1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
2: %\usepackage[pdftex]{graphicx}
3: \usepackage{psfig,epsfig}
4: \def\lsim{\raisebox{-4pt}{$\,\stackrel{\textstyle{<}}{\sim}\,$}}
5: \def\gsim{\raisebox{-4pt}{$\,\stackrel{\textstyle{>}}{\sim}\,$}}
6: \textwidth 6.0in
7: \textheight 8.5in
8: %\pagestyle{empty}
9: \topmargin -0.25truein
10: \oddsidemargin 0.30truein
11: \evensidemargin 0.30truein\raggedbottom
12: \parindent=3pc
13: \baselineskip=12pt
14:
15: \newcommand{\epsfigure}[1]{\epsfig{#1}}
16: %\newcommand{\epsfigure}[1]{\vspace{1cm}}
17:
18: %\renewcommand{\resizebox}[2]{}
19: %\renewcommand{\includegraphics}[1]{}
20:
21:
22: \newcommand{\dnn}{\mbox{$\Delta N_\nu$}}
23: \newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}
24: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}
25: \newcommand{\zpr}{\mbox{$Z'$}}
26: \newcommand{\mzp}{\mbox{$M_{Z'}$}}
27:
28: \newcommand{\upr}{\mbox{$U(1)'$}}
29: \def\mxth{\mathsurround=0pt }
30: \def\xversim#1#2{\lower2.pt\vbox{\baselineskip0pt \lineskip-.5pt
31: \ialign{$\mxth#1\hfil##\hfil$\crcr#2\crcr\sim\crcr}}}
32: \def\simgr{\mathrel{\mathpalette\xversim >}}
33: \def\simle{\mathrel{\mathpalette\xversim <}}
34: \newcommand{\neff}{\mbox{$\Delta N_\nu$}}
35:
36: %\newcommand{\bd}{\begin{displaymath}}
37: %\newcommand{\ed}{\end{displaymath}}
38: \newcommand{\bd}{\begin{equation}}
39: \newcommand{\ed}{\end{equation}}
40:
41: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}
42: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}
43: \newcommand{\ba}{\begin{array}}
44: \newcommand{\ea}{\end{array}}
45: \newcommand{\nn}{\nonumber}
46:
47: \begin{document}
48:
49: %{\sc <Draft v8.0>}
50:
51:
52: \input{psfig.sty}
53: \begin{flushright}
54: \baselineskip=12pt
55: MADPH-02-1284 \\ UPR-1006T
56: \end{flushright}
57:
58: \begin{center}
59: %\vglue 1.5cm
60: {\Large\bf Primordial Nucleosynthesis Constraints \\
61: on $Z'$ Properties}
62: %\vglue 2.0cm
63: \vglue 1.0cm
64: {\Large Vernon Barger$^{1}$, Paul Langacker$^{1,2}$ and Hye-Sung Lee$^{1}$}
65: \vglue 1cm
66: {$^1$ Department of Physics \\
67: University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706 \\
68: ~ \\
69: $^2$ Department of Physics and Astronomy \\
70: University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 \\}
71: \end{center}
72:
73: %\vglue 1.5cm
74: \vglue 1.0cm
75: \begin{abstract}
76:
77: In models involving new TeV-scale \zpr \ gauge bosons, the new
78: \upr \ symmetry often prevents the generation of Majorana masses
79: needed for a conventional neutrino seesaw, leading to three superweakly
80: interacting
81: ``right-handed'' neutrinos $\nu_R$, the Dirac partners of the ordinary
82: neutrinos. These can be produced prior to big bang nucleosynthesis by the
83: \zpr \ interactions, leading to a faster expansion rate and too
84: much $^4He$. We quantify the constraints on the \zpr \ properties
85: from nucleosynthesis for \zpr \ couplings motivated by a class of
86: $E_6$ models parametrized by an angle $\theta_{E6}$.
87: The rate for the annihilation of three
88: approximately massless right-handed neutrinos into other particle
89: pairs through the \zpr \ channel is calculated.
90: The decoupling temperature, which is higher than that of ordinary
91: left-handed neutrinos due to the large \zpr \ mass, is evaluated,
92: and the equivalent number of new doublet neutrinos
93: $\Delta N_\nu$ is obtained numerically as a function of the \zpr \ mass and
94: couplings for a variety of assumptions concerning
95: the $Z-Z'$ mixing angle and the
96: quark-hadron transition temperature $T_c$.
97: Except near the values of
98: $\theta_{E6}$ for which the $Z'$ decouples
99: from the right-handed neutrinos, the \zpr \ mass and mixing constraints
100: from nucleosynthesis are much more stringent than the existing laboratory
101: limits from searches for direct production or from precision electroweak
102: data, and are comparable to the ranges that may ultimately be probed
103: at proposed colliders.
104: For the case $T_c = 150 $ MeV with the theoretically favored range
105: of
106: $Z-Z'$ mixings,
107: $\Delta N_\nu \simle 0.3$ for $M_{Z'} \simgr 4.3 $ TeV for any
108: value of $\theta_{E6}$.
109: %The constraints are weaker for values of
110: % $\theta_{E6}$ close to the critical value for which the $Z'$ decouples
111: % from the right-handed neutrinos.
112: Larger mixing or larger $T_c$ often lead to
113: unacceptably large $\Delta N_\nu $ except near the $\nu_R$ decoupling
114: limit.
115:
116: \end{abstract}
117:
118: \vspace{0.5cm}
119: \begin{flushleft}
120: \baselineskip=12pt
121: \today\\
122: \end{flushleft}
123: \newpage
124: %\setcounter{page}{1}
125: %\pagestyle{plain}
126: \baselineskip=14pt
127:
128: \section{Introduction}
129:
130: Additional heavy \zpr \ gauge bosons~\cite{ell} are predicted in many
131: superstring~\cite{string} and grand unified~\cite{review} theories, and
132: also in models of dynamical symmetry breaking~\cite{DSB}.
133: If present at a scale of a TeV or so they could provide
134: a solution to the $\mu$ problem~\cite{muprob} and other problems
135: of the minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM)~\cite{general}.
136: Current limits from collider~\cite{explim,LEPmixing} and precision~\cite{indirect}
137: experiments are model dependent, but generally imply that $M_{Z'} > (500-800)$ GeV
138: and that the $Z-Z'$ mixing angle is smaller than a few $\times 10^{-3}$.
139: There are even hints of deviations in atomic parity violation~\cite{APV}\footnote{The
140: interpretation of these results is controversial. For recent discussion, see
141: \cite{interp}.}.
142: and the NuTeV experiment~\cite{NuTeV}, which could be an early indication of
143: a \zpr~\cite{hints}.
144: A \zpr \ lighter than a TeV or so should be observable at Run II
145: at the Tevatron. Future colliders should be able to observe
146: a \zpr \ with mass up to around 5
147: TeV and perform diagnostics on the couplings up to a few
148: TeV~\cite{collider}.
149:
150: An electroweak or TeV-scale \zpr \ would have important implications
151: for theories of neutrino mass. If the right-handed neutrinos carry a non-zero
152: \upr \ charge, then the \upr \ symmetry forbids them from obtaining
153: a Majorana mass much larger than the \upr-breaking scale, and in particular
154: would forbid a conventional neutrino seesaw model~\cite{seesaw}.
155: In this case, it might still be possible to generate small Majorana
156: masses for the ordinary (active) neutrinos by some sort of
157: TeV-scale seesaw mechanism in which there are additional mass
158: suppressions~\cite{TEVseesaw}. However, another possibility is that
159: there are no Majorana mass terms, and that the neutrinos have
160: Dirac masses which are small for some reason, such as higher
161: dimensional operators~\cite{HDO} or volume suppressions in theories with large
162: extra dimensions~\cite{LED}. In this case, the model would contain three additional
163: right-handed partners of the ordinary neutrinos, which would be almost massless.
164: Such light Dirac neutrinos (i.e., with mass less than an eV or so) in the
165: standard model or MSSM are essentially sterile, except for the tiny
166: effects associated with their masses and Higgs couplings, which are much
167: too small to produce them in significant numbers prior to
168: nucleosynthesis or in a supernova. However, the superweak interactions
169: of these states due to their coupling to a heavy
170: $Z'$ (or a heavy $W'$ in the $SU(2)_L \times SU(2)_R \times U(1)$ extension of the
171: standard model~\cite{LR}) might be sufficient to create
172: them in large numbers in the early
173: universe~\cite{steigman,steigman2,dolgov} or in a supernova~\cite{supernova}.
174: In this paper, we consider the constraints following from big bang nucleosynthesis
175: on \zpr \ properties in a class of $E_6$-motivated models.
176:
177: It is well known that any new relativistic particle species that were present
178: when the temperature $T$ was a few MeV would increase the expansion rate,
179: leading to an earlier freeze-out of the neutron to proton ratio and therefore
180: to a higher $^4He$ abundance~\cite{yang,bbnreview}. Their contribution is usually
181: parametrized by the number \neff \ of additional neutrinos with full-strength
182: weak interactions
183: that would yield the same contribution to the energy
184: density.
185: The primordial $^4He$ abundance is still rather uncertain, but
186: typical estimates of the upper limit on \neff \ are in the range\footnote{
187: The limit can be weakened by invoking an excess of $\nu_e$ with respect to
188: $\bar{\nu}_e$, which lowers the $n/p$ ratio.}
189: $\neff < (0.3-1)$~\cite{bbnreview,lisi}.
190: Of course, the $Z$-width does not allow more than 3
191: light active neutrinos~\cite{PDG},
192: so \neff \ should be interpreted as
193: an effective parameter describing degrees of freedom that do not couple with
194: full strength to the $Z$.
195:
196: In 1979, Steigman, Olive,
197: and Schramm~\cite{steigman,steigman2} described the implications of
198: a superweakly interacting light particle, such as a right-handed neutrino
199: coupling to a heavy $Z'$. Because of their superweak interactions, such
200: particles decoupled earlier than ordinary neutrinos. As the temperature dropped
201: further, massive particles such as quarks, pions, and muons subsequently
202: annihilated, reheating the ordinary neutrinos and other particles in equilibrium,
203: but not the superweak particles. One must also take into account
204: the transition between the quark-gluon phase and the hadron phase.
205:
206: A simple estimate of the decoupling temperature is obtained as
207: follows~\cite{steigman,steigman2}.
208: Ordinary neutrinos have
209: cross-sections $\sigma_W \propto G_W^2 T^2$, where $G_W$ is the
210: Fermi constant, and interaction rates
211: \bd
212: \Gamma_W(T) = n \left< \sigma_W v \right> \propto G_W^2 T^5,
213: \ed
214: where $n$ is the density of target particles.
215: The Hubble expansion parameter varies as $H \propto T^2/M_P$,
216: where $M_P $ is the Planck scale, so
217: the decoupling temperature $T_d$ at which $\Gamma$ is equal to $H$ becomes
218: \bd
219: T_d \propto (G_W^2 M_P)^{-1/3}.
220: \ed
221: Putting in the coefficients, $T_d (\nu_L) \approx 1 $ MeV
222: for the ordinary neutrinos\footnote{More detailed studies~\cite{bbnreview}
223: obtain $T_d (\nu_L) \sim 3$ MeV. We will obtain $T_d (\nu_R)$ by an explicit
224: calculation, so the difference is irrelevant for our purposes.}.
225: Similarly,
226: a superweakly interacting particle such as a right-handed neutrino
227: with a cross-section $\sigma_{SW} \propto G_{SW}^2 T^2$, would decouple at
228: \bd
229: T_d (\nu_R)~ \sim \left( \frac{G_W}{G_{SW}} \right)^{2/3} T_d (\nu_L).
230: \ed
231: If in the specific model, the effective superweak coupling constant $G_{SW}$
232: is proportional to $M_{SW}^{-2}$, where $M_{SW}$ is the mass of a superweak gauge boson,
233: the decoupling temperature can be written as
234: \bd
235: T_d(\nu_R)~ \sim \left( \frac{M_{SW}}{M_W} \right)^{4/3} T_d (\nu_L),
236: \label{simple}
237: \ed
238: where $M_W$ is the $W$ mass. It is then straightforward to calculate the dilution
239: by the subsequent quark-hadron transition and the
240: annihilations of heavy particles, and the
241: corresponding
242: \neff \ from the superweak particles.
243:
244: Of course, the estimate in
245: (\ref{simple}) is very rough. In particular, the detailed couplings of the \zpr \
246: to the $\nu_R$ and to all of the other relevant particles must be considered for
247: a precise estimate\footnote{Detailed calculations were carried out in~\cite{prev1}
248: for the $\eta$ model (see Section \ref{model}), in~\cite{prev2} for more
249: general $E_6$ models, and in~\cite{afdvn} for a model with generators
250: $T_{3R}$ and $B-L$. However, these studies considered only
251: $\nu_R \overline{\nu_R} \leftrightarrow (e^+e^-, \nu_L \overline{\nu_L} )$. In the
252: present paper we include the interactions with all of the particles in
253: equilibrium at a given temperature. This leads to a lower $T_d (\nu_R)$
254: and more stringent limits. Constraints on extended technicolor models
255: were considered in~\cite{ETC}.}
256: In this paper, we do this for a class of $Z'$ models with couplings
257: motivated by $E_6$ grand unification~\cite{lw}. (The full structure of $E_6$
258: is not required.)
259: We define the $U(1)'$ model in Section \ref{model}.
260: The implications of superweakly coupled particles for nucleosynthesis
261: and the uncertainties from the quark-hadron transition temperature $T_c$
262: are summarized in Section \ref{nucleosynthesis}.
263: Section \ref{calculation} deals with the
264: calculation of the decoupling temperature.
265: We present our results and numerical analysis for $T_d$ and \neff \
266: for three right-handed neutrinos as a function
267: of the \zpr \ mass and couplings for various assumptions concerning the$Z-Z'$ mixing
268: and $T_c$ in Section
269: \ref{result}. The discussion and conclusion follows in Section \ref{discussion}.
270:
271: \section{$Z'$ in $E_6$-motivated models}
272: \label{model}
273: A general model with an extra \zpr \ is characterized by the \zpr \
274: mass; the $Z-Z'$ mixing angle; the \upr \ gauge coupling; the
275: \upr \ chiral charges for all of the fermions and scalars,
276: which in general may be family non-universal, leading to flavor changing
277: neutral currents~\cite{famnon};
278: and an additional parameter associated with mixing
279: between the $Z$ and $Z'$ kinetic terms~\cite{kinetic}.
280: Furthermore, most concrete \zpr \ models involve additional
281: particles with exotic standard model quantum numbers, which are
282: required to prevent anomalies. It is difficult to work with the
283: most general case, so many studies make use of the \upr \ charges
284: and exotic particle content associated with the $E_6$ model,
285: as an example of a consistent anomaly-free construction\footnote{
286: The full structure of $E_6$ grand unification is not required, and in
287: fact the $E_6$ Yukawa coupling relations must not be respected
288: in order to prevent rapid proton decay~\cite{lw}.}. Explicit
289: string constructions~\cite{stringmodels} often lead to other
290: patterns of couplings and exotics, but these are very model
291: dependent.
292:
293: $E_6$ actually yields two additional \upr \ factors when broken
294: to the standard model (or to $SU(5)$), i.e.,
295: \bd
296: E_6 \to SO(10) \times U(1)_\psi \to SU(5) \times U(1)_\chi \times U(1)_\psi.
297: \ed
298: It is usually assumed that only one linear combination survives to
299: low energies, parametrized by a mixing angle $\theta_{E6}$.
300: The resultant $U(1)'$ charge is then\footnote{We ignore the possibility of
301: kinetic mixing~\cite{kinetic}.}
302: \bd
303: Q = Q_\chi \cos \theta_{E6} + Q_\psi \sin \theta_{E6}. \label{Qdef}
304: \ed
305: A special case that is often considered is $U(1)_\eta$, which
306: corresponds to $\theta_{E6} = 2 \pi - \tan^{-1} \sqrt{\frac{5}{3}}=1.71 \pi$.
307: We list the charges of $U(1)_\chi$ and $U(1)_\psi$ that we
308: need in Table \ref{table1}.
309: The quantum numbers of the associated exotic particles are given in~\cite{lw}.
310: It is conventional to choose $\theta_{E6}$ to be in the range $(0,\pi)$,
311: since the charges merely change sign for $\theta_{E6} \rightarrow \theta_{E6} + \pi$.
312: With this convention one must allow both positive and negative values for the
313: $Z-Z'$ mixing angle $\delta$. In this paper, we find it convenient
314: to choose a different convention in which $\theta_{E6}$ varies from $0$ to $2 \pi$, but
315: for which $\delta \le 0$. That is, the range $0-\pi$ corresponds to the
316: $E_6$ models with negative mixing, while $\pi-2 \pi$ corresponds to
317: positive mixing.
318: The $\nu_R$ charge is nonzero, precluding
319: an ordinary seesaw, except for $\theta_{E6} \sim 0.42 \pi$ and $1.42 \pi$.
320: We will always assume that the neutrinos are Dirac and that the three
321: right-handed neutrinos are therefore very light. (In fact, the non-zero Dirac
322: masses play no role in the analysis.)
323: There could be additional sterile states,
324: such as the $SO(10)$-singlet states occurring in the 27-plet of $E_6$. If these
325: involve nearly-massless fermions they could also contribute to the expansion rate prior
326: to nucleosynthesis. We assume that these additional neutralinos
327: acquire electroweak scale masses from the gauge symmetry breaking~\cite{ell}.
328:
329:
330:
331:
332: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.4}
333: \begin{table}[t]
334: \caption{The (family-universal) charges of the $U(1)_\chi$ and the $U(1)_\psi$.}
335: \label{table1}
336: \vspace{0.4cm}
337: \begin{center}
338: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|}
339: \hline
340: Fields & $Q_\chi$ & $Q_\psi$ \\
341: \hline
342: $u_L$ & $-1/2 \sqrt{10}$ & $1/2 \sqrt{6}$ \\
343: \hline
344: $u_R$ & $1/2 \sqrt{10}$ & $-1/2 \sqrt{6}$ \\
345: \hline
346: $d_L$ & $-1/2 \sqrt{10}$ & $1/2 \sqrt{6}$ \\
347: \hline
348: $d_R$ & $-3/2 \sqrt{10}$ & $-1/2 \sqrt{6}$ \\
349: \hline
350: $e_L$ & $3/2 \sqrt{10}$ & $1/2 \sqrt{6}$ \\
351: \hline
352: $e_R$ & $1/2 \sqrt{10}$ & $-1/2 \sqrt{6}$ \\
353: \hline
354: $\nu_L$ & $3/2 \sqrt{10}$ & $1/2 \sqrt{6}$ \\
355: \hline
356: $\nu_R$ & $5/2 \sqrt{10}$ & $-1/2 \sqrt{6}$ \\
357: \hline
358: \end{tabular}
359: \end{center}
360: \end{table}
361:
362:
363:
364:
365: Let $Z$ and \zpr \ represent the Standard Model and \upr \ gauge bosons, respectively,
366: and $Z_{1,2}$ the mass eigenstate bosons, related by
367: \bd
368: \left( \begin{array}{c} Z_1 \\ Z_2 \end{array} \right) =
369: \left( \begin{array}{cc} \cos \delta &
370: -\sin \delta \\ \sin \delta & \cos \delta \end{array} \right)
371: \left( \begin{array}{c} Z \\ Z' \end{array} \right),
372: \ed
373: where $\delta$ is the $Z-Z'$ mixing angle. As stated in the Introduction, the limits
374: on $M_{Z_2} \sim M_{Z'}$ depend on $\theta_{E6}$ and also on the masses of any exotics and
375: superpartners to which the $Z'$ couples,
376: but are typically in the range $\mzp > (500 - 800)$ GeV.
377: The limits on $\delta$ are correlated with those for \mzp \ and are asymmetric under
378: $\delta \rightarrow - \delta$. However, for $\mzp \sim 1$ TeV
379: the constraints are less sensitive to $\theta_{E6}$ and are approximately symmetric,
380: with $|\delta|<0.002$ giving a reasonable approximation for all $\theta_{E6}$.
381: For larger \mzp \ there are two theoretical constraints on the mixing,
382: corresponding to equations (6) and (5) of~\cite{luo}. The first
383: is a theoretical relation between the
384: mass and mixing,
385: \beq
386: \delta = C \frac{g_{Z}'}{g_Z} \frac{M_{Z_1}^2}{M_{Z_2}^2}, \label{mixval} \eeq
387: where
388: $g_Z \equiv \sqrt{g_1^2 + g_2^2}$
389: and $g_Z'$ is the \upr \ gauge coupling constant. The value of $g_Z'$
390: depends on the embedding and breaking of the underlying theory. We will choose
391: $g_Z' = \sqrt\frac{5}{3} g_Z \sin \theta_W$, which corresponds to a unification of
392: $g_Z'$ with the other gauge couplings for the exotic particle quantum numbers of
393: supersymmetric $E_6$.
394: In (\ref{mixval}) $C$ depends on the charges of the scalar fields which
395: lead to the mixing (see Table III of~\cite{luo}). However, for the
396: typical cases in which the mixing is induced by scalars
397: in an $E_6$ 27 or $\overline{27}$-plet,
398: it is a reasonable approximation
399: to take $-1 < C < 1$ for all $\theta_{E6}$. (One can have a slightly
400: more restrictive range for some $\theta_{E6}$.)
401: The assumption $|C| < 1$ corresponds to
402: $|\delta | < 0.0051/M_{Z_2}^2$,
403: where $M_{Z_2}$ is in TeV.
404: The second theoretical constraint
405: is the
406: requirement that the mixing should not change the mass of the lighter $Z$ more
407: than is allowed by the data. It is equivalent to
408: \beq
409: | \delta | \sim \sqrt{\rho_0 -1 }\ \ \frac { M_{Z_1}}{M_{Z_2}}, \eeq
410: where
411: $M_{Z_1} = M_Z$, and the $\rho_0$ parameter, defined precisely
412: in~\cite{erler2}, should be exactly 1 in the standard model. The precision data
413: imply $\rho_0 < 1.001$. Hence,
414: $|\delta | < 0.0029/M_{Z_2}$,
415: where $M_{Z_2}$ is again in TeV.
416: %
417: %
418: We will consider the following cases:
419: \bea
420: {\rm (A0)}\ \ \delta \ &=& 0 \ \ {\rm (no\ mixing)} \nn \\
421: {\rm (A1)}\
422: |\delta | &<& 0.0051/M_{Z_2}^2 \ \
423: {\rm (theoretical \ mass-mixing \ relation)} \nn
424: \\
425: {\rm (A2)}\ |\delta | &<& 0.0029/M_{Z_2} \ \ {\rm (\rho_0 \ constraint)} \nn \\
426: {\rm (A3)}\ |\delta | &=& 0.002 \ \ {\rm (maximal\ mixing\ allowed\ for\ M_{Z_2} \sim 1
427: \ TeV)}.
428: \label{cases}
429: \eea
430: A1 is more stringent than A2 and A3 in the large mass range, so we will mainly
431: focus on A0 and A1.
432:
433:
434: The lagrangian for the massive neutral current coupling to fermion $f$ is~\cite{luo}
435: \bea
436: {- \mathcal L}_{\it int} &=& g_Z Q_Z(f_L){\bar f_L} \gamma^\mu
437: f_L Z_\mu + g_Z Q_Z(f_R){\bar f_R} \gamma^\mu f_R Z_\mu \nn \\
438: & & + g_Z' Q(f_L){\bar f_L}
439: \gamma^\mu f_L Z'_\mu + g_Z' Q(f_R){\bar f_R} \gamma^\mu f_R Z'_\mu
440: \eea
441: where
442: \bea
443: Q_Z(f_L) \equiv T^3_f - q_f \sin^2 \theta_W, \nn \\
444: Q_Z(f_R)\equiv - q_f \sin^2 \theta_W,
445: \eea
446: and $Q(f_{L,R})$ is given by (\ref{Qdef}).
447: The annihilation cross-section through $Z'$ has both (light) $Z_1$ and (heavy)
448: $Z_2$ contributions unless $\delta = 0$ and is calculated in Section \ref{calculation}.
449:
450:
451:
452:
453: \section{Nucleosynthesis}
454: \label{nucleosynthesis}
455: As described in the Introduction, the
456: observed $^4He$ abundance constrains the energy density at the time
457: of Big Bang Nucleosynthesis \cite{yang}, with most recent
458: estimates~\cite{bbnreview,lisi} of the number of equivalent new
459: active neutrino types in the range $\neff < (0.3-1)$.
460:
461: The contribution of new relativistic species can be written
462: \bd
463: \Delta N_\nu = \frac{8}{7} \sum_B \frac{g_B}{2}
464: \left( \frac{T_B}{T_{BBN}} \right)^4 + \sum_F \frac{g_F}{2} \left( \frac{T_F}{T_{BBN}} \right)^4,
465: \ed
466: where $g_B$ and $g_F$ are degrees of freedom of new bosons (B) and new fermions (F), respectively,
467: $T_{B,F}$ are their effective temperatures, and $T_{BBN} \sim 1$ MeV is the
468: temperature at the time of the freeze-out of the neutron to proton ratio.
469: In particular, the contribution of three types of right-handed neutrinos is
470: \beq \label{NfromT}
471: \Delta N_\nu = 3 \cdot 1 \cdot \left( \frac{T_{\nu_R}}{T_{BBN}} \right)^4
472: = 3 \left( \frac{g(T_{BBN})}{g(T_d(\nu_R))} \right)^{4/3}
473: \eeq
474: where $T_d(\nu_R)$ is the decoupling temperature of the right-handed neutrinos.
475: $g(T)$ is the effective number of degrees of freedom at temperature $T$.
476: Neglecting finite mass corrections, it is given by $g_B(T) + \frac{7}{8} g_F(T)$,
477: where $g_{B,F}(T)$ are the number of bosonic and fermionic relativistic degrees
478: of freedom in equilibrium at temperature $T$~\cite{steigman,steigman2}.
479: In particular,
480: $g(T_{BBN}) = 43/4$ from the three active neutrinos, $e^{\pm}$, and $\gamma$, and
481: $g(T)$ increases (in this approximation)
482: as a series of step functions at higher temperature as more
483: particles are in equilibrium.
484: The second equality in (\ref{NfromT}) comes
485: from entropy conservation \cite{steigman}
486: in the heavy particle decouplings and quark-hadron transition subsequent to
487: the $\nu_R$ decoupling. Therefore,
488: the $\nu_R$ are not included in our definition of $g(T)$.
489: (They will be included in the expansion rate formula prior to decoupling.)
490:
491:
492:
493:
494: In calculating $g(T)$
495: one must also take into account the QCD phase transition
496: at temperature $T_c$. Above $T_c$ the $u$ and $d$ (and possibly $s$)
497: quarks and the gluons were the relevant
498: hadronic degrees of freedom,
499: while below $T_c$ they are replaced by pions~\cite{steigman,steigman2}.
500: The value of $T_c$ is poorly known, but is usually estimated to be in the range
501: $(150-400)$ MeV~\cite{olive}. This range is estimated in quark and hadron
502: potential models as the temperature above which hadrons start to overlap
503: (lower end) or as the temperature below which the quark gas in no longer
504: ideal (upper end). A related uncertainty is whether to use current or
505: constituent quark masses. At very high temperatures the quarks
506: can be considered as asymptotically free and current masses are appropriate, while
507: around $T_c$
508: constituent effects become important\footnote{One can alternatively
509: argue that the current masses are appropriate above a temperature $T_{chiral}$,
510: above which chiral symmetry is restored,
511: and constitutent masses below $T_{chiral}$.
512: One would expect $T_c$ and $T_{chiral}$ to be comparable, but their precise
513: relation is uncertain.}.
514: The range of estimates
515: for $T_c$ is essentially unchanged if one simply fixes the quark masses
516: at either value~\cite{olive}.
517:
518: Figure \ref{dof} shows the explicit values of
519: $g(T)$ from the more detailed analysis of
520: Ref.~\cite{srednicki}, which includes finite mass and other corrections,
521: and uses the two values
522: $T_c= 150$ MeV and 400 MeV. We will also use these
523: values for our numerical analysis.
524: The sharp increase in $g(T)$ above $T_c$ (because of the large number
525: of quark and gluon degrees of freedom) is extremely important for relaxing
526: the constraints on the \zpr \ mass.
527:
528:
529: The QCD phase transition does not occur instantaneously or at one temperature
530: but rather smoothly (meaning both quarks and hadrons exist at the
531: same temperature) for a period of time around
532: $T_c$, as illustrated by the smooth curves in Figure \ref{dof}.
533: Risking a small inconsistency,
534: we approximate our calculation of the interaction rate
535: by simply switching from quarks
536: to hadrons for temperatures below $T_c$. We will take
537: the values $T_c$ = 150 and 400 MeV to illustrate the range of hadronic
538: uncertainties.
539: Above $T_c$, the interaction rate
540: depends in principle on the quark masses, especially for low $T_c$.
541: However, we have found in practice that the results are almost identical
542: for constituent and current masses, so we will mainly display them for
543: the constituent case (both will be shown for the $\eta$ model).
544:
545:
546: The calculation of the right-handed neutrino decoupling temperature,
547: $T_d(\nu_R)$ in terms of the $Z'$ parameters is discussed in the next section.
548:
549:
550:
551:
552: \section{The expansion and interaction rates}
553: \label{calculation}
554: A particle is decoupled from the background when its interaction rate drops below
555: the expansion rate of the universe.
556: In this section, we present the the cosmological expansion rate
557: $H(T)$ along with the explicit form of the interaction rate $\Gamma(T)$
558: for $\overline{\nu_R} \nu_R$ annihilating into all open
559: channels\footnote{As long as equilibrium is maintained, the $\nu_R$ annihilation and
560: production rates are the same. It is more convenient to estimate
561: the annihilation rate of $\overline{\nu_R} \nu_R$ into massive particles, because
562: the final state mass effects are easily incorporated in the cross section
563: formulae, whereas for the production rate one must explicitly consider
564: the suppressed number density for the massive particles.},
565: and estimate the decoupling temperature $T_d$ of a
566: right-handed neutrino by $\Gamma(T_d) \sim H(T_d)$.
567:
568: The Hubble expansion parameter is given by
569: \bd
570: H(T) = \sqrt{\frac{8 \pi G_N \rho(T)}{3}}
571: = \sqrt{\frac{4 \pi^3 G_N g'(T)}{45}} T^2
572: \ed
573: where $G_N = M_P^{-2}$ is the Newton constant and $\rho(T)$ is
574: the energy density.
575: We define
576: $g'(T) = g(T) + \frac{21}{4}$, where the $21/4$
577: reflects the 3 massless right-handed neutrinos.
578:
579:
580: The cross-section $\sigma_i (s) \equiv \sigma(\overline{\nu_R} \nu_R \to
581: \overline{ f_i} f_i)$
582: for a massless right-handed neutrino
583: pair to annihilate into a fermion pair through the $Z'$-channel is
584:
585: \bea \label{sigma}
586: \sigma_i (s) = N_C^i \frac{s \beta_i}{16 \pi}
587: \left\{ \left( 1 + \frac{\beta_i^2}{3} \right) \left(
588: (G_{RL}^i)^2 + (G_{RR}^i)^2 \right) +
589: 2 \left( 1 - \beta_i^2 \right) G_{RL}^i G_{RR}^i \right\}
590: \eea
591: where (for $s \ll M_{Z_1}^2, M_{Z_2}^2$)
592: \bea
593: G_{RX}^i &=& g_Z'^2 Q(\nu_R) Q(f_{iX})
594: \left( \frac{\sin^2 \delta}{M_{Z_1}^2} + \frac{\cos^2
595: \delta}{M_{Z_2}^2} \right) \nn \\
596: &-& g_Z' g_Z Q(\nu_R) Q_Z(f_{iX}) \left( \frac{\sin \delta \cos \delta}{M_{Z_1}^2} -
597: \frac{\sin \delta \cos \delta}{M_{Z_2}^2} \right),
598: \label{grx}
599: \eea
600: where $X = L$ or $R$, \ \
601: $\beta_i \equiv \sqrt{1 - 4 m_{f_i}^2 / s}$ is the relativistic velocity for the
602: final particles,
603: and $N_C^i$ is the color factor of particle $f_i$.
604:
605: In the limit of no-mixing $( \delta = 0 )$ and massless final particles $( \beta_i =
606: 1 )$, the cross-section simplifies to
607:
608: \beq
609: \sigma_i (s)
610: \to N_C^i \frac{s}{12 \pi} \left( \frac{g_Z'^2}{M_{Z'}^2}
611: \right)^2 Q(\nu_R)^2 \left( Q(f_{iL})^2
612: + Q(f_{iR})^2 \right),
613: \label{nomixlimit}
614: \eeq
615: consistent with the earlier estimate $\sigma_{SW} \propto G_{SW}^2
616: T^2$ with $G_{SW} \propto \frac{g_Z'^2}{M_{Z'}^2}$ and $T \propto \sqrt{s}$.
617:
618:
619: For temperatures less than the quark-hadron transition temperature
620: $T_c = 150 - 400$ MeV, we replace the quark degrees of freedom with hadrons.
621: The only relevant annihilation channels are into charged pions.
622: We approximate the cross-section of $\overline{\nu_R} \nu_R$
623: annihilating into $\pi^+ \pi^-$ by using the
624: $\rho$ dominance model \cite{sakurai}.
625: \bea \label{sigmapi}
626: \sigma_\pi (s) \equiv \sigma(\overline{\nu_R} \nu_R \to
627: \pi^+ \pi^-) = \frac{s \beta_\pi^3}{96 \pi} | F_\pi (s) |^2
628: \left( G_{RL}^u + G_{RL}^{\bar d} + G_{RR}^u + G_{RR}^{\bar d} \right)^2
629: \eea
630: which is basically obtained by using
631: $Q(f_{iL}) = Q(u_L) + Q(\bar d_L)$
632: and $Q_Z(f_{iL}) = Q_Z(u_L) + Q_Z(\bar d_L)$ for $G_{RL}^i$ and likewise for $G_{RR}^i$.
633: The pion form factor\footnote{More complicated form factors
634: are known to fit the experimental data better~\cite{sakurai2}, but
635: (\ref{formfactor}) is adequate for our purposes.} is
636: \beq
637: F_\pi (s) = \frac{m_\rho^2}{s - m^2_\rho + i m_\rho \Gamma_\rho}, \label{formfactor} \eeq
638: with
639: $m_\rho = 771$ MeV and $\Gamma_\rho = 149$ MeV.
640:
641:
642: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.4}
643: \begin{table}[t]
644: \caption{The masses (in MeV) used for the numerical analysis.}
645: \label{table2}
646: \vspace{0.4cm}
647: \begin{center}
648: \begin{tabular}{|c|c||c|c|}
649: \hline
650: Quarks & Current (Constituent) masses & Others & Masses\\
651: \hline
652: $u$ & $4.2\ (340)$ & $\nu$ & $0$ \\
653: \hline
654: $d$ & $7.5\ (340)$ & $e$ & $0.511$ \\
655: \hline
656: $s$ & $150\ (540)$ & $\mu$ & $105$ \\
657: \hline
658: $c$ & $1150\ (1500)$ & $\tau$ & $1800$ \\
659: \hline
660: $b$ & $4200\ (4500)$ & $\pi$ & $137$ \\
661: \hline
662: \end{tabular}
663: \end{center}
664: \end{table}
665:
666:
667:
668:
669: The interaction rate per $\nu_R$ is
670: %$\Gamma(T) = n \left< \sigma v \right>$
671: %where $n$ is the right-handed neutrino number density
672: \bd
673: \Gamma(T) = \sum_i \Gamma_i(T) = \sum_i \frac{n_{\nu_R}}{g_{\nu_R}}
674: \left< \sigma v (\overline{\nu_R} \nu_R \to
675: \overline{ f_i} f_i,~ \pi^+ \pi^-) \right>,
676: \ed
677: where $n_{\nu_R}$
678: is the number density of a single flavor of massless right-handed
679: neutrinos plus antineutrinos,
680: $g_{\nu_R}=2$ is the number of degrees of freedom,
681: and $\left< \sigma v \right>$ is the
682: thermal average of the cross-section times velocity.
683:
684:
685:
686:
687: We use the same masses (Table \ref{table2}) used in the
688: calculation~\cite{steigman2,srednicki}
689: of $g(T)$ in Figure~\ref{dof}, except for
690: the value $m_b = 4200$ MeV of the $b$ quark current mass~\cite{PDG}.
691: We include the contributions of all
692: particles up to the $b$ quarks.
693: The contributions from the top quark and
694: heavy particles from new physics, such as
695: squarks, sleptons, and exotics would only be relevant
696: when the decoupling temperature is close
697: to the electroweak scale or higher. This only occurs when $\theta_{E6}$
698: is extremely close to
699: the values for which the $\nu_R$ decouples from the \zpr.
700:
701: For a massless right-handed neutrino pair colliding with 4-momenta
702: $p^\mu \equiv (p, \bf p)$
703: and $k^\mu \equiv (k, \bf k)$ with relative
704: angle $\theta$, the interaction rate per neutrino is~\cite{Kolb}
705: \bea
706: \Gamma_i (T) &=& \frac{g_{\nu_R}}{n_{\nu_R} (T)}
707: \int \frac{d^3 \bf p}{(2 \pi)^3} \frac{d^3 \bf k}{(2 \pi)^3}
708: f_\nu(p) f_\nu(k) \sigma_i(s) v_M \nn
709: \\ &=& \frac{ g_{\nu_R}}{8 \pi^4 n_{\nu_R}}
710: \int_0^\infty p^2 dp \int_0^\infty k^2 dk \int_{-1}^1 d \cos
711: \theta ~\frac{\left(1 - \cos \theta\right)}{\left(e^{k/T} +
712: 1\right) \left(e^{p/T} + 1\right)}
713: \sigma_i (s),
714: \eea
715: where
716: $f_\nu(k) = (e^{k/T} + 1)^{-1}$
717: is the Fermi-Dirac distribution with
718: \bd
719: n_{\nu_R} (T) = g_{\nu_R} \int \frac{d^3 \bf k}{(2 \pi)^3}
720: f_\nu(k) = 2 \cdot \frac{3}{4 \pi^2} \zeta(3) T^3,
721: \ed
722: $v_M = p \cdot k/pk = 1 - \cos\theta$
723: is the M\o ller velocity, and
724: $s = 2 p k (1 - \cos\theta)$
725: is the square of the center-of-mass energy.
726:
727:
728:
729: A root-finding method was used to calculate the decoupling temperature,
730: for which $H =
731: \Gamma$. A several percent error was allowed in
732: the numerical result to calculate the roots
733: efficiently.
734: Finite temperature effects, such as changes in the phase space
735: due to interactions with the thermal bath, can increase the ordinary neutrino
736: decoupling temperature by
737: several percent~\cite{fornengo}. Analogous effects for the
738: $\nu_R$ are too small to significantly affect our
739: results.
740:
741:
742: \section{Numerical results}
743: \label{result}
744: In this section, we present the numerical results from the calculation.
745: The marked points in Figures \ref{decoupling1}-\ref{A1-400}
746: are the results of the actual calculation, while the curves
747: interpolate.
748:
749:
750: Figures \ref{decoupling1} and \ref{decoupling1a} show how the right-handed
751: neutrino decoupling temperature $T_d$ and the equivalent
752: number of extra neutrino species $\Delta
753: N_\nu$ change with $M_{Z_2}$ for $\theta_{E6} = 2 \pi - \tan^{-1} \sqrt{\frac{5}{3}}
754: \sim 1.71
755: \pi$ (the $\eta$ model) for constituent and current masses, respectively,
756: for $T_c=$ 150 and 400 MeV and the various assumptions concerning the $Z-Z'$ mixing
757: listed in (\ref{cases}). The no-mixing curves (A0) exhibit an approximate $T_d \sim
758: (M_{Z_2}/M_Z)^{4/3}$ dependence, in agreement with the simple estimate in the
759: Introduction~\cite{steigman,steigman2}. This is to be roughly expected because
760: of the $M_{Z_2}^{-4}$ dependence of the cross section for no mixing, but is not
761: exact because additional channels which affect both the expansion and interaction
762: rates open up at higher temperatures. The no-mixing curves in Figures
763: \ref{decoupling1} and \ref{decoupling1a}
764: are reasonably described by (\ref{simple})
765: for $T_d(\nu_L) \sim$ 3 MeV for the $\eta$ model,
766: but the coefficients in front
767: of $(M_{Z_2}/M_Z)^{4/3}$ are strongly model dependent,
768: as is apparent in Figures \ref{A1-150}-\ref{A1-400}. $T_d$ is
769: usually lower in the cases involving
770: $Z-Z'$ mixing, because the $Z$ annihilation channel yields a contribution
771: proportional to $\delta^2$ even for infinite $M_{Z_2}$.
772: That is why the (theoretically unrealistic) curves A3 for fixed $|\delta| = 0.002$
773: are asymptotically flat for large $M_{Z_2}$. Case A1, in which
774: $|\delta| \sim 0.0051/M_{Z_2}^2$, also has $T_d \sim
775: (M_{Z_2}/M_Z)^{4/3}$, though with a smaller coefficient than for no mixing\footnote{The
776: coefficient is smaller for most but not all values of $\theta_{E6}$.}, while
777: A2, with $|\delta |= 0.0029/M_{Z_2}$, has $T_d \sim
778: (M_{Z_2}/M_Z)^{2/3}$. For case A1, $T_d$ is asymmetric under $\delta \rightarrow - \delta$
779: for all $M_{Z_2}$, as is apparent from (\ref{cases})
780: and (\ref{grx}). The difference vanishes
781: asymptotically for A2 and A3, but even for $M_{Z_2}=$ 5 TeV there is still a difference,
782: especially for A2.
783:
784: The decoupling temperature is
785: slightly lower for $T_c=$ 400 MeV than for 150 MeV, provided
786: it is in the range for
787: which the two curves in Figure~\ref{dof} differ. Both the
788: expansion and annihilation rates are
789: smaller for $T_c=$ 400 MeV, but the effect on the
790: expansion rate is more important
791: because of the gluonic degrees of freedom. Similarly,
792: $T_d$ is smaller for current quark masses than for constituent masses, provided
793: $T_d > T_c$, because of the larger annihilation
794: rate\footnote{The difference between current and constituent masses
795: would be reduced if
796: their effects in the annihilation rate were properly correlated
797: with those in the expansion rate. However, as described in
798: Section \ref{nucleosynthesis}, the effect on $g(T)$ is small compared
799: with the uncertainty from $T_c$, and will be neglected.}.
800:
801: The $\Delta
802: N_\nu$ curves change rapidly when $T_d$ reaches the quark-hadron phase
803: transition temperature
804: $T_c$, where $g(T)$ changes significantly. That is why \dnn \ is so much larger for
805: $T_c$ = 400 MeV than for 150 MeV. For the no-mixing case, the difference
806: is significant for $M_{Z_2} \simle $ 4 TeV, and it persists to even higher masses
807: for the mixing cases (and to infinite mass for maximal mixing).
808: The only significant difference between the constituent and current quark masses
809: is in the maximal mixing case with $T_c=$ 150 MeV. That is because $T_d$ is very close
810: to $T_c$, and even a small change in $T_d$ leads to a
811: significant change in $g(T)$, as can be seen in Figure~\ref{dof}.
812:
813: It is apparent from Figures \ref{decoupling1} and \ref{decoupling1a}
814: that the $\eta$ model leads to a significant \dnn \ for all of the
815: cases and parameter ranges considered. Even the very conservative constraint
816: $\Delta N_\nu < 1$ implies $M_{Z_2} > 1.5-2.2$ TeV for $T_c = 150$ MeV,
817: or, limiting ourselves to the most realistic cases A0 and A1, $M_{Z_2} > 1.5-1.9$ TeV.
818: For $T_c = 400$ MeV one finds
819: $M_{Z_2} > 3.3-4$ TeV for A0 and A1, $M_{Z_2} > 5$ TeV for A2
820: and no allowed values for A3.
821: All of these are much more stringent than the direct laboratory limit
822: of 620 GeV~\cite{explim} or the indirect limits from precision electroweak
823: data~\cite{indirect}. The more stringent limit
824: $\Delta N_\nu < 0.3$ is satisfied for cases A0 and A1
825: for $M_{Z_2} > 2.5-3.2$ TeV for $T_c = 150$ MeV,
826: and $M_{Z_2} > 4.0-4.9$ TeV for $T_c = 400$ MeV. It is not satisfied for
827: case A2 with $T_c=$ 400 MeV until extremely high masses, and never for (fixed)
828: maximal mixing unless one takes a mixing much smaller than the
829: present accelerator limit ($|\delta| < 0.0024$) \cite{LEPmixing}.
830:
831:
832:
833: Figures \ref{A1-150} and \ref{A1-400} display the results for the class of $E_6$ models
834: parametrized by the angle $\theta_{E6}$ defined in (\ref{Qdef}), for
835: constituent masses and
836: $T_c=$ 150 MeV and 400 MeV, respectively. Each figure
837: includes the no-mixing case and the mixing assumption A1 defined in (\ref{cases}),
838: which is the most stringent and realistic.
839: The limits in the presence of $Z-Z'$ mixing are asymmetric under
840: $\delta \rightarrow - \delta$. This is represented in the right-handed graphs
841: by taking $\delta < 0$ but allowing $\theta_{E6}$ to run from 0 to $2\pi$,
842: so that the $(\pi-2\pi)$ range for $\delta < 0$ is equivalent to
843: $(0-\pi)$ with $\delta > 0$.
844: The top graphs display $T_d$ as a function of $\theta_{E6}$
845: for fixed values $M_{Z_2}=$ 500, 1000, 1500, 2000, 2500, 3500, 4000,
846: and 5000 GeV, with larger
847: $M_{Z_2}$ corresponding to higher $T_d$.
848: The middle graphs show \dnn \ as a function of $\theta_{E6}$ for the same
849: values of $M_{Z_2}$, with larger $M_{Z_2}$
850: corresponding to smaller \dnn. The bottom figures show the lower bounds on $M_{Z_2}$ for
851: $\Delta N_\nu < 0.3$, $0.5$, $1.0$ and $1.2$, with
852: larger $\Delta N_\nu$ corresponding to smaller $M_{Z_2}$.
853:
854: It is seen that $T_d$ becomes very large and the $M_{Z_2}$ limits essentially disappear
855: as $\theta_{E6}$ approaches $\theta_{E6} \sim 0.42
856: \pi$ or $ 1.42 \pi$, for which $\nu_R$ decouples completely
857: ($Q(\nu_R) = 0$), but the details depend on
858: the new physics at the electroweak and higher scales
859: (we only explicitly included particles up to the
860: $b$ quark).
861: $\theta_{E6} = 1.71 \pi$ corresponds to the $\eta$ model with $\delta < 0$,
862: while $\theta_{E6} = 0.71 \pi$ corresonds to $\delta > 0$. It is seen from the figures
863: that \dnn \ is larger for values of $\theta_{E6}$ closer to 0 (the $\chi$ model),
864: but are weaker near $\theta_{E6}=\pi/2$ (the $\psi$ model).
865:
866: From the figures it is apparent that requiring $\dnn \le 1$
867: excludes much of the interesting
868: parameter space for $T_c=$ 150 MeV, except for large $Z_2$ masses or regions
869: very close to the $\nu_R$ decoupling angles
870: $\sim 0.42\pi$ and $1.42 \pi$. In particular, the $\dnn \le 1$ constraint is satisfied
871: for all values of $\theta_{E6}$ for $M_{Z_2} \simgr 2.2$ TeV if there is no
872: mixing, with a slightly more stringent constraint $M_{Z_2} \simgr 2.4$ TeV for mixing
873: assumption A1. The corresponding $M_{Z_2}$ limits
874: for $\dnn \le 0.3$ are 3.8 and 4.3 TeV.
875: The constraints for $T_c=$ 400 MeV are even more stringent, essentially requiring
876: $\nu_R$ decoupling or very large $Z_2$ masses. One has
877: $\dnn \le 1 (0.3)$ for all $\theta_{E6}$ for cases A0 and A1 for
878: $M_{Z_2} \simgr 5.1(6.1)$ TeV.
879:
880:
881:
882:
883:
884:
885: \section{Discussion and Conclusion}
886: \label{discussion}
887:
888: Many theories beyond the standard model predict the existence of additional
889: \zpr \ gauge bosons at the TeV scale. The associated \upr \ gauge symmetry
890: often prevents the large Majorana masses needed for an ordinary neutrino seesaw
891: model. One possibility is that the neutrino masses are Dirac and small.
892: In that case, there is a possibility of producing the sterile
893: ``right-handed'' neutrino partners $\nu_R$ via \zpr \ interactions prior to
894: nucleosynthesis~\cite{steigman,steigman2}, leading to a faster expansion and
895: additional $^4He$.
896:
897: We have studied the right-handed neutrino decoupling temperature $T_d$
898: in a class of $E_6$-motivated \upr \ models as a function of the \zpr \ mass
899: and couplings (determined by an angle $\theta_{E6}$) for a variety of assumptions
900: concerning the $Z-Z'$ mixing angle $\delta$, the quark-hadron transition temperature $T_c$, and the
901: nature (constituent or current) of the quark masses. We have taken all relevant
902: channels (quark, gluon, lepton, and hadron) into account, not only in
903: the expansion rate $H(T)$ and entropy, but also in the rate
904: $\Gamma(T)$ for a massless right-handed neutrino
905: pair to annihilate into a fermion or pion pair via the ordinary or heavy $Z$ bosons.
906: We therefore obtain a larger annihilation rate, and thus a lower decoupling
907: temperature and more stringent constraints, than earlier calculations, which
908: only included annihilation into $e^+e^-$ and $\nu_L \overline{\nu_L}$.
909:
910: From the decoupling temperature and entropy conservation as quarks and gluons are
911: confined or as various heavy particle
912: types decouple and annihilate, one can obtain the number of right-handed neutrinos
913: at nucleosynthesis, expressed in terms of the equivalent number $\Delta N_\nu$ of new
914: ordinary neutrino species,
915: for various sets
916: of model parameters $M_{Z_2}$, $\delta$, $\theta_{E6}$, and $T_c$.
917: Most recent studies of the primordial abundances obtain upper limits on $\Delta N_\nu$
918: in the range (0.3--1)~\cite{bbnreview,lisi}. As can be seen in Figures
919: \ref{A1-150}-\ref{A1-400}, this implies rather
920: stringent constraints on the \zpr \ parameters for most values of $\theta_{E6}$.
921: For $T_c=$ 150 MeV, the constraint $\dnn < 0.3 (1)$ is satisfied for
922: all $\theta_{E6}$ for $M_{Z_2} \simgr 3.8 (2.2)$ TeV for no $Z-Z'$ mixing,
923: and for $M_{Z_2} \simgr 4.3 (2.4)$ TeV allowing the range of mixing angles $\delta$
924: obtained approximately when one assumes that the scalar fields responsible for the
925: mixing are contained in the 27 or $\overline{27}$-plet of $E_6$ (case A1 in (\ref{cases})).
926: For $T_c=$ 400 MeV the constraints are much stronger,
927: $M_{Z_2} \simgr 6.1 (5.1)$ TeV for $\dnn < 0.3 (1)$. The strong dependence on
928: $T_c$ is due to the large increase in the number of degrees of freedom
929: for temperatures $\simgr T_c$ (Figure (\ref{dof})), so that the number density
930: of $\nu_R$ is strongly diluted for $T_d \simgr T_c$.
931: The constraints are strongest for $\theta_{E6}$ close to 0 or $\pi$,
932: i.e., near the $\chi$ model, which corresponds to
933: $ SO(10) \to SU(5) \times U(1)_\chi$, and are very weak near the
934: $\psi$ model corresponding to $E_6 \to SO(10) \times U(1)_\psi$, $\theta_{E6}=\pi/2$.
935: They disappear entirely at the values
936: $\theta_{E6} = 0.42\pi$ and $1.42 \pi$, for which the $\nu_R$
937: decouple from the \zpr. The often considered $\eta$ model,
938: $\theta_{E6} = 2 \pi - \tan^{-1} \sqrt{\frac{5}{3}}=1.71 \pi$ (or $0.71 \pi$ for $-Z_\eta$)
939: is somewhere in between, with the constraints shown in more detail in
940: Figures \ref{decoupling1} and \ref{decoupling1a}.
941:
942: Except near the $\nu_R$ decoupling angles, the \zpr \ mass and mixing constraints
943: from nucleosynthesis are much more stringent than the existing laboratory
944: limits from searches for direct production or from precision electroweak
945: data, and are comparable to the ranges that may ultimately be probed
946: at proposed colliders.
947: They are qualitatively similar to
948: the limits from energy emission from Supernova 1987A~\cite{supernova},
949: but somewhat more stringent for
950: $\dnn<0.3$, and have entirely different theoretical and systematic uncertainties.
951:
952: There are several ways to evade the nucleosynthesis constraints on an extra \zpr.
953: One possibility is to generate small Majorana neutrino masses for the ordinary
954: neutrinos by invoking an extended seesaw model~\cite{TEVseesaw}, in which the extra
955: sterile neutrinos are typically at the TeV scale. Another possibility
956: is that the $\nu_R$ decouple from the \zpr, in which case the constraints
957: disappear. This can in fact occur naturally in classes of models in which
958: one combination of the $\chi$ and $\psi$ charges is broken at a
959: large scale associated with an $F$ and $D$-flat direction~\cite{decouplingmodel},
960: leaving a light \zpr \ which decouples from the $\nu_R$\footnote{A large Majorana
961: mass for the $\nu_R$ may still be forbidden in the model.}. Yet
962: another possibility is to weaken the observational constraint
963: on \dnn \ by allowing a large excess\footnote{Several authors~\cite{equilibrate} have
964: recently argued
965: that the observed atmospheric and solar neutrino mixing (for the
966: large mixing angle solution)
967: would equilibrate the $\nu_e, \ \nu_\mu$, and $\nu_\tau$ asymmetries.
968: They obtain stringent
969: constraints on the asymmetry if one requires a balance between
970: the effects on the $\nu_e n
971: \leftrightarrow e^- p$ and expansion rates. However, these limits do not apply
972: in the present case because of the
973: additional contribution to the expansion rate from the $\nu_R$.}
974: of $\nu_e$ with respect to $\bar{\nu}_e $. This would, however, require a somewhat
975: fine-tuned cancellation between the effects of the $\nu_R$ and
976: the $\nu_e - \bar{\nu}_e$ asymmetry.
977:
978:
979: Similar constraints
980: on the $W'$ and $Z'$ properties in $SU(2)_L \times SU(2)_R \times U(1)$ models~\cite{LR}
981: are under investigation~\cite{lrconstraints}.
982:
983: \section*{Acknowledgments}
984: This research was supported in part by the U.S. Department of
985: Energy under Grants No. EY-76-02-3071 and No. DE-FG02-95ER40896, and
986: in part by the Wisconsin
987: Alumni Research Foundation.
988: VB thanks the Kavli Institute for Theoretical
989: Physics at the University of California in Santa Barbara for hospitality.
990:
991:
992: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
993:
994: \bibitem{ell}
995: For recent surveys, see
996: J.~Erler, P.~Langacker and T.~J.~Li,
997: %``The Z - Z' mass hierarchy in a supersymmetric
998: %model with a secluded U(1)'-breaking sector,''
999: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 015002 (2002);
1000: S.~Hesselbach, F.~Franke and H.~Fraas,
1001: %``Neutralinos in E6 inspired Supersymmetric U(1)' models''
1002: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ {\bf C23}, 149 (2002).
1003:
1004:
1005: \bibitem{string}
1006: M.~Cveti\v c and P.~Langacker,
1007: %``Implications of Abelian Extended Gauge Structures From String Models,''
1008: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 54}, 3570 (1996) and
1009: Mod.\ Phys.\ Lett.\ A {\bf 11}, 1247 (1996).
1010:
1011: \bibitem{review}
1012: For a review, see, M.~Cveti\v c and P.~Langacker,
1013: %``Z' physics and supersymmetry,''
1014: in {\it Perspectives on supersymmetry}, ed. G. L. Kane
1015: (World, Singapore, 1998), p. 312.
1016:
1017: \bibitem{DSB}
1018: For a review, see
1019: C.~T.~Hill and E.~H.~Simmons,
1020: %``Strong dynamics and electroweak symmetry breaking,''
1021: hep-ph/0203079.
1022:
1023: \bibitem{muprob}
1024: D.~Suematsu and Y.~Yamagishi,
1025: %``Radiative symmetry breaking in a supersymmetric model with an extra U(1),''
1026: Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 10}, 4521 (1995);
1027: M.~Cveti\v c, D.~A.~Demir, J.~R.~Espinosa, L.~L.~Everett and P.~Langacker,
1028: %``Electroweak breaking and the mu
1029: %problem in supergravity models with an additional U(1),''
1030: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 56}, 2861 (1997)
1031: [Erratum-ibid.\ D {\bf 58}, 119905 (1997)].
1032:
1033: \bibitem{general}
1034: J.~Erler,
1035: %``Chiral models of weak scale supersymmetry,''
1036: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 586}, 73 (2000).
1037:
1038: \bibitem{explim} F. Abe { et al.} [CDF Collaboration],
1039: { Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf 79}, 2192 (1997).
1040:
1041: \bibitem{LEPmixing}
1042: R.~Barate {\it et al.} [ALEPH Collaboration],
1043: %``Study of fermion pair production in e+ e- collisions at 130-GeV to 183-GeV,''
1044: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 12}, 183 (2000);
1045: P.~Abreu {\it et al.} [DELPHI Collaboration],
1046: %``Measurement and Interpretation of Fermion-Pair
1047: %Production at LEP Energies of 183 and 189 GeV,''
1048: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 485}, 45 (2000).
1049:
1050: \bibitem{indirect}
1051: J.~Erler and P.~Langacker,
1052: %``Constraints on extended neutral gauge structures,''
1053: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 456}, 68 (1999), and references therein.
1054:
1055: \bibitem{APV} C.S. Wood { et al.}, { Science} {\bf 275}, 1759
1056: (1997);
1057: S.C. Bennett and C.E. Wieman, { Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf 82}, 2484
1058: (1999).
1059:
1060: \bibitem{interp}
1061: V.A. Dzuba, V.V. Flambaum, and J.S.M. Ginges, hep-ph/0204134;
1062: M. Y. Kuchiev,
1063: J.\ Phys.\ BB {\bf 35}, L503 (2002).
1064:
1065:
1066: \bibitem{NuTeV}
1067: G.~P.~Zeller { et al.} [NuTeV Collaboration],
1068: %``A precise determination of electroweak
1069: %parameters in neutrino nucleon scattering,''
1070: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 88}, 091802 (2002).
1071:
1072:
1073:
1074: \bibitem{hints}
1075: R.~Casalbuoni, S.~De Curtis, D.~Dominici and R.~Gatto,
1076: %``Bounds on new physics from the new data on parity violation in atomic
1077: %cesium,''
1078: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 460}, 135 (1999);
1079: J.~L.~Rosner,
1080: %``Atomic parity violation and precision electroweak physics: An updated
1081: %analysis,''
1082: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 61}, 016006 (2000);
1083: J.~Erler and P.~Langacker,
1084: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 84}, 212 (2000).
1085:
1086: \bibitem{collider}
1087: For reviews, see
1088: M.~Cveti\v c and S.~Godfrey,
1089: %``Discovery and identification of extra gauge bosons,''
1090: hep-ph/9504216;
1091: A.~Leike,
1092: %``The phenomenology of extra neutral gauge bosons,''
1093: Phys.\ Rept.\ {\bf 317}, 143 (1999).
1094: For a recent update, see S.~Godfrey
1095: in {\it Proc. of the APS/DPF/DPB Summer Study
1096: on the Future of Particle Physics (Snowmass 2001) } ed. N.~Graf,
1097: hep-ph/0201093 and hep-ph/0201092.
1098:
1099: \bibitem{seesaw}
1100: M. Gell-Mann, P. Ramond, and R. Slansky, in {\it
1101: Supergravity}, ed. F. van Nieuwenhuizen and D. Freedman, (North
1102: Holland, Amsterdam, 1979) p. 315; T. Yanagida, {\it Proc. of the
1103: Workshop on Unified Theory and the Baryon Number of the Universe},
1104: KEK, Japan, 1979; S. Weinberg,
1105: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 43}, 1566 (1979);
1106: R.~N.~Mohapatra and G.~Senjanovic,
1107: %``Neutrino Mass And Spontaneous Parity Nonconservation,''
1108: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 44}, 912 (1980) and
1109: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 23}, 165 (1981).
1110:
1111: \bibitem{TEVseesaw}
1112: See, for example,
1113: R.~N.~Mohapatra and J.~W.~Valle,
1114: %``Neutrino Mass And Baryon-Number Nonconservation In Superstring Models,''
1115: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 34}, 1642 (1986), and references therein;
1116: for an extension to \upr \ models,
1117: see
1118: A.~E.~Faraggi,
1119: %``Tau-Neutrino Mass As Possible Evidence For A Superstring Inspired Standard Like Model,''
1120: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 245}, 435 (1990);
1121: J. Kang, P. Langacker, and T. Li, UPR-1010-T, to appear.
1122:
1123: \bibitem{HDO}
1124: These could arise, for example, in a variant on the
1125: model in
1126: P.~Langacker,
1127: %``A mechanism for ordinary-sterile neutrino mixing,''
1128: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 58}, 093017 (1998).
1129:
1130: \bibitem{LED}
1131: See, for example,
1132: K.~R.~Dienes, E.~Dudas and T.~Gherghetta,
1133: %``Light neutrinos without heavy mass scales: A higher-dimensional seesaw mechanism,''
1134: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 557}, 25 (1999);
1135: G.~R.~Dvali and A.~Y.~Smirnov,
1136: %``Probing large extra dimensions with neutrinos,''
1137: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 563}, 63 (1999);
1138: N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G. R. Dvali and J. March-Russel,
1139: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D65}, 024032 (2002);
1140: T. Appelquist, B. Dobrescu, E. Ponton and H. Yee,
1141: %''Neutrinos Vis-a-vis the Six-Dimensional Standard Model''
1142: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D65}, 105019 (2002);
1143: H.~Davoudiasl, P.~Langacker and M.~Perelstein,
1144: %``Constraints on large extra dimensions from neutrino oscillation experiments,''
1145: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 105015 (2002),
1146: and references therein.
1147: \bibitem{LR}
1148: %LR models
1149: J. C. Pati and A. Salam,
1150: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D10}, 275 (1974);
1151: R. N. Mohapatra and J. C. Pati,
1152: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D11}, 566 (1975);
1153: ibid. Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D11}, 2558 (1975);
1154: G. Senjanovic and R. N. Mohapatra,
1155: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D12}, 1502 (1975);
1156: R.~N.~Mohapatra,
1157: {\it Unification And Supersymmetry} (Springer, New York, 1986).
1158:
1159: \bibitem{steigman}
1160: G.~Steigman, K.~A.~Olive and D.~N.~Schramm,
1161: %``Cosmological Constrains on Superweak Particles''
1162: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett. {\bf 43}, 239 (1979).
1163:
1164: \bibitem{steigman2}
1165: K.~A.~Olive and D.~N.~Schramm and G.~Steigman,
1166: %``Limits on New Superweakly Interacting Particles from Primordial Nucleosynthesis''
1167: Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf B180}, 497 (1981).
1168:
1169: \bibitem{dolgov}
1170: For a general review of neutrinos in cosmology, see
1171: A.~D.~Dolgov,
1172: %``Neutrinos in Cosmology''
1173: %hep-ph/0202122
1174: Phys.\ Rept.\ {\bf 370}, 333 (2002)
1175:
1176:
1177:
1178: \bibitem{supernova}
1179: %Supernova constraints
1180: G. Raffelt and D. Seckel,
1181: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett. {\bf 60}, 1793 (1988);
1182: R. Barbieri and R. N. Mohapatra,
1183: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D39}, 1229 (1989);
1184: J. A. Grifols and E. Masso,
1185: %''Implications from SN1987A on Supersymmetric, Lef-Right and E6 Particle Masses''
1186: Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf B331}, 244 (1990);
1187: J.~A.~Grifols, E.~Masso and T.~G.~Rizzo,
1188: %``E(6) Models Confront Sn1987a,''
1189: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 42}, 3293 (1990);
1190: T.~G.~Rizzo,
1191: %``Z - Z-Prime Mixing And Bounds On New Neutral Gauge Bosons From Sn1987a Data,''
1192: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 44}, 202 (1991).
1193:
1194: \bibitem{yang}
1195: J.~Yang, D.~N.~Schramm, G.~Steigman and R.~T.~Rood,
1196: Astrophys.\ J.\ {\bf 227}, 697 (1979).
1197:
1198: \bibitem{bbnreview}
1199: For recent reviews, see G. Steigman, astro-ph/0009506;
1200: the articles by K. A. Olive and J. A. Peacock and by
1201: B. D. Fields and S. Sarkar
1202: in~\cite{PDG}; and \cite{dolgov}.
1203:
1204: \bibitem{lisi}
1205: E.~Lisi, S.~Sarkar and F.~L.~Villante,
1206: %``The big bang nucleosynthesis limit on N(nu),''
1207: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 59}, 123520 (1999).
1208:
1209: \bibitem{PDG}
1210: Particle Data Group: K. Hagiwara et al, Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D66}, 010001 (2002).
1211:
1212: \bibitem{prev1}
1213: J.~R.~Ellis, K.~Enqvist, D.~V.~Nanopoulos and S.~Sarkar,
1214: %``Primordial Nucleosynthesis, Additional
1215: %Neutrinos And Neutral Currents From The Superstring,''
1216: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 167}, 457 (1986);
1217: J.~L.~Lopez and D.~V.~Nanopoulos,
1218: %``New Bounds On Primordial Nucleosynthesis In The Presence Of A Cornered Z-Prime,''
1219: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 241}, 392 (1990).
1220:
1221: \bibitem{prev2}
1222: M.~C.~Gonzalez-Garcia and J.~W.~Valle,
1223: %``Cosmological Constraints On Additional Light Neutrinos And Neutral Gauge Bosons,''
1224: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 240}, 163 (1990).
1225:
1226: \bibitem{afdvn}
1227: A.~E.~Faraggi and D.~V.~Nanopoulos,
1228: %``A Superstring Z-Prime At O (1-Tev)?,''
1229: Mod.\ Phys.\ Lett.\ A {\bf 6}, 61 (1991).
1230:
1231: \bibitem{ETC}
1232: L.~M.~Krauss, J.~Terning and T.~Appelquist,
1233: %``Neutrino cosmology and limits on extended technicolor,''
1234: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 71}, 823 (1993).
1235:
1236: \bibitem{lw}
1237: For a study of \upr \ breaking in supersymmetric $E_6$ models,
1238: see
1239: P.~Langacker and J.~Wang,
1240: %``U(1)' symmetry breaking in supersymmetric E6 models''
1241: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D58}, 115010 (1998).
1242:
1243: \bibitem{famnon}
1244: P.~Langacker and M.~Plumacher,
1245: %``Flavor changing effects in theories
1246: %with a heavy Z' boson with family non-universal couplings,''
1247: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62}, 013006 (2000).
1248:
1249: \bibitem{kinetic}
1250: %Kinetic mixing
1251: B. Holdom,
1252: Phys.\ Lett.\ {\bf B259}, 329 (1991);
1253: F.~Del Aguila, M.~Masip and M.~Perez-Victoria,
1254: %``Search for New Neutral Bosons at Future Colliders,''
1255: Acta Phys.\ Polon.\ B {\bf 27}, 1469 (1996);
1256: K.~S.~Babu, C.~F.~Kolda and J.~March-Russell,
1257: %``Implications of generalized Z Z' mixing,''
1258: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 57}, 6788 (1998).
1259:
1260: \bibitem{stringmodels}
1261: See, for example,
1262: G.~Cleaver, M.~Cvetic, J.~R.~Espinosa, L.~L.~Everett, P.~Langacker and J.~Wang,
1263: %``Physics implications of flat directions
1264: %in free fermionic superstring models. I: Mass spectrum and couplings,''
1265: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 59}, 055005 (1999);
1266: M.~Cvetic, P.~Langacker and G.~Shiu,
1267: %``Phenomenology of a three-family standard-like string model,''
1268: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 066004 (2002).
1269:
1270:
1271: \bibitem{luo}
1272: P.~Langacker and M.~X.~Luo,
1273: %``Constraints on additional Z bosons,''
1274: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 45}, 278 (1992), and references therein.
1275:
1276: \bibitem{erler2}
1277: J. Erler and P. Langacker, in \cite{PDG}.
1278:
1279: \bibitem{olive}
1280: R.~V.~Wagoner and G.~Steigman,
1281: %``Production Of Free Quarks In The Early Universe,''
1282: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 20}, 825 (1979);
1283: K.~A.~Olive,
1284: %``The Thermodynamics Of The Quark - Hadron Phase Transition In The Early Universe,''
1285: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 190}, 483 (1981) and
1286: {\it Neutrino 79}, ed. A. Haatuft and C. Jarlskog (Astvedt Industrier
1287: A/S, Norway, 1979), v.2:421.
1288:
1289:
1290: \bibitem{srednicki}
1291: M.~Srednicki, R.~Watkins and K.~A.~Olive,
1292: %``Calculations Of Relic Densities In The Early Universe,''
1293: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 310}, 693 (1988). For a recent discussion, see
1294: K. A. Olive and J. A. Peacock, \cite{PDG}.
1295: For a larger temperature range, see P. Gondolo and G. Gelmini,
1296: %``Cosmic Abundances of Stable Particles: Improved Analysis''
1297: Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf B360}, 145 (1991).
1298:
1299: \bibitem{sakurai}
1300: See, for example J.~J.~Sakurai, {\it Currents and Mesons},
1301: University of Chicago Press, 1969.
1302:
1303: \bibitem{sakurai2}
1304: G. J. Gounaris and J. J. Sakurai, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 21}, 244 (1968);
1305: C.~Gale and J.~Kaputsta,
1306: %``Dilepton radiation from high temperature nuclear matter''
1307: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf C35}, 2107 (1987).
1308:
1309: \bibitem{Kolb}
1310: See, for example,
1311: E.~W.~Kolb and M.~S.~Turner,
1312: {\it The Early Universe} (Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, 1990) and \cite{fornengo}.
1313:
1314: \bibitem{fornengo}
1315: N.~Fornengo, C.~W.~Kim and J.~Song,
1316: %``Finite Temperature Effects on the Neutrino Decoupling in the Early Universe.''
1317: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf D56}, 5123 (1997).
1318:
1319: \bibitem{decouplingmodel}
1320: P. Langacker, in preparation.
1321:
1322: \bibitem{equilibrate}
1323: C.~Lunardini and A.~Y.~Smirnov,
1324: %``High-energy neutrino conversion and the lepton asymmetry in the universe,''
1325: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64}, 073006 (2001);
1326: A.~D.~Dolgov, S.~H.~Hansen, S.~Pastor, S.~T.~Petcov, G.~G.~Raffelt and D.~V.~Semikoz,
1327: %``Cosmological bounds on neutrino degeneracy improved by flavor oscillations,''
1328: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 632}, 363 (2002);
1329: Y.~Y.~Wong,
1330: %``Analytical treatment of neutrino asymmetry
1331: %equilibration from flavour oscillations in the early universe,''
1332: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 025015 (2002);
1333: K.~N.~Abazajian, J.~F.~Beacom and N.~F.~Bell,
1334: %``Stringent constraints on cosmological neutrino antineutrino asymmetries from synchronized flavor transformation,''
1335: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 013008 (2002).
1336:
1337: \bibitem{lrconstraints}
1338: V. Barger, P. Langacker, and H.-S. Lee,in preparation.
1339:
1340: \end{thebibliography}
1341:
1342: \newpage
1343:
1344:
1345: \begin{figure}
1346: \begin{center}
1347: \resizebox{!}{3.0in}{\includegraphics{GvsT.td.ps}}
1348: \end{center}
1349: \caption{The effective number of degrees of freedom as a function of temperature for the
1350: quark-hadron transition temperature $T_c=
1351: 150$ MeV and $400$ MeV, from~\cite{srednicki}.
1352: $g(T)$ does not include contributions from
1353: the three right-handed neutrinos, which are added separately
1354: in the expansion rate formula.}
1355: \label{dof}
1356: \end{figure}
1357:
1358:
1359: \begin{figure}
1360: \begin{center}
1361: \resizebox{!}{1.87in}{\includegraphics{TvsM150_400A0A3.td.ps}}
1362: \resizebox{!}{1.87in}{\includegraphics{TvsM150_400A1A2.td.ps}}
1363: \resizebox{!}{1.87in}{\includegraphics{NvsM150_400A0A3.td.ps}}
1364: \resizebox{!}{1.87in}{\includegraphics{NvsM150_400A1A2.td.ps}}
1365: \end{center}
1366: \caption{The decoupling temperature $T_d$ (top) and the equivalent number of extra
1367: neutrinos $\Delta N_\nu$ (bottom) for the $\eta$ model
1368: %($\theta_{E6} = 2 \pi - \tan^{-1} \sqrt{\frac{5}{3}} \sim 1.71 \pi$)
1369: as a function of the $Z_2$ mass $M_{Z_2}$ for constituent quark masses, for a
1370: quark-hadron transition temperature $T_c=$ 150 MeV (circles) and
1371: 400 MeV (crosses). The left two figures are for the cases A0 and A3 defined in (\ref{cases}),
1372: i.e.,
1373: the solid, dashed and dotted
1374: lines represent zero-mixing ($\delta = 0$), and positive and negative maximal-mixing
1375: ($\delta = \pm
1376: 0.002$), respectively. The $T_c$ = 150
1377: MeV case has higher $T_d$ and lower $\Delta N_\nu$ for the same $M_{Z_2}$ than $T_c$ = 400 MeV.
1378: The right figures are for the intermediate mixing assumptions A1 and A2.
1379: The solid and dash-dot curves are for the mass-mixing relations
1380: $\delta= \pm 0.0051/M_{Z_2}^2$, while the dashed
1381: and dotted curves are for the
1382: $\rho_0$ constraints
1383: $\delta =\pm 0.0029/M_{Z_2}$.}
1384: \label{decoupling1}
1385: \end{figure}
1386:
1387: \begin{figure}
1388: \begin{center}
1389: \resizebox{!}{1.87in}{\includegraphics{TvsM150_400currA0A3.td.ps}}
1390: \resizebox{!}{1.87in}{\includegraphics{TvsM150_400currA1A2.td.ps}}
1391: \resizebox{!}{1.87in}{\includegraphics{NvsM150_400currA0A3.td.ps}}
1392: \resizebox{!}{1.87in}{\includegraphics{NvsM150_400currA1A2.td.ps}}
1393: \end{center}
1394: \caption{
1395: Same as Figure \ref{decoupling1} except that current quark masses are used.
1396: The upper graphs share most features with the constituent mass case except that $T_d$ can
1397: be slightly lower when $T_d > T_c$. The only significant
1398: change in $\Delta N_\nu$ is for the $T_c$ = 150 MeV maximal mixing case (see text).}
1399: \label{decoupling1a}
1400: \end{figure}
1401:
1402:
1403:
1404: \newpage
1405:
1406: \begin{figure}
1407: \begin{center}
1408: \resizebox{!}{2.38in}{\includegraphics{150A0TvsE6.td.ps}}
1409: \resizebox{!}{2.38in}{\includegraphics{150A1TvsE6.td.ps}}
1410: \resizebox{!}{2.38in}{\includegraphics{150A0NvsE6.td.ps}}
1411: \resizebox{!}{2.38in}{\includegraphics{150A1NvsE6.td.ps}}
1412: \resizebox{!}{2.38in}{\includegraphics{150A0MvsE6.td.ps}}
1413: \resizebox{!}{2.38in}{\includegraphics{150A1MvsE6.td.ps}}
1414: \end{center}
1415: \caption{$T_d$ (top) and $\Delta N_\nu$ (middle)
1416: for $M_{Z_2} = $
1417: 500, 1000, 1500, 2000, 2500, 3500, 4000, and 5000 GeV,
1418: for $T_c = 150$ MeV and constituent masses.
1419: Larger $M_{Z_2}$
1420: corresponds to higher $T_d$
1421: and smaller $\Delta N_\nu$.
1422: The graphs on the left are for no mixing (case A0 in (\ref{cases})),
1423: while the right-hand graphs are for the mass-mixing relation
1424: $|\delta | < 0.0051/M_{Z_2}^2$ (case A1).
1425: The bottom graphs are $M_{Z_2}$ corresponding to
1426: $\Delta N_\nu = 0.3$, $0.5$, $1.0$ and $1.2$, with
1427: larger $\Delta N_\nu$ corresponding to smaller $M_{Z_2}$.}
1428: %at the electroweak and higher scales.}
1429: \label{A1-150}
1430: \end{figure}
1431:
1432:
1433:
1434:
1435:
1436: \begin{figure}
1437: \begin{center}
1438: \resizebox{!}{2.38in}{\includegraphics{400A0TvsE6.td.ps}}
1439: \resizebox{!}{2.38in}{\includegraphics{400A1TvsE6.td.ps}}
1440: \resizebox{!}{2.38in}{\includegraphics{400A0NvsE6.td.ps}}
1441: \resizebox{!}{2.38in}{\includegraphics{400A1NvsE6.td.ps}}
1442: \resizebox{!}{2.38in}{\includegraphics{400A0MvsE6.td.ps}}
1443: \resizebox{!}{2.38in}{\includegraphics{400A1MvsE6.td.ps}}
1444: \end{center}
1445: %\caption{For Tc=400 MeV. Constituent(solid) and Current (dash) mass. A0 and A1}
1446: \caption{Same as Figure~\ref{A1-150}, except $T_c=400$ MeV. $T_d$ is slightly smaller
1447: (for $T_d>$ 150 MeV) for fixed $M_{Z_2}$
1448: and $\theta_{E6}$, while $\Delta N_\nu$ and the bound on $M_{Z_2}$ for fixed $\Delta N_\nu$
1449: are increased.}
1450: \label{A1-400}
1451: \end{figure}
1452:
1453:
1454: \end{document}
1455: