1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: \documentclass[11pt]{article}
3: %\documentstyle[12pt,axodraw]{article}
4: %\documentstyle[prd,twocolumn,eqsecnum,aps]{revtex}
5: %\documentstyle[prd,eqsecnum,aps,epsf]{revtex}
6:
7: \usepackage{epsfig}
8: %\usepackage{latexsym,axodraw}
9:
10: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
11:
12: %usepackage{amsmath}
13:
14: %usepackage{graphicx}
15:
16: %usepackage{amsthm}
17:
18: %\usepackage[italian]{babel}
19:
20: %\usepackage[small,sl]{caption}
21:
22: %usepackage{amsfonts}
23:
24: %usepackage{amssymb}
25:
26:
27: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
28:
29: \topmargin -0.5in
30: \oddsidemargin 0.3in
31: \evensidemargin 0.3in
32: \textwidth 16.0cm
33: \textheight 22cm
34: \headsep 0.5in
35:
36: %------------------------------
37: \newcommand{\gsim}{\mbox{\raisebox{-1.ex}{$\stackrel
38: {\textstyle>}{\textstyle\sim}$}}}
39: \newcommand{\lsim}{\mbox{\raisebox{-1.ex}{$\stackrel
40: {\textstyle<}{\textstyle \sim}$}}}
41: \newcommand{\square}{\kern1pt\vbox{\hrule height
42: 1.2pt\hbox{\vrule width 1.2pt\hskip 3pt
43: \vbox{\vskip 6pt}\hskip 3pt\vrule width 0.6pt}\hrule
44: height 0.6pt}\kern1pt}
45:
46: \newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}
47: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}
48: \newcommand{\beqa}{\begin{eqnarray}}
49: \newcommand{\eeqa}{\end{eqnarray}}
50: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{array}}
51: \newcommand{\ena}{\end{array}}
52: \newcommand{\vect}[1]{\!\!\!\mbox{ \boldmath $#1$}}
53:
54: %\textheight 8.0in
55: %\textwidth 5in
56: %\hoffset-1cm
57: %\voffset-2.2cm
58: %\def\baselinestretch{1.2}
59: %\def\s{1.5}
60:
61: %
62: \def\al{\alpha^{\prime}}
63: \def\a{& \hspace{-7pt}}
64: \newcommand\tw[2]{
65: \Bigg(\hspace{-1pt}\raisebox{1pt}
66: {$\begin{array}{c}
67: \displaystyle{#1} \\ \displaystyle{#2}
68: \end{array}$}
69: \hspace{-1pt}\Bigg)}
70: \newcommand\pertw[4]{
71: \Bigg[\hspace{-1pt}\raisebox{1pt}
72: {$\begin{array}{c}
73: \displaystyle{#1} \\ \displaystyle{#2}
74: \end{array}$}
75: \hspace{0pt}\Bigg|\hspace{0pt}\raisebox{1pt}
76: {$\begin{array}{c}
77: \displaystyle{#3} \\ \displaystyle{#4}
78: \end{array}$}
79: \hspace{-1pt}\Bigg]}
80: \newcommand{\eqalign}[1]
81: {\hspace{-10pt}\begin{array}{ll}#1\end{array}\hspace{-10pt}}
82: \def\dslash{\raisebox{1pt}{$\slash$} \hspace{-7pt} \partial}
83: \def\Aslash{\hspace{3pt}\raisebox{1pt}{$\slash$} \hspace{-9pt} A}
84: \def\Dslash{\hspace{3pt}\raisebox{1pt}{$\slash$} \hspace{-9pt} D}
85: \def\bea{\begin{eqnarray}}
86: \def\eea{\end{eqnarray}}
87: \def\beq{\begin{equation}}
88: \def\eeq{\end{equation}}
89: \def\kron{\delta_{m_in_i + N-\bar N}}
90: \def\be{\begin{equation}}
91: \def\ee{\end{equation}}
92: \def\nn{\nonumber}
93: \def\a{& \hspace{-7pt}}
94: \def\c{\hspace{-5pt}}
95: \def\Z{{\bf Z}}
96: \def\z{{\bf Z^\prime}}
97: \def\5{\overline 5}
98: %
99: \begin{document}
100:
101: \thispagestyle{empty}
102:
103: \begin{center}
104: \begin{center}
105:
106: \vspace{1.7cm}
107:
108: {\LARGE\bf Introductory Review of Cosmic Inflation}
109:
110: \end{center}
111:
112: \vspace{1.4cm}
113:
114: {\large Shinji
115: Tsujikawa\footnote{email:
116: shinji@resceu.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp,
117: shinji@gravity.phys.waseda.ac.jp}}\\
118:
119: \vspace{1.2cm}
120:
121: {\em Research Center for the Early Universe, University of Tokyo,} \\
122: {\em Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan}
123:
124: \vspace{.3cm}
125:
126: \end{center}
127:
128: \vspace{0.8cm}
129:
130:
131: \vspace{3cm}
132:
133: \centerline{\Large Abstract}
134: \vspace{3 mm}
135: \begin{quote}\small
136: These lecture notes provide an introduction to cosmic inflation. In
137: particular I will review the basic concepts of inflation, generation of
138: density perturbations, and reheating after inflation.
139: \end{quote}
140:
141: \vfill
142: \newpage
143:
144: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
145: \section{Preface}
146: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
147:
148: These lecture notes are based on invited lectures at The Second Tah Poe
149: School on Cosmology ``Modern Cosmology",
150: Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand, April 17 -25, 2003.
151: See the web page
152:
153: {\tt http://www.tech.port.ac.uk/staffweb/gumjudpb/TPC2FIRSTpage.html} \\
154: for the details of this school and conference.
155:
156:
157: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
158: \section{Introduction}
159: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
160:
161: The proposal of General
162: Relativity by Einstein in 1915 made it possible to discuss the structure of
163: spacetime and the evolution of the universe in terms of physical laws. In
164: 1922 Friedmann found the existence of expanding/collapsing cosmological
165: solutions by solving the Einstein field equations. In 1929 Hubble
166: discovered the expansion of the universe by the observations in the
167: redshift of galaxies, as the Einstein theory predicts. In 1946 Gamov and
168: his collaborators showed that the universe must begin in a very hot and
169: dense state from the theory of nucleosynthesis. They also predicted that
170: the present universe should be filled with the microwaves with black body
171: radiations. In 1965 Penzias and Wilson discovered microwave background
172: radiations which coincide well with theoretical predictions by Gamov {\it et
173: al.}. These strong observational evidences have made people believe that the
174: universe started out from a hot and dense state, which is called as the
175: standard big-bang model.
176:
177: In standard big-bang cosmology the state of the universe is characterized
178: by the radiation-dominated or the matter-dominated stage.
179: These correspond to the decelerated expansion of the universe
180: where the second derivative of the scale factor is negative.
181: Meanwhile this decelerated
182: expansion is not sufficient to solve a number of cosmological problems such
183: as flatness and horizon problems which plagues in the standard big-bang
184: scenario\footnote{In the next section I will explain how inflation solves
185: these problems.}. In order to overcome these fundamental problems, it is
186: required to consider an epoch of accelerated expansion in the early
187: universe, {\it i.e.}, {\it inflation}.
188:
189: The basic ideas of inflation were originally proposed
190: by Guth \cite{Guth} and Sato \cite{Sato} independently in 1981,
191: which is now termed as {\it old inflation}\footnote{Note that a specific
192: version of the inflationary scenario--so called $R^2$ inflation-- was
193: proposed by Starobinsky one year earlier \cite{Star}. Nevertheless this did
194: not explicitly point out the virtue of inflation as in the paper of Guth.}.
195: This corresponds to the de-Sitter inflation which makes use of the
196: first-order transition to true vacuum. However, it has a serious
197: shortcoming that the universe becomes inhomogeneous by the bubble
198: collision soon after the inflation ends. The revised version was proposed
199: by Linde \cite{Linde82}, and Albrecht and Steinhardt \cite{AS82} in 1982,
200: which is dubbed as {\it new inflation}. This corresponds to the slow-roll
201: inflation with the second-order transition to true vacuum. Unfortunately
202: this scenario also suffers from a fine-tuning problem of spending enough
203: time in false vacuum to lead to sufficient amount of inflation. In 1983
204: Linde \cite{Linde83} considered the variant version of the slow-roll
205: inflation called {\it chaotic inflation}, in which initial conditions of
206: scalar fields are chaotic. According to this model, our homogeneous and
207: isotropic universe may be produced in the regions where inflation occurs
208: sufficiently. While old and new inflation models are based on the
209: assumption that the universe was in a state of thermal equilibrium from the
210: beginning, chaotic inflation can occur even without such an assumption. In
211: addition chaotic inflation can start out in the regime close to Planck
212: density, thereby solving the problem of initial conditions.
213:
214: Many kinds of inflationary models have been constructed in these twenty
215: years (see {\it e.g.,} ref.~\cite{Linde,LL}). In particular, the recent trend
216: is to construct consistent models of inflation based on superstring or
217: supergravity models. See ref.~\cite{LR99} for a review in such a direction.
218:
219: The inflationary paradigm not only provides an excellent way in solving
220: flatness and horizon problems but also generates density perturbations as
221: seeds for large scale structure in the universe \cite{inper}. In fact
222: inflation provides a causal mechanism to generate nearly scale-invariant
223: spectra of cosmological perturbations. Quantum fluctuations of the field
224: driving inflation--called {\em inflaton}-- are
225: typically frozen by the accelerating expansion when the scales of
226: fluctuations leave the Hubble radius. Long after the inflation ends, the
227: scales cross inside the Hubble radius again. Thus perturbations imprinted
228: during inflation can be the origin of large-scale structure in the
229: universe. In fact temperature anisotropies observed by the COBE satellite
230: in 1992 exhibit nearly scale-invariant spectra as predicted by the
231: inflationary paradigm. Recent observations of WMAP also show strong
232: evidence for inflation \cite{Bennett:2003bz}.
233:
234: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
235: \section{The standard big-bang cosmology and its problems}
236: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
237:
238: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
239: \subsection{The standard big-bang cosmology}
240: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
241:
242: The standard big-bang cosmology is based on
243: the cosmological principle \cite{LL}, which means that the universe is
244: homogeneous and isotropic on large distance.
245: Then the metric takes the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) form:
246: \beqa
247: ds^2=g_{\mu\nu}dx^{\mu}dx^{\nu}= -dt^2+a^2(t)\left[\frac{dr^2}{1-Kr^2}+
248: r^2(d\theta^2+\sin^2\theta d \phi^2) \right].
249: \label{2_1_1}
250: \eeqa
251: Here $a(t)$ is the scale factor with $t$ being the cosmic time.
252: The constant $K$ is the spatial curvature, where positive, zero, and negative
253: values correspond to closed, flat, and open universes, respectively.
254:
255: The evolution of the universe is dependent on the material within it. This is
256: characterized by the equation of state between the energy density $\rho(t)$
257: and the pressure $p(t)$.
258: Typical examples are :
259: \beqa
260: p&=&\rho/3\,,~~~~~~{\rm radiation}\,, \\
261: p&=&0\,,~~~~~~~~~{\rm dust}\,.
262: \label{2_1_2}
263: \eeqa
264: In order to know the dynamical evolution of the universe, it is required to
265: solve the Einstein equations in General Relativity.
266: The Einstein equations are expressed as \cite{Weinberg,Gravitation}
267: \beqa
268: G_{\mu \nu} \equiv R_{\mu\nu}-\frac12 g_{\mu\nu} R=
269: 8\pi G T_{\mu\nu}-\Lambda
270: g_{\mu\nu},
271: \label{2_1_3}
272: \eeqa
273: where $R_{\mu\nu}$, $R$, $T_{\mu\nu}$, and
274: $G$ are the Ricci tensor, Ricci scalar, energy momentum tensor,
275: gravitational constant, respectively. The Planck energy,
276: $m_{\rm pl}=1.2211 \times 10^{19}$\,GeV, is related with $G$ through the
277: relation $m_{\rm pl}=(\hbar c^5/G)^{1/2}$. Here
278: $\hbar$ and $c$ are the Planck's constant and the speed of light,
279: respectively.
280: Hereafter we use the units $\hbar=c=1$.
281: $\Lambda$ is a cosmological constant
282: originally introduced by Einstein.
283:
284: For the background metric (\ref{2_1_1}) with a negligible cosmological
285: constant, the Einstein equations (\ref{2_1_3}) yield
286: \beqa
287: H^2=\frac{8\pi}{3m_{\rm pl}^2}\rho-\frac{K}{a^2}\,,
288: \label{2_1_4}
289: \eeqa
290: \beqa
291: \dot{\rho}+3H(\rho+p)=0\,,
292: \label{2_1_5}
293: \eeqa
294: where a dot denotes the derivative with respect to $t$, and $H \equiv
295: \dot{a}/a$ is the Hubble expansion rate. Eqs.~(\ref{2_1_4}) and
296: (\ref{2_1_5}) are so called the Friedmann and Fluid equations,
297: respectively. Combining these relations gives the following equation,
298: \beqa
299: \frac{\ddot{a}}{a}=-\frac{4\pi}{3m_{\rm pl}^2} (\rho+3p)\,.
300: \label{2_1_6}
301: \eeqa
302: The Friedmann equation (\ref{2_1_4}) can be rewritten as
303: \beqa
304: \Omega-1=\frac{K}{a^2H^2}\,,
305: \label{2_1_7}
306: \eeqa
307: where
308: \beqa
309: \Omega \equiv \frac{\rho}{\rho_c},~~~~~{\rm with}
310: ~~~~~\rho_c \equiv \frac{3H^2m_{\rm pl}^2}{8\pi}\,.
311: \label{2_1_8}
312: \eeqa
313: Here the density parameter $\Omega$ is the ratio of the energy density to the
314: critical density.
315: When the spatial geometry is flat ($K=0$),
316: the solutions for Eqs.~(\ref{2_1_4}) and (\ref{2_1_5}) are
317: \beqa
318: {\rm Radiation~~dominant}:~~~~~a \propto t^{1/2}\,,~~~~~
319: \rho \propto a^{-4}\,, \\
320: {\rm Dust~~dominant}:~~~~~a \propto t^{2/3}\,,~~~~~\rho \propto a^{-3}\,.
321: \label{2_1_9}
322: \eeqa
323: In these simple cases, the universe is
324: expanding deceleratedly ($\ddot{a}<0$) as confirmed by Eq.~(\ref{2_1_6}).
325:
326: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
327: \subsection{Problems of the standard big-bang cosmology}
328: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
329:
330: \subsubsection{Flatness problem}
331:
332: In the standard big-bang theory with $\ddot{a}<0$,
333: the $a^2H^2 (=\dot{a}^2)$ term in
334: Eq.~(\ref{2_1_7}) always decreases. This indicates that $\Omega$
335: tends to shift away from unity with the expansion of the universe.
336: However, since present observations suggest that $\Omega$ is within the
337: order of magnitude of one \cite{Bennett:2003bz}, $\Omega$ needs to be very
338: close to one in the past. For example, we require $|\Omega-1| < {\cal
339: O}(10^{-16})$ at the epoch of nucleosynthesis \cite{LL,Liddle} and
340: $|\Omega-1| < {\cal O}(10^{-64})$ at the Planck epoch \cite{Riotto}. This
341: is an extreme fine-tuning of initial conditions. Unless initial conditions
342: are chosen very accurately, the universe soon collapses, or expands quickly
343: before the structure can be formed. This is so called the flatness
344: problem.
345:
346: \subsubsection{Horizon problem}
347:
348: Consider a comoving wavelength, $\lambda$, and also a physical wavelength,
349: $a\lambda$, which is inside the Hubble radius, $H^{-1}$
350: ({\it i.e.,}~$a\lambda~\lsim~H^{-1}$). The standard big-bang cosmology is
351: characterized by the cosmic evolution of $a \propto t^p$ with $0<p<1$. In
352: this case the physical wavelength grows as $a\lambda \propto t^p$, whereas
353: the Hubble radius evolves as $H^{-1} \propto t$. Therefore the physical
354: wavelength becomes much smaller than the Hubble radius with the passage of
355: time. This means that the region where the causality works eventually
356: becomes the only small fraction of the Hubble radius.
357:
358: To be more precise, let us first define the particle horizon $D_H(t)$ where
359: the light travels from the beginning of the universe, $t=t_*$, \beqa
360: D_H(t)=a(t)d_H(t)\,,~~~~{\rm with }~~~~ d_H(t)=\int_{t_*}^t
361: \frac{dt}{a(t)}\,.
362: \label{2_1_11}
363: \eeqa
364: Here $d_H(t)$ corresponds to the comoving distance. Setting $t_*=0$, we find
365: $d_H(t)=3t$ in the matter-dominant era. We observe photons in the
366: Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) which are emitted at the time of {\it
367: decoupling}.
368: The particle horizon at decoupling,
369: $D_H(t_{\rm dec})=a(t_{\rm dec})d_H(t_{\rm dec})$,
370: corresponds to the region where photons could have contacted causally at
371: that time. The ratio of $d_H(t_{\rm dec})$ to the particle horizon today,
372: $d_H(t_0)$, where $t_0$ is the present time, is estimated as \beqa
373: \frac{d_H(t_{\rm dec})}{d_H(t_0)} \approx \left(\frac{t_0}{t_{\rm
374: dec}}\right)^{1/3} \approx \left(\frac{10^5}{10^{10}}\right)^{1/3} \approx
375: 10^{-2}.
376: \label{2_1_12}
377: \eeqa
378: This result implies that the causality regions of photons
379: are restricted to be small. In fact the surface of the last scattering
380: surface only corresponds to the angle of order $1^{\circ}$.
381: Observationally, however, we see photons which thermalize to the same
382: temperature in all regions in the CMB sky. This is so called the horizon
383: problem.
384:
385: \subsubsection{The origin of large-scale structure in the universe}
386:
387: The COBE satellite observes the anisotropies in
388: the last scattering surface,
389: whose amplitudes are small and close to scale-invariant. These fluctuations
390: spread so large a scale that it is practically impossible to generate them
391: between the big bang and the time of the last scattering in the standard
392: cosmology. This problem is almost equivalent to the horizon problem mentioned
393: above, {\it i.e.}, the standard cosmology can not provide satisfactory
394: explanation for the origin of large-scale structure.
395:
396:
397: \subsubsection{Monopole problem}
398:
399: According to the view point of particle physics,
400: the breaking of supersymmetry leads to the production of many unwanted relics
401: such as monopoles, cosmic strings, and topological defects \cite{Linde}.
402: The string theories also predict supersymmetric particles such as
403: gravitinos, Kaluza-Klein particles, and moduli fields.
404:
405: If these particles exist in the early stage of the universe,
406: the energy densities of them decrease as a matter component ($\sim a^{-3}$).
407: Since the radiation energy density decreases as $\sim a^{-4}$ in the
408: radiation-dominant era, these massive relics could be the dominant materials
409: in the universe, which contradicts with observations. This problem is
410: generally called as the monopole problem.
411:
412:
413: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
414: \section{Idea of inflationary cosmology}
415: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
416:
417: The problems in the big-bang cosmology lie in the fact that the universe
418: always exhibits the decelerating expansion. Let us assume the existence of
419: a stage in the early universe with an accelerated expansion of
420: the universe, {\it i.e.},
421: \beqa
422: \ddot{a}>0\,.
423: \label{2_2_1}
424: \eeqa
425: {}From the relation (\ref{2_1_6}) this corresponds to the condition
426: \beqa
427: \rho+3p<0\,.
428: \label{2_2_2}
429: \eeqa
430: The condition (\ref{2_2_1}) essentially means that
431: $\dot{a}\,(=aH)$ increases during inflation. Then the
432: comoving Hubble radius, $(aH)^{-1}$, decreases in the inflationary phase.
433: This property is the key point to solve the cosmological puzzles in the
434: standard big-bang cosmology as I will show below.
435:
436: \subsection{Flatness problem}
437:
438: Since the $a^2H^2$ term in Eq.~(\ref{2_1_7}) increases during
439: inflation, $\Omega$ rapidly approaches unity. After the inflationary period
440: ends, the evolution of the universe is followed by the conventional big-bang
441: phase and $|\Omega-1|$ begins to increase. In spite of this, as long as
442: the inflationary expansion occurs sufficiently and makes $\Omega$ very
443: close to one, $\Omega$ stays of order unity even in the present epoch.
444:
445: \subsection{Horizon problem}
446:
447: Since the scale factor evolves as $a \propto t^{p}$ with $p>1$
448: during inflation, the physical wavelength, $a\lambda$, grows faster
449: than the Hubble radius, $H^{-1} (\propto t)$.
450: Therefore the physical wavelength is pushed outside the Hubble radius
451: during inflation. This means that the region where the causality works
452: is stretched on scales much larger than the Hubble radius,
453: thus solving the horizon problem.
454:
455: Of course the Hubble radius begins to grow faster than the physical
456: wavelength after inflation (radiation/matter dominant era).
457: In order to solve the horizon problem, it is required that the following
458: condition is satisfied for the comoving particle horizon:
459: \beqa
460: \int_{t_*}^{t_{\rm dec}}\frac{dt}{a(t)} \gg \int_{t_{\rm
461: dec}}^{t_0}\frac{dt}{a(t)}\,.
462: \label{2_2_3}
463: \eeqa
464: This implies that the comoving distance that photons can travel before
465: decoupling needs to be much larger than that after the decoupling.
466: According to the precise calculation, it is achieved when the universe
467: expands about $e^{70}$ times during inflation \cite{LL,Riotto}.
468:
469: \subsection{The origin of the large scale structure}
470: The fact that the comoving Hubble radius decreases during inflation
471: makes it possible to generate the nearly scale-invariant density perturbations
472: on large scales. Since the scales of
473: perturbations are within the Hubble radius in the early stage of inflation,
474: causal physics works to generate small quantum fluctuations.
475: After a scale is pushed outside the Hubble radius ({\it i.e.}, the first
476: horizon crossing) during inflation,
477: the perturbations can be described by classical ones.
478: When the inflationary period ends, the evolution of the universe is followed by the
479: standard big-bang cosmology, and the comoving Hubble radius begins to
480: increase. Then the scales of perturbations cross inside the Hubble radius
481: again (the second horizon crossing), after which causality works. The small
482: perturbations imprinted during inflation appear as large-scale
483: perturbations after the second horizon crossing. In this way the
484: inflationary paradigm naturally provides a causal mechanism in generating
485: the seeds of density perturbations observed in the CMB anisotropies.
486:
487: \subsection{Monopole problem}
488: During the inflationary phase ($\rho+3p<0$), the energy density of the
489: universe decreases very slowly.
490: For example, when the universe evolves as $a \propto t^p$ with $p>1$,
491: we have $H \propto t^{-1} \propto a^{-1/p}$ and $\rho \propto a^{-2/p}$.
492: Meanwhile the energy density of massive particles decreases much faster
493: ($\sim a^{-3}$), these particles are red-shifted away during inflation,
494: thereby solving the monopole problem.
495:
496: Of course, we have to worry for the case where these unwanted particles are
497: produced {\it after} inflation. In the process of reheating followed by
498: inflation, the energy of the universe can be transferred to radiation or
499: other light particles. At this stage unwanted particles must not be
500: overproduced in order not to violate the success of the standard cosmology
501: such as nucleosynthesis. Generally if the reheating temperature is
502: sufficiently low, the thermal production of unwanted relics such as
503: gravitinos can be avoided.
504:
505: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
506: \section{Inflationary dynamics}
507: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
508:
509: The scalar fields are the important ingredients in particle physics
510: theories. Consider a homogeneous scalar field, $\phi$,
511: called {\it inflaton}, whose potential energy leads to the
512: exponential expansion of the universe.
513: The energy density and the pressure density of the inflaton can be described,
514: respectively, as
515: \beqa
516: \rho=\frac12\dot{\phi}^2+V(\phi)\,,
517: ~~~p=\frac12\dot{\phi}^2-V(\phi)\,,
518: \label{2_3_1}
519: \eeqa
520: where $V(\phi)$ is the potential of the inflaton. Substituting
521: Eq.~(\ref{2_3_1}) for Eqs.~(\ref{2_1_4}) and (\ref{2_1_5}), we get
522: \beqa
523: H^2=\frac{8\pi}{3m_{\rm pl}^2}
524: \left[\frac12 \dot{\phi}^2+V(\phi) \right]\,,
525: \label{2_3_2}
526: \eeqa
527: \beqa
528: \ddot{\phi}+3H\dot{\phi}+V'(\phi)=0\,,
529: \label{2_3_3}
530: \eeqa
531: where $\kappa^2 \equiv 8\pi G=8\pi/m_{\rm pl}^2$,
532: and we neglected the curvature term $K^2/a^2$ in Eq.~(\ref{2_3_2}).
533:
534: During inflation, the relation (\ref{2_2_2}) yields $\dot{\phi}^2<V(\phi)$,
535: which indicates that the potential energy of the inflaton dominates over the
536: kinetic energy of it. Therefore a flat potential of the inflaton is
537: required in order to lead to sufficient amount of inflation.
538: Imposing the slow-roll conditions: $\frac12 \dot{\phi}^2 \ll V(\phi)$
539: and $\ddot{\phi} \ll 3H\dot{\phi}$, Eqs.~(\ref{2_3_2}) and (\ref{2_3_3})
540: are approximately given as
541: \beqa
542: H^2 \simeq \frac{8\pi}{3m_{\rm pl}^2}V(\phi),
543: \label{2_3_4}
544: \eeqa
545: \beqa
546: 3H\dot{\phi}\simeq -V'(\phi).
547: \label{2_3_5}
548: \eeqa
549: Defining the so-called slow-roll parameters
550: \beqa
551: \epsilon \equiv
552: \frac{m_{\rm pl}^2}{16\pi}\left(\frac{V'}{V}\right)^2\,,~~~ \eta \equiv
553: \frac{m_{\rm pl}^2}{8\pi} \frac{V''}{V}\,,
554: \label{2_3_6}
555: \eeqa
556: we can easily verify that the above slow-roll approximations are valid when
557: \beqa
558: \epsilon \ll 1, ~~~|\eta| \ll 1\,.
559: \label{2_3_7}
560: \eeqa
561: The inflationary phase ends when $\epsilon$ and $|\eta|$ grow of order unity.
562: A useful quantity to describe the amount of inflation is the number
563: of e-foldings, defined by
564: \beqa
565: N \equiv \ln \frac{a_f}{a_i}=\int_{t_i}^{t_f} H dt\,,
566: \label{2_3_8}
567: \eeqa
568: where the subscripts $i$ and $f$ denote the quantities at the beginning
569: and the end of the inflation, respectively.
570:
571: In order to solve the flatness problem, $\Omega$ is required to be
572: $|\Omega_f-1|~\lsim~10^{-60}$ right after the end of inflation.
573: Meanwhile the ratio $|\Omega-1|$ between the initial and final
574: phase of inflation is given by
575: \beqa
576: \frac{|\Omega_f-1|}{|\Omega_i-1|} \simeq \left(\frac{a_i}{a_f}
577: \right)^2=e^{-2N}\,,
578: \label{2_3}
579: \eeqa
580: where we used the fact that $H$ is nearly constant during inflation.
581: Assuming that $|\Omega_i-1|$ is of order unity, the number of
582: e-foldings is required to be $N~\gsim~70$ to solve the flatness problem. We
583: have similar number of e-foldings from the requirement to solve the horizon
584: problem.
585:
586: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
587: \section{Models of inflation}
588: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
589:
590: So far we did not mention the form of the inflaton potential, $V(\phi)$.
591: Originating from the old inflationary scenario proposed by Guth \cite{Guth}
592: and Sato \cite{Sato}, we now have varieties of inflationary models : $R^2$,
593: new, chaotic, extended, power-law, hybrid, natural, supernatural, extranatural,
594: eternal, D-term, F-term, brane, oscillating, trace-anomaly
595: driven,..., etc.
596:
597: These different kinds of models can be roughly classified in the following
598: way \cite{Kolbclass}. The first class (type I) is the ``large field" model,
599: in which the initial value of the inflaton is large and it rolls down toward
600: the potential minimum at smaller $\phi$.
601: Chaotic inflation \cite{Linde83} is one of
602: the representative models of this class.
603: The second class (type II) is the ``small field" model, in which
604: the inflaton field is small initially and slowly evolves toward the potential
605: minimum at larger $\phi$. New inflation \cite{Linde82,AS82} and natural
606: inflation \cite{Natural} are the examples of this type. In the first model,
607: the second derivative of the potential $V^{(2)}(\phi)$ usually takes
608: positive values, whereas $V^{(2)}(\phi)$ can change its sign in the second
609: model. The third one (type III) is the hybrid (double) inflation model
610: \cite{hybrid}, in which inflation typically ends by the phase transition
611: triggered by the presence of the second scalar field (or by the second
612: phase of inflation after the phase transition).
613:
614: Let us briefly recap each type of inflationary models.
615:
616: \subsubsection{Chaotic inflation--~an example of type I}
617:
618: The chaotic inflation model is described by the quadratic or
619: quartic inflaton potential,
620: \beqa
621: V(\phi)=\frac12 m^2\phi^2\,,~~~{\rm or}~~~
622: V(\phi)=\frac14 \lambda\phi^4\,.
623: \label{2_3_9}
624: \eeqa
625: The {\it ``chaotic"} means that initial conditions of
626: inflaton are distributed chaotically.
627: According to this scenario, the region which undergoes the
628: sufficient amount of inflation gives rise to our universe.
629:
630: Let us investigate the evolution of the universe in the case of the
631: quadratic potential.
632: Then Eqs.~(\ref{2_3_4}) and (\ref{2_3_5}) read
633: \beqa
634: H^2 \simeq \frac{4\pi m^2\phi^2}{3m_{\rm pl}^2}\,,~~~~
635: 3H\dot{\phi}+m^2\phi \simeq 0\,.
636: \label{2_3_10}
637: \eeqa
638: Combining these relations gives the following solutions:
639: \beqa
640: \phi \simeq \phi_i-\frac{m m_{\rm pl}}{2\sqrt{3\pi}}t\,,
641: \label{2_3_11}
642: \eeqa
643: \beqa
644: a \simeq a_i \exp \left[2\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{3}}\frac{m}{m_{\rm pl}} \left(\phi_i
645: t-\frac{mm_{\rm pl}}{4\sqrt{3\pi}}t^2\right) \right]\,,
646: \label{2_3_12}
647: \eeqa
648: where $\phi_i$ is an integration constant corresponding to the initial
649: values of the inflaton.
650: We find from the relation (\ref{2_3_12}) that
651: the universe expands exponentially during the initial stage of inflation.
652: With the increase of the second term in the square bracket of
653: Eq.~(\ref{2_3_12}), the expansion rate slows down. Since the slow-roll
654: parameters are expressed as
655: \beqa
656: \epsilon=\eta=\frac{m_{\rm pl}^2}{4\pi
657: \phi^2}\,,
658: \label{2_3_13}
659: \eeqa
660: the inflationary period ends around
661: $|\phi| \approx m_{\rm pl}/\sqrt{4\pi}$, after which
662: the system enters a reheating stage. The total amount of inflation is
663: approximately expressed as
664: \beqa
665: N \simeq 2\pi \left(\frac{\phi_i}{m_{\rm pl}}\right)^2 -\frac12.
666: \label{2_3_14}
667: \eeqa
668: In order to lead to sufficient inflation $N~\gsim~70$,
669: we require the initial value to be $\phi_i~\gsim~3m_{\rm pl}$. The inflaton
670: mass, $m$, is constrained by the amplitude of density perturbations
671: observed by the COBE satellite.
672: In order to fit observations, $m$ is
673: required to be \cite{LL}
674: \beqa m \simeq 10^{-6} m_{\rm pl}\,.
675: \label{2_3_15}
676: \eeqa
677: In the quartic potential case, the self-coupling is constrained
678: to be $\lambda \simeq 10^{-13}$
679: by the similar argument \cite{Linde,LL}.
680:
681: %%%
682: \begin{figure}
683: \epsfxsize = 4.5in \epsffile{chaotic.eps} \caption{The schematic
684: illustration of the potential of the chaotic inflation model. This belongs
685: to the class of the ``large field" model.}
686: \label{chaotic}
687: \end{figure}
688: %%%
689:
690: \subsubsection{Natural inflation--~an example of type II}
691:
692: Natural inflation model \cite{Natural} is characterized
693: by Pseudo Nambu-Goldstone bosons (PNGBs) which appear
694: when an approximate global symmetry is
695: spontaneously broken.
696: The PNGB potential is expressed as
697: \beqa
698: V(\phi)=m^4 \left[1+\cos \left(\frac{\phi}{f}\right) \right]\,,
699: \label{2_3_16}
700: \eeqa
701: where two mass scales $m$ and $f$ characterize
702: the height and width of the potential, respectively.
703: The typical mass scales are of order
704: $f \sim m_{\rm pl} \sim 10^{19}$ GeV and
705: $m \sim m_{\rm GUT}\sim 10^{16}$ GeV,
706: which are expected by particle physics.
707:
708: Let us consider the case where the inflaton is initially located in the
709: region, $0 <\phi < \pi f$, and inflation occurs while the inflaton slowly
710: evolves toward the potential minimum at $\phi=\pi f$. The slow-roll
711: parameters are
712: \beqa \epsilon=\frac{m_{\rm pl}^2}{16\pi f^2}
713: \left[ \frac{\sin(\phi/f)}{1+\cos(\phi/f)} \right]^2,~~~~
714: \eta=-\frac{m_{\rm
715: pl}^2}{8\pi f^2} \frac{\cos(\phi/f)}{1+\cos(\phi/f)}.
716: \label{2_3_17}
717: \eeqa
718: Note that $\epsilon$ and $\eta$ depend on $f$, but not on $m$.
719: Inflation starts out from the regime where $\phi$ is close to zero.
720: The system enters a reheating stage when the inflaton
721: begins to oscillate
722: around $\phi =\pi f$.
723:
724: One typical property in the type II model is that the second derivative of
725: the inflaton potential can change its sign. In the natural inflation,
726: $V^{(2)}(\phi)$ is negative when inflaton evolves in the region of $0 <\phi
727: < \pi f/2$. This leads to the enhancement of inflaton fluctuations by
728: spinodal (tachyonic) instability \cite{CH,TTspinodal,Felder}. When the
729: particle creation by spinodal instability is neglected, the number of
730: $e$-foldings is expressed by \cite{Natural}
731: \beqa
732: N=\frac{16\pi f^2}{m_{\rm
733: pl}^2} {\rm ln} \left[ \frac{\sin (\phi_f/2f)} {\sin (\phi_i/2f)} \right]\,,
734: \label{2_3_18}
735: \eeqa
736: where $\phi_i$ and $\phi_f$ are the initial and final values of the inflaton
737: during inflation, respectively. In order to obtain the sufficient amount of
738: e-foldings satisfying $N~\gsim~70$, the initial value of the inflaton is
739: required to be $\phi(t_i)~\lsim~0.1 m_{\rm pl}$ for the mass scale $f \sim
740: m_{\rm pl}$.
741:
742: %%%
743: \begin{figure}
744: \epsfxsize = 4.5in \epsffile{natural.eps}
745: \caption{The schematic illustration of the potential
746: of the natural inflation model. This belongs to the class of the ``small
747: field" model.}
748: \label{natural}
749: \end{figure}
750: %%%
751:
752:
753: \subsubsection{Hybrid (Double) inflation--~an example of type III}
754:
755: The inflationary model building in the presence of multiple scalar fields is
756: the recent trend from the viewpoint of particle physics \cite{LR99}.
757: Let us consider the Linde's hybrid inflation model \cite{hybrid},
758: described by
759: \beqa
760: V= \frac{\lambda}{4} \left(\chi^2-\frac{M^2} {\lambda}\right)^2
761: +\frac12 g^2 \phi^2 \chi^2+ \frac12 m^2\phi^2\,.
762: \label{2_3_19}
763: \eeqa
764: When $\phi^2$ is large, the field tends to roll down toward the potential
765: minimum at $\chi=0$. In this case, the potential is effectively described
766: by a single field,
767: \beqa
768: V \simeq \frac{M^4}{4\lambda} +\frac12 m^2\phi^2\,.
769: \label{2_3_20}
770: \eeqa
771: Inflation does not end for the potential (\ref{2_3_20}).
772: In the presence of the $\chi$ field, however, the mass
773: of the field $\chi$ becomes negative for $\phi<\phi_c \equiv M/g$. Then
774: the field begins to roll down to one of the true minima at $\phi=0$ and
775: $\chi=\pm M/\sqrt{\lambda}$ (see Fig.~\ref{hybrid}). The original version
776: of the hybrid inflation \cite{hybrid} corresponds to the case where the
777: inflation soon comes to an end after the symmetry breaking ($\phi<\phi_c$)
778: due to the rapid rolling of the field $\chi$.
779: In this case the number of e-foldings acquired in double inflation
780: can be approximately estimated by using the potential (\ref{2_3_20}):
781: %
782: \begin{eqnarray}
783: N \simeq \frac{2\pi M^4} {\lambda m^2m_{\rm pl}^2}\,{\rm ln}
784: \frac{\phi_i}{\phi_c} \,,
785: \label{N1}
786: \end{eqnarray}
787: %
788: where $\phi_i$ is the initial value of inflaton.
789:
790: If the condition, $M^2 \gg
791: \lambda M_p^2$, is satisfied, the mass of the field $\chi$ is ``light''
792: relative to the Hubble rate around $\phi=\phi_c$, thereby leading to the
793: second stage of inflation for $\phi<\phi_c$ \cite{TPB}.
794: This corresponds to the double inflationary scenario.
795:
796: %%%
797: \begin{figure}
798: \epsfxsize = 4.5in \epsffile{hybrid.eps} \caption{The schematic
799: illustration of the potential of the hybrid (double) inflation model. This
800: model is characterized by multiple scalar fields.}
801: \label{hybrid}
802: \end{figure}
803: %%%
804:
805:
806: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
807: \section{Density perturbations from inflation}
808: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
809:
810: In this section we study cosmological perturbations generated
811: from inflation. For simplicity we shall consider the single-field model
812: of inflation.
813: The most general form of the line
814: element that describes scalar metric perturbations is written as
815: \cite{cosmo1,cosmo2}
816: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
817: \begin{eqnarray}
818: ds^2=a^2(\tau)\{-(1+2A)d\tau^2+2B,_{i}dx^{i}d\tau
819: +[(1-2\psi)\gamma_{ij}+2E,_{ij}]dx^idx^j\}\,,
820: \label{6_1_1}
821: \end{eqnarray}
822: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
823: where $\tau \equiv \int a^{-1} dt$ is the conformal time. The scalar
824: quantities $A$, $\psi$, $B$, and $E$ are the functions of space and time
825: coordinates. We denote the three-dimensional covariant derivative of a
826: function $f$ with respect to some coordinate $i$ by $f_i$.
827: In the linear perturbation theory of cosmological perturbations,
828: there exist some redundant degress of freedom in the
829: equations of motions which can be fixed without
830: affecting the physics.
831: It is important to choose a proper gauge condition so that it allows for an
832: simplified mathematical analysis and an easier physical interpretation
833: (see {\em e.g.,} Ref.~\cite{hwang} for details). Among several gauge
834: conditions, the longitudinal gauge defined by the gauge condition $B=E=0$
835: is often used :
836: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
837: \begin{eqnarray}
838: ds^2 &=&
839: a^2(\tau)[-(1+2\Phi) d\tau^2 +(1-2\Psi)\gamma_{ij}dx^idx^j] \nonumber \\
840: &=&
841: -(1+2\Phi)dt^2
842: +a^2(t)(1-2\Psi)\delta_{ij} dx^i dx^j\,.
843: \label{6_1_2}
844: \end{eqnarray}
845: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
846: The potentials $\Phi$ and $\Psi$ can be constructed as
847: gauge-invariant variables, whose forms are invariant under
848: infinitesimal coordinate transformations (see Ref.~\cite{cosmo2}
849: for details). When the spatial part of the energy-momentum tensor is diagonal,
850: $\delta T^{i}_{j} \sim \delta^{i}_{j}$, $\Phi$ coincides with $\Psi$.
851:
852: Let us consider the linearized Einstein equation with $\Lambda=0$ :
853: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
854: \begin{eqnarray}
855: \delta G^{\mu}_{\nu}=8\pi G \delta T^{\mu}_{\nu}.
856: \label{6_1_3}
857: \end{eqnarray}
858: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
859: The perturbed Einstein tensor can be evaluated in the longitudinal
860: gauge as follows
861: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
862: \begin{eqnarray}
863: \delta G^0_0 &=& 2a^{-2}\left[-3{\cal H}({\cal H} \Phi+\Psi')
864: +\nabla^2 \Psi \right], \nonumber \\
865: \delta G^0_i &=& 2a^{-2}({\cal H} \Phi+\Psi') ,_{i}~, \nonumber \\
866: \delta G^i_j &=& -2a^{-2} \left\{\left[2{\cal H}'+{\cal H}^2)\Phi+ {\cal
867: H}\Phi'+\Psi''+2{\cal H}\Psi'+\frac12 \nabla^2 D \right] \delta^i_j -\frac12
868: \gamma^{ik} D,_{kj} \right\},
869: \label{6_1_4}
870: \end{eqnarray}
871: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
872: where ${\cal H} \equiv a'/a$ and $D \equiv \Phi-\Psi$, with a prime being a
873: derivative with respect to $\tau$. In the case where the universe is filled
874: with a minimally coupled scalar field, $\phi$, the energy momentum tensor
875: takes the following form
876: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
877: \begin{eqnarray}
878: T^{\mu}_{\nu}=-(\nabla \phi)^2+\left[ \frac12
879: (\nabla \phi)^2+V (\phi) \right] \delta^{\mu}_{\nu}.
880: \label{6_1_5}
881: \end{eqnarray}
882: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
883: We decompose the field $\phi$ into homogenous and fluctuational parts as
884: $\phi=\phi_0+\delta \phi$. Then the energy momentum tensor is
885: decomposed
886: into background and perturbed parts as
887: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
888: \begin{eqnarray}
889: T^{\mu}_{\nu}=^{(0)}T^{\mu}_{\nu}+\delta T^{\mu}_{\nu}\,,
890: \label{6_1_6}
891: \end{eqnarray}
892: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
893: where
894: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
895: \begin{eqnarray}
896: ^{(0)}T^0_0=\frac{1}{2a^2}\phi_0'^2+V(\phi_0)\,,~~~
897: ^{(0)}T^0_i=0\,,~~~
898: ^{(0)}T^i_j=\left[-\frac{1}{2a^2}\phi_0'^2+V(\phi_0)\right]
899: \delta^i_j\,,
900: \label{6_1_7}
901: \end{eqnarray}
902: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
903: and
904: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
905: \begin{eqnarray}
906: \delta T^0_0 &=& a^{-2} \left[-\phi_0'^2\Phi+\phi_0' \delta\phi'+
907: V'(\phi)a^2\delta\phi \right]\,, \nonumber \\
908: \delta T^0_i &=& a^{-2} \phi_0'\delta\phi,_{i}\,, \nonumber \\
909: \delta T^i_j &=& a^{-2} \left[+\phi_0'^2\Phi-\phi_0' \delta\phi'+
910: V'(\phi)a^2\delta\phi \right]\delta^{i}_{j}\,.
911: \label{6_1_8}
912: \end{eqnarray}
913: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
914: Note that the relation $\delta T^i_j \sim \delta^i_j$ holds in this case. This
915: leads to the relation $D=\Phi-\Psi=0$ by considering the $ij$ part in
916: Eq.~(\ref{6_1_3}).
917: Then the perturbed Einstein equation (\ref{6_1_3}) can be
918: written as
919: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
920: \begin{eqnarray}
921: \nabla^2\Phi-3{\cal H}\Phi'-({\cal H}'+2{\cal H}^2)\Phi
922: =\frac{\kappa^2}{2}(\phi_0'\delta\phi+V'(\phi)a^2\delta\phi),
923: \label{6_1_9}
924: \end{eqnarray}
925: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
926: \begin{eqnarray}
927: \Phi'+{\cal H}\Phi=\frac{\kappa^2}{2}\phi_0'\delta\phi,
928: \label{6_1_10}
929: \end{eqnarray}
930: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
931: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
932: \begin{eqnarray}
933: \Phi''+3{\cal H}\Phi'+({\cal H}'+2{\cal H}^2)\Phi=
934: \frac{\kappa^2}{2}(\phi_0'\delta\phi-V'(\phi)a^2\delta\phi)\,,
935: \label{6_1_11}
936: \end{eqnarray}
937: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
938: where $\kappa^2 \equiv 8\pi G$. We used the background equations
939: in deriving these equations. Combining
940: Eqs.~(\ref{6_1_9})-(\ref{6_1_11}) gives the equation for the
941: gauge-invariant scalar field:
942: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
943: \begin{eqnarray}
944: \delta\phi''+2{\cal H}\delta\phi'-\nabla^2\delta\phi+
945: V''(\phi)a^2\delta\phi =4\phi_0'\Phi'-2V'(\phi)a^2\Phi.
946: \label{6_1_12}
947: \end{eqnarray}
948: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
949: Note that the effect of gravitational perturbations appears in the
950: rhs of Eq.~(\ref{6_1_12}).
951:
952: Eliminating the scalar field perturbation in
953: Eqs.~(\ref{6_1_9})-(\ref{6_1_11}), we find the following equation for
954: gauge-invariant cosmological perturbations:
955: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
956: \begin{eqnarray}
957: \Phi''+2(a/\phi_0')'(a/\phi_0')^{-1}\Phi'-\nabla^2\Phi
958: +2\phi_0'({\cal H}/\phi')'\Phi=0\,.
959: \label{6_1_13}
960: \end{eqnarray}
961: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
962: Introducing new variables
963: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
964: \begin{eqnarray}
965: u=(a/\phi_0')\Phi\,,~~~~z={\cal H}/a\phi_0'\,,
966: \label{6_1_14}
967: \end{eqnarray}
968: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
969: Eq.~(\ref{6_1_13}) reduces to
970: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
971: \begin{eqnarray}
972: u''-\nabla^2 u-(z''/z)u=0\,.
973: \label{6_1_15}
974: \end{eqnarray}
975: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
976: Making Fourier transformations, the mode function $u_k$ with
977: a wave number $k$ satisfies\footnote{Note that the comoving wavelength
978: $\lambda$ is related with $k$ by the relation $\lambda=2\pi/k$.}
979: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
980: \begin{eqnarray}
981: u_k''+(k^2-z''/z)u_k=0\,.
982: \label{6_1_16}
983: \end{eqnarray}
984: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
985: In the long-wavelength limit, $k^2 \ll z''/z$, we find the analytic
986: solution
987: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
988: \begin{eqnarray}
989: u=z \left(c_1+c_2 \int \frac{d\tau}{z^2}\right)\,,
990: \label{6_1_17}
991: \end{eqnarray}
992: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
993: where $c_1$ and $c_2$ are integration constants.
994: Making use of Eqs.~(\ref{6_1_10}), (\ref{6_1_14}), and (\ref{6_1_17}),
995: we have
996: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
997: \begin{eqnarray}
998: \Phi=\frac{\dot{a}}{a^2}\left(c_1-2c_2 \int adt \right)+2c_2\,,
999: \label{6_1_18}
1000: \end{eqnarray}
1001: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1002: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1003: \begin{eqnarray}
1004: \delta\phi=-\frac{\dot{\phi}_0}{a} \left(c_1-2c_2 \int adt \right)\,.
1005: \label{6_1_19}
1006: \end{eqnarray}
1007: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1008: The solution (\ref{6_1_18}) indicates that there exists a
1009: gauge-invariant conserved quantity (comoving curvature perturbation)
1010: in the long-wavelength limit:
1011: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1012: \begin{eqnarray}
1013: {\cal R}=\Phi-\frac{H^2}{\dot{H}} \left(\Phi+\frac{\dot{\Phi}}{H} \right)
1014: =2c_2\,,
1015: \label{6_1_20}
1016: \end{eqnarray}
1017: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1018: which was firstly introduced by Bardeen \cite{Bardeen}.
1019:
1020: During inflation, the perturbations with a comoving wavenumber
1021: $k$ are pushed outside the Hubble radius by the accelerated expansion
1022: of the universe. This makes the wavenumber toward the
1023: long wavelength regions: $k^2 \ll z''/z$, in which case we have the analytic
1024: solutions of Eqs.~(\ref{6_1_18}) and (\ref{6_1_19}). Since the terms which
1025: include the $c_1$ coefficient rapidly decrease and the relation $|\dot{H}|
1026: \ll H^2$ holds during the inflationary phase, Eqs.~(\ref{6_1_18}) and
1027: (\ref{6_1_19}) yield
1028: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1029: \begin{eqnarray}
1030: \Phi &\simeq& 2c_2 \left( \frac{1}{a} \int adt \right)^{\cdot{}}
1031: \nonumber \\
1032: &=& 2c_2 \left[ H^{-1}-a^{-1} \int a(H^{-1})^{\cdot{}}dt
1033: \right]^{\cdot{}} \simeq -2c_2 \dot{H}/H^2\,,
1034: \label{6_1_21}
1035: \end{eqnarray}
1036: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1037: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1038: \begin{eqnarray}
1039: \delta\phi \simeq 2c_2 \dot{\phi}_0 a^{-1} \int adt \simeq 2c_2
1040: \dot{\phi}_0/H\,.
1041: \label{6_1_22}
1042: \end{eqnarray}
1043: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1044: Combining Eqs.~(\ref{6_1_20}) and (\ref{6_1_22}), we have
1045: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1046: \begin{eqnarray}
1047: {\cal R}=\frac{H\delta\phi_k}{\dot{\phi}_0}\,,
1048: \label{6_1_23}
1049: \end{eqnarray}
1050: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1051: where we introduced the subscript ``{\it k}" for the fluctuation, $\delta\phi$.
1052: The $H\delta\phi_k/\dot{\phi}_0$ term should be evaluated when the
1053: wavelength of the perturbation crosses the Hubble radius: $k^2=z''/z$.
1054: Once the scales are pushed outside the Hubble radius during inflation, the
1055: evolution of perturbations can be described by Eqs.~(\ref{6_1_18}) and
1056: (\ref{6_1_19}).
1057: Long after the inflation ends, the scale of the
1058: perturbations reenters the Hubble radius again, which generates the seeds
1059: for the galaxies and clusters. Thus the inflationary paradigm naturally
1060: explains the origin of large-scale structure.
1061:
1062: The spectrum of the comoving curvature perturbation is defined as
1063: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1064: \begin{eqnarray}
1065: {\cal P}_{\cal R}=\frac{k^3}{2\pi^2}\langle|{\cal R}|^2 \rangle
1066: =\frac{k^3}{2\pi^2}\frac{H^2}{\dot{\phi}_0^2}|\delta \phi_k|^2\,.
1067: \label{spe}
1068: \end{eqnarray}
1069: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1070: {}From Eqs.~(\ref{6_1_21}) and (\ref{6_1_22}) we have
1071: $\Phi \simeq \epsilon H\delta\phi_k/\dot{\phi}_0$ with
1072: $\epsilon=-\dot{H}/H^2$ being the slow-roll parameter defined in
1073: eq.~(\ref{2_3_6}). Taking note that $|4\phi_0'\Phi'| \ll
1074: |2V'(\phi)a^2\Phi|$ on super-Hubble scales and making use of the slow-roll
1075: relation $3H\dot{\phi} \simeq -V'(\phi)$, Eq.~(\ref{6_1_12}) can be
1076: approximately written as %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1077: \begin{eqnarray}
1078: \delta\phi_k''+2{\cal H}\delta\phi_k'+
1079: \left[k^2+a^2V''(\phi)+6a^2\epsilon H^2 \right]\delta\phi_k=0\,.
1080: \label{delp}
1081: \end{eqnarray}
1082: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1083: Redefining a field perturbation, $\delta \chi_k=a^{-1}\delta\phi_k$,
1084: this equation reduces to
1085: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1086: \begin{eqnarray}
1087: \delta\chi_k''+\left[k^2-\frac{1}{\tau^2}\left(\nu^2-\frac14\right) \right]
1088: \delta\chi_k=0~~~{\rm with}~~~\nu^2=\frac94+9\epsilon-3\eta\,,
1089: \label{delc}
1090: \end{eqnarray}
1091: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1092: where we used the fact that $a''/a=a^2(2-\epsilon)H^2 \simeq
1093: (2+3\epsilon)/\tau^2$. When $\nu$ is a real number, the solution for this
1094: equation can be written in terms of the Hankel functions of the first and
1095: second kind:
1096: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1097: \begin{eqnarray}
1098: \delta\chi_k=\sqrt{-\tau} \left[c_1(k) H_{\nu}^{(1)}(-k\tau)+ c_2(k)
1099: H_{\nu}^{(2)}(-k\tau) \right]\,.
1100: \label{han}
1101: \end{eqnarray}
1102: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1103: Quantum fluctuations are generated in the ultraviolet regime ($k \gg aH)$,
1104: which is required to take the plane-wave form $e^{-ik\tau}/\sqrt{2k}$ for
1105: $-k\tau \gg 1$. Matching Eq.~(\ref{han}) with this quantum fluctuation, we
1106: have $c_1(k)=\frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{2}e^{i(\nu+\frac12)\frac{\pi}{2}}$ and
1107: $c_2(k)=0$, thereby yielding
1108: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1109: \begin{eqnarray}
1110: \delta\chi_k=\frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{2}e^{i(\nu+\frac12)\frac{\pi}{2}}
1111: \sqrt{-\tau}H_{\nu}^{(1)}(-k\tau)\,.
1112: \label{han2}
1113: \end{eqnarray}
1114: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1115: Since the Hankel function takes the form $H_\nu (-k\tau \ll 1) \simeq
1116: \sqrt{\frac{2}{\pi}}e^{-i\frac{\pi}{2}}2^{\nu-\frac32}
1117: (\Gamma(\nu)/\Gamma(3/2))(-k\tau)^{-\nu}$ on super-Hubble scales, the
1118: amplitude of the fluctuation $\delta\phi_k$ is estimated as
1119: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1120: \begin{eqnarray}
1121: |\delta\phi_k| \simeq \frac{H}{\sqrt{2k^3}}
1122: \left(\frac{k}{aH}\right)^{\frac32-\nu}\,.
1123: \label{del2}
1124: \end{eqnarray}
1125: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1126: Substituting this relation for eq.~(\ref{spe}), we finally get the spectrum of
1127: the curvature perturbations on super-Hubble scales:
1128: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1129: \begin{eqnarray}
1130: {\cal P}_{\cal R}=\frac{4\pi}{m_{\rm pl}^2 \epsilon}
1131: \left(\frac{H}{2\pi}\right)^2 \left(\frac{k}{aH}\right)^{3-2\nu} \equiv
1132: A_{\cal R}^2 \left(\frac{k}{aH}\right)^{n_{\cal R}-1}\,.
1133: \label{power}
1134: \end{eqnarray}
1135: %%%%%%%%%%%%%
1136: Here the spectral index $n_{\cal R}$ is given as
1137: %
1138: \begin{eqnarray}
1139: n_{\cal R}-1 \equiv \frac{d\,{\rm ln} {\cal P}_{\cal R}}{d\,{\rm ln} k}
1140: =-6\epsilon+2\eta\,.
1141: \label{n}
1142: \end{eqnarray}
1143: %
1144: When $n_{\cal R}=1$, the spectrum of the curvature perturbation is
1145: scale-invariant. Since the slow-roll parameters $\epsilon$ and $\eta$
1146: are much smaller than unity [see eq.~(\ref{2_3_7})], scalar
1147: perturbations generated in standard inflation are close to scale-invariant.
1148: This property is consistent with the recent observation of WMAP
1149: \cite{Bennett:2003bz}. When $n_{\cal R}<1$ and $n_{\cal R}>1$, we call the
1150: red-tilted spectrum and the blue-tilted spectrum, respectively. For
1151: example the chaotic inflation model exhibits the red-tilted spectrum, while
1152: the hybrid inflation model shows the blue-tilted spectrum \cite{LL}. This
1153: property is useful to constrain on inflationary models from observations.
1154:
1155: The spectrum (\ref{power}) corresponds to the adiabatic perturbation
1156: generated in the single-field inflationary scenario. In the case of the
1157: multi-field inflation, this is modified due to the presence of
1158: isocurvature (entropy) perturbations \cite{Polarski:1994rz}. In particular
1159: the curvature perturbation ${\cal R}$ is no longer a conserved quantity in
1160: the multi-field context \cite{Starobinsky:2001xq}.
1161: Therefore we have to estimate the curvature perturbation at the end of
1162: inflation instead of using its value at the horizon crossing.
1163: See ref.~\cite{TPB} for the detailed numerical analysis of correlated
1164: adiabatic and isocurvature perturbations in concrete models of
1165: double inflation.
1166:
1167:
1168: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1169: \section{Reheating after inflation}
1170: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1171:
1172: After the end of inflation, the universe enters a reheating stage,
1173: during which the potential energy of the inflaton is transferred to radiation
1174: and the universe is thermalized. In the original version of the reheating
1175: scenario which is now called {\it old reheating}, the decay of the
1176: inflaton is described by the perturbation theory \cite{oldre}. This process
1177: is not efficient for the success of the GUT scale baryogenesis scenario.
1178: In contrast, it was later found that the existence of the nonperturbative
1179: stage called {\it preheating} can lead to the explosive particle production
1180: in the early stage of reheating \cite{TB,KLS1}.
1181:
1182: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1183: \subsection{Old reheating}
1184: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1185:
1186: The reheating stage turns on when the inflaton reaches the potential
1187: minimum and begins to oscillate.
1188: Let us first study the background evolution during reheating for the
1189: polynomial potential
1190: \beqa
1191: V(\phi)=\frac{1}{2n}m^2m_{\rm pl}^2
1192: \left(\frac{\phi}{m_{\rm pl}}\right)^{2n}\,,
1193: \label{3_1_4}
1194: \eeqa
1195: where $n$ is a positive integer.
1196: Making use of the time-averaged relation
1197: \beqa
1198: \langle \dot{\phi}^2 \rangle_{T} = 2n
1199: \langle V(\phi) \rangle_{T}\,,
1200: \label{taverage}
1201: \eeqa
1202: the time evolution of the scale factor and the
1203: Hubble parameter are
1204: \beqa
1205: a \propto t^{(n+1)/3n}\,,~~~H \propto \frac{n+1}{3n}
1206: \frac{1}{t}\,,
1207: \label{3_1_5}
1208: \eeqa
1209: where we used eqs.~(\ref{2_3_2}) and (\ref{2_3_3}).
1210: When $n=1$ and $n=2$, the universe
1211: evolves as matter-dominant ($a \propto t^{2/3}$) and radiation-dominant ($a
1212: \propto t^{1/2}$), respectively.
1213:
1214: Let us consider the case of $n=1$ in order to understand
1215: the basic picture of reheating.
1216: In this case, the evolution of the inflaton is described by the sinusoidal
1217: oscillation with a decreasing amplitude $\tilde{\Phi}(t)$:
1218: \beqa
1219: \phi=\tilde{\Phi}(t) \sin mt\,, ~~~
1220: \tilde{\Phi}(t)=\frac{m_{\rm pl}} {\sqrt{3\pi}mt}\,.
1221: \label{3_1_6}
1222: \eeqa
1223: Then the energy density of the inflaton decreases as
1224: \beqa
1225: \rho=\frac12
1226: \dot{\phi}^2+V(\phi) \approx \frac12 m^2
1227: \tilde{\Phi}^2 \propto a^{-3}\,.
1228: \label{3_1_7}
1229: \eeqa
1230: The simple estimations of Eqs.~(\ref{3_1_6}) and (\ref{3_1_7})
1231: should be modified in the presence of the inflaton decay.
1232: Without this decay, the universe will evolve toward
1233: emptier and colder states because of the redshift of
1234: the energy density.
1235: In the old reheating scenario \cite{oldre} where the single inflaton
1236: decay is considered, the inflaton $\phi$ is coupled to
1237: a scalar field $\chi$ and a fermion field $\psi$ with the interacting
1238: Lagrangian,
1239: \beqa
1240: {\cal L}_{\rm int}=-\sigma\phi\chi^2-h\phi\bar{\psi}\psi\,,
1241: \label{3_1_8}
1242: \eeqa
1243: where $\sigma$ and $h$ are coupling constants.
1244: Note that we assume that the bare masses of $\chi$ and $\psi$
1245: are much smaller than the inflaton mass $m$ and neglect them.
1246: We include quantum correction effects to the equation of inflaton as
1247: \beqa
1248: \ddot{\phi}+3H\dot{\phi}+\left[m^2+\Pi(m)\right]\phi=0,
1249: \label{3_1_9}
1250: \eeqa
1251: where $\Pi(m)$ is the polarization operator of inflaton.
1252: Although the real part of $\Pi(m)$ is small relative to $m^2$,
1253: $\Pi(m)$ acquires an imaginary part,
1254: \beqa
1255: {\rm Im}~\Pi(m)=-m\Gamma\,,
1256: \label{3_1_10}
1257: \eeqa
1258: where $\Gamma=\Gamma(\phi \to \chi \chi)+
1259: \Gamma(\phi \to \bar{\psi}\psi)$ is the total decay rate of inflaton.
1260: The perturbative decay rates of $\phi \to \chi$ and $\phi \to \psi$
1261: are expressed as \cite{oldre}
1262: \beqa
1263: \Gamma(\phi \to \chi \chi)=\frac{\sigma^2}{8\pi m}\,,~~~~
1264: \Gamma(\phi \to \bar{\psi}\psi)=\frac{h^2m}{8\pi}\,.
1265: \label{3_1_11}
1266: \eeqa
1267: Note that these relations are valid in the case of $\Gamma \ll m$,
1268: which implies the relations: $\sigma^2 \ll m^2$ and $h^2 \ll 1$. We cannot
1269: use Eq.~(\ref{3_1_11}) in the nonperturbative stage of reheating (preheating).
1270:
1271: Combining Eqs.~(\ref{3_1_9}) and (\ref{3_1_10})
1272: and setting $\phi=\tilde{\Phi}(t) \exp(imt)$, we find
1273: \beqa
1274: \tilde{\Phi}(t)=\frac{m_{\rm pl}}{\sqrt{3\pi}mt} \exp(-\Gamma t/2)\,.
1275: \label{3_1_13}
1276: \eeqa
1277: The same solution can be obtained by adding the phenomenological
1278: decay term $\Gamma \dot{\phi}$ to the equation of inflaton:
1279: \beqa
1280: \ddot{\phi}+3H\dot{\phi}+\Gamma \dot{\phi}+m^2\phi=0\,.
1281: \label{3_1_14}
1282: \eeqa
1283: The relation, $\Gamma<3H$, holds in the initial stage
1284: as long as coupling constants $\sigma$ and $h$
1285: are small. Since the Hubble parameter decreases as $H \propto 1/t$,
1286: the fraction of produced particles to the total energy density becomes
1287: important when $3H$ drops less than $\Gamma$.
1288: The energy density of the universe at this time can be estimated by
1289: setting $\Gamma^2=(3H)^2=24\pi \rho/m_{\rm pl}^2$, as
1290: \beqa
1291: \rho=\frac{\Gamma^2 m_{\rm pl}^2}{24\pi}\,.
1292: \label{3_1_15}
1293: \eeqa
1294: If we assume that this energy density is rapidly transferred to light
1295: particles and newly-produced particles acquire the radiation energy with
1296: temperature $T_R$ by instant thermalization, we obtain the relation
1297: \beqa
1298: \rho=\frac{g_* \pi^2 T_R^4}{30}=
1299: \frac{\Gamma^2 m_{\rm pl}^2}{24\pi}\,,
1300: \label{3_1_16}
1301: \eeqa
1302: where $g_* (~\gsim~100)$ is the effective number of degrees of freedom
1303: at $T=T_R$. Then the reheating temperature is estimated as
1304: \beqa
1305: T_R~\lsim~0.1 \sqrt{\Gamma m_{\rm pl}}\,.
1306: \label{3_1_17}
1307: \eeqa
1308: Taking into account the relation,
1309: $\Gamma \ll m~\lsim~10^{-6}m_{\rm pl}$, we find
1310: \beqa
1311: T_R \ll 10^{-4}m_{\rm pl}\,.
1312: \label{3_1_18}
1313: \eeqa
1314: This value is much smaller than the
1315: GUT scale temperature $T_{\rm GUT}=10^{-3}m_{\rm pl}$,
1316: which indicates that the GUT scale
1317: baryogenesis does not work well in the old reheating scenario.
1318:
1319:
1320: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1321: \subsection{Preheating}
1322: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1323:
1324: In the early 1990s, it was realized that the inflaton decay may
1325: have started in a much more explosive process,
1326: called {\it preheating} \cite{TB,KLS1}
1327: before the perturbative decay (see also refs.~\cite{Boy,KLS2,GKLS}).
1328: At this stage, the fluctuations of scalar particles can grow quasi-exponentially by
1329: parametric resonance. The process of reheating consists of three stages:
1330: \vspace{0.2cm}
1331:
1332: (i) Preheating stage where particles are nonperturbatively produced
1333:
1334: (ii) Perturbative stage where the inflaton decay is described by
1335: the Born process
1336:
1337: (iii) Thermalization of produced particles
1338:
1339: \vspace{0.2cm}
1340: Among variant models of inflation, chaotic inflation has an advantage
1341: that the dynamics of preheating is simply analyzed.
1342: Kofman, Linde, and Starobinsky
1343: investigated the structure of resonance in preheating
1344: both in massive and self-interacting inflationary
1345: models \cite{KLS1}.
1346: Hereafter we shall review the dynamics of
1347: preheating for the two-field model with a massive inflaton,
1348: \beqa
1349: V(\phi,\chi)=\frac12 m^2\phi^2+\frac12 g^2\phi^2\chi^2\,.
1350: \label{3_2_1}
1351: \eeqa
1352: We assume that the spacetime and the inflaton
1353: $\phi$ give a classical background and the scalar field $\chi$
1354: is treated as a quantum field on that background.
1355: Expanding the scalar field $\chi$ as
1356: \beqa
1357: \chi=\frac{1}{(2\pi)^{3/2}} \int \left(a_k \chi_k(t)
1358: e^{-i {\bf k} \cdot {\bf x}}+a_k^{\dagger} \chi_k^{*}(t)
1359: e^{i {\bf k} \cdot {\bf x}} \right) d^3{\bf k}\,,
1360: \label{3_2_2}
1361: \eeqa
1362: and adopting the flat Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) metric,
1363: the each Fourier component $\chi_k(t)$ satisfies
1364: the following equation of motion,
1365: \beqa
1366: \ddot{\chi}_k+3H\dot{\chi}_k+
1367: \left(\frac{k^2}{a^2}+ g^2\phi^2 \right)\chi_k=0\,.
1368: \label{3_2_3}
1369: \eeqa
1370: Introducing a new scalar field $X_k \equiv a^{3/2}\chi_k$,
1371: Eq.~(\ref{3_2_3}) yields
1372: \beqa
1373: \ddot{X}_k+\omega_k^2 X_k=0\,,
1374: \label{3_2_4}
1375: \eeqa
1376: where
1377: \beqa
1378: \omega_k^2 \equiv \frac{k^2}{a^2} + g^2\phi^2
1379: -\frac34 \left(\frac{2\ddot{a}}{a}+
1380: \frac{\dot{a}^2}{a^2}\right)\,.
1381: \label{3_2_5}
1382: \eeqa
1383: We neglect the last term in Eq.~(\ref{3_2_5}) for analytic
1384: investigations since this term becomes gradually negligible
1385: during the reheating phase.
1386:
1387: Then Eq.~(\ref{3_2_5}) is reduced to the well known
1388: Mathieu equation
1389: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1390: \begin{eqnarray}
1391: \frac{d^2 X_k}{d z^2} + \left(A_k -2q \cos 2z \right) X_k=0\,,
1392: \label{3_2_6}
1393: \end{eqnarray}
1394: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1395: where $z=mt$ and
1396: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1397: \begin{eqnarray}
1398: A_k= 2q + \frac{k^2}{m^2a^2}\,,
1399: \label{3_2_7}
1400: \end{eqnarray}
1401: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1402: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1403: \begin{eqnarray}
1404: q=\frac{g^2\tilde{\Phi}^2(t)}{4m^2}\,.
1405: \label{3_2_8}
1406: \end{eqnarray}
1407: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1408: The strength of the resonance in Eq.~(\ref{3_2_6}) depends on the variables
1409: of $A_k$ and $q$, which is shown in a stability-instability chart of
1410: Fig.~\ref{Mathieu}. In the unstable region (the lined region in
1411: Fig.~\ref{Mathieu}), $X_k$ grows exponentially as $X_k \propto {\rm exp}
1412: (\mu_k z)$ with the Floquet index $\mu_k$ and particles with momentum $k$
1413: are produced. For small $q~(\lsim~1)$, the width of the instability band
1414: is small and few $k$-modes grow by this resonance. This is called the
1415: narrow resonance. On the other hand, for the large $q (\gg 1)$, the
1416: resonance can occur for a broad range of the momentum $k$-space. Since the
1417: growth rate of the $\chi$-particle becomes larger with the increase of the
1418: variable $q$, this resonance provides more efficient particle production
1419: than in the narrow one. This is called the broad resonance \cite{KLS1}.
1420: Note that the initial amplitude of the inflaton and the coupling constant $g$
1421: play important roles to determine whether the resonance is narrow or broad.
1422: Since the inflaton mass is constrained to be small as $m \sim 10^{-6}m_{\rm
1423: pl}$ by COBE normalizations, the large resonance parameter, $q \gg 1$, can
1424: be easily achieved for the coupling $g~\gsim~10^{-4}$ with the initial
1425: amplitude, $\tilde{\Phi}(t_i) \sim 0.2m_{\rm pl}$. The allowed region on the
1426: Mathieu chart is determined by Eq.~(\ref{3_2_7}) as
1427: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1428: \begin{eqnarray}
1429: A_k \geq 2q\,.
1430: \label{3_2_9}
1431: \end{eqnarray}
1432: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1433: Hence the broadest resonance is given by the limit line $A_k =2q$.
1434:
1435: %%%
1436: \begin{figure}
1437: \epsfxsize = 4.5in
1438: \epsffile{Mathieu.eps} \caption{The schematic diagram of the
1439: Mathieu chart and the typical
1440: paths for three types of resonance. The lined regions
1441: denote the instability bands (zeroth, first, second,$\cdots$).
1442: Note that the field perturbation evolves in the region $A_k \ge 2q$.}
1443: \label{Mathieu}
1444: \end{figure}
1445: %%%
1446:
1447: As is found in Eq.~(\ref{3_2_7}), particles with low momenta are
1448: mainly produced. Considering the nonadiabatic condition,
1449: $d\omega_k/dt \gg \omega_k^2$, for the particle production, the
1450: maximum comoving momentum is roughly estimated as \cite{KLS2}
1451: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1452: \begin{eqnarray}
1453: k~\lsim~\sqrt{\frac{g m \tilde{\Phi}}{2}}\,.
1454: \label{3_2_9_1}
1455: \end{eqnarray}
1456: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1457: This indicates that large values of $g$ and $\tilde{\Phi}$ lead to the
1458: production of particles with high momenta.
1459:
1460: When $q$ is sufficiently large initially ($q \gg 1$),
1461: the resonance of each mode occurs {\it stochastically} \cite{KLS2}.
1462: In this case, the frequency $\omega_k$ decreases by cosmic expansion and
1463: $\omega_k$ drastically changes within each oscillation of the inflaton field,
1464: so the phases of $\chi$ field at successive moment of $\phi=0$ are not correlated each other.
1465: In the first stage of preheating, the $\chi$ fields cross large number of instability bands.
1466: The periods when they are in instability
1467: bands are so short that the resonance can not occur efficiently relative to
1468: the Minkowski spacetime case.
1469: Nevertheless, the $\chi$ fluctuations can still grow quasi-exponentially.
1470: As $q$ becomes smaller, cosmic expansion slows down, and the fields stay
1471: in each resonance band for a longer time.
1472: When the variables
1473: decrease below the lower boundary of the first resonance band by the expansion
1474: of the universe, particle productions come to an end.
1475:
1476: %%%
1477: \begin{figure}
1478: \epsfxsize = 4.5in
1479: \epsffile{chievolution.eps}
1480: \caption{
1481: The evolution of the variance
1482: $\langle\bar{\chi}^2\rangle=\langle\chi^2\rangle/m^2$
1483: for $g=3.0 \times 10^{-4}$.}
1484: \label{chievolution}
1485: \end{figure}
1486: %%%
1487:
1488: We have to note that there is another mechanism
1489: which terminates the resonance.
1490: Taking into account the backreaction effect of created $\chi$ particles,
1491: the equation of inflaton is modified as
1492: \beqa
1493: \ddot{\phi}+3H\dot{\phi}+(m^2+g^2\langle\chi^2\rangle)\phi=0\,,
1494: \label{3_2_11}
1495: \eeqa
1496: where the expectation value of $\chi^2$ is defined as
1497: \beqa
1498: \langle\chi^2\rangle \equiv \frac{1}{2\pi^2} \int k^2|\chi_k|^2~dk\,.
1499: \label{3_2_12}
1500: \eeqa
1501: When the initial value of $q$ is large as $q~\gsim~3000$,
1502: which corresponds to $g~\gsim~3.0 \times 10^{-4}$,
1503: the variance $\langle\chi^2\rangle$ grows of order $m^2/g^2$
1504: and the backreaction onto the inflaton field cannot be ignored.
1505: This makes the oscillation of the inflaton incoherent, which
1506: finally stops the resonance.
1507: The evolution of the variance $\langle\chi^2\rangle$ for $g=3.0 \times
1508: 10^{-4}$ is shown in fig.~\ref{chievolution}.
1509:
1510: The growth of the field perturbations can stimulate the enhancement of
1511: metric perturbations on sub-Hubble and even on super-Hubble
1512: scales~\cite{metpre}.
1513: Whether this enhancement occurs or not is sensitive to
1514: the evolution of the large-scale $\chi$ fluctuation {\it during} inflation.
1515: In the model (\ref{3_2_1}), for example, strong amplification of the $\chi$
1516: fluctuation requires a resonance parameter $q\gg 1$ at the beginning of
1517: preheating, in which case the large-scale $\chi_k$ modes are suppressed
1518: during inflation \cite{sup}. Therefore it is difficult to amplify
1519: super-Hubble metric perturbations in this model. However there exist
1520: several models of inflation where metric perturbations can be amplified
1521: during preheating \cite{TB2}. This also provides an interesting possibility
1522: of overproducing primordial black holes in certain cases \cite{PBH}.
1523:
1524:
1525: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1526: \section{Summary}
1527: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1528:
1529: In this lecture note I reviewed the concept of inflation, generation of
1530: density perturbations, and reheating after inflation.
1531: I explained how inflationary cosmology solves a number of cosmological
1532: problems such as flatness, horizon, and monopole problems. In addition
1533: inflation makes it possible to generate nearly scale-invariant density
1534: perturbations, which is consistent with observations. Inflation is really
1535: an efficient mechanism to solve the cosmological problems associated
1536: with standard big-bang cosmology. In addition, elementary particles can be
1537: produced during the (p)reheating stage after inflation through the decay of
1538: the inflaton.
1539:
1540: So far there exist several cosmological scenarios that might be the alternative
1541: to inflation such as the pre-big-bang \cite{Veneziano:1991ek} and
1542: ekpyrotic/cyclic model \cite{ekpyr}. Nevertheless, unlike the standard
1543: inflation, it is generally difficult to solve all of the major cosmological
1544: problems at the same time in these models without a fine tuning of the model
1545: parameters. It is fair to say that standard inflation with a slow-roll
1546: flat potential is the most promising scenario in the very early universe among
1547: the models proposed so far.
1548:
1549: Nevertheless we still have unsolved problems even in the inflationary
1550: cosmology: What is the origin of the inflaton field? What is the state of the
1551: universe before inflation? The initial singularity can be avoided?
1552:
1553: Fortunately we begin to get the high-precision observational data, which is
1554: expected to reveal the nature of inflation in details in near future.
1555: From the theoretical side, there are a lot of extensive works to try to
1556: construct viable models of inflation based on superstring and
1557: supergravity theories. It is really encouraging that we are living
1558: in an exciting era where the early universe models can be strongly
1559: constrained from the upcoming observational data.
1560:
1561:
1562: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1563: \section*{ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS}
1564: I thank the organizers of the school, especially Burin Gumjudpai and
1565: Rachan Rangdee, for organizing nice school and conference.
1566: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1567:
1568:
1569: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1570: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
1571: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1572:
1573: \bibitem{Guth}
1574: A. H. Guth, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 23}, 347 (1981).
1575:
1576: \bibitem{Sato}
1577: K. Sato, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. {\bf 195}, 467 (1981);
1578: Phys. Lett. {\bf 99B}, 66 (1981).
1579:
1580: \bibitem{Star}
1581: A.~A.~Starobinsky,
1582: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 91}, 99 (1980).
1583:
1584: \bibitem{Linde82}
1585: A. Linde, Phys. Lett. {\bf 108B}, 389 (1982).
1586:
1587: \bibitem{AS82}
1588: A. Albrecht and P. Steinhardt,
1589: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 48}, 1220 (1982).
1590:
1591: \bibitem{Linde83}
1592: A. Linde, Phys. Lett. {\bf 129B}, 177 (1983).
1593:
1594: \bibitem{Linde}
1595: A. Linde, {\em Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology},
1596: Harwood, Chur (1990).
1597:
1598: \bibitem{LL}
1599: A.~R.~Liddle and D.~H. ~Lyth, {\em Cosmological inflation and
1600: large-scale structure}, Cambridge University Press (2000).
1601:
1602: \bibitem{LR99}
1603: D. Lyth and A. Riotto, Phys. Rept. {\bf 314}, 1 (1999).
1604:
1605: \bibitem{inper}
1606: S.~W.~Hawking,
1607: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 115}, 295 (1982);
1608: A.~A.~Starobinsky,
1609: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 117}, 175 (1982);
1610: A.~H.~Guth and S.~Y.~Pi,
1611: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 49}, 1110 (1982);
1612: J.~M.~Bardeen, P.~J.~Steinhardt and M.~S.~Turner,
1613: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 28}, 679 (1983).
1614:
1615: \bibitem{Bennett:2003bz}
1616: C.~L.~Bennett {\it et al.},
1617: arXiv:astro-ph/0302207;
1618: H.~V.~Peiris {\it et al.},
1619: arXiv:astro-ph/0302225.
1620:
1621: \bibitem{Weinberg}
1622: S. Weinberg, {\em Gravitation and Cosmology},
1623: J.~Wiley, New York (1972).
1624:
1625: \bibitem{Gravitation}
1626: C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler,
1627: {\em Gravitation}, W.~H.~Freeman, New York (1972).
1628:
1629: \bibitem{Liddle}
1630: A.~R.~Liddle, astro-ph/9612093 (1996).
1631:
1632: \bibitem{Riotto}
1633: A.~Riotto, hep-ph/0210162 (2002).
1634:
1635: \bibitem{Kolbclass}
1636: E. W. Kolb, hep-ph/9910311 (1999).
1637:
1638: \bibitem{Natural}
1639: K. Freese, J. A. Frieman, A. V. Orinto, Phys. Rev. Lett.
1640: {\bf 65}, 3233 (1990);
1641: F. C. Adams, J. R. Bond, K. Freese, J. A. Frieman, and A. V. Orinto,
1642: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 47}, 426 (1993).
1643:
1644: \bibitem{hybrid}
1645: A. D. Linde, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 49}, 748 (1994);
1646: E. J. Copeland, A. R. Liddle, D.H. Lyth, E. D. Stewart,
1647: and D. Wands, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 49}, 6410 (1994).
1648:
1649: \bibitem{CH}
1650: D. Cormier and R. Holman, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 60}, 041301 (1999);
1651: D. Cormier and R. Holman, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 62}, 023520 (2000).
1652:
1653: \bibitem{TTspinodal}
1654: S. Tsujikawa and T. Torii, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 62}, 043505 (2000).
1655:
1656: \bibitem{Felder}
1657: G. Felder et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 87}, 011601 (2001);
1658: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 64}, 123517 (2001).
1659:
1660: \bibitem{TPB}
1661: S.~Tsujikawa, D.~Parkinson, B.~A.~Bassett,
1662: astro-ph/ 0210322, {\it Physcial Review D to appear}.
1663:
1664: \bibitem{cosmo1}
1665: H. Kodama and M. Sasaki, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.
1666: No. 78, 1 (1984).
1667:
1668: \bibitem{cosmo2}
1669: V. Mukhanov, H. Feldman and R. Brandenberger,
1670: Phys. Rep. {\bf 215}, 203 (1992).
1671:
1672: \bibitem{hwang}
1673: J. Hwang, Astrophys. J. {\bf 375}, 443 (1991).
1674:
1675: \bibitem{Bardeen}
1676: J. Bardeen, Phys. Rev. {\bf D22}, 1882 (1980).
1677:
1678: \bibitem{Polarski:1994rz}
1679: D.~Polarski and A.~A.~Starobinsky,
1680: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 50}, 6123 (1994);
1681: M.~Sasaki and E.~D.~Stewart,
1682: Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ {\bf 95}, 71 (1996);
1683: J.~c.~Hwang and H.~Noh,
1684: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 495}, 277 (2000);
1685: C.~Gordon, D.~Wands, B.~A.~Bassett and R.~Maartens,
1686: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63}, 023506 (2001).
1687:
1688: \bibitem{Starobinsky:2001xq}
1689: J.~Garcia-Bellido and D.~Wands,
1690: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 53}, 5437 (1996);
1691: A.~A.~Starobinsky, S.~Tsujikawa and J.~Yokoyama,
1692: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 610}, 383 (2001);
1693: N.~Bartolo, S.~Matarrese and A.~Riotto,
1694: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64}, 123504 (2001).
1695:
1696:
1697: \bibitem{oldre}
1698: A. Dolgov and A. Linde, Phys. Lett. {\bf 116B}, 329
1699: (1982); L. Abbott, E. Farhi, and M. Wise, Phys. Lett. {\bf 117B}, 29.
1700:
1701: \bibitem{TB}
1702: J. Traschen and R. H. Brandenberger, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 42}, 2491 (1990);
1703: Y. Shatanov, J. Trashen, and R. H. Brandenberger,
1704: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 51}, 5438 (1995).
1705:
1706: \bibitem{KLS1}
1707: L. Kofman, A. Linde, and A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Rev. Lett.
1708: {\bf 73}, 3195 (1994).
1709:
1710: \bibitem{Boy}
1711: D. Boyanovsky, H. J. de Vega, R. Holman, D. S. Lee, and A. Singh,
1712: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 51}, 4419 (1995);
1713: M. Yoshimura, Prog. Theor. Phys. {\bf 94}, 873 (1995);
1714: D. I. Kaiser, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 53}, 1776 (1995);
1715: S. Khlebnikov and I. I. Tkachev, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 77}, 219 (1996);
1716: J. Baacke, K. Heitmann, C. P\"atzold, Phys. Rev. D{\bf 55}, 2320 (1997).
1717:
1718: \bibitem{KLS2}
1719: L. Kofman, A. Linde, and A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 56},
1720: 3258 (1997).
1721:
1722: \bibitem{GKLS}
1723: P. B. Greene, L. Kofman, A. Linde, and A. A. Starobinsky,
1724: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 56}, 6175 (1997).
1725:
1726: \bibitem{metpre}
1727: A. Taruya and Y. Nambu,
1728: Phys. Lett. {\bf B428}, 37 (1998);
1729: F. Finelli and R.H. Brandenberger,
1730: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 82}, 1362 (1999);
1731: B.~A. Bassett, D.~I. Kaiser, and R. Maartens,
1732: Phys. Lett. {\bf B455}, 84 (1999);
1733: M. Parry and R. Easther, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 62},
1734: 103503 (2000); B. A. Bassett and F. Viniegra,
1735: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 62}, 043507 (2000);
1736: F. Finelli and R. H. Brandenberger,
1737: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 62}, 083502 (2000);
1738: S.~Tsujikawa, B.~A. Bassett, and F. Viniegra,
1739: JHEP {\bf 08}, 019 (2000);
1740: B.~A.~Bassett, M.~Peloso, L.~Sorbo and S.~Tsujikawa,
1741: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 622}, 393 (2002).
1742:
1743: \bibitem{sup}
1744: K. Jedamzik and G. Sigl, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 61}, 023519 (2000);
1745: P. Ivanov, Phys, Rev. D {\bf 61}, 023505 (2000).
1746:
1747: \bibitem{TB2}
1748: S.~Tsujikawa and B.~A.~Bassett,
1749: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 536}, 9 (2002).
1750:
1751: \bibitem{PBH}
1752: A.~M. Green and K. A. Malik,
1753: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 64}, 021301 (2001);
1754: B.~A. Bassett and S. Tsujikawa,
1755: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 63}, 123503 (2001);
1756: F. Finelli and S. Khlebnikov,
1757: Phys. Lett. {\bf B 504}, 309 (2001).
1758:
1759: \bibitem{Veneziano:1991ek}
1760: G.~Veneziano,
1761: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 265}, 287 (1991);
1762: M.~Gasperini and G.~Veneziano,
1763: Astropart.\ Phys.\ {\bf 1} 317 (1993).
1764:
1765: \bibitem{ekpyr}
1766: J.~Khoury, B.~A.~Ovrut, P.~J.~Steinhardt and N.~Turok,
1767: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64}, 123522 (2001);
1768: P.~J.~Steinhardt and N.~Turok,
1769: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65}, 126003 (2002).
1770:
1771: \end{thebibliography}
1772:
1773:
1774: \end{document}
1775:
1776:
1777: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1778: %%%%%%%% figures %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1779: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1780:
1781: