1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %\documentstyle[aps,axodraw,epsfig,multicol]{revtex}
3: \documentstyle[12pt,axodraw,epsfig]{article}
4: %\documentclass[a4,12pt]{article}
5: %\usepackage{graphicx,psfrag,amssymb,cite}
6: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
7:
8: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
9: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}
10: \newcommand{\cita} [1] {$^{\hbox{\scriptsize \cite{#1}}}$}
11: %
12: \newcommand{\prepr}[1] {\begin{flushright} {\bf #1} \end{flushright} \vskip 1.cm}
13: %
14: \newcommand{\titul}[1] {\boldmath \begin{center}{\Large {\bf #1 } } \end{center}
15: \vskip 0.8cm}
16:
17: \newcommand{\autor}[1] {\begin{center} {\bf \lineskip .3cm #1 }
18: \end{center} }
19:
20: \newcommand{\lugar}[1] {\begin{center} {\normalsize \bf \it #1 } \end{center}}
21: %
22: \newcommand{\abstr}[1] {{\begin{center} \vskip .5cm {\bf \large Abstract
23: \vspace{0pt}} \end{center}}\begin{quote} \small #1
24: \end{quote}}
25: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
26: \topmargin=-10mm
27: \textheight=225mm
28: \textwidth=170mm
29: %\baselineskip 1.5\baselineskip
30: %\double
31: %\hoffset -0.65in
32: \def \baselinestretch{1.0}
33: \oddsidemargin=-6mm
34: \evensidemargin=-6mm
35: \newcounter{muni}
36: \newenvironment{remunerate}{\begin{list}
37: { {\bf \arabic{muni}.}}{\usecounter{muni}
38: \setlength{\leftmargin}{3pt}\setlength{\itemindent}{17pt}}}{\end{list}}
39: %------------ der feynman slash ---------------
40: \makeatletter
41: \def\fmslash{\@ifnextchar[{\fmsl@sh}{\fmsl@sh[0mu]}}
42: \def\fmsl@sh[#1]#2{%
43: \mathchoice
44: {\@fmsl@sh\displaystyle{#1}{#2}}%
45: {\@fmsl@sh\textstyle{#1}{#2}}%
46: {\@fmsl@sh\scriptstyle{#1}{#2}}%
47: {\@fmsl@sh\scriptscriptstyle{#1}{#2}}}
48: \def\@fmsl@sh#1#2#3{\m@th\ooalign{$\hfil#1\mkern#2/\hfil$\crcr$#1#3$}}
49: \makeatother
50: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
51: \pagestyle{plain}
52: \begin{document}
53: \hbadness=10000
54: \pagenumbering{arabic}
55: \begin{titlepage}
56:
57: \prepr{hep-ph/0306045\\
58: \hspace{30mm} KIAS--P03035 \\
59: \hspace{30mm} June 2003}
60: %
61:
62: \begin{center}
63: \titul{\bf Searching for a very light Higgs boson \\
64: at the Tevatron}
65:
66: \autor{A.G. Akeroyd\footnote{akeroyd@kias.re.kr}}
67: \lugar{Korea Institute for Advanced Study,
68: 207-43 Cheongryangri 2-dong,\\ Dongdaemun-gu,
69: Seoul 130-722, Republic of Korea}
70:
71:
72: \end{center}
73:
74: \vskip2.0cm
75:
76: \begin{abstract}
77: \noindent
78: Light Higgs bosons ($h^0$) with a mass below 60 GeV
79: may have escaped detection at LEP due to a suppressed
80: cross--section for $e^+e^-\to Zh^0$. Their discovery is also problematic
81: in standard search channels at the Tevatron Run II and LHC.
82: Such a $h^0$ can arise in the
83: two Higgs doublet model (2HDM) and in the Minimal
84: Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) with explicit CP violating phases.
85: We propose the mechanism $p\overline p \to H^\pm h^0$ which offers
86: cross--sections of up to 500 fb in the 2HDM, or up to 100 fb in the MSSM.
87: The possibility of a large branching ratio for $H^\pm\to h^0W^\pm$
88: would give rise to the non--standard signature
89: $h^0h^0W^\pm$ which might facilitate detection.
90:
91:
92: \end{abstract}
93:
94: \vskip1.0cm
95: {\bf PACS index :12.60.Fr,14.80.Cp}
96: \vskip1.0cm
97: {\bf Keywords : Higgs boson\small }
98: \end{titlepage}
99: \thispagestyle{empty}
100: \newpage
101:
102: \pagestyle{plain}
103: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\arabic{footnote} }
104: \setcounter{footnote}{0}
105:
106: \section{Introduction}
107: The quest for Higgs bosons is of utmost importance at high energy
108: colliders \cite{Carena:2002es}. The Standard Model (SM)
109: predicts one neutral Higgs boson ($\phi^0$) for which a
110: lower limit on its mass $m_{\phi^0}> 114$ GeV has been obtained
111: by direct searches at LEP2 in the production channel
112: $e^+e^-\to \phi^0Z$ \cite{Hagiwara:fs}.
113: For the lightest CP--even Higgs boson ($h^0$) of the
114: Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) the
115: analogous mechanism $e^+e^-\to h^0Z$ has
116: a mixing angle suppression of $\sin^2(\beta-\alpha)$
117: relative to the cross--section for $\phi^0$. However,
118: this factor is close to 1 in most of the allowed
119: supersymmetric (SUSY) parameter space, and
120: even if $\sin^2(\beta-\alpha)$ is suppressed, the complementary channel
121: $e^+e^-\to h^0A^0 \sim \cos^2(\beta-\alpha)$ can be used.
122: Combining these two search mechanisms enabled LEP to obtain the
123: bound $m_{h^0}> 90$ GeV in the MSSM \cite{Hagiwara:fs}.
124:
125: Nevertheless, much weaker numerical bounds
126: apply to the lightest neutral CP--even Higgs boson $h^0$ in
127: a general (non--supersymmetric)
128: two Higgs doublet model (2HDM) \cite{Kalinowski:1988sp}.
129: Here the factor $\sin^2(\beta-\alpha)$
130: is a free parameter and merely taking $\sin(\beta-\alpha)<0.1$
131: reduces the direct search bound to $m_{h^0}> 20$ GeV \cite{Abbiendi:2000ug}.
132: Hence a very light $h^0$ ($m_{h^0}<< 100$ GeV) is not excluded by
133: direct searches and is also entirely consistent with
134: electroweak precision fits \cite{Chankowski:2000an}.
135: In the MSSM case the above bound $m_{h^0}>90$ GeV
136: can be weakened in specific regions of parameter space
137: if explicit CP violating phases are present
138: in some SUSY parameters. In this scenario the
139: CP--even and CP--odd scalar fields mix
140: resulting in three mass eigenstates $h_1,h_2,h_3$ which are
141: now not definite eigenstates of CP \cite{Pilaftsis:1998dd},
142: \cite{Demir:1999hj}. The coupling $h_1ZZ$ can be very suppressed,
143: thus debilitating the LEP searches in the channel $e^+e^-\to h_1Z$.
144: In addition, the complementary search channel $e^+e^-\to h_1h_2$
145: can be rendered ineffective due to the dominance of the
146: experimentally challenging decay $h_{2}\to h_1h_1$.
147: If the CP violating phases are large ($> \pi/3$), and other
148: SUSY parameters are chosen to enhance the scalar--pseudoscalar
149: mixing (called the ``CPX scenario'' in \cite{Carena:2002bb}),
150: there remains a region $m_{h_1}<60$ GeV, $3 < \tan\beta < 5$ and
151: $120< m_{H^\pm} < 130$ GeV which was not covered by LEP and
152: will remain elusive in all standard search channels
153: at both the Tevatron Run II and LHC \cite{Carena:2002bb}.
154: A high energy $e^+e^-$ linear collider operating at $\sqrt s=500$ GeV
155: would provide much improved coverage of this region via
156: $e^+e^-\to h_1Z$ and $e^+e^-\to h_1h_2$ \cite{Akeroyd:2001kt}.
157:
158: In the meantime, it is of interest to seek alternative
159: production mechanisms for a very light $h^0$
160: (of the 2HDM) and $h_1$ (of the MSSM) at existing
161: colliders such as the Tevatron Run II.\footnote{We will not be concerned
162: with a very light pseudoscalar $A^0$ which has zero tree--level coupling
163: $A^0ZZ$ -- see \cite{Larios:2001ma}.}
164: Recently, diffractive Higgs production, $p\overline p\to p\overline p
165: h_1$, has been suggested \cite{Cox:2003xp} which can lead to
166: sizeable cross--sections
167: in the MSSM case of order 100 fb for $m_{h_1}< 20$ GeV.
168: This mechanism might offer a favourable signal/background ratio,
169: but requires suitable proton tagging detectors to be installed.
170: In this paper we suggest an additional production process,
171: $p\overline p\to H^\pm h_1,H^\pm h^0$, which is unsuppressed in the
172: above elusive parameter space.
173: This mechanism was first proposed in \cite{Akeroyd:2003bt} in the context of
174: light fermiophobic Higgs bosons ($h_f$)
175: with enhanced $h_f\to \gamma\gamma$ decays, and in this paper
176: we consider its application to the above scenarios of a light
177: $h^0$ and $h_1$.
178: We will show that $\sigma(p\overline p\to H^\pm h_1,H^\pm h^0$)
179: can be comparable in size to the
180: diffractive production mechanism, and that the branching ratio (BR)
181: for $H^\pm\to h_1W^\pm,h^0W^\pm$ can be large
182: in the parameter space of interest, which would lead to the
183: non--standard signature of $h^0h^0W^\pm$. Given the importance of finding
184: unsuppressed mechanisms for producing a very light
185: $h^0$ or $h_1$, the process $p\overline p\to H^\pm h^0 \to h^0h^0W^\pm$
186: possibly merits a detailed experimental simulation.
187:
188: In section 2 we introduce the mechanism $p\overline p\to H^\pm h^0(h_1)$,
189: section 3 presents our numerical results with conclusions in section 4.
190:
191: \section{The mechanism $p\overline p\to H^\pm h^0$}
192: The cross--section for the process $p\overline p\to H^\pm h^0$
193: \cite{Akeroyd:2003bt} depends on three input parameters:
194: $m_{h^0}$, $m_{H^\pm}$ and the coupling $|W^\pm H^\pm h^0|^2$.
195:
196: \begin{center}
197: \vspace{-40pt} \hfill \\
198: \hspace{1cm}
199: \begin{picture}(200,70)(0,25) % y_2 controls equation position
200: %
201: \Photon(60,25)(118,25){4}{8}
202: \ArrowLine(10,55)(60,25)
203: \ArrowLine(60,25)(10,-5)
204: \DashLine(168,-5)(118,25){3}
205: \DashLine(118,25)(168,55){3}
206: \Text(2,55)[]{$u$}
207: \Text(2,-5)[]{$\overline d$}
208: \Text(184,-2)[]{$h^0,h_1$}
209: \Text(179,55)[]{$H^{+}$}
210: \Text(90,38)[]{$W^{+}$}
211: %
212: \end{picture}
213: \end{center}
214: \vspace{1cm}
215: This mechanism has been disregarded as an effective way of producing
216: $h^0$ and/or $H^\pm$ at hadron colliders (e.g. Tevatron).
217: This view is justified in the MSSM {\it without} explicit
218: CP violating phases in the SUSY parameters. A small
219: $\sigma(p\overline p\to H^\pm h^0)$ is ensured since
220: the coupling $|W^\pm H^\pm h^0|^2$
221: $\sim \cos^2(\beta-\alpha)$ is suppressed in the
222: MSSM parameter space for $m_{A^0}> m_Z$.
223: %In addition, with the dominant Higgs boson decays being
224: %$h^0\to b\overline b$ and
225: %$H^\pm\to \tau^\pm\nu_{\tau}$ (for $m_{H^\pm}< m_t+m_b$), the background is
226: %expected to be much larger than the signal.
227: In addition, the phase space suppression is substantial at Tevatron energies
228: due to the current lower bounds of $m_{h^0}\ge 90$ GeV and
229: $m_{H^\pm}\ge 120$ GeV. However,
230: $\sigma(p\overline p\to H^\pm h^0)$ is much larger
231: if the following conditions are fulfilled \cite{Akeroyd:2003bt}:
232: \begin{itemize}
233:
234: \item[{(i)}] There is little or no mixing angle suppression
235: in the coupling $|W^\pm H^\pm h^0|^2$
236:
237: \item[{(ii)}] $h^0$ is very light
238:
239: \end{itemize}
240: Both these conditions are satisfied in the MSSM elusive parameter space
241: of a light $h_1$ with suppressed coupling $ZZh_1$.
242: %Condition (i) is a consequence of the very suppressed
243: %coupling $ZZh_1$. Condition (ii) ensures that BR$(h_2\to h_1h_1)$ is
244: %large, which renders ineffective searches in the channel
245: %$e^+e^-\to h_1h_2$.
246: %If the CP violating phase in $\mu A_t$ is large ($> \pi/3$), and other
247: %SUSY parameters are chosen to enhance the scalar--pseudoscalar
248: %mixing (called the ``CPX scenario'' in \cite{Carena:2002bb}),
249: %there remains a region $m_{h_1}<60$ GeV, $3 < \tan\beta < 5$ and
250: %$120< m_{H^\pm} < 130$ GeV which was not covered by LEP and
251: %will remain elusive in all standard search channels
252: %at both the Tevatron Run II and LHC \cite{Carena:2002bb}.
253: In a 2HDM the condition for a light, undetected $h^0$ is merely that
254: the coupling $ZZh^0$ is small. This corresponds to taking small
255: values of $\sin^2(\beta-\alpha)$ which maximizes the coupling
256: $|W^\pm H^\pm h^0|^2$ $\sim \cos^2(\beta-\alpha)$.
257: In both these scenarios the processes $p\overline p\to H^\pm h^0$
258: and $p\overline p\to H^\pm h_1$ are not so suppressed, and thus
259: this mechanism may offer a chance of probing the problematic
260: parameter space.
261:
262: In \cite{Akeroyd:2003bt}
263: this mechanism was applied to a special case of the 2HDM
264: with a light fermiophobic Higgs, $h_f$, which has a large
265: BR$(h_f\to \gamma\gamma$) and thus a relatively high
266: experimental detection efficiency.
267: It was shown that $p\overline p\to H^\pm h_f$ at Tevatron energies
268: can offer cross--sections
269: $> 100$ fb for $m_{H^\pm}< 100$ GeV
270: and $m_{h_f}=50$ GeV. In the two scenarios
271: of interest in this paper the dominant decay of $h^0$ and $h_1$ is
272: to $b$ quarks, ($h^0,h_1\to b\overline b$), and assuming
273: $H^\pm\to \tau^\pm\nu_{\tau}$ the experimental signature of
274: $b\overline b \tau\nu_{\tau}$ would suffer from
275: a much larger background than in the fermiophobic case.
276: We are not aware of an experimental simulation although this
277: may become available soon for the case of the related process
278: $p\overline p\to H^\pm A^0$, where $m_A>90$ GeV was assumed
279: \cite{Kanemura:2001hz}.
280: Hence it is not clear at this stage if $p\overline p\to H^\pm h^0$
281: would be observable above the background even
282: if $\sigma(p\overline p\to H^\pm h^0$) were sizeable ($>100$ fb).
283: Nevertheless, given the need to probe the problematic
284: parameter space we believe it is beneficial to give a numerical
285: estimation of $\sigma(p\overline p \to H^\pm h^0$)
286: in both the above scenarios. Interestingly, we will show that
287: BR($H^\pm\to h^0W^\pm$) can be large,
288: which would give rise to the non--standard signature of $h^0h^0W^\pm$
289: and might ameliorate the signal--background situation.
290:
291: In order for $p\overline p\to H^\pm h^0$ to be maximized, $H^\pm$ should
292: not be too heavy. It is known that the rare decay $b\to s\gamma$
293: imposes strong
294: lower bounds on $m_{H^\pm}$ in the 2HDM (Model II), but
295: these are easily avoided in Model I for $\tan\beta>1$
296: \cite{Borzumati:1998tg}. For Model II type fermionic couplings one has
297: $m_{H^\pm}>200$ GeV \cite{Borzumati:1998tg},
298: which would render $\sigma(p\overline p\to H^\pm h^0$)
299: small at Tevatron energies.
300: A caveat here is that this bound can be weakened to the current
301: direct search limits ($m_{H^\pm} > 80$ GeV)
302: if CP violating phases are added in the 2HDM
303: \cite{Bowser-Chao:1998yp}, or in a model with more than 2
304: Higgs doublets \cite{Borzumati:1998xr},\cite{Grossman:1994jb}.
305: Given these possibilities, in our analysis for the 2HDM we will
306: consider $m_{H^\pm}$ as light as 90 GeV.
307: In the MSSM it is known that $b\to s\gamma$ constraints depend strongly
308: on the flavour sector and $120$ GeV $< m_{H^\pm} <130$ GeV (corresponding
309: to the elusive region) is permissible parameter space.
310:
311:
312: \section{Numerical Results}
313: We will show results for $\sigma(p\overline p\to H^\pm h^0$) for a
314: light $h^0$ in the 2HDM. The angular factor $\cos^2(\beta-\alpha)$
315: arising from the squared coupling $|W^\pm H^\pm h^0|^2$
316: is close to 1 in the parameter space of interest of
317: $\sin^2(\beta-\alpha)<< 1$, and for definiteness we take
318: 0.97. The cross--section for
319: $h_1$ in the problematic parameter space in the MSSM
320: can be obtained from the 2HDM cross--section by
321: taking $m_{h_1}$ and $m_{H^\pm}$ to lie in the elusive region
322: $m_{h_1}\le 60$ GeV, 120 GeV $\le m_{H^\pm}\le 130$ GeV.
323: We calculate the coupling $|W^\pm H^\pm h_1|^2$ in this region
324: by using the public code cph.f \cite{pilaftsis:cph}
325: (which was used in \cite{Carena:2002bb})
326: and find $|W^\pm H^\pm h_1|^2\ge 0.95$, which is consistent
327: with our choice of 0.97 used above. We sum over the rates for
328: $\sigma(p\overline p\to H^+ h^0$) and $\sigma(p\overline p\to H^- h^0$),
329: and use the Martin-Roberts-Stirling-Thorne parton distribution
330: functions (MRST2002) from \cite{Martin:2001es}.
331: In Fig.1 we plot $\sigma(p\overline p\to H^\pm h^0$) as a
332: function of $m_{h^0}$, for $10$ GeV$ < m_{h^0} < 90$ GeV.
333: Note that we are considering smaller $m_{h^0}$ than in
334: \cite{Akeroyd:2003bt}, which took $m_{h^0}> 50$ GeV.
335: We plot several curves corresponding to different
336: values of $m_{H^\pm}$. For the lightest values of the
337: Higgs masses ($m_{h^0}=10$ GeV and $m_{H^\pm}=90$ GeV) we obtain
338: cross--sections as large as 450 fb. The MSSM result can be read
339: off from the curve for $m_{H^\pm}=127$ GeV and
340: $10$ GeV $< m_{h_1} < 60$ GeV, which gives cross--sections of
341: $100$ fb $\to 60$ fb.
342: \begin{figure}
343: \centerline{\protect\hbox{\epsfig{file=fig1.ps,
344: width=0.50\textwidth,angle=0}}}
345: \caption{\it Production cross--section $\sigma(p\overline p\to H^\pm h^0$)
346: at the Tevatron as a function of $m_{h^0}$ for various values of $m_{H^\pm}$,
347: without including QCD enhancement factor of 1.3.}
348: \label{cs_all_tb}
349: \end{figure}
350: We note that a further enhancement of
351: $\sigma(p\overline p\to H^\pm h^0$) comes from the
352: the QCD correction factor of 1.3 \cite{Dawson:1998py} which we
353: have not included in Fig.1.
354: The cross--sections for the MSSM case are smaller than those for the
355: diffractive production mechanism \cite{Cox:2003xp} if
356: $m_{h_1} < 20$ GeV, but are larger if $m_{h_1}> 20$ GeV.
357:
358: \begin{figure}
359: \centerline{\protect\hbox{\epsfig{file=fig2.ps,
360: width=0.50\textwidth,angle=0}}}
361: \caption{\it BR$(H^\pm\to h^0W^\pm)$ as a function of $m_{h^0}$
362: for various values of $m_{H^\pm}$.}
363: \label{cs_all_tb}
364: \end{figure}
365:
366: BR$(H^\pm\to h^0W^\pm)$ can be very large when $h^0$ is light.
367: Previous analyses of this decay mode have been performed
368: in the (CP conserving) MSSM
369: \cite{Moretti:1994ds}, 2HDM (Model II) \cite{Borzumati:1998xr},
370: and 2HDM (Model I) \cite{Akeroyd:1998dt}.
371: For $m_{H^\pm}< m_t+m_b$ of interest to us, the dominant competing
372: decay is $H^\pm\to \tau^\pm\nu_{\tau}$
373: whose rate is proportional to $\tan^2\beta$ for Model II type
374: fermionic couplings on which we will focus. In Fig.2 we take
375: $\tan\beta=4.2$ for all curves, which is inside the problematic interval
376: of $3 < \tan\beta < 5$ in the MSSM case.
377: %Note that this differs from
378: %the values $\tan\beta=1,2$ taken in \cite{Borzumati:1998xr}, and
379: %the decay can proceed on shell which is not permitted in the
380: We find BR$(H^\pm\to h^0W^\pm)>80\%$ for the MSSM curve of
381: $m_{H^\pm}=127$ GeV if $m_{h_1}< 40$ GeV. Thus $H^\pm$ decays
382: dominantly in this non--standard way in most of the
383: elusive parameter space.
384: In the 2HDM case, the lighter values of $m_{H^\pm}$ (which
385: have the largest cross--sections)
386: correspond to smaller, but still sizeable BR$(H^\pm\to h^0W^\pm)$.
387: This decay would lead to a signature of
388: $h^0h^0W^\pm$, followed by $h^0\to b\overline b$.
389: A detailed signal to background simulation would be needed to evaluate
390: the detection prospects in this channel.
391: Given the reasonable cross--sections
392: we encourage experimental simulations.
393: We note that some studies of the detection prospects
394: of $H^\pm\to h^0W^\pm$ decays have been performed
395: for LHC energies in the
396: context of the Next to Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model
397: (NMSSM), which may also have a large BR$(H^\pm\to h^0W^\pm)$
398: \cite{Drees:1999sb}.
399: Here the production mechanism $pp\to H^\pm tb$
400: was used, and promising signal/background ratios were obtained
401: when BR$(H^\pm\to h^0W^\pm)$ is large.
402: We are not aware of any such simulations at Tevatron energies.
403: We note that the analogous mechanism at the Tevatron $p\overline p
404: \to H^\pm tb$, followed by $H^\pm\to h^0W^\pm$ decay
405: could also be used for the scenario of a light $h^0$ and $h_1$.
406: Here $\sigma(p\overline p
407: \to H^\pm tb$) is around $50 \to 100$ fb \cite{Carena:2000yx}
408: for the MSSM elusive region of
409: 120 GeV $< m_{H^\pm} <130$ GeV and $3 < \tan\beta <5$.
410: These cross--sections are comparable to those of our proposed channel
411: $p\overline p\to H^\pm h_1$.
412:
413: \section{Conclusions}
414: A very light ($< 60$ GeV) Higgs boson $h^0$ would
415: have escaped detection at LEP if the coupling $h^0ZZ$ were suppressed.
416: Searching for such a Higgs boson at the Tevatron Run II and the LHC
417: in standard channels is also problematic.
418: We considered two models which may provide such a $h^0$;
419: the 2HDM and the MSSM with SUSY sources of CP violation (the
420: latter for a very specific parameter choice).
421: We showed that the mechanism $p\overline p\to H^\pm h^0$
422: at the Tevatron Run II offers
423: sizeable cross--sections of up to 500 fb in the 2HDM
424: and 100 fb in the MSSM. The possibility of a large branching ratio for
425: $H^\pm\to h^0W^\pm$ would lead to the non--standard
426: $h^0h^0W^\pm$ signature. Given the reasonable cross--sections
427: we encourage experimental simulations of this production
428: mechanism for a light $h^0$.
429:
430: %\section*{Acknowledgements}
431:
432:
433: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
434:
435: %\cite{Carena:2002es}
436: \bibitem{Carena:2002es}
437: For a recent review see: M.~Carena and H.~E.~Haber,
438: %``Higgs boson theory and phenomenology,''
439: Prog.\ Part.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf 50}, 63 (2003)
440: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0208209].
441: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0208209;%%
442:
443: %\cite{Hagiwara:fs}
444: \bibitem{Hagiwara:fs}
445: K.~Hagiwara {\it et al.} [Particle Data Group Collaboration],
446: %``Review Of Particle Physics,''
447: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 010001 (2002)
448: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D66,010001;%%
449: %\cite{Pilaftsis:1998dd}
450:
451: %\cite{Kalinowski:1988sp}
452: \bibitem{Kalinowski:1988sp}
453: J.~Kalinowski and S.~Pokorski,
454: %``Higgs Particle Production At Lep In Multidoublet Scenarios
455: %With Hierarchy Of The Vacuum Expectation Values,''
456: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 219}, 116 (1989)
457: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B219,116;%%
458:
459: %\cite{Abbiendi:2000ug}
460: \bibitem{Abbiendi:2000ug}
461: G.~Abbiendi {\it et al.} [OPAL Collaboration],
462: %``Two Higgs doublet model and model independent interpretation of
463: %neutral Higgs boson searches,''
464: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 18}, 425 (2001)
465: %[arXiv:hep-ex/0007040].
466: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0007040;%%
467:
468: %\cite{Chankowski:2000an}
469: \bibitem{Chankowski:2000an}
470: P.~Chankowski, T.~Farris, B.~Grzadkowski, J.~F.~Gunion,
471: J.~Kalinowski and M.~Krawczyk,
472: %``Do precision electroweak constraints guarantee e+ e- collider discovery
473: % of at least one Higgs boson of a two Higgs doublet model?,''
474: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 496}, 195 (2000);
475: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0009271].
476: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0009271;%%
477: %\cite{Chankowski:1999ta}
478: %\bibitem{Chankowski:1999ta}
479: P.~H.~Chankowski, M.~Krawczyk and J.~Zochowski,
480: %``Implications of the precision data for very light Higgs
481: %boson scenario in 2HDM(II),''
482: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 11}, 661 (1999)
483: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9905436].
484: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9905436;%%
485:
486: \bibitem{Pilaftsis:1998dd}
487: A.~Pilaftsis,
488: %``Higgs scalar-pseudoscalar mixing in the minimal supersymmetric
489: %standard model,''
490: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 435}, 88 (1998);
491: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9805373].
492: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9805373;%%
493: %\cite{Pilaftsis:1998pe}
494: %\bibitem{Pilaftsis:1998pe}
495: A.~Pilaftsis,
496: %``CP-odd tadpole renormalization of Higgs scalar-pseudoscalar mixing,''
497: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 58}, 096010 (1998);
498: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9803297].
499: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9803297;%%
500: A.~Pilaftsis and C.~E.~Wagner,
501: %``Higgs bosons in the minimal supersymmetric standard model with
502: %explicit CP violation,''
503: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 553}, 3 (1999);
504: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9902371].
505: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9902371;%%
506: M.~Carena, J.~R.~Ellis, A.~Pilaftsis and C.~E.~Wagner,
507: %``Renormalization-group-improved effective potential for the MSSM Higgs
508: %sector with explicit CP violation,''
509: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 586}, 92 (2000);
510: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0003180].
511: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0003180;%%
512: M.~Carena, J.~R.~Ellis, A.~Pilaftsis and C.~E.~Wagner,
513: %``CP-violating MSSM Higgs bosons in the light of LEP 2,''
514: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 495}, 155 (2000);
515: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0009212].
516: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0009212;%%
517: M.~Carena, J.~R.~Ellis, A.~Pilaftsis and C.~E.~Wagner,
518: %``Higgs-boson pole masses in the MSSM with explicit CP violation,''
519: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 625}, 345 (2002)
520: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0111245].
521: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0111245;%%
522:
523: %\cite{Demir:1999hj}
524: \bibitem{Demir:1999hj}
525: D.~A.~Demir,
526: %``Effects of the supersymmetric phases on the neutral Higgs sector,''
527: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 055006 (1999);
528: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9901389].
529: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9901389;%%
530: %\cite{Choi:2000wz}
531: %\bibitem{Choi:2000wz}
532: S.~Y.~Choi, M.~Drees and J.~S.~Lee,
533: %``Loop corrections to the neutral Higgs boson sector of
534: %the MSSM with explicit CP violation,''
535: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 481}, 57 (2000);
536: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0002287].
537: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0002287;%%
538: %\cite{Choi:2001iu}
539: %\bibitem{Choi:2001iu}
540: S.~Y.~Choi, K.~Hagiwara and J.~S.~Lee,
541: %``Observability of the lightest MSSM Higgs boson with
542: %explicit CP violation via gluon fusion at the LHC,''
543: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 529}, 212 (2002);
544: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0110138].
545: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0110138;%%
546: %\cite{Ibrahim:2000qj}
547: %\bibitem{Ibrahim:2000qj}
548: T.~Ibrahim and P.~Nath,
549: %``Corrections to the Higgs boson masses and mixings from chargino,
550: %W and charged Higgs exchange loops and large CP phases,''
551: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 63}, 035009 (2001);
552: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0008237].
553: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0008237;%%
554: %\cite{Ibrahim:2002zk}
555: %\bibitem{Ibrahim:2002zk}
556: T.~Ibrahim and P.~Nath,
557: %``Neutralino exchange corrections to the Higgs boson
558: %mixings with explicit CP violation,''
559: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 66}, 015005 (2002);
560: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0204092].
561: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0204092;%%
562: %\cite{Arhrib:2001pg}
563: %\bibitem{Arhrib:2001pg}
564: A.~Arhrib, D.~K.~Ghosh and O.~C.~Kong,
565: %``Observing CP violating MSSM Higgs bosons at hadron colliders?,''
566: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 537}, 217 (2002)
567: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0112039].
568: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0112039;%%
569:
570: %\cite{Carena:2002bb}
571: \bibitem{Carena:2002bb}
572: M.~Carena, J.~Ellis, S.~Mrenna, A.~Pilaftsis and C.~E.~Wagner,
573: %``Collider probes of the MSSM Higgs sector with explicit CP violation,''
574: arXiv:hep-ph/0211467
575: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0211467;%%
576:
577: %\cite{Akeroyd:2001kt}
578: \bibitem{Akeroyd:2001kt}
579: A.~G.~Akeroyd and A.~Arhrib,
580: %``Probing scalar pseudoscalar mixing in the CP violating MSSM at
581: %high-energy e+ e- colliders,''
582: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64}, 095018 (2001)
583: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0107040].
584: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0107040;%%
585:
586:
587: %\cite{Larios:2001ma}
588: \bibitem{Larios:2001ma}
589: F.~Larios, G.~Tavares-Velasco and C.~P.~Yuan,
590: %``A very light CP-odd scalar in the two-Higgs-doublet model,''
591: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 64}, 055004 (2001);
592: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0103292].
593: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0103292;%%
594: %\cite{Anderson:2003bj}
595: %\bibitem{Anderson:2003bj}
596: D.~L.~Anderson, C.~D.~Carone and M.~Sher,
597: %``Probing the light pseudoscalar window,''
598: arXiv:hep-ph/0303215.
599: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0303215;%%
600:
601: %\cite{Cox:2003xp}
602: \bibitem{Cox:2003xp}
603: B.~E.~Cox, J.~R.~Forshaw, J.~S.~Lee, J.~Monk and A.~Pilaftsis,
604: %``Observing a light CP-violating Higgs boson in diffraction,''
605: arXiv:hep-ph/0303206
606: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0303206;%%
607:
608: %\cite{Akeroyd:2003bt}
609: \bibitem{Akeroyd:2003bt}
610: A.~G.~Akeroyd and M.~A.~Diaz,
611: %``Searching for a light fermiophobic Higgs boson at the Tevatron,''
612: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67}, 095007 (2003)
613: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0301203].
614: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0301203;%%
615:
616: %\cite{Kanemura:2001hz}
617: \bibitem{Kanemura:2001hz}
618: S.~Kanemura and C.~P.~Yuan,
619: %``Testing supersymmetry in the
620: %associated production of CP-odd and charged Higgs bosons,''
621: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 530}, 188 (2002)
622: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0112165].
623: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0112165;%%
624:
625: %\cite{Borzumati:1998tg}
626: \bibitem{Borzumati:1998tg}
627: F.~M.~Borzumati and C.~Greub,
628: %``2HDMs predictions for anti-B $\to$ X/s gamma in NLO {QCD},''
629: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 58}, 074004 (1998);
630: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9802391].
631: %\cite{Borzumati:1998nx}
632: %\bibitem{Borzumati:1998nx}
633: F.~M.~Borzumati and C.~Greub,
634: %``Two Higgs doublet model predictions for anti-B $\to$ X/s gamma
635: %in NLO {QCD}. (Addendum),''
636: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 59}, 057501 (1999)
637: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9809438].
638: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9809438;%%
639:
640:
641: %\cite{Bowser-Chao:1998yp}
642: \bibitem{Bowser-Chao:1998yp}
643: D.~Bowser-Chao, K.~m.~Cheung and W.~Y.~Keung,
644: %``Phase effect of a general two-Higgs doublet model in b $\to$ s gamma,''
645: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 59}, 115006 (1999)
646: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9811235].
647: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9811235;%%
648:
649: %\cite{Borzumati:1998xr}
650: \bibitem{Borzumati:1998xr}
651: F.~M.~Borzumati and A.~Djouadi,
652: %``Lower bounds on charged Higgs bosons from LEP and Tevatron,''
653: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 549}, 170 (2002)
654: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9806301].
655: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9806301;%%
656:
657: %\cite{Grossman:1994jb}
658: \bibitem{Grossman:1994jb}
659: Y.~Grossman,
660: %``Phenomenology of models with more than two Higgs doublets,''
661: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 426}, 355 (1994);
662: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9401311].
663: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9401311;%%
664: %\cite{Albright:1979yc}
665: %\bibitem{Albright:1979yc}
666: C.~H.~Albright, J.~Smith and S.~H.~Tye,
667: %``Signatures For Charged Higgs Boson Production In E+ E- Collisions,''
668: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 21}, 711 (1980)
669: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D21,711;%%
670:
671: %\cite{pilaftsis:cph}
672: \bibitem{pilaftsis:cph}
673: The fortran code cph.f is available at http://home.cern.ch/p/pilaftsi/www
674:
675: %\cite{Martin:2001es}
676: \bibitem{Martin:2001es}
677: A.~D.~Martin, R.~G.~Roberts, W.~J.~Stirling and R.~S.~Thorne,
678: %``MRST2001: Partons and alpha(s) from precise deep
679: %inelastic scattering and Tevatron jet data,''
680: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 23}, 73 (2002)
681: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0110215].
682: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0110215;%%
683:
684:
685: \bibitem{Dawson:1998py}
686: S.~Dawson, S.~Dittmaier and M.~Spira,
687: %``Neutral Higgs-boson pair production at hadron colliders:
688: %{QCD} corrections,''
689: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 58}, 115012 (1998)
690: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9805244].
691: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9805244;%%
692:
693: %\cite{Moretti:1994ds}
694: \bibitem{Moretti:1994ds}
695: S.~Moretti and W.~J.~Stirling,
696: %``Contributions of below threshold decays to MSSM Higgs branching ratios,''
697: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 347}, 291 (1995)
698: [Erratum-ibid.\ B {\bf 366}, 451 (1996)];
699: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9412209].
700: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9412209;%%
701: %\cite{Djouadi:1995gv}
702: %\bibitem{Djouadi:1995gv}
703: A.~Djouadi, J.~Kalinowski and P.~M.~Zerwas,
704: %``Two- and Three-Body Decay Modes of SUSY Higgs Particles,''
705: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 70}, 435 (1996)
706: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9511342].
707: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9511342;%%
708:
709: %\cite{Akeroyd:1998dt}
710: \bibitem{Akeroyd:1998dt}
711: A.~G.~Akeroyd,
712: %``Three-body decays of Higgs bosons at LEP2 and application
713: %to a hidden fermiophobic Higgs,''
714: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 544}, 557 (1999)
715: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9806337].
716: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9806337;%%
717:
718: %\cite{Drees:1999sb}
719: \bibitem{Drees:1999sb}
720: M.~Drees, M.~Guchait and D.~P.~Roy,
721: %``Signature of charged to neutral Higgs boson decay at the
722: %LHC in SUSY models,''
723: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 471}, 39 (1999);
724: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9909266].
725: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9909266;%%
726: %\cite{Moretti:2000yg}
727: %\bibitem{Moretti:2000yg}
728: S.~Moretti,
729: %``The W+- h decay channel as a probe of charged Higgs boson
730: %production at the Large Hadron Collider,''
731: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 481}, 49 (2000);
732: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0003178].
733: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0003178;%%
734: %\cite{Assamagan:2002ne}
735: %\bibitem{Assamagan:2002ne}
736: K.~A.~Assamagan, Y.~Coadou and A.~Deandrea,
737: %``ATLAS discovery potential for a heavy charged Higgs boson,''
738: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ directC {\bf 4}, 9 (2002)
739: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0203121].
740: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0203121;%%
741: %\cite{Dawson:1998py}
742:
743: %\cite{Carena:2000yx}
744: \bibitem{Carena:2000yx}
745: M.~Carena {\it et al.} [Higgs Working Group Collaboration],
746: %``Report of the Tevatron Higgs working group,''
747: arXiv:hep-ph/0010338.
748: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0010338;%%
749:
750:
751:
752: \end{thebibliography}
753:
754: \end{document}
755:
756:
757:
758:
759:
760:
761:
762:
763: