1: \documentclass{npcs}
2: %AUTHORS CAN ADD ON THEIR OWN LaTeX PACKAGES
3: %\usepackage[pdftex]{graphics}
4: \usepackage{axodraw}
5: \usepackage{graphics} % <------- for LatTeX + PS
6: \usepackage{epsfig}
7: \usepackage{multicol}
8: \usepackage{amsmath}
9: \setcounter{page}{1}
10:
11: \newcommand{\multsp}{\,}
12:
13: \def\baselinestretch{1.}%<---------Scaling
14:
15: \topmargin = -26mm
16:
17:
18: %\usepackage[active]{srcltx}
19: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
20: \begin{document}
21:
22: \runauthor{T. Shishkina, V. Mossolov, I. Marfin} \runtitle{The investigation of the $\gamma\gamma\rightarrow
23: W^+W^-$ including electromagnetic corrections
24: at the TESLA kinematics}
25: \begin{topmatter}
26: \title{ The investigation of the $\gamma\gamma\rightarrow
27: W^+W^-$ including electromagnetic corrections
28: at the TESLA kinematics}
29: \author{Author I.B. Marfin}
30: \institution{NCHEP}
31: \address{153 Bogdanovitcha str.,220040 Minsk, Belarus}
32: \email{marfin@hep.by}
33: \author{Author V.A. Mossolov}
34: \institution{NCHEP}
35: \address{153 Bogdanovitcha str.,220040 Minsk, Belarus}
36: \email{mos@hep.by}
37: \author{Author T.V. Shishkina}
38: \institution{NCHEP}
39: \address{153 Bogdanovitcha str.,220040 Minsk, Belarus}
40: \email{shishkina@hep.by}
41: \begin{abstract}
42:
43: The $W^+W^-$ production in $\gamma\gamma$ scattering is considered in the Standard Model.
44: The main contribution to radiative effects for the process $\gamma\gamma\rightarrow W^+W^-$ has been
45: calculating and analyzing. It is found the latter is considerable at
46: high energies and greatly contributes to the differential cross
47: section $d\sigma_{\lambda_1\lambda_2\lambda_3\lambda_4}$ at various
48: polarizations of initial photons and final bosons. Monte-Carlo generator built based on TESLA kinematics.
49: \end{abstract}
50:
51: \end{topmatter}
52: \newpage
53:
54: \section{Introduction}
55:
56: $ $
57:
58: The multiple vector-boson production will be a
59: crucial test of gauge structure of the Standard Model since the
60: triple and quartic vector-boson couplings involved in this kind of
61: reaction are constrained by the $SU(2)\bigotimes U(1)$ gauge
62: invariance. The production of several vector bosons is the best place to
63: search directly for any anomalous behavior of triple and quartic
64: couplings \cite{bib0}.
65:
66: Any small deviation from the Standard Model predictions for these
67: coupling spoils the cancellations of the high energy
68: behaviour between the various diagrams, giving rise to an
69: anomalous growth of the cross section with energy. It is important
70: to measure the vector-boson selfcouplings and look for deviations
71: from the Standard Model.
72:
73: %B.
74: Using the linear $e^+e^-$-collider, one can
75: obtain the colliding $\gamma e$ and $\gamma\gamma$ beams with
76: the same energies as in $e^+e^-$-
77: collisions and with high luminosity.
78:
79: Thus, there is the possibility of direct experimental
80: investigation of the reactions: $$\gamma e\rightarrow W\nu $$ and
81: $$\gamma\gamma \rightarrow W^+W^-. $$ These reactions were
82: considered as parts of the W-bosons production process in $e^+e^-$
83: collisions ($ee\rightarrow eW\nu, e^+e^-\rightarrow W+X,
84: ee\rightarrow eeWW$) and in $ep$ and $pp$ collisions as well.
85: However, the corresponding cross sections are very small and such
86: processes will be observed in the nearest future hardly.
87:
88: Reactions $e^+e^-\rightarrow W^+W^-$ and $\gamma\gamma\rightarrow
89: W^+W^-$ will give the unique possibilities of $ W$-investigation due to
90: relatively large cross sections and low background. Moreover, the
91: colliding $\gamma e$ and $\gamma\gamma$ beams will allow us to
92: study a number of problems which are harding solved in other
93: collisions \cite{bib3}. The cross sections of process
94: $\gamma\gamma\rightarrow W^+W^-$ is of order $\sim 4\pi\alpha^2/M_W^2$
95: at high energy (they are constant at $s\rightarrow \infty$
96: due to the t-channel vector exchange). Therefore, at $s_{\gamma
97: e}\sim s_{\gamma\gamma} \sim s_{ee}\gg M_W^2$, the cross sections
98: of this reaction considerably exceed the cross section of the
99: $e^+e^-$ annihilation into hadrons.
100:
101: \section{The probing triple and quartic gauge bosons couplings}
102:
103: $ $
104:
105: The cross section $\gamma\gamma\to W^{+}W^{-}$ is about
106: an order of magnitude larger than $e^+ e^- \to W^{+}W^{-}$.
107:
108:
109: We discuss how one can use $\gamma\gamma$ collisions to study
110: the pair production of vector bosons (see fig. \ref{p1}) $$\gamma+\gamma\ \rightarrow W^{+} + W^{-}$$
111: %and $W^+W^-Z$ production $$ \gamma+\gamma\ \rightarrow W^{+} +
112: %W^{-} + Z$$
113: and get information on three- and four-boson
114: vertices. %See Feynman diagrams in fig. \ref{p2}.
115:
116:
117: The process $\gamma\gamma\rightarrow W^+W^-$ depends at the tree level both
118: on the triple $\gamma WW$ and the quartic $\gamma\gamma WW$ coupling,
119: and no other vertices are involved in the unitary gauge at the lowest order \cite{bib1}.
120: The sensitivity to the $\gamma WW$ coupling is comparable and complementary
121: to the reactions $e^+e^- \to W^+W^-$ and $\gamma e^- \to W^-\nu$:
122: the first process involves a mixture of the $\gamma WW$ and the $ZWW$ coupling,
123: the second -- involves the $\gamma WW$ alone but is not such sensitive.
124: %\begin{figure}[th]\label{p1}
125: %\begin{picture}(200,200)
126: %\put(120,200){\special{em:graph 2n.bmp}}
127: %\end{picture}
128: %\caption{The first-order Feynman diagrams for $W^+W^-$-production}\label{p1}
129: %\end{figure}
130: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
131: %%% 1.1
132: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
133: \begin{figure}[h]
134: \begin{center}
135: \begin{picture}(400,200)(0,0)
136:
137: %1
138: \Photon(10,110)(100,110){2}{4}\put(10,120){$\gamma_2$}
139: \Vertex(100,110){1.2}
140: \Line(100,110)(190,110)\put(170,120){$W^+$}
141: \Line(100,110)(100,190)
142: \Photon(10,190)(100,190){2}{4}\put(10,170){$\gamma_1$}
143: \Vertex(100,190){1.2}
144: \Line(100,190)(190,190)\put(170,180){$W^-$}
145:
146: %2
147: \Photon(210,110)(300,110){2}{4}\put(210,120){$\gamma_2$}
148: \Vertex(300,110){1.2}
149: \Line(300,110)(390,110)\put(370,120){$W^-$}
150: \Line(300,110)(300,190)
151: \Photon(210,190)(300,190){2}{4}\put(210,180){$\gamma_1$}
152: \Vertex(300,190){1.2}
153: \Line(300,190)(390,190)\put(370,180){$W^+$}
154:
155: %3
156: \Photon(110,10)(200,50){2}{4}\put(90,10){$\gamma_2$}
157: \Vertex(200,50){1.2}
158: \Photon(110,90)(200,50){2}{4}\put(90,80){$\gamma_1$}
159: \Line(200,50)(290,10)\put(300,10){$W^+$}
160: \Line(200,50)(290,90)\put(300,80){$W^-$}
161:
162: \end{picture}
163: \end{center}
164: \caption{The Feynman diagrams for $W^+W^-$-production}\label{p1}
165: \end{figure}
166: Because the sensitivity to the $\gamma\gamma WW$ coupling is much larger in the considering process
167: than the one in $e^+e^-$ collisions, $\gamma\gamma\to W^+W^-$
168: is the ideal process to study this coupling.
169:
170: The measurement
171: of cross section and asymmetries of the process
172: $\gamma\gamma\rightarrow W^+W^-Z$ is complimentary to the analysis
173: of the production of vector-boson pairs.
174:
175: %\begin{figure}[th]
176: %\begin{picture}(100,400)
177: %\put(100,400){\special{em:graph 1n.bmp}}
178: %\end{picture}
179: %\caption { The Feynman diagrams for $W^+W^-Z$-production }\label{p2}
180: %\end{figure}
181:
182:
183:
184: $ $
185:
186: We have the unique possibility to examine production of two and three
187: vector bosons in $\gamma\gamma$ collisions through the reaction
188: using beams of polarized and unpolarized photons.
189:
190: \begin{itemize}
191: \item This process involves only interactions between the gauge
192: bosons making more evident any deviation from predictions of the
193: gauge structure by Standard Model.
194: \item There is no tree-level contribution involving the Higgs
195: boson with any uncertainties coming from the scalar
196: sector.
197: \end{itemize}
198:
199: %E.
200: We started from explicit expression for the
201: amplitude of process $\gamma\gamma\rightarrow W^+W^-$
202: %and $\gamma\gamma\rightarrow W^+W^-Z$.
203:
204:
205: \begin{align}\label{c1}
206: M = & G_v \epsilon_{\mu}(k_1)\epsilon_{\nu}(k_2)
207: \epsilon_{\alpha}(p_{+})\epsilon_{\beta}(p_{-})
208: %\epsilon_{\gamma}(k_3)
209: M_T^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta},
210: \end{align}
211: where
212: \begin{align}\label{c2}
213: M_T^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta} = \sum_{i=1}^{3}
214: M_i^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta},
215: \end{align}
216: $k_1$, $k_2$, $p_{+}$, $p_{-}$ are four-momenta of the $\gamma$, $\gamma$, $W^{+}$, $W^{-}$, respectively
217: and $\epsilon_{\mu}(k_1), \epsilon_{\nu}(k_2),\epsilon_{\alpha}(p_{+}), \epsilon_{\beta}(p_{-})$
218: -- their polarizations.
219: $$G_v = e^3 \cot\theta_W.$$
220:
221: It is convenient to define the triple-gauge-boson coupling in the following way:
222: \begin{align}\label{a1}
223: {\Gamma}_{3}^{\alpha\beta\gamma}(P_1,P_2) = & [(2P_1 +
224: P_2)^{\beta} g^{\alpha\gamma} - (2P_2 + P_1)^{\alpha}
225: g^{\beta\gamma} + (P_2 - P_1)^{\gamma} g^{\alpha\beta}],
226: \end{align}
227: the quartic-gauge-boson coupling as
228: \begin{align}\label{a2}
229: {\Gamma}_{4}^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta} = & g^{\mu\alpha} g^{\nu\beta} +
230: g^{\mu\beta} g^{\nu\alpha} -2 g^{\mu\nu} g^{\alpha\beta},
231: \end{align}
232: and the propagator tensor for the vector boson as
233: \begin{align}\label{a3}
234: D^{\mu\nu}(k) = & \frac{(g{\mu\nu} - k^{\mu}k^{\nu}/m^2)}{k^2 -
235: m^2}.
236: \end{align}
237: Using the expression defined above, the contributions of the three
238: Feynman diagrams (see fig. $1$) for the $WW$-production can be written as
239: %\begin{align}\label{b1}
240: %M_{1}^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta\gamma} = & {\Gamma}_{3}^{\alpha\gamma\xi}
241: %(p_{+},k_3) D_{\xi\sigma}(p_{+}+k_3) {\Gamma}_{3}^{\mu\sigma\rho}
242: %(k_1,-(p_{+} + k_3)) \nonumber\\ & D_{\rho\lambda}(p_{-} - k_2)
243: %{\Gamma}_{3}^{\beta\nu\lambda}(-p_{-},k_2) + [k_1\leftrightarrow
244: %k_2; \mu\leftrightarrow\nu],
245: %\end{align}
246: %\begin{align}\label{b2}
247: %M_{2}^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta\gamma} = & {\Gamma}_{3}^{\gamma\beta\xi}
248: %(k_3,p_{-}) D_{\xi\sigma}(p_{-}+k_3) {\Gamma}_{3}^{\sigma\nu\rho}
249: %(-(p_{-} + k_3),k_2) \nonumber\\ & D_{\rho\lambda}(k_1 - p_{+})
250: %{\Gamma}_{3}^{\alpha\mu\lambda}(-p_{+},k_1) + [k_1\leftrightarrow
251: %k_2; \mu\leftrightarrow\nu],
252: %\end{align}
253: %\begin{align}\label{b3}
254: %M_{3}^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta\gamma} = & {\Gamma}_{3}^{\mu\alpha\xi}
255: %(k_1,-p_{+}) D_{\xi\sigma}(k_1 - p_{+})
256: %{\Gamma}_{3}^{\gamma\sigma\rho} (-k_3,(k_1 - p_{+})) \nonumber\\ &
257: %D_{\rho\lambda}(p_{-} - k_2)
258: %{\Gamma}_{3}^{\nu\beta\lambda}(-k_2,p_{-}) + [k_1\leftrightarrow
259: %k_2; \mu\leftrightarrow\nu],
260: %\end{align}
261: %\begin{align}\label{b4}
262: %M_{4}^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta\gamma} = & {\Gamma}_{3}^{\beta\nu\xi}
263: %(-p_{-},k_2) D_{\xi\lambda}(k_2 - p_{-})
264: %{\Gamma}_{4}^{\lambda\alpha\mu\gamma} + [k_1\leftrightarrow k_2;
265: %\mu\leftrightarrow\nu],
266: %\end{align}
267: %\begin{align}\label{b5}
268: %M_{5}^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta\gamma} = & {\Gamma}_{3}^{\mu\alpha\xi}
269: %(k_1,-p_{+}) D_{\xi\lambda}(k_1 - p_{+})
270: %{\Gamma}_{4}^{\lambda\beta\nu\gamma} + [k_1\leftrightarrow k_2;
271: %\mu\leftrightarrow\nu],
272: %\end{align}
273: %\begin{align}\label{b6}
274: %M_{6}^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta\gamma} = & {\Gamma}_{3}^{\alpha\gamma\xi}
275: %(p_{+},k_3) D_{\xi\lambda}(k_3 + p_{+})
276: %{\Gamma}_{4}^{\lambda\beta\nu\mu},
277: %\end{align}
278: %\begin{align}\label{b7}
279: %M_{7}^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta\gamma} = & {\Gamma}_{3}^{\gamma\beta\xi}
280: %(k_3,p_{-}) D_{\xi\lambda}(-k_3 - p_{-})
281: %{\Gamma}_{4}^{\lambda\alpha\nu\mu},
282: %\end{align}
283: %where $[k_1\leftrightarrow k_2; \mu\leftrightarrow\nu]$ defines
284: %the crossed contributions of the initial photons. The expressions
285: %for W-pair productions can be given also.
286: \begin{align}\label{b8}
287: M_{1}^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta} = & {\Gamma}_{3}^{\mu\alpha\xi}
288: (-k_1,p_{+}) D_{\xi\lambda}(p_+ -
289: k_1){\Gamma}_{3}^{\nu\beta\lambda}(-k_2,p_-),
290: \end{align}
291: \begin{align}\label{b9}
292: M_{2}^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta} = & {\Gamma}_{3}^{\mu\beta\xi}
293: (-k_1,p_{-}) D_{\xi\lambda}(p_- -
294: k_1){\Gamma}_{3}^{\nu\alpha\lambda}(-k_2,p_+),
295: \end{align}
296: \begin{align}\label{b10}
297: M_{3}^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta} = & {\Gamma}_{4}^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}.
298: \end{align}
299: Then we calculate cross sections for polarized beams and for all combinations of
300: polarizations of final particles. The exact covariant expressions for all amplitudes of different
301: Feynman diagrams (see fig. \ref{p1}) are presented in the appendix (\ref{ap1}) -- (\ref{ap4}).
302:
303:
304:
305:
306: \section{Cross sections and asymmetries}
307:
308: $ $
309:
310:
311: We analyze the total cross sections of the considered process
312: as well as different distributions of the final state vector
313: bosons. We have evaluated the total cross section for the
314: processes $\gamma\gamma\rightarrow W^+W^-$
315: \begin{eqnarray}
316: \begin{array}{c}
317: \displaystyle \sigma = \int|M|^2d\Gamma,
318: \end{array}
319: \end{eqnarray}
320: where $|M|$ can be defined through formula (\ref{ap1}) -- (\ref{ap4}), the phase-space volume element is assumed as
321: $$d\Gamma=\frac{d^3p_+}{(2\pi)^32p_+^0}\frac{d^3p_-}{(2\pi)^32p_-^0}(2\pi)^4\delta(k_1+k_2-p_+-p_-).$$
322: %and $\gamma\gamma\rightarrow W^+W^-Z$
323: % In Table we exhibit the results for the total cross
324: %sections.
325: %\begin{center}
326: %Table.
327: The total cross sections of $\gamma\gamma\rightarrow W^+W^-$ at $\sqrt{s}\simeq 1$ TeV
328: %\end{center}
329: %\begin{center}
330: %\begin{tabular}{|l|l|}
331: %\hline
332: % $\gamma\gamma\rightarrow W^{+}W^{-}$ & $ \gamma\gamma\rightarrow
333: % W^{+}W^{-}Z^{0}$ \\ & \\
334: % \hline
335: is about $\sigma = 3.89\cdot 10^{-8}\ \mbox{GeV}^{-2}$.% & $\sigma = 1.53
336: %\cdot 10^{-9}\ \mbox{GeV}^{-2}$
337: %\\ & \\
338: %\hline
339: %\end{tabular}
340: %\end{center}
341: %\vspace{2pt}
342:
343: %As one can see, the two-gauge boson cross-section
344: %($\gamma\gamma\rightarrow W^{+}W^{-}$), which is the main reaction
345: %in a $\gamma\gamma$-collisions, is about $2$-$4$
346: %orders of magnitude above these for three gauge bosons.
347: %times larger than one for three gauge bosons production.
348:
349: In order to reach the best understanding of these reactions we
350: present here various differential cross-section as well as
351: polarized asymmetries of two- and three-boson production:
352: \begin{eqnarray}
353: \begin{array}{c}
354: \displaystyle A_1 = \frac{d\sigma_{+,+,+,+}/dy_- - d\sigma_{+,-,+,+}/dy_-}{d\sigma_{+,+,+,+}/dy_- + d\sigma_{+,-,+,+}/dy_-}, \\
355: \displaystyle A_2 = \frac{d\sigma_{+,+,+,-}/dy_- - d\sigma_{+,-,+,-}/dy_-}{d\sigma_{+,+,+,-}/dy_- + d\sigma_{+,-,+,-}/dy_-}, \\
356: \displaystyle A_3 = \frac{d\sigma_{+,+,0,0}/dy_--d\sigma_{+,-,0,0}/dy_-}{d\sigma_{+,+,0,0}/dy_-+d\sigma_{+,-,0,0}/dy_-}, \\
357: \displaystyle A_4 = \frac{d\sigma_{+,+,unpol,unpol}/dy_- - d\sigma_{+,-,unpol,unpol}/dy_-}{d\sigma_{+,+,unpol,unpol}/dy_- + d\sigma_{+,-,unpol,unpol}/dy_-}. \\
358: \end{array}
359: \end{eqnarray}
360: Here the following notations are introduced: $+,-$ denote right and left circular polarizations of gammas and final bosons, $0$ means a longitudinal polarization, $unpol$ relates to
361: the case of unpolarized particles.
362:
363: One can see the $y_-$-distribution($y_-=(k_1,p_-)/S$) and different kinds of
364: polarized asymmetries in fig. \ref{p6} -- fig. \ref{p42}.
365:
366: Using these formulas we have constructed the Monte-Carlo event`s
367: generator \cite{bib2}. The universal kinematical block of this
368: generator allows us to produce $2$-particles, $3$-particles and even
369: more particles final state in identical way. We have used
370: this block to calculation above mentioned processes and we are
371: going to use it to another similar calculations some others
372: processes in TESLA kinematics. It is realized as a fast-working
373: FORTRAN module which provides required number of events (up to
374: several billions in realistic time) with a defined initial energy
375: and final masses.
376:
377:
378: The considered process is very important to study quartic-boson vertex (see
379: fig.\ref{p5}). The contribution of four-boson vertex to total cross
380: section is investigated specially. Obviously, processes of
381: $\gamma\gamma$-scattering are sensitive to the four-boson vertex construction.
382: The experiments with polarized particles give wide set of
383: additional data for investigation of electroweak gauge
384: models.
385:
386: \section{ The lowest-order correction to the $\gamma\gamma\rightarrow W^+W^-$ process}
387:
388: $ $
389:
390: Obviously the correct comparison of results for
391: these two processes and precision analysis of data of the future
392: experiments are impossible without calculation of full set the
393: first-order radiative corrections, presented in figs. \ref{p5x},
394: \ref{p6x} (see, for example, refs. \cite{bib4} -- \cite{bib9}).
395:
396: As a rule, the one-loop diagrams involving Higgs boson have been calculated
397: in order to study the possible investigation of the Higgs boson
398: via $\gamma\gamma \to H^* \to W^+W^-$.
399: See, for example, refs. \cite{bib01} -- \cite{bib03}.
400: Only the channels of longitudinal $W$-boson production
401: are sensitive to the Higgs mechanism, but the channels with $W$
402: transfer are insensitive.
403: This insensitivity to the Higgs sector render
404: $\gamma\gamma \to W^+W^-$ even more suitable
405: for the investigation of the self couplings.
406:
407: So, at $\sqrt{s} \sim 1000\,\, GeV$ the radiative correction
408: is about a value of Born cross section.
409: In this work we focus on the most important
410: QED one-loop corrections to $\gamma\gamma\to W^+W^-$.
411:
412:
413:
414: The additional real photon contribution
415: (see Feynman diagrams in fig. \ref{p5x})
416: and additional virtual photon contribution
417: (see Feynman diagrams in fig. \ref{p6x})
418: are shown in figs. \ref{p2x} -- \ref{p17}.
419:
420: %\begin{figure}[t!]
421: %\begin{picture}(200,370)
422: %\put(100,370){\special{em:graph 3n.bmp}}
423: %\end{picture}
424: %\caption{The radiative corrections for $\gamma\gamma\rightarrow
425: %W^+W^-$ due to additional real photon}\label{p5x}
426: %\end{figure}
427:
428: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
429: \begin{figure}[h!]
430: \begin{center}
431: \begin{picture}(400,400)(0,0)
432:
433: %1
434: \Photon(10,370)(100,370){2}{4}\put(10,360){$\gamma_1$}
435: \Photon(10,310)(100,310){2}{4}\put(10,320){$\gamma_2$}
436: \Vertex(100,370){1.2}
437: \Line(100,370)(145,370)
438: \Vertex(145,370){1.2}
439: \Line(145,370)(190,390)\put(170,370){$W^+$}
440: \Photon(145,370)(190,350){2}{4}\put(170,340){$\gamma$}
441: \Line(100,310)(100,370)
442: \Vertex(100,310){1.2}
443: \Line(100,310)(190,310)\put(170,315){$W^-$}
444: \put(100,295){$1$}
445:
446: %2
447: \Photon(210,370)(300,370){2}{4}\put(210,360){$\gamma_1$}
448: \Photon(210,310)(300,310){2}{4}\put(210,320){$\gamma_2$}
449: \Vertex(300,370){1.2}
450: \Line(300,370)(345,370)
451: \Vertex(345,370){1.2}
452: \Line(345,370)(390,390)\put(370,370){$W^-$}
453: \Photon(345,370)(390,350){2}{4}\put(370,340){$\gamma$}
454: \Line(300,310)(300,370)
455: \Vertex(300,310){1.2}
456: \Line(300,310)(390,310)\put(370,315){$W^+$}
457: \put(300,295){$2$}
458:
459: %3
460: \Photon(110,280)(180,280){2}{4}\put(110,270){$\gamma_1$}
461: \Photon(110,220)(180,220){2}{4}\put(110,230){$\gamma_2$}
462: \Vertex(180,280){1.2}
463: \Line(180,280)(280,300)\put(270,280){$W^+$}
464: \Line(180,280)(220,250)
465: \Vertex(220,250){1.2}
466: \Photon(220,250)(290,250){2}{4}\put(295,245){$\gamma$}
467: \Line(180,220)(220,250)
468: \Vertex(180,220){1.2}
469: \Line(180,220)(280,200)\put(270,210){$W^-$}
470: \put(200,200){$3$}
471:
472: %4
473: \Photon(10,190)(100,190){2}{4}\put(10,180){$\gamma_1$}
474: \Photon(10,130)(100,130){2}{4}\put(10,140){$\gamma_2$}
475: \Vertex(100,190){1.2}
476: \Line(100,190)(190,190)\put(170,180){$W^-$}
477: \Line(100,130)(100,190)
478: \Vertex(100,130){1.2}
479: \Line(100,130)(190,150)\put(170,150){$W^+$}
480: \Photon(100,130)(190,110){2}{4}\put(170,120){$\gamma$}
481: \put(100,100){$4$}
482:
483: %5
484: \Photon(210,190)(300,190){2}{4}\put(210,180){$\gamma_1$}
485: \Photon(210,130)(300,130){2}{4}\put(210,140){$\gamma_2$}
486: \Vertex(300,190){1.2}
487: \Line(300,190)(390,190)\put(370,180){$W^+$}
488: \Line(300,130)(300,190)
489: \Vertex(300,130){1.2}
490: \Line(300,130)(390,150)\put(370,150){$W^-$}
491: \Photon(300,130)(390,110){2}{4}\put(370,120){$\gamma$}
492: \put(300,100){$5$}
493:
494: %6
495: \Photon(10,90)(100,50){2}{4}\put(30,90){$\gamma_1$}
496: \Photon(10,10)(100,50){2}{4}\put(30,10){$\gamma_2$}
497: \Vertex(100,50){1.2}
498: \Line(100,50)(190,10)\put(150,10){$W^-$}
499: \Line(100,50)(145,65)
500: \Vertex(145,65){1.2}
501: \Line(145,65)(190,90)\put(150,80){$W^+$}
502: \Photon(145,65)(190,60){2}{4}\put(150,50){$\gamma$}
503: \put(100,0){$6$}
504:
505: %7
506: \Photon(210,90)(300,50){2}{4}\put(230,90){$\gamma_1$}
507: \Photon(210,10)(300,50){2}{4}\put(230,10){$\gamma_2$}
508: \Vertex(300,50){1.2}
509: \Line(300,50)(390,10)\put(350,10){$W^+$}
510: \Line(300,50)(345,65)
511: \Vertex(345,65){1.2}
512: \Line(345,65)(390,90)\put(350,80){$W^-$}
513: \Photon(345,65)(390,60){2}{4}\put(350,50){$\gamma$}
514: \put(300,0){$7$}
515:
516: \end{picture}
517: \end{center}
518: \caption{The radiative corrections for $\gamma\gamma\rightarrow
519: W^+W^-$ due to additional real photon}\label{p5x}
520: \end{figure}
521:
522:
523:
524: The radiative correction achives maximal value
525: in the kinematical region, where $y_-$ is near $0$.
526: %\begin{figure}[h]
527: %\begin{picture}(100,380)
528: %\put(130,380){\special{em:graph 4n.bmp}}
529: %\end{picture}
530: %\caption{The radiative corrections for $\gamma\gamma\rightarrow
531: %W^+W^-$ due to additional virtual photon and Z-boson}\label{p6x}
532: %\end{figure}
533:
534:
535: \begin{figure}[h!]
536: \begin{center}
537: \begin{picture}(400,400)(0,0)
538:
539: %1
540: \Photon(10,370)(100,370){2}{4}\put(10,360){$\gamma_1$}
541: \Photon(10,310)(100,310){2}{4}\put(10,320){$\gamma_2$}
542: \Vertex(100,370){1.2}
543: \Line(100,370)(190,370)\put(170,375){$W^+$}
544: \Vertex(145,370){1.2}
545: \Photon(145,370)(100,340){2}{4}
546: \Vertex(100,340){1.2}
547: \Line(100,310)(100,370)
548: \Vertex(100,310){1.2}
549: \Line(100,310)(190,310)\put(170,315){$W^-$}
550: \put(100,295){$1$}
551:
552: %2
553: \Photon(210,370)(300,370){2}{4}\put(210,360){$\gamma_1$}
554: \Photon(210,310)(300,310){2}{4}\put(210,320){$\gamma_2$}
555: \Vertex(300,370){1.2}
556: \Line(300,370)(390,370)\put(370,375){$W^-$}
557: \Vertex(345,370){1.2}
558: \Line(345,370)(300,340)
559: \Vertex(300,340){1.2}
560: \Line(300,310)(300,370)
561: \Vertex(300,310){1.2}
562: \Line(300,310)(390,310)\put(370,315){$W^+$}
563: \put(300,295){$2$}
564: %3
565: \Photon(10,270)(100,270){2}{4}\put(10,260){$\gamma_1$}
566: \Photon(10,210)(100,210){2}{4}\put(10,220){$\gamma_2$}
567: \Vertex(100,270){1.2}
568: \Line(100,270)(190,270)\put(170,275){$W^+$}
569: \Vertex(145,270){1.2}
570: \Photon(145,270)(145,210){2}{4}
571: \Vertex(145,210){1.2}
572: \Line(100,210)(100,270)
573: \Vertex(100,210){1.2}
574: \Line(100,210)(190,210)\put(170,215){$W^-$}
575: \put(100,195){$3$}
576:
577: %4
578: \Photon(210,270)(300,270){2}{4}\put(210,260){$\gamma_1$}
579: \Photon(210,210)(300,210){2}{4}\put(210,220){$\gamma_2$}
580: \Vertex(300,270){1.2}
581: \Line(300,270)(390,270)\put(370,275){$W^-$}
582: \Vertex(345,270){1.2}
583: \Line(345,270)(345,210)
584: \Vertex(345,210){1.2}
585: \Line(300,210)(300,270)
586: \Vertex(300,210){1.2}
587: \Line(300,210)(390,210)\put(370,215){$W^+$}
588: \put(300,195){$4$}
589: %5
590: \Photon(10,170)(100,170){2}{4}\put(10,160){$\gamma_1$}
591: \Photon(10,110)(100,110){2}{4}\put(10,120){$\gamma_2$}
592: \Vertex(100,170){1.2}
593: \Line(100,170)(190,170)\put(170,175){$W^+$}
594: \Vertex(145,110){1.2}
595: \Photon(145,110)(100,140){2}{4}
596: \Vertex(100,140){1.2}
597: \Line(100,110)(100,170)
598: \Vertex(100,110){1.2}
599: \Line(100,110)(190,110)\put(170,115){$W^-$}
600: \put(100,95){$5$}
601: %6
602: \Photon(210,170)(300,170){2}{4}\put(210,160){$\gamma_1$}
603: \Photon(210,110)(300,110){2}{4}\put(210,120){$\gamma_2$}
604: \Vertex(300,170){1.2}
605: \Line(300,170)(390,170)\put(370,175){$W^-$}
606: \Vertex(345,110){1.2}
607: \Line(345,110)(300,140)
608: \Vertex(300,140){1.2}
609: \Line(300,110)(300,170)
610: \Vertex(300,110){1.2}
611: \Line(300,110)(390,110)\put(370,115){$W^+$}
612: \put(300,95){$6$}
613: %7
614: \Photon(10,90)(100,50){2}{4}\put(30,90){$\gamma_1$}
615: \Photon(10,10)(100,50){2}{4}\put(30,10){$\gamma_2$}
616: \Vertex(100,50){1.2}
617: \Line(100,50)(190,10)\put(150,10){$W^-$}
618: \Line(100,50)(145,65)
619: \Vertex(145,65){1.2}
620: \Photon(145,65)(145,30){2}{4}
621: \Vertex(145,30){1.2}
622: \Line(145,65)(190,82)\put(150,80){$W^+$}
623: \put(100,0){$7$}
624: %8
625: \Photon(210,90)(300,50){2}{4}\put(230,90){$\gamma_1$}
626: \Photon(210,10)(300,50){2}{4}\put(230,10){$\gamma_2$}
627: \Vertex(300,50){1.2}
628: \Line(300,50)(390,10)\put(350,10){$W^+$}
629: \Line(300,50)(345,65)
630: \Vertex(345,65){1.2}
631: \Line(345,65)(345,30)
632: \Vertex(345,30){1.2}
633: \Line(345,65)(390,82)\put(350,80){$W^-$}
634: \put(300,0){$8$}
635:
636:
637: \end{picture}
638: \end{center}
639: \caption{The radiative corrections for $\gamma\gamma\rightarrow
640: W^+W^-$ due to additional virtual photon and Z-boson}\label{p6x}
641: \end{figure}
642:
643:
644:
645: %\newpage
646: %\vspace{5pt}
647:
648:
649: %{\bf Some formulas and integrals for calculating the radiative
650: %correction.}
651: %\vspace{5pt}
652: %\newpage
653:
654: There is a list of important expressions needed to calculate a
655: radiative contribution to the processes in figs. \ref{p5x} and \ref{p6x}.
656: %\normalsize
657: Here
658: \begin{eqnarray}\label{rc3}
659: \begin{array}{l}
660: \displaystyle |M_1+M_2+M_3+M_4+M_5+M_6+M_7|^{2}_{soft} =
661: \left(\frac{A_1^{\gamma}+A_2^{\gamma}}{2(p_+k)} +
662: \frac{B_1^{\gamma}+B_2^{\gamma}}{2(p_-k)}\right)^2,
663: \end{array}
664: \end{eqnarray}
665: \begin{eqnarray}\label{rc1}
666: \begin{array}{l}
667: A^{\gamma}_1
668: =C_{0\alpha\beta\mu\nu}[\Gamma_3^{\nu\beta\lambda}(k_2,-p_-,p_--k_2)
669: D_{\lambda\sigma}(p_--k_2)\Gamma_3^{\mu\sigma\rho}(k_1,k_2-p_,-p_+)(\delta_{\rho\eta}-
670: \\
671: \rule{0cm}{0.6cm} -p_{+\rho}p_{+\eta}/m_W^2)\Gamma_3^{\gamma\eta\alpha}(0,p_+,-p_+)+
672: \Gamma_3^{\gamma\rho\alpha}(0,-p_+,-P_+)(\delta_{\rho\eta} -
673: p_{+\rho}p_{+\eta}/m_W^2)\Gamma_4^{
674: \mu\nu\beta\eta}]_{\vec{p}_+=0},
675: \end{array}
676: \end{eqnarray}
677: \begin{eqnarray}\label{rc01}
678: \begin{array}{l}
679: A^{\gamma}_2 =
680: C_{0\alpha\beta\mu\nu}[\Gamma_3^{\mu\beta\lambda}(k_1,-p_-,p_--k_1)
681: D_{\lambda\sigma}(p_--k_1)\Gamma_3^{\nu\sigma\rho}(k_2,k_1-p_,-p_+)(\delta_{\rho\eta}-
682: \\
683: \rule{0cm}{0.6cm} -p_{+\rho}p_{+\eta}/m_W^2)\Gamma_3^{\gamma\eta\alpha}(0,p_+,-p_+)+
684: \Gamma_3^{\gamma\rho\alpha}(0,-p_+,-P_+)(\delta_{\rho\eta} -
685: p_{+\rho}p_{+\eta}/m_W^2)\Gamma_4^{
686: \mu\nu\beta\eta}]_{\vec{p}_+=0},
687: \end{array}
688: \end{eqnarray}
689: \begin{eqnarray}\label{rc2}
690: \begin{array}{l}
691: B^{\gamma}_1
692: =C_{0\alpha\beta\mu\nu}[\Gamma_3^{\gamma\beta\eta}(0,-p_-,p_-)(\delta_{\rho\eta}-
693: p_{-\rho}p_{-\eta}/m_W^2)\Gamma_3^{\mu\rho\sigma}(k_1,-p_,-p_++k_2)D_{\lambda\sigma}(p_+-k_2)\times
694: \\
695: \rule{0cm}{0.6cm} \times\Gamma_3^{\nu\lambda\alpha}(k_2,p_+-k_2,-p_+)+
696: \Gamma_3^{\gamma\beta\rho}(0,-p_-,P_-)(\delta_{\rho\sigma} -
697: p_{-\rho}p_{-\sigma}/m_W^2)\Gamma_4^{
698: \mu\nu\alpha\sigma}]_{\vec{p}_+=0},\\ \rule{0cm}{0.6cm}B^{\gamma}_2
699: =C_{0\alpha\beta\mu\nu}[\Gamma_3^{\gamma\beta\eta}(0,-p_-,p_-)(\delta_{\rho\eta}-
700: p_{-\rho}p_{-\eta}/m_W^2)\Gamma_3^{\nu\rho\sigma}(k_2,-p_,-p_++k_1)D_{\lambda\sigma}(p_+-k_1)\times\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!
701: \\
702: \rule{0cm}{0.6cm} \times\Gamma_3^{\mu\lambda\alpha}(k_1,p_+-k_1,-p_+)+
703: \Gamma_3^{\gamma\beta\rho}(0,-p_-,P_-)(\delta_{\rho\sigma} -
704: p_{-\rho}p_{-\sigma}/m_W^2)\Gamma_4^{
705: \mu\nu\alpha\sigma}]_{\vec{p}_+=0},
706: \end{array}
707: \end{eqnarray}
708: After that one can define the expressions of $D_1,D_2,D_3$.
709: \begin{eqnarray}\label{rc4}
710: \begin{array}{l}
711: D_1 =
712: (|A_1^{\gamma}+A_2^{\gamma}|^2p_0^2+|B_1^{\gamma}+B_2^{\gamma}|^2m_W^2+
713: 2Re(A_1^{\gamma}+A_2^{\gamma}
714: (B_1^{\gamma}+B_2^{\gamma})p_-^0m)(8m_W^2p_-^{02})^{-1},
715: \\ \rule{0cm}{0.6cm} D_2 =2
716: (|A_1^{\gamma}+A_2^{\gamma}|^2p_0^2+2Re(A_1^{\gamma}+A_2^{\gamma}
717: (B_1^{\gamma}+B_2^{\gamma})p_-^0m)(8m_W^2p_-^{02})^{-1},\\ \rule{0cm}{0.6cm}D_3 =
718: (|A_1^{\gamma}+A_2^{\gamma}|^2p_0^2)(8m_W^2p_-^{02})^{-1}.
719: \end{array}
720: \end{eqnarray}
721: Note, really it is impossible to obtain information with high precision from experimental data without the high-oder effects consideration \cite{bib9}.
722: The radiative correction is defined as
723: \begin{eqnarray}\label{rc5}
724: %\begin{array}{l}
725: \displaystyle \int(\sum_i M_i)^2\frac{d^3k}{(2\pi)^32k^0} = \int(\sum_i
726: M_i)^2\frac{d^{n-1}k}{(2\pi)^{n-1}2k} =
727: \int\frac{2\pi^{1/2n-1}k^{n-2}\sin^{n-3}{\theta}
728: dkd\theta}{\Gamma(1/2n-1)(2\pi)^{n-1}2k}(\sum_i M_i)^2,\qquad\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\nonumber\\ \rule{0cm}{0.8cm}
729: \displaystyle R.C. =
730: \frac{2\pi^{1/2n-1}}{(2\pi)^{n-1}\Gamma(1/2n-1)}\int_0^{\omega}k^{n-5}dk\int_0^{\pi}\sin^{n-3}{\theta}\frac{[D_1-v\cos{\theta}D_2
731: + v^2\cos^2{\theta}D_3]}{(1-v\cos{\theta})^2},\qquad\quad\!\!
732: %\end{array}
733: \end{eqnarray}
734: where $v=|\vec{p}_-|/p^0_-$. The first two terms in Loran`s series
735: are
736: \begin{eqnarray}\label{rc6}
737: %\begin{array}{l}
738: \displaystyle C_{-1} =
739: \frac{1}{16\pi^2}\left[-\frac{2D_1}{1-v^2}-\frac{2D_3}{1-v^2}-\frac{2D_2}{(1-v^2)^2}-\frac{1}{v}\log{(\frac{1+v}{1-v})}[
740: D_2+2D_3]+2D_3\right], \rule{0cm}{0.8cm}\quad\,\,\nonumber\\ \displaystyle C_0 =
741: \frac{1}{16\pi^2}[(\log{\omega}-\log{2\sqrt{2}}+\frac{1}{2}C)(16\pi^2C_{-1})+\frac{1}{2}(\frac{4\log{2}}{1-v^2}+\frac{2}{1-v^2}\log{\frac{1-v}{1+v}})\times\rule{0cm}{0.8cm}\quad\,\,\\
742: \displaystyle \times(D_1-D_2+D_3)-\frac{1}{v}(\log{\frac{1-v}{1+v}}(\log{(1-\frac{1}{v})}+\log{(1+\frac{1}{v})})
743: +\Phi[\frac{1+v}{1-v}]-\Phi[\frac{1-v}{1+v}]\times\!\!\!\!\nonumber\\ \rule{0cm}{0.6cm}
744: \displaystyle\times(D_2-2D_3-2D_3(\log{2}-1)))].\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\quad\,\,\,\nonumber
745: %\end{array}
746: \end{eqnarray}
747: There are some integrals needed for the calculation of a virtual
748: $\gamma$-contributions. This part of the correction was calculated
749: using integration package of the $\sl Mathematica 4.0$.
750: \begin{eqnarray}\label{vc1}
751: \begin{array}{l}
752: \displaystyle I_1 =
753: \int\frac{d^nk}{(2\pi)^n}\frac{1}{k^2((p'-k)^2-m_W^2)((p+k)^2-m_W^2)}
754: = \\ \displaystyle \rule{0cm}{0.8cm} =
755: \frac{-i}{16\pi^2}\frac{1}{2}((\frac{1}{n-4}+\frac{1}{2}C-\log{2\sqrt{\pi}}+\log{m})-\frac{1}{2}(1-\log{2}-
756: \log{(1+\frac{pp'}{m_W^2})}))\frac{1}{m_W^2+pp'}, \\ \displaystyle \rule{0cm}{0.8cm}
757: I_{\alpha} =
758: \int\frac{d^nk}{(2\pi)^n}\frac{k_{\alpha}}{k^2((p'-k)^2-m_W^2)((p+k)^2-m_W^2)}
759: = \\ \displaystyle \rule{0cm}{0.8cm}
760: =\frac{1}{q^2}\frac{1}{2p(p+p')/m_W^2+1}\left[(\frac{2p(p+p')}{m_W^2}+2)\log(\frac{2p(p+p')}{m_W^2}+2)-(\frac{2p(p+p')}{m_W^2}+1)\right]q_{\alpha},
761: \\ \displaystyle\rule{0cm}{0.8cm} I_{\alpha\beta} =
762: \int\frac{d^nk}{(2\pi)^n}\frac{k_{\alpha\beta}}{k^2((p'-k)^2-m_W^2)((p+k)^2-m_W^2)}
763: = \\ \displaystyle\rule{0cm}{0.8cm} = A\delta_{\alpha\beta}+B(p_{\alpha}p_{\beta} +
764: p'_{\alpha}p'_{\beta})-C(p_{\alpha}p'_{\beta}+p_{\beta}p'_{\alpha}),
765: \end{array}
766: \end{eqnarray}
767: where $A,B,C$ are given by following equations
768: \begin{eqnarray}\label{vc2}
769: \begin{array}{l}
770: \displaystyle A =\frac{L^{(n)}+2(pp')(B+C)}{4},\\ \displaystyle\rule{0cm}{0.8cm} B
771: =\frac{J_1+2(-m_W^2-2(pp'))C}{2(pp')}, \\ \displaystyle \rule{0cm}{0.8cm} C =
772: \frac{2J_2-L^{(n)}-J_1[-m_W^2/4-3/2(pp')]/(2(pp'))}{7/4 (pp')+(-m_W^2-2(pp'))/(pp')(-m_W^2/4+3/2(pp'))},
773: \end{array}
774: \end{eqnarray}
775: \begin{eqnarray}\label{vc3}
776: \begin{array}{l}
777: \displaystyle L^{(n)}
778: =\frac{-2i}{16\pi^2}[(\frac{1}{n-4}+\log{m_W}-\log{2\sqrt{\pi}}+\frac{1}{2}C)+\frac{1}{\chi}((\chi+1)\log(\chi+1)-\chi)],
779: \\ \displaystyle\rule{0cm}{0.8cm} J_1 = D_0^{(n)} - D_1^{(n)} +
780: \frac{p^2-m_W^2}{q^2}\frac{1}{\chi}((\chi+1)\log(\chi+1)-\chi),
781: \\ \displaystyle\rule{0cm}{0.8cm} J_2 = D_2^{(n)} -
782: \frac{p^2-m_W^2}{q^2}\frac{1}{\chi}((\chi+1)\log(\chi+1)-\chi), \\ \displaystyle\rule{0cm}{0.8cm}
783: D_0^{(n)} =\frac{-i}{16\pi^2}[(\frac{1}{n-4}+\frac{1}{2}C-1) +
784: \log{m_W}],\\ \displaystyle\rule{0cm}{0.8cm} D_1^{(n)}
785: =\frac{-i}{16\pi^2}[(\frac{1}{n-4}+\log{m_W}-\log{2\sqrt{\pi}}+\frac{1}{2}C)+\frac{1}{\chi^2}(\frac{(\chi+1)^2}{2}\log(\chi+1)-
786: \\ \displaystyle\rule{0cm}{0.8cm}
787: -\frac{(\chi+1)^2}{4}+\frac{1}{4}-(\chi+1)\log(\chi+1)+\chi)], \\ \displaystyle\rule{0cm}{0.8cm}
788: D_2^{(n)} =
789: \frac{-2i}{16\pi^2}[(\frac{1}{n-4}+\log{m_W}-\log{2\sqrt{\pi}}+\frac{1}{2}C)
790: + \frac{1}{\chi}((\chi+1)\log(\chi+1)-\chi)- \\ \displaystyle\rule{0cm}{0.8cm}
791: -\frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{\chi^2}(\frac{(\chi+1)^2}{2}\log(\chi+1)-\frac{(\chi+1)^2}{4}+\frac{1}{4}-(\chi+1)\log(\chi+1)+\chi))],\\ \displaystyle\rule{0cm}{0.8cm}
792: \chi =2p(p+p')/m_W^2+1,
793: \end{array}
794: \end{eqnarray}
795: where $C$ - Euler's constant.
796:
797:
798: \newpage%***********************************************************1
799:
800: \section*{Appendix A}
801: $ $
802:
803: Using expressions (\ref{a1}) -- (\ref{b10}) for the Feynman diagrams figs. $1-3$ we have
804: obtained the following matrix element for $\gamma\gamma\rightarrow W^+W^-$:
805: \begin{eqnarray}\label{ap1}
806: \begin{array}{c}
807: M = G_v \sum_{i=1}^{3} M_i,
808: \end{array}
809: \end{eqnarray}
810: where $M_i$ ($i=1,3$) are matrix elements related to the Feynman diagrams according to $i$.
811: \begin{eqnarray}\label{ap2}
812: \begin{array}{c}
813: \displaystyle M_1 = \frac{1}{(k_1-p_+)^2 - m^2}({p_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_+}-{p_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon
814: }_2}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_+}-2\multsp {p_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_+}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}+ \\
815: \displaystyle %0.479167ex}}
816: \hspace{1.em} 2\multsp {p_-}.{{\epsilon }_+}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}+\frac{{p_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp
817: {{\epsilon }_-}.{p_+}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_+}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}}{{m^2}}- \\
818: \displaystyle %0.552083ex}}
819: \hspace{1.em} \frac{{p_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{k_1}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_+}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}}{{m^2}}-\frac{{p_-}.{p_+}\multsp
820: {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_+}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}}{{m^2}}+ \\
821: \displaystyle %0.552083ex}}
822: \hspace{1.em} \frac{{p_-}.{k_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_+}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}}{{m^2}}-\frac{{{\epsilon
823: }_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_+}\multsp {p_+}.{k_2}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}}{{m^2}}- \\
824: \displaystyle %0.552083ex}}
825: \hspace{1.em} {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_+}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}+2\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_+}\multsp
826: {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}+\frac{{{\epsilon }_-}.{k_2}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_+}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon
827: }_2}}{{m^2}}- \\
828: \displaystyle %0.572917ex}}
829: \hspace{1.em} 2\multsp {p_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{k_1}+2\multsp {p_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp
830: {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{k_1}+2\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon
831: }_+}.{k_1}+ \\
832: \displaystyle %0.5ex}}
833: \hspace{1.em} 2\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{k_2}+{p_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon
834: }_-}.{p_+}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}+{p_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{k_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}- \\
835: \displaystyle %0.479167ex}}
836: \hspace{1.em} {p_-}.{p_+}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}-{p_-}.{k_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon
837: }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}-\frac{{p_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{p_+}\multsp {p_+}.{p_+}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon
838: }_1}}{{m^2}}+ \\
839: \displaystyle %0.552083ex}}
840: \hspace{1.em} \frac{{p_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{k_1}\multsp {p_+}.{p_+}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}}{{m^2}}+\frac{{p_-}.{p_+}\multsp
841: {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {p_+}.{p_+}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}}{{m^2}}- \\
842: \displaystyle %0.552083ex}}
843: \hspace{1.em} \frac{{p_-}.{k_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {p_+}.{p_+}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}}{{m^2}}-{{\epsilon
844: }_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {p_+}.{k_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}+ \\
845: \displaystyle %0.552083ex}}
846: \hspace{1.em} \frac{{{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {p_+}.{p_+}\multsp {p_+}.{k_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}}{{m^2}}-2\multsp
847: {{\epsilon }_-}.{k_1}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}+ \\
848: \displaystyle %0.552083ex}}
849: \hspace{1.em} {{\epsilon }_-}.{k_2}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}-\frac{{{\epsilon }_-}.{k_2}\multsp {p_+}.{p_+}\multsp
850: {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}}{{m^2}}- \\
851: \displaystyle %0.572917ex}}
852: \hspace{1.em} 2\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{p_+}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}+2\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{k_1}\multsp
853: {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}-2\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{k_2}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon
854: }_2}+ \\
855: \displaystyle %0.479167ex}}
856: \hspace{1.em} \frac{{p_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{p_+}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {k_1}.{k_1}}{{m^2}}-\frac{{p_-}.{{\epsilon
857: }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{k_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {k_1}.{k_1}}{{m^2}}- \\
858: \displaystyle %0.552083ex}}
859: \hspace{1.em} \frac{{p_-}.{p_+}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {k_1}.{k_1}}{{m^2}}+\frac{{p_-}.{k_1}\multsp
860: {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {k_1}.{k_1}}{{m^2}}- \\
861: \displaystyle %0.552083ex}}
862: \hspace{1.em} \frac{{{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {p_+}.{k_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {k_1}.{k_1}}{{m^2}}+\frac{{{\epsilon
863: }_-}.{k_2}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {k_1}.{k_1}}{{m^2}}+ \\
864: \displaystyle %0.552083ex}}
865: \hspace{1.em} \frac{{{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_+}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {k_1}.{k_2}}{{m^2}}-{{\epsilon
866: }_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {k_1}.{k_2}- \\
867: \displaystyle %0.552083ex}}
868: \hspace{1.em} \frac{{{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {p_+}.{p_+}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {k_1}.{k_2}}{{m^2}}+\frac{{{\epsilon
869: }_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {k_1}.{k_1}\multsp {k_1}.{k_2}}{{m^2}}+ \\
870: \displaystyle %0.572917ex}}
871: \hspace{1.em} {p_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_+}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_1}-{p_-}.{{\epsilon }_+}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon
872: }_2}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_1}-{{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_+}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_1}- \\
873: \displaystyle %0.479167ex}}
874: \hspace{1.em} \frac{{p_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{p_+}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{k_1}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_1}}{{m^2}}+\frac{{p_-}.{{\epsilon
875: }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{k_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{k_1}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_1}}{{m^2}}+ \\
876: \displaystyle %0.552083ex}}
877: \hspace{1.em} \frac{{p_-}.{p_+}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{k_1}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_1}}{{m^2}}-\frac{{p_-}.{k_1}\multsp
878: {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{k_1}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_1}}{{m^2}}+ \\
879: \displaystyle %0.552083ex}}
880: \hspace{1.em} \frac{{{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {p_+}.{k_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{k_1}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_1}}{{m^2}}-\frac{{{\epsilon
881: }_-}.{k_2}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{k_1}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_1}}{{m^2}}- \\
882: \displaystyle %0.572917ex}}
883: \hspace{1.em} {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{k_2}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_1}+{{\epsilon }_-}.{p_+}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon
884: }_2}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_1}-{{\epsilon }_-}.{k_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_1}+ \\
885: \displaystyle %0.479167ex}}
886: \hspace{1.em} {{\epsilon }_-}.{k_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_1}-\frac{{{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp
887: {{\epsilon }_+}.{k_1}\multsp {k_1}.{k_2}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_1}}{{m^2}}+{{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_+}\multsp
888: {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_2}- \\
889: \end{array}
890: \end{eqnarray}
891: \begin{eqnarray}\nonumber
892: \begin{array}{c}
893: \displaystyle %0.552083ex}}
894: \hspace{1.em} 2\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_+}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_2}-\frac{{{\epsilon }_-}.{k_2}\multsp
895: {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_+}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_2}}{{m^2}}-2\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {{\epsilon
896: }_+}.{k_1}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_2}+ \\
897: \displaystyle %0.552083ex}}
898: \hspace{1.em} 2\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{p_+}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_2}+{{\epsilon }_-}.{k_2}\multsp {{\epsilon
899: }_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_2}+\frac{{{\epsilon }_-}.{k_2}\multsp {p_+}.{p_+}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon
900: }_2}}{{m^2}}- \\
901: \displaystyle %0.552083ex}}
902: \hspace{1.em} \frac{{{\epsilon }_-}.{k_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {k_1}.{k_1}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_2}}{{m^2}}+{{\epsilon
903: }_-}.{{\epsilon }_+}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_2}+ \\
904: \displaystyle %0.552083ex}}
905: \hspace{1.em} \frac{{{\epsilon }_-}.{k_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{k_1}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_2}}{{m^2}}-{{\epsilon
906: }_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_+}\multsp {k_2}.{{\epsilon }_1}+2\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{k_1}\multsp
907: {k_2}.{{\epsilon }_1}+ \\
908: \displaystyle %0.572917ex}}
909: \hspace{1.em} {{\epsilon }_-}.{p_+}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_+}\multsp {{\epsilon }_1}.{{\epsilon }_2}-{{\epsilon }_-}.{k_1}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon
910: }_+}\multsp {{\epsilon }_1}.{{\epsilon }_2}+{{\epsilon }_-}.{k_2}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_+}\multsp {{\epsilon }_1}.{{\epsilon }_2}- \\
911: \displaystyle %0.5ex}}
912: \hspace{1.em} 2\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{p_+}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{k_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_1}.{{\epsilon }_2}+2\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{k_1}\multsp
913: {{\epsilon }_+}.{k_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_1}.{{\epsilon }_2}-2\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{k_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{k_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_1}.{{\epsilon
914: }_2}),
915: \end{array}
916: \end{eqnarray}
917: \begin{eqnarray}\label{ap3}
918: \begin{array}{c}
919: \displaystyle M_2 = \frac{1}{(k_1-p_-)^2 - m^2}(2\multsp {p_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {p_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_+}-2\multsp {p_-}.{{\epsilon }_+}\multsp {p_-}.{{\epsilon
920: }_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}+\frac{{p_-}.{{\epsilon }_-}\multsp {p_-}.{{\epsilon }_+}\multsp {p_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon
921: }_2}}{{m^2}}- \\
922: \displaystyle %1.07292ex}}
923: \hspace{1.em} 2\multsp {p_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_+}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}+{p_-}.{{\epsilon }_+}\multsp {{\epsilon
924: }_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}-\frac{{p_-}.{p_-}\multsp {p_-}.{{\epsilon }_+}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon
925: }_2}}{{m^2}}- \\
926: \displaystyle %1.07292ex}}
927: \hspace{1.em} 2\multsp {p_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{k_1}+2\multsp {p_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp
928: {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{k_1}-\frac{{p_-}.{{\epsilon }_-}\multsp {p_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp
929: {{\epsilon }_+}.{k_1}}{{m^2}}+ \\
930: \displaystyle %1.07292ex}}
931: \hspace{1.em} {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{k_1}+\frac{{p_-}.{p_-}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon
932: }_1}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{k_1}}{{m^2}}+\frac{{p_-}.{{\epsilon }_-}\multsp {p_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {p_-}.{{\epsilon
933: }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{k_2}}{{m^2}}+ \\
934: \displaystyle %1.07292ex}}
935: \hspace{1.em} {p_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{k_2}-\frac{{p_-}.{p_-}\multsp {p_-}.{{\epsilon
936: }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{k_2}}{{m^2}}-2\multsp {p_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon
937: }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{k_2}- \\
938: \displaystyle %0.90625ex}}
939: \hspace{1.em} {p_-}.{{\epsilon }_-}\multsp {p_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}+2\multsp {p_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon
940: }_-}.{k_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}+{p_-}.{{\epsilon }_-}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}- \\
941: \displaystyle %0.833333ex}}
942: \hspace{1.em} 2\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{k_1}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}-\frac{{p_-}.{{\epsilon }_-}\multsp
943: {p_-}.{p_+}\multsp {p_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}}{{m^2}}-\frac{{p_-}.{{\epsilon }_-}\multsp {p_-}.{k_2}\multsp {p_-}.{{\epsilon
944: }_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}}{{m^2}}+ \\
945: \displaystyle %0.90625ex}}
946: \hspace{1.em} 2\multsp {p_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{p_+}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}+2\multsp {p_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp
947: {{\epsilon }_-}.{k_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}-{p_-}.{p_+}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon
948: }_2}+ \\
949: \displaystyle %0.833333ex}}
950: \hspace{1.em} \frac{{p_-}.{p_-}\multsp {p_-}.{p_+}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}}{{m^2}}-{p_-}.{k_2}\multsp
951: {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}+\frac{{p_-}.{p_-}\multsp {p_-}.{k_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp
952: {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}}{{m^2}}+ \\
953: \displaystyle %1.07292ex}}
954: \hspace{1.em} \frac{{p_-}.{{\epsilon }_-}\multsp {p_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {p_+}.{k_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}}{{m^2}}-{{\epsilon
955: }_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {p_+}.{k_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}-\frac{{p_-}.{p_-}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {p_+}.{k_1}\multsp
956: {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}}{{m^2}}- \\
957: \displaystyle %1.07292ex}}
958: \hspace{1.em} {p_-}.{{\epsilon }_-}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}+2\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{k_1}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon
959: }_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}+\frac{{p_-}.{{\epsilon }_+}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp
960: {k_1}.{k_1}}{{m^2}}- \\
961: \displaystyle %1.07292ex}}
962: \hspace{1.em} \frac{{{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{k_1}\multsp {k_1}.{k_1}}{{m^2}}+\frac{{p_-}.{{\epsilon
963: }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{k_2}\multsp {k_1}.{k_1}}{{m^2}}- \\
964: \displaystyle %1.07292ex}}
965: \hspace{1.em} \frac{{p_-}.{p_+}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {k_1}.{k_1}}{{m^2}}-\frac{{p_-}.{k_2}\multsp
966: {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {k_1}.{k_1}}{{m^2}}+\frac{{{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {p_+}.{k_1}\multsp
967: {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {k_1}.{k_1}}{{m^2}}+ \\
968: \displaystyle %1.07292ex}}
969: \hspace{1.em} \frac{{p_-}.{{\epsilon }_-}\multsp {p_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {k_1}.{k_2}}{{m^2}}-{{\epsilon
970: }_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {k_1}.{k_2}-\frac{{p_-}.{p_-}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {{\epsilon
971: }_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {k_1}.{k_2}}{{m^2}}+ \\
972: \displaystyle %1.07292ex}}
973: \hspace{1.em} \frac{{{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {k_1}.{k_1}\multsp {k_1}.{k_2}}{{m^2}}-{p_-}.{{\epsilon
974: }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_+}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_1}+{p_-}.{{\epsilon }_+}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon
975: }_1}+ \\
976: \displaystyle %1.07292ex}}
977: \hspace{1.em} {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_+}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_1}-\frac{{p_-}.{{\epsilon }_+}\multsp {{\epsilon
978: }_-}.{k_1}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_1}}{{m^2}}-{{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{k_1}\multsp
979: {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_1}+ \\
980: \displaystyle %1.07292ex}}
981: \hspace{1.em} \frac{{{\epsilon }_-}.{k_1}\multsp {p_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{k_1}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_1}}{{m^2}}-\frac{{p_-}.{{\epsilon
982: }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{k_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{k_2}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_1}}{{m^2}}+{{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon
983: }_+}.{k_2}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_1}- \\
984: \displaystyle %1.07292ex}}
985: \hspace{1.em} {{\epsilon }_-}.{p_+}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_1}+\frac{{p_-}.{p_+}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{k_1}\multsp
986: {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_1}}{{m^2}}+\frac{{p_-}.{k_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{k_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon
987: }_2}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_1}}{{m^2}}- \\
988: \displaystyle %1.07292ex}}
989: \hspace{1.em} {{\epsilon }_-}.{k_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_1}-\frac{{{\epsilon }_-}.{k_1}\multsp {p_+}.{k_1}\multsp
990: {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_1}}{{m^2}}-\frac{{{\epsilon }_-}.{k_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {k_1}.{k_2}\multsp
991: {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_1}}{{m^2}}- \\
992: \displaystyle %1.07292ex}}
993: \hspace{1.em} 2\multsp {p_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_+}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_2}+2\multsp {p_-}.{{\epsilon }_+}\multsp
994: {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_2}-\frac{{p_-}.{{\epsilon }_-}\multsp {p_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{k_2}\multsp
995: {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_2}}{{m^2}}+ \\
996: \displaystyle %1.07292ex}}
997: \hspace{1.em} {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{k_2}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_2}+\frac{{p_-}.{p_-}\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon
998: }_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{k_2}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_2}}{{m^2}}+{p_-}.{{\epsilon }_-}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon
999: }_2}- \\
1000: \displaystyle %1.07292ex}}
1001: \hspace{1.em} 2\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{k_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_2}-\frac{{{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon
1002: }_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{k_2}\multsp {k_1}.{k_1}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_2}}{{m^2}}+{{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_+}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon
1003: }_1}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_2}+ \\
1004: \end{array}
1005: \end{eqnarray}
1006: \begin{eqnarray}\nonumber
1007: \begin{array}{c}
1008: \displaystyle %1.07292ex}}
1009: \hspace{1.em} \frac{{{\epsilon }_-}.{k_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{k_2}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {k_1}.{{\epsilon }_2}}{{m^2}}-{p_-}.{{\epsilon
1010: }_-}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {k_2}.{{\epsilon }_1}+2\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{k_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp
1011: {k_2}.{{\epsilon }_1}+ \\
1012: \displaystyle %0.90625ex}}
1013: \hspace{1.em} {p_-}.{{\epsilon }_-}\multsp {p_-}.{{\epsilon }_+}\multsp {{\epsilon }_1}.{{\epsilon }_2}-2\multsp {p_-}.{{\epsilon }_+}\multsp {{\epsilon
1014: }_-}.{k_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_1}.{{\epsilon }_2}-{p_-}.{{\epsilon }_-}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{k_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_1}.{{\epsilon }_2}+ \\
1015: \displaystyle %0.666667ex}}
1016: \hspace{1.em} 2\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{k_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{k_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_1}.{{\epsilon }_2}+{p_-}.{{\epsilon }_-}\multsp {{\epsilon
1017: }_+}.{k_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_1}.{{\epsilon }_2}-2\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{k_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{k_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_1}.{{\epsilon }_2}),
1018: \end{array}
1019: \end{eqnarray}
1020: \begin{eqnarray}\label{ap4}
1021: \begin{array}{c}
1022: \displaystyle M_3 = -{{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_2}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon }_1}-{{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_1}\multsp {{\epsilon }_+}.{{\epsilon
1023: }_2}+2\multsp {{\epsilon }_-}.{{\epsilon }_+}\multsp {{\epsilon }_1}.{{\epsilon }_2}
1024: \end{array}
1025: \end{eqnarray}
1026: $k_1$, $k_2$, $p_{+}$, $p_{-}$ denote four-momenta of $\gamma$, $\gamma$, $W^{+}$, $W^{-}$, respectively,
1027: and $\epsilon_1, \epsilon_2,\epsilon_{+}, \epsilon_{-}$ -- cooresponding polarizations.
1028: \newpage%***********************************************************2
1029: \section*{Appendix B}
1030: \vspace{-10pt}
1031: \begin{center}
1032: \begin{figure}[h!]
1033: \leavevmode
1034: \begin{minipage}[b]{1.\linewidth}
1035: \centering
1036: \includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth, height=3.9in, angle=0]{4bos.eps}
1037: \begin{center}
1038: \caption{ The ratio $d\sigma_{1\,\,+,+,+,+}/d\sigma_{2\,\,+,+,+,+}$,
1039: where $d\sigma_{1(2)\,\,+,+,+,+}$ -- $4$-boson vertex is
1040: included } (isn't included) \label{p5}
1041: \end{center}
1042: \end{minipage}
1043: \end{figure}
1044: \end{center}
1045: \begin{figure}[h!]
1046: \leavevmode
1047: \begin{minipage}[b]{.475\linewidth}
1048: \centering
1049: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth, height=3.8in, angle=0]{++++.eps}
1050: \caption{ The differential cross section $d\sigma_{+,+,+,+}/dy_{-}$} \label{p6}
1051: \end{minipage}
1052: \begin{minipage}[b]{.475\linewidth} \centering
1053: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth, height=3.8in, angle=0]{+-++.eps}
1054: \caption{ The differential cross section $d\sigma_{+,-,+,+}/dy_{-}$ } \label{p7}
1055: \end{minipage}\hfill
1056: %\begin{minipage}[b]{.475\linewidth}
1057: %\centering
1058: %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth, height=3.8in, angle=0]{unpol.eps}
1059: %\caption{The $d\sigma_{unpol}/dy_{-}$ of unpolarized $\gamma$ and
1060: %$W^{\pm}$-bosons.} \label{p8}
1061: %\end{minipage}
1062: \end{figure}
1063: \newpage%***********************************************************2
1064: \begin{center}
1065: \begin{figure}[h!]
1066: \leavevmode
1067: \begin{minipage}[b]{1.\linewidth}
1068: \centering
1069: \includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth, height=3.8in, angle=0]{as++.eps}
1070: \caption{The asymmetry $A_1$}\label{p9}
1071: \end{minipage}
1072: \end{figure}
1073: \end{center}
1074: \begin{figure}[h!]
1075: \leavevmode
1076: \begin{minipage}[b]{.475\linewidth}
1077: \centering
1078: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth, height=3.8in, angle=0]{+++-.eps}
1079: \caption{The differential cross section $d\sigma_{+,+,+,-}/dy_-$}\label{p13}
1080: \end{minipage}\hfill
1081: \begin{minipage}[b]{.475\linewidth}
1082: \centering
1083: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth, height=3.8in, angle=0]{+-+-.eps}
1084: \caption{The differential cross section $d\sigma_{+,-,+,-}/dy_-$}\label{p14}
1085: \end{minipage}
1086: \end{figure}
1087:
1088: \newpage %********************************************************3
1089: \begin{center}
1090: \begin{figure}[h!]
1091: \begin{minipage}[b]{1.\linewidth}
1092: \centering
1093: \includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth, height=3.8in, angle=0]{as+-.eps}
1094: \caption{The asymmetry $A_2$}\label{p15}
1095: \end{minipage}
1096: \end{figure}
1097: \end{center}
1098: \begin{figure}[h!]
1099: \leavevmode
1100: \begin{minipage}[b]{.475\linewidth}
1101: \centering
1102: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth, height=3.8in, angle=0]{++00.eps}
1103: \caption{The differential cross section $d\sigma_{+,+,0,0}/dy_-$}\label{p16}
1104: \end{minipage}\hfill
1105: \begin{minipage}[b]{.475\linewidth}
1106: \centering
1107: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth, height=3.8in, angle=0]{+-00.eps}
1108: \caption{The differential cross section $d\sigma_{+,-,0,0}/dy_-$}\label{p17}
1109: \end{minipage}
1110: \end{figure}
1111:
1112: \newpage %*********************************************************4
1113: \begin{center}
1114: \begin{figure}[h!]
1115: \begin{minipage}[b]{1.\linewidth}
1116: \centering
1117: \includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth, height=3.8in, angle=0]{as00.eps}
1118: \caption{The asymmetry $A_3$}\label{p40}
1119: \end{minipage}
1120: \end{figure}
1121: \end{center}
1122: \begin{figure}[h!]
1123: \leavevmode
1124: \begin{minipage}[b]{.475\linewidth}
1125: \centering
1126: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth, height=3.8in, angle=0]{++un.eps}
1127: \caption{The differential cross section $d\sigma_{+,+,unpol}/dy_-$}\label{p41}
1128: \end{minipage}\hfill
1129: \begin{minipage}[b]{.475\linewidth}
1130: \centering
1131: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth, height=3.8in, angle=0]{+-un.eps}
1132: \caption{The differential cross section $d\sigma_{+,-,unpol}/dy_-$}\label{p42}
1133: \end{minipage}
1134: \end{figure}
1135: \newpage %***********************************************************5
1136: \begin{center}
1137: \begin{figure}[h!]
1138: \begin{minipage}[b]{1.\linewidth}
1139: \centering
1140: \includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth, height=3.8in, angle=0]{asun.eps}
1141: \caption{The asymmetry $A_4$.}\label{p42}
1142: \end{minipage}
1143: \end{figure}
1144: \end{center}
1145: %\begin{figure}[h!]
1146: %\leavevmode
1147: %\begin{minipage}[b]{.475\linewidth}
1148: %\centering
1149: %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth, height=3.8in, angle=0]{+++++.eps}
1150: %\caption{ $d\sigma_{+,+,+,+,+}/dy_{-}$} \label{p10}
1151: %\end{minipage}\hfil
1152: %\begin{minipage}[b]{.475\linewidth}
1153: %\centering
1154: %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth, height=3.8in, angle=0]{+-+++.eps}
1155: %\caption{ $d\sigma_{+-+++}/dy_{-}$.} \label{p11}
1156: %\end{minipage}
1157: %\end{figure}
1158:
1159: %\newpage %********************************************************6
1160: \begin{figure}[h!]
1161: \leavevmode
1162: \begin{minipage}[b]{.475\linewidth}
1163: \centering
1164: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth, height=3.8in, angle=0]{+-++.eps}% !!!!
1165: \caption{The differential cross section in Born approximation $d\sigma{+,-,+,+}/dy-$.}\label{p3}
1166: \end{minipage}
1167: \begin{minipage}[b]{.475\linewidth}
1168: \centering
1169: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth, height=3.8in, angle=0]{graph1.eps}
1170: \caption{The radiative correction for
1171: $d\sigma{+,-,+,+}/dy-$.}\label{p2x}
1172: \end{minipage}
1173: \end{figure}
1174: \begin{figure}[h!]
1175: \leavevmode
1176: \begin{minipage}[b]{.475\linewidth}
1177: \centering
1178: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth, height=3.8in, angle=0]{+++-.eps}
1179: \caption{The differential cross section in Born approximation $d\sigma{+,+,+,-}/dy-$.}\label{p13}
1180: \end{minipage}
1181: \begin{minipage}[b]{.475\linewidth}
1182: \centering
1183: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth, height=3.8in, angle=0]{graph11.eps}
1184: \caption{The radiative correction for
1185: $d\sigma{+,+,+,-}/dy-$.}\label{p12y}
1186: \end{minipage}\hfill
1187: \end{figure}
1188: \newpage %***********************************************************7
1189: %\begin{figure}[h!]
1190: % \leavevmode
1191: %\begin{minipage}[b]{.475\linewidth}
1192: %\centering
1193: %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth, height=3.8in, angle=0]{graph13.eps}
1194: %\caption{The radiative correction for
1195: %$d\sigma{+,+,+,0}/dy-$.}\label{p14}
1196: %\end{minipage}\hfill
1197: %\begin{minipage}[b]{.475\linewidth}
1198: %\centering
1199: %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth, height=3.8in, angle=0]{graph14.eps}
1200: %\caption{The Born $d\sigma{+,+,+,0}/dy-$.}\label{p15}
1201: %\end{minipage}
1202: %\end{figure}
1203: \begin{figure}[h!]
1204: \leavevmode
1205: \begin{minipage}[b]{.475\linewidth}
1206: \centering
1207: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth, height=3.8in, angle=0]{++00.eps}
1208: \caption{The differential cross section in Born approximation $d\sigma{+,+,0,0}/dy-$.}\label{p17}
1209: \end{minipage}
1210: \begin{minipage}[b]{.475\linewidth}
1211: \centering
1212: \includegraphics[width=\linewidth, height=3.8in, angle=0]{graph15.eps}
1213: \caption{The radiative correction for
1214: $d\sigma{+,+,0,0}/dy-$.}\label{p16}
1215: \end{minipage}\hfill
1216: \end{figure}
1217: %\newpage%***********************************************************5
1218: %\begin{figure}[h!]
1219: % \leavevmode
1220: %\begin{minipage}[b]{.475\linewidth}
1221: %\centering
1222: %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth, height=3.8in, angle=0]{graph5.eps}
1223: %\caption{The radiative correction for
1224: %$d\sigma_{unpol}/dy-$.}\label{p40}
1225: %\end{minipage}\hfill
1226: %\begin{minipage}[b]{.475\linewidth}
1227: %\centering
1228: %\includegraphics[width=\linewidth, height=3.8in, angle=0]{unpol.eps}
1229: %\caption{The Born
1230: %$d\sigma_{unpol}/dy-$.}\label{p41}
1231: %\end{minipage}
1232: %\end{figure}
1233:
1234:
1235: \vspace{5mm}
1236:
1237: \begin{thebibliography}{100}
1238:
1239: \bibitem{bib0}
1240: I. Marfin, V. Mossolov, T. Shishkina hep-ph/0304250
1241: \bibitem{bib3}
1242: TESLA Technical Design Report Part 6. Chapter 1. Photon
1243: collider at TESLA, hep-ex/0108012.
1244: \bibitem{bib1}
1245: F. Brandt et al., Nucl. Phys. B450 (1994) p.223. hep-ph/9308353.
1246: \bibitem{bib2}
1247: S. Weinzierl, NIKHEF-00-012. hep-ph/0006269.
1248: \bibitem{bib01}
1249: M.Shifmanet al. Sov J. Nucl. Phys. 30(1979) p.711.
1250: \bibitem{bib02}
1251: E.Boos et al. Phys. Lett. B275(1992) p.164.
1252: \bibitem{bib03}
1253: H.Veltman, Z.Phys. C62(1994) p.235.
1254: \bibitem{bib4}
1255: M. Roth, A. Denner Nucl. Phys. B479 (1996) p.495. hep-ph/9605420.
1256: \bibitem{bib5}
1257: A. Denner, S. Pozzorini Eur. Phys. J. C18 (2001) p.461. hep-ph/0010201
1258: \bibitem{bib6}
1259: A. Denner, S. Pozzorini Eur. Phys. J. C21 (2001) p.63. hep-ph/0104127.
1260: \bibitem{bib7}
1261: M. Melles Phys. Rept. 375 (2003) p.219. hep-ph/0104232.
1262: \bibitem{bib8}
1263: F. Jegerlehner, M. Kalmykov, O. Veretin Nucl. Phys. B641 (2002) p.285. hep-ph/0105304.
1264: \bibitem{bib9}
1265: B. Kniehl Int. J. Mod. Phys. A10 (1995) p.443. hep-ph/9410330.
1266:
1267:
1268: \end{thebibliography}
1269: \end{document}
1270: