1:
2:
3: %====================================================================%
4: % MORIOND.TEX 2-Feb-1995 %
5: % This latex file rewritten from various sources for use in the %
6: % preparation of the standard proceedings Volume, latest version %
7: % for the Neutrino'96 Helsinki conference proceedings %
8: % by Susan Hezlet with acknowledgments to Lukas Nellen. %
9: % Some changes are due to David Cassel. %
10: % %
11: % Updated to LaTeX2e and adapted to Moriond 2001 conditions %
12: % by F.Montanet 24/04/2001 %
13: %====================================================================%
14:
15: \documentclass[11pt]{article}
16: \usepackage{moriond,epsfig}
17: \usepackage{amsmath}
18: \usepackage{amssymb}
19: %\documentstyle[11pt,moriond,epsfig]{article}
20:
21:
22: \bibliographystyle{unsrt}
23: % for BibTeX - sorted numerical labels by order of
24: % first citation.
25:
26: % A useful Journal macro
27: \def\Journal#1#2#3#4{{#1} {\bf #2}, #3 (#4)}
28:
29: % Some useful journal names
30: \def\NCA{\em Nuovo Cimento}
31: \def\NIM{\em Nucl. Instrum. Methods}
32: \def\NIMA{{\em Nucl. Instrum. Methods} A}
33: \def\NPB{{\em Nucl. Phys.} B}
34: \def\PLB{{\em Phys. Lett.} B}
35: \def\PRL{\em Phys. Rev. Lett.}
36: \def\PRD{{\em Phys. Rev.} D}
37: \def\ZPC{{\em Z. Phys.} C}
38:
39: \def\JHP{\em J. High Energy Phys.}
40:
41: % Some other macros used in the sample text
42: \def\st{\scriptstyle}
43: \def\sst{\scriptscriptstyle}
44: \def\mco{\multicolumn}
45: \def\epp{\epsilon^{\prime}}
46: \def\vep{\varepsilon}
47: \def\ra{\rightarrow}
48: \def\ppg{\pi^+\pi^-\gamma}
49: \def\vp{{\bf p}}
50: \def\ko{K^0}
51: \def\kb{\bar{K^0}}
52: \def\al{\alpha}
53: \def\ab{\bar{\alpha}}
54: \def\be{\begin{equation}}
55: \def\ee{\end{equation}}
56: \def\bea{\begin{eqnarray}}
57: \def\eea{\end{eqnarray}}
58: \def\CPbar{\hbox{{\rm CP}\hskip-1.80em{/}}}
59: %temp replacement due to no font
60: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
61: % %
62: % BEGINNING OF TEXT %
63: % %
64: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
65: \begin{document}
66: \hfill SISSA Ref. 37/2003/EP
67: \vspace*{3.8cm}
68: \title{EXTENDED COANNIHILATIONS\\ FROM NON UNIVERSAL SFERMION MASSES}
69:
70: \author{S.~PROFUMO }
71:
72: \address{Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzati (SISSA-ISAS)\\ and INFN, Sezione di Trieste,
73: I-34014 Trieste, Italy}
74:
75: \maketitle\abstracts{We propose and analyse a GUT-inspired version of the MSSM featuring non universal sfermion masses boundary conditions and asymptotic $b$-$\tau$ Yukawa coupling unification. The particle spectrum of the model gives rise to extended coannihilation processes, involving the lightest sbottom and the tau sneutrino. We study the allowed parameter space, subject to cosmo-phenomenological requirements, and the details of the new coannihilations modes. Implications for direct and indirect neutralino searches, as well as for collider physics, are also briefly summarized.}
76:
77: \section{Introduction and Motivations}
78:
79: The physics at the interface of cosmology and elementary particles
80: theory is currently undergoing an exciting era. On the one side,
81: we entered an epoch of precision measurements in the field of
82: astrophysics and cosmology, as demonstrated by the recent results obtained by
83: the WMAP survey \cite{WMAP}. On the other side, the hunt for
84: supersymmetry, which would solve a number of open fundamental
85: questions concerning the physics beyond the standard model, is
86: going to be boosted both by accelerator \cite{COLLIDERREACH} and by direct or indirect neutralino search
87: experiments \cite{DIRECT}.
88:
89: \noindent As regards the theoretical and phenomenological
90: exploration of supersymmetric models, a number of recent
91: experimental and observational results increasingly constrain
92: the candidate scenarios and their parameter space. In this paper
93: we deal with the so-called minimal supersymmetric extension
94: of the standard model, in a \emph{gravity mediated} SUSY breaking
95: context \cite{SUGRA}. In these models, the numerous \emph{a
96: priori} free low energy parameters are fixed, through RG running, by the values of the soft SUSY breaking masses and
97: trilinear terms at some high energy scale
98: $M_{X}$. The common practice is to assume that some
99: underlying principle forces these high energy variables to some
100: \emph{universal} values at $M_{X}$, thus reducing the unkowns to
101: four numbers and one sign (CMSSM).
102:
103: \noindent If one further supposes that the electroweak and strong
104: interactions ultimately unify in a single \emph{grand unification theory}
105: (GUT), as suggested by the running of the coupling
106: constants, the GUT gauge group can dictate some relations among
107: the Yukawa couplings of the high energy theory (Yukawa
108: Unification) \cite{YU}.
109:
110: \noindent We will analyse here the phenomenology of a class of
111: GUT-inspired models, characterized by the relaxation of the
112: hypothesis of \emph{universality} in the sector of the fermions
113: scalar superpartners and by partial ($b$-$\tau$) Yukawa Unification
114: (YU) \cite{SP}. These models are motivated by a minimal $SU(5)$ SUSY GUT
115: theory in which the scale of grand unification $M_{GUT}$ lies
116: below the scale $M_{X}$ where universality is
117: assumed \cite{SUSYGUTNU}. The $SU(5)$ RG running between $M_{X}$ and
118: $M_{GUT}$ induces a non-universality in the whole scalar sector
119: (the gaugino sector universality is instead not spoiled by the running \cite{SUSYGUTNU}). As
120: regards the sfermions, the multiplet structure of the GUT theory,
121: which collects the particle content into the
122: $\mathbf{\overline{5}}$ (down-type quark singlet and lepton
123: doublet) and the $\mathbf{10}$ (up-type quark and lepton singlets
124: and quark doublet) representations of $SU(5)$, implies the
125: following parameterization for the soft SUSY breaking masses at
126: $M_{GUT}$:
127:
128: \bea & m^2_Q=m^2_U=m^2_E\equiv m^2_{\bf 10}\equiv m^2_0& \\
129: & m^2_L=m^2_D\equiv m^2_{\bf 5} = K^2m^2_{\bf 10}& \eea
130:
131: \begin{figure}[!t]
132: \begin{center}
133: \includegraphics[scale=0.45,angle=-90]{Nonuniv.ps}
134: \end{center}
135: \caption{The evolution of the coupling constants and of the soft SUSY breaking masses of the ${\bf \overline{5}}$ and ${\bf 10}$ $SU(5)$ multiplets for a $SU(5)$ SUSY GUT theory with $M_{GUT}$ smaller than the scale where scalar universality is assumed (here $M_{\rm Planck}$).}
136: \label{Nonuniv}
137: \end{figure}
138:
139: \noindent In fig.\ref{Nonuniv} we sketch a typical pattern for the
140: running of $m^2_{\bf 10}$ and $m^2_{\bf 5}$, compared above with
141: the coupling constants running. Although the full GUT theory would
142: also imply a large non-universality in the Higgs sector and $K\gtrsim
143: 0.7$, we will resort to a simplification of the model, and let
144: $m^2_{H_{1,2}}=m^2_0$ in order to concentrate only on the implications of minimal non-universal sfermion masses (mNUSM). We also vary $K$ between 0 and 1 (the latter being the fully universal case). %\footnote{Since the theory under scrutiny is an almost minimal $SU(5)$ SUSY GUT, the critical question of proton decay should also be addressed. First, we drastically simplify the mentioned SUSY GUT with $M_{GUT}\gg M_{SSB}$, the latter being the scale were universality is assumed, so that it would be difficult to estimate the proton life time. Second, it has been shown that {\em consistent} $SU(5)$ models, obtained with suitable matrix structures for the leptoquark Yukawas (which here we neglect, as the lighter families Yukawas), entail, even at large $\tan\beta$, a decay rate well within the current experimental limits \cite{PROTON}.}.
145: We therefore generically expect a lighter spectrum, with respect to the universal case, for the sparticles belonging
146: to the $\mathbf{\overline{5}}$ representation for $K<1$.
147:
148: \noindent On top of sfermion non-universality, we inherit from the original $SU(5)$ SUSY GUT the
149: successful prediction of $b$-$\tau$ YU. We impose
150: exact YU at $M_{GUT}$, and fix the common Yukawa coupling
151: $h_b=h_\tau(M_{GUT})$ in order to get the right value for
152: $m_{\tau}(M_Z)$, after having included running effects and the
153: SUSY thresholds corrections at $M_{SUSY}\equiv\sqrt{m_{\tilde
154: t_1}m_{\tilde t_2}}$. The output is $m_b(M_Z)$, which is then
155: required to lie within the properly evolved experimental range
156: \cite{MBRANGE}.
157:
158: \noindent The current upper limit on the cosmological relic
159: density of neutralinos as cold dark matter candidates requires, in
160: the CMSSM, efficient suppression mechanisms \cite{STAU,SP}. Among these, a recent
161: uprise of interest has involved the so-called
162: \emph{coannihilation} processes \cite{STAU}, occurring when the
163: next-to-lightest SUSY particle (NLSP) mass is close to the
164: lightest, which, for cosmological reasons, we require to be the neutralino. The main scope of
165: the present analysis is to shed some light on the possibility that
166: the minimal proposed deviation from universality in the sfermion
167: soft SUSY breaking masses could activate
168: \emph{extended coannihilation} channels, involving sparticles belonging to
169: the $\mathbf{\overline{5}}$ (stau, tau sneutrino, sbottom).
170: Further, the requirement of $b$-$\tau$ YU, and the fulfillment
171: of a set of cosmo-phenomenological constraints will strongly
172: limit the allowed $\tan\beta$ values as well as the sparticles
173: mass range. The implications of these bounds for accelerator
174: searches and for direct and indirect SUSY CDM detection will also be
175: briefly discussed.
176: %
177: \section{The Particle Spectrum}
178: %
179: \begin{figure}[!t]
180: \begin{center}
181: \includegraphics[scale=0.45,angle=-90]{CombSpect.ps}
182: \end{center}
183: \caption{The sbottom and sneutrino mass spectrum at $M_{1/2}=1.1\ {\rm TeV}$, $\tan\beta=38.0$ and $A_0=0$, for several values of $m_0$, as functions of the non-universality parameter $K$. For the tau sneutrino, from left to right, $m_0=1350,\ 1650 ,\ 1950$ GeV, while for the sbottom $m_0=2850,\ 3300,\ 3750$ GeV.}
184: \label{CombSpect}
185: \end{figure}
186: \begin{figure}[!b]
187: \begin{center}
188: \includegraphics[scale=0.45,angle=-90]{Isolevel.ps}
189: \end{center}
190: \caption{Mass isolevel curves for the tau sneutrino and for the sbottom in the $(K,m_0/M_{1/2})$ plane. The solid red and black lines indicate respectively $m_{\tilde\nu_\tau}=0$ and $m_{\tilde b}=0$. The splitting between the isolevel curves is 10\% of the neutralino mass $m_{\tilde\chi}\simeq500\ {\rm GeV}$; $\tan\beta=38.0$, $A_0=0$, $\mu<0$.}
191: \label{Isolevel}
192: \end{figure}
193: %
194: The large values of the Yukawa couplings of the third generation
195: fermions, owing to RG running, yield lighter
196: superpartners than the ones of the other two
197: generations. Besides the widely discussed case of the stau
198: \cite{STAU}, the role of NLSP, in presence of non-universal
199: sfermion boundary conditions, can be played by both the sbottom
200: and the tau sneutrino \cite{SP}. In order to quantify this statement, we
201: plot in fig.\ref{CombSpect} the masses of the two sparticles at
202: various values of $m_0$ as functions of the parameter $K$. The features shown in fig.\ref{CombSpect} are
203: traced back to the generic form of the approximate solutions to
204: the RG equations at the electroweak scale, which can be
205: parameterized as
206: %
207: \begin{equation}
208: m_{\scriptscriptstyle\tilde\nu,\tilde b}\ \simeq\ m_0\sqrt{a_{\scriptscriptstyle\tilde\nu, \tilde b}+b_{\scriptscriptstyle\tilde\nu, \tilde b}K^2},
209: \end{equation}
210: %
211: \noindent where $a$ and $b$ are, to a good approximation, functions of the ratio
212: $(m_0/M_{1/2})$ and of $\tan\beta$, and weakly depend on the
213: trilinear coupling $A_0$ \cite{SP}. In all cases we notice that
214: for a given value of $m_0$ there exists a corresponding range for
215: $K$ where the sbottom or the tau sneutrino are quasi-degenerate
216: with the neutralino \footnote{As regards the question of the fine-tuning of the parameter $K$, see the discussion in sec.6.4 of ref. \cite{SP}.} (whose mass roughly depends only on $M_{1/2}$
217: and is therefore insensitive to $K$). The mass isolevel curves
218: plotted in fig.\ref{Isolevel} highlight the plausible
219: coannihilation regions produced by the particle spectrum of NUSM
220: models (see sec.\ref{sec:coann}). The shape of fig.\ref{Isolevel} is qualitatively
221: unchanged by the variation of any SUSY parameter, slowly moving to the
222: right when increasing $\tan\beta$ \cite{SP}. We then conclude that we
223: expect extended sfermion coannihilations for $K< 0.5$ and for relatively
224: large values of $m_0\gtrsim1.5\ M_{1/2}$.
225: %
226: \section{Cosmo-Phenomenological Constraints}
227: %
228: \begin{figure}[!t]
229: \begin{center}
230: \begin{tabular}{cc}
231: \includegraphics[width=5.8cm,height=6.6cm,angle=-90]{Oh2UBC.ps} &
232: \includegraphics[width=6cm,height=6cm,angle=-90]{BsgUBC.ps}\\
233: &\\[-0.2cm]
234: \hspace{1.cm} (\emph{a}) & \hspace{1.cm} (\emph{b})\\
235: \end{tabular}
236: \end{center}
237: \caption{($a$) the neutralino relic density $\Omega_{\tilde\chi}h^2$ and ($b$) the inclusive branching ratio $BR(b\rightarrow s \gamma)$ for three benchmark $K$ cases, corresponding respectively to $NLSP=\tilde\tau,\ \tilde b,\ \tilde\nu_\tau$, at $\tan\beta=36.0$ and fixed $\Delta_{NLSP}=10\%$.}
238: \label{cosmopheno}
239: \end{figure}
240: %
241: Supersymmetric models with conserved $R$ parity are commonly
242: required to fulfill two categories of phenomenological constraints. On
243: the one side, since these models produce natural candidates for
244: the CDM content of the Universe, in our case the neutralino, the
245: corresponding relic abundance as well as the direct or indirect
246: cosmic detection rates must be compatible with the current
247: observational and experimental data. On the other side, many
248: precision accelerator measurements can be used to test the
249: viability of a given supersymmetric scenario. Finally, the extra
250: theoretical constraint of $b$-$\tau$ YU forces the mass of the bottom quark to values to
251: be compared with the current experimental and lattice data. Details on the numerical calculations and on the statistical
252: analysis we adopted in this work can be found in ref. \cite{SP}.
253:
254: \noindent {\bf Neutralino relic density and detection.} We impose
255: to the model the current determination of the upper limit on
256: the CDM content of the Universe, coming from the analysis of the
257: WMAP results \cite{WMAP}, namely $\Omega_{\rm CDM}
258: h^2=0.1126^{+0.0081}_{-0.0091}$. The lower limit can be evaded
259: under the hypothesis that other components contribute to the CDM
260: besides the neutralino. The numerical computation of the neutralino relic density is performed with the updated {\tt micrOMEGAs} code \cite{MICROMEGAS}, which includes thermally averaged exact tree-level cross-sections of all possible (co-)annihilation processes, an appropriate treatment of poles and the one-loop QCD corrections to the Higgs coupling with the fermions. Fig.\ref{cosmopheno} ($a$) shows our results for three {\em benchmark} cases, respectively at $K=0.2,\ 0.4$ and 0.8. In the latter case the coannihilation region overlaps the $A$-pole rapid direct annihilation funnel, extending the allowed $m_{\tilde\chi}$ range up to $\approx700\ {\rm GeV}$. The other two cases, instead, show the typical behavior $\Omega_{\tilde\chi}\propto m^2_{\tilde\chi}$, though suppressed by coannihilation phenomena.\\
261: \noindent As for the direct and indirect neutralino
262: searches, we verified that in any case the detection rate
263: estimates for mNUSM models lie below the {\em current} experimental
264: sensitivity \cite{SP}. We find nonetheless that $t$-channel exchanges of lighter (for $K\ll1$) sfermions generate higher detection rates for small values of $K$, falling within reach of future WIMP search experiments \cite{DIRECT}.
265:
266: \noindent {\bf Accelerator constraints.} The most stringent bounds
267: coming from accelerator data are found to be, in the present work,
268: the inclusive $BR(b\rightarrow s \gamma)$ \cite{BSG} (see fig.\ref{cosmopheno}, frame ($b$)) and the lower
269: limit on the lightest CP-even Higgs mass \cite{LEP}. They both
270: give {\em lower} bounds on the mass of the neutralino $m_{\chi}$. As regards the SUSY contributions
271: to the muon anomalous magnetic moment $\delta a_\mu$,
272: we chose to resort to the so-called {\em super-conservative}
273: approach \cite{MW}, and to take as a constraint the extended
274: 5-$\sigma$ bound derived from the latest experimental and theoretical results \cite{DAM} on
275: $a_\mu$.
276:
277: \noindent {\bf The $b$ quark mass.} In the context of $b$-$\tau$
278: YU, the SUSY corrections to the mass of the $b$ quark constrain
279: the allowed $\tan\beta$ range as well as the sign of $\mu$. In
280: fact, the sign of these corrections is given by the sign of $\mu$,
281: and is proportional to $\tan\beta$; since the tree level value of
282: $m_b$, fixed by the common $b$-$\tau$ Yukawa coupling determined
283: by $m_\tau$, is typically higher than the upper experimental bound
284: on $m_b$, the corrections are required to be {\em negative} (hence
285: $\mu<0$) and {\em large} (hence large $\tan\beta$). In mNUSM models \cite{SP}, the adopted top-down YU excludes $\mu>0$ and
286: forces, in the $\mu<0$ case, $31<\tan\beta<45$.
287:
288: \section{Extended Sfermion Coannihilations}\label{sec:coann}
289: %
290: \begin{figure}[!t]
291: \begin{center}
292: \begin{tabular}{cc}
293: \includegraphics[scale=0.35,angle=-90]{K01tb38.ps} &
294: \includegraphics[scale=0.35,angle=-90]{K035tb38.ps}\\
295: &\\[-0.2cm]
296: \hspace{1.cm} (\emph{a}) & \hspace{1.cm} (\emph{b})\\
297: \end{tabular}
298: \end{center}
299: \caption{The cosmologically and phenomenologically allowed regions in the ($m_{\tilde\chi},\Delta_{NLSP}$) plane at $\tan\beta=38.0$, at $K=0.1$ ($a$) and $K=0.35$ ($b$).}
300: \label{coann}
301: \end{figure}
302: %
303: Minimal NUSM produce a new coannihilation branch at $K<0.5$ (see fig.\ref{Isolevel}), where the coannihilating NLSP is the tau sneutrino at low $1.5\lesssim (m_0/M_{1/2})\lesssim 3$, and the lightest sbottom, for $(m_0/M_{1/2})\gtrsim3$. We study in fig.\ref{coann} the new extended sfermion coannihilations at $A_0=0$ and at an intermediate value of $\tan\beta=38$. Frame ($a$) refers to the tau sneutrino NLSP, at $K=0.1$, while frame ($b$) to the sbottom, at $K=0.35$. We parameterize the remaining variables of the model, $m_0$ and $M_{1/2}$, through $m_{\tilde\chi}$ and $\displaystyle \Delta_{NLSP}\equiv \frac{m_{NLSP}-m_{\tilde\chi}}{m_{\tilde\chi}}$: via RG running, in fact, ($m_0,M_{1/2}$) uniquely determines ($m_{\tilde\chi},\Delta_{NLSP}$), and vice-versa. The NLSP mass range where $\Omega_{\tilde\chi}\lesssim0.13$, at a fixed given $m_{\tilde\chi}$, is as large as allowed by the efficiency of coannihilation processes. We clearly notice that sbottom-neutralino coannihilations (frame ($b$)), which involve strong interaction processes, suppress the relic density much more effectively than in the $\tilde\chi$-$\tilde\nu_\tau$-$\tilde\tau$ case (frame ($a$)). We also find that $\tilde\chi$-$\tilde b$ and $\tilde b$-$\tilde b$ (co-)annihilations evolve, through strong interactions, into few final SM states (respectively $g$-$b$ and $g$-$g$ or $b$-$b^*$) and largely dominate over $\tilde\chi$-$\tilde\chi$ annihilations, while triple $\tilde\chi$-$\tilde\nu_\tau$-$\tilde\tau$ coannihilations present a wider and more complex pattern of final states (see ref. \cite{SP}). In the left part of the figures we show the bounds dictated by the 95\% C.L. exclusion regions of various accelerator constraints. Scanning the values of $\tan\beta$ we find that, for $\tan\beta\gtrsim45$ and $\tan\beta\lesssim31$, the cosmologically allowed region squeezes until no points simultaneously fulfill $b$-$\tau$ YU and the accelerator constraints.
304:
305: \section{Summary and Conclusions}
306:
307: We showed that in a $SU(5)$ SUSY GUT with $m_{\bf 5}=Km_{\bf 10}$ scalar soft SUSY masses new extended sfermion coannihilation modes take place. These involve unusual NLSP coannihilating particles, such as the tau sneutrino and the sbottom. The models, to which we apply the constraint of $b$-$\tau$ YU, as inherited from the inspiring $SU(5)$ theory, fulfill the present phenomenological accelerator bounds as well as the recent cosmological relic density required for the neutralino as cold dark matter constituent.\\
308: \noindent As regards the detectability of the models under scrutiny, we find \cite{SP} that future direct WIMP search experiments \cite{DIRECT} will be sensitive to part of the highlighted coannihilation regions, namely at low $m_{\tilde\chi}$. Moreover, as far as the CERN LHC $pp$ collider reach is concerned \cite{COLLIDERREACH}, we find that most of the tau-sneutrino coannihilation region will be within reach, while the sbottom coannihilation region (where $m_0\gtrsim 3 M_{1/2}$ and a heavier SUSY spectrum is cosmologically allowed), could escape detectability if $m_{\tilde\chi}\gtrsim 500\ {\rm GeV}$.
309:
310: \section*{Acknowledgments}
311: I acknowledge SISSA for financial support and the organizers of the Conference for the very pleasant and stimulating environment.
312:
313: \section*{References}
314: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
315:
316: \bibitem{WMAP} D.N.~Spergel et al., {\tt astro-ph/0302209}; M.~Limon, {\em Talk given at the XXXVIIIth Rencontres de Moriond, 2003}.
317: \bibitem{COLLIDERREACH} H.~Baer, C.~Balazs, A.~Belyaev, T.~Krupovnickas and X.~Tata, {\tt hep-ph/0304303}.
318: \bibitem{DIRECT} V.~Sanglard and R.~Luscher, {\em Talks given at the XXXVIIIth Rencontres de Moriond, 2003}.
319: \bibitem{SUGRA} see e.g. A.~Chamseddine, R.~Arnowitt and P.~Nath,
320: {\em Phys. Rev. Lett.} {\bf 49} (1982) 970.
321: \bibitem{YU} M.~Carena, S.~Pokorski and C.~E.~Wagner,{\em Nucl. Phys.} {\bf B406} (1993) 59; D.~Auto, H.~Baer, C.~Balazs, A.~Belyaev, J.~Ferrandis and X.~Tata, {\tt hep-ph/0302155} and references therein.
322: \bibitem{SP} S.~Profumo, {\tt hep-ph/0304071}.
323: \bibitem{SUSYGUTNU} H.~Baer, M.~Diaz, P.~Quintana and X.~Tata, {\em JHEP} {\bf 0004} (2000) 016.
324: %\bibitem{PROTON} D.~Emmanuel-Costa and S.~Wiesenfeldt, {\tt hep-ph/0302272}.
325: \bibitem{MBRANGE} H.~Baer, J.~Ferrandis, K.~Melnikov, X.~Tata, {\em Phys. Rev.} {\bf D 66} (2002) 074007.
326: \bibitem{STAU} A.~Djouadi, M.~Drees and J.L.~Kneur, {\em JHEP} {\bf 0108} (2001) 055.
327: \bibitem{MICROMEGAS} G.~Belanger, F.~Boudjema, A.~Pukhov and A.~Semenov, {\em Comput. Phys. Commun.} {\bf 149} (2002) 103; {\tt hep-ph/0210327}.
328: \bibitem{BSG} R.~Barate et al. ({\bf ALEPH} Collaboration), {\em Phys. Lett.} {\bf B 429} (1998) 169.
329: \bibitem{LEP} {\bf ALEPH}, {\bf DELPHI}, {\bf L3} and {\bf OPAL} Collaborations, {\tt hep-ex/0107029}.
330: \bibitem{DAM} A.~Nyffeler and F.~Gray, {\em Talks given at the XXXVIIIth Rencontres de Moriond, 2003}; S.~Narison, {\tt hep-ph/0303004}.
331: \bibitem{MW} S.P.~Martin and J.D.~Wells, {\em Phys. Rev.} {\bf D 67} (2003) 015002.
332:
333: \end{thebibliography}
334:
335: \end{document}
336:
337: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
338: % End of moriond.tex %
339: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
340: R
341: