1: \hoffset=0.1in
2: \voffset=-0.3in
3: \documentstyle[12pt,epsf]{article}
4: %\documentstyle[twocolumn,12pt]{article}
5: \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.0}
6: \newcommand{\resection}[1]{\setcounter{equation}{0}\section{#1}}
7: \newcommand{\appsection}{\addtocounter{section}{1} \setcounter{equation}{0}
8: \section*{Appendix \Alph{section}}}
9: %\newcommand{\appsection}{\setcounter{equation}{0} \section*{Appendix}}
10: %\renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}
11: \renewcommand{\theequation}{\arabic{equation}}
12: \textwidth 164mm
13: \textheight 214mm
14: %\textheight 247mm
15: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
16: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
17: %%
18: \def\aprle{\buildrel < \over {_{\sim}}}
19: \def\aprge{\buildrel > \over {_{\sim}}}
20: %%
21: \parindent=0.7truecm
22: \parskip=0.2truecm
23: %\def\imp{\marginpar{$\Leftarrow$}}
24: \begin{document}
25: \topmargin 0pt
26: \oddsidemargin=-0.4truecm
27: \evensidemargin=-0.4truecm
28: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}
29:
30: \newpage
31: \setcounter{page}{1}
32: \begin{titlepage}
33: \vspace*{-2.0cm}
34: \begin{flushright}
35: \vspace*{-0.2cm}
36:
37: %hep-ph/0108312\\
38: \end{flushright}
39: \vspace*{0.5cm}
40:
41: \begin{center}
42: {\Large \bf The MSW effect and Solar Neutrinos
43: \footnote{Invited talk given at the 11th workshop on Neutrino Telescopes,
44: Venice, March 11- 14, 2003.}}
45: %%\vspace{0.4cm}
46: \vspace{0.5cm}
47:
48: {A. Yu. Smirnov$^{2,3}$\\
49:
50: \vspace*{0.2cm}
51: {\em (2) The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics,
52: I-34100 Trieste, Italy }\\
53: {\em (3) Institute for Nuclear Research of Russian Academy
54: of Sciences, Moscow 117312, Russia}
55:
56: }
57: \end{center}
58:
59: \begin{abstract}
60:
61:
62: The MSW (Mikheyev-Smirnov-Wolfenstein) effect is the effect of transformation of one neutrino
63: species (flavor) into another one in a medium with varying density.
64: Three basic elements of the effect include: the refraction of neutrinos in matter,
65: the resonance (level crossing) and the adiabaticity.
66: The key notion is {\it the neutrino eigenstates} in matter.
67: Physical picture of the effect is
68: described in terms of the flavors and the relative phases
69: of eigenstates and the transitions between eigenstates.
70: Features of the large mixing realization of the MSW effect
71: are discussed. The large mixing MSW effect (LMA) provides the
72: solution of the solar neutrino problem. We show in details how this mechanism works.
73: Physics beyond the LMA solution is discussed.
74: The lower $Ar$-production rate (in comparison with the LMA prediction)
75: and absence of significant turn up of the spectrum at low energies
76: can be due to an additional effect of the light
77: sterile neutrino with very small mixing.
78:
79: \end{abstract}
80: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
81: %\centerline{Pacs numbers: 14.60.Lm 14.60.Pq 95.85.Ry 26.65.+t}
82: %\centerline{August 2001}
83: \end{titlepage}
84: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\arabic{footnote}}
85: \setcounter{footnote}{0}
86: %\newpage
87: \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{0.9}
88: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
89:
90:
91: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
92: \section{Introduction}
93:
94: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
95: \subsection{Context}
96: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
97:
98: The key components of the context in which
99: the mechanism of resonance flavor conversion has been proposed
100: include
101:
102:
103: \begin{itemize}
104:
105: \item
106:
107: Neutrino mixing and oscillations invented by
108: B. Pontecorvo (1957, 1958) (neutrino-antineutrino oscillations, maximal mixing)~\cite{pontosc}
109: and $\nu_e - \nu_{\mu}$ (flavor) mixing as well as the ``virtual $\nu_e - \nu_{\mu}$ transmutation"
110: proposed by Z. Maki, M. Nakagawa, S. Sakata~\cite{mns} (1962).
111:
112:
113: \item
114:
115: Spectroscopy of solar neutrinos:
116: the program put forward by J. N. Bahcall~\cite{bah} and independently by
117: G. Zatsepin and V. Kuzmin~\cite{zk}
118: to study interior of the Sun by measuring fluxes of all components of the
119: solar neutrino spectrum.
120: It was proposed to perform several experiments with different energy thresholds.
121:
122: \item
123:
124: The results of the Homestake experiment~\cite{hom}: they led to formulation
125: of the solar neutrino problem which has triggered major experimental
126: and theoretical developments in neutrino physics in the last 30 years.
127: In fact, the problem was predicted by B. Pontecorvo~\cite{pontprob}, who also
128: suggested its vacuum oscillation solution~\cite{pontprob,gp}
129: (averaged vacuum oscillations with maximal or near maximal mixing).
130:
131: \item
132:
133: Matter effects on neutrino oscillations introduced by
134: L. Wolfenstein~\cite{w1}.
135:
136:
137: \end{itemize}
138:
139:
140: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
141: \subsection{References}
142: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
143:
144: Here I give (with some comments) references to the early papers on the MSW effect written by
145: W.\cite{w1,w2,w3} and M.-S.\cite{ms1,ms2,ms3,ms4}.\\
146:
147:
148: \noindent
149: L. Wolfenstein:\\
150: \noindent
151: [1] ``Neutrino oscillations in matter", Phys. Rev. D17:2369-2374, 1978.
152: Topics include: neutrino refraction, mixing in matter,
153: eigenstates for propagation in matter, evolution equation, modification of vacuum oscillations.\\
154:
155:
156: \noindent
157: [2] ``Effect of Matter on Neutrino Oscillations", in
158: {\it ``Neutrino -78"}, Purdue Univ. C3 - C6, 1978.
159: The adiabatic formula has been given for massless neutrino conversion in varying density. \\
160:
161:
162: \noindent
163: [3] ``Neutrino oscillations and stellar collapse",
164: Phys. Rev. D20:2634-2635, 1979.
165: Suppression of oscillations in matter of the star is emphasized. \\
166:
167: We started to work in the beginning of 1984, when Stas Mikheyev had shown me the
168: Wolfenstein's paper [1]. The question was about validity of the results
169: and necessity to use them in the oscillation analysis of the atmospheric neutrino data
170: from the Baksan telescope. \\
171:
172: \noindent
173: S.P. Mikheev, A.Yu. Smirnov:\\
174: \noindent
175: [4] ``Resonant amplification of neutrino oscillations in matter
176: and spectroscopy of solar neutrinos", Yad. Fiz. 42:1441-1448, 1985
177: [Sov.J. Nucl. Phys. 42:913-917, 1985.]\\
178: \noindent
179: [5] ``Resonant amplification of neutrino oscillations
180: in matter and solar neutrino spectroscopy", Nuovo Cim. C9:17-26, 1986.
181: Appearance of these two papers with very close but not identical
182: content ({\it e.g.}, in [5] we comment on the effect in the three neutrino context)
183: is a result of problems with publications.\\
184:
185:
186: \noindent
187: [6] ``Neutrino oscillations in a variable density medium and neutrino bursts
188: due to gravitational collapse of stars",
189: Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.91:7-13, 1986, [Sov. Phys. JETP 64:4-7,1986.].
190: Theory of the adiabatic neutrino conversion is presented.
191: Here formulas for adiabatic probabilities can be found.
192: To ``cheat" editors and referees and to avoid a fate of previous papers
193: we have removed the term ``resonance" and ``solar neutrinos" as well as
194: references to our previous papers [4] [5].
195: The paper had been submitted to JETP Letters in the fall of 1985
196: and successfully ... rejected.
197: It has been resubmitted to JETP in December of 1985.
198: The theory is applied, of course,
199: to solar neutrinos and the paper was reprinted in
200: ``Solar Neutrinos: The first Thirty Years", Ed. J. N. Bahcall, et al., Addison-Wesley 1995. \\
201:
202: \noindent
203: [7] ``Neutrino oscillations in Matter with Varying density",
204: Proc. of the
205: {\it 6th Moriond Workshop on Massive Neutrinos in
206: Astrophysics and Particle Physics} (Tignes, Savoie, France) January 25 - February 1, 1986,
207: eds. O. Fackler and J. Tran Thanh Van, p. 355 - 372.
208: In two talks at Moriond, I have
209: summarized all our results (excluding solar neutrinos) obtained in 1985.
210: The paper contains (apart from theory of the adiabatic conversion) calculations
211: of the Earth matter effect on the solar and atmospheric neutrinos, the graphic representation of
212: oscillations and adiabatic conversion, some attempts to apply the matter effects to neutrinos in the
213: Early Universe etc..
214:
215: One important contribution both to physics of effect and to its promotion:
216: in Summary talk of Savonlinna workshop, where our results
217: have been presented for the first time, N. Cabibbo~\cite{cab}
218: has given interpretation of the effect in terms of
219: eigenvalues and level crossing phenomenon (complementary to our description in terms of eigenstates).
220: A possibility of such an interpretation
221: was mentioned before by V. Rubakov (private communication) and later has been
222: developed independently by H. Bethe~\cite{bet}.
223:
224: What was in between 1979 and 1985?
225: Several papers has been published on neutrino oscillations in matter with constant
226: density \cite{bar,pak,haub,raman,paul}.
227: In particular, in the paper by V. Barger et al,~\cite{bar} and S. Pakvasa~\cite{pak},
228: it was shown that matter can enhance oscillations
229: and for certain energy the mixing can become maximal. Furthermore, matter
230: distinguishes neutrinos and antineutrinos and resolves the ambiguity
231: in the sign of $\Delta m^2$. In \cite{paul} the index of refraction of neutrinos has been derived
232: for moving and polarized medium, correct sign of the matter potential obtained.
233:
234:
235: %%
236: %Just one last comment, rather general, in fact,: to know the ``truth" one needs to read carefully
237: %acknowledgments and footnotes in the original papers (and to understand what is behind).
238: %%
239: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% ppp1 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
240: \section{Flavors, masses, mixing and oscillations}
241: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
242:
243: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
244: \subsection{Introducing mixing}
245: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
246:
247: The {\it flavor} neutrino states: $\nu_f = (\nu_e, \nu_{\mu}, \nu_{\tau})$
248: are defined as the states which correspond to certain charge leptons:
249: $e$, $\mu$ and $\tau$. The correspondence is established by
250: interactions: $\nu_{l}$ and $l$ ($l = e, \mu, \tau$) interact in pairs,
251: forming the charged currents.
252: It is not excluded that additional neutrino states, the sterile neutrinos, $\nu_s$, exist.
253: The neutrino {\it mass states}, $\nu_1$, $\nu_2$, and $\nu_3$, with masses $m_1$, $m_2$, $m_3$
254: are the eigenstates of mass matrix as well as the eigenstates of
255: the total Hamiltonian in vacuum.
256:
257: The {\it vacuum mixing} means that the flavor states do not coincide with the mass eigenstates.
258: The flavor states are combinations of the mass eigenstates:
259: \be
260: \nu_{l} = U_{l i} \nu_{i}, ~~~ l = e, \mu, \tau, ~~~i = 1, 2, 3,
261: \label{mixing}
262: \ee
263: where the mixing parameters $U_{l i}$ form the P-MNS mixing matrix.
264:
265: In the case of two neutrino mixing $\nu_e - \nu_a$, where $\nu_a$ is the
266: non-electron neutrino state, we can write:
267: \begin{eqnarray}
268: \nu_e = \cos\theta~ \nu_1 + \sin \theta~ \nu_2, ~~
269: \nu_a = \cos\theta ~\nu_2 - \sin \theta~ \nu_1.
270: \label{2nu}
271: \end{eqnarray}
272: Here $\theta$ is the vacuum mixing angle.
273: In the three neutrino context $\nu_e$ mixes with $\nu_a$
274: in the mass eigenstates $\nu_1$ and $\nu_2$
275: relevant for the solar neutrinos, and $\nu_a$ is maximal or nearly maximal mixture
276: of $\nu_{\mu}$ and $\nu_{\tau}$.
277:
278:
279: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
280: \subsection{Two aspects of mixing. Portrait of electron neutrino}
281: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
282:
283: There are two important physical aspects of mixing. According to
284: (\ref{2nu}) the flavor neutrino states are combinations of the mass eigenstates.
285: One can think in terms of wave packets. Propagation of
286: $\nu_e$ ($\nu_a$) is described a system of two wave packets which correspond to
287: $\nu_1$ and $\nu_2$.
288:
289: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%ffff1a%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
290: \begin{figure}[htb]
291: \hbox to \hsize{\hfil\epsfxsize=15cm\epsfbox{mix.eps}\hfil}
292: \caption{a). Representation of the flavor neutrino states
293: as the combination of the mass eigenstates.
294: The length of the box gives the admixture of (or probability to
295: find) corresponding mass state in a given flavor state.
296: (The sum of the lengths of the boxes is normalized to 1.
297: b). Flavor composition of the mass eigenstates. The electron flavor is shown by red
298: (dark) and the non-electron flavor by green (grey). The sizes of the red and green parts give the
299: probability to find the electron and non-electron neutrino in a given mass state.
300: c). Portraits of the electron and non-electron neutrinos: shown are representations
301: of the electron and non-electron neutrino states as combinations of the eigenstates
302: for which, in turn, we show the flavor composition.
303: }
304: \label{mix}
305: \end{figure}
306: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
307:
308: In fig.~\ref{mix}a). we show representation of $\nu_e$ and $\nu_a$ as the combination of mass states.
309: The lengths of the boxes, $\cos^2\theta$ and $\sin^2\theta$, give
310: the {\it admixtures } of $\nu_1$ and $\nu_2$ in $\nu_e$ and $\nu_a$.
311:
312: The key point is that the flavor states are {\it coherent} mixtures (combinations) of the
313: mass eigenstates. The {\it relative phase} or phase difference
314: of $\nu_1$ and $\nu_2$ in, $\nu_e$ and $\nu_a$ is fixed:
315: according to (\ref{2nu}) it is zero in $\nu_e$ and $\pi$ in $\nu_a$. Consequently, there are
316: certain {\it interference} effects between $\nu_1$ and $\nu_2$ which depend on the relative
317: phase. \\
318:
319:
320: The relations (\ref{2nu}) can be inverted:
321: \be
322: \nu_{1} = \cos\theta~\nu_e - \sin \theta~\nu_{a}, ~~
323: \nu_{2} = \cos\theta~\nu_{a} + \sin \theta~\nu_{e}.
324: \label{2nuin}
325: \ee
326: They determine the {\it flavor composition} of the mass states (eigenstates of the Hamiltonian),
327: or shortly, the flavors of eigenstates. According to (\ref{2nuin})
328: a probability to find the electron flavor in $\nu_{1}$ is given by $\cos^2\theta$, whereas
329: the probability that $\nu_{1}$ appears as $\nu_a$ equals $\sin^2\theta$. This flavor decomposition is
330: shown in fig.~\ref{mix}b). by colors.
331:
332: Inserting the flavor decomposition of mass states in the representation of the flavors states,
333: we get the ``portraits" of the electron and non-electron neutrinos fig.~\ref{mix}c).
334: According to this figure, $\nu_e$ is a system of the two mass eigenstates which in turn
335: have a composite flavor.
336: On the first sight the portrait has a paradoxical feature: there is the
337: non-electron (muon and tau) flavor
338: in the electron neutrino! The paradox has a simple resolution: in the $\nu_e$- state
339: the $\nu_a$-components of $\nu_{1}$ and $\nu_{2}$ are equal and have opposite phases.
340: Therefore they cancel each other and
341: the electron neutrino has pure electron flavor as it should be.
342: The key point is interference: the interference of the non-electron parts is destructive in $\nu_e$.
343: The electron neutrino has a ``latent" non-electron component
344: which can not be seen due to particular phase arrangement. However during propagation
345: the phase difference changes and the cancellation disappears. This leads to an appearance of the
346: non-electron component
347: in propagating neutrino state which was originally produced as the electron neutrino. This
348: is the mechanism of neutrino oscillations. Similar consideration holds for the $\nu_a$ state.
349:
350:
351: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
352: \subsection{Neutrino oscillation in vacuum}
353: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
354:
355: In vacuum the neutrino mass states are the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian.
356: Therefore dynamics of propagation has the following features:
357:
358: \begin{itemize}
359:
360: \item
361: Admixtures of the eigenstates (mass states) in a given neutrino state do not change.
362: In other words, there is no $\nu_1 \leftrightarrow \nu_2$ transitions.
363: $\nu_1$ and $\nu_2$ propagate independently.
364: The admixtures are determined by mixing in a production point
365: (by $\theta$, if pure flavor state is produced).
366:
367: \item
368: Flavors of the eigenstates do not change. They are also determined by $\theta$.
369: Therefore the picture of neutrino state (fig. 1c) does not change during propagation.
370:
371: \item
372: Relative phase (phase difference) of the eigenstates monotonously increases.
373:
374: \end{itemize}
375: Due to difference of masses, the states $\nu_1$ and $\nu_2$ have different phase
376: velocities
377: \be
378: \Delta v_{phase} \approx \frac{\Delta m^2}{ 2E}, ~~~~ \Delta m^2 \equiv m_2^2 - m_1^2,
379: \ee
380: and the phase difference changes as
381: \be
382: \Delta \phi = \Delta v_{phase} t .
383: \ee
384: The phase is the only operating degree of freedom here.
385:
386: Increase of the phase leads to oscillations. Indeed, the change of phase
387: modifies the interference: in particular, cancellation of the non-electron
388: parts in the state produced as $\nu_e$ disappears and the non-electron component becomes observable.
389: The process is periodic: when $\Delta \phi = \pi$, the interference of non-electron parts is constructive
390: and at this point the probability to find $\nu_{\mu}$ is maximal. Later, when $\Delta \phi = 2\pi$,
391: the system returns to its original state: $\nu(t) = \nu_e$.
392: The oscillation length is the distance at which this return occurs:
393: \be
394: l_{\nu} = \frac{2\pi}{v_{phase}} = \frac{4 \pi E}{\Delta m^2}.
395: \ee
396:
397:
398: The depth of oscillations is determined by the mixing angle.
399: It is given by maximal probability to observe the ``wrong" flavor $\nu_a$. From the fig. 1c.
400: one finds immediately (summing up the parts with the non-electron flavor in the amplitude)
401: \be
402: depth~~ of~~ oscillations~ = \sin^2 2\theta.
403: \ee
404:
405: The oscillations are the effect of the phase increase which changes the interference pattern.
406: The depth of oscillations is the measure of mixing.
407:
408: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
409: \section{Matter effect.}
410: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
411:
412: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
413: \subsection{Refraction}
414: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
415:
416: In matter, neutrino propagation is affected by interactions. At low
417: energies the {\it elastic forward scattering} is relevant only
418: (inelastic scattering can be neglected) \cite{w1}.
419: It can be described by the potentials $V_e$, $V_a$. In usual medium
420: a difference of the potentials for $\nu_e$ and $\nu_a$
421: is due to the charged current scattering
422: of $\nu_e$ on electrons ($\nu_e e \rightarrow \nu_e e$) \cite{w1}:
423: \be
424: V = V_e - V_a = \sqrt{2} G_F n_e~,
425: \ee
426: where $G_F$ is the Fermi coupling constant and $n_e$ is the number density of electrons.
427: Equivalently, one can describe the effect of medium in terms of the refraction index:
428: \be
429: n_{ref} - 1 = \frac{V}{p}.
430: \ee
431: The difference of the potentials leads to an appearance of
432: additional phase difference in the neutrino system:
433: $\Delta \phi_{matter} \equiv (V_e - V_a) t$.
434: The difference of potentials (or refraction indexes) determines
435: the {\it refraction length}:
436: \be
437: l_0 \equiv \frac{2\pi}{V_e - V_a} = \frac{\sqrt{2}\pi} {G_F n_e} .
438: \ee
439: $l_0$ is the distance over which an additional ``matter" phase equals $2\pi$. \\
440:
441: In the presence of matter the Hamiltonian of system changes:
442: \be
443: H_0 \rightarrow H = H_0 + V ,
444: \ee
445: where $H_0$ is the Hamiltonian in vacuum. Correspondingly, the eigenstates and the eigenvalues
446: change:
447: \begin{eqnarray}
448: \nu_1,~~ \nu_2 ~~~\rightarrow ~~~\nu_{1m}, ~~\nu_{2m},\\
449: \frac{m_1^2}{2E},~~ \frac{m_2^2}{2E}~~ \rightarrow ~~ H_{1m},~~ H_{2m} .
450: \end{eqnarray}
451:
452: The mixing in matter is determined with respect to the eigenstates in matter $\nu_{1m}$ and $\nu_{2m}$.
453: Similarly to (\ref{2nu}) the mixing angle in matter, $\theta_m$, gives the relation between
454: the eigenstates in matter and the flavor states:
455: \be
456: \nu_e = \cos\theta_m \nu_{1m} + \sin \theta_m \nu_{2m}, ~~
457: \nu_a = \cos\theta_m \nu_{2m} - \sin \theta_m \nu_{1m}.
458: \label{2num}
459: \ee
460: Furthermore, in matter both the eigenstates and the eigenvalues, and consequently,
461: the mixing angle depend on matter density and neutrino energy.
462: It is this dependence activates new degrees of freedom of the system and
463: leads to qualitatively new effects.
464:
465: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
466: \subsection{Resonance. Level crossing}
467: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
468:
469: In fig.~\ref{fres} we show dependence of the effective mixing parameter in matter,
470: $\sin^2 2\theta_m$, on ratio of the oscillation and refraction lengths:
471: \be
472: x \equiv \frac{l_{\nu}}{l_0} = \frac{2 E V}{\Delta m^2} \propto E n_e
473: \ee
474: for two different values of vacuum mixing angle.
475: %The large mixing is the one relevant for solar data and KamLAND.
476: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%ffff %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
477: \begin{figure}[htb]
478: \hbox to \hsize{\hfil\epsfxsize=10cm\epsfbox{res.ps}\hfil}
479: \caption{The dependence of the effective mixing parameter $\sin^2 2\theta_m$ on
480: the ratio $x = l_{\nu}/l_0$ for two different values of the vacuum mixing: $\sin^2 2\theta = 0.825$
481: (red) which corresponds to the LMA solution and $\tan^2 \theta = 0.08$ (green) which is
482: at the upper bound on 1-3 mixing. The semi-plane $x < 0$ corresponds to the antineutrino channel.
483: }
484: \label{fres}
485: \end{figure}
486: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
487:
488: The dependence in fig.~\ref{fres} has a resonance character. At
489: \be
490: l_{\nu} = l_0 \cos 2\theta~~~~~~~{\rm (resonance~~ condition)}
491: \label{res}
492: \ee
493: the mixing becomes maximal: $\sin^2 2\theta_m = 1$.
494: For small vacuum mixing the condition (\ref{res}) reads:
495: \be
496: Oscillation~~ length \hskip 0.5cm \approx \hskip 0.5cm Refraction~~ length.
497: \ee
498: That is, the eigen-frequency which characterizes a system of mixed neutrinos,
499: $1/l_{\nu}$, coincides with the eigen-frequency of medium, $1/l_0$.
500:
501: For large vacuum mixing (for solar LMA: $\cos 2\theta = 0.4 - 0.5$) there is a significant
502: deviation from the equality. Large vacuum mixing corresponds
503: to the case of strongly coupled system for
504: which, as usual, the shift of frequencies occurs.
505:
506:
507: The resonance condition (\ref{res}) determines the resonance density:
508: \be
509: n_e^{R} = \frac{\Delta m^2}{2E} \frac{\cos 2\theta}{\sqrt{2} G_F}~.
510: \label{eq:resonance}
511: \ee
512: The width of resonance on the half of the height (in the density scale) is given by
513: \be
514: 2 \Delta n_e^R = 2 n_e^R \tan 2\theta,
515: \label{width}
516: \ee
517: Similarly, one can introduce the resonance energy and the width of
518: resonance in the energy scale.
519: The width (\ref{width}) can be rewritten as
520: \be
521: \Delta n_e^R = n_0 \sin 2\theta,~~~~~ n_0 \equiv \frac{\Delta m^2}{2 \sqrt{2} E G_F}~.
522: \ee
523: When the vacuum mixing approaches maximal value,
524: the resonance shifts to zero density: $n_e^R \rightarrow 0$, the width of the resonance increases
525: converging to fixed value: $\Delta n_e^R \rightarrow n_0$.
526:
527: In medium with varying density, the layer where
528: the density changes in the interval
529: \be
530: n_e^R \pm \Delta n_e^R
531: \ee
532: is called the resonance layer.
533:
534: In fig.~\ref{fcross} we show dependence of the eigenvalues $H_{im}$ on the ratio
535: $l_{\nu}/{l_0}$ (level crossing scheme) \cite{cab,bet}.
536: In resonance, the level splitting is minimal and
537: therefore the oscillation length being inversely
538: proportional the level spitting, is maximal.
539: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%ffff %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
540: \begin{figure}[htb]
541: \hbox to \hsize{\hfil\epsfxsize=11cm\epsfbox{crols.ps}\hfil}
542: \caption{Level crossing scheme. Dependence of the eigenvalues
543: of the Hamiltonian in matter, $H_{1m}$ and $H_{2m}$, on the ratio $x \equiv l_{\nu}/l_0$ for
544: two different values of vacuum mixing $\sin^2 2\theta = 0.825$ (solid, blue lines)
545: and $\sin^2 \theta = 0.08$ (dashed, red lines).
546: }
547: \label{fcross}
548: \end{figure}
549: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
550:
551: The resonance has physical meaning both for small and for large mixing.
552: Independently of vacuum mixing in the resonance
553:
554: \begin{itemize}
555:
556: \item
557: the flavor mixing is maximal;
558:
559: \item
560: the level splitting is minimal; correspondingly,
561: in uniform medium the oscillation length is maximal;
562:
563: \end{itemize}
564:
565: When the density changes on the way of neutrinos,
566: it is in the resonance layer the flavor transition mainly occurs.
567:
568:
569:
570: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% ss3.2 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
571: \subsection{Degrees of freedom. Two effects}
572: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
573:
574: An arbitrary neutrino state can be expressed in terms of the
575: instantaneous eigenstates of the Hamiltonian, $\nu_{1m}$ and $\nu_{2m}$, as
576: \be
577: \nu (t) = \cos\theta_a \nu_{1m} + \sin \theta_a \nu_{2m} e^{i\phi}~,
578: \label{exp}
579: \ee
580: where
581: \begin{itemize}
582:
583: \item
584: $\theta_a = \theta_a (t)$ determines the admixtures of
585: eigenstates in $\nu (t)$;\\
586:
587:
588: \item
589: $\phi(t)$ is the phase difference between the two eigenstates (phase
590: of oscillations):
591: \be
592: \phi(t) = \int_0^t \Delta H dt' + \phi(t)_T~,
593: \ee
594: here $\Delta H \equiv H_{1m} - H_{2m}$.
595: The integral gives the adiabatic phase
596: and $\phi(t)_T$ is the rest which can be related to
597: violation of adiabaticity. It may also have a
598: topological contribution (Berry phase) in more complicated systems;\\
599:
600: \item
601: $\theta_m(n_e(t))$ determines the flavor content of the eigenstates:
602: $\langle \nu_e| \nu_{1m}\rangle = \cos \theta_m $, {\it etc.}.
603:
604: \end{itemize}
605:
606: Different processes are associated with these three
607: different degrees of freedom. In what follows we will consider two of them:
608:
609: 1. The resonance enhancement of neutrino oscillations which
610: occurs in matter with constant density. It is induced by
611: the relative phase of neutrino eigenstates.
612:
613: 2. The adiabatic (partially adiabatic) conversion which occurs in medium
614: with varying density and is related to the change of mixing or flavor of the neutrino
615: eigenstates.
616:
617:
618: In general, an interplay of the oscillations and the resonance conversion occurs.
619:
620: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
621: \section{The MSW effect}
622: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
623:
624: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
625: \subsection{Oscillations in matter. Resonance enhancement of oscillations}
626: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
627:
628: In medium with constant density the mixing is constant: $\theta_m (E, n) = const$.
629: Therefore
630:
631: \begin{itemize}
632:
633: \item
634: The flavors of the eigenstates do not change.
635:
636: \item
637: The admixtures of the eigenstates do not change.
638: There is no $\nu_{1m} \leftrightarrow \nu_{2m}$ transitions,
639: $\nu_{1m}$ and $\nu_{2m}$ are the eigenstates of propagation.
640:
641: \item
642: Monotonous increase of the phase difference between the eigenstates occurs:
643: $\Delta \phi_m = (H_{2m} - H_{1m}) t$.
644:
645: \end{itemize}
646:
647: This is similar to what happens in vacuum.
648: The only operative degree of freedom is the phase. Therefore, as in vacuum,
649: the evolution of neutrino has a character of oscillations.
650: However, parameters of oscillations (length, depth) differ from the parameters in vacuum.
651: They are determined by the mixing in matter and by the effective energy splitting in matter:
652: \be
653: \sin^2 2\theta \rightarrow \sin^2 2\theta_m, ~~~~~~
654: l_{\nu} \rightarrow l_{m} = \frac{2\pi}{H_{2m} - H_{1m}}.
655: \ee
656:
657: For a given density of matter the parameters of oscillations depend on the neutrino energy
658: which leads to a characteristic modification of the energy spectra.
659: Suppose a source produces the $\nu_e$- flux $F_0(E)$.
660: The flux crosses a layer of length, $L$,
661: with a constant density $n_e$
662: and then detector measures the electron component of the flux
663: at the exit from the layer, $F (E)$.
664: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%ffff4 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
665: \begin{figure}[htb]
666: \hbox to \hsize{\hfil\epsfxsize=7cm\epsfbox{constl1a.ps}\hfil\epsfxsize=7cm\epsfbox{constl10.ps}\hfil}
667: \caption{~~Resonance enhancement of oscillations in matter with constant density.
668: Shown is a dependence of the ratio of the final and original fluxes,
669: $F/F_0$, on energy ($x \propto E$) for a thin layer, $L = l_0/\pi$ (left panel) and thick
670: layer $L = 10 l_0/ \pi$ (right panel). $l_0$ is the refraction length.
671: The vacuum mixing equals $\sin^2 2\theta = 0.824$. }
672: \label{resenh}
673: \end{figure}
674: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
675: In fig.~\ref{resenh} we show dependence of the ratio $F(E)/F_0(E)$ on energy for
676: thin and thick layers. The ratio has an oscillatory dependence. The oscillatory curve (green)
677: is inscribed in to the resonance curve $(1 - \sin^2 2\theta_m)$ (red). The frequency of the oscillations
678: increases with the length $L$. At the resonance energy, the oscillations proceed with maximal depths.
679: Oscillations are enhanced in the resonance range:
680: \be
681: E = E_R \pm \Delta E_R, ~~~ \Delta E_R = \tan 2\theta~ E_R = \sin 2\theta ~E_R^0,
682: \ee
683: where $E_R^0 = \Delta m^2/2\sqrt{2} G_F n_e$.
684: Several comments: for $E \gg E_R$, matter suppresses the oscillation depth;
685: for small mixing the resonance layer is
686: narrow, and the oscillation length in the resonance is large.
687: With increase of the vacuum mixing: $E_R \rightarrow 0$ and $\Delta E_R \rightarrow E_R^0$.
688:
689:
690: The oscillations in medium with nearly constant density are realized for neutrinos
691: crossing the mantle of the Earth.
692:
693: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
694: \subsection{MSW: adiabatic conversion}
695: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
696:
697:
698: In non-uniform medium, density changes on the way of neutrinos:
699: $n_e = n_e(t)$. Correspondingly, the Hamiltonian of system depends on time:
700: $H = H(t)$. Therefore,
701:
702: (i). the mixing angle changes in the course of propagation:
703: $\theta_m = \theta_m (n_e(t))$;
704:
705: (ii). the (instantaneous) eigenstates of the Hamiltonian, $\nu_{1m}$ and $\nu_{2m}$, are no more the
706: ``eigenstates" of propagation: the transitions $\nu_{1m} \leftrightarrow \nu_{2m}$ occur.
707:
708:
709: However, if the density changes slowly enough (the adiabaticity condition) the transitions
710: $\nu_{1m} \leftrightarrow \nu_{2m}$ can be neglected. This is the essence of the
711: adiabatic condition: $\nu_{1m}$ and $\nu_{2m}$ propagate independently, as in vacuum or
712: uniform medium. Therefore dynamical features can be summarized in the following way:
713:
714: \begin{itemize}
715:
716: \item
717: The flavors of the eigenstates change according to density change.
718: The flavor composition of the eigenstates is determined by $\theta_m(t)$.
719:
720: \item
721: The admixtures of the eigenstates in a propagating neutrino state do not change
722: (adiabaticity: no $\nu_{1m} \leftrightarrow \nu_{2m}$ transitions). The admixtures
723: are given by the mixing in production point, $\theta_m^0$.
724:
725: \item
726: The phase difference increases; the phase velocity is determined by the level splitting
727: (which in turn, changes with density (time)).
728:
729: \end{itemize}
730:
731: Now two degrees of freedom become operative: the relative phase and
732: the flavors of neutrino eigenstates.
733: The MSW effect is driven by the change of flavors of the neutrino
734: eigenstates in matter with varying density.
735: The change of phase produces the oscillation effect on the top of the adiabatic conversion.\\
736:
737:
738:
739: Let us comment on the adiabaticity condition.
740: If external conditions (density) change slowly,
741: the system (mixed neutrinos) has time to adjust this change.
742: In general, the adiabaticity condition can be written as \cite{mess,msad}
743: \be
744: \gamma = \left| \frac{\dot{\theta}_m}{H_{2m} - H_{1m}} \right| \ll 1.
745: \label{adiab}
746: \ee
747: As follows from the evolution equation for the neutrino eigenstates \cite{ms3,mess},
748: $|\dot{\theta}_m|$ determines the energy of transition
749: $\nu_{1m} \leftrightarrow \nu_{2m}$ and $|H_{2m} - H_{1m}|$ gives the energy gap between levels.
750: The condition (\ref{adiab}) means that
751: the transitions $\nu_{1m} \leftrightarrow \nu_{2m}$ can be neglected
752: and the eigenstates propagate independently
753: (the angle $\theta_a$ (\ref{exp}) is constant).
754:
755:
756:
757: The adiabaticity condition is crucial in the resonance layer where
758: (i) the level splitting is small and (ii) the mixing angle changes rapidly.
759: If the vacuum mixing is small, the adiabaticity is critical in the resonance point.
760: It takes the form \cite{ms1}
761: \be
762: \Delta r_R > l_R,
763: \label{adiab2}
764: \ee
765: where $l_R = l_{\nu}/\sin 2\theta$ is the oscillation length in resonance,
766: and $\Delta r_R = n_R/ (dn_e/dr)_R \tan 2\theta$ is the spatial width of resonance layer.
767: According to (\ref{adiab2}) for the adiabatic evolution at least one
768: oscillation length should be obtained in the resonance layer. The adiabaticity condition has been considered outside the
769: resonance and in the non-resonance channel in \cite{ssb}.
770:
771: In the case of large vacuum mixing the point of maximal adiabaticity violation~\cite{lisi,fried} is shifted
772: to densities $n_e(av)$ larger than the resonance density:
773: $n_e(av) \rightarrow n_B > n_R$. Here
774: $n_B = \Delta m^2 /2\sqrt{2} G_F E$ is the density at the border of resonance layer for
775: maximal mixing. \\
776:
777:
778: Let us describe pattern of the adiabatic conversion.
779: According to the dynamical conditions, the admixtures of
780: eigenstates are determined by the
781: mixing in neutrino production point. This mixing in turn,
782: depends on the density in the initial point,
783: $n_e^0$, as compared to the resonance density. Consequently, a picture of the conversion depends on
784: how far from the resonance layer (in the density scale) a neutrino is produced.
785:
786: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%ffff5 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
787: \begin{figure}[htb]
788: \hbox to \hsize{\hfil\epsfxsize=14cm\epsfbox{aev.eps}\hfil}
789: \caption{~~Adiabatic evolution of neutrino state for
790: three different initial condition ($n_e^0$).
791: Shown are the neutrino states in different moments of propagation in medium
792: with varying (decreasing) density. The yellow vertical line indicates
793: position of resonance. The initial state is $\nu_e$ in all the cases.
794: The sizes of the boxes do not change, whereas the flavors (colors) follow the density change.
795: }
796: \label{faev}
797: \end{figure}
798: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
799:
800: Three possibilities can be identified.
801: They are shown in fig.~\ref{faev}.
802: and correspond to large vacuum mixing which is relevant for
803: the solar neutrinos. We show propagation of the state
804: produced as $\nu_e$ from large density region to zero density.
805: Due to adiabaticity the sizes of boxes which correspond
806: to the neutrino eigenstates do not change.
807:
808: 1). $n_e^0 \gg n_e^R$ - production far above the resonance (the upper panel).
809: The initial mixing is strongly suppressed,
810: consequently, the neutrino state, $\nu_e$, consists mainly of one
811: ($\nu_{2m}$) eigenstate, and furthermore, one flavor dominates in a given
812: eigenstate. In the resonance (its position is marked by the yellow line) the mixing is maximal:
813: both flavors are present equally. Since the admixture of the second eigenstate is very small, oscillations
814: (interference effects) are strongly suppressed. So, here we deal with
815: the non-oscillatory flavor transition when the flavor of whole state (which nearly coincides with
816: $\nu_{2m}$) follows the density change. At zero density we have $\nu_{2m} = \nu_{2}$, and therefore
817: the probability to find the electron neutrino (survival probability) equals
818: \be
819: P = |\langle \nu_e | \nu(t) \rangle|^2 \approx |\langle \nu_e |\nu_{2m}(t) \rangle|^2
820: = |\langle \nu_e |\nu_{2} \rangle|^2 \approx \sin^2 \theta.
821: \label{surv}
822: \ee
823: The value of final probability, $\sin^2 \theta$, is the feature of the non-oscillatory transition.
824: Deviation from this value indicates a presence of oscillations.
825:
826: 2). $n_e^0 > n_e^R$ production above the resonance (middle panel).
827: The initial mixing is not suppressed. Although $\nu_{2m}$ is the main component,
828: the second eigenstate, $\nu_{1m}$,
829: has appreciable admixture;
830: the flavor mixing in the neutrino eigenstates is significant.
831: So, the interference effect is not suppressed.
832: As a result, here an interplay of the adiabatic conversion and
833: occurs.
834:
835: 3). $n_e^0 < n_e^R$: production below the resonance (lower panel).
836: There is no crossing of the resonance region.
837: In this case the matter effect gives only corrections to the vacuum oscillation picture.
838:
839:
840: The resonance density is inversely propotional to the
841: neutrino energy:
842: $n_e^R \propto 1/E$. So, for the same density profile, the condition
843: 1) is realized for high energies, regime 2) for
844: intermediate
845: energies and 3) -- for low energies. As we will see all three case are realized for solar neutrinos.
846:
847: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
848: \subsection{Universality}
849: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
850:
851: The adiabatic transformations show universality: The averaged probability
852: and the depth of oscillations in a given moment
853: of propagation are determined by the density in a given point and by
854: initial condition (initial density and flavor). They do not depend on
855: density distribution between the initial and final points.
856: In contrast, the phase of oscillations is an integral effect of previous evolution and it depends on
857: a density distribution.
858:
859: Universal character of the adiabatic conversion can be further generalized in terms of
860: variable~\cite{ms3,ms4}
861: \be
862: n = \frac{n_e^R - n_e}{\Delta n_e^R}
863: \label{y-var}
864: \ee
865: which is the distance (in the density scale) from the resonance density in the units of
866: the width of resonance layer. In terms of $n$ the conversion pattern
867: depend only on initial value $n_0$.
868: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%ffff6 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
869: \begin{figure}[htb]
870: \hbox to \hsize{\hfil\epsfxsize=10cm\epsfbox{evols.ps}\hfil}
871: \caption{~~The dependence of the average probability (dashed line) and the depth of oscillations
872: ($P^{max}$, $P^{min}$ solid lines) on $n$ for $n_0 = - 5$.
873: The resonance layer corresponds to $n = 0$. For $\tan^2 \theta = 0.4$ (large mixing MSW solution)
874: the evolution stops at $n_f = 0.47$.
875: }
876: \label{msw}
877: \end{figure}
878: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
879:
880: In fig.~\ref{msw} we show dependences of the average probability and depth of oscillations, that is,
881: $\bar{P}$, $P^{max}$, and $P^{min}$, on $n$. The probability itself is the oscillatory function which
882: is inscribed into the band shown by solid lines. The average probability is shown by the dashed line.
883: The curves are determined by initial value
884: $n_0$ only, in particular, there is no explicit dependence on the vacuum mixing angle.
885: The resonance is at $n = 0$ and the resonance layer is given by the interval
886: $n = -1 \div 1$. The figure corresponds to $n_0 = - 5$, {\it i.e.}, to production
887: above the resonance layer; the oscillation depth is relatively small.
888: With further decrease of $n_0$, the oscillation band becomes narrower
889: approaching the line of non-oscillatory conversion.
890: For zero final density we have
891: \be
892: n_f = \frac{1}{\tan 2\theta}.
893: \ee
894: So, the vacuum mixing enters final condition.
895: For the best fit LMA point, $n_f = 0.45 - 0.50$, and the evolution should stop at this point.
896: The smaller mixing the larger final $n_f$ and the stronger transition.
897:
898:
899: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
900: \subsection{Adiabaticity violation}
901: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
902:
903: In the adiabatic regime the probability of transition between the eigenstates is exponentially
904: suppressed $P_{12} \sim exp{(- \pi/2\gamma)}$ and $\gamma$ is given in (\ref{adiab}) \cite{hax,par}.
905: One can consider such a transition as penetration through a barrier of the height
906: $H_{2m} - H_{1m}$ by a system with the kinetic energy $d\theta_m /dt$.
907:
908:
909: If density changes rapidly, so that the condition (\ref{adiab}) is not satisfied,
910: the transitions $\nu_{1m} \leftrightarrow \nu_{2m}$ become efficient.
911: Therefore admixtures of the eigenstates in a given propagating state
912: change. In our pictorial representation (fig. 5) the sizes of boxes change.
913: Now all three degrees of freedom of the system become operative.
914:
915: Typically, adiabaticity breaking leads to weakening of the flavor
916: transition. The non-adiabatic transitions can
917: be realized inside supernovas for the very small 1-3 mixing.
918:
919:
920:
921:
922: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
923: \section{Solar Neutrinos. Large Angle MSW solution}
924: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
925:
926: The first KamLAND result~\cite{kam} has confirmed the large mixing MSW (LMA) solution of the solar neutrino
927: problem. Both the total rate of events and the spectrum distortion are in a very good agreement with predictions
928: made on the basis of LMA \cite{pred}.
929:
930: According to the large angle MSW solution, inside the Sun the initially produced electron neutrinos
931: undergo adiabatic conversion. Adiabaticity condition is fulfilled with very high accuracy for
932: all relevant energies. Inside the Sun several thousands of oscillation lengths are obtained.
933:
934: On the way from the Sun to the Earth the coherence of
935: neutrino state is lost and at the surface of the Earth, incoherent fluxes of the
936: mass states $\nu_1$ and $\nu_2$ arrive. In the matter of the Earth $\nu_1$ and $\nu_2$
937: oscillate producing partial regeneration of the $\nu_e$-flux.
938:
939:
940:
941: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%ffff7 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
942: \begin{figure}[htb]
943: \hbox to \hsize{\hfil\epsfxsize=7cm\epsfbox{chi2lma.eps}\hfil\epsfxsize=7cm\epsfbox{chi2combspec.eps}\hfil}
944: \caption{~~The best fit points and the allowed regions (at different C.L.)
945: of the oscillation parameters (at different C.L.) from the global fit
946: of the solar neutrino data (left), and from the combined analysis of the solar
947: neutrino data and KamLAND (right).
948: }
949: \label{solution}
950: \end{figure}
951:
952: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
953:
954:
955: In fig.~\ref{solution} from \cite{comb} we show the best fit point and the allowed regions of
956: oscillation parameters
957: from (a) analysis of the solar neutrino data and (b)
958: combined analysis of the solar and KamLAND results (in assumption of the CPT invariance).
959: The best fit point is at
960: \be
961: \Delta m^2 \sim 7 \cdot 10^{-5} {\rm eV}^2, ~~~~ \tan^2 \theta \sim 0.4.
962: \label{param}
963: \ee
964: For these parameters,
965: the energy ``profile of the effect" -
966: the dependence of the survival probability
967: on the neutrino energy is shown in fig.~\ref{profile}. In fig.~\ref{pattern} we present conversion patterns
968: for different neutrino energies.
969:
970: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%ffff8 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
971: \begin{figure}[htb]
972: \hbox to \hsize{\hfil\epsfxsize=9cm\epsfbox{prof.ps}\hfil}
973: \caption{~~Profile of the effect. Dependence of the survival probability on
974: neutrino energy for the best fit values of parameters and production
975: in the center of the Sun (solid line). For $\Delta m^2 = 7\cdot 10^{-5}$ eV$^2$, $x = 2$ corresponds to
976: $E \approx 10$ MeV. The dashed line shows the averaging effect over the production region
977: $R = 0.1 R_{sun}$. The Earth matter regeneration effect is not included.}
978: \label{profile}
979: \end{figure}
980: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
981: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%ffff9 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
982: \begin{figure}[htb]
983: \hbox to \hsize{\hfil\epsfxsize=7cm\epsfbox{evol14.ps}\hfil\epsfxsize=7cm\epsfbox{evol6.ps}\hfil}
984: \vskip 0.5cm
985: \hbox to \hsize{\hfil\epsfxsize=7cm\epsfbox{evol2.ps}\hfil\epsfxsize=7cm\epsfbox{evol86.ps}\hfil}
986: \caption{~~The evolution of the neutrinos with different energies in the Sun.
987: Shown are the dependences of the averaged value of the survival
988: probability (dashed lines), as well as maximal and minimal values of the probability (solid lines)
989: on $n$. Neutrino is produced in the center of the Sun. The density decreases from the left to the
990: right. The resonance cis at $n = 0$. The probability is the oscillatory
991: curve which is inscribed in the band between $P^{max}$ and $P^{min}$.
992: Upper left panel: $E = 14$ MeV, upper right panel: $E = 6$ MeV, lower left panel $E = 2$ MeV,
993: lower right panel $E = 0.86$ MeV.}
994: \label{pattern}
995: \end{figure}
996: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
997:
998: There are three energy ranges with different features of transition:
999:
1000: 1. In the high energy part of spectrum, $E > 10$ MeV ($x > 2$), the adiabatic conversion with small
1001: oscillation effect occurs. The spatial evolution (in $n$-scale) is shown in the upper left panel of fig.~\ref{pattern}.
1002: At the exit, the resulting averaged probability is slightly larger than $\sin^2 \theta$ expected
1003: from the non-oscillatory transition.
1004: Pictorial representation of the conversion is shown in fig. \ref{pattern}.
1005: With decrease of energy the initial density approaches the resonance density,
1006: and the depths of oscillations increases.
1007:
1008: 2. Intermediate energy range $E \sim (2 - 10)$ MeV ($x = 0.3 - 2$ ) the oscillation effect is significant.
1009: The interplay of the oscillations and conversion takes place (fig.~\ref{pattern}).
1010: %In resonance $\bar{P} = 0.5$.
1011:
1012: For $E \sim 2$ MeV neutrinos are produced in resonance (bottom left panel). Initial depth of oscillations is
1013: maximal and $\bar{P} = 0.5$.
1014:
1015:
1016: 3. At low energies: $E < 2$ MeV ($x < 0.3$), the vacuum oscillations with small matter corrections
1017: occur.
1018:
1019: Notice that without matter effect for all energies one would get the pattern of evolution
1020: close to that in the bottom-right panel.
1021:
1022: Basically this is what was called the ``adiabatic solution" in the early days:
1023: the boron neutrino spectrum
1024: is ``sitting" on the adiabatic edge of the suppression pit. An absence of observable spectrum distortion
1025: allows now only the large mixing part of the adiabatic solution.
1026:
1027:
1028: As a specific example, let us consider neutrinos with $E = 10$ MeV produced in the center of the
1029: Sun. For these neutrinos the resonance density equals $n_R Y_e = 20$ g/cc, where $Y_e$ is the
1030: number of electrons per nucleon. The resonance layer is in the central parts of the Sun:
1031: $R_R = 0.24 R_{sun}$. In the production point:
1032: $\sin^2 \theta_m = 0.94$ and $\cos^2 \theta_m = 0.06$, so indeed, $\nu_{2m}$ dominates.
1033: At the surface of the Sun the state $\nu_{2m}$ appears as $\nu_{2}$ and then arrives at the Earth
1034: loosing the coherence with $\nu_{1}$.
1035: Entering the Earth the state $\nu_{2}$ splits in two matter eigenstates:
1036: \be
1037: \nu_{2} \rightarrow \cos\theta_m' \nu_{2m} + \sin \theta_m'\nu_{1m}.
1038: \ee
1039: It oscillates regenerating the $\nu_e$-flux. With the Earth matter effect taken into account,
1040: the survival probability at high energies can be written as
1041: \be
1042: P \approx \sin^2 \theta + f_{reg},
1043: \ee
1044: where the regeneration factor equals
1045: \be
1046: f_{reg} =
1047: 0.5 \sin^2 2\theta ~\frac{l_{\nu}}{l_0}~.
1048: \label{freg}
1049: \ee
1050: Notice that the oscillations of $\nu_{2}$ are pure matter effect and for the presently favored
1051: value of $\Delta m^2$ this effect is small. According to (\ref{freg}),
1052: $f_{reg} \propto 1/\Delta m^2$ and the expected day-night asymmetry of the charged current signal
1053: equals
1054: \be
1055: A_{DN} = f_{reg}/P \sim (3 - 5)\%~.
1056: \label{freg1}
1057: \ee
1058:
1059: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1060: \section{Beyond LMA}
1061: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1062:
1063:
1064: Is the solar neutrino problem solved?
1065: In assumption of the CPT, the large angle MSW effect is indeed the dominant mechanism
1066: of the solar neutrino conversion, and all other possible mechanisms could
1067: give the sub-dominant effects only.
1068:
1069:
1070: What is the next? First of all, even accepting the LMA solution one needs better determination of the
1071: oscillation parameters. In particular, further improvements of the upper bounds on
1072: $\Delta m^2$ and $\tan^2 \theta$ (deviation from maximal mixing) are of great importance.
1073: These improvements have implications for both phenomenology (future long baseline experiments,
1074: double beta decay searches, {\it etc.}) and theory.
1075: The improvements are also needed for better understanding of physics of the solar neutrino conversion.
1076: In sect. 6 we have described the picture which corresponds to the oscillation parameter near the best fit point
1077: (\ref{param}). Physics, in particular relative importance of the vacuum oscillations and the matter effect,
1078: changes with parameters within the presently allowed region (fig. \ref{solution}).
1079:
1080:
1081: Is large mixing MSW sufficient to describe the data? If there are observations
1082: which may indicate some deviations from LMA?
1083: According to recent analysis, LMA describes all the data very well: pulls
1084: of predictions from results of measurements are below $1\sigma$
1085: for all but one experiment~\cite{comb}).
1086: High Ar-production rate, $Q_{Ar} \sim 3$ SNU, is a generic prediction of LMA.
1087: The predicted rate is about $2\sigma$ above the Homestake result.
1088: This difference can be statistical fluctuation or some systematics which may be
1089: related to the claimed time variations of the Homestake signal.
1090:
1091: Another generic prediction is the ``turn up of spectrum" (spectrum distortion) at low energies.
1092: According to LMA the survival probability should increase with decrease of energy
1093: (fig.~\ref{profile}): for the best fit point the turn up can be as large as 10 - 15\%
1094: between 8 and 5 MeV~\cite{comb}.
1095: Neither SuperKamiokande nor SNO show any turn up although the present sensitivity is not enough to
1096: make any statistically significant statement.
1097:
1098: Are these observations related? Do they indicate some new physics
1099: at low energies? It happens that both the lower $Ar$-production
1100: rate and absence of (or weaker) turn up of the
1101: spectrum can be explained by the effect of new (sterile) neutrino~\cite{pedr}.
1102:
1103: Suppose that on the top of usual pair of states with the LMA parameters
1104: (\ref{param}) new light neutrino state, $\nu_s$, exists which
1105:
1106: - mixes weakly with the lightest state $\nu_1$: $\sin^2 2\theta_{01} \sim (10^{-4} - 10^{-3})$,
1107:
1108:
1109: - has the mass difference with $\nu_1$: $\Delta m^2_{01} = (2 - 10) \cdot 10^{-6}$ eV$^2$.
1110: If $\nu_1$ is very light, the mass of $\nu_0$ equals $(2- 3)\cdot 10^{-3}$ eV.
1111:
1112:
1113: It can be shown, that the presence of such a neutrino does not change the survival probability
1114: in the non-oscillatory and vacuum ranges but do change it in the transition region.
1115: In general, it leads to appearance of a dip in the adiabatic edge:
1116: at $E = (0.5 - 2)$ MeV and flattening of spectrum distortion at higher energies.
1117: The dip produces suppression of the $Be$-neutrino flux as well as other fluxes
1118: at the intermediate energies, and consequently,
1119: suppression of the $Ar$-production rate. It also diminishes or eliminates completely (depending on the
1120: angle and $\Delta m^2_{01}$) the turn up of spectrum.
1121: This scenario predicts low rate in BOREXINO: it can be as low as $\sin^4 \theta \sim 0.1$ of the SSM rate.
1122: The scenario implies also smaller 1-2 mixing, $\tan^2 \theta$, (to compensate decrease of the $Ge$-production rate)
1123: and larger boron neutrino flux (to reproduce the high energy data).
1124: For $\Delta m^2 > (1 - 2)\cdot 10^{-5}$ eV$^2$ the turn up can be changed without diminishing
1125: the $Be$- neutrino flux.
1126:
1127: Smallness of mixing of the sterile neutrino allows to avoid the nucleosynthesis bound:
1128: such a neutrino does not equilibrate in the Early Universe.
1129:
1130:
1131: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1132: \section{Summary}
1133: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1134:
1135: 1. We have described here two matter effects:
1136:
1137: The resonance enhancement of oscillations in matter with constant density.
1138:
1139: The adiabatic (quasi-adiabatic) conversion in medium with varying density (MSW).\\
1140:
1141:
1142: 2. Adiabatic (quasi-adiabatic) conversion is related to the change of the mixing in matter
1143: on the way of neutrino, or equivalently, to the change of flavors of the neutrino
1144: eigenstates.
1145: In contrast, oscillations are related to change of the relative phase of the eigenstates.\\
1146:
1147:
1148: 3. The large mixing MSW effect provides the solution of the solar neutrino problem.
1149: The solar neutrino data allow to determine the oscillation parameters $\Delta m^2_{12}$ and
1150: $\theta_{12}$ and therefore to make next important step in reconstruction of
1151: the neutrino mass and flavor spectrum.
1152:
1153:
1154: Now we can say how the mechanism of conversion of the solar neutrinos works.
1155: A picture of the conversion depends on neutrino energy. It has a character of
1156:
1157: - nearly non-oscillatory transition for $E > 10$ MeV,
1158:
1159: - interplay of the adiabatic conversion and oscillations for $E = 2 - 10$ MeV,
1160:
1161: - oscillations with small matter corrections for $E < 2$ MeV. \\
1162:
1163:
1164: 4. The large angle MSW effect is the dominant mechanism of the solar neutrino conversion.
1165: Although more precise determination of parameters is needed to identify completely
1166: the physical picture of the effect. All other suggested mechanisms can produce sub-leading effects.
1167: With the available data we know
1168: rather well what happens with high energy neutrinos ($ E > 5$ MeV). Still some physics beyond LMA may
1169: show up in the low energy part of spectrum. The low $ Ar$ -production rate and absence of the turn up
1170: of the spectrum distortion in the range $E < 8$ MeV
1171: can be due to an additional effect of the light sterile neutrino with very small mixing.
1172: BOREXINO~\cite{bor} and KamLAND can test this possibility in future.
1173:
1174:
1175:
1176:
1177: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1178: \section{Acknowledgments}
1179:
1180: I would like to thank Milla Baldo-Ceolin for invitation to give this talk and for hospitality
1181: during my stay in Rome and Venice.
1182:
1183:
1184: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
1185: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1186:
1187: \bibitem{pontosc} B. Pontecorvo, Zh. Eksp. Theor. Fiz. {\bf 33} (1957); {\bf 34} (1958) 247.
1188:
1189: \bibitem{mns} Z. Maki, M. Nakagawa and S. Sakata, Prog. Theor. Phys. {\bf 28} (1962) 870.
1190:
1191: \bibitem{bah} J. N. Bahcall, Phys. Lett. {\bf 13} 332 (1964).
1192:
1193: \bibitem{zk} V. A. Kuzmin and G. T. Zatsepin Proc. of the 9th Int. Conf. on Cosmic
1194: Rays, Jaipur, India, v. {\bf 2} p. 1023 (1965).
1195:
1196: \bibitem{hom} R. Davis Jr., D.S. Harmer, K.S. Hoffman,
1197: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 20}, 1205, (1968).
1198:
1199: \bibitem{pontprob} B. Pontecorvo, ZETF, {\bf 53}, 1771 (1967) [Sov. Phys.
1200: JETP, {\bf 26}, 984 (1968)]
1201:
1202: \bibitem{gp} V. N. Gribov and B. Pontecorvo, Phys. Lett. {\bf 28B}, 493
1203: (1969).
1204:
1205: \bibitem{w1} L. Wolfenstein, Phys. Rev. D{\bf 17} (1978) 2369.
1206:
1207: \bibitem{w2} L. Wolfenstein, in {\it ``Neutrino -78"}, Purdue Univ. C3, 1978.
1208:
1209:
1210: \bibitem{w3} L. Wolfenstein, Phys. Rev. {\bf D20} 2634, 1979.
1211:
1212: \bibitem{ms1} S. P. Mikheyev and A. Yu. Smirnov, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.
1213: {\bf 42} (1985) 913.
1214:
1215: \bibitem{ms2} S.P. Mikheev, A.Yu. Smirnov, Nuovo Cim. {\bf C9} 17, 1986.
1216:
1217: \bibitem{ms3} S.P. Mikheev, A.Yu. Smirnov, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. {\bf 91}, 7 (1986),
1218: [Sov. Phys. JETP {\bf 64}, 4 (1986)].
1219:
1220: \bibitem{ms4} S. P. Mikheyev and A. Yu. Smirnov, Proc. of the 6th Moriond
1221: Workshop on massive Neutrinos in Astrophysics and Particle Physics,
1222: Tignes, Savoie, France Jan. 1986 (eds. O. Fackler and J. Tran Thanh Van)
1223: p. 355 (1986).
1224:
1225:
1226: \bibitem{cab} N. Cabibbo, Summary talk given at 10th Int. Workshop on
1227: Weak Interactions and Neutrinos, Savonlinna, Finland, June 1985.
1228:
1229: \bibitem{bet} H. Bethe, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 56}, 1305 (1986).
1230:
1231: \bibitem{bar} V. Barger, K. Whisnant, S. Pakvasa and R.J. N. Phillips,
1232: Phys. Rev. {\bf D22}, 2718 (1980).
1233:
1234: \bibitem{pak} S. Pakvasa, in DUMAND-80, 1981 vol.2, p.457.
1235:
1236: \bibitem{haub} H. J. Haubold, Astrophys. Spac. Sci., {\bf 82}, 457 (1982).
1237:
1238: \bibitem{raman} P. V. Ramana Murthy, in Proc. of the 18th Int Cosmic Ray
1239: Conf., v. 7, 125 (1983).
1240:
1241: \bibitem{paul} P. Langacker, J. P. Leville and J. Sheiman, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 27}
1242: 1228 (1983).
1243:
1244: \bibitem{mess} A. Messiah, Proc. of the 6th Moriond Workshop on Massive
1245: Neutrinos in Particle Physics and Astrophysics, eds O. Fackler and J. Tran
1246: Thanh Van, Tignes, France, Jan. 1986, p. 373.
1247:
1248: \bibitem{msad} S. P. Mikheev and A.Y. Smirnov, Sov. Phys. JETP {\bf 65}, 230 (1987).
1249:
1250: \bibitem{ssb} A. Yu. Smirnov, D. N. Spergel, J. N. Bahcall, Phys. Rev. D{\bf 49} 1389 (1994).
1251:
1252: \bibitem{lisi} E. Lisi, A. Marrone, D. Montanino, A. Palazzo and S.T.
1253: Petcov, Phys. Rev. {\bf D63} 093002 (2001)
1254:
1255: \bibitem{fried} A. Friedland, Phys. Rev. {\bf D64}, 013008 (2001),
1256: and hep-ph/0106042.
1257:
1258: \bibitem{hax} W. C. Haxton, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 57}, 1271 (1986).
1259:
1260: \bibitem{par} S. J. Parke, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 57}, 1275 (1986).
1261:
1262: \bibitem{kam} K. Eguchi et al, (KamLAND collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett, {\bf 90} 021802 (2003).
1263:
1264: \bibitem{pred} J. N. Bahcall, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, and C. Pena-Garay,
1265: JHEP 079(2002) 0054; P. C. de Holanda and A. Yu. Smirnov, Phys. Rev {\bf D66}:113005, (2002).
1266:
1267: \bibitem{comb}P. C. de Holanda and A. Yu. Smirnov, JCAP {\bf 01} (2003) 001.
1268:
1269: \bibitem{pedr} P. de Holanda and A. Yu. Smirnov, in preparation.
1270:
1271: \bibitem{bor} G. Alimonti et al, (BOREXINO) Astrophysics J. {\bf 16} 205 (2002).
1272:
1273: %%\bibitem{coh} Q. Y. Liu, S. P. Mikheyev, A. Yu. Smirnov, hep-ph/9803415.
1274:
1275:
1276:
1277: \end{thebibliography}
1278:
1279: \end{document}
1280:
1281: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1282: %% End of sprocl.tex
1283: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1284: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% graf2a.eps %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1285: \begin{figure}[htb]
1286: \hbox to \hsize{\hfil\epsfxsize=5.5cm\epsfbox{graf2a.eps}\hfil}
1287: \caption{ Graphic representation of the neutrino
1288: adiabatic conversion (see text).
1289: }
1290: \end{figure}
1291: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1292: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1293: Graphically, the adiabatic conversion
1294: is described in the following way (fig. 3).
1295: The axis of the cone rotates according to density change.
1296: The cone angle is unchanged (adiabaticity). The
1297: evolution consists of the rotation of the cone and the rotation
1298: of the neutrino vector on the surface of the cone.
1299:
1300:
1301: In the graphic representation (fig.~4)
1302: the axis of the cone rotates according to density change.
1303: The cone angle changes (violation of the adiabaticity).
1304: The neutrino vector moves on the surface of the cone (phase change).
1305: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1306: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% graf3 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1307: \begin{figure}[htb]
1308: \hbox to \hsize{\hfil\epsfxsize=5.5cm\epsfbox{graf3.eps}\hfil}
1309: \caption{~~Graphic representation of the non-adiabatic neutrino
1310: conversion (see text).
1311: }
1312: \end{figure}
1313: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1314:
1315: %the evolution consists of $\vec{\nu}$- precession
1316: %around $\vec{B}$: $\vec{\nu}$ moves monotonously
1317: %according to increase of the oscillation phase, $\phi$.
1318: %The evolution of neutrino has a character of
1319: %oscillations. Oscillations are the consequence of the monotonous
1320: %change of the phase. Only this degree of freedom operates.
1321: %Flavors of the eigenstates and the admixtures of the eigenstates in a
1322: %given state are fixed:
1323: %\begin{equation}
1324: %\theta_m = const, ~~~~ \theta_a = const, ~~~~ \phi = (H_2 - H_1)t.
1325: %\end{equation}
1326:
1327: The mixing angle depends on the neutrino energy. Therefore
1328: for different energies vectors of the neutrino states
1329: will rotate around
1330: different axes with different cone angles. At the resonance energy,
1331: the rotation proceeds around $\nu_x$, and the cone angle equals $\pi/2$.
1332:
1333:
1334:
1335: %\subsection{Evolution Equation}
1336: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1337: %
1338: %We will consider the system of three (or more)
1339: %neutrinos $\nu_f = (\nu_e, \nu_{\mu}, \nu_{\tau} ...)$
1340: %mixed by mass terms (vacuum mixing).
1341: %In the ultrarelativistic limit a propagation of these
1342: %neutrinos is described by the evolution equation \cite{W,MS}
1343: %\be
1344: %i\displaystyle{\frac{d\nu_f}{dt}= H\nu_f}, ~~~~~~~
1345: %H\simeq\displaystyle{\frac{M^2}{2E} + V_f} ~,
1346: %\label{evolution}
1347: %\ee
1348: %where
1349: %\be
1350: %M = S M^{diag} S^{\dagger}
1351: %\label{mixi}
1352: %\ee
1353: %is the mass matrix in flavor basis. Here $M^{diag} \equiv diag(m_1, m_2, m_3, ...)$ and
1354: %$m_i$ are the masses of neutrinos. $S$ is the mixing matrix
1355: %$determined by $\nu_f = S \nu$, where $\nu = (\nu_1, \nu_2, \nu_3, ...) $ are
1356: %the eigenstates of the mass matrix. $E$ is the neutrino energy.
1357: %$V_f$ is the matrix of the effective potentials which describes the
1358: %interactions of neutrinos with medium. The real part of the
1359: %potential corresponds to refraction effect. The imaginary part
1360: %describes inelastic collisions which lead to
1361: %depart of the neutrino from the coherent state.
1362: %The ratio of the imaginary to real parts of the potentials
1363: %is $V_I/V_R \sim \sqrt{s}/ m_W$ ($m_W$ is the W-boson mass)
1364: %and for $\sqrt{s} \ll m_W$
1365: %the imaginary part can be neglected for many applications.
1366: %The Hamiltonian is hermitian in this case.
1367:
1368: %For two neutrino case, {\it e.g.} $(\nu_e, \nu_{\mu})$, we get explicitly:
1369: %\be
1370: %H = \displaystyle{\frac{\Delta m^2}{4E}}\left(
1371: %\begin{array}{ccc}
1372: %- \cos 2\theta + 4 V_{e \mu} E/\Delta m^2 & \sin2 \theta \\
1373: %\sin 2 \theta & \cos 2\theta
1374: %\end{array}
1375: %\right)~, ~
1376: %\label{ham}
1377: %\ee
1378: %where $\theta$ is the mixing angle in vacuum, $\Delta m^2 \equiv m^2_2 - m^2_1$,
1379: %and $V_{e \mu} \equiv V_e - V_{\mu}$.
1380:
1381: %Let us consider the evolution equation (\ref{evolution}) for
1382: %two neutrino species $(\nu_e, \nu_{\mu})$.
1383: %The Hamiltonian is the function of the electron density,
1384: %and consequently, the time: $H = H(n_e(t))$.
1385: %For a given moment of time $t$ we can introduce the instantaneous
1386: %eigenstates of $H$, $\nu_{im}(t)$, and eigenvalues of $H$, $E_{im}(t)$,
1387: %$(i = 1, 2)$:
1388: %$$
1389: %H(t) \nu_{im}(t) = E_{im}(t)\nu_{im}(t)~.
1390: %$$
1391: From (\ref{flavmass}) we find the inverse relation:
1392: \be
1393: \nu_{1m} = \cos\theta_m \nu_e - \sin \theta_m \nu_{\mu}, ~~
1394: \nu_{2m} = \cos\theta_m \nu_{\mu} - \sin \theta_m \nu_{e}.
1395: \label{flav}
1396: \ee
1397: According to (\ref{flav}) the mixing angle $\theta_m$ determines the
1398: $\nu_e-$,
1399: $\nu_{\mu}-$
1400: (that is, flavor) content of the neutrino eigenstates.
1401: When $n_e$ changes with distance,
1402: $\theta_m$ also changes according to
1403: (\ref{mam}). Then from (\ref{flav}) we get
1404: the following conclusion. In the nonuniform medium the
1405: flavors of the eigenstates change: they
1406: uniquely follow a change of the electron density.
1407: When density changes from
1408: $n_e \gg n_e^R$ to $n_e \ll n_e^R$ (and if the vacuum mixing is small),
1409: the flavor of the $\nu_{1m}$ changes from being
1410: almost $\nu_{\mu}$ to $\nu_e$
1411: and the flavor of $\nu_{2m}$ -- from $\nu_e$ to $\nu_{\mu}$ (fig. 1).
1412: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1413: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% res %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1414: \begin{figure}[htb]
1415: \hbox to \hsize{\hfil\epsfxsize=8cm\epsfbox{res.eps}\hfil}
1416: \caption{~~Energies $H_i$ (solid lines) and flavors of the neutrino
1417: eigenstates
1418: as functions of the effective density $\rho \equiv m_N n_e$
1419: ($m_N$ is the mass of the nucleon).
1420: White parts of boxes represent the electron flavor and
1421: shadowed parts are the muon flavor.
1422: }
1423: \end{figure}
1424: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1425: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1426:
1427: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1428: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% ss3.3 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1429: \subsection{Density matrix and Graphic representation}
1430: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1431:
1432: We will consider dynamics of transitions in different
1433: media using graphic representation \cite{graph}.
1434: The representation is based on
1435: analogy of the neutrino evolution with behavior of
1436: spin of the electron in the magnetic field. Indeed,
1437: a neutrino state can be described by vector (of the length 1/2):
1438: \begin{equation}
1439: \vec{\nu} = \left( {\rm Re} \nu_{e}^{\dagger} \nu_{\mu}, ~~
1440: {\rm Im} \nu_{e}^{\dagger} \nu_{\mu},~~
1441: \nu_{e}^{\dagger} \nu_{e} - 1/2 \right) ~,
1442: \end{equation}
1443: where $\nu_{i}$, ($i = \mu, e$) are the neutrino wave functions.
1444: (The elements of this vector are nothing but components of the density
1445: matrix.)
1446: Introducing another vector:
1447: \begin{equation}
1448: \vec{B} \equiv \frac{2 \pi}{l_m} (\sin 2 \theta_m,~~ 0 ,~~ \cos 2
1449: \theta_m)~
1450: \label{axisb}
1451: \end{equation}
1452: ($l_m = 2\pi/\Delta H$ is the oscillation length in medium) which
1453: corresponds to the magnetic field, one gets from the evolution equations
1454: for the wave functions (\ref{evolution}) the equation
1455: \begin{equation}
1456: \frac{d \vec{\nu}}{d t} = \left(\vec{B} \times \vec{\nu} \right)~.
1457: \end{equation}
1458:
1459: The vector $\vec{\nu}$ moves (see fig.~2)
1460: on the surface of the cone with axis $\vec{B}$
1461: according to increase of the oscillation phase, $\phi$.
1462: The direction of the axis, $\vec{B}$,
1463: is determined by $2\theta_m$ (\ref{axisb}).
1464: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1465: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% graf1a %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1466: \begin{figure}[htb]
1467: \hbox to \hsize{\hfil\epsfxsize=6.5cm\epsfbox{graf1a.eps}\hfil}
1468: \caption{ Graphic representation of the neutrino
1469: oscillations in the uniform medium (see text).
1470: $R \equiv {\rm Re} \nu_{e}^{\dagger} \nu_{\mu}$,
1471: $I \equiv {\rm Im} \nu_{e}^{\dagger} \nu_{\mu}$,
1472: $P \equiv \nu_{e}^{\dagger} \nu_{e}$.
1473: }
1474: \end{figure}
1475: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1476: The cone angle -- the angle between $\vec{\nu}$ and
1477: $\vec{B}$ -- is given by $2\theta_a$ (see (\ref{exp})).
1478: It depends
1479: both on mixing angle and on the initial state, and in general, changes
1480: in process of evolution.
1481: If the initial state is $\nu_{e}$,
1482: the angle equals $2\theta_{a} = 2\theta_m$ in the initial moment.
1483: The projection of $\vec{\nu}$ on the axis
1484: $\nu_{z}$, gives the probability
1485: to find $\nu_{e}$ in a state $\vec{\nu}$:
1486: \begin{equation}
1487: P \equiv \nu_{e}^{\dagger} \nu_{e} =
1488: \nu_z + \frac{1}{2} =
1489: \cos^2 \frac{\theta_z}{2} ~.
1490: \label{thetaz}
1491: \end{equation}
1492: Here $\nu_{z} \equiv 0.5 \cos \theta_z$,
1493: and $\theta_z$ is the angle between $\vec{\nu}$ and the axis $\nu_z$.
1494:
1495: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1496:
1497: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1498:
1499: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% ppp2 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1500: \section{Reconstructing Neutrino Mass Spectrum}
1501: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1502:
1503:
1504:
1505:
1506:
1507: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1508: \subsection{Phenomenological input}
1509: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1510:
1511:
1512: The experimental situation can be
1513: summarized in the following way:
1514:
1515:
1516:
1517:
1518: In the bi-maximal scheme \cite{bimax} neutrinos have masses
1519: \be
1520: m_3 = (0.3 - 3) \cdot 10^{-1} {\rm eV},~~~
1521: m_2 \sim (0.7 - 2) \cdot 10^{-5}{\rm eV},~~~
1522: m_1 \ll m_2
1523: \ee
1524: (see fig. \ref{fbimax});
1525: $\nu_{\mu}$ and $\nu_{\tau}$ mix maximally in
1526: $\nu_{3} = (\nu_{\mu} + \nu_{\tau})/\sqrt{2}$; the orthogonal
1527: combination, $\nu_2' \equiv (\nu_{\mu} - \nu_{\tau})/\sqrt{2}$
1528: strongly mixes with
1529: $\nu_e$ in $\nu_{1}$ and $\nu_{2}$.
1530: There is no admixture of $\nu_e$ in the $\nu_{3}$.
1531: The corresponding mixing matrix has the form:
1532: \be
1533: V_{MNS} =
1534: \left(
1535: \matrix{
1536: \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} & - \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} & 0 \cr
1537: \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2} & - \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \cr
1538: \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \cr}
1539: \right),
1540: \label{viss}
1541: \ee
1542: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1543: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% bimainv %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1544: \begin{figure}[htb]
1545: \hbox to \hsize{\hfil\epsfxsize=7cm\epsfbox{bimainv.eps}\hfil}
1546: \caption{~~The neutrino mass and mixing in the bi-maximal
1547: mixing scheme with inverse mass hierarchy.
1548: }
1549: \label{fbimaxinv}
1550: \end{figure}
1551:
1552:
1553: \section{Summary}
1554:
1555: (iii) identification of solution of the
1556: solar neutrino problem: Just- so, large mixing MSW
1557: small mixing MSW etc..
1558:
1559: (iv) clarification of a role of sterile neutrinos in conversion of
1560: the solar neutrinos. \\
1561:
1562:
1563: \noindent
1564: 4). Introduction of sterile neutrino can be motivated
1565: by explanation of large lepton mixing.
1566: This allows one to keep all flavor mixings to be small,
1567: and to rescue natural scenarios of neutrino mass and mixing.
1568:
1569: Large $\nu_{\mu} - \nu_{\tau}$ mixing can be naturally
1570: associated with mass degeneracy. In such a scheme, the solar
1571: neutrino problem is solved via the
1572: $\nu_{e}- \nu_s$ conversion.
1573: The latter can be checked by studies of
1574: correlation of the spectrum distortion and the day-night effect at SK
1575: and (in future) by studies of the neutral current
1576: interactions in Sudbury Neutrino Observatory.
1577:
1578:
1579: