1: \documentclass{elsart}
2: %% Use the option doublespacing or reviewcopy to obtain double line spacing
3: %%\documentclass[doublespacing]{elsart}
4:
5: %% Extra packages
6: \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
7: \usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
8: \usepackage[numbers,sort]{natbib}
9: %\usepackage{hyperref}
10:
11:
12: %% Extra commands
13: \newcommand*{\vect}[1]{\mathbf{#1}} %% vector
14: %\newcommand*{\vect}[1]{\vec{#1}}
15: \newcommand*{\abs}[1]{\lvert{#1}\rvert} %% absolute value
16: \newcommand*{\bra}[1]{\langle{#1}\rvert}
17: \newcommand*{\ket}[1]{\lvert{#1}\rangle}
18:
19:
20: %% Extra math operators
21: \DeclareMathOperator{\erf}{erf} %% the error function
22: \DeclareMathOperator{\Ei}{Ei} %% the exponential integral
23: \DeclareMathOperator{\Tr}{Tr} %% trace (of an operator)
24: \DeclareMathOperator{\sign}{sign} %% signum
25:
26:
27: %%% ====================================================================
28: %%% ====================================================================
29: %%% ====================================================================
30: %%% ====================================================================
31:
32:
33: \begin{document}
34:
35: %\bibliographystyle{h-elsevier}
36: %\bibliographystyle{elsart-harv}
37:
38: %\bibliographystyle{hunsrt}
39: %\bibliographystyle{unsrtnat}
40:
41: \bibliographystyle{my-hunsrt}
42: %\bibliographystyle{my-unsrt}
43:
44:
45: \begin{frontmatter}
46:
47: \title{Color van der {W}aals forces between heavy quarkonia in
48: effective {QCD}}
49: \author{Jakub Nar\k{e}bski}
50: \address{
51: Institute of Theoretical Physics, Warsaw University,
52: ul. Ho\.{z}a 69, 00-681 Warsaw, Poland}
53: \ead{jnareb@fuw.edu.pl}
54:
55: \date{25 September 2002}
56:
57: \begin{abstract}
58: The perturbative renormalization group for light--front QCD
59: Hamiltonian produces a logarithmically rising interquark potential
60: already in second order, when all gluons are neglected. There is a
61: question if this approach produces also color van der Waals forces
62: between heavy quarkonia and of what kind. This article shows that
63: such forces do exist and estimates their strength, with the result
64: that they are on the border of exclusion in naiv\'{e} approach,
65: while more advanced calculation is possible in QCD.
66: \end{abstract}
67:
68: \begin{keyword}
69: effective interaction \sep
70: similarity for particles \sep
71: renormalization \sep
72: color van der Waals forces
73:
74: \PACS 11.10.Ef \sep 11.10.Gh
75: \end{keyword}
76:
77: %% preprint IFT/39/02
78:
79: \maketitle
80:
81: \end{frontmatter}
82:
83:
84: %% Potential model
85: In the constituent models used to describe hadrons, quarks can be
86: assumed to interact via additive 2--body confining potential with the
87: same color structure as if the interaction were mediated by one--gluon
88: exchange,
89: \begin{equation}
90: \label{eq:potential-model}
91: H_I = - \sum_{i<j} F_i \cdot F_j \; V(\vect{r}_i - \vect{r}_j),
92: \end{equation}
93: where $F_i \cdot F_j$ denotes $\sum_{a=1}^{8} F^a_i F^a_j$, and
94: $F^a_i$ are the eight SU(3) color generators for $i$--th quark or
95: antiquark, located at $\vect{r}_i$. The potential models describe
96: properties of single--hadron states quite well, but also predict
97: power--law color van der Waals forces between colorless hadrons, which
98: contradict experiments by being too strong. The color confining
99: potentials also cause that the model Hamiltonians are unbounded from
100: below for all states except color singlets, triplets and
101: antitriplets~\citep{Greenberg:1981xn}. Potential models which try to
102: avoid these drawbacks appear to be arbitrary and not systematically
103: related to QCD.
104:
105: %% Constituent quarks from QCD; Perry, Brisudova results
106: One of the attempts to derive a constituent picture of hadrons
107: directly from QCD is by using the perturbative similarity
108: renormalization group concept for light--front
109: Hamiltonian~\citep{Wilson:1994fk}. \citet{Perry:1997uv}, and
110: \citet{Brisudova:1996hv} have shown that one can get confining
111: potential already in second--order calculations based on this concept.
112: In their calculation the model Hamiltonian is bounded from below for
113: all color states of quark--antiquark pairs. However, their approach
114: was not boost invariant and it was not clear how to describe
115: two--meson states with clear control on their masses. Since then, the
116: similarity renormalization group approach has advanced so that one can
117: preserve boost invariance and required cluster properties by
118: introducing effective particles~\citep{Glazek:1998sd,Glazek:2001gb}.
119:
120: %% Similarity renormalization group for effective particles
121: We use similarity renormalization approach (see
122: Ref.~\citep{Glazek:2001gb} for description and references) to express
123: the field--theoretical canonical Hamiltonian in terms of creation and
124: annihilation operators for effective particles, which are unitarily
125: equivalent to the canonical ones, viz.\
126: \begin{math}
127: b_{\lambda} =
128: U^{\dag}_{\lambda} b_{\text{can}} U^{\hphantom{\dag}}_{\lambda}
129: \end{math}
130: etc. The Hamiltonian $H_\lambda$ written using the new operators is
131: band--diagonal, i.e.\ each term is multiplied by formfactor
132: $f_{\lambda}$, which vanishes when energy changes by more than width
133: $\lambda$. We construct similarity transformation
134: $U^{\vphantom{\dag}}_{\lambda}$ using second order perturbation
135: theory.
136:
137: %% Similarity renormalization group: details (factors used)
138: Following~\citep{Wilson:1994fk}, we start from the canonical QCD
139: Hamiltonian on the light front (LF), taking the advantage of the fact
140: that in this formulation vacuum can be made trivial by means of a
141: cutoff on longitudinal momenta. We regulate the Hamiltonian term by
142: term in the expansion into products of creation and annihilation
143: operators~\citep{Glazek:2001gb}, introducing regulating factors
144: \begin{math}
145: %%\label{eq:regulator}
146: r_{\Delta\delta} (\kappa^\perp, x) =
147: \exp\bigl[\kappa^{\perp\,2}/(x\,\Delta^2)\bigr]
148: r_{\delta}(x)
149: \end{math}
150: for each operator in every term. Here $x$ and $\kappa^{\perp}$ are
151: the relative momenta of a particle with respect to other particles in
152: a vertex (see~\citep{Glazek:2001gb}). In gauge--field theory we need
153: $r_{\delta}$, the small--$x$ regulator, and we choose
154: $r_{\delta}(x) = \Theta(x - \delta)$ as the simplest option. We use
155: boost--invariant formfactor~\citep{Glazek:2001gb}
156: \begin{equation}
157: \label{eq:f_lambda}
158: f_{\lambda}(\mathcal{M}^2_c - \mathcal{M}^2_a) =
159: \exp \bigl[-(\mathcal{M}^2_c - \mathcal{M}^2_a)^2 \big/ \lambda^4\bigr].
160: \end{equation}
161: Here $\mathcal{M}^2_c \equiv \bigl(\sum_{i\in\text{creat}} p_j \bigr)^2$
162: is the free invariant mass of the particles created in the vertex,
163: and $\mathcal{M}^2_a$, similarly, for particles annihilated in
164: vertex.
165:
166:
167: %% Mass term: regularization and renormalization
168: In the evaluation of $H_\lambda$, we have to calculate the effective
169: mass $m_{\lambda}$ for quarks and antiquarks.
170: Following~\citep{Glazek:1998sd}, we use the eigenvalue equation for a
171: single quark state, derived in 2nd order for $H_{\lambda}$, at one
172: arbitrary scale $\lambda = \lambda_0$ to specify notation for the
173: counterterm.
174: \begin{equation}
175: \label{eq:m_tilde}
176: \frac{P^{\perp\,2} + \tilde{m}^2}{P^+} \ket{q(P)}
177: = \frac{P^{\perp\,2} + m^2_{\lambda_0}}{P^+} \ket{q(P)}
178: -
179: H_{I\,\lambda_0}
180: \frac{\ket{qg(P)}\bra{qg(P)}}{\mathcal{M}^2 - m^2}
181: H_{I\,\lambda_0}
182: \ket{q(P)}.
183: \end{equation}
184: Here $\mathcal{M}^2$ is the free invariant mass of quark--gluon
185: states. We express $m_{\lambda_0}$, presumably infinite when the
186: cutoff $\delta$ is removed, in terms of the would--be perturbative
187: eigenvalue $\tilde{m}^2$. With hindsight, we set the eigenvalue mass
188: $\tilde{m}$ to be equal to the constituent quark mass.
189: %% NOTE
190: Note that this condition is not meant to imply that there are free
191: quarks, since it is imposed only in the formal expansion in $g$, and
192: ignores nonperturbative effects that prevent quarks from being free in
193: this formulation.
194:
195: %% Mass term: divergence
196: We use $m^2_{\lambda_0}$ as the starting point in evaluation of
197: $m^2_{\lambda}$. Obtained quark mass
198: $m^2_{\lambda} = \tilde{m}^2 + \delta m^2_{\lambda}$
199: diverges logarithmically when $\delta$ goes to 0,
200: \begin{equation}
201: \label{eq:dm_lambda}
202: \delta m^2_{\lambda}
203: %%
204: \xrightarrow[\;\delta \to 0\;]{}
205: %%
206: \frac{g^2 C_F}{2 (2 \pi)^3}
207: \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2}}\lambda^2
208: \log\frac{1}{\delta}.
209: \end{equation}
210: Here $C_F$ is the SU(3) color factor for color triplet. We would
211: obtain the same result for $\delta m^2_{\lambda}$ in our approach if
212: we used the coupling coherence
213: condition~\citep{Perry:1997uv,Brisudova:1996hv,Perry:1993gp}.
214:
215:
216: %% QQ interaction
217: Let us now consider the quark--antiquark interaction term in the
218: renormalized Hamiltonian $H_{\lambda}$. For simplicity, we assume
219: that all quarks have the same masses but different flavors (to avoid
220: the insignificant discussion of antisymmetrization in the later
221: treatment of the van der Waals forces). We will also use non
222: relativistic (NR) approximation, which much simplifies further
223: calculations. This approximation is justified here when studying the
224: bound states of heavy quarks because the formfactor $f_{\lambda}$ with
225: $\lambda \ll \tilde{m}$ limits quark momenta to nonrelativistic values
226: despite a large coupling constant~\citep{Glazek:2002jg}. We use a
227: three--vector $\vect{q}_{12}$ defined through the requirement that
228: \begin{equation}
229: \label{eq:NR-notation}
230: 4 (\vect{q}_{12}^2 + m^2) =
231: \mathcal{M}^2_{12} =
232: \frac{\kappa^{\perp\,2} + m^2}{x(1-x)},\quad
233: \vect{q}_{12}^{\perp} = \vect{\kappa}^{\perp}.
234: \end{equation}
235: From this requirement one obtains $x$ as function of $q_{12}^z$ and
236: $\vect{q}_{12}^{\perp}$, and one expands $q_{12}^z$ in the powers of
237: $\abs{\vect{q}_{12}}/m$, obtaining in first order
238: \begin{math}
239: q_{12}^z \simeq \left(x - \frac{1}{2}\right) 2 m %% or m
240: \end{math}
241: We should express the bare mass $m$ in terms of $\tilde{m}$, but
242: because the difference between $m$ and $\tilde{m}$ is of second order
243: in $g$ (see Eq.~\eqref{eq:dm_lambda}), and the interaction term is
244: already of second order, we can put $m = m_{\lambda} = \tilde{m}$
245: here.
246:
247: %% QQ potential in NR approximation
248: When one applies the NR approximation to the effective potential
249: $f_{\lambda} V_{q\bar{q}}$ in Hamiltonian $H_{\lambda}$, one obtains
250: the following result (cf.~\citep{Brisudova:2001yc})
251: \begin{multline}
252: \label{eq:V-interaction-q:NR}
253: f_{\lambda} V_{\text{NR}}(\vect{q}) =
254: -g^2
255: %%\Cpsi
256: F_{12} \cdot F_{34}
257: %%f_{\lambda}
258: \exp
259: \left[
260: - \frac{\vect{q}^2_{12} - \vect{q}^2_{34}}{\lambda^4}
261: \right]
262: \times\mbox{} \\ \mbox{}\times
263: \left\{
264: \frac{1}{\vect{q}^2}
265: +
266: \biggl[
267: - \frac{1}{\vect{q}^2} + \frac{1}{q_z^2}
268: \biggr]
269: \exp\biggl(
270: - \frac{2 m^2}{q_z^2}
271: \frac{\bigl(\vect{q}^2\bigr)^2}{\lambda^4}
272: \biggr)
273: \right\}
274: r^2_{\delta}\!\left(\frac{q_z}{2 m}\right),
275: \end{multline}
276: where $\vect{q} = \vect{q}_{12} - \vect{q}_{34}$. The NR potential is
277: spin--diagonal.
278:
279:
280: %% f_lambda (external similarity factor)
281: The analysis of this interaction is made somewhat complicated by the
282: external similarity factor $f_{\lambda}$, which depends not only on
283: the momentum transfer \(\vect{q}\), but on $\abs{\vect{q}_{12}}$ and
284: $\abs{\vect{q}_{34}}$ separately. However, when $\lambda$ is much
285: larger than momentum width of a wavefunction, $f_{\lambda}$ can be
286: replaced by 1 in the region that matters.
287:
288:
289: %% Fock sectors (no gluons)
290: Following~\citep{Perry:1997uv,Brisudova:1996hv}, we neglect in our
291: analysis of van der Waals forces all Fock sectors except Q\=Q and
292: QQ\=Q\=Q. This is justified for heavy quarks by the expectation that
293: gluons are lifted up in energy by certain gap condition, which is a
294: non-perturbative effect. According
295: to~\citep{Perry:1997uv,Brisudova:1996hv}, gluons should not appear
296: explicitly in the resulting model.
297:
298:
299: %% Cancellation of divergences
300: When gluons are neglected, there remains uncanceled
301: $\delta$--divergent, $\lambda$--dependent term in effective quark
302: (antiquark) mass term. This term cancels exactly in the matrix
303: element $\bra{\Psi_1} H \ket{\Psi_2}$ against the divergence coming
304: from Q\=Q--interaction, when $\ket{\Psi_1}$ and $\ket{\Psi_2}$ are
305: color singlets. For other color states, the Hamiltonian matrix
306: elements are positive infinite, since the mass diverges stronger than
307: the potential of
308: Eq.~\eqref{eq:V-interaction-q:NR}~\citep{Perry:1997uv}. Therefore,
309: the Hamiltonian is bounded from below for all states (as opposed to
310: phenomenological additive color potential model where
311: $\bra{\Psi_1} H \ket{\Psi_2}$ goes to $-\infty$ with growing distance
312: between quarks when both $\ket{\Psi_i}$ are in color--octet state,
313: for all \(V(r) \xrightarrow[r \to \infty]{} \infty\)~\citep{Greenberg:1981xn}).
314: This is the first important distinction between the renormalization
315: group approach to QCD and potential models, where the colored states
316: would cause trouble.
317:
318: Note however that this cancellation does not occur outside the NR
319: approximation~\citep{Brisudova:2001yc}. One has to include
320: transitions to $q\bar{q}g$ sector to obtain cancellation outside NR
321: approximation. The second order perturbation calculations would then
322: also lead to reduction of the confining part of effective potential,
323: but nonperturbative effects could prevent complete
324: cancellation~\citep{Glazek:privcomm}, resulting only in weaker force.
325:
326:
327:
328: %% Color van der Waals forces: intro
329: Color van der Waals forces between two mesons come from the mixing of
330: octet--octet state (coupled to overall singlet) to singlet--singlet
331: state, because the color dependent interaction polarizes mesons in
332: color space as well as in position space. We choose states
333: $\ket{\alpha} = \ket{1_{13} 1_{24}}$ (both mesons in singlet state)
334: and $\ket{\beta} = \ket{1_{14} 1_{23}}$, as the basis of the color
335: subspace, where mesons are in color singlet state as a whole, where
336: $1_{ij}$ means that quark $i$ and antiquark $j$ are in color singlet.
337:
338: We will use static treatment to see if small--$x$ divergences (which
339: are constants) cancel in the eigenequation for QQ\={Q}\={Q} sector.
340: For the meson--meson states, the interaction term $H_I$ is a $2 \times 2$
341: matrix in color space~\citep{Lipkin:1973pq}:
342: \begin{subequations}
343: \label{eq:vdW:colors}
344: \begin{align}
345: H_I \ket{\alpha} &=
346: (\tfrac{8}{3} u_{\alpha} - \tfrac{1}{3}u_{\beta} + \tfrac{1}{3}u_{\mathrm{q}}) \ket{\alpha}
347: + (u_{\beta} - u_{\mathrm{q}}) \ket{\beta}, \\
348: H_I \ket{\beta} &=
349: (u_{\alpha} - u_{\mathrm{q}}) \ket{\alpha}
350: + (\tfrac{8}{3} u_{\beta} - \tfrac{1}{3}u_{\alpha} + \tfrac{1}{3}u_{\mathrm{q}}) \ket{\beta},
351: \end{align}
352: \end{subequations}
353: where
354: \begin{align}
355: \label{eq:u_something}
356: u_{\alpha} &= u_{13} + u_{24}, &
357: u_{\beta} &= u_{14} + u_{23}, &
358: u_{\mathrm{q}} &= u_{12} + u_{34},
359: \end{align}
360: and $u_{ij} = V(\vect{r}_{ij}) = V(\vect{r}_i - \vect{r}_j)$ is the
361: quark--(anti)quark potential. The mass term is diagonal in
362: $\ket{\alpha}, \ket{\beta}$. The divergences in the off diagonal
363: (mixing) part cancel out because $V_{\bar{q}\bar{q}} = V_{qq} = - V_{q\bar{q}}$.
364: In the diagonal part, divergences in masses cancel
365: with divergences in potential inside singlets (i.e. $u_{\alpha}$ and
366: $u_{\beta}$, respectively) and divergences in the $u_{\mathrm{q}} - u_{\beta}$
367: and $u_{\mathrm{q}} - u_{\alpha}$ cancel also. Thus, all
368: small--$x$ divergences cancel out and Eq.~\eqref{eq:vdW:colors} has
369: finite elements. Therefore, color van der Waals forces emerge in the
370: approach presented here as they appear in color potential models.
371: This is the second result of the effective particle approach in the
372: approximation proposed in~\citep{Perry:1997uv,Brisudova:1996hv}. The
373: third result is that we may then use the results on color van der
374: Waals forces as known from potential models.
375:
376:
377: %% V_conf for large distances
378: To see what the van der Waals force looks like we have to look at the
379: NR potential~\eqref{eq:V-interaction-q:NR} behavior at large
380: distances. We will use the spatial derivatives of the confining
381: potential~\citep{Perry:1997uv}. The partial derivative with respect
382: to $r_x$ for $r_z = r_y = 0$, $\vect{r}$ being the distance between
383: Q and \=Q in quarkonium state, is given by the equation
384: \begin{equation}
385: \label{eq:V_conf:large-r_perp}
386: \frac{\partial}{\partial r_x} V_{\text{conf}}(r_x)
387: \simeq
388: \frac{\alpha_s}{2 \pi}
389: \frac{\lambda^2}{m}
390: 2 \sqrt{2 \pi}
391: \frac{\partial}{\partial r_x}\log\abs{r_x/r_0}
392: + \text{short range}
393: \end{equation}
394: (the result for the $r_y$ direction is identical). Similar
395: calculations of the shape of the potential in the $r_z$ direction give
396: in the large distance limit the same functional form of the potential
397: but twice weaker. Equation~\eqref{eq:V_conf:large-r_perp} contains
398: unknown value of $r_0$, but from the fit to numerically obtained
399: Fourier transformation one gets $r_0$ of the order of $m/\lambda^2$.
400:
401:
402: %% Averaging over angles
403: To simplify further calculations, we will use $V_{\text{conf}}$
404: averaged over angles (like in~\citep{Brisudova:1996hv}). Numerical
405: calculations show that with growth of $r$ the range of polar angle
406: $\varTheta$, where $V_{\text{conf}}$ differs significantly from the
407: value for $\varTheta = \pi/2$, gets smaller and smaller. Therefore,
408: for the large $r$ we can use the analytical result for the
409: $\vect{r}_{\perp}$ direction~\eqref{eq:V_conf:large-r_perp}, getting
410: the potential of the form
411: \begin{equation}
412: \label{eq:V_conf}
413: u(r) = V_0 \log(r/r_0),
414: \quad
415: \text{where\ }V_0 = 2 \alpha_s\lambda^2\big/[\sqrt{2 \pi} m].
416: \end{equation}
417:
418:
419:
420: %% Van der Waals forces for meson
421: For such logarithmic potential one obtains from the eigenvalues of $2
422: \times 2$ matrix in Eq.~\eqref{eq:vdW:colors} and virial
423: theorem~\citep{Greenberg:1981xn} the following color van der Waals
424: force between two heavy mesons:
425: \begin{equation}
426: \label{eq:vdW:log}
427: V_{\text{vdW}}(R) =
428: \frac{3}{54} V_0 \frac{\langle r^2_{13} \rangle^2}{{R}^{4}} \frac{1}{\log(R/r_{13})},
429: \end{equation}
430: where $R$ is the distance between the mesons and $r_{13}$ is the mean
431: width of a meson. Note that the value of $r_0$ does not enter the
432: expression for the van der Waals force~\eqref{eq:vdW:log}.
433:
434:
435: %% Value of V_0 from spectra
436: The fit to the $B$ meson spectra via heavy quark effective theory
437: in~\citep{Brisudova:1996hv} and the fit to the $c\bar{c}$ and
438: $b\bar{c}$ spectra in~\citep{Brisudova:1997vw} give
439: $\alpha_s \lambda^2/m$ around 1~GeV, i.e.\ $V_0 \simeq$~0.8~GeV.
440: In color potential model~\eqref{eq:potential-model} with
441: $V(r) = V_0 \log(r/r_0)$, one obtains from charmonium data
442: $V_0 =$~731~GeV~\citep{Eichten:1980ms,Kwong:1987mj}.
443: The question is then if such well established value of $V_0$ produces
444: acceptable strength of color van der Waals potential~\eqref{eq:vdW:log}.
445:
446:
447: %% Assumptions needed to use existing experimental limits on V_vdW
448: We have done our calculations of the effective confining potential in
449: the NR limit, which strictly speaking can be valid only for heavy
450: quarkonia. To the author's best knowledge there currently exist no
451: data on forces between such mesons. Therefore, we will use existing
452: experimental limits on the color van der Waals forces between
453: \emph{light hadrons}, to make only order of magnitude guesses about
454: the allowed strength of $V_0$.
455:
456:
457: Between two (heavy) baryons one obtains the same type of force as
458: between two (heavy) mesons but with different coefficient (e.g.\
459: \citet{Gavela:1979zu} gives $1/2$ for baryons instead of $3/54$ for
460: mesons, but they use a different method to calculate van der Waals
461: force coming from potential~\eqref{eq:V_conf}). Our NR
462: potential~\eqref{eq:V-interaction-q:NR} does not apply to light
463: quarks, but because van der Waals force is a low--energy interaction
464: acting between slow--moving particles, and in constituent models NR
465: approximation is commonly used, we will treat the NR
466: equation~\eqref{eq:vdW:log} for the van der Waals potential as
467: providing approximately right order of magnitude, disregarding any
468: doubts that such procedure may no longer be adequate in the case of
469: effective QCD for light quarks, where precise comparison with data is
470: attempted.
471:
472:
473: %% Comparing V_vdW with existing experimental limits
474: Data from Cavendish--type experiments~\citep{Feinberg:1979yw} give no
475: real constraints on the van der Waals force resulting from logarithmic
476: inter--quark potential, as opposed to the one from linear
477: potential~\citep{Greenberg:1981xn}. The data from hadronic
478: atoms~\citep{Feinberg:1979yw} implies $(3/54) V_0 \lesssim 2\ \text{MeV}$
479: i.e.\ $V_0 \lesssim 40\ \text{MeV}$ for $r_{13} = 1\ \text{fm}$.
480: We see that $V_0 \simeq 0.8\ \text{GeV}$ appears to be
481: very large. \citet{Sawada:2000sm,Sawada:2000td} finds in the behavior
482: of P--wave amplitude of $\pi$--$\pi$ and S--wave p--p scattering at
483: low energy some signs of long range super--strong force $\propto
484: 1/R^{n}$ with $n$ about 6, but no trace of forces $\propto 1/[R^4\log(R)]$
485: is found. While the strength of his force is too large to
486: be explained using $\alpha_s$ that appears in Eq.~\eqref{eq:V_conf},
487: and remains to be explained, it is interesting that van der Waals
488: force $\propto 1/R^6$ comes from Coulombic part of the inter--quark
489: potential, which cannot be easily canceled.
490:
491: %% Summary
492: It is clear that the calculation reported here can be considered only
493: an initial step towards derivation of color van der Waals forces in
494: QCD. The non--cancellation of small--$x$ divergences without NR
495: approximation, and the lack of rotational symmetry of $V_{q\bar{q}}$,
496: suggest that one needs to consider Fock sectors with additional
497: gluons. Most prominently however, one should expect corrections from
498: creation of quark--antiquark pairs~\citep{Brisudova:1998wq}. These
499: elements can reduce the van der Waals forces we obtained here and
500: recover agreement with experimental findings. The most attractive
501: feature of presented approach is that, contrary to the potential
502: models, the effective particle picture is clearly open to further
503: study in QCD, and can incorporate all these effects starting from
504: first principles.
505:
506:
507: \bibliography{vdW-bib}
508:
509: \end{document}
510: