1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: \documentclass{article}
3: %\usepackage{rotating}
4: %\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,epsfig}
5: \usepackage{epsfig,amssymb,float,psfig}
6: \input{epsf}
7: \textheight 23.cm
8: %\textwidth 16.cm
9: \topmargin -1.7cm
10: \hoffset -2.8cm
11: \headsep 1.5cm
12: \parindent 1.2em
13: \textwidth 17.cm
14:
15: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
16: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
17: \newcommand{\ba}{\begin{eqnarray}}
18: \newcommand{\ea}{\end{eqnarray}}
19: \newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}
20: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}
21: \newcommand{\beqa}{\begin{eqnarray}}
22: \newcommand{\eeqa}{\end{eqnarray}}
23: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\#\arabic{footnote}}
24: \newcommand{\ve}{\varepsilon}
25: \newcommand{\no}{\nonumber}
26: \newcommand{\vs}{\vspace{-0.275cm}}
27: \def\barre#1{{\not\mathrel #1}}
28:
29: %\baselineskip 16pt plus 2pt minus 2pt
30:
31: \begin{document}
32:
33: %\begin{flushright}
34: %{\tiny HISKP(TH)-2003-nn} \\
35: %{\tiny $\,$} \\
36: %\end{flushright}
37:
38: $\,$
39:
40: \vspace{1cm}
41:
42: \begin{center}
43:
44: \bigskip
45:
46: {{\Large\bf Infrared regularization with spin-3/2 fields
47: }}
48:
49: \end{center}
50:
51: \vspace{.3in}
52:
53: \begin{center}
54: {\large
55: V\'eronique Bernard$^{\dagger,}$\footnote{email: bernard@lpt6.u-strasbg.fr},
56: Thomas R. Hemmert$^{\ast,}$\footnote{email: themmert@physik.tu-muenchen.de},
57: Ulf-G. Mei{\ss}ner$^{\ddagger}$\footnote{email: meissner@itkp.uni-bonn.de}
58: }
59:
60: \vspace{1cm}
61:
62: $^\dagger${\it Universit\'e Louis Pasteur, Laboratoire de Physique
63: Th\'eorique\\
64: F--67084 Strasbourg, France}
65:
66:
67: \bigskip
68:
69:
70: $^{\ast}${\it Technische Universit\"at M\"unchen, Physik Department T-39\\
71: D-85747 Garching, Germany }
72:
73: \bigskip
74:
75: $^\ddagger${\it Universit\"at Bonn, Helmholtz Institut f\"ur Strahlen-
76: und Kernphysik (Theorie)\\ Nu{\ss}allee 14-16, D-53115 Bonn, Germany.}
77:
78:
79:
80:
81: \bigskip
82:
83: \end{center}
84:
85: \vspace{.6in}
86:
87: \thispagestyle{empty}
88:
89: \begin{abstract}\noindent
90: We present a Lorentz--invariant formulation of baryon chiral perturbation theory
91: including spin-3/2 fields.
92: %This is based on a power counting where the nucleon-delta
93: %mass difference is counted as a small parameter.
94: Particular attention is paid to the projection on the spin-3/2 components of the delta fields.
95: We also discuss the nucleon mass and the pion-nucleon sigma term.
96: \end{abstract}
97:
98: \vfill
99:
100:
101: \pagebreak
102:
103: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
104: \noindent {\bf 1.} The delta resonance plays a special role in low-energy
105: nuclear and particle physics, due to its near mass degeneracy with the nucleon
106: and its strong couplings to pions, nucleons and photons. It was therefore
107: argued early that spin-3/2 (decuplet) states should be included in baryon
108: chiral perturbation theory \cite{JMdel}, which is the low-energy effective
109: field theory of the Standard Model. The work of \cite{JMdel} and subsequent authors
110: made use of the heavy baryon approach, which treats the baryons as static
111: sources
112: like in heavy quark effective field theory and allows for a systematic power
113: counting in the presence of matter fields, as pioneered in \cite{JM} and
114: systematically explored in \cite{BKKM}. Also, special care has to be taken about the
115: decoupling of resonances in the chiral limit \cite{GZ}. This approach was systematized
116: by counting the nucleon-delta mass splitting as an additional small parameter in
117: Ref.\cite{HHK}, the corresponding power counting was called the ``small scale
118: expansion''. The heavy baryon approach has been successfully applied to a
119: variety of processes, for reviews see \cite{BKMrev,UGM}, and a status report
120: on chiral effective field theories with deltas is given in \cite{TRH}.
121: More recently, a Lorentz-invariant formulation of baryon chiral perturbation
122: theory has become available \cite{BL}, the so--called ``infrared regularization'' (IR).
123: A similar approach had been presented earlier in \cite{ET}. Such a formulation allows
124: to include strictures from analyticity and is thus particularly suited for extensions
125: of chiral perturbation theory based on dispersion relations, see e.g.
126: \cite{TNT,DGL,GM,OO,OM,AB,bern}. Furthermore, the
127: use of the Dirac propagator as opposed to the static fermion propagator in the
128: heavy baryon scheme allows for a resummation of important recoil effects, see e.g.
129: the work on electromagnetic form factors \cite{KM} or the nucleon spin
130: structure \cite{BHMdhg1,BHMdhg2}. The chiral expansion of the baryon masses
131: also seems to converge faster in this scheme \cite{ETo} whereas the description
132: of pion--nucleon scattering is not yet in a satisfactory status \cite{BL2,ETo2}.
133: The renormalization of relativistic baryon chiral
134: perturbation theory has been discussed in detail in \cite{FGJS}. In this Letter, we
135: give a consistent extension of the infrared regularization method in the presence
136: of spin-3/2~\footnote{The inclusion of the delta when one separates loop
137: integrals into soft and hard parts was already considered in \cite{ETo2}.}.
138: What is new here is that we explicitly project onto the spin-3/2 parts and
139: that the method easily allows to include any external source in a chiral
140: and gauge invariant fashion (in contrast to the recent proposal in \cite{PP}).
141: As simple applications, we calculate
142: the delta loop contribution to the nucleon self-energy and the
143: pion--nucleon sigma term.
144:
145:
146: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
147: \bigskip
148: \noindent {\bf 2.}
149: In this section, we briefly review the formalism necessary to describe spin-3/2 fields.
150: More details can e.g. be found in \cite{RS,BDM,PT}.
151: We first write down the propagator for a free spin-3/2 field
152: (called the delta propagator from here on) in $d$ space--time dimensions,
153: \beq\label{fullP}
154: \mathcal{G}_{\mu\nu}^{\Delta} (p) = -{\barre{p} + m_\Delta \over p^2 - m_\Delta^2}\,
155: \Biggl\{g_{\mu\nu} - { 1 \over d-1} \, \gamma_\mu \gamma_\nu
156: -{ (d-2)\, p_\mu p_\nu \over (d-1)\, m_\Delta^2}
157: + { p_\mu \gamma_\nu - p_\nu \gamma_\mu \over (d-1) \, m_\Delta}\Biggr\}~,
158: \eeq
159: with $m_\Delta $ the delta mass. This may be rewritten by
160: projection onto the spin $3/2$ and $1/2$ components
161: \beq
162: \mathcal{G}_{\mu\nu}^{\Delta} (p)
163: = -{\barre{p} + m_\Delta \over p^2 - m_\Delta^2}\, P_{\mu\nu}^{3/2}
164: - {1 \over \sqrt{d-1} m_\Delta} \Biggl( \bigl( P_{12}^{1/2}\bigr)_{\mu\nu} +
165: \bigl( P_{21}^{1/2}\bigr)_{\mu\nu} \Biggr) +
166: {d-2\over (d-1)\, m_\Delta^2} \, (\barre{p} + m_\Delta )
167: \, \bigl( P_{22}^{1/2}\bigr)_{\mu\nu}~,
168: \eeq
169: with
170: \beqa\label{proj}
171: P_{\mu\nu}^{3/2} &=& g_{\mu\nu} -{1\over d-1}\, \gamma_\mu \gamma_\nu
172: - {1\over (d-1)\,p^2}
173: \bigl( \barre{p} \gamma_\mu p_\nu + p_\mu \gamma_\nu \barre{p} \bigr)
174: - {d-4 \over d-1} \, {p_\mu p_\nu\over p^2}~,\no\\
175: \bigl( P_{12}^{1/2}\bigr)_{\mu\nu} &=& {1\over \sqrt{d-1}p^2}
176: \bigl( p_\mu p_\nu - \barre{p} p_\nu \gamma_\mu)~,\no\\
177: \bigl( P_{21}^{1/2}\bigr)_{\mu\nu} &=& {1\over \sqrt{d-1}p^2}
178: \bigl( \barre{p} p_\mu \gamma_\nu - p_\mu p_\nu )~,\no\\
179: \bigl( P_{22}^{1/2}\bigr)_{\mu\nu} &=& { p_\mu \,p_\nu \over p^2}~.
180: \eeqa
181: These spin projection operators fulfill the orthogonality relations
182: \beq
183: \left( P^I_{ij} \right)_{\mu\nu} \left( P^J_{kl} \right)^{\nu\rho} =
184: \delta_{IJ}\,\delta_{jk}\, \left( P^I_{il} \right)^{\rho}_\mu\, , \quad (I,J)
185: = 1,2 \, ,
186: \quad (i,j,k,l) = 1,2~.
187: \eeq
188: Note the infrared singular pieces $\sim 1/p^2$ appearing in the spin-projected
189: parts of the propagator, which will play an important role later on. Also, we remark
190: that the spin-1/2 pieces do not propagate and thus one should be able to absorb
191: their contribution in purely polynomial terms (which amounts to a redefinition of
192: certain low-energy constants in the effective field theory).
193: If one considers processes where the center-of-mass energy reaches the delta mass,
194: $\sqrt{s} = m_\Delta$, the free delta propagator has to be resummed as described
195: in detail e.g. in \cite{ET,PP}.
196: Let us now briefly discuss the leading chiral pion-delta-nucleon
197: Lagrangian. It is given by
198: %discuss $\Delta N \pi$ vertex
199: \beq\label{Lagr}
200: {\cal L}_{\pi \Delta N} = c_A \, \bar\Psi_\mu^i \,\,\Theta^\mu_\nu (Z)
201: \, w^\nu_i \, \psi
202: + {\rm h.c.}~,
203: \eeq
204: where $\Psi_\mu$ describes the Rarita-Schwinger (spin-3/2) field, $\psi$ the
205: nucleon doublet, $w^\mu_i = {\rm Tr}(\tau_i u^\mu)/2$ the axial current and
206: $\Theta_{\mu\nu} = g_{\mu\nu} + (Z-{1/2}) \gamma_\mu \gamma_\nu$. The dependence
207: on the so-called off-shell parameter $Z$ is, however, spurious, since it does not appear in
208: the spin-3/2 contributions and thus physical observables do not depend on it.
209: The axial-vector coupling constant $c_A$, which is related to the
210: pion-delta-nucleon coupling
211: $g_{\pi \Delta N}$, is frequently called $h_A$ in the literature. More precisely,
212: what appears in Eq.(\ref{Lagr}) is the the coupling $c_A$ in the chiral limit.
213: For simplicity, we use in the following the SU(4) coupling constant relation
214: \beq\label{gpiDN}
215: c_A = h_A = \frac{3}{2\sqrt{2}}\, g_A~.
216: \eeq
217: The resulting value is somewhat larger than found in typical fits say to
218: pion-nucleon scattering data or from fitting the $\Delta \to N\pi$ width,
219: see e.g. \cite{FMdel,HHK2}. We remark that like in Eq.(\ref{Lagr}),
220: we are using standard chiral-invariant couplings of the ${\pi \Delta
221: N}$ system, because differences to other couplings appearing in the
222: literature can simply be absorbed in the polynomial contributions to
223: be discussed in the following.
224:
225:
226: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
227: \bigskip
228: \noindent {\bf 3.} Next, we make some short remarks about the effective
229: field theory of massive spin-1/2 fields chirally coupled to Goldstone
230: bosons and external sources, called baryon chiral perturbation theory.
231: It is complicated by the fact that the nucleon mass does not vanish in
232: the chiral limit and thus introduces a new mass scale apart from the
233: ones set by the quark masses. Therefore, any power of the quark masses
234: can be generated by chiral loops in the nucleon (baryon) case, spoiling the
235: one--to--one correspondence between the loop expansion and the one
236: in the small parameter $q$. One method to overcome this is the heavy mass
237: expansion (called heavy baryon chiral perturbation theory, for short HBCHPT)
238: where the nucleon mass is
239: transformed from the propagator into a string of vertices with
240: increasing powers of $1/m$. Then, a consistent power counting emerges\footnote{The
241: extension of this method for including deltas treating the $N\Delta$ mass splitting
242: as an additional small parameter has been given in \cite{HHK}.}.
243: However, this method has the disadvantage
244: that certain types of diagrams are at odds with strictures from analyticity.
245: The best example is the so--called triangle graph, which enters e.g. the
246: scalar form factor or the isovector electromagnetic form factors of the
247: nucleon. In a fully relativistic treatment,
248: such constraints from analyticity are automatically fulfilled. It was
249: argued in~\cite{ET} that relativistic one--loop integrals can be separated
250: into ``soft'' and ``hard'' parts. While for the former the power counting
251: as in HBCHPT applies, the contributions from the latter can be absorbed in
252: certain LECs. In this way, one can combine the advantages
253: of both methods. A more formal and rigorous implementation of such a program
254: was given in \cite{BL}. The underlying method is called
255: ``infrared regularization''. Any dimensionally regularized
256: one--loop integral $H$ is split into an infrared singular (called $I$) and
257: a regular part (called $R$) by a particular choice of Feynman
258: parameterization,
259: %\footnote{The extension of such methods to higher loops is
260: %studied in \cite{GeJa})
261: \beq
262: H = I + R ~.
263: \eeq
264: Consider first the regular part. If one chirally expands the contributions
265: to $R$, one generates
266: polynomials in momenta and quark masses. Consequently, to any order, $R$ can
267: be absorbed in the LECs of the effective Lagrangian. On the other hand, the
268: infrared (IR) singular part has the same analytical properties as the full
269: integral $H$ in the low--energy region and its chiral expansion leads to the
270: non--trivial momentum and quark--mass dependences of CHPT, like e.g. the
271: chiral logs or fractional powers of the quark masses.
272: For a typical one--loop integral (like e.g. the nucleon self--energy $\Sigma$)
273: this splitting can be achieved in the following way (omitting prefactors)
274: \beqa
275: \Sigma = \int \frac{d^dk}{(2\pi)^d} {1 \over AB}
276: &=& \int_0^1 dz \int \frac{d^dk}{(2\pi)^d} {1 \over [(1-z)A+zB]^2}
277: \nonumber \\
278: &=& \biggl\{ \int_0^\infty - \int_1^\infty \biggr\} dz
279: \int \frac{d^dk}{(2\pi)^d} {1 \over [(1-z)A+zB]^2} = I + R~,
280: \eeqa
281: with $A=M_\pi^2-k^2-i\epsilon$, $B=m^2 -(p-k)^2 -i\epsilon$,
282: $\epsilon \to 0^+$, $M_\pi$ the pion mass and $d$ the number of space--time
283: dimensions. Any general
284: one--loop diagram with arbitrary many insertions from external sources
285: can be brought into this form by combining the propagators to a single
286: pion and a single nucleon propagator. It was also shown
287: that this procedure leads to a unique, i.e.
288: process--independent result, in accordance with the chiral Ward
289: identities of QCD \cite{BL}.
290: Consequently, the transition from any one--loop graph $H$
291: to its IR singular piece $I$ defines a symmetry--preserving regularization.
292: For more details, the reader is referred to \cite{BL}.
293:
294:
295: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
296: \bigskip
297: \noindent {\bf 4.}
298: Next, we develop a systematic infrared regularization for effective field theories
299: with spin-3/2 fields. This should be considered the main result of this paper.
300: Due to the presence of the IR singular terms $\sim 1/p^2$ when one projects
301: the delta propagator onto its spin-3/2 and spin-1/2 components, cf. Eq.(\ref{proj}),
302: one has to deal with a type of integrals that do not appear in the pure pion--nucleon
303: approach. To be specific, consider the integral appearing in the self-energy
304: (details of the self-energy calculation will be given below)
305: \beqa\label{J00}
306: J_0^0 (p^2) &=& {1\over i} \int \frac{d^4 k}{(2\pi)^4}\, {-1
307: \over (k-p)^2(M_\pi^2 -k^2)}\no\\
308: &=& \frac{1}{(2\pi )^4}\, \int_0^1 dx \int d^4k \, {1\over [ k^2 + p^2 x
309: (x-1) +M_\pi^2 (1-x)]^2}\no\\
310: &=& \frac{\pi^d}{(2\pi )^d}\,{\Gamma ( 2 -d/2)\over \Gamma (2)}\,
311: \int_0^1 dx \, {1\over (1-x)^{2-d/2}(-p^2 x + M_\pi^2)^{2-d/2}}~.
312: \eeqa
313: In the region of low momenta, where the chiral expansion is expected to converge quickly,
314: the first factor in the denominator is of ${\cal O}(q^0)$, while the second is of
315: ${\cal O}(q^2)$ so that the chiral dimension of the integral should be
316: ${\cal O}(q^{d-2})$.
317: We remark that at $x=1$, the integrand develops a pole.
318: Following \cite{BL}, we perform a change of variables
319: \beq
320: x = {M_\pi^2 \over p^2} \, u \equiv \alpha\, u~,
321: \eeq
322: so that
323: \beq
324: J_0^0 (p^2) = \frac{\pi^{d/2}}{(2\pi )^d}\,{\Gamma ( 2 -d/2)\over \Gamma (2)}\,
325: {1\over p^2} \,
326: \int_0^{1/\alpha} du \, {1\over (1-\alpha u)^{2-d/2}(1-u)^{2-d/2}}\,
327: (M_\pi^2)^{d/2-1}~.
328: \eeq
329: We see that a complication arises due to the infrared singular piece
330: $\sim 1/(k-p)^2$ in the spin-projected parts of the propagator. Specifically,
331: due to the term $\sim\alpha u^2$, the denominator
332: brings some additional $\alpha$ contribution when performing the integral.
333: $J_0^0 (p^2)$ turns out to behave as $M_\pi^{d-4}$ instead of the expected
334: $M_\pi^{d-2}$.
335: If one evaluates this integral straightforwardly, one finds that it contains a
336: logarithmic contribution that indeed has the correct chiral behavior. The disturbing
337: contribution is due to the factor $(1-\alpha u)$ which stems from the pole at $x=1$
338: of the infrared singular part of the propagator.
339: In fact, such contributions should be contained in the
340: regular part, since they have nothing to do with the chiral expansion. To formally
341: achieve this separation, one rewrites the integral as ($d=4-2 \ve$)
342: \beqa
343: \int_0^{1/\alpha} du \, {1\over (1-\alpha u)^{2-d/2}(1-u)^{2-d/2}}
344: &=& \int_0^{1/\alpha} du \,(1 -\ve \ln(1-\alpha u) - \ve\ln (1-u)) \no\\
345: &=& \int_0^{1/\alpha} du \, ((1 -\ve \ln(1-\alpha u) - 1) +
346: \int_0^{1/\alpha} du \, {1 \over (1-u)^{2-d/2}}~.
347: \eeqa
348: From the second integral one then obtains the irregular part by letting $1/\alpha
349: \to \infty$.
350: Therefore, the separation of the integral ${J_0^0 (p^2)}$ into the irregular and
351: the regular terms reads, ${J_0^0 (p^2)}= I_0^0 (p^2) + R_0^0 (p^2)$,
352: \beqa
353: I_0^0 (p^2) &=& \frac{\pi^{d/2}}{(2\pi )^d}\,{\Gamma ( 2 -d/2)\over \Gamma (2)}\,
354: {1\over p^2}\, \int_0^\infty du \, {1\over (1-u)^{2-d/2}}\,(M_\pi^2)^{d/2-1}~,
355: \\
356: R_0^0 (p^2) &=& \frac{\pi^{d/2}}{(2\pi )^d}\,{\Gamma ( 2 -d/2)\over \Gamma (2)}\,
357: \biggl\{ \int_0^1 dx \,\biggl[ {1\over (1-x))^{2-d/2}} -1 \biggr]-
358: \int_1^\infty dx \, {1\over (-p^2 x +M_\pi^2)^{2-d/2}}\biggr\}~.
359: \eeqa
360: The irregular part can now be worked out using the methodology developed
361: in \cite{BL}, we find
362: \beq\label{IRres}
363: I_0^0 (p^2) = -{M_\pi^2 \over p^2}\, \Bigl[ 2\bar\lambda +\frac{1}{16\pi^2}
364: \ln\frac{M_\pi^2}{m^2} \Bigr] = - {\Delta_\pi \over p^2}~.
365: \eeq
366: Here, the piece $\sim \bar\lambda$ contains a pole term,
367: \beq\label{lambdabar}
368: \bar\lambda = {m^{d-4} \over 16\pi^2} \biggl\{ {1\over d-4} -{1\over 2} \left(
369: \ln 4\pi + \gamma_E +1 \right) \biggr\}~,
370: \eeq
371: with $\gamma_E$ the Euler-Mascheroni constant and we have set the running scale
372: of dimensional regularization, $\lambda$, to be the nucleon mass \cite{BL}.
373: Furthermore, the pion tadpole contribution $\Delta_\pi$ is given by the
374: well-known loop integral
375: \beq
376: \Delta_\pi = {1\over i} \int {d^d k \over (2\pi)^2} {1 \over M_\pi^2 - k^2}~.
377: %= 2 M_\pi^2 \biggl( L + {1\over 16\pi^2} \ln {M_\pi \over \lambda} \biggr)~.
378: \eeq
379: Of course, the
380: scale that naturally appears in loop integrals with deltas is $m_\Delta$, not $m$,
381: as used in Eqs.(\ref{IRres},\ref{lambdabar}).
382: However, the differences due to this choice of scale
383: can be absorbed in polynomial (regular) terms, so that
384: one can work with one scale only in the coupled pion-nucleon-delta system. However, to
385: assess the theoretical uncertainty at a given order, one can set $\lambda = m_\Delta$
386: in the delta loop diagrams. Eq.(\ref{IRres}) also shows that the non-propagating
387: parts of the projected propagator will be absorbed in tadpole contributions,
388: as it is expected since such contributions can be understood as a very heavy delta
389: shrunk to a point-like vertex.
390:
391: \medskip\noindent
392: Armed with this prescription, we can now set up a consistent expansion in small
393: external momenta, pion masses and the $N\Delta$ mass splitting $\Delta = m_\Delta - m$,
394: in complete analogy to the small scale expansion formulated for heavy spin-3/2
395: fields \cite{HHK}. We therefore refrain from discussing here in any detail the
396: corresponding power counting and the construction of the chiral effective Lagrangian
397: (most of this is available in the literature).
398: As discussed in detail in \cite{BFHM}, special care has
399: to be taken to fulfill the decoupling theorem of QCD, which states that leading
400: chiral singularities can not be modified by resonance fields. From here on,
401: all small parameters (quark masses, external momenta, nucleon-delta mass
402: splitting) are collectively denoted as $\epsilon$.
403:
404:
405: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
406: \bigskip
407: \noindent {\bf 5.}
408: \begin{figure}[tb]
409: %\vspace{3.5cm}
410: \centerline{
411: \epsfxsize=2in
412: \epsffile{self.eps}
413: }
414: \vspace{0.1cm}
415: \begin{center}
416: \caption{Feynman diagram for the nucleon self-energy
417: with an spin-3/2 intermediate state. Solid, double and dashed
418: lines denote nucleons, deltas and pions, in order.
419: \label{fig:self}}
420: \end{center}
421: \end{figure}
422: We first calculate the leading one-loop contribution to the nucleon self-energy
423: with an intermediate delta without any reference to a
424: special regularization and with the full propagator,
425: Eq.(\ref{fullP}), see Fig.~\ref{fig:self}. This is done for the following reasons.
426: First, such a calculation allows one to study different regularization procedures.
427: Second, one can explicitly study the role of the non-propagating spin-1/2
428: components. Third, one can also easier compare with existing calculations in the
429: literature. We have
430: \beq
431: \Sigma_\Delta (p^2) = -\frac{9}{4}\frac{g_A^2}{F_\pi^2} \, i\, \int
432: \frac{d^4 k }{(2\pi )^4}\,\biggl[ k^\mu -
433: \bigl( Z + \frac{1}{2}\bigr) \barre{k} \gamma^\mu \biggr]\, \mathcal{G}_{\mu\nu}^{\Delta}
434: (p-k) \, {1\over M_\pi^2 -k^2} \, \biggl[ k^\nu - \bigl( Z + \frac{1}{2}\bigr)
435: \gamma^\nu \barre{k} \biggr]\, ,
436: \eeq
437: The general structure of this integral is
438: \beq\label{selfk}
439: \Sigma_\Delta (p^2) = {\rm C} \, \frac{1}{i}\,
440: \int \frac{d^4 k }{(2\pi )^4}\, \biggl( A(k) + B(k) \barre{p} + C(k) \barre{k} \biggr)
441: \eeq
442: with ${\rm C} = 9g_A^2/(4F_\pi^2)$,
443: and the functions $A(k)$, $B(k)$ and $C(k)$ can be straightforwardly evaluated.
444: After integration, the self-energy can be written as
445: \beq
446: \Sigma_\Delta (p^2) = \tilde{A} + \barre{p}\, \tilde{B} =
447: \tilde{A} + \tilde{B}\, m + (\barre{p} -m)\, \tilde{B}~,
448: \eeq
449: where the functions $\tilde{A}$ and $\tilde{B}$ follow after integration of
450: Eq.(\ref{selfk}).
451: The nucleon mass shift due to the delta intermediate state is
452: (setting $Z=-1/2$ for simplicity)
453: \beqa
454: \delta m &=& (\tilde{A} + \tilde{B}\, m)|_{p^2=m^2}\no\\
455: &=& {(d-2)\,{\rm C}\over (d-1)\,m_\Delta^2} \,
456: \biggl( -{1\over 2d}m_\Delta^2 m \Delta_\Delta
457: - {1\over 2} m_\Delta m^2\Delta_\Delta +{\Delta \over 4} (m_\Delta +m) m
458: \Delta_\Delta
459: + {\Delta \over 2} (m_\Delta +m)^2 m^2 J_1 (m^2) \no \\
460: && \qquad\quad +M_\pi^2m^2(m_\Delta+m) J_0(m^2) -{M_\pi^2\over 4} \Delta_\Delta
461: - m M_\pi^2 J_1(m^2) \biggl[m^2 + {1\over 2}m_\Delta m + {1\over 2}m_\Delta^2\biggr]
462: \no\\
463: && \qquad\quad + {1\over 4} M_\pi^4 m J_1(m^2) + M_\pi^2 \Delta_\pi \biggl[ m_\Delta
464: + m + {1\over 2d} m \biggr]\biggr)~,
465: \eeqa
466: in terms of the loop functions
467: \beqa
468: J_0 (p^2) &=& {1\over i} \int {d^d k \over (2\pi)^2} {1 \over (M_\pi^2 - k^2)
469: (m_\Delta^2 - (p-k)^2)}~, \no\\
470: p_\mu \, J_1 (p^2) &=& {1\over i} \int {d^d k \over (2\pi)^2} {k_\mu
471: \over (M_\pi^2 - k^2) (m_\Delta^2 - (p-k)^2)}~,\no\\
472: \Delta_\Delta &=&{1\over i} \int {d^d k \over (2\pi)^2} {1 \over m_\Delta^2 - k^2}~,
473: %= 2 m_\Delta^2 \biggl( L + {1\over 16\pi^2} \ln {m_\Delta \over \lambda} \biggr)~,
474: \eeqa
475: and we have defined
476: \beq
477: \Delta \equiv m_\Delta - m ~.
478: \eeq
479: In IR, we have $\Delta_\Delta = 0$,
480: and $J_0(m^2)\, (J_1(m^2))$ is
481: of order ${\cal O}(\epsilon)\, ({\cal O}(\epsilon^2))$, so that to lowest (third) order
482: \beqa\label{deltamLO}
483: \delta m &=& {(d-2)\,{\rm C}\over (d-1)\,m_\Delta^2} \,
484: \biggl[ \frac{1}{2} \,\Delta \, (m+m_\Delta)^2 \,
485: m^2\, J_1(m^2) + M_\pi^2 \, m^2 \, (m+m_\Delta) \, J_0(m^2) \biggr]
486: \no \\
487: &=& \!\!\! -{{3g_A^2} \over {16 \pi^2 F_\pi^2}} \biggl[ \Delta \left(\Delta^2-
488: {3 \over 2}
489: M_\pi^2\right) \ln{M_\pi^2 \over m^2} + 2 (\Delta^2-M_\pi^2)^{3/2}
490: \ln{\biggl({{\Delta} \over {M_\pi}}+\sqrt{{{\Delta^2}\over{M_\pi^2}}-1}\biggr)}
491: -{\Delta \over 2} \left(\frac{4}{3}\Delta^2-M_\pi^2\right)\biggr]~,\no\\
492: &&
493: \eeqa
494: where the last equation is valid for $\Delta^2 > M_\pi^2$ (as it is the case
495: in nature). This result agrees with the one in \cite{HHK2}.
496: Note also that for a more compact notation and easier comparison with the existing
497: literature, we have retained some higher order terms in the formula expressing the
498: mass shift in terms of the loop functions $J_0$ and $J_1$.
499: %One can now work out an analytical expression from this equation. However, this is
500: %rather lengthy and we refrain from displaying it here. For orientation, we simply give
501: %result for the loop function $J_0(m^2)$ to leading order in the small scale expansion,
502: %\beq
503: %J_0 (m^2) = {\Delta \over m} \biggl[ 2\bar\lambda + {1\over 16 \pi^2}\biggl( \ln
504: %{M_\pi^2\over m^2} - 1 \biggr)\biggr] + {1\over 16 \pi^2\, m}\sqrt{\Delta^2 - M_\pi^2}
505: %\,\ln {\Delta + \sqrt{\Delta^2 - M_\pi^2} \over \Delta - \sqrt{\Delta^2 - M_\pi^2}}~,
506: %\eeq
507: %and the infinities get absorbed in a counter term of the form XXX.
508:
509: \medskip\noindent
510: As noted above, we have not yet separated the spin-3/2 from the spin-1/2 components.
511: Since the spin-1/2 components do not propagate, their contribution should be entirely
512: absorbed in polynomial pieces (contact terms). Utilizing the projection operators
513: given in Eq.(\ref{proj}), the spin-3/2 contribution to the self-energy takes the
514: form
515: \beq
516: \Sigma_\Delta^{3/2} (p^2) = -\frac{(d-2)\,{\rm C}}{d-1} \,
517: \int \frac{d^4 k }{(2\pi )^4}\,
518: (k^2p^2 - (k\cdot p)^2) { -(\barre{p} + m_\Delta - \barre{k})
519: \over (k-p)^2 (M_\pi^2-k^2)
520: (m_\Delta^2 - (k-p)^2)}~,
521: \eeq
522: which leads to the nucleon mass-shift (we give here only the result employing IR)
523: \beqa\label{delmIR}
524: \delta m^{3/2}
525: &=& {(d-2)\,{\rm C}\over (d-1)\,m_\Delta^2}
526: \, \biggl[M_\pi^2 m^2 \biggl (J_0(m^2) (m_\Delta+m) -
527: m J_1 (m^2)\biggr) + {1\over 2}m^2 \biggl(\Delta (m_\Delta +m) - M_\pi^2\biggr)
528: (m_\Delta +m)J_1 (m^2)
529: \no \\&& \qquad\quad
530: + {1\over 4}\biggl( -\Delta (m_\Delta +m) + M_\pi^2\biggr)^2 m J_1 (m^2)
531: \no
532: - M_\pi^2m^2 \biggl( J_0^0(m^2) (m_\Delta +m) - J_1^0 (m^2) m \biggr)\no\\
533: && \qquad\quad + {m^2\over 2} (M_\pi^2 +m^2)(m_\Delta +m) J_1^0 (m^2) -
534: {m \over 4} (M_\pi^2 +m^2)^2 J_1^0 (m^2) \biggr]~,
535: \eeqa
536: in terms of the new loop functions $J_0^0 (p^2)$ defined in Eq.(\ref{J00}) and
537: \beq
538: p_\mu \, J_1^0 (p^2) = {1\over i} \int {d^d k \over (2\pi)^2} {-k_\mu
539: \over (p-k)^2 \, (M_\pi^2 - k^2) }~.
540: \eeq
541: We also have the loop function relation $J_1^0 (p^2) = (p^2+M_\pi^2)J_0^0 (p^2)
542: /(2 p^2) + \Delta_\pi /(2p^2)$ (in dimensional regularization).
543: Noting now that the loop functions $J_0^0 (m^2)$
544: and $J_1^0 (m^2)$ are of order ${\cal O}(\epsilon^2)$ in the chiral expansion, the lowest
545: (third) order result for the mass shift derived from Eq.(\ref{delmIR}) agrees
546: with the one given in Eq.(\ref{deltamLO}) but differs of course in the higher
547: order terms. It is also important to stress that the spin-3/2 contribution to the
548: mass shift is independent of $Z$, as it should be.
549:
550: \medskip\noindent
551: Next, we consider the spin-1/2 contribution to the self-energy,
552: $\Sigma_\Delta^{1/2} (p^2)$. The corresponding mass shift has the form
553: (we again give for simplicity the result for $Z=-1/2$)
554: \beqa
555: \delta m^{1/2} &=& {3g_A^2\over 2F_\pi^2 m_\Delta^2} {1\over 256} \, M_\pi^4\,
556: \biggl[ 2\ln {M_\pi^2\over m^2} \biggl( 2(m_\Delta+m) + {2M_\pi^2 \over m^2}
557: (2m+m_\Delta) - {M_\pi^4\over m^3} \biggl) \no\\
558: &&\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad + {1\over 3}\left( (m+4m_\Delta) + 4{M_\pi^2\over m^2} (2m+m_\Delta)
559: -2 {M_\pi^4\over m^3}\right)\biggr]~.
560: \eeqa
561: We have thus shown explicitly that these contributions can
562: be completely absorbed into polynomial
563: terms appearing in the chiral expansion of the nucleon mass beyond leading
564: one--loop order \cite{BM,BL},
565: \beq
566: m_N = m_0 - 4c_1 M_\pi^2 - {{3g_A^2 M_\pi^3}\over {32\pi F_\pi^2}} +
567: k_1 \, M_\pi^4
568: \ln {M_\pi \over m} + k_2\, M_\pi^4 +
569: {\cal O}(M_\pi^5)~,
570: \eeq
571: where $c_1, k_1$ and $k_2$ are (combinations of) dimension two and four low--energy
572: constants and $m_0$ is the nucleon mass in the chiral limit. Furthermore, all
573: $Z$-dependence is of course included in these polynomial terms, too.
574:
575: \medskip\noindent
576: From the mass shift, one can directly derive the delta loop contribution to the
577: sigma term using the Feynman-Hellmann theorem,
578: \beq
579: \sigma_{\pi N}^\Delta (0) = M_\pi^2 \, {d\delta m \over dM_\pi^2}~.
580: \eeq
581: %In terms of loop functions, this reads in the case of the full propagator
582: %\beq
583: %\sigma_{\pi N}^\Delta (0) = M_\pi^2 (m+m_\Delta) \, {\rm C} \,
584: % \biggl[ m_\Delta \, J_0(m^2) + \bigl(
585: %M_\pi^2 m_\Delta^2
586: %- \frac{1}{4}\Delta^2 (m+m_\Delta)^2 \bigr) \frac{dJ_0(m^2)}{dM_\pi^2} + \frac%{1}{4}\Delta
587: %(m+m_\Delta) \frac{d\Delta_\pi}{dM_\pi^2}\biggr]~,
588: %\eeq
589: To leading order one has
590: (using the full or the spin 3/2 part of the propagator):
591: \beqa\label{sigmaloop}
592: \sigma_{\pi N}^\Delta (0)
593: &=& \frac{M_\pi^2 (m+m_\Delta)}{m_\Delta^2} \,{\rm C} \, \biggl( m^2 J_0(m^2) +
594: \frac{1}{6}\, \frac{1}{4 \pi^2}
595: \frac{m^2+2 m_\Delta^2}{m^2}\, \Delta \, (m+m_\Delta)\biggr)\no\\
596: &=& {{{\rm C} M_\pi^2} \over {4 \pi^2}} \, \biggl[\Delta \, \ln{M_\pi \over m}
597: + \sqrt{\Delta^2-M_\pi^2}
598: \,\ln{\biggl({{\Delta} \over {M_\pi}}+\sqrt{{{\Delta^2}\over{M_\pi^2}}-1}\biggr)
599: \biggr]}~.
600: \eeqa
601: Eq.~(\ref{sigmaloop}) naturally agrees with the result of Ref.~\cite{ETo2}
602: but differs by a polynomial contribution in $\Delta$ from the one of
603: \cite{ET} due to the use of a $d$--independent propagator in that paper.
604: Again, for easier comparison we have retained some higher order terms in the
605: upper expression in Eq.~(\ref{sigmaloop}).
606: This concludes the formalism and we now turn to a numerical evaluation of the mass shift
607: and the sigma term.
608:
609: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
610: \bigskip
611: \noindent {\bf 6.} We are now in the position to evaluate the delta loop
612: contribution to the nucleon mass shift and the sigma term. We use $g_A =
613: 1.267$, $M_\pi = 139.57\,$MeV, $F_\pi = 92.4\,$MeV and $\Delta = 271\,$MeV.
614: From Eq.(\ref{gpiDN}) it follows that $c_A =1.34$.
615: We remark that the resulting numbers scale
616: linearly with the axial-vector coupling constant $c_A$.
617: The delta contribution to the nucleon mass shift and the sigma term are
618: collected in Table~\ref{tab:res}. We give the lowest (third) order result
619: which is the same if one uses the full or the projected spin-3/2 propagator,
620: as pointed out earlier. However, in IR the integrals also contain higher
621: order pieces which can be retained (see e.g. the detailed discussion in \cite{KM}).
622: In that case, one has to project onto
623: the spin-3/2 pieces to get rid of the unphysical contribution from the
624: spin-1/2 components. However, as shown in the table, the difference is
625: numerically irrelevant for the observables considered here. Furthermore,
626: these higher order corrections amount to a very small correction to the
627: lowest order result. This, however, is not always the case, see e.g.
628: \cite{KM}. We also remark a certain sensitivity to the scale of dimensional
629: regularization. This dependence, however, will be balanced by counter terms
630: not considered here.
631: The results shown in Table~\ref{tab:res} are not very different
632: from earlier ones obtained in the heavy baryon approach \cite{J,BKMmass},
633: which is expected since to this order neither the delta loop contribution to
634: the nucleon mass shift nor to the sigma term is very sensitive to recoil corrections
635: or similar effects. We stress again that a complete analysis of the nucleon
636: mass or the sigma term would require a novel determination of certain low-energy
637: constants to fulfill the requirements of decoupling. This, however,
638: goes beyond the scope of this Letter.
639:
640: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.2}
641: \begin{table}[ht]
642: \begin{center}
643: \begin{tabular}{|l|cc|}
644: \hline
645: & $\delta m$ [MeV] & $\sigma_{\pi N}^\Delta (0)$ [MeV] \\
646: \hline
647: lowest order & 86.4~(108.1) & $-$45.6~($-$60.0) \\
648: unexpanded, with full propagator & 87.2~(112.7) & $-$46.3~($-$63.3) \\
649: unexpanded, with spin-3/2 propagator & 88.1~(113.7) & $-$44.7~($-$61.4) \\
650: \hline
651: \end{tabular}
652: \caption{\it Delta contribution to the nucleon mass shift and the sigma term.
653: Lowest order refers to the third order IR result based on
654: Eq.(\protect\ref{deltamLO}). Unexpanded means that the higher order terms
655: from the various loop functions are retained. The propagator used is also
656: given (in the lowest order case, using the full or the spin-3/2 part of the
657: propagator leads to the same result, as discussed in the text). The numbers
658: in the round brackets are obtained with $\lambda = m_\Delta$.
659: \label{tab:res}}
660: \end{center}
661: \end{table}
662:
663:
664: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
665: \bigskip
666: \noindent {\bf 7.} In this Letter, we constructed a systematic infrared
667: regularization for chiral effective field theories including spin-3/2
668: fields. To arrive at a consistent formulation, one has to project onto
669: the spin-3/2 components of these fields.
670: This projection leads to a new type of integrals as compared to the
671: pure pion-nucleon theory. We have shown that the IR scheme of \cite{BL} can
672: be extended systematically and furthermore, this procedure allows for a chiral
673: invariant inclusion of external sources, like e.g. photons or weak
674: currents. The contributions from the spin-1/2 components get
675: completely absorbed into the polynomial pieces of the effective
676: Lagrangian. Furthermore, the frequently used off--shell parameters
677: ($X,Y,Z$) are also contained in these polynoms and thus do not lead
678: to observable consequences.
679: It is now
680: important to apply this method to observables, where $\Delta\pi$ loops are
681: expected to play a significant role, like in all types of Compton scattering.
682: Work along these lines is underway.
683:
684: \bigskip\noindent
685: TRH thanks the Universit\'e Louis Pasteur for hospitality, where part of this
686: work was done.
687:
688:
689: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% REFERENCES %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
690: \bigskip
691: %\pagebreak
692:
693: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
694: \frenchspacing
695: \bibitem{JMdel}
696: E.~Jenkins and A.~V.~Manohar,
697: %``Chiral corrections to the baryon axial currents,''
698: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 259} (1991) 353.\vs
699: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B259,353;%%
700: \bibitem{JM}
701: E.~Jenkins and A.~V.~Manohar,
702: %``Baryon Chiral Perturbation Theory Using A Heavy Fermion Lagrangian,''
703: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 255} (1991) 558.\vs
704: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B255,558;%%
705: \bibitem{BKKM}
706: V.~Bernard, N.~Kaiser, J.~Kambor and U.-G.~Mei{\ss}ner,
707: %``Chiral structure of the nucleon,''
708: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 388} (1992) 315.\vs
709: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B388,315;%%
710: \bibitem{GZ}
711: J.~Gasser and A.~Zepeda,
712: %``Approaching The Chiral Limit In QCD,''
713: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 174} (1980) 445.\vs
714: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B174,445;%%
715: \bibitem{HHK}
716: T.~R.~Hemmert, B.~R.~Holstein and J.~Kambor,
717: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 24} (1998) 1831
718: [arXiv:hep-ph/9712496].\vs
719: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9712496;%%
720: \bibitem{BKMrev}
721: V.~Bernard, N.~Kaiser and U.-G.~Mei{\ss}ner,
722: Int.\ J.\ Mod.\ Phys.\ E {\bf 4} (1995) 193
723: [arXiv:hep-ph/9501384].\vs
724: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9501384;%%
725: \bibitem{UGM}
726: U.-G.~Mei{\ss}ner, in Shifman, M. (ed.): ``At the frontier of particle physics'', vol. 1, pp. 417-505
727: (World Scientific, Singapore, 2001)
728: %``Chiral QCD: Baryon dynamics,''
729: [arXiv:hep-ph/0007092].\vs
730: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0007092;%%
731: \bibitem{TRH}
732: T.~R.~Hemmert,
733: %``Chiral effective field theories with explicit spin 3/2 degrees of freedom: A status report,''
734: arXiv:nucl-th/0105051.\vs
735: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0105051;%%
736: \bibitem{BL}
737: T.~Becher and H.~Leutwyler,
738: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 9} (1999) 643
739: [arXiv:hep-ph/9901384].\vs
740: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9901384;%%
741: \bibitem{ET}
742: P.~J.~Ellis and H.~B.~Tang,
743: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 57} (1998) 3356
744: [arXiv:hep-ph/9709354].\vs
745: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9709354;%%
746: \bibitem{TNT}
747: T.~N.~Truong,
748: %``Modern Application Of Dispersion Relation: Chiral Perturbation Versus Dispersion Technique,''
749: CERN-TH-4748/87.\vs
750: %\href{http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?r=cern-th-4748\%2F87}{SPIRES entry}
751: \bibitem{DGL}
752: J.~F.~Donoghue, J.~Gasser and H.~Leutwyler,
753: %``The Decay Of A Light Higgs Boson,''
754: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 343} (1990) 341.\vs
755: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B343,341;%%
756: \bibitem{GM}
757: J.~Gasser and U.-G.~Mei{\ss}ner,
758: %``Chiral Expansion Of Pion Form-Factors Beyond One Loop,''
759: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 357} (1991) 90.\vs
760: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B357,90;%%
761: \bibitem{OO}
762: J.~A.~Oller and E.~Oset,
763: %``N/D description of two meson amplitudes and chiral symmetry,''
764: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60} (1999) 074023
765: [arXiv:hep-ph/9809337].\vs
766: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9809337;%%
767: \bibitem{OM}
768: U.-G.~Mei{\ss}ner and J.~A.~Oller,
769: %``Chiral unitary meson baryon dynamics in the presence of resonances:
770: %Elastic pion nucleon scattering,''
771: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 673} (2000) 311
772: [arXiv:nucl-th/9912026].\vs
773: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9912026;%%
774: \bibitem{AB}
775: B.~Ananthanarayan and P.~B\"uttiker,
776: %``Comparison of pi K scattering in SU(3) chiral perturbation theory and dispersion relations,''
777: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 19} (2001) 517
778: [arXiv:hep-ph/0012023].\vs
779: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0012023;%%
780: \bibitem{bern}
781: B.~Ananthanarayan, G.~Colangelo, J.~Gasser and H.~Leutwyler,
782: %``Roy equation analysis of pi pi scattering,''
783: Phys.\ Rept.\ {\bf 353} (2001) 207
784: [arXiv:hep-ph/0005297].\vs
785: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0005297;%%
786: \bibitem{KM}
787: B.~Kubis and U.-G.~Mei{\ss}ner,
788: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 679} (2001) 698.
789: [arXiv:hep-ph/0007056].\vs
790: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0007056;%%
791: \bibitem{BHMdhg1}
792: V.~Bernard, T.~R.~Hemmert and U.-G.~Mei{\ss}ner,
793: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 545} (2002) 105
794: [arXiv:hep-ph/0203167].\vs
795: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0203167;%%
796: \bibitem{BHMdhg2}
797: V.~Bernard, T.~R.~Hemmert and U.-G.~Mei{\ss}ner,
798: %``Spin structure of the nucleon at low energies,''
799: arXiv:hep-ph/0212033, Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67} (2003), in press.\vs
800: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0212033;%%
801: \bibitem{ETo}
802: P.~J.~Ellis and K.~Torikoshi,
803: %``Baryon masses in chiral perturbation theory with infrared regularization,''
804: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 61} (2000) 015205
805: [arXiv:nucl-th/9904017].\vs
806: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9904017;%%
807: \bibitem{BL2}
808: T.~Becher and H.~Leutwyler,
809: %``Low energy analysis of pi N $\to$ pi N,''
810: JHEP {\bf 0106} (2001) 017
811: [arXiv:hep-ph/0103263].\vs
812: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0103263;%%
813: \bibitem{ETo2}
814: K.~Torikoshi and P.~J.~Ellis,
815: %``Low energy pion nucleon scattering in the heavy baryon and infrared schemes,''
816: arXiv:nucl-th/0208049.\vs
817: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0208049;%%
818: \bibitem{FGJS}
819: T.~Fuchs, J.~Gegelia, G.~Japaridze and S.~Scherer,
820: %``Renormalization of relativistic baryon chiral perturbation theory and power counting,''
821: arXiv:hep-ph/0302117.\vs
822: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0302117;%%
823: \bibitem{PP}
824: V.~Pascalutsa and D.~R.~Phillips,
825: %``Effective theory of the Delta(1232) in Compton scattering off the nucleon,''
826: arXiv:nucl-th/0212024.\vs
827: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0212024;%%
828: \bibitem{RS}
829: W.~Rarita and J.~S.~Schwinger,
830: %``On A Theory Of Particles With Half Integral Spin,''
831: Phys.\ Rev.\ {\bf 60} (1941) 61.\vs
832: %%CITATION = PHRVA,60,61;%%
833: \bibitem{BDM}
834: M.~Benmerrouche, R.~M.~Davidson and N.~C.~Mukhopadhyay,
835: %``Problems Of Describing Spin 3/2 Baryon Resonances In The Effective Lagrangian Theory,''
836: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 39} (1989) 2339.\vs
837: %%CITATION = PHRVA,C39,2339;%%
838: \bibitem{PT}
839: V.~Pascalutsa and R.~Timmermans,
840: %``Field theory of nucleon to higher-spin baryon transitions,''
841: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 60} (1999) 042201
842: [arXiv:nucl-th/9905065].\vs
843: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9905065;%%
844: \bibitem{FMdel}
845: N.~Fettes and U.-G.~Mei{\ss}ner,
846: %``Pion nucleon scattering in an effective chiral field theory with explicit spin-3/2 fields,''
847: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 679} (2001) 629
848: [arXiv:hep-ph/0006299].\vs
849: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0006299;%%
850: \bibitem{HHK2}
851: T.~R.~Hemmert, B.~R.~Holstein, J.~Kambor and G.~Kn\"ochlein,
852: %``Compton scattering and the spin structure of the nucleon at low energies,''
853: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 57} (1998) 5746
854: [arXiv:nucl-th/9709063].\vs
855: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9709063;%%
856: \bibitem{BFHM}
857: V.~Bernard, H.~W.~Fearing, T.~R.~Hemmert and U.-G.~Mei{\ss}ner,
858: %``The form factors of the nucleon at small momentum transfer,''
859: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 635} (1998) 121
860: [Erratum-ibid.\ A {\bf 642} (1998) 563]
861: [arXiv:hep-ph/9801297].\vs
862: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9801297;%%
863: \bibitem{BM}
864: B.~Borasoy and U.-G.~Mei{\ss}ner,
865: %``Chiral expansion of baryon masses and sigma-terms,''
866: Annals Phys.\ {\bf 254} (1997) 192
867: [arXiv:hep-ph/9607432].\vs
868: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9607432;%%
869: \bibitem{BKMmass}
870: V.~Bernard, N.~Kaiser and U.-G.~Mei{\ss}ner,
871: %``Critical analysis of baryon masses and sigma terms in heavy baryon chiral perturbation theory,''
872: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 60} (1993) 111
873: [arXiv:hep-ph/9303311].\vs
874: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9303311;%%
875: \bibitem{J}
876: E.~Jenkins,
877: %``Baryon masses in chiral perturbation theory,''
878: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 368} (1992) 190.\vs
879: %%CITATION = NUPHA,B368,190;%%
880: \end{thebibliography}
881:
882: \end{document}
883: