: A.~G.~Akeroyd and S.~Recksiegel,
674: %``Direct CP asymmetry of B $\to$ X/d,s gamma in a model with vector quarks,''
675: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 525}, 81 (2002);
676: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0109091].
677: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0109091;%%
678: %\cite{Arhrib:2001gr}
679: A.~Arhrib, C.~K.~Chua and W.~S.~Hou,
680: %``Supersymmetric model contributions to B/d0 anti-B/d0 mixing and
681: % B $\to$ pi pi, rho gamma decays,''
682: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 21}, 567 (2001);
683: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0104122].
684: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0104122;%%
685: %\cite{Ali:2002kw}
686: A.~Ali and E.~Lunghi,
687: %``Implications of B $\to$ rho gamma measurements in the
688: %standard model and supersymmetric theories,''
689: hep-ph/0206242.
690: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0206242;%%
691:
692: %\cite{Shipsey:2002ye}
693: \bibitem{Shipsey:2002ye}
694: I.~Shipsey,
695: %``CLEO-c and CESR-c: Allowing quark flavor physics to reach its
696: %full potential,''
697: hep-ex/0207091\\
698: (See also http://www.lns.cornell.edu/public/CLEO/spoke/CLEOc/).
699: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0207091;%%
700:
701: %\cite{Soldner-Rembold:2001zk}
702: \bibitem{Soldner-Rembold:2001zk}
703: S.~S\"oldner-Rembold,
704: %``Experimental status of leptonic D/s decays,''
705: hep-ex/0109023.
706: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0109023;%%
707:
708: %\cite{Bai:cg}
709: \bibitem{Bai:cg}
710: J.~Z.~Bai {\it et al.} [BES Collaboration],
711: %``Evidence For The Leptonic Decay D $\to$ Mu Nu(Mu),''
712: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 429}, 188 (1998).
713: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B429,188;%%
714:
715: %\cite{Heister:2002fp}
716: \bibitem{Heister:2002fp}
717: A.~Heister {\it et al.} [ALEPH Collaboration],
718: %``Leptonic decays of the D/s meson,''
719: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 528}, 1 (2002).
720: %[arXiv:hep-ex/0201024].
721: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0201024;%%
722:
723: %\cite{Aitala:1999db}
724: \bibitem{Aitala:1999db}
725: E.~M.~Aitala {\it et al.} [E791 Collaboration],
726: %``Search for rare and forbidden dilepton decays of the
727: %D+, D/s+, and D0 charmed mesons,''
728: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 462}, 401 (1999).
729: %[arXiv:hep-ex/9906045].
730: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9906045;%%
731:
732: %\cite{Chadha:1997zh}
733: \bibitem{Chadha:1997zh}
734: M.~Chadha {\it et al.} [CLEO Collaboration],
735: %``Improved measurement of the pseudoscalar decay constant f(D/s),''
736: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 58}, 032002 (1998).
737: %[arXiv:hep-ex/9712014].
738: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9712014;%%
739:
740: %\cite{Abbiendi:2001nb}
741: \bibitem{Abbiendi:2001nb}
742: G.~Abbiendi {\it et al.} [OPAL Collaboration],
743: %``Measurement of the branching ratio for D/s- $\to$ tau- anti-nu/tau
744: %decays,''
745: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 516}, 236 (2001).
746: %[arXiv:hep-ex/0103012].
747: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0103012;%%
748:
749: %\cite{Burdman:1994ip}
750: \bibitem{Burdman:1994ip}
751: G.~Burdman, T.~Goldman and D.~Wyler,
752: %``Radiative leptonic decays of heavy mesons,''
753: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 51}, 111 (1995);
754: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9405425].
755: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9405425;%%
756: D.~Atwood, G.~Eilam and A.~Soni,
757: %``Pure leptonic radiative decays B+-, D(s) $\to$ lepton neutrino
758: %gamma and the annihilation graph,''
759: Mod.\ Phys.\ Lett.\ A {\bf 11}, 1061 (1996);
760: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9411367].
761: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9411367;%%
762: C.~Q.~Geng, C.~C.~Lih and W.~M.~Zhang,
763: %``Study of radiative leptonic D meson decays,''
764: Mod.\ Phys.\ Lett.\ A {\bf 15}, 2087 (2000);
765: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0012066].
766: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0012066;%%
767: G.~L.~Wang, C.~H.~Chang and T.~F.~Feng,
768: %``The pure leptonic decays of D/s meson and their radiative corrections,''
769: hep-ph/0102251.
770: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0102251;%%
771:
772: %\cite{Korchemsky:1999qb}
773: \bibitem{Korchemsky:1999qb}
774: G.~P.~Korchemsky, D.~Pirjol and T.~M.~Yan,
775: %``Radiative leptonic decays of B mesons in QCD,''
776: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 61}, 114510 (2000).
777: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9911427].
778: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9911427;%%
779:
780: %\cite{Bai:1997un}
781: \bibitem{Bai:1997un}
782: J.~Z.~Bai {\it et al.} [BES Collaboration],
783: %``A Measurement of the branching fraction of D(s) inclusive
784: %semileptonic decay D(s)+ $\to$ e+ X,''
785: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 56}, 3779 (1997).
786: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D56,3779;%%
787:
788: %\cite{Abbiendi:1998ub}
789: \bibitem{Abbiendi:1998ub}
790: G.~Abbiendi {\it et al.} [OPAL Collaboration],
791: %``Measurement of the semileptonic branching ratio of charm hadrons
792: % produced in Z0 $\to$ c anti-c decays,''
793: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 8}, 573 (1999).
794: %[arXiv:hep-ex/9810016].
795: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9810016;%%
796:
797: %\cite{Dreiner:1997uz}
798: \bibitem{Dreiner:1997uz}
799: H.~K.~Dreiner,
800: %``An introduction to explicit R-parity violation,''
801: In ``Kane, G.L. (ed.): Perspectives on supersymmetry'' 462-479,\\
802: (hep-ph/9707435);
803: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9707435;%%
804: %\cite{Bhattacharyya:1996nj}
805: G.~Bhattacharyya,
806: %``R-parity-violating supersymmetric Yukawa couplings: A mini-review,''
807: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 52A} (1997) 83;
808: %\cite{Kong:2002hb}
809: O.~C.~Kong,
810: %``On the formulation of the generic supersymmetric standard
811: %model (or supersymmetry without R parity),''
812: hep-ph/0205205.
813: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0205205;%%
814:
815: %\cite{Allanach:1999ic}
816: \bibitem{Allanach:1999ic}
817: B.~C.~Allanach, A.~Dedes and H.~K.~Dreiner,
818: %``Bounds on R-parity violating couplings at the weak scale and
819: %at the GUT scale,''
820: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 075014 (1999).
821: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9906209].
822: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9906209;%%
823:
824: %\cite{Aulakh:1982yn}
825: \bibitem{Aulakh:1982yn}
826: C.~S.~Aulakh and R.~N.~Mohapatra,
827: %``Neutrino As The Supersymmetric Partner Of The Majoron,''
828: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 119}, 136 (1982);
829: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B119,136;%%
830: L.~J.~Hall and M.~Suzuki,
831: %``Explicit R Parity Breaking In Supersymmetric Models,''
832: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 231}, 419 (1984);
833: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B231,419;%%
834: R.~Hempfling,
835: %``Neutrino Masses and Mixing Angles in SUSY-GUT Theories with
836: %explicit R-Parity Breaking,''
837: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 478}, 3 (1996);
838: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9511288].
839: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9511288;%%
840: H.~P.~Nilles and N.~Polonsky,
841: %``Supersymmetric neutrino masses, R-symmetries, and the
842: %generalized mu problem,''
843: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 484}, 33 (1997);
844: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9606388].
845: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9606388;%%
846: %\cite{Chun:1998gp}
847: E.~J.~Chun, S.~K.~Kang, C.~W.~Kim and U.~W.~Lee,
848: %``Supersymmetric neutrino masses and mixing with R-parity violation,''
849: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 544}, 89 (1999);
850: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9807327].
851: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9807327;%%
852: %\cite{Kong:1998bs}
853: O.~C.~Kong,
854: %``Neutrino oscillations and flavor structure of supersymmetry
855: % without R-parity,''
856: Mod.\ Phys.\ Lett.\ A {\bf 14}, 903 (1999);
857: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9808304].
858: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9808304;%%
859: %\cite{Kang:2002nq}
860: S.~K.~Kang and O.~C.~Kong,
861: %``A detailed analysis of one loop neutrino masses from the
862: %generic supersymmetric standard model,''
863: hep-ph/0206009.
864: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0206009;%%
865:
866: %\cite{Borzumati:2002bf}
867: \bibitem{Borzumati:2002bf}
868: F.~Borzumati and J.~S.~Lee,
869: %``Novel constraints on Delta(L) = 1 interactions from neutrino masses,''
870: hep-ph/0207184.
871: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0207184;%%
872:
873: %\cite{Agashe:1995qm}
874: \bibitem{Agashe:1995qm}
875: K.~Agashe and M.~Graesser,
876: %``$R$-Parity Violation in Flavor Changing Neutral Current
877: %Processes and Top Quark Decays,''
878: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 54}, 4445 (1996).
879: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9510439].
880: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9510439;%%
881:
882: %\cite{Baek:1999ch}
883: \bibitem{Baek:1999ch}
884: S.~W.~Baek and Y.~G.~Kim,
885: %``Constraints on the R-parity violating couplings from B+- $\to$
886: %l+- nu decays,''
887: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 077701 (1999).
888: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9906385].
889: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9906385;%%
890:
891: %\cite{Dreiner:2001kc}
892: \bibitem{Dreiner:2001kc}
893: H.~K.~Dreiner, G.~Polesello and M.~Thormeier,
894: %``Bounds on broken R-parity from leptonic meson decays,''
895: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 115006 (2002).
896: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0112228].
897: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0112228;%%
898:
899: %\cite{Akeroyd:2002cs}
900: \bibitem{Akeroyd:2002cs}
901: A.~G.~Akeroyd and S.~Recksiegel,
902: %``R parity violating enhancement of B/u+ $\to$ l+ nu and B/c+ $\to$ l+ nu,''
903: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 541}, 121 (2002).
904: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0205176].
905: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0205176;%%
906:
907: %\cite{Akeroyd:2002gr}
908: \bibitem{Akeroyd:2002gr}
909: A.~G.~Akeroyd and S.~Recksiegel,
910: %``Purely Leptonic B decays at High Luminosity e+e- B factories,''
911: hep-ph/0209252.
912: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0209252;%%
913:
914: %\cite{Hou:1992sy}
915: \bibitem{Hou:1992sy}
916: W.~S.~Hou,
917: %``Enhanced charged Higgs boson effects in B- $\to$ tau anti-neutrino,
918: %mu anti-neutrino and b $\to$ tau anti-neutrino + X,''
919: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 48}, 2342 (1993).
920: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D48,2342;%%
921:
922: %\cite{Ledroit:1998}
923: \bibitem{Ledroit:1998}
924: F. Ledoit and G. Sajot,\\
925: http://qcd.th.u-psud.fr/GDR\_SUSY/GDR\_SUSY\_PUBLIC/entete\_note\_publique
926:
927: %\cite{Burdman:1995te}
928: \bibitem{Burdman:1995te}
929: G.~Burdman, E.~Golowich, J.~L.~Hewett and S.~Pakvasa,
930: %``Radiative weak decays of charm mesons,''
931: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 52}, 6383 (1995).
932: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9502329].
933: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9502329;%%
934:
935: %\cite{Burdman:2001tf}
936: \bibitem{Burdman:2001tf}
937: G.~Burdman, E.~Golowich, J.~Hewett and S.~Pakvasa,
938: %``Rare charm decays in the standard model and beyond,''
939: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 014009 (2002).
940: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0112235].
941: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0112235;%%
942:
943: %\cite{Choudhury:1996ia}
944: \bibitem{Choudhury:1996ia}
945: D.~Choudhury and P.~Roy,
946: %``New Constraints On Lepton Nonconserving R-parity Violating Couplings,''
947: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 378}, 153 (1996).
948: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9603363].
949: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9603363;%%
950:
951: %\cite{Saha:2002kt}
952: \bibitem{Saha:2002kt}
953: J.~P.~Saha and A.~Kundu,
954: %``Constraints on R-parity violating supersymmetry from leptonic and
955: %semileptonic tau, B/d and B/s decays,''
956: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 054021 (2002).
957: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0205046;%%
958:
959: %\cite{Hayes:1981bn}
960: \bibitem{Hayes:1981bn}
961: K.~G.~Hayes {\it et al.},
962: %``Experimental Upper Limits On Branching Fractions For
963: %Unexpected Decay Modes Of The Tau Lepton,''
964: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 25}, 2869 (1982).
965: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D25,2869;%%
966:
967: %\cite{Chen:2002ug}
968: \bibitem{Chen:2002ug}
969: S.~Chen {\it et al.} [CLEO Collaboration],
970: %``Search for neutrinoless tau decays involving the K0(S) meson,''
971: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 071101 (2002).
972: %[arXiv:hep-ex/0208019].
973: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0208019;%%
974:
975: %\cite{Bonvicini:1997bw}
976: \bibitem{Bonvicini:1997bw}
977: G.~Bonvicini {\it et al.} [CLEO Collaboration],
978: %``Search for neutrinoless tau decays involving pi0 or eta mesons,''
979: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 79}, 1221 (1997).
980: %[arXiv:hep-ex/9704010].
981: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9704010;%%
982:
983: %\cite{Bliss:1997iq}
984: %\bibitem{Bliss:1997iq}
985: %D.~W.~Bliss {\it et al.} [CLEO Collaboration],
986: %``New limits for neutrinoless tau decays,''
987: %Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 57}, 5903 (1998)
988: %[arXiv:hep-ex/9712010].
989: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9712010;%%
990:
991: \end{thebibliography}
992:
993: \end{document}
994:
995:
996:
997:
998:
999:
1000:
1001:
1002: