1: \documentclass[aps,12pt]{revtex4}
2: \usepackage{epsfig,amsmath,amssymb}
3: \newcommand{\ta}{\mathbf{t}_{a}}
4: \newcommand{\bm}[1]{% arg1: var namei
5: \mathbf{#1}}
6: \newcommand{\bs}[1]{% arg1: var name
7: \mathbf{#1}}
8: \newcommand{\eq}{{\, \equiv\, }}
9: \newcommand{\fr}[1]{% arg1: var name
10: \frac{#1}}
11: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}
12: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}
13: \newcommand{\psibar}{\overline{\psi}}
14: \newcommand{\chibar}{\overline{\chi}}
15: \newcommand{\Hbar}{\overline{H}_{v}}
16: \newcommand{\Hv}{H_{v}}
17: \newcommand{\Qvbar}{\overline{Q}_{v}}
18: \newcommand{\hvbar}{\overline{h}_{v}}
19: \newcommand{\ket}{{\cal i}}
20: \newcommand{\Qm}{Q^{(-)}_v}
21: \newcommand{\bra}{{\cal h}}
22: \newcommand{\gc}{\bra\fr{\alpha_s}{\pi}G^2\ket}
23: \newcommand{\gca}{\bra\alpha_s/\pi G^2\ket}
24: \newcommand{\qc}{\bra\,\overline{q}q\,\ket}
25: \newcommand{\fm}{\left(\fr{f_\pi}{m}\right)}
26: \newcommand{\ga}{{g_{{\cal A}}}}
27: \newcommand{\gat}{\tilde{g}_{{\cal A}}}
28: \newcommand{\ebar}{{\bar{\varepsilon}}}
29: \newcommand{\Qp}{Q^{(+)}_v}
30: \def\slash#1{#1 \hskip -0.5em / }
31: \begin{document}
32: \title{On the Colour Suppressed \\
33: Decay Modes $\overline{B^0} \rightarrow D_s^+ D_s^-$
34: and $\overline{B_s^0} \rightarrow D^+ D^-$}
35: \author{J. O. Eeg$^a$, S. Fajfer$^{b,c}$, and A. Hiorth$^a$ \\
36: $^a$Dept. of Physics, Univ. of Oslo, N-0316 Oslo, Norway\\
37: $^b$Physics Department, University of Ljubljana, Jadranska 19,
38: SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia\\
39: $^c$Institut Jo\v{z}ef Stefan, Jamova 39, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia}
40: %\author{J. O. Eeg}
41: \email{j.o.eeg@fys.uio.no}
42: %\affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Oslo,
43: %P.O.Box 1048 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway}
44: %\author{S. Fajfer}
45: \email{Svjetlana.Fajfer@ijs.si}
46: %\affiliation{Istitut Josef Stefan,
47: %Jamova 19, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenija}
48: %\author{A. Hiorth}
49: \email{aksel.hiorth@fys.uio.no}
50: %\affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Oslo,
51: %P.O.Box 1048 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway}
52:
53:
54: %\begin{titlepage}
55: %\pubblock
56: %\vfill
57: \vspace{1cm}
58:
59: \begin{abstract}
60:
61: We point out that the decay modes
62: $\overline{B^0} \rightarrow D_s^+ D_s^-$
63: and $\overline{B_s^0} \rightarrow D^+ D^-$
64: have no factorized contribution.
65: At quark level these dacays can only proceed through the annihilation
66: mechanism, which
67: in the factorized limit give zero amplitude
68: due to current conservation.
69: In this paper, we identify the dominating non-factorizable
70: (colour suppressed) contributions in terms of
71: two chiral loop contributions and
72: one soft gluon emission contribution.
73: The latter contribution can be
74: calculated in terms of the (lowest dimension) gluon condensate within
75: a recently developed heavy-light chiral quark model.
76: We find braching ratios $BR (\bar B^0 \to D_s^+ D_s^-)$
77: $ \simeq 7 \times 10^{-5}$ and
78: $BR (\bar B^0_s \to D^+ D^-)$
79: $ \simeq 1\times 10^{-3}$.
80:
81: \end{abstract}
82:
83: \maketitle
84:
85: \section{Introduction}
86: There is presently great interest in decays of $B$-mesons,
87: due to numerous experimental results coming from Ba Bar and Belle,
88: and later at LHC.
89:
90: It has been shown \cite{BBNS} that some classes of $B$-meson decay amplitudes
91: exhibit {\it QCD factorization}.
92: This means that, up to $\alpha_s/\pi$ (calculable) and
93: $\Lambda_{QCD}/m_b$ (not calculable),
94: their amplitudes factorize into the product
95: of two matrix elements of weak currents.
96: Typically, the decay amplitudes which factorize in this sense
97: are $B \rightarrow \pi \pi$ and $B \rightarrow K \pi$ where the energy
98: release is big compared to the light
99: meson masses.
100: However, for various decays of the type $\bar{B} \rightarrow D \bar{D}$ where
101: the energy release
102: is of order 1 GeV, QCD factorization is not expected to hold.
103: (Here $\bar{B}$, $D$, and $\bar{D}$ contain a heavy $b$, $c$, and
104: anti-$c$
105: quark respectively).
106: Such decay modes
107: have been considered in
108: connection with
109: intermediate $D \bar{D}$ states for other $B$-decay modes \cite{PhaCo}.
110:
111: In a previous paper \cite{EFZ},
112: it was pointed out that the
113: decay mode $D^0 \rightarrow K^0 \overline{K^0}$ was zero in the factorized
114: limit due to current conservation. However, there are in that case
115: non-factorizable (colour suppressed) contributions in terms of chiral
116: loops and soft gluon emission modelled by a gluon condensate.
117:
118: \vspace{0.1cm}
119:
120: In this paper we report on the following observation:
121: The decay modes
122: $\overline{B^0} \rightarrow D_s^+ D_s^-$
123: and $\overline{B_s^0} \rightarrow D^+ D^-$
124: have no factorized (colour non-suppressed) contributions.
125: At quark level, these decays a priori proceed through the
126: annihilation mechanism
127: $b \bar{s} \rightarrow c \bar{c}$ and $b \bar{d} \rightarrow c \bar{c}$,
128: respectively. However, within the factorized limit the annihilation
129: mechanism will give a zero amplitude
130: due to current conservation, as for $D^0 \rightarrow K^0 \overline{K^0}$.
131: But there are non-zero factorized contributions through the axial
132: part of the weak current
133: if at least one of $D$-mesons in the final state
134: is a vector meson $D^*$. Such contributions are, however,
135: proportional to the numerically non-favourable Wilson coefficient
136: $C_1$, which we will neglect in this short paper.
137: In contrast,
138: the typical factorized decay modes which proceed
139: through the spectator mechanism, say
140: $\overline{B^0} \rightarrow D^+ D_s^-$,
141: are proportional to the numerically favourable Wilson coefficient $C_2$.
142: If the mesons in this amplitude are also allowed to be vector mesons,
143: such amplitudes will
144: generate non-factorizable ($\sim 1/N_c$) chiral loop contributions
145: to the process
146: $\overline{B_d^0} \rightarrow D_s^+ D_s^-$ due to $K^0$-exchange. These will be
147: considered in the present paper.
148:
149: There are also non-factorizable ($\sim 1/N_c$) contributions
150: due to soft gluon emission.
151: Such contributions can be
152: calculated in terms of the (lowest dimension) gluon condensate within
153: a recently developed Heavy Light Chiral Quark Model (HL$\chi$QM) \cite{ahjoe},
154: which is based on Heavy Quark Effective Theory (HQEFT) \cite{neu}.
155: This model has been applied to processes with $B$-mesons in \cite{EHP,ahjoeB}.
156: The gluon condensate contributions is also proportional to
157: the favourable Wilson coefficient $C_2$.
158:
159: In the next section (II), we shortly present the
160: four quark Lagrangian at quark level. In section III we present our
161: analysis of chiral loop contributions within
162: the heavy light chiral perturbation theory.
163: In section IV we give the calculation of
164: non-factorizable
165: matrix elements due to soft gluons expressed through the (model
166: dependent) quark condensate.
167: In section V we give the results and
168: conclusion.
169: Throughout the paper, we will give
170: formulae and figures for the decay mode
171: $\overline{B^0} \rightarrow D_s^+ D_s^-$.
172: The treatment of $\overline{B_s^0} \rightarrow D^+ D^-$ will proceed
173: analogously.
174:
175:
176: \section{Effective non-leptonic Lagrangian at quark level}
177:
178: Based on the electroweak and quantum chromodynamical interactions,
179: one constructs an effective Lagrangian at
180: quark level in the standard way:
181: \begin{equation}
182: {\cal L}_{W}= \sum_i C_i(\mu) \; Q_i (\mu) \; ,
183: \label{Lquark}
184: \end{equation}
185: where all information of the short distance (SD) loop
186: effects above a renormalization scale $\mu$
187: is contained in the (Wilson) coefficients $C_i$.
188: In our case there are two relevant
189: operators
190: \begin{eqnarray}
191: Q_{1} = 4 (\overline{q}_L \gamma^\alpha b_L ) \;
192: ( \overline{c}_L \gamma_\alpha c_L )
193: \qquad , \; \; \; \;
194: Q_{2} = 4 \, ( \overline{c}_L \gamma^\alpha b_L ) \;
195: ( \overline{q}_L \gamma_\alpha c_L ) \; ,
196: \label{Q12}
197: \end{eqnarray}
198: for $q = d,s$.
199: Penguin operators may also contribute, but have small Wilson coefficients.
200: We may write $C_i = - \frac{G_F}{\sqrt{2}} V_{cb}V_{cq}^* a_i$ ,
201: where $a_1 \sim 10^{-1}$ and $a_2 \sim 1$ at the scale $\mu = m_b$.
202: Performing perturbative QCD corrections within
203: Heavy Quark Effective Theory~(HQEFT)~\cite{neu},
204: the effective Lagrangian (\ref{Lquark}) can be evolved down to the scale
205: $\mu \sim \Lambda_\chi \sim$1 GeV \cite{GKMW,Fleischer}, where one finds
206: $|a_1| \simeq 0.4$ and $|a_2| \simeq 1.4$. The $b$, $c$, and
207: $\overline{c}$
208: quarks are then treated within HQEFT.
209:
210: In order to study non-factorizable contributions at quark level,
211: we may use the
212: following relation between the generators of $SU(3)_c$ ($i,j,l,n$
213: are colour indices running from 1 to 3):
214: \begin{equation}
215: \delta_{i j}\delta_{l n} = \fr{1}{N_c} \delta_{i n} \delta_{l j}
216: \; + \; 2 \; t_{i n}^a \; t_{l j}^a \; ,
217: \label{fierz}
218: \end{equation}
219: where $a$ is the color octet index.
220: Then the operators $Q_{1,2}$ may, by means of a Fierz transformation,
221: be written in the following way :
222: \begin{eqnarray}
223: Q_{1} = \frac{1}{N_c} Q_2 + 2 \widetilde{Q_2}
224: \qquad , \; \; \; \,Q_{2} = \frac{1}{N_c} Q_1 + 2 \widetilde{Q_1}
225: \; \; ,
226: \label{QFierz}
227: \end{eqnarray}
228: where
229: %the superscript $F$ means ``Fierzed'' and
230: the operators with the ``tilde'' contain colour matrices:
231: \begin{eqnarray}
232: \widetilde{Q_{1}} = 4 (\overline{q}_L \gamma^\alpha t^a b_L ) \; \,
233: ( \overline{c}_L \gamma_\alpha t^a c_L ) \,
234: \qquad , \; \; \;
235: \widetilde{Q_{2}} = 4 \, ( \overline{c}_L \gamma^\alpha t^a b_L ) \; \,
236: ( \overline{q}_L \gamma_\alpha t^a c_L ) \; .
237: \label{QCol}
238: \end{eqnarray}
239: To obtain
240: a physical amplitude, one has to calculate the hadronic matrix elements
241: of the quark operators $Q_i$ within some framework
242: describing long distance (LD) effects.
243:
244: \begin{figure}[t]
245: \begin{center}
246: \epsfig{file=bdd_fact.ps,width=7cm}
247: \caption{Factorized contribution for
248: $\overline{B^0} \rightarrow D^+ D_s^-$
249: through the spectator mechanism, which does not exist for
250: decay mode $\overline{B^0} \rightarrow D_s^+ D_s^-$
251: we consider in this paper.
252: The double dashed lines represent heavy mesons, the double lines
253: represent heavy quarks, and the single lines light quarks.}
254: \label{fig:bdd_fact}
255: \end{center}
256: \end{figure}
257:
258: As an example of a typical {\it factorized} case we choose
259: the amplitude for $\overline{B^0} \rightarrow D^+ D_s^-$
260: obtained from (\ref{Lquark}) and (\ref{Q12}):
261: \begin{eqnarray}
262: \langle D_s^- D^+ | {\cal L}_W| \overline{B^0} \rangle_F \, = \,
263: \; - (C_2 +\frac{1}{N_c} C_1)
264: \langle D_s^- | \overline{s}\gamma_\mu \gamma_5 c |0 \rangle
265: \langle D^+|\overline{c}\gamma_\mu b|\overline{B^0} \rangle \; ,
266: \label{FactorizedP}
267: \end{eqnarray}
268: which will in section III be compared with our chiral loop contributions.
269: %The {\it subscript} $F$ means ``factorized''.
270: This term is proportional to the $D$-meson decay constant times
271: the Isgur-Wise function
272: (for $\bar{B} \rightarrow D$ transition)
273: and is vizualized in figure~\ref{fig:bdd_fact}.
274:
275: The factorized amplitude for $\overline{B^0} \rightarrow D_s^+ D_s^-$
276: obtained from (\ref{Lquark}) and (\ref{Q12})
277: is vizualized in figure~\ref{fig:bdd_fact2}, and is given by
278: \begin{eqnarray}
279: \langle D_s^- D_s^+ | {\cal L}_W| \overline{B^0} \rangle_F \, = \,
280: 4 (C_1 +\frac{1}{N_c} C_2)
281: \langle D_s^- D_s^+|\overline{c_L} \gamma_\mu c_L |0 \rangle
282: \langle 0 |\overline{d_L} \gamma^\mu b_L |\overline{B^0} \rangle \; .
283: \label{FactorizAnn}
284: \end{eqnarray}
285: Unless one or both of the $D$-mesons in the final state
286: are vector mesons, this matrix
287: element is zero due to current conservation:
288: \bea
289: \langle D_s^+ D_s^-|\overline{c} \gamma_\mu c |0 \rangle
290: \langle 0 |\overline{d} \gamma^\mu \gamma_5 b |\overline{B^0} \rangle
291: \sim f_B (p_D + p_{\bar{D}})^\mu \,
292: \langle D_s^+ D_s^- |\overline{c} \gamma_\mu c |0 \rangle \; = 0 \; .
293: \eea
294:
295: \begin{figure}[t]
296: \begin{center}
297: \epsfig{file=bdd_fact2.ps,width=8cm}
298: \caption{Factorized contribution for
299: $\overline{B^0} \rightarrow D_s^+ D_s^-$
300: through the annihilation mechanism, which give zero contributions if
301: both $D_s^+$ and $D_s^-$ are pseudoscalars.}
302: \label{fig:bdd_fact2}
303: \end{center}
304: \end{figure}
305:
306: The genuine non-factorizable part for
307: $\overline{B^0} \rightarrow D_s^+ D_s^-$
308: can be written
309: in terms of coulored currents (see eqs. (\ref{QFierz}) and (\ref{QCol})):
310: \begin{eqnarray}
311: \langle D_s^- D_s^+ | {\cal L}_W| \overline{B^0} \rangle_{NF} \, = \,
312: 8 C_2 \,
313: \langle D_s^- D_s^+ | (\overline{q}_L \gamma^\alpha t^a b_L ) \;
314: ( \overline{c}_L \gamma_\alpha t^a c_L ) \ | \overline{B^0} \rangle
315: \label{QNFact}
316: \end{eqnarray}
317: We observe that the annihilation mechanism amplitude
318: in the non-factorizable case has the numerically favourable
319: Wilson coefficient $C_2$.
320: This amplitude is, within the HL$\chi$QM vizualized later in
321: figure~\ref{fig:bdd_nfact2} .
322:
323: \section{Heavy light chiral perturbation theory}
324:
325:
326: Our calculations will be based on
327: HQEFT \cite{neu}, which is a systematic $1/m_Q$ expansion in the
328: heavy quark mass $m_Q$.
329: The heavy quark field $Q(x) =b(x)$ (eventually $c(x)$ or
330: $\overline{c}$)
331: is replaced with a ``reduced''
332: field $Q_v^{(+)}(x)$ for a heavy quark, and $Q_v^{(-)}(x)$ for a heavy
333: antiquark. These are related to the full
334: field $Q(x)$ in the following way:
335: \begin{equation}
336: Q_v^{(\pm)}(x)=P_{\pm}e^{\mp im_Q v \cdot x} Q(x) \, ,
337: \end{equation}
338: where $P_\pm$ are projecting operators $P_\pm=(1 \pm \gamma \cdot
339: v)/2$.
340: The Lagrangian for heavy
341: quarks is:
342: \begin{equation}
343: {\cal L}_{HQEFT} = \pm \overline{Q_v^{(\pm)}} \, i v \cdot D \, Q_v^{(\pm)}
344: + {\cal O}(m_Q^{- 1}) \; ,
345: \label{LHQEFT}
346: \end{equation}
347: where $D_\mu$ is the covariant derivative containing the gluon field.
348: In \cite{ahjoeB} the $1/m_Q$ corrections were calculated for $B
349: -\overline{B}$ -mixing. In this paper these will not be considered.
350:
351: Integrating out the heavy and light quarks, the effective Lagrangian up
352: to ${\cal O}(m_Q^{-1})$ can be written as
353: \cite{itchpt,ahjoe}
354: \begin{equation}
355: {\cal L} = \mp Tr\left[\overline{H^{(\pm)}_{a}}
356: iv\cdot {\cal D}_{ba}
357: H^{(\pm)}_{b}\right]\, -\,
358: \ga \, Tr\left[\overline{H^{(\pm)}_{a}}H^{(\pm)}_{b}
359: \gamma_\mu\gamma_5 {\cal A}^\mu_{ba}\right]\,
360: ,\label{LS1}
361: \end{equation}
362: where
363: $H_a^{(\pm)}$ is the heavy meson field containing
364: a spin zero and spin one boson:
365: \begin{eqnarray}
366: &H_a^{(\pm)} & \eq P_{\pm} (P_{a \mu}^{(\pm)} \gamma^\mu -
367: i P_{a 5}^{(\pm)} \gamma_5) \; \; .
368: \label{barH}
369: \end{eqnarray}
370: The fields $P_M^{(+)}(P_M^{(-)})$ annihilates (creates) a heavy meson
371: (vector for $M=\mu$ and pseudoscalar for $M=5$) containing a heavy
372: quark (anti-quark) with velocity $v$.
373: Furthermore, $i{\cal D}^\mu_{ba}=i \delta_{ba} D^\mu-{\cal V}^\mu_{ba}$,
374: and $a,b$ are flavour indices.
375: The vector and axial vector fields ${\cal V}_{\mu}$ and ${\cal A}_{\mu}$
376: contain the field
377: $\xi$ (and its first derivative) which is a 3 by 3 matrix containing
378: the (would be) Goldstone octet ($\pi, K, \eta$) :
379: \begin{equation}
380: {\cal V}_{\mu}\eq \fr{i}{2}(\xi^\dagger\partial_\mu\xi
381: +\xi\partial_\mu\xi^\dagger
382: ) \quad ; \; \; \;
383: {\cal A}_\mu\eq - \fr{i}{2}
384: (\xi^\dagger\partial_\mu\xi
385: -\xi\partial_\mu\xi^\dagger) \quad , \; \; \; \xi\equiv exp{i(\Pi/f)}\,
386: \label{defVA}
387: \end{equation}
388: where $f$ is the bare pion coupling, and $\Pi$ is a 3 by 3 matrix
389: which contains the Goldstone bosons $\pi,K,\eta$ in the standard way.
390: The axial chiral coupling is
391: $\ga \simeq 0.6$. Eqs. (\ref{LS1}), (\ref{barH}), and (\ref{defVA}) will be
392: used for the chiral loop contributions.
393:
394:
395:
396: The simplest way to calculate the matrix element of four quark
397: operators like $Q_{1,2}$ in eq. (1) is by inserting vacuum
398: states between the two currents, as indicated in section II.
399: This vacuum insertion approach (VSA)
400: corresponds to bosonizing the two currents in $Q_{1,2}$ separately
401: and multiply them, i.e. the factorized case.
402: Based on the symmetry of HQEFT,
403: the bosonized current for decay of the $b \bar{q}$
404: system is \cite{itchpt,ahjoe}:
405: \begin{equation}
406: \overline{q_L} \,\gamma^\mu\, Q_{v}^{(+)} \; \longrightarrow \;
407: \fr{\alpha_H}{2} Tr\left[\xi^{\dagger} \gamma^\alpha
408: L \, H_{b}^{(+)} \right]
409: \; ,
410: \label{J(0)}
411: \end{equation}
412: where $Q_{v}^{(+)}$ is a heavy $b$-quark field, $v$ is its velocity, and
413: $H_{b}^{(+)}$ is the corresponding heavy meson field.
414: This bosonization has to be compared with the
415: matrix elements defining the meson decay
416: constants $f_H \, (H=B,D)$ are the same when QCD corrections below
417: $m_Q$ are neglected (see \cite{neu,ahjoe}):
418: \begin{equation}
419: \alpha_H = \frac{f_H\sqrt{M_H}}{(C_v + C_\gamma)} \; ,
420: \label{fb}
421: \end{equation}
422: where $C_{v,\gamma}$ are Wilson coefficients due to perturbative QCD
423: for scales $\mu < m_Q$
424: ($Q=b,c$ for $H=B,D$).
425: We take $\mu = \Lambda_\chi$, which is the scale where perturbative
426: QCD are matched to our hadronic matrix elements.
427:
428: For the $W$-boson materializing to a $\bar{D}$ we obtain the bosonized current
429: \begin{equation}
430: \overline{q_L} \gamma^\mu\ Q_{\bar{v}}^{(-)} \; \longrightarrow \;
431: \fr{\alpha_H}{2} Tr\left[\xi^\dagger \gamma^\alpha L
432: H_{\bar{c}}^{(-)} \right]
433: \; ,
434: \label{Jqc}
435: \end{equation}
436: where $\bar{v}$ is the velocity of the heavy $\bar{c}$ quark and
437: $H_{\bar{c}}^{(-)}$ is the corresponding field for the $\bar{D}$ meson.
438:
439: For the $b \rightarrow c$ transition, we obtain the bosonized current
440: \begin{equation}
441: \overline{Q_{v}^{(+)}} \,\gamma^\mu\, L Q_{v'}^{(+)}\; \longrightarrow \;
442: - \zeta(\omega) Tr\left[
443: \overline{H_c^{(+)}} \gamma^\alpha L H_{b}^{(+)} \right]
444: \; ,
445: \label{Jbc}
446: \end{equation}
447: where $\zeta(\omega)$ is the Isgur-Wise function
448: for the $\bar{B} \rightarrow D$ - transition, and $v'$ is the
449: velocity of the heavy $c$-quark.
450: Furthermore, $\omega \equiv v \cdot v'= v \cdot \bar{v} = M_B/(2M_D)$.
451: Note also that
452: from conservation of momentum we find
453: the relation between the heavy quark velocities:
454: \bea
455: p_{\bar{B}}= p_D + p_{\bar{D}} \; \; \Longrightarrow \; \;
456: v^\mu \; = \; \frac{M_D}{M_B} \, (v'+\bar{v})^\mu \; .
457: \eea
458:
459:
460: For the weak current for $D \bar{D}$ production
461: (corresponding to the factorizable annihilation mechanism) we obtain
462: \begin{equation}
463: \overline{Q_{v'}^{(+)}} \,\gamma^\mu\, L Q_{\bar{v}}^{(-)}\;
464: \longrightarrow \;
465: - \zeta(-\lambda) Tr\left[
466: \overline{H_c^{(+)}} \gamma^\alpha L H_{\bar{c}}^{(-)} \right]
467: \; ,
468: \label{Jcc}
469: \end{equation}
470: where $\lambda= \bar{v} \cdot v' = [M_B^2/(2M_D^2) -1]$.
471: The Isgur-Wise function $\zeta(-\lambda)$ in (\ref{Jcc}) is a complex
472: function, and not so well-known as for the $b \rightarrow c$
473: transition.
474: In the factorized limit, the matrix elements of the four quark
475: operators are obtained by multiplying the bosonized currents above.
476:
477:
478: In the following we will consider explicitely the decay mode
479: $\overline{B^0} \rightarrow D_s^+ D_s^-$. The analysis of
480: $\overline{B^0_s} \rightarrow D^+ D^-$ proceed the same way.
481: To calculate the chiral loop amplitudes
482: we need the (factorized) amplitudes for
483: $\overline{B_s^{*0}} \rightarrow D_s^+ D^{*-}$ and
484: $\overline{B^0} \rightarrow D^{*+} D^{*-}$, which proceed through the
485: spectator mechanism as in figure~\ref{fig:bdd_fact}.
486: The point is that the leading chiral coupling obtained from (\ref{LS1})
487: is a coupling between a pseudoscalar meson $H$, vector meson $H^*$
488: a light pseudoscalar $M$ ($=\pi, K, \eta$).
489: \begin{figure}[t]
490: \begin{center}
491: \epsfig{file=chiral1.ps,width=10cm}
492: \caption{Non-factorizable chiral loops for
493: $\overline{B^0} \rightarrow D_s^+ D_s^-$.}
494: \label{fig:chiral1}
495: \end{center}
496: \end{figure}
497: Using the bosonized currents in eqs. (\ref{Jqc}) and (\ref{Jbc}),
498: we obtain the following chiral loop amplitude for the process
499: $\overline{B^0} \rightarrow D_s^+ D_s^-$
500: from the figure~\ref{fig:chiral1}:
501: \bea
502: A(\overline{B^0} \rightarrow D_s^+ D_s^-)_\chi \, = \,
503: \left(V_{cd}^*/V_{cs}^*\right)
504: \, A(\overline{B_d^0} \rightarrow D_d^+ D_s^-)_F \cdot
505: \; R^\chi \; \, ,
506: \label{chiralR}
507: \eea
508: where the factorized amplitude
509: for the process $\overline{B^0} \rightarrow D^+ D_s^-$ is
510: \bea
511: A(\overline{B^0} \rightarrow D^+ D_s^-)_F =
512: -\frac{G_F}{{\sqrt 2}}V_{cb} V_{cs}^*
513: \, a_2 \,\zeta(\omega) f_D M_D
514: \sqrt{M_B M_D} \; (\lambda + \omega) \; \, .
515: \label{BDDF}
516: \eea
517: The quantity $R^\chi$ is a sum of contributions $R^\chi_{1,2}$
518: from the left and right
519: part of figure~\ref{fig:chiral1} respectively.
520: In the $\overline{MS}$ scheme the results for $R^\chi_{1,2}$
521: are
522: \begin{eqnarray}
523: R^\chi_1 \; = \;
524: &&\fr{m_K^2}{2 (4\pi f)^2} \ga^2\left[\left\{2
525: \frac{(\omega+1)}{(\omega+\lambda)}\,r(-\omega)- 1\right\}
526: \ln\left(\fr{m_K^2}{\Lambda_\chi^2}\right)- 1\right] \; , \\
527: R^\chi_2 \; = \;
528: &&\fr{m_K^2}{2 (4\pi f)^2} \ga^2 \left[\left\{2
529: \frac{(\omega+1)}{(\lambda+\omega)}\,r(-\lambda)- 1\right\}
530: \ln\left(\fr{m_K^2}{\Lambda_\chi^2}\right)- 1\right] \; .
531: \end{eqnarray}
532: Adding these two contributions we find :
533: \begin{eqnarray}
534: R^\chi \; = \;
535: &&\fr{m_K^2}{(4\pi f)^2}\ga^2\left[\left\{
536: \frac{(\omega+1)}{(\omega+\lambda)}\, [r(-\omega)+r(-\lambda)]
537: - 1\right\}
538: \ln\left(\fr{m_K^2}{\Lambda_\chi^2}\right)- 1 \right]
539: \label{chiralT}
540: \end{eqnarray}
541: As usual, the $1/N_c$ suppression is due to $f^2 \sim N_c$.
542: The function $r(x)$ is also appearing in loop calculations
543: \cite{GKMW,Fleischer} of the
544: anomalous dimension in HQEFT (for $x > 1$ and $x< -1$ respectively):
545: \begin{equation}
546: r(x) \equiv \fr{1}{\sqrt{x^2-1}}\,
547: \text{ln}\left(x+\sqrt{x^2-1}\right) \quad , \; \; \;
548: r(-x)= -r(x) + \fr{i \pi}{\sqrt{x^2-1}} \, \; ,
549: \end{equation}
550: which means that the amplitude
551: gets an imaginary part.
552: Numerically, we find
553: \bea
554: R^\chi \;\simeq \; 0.12 - 0.26 i \; .
555: \label{XNum}
556: \eea
557:
558:
559: \section{Non-factorizable soft gluon emission }
560:
561: The genuine non-factorizable part (see eqs. (\ref{QFierz}),
562: (\ref{QCol}) and (\ref{QNFact}) )
563: can, within the framework presented in this section, be written in a
564: quasi-factorized way
565: in terms of matrix elements of coulored currents:
566: \begin{eqnarray}
567: \langle D_s^+ D_s^- | {\cal L}_W| \overline{B^0} \rangle_{NF}^G \, = \,
568: 8 C_2 \,
569: \langle D_s^+ D_s^-|\overline{c}_L \gamma_\mu t^a c_L |G \rangle
570: \langle G |\overline{d}_L \gamma^\mu t^a b_L |\overline{B^0} \rangle
571: \; ,
572: \label{QGlue}
573: \end{eqnarray}
574: where a $G$ in the bra-kets symbolizes emision of one gluon
575: (from each current) as vizualized in figure \ref{fig:bdd_nfact2}.
576: \begin{figure}[t]
577: \begin{center}
578: \epsfig{file=bdd_nfact2.ps,width=8cm}
579: \caption{Non-factorizable contribution for
580: $\overline{B^0} \rightarrow D_s^+ D_s^-$
581: through the annihilation mechanism with additional soft gluon emision.
582: The wavy lines represent soft
583: gluons ending in vacuum to make gluon condensates.}
584: \label{fig:bdd_nfact2}
585: \end{center}
586: \end{figure}
587: We observe that the annihilation mechanism amplitude
588: in the
589: non-factorizable case has the numerically favourable Wilson coefficient $C_2$.
590:
591: In order to calculate the matrix elements (\ref{QGlue}), we will use
592: a model which incorporates emision of soft gluons modelled by a gluon
593: condensate. This will be the Heavy Light
594: Chiral Quark Model (HL$\chi$QM) recently developed in \cite{ahjoe}.
595: This model belongs to a class of models extensively studied in the
596: literature \cite{chiqm,barhi,itCQM,effr,ebert3,bijnes}.
597: For details we refer to ref. \cite{ahjoe}.
598:
599:
600: The Lagrangian for the HL$\chi$QM is
601: \begin{equation}
602: {\cal L}_{\text{HL$\chi$QM}} = {\cal L}_{\text{HQEFT}} + {\cal L}_{\chi\text{QM}} + {\cal L}_{\text{Int}} \; .
603: \label{totlag}
604: \end{equation}
605: The first term is given in equation (\ref{LHQEFT}).
606: The light quark sector is described by the Chiral Quark Model ($\chi$QM),
607: having a standard QCD term and a term describing interactions between
608: quarks and (Goldstone) mesons:
609: \begin{equation}
610: {\cal L}_{\chi\text{QM}} =
611: \chibar \left[\gamma^\mu (i D_\mu + {\cal V}_{\mu} +
612: \gamma_5 {\cal A}_{\mu}) - m \right]\chi \; .
613: \label{chqmR}
614: \end{equation}
615: Here $m$ is the SU(3) invariant constituent light quark mass, and
616: $\chi$ is the flavour rotated quark fields given by
617: $\chi_L = \xi^\dagger q_L \; \; , \; \chi_R = \xi q_R$,
618: where $q^T = (u,d,s)$ are the light quark fields. The left- and
619: right-handed
620: projections $q_L$ and $q_R$ are transforming after $SU(3)_L$ and $SU(3)_R$
621: respectively. In (\ref{chqmR}) we have discarded terms involving the light
622: current quark mass which is irrelevant in the present paper.
623: The covariant derivative $D_\mu$ in (\ref{chqmR})
624: contains the soft gluon field forming the gluon condensates. The gluon
625: condensate contributions are calculated by Feynman diagram techniques
626: as in \cite{ahjoe,EHP,ahjoeB,epb,BEF}. They may also be calculated
627: by means of heat kernel techniques as in \cite{pider,bijnes,ebert3}.
628:
629:
630:
631: The interaction between heavy meson fields and heavy quarks are
632: described by the following Lagrangian \cite{ahjoe}:
633: \begin{equation}
634: {\cal L}_{Int} =
635: - G_H \, \left[ \chibar_a \, \overline{H_a^{(\pm)}}
636: \, Q^{(\pm)}_{v} \,
637: + \overline{Q_{v}^{(\pm)}} \, H_a^{(\pm)} \, \chi_a \right] \; ,
638: \label{Int}
639: \end{equation}
640: where
641: $G_H \sim \sqrt{2 m}/f$ is a coupling constant.
642: In \cite{ahjoe} it was shown
643: how (\ref{LS1}) could be obtained from the HL$\chi$QM.
644: Performing this bosonization of the HL$\chi$QM, one encounters divergent loop
645: integrals which will in general be quadratic-, linear- and
646: logarithmic divergent \cite{ahjoe}.
647: Also, as in the
648: light sector \cite{BEF} the quadratic and logarithmic integrals are
649: related to the quark condensate and the gluon condensate respectively.
650:
651: Within the model, one finds the following expression for the Isgur-Wise
652: function \cite{ahjoe}
653: \begin{equation}\label{iw}
654: \zeta(\omega)= \fr{2}{1+\omega} \left(1-\rho \right)+
655: \rho \, r(\omega)\, ,
656: \end{equation}
657: where $\rho$ is a hadronic parameter giving the deviation from the
658: leading value \cite{ahjoe}:
659: \begin{equation}
660: G_H^2 = \fr{2m}{f^2} \, \rho \; \, ,
661: \quad
662: \rho \, \eq \, \fr{(1 + 3g_{\cal A}) +
663: \frac{\mu_G^2}{\eta \, m^2}}{4 (1 + \frac{N_c m^2}{8 \pi f^2} )}
664: \quad , \; \; \; \mu_G^2(H) \, = \, \frac{3}{2} m_Q (M_{H^*} - M_H) ,
665: \label{rho}
666: \end{equation}
667: where $\eta= (1+ 2/\pi)$. Numerically, the deviation of $\rho$
668: one is of order $10\%$.
669: The simple expression in (\ref{iw}) is
670: modified by perturbative QCD corrections down to
671: $\mu= \Lambda_\chi$ (analogous to eq. (\ref{fb})) and chiral loop corrections.
672: Our model dependent expression $\zeta(\omega)$ in (\ref{iw}) give a
673: good description of the Isgur-Wise function.
674:
675: The left part in figure~\ref{fig:bdd_fact2} with gluon emision
676: gives us the bosonized coloured current :
677: \bea
678: \left(\overline{q_L} \, t^a \,\gamma^\alpha \, Q_{v_B}^{(+)}\right)_{1G}
679: \; \longrightarrow \;
680: - \fr{G_H \, g_s}{64 \pi} \,G_{\mu\nu}^a
681: \;Tr\left[\xi^\dagger \gamma^\alpha L \, H_b^{(+)}
682: \left( \sigma^{\mu\nu} \, - \,
683: \fr{2 \pi f^2}{m^2 \, N_c} \{\sigma^{\mu\nu},
684: \gamma \cdot v \} \,
685: \right)\right] \; ,
686: \label{1G}
687: \eea
688: where $G^a_{\mu \nu}$ is the octet gluon tensor, and
689: $H_b^{(+)}$ represents the heavy $\bar{B}$-meson fields.
690: Similarly the (heavy) $D$- and $\bar{D}$-mesons are represented by
691: $H_c^{(+)}$ and $H_{\bar{c}}^{(-)}$ corresponding to a heavy quark field
692: $Q_{v'}^{(+)}$ and heavy anti-quak field $Q_{\bar{v}}^{(-)}$ respectively.
693: The symbol $\{\; , \; \}$ denotes the anti-commutator.
694:
695: For the creation of a $D \bar{D}$ pair in the right part of figure
696: \ref{fig:bdd_fact2}, the analogue of (\ref{1G}) is
697: \bea
698: \left(\overline{Q_{v'}^{(+)}} \,t^a \;
699: \gamma^\alpha \, L Q_{\bar{v}}^{(-)}\right)_{1G} \;
700: \; \longrightarrow \;
701: \fr{G_H^2 \, g_s}{32 \pi}\,G_{\mu\nu}^a
702: \;Tr\left[ \overline{H_c^{(+)}} \; \gamma^\alpha \, L \,
703: H_{\bar{c}}^{(-)} \right. \nonumber \\
704: \left. \times \left( \frac{\widetilde{r}}{\pi} \sigma^{\mu\nu}
705: \, + \, \frac{1}{4 m (\lambda-1)}
706: \left\{\sigma^{\mu\nu}, \gamma \cdot t \right\} \,
707: \right)\right] \; ,
708: \label{1Gc}
709: \eea
710: where $\, t=v'-\bar{v} \,$, and $\widetilde{r} \equiv r(-\lambda)$.
711: Multiplying the currents in eqs. (\ref{1G}) and (\ref{1Gc}),
712: and using the replacement:
713: \begin{equation}
714: g_s^2 G_{\mu \nu}^a G_{\alpha \beta}^a \; \rightarrow 4 \pi^2
715: \gc \frac{1}{12} (g_{\mu \alpha} g_{\nu \beta} -
716: g_{\mu \beta} g_{\nu \alpha} ) \, ,
717: \label{gluecond}
718: \end{equation}
719: we obtain the bosonized version for the operator $\widetilde{Q_1}$
720: in eq. (\ref{QCol}) (see also eq. (\ref{QGlue})) as the product of two
721: traces. (The expression may be simplified by using the Dirac algebra, but we do
722: not enter these details here).
723:
724: Taking the pseudoscalar parts of (\ref{1G}) and (\ref{1Gc}),
725: we find the gluon condensate contribution
726: for $\overline{B^0} \rightarrow D_s^+ D_s^-$
727: within our model:
728: \bea
729: A(\overline{B^0} \rightarrow D_s^+ D_s^-)_G =
730: C_2 \gc \;
731: \fr{(G_H \sqrt{M_B})^3}{384 m}
732: \left(1 + \,
733: \frac{3 \, \widetilde{r}}{\pi} \right) \; .
734: \label{B2DD}
735: \eea
736: (For our algebraic manipulations, the
737: program FORM \cite{Verm} was useful).
738: The ratio between this amplitude and the factorized one in
739: (\ref{BDDF}) scales as $M_D/(N_c M_B)$ times
740: hadronic parameters calculated within HL$\chi$QM.
741: We define a quantity $R^G$ for the gluon
742: condensate amplitude analogously to $R^\chi$ in (\ref{chiralR})
743: and (\ref{chiralT})
744: for chiral loops.
745: Numerically, we find that the ratio between the two amplitudes
746: in (\ref{B2DD}) and (\ref{BDDF}) is
747: \bea
748: R_G \; \simeq \; 0.055 + 0.16 i \; ,
749: \label{RNum}
750: \eea
751: which is of order one third of the chiral loop contribution in
752: eq. (\ref{chiralT}).
753:
754: \section{ Discussion and Results}
755:
756: Our amplitude is complex as expected. In the chiral loop amplitude
757: these are due to physical cuts (exchanges of physical particles)
758: to the one-loop order we consider in this paper.
759: The Wilson coefficients turn complex when the
760: c-quark is treated \cite{GKMW,Fleischer} within HQEFT. This is also the
761: case for the matrix elements that
762: these Wilson coefficients should be matched to.
763: There is a potential problem with a quark model without
764: confinement that the amplitude
765: may get an imaginary part due to production of free quarks.
766: Still, within HQEFT one can hardly
767: distinguish $m_c$ from $M_D$ because of the reparametrization
768: invariance.
769: Thus, at the present stage, it is not clear
770: how well our model describes imaginary matrix elements, and we will
771: not go into such details here, as the numerical consequences turn out
772: to be minor.
773:
774:
775: Adding the amplitudes $R_\chi$ and $R_G$ and multiplying with the
776: Wilson coefficient \cite{GKMW,Fleischer} $a_2 \simeq 1.33 + 0.2 i$,
777: we obtain the quantity:
778: \bea
779: \label{Tres}
780: \widetilde{R_T} \, \equiv \,
781: a_2 \, (R_\chi + R_G) \; \simeq 0.26 - 0.11 i \; .
782: \eea
783: Dropping the imaginary parts of the three quantities would give
784: instead the value $\simeq 0.25$. Anyway,
785: we have found that the amplitude for
786: $\overline{B^0} \rightarrow D_s^+ D_s^-$ is of order $15-20 \%$
787: of the factorizable amplitude for
788: $\overline{B^0} \rightarrow D^+ D_s^-$, before the different KM-factors are
789: taken into account.
790: We obtain the branching ratios
791: \bea
792: \label{Brd}
793: BR(\overline{B^0_d} \to D_s^+ D_s^-) \, = \,
794: 6.5 \times 10^{-5} \times |\frac{V_{cb}}{0.041} \, \frac{V^*_{cd}}{0.223}
795: \, \frac{\widetilde{R_T}}{0.25}\, \frac{\zeta(\omega)}{0.9} |^2
796: \eea
797: and
798: \begin{equation}
799: \label{Brs}
800: BR(\overline{B^0_s} \to D^+ D^-) \, = \, 8.9 \times 10^{-4} \times
801: |\frac{V_{cb}}{0.041} \, \frac{V^*_{cs}}{0.974} \,
802: \frac{\widetilde{R_T}}{0.25} \, \frac{\zeta(\omega)}{0.9} |^2
803: \end{equation}
804: The difference between the branching ratios is mainly due to the difference in
805: KM factor.
806: Taking into account the comments above, we end up with the conclusion that
807: \bea
808: \label{BR}
809: BR(\overline{B^0_d} \to D_s^+ D_s^-) \simeq
810: 7 \times 10^{-5} \; \; , \text{and} \quad
811: BR(\overline{B^0_s} \to D_s^+ D_s^-) \simeq 1 \times 10^{-3} \; \; .
812: \eea
813:
814: The ongoing searches at Belle might soon give the limit on the rate
815: $\overline{B^0} \to D_s^+ D_s^-$, while the detection of the
816: $\overline{B_s^0}$ mode might be presently
817: more difficult due to troubles with $\overline{B_s^0}$ identification.
818:
819:
820: \vspace{1cm}
821: S.F. thanks P. Kri\v{z}an and B. Golob
822: for fruitful discussion
823:
824: \bibliographystyle{unsrt}
825: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
826:
827: %\bibitem{Exp}
828: %Experimental reference?
829:
830: \bibitem{BBNS}
831: M. Beneke, G. Buchalla, M. Neubert, C.T. Sachrajda {\it Phys. Rev.
832: Lett.} {\bf 83} (1999) 1914.
833: %-1917.
834:
835: \bibitem{PhaCo}
836: P. Colangelo, F. De Fazio, and T.N. Pham,
837: {\it Phys. Lett.} {\bf B 542} (2002) 71. \\
838: %-79.\\
839: C. Isola, M. Ladisa, G. Nardulli, T.N. Pham, and P. Santorelli,\\
840: {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D 65} (2002) 094005.
841:
842:
843: \bibitem{EFZ}
844: J.O. Eeg, S. Fajfer, J. Zupan, {\it Phys. Rev. } {\bf D 64} (2001) 034010.
845:
846: \bibitem{ahjoe} A.~Hiorth and J.~O.~Eeg, {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D 66}
847: (2002) 074001.
848:
849:
850: \bibitem{neu} For a review, see
851: M.~Neubert, {\it Phys. Rep.} {\bf 245} (1994) 259.
852:
853: \bibitem{EHP}
854: J.~O.~Eeg, A.~Hiorth, A.~D.~Polosa,
855: {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D 65} (2002) 054030.
856:
857: \bibitem{ahjoeB}
858: A.~Hiorth and J.~O.~Eeg,
859: {\it Eur.Phys.J.direct} {\bf C30} (2003) 006.
860:
861: \bibitem{GKMW}
862: B. Grinstein, W.~Kilian, T.~Mannel, and M.B. Wise, {\it Nucl. Phys.} {\bf B363}
863: (1991) 19.
864: %-33.
865:
866: \bibitem{Fleischer}
867: R. Fleischer, {\it Nucl. Phys.} {\bf B 412} (1994) 201.
868: %-224.
869:
870:
871: \bibitem{itchpt} R.~Casalbuoni, A.~Deandrea, N.~Di~Bartelomeo,
872: R.~Gatto, F.~Feruglio and G.~Nardulli, \\
873: {\it Phys. Rep.} {\bf 281} (1997) 145.\\
874: J.L. Goity,, {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D46} (1992) 3929.
875: %-3936 .
876:
877:
878: \bibitem{chiqm}
879: J.~A.~Cronin, {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf 161} (1967) 1483, \\
880: S.~Weinberg, {\it Physica} {\bf 96A} (1979) 327, \\
881: D.~Ebert and M.K.~Volkov, {\it Z. Phys.} {\bf C 16}(1983) 205, \\
882: A.~Manohar and H.~Georgi, {\it Nucl. Phys.} {\bf B234}(1984) 189, \\
883: J.~Bijnens, H.~Sonoda and M.B.~Wise, {\it Can. J. Phys.} {\bf 64} (1986) 1, \\
884: D.~Ebert and H.~Reinhardt, {\it Nucl. Phys.} {\bf B71}(1986) 188, \\
885: D.~I.~Diakonov, V.~Yu.~Petrov and P.~V.~Pobylitsa,
886: {\it Nucl. Phys.} {\bf B306}(1988) 809, \\
887: D.~Espriu, E.~de~Rafael and J.~Taron, {\it Nucl. Phys.} {\bf B345} (1990) 22.
888:
889: \bibitem{barhi}
890: W.~A.~Bardeen and C.~T.~Hill, {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D49} (1994) 409 .
891:
892: \bibitem{itCQM}
893: A.~Deandrea, N.~Di~Bartelomeo, R.~Gatto, G.~Nardulli, and A.~D.~Polosa, \\
894: {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf D58} (1998) 034004.
895: A.~Polosa, {\it Riv. Nuovo Ceimento} {\bf 23 N11} (2000) 1.
896:
897: \bibitem{effr}
898: D.~Ebert, T.~Feldmann R.~Friedrich and H.~Reinhardt,
899: {\it Nucl. Phys.} {\bf B434} (1995) 619.
900:
901:
902: \bibitem{ebert3} D.~Ebert and M.K.~Volkov, {\it Phys.Lett.} {\bf B 272}
903: (1991), 86.
904:
905:
906: \bibitem{bijnes} J.~Bijnens, {\it Phys. Rept.} {\bf 265} (1996).
907:
908:
909: \bibitem{epb}
910: J.~O.~Eeg and I.~Picek, {\it Phys. Lett.} {\bf B301} (1993) 423,
911: %J.~O.~Eeg and I.~Picek, {\it Phys. Lett.}
912: {\it ibid.} {\bf B323} (1994) 193, \\
913: A.E.~Bergan and J.O.~Eeg, {\it Phys. Lett.} {\bf390} (1997) 420.
914:
915:
916: \bibitem{BEF}
917: S.~Bertolini, J.O.~Eeg and M.~Fabbrichesi,
918: {\it Nucl. Phys.} {\bf B449} (1995) 197, \\
919: V.~Antonelli, S.~Bertolini, J.O.~Eeg,
920: M.~Fabbrichesi and E.I.~Lashin, \\
921: {\it Nucl. Phys.} {\bf B469} (1996) 143,
922: %\\
923: S.~Bertolini, J.O.~Eeg,
924: M.~Fabbrichesi and E.I.~Lashin, \\
925: {\it Nucl. Phys.} {\bf B514} (1998) 63,
926: % \\
927: {\it ibid} {\bf B514} (1998) 93.
928:
929:
930: \bibitem{pider}
931: A.~Pich and E.~de Rafael, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B358} (1991) 311.
932:
933:
934: \bibitem{Verm}
935: J.A.M. Vermaseren, ``Symbloic Manipulation with FORM'', \\
936: CAN 1991, Amsterdam. (ISBN 90-74116-01-9).
937:
938:
939: \end{thebibliography}
940:
941: \end{document}
942:
943:
944:
945:
946:
947:
948:
949:
950:
951:
952:
953:
954:
955:
956:
957:
958: