1:
2: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
3:
4: \oddsidemargin 5mm
5: \evensidemargin 5mm
6: \usepackage[dvips]{graphics}
7:
8: \begin{document}
9:
10: \title{\bf On search for new Higgs physics in CDF at the Tevatron}
11: \author{
12: G.A. Kozlov\\
13: \em Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics,\\
14: \em Joint Institute for Nuclear Research,\\
15: \em 141980 Dubna, Moscow Region, Russia\\
16: %\em tel.: 7 096 2162163; Fax: 7 096 2165084\\
17: \em e-mail: kozlov@thsun1.jinr.ru\\
18: T. Morii\\
19: \em Div. of Sciences for Natural Environment,\\
20: \em Faculty of Human Development,\\
21: \em Kobe University, Kobe, Japan\\
22: \em e-mail: morii@kobe-u.ac.jp }
23:
24:
25: \date{}
26: \maketitle
27: \begin{abstract}
28:
29: {\small We discuss the Higgs boson mass sum rules in the Minimal
30: Supersymmetric Standard Model in order to estimate the upper
31: limits on the masses of stop quarks as well as the lower bounds
32: on the masses of the scalar Higgs boson state.
33: The bounds on the scale of quark-lepton
34: compositeness derived from the CDF Collaboration (Fermilab Tevatron)
35: data and
36: applied to new extra gauge boson search is taken into account.
37: These extra gauge bosons are considered in the framework of
38: the extended $SU(2)_{h}\times SU(2)_{l}$ model. In addition,
39: we discuss the physics of rare decays of the MSSM Higgs bosons in both
40: CP-even and CP-odd sectors and also some extra gauge bosons.}
41:
42:
43:
44:
45: %PACS 12.38.Aw, 11.15.Kc, 12.38Aw, 12.38Lg, 12.39Mk, 12.39Pn }
46: \end{abstract}
47: %\newpage
48:
49: \section{Introduction}
50: %\setcounter{equation}{0}
51:
52: %{\bf 1}.
53: There are still some serious ingredients in the fundamental
54: interactions of elementary particles that have not been
55: experimentally verified.
56: The Higgs particle(s) and new heavy neutral gauge bosons
57: $G^{\prime}\subset Z^{\prime}$, $W^{{\pm}^{\prime}}$,
58: $ Z^{\prime\prime}$, $W^{{\pm}^{\prime\prime}}$, ... have not
59: yet been established and physics of those particles still
60: remain elusive. In recent years, the amount of works for
61: searching for the Higgs and extra gauge bosons have considerably
62: increased and this research subject is now one of the most exciting
63: topics in searching physics beyond the standard model (SM).
64: On one hand, recent LEP 2 experiments determined a lower bound of
65: the Higgs boson mass to be approximately 114.1 GeV [1].
66: Furthermore, it should be pointed out that the
67: Tevatron data [2] for searching for the low energy effects of
68: quark-lepton contact interactions on dilepton production taken
69: at $\sqrt s$=1.8 TeV are translated into lower bounds on the masses of
70: extra neutral gauge bosons $Z^{\prime}$. On the other hand, recent
71: theoretical progress on study of strong and electroweak interactions and
72: the fundamental concept on natural extensions of the SM,
73: have turned the physics of interplay between the
74: known matter fields and exciting new phenomena related to
75: new matter fields via new interactions.
76:
77: One of the most challenging current topics beyond the SM is to study
78: physical
79: %The principal aim of the present work is to attract the
80: %attention to
81: implication of a set of Higgs particles and extra
82: gauge bosons predicted by the Minimal
83: Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) in the Tevatron $\bar{p}p$
84: collider experiment at $\sqrt s$=2 TeV.
85: The production of Higgs bosons
86: or their decays (via the heavy quark/lepton interactions) are
87: promising and useful processes which would be
88: searched for in the forthcoming high energy experiments.
89: With the advent of the Run II at the Tevatron, it is expected to be
90: clarified that the intermediate heavy quark loop can be a
91: sizeable source of Higgs bosons in both CP-even (light $h$ and
92: heavy $H$) scalar and CP-odd pseudoscalar ($A$) sectors.
93: % The question of why the top quark is so
94: %heavy could be due to extra gauge
95: %interactions that single out the fermions of the third
96: %generation.
97: As for extra neutral gauge bosons $G^{\prime}$, existence of those
98: neutral gauge bosons are
99: required by the models addressing the physics beyond the SM, such
100: as Supersymmetry (SUSY), Grand Unification Theory, superstrings and
101: so on. The prediction for the masses $M_{G^{\prime}}$ of
102: $G^{\prime}$-bosons is rather uncertain, though
103: these bosons could be heavy enough with the
104: masses $M_{G^{\prime}}\gg {\cal O}(m_{Z})$
105: ($m_{Z}$ is the mass of the $Z$-boson). The simplest version
106: of existing $G^{\prime}$-bosons
107: is based on the model with extension of the standard $SU(3)\times
108: SU(2)\times U(1)$ gauge group by an extra $U(1)$ factor [3].
109: There are also many other extended models of the SM,
110: such as the ones in which the
111: $SU(2)$ gauge group is extended to $SU(2)\times SU(2)$ [4-7] and
112: to $SU(2)\times SU(2)\times U(1)$ [8]. In those
113: models, the massive SU(2) extra gauge
114: bosons (corresponding to the broken generators) could couple to
115: fermions in different generations with different strength and thus could give
116: the answer to the question of why the top quark is so
117: heavy, since they might single out the fermions of the third
118: generation.
119: The precision measurements of electroweak parameters narrowed the
120: allowed region of extra gauge boson masses keeping Higgs boson masses
121: to be consistent with
122: radiative corrections including the supersymmetric ones.
123:
124: %It is naturally realized that the production of the Higgs bosons
125: %or their decays via the heavy quark constituents should be both
126: %promising and instructive processes which would be
127: %searching for at the Tevatron.
128: %With the advent of the Run II at the Tevatron, it should be
129: %clarified that the intermediate heavy quark loop may be a
130: %sizeable source of the Higgs bosons in both CP-even (light $h$ and
131: %heavy $H$) scalars and CP-odd pseudoscalar ($A$) sectors.
132:
133: One of the goals of the present work is to examine the potential
134: of the Run II experiment at the Tevatron in searching for $h$-, $H$-
135: and $A$- Higgs bosons, new extra gauge bosons, and to give the
136: estimation of the upper limits on the masses of stop quarks as
137: well as the lower bounds on the masses of the scalar Higgs bosons
138: both in the light and heavy mass sectors.
139:
140: We first show how the existing Tevatron
141: bounds on the scale of quark-lepton compositeness [9] can be
142: adopted to provide an upper limit of the quantity
143: $m_{{\tilde t}_{1}}\cdot m_{{\tilde t}_{2}}$, i.e.
144: the product of
145: masses of stop eigenstates ${\tilde t}_{1}$ and ${\tilde
146: t}_{2}$. We also discuss how the lower bounds of
147: the scalar Higgs boson masses can be obtained
148: from the forthcoming Tevatron data.
149: %The Tevatron data [2] of
150: %searching for the low energy effects of quark-lepton contact
151: %interactions on dilepton production taken at
152: %$\sqrt s$=1.8 TeV translate into lower bounds on the masses of
153: %extra neutral gauge bosons $Z^{\prime}$.
154: Furthermore, we
155: emphasize that the forthcoming experiments for discovering the
156: supersymmetry in both Higgs and quark sectors could lead to
157: estimations of the masses of neutral and charged extra gauge
158: bosons $Z^{\prime}$ and $W^{{\pm}^{\prime}}$, respectively.
159: An example-the models in which the precision electroweak data allow the
160: extra gauge bosons to be of the order ${\cal O}$(0.5~ TeV) are, e.g.,
161: the noncommuting extended technicolor models [5].
162: The $Z^{\prime}$ and $W^{{\pm}^{\prime}}$ bosons with such
163: masses are of interest, since they are within the kinematic
164: reach of the Tevatron's Run II experiments.
165:
166:
167: Then we also study the processes like
168: \begin{eqnarray}
169: \label{e1}
170: \bar{p}p\rightarrow gg\rightarrow (h/H) X, A X
171: \end{eqnarray}
172: keeping in mind that the main channels in the MSSM are the scalar
173: ones , i.e., $\bar{l}l$, $\bar{Q}Q$, $\gamma\gamma h$, $ggh$
174: ($\gamma$, $g$, $l$ and $Q$ mean a photon, a gluon, a lepton
175: and a heavy quark, respectively) since the pseudoscalar mode is
176: largely suppressed in the wide range of the MSSM parameters.
177: Since in two photons ($\gamma\gamma$) or two gluons ($gg$) decays the
178: invariant mass of $\gamma\gamma$ or $gg$ system would be
179: identical to the mass of the decaying boson, a promising
180: way to detect $h$- and $H$-bosons at the Tevatron is to
181: search for the decays $h$, $H\rightarrow \gamma\gamma$
182: and $h$, $H\rightarrow gg$ as well.
183: It is known that at high energy $\bar{p}p$ (or $pp$) collisions
184: a contribution of gluonic interactions become large due to increase
185: of gluon densities in the proton.
186: The Tevatron Run II experiment could observe
187: the lightest Higgs boson production via a two gluon
188: fusion $gg\rightarrow h$ with the cross-section $\sigma$ of an
189: order $\sigma\sim {\cal O}$(1.0 pb) at $m_{h}\sim$ 110 GeV [10].
190: Raise of the $h$-boson mass up to 180 GeV would lead to
191: decreasing of $\sigma$ up to the order ${\cal O}$(0.2 pb).
192: For the $A$-Higgs boson production the
193: following important features
194: are remarkable :\\
195: (i) the detection efficiency of the signal events has high
196: accuracy because the decay of $A$ Higgs-bosons can be precisely modeled
197: in the kinematic region for various decay channels
198: , e.g., $A\rightarrow \bar{l}l, \gamma\gamma h, ggh$
199: (here, the leptons $l$ run over electrons $e$, muons $\mu$ and
200: $\tau$-leptons);\\
201: (ii) the mass $M_{A}$ of the $A$ Higgs-boson can be reconstructed from
202: its final state to test the mass relation
203: in the MSSM mass sum rule [11] at the tree-level
204: \begin{eqnarray}
205: \label{e2}
206: m_{h}^2+M_{H}^2=M_{A}^2+m_{Z}^2
207: \end{eqnarray}
208: with its deviation due to radiative corrections
209: ($m_{h}$ and $M_{H}$ are the masses of the
210: CP-even $h$ and $H$ Higgs bosons, respectively).
211:
212:
213: The outline of the article is as follows. In Section 2, we
214: define the model. Estimation of the upper limits of
215: the masses of stop quarks as well as the lower bounds on the
216: masses of the scalar Higgs bosons will be discussed in Sec. 3.
217: Section 4 is devoted to study on rare decays of
218: $h$-, $H$- and $A$- Higgs bosons in the MSSM. Section 5 focuses
219: on the $h$ Higgs boson production in the decay of an extra
220: gauge boson $Z_{2}$. Finally, in Section 6, we give our conclusions.
221:
222: \section{The effective model. }
223:
224: In the model of extended weak interactions governed by a pair of
225: $SU(2)$ gauge groups $SU(2)_{h}\times SU(2)_{l}$ for heavy
226: (third generation) and light fermions (labels $h$ and $l$ mean
227: heavy and light, respectively) the gauge boson eigenstates are
228: given by [12]
229: \begin{eqnarray}
230: \label{e3}
231: A^{\mu}=\sin\theta\,(\cos\phi\,W_{{3_{h}}}^{\mu}+\sin\phi\,W_{{3_{l}}}^{\mu})+
232: \cos\theta\,X^{\mu}
233: \end{eqnarray}
234: for a photon and
235: \begin{eqnarray}
236: \label{e4}
237: Z_{1}^{\mu}=\cos\theta\,(\cos\phi\,W_{{3_{h}}}^{\mu}+\sin\phi\,W_{{3_{l}}}^{\mu})-
238: \sin\theta\,X^{\mu}\ ,
239: \end{eqnarray}
240: \begin{eqnarray}
241: \label{e5}
242: Z_{2}^{\mu}=-\sin\phi\,W_{{3_{h}}}^{\mu}+\cos\phi\,W_{{3_{l}}}^{\mu}
243: \end{eqnarray}
244: for neutral gauge bosons $Z_{1}$, $Z_{2}$, respectively, which define
245: neutral mass eigenstates $Z$ and $Z^{\prime}$ at the leading order of a
246: free parameter $x$ [9]
247: \begin{eqnarray}
248: \label{e6}
249: {Z\choose Z^{\prime}}\simeq
250: \left(\matrix{1&\frac{-\cos^3\phi\,\sin\phi}{x\,\cos\theta}\cr
251: \frac{\cos^3\phi\,\sin\phi}{x\,\cos\theta}&1\cr}\right)\cdot
252: {Z_{1}\choose Z_{2}}\ ,
253: \end{eqnarray}
254: where $\theta$ is the usual weak
255: mixing angle and $\phi$ is an additional mixing angle due to
256: the existence of $SU(2)_{h}\times SU(2)_{l}$.
257: % The mass eigenstates $Z_{1}$ and $Z_{2}$
258: %are defined as [5]
259:
260: %\begin{eqnarray}
261: %\label{e7}
262: %$${Z\choose Z^{\prime}}\simeq
263: %\left(\matrix{1&\frac{-\cos^3\phi\,\sin\phi}{x\,\cos\theta}\cr
264: %\frac{\cos^3\phi\,\sin\phi}{x\,\cos\theta}&1\cr}\right)\cdot
265: %{Z_{1}\choose Z_{2}}\ . $$
266: %\end{eqnarray}
267: The parameter $x$ in (\ref{e6}) is defined as the ratio
268: $x=u^2/v^2$, where $u$ is the
269: energy scale at which the extended weak gauge group $SU(2)_{h}\times SU(2)_{l}$
270: is broken to its diagonal subgroup $SU(2)_{L}$, while $v\simeq$
271: 246 GeV is the vacuum expectation value of the (composite)
272: scalar field responsible for the symmetry breaking $
273: SU(2)_{L}\times U(1)_{Y}\rightarrow U(1)_{em}$ in the model of
274: extended weak interactions. The generator of the
275: $U(1)_{em}$ group is the usual electric charge operator
276: $Q=T_{3_{h}}+T_{3_{l}}+Y$. At large values of $\sin\phi$, the
277: $Z_{2}$-boson has an enhanced coupling to the third generation
278: fermions through the covariant derivative
279: \begin{eqnarray}
280: \label{e7}
281: D^{\mu}=\partial^{\mu}-i\,\frac{g}{\cos\theta}\,Z_{1}^{\mu}\,\left(T_{3_{h}}+
282: T_{3_{l}}-\sin^{2}\theta\cdot Q\right)\cr
283: -i\,g\,Z_{2}^{\mu}\,\left(-\frac{\sin\phi}{\cos\phi}\,
284: T_{3_{h}}+\frac{\cos\phi}{\sin\phi}\,T_{3_{l}}\right).
285: \end{eqnarray}
286: The Lagrangian density for an effective quark-lepton
287: contact interaction looks like
288: \begin{eqnarray}
289: \label{e8}
290: {\cal L}\supset\frac{1}{\Lambda_{LL}^2}\left [g_{0}^2
291: (\bar{E}_{L}\gamma_{\mu} E_{L})(\bar{Q}_{L}\gamma^{\mu}
292: Q_{L})+g_{1}^2 (\bar{E}_{L}\gamma_{\mu}\tau_{a} E_{L})(\bar{Q}_{L}\gamma^{\mu}
293: \tau_{a} Q_{L})\right ]\cr
294: +\frac{g_{e}^2}{\Lambda_{LR}^2}
295: (\bar{e}_{R}\gamma_{\mu} e_{R})(\bar{Q}_{L}\gamma^{\mu}Q_{L})\cr
296: +\left [\frac{1}{\Lambda_{LR}^2}(\bar{E}_{L}\gamma_{\mu}E_{L})
297: +\frac{1}{\Lambda_{RR}^2}(\bar{e}_{R}\gamma_{\mu}
298: e_{R}) \right ]\sum_{q:u,d} g_{q}^2 (\bar{q}_{R}\gamma^{\mu}q_{R})\
299: ,
300: \end{eqnarray}
301: where $E_{L}=(\nu_{e},e)_{L}, Q_{L}=(u,d)_{L}$; $g_{i}$ are the
302: effective couplings and $\Lambda_{ij}$ are the scales of new
303: physics. The aim of the CDF collaboration analysis [2] was to
304: search for the deviation of the SM prediction in the dilepton
305: production spectrum. If no such deviations have been found, the
306: lower bound of the $\Lambda$-scale can be obtained.
307: The embedding of the extra gauge bosons in the model
308: beyond the SM gives rise
309: to quark-lepton contact interactions in accordance to the
310: following part of the Lagrangian density (see [9])
311: \begin{eqnarray}
312: \label{e9}
313: {\cal L}\supset
314: -\frac{g^2}{M_{Z^{\prime}}^2}\left (\frac{\cot\phi}{2}\right )^2
315: \left (\sum_{l:e,\mu} \bar{l}_{L}\gamma_{\mu}l_{L}\right )
316: \left (\sum_{q:u,d,s,c} \bar{q}_{L}\gamma^{\mu}q_{L}\right )\
317: ,
318: \end{eqnarray}
319: where $g=e/\sin\theta$.
320: We suppose that the couplings in the first two generations are
321: same in strength.
322:
323: \section{Mass bound on stop quarks and some Higgs boson mass estimations}
324:
325: In the MSSM, the mass sum rule (\ref{e2}) at the tree-level
326: is transformed into the following form because of the loop corrections [13]
327: \begin{eqnarray}
328: \label{e10}
329: M_{Z^{\prime}}=\frac{m_{h}^2-M_{A}^2+\delta_{ZZ^{\prime}}
330: -\Delta}{M_{Z^{\prime}}
331: +M_{H}}+M_{H}\ ,
332: \end{eqnarray}
333: where $M_{Z^{\prime}}$ is the mass of $Z^{\prime}$-boson;
334: $\delta_{ZZ^{\prime}}=M_{Z^{\prime}}^2-m_{Z}^2$. The correction
335: $\Delta$ reflects the contribution from loop diagrams involving
336: all the particles that couple to the Higgs bosons [14,15]
337: \begin{eqnarray}
338: \label{e11}
339: \Delta=\left (\frac{\sqrt
340: N_{c}\,g\,m_{t}^2}{4\,\pi\,m_{W}\,\sin\beta}\right
341: )^2\,\log\left (\frac{m_{{\tilde t}_{1}}\cdot m_{{\tilde
342: t}_{2}}}{m_{t}^2}\right )^2\ ,
343: \end{eqnarray}
344: where $N_{c}$ is the number of colors, $m_{t}$ and $m_{W}$ are
345: the masses of top quark and $W$-boson, respectively. $\tan\beta$
346: defines the structure of the MSSM. The values of $\Delta\sim {\cal O}(
347: 0.01~TeV^2)$ have been calculated [14] for any choice of
348: parameter space of the MSSM. We suggest that the
349: measurement of $M_{Z^{\prime}}$ would predict
350: the masses of mass-eigenstates ${\tilde t}_{1}$ and ${\tilde
351: t}_{2}$,
352: since $m_{t}$ and $m_{W}$ are already measured in the
353: experiments and
354: $m_{h}$ is restricted by the LEP 2 data [1] as $m_{h}<$
355: 130 GeV [16]; $M_{A}$ and $M_{H}$ are free parameters bounded by
356: combined data coming from the MSSM parameters space and the
357: experimental data [17].
358:
359: Comparing (\ref{e8}) and (\ref{e9}), one can get the following
360: relation between $M_{Z^{\prime}}$ and $\Lambda$ as [9]
361: \begin{eqnarray}
362: \label{e12}
363: M_{Z^{\prime}}=\sqrt{\alpha_{em}}\,\Lambda\,\cot\phi/(2\,\sin\theta)\
364: ,
365: \end{eqnarray}
366: where the value of $\Lambda $ was constrained from the CDF data at
367: $\sqrt s$=1.8 TeV as
368: $\Lambda >$ 3.7 TeV or 4.1 TeV, depending on the contact
369: interactions for the
370: left-handed electrons or muons, respectively found at 95 $\%$
371: confidence level [2,9].
372:
373: In the decoupling regime of the MSSM Higgs sector where the couplings
374: of the light CP-even Higgs boson $h$ in the MSSM are identical
375: to those of the SM Higgs bosons and thus, the
376: CP-even mixing angle $\alpha$ behaves as $\tan\alpha\rightarrow
377: -\cot\beta$ with the $M_{A}\gg m_{Z}$ relation, one can get $M_{H}^2\simeq
378: M_{A}^2+m_{Z}^2\sin^{2}(2\beta)+\mu^2$ which leads to disappearance
379: of the $H$-Higgs boson mass in (\ref{e10}). Here,
380: $\mu$ is the positive massive parameter which can, in principle, be
381: defined from the experiment searching for separation of two
382: degenerate heavy Higgs bosons, $A$ and $H$. This behavior
383: verified at the tree-level continues to hold even when radiative
384: corrections are included. It has been checked that this
385: decoupling regime is an effective one for all values of
386: $\tan\beta$ and that the pattern of most of the Higgs couplings
387: results from this limit.
388:
389: In studying the mass relation (\ref{e10}) from the extended
390: electroweak gauge structure, we must be aware of the issues
391: related to the structure of $M_{Z^{\prime}}$ in both sides of
392: (\ref{e10}). We suppose that $M_{Z^{\prime}}$ in the l.h.s.
393: of (\ref{e10}) is the mass to be determined
394: using the CDF analysis data [2,9]. Therefore, one can
395: approximate its mass via the phenomenological relation (\ref{e12})
396: while the r.h.s. of (\ref{e10}) is model-dependent, where, to the
397: leading order, the mass $M_{Z^{\prime}}$ in the extended weak
398: interaction model is $ M_{Z^{\prime}}=m_{W}\,\sqrt{x}/(\cos\phi\sin\phi)$
399: [9] in the region where $\cos\phi< \sin\phi$.
400: With the help of the CDF restriction for $\Lambda$ [2] entering
401: into (\ref{e12}), one can easily find the upper limit
402: of the product of $m_{{\tilde t}_{1}}\cdot m_{{\tilde t}_{2}}$
403: from the following relation [13]
404: \begin{eqnarray}
405: \label{e13}
406: \Delta
407: <(B+M_{H}^{\star})\,(B-f\,C)+m_{h}^2-m_{Z}^2\,(1-\sin^{2}2\beta)+\mu^2\,
408: ,
409: \end{eqnarray}
410: where $M_{H}^{\star}=(M_{A}^{2}+m_{Z}^2\,\sin^{2}2\beta
411: +\mu^2)^{1/2}$,
412: $f\equiv f(\phi)=\cot\phi\,\sqrt{\alpha_{em}}/(2\,\sin\theta)$,
413: $B\equiv B(x,\phi)=m_{W}\sqrt{x}/(\cos\phi\,\sin\phi)$, and $C$ is a
414: minimal value of the $\Lambda$ scale extracted from the CDF
415: analysis [2].
416: The masses of $Z$- and $W$-bosons are currently known with errors
417: of a few MeV each [18], whereas the mass of the top quark is known
418: with errors of a few GeV [18].
419: Note that the dependence of particle
420: couplings via $\tan\beta$ enters into the radiative correction
421: $\Delta$ in (\ref{e11}) and the mass $M_{H}$
422: defined in the decoupling regime. Thus,
423: the upper limit on $m_{{\tilde t}_{1}}\cdot m_{{\tilde t}_{2}}$
424: can be accurately predicted by precision measurements of the lower
425: bound of $M_{Z^{\prime}}$ and the masses of the Higgs bosons $h$ and $A$.
426:
427: Fig. 1 shows the upper limit on
428: $L\equiv \log\left (\frac{m_{{\tilde t}_{1}}\cdot m_{{\tilde
429: t}_{2}}}{m_{t}^2}\right )$ as a function of $\sin\phi$ for $x=2$ and
430: $x=3$
431: at fixed values of $\mu$ and $M_{A}$.
432: We use the following range of the mixing parameter
433: $0.75\leq\sin\phi\leq 0.85$ for a $Z^{\prime}$ boson [9] where
434: the luminosity required to exclude SU(2) $Z^{\prime}$ bosons of
435: various masses is lowest. The corresponding range of the lower
436: bound on $x$ is $3.9\geq x\geq 1.6$ (left-handed muons and
437: up-type quarks is taken into account) for the $\sin\phi$ range
438: above mentioned.
439: The regions of the parameter space lying below a
440: given line are allowed by the present model.
441: At present, the LEP bounds on the mass of
442: $A$-Higgs boson are $M_{A}>$ 88.4 GeV [1]. This result
443: corresponds to the large $\tan\beta$ region.
444: We see that the function $L$ is rather sensitive within the
445: changing of $\sin\phi$, i.e. the ratio of gauge couplings
446: $g/g_{l}$. Here, $g^{-2}=g_{l}^{-2}+g_{h}^{-2}$, where $g_{l}$
447: is associated with the $SU(2)_{l}$ group and defines the
448: couplings to the first and second generation fermions, whose
449: charges under subgroup $SU(2)_{l}$ are the same as in the SM, while
450: $g_{h}$ is originated from the $SU(2)_{h}$ group which governs
451: the weak interactions for the third generation (heavy) fermions.
452: In the range of $\sin\phi$ presented in the Fig. 1, the width
453: $\Gamma_{Z^{\prime}}$ of the $Z^{\prime}$-boson
454: falls to a minimum in the neighborhood of $\sin\phi =0.8$ [9], due
455: to the decreasing couplings to first two generations of fermions.
456: In the range $\sin\phi > 0.8$, $\Gamma_{Z^{\prime}}$
457: grows large, due to the rapid growth in the third generation
458: coupling.
459: %In our calculations, the parameters of
460: %the model are chosen as $M_{A}=0.5$ TeV (Fig.1(a)) and
461: %$M_{A}=0.8$ TeV (Fig.1(b)); $m_{h}=110$ GeV and $m_{h}=130$ GeV,
462: %$\tan\beta=30$. Here, we did not use the mass difference between
463: %$\tilde{t_{1}}$ and $\tilde{t_{2}}$ mass eigenstates.
464: %As $\sin\phi$ approaches 1, the value of
465: %$\log\left (\frac{m_{{\tilde t}_{1}}\cdot m_{{\tilde
466: %t}_{2}}}{m_{t}^2}\right )$ (see Fig.1) goes down
467: %to zero for small $x$. A similar behaviour is
468: %seen for $x=8, 12$ and 16 when $\sin\phi$ approaches approximately
469:
470: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
471:
472: \begin{center}
473: \begin{figure}[h]
474:
475: \resizebox{12cm}{!}{\includegraphics{kob1.eps}}
476:
477: Fig. 1 The upper limit on
478: $L\equiv \log\left (\frac{m_{{\tilde t}_{1}}\cdot m_{{\tilde
479: t}_{2}}}{m_{t}^2}\right )$
480: as a function of $\sin\phi$ for different values of $x = 2$ and 3;
481: $\mu=m_{h}=120$~GeV (dashed line), $\mu=0$ (solid line) for
482: $M_A=0.8$~TeV; $\tan\beta$=30.
483:
484: \end{figure}
485: \end{center}
486:
487: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
488:
489: \begin{center}
490: \begin{figure}[h]
491:
492: \resizebox{12cm}{!}{\includegraphics{kob.eps}}
493:
494:
495: Fig. 2 The lower bound on $m^{2}_h$ as a function of $\sin\phi$
496: for different values of $x = 2$ and 3;
497: $\mu=m_{h}=120$~GeV (dashed line), $\mu=0$ (solid line) for
498: $M_A=0.8$~TeV; $\tan\beta$=30.
499: The regions of the parameter space lying
500: above a given line are allowed by the present model.
501:
502:
503: \end{figure}
504: \end{center}
505:
506: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
507:
508: The CDF analysis of the contact interaction between left-handed
509: muons and the up-type quarks is taken into account ($C=4.1$
510: TeV) in our calculations.
511: The lower bounds of $m^{2}_{h}$ are illustrated in Fig. 2.
512: The constraints are given for
513: different ratios of $x=2$ and $3$ as a function of
514: $\sin\phi$.
515: In our calculations, the parameters of the model are typically chosen as
516: $m_{h}= 120$ GeV, $\tan\beta=30$.
517: The value of the neutral CP-odd Higgs boson $A$ mass is set to
518: be $M_{A}= 0.8$ TeV within the typical upper limit of $M_{A}$
519: kinematically allowed at the Tevatron Run II energy. Herewith,
520: we suppose that $A$ Higgs boson can be identified, e.g., via
521: two-lepton decays in the $AZ$ associated production process
522: $p\bar{p}\rightarrow AZ+X$ with $\sqrt{s} > M_{A}+m_{Z}$.
523: Here, we did not use the mass difference between $\tilde{t_{1}}$
524: and $\tilde{t_{2}}$ mass eigenstates, and we set
525: $m_{\tilde{t_{1}}}=m_{\tilde{t_{2}}}=$ 1 TeV (see Fig. 2).
526: The regions of the parameter space lying above a
527: given line are allowed by the present data.
528: % It should be noted that a
529: %combined fit of the experimental data [1] gives
530: %$m_{h}=90^{+55}_{-47}$ GeV. Also note that recent direct
531: %searches at LEP 2 give the
532: %lower bound on the Higgs boson mass which is 113.4 GeV [1].
533:
534: In a more extended SUSY models, their mass sum rules can give
535: some useful estimations with the help of the CDF data [2].
536: For example, in the minimal $E_{6}$ superstring theory, the
537: particle spectrum consists of three scalar Higgs bosons $h$,
538: $H_{1}$, $H_{2}$, a pseudoscalar Higgs $A$, a charged Higgs
539: boson pair $H^{\pm}$, and two neutral gauge bosons $Z$ and
540: $Z^{\prime}$. Among these particles, there exists a mass
541: sum rule, at the
542: tree-level, of the form [19]:
543: \begin{eqnarray}
544: \label{e14}
545: M_{Z^{\prime}}^{2}=m_{h}^{2}+M_{H_{1}}^{2}+M_{H_{2}}^{2}-M_{A}^{2}-m_{Z}^{2}\,.
546: \end{eqnarray}
547: The analytical expressions for the loop corrections are unknown
548: yet. However, it is known that the one-loop corrections can be summarized into
549: the term logarithmically dependent on the SUSY sector mass scale
550: [19]. Considering that $m_{h}$ can be identified with
551: the lower bound on the Higgs boson mass, we obtain the
552: lower bound on the sum $M_{H_{1}}^{2}+M_{H_{2}}^{2}$ at fixed
553: $M_{A}$ as a function of $\sin\phi$:
554: \begin{eqnarray}
555: \label{e15}
556: \sum_{j=1}^{2} M_{H_{j}}^{2}> M_{A}^{2}+m_{Z}^{2}-m_{h}^{2}+
557: \frac{\alpha_{em}\,C^2\,\cot^{2}\phi}{4\,\sin^{2}\theta} \,.
558: \end{eqnarray}
559:
560: The results of the calculation of the lower bound on $M\equiv (\sum_{j=1}^{2}
561: M_{H_{j}}^{2})^{1/2}$ as the function of $\sin\phi$ is given in the Fig. 3
562: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
563: \begin{center}
564: \begin{figure}[h]
565:
566: \resizebox{12cm}{!}{\includegraphics{ko3.eps}}
567:
568:
569: Fig. 3 The lower bound on $M\equiv (\sum_{j=1}^{2}
570: M_{H_{j}}^{2})^{1/2}$ as the function of $\sin\phi$.
571:
572:
573:
574:
575: \end{figure}
576: \end{center}
577: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
578:
579: We have used the scales of new physics $\Lambda >C$ coming from the
580: CDF analysis [9] at 95 $\%$ confidence level
581: in which contact interactions were assumed only between left-handed
582: electron (muon) and up-type quarks: $\Lambda> 4.1$ TeV
583: and $\Lambda > 3.7$ TeV for left-handed muons and
584: left-handed electrons, respectively.
585:
586:
587: \section{Rare decays of the Higgs bosons}
588:
589: As is well known, Higgs bosons dominantly couple to heavy particles
590: even in the MSSM.
591: %We suppose that the only heavy quarks couple to the Higgs bosons
592: %with the couplings given by the MSSM prediction.
593: Observation
594: of $h$-, $H$- and $A$-Higgs bosons depends on the
595: model parameters including the
596: masses $m_{h}$, $m_{H}$ and $M_{A}$.
597:
598: (a) The decays $h,H\rightarrow gg, \gamma\gamma$.
599:
600: Let us begin with
601: study on the decays
602: $X\rightarrow gg$ and $X\rightarrow \gamma\gamma$ ($X:h,H$), where the
603: former dominates over the later.
604: The decay width of $X\rightarrow gg$ (the radiative
605: corrections are not included) is given by
606: \begin{eqnarray}
607: \label{e16}
608: \Gamma (X\rightarrow gg)=
609: \frac{g^2\,\alpha_{s}^{2}\,m_{X}^3}{128\,\pi^3\,m_{W}^2}\cdot {\vert\tilde
610: F_{Q}\vert }^2\ ,
611: \end{eqnarray}
612: where the transition formfactor $\tilde F_{Q}$ is
613: provided by an intermediate quark loop containing $b$- and
614: $t$-quarks, [20,21]:
615: \begin{eqnarray}
616: \label{e17}
617: \tilde
618: F_{Q}=\rho_{Xb}\,\tau_{b}\left\{\frac{(\tau_{b}-1)}{4}\left
619: [\pi^2-\ln^{2}\left (\frac{1+\xi_{b}}{1-\xi_{b}}\right )\right
620: ]-1\right\}\cr
621: +\rho_{Xt}\,\tau_{t}\left\{(\tau_{t}-1)\left [\arcsin^{2}\left
622: (\frac{m_{X}}{2\,m_{t}}\right )\cdot\theta (2\,m_{t}-m_{X}) \right.\right.\cr
623: \left.\left. +\frac{1}{4}\,\left [\pi^2-\ln^{2}
624: \left (\frac{1+\xi_{t}}{1-\xi_{t}}\right )\right
625: ]\cdot\theta (m_{X}-2\,m_{t})\right ] -1\right\}\ .
626: \end{eqnarray}
627: Here, $\tau_{Q}=(2\,m_{Q}/m_{X})^2$, $\xi_{Q}=\sqrt
628: {1-\tau_{Q}}$, $\rho_{hQ}=-\sin\alpha/\cos\beta$ and
629: $\rho_{HQ}=\cos\alpha/\cos\beta$ for b-quarks;
630: $\rho_{hQ}=\cos\alpha/\sin\beta$ and
631: $\rho_{HQ}=\sin\alpha/\sin\beta$ for t-quarks; the mixing angle $\alpha$
632: diagonalizes the CP-even Higgs squared-mass matrix. For comparison,
633: the decay width $\Gamma (X\rightarrow\gamma\gamma)$ can be
634: easily obtained from the corresponding decay to two gluons
635: (\ref{e16}) by a simple replacement
636: $\alpha_{s}\rightarrow\frac{3}{\sqrt 2}\alpha\,e_{Q}^2$
637: (the heavy quark charges $e_{Q}$ are included into the formfactors)
638: and $\tilde F_{Q}\rightarrow F_{Q}+F_{W}+F^{\pm}_{H}$
639: \begin{eqnarray}
640: \label{e18}
641: \Gamma (X\rightarrow\gamma\gamma)=
642: \frac{g^2\,\alpha^2 \,m_{X}^3}{1024\,\pi^3\,m_{W}^2}\cdot {\vert
643: F_{Q}+F_{W}+ F_{H^{\pm}}\vert }^2\ ,
644: \end{eqnarray}
645: where the formfactor $F_{Q}$ contributed from heavy quarks $Q$ is given by
646: \begin{eqnarray}
647: \label{e19}
648: F_{Q}=2\left \{\rho_{Xb}\frac{\tau_{b}}{3}\left [\frac{(\tau_{b}-1)}{4}\left
649: (\pi^2-\ln^{2}\frac{1+\xi_{b}}{1-\xi_{b}}\right )-1\right ]\right.\cr
650: \left. +\frac{4}{3}\,\rho_{Xt}\,\tau_{t}\left [(\tau_{t}-1)\left (\arcsin^{2}\left
651: (\frac{m_{X}}{2\,m_{t}}\right )\cdot\theta (2\,m_{t}-m_{X})\right. \right.\right.\cr
652: \left.\left.\left. +\frac{1}{4}\,\left (\pi^2-\ln^{2}\frac{1+\xi_{t}}{1-\xi_{t}}\right
653: )\cdot\theta (m_{X}-2\,m_{t})\right )\right ] -1\right\}\
654: \end{eqnarray}
655: and the ones $F_{W}$ from weak bosons $W^{\pm}$ and $ F_{H^{\pm}}$ from charged Higgs
656: bosons $H^{\pm}$ are [22]
657: \begin{eqnarray}
658: \label{e20}
659: F_{W}=\rho_{XW}\left \{2+3\,\tau_{W}+3\,\tau_{W}(2-\tau_{W})\left
660: [\arcsin^{2}\left (\frac{m_{X}}{2\,m_{W}}\right )\cdot\theta (2\,m_{W}-m_{X})
661: \right.\right.\cr
662: \left.\left. +\frac{1}{4}\,\left (\pi^2-\ln^{2}
663: \frac{1+\xi_{W}}{1-\xi_{W}}\right )
664: \cdot\theta (m_{X}-2\,m_{W})\right ]\right \}
665: \end{eqnarray}
666: and
667: %and the charged Higgs bosons $H^{\pm}$
668: \begin{eqnarray}
669: \label{e21}
670: F_{H^{\pm}}=\rho_{XH^{\pm}}\left (\frac{m_{W}}{M_{H^{\pm}}}\right
671: )^2\left
672: (1-\tau_{H^{\pm}}\,\arcsin^{2}\frac{m_{X}}{2\,M_{H^{\pm}}}\right
673: )\ ,
674: \end{eqnarray}
675: respectively. Here, $\rho_{hW}=\sin(\beta-\alpha)$,
676: $\rho_{HW}=\cos(\beta-\alpha)$,
677: $\rho_{hH^{\pm}}=\rho_{hW}+
678: \frac{\cos 2\beta\,\sin(\beta+\alpha)}{2\,\cos^{2}\theta_{W}}$,
679: $\tau_{H^{\pm}}=(2\,M_{H^{\pm}}/m_{X})^2$.
680: %The formfactor $F_{Q}$ in (\ref{e18}) is
681: %\begin{eqnarray}
682: %\label{e21}
683: %F_{Q}=2\left \{\rho_{Xb}\frac{\tau_{b}}{3}\left [\frac{(\tau_{b}-1)}{4}\left
684: %(\pi^2-\ln^{2}\frac{1+\xi_{b}}{1-\xi_{b}}\right )-1\right ]\right.\cr
685: %\left. +\frac{4}{3}\,\rho_{Xt}\,\tau_{t}\left [(\tau_{t}-1)\left (\arcsin^{2}\left
686: %(\frac{m_{X}}{2\,m_{t}}\right )\cdot\theta (2\,m_{t}-m_{X})\right. \right.\right.\cr
687: %\left.\left.\left. +\frac{1}{4}\,\left (\pi^2-\ln^{2}\frac{1+\xi_{t}}{1-\xi_{t}}\right
688: %)\cdot\theta (m_{X}-2\,m_{t})\right )\right ] -1\right\}\ .
689: %\end{eqnarray}
690: Calculated results of
691: $\Gamma (H\rightarrow gg)$, $\Gamma (h\rightarrow gg)$ and
692: $\Gamma (H\rightarrow\gamma\gamma)$, $\Gamma (h\rightarrow\gamma\gamma)$
693: are given in the Figs. 4, 5 and 6, 7, respectively, where
694: the mass of the CP-odd $A$-Higgs boson was typically taken to be $M_{A}=$ 0.8 TeV.
695: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
696: %\vspace{0.5cm}
697: \begin{center}
698: \begin{figure}[h]
699: \resizebox{14cm}{!}{\includegraphics{1s.eps}}
700:
701: Fig. 4 The decay width $\Gamma (H\rightarrow gg)$ as the
702: function of $M_{H}$ for different $\alpha_{s}$ (from below $\alpha_{s}$
703: = 0.110, 0.115, 0.119, 0.123) and $\tan\beta$= 10 and 30.
704: \end{figure}
705: \end{center}
706: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
707: \begin{center}
708: \begin{figure}[h]
709: \resizebox{14cm}{!}{\includegraphics{2s.eps}}
710:
711: Fig. 5 The decay width $\Gamma (h\rightarrow gg)$ as the
712: function of $m_{h}$ for different $\alpha_{s}$ (from below $\alpha_{s}$
713: = 0.110, 0.115, 0.119, 0.123) in the decoupling limit.
714: \end{figure}
715: \end{center}
716: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
717: \begin{center}
718: \begin{figure}[h]
719: \resizebox{14cm}{!}{\includegraphics{3s.eps}}
720:
721: Fig. 6 The decay width $\Gamma (H\rightarrow\gamma\gamma)$ as the
722: function of $M_{H}$ for different $\tan\beta$= 10 and 30.
723: \end{figure}
724: \end{center}
725: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
726: \begin{center}
727: \begin{figure}[h]
728: \resizebox{14cm}{!}{\includegraphics{4s.eps}}
729:
730: Fig. 7 The decay width $\Gamma (h\rightarrow\gamma\gamma)$ as the
731: function of $m_{h}$ in the decoupling limit.
732: \end{figure}
733: \end{center}
734: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
735: In our calculations, the couplings between $h$-Higgs and left-and
736: right-handed
737: sfermions as well as $h$-Higgs to charginos were neglected.
738: The following relation between the
739: mixing angle $\alpha$ and $\tan\beta$
740: \begin{eqnarray}
741: \label{e22}
742: \cot\alpha=-\tan\beta\left [1+2{\left
743: (\frac{m_{Z}}{M_{A}}\right )}^2\,\cos 2\beta\right ] + {\cal O}\left
744: (\frac{m^{4}_{Z}}{M^{4}_{A}}\right )
745: \end{eqnarray}
746: is useful in evaluating $h$-Higgs boson couplings to $b$-and $t$-quarks
747: in the decoupling regime.
748:
749: %In the region 130 GeV$\leq m_{h}\leq$ 180 GeV, the lightest
750: %h-Higgs decays mainly into $W^{\pm}W^{\mp}$.
751: Here, we point out
752: that the Run II at the Tevatron could observe the Higgs boson $h$
753: through the promising final states of $gg$ and
754: $\gamma\gamma$ channels or $\bar{b}b$ final state.\\
755:
756:
757:
758: (b) The decays $A\rightarrow \bar{l}l$.
759:
760: In the MSSM, the decay amplitude of a CP-odd neutral Higgs boson $A$ (with
761: mass $M_{A}$ and 4-momentum $P_{\mu}$) into a lepton $l$
762: and antilepton $\bar{l}$ with 4-momenta $p_{\mu}$ and
763: $(P-p)_{\mu}$, respectively, is given by the following Feynman
764: amplitude
765: \begin{eqnarray}
766: \label{e23}
767: Am(A\rightarrow\bar{l}l)=i\,\sum_{Q:b,t}\bar{u}(p)\,\gamma_{5}\,F_{Q}(M_{A}^2)\,
768: v(P-p)\ ,
769: \end{eqnarray}
770: where $F_{Q}(t=M_{A}^2)$ is the complex function (formfactor) providing the
771: transition from the $A$ Higgs boson into a lepton pair. One can
772: consider this transition via the intermediate of-shell spin-1 bosons $V^{*}$ (photons,
773: $W^{\pm}$-bosons, and so on) within the vertex $AV^{*}V^{*}$
774: \begin{eqnarray}
775: \label{e24}
776: \Gamma_{\mu\nu}=\epsilon_{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}\,k^{\alpha}\,(P-k)^{\beta}\,F_{A}[
777: k^2,(P-k)^{2}]\
778: \end{eqnarray}
779: with
780: \begin{eqnarray}
781: \label{e25}
782: F_{A}[k^2,(P-k)^{2}]=\sum_{Q:b,t}\rho_{Q}\,e_{Q}^2\,f_{VV}^{Q}
783: \,\hat{F_{QA}}[k^2,(P-k)^{2}]\
784: .
785: \end{eqnarray}
786: Here, $\rho_{Q}=\tan\beta$ for $b$-quark-loop and $\rho_{Q}=\cot\beta$ for
787: $t$-quark-loop; $k_{\mu}$ is the
788: 4-momentum of a $V^{*}$ -boson. There is a natural normalization
789: condition $F_{A}(0,0)$=$f_{VV}$ in (\ref{e24}) where the decay constant
790: $f_{VV}$ is given for the decay of $A$-Higgs into two real $V$
791: -bosons. The form of $F_{A}$ in (\ref{e25}) should be taken so
792: that the Feynman integrals are not divergent. Here, we simply take
793: $\hat{F_{QA}}[k^2,(P-k)^{2}]$ as
794: \begin{eqnarray}
795: \label{e26}
796: \hat{F_{QA}}[k^2,(P-k)^{2}]=\frac{\lambda_{Q}^2}{\lambda_{Q}^2-k^2-(P-k)^{2}}
797: \end{eqnarray}
798: which has the good analytical properties, and carries both the
799: vector dominance features and the properties of the right static
800: limit. The parameter $\lambda_{Q}$ must be large enough, and
801: for numerical estimations we put $\lambda_{Q}^2=M_{A}^2$ where
802: $M_{A}\sim {\cal O}$(1 TeV). To be more precise in the calculations of
803: the decay width of the process $A\rightarrow\bar{l}l$, one has
804: to take into account the fact that the formfactor $F_{A}[k^2,(P-k)^{2}]$
805: should be complex function with the following real part
806: \begin{eqnarray}
807: \label{e27}
808: Re~ F_{A}(M_{A}^2)=\frac{P}{\pi}\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{Abs
809: [F_{A}(t)]}{t-M_{A}^2}\,dt\ .
810: \end{eqnarray}
811: Here, the absorptive part $Abs [F_{A}(t)]$ can be found if we take
812: the $S_{0}^{1}$ leptonic pair in the final state and taking into account
813: the unitarity condition for the decay amplitude
814: \begin{eqnarray}
815: \label{e28}
816: Abs [F_{A}(t)]=\frac{1}{2\,i\,\sqrt{2\,t}}\int
817: d\Omega_{I}\,\delta^{4}(P-\sum_{I} q_{I}){\langle I\vert T\vert
818: (\bar{l}l)_{S_{0}^{1}}\rangle}^{*}\,Am (A\rightarrow I)\ .
819: \end{eqnarray}
820: In (\ref{e28}), the integration over the phase-space
821: volume $\Omega_{I}$ for all possible intermediate states $I$, i.e.
822: off-shell $\gamma^{*}\gamma^{*}$-state, heavy quark-antiquark
823: state, heavy quark and the of-shell $\gamma^{*}$-quantum are taken
824: into account.
825: The decay width $\Gamma(A\rightarrow\bar{l}l)$ normalized to
826: two photon decays is calculated as follows [20]
827: \begin{eqnarray}
828: \label{e29}
829: Br(A\rightarrow\bar{l}l/\gamma\gamma)\equiv\frac{\Gamma(A\rightarrow\bar{l}l)}
830: {\Gamma(A\rightarrow\gamma\gamma)}=2\,\xi_{l}\,\frac{1}{(4\,\pi)^2}\,\left
831: (\frac{m_{l}}{M_{A}}\right )^2\frac{1}{\pi^2}\,{\vert R\vert}^2\
832: \end{eqnarray}
833: with
834: \begin{eqnarray}
835: \label{e30}
836: R=\frac{1}{\xi_{l}}\left [\frac{i\,\pi}{2}\ln\frac{1-\xi_{l}}{1+\xi_{l}}+
837: \frac{1}{4}\ln^{2}\frac{1+\xi_{l}}{1-\xi_{l}}-\ln\frac{1+\xi_{l}}{1-\xi_{l}}
838: +\frac{\pi^2}{12}-\Phi\left (\frac{1-\xi_{l}}{1+\xi_{l}}\right
839: )\right ]
840: ,
841: \end{eqnarray}
842: where $\Phi(x)=\int_{0}^{x}\,dt\,\ln(1+t)/t$,
843: $\xi_{l}=\sqrt{1-(2\,m_{l}/M_{A})^2}$.
844: The normalized decay rate (\ref{e29}) is very convenient because the
845: dependence on $\tan\beta$ is cancelled for the $VV$-channel.
846: The corresponding SM background comes from the Drell-Yan
847: production
848: $$\bar{q}q\rightarrow\gamma^{*},Z^{*},Z^{\prime}{^*}\rightarrow\bar{l}l\
849: .$$
850: The signals we are looking for would be identified by the
851: peaks of the invariant mass of
852: $\tau^{+}\tau^{-}$ and/or $\mu^{+}\mu^{-}$ pairs.
853: In $Table~ 1$ we show the calculated results of the decay widths
854: $A\rightarrow\mu^{+}\mu^{-}$ and $A\rightarrow\tau^{+}\tau^{-}$
855: normalized to $\gamma\gamma$- channel as the function of $M_{A}$.
856:
857:
858: {\bf $\underline {Table 1}$. } The values
859: $Br(A\rightarrow\bar{l}l/\gamma\gamma)$ as the function of
860: $M_{A}$ where $l=\mu^{-}$ and $\tau^{-}$.
861:
862:
863: \begin{center}
864: \begin{tabular}{c c c c c c c } \hline
865: \multicolumn{7}{c}
866: {$M_{A} (TeV)$} \\[0.5 mm]
867: \hline
868: $ $& 0.10 & 0.25 & 0.50 & 0.75 & 1.00 & 1.20 \\[0.5 mm]
869: \hline
870: $ Br(A\rightarrow\mu^{+}\mu^{-}/\gamma\gamma)\cdot 10^{8}$ & 3.00 & 1.00 &0.28 & 0.15 & 0.10 & 0.007 \\[0.5 mm]
871: $ Br(A\rightarrow\tau^{+}\tau^{-}/\gamma\gamma)\cdot 10^{6}$ & 0.84 & 0.27 & 0.11 & 0.06 & 0.04 & 0.02 \\[0.5 mm]
872: %$\Gamma (h\rightarrow\gamma\gamma)_{\tan\beta=5} (MeV)$ & 0.037 & $0.045$ & $0.050$ & $0.069$ & $0.087$ & $0.110$ \\[0.5 mm]
873: %$\Gamma (h\rightarrow\gamma\gamma)_{\tan\beta=20} (MeV)$ & $0.016$ & $0.017$ & $0.019$ & $0.026$& $0.037$ &$ 0.047$ \\[0.5 mm]
874: %$M (TeV) $ & 0.425 & 0.425 & 0.80 & 0.80 & 1.00 & 1.00 \\[0.5 mm]
875: %\hline
876: %$m_{h} (GeV) $ & 82.9 & 96.2 & 100.7 & 113.9 & 102.7 & 116.9 \\[0.5 mm]
877: \hline
878: \end{tabular}
879: \end{center}
880: At the end of this part, we conclude that apart from reducing
881: of the
882: $A\rightarrow\tau^{+}\tau^{-}$-signal due to some
883: experimental constraints, this decay mode could be
884: detected at the Tevatron's Run II as (almost) easily as the corresponding signal of
885: $A\rightarrow\mu^{+}\mu^{-}$ decay.\\
886:
887: (c) The decays $A\rightarrow\gamma\gamma h, ggh$.
888:
889: In addition to the proposal for searching for $A$-Higgs bosons via
890: the decay $A\rightarrow Zh$ [10], we suggest to investigate the
891: decays $A\rightarrow\gamma\gamma h$ and $A\rightarrow ggh$ which can be
892: relevant at the Tevatron's Run II for $M_{A}>m_{h}$ at large $\tan\beta$.
893: We first note that the rate of the $\gamma\gamma h$ channel can be more
894: promising for discovery for $A$-Higgs bosons than that of
895: $\tau^{+}\tau^{-}$ or $\mu^{+}\mu^{-}$ channels.
896:
897: The matrix element of the decay of $A$-Higgs bosons with momentum $P$
898: into $\gamma$, $\gamma$ and $h$ with the momenta $k_{1}, k_{2}$ and
899: $k_{3}$, respectively, has the following form
900: \begin{eqnarray}
901: \label{e31}
902: M(A\rightarrow\gamma\gamma
903: h)=\frac{\sqrt{N_{c}}\,\pi\,\alpha\,i\,g}{m_{W}\,\sqrt{M_{A}}}\,
904: Tr \left [\sum_{Q:b,t}
905: \gamma_{5}\,\rho_{Q}\,e_{Q}^{2}\,m_{Q}\,(M_{A}-\hat{P})
906: \Gamma_{Q}\,\rho_{hQ}\,T_{Q}\right ]\ ,
907: \end{eqnarray}
908: where $T_{Q}$ is the amplitude providing the transition of the
909: $\bar{Q}Q$-virtual quark pair into the $\gamma\gamma h$ final state
910: (the permutations are taken into account); $\Gamma_{Q}$ is the
911: vertex function describing the couplings $h\bar{Q}Q$
912: taking into account the
913: $\rho_{Q}$ flavor-dependent factor.
914: The differential distribution of the decay width
915: $A\rightarrow\gamma\gamma h$ over the invariant mass $\tilde s$ of
916: final state's two-photon pairs and normalized to the
917: $\gamma\gamma$ width is given by
918: \begin{eqnarray}
919: \label{e32}
920: \frac{1}{\Gamma(A\rightarrow\gamma\gamma)}
921: \frac{d \Gamma(A\rightarrow\gamma\gamma h)}{d \tilde{s}}=
922: \rho^{2}_{hQ}\frac{G_{F}\,a^{3}\,\tilde{s}\,M_{A}^{2}}
923: {8\,\sqrt{2}\,\pi^{2}\,(a^2-{\tilde{s}}^2)^2\,(a+\tilde{s}/2)},
924: \end{eqnarray}
925: where $a=(1-\kappa^2)/2$, $\kappa=m_{h}/M_{A}$,
926: $\tilde{s}=s/M_{A}^2$, $s=(k_{1}+k_{2})^2$. In $Table~ 2$, we
927: present $Br(A\rightarrow\gamma\gamma h/\gamma\gamma)$ as a
928: function of $\kappa$ for different values of $\tan\beta=5,10,20$
929: and $50$ at fixed $M_{A}$=0.8 TeV.
930:
931:
932: {\bf $\underline {Table~2}$. } $Br(A\rightarrow\gamma\gamma h/\gamma\gamma)\cdot
933: 10^{-2}$ as a
934: function of $\kappa$ for $\tan\beta=5,10,20$ and $50$;
935: $M_{A}$ is taken to be $M_{A}$=0.8 TeV as a typical value.
936:
937: \begin{center}
938: \begin{tabular}{ c c c c c c c } \hline
939: \multicolumn{7}{c}
940: {$\kappa=m_{h}/M_{A}$} \\[0.5 mm]
941: \hline
942: $ $& 0.05 & 0.1 & 0.2 & 0.3 & 0.4 & 0.5 \\[0.5 mm]
943: \hline
944: $ \tan\beta =5$ & 0.066 & 0.054 & 0.044 & 0.032 & 0.025 & 0.014 \\[0.5 mm]
945: $ \tan\beta =10$ & 0.26 & 0.22 & 0.18 & 0.13 & 0.10 & 0.058 \\[0.5 mm]
946: $ \tan\beta =20$ & 1.09 & 0.91 & 0.73 & 0.54 & 0.42 & 0.24 \\[0.5 mm]
947: $\tan\beta =50 $ & 6.54 & 5.43 & 4.43 & 3.28& 2.54 & 1.43 \\[0.5 mm]
948: %$M (TeV) $ & 0.425 & 0.425 & 0.80 & 0.80 & 1.00 & 1.00 \\[0.5 mm]
949: %\hline
950: %$m_{h} (GeV) $ & 82.9 & 96.2 & 100.7 & 113.9 & 102.7 & 116.9 \\[0.5 mm]
951: \hline
952: \end{tabular}
953: \end{center}
954: The width $\Gamma (A\rightarrow ggh)$ can be obtained from the
955: corresponding decay width for $A\rightarrow \gamma\gamma h$ by
956: making a replacement
957: $\alpha\,e_{Q}^2\rightarrow (\sqrt{2}/3)\,\alpha_{s}$. The
958: relative decay width of $A\rightarrow ggh$ normalized to
959: $A\rightarrow gg$ gives an identical value to the one listed in
960: $Table~ 2$ at $M_{A}$=0.8 TeV.
961:
962: Compared with
963: $A\rightarrow\tau^{+}\tau^{-}$/$\mu^{+}\mu^{-}$ cases as discussed
964: in (b), we conclude that the $A\rightarrow\gamma\gamma
965: h$ channel in MSSM could be observed for 0.15$\leq\kappa\leq$0.2
966: (120 GeV$\leq m_{h}\leq$ 160 GeV) and for $\tan\beta >$5.
967:
968: \section{The decays $Z_{2}\rightarrow Z_{1}h$}
969: To reach a unified theory of all interactions one could start with
970: Grand Unification Theory (GUT) group
971: $SU(5)$ [23] which is
972: the minimal unification group of strong and electromagnetic
973: interactions. However, this example was ruled out by several
974: experiments such as searching for the proton decay. The
975: natural extension leads to $SO(10)$ [24]. It is known that all
976: unification groups larger than $SU(5)$ have extra gauge bosons,
977: the neutral $Z^{\prime}$ bosons and the charged ${W^{\pm}}^{\prime}$ ones.
978: Experimental signals of those extra gauge bosons would give very
979: important information about the underlying GUT and its origin.
980: Search for $Z^{\prime}$ and ${W^{\pm}}^{\prime}$ is therefore an
981: important subject for the physical program at the Tevatron's
982: Run II, where very high precision measurements
983: can give valuable information on $Z^{\prime}$ and ${W^{\pm}}^{\prime}$
984: because they are sensitive to rare processes including their
985: decays.
986:
987: The cross-section $\sigma (\bar{p}p\rightarrow
988: Z^{\prime}\bar{l}l)$ for $Z^{\prime}$ production at the Tevatron
989: is inversely proportional to the total decay width
990: $\Gamma_{Z^{\prime}}$. Obviously, the inclusion of extra
991: channels to $Z^{\prime}$-decays leads to that $\Gamma_{Z^{\prime}}$
992: will become larger and $\sigma (\bar{p}p\rightarrow
993: Z^{\prime}\bar{l}l)$ smaller.
994: As already pointed out [25,26], if the decays of $Z^{\prime}$ into
995: $h +\{\bar{Q}Q\}_{s=1}$, $h\bar{l}l$ are
996: kinematically allowed, search for $h$ Higgs boson or an exotic heavy
997: quark-antiquark bound states $\{\bar{Q}Q\}_{s=1}$ with spin
998: $s=1$ would be the interesting channels.
999: The study of the
1000: decay $Z^{\prime}\rightarrow h +\{\bar{Q}Q\}_{s=1}$ [25,26]
1001: would provide a useful information about the nature of the
1002: extended gauge structure such as the couplings of $Z^{\prime}$
1003: with heavy quarks in both vector and axial-vector sectors,
1004: couplings of $h$ with heavy quarks, $Z-Z^{\prime}$ mixing effects,
1005: physics of mass eigenstates $Z_{1}$ and $Z_{2}$ and
1006: interplay with matter fields.
1007:
1008: In an effective rank-5 model, including only one extra neutral
1009: gauge boson $Z^{\prime}$, the interaction Lagrangian is given by
1010: standard manner
1011: \begin{eqnarray}
1012: \label{e33}
1013: -{\cal L}_{int}=\frac{1}{2}g_{1}Z_{\mu}\left
1014: [\sum_{f}\bar\Psi_{f}\gamma^{\mu}
1015: (g_{v}^{f}-g_{a}^{f}\gamma_{5} )\Psi_{f}\right ]\cr
1016: +\frac{1}{2}g_{2}Z^{\prime}_{\mu}\left
1017: [\sum_{f}\bar\Psi_{f}\gamma^{\mu}
1018: (g_{v}^{f\,\prime}-g_{a}^{f\,\prime}\gamma_{5} )\Psi_{f}\right
1019: ]\, ,
1020: \end{eqnarray}
1021: where $\Psi_{f}$ is the fermion field with the flavor $f$. The
1022: first term in (\ref{e33}) is written down within the SM where
1023: $g_{v}^{f}=T_{3\,L}-2\,Q_{f}\,\sin^{2}\theta_{W}$,
1024: $g_{a}^{f}=T_{3\,L}$; $g_{1}=g/\cos\theta_{W}$ is the SM
1025: coupling constant, $T_{3\,L}$ and $Q_{f}$ are the third component
1026: of the weak isospin and the electric charge, respectively. The
1027: pairs $(g_{v}^{f},g_{a}^{f})$ and $(g_{v}^{f\,\prime},g_{a}^{f\,\prime})$
1028: represent the chiral properties of interactions of $Z$- and $Z^{\prime}$-bosons
1029: to $\Psi_{f}$, respectively. The mass eigenstates
1030: $Z_{1}$ and $Z_{2}$ are parameterized by a mixing angle
1031: $\theta$ originated from the mixing between weak eigenstates
1032: $Z$- and $Z^{\prime}$
1033: \begin{eqnarray}
1034: \label{e34}
1035: {Z_{1}\choose Z_{2}}=
1036: \left(\matrix{\cos\theta&\sin\theta\cr
1037: -\sin\theta&\cos\theta\cr}\right)\cdot {Z\choose Z^{\prime}}\ .
1038: \end{eqnarray}
1039: Therefore, the Lagrangian (\ref{e33}) is replaced by
1040: \begin{eqnarray}
1041: \label{e35}
1042: {\cal L}_{int}=\frac{-g}{2\cos\theta_{W}}\sum_{f}\left
1043: [Z_{1_{\mu}}\bar\Psi_{f}\gamma^{\mu}
1044: (V^{f}-A^{f}\gamma_{5} )\Psi_{f}
1045: +Z_{2_{\mu}}\bar\Psi_{f}\gamma^{\mu}
1046: (V^{f\,\prime}-A^{f\,\prime}\gamma_{5} )\Psi_{f}\right],
1047: \end{eqnarray}
1048: where
1049: \begin{eqnarray}
1050: \label{e36}
1051: V^{f}=g_{v}^{f}\cos\theta+\frac{g_{2}}{g_{1}}\,g_{v}^{f\,\prime}\,\sin\theta\
1052: ,\,\,A^{f}=g_{a}^{f}\cos\theta+\frac{g_{2}}{g_{1}}\,g_{a}^{f\,\prime}\,\sin\theta\,
1053: \end{eqnarray}
1054: and
1055: \begin{eqnarray}
1056: \label{e37}
1057: V^{f\,\prime}=\frac{g_{2}}{g_{1}}\,g_{v}^{f\,\prime}\,\cos\theta-g_{v}^{f}\,\sin\theta\
1058: ,\,\,A^{f\,\prime}=\frac{g_{2}}{g_{1}}\,g_{a}^{f\,\prime}\,\cos\theta
1059: -g_{a}^{f}\,\sin\theta\,
1060: \end{eqnarray}
1061: with $g_{2}=g_{1}\sqrt{(5/3)\,\sin^{2}\theta_{W}\,\lambda}\simeq
1062: g_{1}\cdot 0.62\sqrt{\lambda}$, $\lambda\sim {\cal O}$(1) [27].
1063: We use the LEP measured value $\sin^{2}\theta_{W}(\overline{MS})$=0.23117 [18].
1064:
1065: The decays of $Z_{2}$ are the promising place to search for
1066: CP-even light Higgs-boson $h$. Here, the effects of heavy quarks
1067: cannot be neglected. As a result, there exist an effective
1068: $h$-gluon-gluon interaction which arises from the triangle
1069: diagram with a heavy quark loop and does not decouple in the
1070: limit of large quark masses. One can separate out the heavy
1071: quark contribution and use an effective low-energy theorem [28-30]
1072: for Higgs boson interactions. In the limit $M_{Z_{2}}\gg m_{h}$
1073: ($m_{h}\sim {\cal O}$(100 GeV), $M_{Z_{2}}$ is the mass of $Z_{2}$)
1074: when $h$ is a constant field, the interactions of $h$ is
1075: reproduced by rescaling all the mass terms $m_{j}=m_{j}(1+h/v)$,
1076: $j$= quarks, W, $Z, Z^{\prime}$,..., and $\alpha_{s}\rightarrow
1077: \alpha_{s}+\delta\alpha_{s}$ with
1078: $\delta\alpha_{s}=\alpha_{s}^2\,h/(3\,\pi\,v)$ [28-30].
1079: Here, the number of heavy quarks is restricted by one, that is only
1080: top quark loop will be involved into the game.
1081: The interaction Lagrangian looks like:
1082: \begin{eqnarray}
1083: \label{e38}
1084: {\cal L}_{int}=(1+h/v)\rho_{ht}\,m_{t}\,\bar{t}t+
1085: \frac{\alpha_{s}\,\rho_{ht}}{12\,\pi\,v}\,h\,G_{\mu\nu}\,G^{\mu\nu}\cr
1086: -(1+h/v)^2 \left (m_{W}^2
1087: W_{\mu}^{+}W^{\mu\-}+\frac{1}{2} m_{Z}^2 Z_{\mu}Z^{\mu} +
1088: \frac{1}{2} M_{Z^{\prime}}^2 Z_{\mu}^{\prime} Z^{\mu\,\prime}\right ) \,,
1089: \end{eqnarray}
1090: where $G_{\mu\nu}$ is the standard gluon field strength tensor
1091: and $hgg$ interactions are induced by the top-quark loop.
1092:
1093: If the
1094: mass of $h$ Higgs boson is low enough for the decay
1095: $Z_{2}\rightarrow Z_{1} h\rightarrow\bar{l}l h$ so as to be kinematically allowed, the
1096: Tevatron bounds on this transition could severely
1097: constrain the structure of $h$-couplings.
1098: The relative differential distribution of the decay width
1099: $\Gamma (Z_{2}\rightarrow\bar{l}l h)$ over the dimensionless
1100: variable $x=(p_{l}+p_{\bar{l}})^2/M_{Z_{2}}^2$ ($p_{l}$ and $p_{\bar{l}}$
1101: are the momenta of a lepton and antilepton, respectively) is given by
1102: \begin{eqnarray}
1103: \label{e39}
1104: R_{\bar{l}lh}(x)\equiv\frac{1}{\Gamma (Z_{2}\rightarrow\bar{l}l)}
1105: \frac{d\,\Gamma (Z_{2}\rightarrow\bar{l}l h)}{d x}\cr
1106: =\frac{g^2\,V^{\prime}\,V\,M_{Z_{2}}^2\,\rho_{ht}^2}{4\,\cos^{2}\theta_{W}\,
1107: \bar{V^{\prime}}\,24\,\pi^2\,v^2\,x}\left [(1-a_{h})^2+x^2-
1108: 2\,x (1+a_{h})\right ]^{\frac{1}{2}}\cr
1109: \times\left (1-\frac{4}{x}a_{l}\right )^{\frac{1}{2}}\,
1110: \left (1+\frac{2}{x}a_{l}\right
1111: )\,\frac{(1-a_{h})^2+x^2+2\,x\,(2-a_{h})}{(1-x)^2+c^2}\, ,
1112: \end{eqnarray}
1113: where
1114: $V^{\prime}=0.62\,\lambda^{1/2}-\theta\,g_{v}$,
1115: $V=g_{v}+0.62\,\lambda^{1/2}\,\theta$ [27],
1116: $\bar{V^{\prime}}=(\sqrt{3}/2)\,(1-4\,\sin^{2}\theta_{W})^{1/2}$
1117: [31], $a_{j}=(m_{j}/M_{Z_{2}})^{2}$ with $j= l, h$;
1118: $c=\Gamma_{Z_{2}}/M_{Z_{2}}$.
1119: To get $\bar{V^{\prime}}$ we have taken into account the same
1120: normalization for the $Z_{2}$-lepton couplings as the usual one
1121: for the $Z$-lepton interplay within the SM. In the formula (\ref{e39}),
1122: the Drell-Yan
1123: process $\bar{p}p\rightarrow Z_{2}\rightarrow\bar{l}l$
1124: is used as normalization. For numerical
1125: estimations, we used the parameters determined by electroweak
1126: data analysis [27] with pure vector couplings of $Z_{2}$.
1127: One would expect the amplitude for the process
1128: $\bar{p}p\rightarrow Z_{2}\rightarrow\bar{l}l h$ to be enhanced
1129: by the factor $\rho_{ht}^2\,V^{\prime}\,V$ with respect to the
1130: standard model prediction.
1131: The calculated results of the decay width for
1132: $Z_{2}\rightarrow \mu^{+}\mu^{-} h$ calculations
1133: normalized to
1134: $Z_{2}\rightarrow \mu^{+}\mu^{-} $ are given in Fig. 8
1135: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1136: \begin{center}
1137: \begin{figure}[h]
1138: \resizebox{14cm}{!}{\includegraphics{5s.eps}}
1139:
1140: Fig. 8 The $x=(p_{l}+p_{\bar{l}})^2/M_{Z_{2}}^2$ distribution
1141: of $R_{\mu^{+}\mu^{-} h}$ in the decay $Z_{2}\rightarrow \mu^{+}\mu^{-} h$
1142: for $M_{Z_{2}}$= 0.3 TeV, 0.5 TeV, 0.8 TeV and 1 TeV.
1143: \end{figure}
1144: \end{center}
1145: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1146: We used the typical value for the mixing angle $\theta$=-0.02 for
1147: a reasonable approximation $\sin\theta\simeq\theta$ and the trial
1148: value $c$=0.02 for the ratio $\Gamma_{Z_{2}}/M_{Z_{2}}$ [27].
1149: Note that the changing of the parameters $\theta$ and $c$ in the
1150: window of allowed electroweak parameters [27],
1151: does not lead to the visible new effects with respect to the
1152: estimation done in Fig. 8.
1153:
1154: \section{Conclusion}
1155: To summarize, we have demonstrated that the
1156: bounds on the scale of quark-lepton compositeness
1157: %derived from
1158: %the data taken at the Tevatron (CDF analysis) and the once applied
1159: %to $Z^{\prime}$ boson masses
1160: and the $Z^{\prime}$ boson mass in the extended $SU(2)_{h}\times SU(2)_{l}$
1161: model which are derived from the data taken at the Tevatron (CDF analysis)
1162: %within the models
1163: %of the extended $SU(2)_{h}\times SU(2)_{l}$
1164: %interactions
1165: can be combined to constrain the upper
1166: limit of the masses of mass-eigenstates $\tilde{t_{1}}$ and
1167: $\tilde{t_{2}}$ and thus can be used to sensitively probe radiative corrections
1168: to the MSSM Higgs sector. Comparison of experimentally
1169: measured radiative corrections combined into $\Delta$ with its
1170: calculations can give a precise estimation of the lower bound
1171: on the $h$ - (as well as $A$-) Higgs boson masses.
1172: The analysis of the scale
1173: $\Lambda$ as well as the precise measurement of the lower bound
1174: on the $Z^{\prime}$ boson mass at the Tevatron Run II can probe
1175: the CP-violating mixing between two heavy neutral
1176: CP-eigenstates $H$ and $A$,
1177: and as a consequence, the nonminimality of the MSSM Higgs
1178: sector. It is expected that the Tevatron Run II experiments will be able
1179: to exclude $Z^{\prime}$ bosons with masses up to 750 GeV. This
1180: leads to the restriction of the model scale parameter like $x=u^2/v^2$
1181: which would grow.
1182: Note that recent experimental limits on $W^{\prime}_{LR}$ and
1183: $Z^{\prime}_{LR}$ gauge bosons in the canonical left-right
1184: symmetric model [32] require that their mass be higher than
1185: about 800 GeV.
1186: An important question is whether the
1187: forthcoming data at the Tevatron Run II at $\sqrt s$=2 TeV will
1188: progress far enough to determine the lower bounds on the
1189: $\Lambda$-scale and the $Z^{\prime}$ boson mass within
1190: the models considered in this work.\\
1191: A large decay width $h\rightarrow gg$ arises due to a sum of
1192: one-loop intermediate heavy quark states largely decaying into
1193: two gluons (a new interaction of the $h$-Higgs boson is extended only
1194: on the third family). The $h\rightarrow \bar{b}b $ channel
1195: will
1196: be diminished, otherwise it must have already been established
1197: at the Tevatron. The $\bar{l}l$ mode via a gluon fusion may be
1198: significantly enhanced in MSSM. Thus, this mode is a very
1199: promising channel to discover CP-odd Higgs boson $A$.
1200: Discovery region for the $\tau^{+}\tau^{-}$ mode might be enlarged
1201: as well as
1202: the $\mu^{+}\mu^{-}$ channel, if a precise
1203: reconstruction of the mass of the $A$ -Higgs bosons is available. The detection modes
1204: $A\rightarrow\gamma\gamma h$ and $A\rightarrow ggh$
1205: may be good channels for discovery of two Higgs bosons predicted
1206: in the MSSM.\\
1207: From the above consideration, we note that the Tevatron Run II
1208: can catch an evidence of Higgs bosons ($h$/$H$ and/or $A$) whose dominant
1209: final states could be
1210: gluon jets and/or pairs of $\tau^{+}\tau^{-}$ or
1211: $\mu^{+}\mu^{-}$ instead of $\bar{b}b$.
1212:
1213:
1214:
1215: We thank G. Arabidze for help in numerical calculations.
1216:
1217: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
1218: \bibitem{1}
1219: The LEP Higgs Working Group, R. Bock et al., CERN-EP-2000-055
1220: and LEP experiments, ALEPH 2000-28, DELPHI 2000-050, L3-Note
1221: 2525, OPAL TN 646.
1222: \bibitem{2}
1223: CDF Collaboration, F. Abe et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 79},
1224: 2198 (1997).
1225: \bibitem{3}
1226: J.L. Hewett and T. Rizzo, Phys. Rep. {\bf 183}, 193 (1989).
1227: \bibitem{4}
1228: C.T. Hill, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 266}, 419 (1991).
1229: \bibitem{5}
1230: R.S. Chivukula, E.H. Simmons, J. Terning, Phys. Lett. B {\bf
1231: 331}, 383 (1994).
1232: \bibitem{6}
1233: C.T. Hill, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 345}, 483 (1995).
1234: \bibitem{7}
1235: R.S. Chivukula, A.G. Cohen and E.H. Simmons, Phys. Lett. B {\bf
1236: 380}, 92 (1996).
1237: \bibitem{8}
1238: E. Malkawi, T. Tait, C.-P. Yuan, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 385}, 304 (1996).
1239: \bibitem{9}
1240: K.R. Lynch, S. Mrenna, M. Narain and E.H. Simmons, Phys. Rev.
1241: D {\bf 63}, 035006 (2001).
1242: \bibitem{10}
1243: M. Carena, J.S. Conway, H.E. Haber, J.D. Hobbs et al., "Report of the
1244: Tevatron Higgs Working Group", hep-ph/0010338.
1245: \bibitem{11}
1246: K. Inoue et al., Prog. Theor. Phys. {\bf 67}, 1889 (1982).
1247: \bibitem{12}
1248: H. Georgi, E.E. Jenkins and E.H. Simmons, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf
1249: 62}, 2789 (1989) and Erratum Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 63} 1540
1250: (1989) and Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 331}, 541 (1990).
1251: \bibitem{13}
1252: G.A. Kozlov, T. Morii, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 545}, 127 (2002).
1253: \bibitem{14}
1254: M.S. Berger, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 41}, 225 (1990).
1255: \bibitem{15}
1256: M.S. Berger, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 87}, 131801 (2001).
1257: \bibitem{16}
1258: J. Ellis, Invited talk given at 20th Int. Sym. on Lepton and
1259: Photon Interactins at High Energies, Rome, 2001 (and references
1260: therein), hep-ph/0110192.
1261: \bibitem{17}
1262: See e.g., A. Dedes and H.E. Haber, JHEP {\bf 0105}, 006 (2001).
1263: \bibitem{18}
1264: D.E. Groom et al. [Particle Data Group Collaboration], Eur. Phys. J. C {\bf 15},
1265: 1 (2000).
1266: \bibitem{19}
1267: J.F. Gunion and A. Turski, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 40}, 2325 (1989).
1268: \bibitem{20}
1269: Ll. Ametller, L. Bergstrom, A. Bramon, E. Masso, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 228} 301 (1983) .
1270: \bibitem{21}
1271: G.A. Kozlov, Int. Journ. Mod. Phys. A {\bf 7 }, 1935 (1992).
1272: \bibitem{22}
1273: J. Ellis, M.K. Gaillard, D.V. Nanopoulos, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf
1274: 106}, 292 (1976); J.F. Gunion, H.E. Haber, G.L. Kane, S. Dawson,
1275: The Higgs Hunter's Guide, SCIPP-89/13; L.B. Okun, Leptons and
1276: Quarks, Moscow, Nauka, 1989.
1277: \bibitem{23}
1278: H. Georgi, S.L. Glashow Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 32}, 438 (1974).
1279: \bibitem{24}
1280: H. Fritzsch, P. Minkowski, Ann. Phys. (NY) {\bf 93}, 193 (1975).
1281: \bibitem{25}
1282: G.A. Kozlov, IL Nuovo Cim. A {\bf 112}, 1103 (1999).
1283: \bibitem{26}
1284: G.A. Kozlov, Phys. of Atom. Nucl. {\bf 63}, 2197 (2000).
1285: \bibitem{27}
1286: V. Barger, K. Cheung and P. Langacker, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 381}, 226 (1996).
1287: \bibitem{28}
1288: A.I. Vainshtein, M.B. Voloshin, V.I. Zakharov and M.A. Shifman,
1289: Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. {\bf 30}, 711 (1979).
1290: \bibitem{29}
1291: A.I. Vainshtein, V.I. Zakharov and M.A. Shifman,
1292: Sov. Phys. Usp. {\bf 23}, 429 (1980).
1293: \bibitem{30}
1294: M.B. Voloshin, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. {\bf 44}, 478 (1986).
1295: \bibitem{31}
1296: D. Gomez Dumm, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 411}, 313 (1997).
1297: \bibitem{32}
1298: K. Hagiwara et al., [Particle Data Group Collaboration] Phys. Rev. D {\bf 66},
1299: 010001 (2002).
1300:
1301: \end{thebibliography}
1302:
1303: \end{document}
1304: