1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: % INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS PUBLISHING %
3: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
4: %
5: \documentclass[10pt]{iopart}
6: % Uncomment next line if AMS fonts required
7: %\usepackage{iopams}
8:
9: \begin{document}
10: %\hfill {\normalsize Moscow preprint, SAGA-HE-194-02} \\
11: % \ \\
12: % \ \\
13: \title{Summary of Working Group 3}
14:
15: \author{A. L. Kataev \dag\ and S. Kumano\ddag}
16:
17: \address{\dag\ Institute for Nuclear Research of the Academy
18: of Sciences of Russia, 117312, Moscow, Russia}
19:
20: \address{\ddag\ Department of Physics, Saga University,
21: Saga, 840-8502, Japan}
22:
23:
24: \ead{kataev@ms2.inr.ac.ru,~kumanos@cc.saga-u.ac.jp}
25:
26:
27: \begin{abstract}
28: The parallel sessions of the working group 3 were devoted
29: to the discussions of short-baseline neutrino
30: physics program at neutrino factories.
31: First, possible studies of parton distribution
32: functions (PDFs), in particular nuclear and polarized PDFs,
33: are discussed in this summary.
34: Second, the extractions of $\alpha_s$ from sum rules and
35: structure functions of deep-inelastic neutrino-nucleon scattering,
36: higher-order perturbative QCD corrections and
37: estimates of high-twist effects are summarized.
38: Third, the situation of the observed NuTeV $\sin^2 \theta_W$
39: anomaly is discussed.
40: \end{abstract}
41:
42: %Uncomment for PACS numbers title message
43: %\pacs{00.00, 20.00, 42.10}
44:
45: % Uncomment for Submitted to journal title message
46: %\submitto{\JPA}
47:
48: % Comment out if separate title page not required
49: %\maketitle
50:
51: \section{Introduction}
52:
53: Neutrino reactions played an important role in investigations
54: of hadron structure and determinations
55: of basic QCD and electroweak (EW) parameters.
56: Recently, the feasibility of constructing future neutrino factories
57: with intense neutrino beams was investigated in Europe, Japan and US.
58: In particular, proton and deuteron targets will become
59: available at these factories, so that the actual nucleon structure
60: can be investigated together with the detailed studies of
61: nuclear corrections.
62:
63: In analyzing the neutrino-reaction processes, it is essential
64: to use accurate parton distribution functions (PDFs) in the nucleon.
65: The current status of art was summarized by Stirling \cite{Stirling}
66: in his plenary talk at this workshop.
67: It was explained that different PDF sets are constructed
68: from available experimental data including the data for structure
69: functions in unpolarized and polarized deep-inelastic scattering (DIS).
70: Due to the existence of various experimental data
71: in the wide region of $x$, the unpolarized PDFs are now well determined
72: from very small $x$ to relatively large $x$.
73: However, the situation of the polarized PDFs and nuclear PDFs is,
74: in particular, worse than the one of the unpolarized PDFs.
75: It should be stressed that these studies are really important
76: not only for fundamental understanding
77: of hadron structure but also for applications
78: to the reactions with heavy-ions and neutrinos.
79: In the first part of working group 3 (WG3) parallel sessions,
80: we try to understand the present situation of the nuclear
81: and polarized PDFs, and then possible studies at the neutrino
82: factories are discussed.
83:
84: The physics of various neutrino-induced unpolarized processes
85: was also discussed at this workshop.
86: Because of planned huge statistics of unpolarized $\nu N$ data
87: with relatively low $Q^2$ at the neutrino factories,
88: it is becoming more realistic to investigate
89: non-perturbative $1/Q^2$ corrections to
90: Bjorken unpolarized and Gross-Llewellyn Smith sum rules,
91: and their comparison with available theoretical estimates.
92: These phenomenological investigations are closely related
93: to the problem of correlations between high-twist effects
94: and the values of QCD coupling constant $\alpha_s$, which is
95: extracted from experimental data in different orders of
96: perturbation theory. The related experiments at the neutrino factories
97: can put investigations of the role of twist-4 corrections
98: and determinations of $\alpha_s$-values
99: from $\nu N$ DIS characteristics on more solid ground.
100:
101: More detailed studies of neutrino-induced processes can be also important
102: for checking the predictions of the standard EW model and independent
103: extractions of its parameters. A typical example is the recent
104: NuTeV work of Ref.~\cite{Zeller:2001hh}, which reported that
105: the extracted $\sin^2\theta_W$ value
106: from the ratios of neutral current to charged
107: current DIS cross-sections is in over $3\sigma$ deviation
108: from the result of LEP EW Working Group (LEPEWWG).
109: Clearly, this intriguing situation is waiting its explanation.
110:
111: We summarize the presentations during the first two days of the WG3
112: parallel sessions.
113: The discussions of nuclear and polarized PDFs are reported in Sec.$\,$2.
114: The DIS sum rules, higher-twists, extractions of $\alpha_s$, modified
115: GRV98 leading-order unpolarized PDFs and the status
116: of NuTeV anomaly are discussed in Sec.$\,$3.
117: Low-energy neutrino physics was discussed at the joined sessions
118: with the working group 2 on the third day, and this part
119: is included in the summary of the working group 2 \cite{McFarland}.
120:
121: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
122: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
123:
124: \section{Parton distribution functions}
125:
126: The first day of the WG3 parallel sessions
127: was focused on discussions of the nuclear and polarized PDFs.
128: Note that there are extensive reports on structure functions
129: and PDFs at future neutrino factories by M. L. Mangano {\it et. al.}
130: \cite{Mangano:2001mj,forte} and C. Albright {\it et. al.} \cite{Albright} ,
131: so that the reader may look at these reports for introduction.
132:
133: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
134: \subsection{Nuclear PDFs}
135:
136: There were three talks on the nuclear PDFs by
137: J. G. Morfin, C. A. Salgado, and S. Kumano. It is known that nuclear
138: effects modify the PDFs in the nucleon.
139: This topic has been investigated since the discovery of the EMC effect
140: for the structure functions $F_2$ in muon scattering.
141: However, due to the lack of accurate deuteron data,
142: nuclear effects are not seriously investigated
143: in neutrino-nucleus scattering. If a neutrino factory is built,
144: as discussed in this workshop, it could play an important role in
145: determining accurate nuclear PDFs. The studies are valuable for
146: high-energy nuclear structure physics, application to heavy-ion
147: phenomena, and also neutrino oscillation physics.
148:
149: The nuclear PDFs have been investigated in the leading order
150: by many people; however, the first serious parameterization was
151: reported by Eskola, Kolhinen, Ruuskanen, and Salgado (EKRS) \cite{ekrs}.
152: In the EKRS set, the $x$ region is divided into three parts.
153: In the large $x$ region, the $F_2$ data fix valence-quark behavior
154: but sea-quark and gluon distributions are not determined.
155: In the medium $x$ region, the $F_2$ and Drell-Yan data constrain both
156: the valence and sea distributions. At small $x$,
157: they can determine the sea-quark distributions form the $F_2$ data,
158: and the valence distributions are constrained by the baryon number.
159: Certain $x$ dependent functional forms are assumed in these three regions,
160: and they are determined so as to agree with the $F_2$ and Drell-Yan (DY) data.
161:
162: The PDFs in the nucleon have been obtained by $\chi^2$ analyses of various
163: high-energy reaction data. Unfortunately, such a technique
164: was not developed for the nuclear PDFs until recently. The studies
165: of Ref. \cite{saga01} are intended to create a simple $\chi^2$ method.
166: Used data set was limited to $F_2^A/F_2^D$, so that the obtained distributions
167: are rather different from those of the EKRS analysis.
168: In particular, the small-$x$ valence-quark and medium-$x$ antiquark
169: distributions are very different because the DY data are not included.
170: After the publication, the analysis has been extended
171: by including the DY data,
172: and the preliminary results show a similar $x$ dependent form to the EKRS
173: except
174: for the gluon distribution at medium $x$. At this stage, it is not possible
175: to fix the gluon distribution in such an $x$ region in any case.
176:
177: These nuclear PDF analyses will not be developed significantly without
178: new experimental data. As a new neutrino facility, the Fermilab-NuMI project
179: was explained by J. G. Morfin \cite{morfin}.
180: The unpolarized cross section for neutrino scattering is expressed
181: in term of three structure functions $F_1$, $F_2$, and $F_3$:
182: \begin{equation}
183: \label{cross}
184: \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \!
185: \frac{d^2\sigma}{dx dy} = \frac{G_F^2 s}{2\pi(1+Q^2/M_W^2)^2} \,
186: \bigg [ (1-y) F_2 + y^2 xF_1 \pm y (1-y/2) xF_3 \bigg ] ,
187: \end{equation}
188: where $+$ and $-$ of $\pm$ indicate neutrino and antineutrino reactions,
189: respectively.
190: The facility provides an extremely intense neutrino beam, and it
191: is ideal for high statistics neutrino-nucleon/nucleus experiments.
192: Among many physics topics at the NuMI facility,
193: it is a unique opportunity for investigating the nuclear PDFs, particularly,
194: the nuclear modification of the valence-quark distributions
195: through the structure function $F_3$:
196: \begin{equation}
197: \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \!
198: \frac{1}{4} \, [ \, F_3^{\nu (p+n)} + F_3^{\bar \nu (p+n)} \, ]
199: = u_v+d_v + (s - \bar s) + (c - \bar c)
200: \approx u_v+d_v
201: \ .
202: \end{equation}
203: It is predicted by the
204: parameterizations and some model studies, for example, by S. A. Kulagin
205: \cite{kulagin} that the valence shadowing is in general different
206: from the antiquark one. In the first stage of NuMI, carbon, iron,
207: and lead targets are installed, then the ratios $Fe/C$ and $Pb/C$
208: are obtained typically within a few percent
209: statistical errors by the three-year MINOS run.
210: In the subsequent stage, $LH_2$ and $LD_2$ targets are prepared to
211: measure proton and deuteron structure functions. Then, the ratios
212: to the deuteron ($A/D$) will be obtained to find the nuclear effects.
213: This topic will be also investigated eventually at the neutrino
214: factories. There are other interesting aims of the NuMI project,
215: namely studies of quasi-elastics
216: scattering, $\sin^2 \theta_W$ issue, polarized strange-quark and charm
217: quark distributions \cite{morfin}.
218:
219:
220: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
221: \subsection{Polarized PDFs}
222:
223: The details of the polarized PDFs are not known to the same extent
224: that they are understood in the unpolarized PDFs.
225: The reason is that a variety of data are not yet
226: available. The data come from inclusive and semi-inclusive electron or muon
227: scattering from the polarized proton, deuteron, and $^3$He.
228: However, they are not enough to determine the details
229: of unpolarized PDFs, such as the polarized gluon distribution and
230: $x$-dependent shape of antiquark distributions.
231: Nevertheless, in the case of polarized PDFs,
232: the situation is better than the one for the nuclear PDF studies.
233: Indeed, there are
234: on-going polarized experiments such as RHIC and COMPASS. Moreover,
235: several active groups for the global $\chi^2$ analysis are working
236: in this area.
237:
238: The results of recent global analyses of polarized data
239: were reported at this workshop by J. Bl\"umlein, E. Leader,
240: and M. Hirai. The techniques of their analysis are almost the same.
241: Bl\"umlein and B\"ottcher (BB) \cite{bb02}, Leader, Sidorov,
242: and Stamenov (LSS) \cite{lss02}, and Asymmetry Analysis Collaboration (AAC)
243: \cite{aac} have slightly different initial distributions:
244: \begin{eqnarray}
245: \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \!
246: x \Delta f_i(x, Q^2_0) & = \eta_i \, A_i \, x^{a_i} \,
247: (1-x)^{b_i} \, (1 + \gamma_i \, x + \rho_i \sqrt{x})
248: & \ \ \ \textstyle{\rm {in \ BB}},
249: \nonumber \\
250: \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \!
251: \Delta f_i(x, Q^2_0) & = \eta_i \, A_i \, x^{a_i} \, f_i(x, Q^2_0)
252: & \ \ \ \textstyle{\rm {in \ LSS}},
253: \label{eqn:initial}
254: \\
255: \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \!
256: \Delta f_i(x, Q^2_0) & = A_i \, x^{\alpha_i} \,
257: (1 + \gamma_i \, x^{\lambda_i} ) \, f_i(x, Q^2_0)
258: & \ \ \ \textstyle{\rm {in \ AAC}}.
259: \nonumber
260: \end{eqnarray}
261: Here, $f_i$ is the corresponding unpolarized distribution in the nucleon.
262: There are also other recent studies on the polarized PDFs \cite{recent0102}.
263: These distributions are evolved to the experimental $Q^2$ points of
264: the spin asymmetry $A_1$ or $g_1$. Then, the parameters
265: in Eq. (\ref{eqn:initial}) are determined so as
266: to minimize the $\chi^2$ value.
267: In the updated analysis of the LSS, the SLAC-E155 data are included
268: by taking care of the positivity constraint and using updated
269: values for the axial charges $a_3$ and $a_8$.
270: It is important that the BB analysis demonstrated error bands for
271: the polarized PDFs, so that the uncertainties of the present
272: distributions become clear. In particular, the error band is very
273: large for the polarized gluon distribution, which should be determined
274: more precisely by future measurements.
275: An error analysis was also made by AAC. The AAC error bands show similar
276: tendency; however, the details are different due to the different
277: choice of the functional form.
278: For example, the gluon error is larger for AAC than the one for BB.
279:
280: Possibilities of determining the polarized strange-quark distribution
281: in neutrino reactions were discussed by K. Sudoh, and
282: charmed meson detectors
283: were discussed by P. J. M. Soler.
284: Semi-inclusive $D$ and $\bar D$ production cross sections were investigated
285: in polarized neutrino-proton reactions \cite{sudoh}. Four different
286: parameterizations, AAC, BB, GRSV, and LSS, are used for calculating
287: the polarization asymmetry. Because a charm quark is produced partially
288: from a strange quark in the nucleon, the studies indicate that the polarized
289: strange-quark distribution could be measured by these reactions.
290: Experimentally, silicon detectors have been developed by the NOMAD-STAR
291: group \cite{soler} for the charm identification in neutrino reactions,
292: and it was installed inside the NOMAD experiment.
293: From about 11,500 $\nu_\mu$ charged-current events, 45 charmed mesons were
294: obtained. The studies indicate that the silicon detectors could be
295: used at the future neutrino factories for identifying the charmed mesons,
296: so that they could contribute significantly to the PDF studies.
297:
298: The situation of the HERMES experiment and possible
299: neutrino experiments were presented by T.-A. Shibata.
300: Near-future polarized experiments were discussed by N. Saito.
301: The HERMES experiments measured semi-inclusive hadron production
302: cross sections in polarized electron-nucleon scattering,
303: and the data enabled them to investigate flavor decomposition
304: of the polarized PDFs \cite{shibata}. Furthermore, the single
305: spin azimuthal asymmetry measurements indicated chiral-odd distributions.
306: From his experience of these experiments, he suggested that
307: a future neutrino factory should have detectors with good particle
308: identification in the final state for precise determination
309: of the polarized PDFs.
310: Next, N. Saito explained the present and near-future experiments to
311: study the polarized PDFs \cite{saito}. The present data are mainly taken
312: for the inclusive structure function $g_1$ and some semi-inclusive
313: reactions, so that they provide us a limited information
314: for the gluon polarization. However, since
315: RHIC, HERMES, COMPASS, and TESLA-N projects intend to measure
316: $\Delta g(x)/g(x)$ accurately, the situation should become clear
317: in the near future.
318: In particular, he demonstrated that the RHIC $\Delta g$
319: measurements provide a strong constraint for the gluon polarization.
320: Indeed, after including virtual RHIC data in the global fit,
321: the $\Delta g$ error becomes significantly smaller.
322: In addition, the $W$ production measurements
323: should provide a constraint for the polarized antiquark distributions.
324:
325: As for the polarized PDFs and structure functions at the neutrino factories,
326: there were discussions by E. Leader and G. Ridolfi.
327: There are extensive studies of polarized structure functions and polarized
328: PDFs, which could be obtained from
329: the possible European neutrino factory \cite{Mangano:2001mj,forte}.
330: In addition to the polarized structure functions
331: $g_1$ and $g_2$ in electron or muon scattering, there are new
332: ones, namely $g_3$, $g_4$, and $g_5$, in polarized neutrino
333: scattering. In should be noted, however, that
334: there are different definitions for these functions among researchers,
335: and they are summarized in Ref. \cite{g345}.
336: In the convention of Refs. \cite{Mangano:2001mj,forte,g345}, $g_4$ and $g_5$
337: are related by $g_4=2x g_5$ in the leading order.
338: Neglecting the $g_2$ and $g_3$ terms by taking the high-energy limit,
339: we have \cite{Mangano:2001mj,forte}
340: \begin{equation}
341: \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \!
342: \frac{d^2\Delta\sigma^{\lambda_\ell}}{dx \, dy}
343: = {G^2_F \over \pi (1+Q^2/m_W^2)^2}{Q^2\over xy}
344: [ -\lambda_\ell\, y (2-y) x g_1- (1-y) g_4- y^2 x g_5 ] ,
345: \end{equation}
346: where $\lambda_\ell$ is the lepton helicity, and
347: $\Delta\sigma$ is the difference between the polarized
348: cross sections: $\Delta\sigma= \sigma_{\lambda_p=-1}-\sigma_{\lambda_p=+1}$
349: with the proton helicity $\lambda_p$.
350:
351: The charged-current structure functions $g_1$ and $g_5$ are expressed in term
352: of the polarized PDFs in the leading order:
353: \begin{eqnarray}
354: \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \!
355: & g_1^{W^+} = \Delta\bar u + \Delta d + \Delta s + \Delta\bar c,
356: \ \ \ \
357: & g_1^{W^-} = \Delta u +\Delta\bar d + \Delta\bar s + \Delta c,
358: \nonumber \\
359: \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \!
360: & g_5^{W^+} = \Delta\bar u - \Delta d -\Delta s +\Delta \bar c,
361: \ \ \ \
362: & g_5^{W^-} = -\Delta u + \Delta \bar d + \Delta \bar s - \Delta c .
363: \end{eqnarray}
364: A combination of the $g_1$ structure functions becomes
365: the flavor singlet distribution:
366: \begin{eqnarray}
367: \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \!
368: & \Delta\Sigma (x) & = (g_1^{W^+ +W^-})_p=(g_1^{W^+ +W^-})_n
369: \nonumber \\
370: & & =\Delta u+\Delta\bar u +\Delta d+\Delta\bar d
371: +\Delta s+\Delta\bar s +\Delta c+\Delta\bar c ,
372: \label{eqn:ds}
373: \end{eqnarray}
374: where isospin symmetry is used for the distributions in the neutron.
375: It is especially important that the spin content
376: $\Delta\Sigma = \int dx \Delta\Sigma (x)$ is found directly.
377: In the present situation, the spin content is determined
378: by the $\chi^2$ analysis of electron and muon scattering data
379: together with the first moments $\int dx \Delta u_v$ and
380: $\int dx \Delta d_v$, which are fixed by semi-leptonic decay data.
381: According to Eq. (\ref{eqn:ds}), we do not have to rely on such
382: low-energy data.
383: As noticed in Ref. \cite{aac}, the accurate determination
384: of $\Delta \Sigma$ is not possible at this stage because
385: the polarized antiquark distribution $\Delta \bar q(x)$ cannot
386: be determined at small $x$ from the present data.
387: The neutrino reactions should provide valuable information
388: on the spin content. Combining these structure functions,
389: we obtain, for example,
390: \begin{eqnarray}
391: \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \!
392: \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \!
393: & (g_5^{W^+ +W^-})_p=(g_5^{W^+ +W^-})_n
394: = -\Delta u+\Delta\bar u -\Delta d + \Delta\bar d
395: -\Delta s+\Delta\bar s -\Delta c+\Delta\bar c,
396: \nonumber\\
397: \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \!
398: \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \!
399: & (g_5^{W^+ -W^-})_p+(g_5^{W^+ -W^-})_n
400: = -2 \, (\Delta s+\Delta\bar s) + 2 \, (\Delta c + \Delta\bar c) ,
401: \\
402: \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \!
403: \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \!
404: & (g_1^{W^+ -W^-})_p+(g_1^{W^+ -W^-})_n
405: = 2 \, (\Delta s-\Delta\bar s) - 2 \, (\Delta c - \Delta\bar c) .
406: \nonumber
407: \end{eqnarray}
408: Therefore, the first $g_5$ combination is especially useful for determining
409: the polarized valence-quark distributions. Furthermore, the second $g_5$
410: combination indicates the polarized strange- and charm-quark distributions.
411: If the $g_1$ data are accurate enough, it could be possible to
412: find the difference between $\Delta s$ and $\Delta \bar s$.
413: The feasibility of measuring these structure functions $g_1$ and $g_5$
414: was investigated for the European neutrino factory in Ref. \cite{forte},
415: and possible errors are estimated in the region $x>0.1$.
416: In particular, G. Ridolfi showed in his talk
417: that the first moments of C-even distributions
418: ($\Delta q+\Delta \bar q$) could be improved by an order of magnitude
419: in comparison with the present uncertainties, whereas those of C-odd
420: distributions
421: ($\Delta u-\Delta \bar u$, $\Delta d-\Delta \bar d$) are determined
422: at the level of a few percent.
423: In this way, measurements of $g_1$ and $g_5$ should provide
424: important information for the polarized PDFs.
425:
426: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
427: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
428:
429:
430: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
431: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
432: \section{Unpolarized deep-inelastic scattering}
433: The second part of the WG3 sessions was devoted to
434: the discussions of the physical information, which can be obtained
435: from theoretical and experimental considerations of characteristics of
436: unpolarized DIS. These characteristics are
437: related to the differential cross-sections in Eq. (\ref{cross})
438: where $0\leq x\leq 1$, $y=E_{had}/E_{\nu}$, and
439: $0\leq y\leq 1/(1+\frac{xM_W}{2E_{\nu}})$.
440: Because of the large variation of $y$ at the neutrino factories
441: \cite{Mangano:2001mj}, it is possible to extract
442: not only the standard structure functions (SFs) $F_2^{\nu N}$ and
443: $xF_3^{\nu N}$ but also $F_1^{\nu N}$ from the cross-sections
444: of Eq. (\ref{cross}). This procedure might allow us to push ahead new
445: QCD studies, which aim at a direct analysis of
446: scaling violation in $F_1^{\nu N}$ SF data.
447: Moreover, in addition to two well-known sum rules of $\nu N$ DIS,
448: namely to the Adler sum rule
449: \begin{equation}
450: \label{A}
451: \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \!
452: I_{F_2}=
453: \int_0^1 \frac{dx}{x}\bigg[F_2^{\nu n}(x,Q^2)-
454: F_2^{\nu p}(x,Q^2)\bigg]= 2
455: \end{equation}
456: and the Gross--Llewellyn Smith sum rule
457: \begin{equation}
458: \label{GLS}
459: \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \!
460: I_{F_3}=
461: \frac{1}{2}\int_0^1\bigg[F_3^{\nu n}(x,Q^2)
462: +F_3^{\nu p}(x,Q^2)\bigg] = 1 -\frac{\alpha_s}{\pi}-...+
463: O\bigg(\frac{1}{Q^2}\bigg) \ ,
464: \end{equation}
465: it will also be possible to verify
466: the Bjorken unpolarized sum rule
467: \begin{equation}
468: \label{Bju}
469: \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \!
470: I_{F_1}=
471: \int_0^{1}dx\bigg[F_1^{\nu n}(x,Q^2)-F_1^{\nu p}(x,Q^2)\bigg]=1-
472: \frac{2}{3}\frac{\alpha_s}{\pi}-....+O\bigg(\frac{1}{Q^2}\bigg) ~.
473: \end{equation}
474: Note that, contrary to the exact theoretical
475: expression for Eq. (\ref{A}), the integrals $I_{F_3}$ and $I_{F_1}$
476: contain
477: perturbative QCD corrections, calculated explicitly in
478: the $\overline{MS}$-scheme up to order
479: $\alpha_s^3$ in Refs.\cite{Larin:tj} and \cite{Larin:1990zw}
480: respectively and estimated by different ways at the $\alpha_s^4$
481: level (see Refs.\cite{Kataev:1995vh,Samuel:1995jc,Broadhurst:2002bi}).
482: Therefore, experimental measurements of these DIS sum rules can
483: provide useful information on the value of the QCD coupling constant
484: $\alpha_s$. Moreover, while the existing sets of data for
485: the $xF_3$ SF, including the most precise published
486: one provided by the CCFR collaboration
487: \cite{Seligman:mc}, were already used for the extraction
488: of $I_{F_3}$ at different
489: $Q^2$ bins \cite{Kim:1998ki} (see Ref. \cite{Kataev:1994rj}
490: for the discussion of the $Q^2$ behavior
491: of $I_{F_3}$, extracted from previous CCFR data),
492: new experiments at the neutrino factories can give the possibility of
493: the first measurement of the $I_{F_1}$ sum rule.
494: It is interesting from the point of view of an independent determination
495: of $\alpha_s$ (see Ref. \cite{Mangano:2001mj}). This problem was
496: discussed at this workshop in the talk of Ref. \cite{Alekhin:2002pj}.
497:
498: It should be stressed that theoretical $\alpha_s$ ambiguities,
499: which result from the comparison of the QCD predictions
500: with DIS experimental data,
501: and with the sum rules $I_{F_3}$ and $I_{F_1}$ in particular,
502: are related to the uncertainties in the
503: non-perturbative twist-4 corrections. They manifest themselves as
504: the $O(1/Q^2)$-contributions to the corresponding theoretical
505: predictions. In the case of the mentioned sum rules, the twist-4
506: model-independent
507: matrix elements are known \cite{Shuryak:1981kj}.
508: The problem of getting concrete
509: numbers for these matrix elements was discussed in detail in the
510: talk of Weiss \cite{Weiss}. He presented the preliminary
511: calculations of twist-4 contributions to $I_{F_3}$
512: and $I_{F_1}$ within the framework
513: of the instanton-vacuum model, developed
514: in Ref. \cite{Diakonov:1983hh}.
515: In the case of $I_{F_3}$, the reported estimates
516: turned out
517: to be in good agreement with the ones obtained in Ref.\cite{Braun:1986ty}
518: with the help of three-point function QCD sum rules.
519: Within
520: existing theoretical uncertainties, this result of
521: Ref. \cite{Braun:1986ty} is supported by the independent
522: three-point function QCD sum rule analysis of Ref. \cite{Ross:1993gb}.
523: In the case of another twist-4 operator, which contributes
524: to $I_{F_1}$, the estimate reported by Weiss also confirmed
525: the results of Ref. \cite{Braun:1986ty} obtained with the help of
526: three-point function QCD sum rules.
527: As demonstrated in Ref. \cite{Alekhin:2002pj}, the errors
528: of the twist-4 contribution to $I_{F_1}$
529: are playing the dominant role in the uncertainties of
530: $\alpha_s(M_Z)$, extracted from the $Q^2$-behavior of
531: this sum rule with the next-to-leading order (NLO) PDF set of
532: Ref. \cite{Alekhin:2000ch}. Indeed, in the process of normalizing the
533: theoretical
534: expression for $I_{F_1}$ to $Q^2=4$ GeV$^2$
535: and $Q^2=10$ GeV$^2$, the authors of Ref. \cite{Alekhin:2002pj} obtained
536: $\Delta^{HT}\alpha_s(M_Z)=0.012$ and $\Delta^{HT}\alpha_s(M_Z)=0.007$.
537: It is now important to fix in more detail the theoretical errors
538: in the calculations of the twist-4 contributions to $I_{F_1}$,
539: performed by different methods in Refs. \cite{Braun:1986ty}
540: and \cite{Weiss}.
541:
542: However, the inclusion of higher-order perturbative QCD corrections
543: into the $\alpha_s(M_Z)$ determination
544: procedures can result in the appearance of a problem
545: of correlations between perturbative and non-perturbative QCD contributions.
546: This property was discovered in the process of the next-to-next-to-leading
547: order (NNLO) fits to $xF_3$ data of the CCFR collaboration \cite{Kataev:1997nc}
548: with the NNLO corrections to anomalous dimensions of even non-singlet
549: moments for
550: $F_2$ SF calculated in Ref. \cite{Larin:1996wd}.
551: (The summary of more detailed recent NNLO fits to $xF_3$ data
552: \cite{Kataev:2001kk}
553: was reported to WG3 in the talk of Ref. \cite{Kataev:2002wr}.
554: The fits performed in Ref.\cite{Kataev:2001kk} are based on the application
555: of the NNLO corrections to anomalous dimensions of odd moments
556: for $xF_3$ SF calculated in Ref. \cite{Retey:2000nq}.)
557: A similar pattern, discussed in the contribution of Ref.\cite{Bodek},
558: was independently revealed in Ref. \cite{Yang:1999xg}
559: in the process of the NNLO fits to SLAC, NMC and BCDMS data
560: for the $F_2$ SF. As was argued further on \cite{Contreras:2002kf}
561: (see the talk by Cvetic \cite{Cvetic}),
562: the application of the Borel resummation technique, together with
563: the incorporation of the the $1/Q^2$-term typical to the infrared renormalon
564: approach (for a review, see Ref. \cite{Beneke:1998ui}),
565: leads to a minimization of the role of this power correction
566: in the procedure of extracting $\alpha_s(M_Z)$ from the data for $I_{F_3}$
567: at $Q^2\leq 4$ GeV$^2$.
568: The result in Ref. \cite{Cvetic},
569: \begin{equation}
570: \label{resummed}
571: \alpha_s(M_Z)=0.1167^{+0.0128}_{-0.0118}~(\rm{exp}) \pm 0.0008~ (\rm{th})~,
572: \end{equation}
573: which follows from the resumed perturbative expression for $I_{F_3}$,
574: turned out to be closer to the world average value of
575: $\alpha_s(M_Z)=0.1184\pm 0.0031$
576: \cite{Bethke:2000ai} than its analogue:
577: \begin{equation}
578: \label{truncated}
579: \alpha_s(M_Z)=0.114^{+0.005}_{-0.006}~({\rm stat})^{+0.007}_{-0.009}~
580: (\rm{syst})\pm 0.005~(\rm{th})
581: \end{equation}
582: obtained in Ref. \cite{Kim:1998ki} by the CCFR/NuTeV collaboration
583: from the truncated NNLO
584: perturbative series for $I_{F_3}$, supplemented with
585: the estimate of twist-4 power correction from
586: Ref. \cite{Braun:1986ty}.
587: Note that from our point of view, the theoretical uncertainties in
588: Eq. (\ref{resummed}) might be underestimated. Moreover, in
589: view of different opinions on the role of non-perturbative effects in the
590: extraction of $\alpha_s$ from the $I_{F_3}$ sum rule
591: and of the possible appearance of more precise data for $xF_3$
592: at the neutrino factories, it would be useful to clarify
593: the role of twist-4 terms in the $\alpha_s(M_Z)$ determination
594: from the $I_{F_3}$ sum rule.
595:
596: Let us return to the problem of parameterizing non-perturbative effects
597: to DIS SFs.
598: Contrary to the discussed sum rules, the complete form of
599: dynamical twist-4 corrections in both $xF_3$ and $F_2$
600: is unknown. Therefore, various models for $1/Q^2$
601: contributions are generally used. The most popular one was constructed
602: in Ref. \cite{Dasgupta:1996hh} with the help of the infrared
603: renormalon (IRR) approach. Within this approach,
604: the $1/Q^2$ contributions to SFs are defined as
605: $F_i^{HT}/Q^2=(A_2^{'}/Q^2)\int_x^1(dz/z)C_i(z)q(x/z,Q^2)$, where
606: $q=u_v+d_v$ indicates
607: the valence contributions, $C_i(z)$ is a part of the coefficient function
608: which is calculated from the chain of quark, gluon and ghost
609: loop insertions into the internal gluon line of the corresponding
610: Born diagrams, and $A_2^{'}$
611: is the free parameter which should be extracted from the fits to
612: experimental data.
613:
614: Here we recall that in the era when experimental results
615: for $xF_3$ were not precise enough, the
616: concrete fits of Ref. \cite{Abbott:1979as} were not able to make
617: an unambiguous choice between perturbative and non-perturbative
618: sources of scaling violation. At present, thanks to the increase in
619: precision of $\nu N$ DIS experiments, it has become
620: possible to separate the two mechanisms
621: of scaling violation in the process of NLO fits. Indeed, the most
622: recent NLO analysis of CCFR data for $xF_3$ SF \cite{Kataev:2001kk}
623: described in the talk of Ref. \cite{Kataev:2002wr}
624: allowed the extraction of both $\alpha_s(M_Z)$ of the $\overline{MS}$-scheme
625: and the free parameter of the IRR model $A_2^{'}$ with reasonable
626: error bars:
627: \begin{eqnarray}
628: \label{results}
629: \alpha_s(M_Z)&=&0.120 \pm 0.002~(\rm{stat})\pm 0.005~ (\rm{syst})
630: \\ \nonumber
631: &&\pm 0.002~(\rm{thresh})^{+0.010}_{-0.006}~ (\rm{scale}) \\
632: \label{IRR}
633: A_2^{'}&=&-0.125 \pm 0.053~{\rm GeV}^2
634: \ .
635: \end{eqnarray}
636: The theoretical errors in $\alpha_s(M_Z)$ reflect the uncertainties in
637: passing the threshold of production of $b$-quarks and the ambiguities in
638: choosing renormalization and factorization scales. It is interesting that
639: the NLO fits to $F_2$ data, performed in Ref. \cite{Yang:1999xg} with
640: the help of the MRS(R2) PDF set \cite{Martin:1996as} result in the value
641: of $A_2^{'}=-0.104\pm0.005$ GeV$^2$, which is in agreement
642: with the result of Eq. (\ref{IRR}).
643:
644: As shown in the talks of Refs. \cite{Kataev:2002wr,Bodek}, the incorporation
645: of the NNLO corrections into the fits to $xF_3$ and $F_2$ data makes
646: the detection of dynamical $1/Q^2$- contributions more problematic,
647: provided that the NNLO values of $\alpha_s(M_Z)$ are lying not far from
648: the world average result of $\alpha_s(M_Z)\approx 0.118$.
649: Indeed, the IRR model parameter obtained from the NNLO fits
650: to CCFR'97 $xF_3$ data is comparable with zero, within the statistical
651: error bars: $A_2^{'}=-0.013\pm0.051$ GeV$^2$
652: (see e.g. Ref. \cite{Kataev:2001kk}).
653: A similar value, namely $A_2^{'}=-0.0065\pm 0.0059$ GeV$^2$,
654: was obtained from the NNLO fits to $F_2$ SF data \cite{Yang:1999xg}
655: based on application of the recent estimates of the NNLO DGLAP splitting
656: functions for the NNLO PDFs \cite{vanNeerven:1999ca}.
657: Moreover, as shown in
658: Refs. \cite{Santiago:2001mh,Kataev:2001kk,Maxwell:2002mt}, the effect of
659: minimization of the
660: $1/Q^2$ contributions to $xF_3$ SF extracted at the NNLO does not depend
661: on the model chosen for their parameterization. Thus,
662: we are returning to the situation of 1979 at a new level
663: of understanding. Indeed, we can conclude that, in order to detect
664: at the NNLO signals from dynamical $1/Q^2$-contributions to
665: the DIS structure functions,
666: we need more precise experimental data, which can be obtained in
667: the future at the neutrino factories.
668:
669: It is planned that the neutrino factories
670: will cover the region with low $Q^2$. In the second part of the
671: contribution of Ref.\cite{Bodek}, based on the second talk of Bodek,
672: the modification of GRV98 LO PDFs \cite{Gluck:1998xa}
673: was
674: proposed. The main modifications are based on the application of the
675: introduced new scaling variable $\xi_w$ (see Ref.\cite{Bodek}).
676: These modified GRV98 LO PDFs can be used to model electron, muon
677: and neutrino inelastic scattering cross-sections at both very low
678: and high energies.
679:
680: Among the most recent problems discussed at the WG3 meeting, there
681: was the NuTeV anomaly,
682: described in the detailed talk of Bernstein \cite{Bernstein}.
683: In this talk, the extracted $\sin^2\theta_W$ from NuTeV data
684: for the ratios of neutral current to charged current DIS cross-sections
685: \begin{equation}
686: R^{\nu}= \frac{\sigma(\nu N\rightarrow \nu X)}
687: {\sigma(\nu N\rightarrow l^-X)}~~{\rm and}~ R^{\overline{\nu}} =
688: \frac{\sigma(\overline{\nu} N\rightarrow \overline{\nu} X)}
689: {\sigma(\overline{\nu} N\rightarrow l^+X)}
690: \label{Ratio}
691: \end{equation}
692: is reported.
693: The NuTeV collaboration obtained the ratios $R^{\nu}=0.3916\pm 0.0007$
694: and $R^{\overline{\nu}}=0.4050\pm 0.0016$ from their data.
695: Using a LO description for the cross-sections with the LO PDFs,
696: they obtained the following value
697: for $\sin^2\theta_W$ \cite{Zeller:2001hh}:
698: \vfill\eject
699: \begin{eqnarray}
700: \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \! \!
701: \! \! \! \! \! \!
702: {\rm sin}^2\theta_W^{on-shell}&=&0.2277\pm 0.0013~
703: ({\rm stat})\pm 0.009~(\rm{syst})
704: \nonumber \\
705: &-&0.00022 \bigg(\frac{M_t^2-(175~{\rm GeV})^2}{(50~{\rm GeV}^2)}\bigg)
706: % \nonumber \\
707: \label{NuTeV}
708: %&+&0.00032~{\rm ln}\bigg(\frac{M_{Higgs}}{150~{\rm GeV}}\bigg)~~~~~.
709: +0.00032~{\rm ln}\bigg(\frac{M_{Higgs}}{150~{\rm GeV}}\bigg)~.
710: \end{eqnarray}
711: This value has a 3$\sigma$ deviation from the one obtained from the
712: fit to other electroweak measurements by LEPEWWG:
713: ${\rm sin}^2\theta_W^{on-shell}=0.2227\pm 0.0037$.
714: The origin of the new NuTeV deviation from the standard LEPEWWG one
715: was tried to be understood in the talk of Davidson \cite{Davidson}, which
716: was based on the detailed work of Ref. \cite{Davidson:2001ji}.
717: Unfortunately no convincing enough arguments in favor of
718: the explanation of the origin of the existing discrepancy
719: (see, however, Ref. \cite{Loinaz})
720: including the consideration of definite effects from physics beyond
721: the standard model, were found.
722: In this situation, it is worth while relying on
723: publication of NuTeV data for cross-sections and SFs
724: to allow the interested community to try to clarify the situation
725: with the help of independent analyses of these new experimental
726: data, which should include all types
727: of QCD effects, including those related
728: to NLO perturbative QCD corrections.
729:
730: To conclude, the work of WG3 at the NuFact'02 workshop turned out
731: to be valuable for various aspects of non-oscillation neutrino physics.
732: We hope that the outcome of these works will be used
733: for the continuation of the planning of new experiments
734: at the neutrino factories.
735:
736: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
737: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
738: \vspace{0.4cm}
739: \noindent
740: {\bf Acknowledgments}
741:
742: The conveners express their thanks to all the speakers of WG3 for
743: their interesting contributions. We are grateful to our co-convener
744: K. McFarland for his contributions to the WG3 organization.
745: SK thanks Y. Kuno for financial support for his participating
746: in this workshop. ALK was supported by RFBR Grants N 00-02-17432
747: and N 02-01-00601. He is also grateful to the organizers of this
748: workshop for the support of his stay in London and to
749: the Theory Division of CERN for hospitality during the work
750: on part of this summary.
751:
752: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
753: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
754: \section*{References}
755: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
756: \bibitem{Stirling}
757: W. J. Stirling, plenary talk at this workshop.
758: \bibitem{Zeller:2001hh}
759: G.~P.~Zeller {\it et al.} [NuTeV Collaboration],
760: %``A precise determination of electroweak parameters in neutrino nucleon
761: % scattering,''
762: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 88} (2002) 091802.
763: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0110059;%%
764: \bibitem{McFarland}
765: B. Autin, D. A. Harris, S. F. King, K. S. McFarland and O. Yasuda,
766: WG2 summary, in proceedings of this workshop.
767: %\cite{Mangano:2001mj}
768: \bibitem{Mangano:2001mj}
769: M.~L.~Mangano {\it et al.}, hep-ph/0105155.
770: % Report of the nuDIS Working Group for the ECFA-CERN
771: % Neutrino-Factory study [hep-ph/0105155].
772: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0105155;%%
773: \bibitem{forte} \
774: S.~Forte, M.~L.~Mangano and G.~Ridolfi,
775: %``Polarized parton distributions from charged-current deep-inelastic
776: % scattering and future neutrino factories,''
777: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 602} (2001) 585;
778: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0101192;%%\\
779: G. Ridolfi, in proceedings of this workshop.
780: \bibitem{Albright} C. Albright {\it et. al.},
781: %``Physics at a neutrino factory,''
782: hep-ex/0008064.
783: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0008064;%%
784: \bibitem{ekrs}
785: K.~J.~Eskola, V.~J.~Kolhinen and P.~V.~Ruuskanen,
786: %``Scale evolution of nuclear parton distributions,''
787: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 535} (1998) 351;
788: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9802350;%%
789: K.~J.~Eskola, V.~J.~Kolhinen and C.~A.~Salgado,
790: %``The scale dependent nuclear effects in parton distributions
791: % for practical applications,''
792: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 9} (1999) 61;
793: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9807297;%%
794: K.~J.~Eskola, H.~Honkanen, V.~J.~Kolhinen, P.~V.~Ruuskanen and C.~A.~Salgado,
795: in proceedings of this workshop and hep-ph/0209315.
796: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0209315;%%
797: \bibitem{saga01}
798: M.~Hirai, S.~Kumano and M.~Miyama,
799: %``Determination of nuclear parton distributions,''
800: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64} (2001) 034003
801: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0103208;%%
802: and
803: research in progress with Drell-Yan and $Q^2$ dependent data.
804: \bibitem{morfin} J. G. Morfin, in proceedings of this workshop;
805: in http://neutrino.kek.jp/nuint01/,
806: to published in Nucl. Phys. B (2002).
807: \bibitem{kulagin} S. A. Kulagin,
808: hep-ph/9812532.
809: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9812532;%%
810: \bibitem{bb02} J. Bl\"umlein and H. B\"ottcher,
811: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 636} (2002) 225.
812: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0203155;%%
813: \bibitem{lss02} E. Leader, A. V. Sidorov and D. B. Stamenov,
814: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 23} (2002) 479.
815: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0111267;%%
816: \bibitem{aac} M. Hirai, in proceedings of this workshop;
817: Asymmetry Analysis Collaboration (Y. Goto {\it et al.}),
818: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62} (2000) 034017.
819: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0001046;%%
820: \bibitem{recent0102} M. Gl\"uck, E. Reya, M. Stratmann and W. Vogelsang,
821: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63} (2001) 094005;
822: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0011215;%%
823: J. Bartelski and S. Tatur,
824: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65} (2002) 034002;
825: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0107202;%%
826: C. Bourrely, J. Soffer and F. Buccella,
827: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 23} (2002) 487.
828: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0109160;%%
829: \bibitem{sudoh} K. Sudoh, in proceedings of this workshop.
830: See also
831: K.~Sudoh and T.~Morii,
832: %``Charmed hadron production in neutrino reactions and polarized
833: % s-quark distribution,''
834: hep-ph/0110343.
835: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0110343;%%
836: \bibitem{soler} M. Ellis and F. J. P. Soler, in proceedings of this workshop;
837: M. Ellis, Ph.D. thesis (2001) in
838: http://www.physics.usyd.edu.au/hienergy/nomad\_local.html;
839: G. Barichello {\it et al.},
840: to be published in Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A.
841: \bibitem{shibata}
842: K.~Ackerstaff {\it et al.} [HERMES Collaboration],
843: %``Flavor decomposition of the polarized quark distributions in the nucleon
844: % from inclusive and semi-inclusive deep-inelastic scattering,''
845: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 464} (1999) 123;
846: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9906035;%%
847: A.~Airapetian {\it et al.} [HERMES Collaboration],
848: %``Observation of a single-spin azimuthal asymmetry in semi-inclusive
849: % pion electro-production,''
850: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 84} (2000) 4047.
851: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9910062;%%
852: \bibitem{saito} N. Saito, talk at this workshop;
853: see also N.~Saito,
854: %``Spin Physics Program At Rhic: The First Polarized-Proton Collider,''
855: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 105} (2002) 47.
856: %%CITATION = NUPHZ,105,47;%%
857: \bibitem{g345} J. Bl\"umlein and N. Kochelev,
858: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 498} (1997) 285.
859: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9612318;%%
860: %\cite{Larin:tj}
861: \bibitem{Larin:tj}
862: S.~A.~Larin and J.~A.~M.~Vermaseren,
863: %``The Alpha-S**3 Corrections To The Bjorken Sum Rule For Polarized
864: % Electroproduction And To The Gross-Llewellyn Smith Sum Rule,''
865: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 259} (1991) 345.
866: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B259,345;%%
867: %\cite{Larin:1990zw}
868: \bibitem{Larin:1990zw}
869: S.~A.~Larin, F.~V.~Tkachov and J.~A.~Vermaseren,
870: %``The Alpha(S**3) Correction To The Bjorken Sum Rule,''
871: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 66} (1991) 862.
872: %%CITATION = PRLTA,66,862;%%
873: %\cite{Kataev:1995vh}
874: \bibitem{Kataev:1995vh}
875: A.~L.~Kataev and V.~V.~Starshenko,
876: %``Estimates of the higher order QCD corrections to R(s), R(tau)
877: % and deep inelastic scattering sum rules,''
878: Mod.\ Phys.\ Lett.\ A {\bf 10} (1995) 235.
879: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9502348;%%
880: %\cite{Samuel:1995jc}
881: \bibitem{Samuel:1995jc}
882: M.~A.~Samuel, J.~R.~Ellis and M.~Karliner,
883: %``Comparison of the Pade approximation method to
884: % perturbative QCD calculations,''
885: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 74} (1995) 4380.
886: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9503411;%%
887: %\cite{Broadhurst:2002bi}
888: \bibitem{Broadhurst:2002bi}
889: D.~J.~Broadhurst and A.~L.~Kataev,
890: %``Bjorken unpolarized and polarized sum rules: Comparative analysis
891: % of large-N(F) expansions,''
892: Phys. \ Lett. \ {\bf B544} (2002) 154.
893: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0207261;%%
894: %\cite{Seligman:mc}
895: \bibitem{Seligman:mc}
896: W.~G.~Seligman {\it et al.},
897: %``Improved Determination Of Alpha(S) From Neutrino Nucleon Scattering,''
898: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 79} (1997) 1213.
899: %%CITATION = PRLTA,79,1213;%%
900: %\cite{Kim:1998ki}
901: \bibitem{Kim:1998ki}
902: J.~H.~Kim {\it et al.},
903: %``A measurement of alpha(s)(Q**2) from the Gross-Llewellyn Smith sum rule,''
904: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 81} (1998) 3595.
905: %[arXiv:hep-ex/9808015].
906: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9808015;%%
907: %\cite{Kataev:1994rj}
908: \bibitem{Kataev:1994rj}
909: A.~L.~Kataev and A.~V.~Sidorov,
910: %``The Jacobi polynomials QCD analysis of the CCFR data for xF3 and
911: % the Q**2 dependence of the Gross-Llewellyn-Smith sum rule,''
912: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 331} (1994) 179.
913: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9402342;%%
914: %\cite{Alekhin:2002pj}
915: \bibitem{Alekhin:2002pj}
916: S.~I.~Alekhin and A.~L.~Kataev, talk at this workshop,
917: hep-ph/0209165.
918: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0209165;%%
919: %\cite{Shuryak:1981kj}
920: \bibitem{Shuryak:1981kj}
921: E.~V.~Shuryak and A.~I.~Vainshtein,
922: %``Theory Of Power Corrections To Deep Inelastic Scattering
923: % In Quantum Chromodynamics. 1. Q**2 Effects,''
924: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 199} (1982) 451.
925: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B199,451;%%
926: \bibitem{Weiss}
927: C. Weiss, talk at this workshop, hep-ph/0210132.
928: %\cite{Diakonov:1983hh}
929: \bibitem{Diakonov:1983hh}
930: D.~Diakonov and V.~Y.~Petrov,
931: %``Instanton Based Vacuum From Feynman Variational Principle,''
932: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 245} (1984) 259.
933: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B245,259;%%
934: \bibitem{Braun:1986ty}
935: V.~M.~Braun and A.~V.~Kolesnichenko,
936: %``Power Corrections To Bjorken And Gross-Llewellyn Smith Sum Rules In QCD,''
937: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 283} (1987) 723.
938: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B283,723;%%
939: %\cite{Ross:1993gb}
940: \bibitem{Ross:1993gb}
941: G.~G.~Ross and R.~G.~Roberts,
942: %``Improved QCD sum rule estimates of the higher twist contributions
943: % to polarized and unpolarized nucleon structure functions,''
944: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 322} (1994) 425.
945: %[hep-ph/9312237].
946: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9312237;%%
947: %\cite{Alekhin:2000ch}
948: \bibitem{Alekhin:2000ch}
949: S.~I.~Alekhin,
950: %``Global fit to the charged leptons DIS data: alpha(s),
951: % parton distributions, and high twists,''
952: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63} (2001) 094022.
953: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0011002;%%
954: %\cite{Kataev:1997nc}
955: \bibitem{Kataev:1997nc}
956: A.~L.~Kataev, A.~V.~Kotikov, G.~Parente and A.~V.~Sidorov,
957: %``Next-to-next-to-leading order QCD analysis of the revised
958: % CCFR data for xF3 structure function,''
959: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 417} (1998) 374;\\
960: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9706534;%%
961: A.~L.~Kataev, G.~Parente and A.~V.~Sidorov,
962: %``Higher twists and alpha(s)(M(Z)) extractions from the NNLO {QCD}
963: % analysis of the CCFR data for the xF3 structure function,''
964: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 573} (2000) 405.
965: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9905310;%%
966: %\cite{Larin:1996wd}
967: \bibitem{Larin:1996wd}
968: S.~A.~Larin, P.~Nogueira, T.~van Ritbergen and J.~A.~M.~Vermaseren,
969: %``The 3-loop QCD calculation of the moments of deep inelastic
970: % structure functions,''
971: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 492} (1997) 338.
972: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9605317;%%
973: %\cite{Kataev:2001kk}
974: \bibitem{Kataev:2001kk}
975: A.~L.~Kataev, G.~Parente and A.~V.~Sidorov,
976: %``Fixation of theoretical ambiguities in the improved fits to the xF3
977: % CCFR data at the next-to-next-to-leading order and beyond,''
978: hep-ph/0106221, to be published in Fiz. Elem. Chast. Atom. Yadra (2003).
979: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0106221;%%
980: %\cite{Kataev:2002wr}
981: \bibitem{Kataev:2002wr}
982: A.~L.~Kataev, G.~Parente and A.~V.~Sidorov,
983: talk at this workshop,
984: hep-ph/0209024.
985: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0209024;%%
986: %\cite{Retey:2000nq}
987: \bibitem{Retey:2000nq}
988: A.~Retey and J.~A.~M.~Vermaseren,
989: %``Some higher moments of deep inelastic structure functions
990: % at next-to-next-to leading order of perturbative QCD,''
991: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 604} (2001) 281.
992: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0007294;%%
993: \bibitem{Bodek}
994: A.~Bodek and U.~K.~Yang,
995: %``Higher twist, xi/w scaling, and effective LO PDFs for lepton scattering
996: % in the few GeV region,''
997: hep-ex/0210024.
998: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0210024;%%
999: %\cite{Yang:1999xg}
1000: \bibitem{Yang:1999xg}
1001: U.~K.~Yang and A.~Bodek,
1002: %``Studies of higher twist and higher order effects in NLO and NNLO QCD
1003: % analysis of lepton nucleon scattering data on F2 and R =
1004: %sigma(L)/sigma(T),''
1005: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 13} (2000) 241.
1006: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 9908058;%%
1007: %\cite{Contreras:2002kf}
1008: \bibitem{Contreras:2002kf}
1009: C.~Contreras, G.~Cvetic, K.~S.~Jeong and T.~Lee,
1010: %``Extraction of alpha(s) from the Gross-Llewellyn Smith sum rule
1011: % using Borel resummation,''
1012: Phys. \ Rev. \ {\bf D66} (2002) 054006.
1013: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0203201;%%
1014: \bibitem{Cvetic}
1015: C.~Contreras, G.~Cvetic, K.~S.~Jeong and T.~Lee,
1016: hep-ph/0209142.
1017: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0209142;%%
1018: %\cite{Beneke:1998ui}
1019: \bibitem{Beneke:1998ui}
1020: M.~Beneke,
1021: %``Renormalons,''
1022: Phys.\ Rep.\ {\bf 317} (1999) 1.
1023: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9807443;%%
1024: %\cite{Bethke:2000ai}
1025: \bibitem{Bethke:2000ai}
1026: S.~Bethke,
1027: %``Determination of the QCD coupling alpha(s),''
1028: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 26} (2000) R27.
1029: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0004021;%%
1030: %\cite{Dasgupta:1996hh}
1031: \bibitem{Dasgupta:1996hh}
1032: M.~Dasgupta and B.~R.~Webber,
1033: %``Power Corrections and Renormalons in Deep Inelastic Structure Functions,''
1034: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 382} (1996) 273.
1035: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9604388;%%
1036: %\cite{Abbott:1979as}
1037: \bibitem{Abbott:1979as}
1038: L.~F.~Abbott and R.~M.~Barnett,
1039: %``The Effect Of 1/Q**2 And Alpha-S Corrections On Tests Of QCD,''
1040: Ann. \ Phys.\ {\bf 125} (1980) 276.
1041: %%CITATION = APNYA,125,276;%%
1042: %\cite{Martin:1996as}
1043: \bibitem{Martin:1996as}
1044: A.~D.~Martin, R.~G.~Roberts and W.~J.~Stirling,
1045: %``Parton distributions: A study of the new HERA data, alpha(s),
1046: % the gluon and p anti-p jet production,''
1047: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 387} (1996) 419.
1048: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9606345;%%
1049: %\cite{vanNeerven:1999ca}
1050: \bibitem{vanNeerven:1999ca}
1051: W.~L.~van Neerven and A.~Vogt,
1052: %``NNLO evolution of deep-inelastic structure functions:
1053: % The non-singlet case,''
1054: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 568} (2000) 263.
1055: % [arXiv:hep-ph/9907472].
1056: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9907472;%%
1057: %\cite{Santiago:2001mh}
1058: \bibitem{Santiago:2001mh}
1059: J.~Santiago and F.~J.~Yndurain,
1060: %``Improved calculation of F2 in electroproduction and xF3 in neutrino
1061: % scattering to NNLO and determination of alpha(s),''
1062: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 611} (2001) 447.
1063: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0102247;%%
1064: %\cite{Maxwell:2002mt}
1065: \bibitem{Maxwell:2002mt}
1066: C.~J.~Maxwell and A.~Mirjalili,
1067: %``Direct extraction of QCD Lambda MS-bar from moments of structure
1068: % functions in neutrino nucleon scattering, using the CORGI approach,''
1069: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 645} (2002) 298.
1070: % [arXiv:hep-ph/0207069].
1071: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0207069;%%
1072: %\cite{Gluck:1998xa}
1073: \bibitem{Gluck:1998xa}
1074: M.~Gl\"uck, E.~Reya and A.~Vogt,
1075: %``Dynamical parton distributions revisited,''
1076: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 5} (1998) 461.
1077: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9806404;%%
1078: \bibitem{Bernstein}
1079: R. H. Bernstein, talk at this workshop,
1080: %``Standard Model Explanations for the NuTeV Electroweak Measurements,''
1081: hep-ex/0210061.
1082: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0210061;%%
1083: \bibitem{Davidson}
1084: S. Davidson, talk at this workshop,
1085: hep-ph/0209316.
1086: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0209316;%%
1087: %\cite{Davidson:2001ji}
1088: \bibitem{Davidson:2001ji}
1089: S.~Davidson, S.~Forte, P.~Gambino, N.~Rius and A.~Strumia,
1090: %``Old and new physics interpretations of the NuTeV anomaly,''
1091: JHEP {\bf 0202} (2002) 037.
1092: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0112302;%%
1093: \bibitem{Loinaz}
1094: W. Loinaz, N. Okamura, T. Takeuchi, L. C. R. Wijewardhana,
1095: hep-ph/0210193.
1096: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0210193;%%
1097: \end{thebibliography}
1098: \end{document}
1099: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1100: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1101: