1: \documentclass[12pt,amssymb]{article}

2: \usepackage{amssymb}

3: \usepackage{graphicx}

4: %\textwidth=17cm

5: %\textheight=22.5cm

6: %\topmargin -1.5cm

7: %\oddsidemargin -0.3cm

8: 

9: 

10: %\evensidemargin -0.8cm

11: 

12: 

13: 

14: 

15: 

16: \parskip 0.3cm

17: 

18: \def\gappeq{\mathrel{\rlap {\raise.5ex\hbox{$>$}}

19: {\lower.5ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}}

20: 

21: \def\lappeq{\mathrel{\rlap{\raise.5ex\hbox{$<$}}

22: {\lower.5ex\hbox{$\sim$}}}}

23: 

24: \def\Toprel#1\over#2{\mathrel{\mathop{#2}\limits^{#1}}}

25: \def\FF{\Toprel{\hbox{$\scriptscriptstyle(-)$}}\over{$\nu$}}

26: 

27: 

28: \begin{document}

29: \pagestyle{empty}

30: \begin{flushright}

31: hep-ph/0302101\\

32: \end{flushright}

33: \vspace*{3mm}

34: \begin{center}

35: {\Large \bf  

36: The constraints on the non-singlet polarised parton densities 

37: from the infrared-renormalon model}\\

38: \vspace{0.1cm}

39: {\bf A.L. Kataev}\\

40: \vspace{0.1cm}

41: Institute for Nuclear Research of the Academy of Sciences of 

42: Russia,\\ 117312, Moscow, Russia\\

43: \end{center}

44: %\vspace*{1cm}

45: \begin{center}

46: {\bf ABSTRACT}\\

47: \end{center}

48: 

49: Using  the infrared-renormalon approach, 

50: we obtain  the constraints on the next-to-leading order non-singlet 

51: polarised parton densities. The advocated feature follows from the 

52: consideration  of the effect revealed in the process 

53: of the next-to-leading order fits to the  data for the assymetry 

54: of  polarised

55: lepton-nucleon scattering   

56: which result in the 

57: approximate nullification 

58: of the   $1/Q^2$-correction to $A_1^N(x,Q^2)$.

59: 

60: 

61: %\vspace*{5mm}

62: \noindent

63: 

64: The study of the QCD predictions for the photon-nucleon asymmetry 

65: $A_1^N=\frac{\sigma_{1/2}-\sigma_{3/2}}{\sigma_{1/2}+\sigma_{3/2}}$,

66: where subscripts denote the total angular momentum of the 

67: photon-nucleon pair along the incoming lepton's direction,

68: plays the essential role in the analysis of polarised deep inelastic scattering 

69: (DIS) (see e.g. Ref. \cite{Altarelli:1998gn}). It is related to the well-known 

70: structure function $g_1^N$ of polarised DIS by the following way 

71: \begin{equation}

72: \label{E1}

73: A_1^N(x,Q^2)=(1+\gamma^2)\frac{g_1^N(x,Q^2)}{F_1^N(x,Q^2)}

74: \end{equation}

75: where the kinematic factor $\gamma$ is defined as $\gamma=(4M_N^2x^2/Q^2)$ 

76: and $g_1^N(x,Q^2)$ is the structure function (SF) of 

77: polarised DIS, while $F_1^N(x,Q^2)$ SF 

78: enters into the cross-section of unpolarised charged lepton-hadron DIS 

79: (see e.g. Ref. \cite{Leader:2002ni}). Quite recently several procedures of the 

80: study of  the     

81:  $Q^2$-behaviour of $A_1^N$ were discussed in the literature (see Refs. 

82: \cite{Kotikov:1996vr}-\cite{Leader:2001kh}). 

83: Moreover, in Refs. \cite{Leader:1999qp,Leader:2001kh,Leader:2002ni} 

84: by fitting existing   CERN,  DESY and SLAC  data for polarised DIS 

85: in the kinematic region $0.005\leq x\leq 0.75$ and 

86: 1 GeV$^2$$\leq Q^2\leq 58$ GeV$^2$ the  $1/Q^2$ dynamical power correction 

87: to $A_1^N$

88: was  extracted. 

89: In general it   gives additional contribution to the perturbation theory 

90: part of $(A_1^N)_{PT}$ and can  be parameterised as 

91: \begin{equation} 

92: \label{E2}

93: A_1^N(x,Q^2)=(A_1^N(x,Q^2))_{PT}+\frac{h^{A_1}(x)}{Q^2}~~~~.

94: \end{equation}

95: It is interesting, that in the process of the fits of 

96: Refs. \cite{Leader:1999qp,Leader:2001kh,Leader:2002ni} 

97: it was found that the $x$-shape of $h^{A_1}(x)$ is   consistent 

98: with zero (see e.g.  Fig.1 from Ref.\cite{Leader:2002ni}).

99: 

100: %\end{equation}

101: \begin{figure}

102: \includegraphics[width=8cm]{Fig1.ps}

103: %\includegraphics[width=8cm]{0212085.Fig1.ps}

104: \caption{The results of extraction of $h^{A_1}(x)$ from the next-to-leading 

105: order  fits of 

106: Ref. \cite{Leader:2002ni} in the JET scheme \cite{Carlitz:ab} .}   

107: \end{figure}

108: 

109: 

110: In this note we are describing the possible consequences 

111: of this effect in the 

112: non-singlet (NS) approximation, which is valid for the  $x$-cut $x\gtrsim 0.25$.

113: Our consideration will be based on  the infrared-renormalon (IRR) approach, 

114: developed  in QCD in Ref. \cite{Zakharov:1992bx} and reviewed in detail 

115: in Ref. \cite{Beneke:1998ui}.    

116: This 

117: approach was used in Ref. \cite{Dasgupta:1996hh} to 

118: study   the behaviour of the  $1/Q^2$ corrections 

119: to the NS contributions to  $F_2$ and $F_1$

120: SFs of unpolarised  DIS of charged leptons on nucleons 

121: and the pure NS  $xF_3$ SF of $\nu N$ DIS using 

122: $\overline{MS}$-scheme 

123: calculations\footnote{Note that we avoid considerations of the 

124: IRR renormalon free   expansions in QCD coupling constants with  

125: the ``freezing-type'' behaviour at small $Q^2$ (see 

126: Refs. \cite{Krasnikov:1996jq}).} .

127: It is interesting that  the predicted in Ref. \cite{Dasgupta:1996hh}

128: $x$-shape of the IRR induced power corrections to $xF_3$ was supported 

129: in Refs. \cite{Kataev:1997nc,Alekhin:1998df}

130: by the  leading order (LO) and next-to-leading order (NLO) 

131: fits to CCFR'97 data ( 

132: the detailed description and refinements of the fits of 

133: Ref. \cite{Kataev:1997nc} is given in 

134: Refs. \cite{Kataev:1999bp,Kataev:2001kk}). Therefore, it is 

135: worth to consider  the consequences  of calculations of the    

136: IRR 

137: contributions to the NS part of  $g_1^N$ SF  of polarised 

138: deep-inelastic scattering, which was also performed in 

139: Ref. \cite{Dasgupta:1996hh}.

140: 

141: Let us rewrite Eqs.(\ref{E1}),(\ref{E2}) in the following way

142: \begin{equation}

143: A_1^N=(1+\gamma^2)\frac{g_1^N(x,Q^2) (1+\frac{h^{g_1}(x)}{Q^2~g_1^N(x,Q^2)})}

144: {F_1^N(x,Q^2) (1+\frac{h^{F_1}(x)}{Q^2~F_1^N(x,Q^2)})}

145: \end{equation} 

146: where $h^{g_1}(x)/Q^2$ and $h^{F_1}(x)/Q^2$ are the model-independent 

147: parameterisations for the  twist-4 contributions to 

148: $g_1^N$ and $F_1^N$ SFs, which in general are non-zero. 

149: Using  the above mentioned effect of approximate 

150: nullification of the twist-4 correction to $A_1^N$ we get

151: \begin{equation}

152: \label{HT}

153: \frac{h^{g_1}(x)}{Q^2~g_1^N(x,Q^2)}\approx\frac{h^{F_1}(x)}{Q^2~F_1^N(x,Q^2)}~~~.

154: \end{equation} 

155: At the next step we will use  the existing inequality for $g_1^N(x,Q^2)$ 

156: SF, namely  

157: \begin{equation}

158: |g_1^N(x,Q^2)|\leq F_1^N(x,Q^2)~~.

159: \end{equation}

160: Combining it with  Eq. (\ref{HT}) we arrive to to the following bound 

161: \begin{equation}

162: \label{h}

163: |h^{g_1}(x)|\leq |h^{F_1}(x)| 

164: \end{equation}

165: 

166: It should be stressed that the calculations  of Ref. \cite{Dasgupta:1996hh}

167: predict that in the NS approximation (or in the valence-quarks approximation) 

168: the contributions 

169: of  the $1/Q^2$ corrections  to $F_1$ and $xF_3$

170: SFs are the same.

171: Indeed, the corresponding results of  Ref. \cite{Dasgupta:1996hh} can be 

172: re-written in the following way:

173: \begin{equation}

174: \label{F1}

175: h^{F_1}(x,\mu^2)=h^{F_3}(x,\mu^2)= A_2^{'}\int_x^1\frac{dz}{z}C_1(z)q^{NS}(x/z,\mu^2)

176: \end{equation} 

177: where 

178: \begin{equation}

179: \label{C1}

180: C_1(z)= -\frac{4}{(1-x)_{+}}+2(2+x+2x^2)-5\delta(1-x)-\delta^{'}(1-x)~~~,

181: \end{equation}

182: the $'+'$-prescription, for any test function, is defined as 

183: \begin{equation}

184: \int_0^1F(x)_{+}f(x)dx=\int_0^1F(x)[f(x)-f(1)]dx~~~,

185: \end{equation} 

186: and 

187: \begin{equation}

188: q^{NS}(x,\mu^2)=\sum_{i=1}^{n_f}\bigg(e_i^2-\frac{1}{n_f}\sum_{k=1}^{n_f}e_k^2

189: \bigg)

190: \bigg(q_i(x,\mu^2)+\overline{q}_i(x,\mu^2)\bigg)

191: \end{equation} 

192: are the  NS parton densities, 

193: $\mu^2$ is the normalisation point of order 1 GeV$^2$ and $A_2^{'}$ is  

194: is the IRR model parameter, to be extracted from the fits to the 

195: concrete data. Its value was extracted from the  low-energy 

196: $xF_3$ data, collected by the IHEP-JINR Neutrino detector at the 

197: IHEP 70 GeV proton synchrotron  \cite{Alekhin:2001zj}.

198: (see also Ref. \cite{Kataev:2001fv} for a review). The result of 

199: Ref. \cite{Alekhin:2001zj} $A_2^{'}$=$-0.10\pm 0.09$ (exp) GeV$^2$ is 

200: in agreement with 

201: the value extracted from the NLO analysis of the CCFR'97 $xF_3$ 

202: data \cite{Seligman:mc},

203: namely with  $A_2^{'}$=$-0.125\pm0.053$ (stat) GeV$^2$ \cite{Kataev:2001kk}. 

204: It should be noted, that the identity of Eq. (\ref{F1}) does not contradict 

205: point of view, expressed in Refs. \cite{Kotikov:1996vr,Kotikov:1998ew}, 

206: that to study the $Q^2$ behaviour of $A_1(Q^2)$ in the NS approximation 

207: it might be convenient to use the concrete $xF_3$ data  instead of theoretical expression for  $F_1^N$.

208: 

209: 

210: 

211: Consider  now the case of $g_1^N$ SF of polarised DIS. In general, the 

212: IRR contributions to $g_1^N$ were studied in Ref. \cite{Stein:1998wr}.

213: In the NS approximation the IRR contributions 

214: to $g_1^N$ were calculated in  Ref. \cite{Dasgupta:1996hh}, where the following 

215: result was obtained 

216: \begin{equation}

217: \label{g1}

218: h^{g_1}(x,\mu^2)= A_2\int_x^1\frac{dz}{z}C_1(z)\Delta^{NS}(x/z,\mu^2)~~~~.

219: \end{equation}

220: Here  $ \Delta^{NS}(x,\mu^2)$ are the NS polarised parton densities, namely 

221: \begin{equation}

222: \Delta^{NS}(x,\mu^2)=\sum_{i=1}^{n_f}\bigg(e_i^2-

223: \frac{1}{n_f}\sum_{k=1}^{n_f}e_k^2\bigg)

224: \bigg(\Delta q_i(x,\mu^2)+\Delta \overline{q}(x,\mu^2)\bigg)

225: \end{equation} 

226: and   the 

227: IRR model coefficient function $C_1(z)$ is the same,      

228: as in the case of the 

229: IRR model contributions to the  $1/Q^2$ corrections 

230: for $F_1$ and $xF_3$ SFs of unpolarised deep-inelastic scattering

231: (see Eq. (\ref{C1})). As to the IRR model parameter $A_2$, in general 

232: one should not expect that it has the same value as the parameter 

233: $A_2^{'}$ in Eq. (\ref{F1}). In principle, it should be extracted 

234: from the separate  fits to $g_1$ data in the NS approximation.

235: However, it is worth to stress, that in the NS approximation 

236: the IRR contributions to $g_1^N$ and $F_1^N$ are closely related

237: (the similar feature was revealed while 

238: comparing IRR model contributions to the Bjorken  sum rule for $g_1^N$

239: SF \cite{Broadhurst:1993ru} and still unmeasured  Bjorken sum rule for 

240: $F_1^{\nu N}$ SF \cite{Broadhurst:2002bi}). 

241: 

242: 

243: 

244: Using now Eqs. (\ref{h}),(\ref{F1}) and Eq.(11), we get the following 

245: constraint 

246: \begin{equation}

247: |A_2 \Delta^{NS}(x,\mu^2)|\leq | A_2^{'} q^{NS}(x,\mu^2)|

248: \end{equation} 

249: which is valid both at the LO and NLO.

250: This constraint is the main result of our note.

251: The consequences for its $Q^2$-dependence can be further studied using 

252: the machinery of the DGLAP equations \

253: 

254: 

255: It is rather impressive that the NLO constraint of Eq. (13) is similar

256: to  the well-known LO bound of Ref. \cite{Altarelli:1998gn}, namely

257: \begin{equation}

258: |\Delta(x,Q^2)|\leq q(x,Q^2)~~~~~.

259: \end{equation}

260: Moreover, Eq. (13) can be also transformed to the LO relation between  the IRR model parameters

261: of Eq. (3) and Eq. (7), namely 

262: \begin{equation}

263: |A_2|\sim |A_2^{'}|~~.

264: \end{equation}

265: We hope that it will be possible to check  the 

266: relation of Eq. (15)  using 

267: the fits of the concrete  data for $g_1$ SF.

268: 

269: The final version of this work was presented at COMPASS meeting at Dubna 

270: (5 March 2003). I am grateful to M. G. Sapozhnikov for invitation.

271: It is the pleasure to thank  A. V. Sidorov and D.B. Stamenov for discussions

272: of the preliminary version of this note and to  G. Altarelli and B. Webber 

273: for the useful questions and comments. 

274: 

275: 

276: This work is done within the program of the RFBR Grants N 02-01-00601 and 

277: N 03-02-17177.

278: 

279: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

280: %\cite{Altarelli:1998gn}

281: \bibitem{Altarelli:1998gn}

282: G.~Altarelli, S.~Forte and G.~Ridolfi,

283: %``On positivity of parton distributions,''

284: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 534} (1998) 277

285: [hep-ph/9806345].

286: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9806345;%%

287: %\cite{Leader:2002ni}

288: \bibitem{Leader:2002ni}

289: E.~Leader, A.~V.~Sidorov and D.~B.~Stamenov,

290: %``On the role of higher twist in polarized deep inelastic scattering,''

291: hep-ph/0212085, to be published in Phys.\ Rev.\ D.

292: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0212085;%%

293: %\cite{Kotikov:1996vr}

294: \bibitem{Kotikov:1996vr}

295: A.~V.~Kotikov and D.~V.~Peshekhonov,

296: %``The Q**2 dependence of the measured asymmetry A(1): The test of the  Bjorken sum rule,''

297: JETP Lett.\  {\bf 65} (1997) 7

298: [hep-ph/9612319].

299: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9612319;%%

300: %\cite{Kotikov:1998ew}

301: \bibitem{Kotikov:1998ew}

302: A.~V.~Kotikov and D.~V.~Peshekhonov,

303: %``The Q**2 dependence of the measured asymmetry A(1) from the similarity  of g1(x,Q**2) and F3(x,Q**2) structure functions,''

304: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 9} (1999) 55

305: [hep-ph/9810224].

306: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9810224;%%

307: %\cite{Leader:1999qp}

308: \bibitem{Leader:1999qp}

309: E.~Leader, A.~V.~Sidorov and D.~B.~Stamenov,

310: %``A NLO QCD analysis of the spin structure function g1 and higher twist corrections,''

311: %\href{http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?irn=4761260}{SPIRES entry}

312: in Proc. of   9th Lomonosov Conference on Elementary Particle Physics: 

313: Particle Physics on the Boundary of the Millenium, Moscow, Russia, 20-

314: 26 Sep 1999, ed. A.I. Studenikin, World Scientific, 2001, p. 78.

315: %\cite{Leader:2001kh}

316: \bibitem{Leader:2001kh}

317: E.~Leader, A.~V.~Sidorov and D.~B.~Stamenov,

318: %``A new evaluation of polarized parton densities in the nucleon,''

319: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 23} (2002) 479

320: [hep-ph/0111267].

321: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0111267;%%

322: %\cite{Carlitz:ab}

323: \bibitem{Carlitz:ab}

324: R.~D.~Carlitz, J.~C.~Collins and A.~H.~Mueller,

325: %``The Role Of The Axial Anomaly In Measuring Spin Dependent Parton Distributions,''

326: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 214} (1988) 229;

327: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B214,229;%%

328: %\cite{Anselmino:1994gn}

329: %\bibitem{Anselmino:1994gn}

330: M.~Anselmino, A.~Efremov and E.~Leader,

331: %``The theory and phenomenology of polarized deep inelastic scattering,''

332: Phys.\ Rept.\  {\bf 261} (1995) 1

333: [Erratum-ibid.\  {\bf 281} (1997) 399]

334: [hep-ph/9501369];\\

335: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9501369;%%

336: %\bibitem{Muller:1997zu}

337: D.~Muller and O.~V.~Teryaev,

338: %``Non-local generalization of the axial anomaly and x-dependence of the  anomalous gluon contribution,''

339: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 56} (1997) 2607

340: [hep-ph/9701413].

341: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9701413;%%

342: %\cite{Zakharov:1992bx}

343: \bibitem{Zakharov:1992bx}

344: V.~I.~Zakharov,

345: %``QCD perturbative expansions in large orders,''

346: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 385} (1992) 452.

347: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B385,452;%%

348: %\cite{Beneke:1998ui}

349: \bibitem{Beneke:1998ui}

350: M.~Beneke,

351: %``Renormalons,''

352: Phys.\ Rept.\  {\bf 317} (1999) 1

353: [hep-ph/9807443].

354: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9807443;%%

355: %\cite{Dasgupta:1996hh}

356: \bibitem{Dasgupta:1996hh}

357: M.~Dasgupta and B.~R.~Webber,

358: %``Power Corrections and Renormalons in Deep Inelastic Structure Functions,''

359: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 382} (1996) 273

360: [hep-ph/9604388].

361: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9604388;%%

362: %\cite{Krasnikov:1996jq}

363: \bibitem{Krasnikov:1996jq}

364: N.~V.~Krasnikov and A.~A.~Pivovarov,

365: %``Renormalization schemes and renormalons,''

366: Mod.\ Phys.\ Lett.\ A {\bf 11} (1996) 835

367: [hep-ph/9602272];\\

368: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9602272;%%

369: D.~V.~Shirkov and I.~L.~Solovtsov,

370: %``Analytic model for the QCD running coupling with universal  alpha(s)-bar(0) value,''

371: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 79} (1997) 1209

372: [hep-ph/9704333];\\

373: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9704333;%%

374: Y.~A.~Simonov,

375: %``Perturbative expansions in QCD and analytic properties of alpha(s),''

376: Phys.\ Atom.\ Nucl.\  {\bf 65} (2002) 135

377: [Yad.\ Fiz.\  {\bf 65} (2002) 140]

378: [hep-ph/0109081].

379: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0109081;%%

380: %\cite{Kataev:1997nc}

381: \bibitem{Kataev:1997nc}

382: A.~L.~Kataev, A.~V.~Kotikov, G.~Parente and A.~V.~Sidorov,

383: %``Next-to-next-to-leading order QCD analysis of the revised CCFR data for  xF3 structure function,''

384: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 417} (1998) 374

385: [hep-ph/9706534].

386: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9706534;%%

387: %\cite{Alekhin:1998df}

388: \bibitem{Alekhin:1998df}

389: S.~I.~Alekhin and A.~L.~Kataev,

390: %``The NLO DGLAP extraction of alpha(s) and higher twist terms from CCFR  xF3 and F2 structure functions data for nu N DIS,''

391: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 452} (1999) 402

392: [hep-ph/9812348].

393: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9812348;%%

394: %\cite{Kataev:1999bp}

395: \bibitem{Kataev:1999bp}

396: A.~L.~Kataev, G.~Parente and A.~V.~Sidorov,

397: %``Higher twists and alpha(s)(M(Z)) extractions from the NNLO {QCD} analysis  of the CCFR data for the xF3 structure function,''

398: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 573} (2000) 405

399: [hep-ph/9905310].

400: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9905310;%%

401: %\cite{Kataev:2001kk}

402: \bibitem{Kataev:2001kk}

403: A.~L.~Kataev, G.~Parente and A.~V.~Sidorov,

404: %``Fixation of theoretical ambiguities in the improved fits to the xF3  CCFR data at the next-to-next-to-leading order and beyond,''

405: Fiz.\ Elem.\ Chast.\ Atom.\ Yadra {\bf 34} (2003) 43

406: [Phys.\ Part.\ Nucl.\  {\bf 34} (2003) 20]

407: [hep-ph/0106221].

408: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0106221;%%

409: %\cite{Alekhin:2001zj}

410: \bibitem{Alekhin:2001zj}

411: S.~I.~Alekhin {\it et al.}, IHEP-JINR Neutrino Detector collaboration,

412: %``Determination of the high-twist contribution to the structure function  xF3(nu N),''

413: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 512} (2001) 25

414: [hep-ex/0104013].

415: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0104013;%%

416: %\cite{Kataev:2001fv}

417: \bibitem{Kataev:2001fv}

418: A.~L.~Kataev, hep-ph/0107247, in Proc. of 15th Les Recontre de 

419: Physique de la Vallee d'Aosta :

420: Results and Perspectives in Particle Physics, 2001,ed. M. Greco, Frascati 

421: Physics Series, v XXII, p.205.

422: %``Neurino deep-inelastic scattering: New experimental and theoretical  results,''

423: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0107247;%%

424: %\cite{Seligman:mc}

425: \bibitem{Seligman:mc}

426: W.~G.~Seligman {\it et al.}, CCFR collaboration,

427: %``Improved Determination Of Alpha(S) From Neutrino Nucleon Scattering,''

428: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\  {\bf 79} (1997) 1213.

429: %%CITATION = PRLTA,79,1213;%%

430: %\cite{Stein:1998wr}

431: \bibitem{Stein:1998wr}

432: E.~Stein, M.~Maul, L.~Mankiewicz and A.~Schafer,

433: %``Renormalon model predictions for power-corrections to flavour singlet  deep inelastic structure functions,''

434: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 536} (1998) 318

435: [hep-ph/9803342].

436: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9803342;%%

437: %\cite{Broadhurst:1993ru}

438: \bibitem{Broadhurst:1993ru}

439: D.~J.~Broadhurst and A.~L.~Kataev,

440: %``Connections between deep inelastic and annihilation processes at next to next-to-leading order and beyond,''

441: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 315} (1993) 179

442: [hep-ph/9308274].

443: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9308274;%%

444: %\cite{Broadhurst:2002bi}

445: \bibitem{Broadhurst:2002bi}

446: D.~J.~Broadhurst and A.~L.~Kataev,

447: %``Bjorken unpolarized and polarized sum rules: Comparative analysis of  large-N(F) expansions,''

448: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 544} (2002) 154

449: [hep-ph/0207261].

450: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0207261;%%

451: %\cite{Gribov:ri}

452: \bibitem{Gribov:ri}

453: V.~N.~Gribov and L.~N.~Lipatov,

454: %``Deep Inelastic E P Scattering In Perturbation Theory,''

455: Yad.\ Fiz.\  {\bf 15} (1972) 781

456: [Sov.\ J.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\  {\bf 15} (1972) 438];\\

457: %%CITATION = YAFIA,15,781;%%

458: %\cite{Altarelli:1977zs}

459: %\bibitem{Altarelli:1977zs}

460: G.~Altarelli and G.~Parisi,

461: %``Asymptotic Freedom In Parton Language,''

462: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 126} (1977) 298;\\

463: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B126,298;%%

464: %\cite{Dokshitzer:sg}

465: %\bibitem{Dokshitzer:sg}

466: Y.~L.~Dokshitzer,

467: Sov.\ Phys.\ JETP {\bf 46} (1977) 641

468: [Zh.\ Eksp.\ Teor.\ Fiz.\  {\bf 73} (1977) 1216].

469: %%CITATION = SPHJA,46,641;%%

470: \end{thebibliography}

471: \end{document}

472: