1: \documentclass[prd,a4paper,showpacs,preprintnumbers]{revtex4}
2:
3: %\usepackage[dvips]{graphicx}% Include figure files
4: %\usepackage{bm}% bold math
5: \usepackage{epsfig}
6:
7: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
8:
9: \def\nn{\nonumber} % nonumber in equation arrays
10: \def\eqcm{\: ,} % punctuation in equations
11: \def\eqpt{\: .}
12: \def\adj{{\phantom{h}}} % alignment of subscripts
13: \def\bra#1{\mbox{$\langle #1\vert $}}
14: \def\ket#1{\mbox{$\vert #1\rangle$}}
15:
16: \newcommand{\bm}[1]{\mbox{\boldmath $#1$}}
17: \newcommand{\bls}{\baselineskip}
18:
19: \newcommand{\ovl}{\overline}
20: \newcommand{\open}{{<\kern -0.3 em{\scriptscriptstyle )}}}
21: \newcommand{\sT}{{\scriptscriptstyle T}}
22: \newcommand{\nslash}{\kern 0.2 em n\kern -0.45em /}
23: \newcommand{\Pslash}{\kern 0.2 em P\kern -0.56em \raisebox{0.3ex}{/}}
24: \newcommand{\pslash}{\kern 0.2 em p\kern -0.4em /}
25: \newcommand{\kslash}{\kern 0.2 em k\kern -0.45em /}
26: \newcommand{\Sslash}{\kern 0.2 em S\kern -0.56em \raisebox{0.3ex}{/}}
27: \newcommand{\one}{1\hspace{-2pt}\rule[0.08ex]{0.45pt}{1.5ex}\hspace{2pt}}
28: \newcommand{\ds}{\displaystyle}
29: \newcommand{\eq}{\begin{equation}}
30: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
31: \newcommand{\eqa}{\begin{eqnarray}}
32: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}
33: \newcommand{\half}{\textstyle{1\over 2}}
34: \newcommand{\sumint}{\kern 0.2 em {\textstyle\sum} \kern -1.1 em \int}
35:
36: \newcommand{\g}{\gamma}
37: \newcommand{\sig}{\sigma}
38: \newcommand{\eps}{\epsilon}
39:
40:
41: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
42: \begin{document}
43:
44: \title{Interference fragmentation functions in electron-positron annihilation}
45:
46: \author{Daniel Boer}
47: \email{dboer@nat.vu.nl}
48: \affiliation{Dept.\ of Physics and Astronomy, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, \\
49: De Boelelaan 1081, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands}
50:
51: \author{Rainer Jakob}
52: \email{rainer.jakob@physik.uni-wuppertal.de}
53: \affiliation{Fachbereich Physik, Universit\"at Wuppertal,
54: D-42097 Wuppertal, Germany}
55:
56: \author{Marco Radici}
57: \email{marco.radici@pv.infn.it}
58: \affiliation{Dipartimento di Fisica Nucleare e Teorica,
59: Universit\`{a} di Pavia, and\\
60: Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare,
61: Sezione di Pavia, I-27100 Pavia, Italy}
62:
63: \date{\today}
64:
65:
66: \begin{abstract}
67: We study the process of electron-positron annihilation into back-to-back jets,
68: where in each jet a pair of hadrons is detected. The orientation of these two
69: pairs with respect to each other can be used to extract the interference
70: fragmentation functions in a clean way, for instance from BELLE or BABAR
71: experiment data. This is of relevance for studies of the transversity
72: distribution function.
73:
74: In particular, we focus on two azimuthal asymmetries. The first one has already
75: been studied by Artru and Collins, but is now expressed in terms of interference
76: fragmentation functions. The second asymmetry is new
77: and involves a function that is related to longitudinal jet handedness.
78: This asymmetry offers a different way of studying handedness correlations.
79: \end{abstract}
80:
81: \pacs{13.66.Bc, 13.87.Fh, 13.88.+e}
82:
83: \maketitle
84:
85: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
86: \section{\label{sec:intro} Introduction}
87:
88: Interference fragmentation functions (IFFs) have been suggested as a means to
89: access transversity~\cite{Ralston:1979ys}
90: via single spin asymmetries in $e\, p^\uparrow$ and $p \,
91: p^\uparrow$ processes, in which the proton is transversely
92: polarized. Transversity is a measure of how much of the transverse
93: polarization of a proton is transferred to its quarks. It is a helicity-flip
94: (or chiral-odd) distribution function that is very hard to measure and thus
95: far no extraction from data is available. To become sensitive to the
96: transverse spin of quarks inside a transversely polarized proton one can
97: follow two main routes.
98: The first one is to use another transversely
99: polarized hadron (in initial or final state), like in the Drell-Yan
100: process $p^\uparrow\,p^\uparrow \to \ell \, \bar \ell \, X$ or in
101: polarized $\Lambda$ hyperon production.
102: The second route is to
103: exploit the possibility that the direction of the transverse polarization
104: of a fragmenting quark may somehow be encoded in the distribution of hadrons
105: inside the resulting jet.
106: For instance, the Collins effect~\cite{Collins:1992kk}
107: describes the case where the
108: distribution of a hadron inside the jet follows
109: a ${\bm k}_T \times {\bm s}_T$ behaviour, where ${\bm k}_T$ is the
110: transverse momentum of the quark
111: compared to the hadron and ${\bm s}_T$ is the transverse polarization of the
112: fragmenting quark. Here, transverse means orthogonal to the quark (or,
113: equivalently, jet)
114: direction. Due to the transverse momentum dependence, the Collins
115: effect is a very challenging observable both theoretically and experimentally,
116: and an alternative is formed by the IFFs which
117: describe the distribution of two hadrons inside the jet. The idea
118: is that the orientation of two hadrons with respect to each other and to the
119: jet direction, is an indicator for the transverse spin direction of the
120: quark. Such a correlation is expected to occur due to the strong final state
121: interactions between the two hadrons: different partial waves can interfere
122: and this is expected to give rise to nonvanishing, nontrivial fragmentation
123: functions, the two-hadron IFFs.
124:
125: As with all proposals to measure transversity, a second unknown quantity is
126: introduced, which needs to be measured separately. For the nontrivial
127: fragmentation
128: functions, such as the Collins function and the two-hadron IFFs, the
129: cleanest extraction
130: is from two-jet events in the electron-positron annihilation process. Here, we
131: will present the leading twist, fully differential cross section for the
132: process $e^+ e^- \rightarrow (h_1 h_2)
133: ({\bar h}_1 {\bar h}_2) X$ in terms of products of two-hadron fragmentation
134: functions.
135:
136: In Ref.~\cite{Bianconi:1999cd}, the leading twist, transverse momentum
137: dependent two-hadron IFFs have been listed. There are two chiral-odd and
138: one chiral-even IFF, but upon integration over the {\em quark\/} transverse
139: momentum dependence only one chiral-odd IFF survives (called $H_1^{\open}$),
140: discussed at several places in the
141: literature~\cite{Collins:1993kq,Ji:1993vw,Jaffe:1997hf,noiDIS}.
142: The relation among the various approaches and to the $\rho$
143: fragmentation functions (for the two hadrons being two pions) is extensively
144: discussed in Ref.~\cite{Bacchetta:2002ux},
145: where the two-hadron final system is
146: expanded in relative partial waves and a new contribution involving the
147: transversity at leading twist is identified.
148:
149: Here, we will discuss the consequences of all three leading twist
150: IFFs occurring in
151: the process $e^+ e^- \rightarrow (h_1 h_2) ({\bar h}_1 {\bar h}_2) X$; we
152: find that upon integrating the differential
153: cross section over the {\em observed\/}
154: transverse momentum one is actually not only
155: left with the transverse momentum integrated chiral-odd IFF $H_1^{\open}$,
156: but there is also an asymmetry that is governed by the chiral-even IFF,
157: integrated, but weighted, over the transverse momentum:
158: \eq
159: G_1^{\perp}(z,M_h^2) \equiv \int d\xi \int d\phi_R \int d\bm{k}_\sT^{}
160: \; \bm{k}_\sT^{}\!\cdot\! {\bm{R}}^{}_\sT \; G_1^{\perp}
161: (z,\xi,\bm{k}_\sT^2,\bm{R}_\sT^2,\bm{k}^{}_\sT\cdot\bm{R}^{}_\sT),
162: \ee
163: where ${\bm{R}}^{}_\sT$ is the transverse part of the
164: relative momentum between the two hadrons and $\bm{k}_\sT^{}$ is the quark
165: transverse momentum (see Sec.~\ref{sec:kin} for the explicit definitions of
166: the above quantities).
167: This function is related (but not identical) to longitudinal jet handedness
168: and its resulting asymmetry will be discussed in detail below
169: (see Sec.~\ref{sec:asym2}).
170:
171: The asymmetry
172: involving the transverse momentum integrated chiral-odd IFF $H_1^{\open}$
173: has already been studied in a different (less
174: common) notation in a paper by Artru and Collins~\cite{Artru:1995zu}.
175: It is the asymmetry of present-day
176: experimental interest regarding transversity. The extraction of
177: $H_1^{\open}$ from the process $e^+ e^- \rightarrow (h_1 h_2)
178: ({\bar h}_1 {\bar h}_2) X$ is the goal of a group~\cite{GrossePerdekamp}
179: that will analyze the off-resonance data from the BELLE experiment at KEK. In the
180: present article, we provide for the procedure of integrating and properly weighting
181: the fully differential cross section to single out the relevant asymmetry.
182: The extracted IFF will be of use to several ongoing or starting experiments
183: aiming to measure transversity in the processes
184: $e\, p^\uparrow \to (h_1 h_2) X$ (HERMES, COMPASS) and
185: $p\, p^\uparrow \to (h_1 h_2) X$ (RHIC~\cite{GrossePerdekamp}).
186:
187: However, the asymmetry involving $G_1^\perp$ also seems of experimental
188: interest. It can be viewed as the
189: chiral-even counterpart of the Artru-Collins asymmetry. An analogous
190: asymmetry involving chiral-even fragmentation functions
191: does not emerge when only one hadron is detected in each jet; this asymmetry
192: is thus particular to the multi-hadron fragmentation case.
193: But it can also be viewed as an asymmetry arising from a correlation between
194: longitudinal jet handedness functions. As such it is relevant
195: for single spin asymmetries with longitudinally polarized protons,
196: $e\, \vec{p} \to (h_1 h_2) X$ and
197: $p\, \vec{p} \to (h_1 h_2) X$, which are proportional to the well-known
198: quark helicity distribution function $g_1$ (cf., e.g., Eq.~(31) of
199: Ref.~\cite{Bianconi:1999cd}). Since $g_1$ is known to considerable accuracy,
200: one can extract $G_1^\perp$ from $e\, \vec{p} \to (h_1 h_2) X$ and
201: actually predict our longitudinal jet handedness correlation in
202: $e^+ e^- \rightarrow (h_1 h_2)
203: ({\bar h}_1 {\bar h}_2) X$, i.e.\ the expression given below in
204: Eq.\ (\ref{eq:newasym3}). Any experimental deviation
205: may be related to a CP-violating effect of the QCD
206: vacuum~\cite{Efremov:1995ff}.
207:
208: The function $G_1^\perp$ is also relevant for the
209: studies of IFFs in the processes $e\, p^\uparrow \to (h_1 h_2) X$ and
210: $p\, p^\uparrow \to (h_1 h_2) X$. There, next to the asymmetry proportional
211: to the transversity function, another $G_1^\perp$ dependent
212: asymmetry~\cite{noiDIS} occurs, which is
213: proportional to the transverse momentum dependent distribution function
214: $g_{1T}$~\cite{Tangerman:1994eh}. This function (extrapolated to $x=0$)
215: gives information on violations of the Burkhardt-Cottingham sum rule.
216: Apart from the intrinsic interest in such an asymmetry, it also shows the need
217: for appropriate weight functions to separate the asymmetry proportional to
218: $g_{1T} G_1^\perp$ from the asymmetries proportional to
219: $h_1 H_1^\open$ and $h_1 H_1^\perp$ (where $h_1$ denotes the transversity
220: function).
221:
222: The other results presented below, i.e.\ the other terms arising in the
223: fully differential $e^+ e^-$ cross section, may also be of
224: interest in the future and the notation used here hopefully will
225: facilitate the communication between different
226: experimental groups planning or performing two-hadron IFF-related
227: studies for different processes.
228:
229: The paper is organized as follows. In Sec.~\ref{sec:kin} we first discuss the
230: kinematics of the process $e^+ e^- \rightarrow (h_1 h_2) ({\bar h}_1 {\bar
231: h}_2) X$. In Sec.~\ref{sec:cross} we present the cross section in terms of the
232: interference fragmentation functions. Next, we investigate extensively the
233: Artru-Collins azimuthal asymmetry (Sec.~\ref{sec:asym1}) and
234: the newly-found longitudinal jet
235: handedness asymmetry (Sec.~\ref{sec:asym2}).
236: During the discussion of these two asymmetries in
237: $e^+ e^- \rightarrow (h_1 h_2) ({\bar h}_1 {\bar h}_2) X$ we also remark on
238: corresponding asymmetries in two-hadron inclusive
239: DIS involving the same IFFs to facilitate comparison.
240: We end with conclusions (Sec.~\ref{sec:end}).
241:
242: \begin{figure}[h]
243: \epsfig{file=kin.eps,width=16truecm,height=7truecm}
244: \caption{Kinematic for the
245: $e^+ e^- \rightarrow (h_1 h_2) ({\bar h}_1 {\bar h}_2) X$ process.}
246: \label{fig:kin}
247: \end{figure}
248:
249: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
250: \section{\label{sec:kin} Kinematics}
251:
252: We will consider the process
253: $e^+e^- \rightarrow (h_1 h_2) ({\bar h}_1 {\bar h}_2) X$,
254: schematically depicted in Fig.~\ref{fig:kin}. An electron and a positron with
255: momenta $l$ and $l'$, respectively, annihilate into a photon with timelike
256: momentum $q=l+l'$ and $q^2=Q^2$. A quark and an antiquark are then emitted and
257: fragment each one into a residual jet and a pair of leading unpolarized
258: hadrons $(h_1,h_2)$ with momenta $P_1,P_2$, and masses $M_1,M_2$ (for the
259: antiquark we have the corresponding notation
260: $({\bar h}_1,{\bar h}_2)$ with momenta ${\ovl P}_1, {\ovl P}_2$
261: and masses ${\ovl M}_1,{\ovl M}_2$). We introduce the vectors
262: $P_h=P_1+P_2, \, R=(P_1-P_2)/2$, and
263: ${\ovl P}_h={\ovl P}_1+{\ovl P}_2, \, {\ovl R}=({\ovl P}_1- {\ovl P}_2)/2$.
264: The two jets are emitted in opposite directions, therefore
265: $P_h\cdot {\ovl P}_h \sim Q^2$.
266: Neglecting $1/Q$ mass-term corrections~\cite{Amst98}, we can
267: parametrize the momenta as
268: \eqa
269: P_h^\mu &= &\frac{z_h Q}{\sqrt{2}} \ n_-^\mu \nn \\
270: {\ovl P}_h^\mu &= &\frac{{\ovl z}_h Q}{\sqrt{2}} \ n_+^\mu \nn \\
271: q^\mu &= &\frac{Q}{\sqrt{2}} \ n_-^\mu
272: + \frac{Q}{\sqrt{2}} \ n_+^\mu + q_T^\mu
273: \eqcm
274: \label{eq:lightpar}
275: \eea
276: where $-q_T^2 \equiv Q_T^2 \ll Q^2$, and $n_+, n_-$, are light-like vectors
277: satisfying $n_+^2 = n_-^2 = 0$ and $n_+ \cdot n_- = 1$. We use the following
278: notation, $a^\pm = a \cdot n_\mp$, for a generic 4-vector $a$ with light-cone
279: components $a=[a^-,a^+,\bm{a}_T]$. We define also
280: $z = P_h^-/q^- \sim 2 P_h \cdot q/Q^2 = z_h \, , \, {\ovl z} =
281: {\ovl P}_h^+ /q^+ \sim 2 {\ovl P}_h \cdot q/Q^2 = {\ovl z}_h$, representing
282: the light-cone momentum fractions of the fragmenting (anti-)quark
283: carried by each hadron system. Analogously,
284: we define the following fractions
285: \eqa
286: \xi &= &\frac{1}{2}+\frac{R^-}{P_h^-} = \frac{P_1^-}{P_1^-+P_2^-} \nn \\
287: {\ovl \xi} &= &\frac{1}{2}+\frac{{\ovl R}^-}{{\ovl P}_h^-} =
288: \frac{{\ovl P}_1^-}{{\ovl P}_1^-+{\ovl P}_2^-} \eqcm
289: \label{eq:xi}
290: \eea
291: that describe how the momentum of the (anti-)quark is split into each
292: component of the hadron pair. The $\hat z$ axis is defined using $P_h$; in
293: particular, from Fig.~\ref{fig:kin} it is $\bm{P}_h \parallel \bm{\hat z}$.
294: It is useful to define the so-called $\perp$ plane \cite{Amst97}
295: perpendicular to $\bm{\hat
296: z}$, where $\bm{P}_{h\perp} = \bm{q}_\perp = 0$. Up to corrections in
297: $Q_T^2/Q^2 \ll 1$, we have ${\ovl P}_{h\, \perp}^\mu = - {\ovl z} q_T^\mu$
298: and, consequently, $\bm{\ovl P}_{h\, \perp} = -{\ovl z} \bm{q}_T$.
299: The $\perp$ plane is spanned by the two unit vectors
300: \eqa
301: \hat h &= &\frac{\bm{\ovl P}_{h\, \perp}}{|\bm{\ovl P}_{h\, \perp}|} =
302: -\frac{\bm{q}_T}{|\bm{q}_T|} = (\cos \phi_1 \ , \ \sin \phi_1) \nn \\[2mm]
303: {\hat g}^i &= &\eps_T^{ij} {\hat h}^j \equiv \eps^{-+ij} {\hat h}^j =
304: \eps^{0ij3} {\hat h}^j = (\sin \phi_1 \ , \ -\cos \phi_1) \eqcm
305: \label{eq:versors}
306: \eea
307: with $\phi_1$ defined in Fig.~\ref{fig:kin}. Therefore, we have
308: $\hat g \cdot \bm{a} = (\bm{a} \times {\hat h})_z$ for a generic 3-vector
309: $\bm{a}$. As in Deep Inelastic Scattering (DIS), the
310: $\perp$ and transverse $(T)$ components of a 4-vector can be obtained by
311: the following tensors
312: \eqa
313: g_T^{\mu \nu} &= &g^{\mu \nu} - n_+^\mu n_-^\nu - n_-^\mu n_+^\nu \nn \\
314: g_\perp^{\mu \nu} &= &g_T^{\mu \nu} -
315: \frac{\sqrt{2} ( n_+^\mu q_T^\nu + n_+^\nu q_T^\mu )}{Q} \eqpt
316: \eea
317: In the following, we will consistently neglect the ${\cal O}(1/Q)$
318: difference, thus not distinguishing between $\perp$ and $T$ components of
319: 4-vectors. From previous definitions we have also
320: \eqa
321: |\bm{R}_T|^2 &= &\xi (1-\xi) M_h^2 - (1-\xi) M_1^2 -\xi M_2^2 \nn \\[2mm]
322: |\bm{\ovl R}_T|^2 &= &{\ovl \xi} (1-{\ovl \xi}) {\ovl M}_h^2 -
323: (1-{\ovl \xi}) {\ovl M}_1^2 - {\ovl \xi} {\ovl M}_2^2 \eqcm
324: \label{eq:rt}
325: \eea
326: where $P_h^2=M_h^2$ and ${\ovl P}_h^2={\ovl M}_h^2$ are the invariant masses
327: of the two final hadronic systems. The azimuthal angles
328: $\phi_R, \phi_{\ovl R}$, parametrizing the transverse components of
329: $R,{\ovl R}$, are depicted in Fig.~\ref{fig:kin}. There, a
330: further azimuthal angle $\phi^l$ should be considered which identifies the
331: position of the lepton frame with respect to the laboratory frame. In
332: Fig.~\ref{fig:kin} it is taken $\phi^l=0$ for convenience, but in the
333: following (see Secs.~\ref{sec:asym1} and \ref{sec:asym2}) we will
334: have to retain its dependence explicitly such that the position
335: of the hadron pairs with respect to the lepton frame is $\phi_R - \phi^l$ and
336: $\phi_{\ovl R} - \phi^l$, respectively.
337:
338: The cross section for the 4-unpolarized-particle inclusive $e^+e^-$ annihilation
339: is
340: \eq
341: \frac{2P_1^0 \, 2P_2^0 \, 2{\ovl P}_1^0 \, 2{\ovl P}_2^0 \, d\sig }
342: {d\bm{P}_1 d\bm{P}_2 d\bm{\ovl P}_1 d\bm{\ovl P}_2} =
343: \frac{\alpha^2}{Q^6} \, L_{\mu \nu} W^{\mu \nu}_{(4h)} \eqcm
344: \label{eq:x}
345: \ee
346: where
347: \eqa
348: L^{\mu \nu} &=& Q^2 \Big[ -2\,A(y)\, g_\perp^{\mu \nu}
349: + 4\, B(y) \, {\hat z}^\mu {\hat z}^\nu \,
350: - 4\,B(y) \left( {\hat l}_\perp^\mu {\hat l}_\perp^\nu \,
351: + \frac{1}{2}\, g_\perp^{\mu \nu} \right) \nn \\
352: & &\quad {}- \, 2 \, C(y) B^{1/2}(y) ({\hat z}^\mu
353: {\hat l}_\perp^\nu + {\hat z}^\nu {\hat l}_\perp^\mu ) \Big]
354: \eqcm \label{eq:Ltens}
355: \\[2mm]
356: A(y) & = & \left(\frac{1}{2}-y+y^2\right) \ \stackrel{cm}{=} \;
357: \ds{\frac{\left( 1 + \cos^2\theta_2 \right)}{4}} \nn\\[2mm]
358: B(y) & = & y\,(1-y) \ \stackrel{cm}{=} \ \ds{\frac{\sin^2 \theta_2}{4}}
359: \nn\\[2 mm]
360: C(y) & = & 1-2y \ \stackrel{cm}{=} \ - \cos \theta_2
361: \eqcm \label{eq:Ltenscoff}
362: \eea
363: is the lepton tensor. In fact, only the $L^{\mu \nu}_{\perp}$
364: part contributes at
365: leading twist. The invariant $y = P_h\cdot l/P_h\cdot q\sim l^-/q^-$
366: becomes, in the lepton center-of-mass (cm) frame, $y=(1+\cos \theta_2)/2$,
367: where $\theta_2$ is defined in Fig.~\ref{fig:kin}. The unit vectors are
368: defined as
369: \eqa
370: {\hat l}_\perp^\mu &= &l^\mu_\perp / |\bm{l}_\perp | \nn \\
371: {\hat z}^\mu &= & \frac{2}{z Q} P_h - \frac{q^\mu}{Q} \eqpt
372: \label{eq:versors2}
373: \eea
374:
375: The hadronic tensor is
376: \eqa
377: W^{\mu \nu}_{(4h)}(q;P_1,P_2,{\ovl P}_1,{\ovl P}_2)
378: &= &\frac{1}{(2\pi)^{10}} \,
379: \sumint_X \frac{d\bm{P}_X}{(2\pi )^32P_X^0} \, (2\pi )^4 \delta(q-P_X-P_1-P_2-
380: {\ovl P}_1 - {\ovl P}_2) \nn \\[1mm]
381: & &\mbox{\hspace{1.5truecm}} \times \bra{0}J^\mu(0)
382: \ket{P_X;P_1,P_2,{\ovl P}_1,{\ovl P}_2}
383: \bra{P_X;P_1,P_2,{\ovl P}_1,{\ovl P}_2} J^\nu(0) \ket{0} \eqpt
384: \label{eq:Wtens4}
385: \eea
386: Such definition allows for recovering the corresponding formulae in the case
387: of 2-particle, 1-particle and totally inclusive $e^+e^-$ annihilation. For
388: example, after integrating over one of the two hadrons in each pair,
389: \eqa
390: \sumint_{h_2} \frac{d\bm{P}_2}{2P_2^0} \, \sumint_{{\bar h}_2}
391: \frac{d\bm{\ovl P}_2}{2{\ovl P}_2^0} \,
392: \frac{2P_1^0 \, 2P_2^0 \, 2{\ovl P}_1^0 \, 2{\ovl P}_2^0 d\sig}
393: {d\bm{P}_1 d\bm{P}_2 d\bm{\ovl P}_1 d\bm{\ovl P}_2} &\equiv &
394: \frac{2P_1^0 \, 2{\ovl P}_1^0 d\sig}{d\bm{P}_1 d\bm{\ovl P}_1} =
395: \frac{\alpha^2}{Q^6}\, L_{\mu \nu} \, \sumint_{h_2} \frac{d\bm{P}_2}{2P_2^0}
396: \sumint_{{\bar h}_2} \frac{d\bm{\ovl P}_2}{2{\ovl P}_2^0}\,
397: W^{\mu\nu}_{(4h)} \nn \\
398: & &\mbox{\hspace{-3truecm}}
399: =\frac{\alpha^2}{Q^6}\, L_{\mu \nu} \, \frac{1}{(2\pi )^4}
400: \, \sumint_X \frac{d\bm{P}_X}{(2\pi )^3 2P_X^0} \, (2\pi )^4
401: \delta(q-P_X-P_1-P_2-{\ovl P}_1-{\ovl P}_2) \nn \\
402: & &\mbox{\hspace{-2truecm}} \times
403: \sumint_{h_2} \frac{d\bm{P}_2}{(2\pi )^3 2P_2^0}
404: \sumint_{{\bar h}_2} \frac{d\bm{\ovl P}_2}{(2\pi )^3 2{\ovl P}_2^0} \,
405: \bra{0} J^\mu \ket{X,P_1,P_2,{\ovl P}_1,{\ovl P}_2}
406: \bra{X,P_1,P_2,{\ovl P}_1,{\ovl P}_2} J^\nu \ket{0} \nn \\
407: & &\mbox{\hspace{-3truecm}} =\frac{\alpha^2}{Q^6}\, L_{\mu \nu} \,
408: \frac{1}{(2\pi )^4}
409: \, \sumint_{X'} \frac{d\bm{P}_{X'}}{(2\pi )^3 2P_{X'}^0} \, (2\pi )^4
410: \delta(q-P_{X'}-P_1-{\ovl P}_1) \,
411: \sumint_{h_2} \frac{d\bm{P}_2}{(2\pi )^3 2P_2^0}
412: \nn \\
413: & &\mbox{\hspace{-2.6truecm}} \times \sumint_{{\bar h}_2}
414: \frac{d\bm{\ovl P}_2}{(2\pi )^3 2{\ovl P}_2^0}\, \bra{0} J^\mu
415: \ket{X'-P_2-{\ovl P}_2,P_1,P_2,{\ovl P}_1,{\ovl P}_2}
416: \bra{X'-P_2-{\ovl P}_2,P_1,P_2,{\ovl P}_1,{\ovl P}_2} J^\nu \ket{0} \nn \\
417: & &\mbox{\hspace{-3truecm}}
418: =\frac{\alpha^2}{Q^6}\, L_{\mu \nu} \, \frac{1}{(2\pi )^4}
419: \, \sumint_{X'} \frac{d\bm{P}_{X'}}{(2\pi )^3 2P_{X'}^0} \, (2\pi )^4
420: \delta(q-P_{X'}-P_1-{\ovl P}_1) \nn \\
421: & &\times \bra{0} J^\mu \ket{X',P_1,{\ovl P}_1}
422: \bra{X',P_1,{\ovl P}_1} J^\nu \ket{0} \nn \\
423: & &\mbox{\hspace{-3truecm}}
424: \equiv \frac{\alpha^2}{Q^6}\, L_{\mu \nu} \, W^{\mu\nu}_{(2h)}
425: \eqcm
426: \label{eq:checke+e-4-2}
427: \eea
428: we recover the cross section for the 2-particle inclusive $e^+e^-$
429: annihilation~\cite{Amst97} after the replacement
430: ${\ovl P}_1 \leftrightarrow P_2$. Further integrations over the detected
431: hadrons lead to the 1-particle inclusive and totally inclusive cross
432: sections (cf.~\cite{Amst97}).
433:
434: Consistently with Eq.~(\ref{eq:lightpar}), we have
435: \eqa
436: P_h^+ \ll P_h^- &\rightarrow &P_h^0 \sim \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} P_h^- \nn \\
437: R^+ \ll R^- &\rightarrow &R^0 \sim \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} R^- \nn \\
438: \frac{R^-}{P_h^-} &= &\xi - \frac{1}{2} \sim \frac{R^0}{P_h^0} \equiv
439: \frac{E_R}{E_h} \nn \\
440: {\ovl P}_h^- \ll {\ovl P}_h^+ &\rightarrow &{\ovl P}_h^0 \sim
441: \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} {\ovl P}_h^+ \nn \\
442: {\ovl R}^- \ll {\ovl R}^+ &\rightarrow &{\ovl R}^0 \sim
443: \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} {\ovl R}^+ \nn \\
444: \frac{{\ovl R}^+}{{\ovl P}_h^+} &\equiv &{\ovl \xi} - \frac{1}{2} \sim
445: \frac{{\ovl R}^0}{{\ovl P}_h^0} \equiv \frac{{\ovl E}_R}{{\ovl E}_h}
446: \eqpt \label{eq:lightappr}
447: \eea
448: The elementary phase space can then be transformed as follows:
449: \eqa
450: \frac{d\bm{P}_1 d\bm{P}_2 d\bm{\ovl P}_1 d\bm{\ovl P}_2}
451: {2P_1^0 \, 2P_2^0 \, 2{\ovl P}_1^0 \, 2{\ovl P}_2^0} &= &
452: \frac{d\bm{P}_h \, d\bm{R} \, d\bm{\ovl P}_h \, d\bm{\ovl R}}
453: {(E_h^2-4E_R^2)({\ovl E}_h^2-4{\ovl E}_R^2)} \sim
454: \frac{|\bm{P}_h|^2 d|\bm{P}_h| d\Omega_h \,
455: d\bm{R}_T dR^- \, d\bm{\ovl P}_{h\perp}
456: d{\ovl P}_h^+ d\bm{\ovl R}_T d{\ovl R}^+}
457: {8\sqrt{2} \, (P_h^-)^2 \xi (1- \xi)
458: ({\ovl P}_h^+)^2 {\ovl \xi} (1- {\ovl \xi})} \nn \\
459: &\sim & \frac{z Q^2}{16 \, \xi (1- \xi)}\,dz\,d\Omega_h\,d\bm{R}_T\,d\xi\,
460: \frac{1}{4 {\ovl z} {\ovl \xi} (1- {\ovl \xi})}
461: d\bm{\ovl P}_{h\perp}\,d{\ovl z}\,d\bm{\ovl R}_T\,d{\ovl \xi} \eqcm
462: \label{eq:phasesp}
463: \eea
464: where $d\Omega_h = 2 dy d\phi^l$, since $\bm{P}_{h\perp} = 0$ and its
465: azimuthal angle actually defines the position of the lepton plane with respect
466: to the laboratory frame.
467: Using Eq.~(\ref{eq:rt}) and
468: \eqa
469: d\bm{R}_T &= &J \, d\phi_R \, dM_h^2 \quad \mbox{with} \, J=\left\vert
470: \begin{array}{cc}
471: \displaystyle{\frac{\partial R_{Tx}}{\partial M_h^2} =
472: \frac{\xi (1-\xi)}{2|\bm{R}_T|}} \cos\phi_R & \;
473: \displaystyle{\frac{\partial R_{Tx}}{\partial \phi_R}} =
474: -|\bm{R}_T| \sin\phi_R
475: \\[3mm]
476: \displaystyle{\frac{\partial R_{Ty}}{\partial M_h^2} =
477: \frac{\xi (1-\xi)}{2|\bm{R}_T|} \sin\phi_R } & \;
478: \displaystyle{\frac{\partial R_{Ty}}{\partial \phi_R}} =
479: |\bm{R}_T| \cos\phi_R
480: \end{array} \right\vert = \frac{\xi (1-\xi)}{2} \nn \\
481: d\bm{\ovl R}_T &= & \frac{{\ovl \xi} (1-{\ovl \xi})}{2} \,
482: d\phi_{\ovl R} \, d{\ovl M}_h^2 \eqcm
483: \label{eq:drt}
484: \eea
485: the cross section can be rewritten as
486: \eq
487: \frac{d\sig}{d\bm{q}_T \, dz \, d\xi \, d\phi_R \, dM_h^2 \, d{\ovl z} \,
488: d{\ovl \xi} \, d\phi_{\ovl R} \, d{\ovl M}_h^2 \, dy \, d\phi^l} =
489: \frac{\alpha^2}{128 \, Q^4} \, z {\ovl z} \, L_{\mu \nu}
490: W^{\mu\nu}_{(4h)} \eqpt
491: \label{eq:x2}
492: \ee
493:
494: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
495:
496: \section{\label{sec:cross} Cross section}
497:
498: \subsection{\label{sec:w} The hadronic tensor}
499:
500: To leading order the expression for the hadron tensor is
501: \eq
502: W^{\mu\nu}_{(4h)}
503: \sim 3 \, (32)^2 \, z {\ovl z} \sum_{a,\ovl a} e_a^2 \, \int
504: d\bm{k}_\sT^{} d\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{} \, \delta^2(\bm{k}_\sT^{}+
505: \bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}-\bm{q}_\sT^{})\, \mbox{Tr} \left[ \left(
506: \frac{1}{32{\ovl z}} \int d{\ovl k}^{\,-} {\ovl \Delta}
507: \right)_{{\ovl k}_\adj^+={\ovl P}_h^+/{\ovl z}} \, \g^\mu \, \left(
508: \frac{1}{32z} \int dk^+ \Delta \right)_{k_\adj^-=P_h^-/z} \, \g^\nu \right]
509: \eqpt
510: \label{eq:Wmunu}
511: \ee
512: The (partly integrated) correlation function $\Delta$ is parametrized in terms
513: of fragmentation functions as \cite{noiDIS}
514: \eqa
515: \lefteqn{
516: \left. \frac{1}{32z}\int dk^+ \Delta(k;P_h,R)
517: \right|_{k_\adj^-=P_h^-/z, {\bf k}_\sT} }
518: \nn\\[5pt]
519: &&
520: = \frac{1}{4\pi} \, \frac{1}{4} \left\{
521: D_1^a (z,\xi,\bm{k}_\sT^2,\bm{R}_\sT^2,\bm{k}_\sT\cdot\bm{R}_\sT)\,
522: \nslash_-
523: {}- G_1^{\perp \, a}
524: (z,\xi,\bm{k}_\sT^2,\bm{R}_\sT^2,\bm{k}_\sT\cdot\bm{R}_\sT)\,
525: \frac{\eps_{\mu\nu\rho\sig}\,\g^\mu\,n_-^\nu\,k_\sT^\rho\,R_\sT^\sig}
526: {M_1 M_2}\,
527: \g_5 \right. \nn\\[5pt]
528: &&
529: \left. {}+ H_1^{\open \, a}
530: (z,\xi,\bm{k}_\sT^2,\bm{R}_\sT^2,\bm{k}_\sT\cdot\bm{R}_\sT)
531: \, \frac{\sig_{\mu\nu}\, R_\sT^\mu\, n_-^\nu}{M_1+M_2} \, {}+ \,
532: H_1^{\perp \, a}
533: (z,\xi,\bm{k}_\sT^2,\bm{R}_\sT^2,\bm{k}_\sT\cdot\bm{R}_\sT)\,
534: \frac{\sig_{\mu\nu}\, k_\sT^\mu\, n_-^\nu}{M_1+M_2} \right\} \eqpt
535: \label{eq:delta}
536: \eea
537: We parametrize the antiquark correlation function $\ovl \Delta$ in the same way
538: by employing overlined quantities, but in this case the
539: suppressed ${\ovl k}{}^{\,-}$ component is integrated over.
540:
541: At leading twist, we have the usual nice probabilistic interpretation of the
542: fragmentation functions in Eq.~(\ref{eq:delta}): $D_1^a$ is the probability
543: for an unpolarized quark with flavor $a$ to fragment into the unpolarized
544: hadron pair ($h_1,h_2$), $G_1^{\perp\, a}$ is the probability difference for a
545: longitudinally polarized quark with flavor $a$ and opposite chiralities to
546: fragment into ($h_1,h_2$), both $H_1^{\open\, a}, \, H_1^{\perp\, a}$, give
547: the same probability difference but for a transversely polarized fragmenting
548: quark. $G_1^{\perp\, a}, \, H_1^{\open\, a}, \, H_1^{\perp\, a}$, are all {\it
549: naive} T-odd and $H_1^{\open\, a}, \, H_1^{\perp\, a}$ are furthermore chiral
550: odd. The function $H_1^{\perp\, a}$ represents a generalization of the Collins
551: effect, namely for two hadrons instead of one. However, $H_1^{\open\, a}$
552: originates from a genuinely new effect, because it relates the transverse
553: polarization of the fragmenting quark to the angular distribution of the
554: hadron pair in the $\perp$ plane
555: (defined in Sec.~\ref{sec:kin}~\cite{noiDIS}).
556:
557: \vspace{.8truecm}
558:
559:
560: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
561:
562: \begin{figure}[h]
563: \epsfig{file=e+e-4.eps,width=7truecm,height=7.5truecm}
564: \caption{Leading-twist contribution to 4p-inclusive $e^+e^-$ annihilation.}
565: \label{fig:handbag}
566: \end{figure}
567:
568: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
569:
570:
571: \subsection{\label{sec:dsig} The fully differential cross section}
572:
573: For the case of the $e^+e^-$ annihilation into four unpolarized (or spinless) hadrons
574: with two leading hadrons in each current jet (see Fig.~\ref{fig:handbag} for a
575: diagrammatic representation at leading order), the differential cross section at
576: leading order in $1/Q$ and $\alpha_s$ is
577: (including now summation over flavor indices with quark charges $e_a$ in
578: units of $e$)
579: \eqa
580: \lefteqn{\frac{d\sigma (e^+e^-\to (h_1h_2)(\bar h_1\bar h_2)X)}
581: {d\bm{q}_\sT^{}\,dz\,d\xi\,dM_h^2\,d\phi^{}_R\, d{\ovl z}\,
582: d{\ovl \xi}\, d{\ovl M}_h^2\,d\phi^{}_{\ovl R}\, dy\,
583: d\phi^l}
584: = \sum_{a,\ovl a}\; e_a^2 \, \frac{6\,\alpha^2}{Q^2} \;z^2 {\ovl z}^2
585: \;\Bigg\{ A(y) \, {\cal F}\left[D_1^a\ovl D{}_1^a \right]}
586: \nn\\[5pt]
587: &&
588: {}+ \cos(2\phi_1)\;B(y)\;{\cal F}\left[\left(2\,\hat{\bm{h}}\!\cdot\!\bm k_\sT^{}\,
589: \,\hat{\bm{h}}\!\cdot\!\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}\,-\,\bm k_\sT^{}\!\cdot \!
590: \bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}\,\right)
591: \frac{H_1^{\perp a} {\ovl H}_1^{\perp a}}
592: {(M_1+M_2)({\ovl M}_1+{\ovl M}_2)} \right] \nn\\[5pt]
593: && {}- \sin(2\phi_1)\;B(y)\;{\cal F}\left[\left(\,\hat{\bm{h}}\!\cdot\!\bm k_\sT^{}\,
594: \,\hat{\bm{g}}\!\cdot\!\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}\,+\,\hat{\bm{h}}\!\cdot\!
595: \bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}\, \,\hat{\bm{g}}\!\cdot\!\bm k_\sT^{}\,\right)
596: \frac{H_1^{\perp a} {\ovl H}_1^{\perp a}}
597: {(M_1+M_2)({\ovl M}_1+{\ovl M}_2)} \right] \nn\\[5pt]
598: && {}+ \cos(\phi_R+\phi_{\ovl R}-2\phi^l)\;B(y)\;|\bm{R}_\sT|\,
599: |\bm{\ovl R}_\sT|\;{\cal F}\left[
600: \frac{H_1^{\open a} {\ovl H}_1^{\open a}}
601: {(M_1+M_2)({\ovl M}_1+{\ovl M}_2)} \right] \nn\\[5pt]
602: &&
603: {}+\cos(\phi_1 + \phi_R-\phi^l)\;B(y)\;|\bm{R}_\sT|\; {\cal F}\left[\,\bm{\hat h}\!
604: \cdot \!\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}\,\frac{H_1^{\open a} {\ovl H}_1^{\perp a}}
605: {(M_1+M_2)({\ovl M}_1+{\ovl M}_2)} \right] \nn\\[5pt]
606: &&
607: {}-\sin(\phi_1 + \phi_R-\phi^l)\;B(y)\;|\bm{R}_\sT|\; {\cal F}\left[\,\bm{\hat g}\!
608: \cdot \!\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}\,\frac{H_1^{\open a} {\ovl H}_1^{\perp a}}
609: {(M_1+M_2)({\ovl M}_1+{\ovl M}_2)} \right] \nn\\[5pt]
610: &&
611: {}+ \cos(\phi_1 + \phi_{\ovl R}-\phi^l)\;B(y)\;|\bm{\ovl R}_\sT|\;
612: {\cal F}\left[\,\bm{\hat h}\!\cdot \!\bm{k}_\sT^{}\,
613: \frac{H_1^{\perp a} {\ovl H}_1^{\open a}}
614: {(M_1+M_2)({\ovl M}_1+{\ovl M}_2)} \right] \nn\\[5pt]
615: &&
616: {}- \sin(\phi_1 + \phi_{\ovl R}-\phi^l)\;B(y)\;|\bm{\ovl R}_\sT|\;
617: {\cal F}\left[\,\bm{\hat g}\!\cdot \!\bm{k}_\sT^{}\,
618: \frac{H_1^{\perp a} {\ovl H}_1^{\open a}}
619: {(M_1+M_2)({\ovl M}_1+{\ovl M}_2)} \right] \nn\\[5pt]
620: &&
621: {}+A(y)\;|\bm{R}_\sT|\,|\bm{\ovl R}_\sT|\;\Bigg[
622: \sin(\phi_1-\phi_R+\phi^l)\,\sin(\phi_1-\phi_{\ovl R}+\phi^l)\;{\cal F}\left[
623: \,\bm{\hat h}\!\cdot \!\bm{k}_\sT^{}\,\bm{\hat h}\!\cdot \!\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}\,
624: \frac{G_1^{\perp a} {\ovl G}_1^{\perp a}}
625: {M_1M_2 {\ovl M}_1 {\ovl M}_2} \right] \nn\\[5pt]
626: &&
627: {}+\sin(\phi_1-\phi_R+\phi^l)\,\cos(\phi_1-\phi_{\ovl R}+\phi^l)\;{\cal F}\left[
628: \,\bm{\hat h}\!\cdot \!\bm{k}_\sT^{}\,\bm{\hat g}\!\cdot \!\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}\,
629: \frac{G_1^{\perp a} {\ovl G}_1^{\perp a}}
630: {M_1M_2 {\ovl M}_1 {\ovl M}_2} \right] \nn\\[5pt]
631: &&
632: {}+\cos(\phi_1-\phi_R+\phi^l)\,\sin(\phi_1-\phi_{\ovl R}+\phi^l)\;{\cal F}\left[
633: \,\bm{\hat g}\!\cdot \!\bm{k}_\sT^{}\,\bm{\hat h}\!\cdot \!\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}\,
634: \frac{G_1^{\perp a} {\ovl G}_1^{\perp a}}
635: {M_1M_2{\ovl M}_1{\ovl M}_2} \right] \nn\\[5pt]
636: &&
637: {}+\cos(\phi_1-\phi_R+\phi^l)\,\cos(\phi_1-\phi_{\ovl R}+\phi^l)\;{\cal F}\left[
638: \,\bm{\hat g}\!\cdot \!\bm{k}_\sT^{}\,\bm{\hat g}\!\cdot \!\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}\,
639: \frac{G_1^{\perp a}{\ovl G}_1^{\perp a}}
640: {M_1M_2{\ovl M}_1{\ovl M}_2} \right] \Bigg] \Bigg\} \eqcm
641: \label{eq:fulldx}
642: \eea
643: where the convolution $\cal F$ is defined as
644: \eqa
645: {\cal F}\left[ w(\bm k_\sT^{},\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{})\;D^a {\ovl D}^a \, \right]
646: &\equiv &\int d\bm k_\sT^{}\; d\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}\; \delta^2
647: (\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}+ \bm k_\sT^{}-\bm q_\sT^{}) \; w(\bm k_\sT^{},
648: \bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{})\;
649: D^a(z,\xi,\bm{k}_\sT^2,\bm{R}_\sT^2,\bm{k}_\sT^{}\cdot\bm{R}_\sT^{}) \nn \\[5pt]
650: & &\mbox{\hspace{6.5truecm}}
651: {\ovl D}^a ({\ovl z},{\ovl \xi},\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^2,
652: \bm{\ovl R}_\sT^2, \bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}\cdot\bm{\ovl R}_\sT^{}) \eqpt
653: \label{eq:convol}
654: \eea
655:
656: The azimuthal dependence is dictated by the fact that any information about
657: the
658: azimuthal asymmetry of the distribution of the four hadrons must be encoded by
659: the
660: relative position of $\bm{R}_T$ and $\bm{\ovl R}_T$ with respect to the
661: lepton frame, i.e.\ by the $\phi_R-\phi^l$ and $\phi_{\ovl R}-\phi^l$ angles,
662: respectively, and by the azimuthal position of the lepton frame
663: itself.
664:
665: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
666:
667: \section{\label{sec:asym1} The Artru-Collins azimuthal asymmetry}
668:
669: In this Section, we will obtain an azimuthal asymmetry in the distribution of the
670: four hadrons that arises only due to the transverse relative momenta of each pair,
671: i.e.\ only due to the relative position of each pair plane with respect to the
672: lepton plane (see Fig.~\ref{fig:kin}). For this purpose, the cross section of
673: Eq.~(\ref{eq:fulldx}) must be properly weighted and its dependence on the intrinsic
674: transverse momenta of
675: the quarks integrated out. We present the procedure in considerable detail,
676: since this will form a crucial aspect of a practical analysis of
677: experimental data. We will show that only $H_1^{\open}$ survives the
678: integration, which is the same fragmentation function appearing in the single-spin
679: asymmetry that can be built at leading twist in the case of two-hadron inclusive
680: DIS~\cite{Ji:1993vw,Jaffe:1997hf,noiDIS}. Therefore, under the hypothesis of
681: factorization (collinear factorization in this particular case), the combined
682: analysis of the two semi-inclusive processes allows in principle
683: to deduce the fragmentation function from $e^+e^-$ and then disentangle the
684: transversity distribution in the corresponding DIS cross section at leading twist.
685:
686: We define the asymmetry
687: \eqa
688: A(y,z,{\ovl z},M_h^2, {\ovl M}_h^2) &= &
689: \frac{\langle\cos(\phi_R^{}+\phi_{\ovl R}^{}-2\phi^l) \rangle}
690: {\langle 1 \rangle } \nn \\[3mm]
691: &\equiv &
692: \Bigg[ \int d\xi \int d{\ovl \xi} \int_0^{2\pi} \frac{d\phi^l}{2\pi} \int_0^{2\pi}
693: d\phi_R^{} \int_0^{2\pi} d\phi_{\ovl R}^{} \,
694: \cos(\phi_R^{} + \phi_{\ovl R}^{}-2\phi^l) \nn \\[2mm]
695: & &\mbox{\hspace{1truecm}} \times \int d\bm{q}_\sT^{} \,
696: \frac{d\sig (e^+e^-\to (h_1h_2)(\bar h_1\bar h_2)X)}
697: {dy\,d\phi^l\,dz\,d{\ovl z}\,d\xi\,d{\ovl \xi}\,d{\bm q_\sT^{}}\,
698: dM_h^2\,d\phi^{}_R\, d{\ovl M}_h^2\,d\phi^{}_{\ovl R}} \Bigg] \nn
699: \\[2mm]
700: & &\times \Bigg[ \int d\xi \int d{\ovl \xi} \int_0^{2\pi} \frac{d\phi^l}{2\pi}
701: \int_0^{2\pi} d\phi_R^{} \int_0^{2\pi} d\phi_{\ovl R}^{} \nn \\[2mm]
702: & &\mbox{\hspace{1truecm}} \times \int d\bm{q}_\sT^{} \,
703: \frac{d\sig (e^+e^-\to (h_1h_2)(\bar h_1\bar h_2)X)}
704: {dy\,d\phi^l\,dz\,d{\ovl z}\,d\xi\,d{\ovl \xi}\,d{\bm q_\sT^{}}\,
705: dM_h^2\,d\phi^{}_R\, d{\ovl M}_h^2\,d\phi^{}_{\ovl R}} \Bigg]^{-1}
706: \eqpt
707: \label{eq:asym}
708: \eea
709:
710: Let us consider first the term in the numerator, involving the trigonometric weight.
711: If we insert the cross section of Eq.~(\ref{eq:fulldx}) into it and consider just
712: the average over the azimuthal positions $\phi^l$ of the lepton plane, we can see
713: that the first three terms give a vanishing contribution because they involve the
714: integral
715: \eq
716: \int_0^{2\pi} \frac{d\phi^l}{2\pi} \, \cos (\phi_R + \phi_{\ovl R} - 2\phi^l) = 0
717: \eqpt \label{eq:num1-3}
718: \ee
719: The fourth term gives
720: \eqa
721: & &\sum_{a,\ovl a}\; e_a2 \, \frac{6\,\alpha^2}{Q^2} \;z^2 {\ovl z}^2\;
722: B(y) \int d\xi \int d{\ovl \xi} \int_0^{2\pi} d\phi_R^{} \int_0^{2\pi}
723: d\phi_{\ovl R}^{} \int_0^{2\pi} \frac{d\phi^l}{2\pi} \; |\bm{R}^{}_\sT|
724: \, |\bm{\ovl R}^{}_\sT| \; \cos^2 (\phi^{}_R+\phi^{}_{\ovl R}-2\phi^l)
725: \int d\bm{q}^{}_\sT \nn \\[2mm]
726: & &\mbox{\hspace{4truecm}} \times {\cal F}\left[
727: \frac{H_1^{\open a}{\ovl H}_1^{\open a}}
728: {(M_1+M_2)({\ovl M}_1+{\ovl M}_2)} \right] = \nn \\[2mm]
729: & &\sum_{a,\ovl a}\; e_a^2 \, \frac{6\,\alpha^2}{Q^2} \;z^2 {\ovl z}^2\;
730: B(y) \int d\xi \int d{\ovl \xi} \int_0^{2\pi} d\phi_R^{} \int_0^{2\pi}
731: d\phi_{\ovl R}^{} \; \frac{|\bm{R}^{}_\sT| \, |\bm{\ovl R}^{}_\sT|}
732: {2(M_1+M_2)({\ovl M}_1+{\ovl M}_2)}
733: \int d\bm{q}^{}_\sT \nn \\[2mm]
734: & &\mbox{\hspace{2truecm}} \times \int d\bm k_\sT^{}\; d\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}\;
735: \delta^2 (\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}+\bm k_\sT^{}-\bm q_\sT^{}) \; H_1^{\open \,a}
736: (z,\xi,\bm{k}_\sT^2,\bm{R}_\sT^2,\bm{k}^{}_\sT\cdot\bm{R}^{}_\sT) \;
737: {\ovl H}_1^{\open \, a} ({\ovl z},{\ovl \xi},\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^2,
738: \bm{\ovl R}_\sT^2,\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}\cdot\bm{\ovl R}_\sT^{}) = \nn \\[2mm]
739: & &\sum_{a,\ovl a}\; e_a^2 \, \frac{3\alpha^2}{Q^2} \;z^2 {\ovl z}^2\;
740: \ds{\frac{B(y)}{(M_1+M_2)({\ovl M}_1+{\ovl M}_2)}} H_{1\,(R)}^{\open \,a}
741: (z,M_h^2) \; {\ovl H}_{1\, (R)}^{\open \, a}({\ovl z},{\ovl M}_h^2) \eqcm
742: \label{eq:num4}
743: \eea
744: where
745: \eqa
746: H_{1\, (R)}^{\open \,a} (z,M_h^2) &= &\int d\xi \, |\bm{R}_\sT^{}| \int_0^{2\pi}
747: d\phi_R^{} \int d\bm{k}_\sT^{} \; H_1^{\open \,a} (z,\xi,\bm{k}_\sT^2,\bm{R}_\sT^2,
748: \bm{k}^{}_\sT\cdot\bm{R}^{}_\sT) \nn \\
749: {\ovl H}_{1\, (R)}^{\open \, a}({\ovl z},{\ovl M}_h^2) &= &\int
750: d{\ovl \xi} \; |\bm{\ovl R}^{}_\sT| \int_0^{2\pi} d\phi_{\ovl R}^{} \int
751: d\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{} \; {\ovl H}_1^{\open \, a} ({\ovl z},{\ovl \xi},
752: \bm{\ovl k}_\sT^2,\bm{\ovl R}_\sT^2,\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}\cdot
753: \bm{\ovl R}_\sT^{})
754: \label{eq:h1angle}
755: \eea
756: are the same moments of fragmentation functions that appear in the following
757: leading twist single-spin asymmetry arising in two-hadron semi-inclusive DIS
758: off a transversely polarized target (see Eq.~(17) of Ref.~\cite{noiDIS}):
759: \eq
760: \langle \sin(\phi_R^{} -2\phi^l) \rangle \propto B(y) \, |\bm{S}_\perp | \;
761: \sum_a e_a^2\; x \; h_1^a(x) \; H_{1\, (R)}^{\open \, a} (z,M_h^2) \eqcm
762: \label{eq:h1angledis}
763: \ee
764: where $\bm{S}_\perp$ is the transverse polarization of the target and $x$ is
765: the light-cone momentum fraction of the quark.
766:
767: The fifth through eighth
768: terms give again a vanishing contribution, because they involve
769: integrals of the kind
770: \eq
771: \int_0^{2\pi} \frac{d\phi^l}{2\pi} \; \left\{ \begin{array}{c} \cos 2\phi^l \\
772: \sin 2\phi^l \end{array} \right\} \otimes \left\{ \begin{array}{c} \cos \phi^l \\
773: \sin \phi^l \end{array} \right\} \, = \, 0 \eqpt
774: \label{eq:num5-8}
775: \ee
776: Finally, it is instructive to check that the last four terms in Eq.~(\ref{eq:fulldx})
777: vanish only after the combined effect of the average over $d\phi^l$ and the
778: integral upon $d\bm{q}_\sT^{}$. In fact,
779: \eqa
780: \sum_{a,\ovl a}\; e_a^2 \, \frac{6\,\alpha^2}{Q^2} \;z^2 {\ovl z}^2\; &
781: A(y) &\int d\xi \int d{\ovl \xi} \int_0^{2\pi} d\phi_R^{}
782: \int_0^{2\pi} d{\ovl \phi}_R^{} \int_0^{2\pi} \frac{d\phi^l}{2\pi} \;
783: \frac{|\bm{R}^{}_\sT| \, |\bm{\ovl R}^{}_\sT|}
784: {M_1 M_2 {\ovl M}_1 {\ovl M}_2} \;
785: \cos (\phi^{}_R+\phi^{}_{\ovl R}-2\phi^l) \int d\bm{q}^{}_\sT \nn \\[3pt]
786: & &\times \Bigg\{ \sin(\phi_1-\phi_R+\phi^l)\,\sin(\phi_1-\phi_{\ovl R}+\phi^l)\;
787: {\cal F}\left[ \,\bm{\hat h}\!\cdot \!\bm{k}_\sT^{}\,\bm{\hat h}\!\cdot \!
788: \bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}\, G_1^{\perp a}{\ovl G}_1^{\perp a} \right] + \nn
789: \\[2pt]
790: & &\qquad \sin(\phi_1-\phi_R+\phi^l)\,\cos(\phi_1-\phi_{\ovl R}+\phi^l)\;
791: {\cal F}\left[ \,\bm{\hat h}\!\cdot \!\bm{k}_\sT^{}\,\bm{\hat g}\!\cdot \!
792: \bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}\, G_1^{\perp a}{\ovl G}_1^{\perp a} \right] + \nn
793: \\[2pt]
794: & &\qquad \cos(\phi_1-\phi_R+\phi^l)\,\sin(\phi_1-\phi_{\ovl R}+\phi^l)\;
795: {\cal F}\left[ \,\bm{\hat g}\!\cdot \!\bm{k}_\sT^{}\,\bm{\hat h}\!\cdot \!
796: \bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}\, G_1^{\perp a}{\ovl G}_1^{\perp a} \right] + \nn
797: \\[2pt]
798: & &\qquad \cos(\phi_1-\phi_R+\phi^l)\,\cos(\phi_1-\phi_{\ovl R}+\phi^l)\;
799: {\cal F}\left[ \,\bm{\hat g}\!\cdot \!\bm{k}_\sT^{}\,\bm{\hat g}\!\cdot \!
800: \bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}\, G_1^{\perp a}{\ovl G}_1^{\perp a} \right] \Bigg\} =
801: \nn \\[8pt]
802: \sum_{a,\ovl a}\; e_a^2 \, \frac{6\,\alpha^2}{Q^2} \;z^2 {\ovl z}^2\; &
803: A(y) &\int d\xi \int d{\ovl \xi} \int_0^{2\pi} d\phi_R^{} \int_0^{2\pi}
804: d\phi_{\ovl R}^{} \; \frac{|\bm{R}^{}_\sT| \, |\bm{\ovl R}^{}_\sT|}
805: {M_1 M_2 {\ovl M}_1 {\ovl M}_2} \;
806: \int d\bm{q}^{}_\sT \int d\bm k_\sT^{}\; d\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}\; \delta^2
807: (\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}+\bm k_\sT^{}-\bm q_\sT^{}) \nn \\[5pt]
808: & &\times \left\{ \frac{1}{4} (\cos^2\phi_1 - \sin^2\phi_1) \;
809: (\bm{\hat g}\!\cdot \!\bm{k}_\sT^{}\,\bm{\hat g}\!\cdot \!\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{} -
810: \bm{\hat h}\!\cdot \!\bm{k}_\sT^{}\,\bm{\hat h}\!\cdot \!\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}) +
811: \right. \nn \\[5pt]
812: & &\qquad \left. \frac{1}{4} \, \sin\phi_1 \, \cos\phi_1 \;
813: (\bm{\hat h}\!\cdot \!\bm{k}_\sT^{}\,\bm{\hat g}\!\cdot \!\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{} +
814: \bm{\hat g}\!\cdot \!\bm{k}_\sT^{}\,\bm{\hat h}\!\cdot \!\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{})
815: \right\} \; G_1^{\perp a}{\ovl G}_1^{\perp a} = \nn \\[8pt]
816: \sum_{a,\ovl a}\; e_a^2 \, \frac{3\,\alpha^2}{2 Q^2} \;z^2 {\ovl z}^2\; &
817: A(y) &\int d\xi \int d{\ovl \xi} \int_0^{2\pi} d\phi_R^{} \int_0^{2\pi}
818: d\phi_{\ovl R}^{} \; \frac{|\bm{R}^{}_\sT| \, |\bm{\ovl R}^{}_\sT|}
819: {M_1 M_2 {\ovl M}_1 {\ovl M}_2}
820: \int d\bm k_\sT^{}\; d\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{} \nn \\[5pt]
821: & &\times \left\{
822: \frac{(\bm k_\sT^{}+\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{})_y^2-
823: (\bm k_\sT^{}+\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{})_x^2}
824: {|\bm k_\sT^{}+\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}|^4} \;
825: \left[ (\bm k_\sT^{}\times \bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{})_z^2 +
826: \bm k_\sT^{}\cdot (\bm k_\sT^{}+\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}) \;
827: \bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}\cdot (\bm k_\sT^{}+\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}) \right] +
828: \right. \nn \\[5pt]
829: & &\qquad \left. 2 \;
830: \frac{(\bm k_\sT^{}+\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{})_x^{}\;
831: (\bm k_\sT^{}+\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{})_y^{}}
832: {|\bm k_\sT^{}+\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}|^4} \;
833: (\bm k_\sT^{}\times \bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{})_z^{} \;
834: (\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^2 - \bm k_\sT^2) \right\} \nn \\[5pt]
835: & &\qquad \times G_1^{\perp \,a} (z,\xi,\bm{k}_\sT^2,\bm{R}_\sT^2,
836: \bm{k}^{}_\sT\cdot\bm{R}^{}_\sT) \;
837: {\ovl G}_1^{\perp \, a} ({\ovl z},{\ovl \xi},\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^2,
838: \bm{\ovl R}_\sT^2,\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}\cdot\bm{\ovl R}_\sT^{}) = 0
839: \eqcm
840: \label{eq:num9-12}
841: \eea
842: because the last two integrands are odd under the transformations
843: \eqa
844: k_{\sT \,x} \leftrightarrow k_{\sT \,y} &\quad , \quad &
845: {\ovl k}_{\sT \,x} \leftrightarrow {\ovl k}_{\sT \,y} \nn \\[1mm]
846: R_{\sT \,x} \leftrightarrow R_{\sT \,y} &\quad , \quad &
847: {\ovl R}_{\sT \,x} \leftrightarrow {\ovl R}_{\sT \,y} \eqpt
848: \label{eq:transf}
849: \eea
850: Hence, we have
851: \eqa
852: \langle\cos(\phi_R^{}+\phi_{\ovl R}^{}-2\phi^l) \rangle &= &
853: \int d\xi \int d{\ovl \xi} \int_0^{2\pi} \frac{d\phi^l}{2\pi} \int_0^{2\pi}
854: d\phi_R^{} \int_0^{2\pi} d\phi_{\ovl R}^{} \,
855: \cos(\phi_R^{} + \phi_{\ovl R}^{}-2\phi^l) \nn \\[2mm]
856: & &\mbox{\hspace{1truecm}} \times \int d\bm{q}_\sT^{} \,
857: \frac{d\sig (e^+e^-\to (h_1h_2)(\bar h_1\bar h_2)X)}
858: {dy\,d\phi^l\,dz\,d{\ovl z}\,d\xi\,d{\ovl \xi}\,d{\bm q_\sT^{}}\,
859: dM_h^2\,d\phi^{}_R\, d{\ovl M}_h^2\,d\phi^{}_{\ovl R}} \nn \\[2mm]
860: &= &\sum_{a,\ovl a}\; e_a^2 \, \frac{3\alpha^2}{Q^2} \;
861: \frac{z^2 {\ovl z}^2 \; B(y)}{(M_1+M_2)({\ovl M}_1+{\ovl M}_2)} \;
862: H_{1\, (R)}^{\open \,a} (z,M_h^2) \; {\ovl H}_{1\, (R)}^{\open \, a}
863: ({\ovl z},{\ovl M}_h^2) \eqpt
864: \label{eq:numtot}
865: \eea
866:
867: In a similar way, it is straightforward to prove that the unweighted cross
868: section receives a
869: contribution only from the first term of Eq.~(\ref{eq:fulldx}), i.e.
870: \eqa
871: \langle 1 \rangle &= &
872: \int d\xi \int d{\ovl \xi} \int_0^{2\pi} \frac{d\phi^l}{2\pi} \int_0^{2\pi}
873: d\phi_R^{} \int_0^{2\pi} d\phi_{\ovl R}^{} \nn \\[2mm]
874: & &\mbox{\hspace{1truecm}} \times \int d\bm{q}_\sT^{} \,
875: \frac{d\sig (e^+e^-\to (h_1h_2)(\bar h_1\bar h_2)X)}
876: {dy\,d\phi^l\,dz\,d{\ovl z}\,d\xi\,d{\ovl \xi}\,d{\bm q_\sT^{}}\,
877: dM_h^2\,d\phi^{}_R\, d{\ovl M}_h^2\,d\phi^{}_{\ovl R}} \nn \\[2mm]
878: &= &\sum_{a,\ovl a}\; e_a^2 \, \frac{6 \alpha^2}{Q^2} \; A(y)\; z^2 \,
879: {\ovl z}^2\; D_1^a (z,M_h^2) \; {\ovl D}_1^a ({\ovl z},
880: {\ovl M}_h^2) \eqcm
881: \label{eq:dentot}
882: \eea
883: where
884: \eqa
885: D_1^a (z,M_h^2) &= &\int d\xi \int_0^{2\pi} d\phi_R^{} \int d\bm{k}_\sT^{} \;
886: D_1^a (z,\xi,\bm{k}_\sT^2,\bm{R}_\sT^2,\bm{k}^{}_\sT\cdot\bm{R}^{}_\sT) \nn \\
887: {\ovl D}_1^a({\ovl z},{\ovl M}_h^2) &= &\int d{\ovl \xi}
888: \int_0^{2\pi} d\phi_{\ovl R}^{} \int d\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{} \;
889: {\ovl D}_1^a ({\ovl z},{\ovl \xi},\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^2,
890: \bm{\ovl R}_\sT^2,\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}\cdot\bm{\ovl R}_\sT^{})
891: \label{eq:d1}
892: \eea
893: are the same fragmentation functions as
894: arising in the unweighted cross section
895: at leading twist for the two-hadron semi-inclusive DIS process
896: (see Eq.~(18) of Ref.~\cite{noiDIS}).
897:
898: The final expression for the azimuthal asymmetry is, from
899: Eq.~(\ref{eq:asym}),
900: \eqa
901: A(y,z,{\ovl z},M_h^2, {\ovl M}_h^2) &= & \frac{1}{2} \; \left[
902: \sum_{a,\ovl a}\; e_a^2 \;
903: \frac{z^2 {\ovl z}^2\; B(y)}{(M_1+M_2)({\ovl M}_1+{\ovl M}_2)} \;
904: H_{1\, (R)}^{\open \,a} (z,M_h^2) \; {\ovl H}_{1\, (R)}^{\open \, a}
905: ({\ovl z},{\ovl M}_h^2) \right] \nn \\[2mm]
906: & &\times \left[ \sum_{a,\ovl a}\; e_a^2 \, z^2 \, {\ovl z}^2 \, A(y)\;
907: D_1^a (z,M_h^2) \; {\ovl D}_1^a({\ovl z},{\ovl M}_h^2) \right]^{-1} \eqpt
908: \label{eq:asym2}
909: \eea
910: This azimuthal asymmetry is our version of the Artru-Collins
911: asymmetry~\cite{Artru:1995zu}.
912:
913:
914: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
915:
916: \section{\label{sec:asym2} The longitudinal jet handedness azimuthal asymmetry}
917:
918: The other azimuthal asymmetry we will explicitly derive is defined as
919: \eqa
920: A(y,z,{\ovl z},M_h^2, {\ovl M}_h^2) &= &
921: \frac{\langle\cos(2(\phi_R^{}-\phi_{\ovl R}^{})) \rangle}
922: {\langle 1 \rangle} \nn \\[3mm]
923: &\equiv &
924: \Bigg[ \int d\xi \int d{\ovl \xi} \int_0^{2\pi} \frac{d\phi^l}{2\pi} \int_0^{2\pi}
925: d\phi_R^{} \int_0^{2\pi} d\phi_{\ovl R}^{} \,
926: \cos(2(\phi_R^{} - \phi_{\ovl R}^{})) \nn \\[2mm]
927: & &\mbox{\hspace{1truecm}} \times \int d\bm{q}_\sT^{} \,
928: \frac{d\sig (e^+e^-\to (h_1h_2)(\bar h_1\bar h_2)X)}
929: {dy\,d\phi^l\,dz\,d{\ovl z}\,d\xi\,d{\ovl \xi}\,d{\bm q_\sT^{}}\,
930: dM_h^2\,d\phi^{}_R\, d{\ovl M}_h^2\,d\phi^{}_{\ovl R}} \Bigg] \nn
931: \\[2mm]
932: & &\times \Bigg[ \int d\xi \int d{\ovl \xi} \int_0^{2\pi}
933: \frac{d\phi^l}{2\pi} \int_0^{2\pi} d\phi_R^{} \int_0^{2\pi} d\phi_{\ovl R}^{}
934: \nn \\[2mm]
935: & &\mbox{\hspace{1truecm}} \times \int d\bm{q}_\sT^{} \,
936: \frac{d\sig (e^+e^-\to (h_1h_2)(\bar h_1\bar h_2)X)}
937: {dy\,d\phi^l\,dz\,d{\ovl z}\,d\xi\,d{\ovl \xi}\,d{\bm q_\sT^{}}\,
938: dM_h^2\,d\phi^{}_R\, d{\ovl M}_h^2\,d\phi^{}_{\ovl R}} \Bigg]^{-1}
939: \eqpt
940: \label{eq:newasym}
941: \eea
942: Note that this asymmetry is independent of the orientation of the lepton scattering
943: plane, contrary to the asymmetry of the previous Section.
944:
945: By performing the integrations in the same order as in
946: Eqs.~(\ref{eq:num1-3}-\ref{eq:num9-12}), the surviving terms are
947: \eqa
948: \sum_{a,\ovl a}\; e_a^2 \, \frac{6\,\alpha^2}{Q^2} \;z^2 {\ovl z}^2 &
949: A(y) &\int d\xi \int d{\ovl \xi} \int_0^{2\pi} d\phi_R^{}
950: \int_0^{2\pi} d\phi_{\ovl R}^{}\int_0^{2\pi} \frac{d\phi^l}{2\pi} \;
951: \frac{|\bm{R}^{}_\sT| \, |\bm{\ovl R}^{}_\sT|}
952: {M_1 M_2 {\ovl M}_1 {\ovl M}_2}\;
953: \cos(2(\phi_R-\phi_{\ovl R})) \int d\bm{q}^{}_\sT \nn \\[3pt]
954: & &\times \Bigg\{ \sin(\phi_1-\phi_R+\phi^l)\,\sin(\phi_1-\phi_{\ovl R}+\phi^l)\;
955: {\cal F}\left[ \,\bm{\hat h}\!\cdot \!\bm{k}_\sT^{}\,\bm{\hat h}\!\cdot \!
956: \bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}\, G_1^{\perp a}{\ovl G}_1^{\perp a} \right] + \nn
957: \\[2pt]
958: & &\qquad \sin(\phi_1-\phi_R+\phi^l)\,\cos(\phi_1-\phi_{\ovl R}+\phi^l)\;
959: {\cal F}\left[ \,\bm{\hat h}\!\cdot \!\bm{k}_\sT^{}\,\bm{\hat g}\!\cdot \!
960: \bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}\, G_1^{\perp a}{\ovl G}_1^{\perp a} \right] + \nn
961: \\[2pt]
962: & &\qquad \cos(\phi_1-\phi_R+\phi^l)\,\sin(\phi_1-\phi_{\ovl R}+\phi^l)\;
963: {\cal F}\left[ \,\bm{\hat g}\!\cdot \!\bm{k}_\sT^{}\,\bm{\hat h}\!\cdot \!
964: \bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}\, G_1^{\perp a}{\ovl G}_1^{\perp a} \right] + \nn
965: \\[2pt]
966: & &\qquad \cos(\phi_1-\phi_R+\phi^l)\,\cos(\phi_1-\phi_{\ovl R}+\phi^l)\;
967: {\cal F}\left[ \,\bm{\hat g}\!\cdot \!\bm{k}_\sT^{}\,\bm{\hat g}\!\cdot \!
968: \bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}\, G_1^{\perp a}{\ovl G}_1^{\perp a} \right] \Bigg\} =
969: \nn \\[8pt]
970: \sum_{a,\ovl a}\; e_a^2 \, \frac{6\,\alpha^2}{Q^2} \;z^2 {\ovl z}^2\; &
971: A(y) &\int d\xi \int d{\ovl \xi} \int_0^{2\pi} d\phi_R^{}
972: \int_0^{2\pi} d\phi_{\ovl R}^{} \;
973: \frac{1}{2M_1 M_2 {\ovl M}_1 {\ovl M}_2}
974: \; \cos(2(\phi_R-\phi_{\ovl R})) \nn \\[3pt]
975: & &\mbox{\hspace{-3.5truecm}} \times \Bigg\{ \cos(\phi_R-\phi_{\ovl R})\;
976: \bm{\hat R}^{}_\sT \!\cdot\! \bm{\hat {\ovl R}}^{}_\sT \int d\bm{k}_\sT^{}
977: \; \bm{k}_\sT^{}\!\cdot\! \bm{R}^{}_\sT \, G_1^{\perp a}
978: (z,\xi,\bm{k}_\sT^2,\bm{R}_\sT^2,\bm{k}^{}_\sT\cdot\bm{R}^{}_\sT) \;
979: \int d\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}\;
980: \bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}\!\cdot\! \bm{\ovl R}^{}_\sT {\ovl G}_1^{\perp a}
981: ({\ovl z},{\ovl \xi},\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^2,\bm{\ovl R}_\sT^2,
982: \bm{\ovl k}^{}_\sT\cdot\bm{\ovl R}^{}_\sT) \nn \\[2pt]
983: & &\mbox{\hspace{-3truecm}} + \sin(\phi_R-\phi_{\ovl R})\;
984: \bm{\hat R}^{}_\sT \!\times\! \bm{\hat {\ovl R}}^{}_\sT \int d\bm{k}_\sT^{}
985: \; \bm{k}_\sT^{}\!\cdot\! \bm{R}^{}_\sT \, G_1^{\perp a}
986: (z,\xi,\bm{k}_\sT^2,\bm{R}_\sT^2,\bm{k}^{}_\sT\cdot\bm{R}^{}_\sT) \;
987: \int d\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{} \;
988: \bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}\!\cdot\! \bm{\ovl R}^{}_\sT {\ovl G}_1^{\perp a}
989: ({\ovl z},{\ovl \xi},\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^2,\bm{\ovl R}_\sT^2,
990: \bm{\ovl k}^{}_\sT\cdot\bm{\ovl R}^{}_\sT) \Bigg\} \nn\\[8pt]
991: =\sum_{a,\ovl a}\; e_a^2 \, \frac{3\,\alpha^2}{2 Q^2} \;z^2 {\ovl z}^2\;
992: &A(y) &\frac{1}{M_1 M_2 {\ovl M}_1 {\ovl M}_2} \;G_1^{\perp a}(z,M_h^2) \;
993: {\ovl G}_1^{\perp a}({\ovl z},{\ovl M}_h^2) \; \eqcm
994: \label{eq:newasym2}
995: \eea
996: where
997: \eqa
998: G_1^{\perp a}(z,M_h^2) &\equiv &\int d\xi \int_0^{2\pi} d\phi_R^{} \int
999: d\bm{k}_\sT^{} \; \bm{k}_\sT^{}\!\cdot\! {\bm{R}}^{}_\sT \; G_1^{\perp a}
1000: (z,\xi,\bm{k}_\sT^2,\bm{R}_\sT^2,\bm{k}^{}_\sT\cdot\bm{R}^{}_\sT) \nn \\
1001: {\ovl G}_1^{\perp a}({\ovl z},{\ovl M}_h^2) &\equiv &\int
1002: d{\ovl \xi} \int_0^{2\pi} d\phi_{\ovl R}^{} \int d\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}
1003: \; \bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}\!\cdot\! {\bm{\ovl R}}^{}_\sT \;
1004: {\ovl G}_1^{\perp a} ({\ovl z},{\ovl \xi},\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^2,
1005: \bm{\ovl R}_\sT^2,\bm{\ovl k}^{}_\sT\cdot\bm{\ovl R}^{}_\sT) \; \eqcm
1006: \label{eq:g1perp}
1007: \eea
1008: are weighted moments of the same IFF that appears in the cross section at
1009: leading twist for two-hadron semi-inclusive DIS off a transversely polarized
1010: target (see Eq.~(10) of Ref.~\cite{noiDIS}). For simplicity of notation,
1011: these moments carry no
1012: further subscripts, as opposed to Eq.~(\ref{eq:h1angle}).
1013:
1014: In Eq.~(\ref{eq:newasym2}), the first step follows from first integrating over
1015: $d\phi^l$, which implies the disappearance of the explicit $\phi_1$ dependence, and
1016: by performing the $d{\bm q}^{}_\sT$ integration using identities like
1017: \eqa
1018: \int d\bm{q}^{}_\sT \, {\cal F}\left[ \,\bm{\hat h}\!\cdot \!\bm{k}_\sT^{}\,
1019: \bm{\hat h}\!\cdot \!\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}\, + \,
1020: \bm{\hat g}\!\cdot \!\bm{k}_\sT^{}\,\bm{\hat g}\!\cdot \!\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{} \right]
1021: \; G_1^{\perp a} {\ovl G}_1^{\perp a} &= &\int d\bm{k}_\sT^{} \; k_\sT^i \;
1022: G_1^{\perp a}(z,\xi,\bm{k}_\sT^2,\bm{R}_\sT^2,\bm{k}^{}_\sT\cdot\bm{R}^{}_\sT) \nn
1023: \\[2pt]
1024: & &\times \int d\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{} \; {\ovl k}_\sT^i \;
1025: {\ovl G}_1^{\perp a} ({\ovl z},{\ovl \xi},\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^2,
1026: \bm{\ovl R}_\sT^2,\bm{\ovl k}^{}_\sT\cdot\bm{\ovl R}^{}_\sT) \nn \\[3pt]
1027: \int d\bm{q}^{}_\sT \, {\cal F}\left[ \,\bm{\hat g}\!\cdot \!\bm{k}_\sT^{}\,
1028: \bm{\hat h}\!\cdot \!\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{}\, - \,
1029: \bm{\hat h}\!\cdot \!\bm{k}_\sT^{}\,\bm{\hat g}\!\cdot \!\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{} \right]
1030: \; G_1^{\perp a} {\ovl G}_1^{\perp a} &= &\epsilon_{3ij} \int d\bm{k}_\sT^{} \;
1031: k_\sT^i \; G_1^{\perp a}(z,\xi,\bm{k}_\sT^2,\bm{R}_\sT^2,
1032: \bm{k}^{}_\sT\cdot\bm{R}^{}_\sT) \nn \\[2pt]
1033: & &\qquad \times \int d\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^{} \; {\ovl k}_\sT^j \;
1034: {\ovl G}_1^{\perp a} ({\ovl z},{\ovl \xi},\bm{\ovl k}_\sT^2,
1035: \bm{\ovl R}_\sT^2,\bm{\ovl k}^{}_\sT\cdot\bm{\ovl R}^{}_\sT) \; \eqpt
1036: \label{eq:identity}
1037: \eea
1038: The latter integrations can only result in a function of
1039: $(z,{\ovl z}, \xi, {\ovl \xi}, \bm{R}_\sT^2, \bm{\ovl R}_\sT^2)$
1040: multiplying the products
1041: $\bm{\hat R}^{}_\sT\!\cdot\!\bm{\hat {\ovl R}}^{}_\sT$ and
1042: $\bm{\hat R}^{}_\sT\!\times\!\bm{\hat {\ovl R}}^{}_\sT$ of unit vectors,
1043: respectively, since there are no other available vectors.
1044:
1045: From Eq.~(\ref{eq:newasym2}) it is also easy to check that $G_1^{\perp}$ does
1046: not enter in the integrated, unweighted, cross section. The resulting expression for
1047: the numerator in Eq.~(\ref{eq:newasym}) becomes
1048: \eqa
1049: \langle\cos(2(\phi_R^{}-\phi_{\ovl R})) \rangle &= &
1050: \int d\xi \int d{\ovl \xi} \int_0^{2\pi} \frac{d\phi^l}{2\pi} \int_0^{2\pi}
1051: d\phi_R^{} \int_0^{2\pi} d\phi_{\ovl R}^{} \,
1052: \cos(\phi_R^{} - \phi_{\ovl R}^{}) \nn \\[2pt]
1053: & &\mbox{\hspace{1truecm}} \times \int d\bm{q}_\sT^{} \,
1054: \frac{d\sig (e^+e^-\to (h_1h_2)(\bar h_1\bar h_2)X)}
1055: {dy\,d\phi^l\,dz\,d{\ovl z}\,d\xi\,d{\ovl \xi}\,d{\bm q_\sT^{}}\,
1056: dM_h^2\,d\phi^{}_R\, d{\ovl M}_h^2\,d\phi^{}_{\ovl R}} \nn \\[2pt]
1057: &= &\sum_{a,\ovl a}\; e_a^2 \, \frac{3\,\alpha^2}{2 Q^2} \;z^2 {\ovl z}^2\;
1058: A(y) \; \frac{1}{M_1 M_2 {\ovl M}_1 {\ovl M}_2} \; G_1^{\perp a}(z,M_h^2) \;
1059: {\ovl G}_1^{\perp a}({\ovl z},{\ovl M}_h^2) \; \eqpt
1060: \label{eq:num2tot}
1061: \eea
1062: The final expression for Eq.~(\ref{eq:newasym}) is
1063: \eqa
1064: A(y,z,{\ovl z},M_h^2, {\ovl M}_h^2) &= & \frac{1}{4} \; \left[
1065: \sum_{a,\ovl a}\; e_a^2 \;
1066: \frac{z^2 {\ovl z}^2}{M_1 M_2 {\ovl M}_1 {\ovl M}_2} \;
1067: G_1^{\perp \,a} (z,M_h^2) \; {\ovl G}_1^{\perp \, a}
1068: ({\ovl z},{\ovl M}_h^2) \right] \nn \\[2pt]
1069: & &\times \left[ \sum_{a,\ovl a}\; e_a^2 \, z^2 \, {\ovl z}^2 \,
1070: D_1^a (z,M_h^2) \; {\ovl D}_1^a({\ovl z},{\ovl M}_h^2) \right]^{-1} \;
1071: \eqpt
1072: \label{eq:newasym3}
1073: \eea
1074: It is possible to consider the $\bm{q}_\sT^2$ weighting and get $\bm{k}_\sT^2$
1075: moments, but we will not do so here. Rather, it is important to remark that the
1076: weighting factor $\bm{k}_\sT^{}\!\cdot\!{\bm{R}}^{}_\sT$ in Eq.~(\ref{eq:g1perp}) is
1077: crucial, since the function
1078: \eq
1079: \int d\xi \int_0^{2\pi} d\phi_R^{} \int d\bm{k}_\sT^{} \; G_1^{\perp a}
1080: (z,\xi,\bm{k}_\sT^2,\bm{R}_\sT^2,\bm{k}^{}_\sT\cdot\bm{R}^{}_\sT)
1081: \ee
1082: does not occur due to parity
1083: invariance~\cite{Collins:1993kq,Jaffe:1997pv,Bianconi:1999cd}.
1084: Nevertheless, the chiral-even IFF $G_1^\perp$ can provide a probe of $g_1$ as it
1085: emerges from the expression of the cross section at leading twist for the two-hadron
1086: semi-inclusive DIS off a longitudinally polarized target (see Eq.~(31) of
1087: Ref.~\cite{Bianconi:1999cd}):
1088: \eq
1089: \frac{d\sigma(e \vec p \to e' h_1 h_2 X)_{OL}}
1090: {d\Omega\,dx\,dz\,d\xi\,d\bm{P}_{h\perp}^{}\, d\bm{R}_T^{}} \propto \Bigg\{
1091: \ldots
1092: {}-\lambda\;|\bm{R}_T|\;A(y)\;\sin(\phi_h-\phi_R)\;
1093: {\cal F}\left[\,\hat h\!\cdot \!\bm{k}_\sT^{}\,
1094: \frac{g_{1} \, G_1^{\perp}}{M_1M_2}\right] +\ldots \Bigg\} \; \eqcm
1095: \label{eq:dislong}
1096: \ee
1097: where $\phi_h^{}$ is the azimuthal angle of $\bm{P}_{h\perp}$ (analogously to
1098: $\phi_1$ in Fig.~\ref{fig:kin}), and $\lambda$ is the target helicity.
1099:
1100: This is a good point to make the connection to handedness studies.
1101: Handedness has been studied for quite some
1102: time~\cite{Nachtmann:1977ek,Efremov:1992pe,Ryskin:hu} as a means to probe the
1103: helicity of fragmenting quarks. Clearly,
1104: $G_1^\perp$ is a similar analyzer of this helicity due to a
1105: $(\bm{k}_\sT^{}\times
1106: {\bm{R}}^{}_\sT)$ correlation present in the fragmentation process and a
1107: direct link with the concept of longitudinal jet
1108: handedness~\cite{Efremov:1992pe} can be made. One can show that the
1109: functions appearing in Eq.~(11) of Ref.~\cite{Efremov:1992pe} are related to
1110: the IFFs dicussed here. For instance, the longitudinal jet handedness is
1111: a linear combination of
1112: functions called $D_1^A$ and $D_2^A$ and is directly proportional to
1113: $(\bm{k}_\sT^{}\times {\bm{R}}^{}_\sT) \; G_1^\perp (z,\xi,\bm{k}_\sT^2,
1114: \bm{R}_\sT^2,\bm{k}^{}_\sT\cdot\bm{R}^{}_\sT)$.
1115: Similarly, the transversal jet handedness (given by a function called $D_1^T$)
1116: is proportional to $(\bm{k}_\sT^{}\times {\bm{R}}^{}_\sT) \; H_1^\open
1117: (z,\xi,\bm{k}_\sT^2,\bm{R}_\sT^2,\bm{k}^{}_\sT\cdot\bm{R}^{}_\sT)$.
1118: Although the unintegrated functions $G_1^{\perp}$ and
1119: $H_1^\open$ are directly related to the jet handedness functions of
1120: Ref.~\cite{Efremov:1992pe}, the asymmetries we have presented here are not easily
1121: translated to the handedness correlation observables discussed in
1122: Ref.~\cite{Efremov:1995ff} (different methods of weighting are employed).
1123: Nevertheless, they should encode similar information
1124: and as such our asymmetry of Eq.~(\ref{eq:newasym3}) could perhaps also
1125: serve as a measure of a CP-violating effect of the QCD vacuum discussed in
1126: Ref.~\cite{Efremov:1995ff}. This interesting topic deserves further study.
1127:
1128: The function $G_1^{\perp}(z,M_h^2)$ of Eq.~(\ref{eq:g1perp}) also provides a
1129: probe of the transverse momentum dependent distribution function $g_{1T}$
1130: through asymmetries in the processes $e\, p^\uparrow \to (h_1 h_2) X$
1131: or $p\, p^\uparrow \to (h_1 h_2) X$. However, these are precisely the
1132: processes where also the transversity asymmetries (proportional to $H_1^\open$
1133: and $H_1^\perp$) occur. In fact, the cross section at leading twist for the
1134: two-hadron semi-inclusive DIS on a
1135: transversely polarized target contains the following terms (see Eq.~(10) of
1136: Ref.~\cite{noiDIS}):
1137: \eqa
1138: \frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega\,d x\,d z\,d\xi\,d\bm{P}_{h\perp}\, d M_h^2\,d\phi_R^{}}
1139: &\propto
1140: &|\bm{S}_\perp| \, \Bigg\{ \ldots + |\bm{R}_T|\;B(y)\;\sin(\phi_R^{}+\phi_{S_\perp})
1141: \; {\cal F}\left[\frac{h_1 \, H_1^{\open}}{M_1+M_2}\right]\nn \\[2mm]
1142: && \mbox{\hspace{-1truecm}}
1143: {}+ B(y)\;\sin(\phi_h+\phi_{S_\perp})
1144: {\cal F}\left[\,{\hat h}\!\cdot \!\bm{k}_\sT^{}\,
1145: \frac{h_1 \, H_1^{\perp}}{M_1+M_2}\right] \, + \,
1146: B(y)\;\cos(\phi_h+\phi_{S_\perp})
1147: {\cal F}\left[\,{\hat g}\!\cdot \!\bm{k}_\sT^{}\,
1148: \frac{h_1 \, H_1^{\perp}}{M_1+M_2}\right]\nn\\
1149: && \mbox{\hspace{-1truecm}}
1150: {}- |\bm{R}_T|\;A(y)\;
1151: \cos(\phi_h-\phi_{S_\perp})\;\sin(\phi_h-\phi_R^{})\;
1152: {\cal F}\left[\,{\hat h}\!\cdot \!\bm{k}_\sT^{}\,
1153: \,{\hat h}\!\cdot \!\bm{p}_\sT^{}\,
1154: \frac{g_{1T} \, G_1^{\perp}}{MM_1M_2}\right]\nn\\
1155: && \mbox{\hspace{-1truecm}}
1156: {}+ |\bm{R}_T|\;A(y)\;
1157: \sin(\phi_h-\phi_{S_\perp})\;\sin(\phi_h-\phi_R^{})\;
1158: {\cal F}\left[\,{\hat h}\!\cdot \!\bm{k}_\sT^{}\,
1159: \,{\hat g}\!\cdot \!\bm{p}_\sT^{}\,
1160: \frac{g_{1T} \, G_1^{\perp}}{MM_1M_2}\right]\nn\\
1161: && \mbox{\hspace{-1truecm}}
1162: {}- |\bm{R}_T|\;A(y)\;
1163: \cos(\phi_h-\phi_{S_\perp})\;\cos (\phi_h-\phi_R^{})\;
1164: {\cal F}\left[\,{\hat g}\!\cdot \!\bm{k}_\sT^{}\,
1165: \,{\hat h}\!\cdot \!\bm{p}_\sT^{}\,
1166: \frac{g_{1T} \, G_1^{\perp}}{MM_1M_2}\right]\nn\\
1167: && \mbox{\hspace{-1truecm}}
1168: {}+ |\bm{R}_T|\;A(y)\;
1169: \sin(\phi_h-\phi_{S_\perp})\;\cos(\phi_h-\phi_R^{})\;
1170: {\cal F}\left[\,{\hat g}\!\cdot \!\bm{k}_\sT^{}\,
1171: \,{\hat g}\!\cdot \!\bm{p}_\sT^{}\,
1172: \frac{g_{1T} \, G_1^{\perp}}{MM_1M_2}\right] \ldots \Bigg\} \eqcm
1173: \label{eq:distrans}
1174: \eea
1175: where $M$ is the target mass with momentum $P^+ = x p^+$. Hence, one
1176: should carefully project out the azimuthal asymmetry of interest in order to avoid
1177: contributions from different mechanisms.
1178:
1179:
1180: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1181:
1182: \section{\label{sec:end} Conclusions}
1183:
1184: We have studied azimuthal asymmetries in the process
1185: $e^+ e^- \rightarrow (h_1 h_2) ({\bar h}_1 {\bar h}_2) X$, which function as
1186: probes for interference fragmentation functions (IFFs).
1187: The asymmetries arise in
1188: the orientation of the two hadron pairs with respect to each other. We have
1189: presented two asymmetries that are of present-day experimental relevance.
1190: Although the asymmetries probe the correlation of longitudinal and
1191: transverse quark and antiquark spin, respectively, they are to be extracted
1192: from the same experimental data by applying different weights in the form of
1193: trigonometric functions of azimuthal angles.
1194: The first asymmetry has already been studied by Artru and Collins, but had
1195: not yet been expressed in terms of the IFF language of
1196: Refs.~\cite{Bianconi:1999cd,noiDIS,Bacchetta:2002ux}.
1197: We have also indicated a relation between the function $H_1^\open$,
1198: that occurs in this asymmetry, and transversal jet handedness.
1199:
1200: The second azimuthal asymmetry that we focussed on specifically, has not been
1201: pointed out before and involves the longitudinally polarized quark IFF
1202: $G_1^\perp$, which is related to longitudinal jet handedness.
1203: The asymmetry offers a different way of studying handedness correlations and,
1204: as such, can perhaps be used as a measure of a specific CP-violating effect
1205: of the QCD vacuum.
1206: We pointed out that the knowledge of the helicity distribution
1207: function $g_1$ is of help in this respect.
1208:
1209: Extracting IFFs from $e^+e^-$ annihilation will provide for the as yet
1210: unknown information needed to disentangle the tranversity distribution from
1211: processes like $e\, p^\uparrow \to (h_1 h_2) X$ or $p\, p^\uparrow \to
1212: (h_1 h_2) X$. However, we stress that azimuthal asymmetries in these processes
1213: with transversely polarized targets involve combinations like
1214: $g_{1T} G_1^\perp$, $h_1 H_1^\open$ and $h_1 H_1^\perp$, hence, a careful
1215: separation of each contribution requires weighting of the cross section with
1216: the appropriate trigonometric functions.
1217:
1218: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1219: \begin{acknowledgments}
1220: This work has been supported in part
1221: by the TMR network HPRN-CT-2000-00130. The research of
1222: D.B.\ has been made possible by financial support from the Royal Netherlands
1223: Academy of Arts and Sciences.
1224: \end{acknowledgments}
1225:
1226: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1227: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
1228:
1229: \bibitem{Ralston:1979ys}
1230: J.~P.~Ralston and D.~E.~Soper,
1231: %``Production Of Dimuons From High-Energy Polarized Proton-Proton Collisions,''
1232: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 152}, 109 (1979).
1233: %CITATION = NUPHA,B152,109;%%
1234:
1235: %\cite{Collins:1992kk}
1236: \bibitem{Collins:1992kk}
1237: J.~C.~Collins,
1238: %``Fragmentation of transversely polarized quarks probed in transverse momentum distributions,''
1239: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 396}, 161 (1993).
1240: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9208213].
1241: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9208213;%%
1242:
1243: %\cite{Bianconi:1999cd}
1244: \bibitem{Bianconi:1999cd}
1245: A.~Bianconi, S.~Boffi, R.~Jakob and M.~Radici,
1246: %``Two-hadron interference fragmentation functions. I: General framework,''
1247: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 62}, 034008 (2000).
1248: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9907475].
1249: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9907475;%%
1250:
1251: %\cite{Collins:1993kq}
1252: \bibitem{Collins:1993kq}
1253: J.~C.~Collins, S.~F.~Heppelmann and G.~A.~Ladinsky,
1254: %``Measuring transversity densities in singly polarized hadron-hadron and lepton - hadron collisions,''
1255: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 420}, 565 (1994).
1256: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9305309].
1257: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9305309;%%
1258:
1259: %\cite{Ji:1993vw}
1260: \bibitem{Ji:1993vw}
1261: X.~D.~Ji,
1262: %``Chiral odd and spin dependent quark fragmentation functions and their applications,''
1263: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 49}, 114 (1994).
1264: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9307235].
1265: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9307235;%%
1266:
1267: %\cite{Jaffe:1997hf}
1268: \bibitem{Jaffe:1997hf}
1269: R.~L.~Jaffe, X.~m.~Jin and J.~Tang,
1270: %``Interference fragmentation functions and the nucleon's transversity,''
1271: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 80}, 1166 (1998).
1272: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9709322].
1273: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9709322;%%
1274:
1275: \bibitem{noiDIS}
1276: M.~Radici, R.~Jakob and A.~Bianconi,
1277: %``Accessing transversity with interference fragmentation functions,''
1278: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 074031 (2002).
1279: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0110252].
1280: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0110252;%%
1281:
1282: %\cite{Bacchetta:2002ux}
1283: \bibitem{Bacchetta:2002ux}
1284: A.~Bacchetta and M.~Radici,
1285: %``Partial-wave analysis of two-hadron fragmentation functions,''
1286: arXiv:hep-ph/0212300.
1287: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0212300;%%
1288:
1289: %\cite{Artru:1995zu}
1290: \bibitem{Artru:1995zu}
1291: X.~Artru and J.~C.~Collins,
1292: %``Measuring transverse spin correlations by 4 particle correlations in e+ e- $\to$ 2 jets,''
1293: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 69}, 277 (1996).
1294: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9504220].
1295: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9504220;%%
1296:
1297: \bibitem{GrossePerdekamp}
1298: M.~Grosse Perdekamp, A.~Ogawa, K.~Hasuko, S.~Lange and V.~Siegle,
1299: %``Future transversity measurements at RHIC,''
1300: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 711}, 69c (2002).
1301: %%CITATION = NUPHA,A711,69;%%
1302:
1303: %\cite{Efremov:1995ff}
1304: \bibitem{Efremov:1995ff}
1305: A.~Efremov and D.~Kharzeev,
1306: %``CP violating effect of QCD vacuum in quark fragmentation,''
1307: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 366}, 311 (1996).
1308: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9506412].
1309: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9506412;%%
1310:
1311: %\cite{Tangerman:1994eh}
1312: \bibitem{Tangerman:1994eh}
1313: R.~D.~Tangerman and P.~J.~Mulders,
1314: %``Intrinsic transverse momentum and the polarized Drell-Yan process,''
1315: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 51}, 3357 (1995).
1316: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9403227].
1317: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9403227;%%
1318:
1319: \bibitem{Amst98}
1320: D.~Boer, R.~Jakob and P.~J.~Mulders,
1321: %``Leading asymmetries in two-hadron production in e+ e- annihilation at the Z pole,''
1322: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 424}, 143 (1998).
1323: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9711488].
1324: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9711488;%%
1325:
1326: \bibitem{Amst97}
1327: D.~Boer, R.~Jakob and P.~J.~Mulders,
1328: %``Asymmetries in polarized hadron production in e+ e- annihilation up to order 1/Q,''
1329: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 504}, 345 (1997).
1330: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9702281].
1331: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9702281;%%
1332:
1333: %\cite{Jaffe:1997pv}
1334: \bibitem{Jaffe:1997pv}
1335: R.~L.~Jaffe, X.~m.~Jin and J.~a.~Tang,
1336: %``Interference fragmentation functions and valence quark spin distributions in the nucleon,''
1337: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 57}, 5920 (1998).
1338: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9710561].
1339: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9710561;%%
1340:
1341: %\cite{Nachtmann:1977ek}
1342: \bibitem{Nachtmann:1977ek}
1343: O.~Nachtmann,
1344: %``A New Tool For The Study Of Fundamental Interactions: Parity Odd Correlations In Quark Fragmentation,''
1345: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 127}, 314 (1977).
1346: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B127,314;%%
1347:
1348: %\cite{Efremov:1992pe}
1349: \bibitem{Efremov:1992pe}
1350: A.~V.~Efremov, L.~Mankiewicz and N.~A.~Tornqvist,
1351: %``Jet handedness as a measure of quark and gluon polarization,''
1352: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 284}, 394 (1992).
1353: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B284,394;%%
1354:
1355: %\cite{Ryskin:hu}
1356: \bibitem{Ryskin:hu}
1357: M.~G.~Ryskin,
1358: %``The Origin Of Handedness In The Jet Fragmentation,''
1359: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 319} (1993) 346.
1360: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B319,346;%%
1361:
1362:
1363: \end{thebibliography}
1364:
1365: \end{document}
1366:
1367:
1368:
1369:
1370:
1371:
1372:
1373:
1374:
1375: