1: %
2: %A SET OF MACROS FOR WRITING PAPERS.
3: %
4: %\today GIVES TODAY'S DATE.
5: %
6: \def\today{\ifcase\month\or January\or February\or March\or April\or May\or
7: June\or July\or August\or September\or October\or November\or December\fi
8: \space\number\day, \number\year}
9: %
10: %\note{footnote} GIVES SEQUENTIALLY NUMBERED FOOTNOTES.
11: %
12: \newcount\notenumber
13: \def\clearnotenumber{\notenumber=0}
14: \def\note{\global\advance\notenumber by 1 \footnote{$^{\the\notenumber}$}}
15: %
16: %\numbereq SEQUENTIALLY NUMBERS EQUATIONS ON THE RIGHT (number)
17: %
18: \newif\ifsectionnumbering
19: \newcount\eqnumber
20: \def\cleareqnumber{\eqnumber=0}
21: \def\numbereq{\global\advance\eqnumber by 1
22: \ifsectionnumbering\eqno(\the\secnumber.\the\eqnumber)\else\eqno
23: (\the\eqnumber) \fi}
24: \def\eqalinno{{\global\advance\eqnumber by 1}
25: \ifsectionnumbering(\the\secnumber.\the\eqnumber)\else(\the\eqnumber)\fi}
26: \def\name#1{\ifsectionnumbering\xdef#1{\the\secnumber.\the\eqnumber}
27: \else\xdef#1{\the\eqnumber}\fi}
28: \def\nosectionnumbering{\sectionnumberingfalse}
29: \sectionnumberingtrue
30: %
31: %\ref{\name} GIVES SEQUENTIALLY NUMBERED
32: %REFERENCES [number], AND ASSIGNS
33: %THAT NUMBER TO A MACRO \name AND WRITES REF. TO FILE 1.
34: %
35: \newcount\refnumber
36: \def\clearrefnumber{\refnumber=0}
37: \immediate\openout1=refs.tex
38: \immediate\write1{\noexpand\frenchspacing}
39: \immediate\write1{\parskip=0pt}
40: \def\ref#1#2{\global\advance\refnumber by 1%
41: [\the\refnumber]\xdef#1{\the\refnumber}%
42: \immediate\write1{\noexpand\item{[#1]}#2}}
43: %
44: \def\tie{\noexpand~}
45: \def\overflow#1{\immediate\write1{#1}}
46: %
47: % NEW SECTION: \newsection The Method. (terminate with a .)
48: %
49: \font\twelvebf=cmbx10 scaled \magstep1
50: \newcount\secnumber
51: \def\clearsecnumber{\secnumber=0}
52: \def\newsection#1.{\ifsectionnumbering\cleareqnumber\else\fi%
53: \global\advance\secnumber by 1%
54: \bigbreak\bigskip\par%
55: \line{\twelvebf \the\secnumber. #1.\hfil}\nobreak\medskip\par\noindent}
56: %
57: %
58: %\Box GIVES WAVE OPERATOR, OR LAPLACIAN
59: %
60: \def \sqr#1#2{{\vcenter{\vbox{\hrule height.#2pt
61: \hbox{\vrule width.#2pt height#1pt \kern#1pt
62: \vrule width.#2pt}
63: \hrule height.#2pt}}}}
64: \def\Box{{\mathchoice\sqr54\sqr54\sqr33\sqr23}\,}
65: %
66: %
67: %\twocolumns GIVES TWO-COLUMN OUTPUT
68: %
69: \newdimen\fullhsize
70: \def\fiddle{\fullhsize=6.5truein \hsize=3.2truein}
71: \def\fullline{\hbox to\fullhsize}
72: \def\mkhdline{\vbox to 0pt{\vskip-22.5pt
73: \fullline{\vbox to8.5pt{}\the\headline}\vss}\nointerlineskip}
74: \def\mkftline{\baselineskip=24pt\fullline{\the\footline}}
75: \let\lr=L \newbox\leftcolumn
76: \def\twocolumns{\fiddle
77: \output={\if L\lr \global\setbox\leftcolumn=\columnbox
78: \global\let\lr=R \else \doubleformat \global\let\lr=L\fi
79: \ifnum\outputpenalty>-20000 \else\dosupereject\fi}}
80: \def\doubleformat{\shipout\vbox{\mkhdline
81: \fullline{\box\leftcolumn\hfil\columnbox}
82: \mkftline} \advancepageno}
83: \def\columnbox{\leftline{\pagebody}}
84: %\nosectionnumbering
85: \magnification=1200
86: \def\pr#1 {Phys. Rev. {\bf D#1\tie }}
87: \def\pe#1 {Phys. Rev. {\bf #1\tie}}
88: \def\pre#1 {Phys. Rep. {\bf #1\tie}}
89: \def\pl#1 {Phys. Lett. {\bf #1B\tie }}
90: \def\prl#1 {Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf #1\tie }}
91: \def\np#1 {Nucl. Phys. {\bf B#1\tie }}
92: \def\ap#1 {Ann. Phys. (NY) {\bf #1\tie }}
93: \def\cmp#1 {Commun. Math. Phys. {\bf #1\tie }}
94: \def\imp#1 {Int. Jour. Mod. Phys. {\bf A#1\tie }}
95: \def\mpl#1 {Mod. Phys. Lett. {\bf A#1\tie}}
96: \def\jhep#1 {JHEP {\bf #1\tie}}
97: \def\nuo#1 {Nuovo Cimento {\bf B#1\tie}}
98: \def\ussr#1 {Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz {\bf #1\tie }}
99: \def\jetp#1 {Soviet Physics JETP {\bf #1\tie }}
100: \def\zetf#1 {Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. {\bf #1\tie }}
101: \def\rmp#1 {Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf #1\tie }}
102: \def\tie{\noexpand~}
103: \def\ov{\bar}
104: \def\s{(\sigma)}
105: \def\se{(\sigma+\epsilon)}
106: \def\sp{(\sigma ')}
107: \def\sep{(\sigma'+\epsilon')}
108: \def\spme{(\sigma'-\epsilon)}
109: \def\spaeaep{(\sigma'+\epsilon+\epsilon')}
110: \def\spaepme{(\sigma'+\epsilon'-\epsilon)}
111: \def\Tb{\bar T}
112: \def\d{\delta(\sigma-\sigma ')}
113: \def\dpr{\delta'(\sigma-\sigma ')}
114: \def\dppr{\delta''(\sigma-\sigma ')}
115: \def\dpppr{\delta'''(\sigma-\sigma ')}
116: \def\de{\delta(\sigma-\sigma ' + \epsilon)}
117: \def\dep{\delta(\sigma-\sigma ' - \epsilon ')}
118: \def\deep{\delta(\sigma-\sigma ' + \epsilon - \epsilon')}
119: \def\dpreep{\delta'(\sigma-\sigma ' + \epsilon -
120: \epsilon')}
121: \def\ints{\int d\sigma\,}
122: \def\intsp{\int d\sigma'\,}
123: \def\dx{\partial X}
124: \def\dbx{{\bar\partial}X}
125: \def\dsx{\partial^2X}
126: \def\dbsx{{\bar\partial}^2X}
127: \parskip=15pt plus 4pt minus 3pt
128: \headline{\ifnum \pageno>1\it\hfil The Ginzburg-Landau theory and
129: the surface energy $\ldots$\else \hfil\fi}
130: \font\title=cmbx10 scaled\magstep1
131: \font\tit=cmti10 scaled\magstep1
132: \footline{\ifnum \pageno>1 \hfil \folio \hfil \else
133: \hfil\fi}
134: \raggedbottom
135:
136:
137: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
138: % jtl definitions
139:
140: \def\half{{\textstyle{1\over2}}}
141: \def\ha{{1\over2}}
142: \overfullrule0pt
143: \def\up{\uparrow}
144: \def\down{\downarrow}
145: \def\updown{\updownarrow}
146: \def\zip{0}
147: \def\mneg{\mskip-\medmuskip}
148:
149: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
150:
151: \rightline{\vbox{\hbox{RU03-01-B}\hbox{hep-th/0305235}}}
152: \vfill
153: \centerline{\title THE GINZBURG-LANDAU THEORY AND THE SURFACE ENERGY}
154: \centerline{\title OF A COLOUR SUPERCONDUCTOR}
155: \vfill
156: {\centerline{\title Ioannis Giannakis${}^{a}$
157: and Hai-cang Ren${}^{a}$ \footnote{$^{\dag}$}
158: {\rm e-mail: \vtop{\baselineskip12pt
159: \hbox{giannak@summit.rockefeller.edu, ren@summit.rockefeller.edu,}}}}
160: }
161: \medskip
162: \centerline{$^{(a)}${\tit Physics Department, The Rockefeller
163: University}}
164: \centerline{\tit 1230 York Avenue, New York, NY
165: 10021-6399}
166: \vfill
167: \centerline{\title Abstract}
168: \bigskip
169: {\narrower\narrower
170: We apply the Ginzburg-Landau theory to the colour superconducting
171: phase of a lump of dense quark matter. We calculate
172: the surface energy of a domain wall separating the normal phase from
173: the super phase with the bulk equilibrium maintained
174: by a critical external magnetic field. Because of the
175: symmetry of the problem, we are able to simplify
176: the Ginzburg-Landau equations and express them in
177: terms of two components of the di-quark condensate
178: and one component of the gauge potential.
179: The equations also contain two
180: dimensionless parameters: the Ginzburg-Landau parameter ${\kappa}$
181: and ${\rho}$. The main result of this paper is a set of
182: inequalities obeyed by the critical value of the Ginzburg-Landau
183: parameter--the value of ${\kappa}$ for which the surface energy
184: changes sign--and its derivative with respect to
185: ${\rho}$. In addition we prove a number of inequalities of
186: the functional dependence of the surface energy on the
187: parameters of the problem and obtain a numerical
188: solution of the Ginzburg-Landau equations. Finally
189: a criterion for the types of colour superconductivity (type I or
190: type II) is established in the weak coupling approximation.
191: \par}
192: \vfill\vfill\break
193:
194: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
195:
196: \newsection Introduction.%
197:
198: The Ginzburg-Landau theory provides a powerful tool for exploring
199: systems with inhomogeneous order parameters near the
200: critical temperature. For instance, its application to the surface
201: energy of a normal-superconducting interface
202: led to the discovery of the
203: two types of superconductors. When an external magnetic field
204: whose magnitude is less than
205: a critical value $H_c$,
206: is applied to type I superconductors, the field is
207: expelled from the interior of
208: the sample (the Meissner effect). As the magnitude of the magnetic field
209: increases above $H_c$,
210: superconductivity disappears completely and the normal
211: phase is restored. In the case of
212: type II superconductors, the
213: sample behaves in a similar manner as long as the
214: external magnetic field remains below a lower critical magnitude,
215: $H_{c1}$. A qualitatively different behaviour
216: emerges when the applied magnetic field
217: lies in the range $H_{c1}<H_{c}<H_{c2}$, where it becomes energetically
218: favourable for the magnetic field
219: to penetrate the sample in the form of quantized flux lines called vortices.
220: Beyond the upper critical magnitude of the
221: field, the vortices are too dense to maintain the
222: condensate, and the normal phase is once again restored.
223:
224: The criterion that determines
225: whether a superconductor is of type I or type II is
226: the Ginzburg-Landau parameter. It is defined as
227: the ratio of the penetration depth of the magnetic field $\delta$
228: over the coherence length $\xi$, the distance
229: over which changes in the order parameter occur,
230: i. e.
231: $\kappa={{\delta}\over {\xi}}$.
232: These characteristic lengths imply that fluctuations in the magnitude
233: of the condensate decay as $e^{{-\sqrt{2}}{x\over {\xi}}}$ while the
234: magnetic field inside the superconductor falls off as
235: $e^{-{x\over {\delta}}}$. In their original paper, Ginzburg and
236: Landau \ref{\landau}{V. L. Ginzburg and L. D. Landau, \zetf20,
237: 1064 (1950).}
238: analyzed the energy of the interface between a normal
239: and a superconducting phase, kept in equilibrium in the bulk by an external
240: magnetic field at the critical value. They found analytically
241: that the surface energy vanishes at
242: $$
243: \kappa=\kappa_c={1\over\sqrt{2}}\cong 0.707.
244: \numbereq\name{\eqpene}
245: $$
246: The physical meaning of
247: this critical value was clarified further by Abrikosov
248: \ref{\abri}{A. A. Abrikosov, \jetp5, 1174 (1957).}.
249: It represents the demarcation line between type I
250: $(\kappa < {1\over\sqrt{2}})$ and type II
251: $(\kappa > {1\over\sqrt{2}})$ superconductors.
252:
253: In the present paper we shall carry out a similar analysis of the
254: Ginzburg-Landau theory for colour superconductors.
255: Colour superconductivity is essentially
256: the quark analog of BCS superconductivity \ref{\col}
257: {B. Barrois, \np129 (1977) 390;
258: S. Frautschi, {\it Proceedings of the Workshop on Hadronic Matter at
259: Extreme Energy Density}, N. Cabibbo, ed., Erice, Italy (1978);
260: D. Bailin and A. Love, \pre107 (1984) 325, and references
261: therein for early works.}, \ref{\alf}
262: {M. Alford, K. Rajagopal and F. Wilczek, \np537, 443 (1999).},
263: \ref{\rssv}{R. Rapp, T. Schafter, E. V. Shuryak, M. Velkovsky,
264: \prl81, 53 (1998).}, \ref{\review}{K. Rajagopal and F. Wilczek, in
265: {\it At the Frontier of Particle Physics/Handbook of QCD}, B. L. Ioffe
266: Festschrift, edited by M. Shifman (World Scientic, Singapore);
267: T. Schafer, Quark Matter, hep-ph/0304281.}.
268: Because of attractive quark-quark
269: interactions in QCD, the Fermi sphere of quarks becomes unstable
270: against the formation of Cooper pairs and the system becomes
271: superconducting at sufficiently low temperatures.
272: In this paper
273: we shall consider a domain wall separating the normal and
274: colour superconducting phases in equilibrium
275: under the influence of an
276: external magnetic field and calculate the surface free energy
277: per unit area. The Ginzburg-Landau equations for this system
278: are considerably more complicated than the analogous equations
279: for an ordinary superconductor \ref{\baym}{K. Iida
280: and G. Baym, \pr63, 074018 (2001).}, \ref{\ren}
281: {I. Giannakis and H-c. Ren, \pr65, 054017 (2002).},
282: \ref{\Iida}{K. Iida and
283: G. Baym, \pr65, 014022 (2002); \pr66, 014015 (2002).},
284: \ref{\nsy}{E. Nakano, T. Suzuki and H. Yabu, J. Phys. G29, 491 (2003).},
285: \ref{\blaschke}{D. Blaschke and D. Sedrakian, Ginzburg-Landau equations
286: for superconducting quark matter in neutron stars, nucl-th/0006038.},
287: because of the non-abelian nature of the problem.
288: By using symmetry arguments, we were able
289: to simplify the
290: problem of the domain wall
291: and express the G-L equations in terms of one gauge potential and
292: two components of the di-quark condensate. When expressed in terms of
293: dimensionless quantities, the G-L equations
294: contains two dimensionless parameters:
295: the usual Ginzburg-Landau parameter $\kappa$ and another parameter $\rho$.
296: Weak coupling calculations fix the value of $\rho$
297: to be equal to $-{1\over 2}$.
298: Although we were unable to derive an analytical result analogous
299: to (\eqpene) we proved the following inequalities
300: for the critical G-L parameter and its derivative with
301: respect to $\rho$:
302: $$
303: \kappa_c(\rho) \le {1\over {\sqrt 2}}, \qquad
304: {{d{\kappa_c}}\over {d\rho}} \ge 0.
305: \numbereq\name{\eqvera}
306: $$
307: We also derived a number of inequalities
308: of the functional dependence of the surface energy
309: on the parameters of the problem
310: and obtained a numerical solution for $\kappa_c(\rho)$. For weak coupling
311: we found that
312: $$
313: \kappa_c\simeq 0.589,
314: \numbereq\name{\eqpenecsc}
315: $$
316: in contrast to (\eqpene).
317:
318: In section 2 of this paper, we shall review the
319: Ginzburg-Landau theory of colour
320: superconductivity.
321: The analytical and numerical solution of the domain wall
322: problem will be presented in section 3. In the final section
323: of the paper we shall summarize our results and in the appendix we
324: shall discuss the validity of the Ginzburg-Landau
325: theory in the presence of
326: the fluctuations of the gauge field.
327:
328: \newsection The Ginzburg-Landau Theory of Colour Superconductivity.%
329:
330: The symmetry group of QCD in the chiral limit is
331: $$
332: SU(3)_c\times SU(3)_{f_R}\times SU(3)_{f_L}\times U(1)_B,
333: \numbereq\name{\eqsymmetry},
334: $$
335: where the subscript $c$ denotes colour, the
336: subscript $f_R(f_L)$ the
337: right(left)-hand flavour and $B$ the baryon number.
338: The electromagnetic gauge group $U(1)_{\rm em}$ is
339: not a separate symmetry
340: group, but a subgroup of $SU(3)_{f_R}\times SU(3)_{f_L}$.
341: The dominant pairing channel
342: consists of two quarks of the same helicity and the corresponding
343: order parameters in a colour superconducting quark matter will be
344: denoted by ${\Psi_R}$ and ${\Psi_L}$. These condensates
345: transform into each
346: other under space inversions. Neglecting the
347: parity violating processess,
348: the Ginzburg-Landau free energy functional which is
349: consistent with the symmetry group (\eqsymmetry) reads
350: $$
351: \eqalign{
352: \Gamma=\int d^3{\vec r}\lbrace{1\over 4}F_{ij}^lF_{ij}^l
353: +{1\over 2}({\vec{\nabla}}\times{\vec{\cal A}})^2&+
354: {1\over 2}{\rm{Tr}}[({\vec D}\Psi_R)^{\dag}({\vec D}\Psi_R)
355: +({\vec D}\Psi_L)^{\dag}({\vec D}\Psi_L)] \cr
356: &+{1\over 2}a{\rm{Tr}}[\Psi_R^{\dag}\Psi_R+\Psi_L^{\dag}\Psi_L]
357: +{1\over 4}b{\rm{Tr}}[(\Psi_R^{\dag}\Psi_R)^2+(\Psi_L^{\dag}\Psi_L)^2] \cr
358: &+{1\over 4}b^\prime[({\rm{Tr}}\Psi_R^{\dag}\Psi_R)^2
359: +({\rm{Tr}}\Psi_L^{\dag}\Psi_L)^2] \cr
360: &+{1\over 2}c{\rm{Tr}}
361: (\Psi_R^{\dag}\Psi_R){\rm{Tr}}(\Psi_L^{\dag}\Psi_L)]
362: \rbrace \cr}
363: \numbereq\name{\eqrseaa}
364: $$
365: where the gauge covariant derivative of
366: the di-quark condensate $\Psi$ reads
367: $$
368: \eqalign{
369: ({\vec D}{\Psi_{R(L)}})^{c_1c_2}_{f_1f_2}=&{\vec\nabla}
370: (\Psi_{R(L)})^{c_1c_2}_{f_1f_2}-ig{\vec A}^{c_1c'}
371: (\Psi_{R(L)})^{c'c_2}_{f_1f_2}-ig{\vec A}^{c_2c'}
372: (\Psi_{R(L)})^{c_1c'}_{f_1f_2}\cr
373: &-ie(q_{f_1}+q_{f_2})
374: {\vec{\cal A}}(\Psi_{R(L)})^{c_1c_2}_{f_1f_2}\cr}
375: \numbereq\name{\eqnatali}
376: $$
377: where ${\vec A}={\vec A}^l T^l$ denotes the classical vector
378: potential of the $SU(3)$ colour gauge field, ${\vec{\cal A}}$
379: the electromagnetic field, and $eq_f$ is the electric charge of the $f$-th
380: flavour quark. The $SU(3)$ generator $T^l$ is in its fundamental
381: representation.
382:
383: At weak coupling, the parameters are calculable from either
384: the perturbative one-gluon exchange interaction of QCD or from
385: the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio effective action. Both approaches lead
386: to the same expression [\baym], [\ren]:
387: $$
388: \eqalign{
389: a&={48\pi^2\over 7\zeta(3)}k_B^2T_c(T-T_c),\cr
390: b&={576\pi^4\over 7\zeta(3)}\Big({k_BT_c\over\mu}\Big)^2, \cr
391: b^\prime&=c=0, \cr}
392: \numbereq\name{\eqcoefffb}
393: $$
394: where $\mu$ is the chemical potential and $T_c$ the transition temperature.
395:
396: Since in this paper we address the domain wall problem-
397: the interface between a normal and a superconducting phase in an external
398: magnetic field-
399: the boundary conditions select the even parity sector of (\eqrseaa)
400: $$
401: \Psi_R=\Psi_L\equiv\Psi.
402: \numbereq\name{\eqparity}
403: $$
404:
405: The one-gluon exchange process that dominates the di-quark interaction
406: at ultrahigh chemical potential is attractive for
407: quarks within the colour
408: antisymmetric channel. Thus the Cooper pairs realise the colour
409: antisymmetric representation to the leading order of the QCD running
410: coupling constant at $T=0$ \ref{\sch}{T. Schafer, \np575,
411: (2000) 269.}, \ref{\sho}{I. Shovkovy and L.C. R. Wijewardhana,
412: \pl470 (1998) 189.}, or to the leading order of
413: $(1-{T\over T_c})$ near $T_c$ [\ren].
414: Assuming such a pairing pattern persists even at
415: moderately high chemical potential, the
416: di-quark condensate $\Psi$ can be expressed in terms of a
417: $3\times 3$ complex
418: matrix, $\Phi$
419: $$
420: {\Psi}^{c_1 c_2}_{f_1 f_2}
421: =\epsilon^{c_1 c_2 c}\epsilon_{f_1 f_2 f}\Phi^{c}_{f}.
422: \numbereq\name{\eqnatal}
423: $$
424: The gauge covariant derivative of $\Phi$ can be written as
425: $$
426: ({\vec D}\Phi)_f^c={\vec\nabla}\Phi_f^c-ig{\vec{\ov A}}^{cc^\prime}
427: \Phi_f^{c^\prime}-ieQ_f{\vec{\cal A}}\Phi_f^c
428: \numbereq\name{\eqmnata}
429: $$
430: where
431: $$
432: {\vec{\ov A}}={\vec A}^l{\ov T}^l, \qquad \Phi=\Phi_0+
433: {\Phi^l}{\ov T}^l
434: \numbereq\name{\eqrioh}
435: $$
436: with ${\ov T}^l=
437: -T^{l*}$ being the generator of the ${\bf {\ov 3}}$ representation,
438: $Q_f=q_{f_1}+q_{f_2}$ and $ff_1f_2$ represent a cyclic
439: permutation of $1, 2, 3$. Arranging the flavour index in the conventional
440: order of $u, d, s$ we find the diagonal electric charge matrix
441: $$
442: Q=-diag ({2\over 3}, -{1\over 3}, -{1\over 3})=
443: -{2\over {\sqrt 3}}{\ov T}^8.
444: \numbereq\name{\eqoktw}
445: $$
446: Here we have adapted an expression of $T^l$ that differs
447: from the standard one by a cyclic permutation of rows (columns),
448: in which ${\ov T}^8={1\over {2\sqrt 3}}diag (2, -1, -1)$.
449: The equation (\eqmnata) takes the matrix form
450: $$
451: {\vec D}\Phi={\vec\nabla}\Phi-ig{\vec{\ov A}}
452: \Phi+i{2\over {\sqrt 3}}e{\vec{\cal A}}\Phi{\ov T}^8,
453: \numbereq\name{\eqmnatata}
454: $$
455: and the Ginzburg-Landau free energy (\eqrseaa)
456: becomes
457: $$
458: \Gamma=\int d^3{\vec r}\Big[{1\over 4}F_{ij}^lF_{ij}^l
459: +{1\over 2}({\vec{\nabla}}\times{\vec{\cal A}})^2+
460: 4{\rm{tr}}({\vec D}\Phi)^{\dag}({\vec D}\Phi)
461: +4a{\rm{tr}}\Phi^{\dag}\Phi+b_1{\rm{tr}}(\Phi^{\dag}\Phi)^2
462: +b_2({\rm{tr}}\Phi^{\dag}\Phi)^2\Big]
463: \numbereq\name{\eqrsebb}
464: $$
465: where the parameters $b_1$ and $b_2$ are related to the
466: parameters of equation (\eqrseaa) in the following manner
467: $$
468: b_1=b, \qquad b_2=b+8b^{\prime}+8c.
469: \numbereq\name{\eqeric}
470: $$
471:
472: First, let us review the case with a homogeneous condensate, i.e.
473: $\vec A=\vec {\cal A}=\vec\nabla\Phi=0$, for which
474: the Ginzburg-Landau free energy (\eqrsebb) becomes
475: $$
476: \Gamma=\int d^3{\vec r}\Big[
477: 4a{\rm{tr}}\Phi^{\dag}\Phi+b_1{\rm{tr}}(\Phi^{\dag}\Phi)^2
478: +b_2({\rm{tr}}\Phi^{\dag}\Phi)^2\Big].
479: \numbereq\name{\eqrsebe}
480: $$
481: We distinguish the following three regions of the
482: parameter space $b_1-b_2$,
483: following the treatment of [\baym]
484: \noindent
485:
486: 1) $b_1>0$ and $b_1+3b_2>0$:
487: The minimum free energy corresponds to the
488: colour-flavour locked condensate [\alf],
489: $$
490: \Phi={\phi}_{0}U
491: \numbereq\name{\eqcfl}
492: $$
493: where
494: $$
495: \phi_0=\sqrt{-{2a\over b_1+3b_2}}
496: \numbereq\name{\eqwer}
497: $$
498: and $U$ is a unitary matrix.\footnote{$^{\dag}$}
499: {\rm It is very important to maintain this general form of the CFL
500: condensate, since its nontrivial winding onto the gauge group,
501: $SU(3)_c\times U(1)_{\rm em}$ gives rise to vortex filaments.}
502: Consequently, we find that
503: $$
504: \Gamma_{\rm min}=-\Omega{12a^2\over b_1+3b_2}.
505: \numbereq\name{\eqfmin}
506: $$
507: 2) $b_1<0$ but $b_1+b_2>0$: In this case the
508: colour-flavour locked condensate
509: (\eqcfl) becomes a saddle point of the free energy, which
510: is neverthless
511: bounded from below. The minimum corresponds to an
512: isoscalar condensate, given
513: by
514: $$
515: \Phi={\rm diag}({\phi^{\prime}}_{0}
516: e^{i\alpha},0,0).
517: \numbereq\name{\eqisosclr}
518: $$
519: where ${\phi^\prime}_0=\sqrt{-{2a\over b_1+b_2}}$. We find then that
520: $$
521: \Gamma_{\rm min}=-\Omega{4a^2\over b_1+3b_2}.
522: \numbereq\name{\eqfminis}
523: $$
524: 3) For $b_1$ and $b_2$ outside the region specified by 1) and 2), the free
525: energy is no longer bounded from below.
526: Higher powers of the order parameter have
527: to be included and the superconducting transition
528: becomes first order.
529: Since case 2) is mathematically identical to a metallic superconductor,
530: we shall not address it in this paper.
531:
532: In order to identify the
533: various characteristic lengths of the system, we consider
534: fluctuations about the homogeneous condensate (\eqcfl).
535: We parametrize the order
536: parameter by
537: $$
538: \Phi=\phi_0+{1\over\sqrt{6}}({{X+iY}\over 2})
539: +\bar T^l({{X_l+iY_l}\over 2})
540: \numbereq\name{\eqdev}
541: $$
542: with $X$'s and $Y$'s real, and form linear combinations
543: of the ordinary electromagnetic
544: gauge potental with the eighth component of the
545: colour gauge potential \ref{\jur}
546: {M. Alford, J. Berges and K. Rajagopal, \np571, (2000) 269.},
547: $$
548: \eqalign{
549: {\vec V}&={\vec A}^8{\cos\theta}+{\vec{\cal A}}{\sin{\theta}}\cr
550: {\vec{\cal V}}&=-{\vec A}^8{\sin\theta}+{\vec{\cal A}}{\cos{\theta}}, \cr}
551: \numbereq\name{\eqelecwk}
552: $$
553: where the ``Weinberg angle'' is given by
554: $$
555: \tan\theta=-{{2e}\over {{\sqrt 3}g}},
556: \numbereq\name{\eqweinberg}
557: $$
558: Next we expand (\eqrsebb)
559: to quadratic order in $X$'s $Y$'s $\vec A$'s and ${\cal A}$. We find
560: $$
561: \eqalign{
562: \Gamma &=\Gamma_{\rm min}+\int d^3{\vec r}\lbrace
563: {1\over 2}(\vec\nabla\times\vec{\cal V})^2
564: +{\rm tr}[(\vec\nabla\times\vec W)^2+m_W^2{\vec W}^2]
565: +{1\over 2}[(\vec\nabla\times\vec Z)^2+m_Z^2{\vec Z}^2]\cr
566: &+{1\over 2}[(\vec\nabla X)^2+m_H^2 X^2]
567: +{1\over 2}[(\vec\nabla X^l)(\vec\nabla X^l)+m_H^{\prime2}X^lX^l]
568: +{1\over 2}(\vec\nabla Y)^2
569: \rbrace \cr},
570: \numbereq\name{\eqexpand}
571: $$
572: where $\vec W=\sum_{l=1}^{7}\bar T^l\vec W^l$ and
573: $$
574: \eqalign{
575: {\vec W}^l&={\vec A}^l-{1\over m_W}\vec\nabla Y^l \qquad {\rm for}
576: \quad l=1, 2, \cdots 7 \cr
577: {\vec Z}&={\vec V}-{1\over m_Z}\vec\nabla Y^8. \cr}
578: \numbereq\name{\eqwz}
579: $$
580: The masses of the excitations provide us with the
581: relevant length scales which are the coherence lengths, $\xi$ and $\xi^\prime$
582: defined by:
583: $$
584: m_H^2=(b_1+3b_2)\phi_0^2={2\over {\xi}^2}, \qquad
585: m_H^{\prime 2}=b_1\phi_0^2={2\over {\xi^\prime}^2},
586: \numbereq\name{\eqhiggs}
587: $$
588: that indicate the distances over which the
589: di-quark condensate varies
590: and the magnetic penetration depths, $\delta$ and $\delta^\prime$ by
591: $$
592: m_Z^{2}=4g^2{\phi_0^2}{\rm sec}^2\theta={1\over {\delta}^2}, \qquad
593: m_W^2=m_Z^{2}{\cos^2{\theta}}={1\over {\delta^\prime}^2}.
594: \numbereq\name{\eqvector}
595: $$
596: The excitations that violate (\eqparity)
597: correspond to the
598: Goldstone bosons associated with chiral symmetry breaking,
599: and the $\eta$ particle that becomes massive through the
600: anomaly.
601:
602: In the rest of this section, we shall determine
603: the critical magnetic field of a
604: homogeneous colour superconductor.
605: For simplicity, the diamagnetic response
606: of the quarks in the normal phase
607: will be neglected. In the presence of an external magnetic field, the
608: thermodynamic function to be minimized is the Gibbs
609: free energy $\tilde\Gamma$,
610: which is a Legendre transformation of the
611: Helmholtz free energy $\Gamma$, i.e.
612: $$
613: \tilde\Gamma=\Gamma-\vec H\cdot\int d^3\vec r\vec\nabla\times
614: \vec{\cal A}.
615: \numbereq\name{\eqlegdr}
616: $$
617: Following the decomposition (\eqelecwk), we write
618: $$
619: {\tilde\Gamma}={\tilde\Gamma}_1+{\tilde\Gamma}_2
620: \numbereq\name{\eqbagger}
621: $$
622: with
623: $$
624: \eqalign{
625: {\tilde\Gamma}_1&={\int}d^3{\vec r}\lbrack
626: {1\over 4}\sum_{l=1}^7F_{ij}^lF_{ij}^l
627: +{1\over 2}({\vec{\nabla}}\times{\vec V})^2+
628: 4{\rm{tr}}({\vec D}\Phi)^{\dag}({\vec D}\Phi)
629: +4a{\rm{tr}}\Phi^{\dag}\Phi+b_1{\rm{tr}}(\Phi^{\dag}\Phi)^2\cr
630: &+b_2({\rm{tr}}\Phi^{\dag}\Phi)^2
631: -{\vec H}\cdot{\nabla}{\times}{\vec V}{\sin\theta} \rbrack \cr
632: {\tilde\Gamma}_2&={\int}d^3{\vec r} \lbrack{1\over 2}({\vec\nabla}\times
633: {\vec{\cal V}})^2-{\vec H}\cdot{\nabla}{\times}{\vec {\cal V}}
634: \cos\theta \rbrack \cr}
635: \numbereq\name{\eqriot}
636: $$
637:
638: The minimization of ${\tilde\Gamma}_2$ gives rise to
639: $$
640: {\vec\nabla}\times\vec{\cal V}=\vec H\cos\theta,
641: \numbereq\name{\eqnormal}
642: $$
643: and no distinction will be made between
644: the super-phase and the normal phase.
645: In the remaining of the section we shall concentrate
646: solely on ${\tilde\Gamma}_1$.
647:
648: A homogeneous super-phase is characterized by a perfect Meissner effect,
649: $\vec \nabla\times{\vec{\cal V}}=0$ and the
650: CFL condensate $\Phi=\phi_0$, which gives rise to
651: the minimum of $\tilde\Gamma$,
652: $\tilde\Gamma_s=\Gamma_{\rm min.}$ given by (\eqfmin).
653: $\tilde\Gamma_1$ for a
654: homogeneous normal phase is minimized
655: by ${\vec\nabla}\times\vec{\cal V}=\vec H\sin\theta$
656: and the minimum reads $\tilde\Gamma_n=-\Omega{1\over 2}H^2\sin^2\theta$.
657: The critical magnetic field $H=H_c$ is determined
658: from the equilibrium condition
659: $$
660: \tilde\Gamma_n=\tilde\Gamma_s=\Gamma_{\rm min}=
661: -\Omega{12a^2\over b_1+3b_2}
662: \numbereq\name{\eqequil},
663: $$
664: which leads to
665: $$
666: H_c=2\sqrt{6a^2\over b_1+3b_2}|{\rm csc}\theta|.
667: \numbereq\name{\eqcritical}
668: $$
669: Substituting the parameters (\eqcoefffb) which were calculated
670: using weak coupling approximation into (\eqequil)
671: yields
672: $$
673: H_c=4{\sqrt{3\over {14{\zeta}(3)}}}{\mu}^2({{k_BT_c}\over
674: {\mu}})(1-{T\over T_c})|{\csc{\theta}}|.
675: \numbereq\name{\eqcrespo}
676: $$
677: Extrapolating this expression to a realistic value for
678: the quark chemical potential, for example $\mu=400$MeV,
679: and using the one-loop running coupling constant
680: $$
681: g^2={{12\pi^2}\over {({11\over 2}N_c-N_f){\ln{{\mu}\over
682: {\Lambda}}}}}
683: \numbereq\name{\eqzaneti}
684: $$
685: with $N_c=N_f=3$ and $\Lambda=200$MeV, we find
686: $$
687: \theta \cong -5.6{^\circ}
688: \numbereq\name{\eqdida}
689: $$
690: and
691: $$
692: H_c \cong 1.47 \times 10^{20}({{k_BT_c}\over
693: {\mu}})(1-{T_c\over T})\quad {\rm Gauss},
694: \numbereq\name{\eqfero}
695: $$
696: which is much higher than the typical magnetic field inside a neutron star.
697: This estimation of course depends on the validity of
698: the extrapolation of the weak coupling formulas to
699: realistic values of the chemical potential.
700:
701:
702: \newsection The Domain Wall Problem.%
703:
704: Let's consider an interface between the normal phase and
705: the colour superconducting phase, for example
706: the $y-z$ plane. The equilibrium in the bulk is maintained by
707: a uniform external magnetic field of critical magnitude,
708: $\vec H=H_c\hat\zeta$.
709: All quantities then in both phases will depend solely on $x$. It
710: is evident from symmetry that the gauge field lies in one plane,
711: let this be the $x-y$ plane, so that
712: ${\vec V}=V(x){\hat y}$ and ${\nabla}\times{\vec V}=
713: {dV\over dx}{\hat\zeta}$.
714: The boundary conditions on the Ginzburg-Landau equations
715: in the problem that we are considering
716: (corresponding to the normal and colour superconducting
717: phases as $x \mapsto -\infty$ and $x \mapsto \infty$) are
718: $$
719: \eqalign{
720: &\phi \mapsto 0, \quad \chi \mapsto 0, \quad {{dV}\over dx} \mapsto
721: H_c{\sin\theta} \quad {\rm at} \quad x \mapsto -\infty \cr
722: &\phi \mapsto \phi_0, \quad \chi \mapsto {\sqrt 2}\phi_0
723: , \quad {dV\over dx} \mapsto 0 \quad {\rm at} \quad x \mapsto \infty \cr}
724: \numbereq\name{\eqerionb}
725: $$
726: The surface energy $\sigma$ is defined as
727: $$
728: \sigma={{\tilde\Gamma}_1-{\tilde\Gamma}_s\over\hbox{ Area of $yz$ plane }}
729: \numbereq\name{\eqdafy}
730: $$
731: where the Gibbs free energy of a homogeneous superphase, $\tilde\Gamma_s$
732: is given by (\eqequil), and it is equal to that of the normal phase
733: in the presence of $H=H_c$.
734:
735: The minimization of $\tilde\Gamma_1$ generates a set of coupled
736: nonlinear differential
737: equations-the Ginzburg-Landau equations-subject
738: to the boundary conditions (\eqerionb).
739: Now we divide the field variables in equation (\eqrioh)
740: into two groups, the
741: first group contains $\Phi_0, \Phi^8, {\vec A}^8, {\vec{\cal A}}$,
742: while the second one includes $\Phi_l, {\vec A}^l$ with
743: $l=1, 2, \cdots 7$.
744: A closer inspection of the structure of
745: ${\vec D}\Phi$ reveals the absence of terms in the free energy
746: (\eqrseaa) that are linear in the variables of the
747: second group. Therefore a solution of the equations of motion
748: exists in which only the fields of the first group acquire
749: non-zero values. Since this {\it ansatz} implements the maximum symmetry
750: allowed by the boundary conditions, we expect that it includes the solution
751: that minimizes the free energy of the domain wall.
752:
753: By setting $\Phi_l={\vec A}^l=0$ for $l=1, 2, \cdots 7$
754: and transforming the
755: remaining variables
756: $$
757: \phi=\Phi_0+{1\over {\sqrt 3}}\Phi^8, \qquad
758: \chi={\sqrt 2}(\Phi_0-{1\over {2\sqrt 3}}\Phi^8),
759: \numbereq\name{\eqwasin}
760: $$
761: we arrive
762: at the following expression for the Ginzburg-Landau
763: free energy functional (\eqrseaa)
764: $$
765: \eqalign{
766: \tilde\Gamma_{1}=\int d^3{\vec r} \Big[ &{1\over 2}({\vec\nabla}\times
767: {\vec V})^2+4|({\vec\nabla}-i{g\over {\sqrt 3}}{\sec\theta}
768: {\vec V})\phi|^2
769: +4|({\vec\nabla}+i{g\over 2{\sqrt 3}}{\sec\theta}{\vec V})\chi|^2 \cr
770: &+4a(|{\phi}|^2+|{\chi}|^2)+b_1(|{\phi}|^4+{1\over 2}|{\chi}|^4)
771: +b_2(|{\phi}|^2+|{\chi}|^2)^2)-H_c{\hat\zeta}\cdot({\vec\nabla}\times {\vec V})
772: {\sin\theta} \Big]. \cr}
773: \numbereq\name{\eqgrop}
774: $$
775: The condition for the colour-flavour locking ( that the
776: $3\times 3$ matrix $\Phi$ is proportional to a unitary
777: matrix ) amounts to $|{\chi}|^2=2|{\phi}|^2$.
778: Consequently, we shall use instead of the variable $x$ and the
779: functions $V$, $\phi$
780: and $\chi$ the dimensionless quantities
781: $$
782: s={\delta}x, \quad \phi={\phi}_0u,
783: \quad \chi={\sqrt 2}{\phi}_0v, \quad
784: {V}=-{\sqrt{-3a}\over g}A{\cos\theta}.
785: \numbereq\name{\eqrewe}
786: $$
787: The boundary conditions in terms of the new dimensionless
788: quantities become
789: $$
790: \eqalign{
791: &u \mapsto 0, \quad v \mapsto 0, \quad A^{\prime} \mapsto 1 \quad
792: {\rm at} \quad s \mapsto -\infty \cr
793: &u \mapsto 1, \quad v \mapsto 1
794: , \quad A^{\prime} \mapsto 0 \quad
795: {\rm at} \quad s \mapsto \infty \cr}
796: \numbereq\name{\eqerionb}
797: $$
798: where prime indicates differentiation with respect to $s$.
799: The surface energy per unit area in terms of the dimensionless
800: quantities becomes
801: $$
802: \eqalign{
803: \sigma={6a^2\over b}{\int^{\infty}_{-\infty}}ds&\lbrace
804: {1\over 2}(A^{\prime}-1)^2+{1\over 3{\kappa}^2}(u^{{\prime}2}
805: +2v^{{\prime}2})+{1\over 6}A^2(2u^2+v^2)-{1\over 3}(u^2+2v^2)\cr
806: &+{1\over 18}(2u^4+2u^2v^2+5v^4)+{1\over 18}\rho(u^2-v^2)^2\rbrace\cr}
807: \numbereq\name{\eqafran}
808: $$
809: where
810: $$
811: \kappa={\delta\over\xi}
812: \numbereq\name{\eqxoutos}
813: $$
814: is the Ginzburg-Landau parameter, $b={1\over 4}(b_1+3b_2)$,
815: and
816: $$
817: \rho={{b_1-3b_2}\over {b_1+3b_2}}
818: \numbereq\name{\eqerdogan}
819: $$
820: is another dimensionless parameter.
821: The weak coupling calculation fixes $\rho$
822: to be equal to $-{1\over 2}$.
823: The Ginzburg-Landau equations which determine the
824: profile of the colour condensate
825: $u$, $v$ and the magnetic field in the colour superconductor
826: are determined by minimizing the surface energy with respect to functions $u$, $v$ and $A$
827: $$
828: \eqalign{
829: &-A^{\prime\prime}+{1\over 3}A(2u^2+v^2)=0, \cr
830: &-{1\over {\kappa}^2}u^{\prime\prime}+(A^2-1)u
831: +{1\over 3}(2u^2+v^2)u+{1\over 3}
832: \rho(u^2-v^2)u=0, \cr
833: &-{1\over {\kappa}^2}v^{\prime\prime}
834: +{1\over 4}(A^2-4)v+{1\over 6}(u^2+5v^2)v
835: -{1\over 6}\rho(u^2-v^2)v=0. \cr}
836: \numbereq\name{\eqfrion}
837: $$
838: In the presence of a non-zero $A$, as it is required by the boundary
839: conditions, this set of equations does not admit a solution in which
840: $u=v$ everywhere. Stated differently, in the presence of an
841: inhomogeneity and a non-zero gauge potential
842: the unlocked
843: condensate-the octet-has to acquire a non-zero value somewhere.
844: This situation is analogous to the Ginzburg-Landau theory of a
845: cuprate superconductor \ref{\ting}{Y. Ren, J.H. Xu and C.S. Ting
846: \prl74, 3680 (1995).}, where the $s$-wave condensate
847: becomes non-zero in the vicinity of a vortex filament while the $d$-wave
848: condensate dominates in the bulk.
849: It is easily verified that equations (\eqfrion) have the
850: first integral
851: $$
852: \eqalign{
853: {1\over 2}A^{{\prime}2}+{1\over 3{\kappa}^2}(u^{{\prime}2}
854: +2v^{{\prime}2})-{1\over 6}A^2(2u^2+v^2)+{1\over 3}(u^2+2v^2)
855: &-{1\over 18}(2u^4+2u^2v^2+5v^4)\cr
856: &-{1\over 18}\rho(u^2-v^2)^2={1\over 2} \cr},
857: \numbereq\name{\eqdeft}
858: $$
859: which implies, according to the boundary conditions (\eqerionb), that
860: $$
861: A(\infty)=0.
862: \numbereq\name{\eqarlim}
863: $$
864:
865: Let $\sigma_{\rm min}$ be the minimum surface energy. It is
866: obtained from the substitution of the field variables
867: $u$, $v$, $A$ that satisfy the GL equations (\eqfrion)
868: into (\eqafran),
869: and is a function of the parameters $\kappa$ and $\rho$. We proceed now
870: to prove the following lemma
871:
872: \noindent
873: {\it Lemma}:
874: $$
875: \Big({\partial\sigma_{\rm min}\over\partial\kappa}\Big)_\rho\le 0;
876: \numbereq\name{\eqlemmaa}
877: $$
878: $$
879: \Big({\partial\sigma_{\rm min}\over\partial\rho}\Big)_\kappa\ge 0;
880: \numbereq\name{\eqlemmab}
881: $$
882:
883: \noindent
884: {\it Proof}:
885:
886: According to (\eqafran),
887: $$
888: \eqalign{
889: \Big({\partial\sigma_{\rm min}\over\partial\kappa}\Big)_\rho&=
890: -{4a^2\over b{\kappa}^3}\int_{-\infty}^\infty
891: ds(u^{\prime 2}+2v^{\prime 2})\cr
892: &+\int_{-\infty}^\infty ds\Big[{\delta\sigma_{\rm min}\over\delta A(s)}
893: \Big({\partial A(s)\over\partial\kappa}\Big)_\rho
894: +{\delta\sigma_{\rm min}\over\delta u(s)}
895: \Big({\partial u(s)\over\partial\kappa}\Big)_\rho
896: +{\delta\sigma_{\rm min}\over\delta v(s)}
897: \Big({\partial v(s)\over\partial\kappa}\Big)_\rho\Big]\cr}
898: \numbereq\name{\eqlemmapf1}
899: $$
900: The second term vanishes because of the equation of motion
901: (\eqfrion) and the boundary conditions (\eqerionb), (\eqarlim).
902: Consequently, we find that
903: $$
904: \Big({\partial\sigma_{\rm min}\over\partial\kappa}\Big)_\rho
905: =-{4a^2\over b{\kappa}^3}\int_{-\infty}^\infty
906: ds(u^{\prime 2}+2v^{\prime 2})\le 0.
907: \numbereq\name{\eqlemmapf2}
908: $$
909: Similarly
910: $$
911: \Big({\partial\sigma_{\rm min}\over\partial\rho}\Big)_\kappa={a^2\over 3b}
912: \int_{-\infty}^\infty ds(u^2-v^2)^2\ge 0.
913: \numbereq\name{\eqlemmapf3}
914: $$
915: The lemma is then proved.
916:
917: Furthermore lets denote the critical value of the
918: Ginzburg-Landau parameter
919: for which $\sigma_{\rm min}$ vanishes by
920: $\kappa_c(\rho)$. We shall prove then the following theorem
921:
922: \noindent
923: {\it Theorem}:
924: $$
925: \kappa_c(\rho)\le {1\over\sqrt{2}}
926: \numbereq\name{\eqtheorema}
927: $$
928: and
929: $$
930: {d\kappa_c\over d\rho}\ge 0.
931: \numbereq\name{\eqtheoremb}
932: $$
933:
934: \noindent
935: {\it Proof}:
936:
937: Consider a special field configuration $u=v$, which
938: satisfies the
939: boundary conditions (\eqerionb) but not
940: the Ginzburg-Landau equations (\eqfrion)
941: with $A\neq 0$. Therefore
942: $$
943: \sigma_{\rm min.}\leq{6a^2\over b}\int_{-\infty}^\infty ds
944: \Big[{1\over 2}(A^\prime-1)^2
945: +{1\over\kappa^2}u^{\prime 2}
946: +{1\over 2}A^2u^2-u^2+{1\over 2}u^4\Big]\equiv\bar\sigma
947: \numbereq\name{\eqtrialb}
948: $$
949: The minimization of $\bar\sigma$ with respect to $u$ and $A$
950: yields the set of differential equations,
951: $$
952: \eqalign{
953: &-A^{\prime\prime}+Vu^2=0, \cr
954: &-{1\over {\kappa}^2}u^{\prime\prime}+{1\over 2}(A^2-2)u+u^3=0, \cr}
955: \numbereq\name{\eqtriala}
956: $$
957: subject to the boundary conditions (\eqerionb).
958: We recognize that (\eqtrialb) and (\eqtriala) correspond exactly
959: to the domain wall problem for
960: an ordinary superconductor analyzed by Ginzburg and Landau
961: in their original
962: work. It follows then that $\bar\sigma=0$ at
963: $\kappa={1\over\sqrt{2}}$. On the other hand, this field
964: configuration does not satisfy
965: the equations of motion (\eqafran) and therefore
966: $\sigma_{\rm min}\le 0$ at $\kappa={1\over\sqrt{2}}$. Following
967: (\eqlemmaa) of the lemma we establish the first equation of the theorem.
968:
969: The second equation of the theorem follows from the identity
970: $$
971: \Big({\partial\kappa\over \partial\rho}\Big)_{\sigma_{\rm min}}
972: =-{\Big({\partial\sigma_{\rm min}\over\partial\rho}\Big)_\kappa
973: \over\Big({\partial\sigma_{\rm min}\over\partial\kappa}\Big)_\rho}
974: \numbereq\name{\eqidty}
975: $$
976: and the lemma. The theorem is then proved.
977:
978:
979: The solution to the Ginzburg-Landau equations (\eqfrion) and the
980: critical value of the Ginzburg-Landau parameter $\kappa$ for
981: various values of $\rho\in(-1,\infty)$ were also determined numerically. The
982: continuous range $s\in(-\infty,\infty)$ was replaced by a finite
983: lattice with
984: $$
985: s_n=-L+n\epsilon
986: \numbereq\name{\eqsite}
987: $$
988: where $n=0,1,2,...,N+1$ and $(N+1)\epsilon=2L$. A good approximation
989: amounts to $\epsilon$ and $L$ that satisfy
990: $\epsilon<<{\rm min}
991: (1,1/\kappa)$ and $L>>{\rm max}(1,1/\kappa)$. The field variables
992: $u_n$, $v_n$, and $A_n$ are assigned to each site and their derivatives
993: can be approximated by
994: $u_n^\prime=(u_{n+1}-u_n)/\epsilon$, $v_n^\prime=(v_{n+1}-v_n)/\epsilon$,
995: and $A_n^\prime=(A_{n+1}-A_n)/\epsilon$. The surface energy is
996: then written
997: $$
998: \eqalign{
999: \sigma&={6a^2\over b}\lbrace\epsilon\sum_{n=0}^N\Big[
1000: {1\over 2}(A_n^\prime-1)^2
1001: +{1\over 3\kappa^2}(u_n^{\prime2}+2v_n^{\prime2})\Big]\cr
1002: &+\sum_{n=0}^{N+1}\epsilon_n\Big[{1\over 6}A_n^2(2u_n^2+v_n^2)
1003: -{1\over 3}(u_n^2+2v_n^2)+{1\over 18}(2u_n^4+2u_n^2v_n^2+5v_n^4)
1004: +{1\over 18}\rho(u_n^2-v_n^2)^2\Big]\rbrace \cr}
1005: \numbereq\name{\eqdiscrete}
1006: $$
1007: with $\epsilon_0=\epsilon_{N+1}={1\over 2}\epsilon$ and
1008: $\epsilon_n=\epsilon$ for $n=1, \cdots N$.
1009: The multivariable function (\eqdiscrete) is then minimized by iteration
1010: subject to the conditions $u_0=v_0=0$, $u_{N+1}=v_{N+1}=1$,
1011: $A_0^\prime=1$ and $A_{N+1}=0$.
1012:
1013: The critical GL parameter, $\kappa_c$ versus
1014: $\rho$ is plotted in Fig.1. The critical value of GL parameter in the weak
1015: coupling approximation
1016: ($\rho=-{1\over 2}$), is $\kappa_c=0.589$.
1017: The two components of the di-quark condensate,
1018: the colour-flavour locked and the colour-flavour octet,
1019: and the corresponding magnetic field, that
1020: correspond to the solution with $\rho=-{1\over 2}$ and
1021: $\kappa=\kappa_c$ are plotted in Fig. 2. The numerical results are consistent
1022: with the inequalities (\eqtheorema) and (\eqtheoremb) that
1023: we derived analytically.
1024:
1025: Substituting the weak coupling expression of the parameters,
1026: the coherence length reads
1027: $$
1028: \xi^2={{7{\zeta}(3)}\over {48{\pi}^2}}\Big({1\over {k_BT_c}}\Big)^2
1029: {T_c\over {T_c-T}},
1030: \numbereq\name{\eqer}
1031: $$
1032: and the penetration depth
1033: $$
1034: \delta^2={{3\pi}\over {2{\alpha}_s{\mu}^2}}{T_c\over {T_c-T}}
1035: {\cos^2\theta}
1036: \numbereq\name{\eqre}
1037: $$
1038: with $\alpha_s={g^2\over 4\pi}$.
1039: The Ginzburg-Landau parameter is given then by
1040: $$
1041: \kappa={{\delta^2}\over {\xi^2}}=
1042: \sqrt{{72\pi^3}\over {7{\zeta}(3){\alpha}_s}}
1043: {{k_BT_c}\over {\mu}}{\cos{\theta}}\cong {16.3\over {\sqrt{\alpha_s}}}
1044: {{k_B}T_c\over {\mu}}.
1045: \numbereq\name{\eqdani}
1046: $$
1047: If we consider a realistic value for the chemical potential,
1048: for example $\mu=400$MeV, it follows from
1049: (\eqpenecsc) that the colour superconductor will be of type I if
1050: $k_BT_c < 14$MeV and of type II otherwise.
1051: Furthermore if we extrapolate the weak coupling
1052: formula for $T_c$ \ref{\son}{D. T. Son
1053: \pr59, 094019 (1999).}, \ref{\schafer}{T. Schafer and F. Wilczek,
1054: \pr60, 114033 (1999).},
1055: \ref{\pisa}{
1056: R. D. Pisarski, and D. H. Rischke, \pr61, 051501 (2000);
1057: \pr61, 074017 (2000).},
1058: \ref{\brown}{W. Brown, J. T. Liu and H-c. Ren, \pr61,
1059: 114012 (2000); \pr62, 054016.}, \ref{\wang}{Q. Wang and D. H.
1060: Rischke, \pr65, (2002) 054005.},
1061: which is valid
1062: at asymptotic densities, to $\mu=400$MeV we find $k_BT_c=3.5$MeV and
1063: the colour superconductor is of type I. Of course
1064: if nonperturbative effects
1065: raise $T_c$ significantly, for example by one order of
1066: magnitude, the colour superconductor could be of type II.
1067:
1068: \newsection Concluding Remarks.%
1069:
1070: In this paper we have applied the Ginzburg-Landau theory to the
1071: problem of a domain wall which separates the normal phase
1072: from the colour superconducting
1073: phase of dense quark matter. The main purpose of this
1074: work was to establish a criterion that determines whether
1075: the colour superconductor is type I or type II
1076: with respect to an external magnetic field. We initially
1077: derived the Ginzburg-Landau equations of motion for the
1078: gauge fields and the order parameter by minimizing the
1079: surface energy of the interface between the two phases.
1080: The condition that the surface energy is a minimum is
1081: equivalent to the requirement that the normal and the
1082: colour superconducting phases are in stable equilibrium
1083: with each other. This equilibrium is maintained by
1084: an external magnetic field. Using symmetry arguments
1085: we were able to simplify the original set of equations
1086: and rewrite them
1087: in terms of only two components of the
1088: order parameter and one gauge potential. The equations also
1089: contain two dimensionless
1090: parameters: the Ginzburg-Landau parameter $\kappa$
1091: and $\rho$.
1092: Therefore the problem is more complicated than the problem
1093: of the metallic superconductor which
1094: was addressed by Ginzburg and Landau.
1095: Although we were unable to derive an analytical result
1096: analogous to the Ginzburg-Landau criterion (\eqpene), we
1097: derived several rigorous
1098: inequalities about the critical parameter $\kappa_c$, the
1099: value for which the surface energy vanishes,
1100: and its derivative with respect to $\rho$.
1101: Those analytical results are
1102: supported by a numerical solution of the
1103: Ginzburg-Landau equations. By extrapolating the weak coupling
1104: approximation formulas for the parameters
1105: to realistic values of the chemical potential,
1106: for example $\mu=400$MeV, we find that
1107: the colour superconductor is of type I (type II)
1108: if the transition temperature is below(above) 14MeV.
1109:
1110: The value of our work is mainly theoretical. It addresses
1111: the broken $U(1)$ gauge field onto which the electromagnetic
1112: field has a small projection.
1113: Although we have been refering to
1114: the typical chemical potential of a neutron star, the
1115: implications of our work might be quite limited [\jur].
1116: First of all, there has not been
1117: any evidence yet that colour superconductivity
1118: is realised in the core
1119: of a neutron star. Even if this is the case, the critical magnetic field
1120: (\eqfero) is too high for the distintion between type I and type II to
1121: be observed unless the pairing force is strong
1122: enough to reduce the lower critical field by several
1123: orders of magnitude. In addition the
1124: small mixing angle (\eqdida)
1125: and the dependence of the magnetic response on
1126: the thickness of the crust of the CSC core make it difficult to observe
1127: the partial magnetic Meissner effect and the
1128: appearance of vortex filaments.
1129:
1130: Because of the strength of the QCD coupling
1131: and the ultra-relativistic Fermi
1132: sea, the fluctuations of the gauge field
1133: could be more significant
1134: than those in a non-relativistic superconductor
1135: \ref{\love}{D. Bailin and A. Love,
1136: \pl109 501 (1982).}.
1137: These fluctuations contribute to the
1138: Ginzburg-Landau free energy functional an energy
1139: density
1140: $$
1141: {\Delta\Gamma} \sim k_BT_c{\delta}^{-3}.
1142: \numbereq\name{\eqerice}
1143: $$
1144: As the condensate energy (\eqfmin) is proportional
1145: to $(1-{T\over T_c})^2$ while $\delta \sim
1146: {\sqrt{1-{T\over T_c}}}$, the contribution
1147: from the fluctuations will eventually dominate as
1148: $T$ approaches $T_c$ and modify the nature of the
1149: phase transition.
1150:
1151: The fluctuation energy is estimated in the appendix within the framework
1152: of the Ginzburg-Landau theory,
1153: where we demonstrate that the inclusion
1154: of this energy modifies the phase transition from
1155: second order to first order. The parameter
1156: $$
1157: t={{\ov T}\over T_c}-1
1158: \numbereq\name{\eqopio}
1159: $$
1160: which describes the deviation of the first order transition
1161: temperature $\ov T$ from the second order one $T_c$, is used
1162: as a measure of the importance of the fluctuations.
1163: We find that
1164: for realistic values of the quark chemical potential,
1165: $\mu=400$MeV and $k_BT_c \ge 13$MeV,
1166: $t \le 0.1$. In that case, the Ginzburg-Landau free
1167: energy functional (\eqrseaa) represents a reasonable approximation.
1168:
1169: For $t\sim 1$ the approximation employed to derive the Ginzburg-Landau
1170: free energy (\eqrseaa) with (\eqcoefffb) from QCD
1171: or from the Nambu-Jona-Lasinio
1172: effective action breaks down. Higher powers of the
1173: order parameter have to be included. It would be very interesting
1174: to develop a systematic weak coupling approximation in this case
1175: and we hope to be able to report progress in the future.
1176:
1177: \noindent
1178: \newsection Acknowlegments.
1179:
1180: We would like like to thank S. Catto, G. Dunne,
1181: H. Hansson and D. Rischke for useful discussions.
1182: This work
1183: is supported in part by US Department of Energy, contract
1184: number DE-FG02-91ER40651-TASKB.
1185:
1186: \newsection Appendix.
1187:
1188: In this appendix we shall estimate the effect of
1189: the fluctuations of the gauge field.
1190: A systematic evaluation of the contribution from the
1191: fluctuations to the free
1192: energy requires a resummation of a set of ring diagrams
1193: of QCD at finite temperature.
1194: Here we shall follow
1195: the treatment of Bailin and Love [\love]
1196: and estimate the fluctuation terms
1197: within
1198: the framework of the Ginzburg-Landau theory. Due to
1199: the Debye screening the contributions of the
1200: longitudinal components of the gauge potentials
1201: are supressed, and only
1202: the transeverse components contribute in the static limit.
1203: We expect that our simple-minded
1204: estimation captures the fluctuation terms to the
1205: leading order of the condensate.
1206:
1207: Assuming that the small fluctuations are governed by the
1208: quadratic form of the Ginzburg-Landau free energy functional,
1209: the shift of
1210: the free energy due to the Meissner effect is given by
1211: $$
1212: \Delta\Gamma=-k_BT\ln{\int[dW][dZ]e^{-S}\over\int[dW][dZ]
1213: e^{-S_0}}
1214: \numbereq\name{\eqbailin}
1215: $$
1216: where $\vec W$ and $\vec Z$ represent the
1217: transverse degrees of freedom and
1218: $$
1219: \eqalign{
1220: S&={{\beta}\over 2}\int d^3{\vec r}
1221: [(\vec\nabla\times\vec W)^2+m_W^2\vec W^2
1222: +(\vec\nabla\times\vec Z)^2+m_Z^2\vec Z^2]\cr
1223: S_0&={{\beta}\over 2}\int d^3\vec r[(\vec\nabla\times\vec
1224: W)^2+(\vec\nabla\times\vec Z)^2].\cr}
1225: \numbereq\name{\eqlove}
1226: $$
1227: Completing the gaussian integral, we find that
1228: $$
1229: \eqalign{
1230: \Delta\Gamma=&k_BT\int {d^3\vec k\over (2\pi)^3}\Big[
1231: 7\ln\Big(1+{m_W^2\over {k^2}}\Big)
1232: +\ln\Big(1+{m_Z^2\over {k^2}}\Big)\Big]\cr
1233: &=-{k_BT_C\over 6\pi}(7\delta^{\prime -3}+\delta^{-3})
1234: =-{4g^3\over {3\pi}}(7+{\sec^2{\theta}})k_BT_c{|\phi|}^3.\cr}
1235: \numbereq\name{\eqkran}
1236: $$
1237: In the previous calculation, dimensional regularization was employed
1238: to eliminate ultraviolet
1239: divergences. By including this term to
1240: the homogeneous Ginzburg-Landau free energy
1241: with $\Phi=\phi$, we find
1242: $$
1243: \Gamma=12a|\phi|^2+12b|\phi|^4
1244: -{4g^3\over {3\pi}}(7+{\sec^2{\theta}})k_BT_c|{\phi}|^3.
1245: \numbereq\name{\eqaust}
1246: $$
1247: The presence of the cubic term will induce a first-order
1248: phase transition at
1249: $\bar T>T_c$ The temperature is determined by the condition that the
1250: free energy curve $\Gamma$ vs. $|\phi|$ becomes tangent to the $\phi$-axis at
1251: some $\phi\neq 0$, i.e.
1252: $$
1253: a={16\pi\alpha_s^3\over 81b}(7+{\rm sec}^2\theta)^2(k_BT_C)^2.
1254: \numbereq\name{\eqcond}
1255: $$
1256: Substituting the weak coupling expression for $a$ and $b$ we obtain that
1257: $$
1258: t\equiv {\bar T\over T_C}-1
1259: ={49{\zeta^2}(3)(7+{\sec^2{\theta}})^2{\alpha^3}_s\over {139968{\pi}^5}}
1260: ({{\mu}\over {k_BT_c}})^2.
1261: \numbereq\name{\eqpoin}
1262: $$
1263: With $\mu=400$MeV, and $k_BT_C>13MeV$, $t<0.1$.
1264: As a result the fluctuations
1265: are not signigicant and the Ginzburg-Landau energy functional
1266: (\eqrseaa) represents a reasonable approximation.
1267:
1268: \immediate\closeout1
1269: \bigbreak\bigskip
1270:
1271: \line{\twelvebf References. \hfil}
1272: \nobreak\medskip\vskip\parskip
1273:
1274: \input refs
1275:
1276: \vskip 1in
1277:
1278: \input epsf
1279: \epsfxsize 3truein
1280: \centerline{\epsffile{GL.eps}}
1281: \bigskip
1282: \noindent
1283: Figure 1. The critical Ginzburg-Landau
1284: parameter $\kappa_c$ vs. the parameter $\rho$.
1285: \bigskip
1286:
1287: \vskip 2in
1288:
1289: \input epsf
1290: \epsfxsize 3truein
1291: \centerline{\epsffile{solution.eps}}
1292: \bigskip
1293: \noindent
1294: Figure 2. The solutions to the Ginzburg-Landau equations (\eqfrion)
1295: for $\rho=-{1\over 2}$
1296: and $\kappa=0.589$. The solid line represents the
1297: colour-flavour locked component,
1298: ${1\over 3}(u+2v)$, the dashed line represents the
1299: colour-flavour octet component,
1300: ${2\over\sqrt{3}}(v-u)$ and the dotted line the
1301: colour-magnetic field, $A^\prime$.
1302: \bigskip
1303:
1304: \vfil\end
1305:
1306: \bye
1307:
1308:
1309:
1310:
1311:
1312:
1313:
1314:
1315:
1316:
1317:
1318:
1319:
1320:
1321:
1322:
1323:
1324:
1325:
1326:
1327: