1: \section{Conclusions}
2: \label{Conclusions}
3:
4: During many years there were indications in favor of the disappearance
5: of solar $\nu_{e}$'s (the so-called ``solar neutrino problem''),
6: obtained in the
7: Homestake \cite{Cleveland:1998nv},
8: Kamiokande \cite{Fukuda:1996sz},
9: GALLEX \cite{Hampel:1998xg}
10: and
11: SAGE \cite{Abdurashitov:1999zd}
12: solar neutrino experiments,
13: and indications in favor of the disappearance of
14: atmospheric $\nu_{\mu}$'s (the so-called ``atmospheric neutrino anomaly''),
15: found in the
16: Kamiokande \cite{Hirata:1992ku,Fukuda:1994mc,Hatakeyama:1998ea},
17: IMB \cite{Becker-Szendy:1992hq},
18: Soudan 2 \cite{Allison:1999ms}
19: and
20: MACRO \cite{Ambrosio:2000qy}
21: atmospheric neutrino experiments.
22: Neutrino oscillations were considered to be the
23: natural interpretation of these data, in spite of the fact that
24: other possibilities were not excluded at that time
25: (as
26: large anomalous magnetic moment of neutrino,
27: neutrino decay,
28: etc.;
29: see Refs.~\cite{Bahcall-book-89,Pulido:1992fb,CWKim-book-93,Mohapatra-book-98}).
30:
31: In the latest years with the impressive results
32: of the atmospheric and solar neutrino experiments
33: Super-Kamiokande and SNO
34: and the long-baseline reactor experiment KamLAND,
35: the status of neutrino
36: masses, mixing and oscillations drastically changed.
37: The up-down asymmetry of the atmospheric multi-GeV muon
38: events discovered in the Super-Kamiokande experiment
39: \cite{Fukuda:1998mi},
40: the evidence of transitions of solar $\nu_e$ into $\nu_\mu$ and $\nu_\tau$
41: obtained in the SNO experiment
42: \cite{Ahmad:2002jz}
43: from the observation of solar
44: neutrinos through the detection of CC and NC reactions,
45: and
46: the evidence of disappearance of reactor $\bar\nu_e$
47: found in the long-baseline KamLAND experiment
48: \cite{hep-ex/0212021}
49: imply that neutrino oscillations driven by small neutrino masses and neutrino mixing
50: is the only viable explanation of the experimental data.
51:
52: The generation of neutrino masses,
53: many orders of magnitude smaller than the masses of their family
54: partner leptons and quarks,
55: requires a new mechanism beyond the Standard Model.
56: Several possibilities for new mechanisms which could generate
57: small neutrino masses are open today. They are based on the
58: see-saw type violation of the
59: total lepton number at a very large scale, large extra dimensions, etc.
60: (see Refs.~\cite{Altarelli:1999gu,Fritzsch:1999ee,Masina:2001pp,hep-ph/0206077}).
61: It is obvious that the understanding of the true mechanism of the generation
62: of neutrino masses and mixing requires new experimental data.
63:
64: First of all, we need to know how many massive neutrino exist in nature.
65: The minimal number of massive neutrinos is equal to the number
66: of flavor neutrinos (three). If, however, the LSND
67: indication in favor of
68: short-baseline $\bar\nu_\mu\to\bar\nu_e$ oscillations
69: is confirmed,
70: at least four massive neutrinos are needed.
71: In spite of the fact that such scenario is disfavored by the analysis of the existing
72: data,
73: in order to reach a conclusion it is needed
74: to wait the decisive check of the LSND result
75: which is under way at Fermilab with the MiniBooNE experiment.
76:
77: The problem of the nature of the massive neutrinos (Dirac or Majorana?)
78: is crucial for the understanding of the origin of neutrino masses.
79: This problem can be solved by the experiments searching for neutrinoless
80: double-$\beta$ decay of some even-even nuclei. From the existing
81: data for the effective Majorana mass $|\langle m \rangle|$ the bound
82: $|\langle m \rangle| \leq (0.3-1.2) \, \mathrm{eV}$
83: has been obtained. Several new experiments
84: with a sensitivity to $|\langle m \rangle|$
85: improved by about one order of magnitude
86: with respect to present experiments
87: are under preparation.
88:
89: Neutrino oscillation experiments allow to determine the
90: neutrino mass-squared differences $\Delta m^{2}$.
91: Since neutrino oscillations is an interference phenomenon,
92: neutrino oscillation experiments are sensitive to
93: very small values of $\Delta m^{2}$.
94: On the other hand,
95: the problem of the
96: \emph{absolute values of neutrino masses}
97: is apparently the most difficult one in the experimental
98: investigation of the
99: physics of massive and mixed neutrinos.
100: In this paper we presented a review of our present knowledge
101: of the absolute values of neutrino masses
102: and
103: the prospects for the future
104: (see also Ref.~\cite{Pas:2001nd}).
105:
106: At present,
107: the bound $m_{\beta} < 2.2 \, \mathrm{eV}$
108: at 95\% C.L. has been obtained
109: from $\beta$-decay experiments
110: \cite{hep-ex/0210050,Lobashev:2001uu}.
111: About one order of the magnitude improvement is expected in the
112: future.
113:
114: With enormous progress in cosmology in the last years
115: the possibility to obtain information about the values of neutrino masses from
116: cosmological data has strongly increased.
117: The existing data allowed to obtain
118: the bound
119: $\sum_{i}m_{i} \lesssim 2 \, \mathrm{eV}$
120: for the total mass of neutrinos
121: \cite{elgaroy,lewis,hannestad2}.
122: About one order of magnitude improvement is expected with the future data.
123:
124: A possible explanation of the observation
125: \cite{Efimov:1990rk,Lawrence:1991cc,Bird:1993yi,Bird:1994wp,Bird-1995ApJ...441..144B,
126: Takeda:1998ps,CosmicRay-1999,Ave:2000nd,Takeda:2002at}
127: of very high-energy cosmic rays beyond the GZK cutoff
128: \cite{Greisen:1966jv,Zatsepin:1966jv}
129: is the existence of $Z$-bursts
130: \cite{Fargion:1997ft,Weiler:1997sh},
131: which are possible if there is at least one neutrino mass
132: in the
133: $0.08 - 1.3 \, \mathrm{eV}$
134: range at 68\% C.L..
135:
136: The observation of supernova 1987A neutrinos
137: by the
138: Kamiokande-II \cite{Hirata:1988ad},
139: IMB \cite{Bratton:1988ww} and
140: Baksan \cite{Alekseev:1988gp}
141: detectors
142: allowed to obtain important information
143: on supernova physics and neutrino properties.
144: The absence of an energy-dependent spread of the neutrino burst
145: constrains the absolute value of the effective electron neutrino mass
146: below 5.7 eV with 95\% probability
147: \cite{Loredo:2001rx}.
148:
149: In the framework of the minimal scheme with three massive neutrinos
150: the values of the neutrino masses are determined
151: by the minimal neutrino mass $m_{1}$ and the neutrino mass-squared differences
152: $\Delta m^{2}_{21}$ and $\Delta m^{2}_{32}$, which will be measured
153: with high precision in solar, atmospheric, long-baseline reactor and accelerator
154: neutrino oscillations experiments.
155: Thus, the problem of the absolute values of neutrino masses is the problem of determination of
156: the minimal mass $m_{1}$.
157: If $m_{1}$ is much smaller than $\sqrt{\Delta m^{2}_{\mathrm{sol}}}\simeq 7\cdot
158: 10^{-3}\,\mathrm{eV}$ (hierarchical mass spectrum),
159: it will be very difficult to reach the
160: absolute values of neutrino masses in terrestrial experiments.
161: Future cosmological measurements could be a possibility in this case
162: (see Ref.~\cite{hannestad3}),
163: although the inferred information is somewhat model dependent.
164: If $m_{1}$ is much smaller than $\sqrt{\Delta m^{2}_{\mathrm{atm}}}
165: \simeq 5\cdot
166: 10^{-2}\,\mathrm{eV}$ and the neutrino mass spectrum is characterized by
167: an inverted hierarchy,
168: information about the
169: absolute values of neutrino masses can be obtained from the future experiments
170: searching for neutrinoless double-$\beta$ decay.
171: If $m_{1}$ is much larger than $\sqrt{\Delta m^{2}_{\mathrm{atm}}}$
172: (practically degenerate neutrino mass spectrum), there is a possibility
173: that $m_{1}$ will be measured in future $\beta$-decay experiments.
174: Of course, progress in experimental techniques could bring some unexpected
175: surprises for the solution of the exciting problem of the absolute neutrino masses.
176: