1: \section{Cosmic Rays}
2: \label{Cosmic Rays}
3:
4: Since the sixties \cite{Greisen:1966jv,Zatsepin:1966jv} it is well-known that the universe
5: is opaque to protons (and other nuclei) on cosmological distances. An
6: ultra high energy (UHE)
7: proton with energy $E$ exceeding the Greisen-Zatsepin-Kuzmin (GZK)
8: energy
9: \begin{equation}
10: E_{\mathrm{GZK}} \sim 5 \times 10^{19}\ \eV
11: \label{GZK}
12: \end{equation}
13: interacts with the photons of the cosmic background producing pions through
14: the $\Delta^*$ resonance,
15: $p+\gamma_{CB}\rightarrow \Delta^* \rightarrow N\pi$.
16: In this way, the initial proton
17: energy is degraded with an attenuation length of about 50 Mpc
18: \cite{Greisen:1966jv,Zatsepin:1966jv}. The UHE photons have even shorter
19: absorption lengths ($\sim 10 \, \mathrm{Mpc}$ for $E\sim 10^{20}$ eV
20: \cite{Halzen:1994gy})
21: due to their interactions with cosmic background photons
22: \cite{Protheroe:1996si}. Since plausible
23: astrophysical sources for UHE particles (like AGNs) are located at
24: distances larger than 50-100 Mpc, one expects the so-called GZK cutoff in the
25: cosmic ray flux at the energy given by (\ref{GZK}).
26: \begin{figure}[t]
27: \begin{center}
28: \includegraphics*[bb=0 16 519 515, height=7cm]{fig/hires-0208301-fig_14_je3.eps}
29: \end{center}
30: \caption{ \label{hires-0208301-fig_14_je3}
31: UHE Cosmic Ray Flux times E$^3$.
32: Results from the
33: HiRes-I and HiRes-II detectors, and the AGASA experiment are
34: shown.
35: Also shown (solid curve) is a fit to the data assuming a model
36: with two sources of cosmic rays,
37: galactic and extragalactic,
38: which includes the GZK cutoff.
39: Figure taken from Ref.~\cite{Abu-Zayyad:2002sf}.
40: }
41: \end{figure}
42:
43: However, in the cosmic ray data \cite{Efimov:1990rk,Lawrence:1991cc,Bird:1993yi,Bird:1994wp,Bird-1995ApJ...441..144B,Takeda:1998ps,CosmicRay-1999,Ave:2000nd,Takeda:2002at,Abu-Zayyad:2002sf},
44: there are about twenty cosmic ray events with energies just above the
45: GZK energy (see Fig.~\ref{hires-0208301-fig_14_je3}).
46: Yet, the whole observational status in the UHE regime is controversial.
47: While the HiRes collaboration claim \cite{Abu-Zayyad:2002sf} that they see
48: the expected event reduction, a recent reevaluation of AGASA data seems
49: to confirm the violation of the GZK cutoff \cite{Takeda:2002at}.
50: Indeed, some apparent
51: inconsistencies among data have been pointed out \cite{Bahcall:2002wi}.
52: The observational status is not settled, but it is clear that
53: if the GZK violation is confirmed, the origin of the super-GZK particles
54: constitutes one of the most pressing puzzles in modern
55: high-energy astrophysics (for a recent review, see Ref.~\cite{Sigl:2002ky}).
56:
57: Several hypothetical explanations have been put forward to account for
58: this phenomenon. For example, there are scenarios where the UHE cosmic
59: rays are decay products of exotic super-massive particles or relic topological
60: defects. Also, a way to solve the problem might be to postulate a
61: violation of Lorentz symmetry, or introduce new particles or/and
62: new interactions (for a recent review, see Ref.~\cite{Sigl:2002ky}).
63: We are concerned here with a possible explanation that is based
64: on the so-called $Z$-bursts \cite{Fargion:1997ft,Weiler:1997sh}.
65: If the GZK cutoff is violated and the Z-burst mechanism
66: is indeed the solution to the GZK puzzle, it may be used to determine
67: the absolute value of neutrino masses and, in fact, it would be an indirect
68: proof of the existence of the relic cosmic background neutrinos.
69:
70: The main hypothesis of the Z-burst explanation of the GZK puzzle is the
71: existence of a very high flux of UHE neutrinos. And the main
72: criticism to it is that standard
73: astrophysical objects cannot produce such fluxes. Thus, the Z-burst
74: hypothesis requires new sources producing UHE neutrinos copiously.
75: (If the flux is so large, it may be measured by the next generation of
76: neutrino telescopes; see Ref.~{\cite{Kalashev:2002kx}.)
77: However, compared to the other models quoted before, the Z-burst scenario
78: does not need new physics
79: beyond the Standard Model of particle physics with neutrino masses.
80:
81: The crucial observation is that neutrinos, contrary
82: to protons and photons, propagate over cosmological distances with negligible
83: opacity. The most important interaction they have is with cosmic
84: background neutrinos. Although this represents a extremely small opacity it
85: might be enough to generate the UHE cosmic rays.
86:
87: Cosmic background neutrinos are the relics of neutrino decoupling in
88: the early Universe,
89: that happened when the Universe was about 1 second old and had a temperature
90: of about 1 MeV. Their number density
91: today can be calculated easily in terms of the observed
92: number density of the relic microwave background $n_\gamma$
93: (see, for example, Ref.~\cite{Kolb:vq}).
94: In the case of no net leptonic number it is given by
95: \begin{equation}
96: n_{\nu_i}=n_{\bar \nu_i}= \frac{3}{22} n_\gamma= 56 \ {\rm cm}^{-3}
97: \,,
98: \label{n_nu0}
99: \end{equation}
100: where $\nu_i$ is a neutrino species. The neutrino cosmic
101: background is in many aspects similar to the photon cosmic
102: background.
103: The photons have been detected but the neutrinos not yet,
104: because the photons have much stronger interactions than the neutrinos.
105: In any case, the neutrino background is a firm prediction of
106: cosmology. These neutrinos decoupled when relativistic, but today they are
107: non-relativistic (if the neutrino mass $m_i>10^{-4}$ eV.)
108:
109: The interaction of UHE neutrinos with background neutrinos is
110: strongly enhanced when
111: it proceeds through the $Z$-resonance, $\nu\bar \nu \rightarrow Z
112: \rightarrow$ hadrons. To be exactly on top of the resonance,
113: the UHE neutrino has to have an energy $E^R$ such that
114: $M_Z^2= (E^R+m_i)^2-(E^R)^2 \simeq 2 m_i E^R$, so that
115: \begin{equation}
116: E^R_{\nu_i} \simeq \frac{M_Z^2}{2 m_i}\simeq 4.2\,
117: \left( \frac{\eV}{m_i}\right)\, \times 10^{21}\ \eV
118: \,.
119: \label{ER}
120: \end{equation}
121: We see there is a resonant energy for each neutrino mass $m_i$,
122: and for this reason we have added the subscript $\nu_i$ to $E^R$.
123: The lowest value of $E^R_{\nu_i}$ corresponds to the highest
124: neutrino mass.
125:
126: To have the $Z$-resonance enhancement,
127: the neutrino energy $E$ must be in the range
128: \begin{equation}
129: E \simeq E^R_{\nu_i} \pm \Gamma_Z
130: \,,
131: \label{band}
132: \end{equation}
133: where $\Gamma_Z$ is the $Z$ width.
134:
135: The idea of the $Z$-burst mechanism
136: \cite{Fargion:1997ft,Weiler:1997sh} is that when a UHE neutrino
137: with energy $E$ in the band (\ref{band})
138: scatters off a relic neutrino, about 70\% of the times gives
139: \begin{equation}
140: \nu\bar \nu \rightarrow Z \rightarrow {\rm hadrons}
141: \,.
142: \label{nunuZ}
143: \end{equation}
144: The hadrons form a highly collimated final state, since in the
145: relic neutrino rest frame the $Z$ particle
146: has a Lorentz factor of $\gamma \sim 10^{11}$.
147: Provided the scattering takes place at a distance from Earth of less
148: than 50 Mpc, attenuation is small and the produced particles may induce
149: air showers in
150: the Earth atmosphere giving rise to the observed super-GZK events.
151:
152: The properties of the process
153: $e^-e^+ \rightarrow Z \rightarrow {\rm hadrons}$,
154: have been studied with
155: huge statistics at LEP (see Ref.~\cite{Hagiwara:pw} for a review),
156: and can be used to determine the properties of the reaction
157: (\ref{nunuZ}).
158: The average multiplicity is $\sim 30$, with final states having an
159: average of about 2 nucleons, 10
160: neutral pions and 17 charged pions. The nucleons will then have
161: an average energy
162: \begin{equation}
163: \langle E_p \rangle \, \sim \frac{ E^R_{\nu_i}}{30}
164: \simeq 1.4\,
165: \left( \frac{\eV}{m_i}\right)\, \times 10^{20}\ \eV
166: \,.
167: \label{avegnucleon}
168: \end{equation}
169: Neutral pions originate photons, $\pi^0 \rightarrow \gamma\gamma$, with
170: average energy
171: \begin{equation}
172: \langle E_\gamma \rangle \, \sim \frac{ E^R_{\nu_i}}{60}
173: \simeq 0.7\,
174: \left( \frac{\eV}{m_i}\right)\, \times 10^{20}\ \eV
175: \,.
176: \label{aveggamma}
177: \end{equation}
178: In the $Z$-burst scenario these protons and/or photons are the cosmic
179: ray primaries. We see that one then needs a mass $m_i \sim 0.1-1$ eV to be
180: just above the GZK cutoff (\ref{GZK}).
181:
182: Relevant for the purposes of this review is the determination of the neutrino
183: mass if the $Z$-burst mechanism turns out to be the solution to
184: the GZK puzzle, as discussed in Ref.~\cite{Pas:2001nd}
185: (see also Ref.\cite{Fargion:2000pv}).
186: A detailed analysis has been done in Ref.~\cite{Fodor:2001qy}, where
187: the observed UHE cosmic ray spectrum is compared with the
188: predictions of the $Z$-burst model. In the analysis
189: one uses collider data to derive the spectra of the final state, and
190: finally one determines the energy losses in the propagation of
191: particles until reaching the Earth atmosphere. A maximum
192: likelihood analysis gives the interval
193: \begin{equation}
194: 0.08\, {\eV} < m_i < 1.3\, {\eV}
195: \qquad
196: (68\% \, \mathrm{C.L.})
197: \,,
198: \end{equation}
199: assuming that the super-GZK events are originated by
200: protons produced in $Z$-bursts outside our galaxy.
201: The authors of Ref.~\cite{Fodor:2001qy} claim that
202: this neutrino mass determination is fairly robust
203: against variations of presently unknown quantities.
204:
205: Another interesting study concerns the $Z$-burst model in presence of a
206: leptonic asymmetry \cite{Gelmini:1999qa},
207: where one has $n_{\nu_i} \neq n_{\bar \nu_i}$ and (\ref{n_nu0})
208: is no longer valid. The authors of Ref.~\cite{Gelmini:1999qa} conclude that
209: a neutrino mass $m_i \sim$ 0.07
210: eV, consistent with Super-Kamiokande data, explains the cosmic ray events
211: in this leptonic asymmetric case.
212: Also, we would like to mention that the possibility that $Z$-bursts may
213: account for events just below the GZK energy and above the ankle
214: of the cosmic ray spectrum is considered in Ref.~\cite{Gelmini:2002xy},
215: again for a mass $m_i \sim$ 0.07 eV.
216:
217: Many other aspects of the $Z$-burst scenario have been treated
218: in the literature \cite{others}.
219: For example, to what extent may neutrino clustering
220: (which is quite likely) enhance the signal,
221: which other observations may put constrains to the model, and which are
222: the distinctive features that may help us in discriminating between
223: $Z$-bursts and other explanations of the UHE cosmic ray puzzle.
224:
225: The future experimental projects aimed at the detection of cosmic rays
226: to probe the UHE regime will be crucial to shed more light on this subject
227: (for a recent review, see for example Ref.~\cite{Sigl:2002yk}).
228: