1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
2: \usepackage{pdproc,epsfig}
3:
4: %--------------------START OF DATA FILE----------------------------------
5: \textwidth 6.0in
6: \textheight 8.6in
7: \pagestyle{empty}
8: \topmargin -0.25truein
9: \oddsidemargin 0.30truein
10: \evensidemargin 0.30truein
11: \parindent=1.5pc
12: \baselineskip=15pt
13: \begin{document}
14:
15: % put your own definitions here:
16: \newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}
17: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}
18: \newcommand{\bea}{\begin{eqnarray}}
19: \newcommand{\eea}{\end{eqnarray}}
20: \def\simlt{\buildrel < \over {_{\sim}}}
21: \def\simgt{\buildrel > \over {_{\sim}}}
22: \newcommand{\ttbs}{\char'134}
23: \newcommand{\AmS}{{\protect\the\textfont2
24: A\kern-.1667em\lower.5ex\hbox{M}\kern-.125emS}}
25: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\alph{footnote}}
26:
27:
28: \title{NEUTRINO MASS, FLAVOUR AND CP VIOLATION}
29:
30: \author{S.F.KING}
31:
32: \address{Department of Physics and Astronomy, \\
33: University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, U.K.
34: {\rm E-mail: sfk@hep.phys.soton.ac.uk}}
35:
36: \abstract{In this talk I discuss the connection between neutrino mass,
37: flavour and CP violation.
38: I focus on three neutrino
39: patterns of neutrino masses and mixing angles,
40: and the corresponding Majorana mass matrices.
41: I discuss the see-saw mechanism, and show how it may be applied
42: in a very natural way to give a neutrino mass hierarchy with
43: large atmospheric and solar angles by assuming
44: sequential right-handed neutrino dominance.
45: I then distinguish between heavy sequential dominance and
46: light sequential dominance, and show how lepton flavour
47: violation in the CMSSM provides a way to discriminate between
48: these two possibilities. I also show that for a well motivated class
49: of light sequential dominance models there is a link between
50: leptogenesis and CP violation measurable in neutrino oscillation experiments. }
51:
52: \normalsize\baselineskip=15pt
53:
54: \section{NEUTRINO MASSES AND MIXING ANGLES}
55:
56: There is by now strong evidence for neutrino oscillations in both the
57: atmospheric and solar neutrino sectors
58: \cite{bahcall,smirnov,mcdonald,asuzuki,kajita,ysuzuki,fogli}.
59: The minimal neutrino sector required to account for the
60: atmospheric and solar neutrino oscillation data consists of
61: three light physical neutrinos with left-handed flavour eigenstates,
62: $\nu_e$, $\nu_\mu$, and $\nu_\tau$, defined to be those states
63: that share the same electroweak doublet as the left-handed
64: charged lepton mass eigenstates.
65: Within the framework of three--neutrino oscillations,
66: the neutrino flavor eigenstates $\nu_e$, $\nu_\mu$, and $\nu_\tau$ are
67: related to the neutrino mass eigenstates $\nu_1$, $\nu_2$, and $\nu_3$
68: with mass $m_1$, $m_2$, and $m_3$, respectively, by a $3\times3$
69: unitary matrix $U$
70: \cite{pontecorvo,Maki:1962mu,Lee:1977qz}
71: \begin{equation}
72: \left(\begin{array}{c} \nu_e \\ \nu_\mu \\ \nu_\tau \end{array} \\ \right)=
73: \left(\begin{array}{ccc}
74: U_{e1} & U_{e2} & U_{e3} \\
75: U_{\mu1} & U_{\mu2} & U_{\mu3} \\
76: U_{\tau1} & U_{\tau2} & U_{\tau3} \\
77: \end{array}\right)
78: \left(\begin{array}{c} \nu_1 \\ \nu_2 \\ \nu_3 \end{array} \\ \right)
79: \; .
80: \end{equation}
81:
82: Assuming the light neutrinos are Majorana,
83: $U$ can be parameterized in terms of three mixing angles
84: $\theta_{ij}$ and three complex phases $\delta_{ij}$.
85: A unitary matrix has six phases but three of them are removed
86: by the phase symmetry of the charged lepton Dirac masses.
87: Since the neutrino masses are Majorana there is no additional
88: phase symmetry associated with them, unlike the case of quark
89: mixing where a further two phases may be removed.
90: The neutrino mixing matrix may be parametrised by
91: a product of three complex Euler rotations,
92: \begin{equation}
93: U=U_{23}U_{13}U_{12}
94: \end{equation}
95: where
96: \begin{equation}
97: U_{23}=
98: \left(\begin{array}{ccc}
99: 1 & 0 & 0 \\
100: 0 & c_{23} & s_{23}e^{-i\delta_{23}} \\
101: 0 & -s_{23}e^{i\delta_{23}} & c_{23} \\
102: \end{array}\right)
103: \end{equation}
104:
105: \begin{equation}
106: U_{13}=
107: \left(\begin{array}{ccc}
108: c_{13} & 0 & s_{13}e^{-i\delta_{13}} \\
109: 0 & 1 & 0 \\
110: -s_{13}e^{i\delta_{13}} & 0 & c_{13} \\
111: \end{array}\right)
112: \end{equation}
113:
114: \begin{equation}
115: U_{12}=
116: \left(\begin{array}{ccc}
117: c_{12} & s_{12}e^{-i\delta_{12}} & 0 \\
118: -s_{12}e^{i\delta_{12}} & c_{12} & 0\\
119: 0 & 0 & 1 \\
120: \end{array}\right)
121: \end{equation}
122:
123:
124: where $c_{ij} = \cos\theta_{ij}$ and $s_{ij} = \sin\theta_{ij}$.
125: Note that the allowed range of the angles is
126: $0\leq \theta_{ij} \leq \pi/2$.
127: Since we have assumed that the neutrinos are Majorana,
128: there are two extra phases, but only one combination
129: $\delta = \delta_{13}-\delta_{23}-\delta_{12}$
130: affects oscillations.
131:
132: Ignoring phases, the relation between
133: the neutrino flavor eigenstates $\nu_e$, $\nu_\mu$, and $\nu_\tau$ and
134: the neutrino mass eigenstates $\nu_1$, $\nu_2$, and $\nu_3$
135: is just given as a product of three Euler rotations as
136: depicted in Fig.\ref{angles}.
137:
138: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
139: \begin{figure}
140: \vspace*{13pt}
141: %\leftline{\hfill\vbox{\hrule width 5cm height0.001pt}\hfill}
142: \mbox{\epsfig{figure=angles.eps,width=16.0cm}}
143: \vspace*{1.4truein} %ORIGINAL SIZE=1.6TRUEIN x 100% - 0.2TRUEIN
144: %\leftline{\hfill\vbox{\hrule width 5cm height0.001pt}\hfill}
145: \caption{A graphical illustration of the neutrino mixing angles.
146: This figure ignores the phases
147: so that the neutrino mixing matrix is constructed
148: as a product of three Euler rotations $U=R_{23}R_{13}R_{12}$.
149: The atmospheric angle is $\theta_{23} \approx \pi/4$,
150: the CHOOZ angle is $\theta_{13} \simlt 0.2$, and the solar angle is
151: $\theta_{12} \approx \pi/6$.}
152: \label{angles}
153: \end{figure}
154: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
155:
156: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
157: \begin{figure}
158: \vspace*{13pt}
159: %\leftline{\hfill\vbox{\hrule width 5cm height0.001pt}\hfill}
160: \mbox{\epsfig{figure=slide1.eps,width=16.0cm}}
161: \vspace*{1.4truein} %ORIGINAL SIZE=1.6TRUEIN x 100% - 0.2TRUEIN
162: %\leftline{\hfill\vbox{\hrule width 5cm height0.001pt}\hfill}
163: \caption{Alternative neutrino mass
164: patterns that are consistent with neutrino
165: oscillation explanations of the atmospheric and solar data.
166: The absolute scale of neutrino masses is not
167: fixed by oscillation data
168: and the lightest neutrino mass may vary from 0.0-0.23 eV.}
169: \label{fig1}
170: \end{figure}
171: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
172:
173: There are basically two
174: patterns of neutrino mass squared orderings
175: consistent with the atmospheric and solar data as shown in
176: Fig.\ref{fig1}.
177:
178:
179: It is clear that neutrino oscillations, which
180: only depend on $\Delta m_{ij}^2\equiv m_i^2-m_j^2$,
181: give no information about the absolute value of the neutrino mass squared
182: eigenvalues $m_i^2$ in Fig.\ref{fig1}.
183: Recent results from the 2df galaxy redshift survey and WMAP
184: indicate that $\sum m_i <0.69 {\rm eV} (95\%C.L.)$
185: under certain mild assumptions \cite{Elgaroy:2002bi,Pierce:2003uh}.
186: Combined with the solar and atmospheric oscillation data
187: this brackets the heaviest neutrino mass to be
188: in the approximate range 0.05-0.23 eV. The fact that the mass of the
189: heaviest neutrino is known to within an order of magnitude represents
190: remarkable progress in neutrino physics over recent years.
191:
192:
193:
194: \section{CONSTRUCTING THE NEUTRINO MIXING MATRIX}
195:
196: From a model building perspective the neutrino
197: and charged lepton masses are given by the eigenvalues
198: of a complex charged lepton mass matrix
199: $m^E_{LR}$ and a complex symmetric neutrino Majorana matrix
200: $m_{LL}$, obtained by diagonalising these mass
201: matrices,
202: \beq
203: V^{E_L}m^E_{LR}{V^{E_R}}^{\dagger}=
204: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
205: m_e & 0 & 0 \\
206: 0 & m_{\mu} & 0 \\
207: 0 & 0 & m_{\tau}
208: \end{array}
209: \right)
210: \label{diag1}
211: \eeq
212: \beq
213: V^{\nu_L}m_{LL}{V^{\nu_L}}^T=
214: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
215: m_1 & 0 & 0 \\
216: 0 & m_2 & 0 \\
217: 0 & 0 & m_3
218: \end{array}
219: \right)
220: \label{diag2}
221: \eeq
222: where $V^{E_L}$, $V^{E_R}$, $V^{\nu_L}$ are unitary tranformations
223: on the left-handed charged lepton fields $E_L$, right-handed charged
224: lepton fields $E_R$, and left-handed neutrino fields $\nu_L$
225: which put the mass matrices into diagonal form with real
226: eigenvalues.
227:
228: The neutrino mixing matrix is then constructed by
229: \beq
230: U=V^{E_L}{V^{\nu_L}}^{\dagger}
231: \label{MNS}
232: \eeq
233:
234: The neutrino mixing matrix is constructed in Eq.\ref{MNS} as a product
235: of a unitary matrix from the charged lepton sector $V^{E_L}$
236: and a unitary matrix from the neutrino sector ${V^{\nu_L}}^{\dagger}$.
237: Each of these unitary matrices may be parametrised by its own
238: mixing angles and phases analagous to the parameters of $U$.
239: As shown in \cite{King:2002nf} the $U$ matrix can be expanded
240: in terms of neutrino and charged lepton mixing angles and phases
241: to leading order in the charged lepton mixing angles which
242: are assumed to be small,
243: \bea
244: s_{23}e^{-i\delta_{23}}
245: & \approx &
246: s_{23}^{\nu_L}e^{-i\delta_{23}^{\nu_L}}
247: -\theta_{23}^{E_L}
248: c_{23}^{\nu_L}e^{-i\delta_{23}^{E_L}}
249: \label{chlep23}
250: \\
251: \theta_{13}e^{-i\delta_{13}}
252: & \approx &
253: \theta_{13}^{\nu_L}e^{-i\delta_{13}^{\nu_L}}
254: -\theta_{13}^{E_L}c_{23}^{\nu_L}e^{-i\delta_{13}^{E_L}} \nonumber \\
255: & + &
256: \theta_{12}^{E_L}s_{23}^{\nu_L}e^{i(-\delta_{23}^{\nu_L}-\delta_{12}^{E_L})}
257: \label{chlep13}
258: \\
259: s_{12}e^{-i\delta_{12}}
260: & \approx &
261: s_{12}^{\nu_L}e^{-i\delta_{12}^{\nu_L}}
262: +\theta_{23}^{E_L}s_{12}^{\nu_L}e^{-i\delta_{12}^{\nu_L}}
263: \nonumber \\
264: & + & \theta_{13}^{E_L}
265: c_{12}^{\nu_L}s_{23}^{\nu_L}e^{i(\delta_{23}^{\nu_L}-\delta_{13}^{E_L})}
266: \nonumber \\
267: & - & \theta_{12}^{E_L}
268: c_{23}^{\nu_L}c_{12}^{\nu_L}e^{-i\delta_{12}^{E_L}}
269: \label{chlep12}
270: \eea
271: Clearly $\theta_{13}$
272: receives important contributions not just from $\theta_{13}^{\nu_L}$,
273: but also from the charged lepton angles
274: $\theta_{12}^{E_L}$, and $\theta_{13}^{E_L}$.
275: In models where $\theta_{13}^{\nu_L}$ is
276: extremely small, $\theta_{13}$ may originate almost entirely from
277: the charged lepton sector.
278: Charged lepton contributions could also be important in models
279: where $\theta_{12}^{\nu_L}=\pi /4$, since charged lepton mixing angles
280: may allow consistency with the LMA MSW solution.
281: Such effects are important for the inverted hierarchy model
282: \cite{King:2001ce,King:2002nf}.
283:
284: \section{NEUTRINO MAJORANA MASS MATRICES}
285:
286: For many (but not all) purposes it is convenient to forget about the
287: division between charged lepton and neutrino mixing angles and
288: work in a basis where the charged lepton mass matrix is diagonal.
289: Then the neutrino mixing
290: angles and phases simply correspond to the neutrino ones.
291: In this special basis the mass matrix is given from Eq.\ref{diag2} and
292: Eq.\ref{MNS} as
293: \beq
294: m_{LL}=
295: U
296: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
297: m_1 & 0 & 0 \\
298: 0 & m_2 & 0 \\
299: 0 & 0 & m_3
300: \end{array}
301: \right)
302: U^T
303: \label{mLLnu}
304: \eeq
305: For a given assumed form of $U$ and set of neutrino masses
306: $m_i$ one may use Eq.\ref{mLLnu} to ``derive'' the form of the neutrino
307: mass matrix $m_{LL}$, and this results in the candidate
308: mass matrices in Table \ref{table1} \cite{Barbieri:1998mq}.
309:
310:
311: \begin{table*}[htb]
312: {\small
313: \caption{Leading order low energy neutrino Majorana mass matrices
314: $m_{LL}$ consistent with large atmospheric and solar mixing angles,
315: classified according to the rate of neutrinoless double beta decay
316: and the pattern of neutrino masses.}
317: \label{table1}
318: \newcommand{\m}{\hphantom{$-$}}
319: \newcommand{\cc}[1]{\multicolumn{1}{c}{#1}}
320: \renewcommand{\tabcolsep}{2pc} % enlarge column spacing
321: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.2} % enlarge line spacing
322: \begin{tabular}{@{}|c|c|c|}
323: \hline
324: \hline
325: & Type I & Type II \\
326: & Small $\beta \beta_{0\nu}$ & Large $\beta \beta_{0\nu}$ \\
327: \hline
328: \hline
329: & & \\
330: A & $\beta \beta_{0\nu}\simlt 0.0082$ eV & \\
331: Normal hierarchy & & \\
332: $m_1^2,m_2^2\ll m_3^2$ &
333: $\left(
334: \begin{array}{ccc}
335: 0 & 0 & 0 \\
336: 0 & 1 & 1\\
337: 0 & 1 & 1 \\
338: \end{array}
339: \right)\frac{m}{2}$ & -- \\
340: & & \\
341: \hline
342: & & \\
343: B & $\beta \beta_{0\nu}\simlt
344: 0.0082$ eV & $\beta \beta_{0\nu}\simgt 0.0085$ eV\\
345: Inverted hierarchy & & \\
346: $m_1^2\approx m_2^2\gg m_3^2$ &
347: $\left(
348: \begin{array}{ccc}
349: 0 & 1 & 1 \\
350: 1 & 0 & 0\\
351: 1 & 0 & 0 \\
352: \end{array}
353: \right)\frac{m}{\sqrt{2}}$ &
354: $\left(
355: \begin{array}{ccc}
356: 1 & 0 & 0 \\
357: 0 & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2}\\
358: 0 & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2} \\
359: \end{array}
360: \right)m$
361: \\
362: & & \\
363: \hline
364: & & \\
365: C & &
366: $\beta \beta_{0\nu}\simgt 0.035$ eV \\
367: Approximate degeneracy & & diag(1,1,1)m\\
368: $m_1^2\approx m_2^2\approx m_3^2$ &
369: $\left(
370: \begin{array}{ccc}
371: 0 & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} & \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \\
372: \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2}\\
373: \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2} \\
374: \end{array}
375: \right)m$ &
376: $\left(
377: \begin{array}{ccc}
378: 1 & 0 & 0 \\
379: 0 & 0 & 1\\
380: 0 & 1 & 0 \\
381: \end{array}
382: \right)m$\\
383: & & \\
384: \hline
385: \hline
386: \end{tabular}\\[2pt]
387: }
388: \end{table*}
389:
390:
391:
392:
393: In Table \ref{table1} the mass matrices are classified into two types:
394:
395: Type I - small neutrinoless double beta decay
396:
397: Type II - large neutrinoless double beta decay
398:
399: They are also classified into the limiting cases consistent with the
400: mass squared orderings in Fig.\ref{fig1}:
401:
402: A - Normal hierarchy $m_1^2,m_2^2\ll m_3^2$
403:
404: B - Inverted hierarchy $m_1^2 \approx m_2^2 \gg m_3^2$
405:
406: C - Approximate degeneracy $m_1^2\approx m_2^2\approx m_3^2$
407:
408: Thus according to our classification there is only one neutrino
409: mass matrix consistent with the normal neutrino mass hierarchy which
410: we call Type IA, corresponding to the leading order neutrino masses
411: of the form $m_i=(0,0,m)$. For the inverted hierarchy there are two
412: cases, Type IB corresponding to $m_i=(m,-m,0)$ or Type IIB
413: corresponding to $m_i=(m,m,0)$. For the approximate degeneracy cases
414: there are three cases, Type IC correponding to $m_i=(m,-m,m)$
415: and two examples of Type IIC corresponding to either
416: $m_i=(m,m,m)$ or $m_i=(m,m,-m)$.
417:
418: At present experiment allows any of the matrices in Table
419: \ref{table1}. In future it will be possible to uniquely specify the
420: neutrino matrix in the following way:
421:
422: 1. Neutrinoless double beta effectively measures the 11 element
423: of the mass matrix $m_{LL}$ corresponding to
424: \beq
425: \beta \beta_{0\nu}\equiv \sum_iU_{ei}^2m_i
426: \eeq
427: and is clearly capable of resolving Type I from Type II cases
428: according to the bounds given in Table \ref{table1} \cite{Pascoli:2002xq}.
429: There has been a recent claim of a signal in neutrinoless double
430: beta decay correponding to $\beta \beta_{0\nu}=0.11-0.56$ eV at 95\% C.L.
431: \cite{Klapdor-Kleingrothaus:2001ke}.
432: However this claim has been criticised by two groups
433: \cite{Feruglio:2002af}, \cite{Aalseth:2002dt} and in turn this
434: criticism has been refuted \cite{Klapdor-Kleingrothaus:2002kf}.
435: Since the Heidelberg-Moscow experiment has almost reached its full
436: sensitivity, we may have to wait for a next generation experiment
437: such as GENIUS \cite{petcov} which is capable
438: of pushing down the sensitivity to 0.01 eV to resolve this question.
439:
440: 2. A neutrino factory will measure the sign of $\Delta m_{32}^2$
441: and resolve A from B \cite{peach}.
442:
443: 3. Tritium beta decay experiments are sensitive to C
444: since they
445: measure the ``electron neutrino mass'' defined by
446: \beq
447: |m_{\nu_e}|\equiv \sum_i|U_{ei}|^2|m_i|.
448: \eeq
449: For example the KATRIN \cite{weinheimer}
450: experiment has a proposed sensitivity of
451: 0.35 eV. As already mentioned the galaxy power spectrum combined with
452: solar and atmospheric oscillation data already limits the degenerate
453: neutrino mass to be less than about 0.6 eV, and this limit is also
454: expected to improve in the future. Also it is worth mentioning that
455: in future it may be possible to measure neutrino masses from
456: gamma ray bursts using time of flight techniques in principle down to
457: 0.001 eV \cite{Choubey:2002bh}.
458:
459: Type IIB and C involve small fractional
460: mass splittings $|\Delta m_{ij}^2| \ll m^2$ which are unstable
461: under radiative corrections, and even the most
462: natural Type IC case is difficult to implement.
463: Types IA and IB seem to be the most natural
464: and later we shall focus on the normal hierarchy Type IA,
465: \beq
466: m_{LL} \sim \left(
467: \begin{array}{ccc}
468: 0 & 0 & 0 \\
469: 0 & 1 & 1\\
470: 0 & 1 & 1 \\
471: \end{array}
472: \right)\frac{m}{2}
473: \label{hier}
474: \eeq
475: However even Type IA models appear to have some remaining naturalness
476: problem since
477: $m_3 \sim \sqrt{|\Delta m_{32}^2|}\sim 5.10^{-2}$ eV and
478: $m_2 \sim \sqrt{|\Delta m_{21}^2|}\sim 7.10^{-3}$ eV,
479: compared to the natural expectation $m_2 \sim m_3$.
480: The question may be phrased
481: in technical terms as one of understanding why
482: the sub-determinant of the mass matrix in Eq.\ref{hier} is small:
483: \beq
484: det \left(
485: \begin{array}{cc}
486: m_{22} & m_{23}\\
487: m_{23} & m_{33} \\
488: \end{array}
489: \right)\ll m^2.
490: \label{det}
491: \eeq
492:
493:
494: \section{THE SEE-SAW MASS MECHANISM}
495:
496: Before discussing the see-saw mechanism it is worth first reviewing
497: the different types of neutrino mass that are possible. So far we
498: have been assuming that neutrino masses are Majorana masses of the form
499: \beq
500: m_{LL}\overline{\nu_L}\nu_L^c
501: \label{mLL}
502: \eeq
503: where $\nu_L$ is a left-handed neutrino field and $\nu_L^c$ is
504: the CP conjugate of a left-handed neutrino field, in other words
505: a right-handed antineutrino field. Such Majorana masses are possible
506: to since both the neutrino and the antineutrino
507: are electrically neutral and so
508: Majorana masses are not forbidden by electric charge conservation.
509: For this reason a Majorana mass for the electron would
510: be strictly forbidden. Majorana neutrino masses ``only''
511: violate lepton number conservation.
512: If we introduce right-handed neutrino fields then there are two sorts
513: of additional neutrino mass terms that are possible. There are
514: additional Majorana masses of the form
515: \beq
516: M_{RR}\overline{\nu_R}\nu_R^c
517: \label{MRR}
518: \eeq
519: where $\nu_R$ is a right-handed neutrino field and $\nu_R^c$ is
520: the CP conjugate of a right-handed neutrino field, in other words
521: a left-handed antineutrino field. In addition there are
522: Dirac masses of the form
523: \beq
524: m_{LR}\overline{\nu_L}\nu_R.
525: \label{mLR}
526: \eeq
527: Such Dirac mass terms conserve lepton number, and are not forbidden
528: by electric charge conservation even for the charged leptons and
529: quarks.
530:
531: In the Standard Model Dirac mass terms for charged leptons and quarks
532: are generated from Yukawa couplings
533: to a Higgs doublet whose vacuum expectation value gives the Dirac
534: mass term. Neutrino masses are zero in the Standard Model because
535: right-handed neutrinos are not present, and also
536: because the Majorana mass terms in Eq.\ref{mLL}
537: require Higgs triplets in order to be generated at the renormalisable
538: level (although non-renormalisable operators can be written down.
539: Higgs triplets are phenomenologically
540: disfavoured so the simplest way to generate neutrino masses
541: from a renormalisable theory is to introduce right-handed neutrinos.
542: Once this is done then the types of neutrino mass discussed
543: in Eqs.\ref{MRR},\ref{mLR} (but not Eq.\ref{mLL} since we
544: have not introduced Higgs triplets)
545: are permitted, and we have the mass matrix
546: \begin{equation}
547: \left(\begin{array}{cc} \overline{\nu_L} & \overline{\nu^c_R}
548: \end{array} \\ \right)
549: \left(\begin{array}{cc}
550: 0 & m_{LR}\\
551: m_{LR}^T & M_{RR} \\
552: \end{array}\right)
553: \left(\begin{array}{c} \nu_L^c \\ \nu_R \end{array} \\ \right)
554: \label{matrix}
555: \end{equation}
556: Since the right-handed neutrinos are electroweak singlets
557: the Majorana masses of the right-handed neutrinos $M_{RR}$
558: may be orders of magnitude larger than the electroweak
559: scale. In the approximation that $M_{RR}\gg m_{LR}$
560: the matrix in Eq.\ref{matrix} may be diagonalised to
561: yield effective Majorana masses of the type in Eq.\ref{mLL},
562: \beq
563: m_{LL}=m_{LR}M_{RR}^{-1}m_{LR}^T
564: \label{seesaw}
565: \eeq
566: This is the see-saw mechanism \footnote{For original references on the
567: see-saw mechanism see \cite{glashow}}. It not only generates
568: Majorana mass terms of the type $m_{LL}$, but also naturally makes them
569: smaller than the Dirac mass terms by a factor of $m_{LR}/M_{RR}\ll 1$.
570: One can think of the heavy right-handed neutrinos as being integrated
571: out to give non-renormalisable Majorana operators suppressed
572: by the heavy mass scale $M_{RR}$.
573:
574: In a realistic model with three left-handed neutrinos and
575: three right-handed neutrinos the Dirac masses $m_{LR}$
576: are a $3\times 3$ (complex) matrix and the heavy Majorana masses $M_{RR}$
577: form a separate $3\times 3$ (complex symmetric) matrix.
578: The light effective Majorana
579: masses $m_{LL}$ are also a $3\times 3$ (complex symmetric) matrix and
580: continue to be given from Eq.\ref{seesaw} which
581: is now interpreted as a matrix product. From a model building
582: perspective the fundamental parameters which must be input
583: into the see-saw mechanism are the Dirac mass matrix $m_{LR}$ and
584: the heavy right-handed neutrino Majorana mass matrix $M_{RR}$.
585: The light effective left-handed Majorana mass
586: matrix $m_{LL}$ arises as an output according to the
587: see-saw formula in Eq.\ref{seesaw}. The goal of see-saw model
588: building is therefore to choose input see-saw matrices
589: $m_{LR}$ and $M_{RR}$ that will give rise to one of the successful
590: matrices $m_{LL}$ in Table \ref{table1}.
591:
592:
593: \section{SEQUENTIAL RIGHT HANDED NEUTRINO DOMINANCE}
594:
595: With three left-handed neutrinos and
596: three right-handed neutrinos the Dirac masses $m_{LR}$
597: are a $3\times 3$ (complex) matrix and the heavy Majorana masses $M_{RR}$
598: form a separate $3\times 3$ (complex symmetric) matrix.
599: The light effective Majorana
600: masses $m_{LL}$ are also a $3\times 3$ (complex symmetric) matrix and
601: continue to be given from Eq.\ref{seesaw} which
602: is now interpreted as a matrix product. From a model building
603: perspective the fundamental parameters which must be input
604: into the see-saw mechanism are the Dirac mass matrix $m_{LR}$ and
605: the heavy right-handed neutrino Majorana mass matrix $M_{RR}$.
606: The light effective left-handed Majorana mass
607: matrix $m_{LL}$ arises as an output according to the
608: see-saw formula in Eq.\ref{seesaw}. The goal of see-saw model
609: building is therefore to choose input see-saw matrices
610: $m_{LR}$ and $M_{RR}$ that will give rise to one of the successful
611: matrices $m_{LL}$ in Table \ref{table1}.
612:
613: We now show how the input see-saw matrices can be simply chosen to
614: give the Type IA matrix in Eq.\ref{hier}, with the property of a
615: naturally small sub-determinant in Eq.\ref{det} using a mechanism
616: first suggested in \cite{King:1998jw}.
617: The idea was developed in \cite{King:1999cm} where it was called
618: single right-handed neutrino dominance (SRHND) . SRHND was first successfully
619: applied to the LMA MSW solution in \cite{King:2000mb}.
620:
621: The SRHND mechanism is most simply described
622: assuming three right-handed neutrinos
623: in the basis where the right-handed neutrino mass matrix is diagonal
624: although it can also be developed in other bases
625: \cite{King:1999cm,King:2000mb}. In this basis we write the input
626: see-saw matrices as
627: \begin{equation}
628: M_{RR}=
629: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
630: X' & 0 & 0 \\
631: 0 & X & 0 \\
632: 0 & 0 & Y
633: \end{array}
634: \right)
635: \label{seq1}
636: \end{equation}
637: \begin{equation}
638: m_{LR}=
639: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
640: a' & a & d \\
641: b' & b & e \\
642: c' & c & f
643: \end{array}
644: \right)
645: \label{dirac}
646: \end{equation}
647: In \cite{King:1998jw} it was suggested that one of the right-handed neutrinos
648: may dominante the contribution to $m_{LL}$ if it is lighter than
649: the other right-handed neutrinos.
650: The dominance condition was subsequently generalised to
651: include other cases where the right-handed neutrino may be
652: heavier than the other right-handed neutrinos but dominates due to its larger
653: Dirac mass couplings \cite{King:1999cm}.
654: In any case the dominant neutrino may be taken to be the third one
655: without loss of generality. Assuming SRHND then Eqs.\ref{seesaw},
656: \ref{seq1}, \ref{dirac} give, retaining only the leading dominant
657: right-handed neutrino contributions proportional to $1/Y$,
658: \beq
659: m_{LL}
660: \approx
661: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
662: \frac{d^2}{Y}
663: & \frac{de}{Y}
664: & \frac{df}{Y} \\
665: .
666: & \frac{e^2}{Y}
667: & \frac{ef}{Y} \\
668: . & . & \frac{f^2}{Y}
669: \end{array}
670: \right)
671: \label{one}
672: \eeq
673: If the Dirac mass couplings satisfy the condition
674: $d\ll e\approx f$ \cite{King:1998jw}
675: then the matrix in Eq.\ref{one} resembles the Type IA matrix in
676: Eq.\ref{hier}, and furthermore has a naturally small sub-determinant as in
677: Eq.\ref{det}. The neutrino mass
678: spectrum consists of one neutrino with mass $m_3\approx (e^2+f^2)/Y$
679: and two approximately
680: massless neutrinos \cite{King:1998jw}. The atmospheric angle is
681: $\tan \theta_{23} \approx e/f$ \cite{King:1998jw}.
682: It was pointed out that small perturbations from
683: the sub-dominant right-handed neutrinos can then lead to a small
684: solar neutrino mass splitting \cite{King:1998jw}.
685:
686: It was subsequently shown how to
687: account for the LMA MSW solution with a large solar angle
688: \cite{King:2000mb} by careful consideration of the sub-dominant contributions.
689: One of the examples considered in \cite{King:2000mb} is when the
690: right-handed neutrinos dominate sequentially,
691: \beq
692: \frac{|e^2|,|f^2|,|ef|}{Y}\gg
693: \frac{|xy|}{X} \gg
694: \frac{|x'y'|}{X'}
695: \label{srhnd}
696: \eeq
697: where $x,y\in a,b,c$ and $x',y'\in a',b',c'$.
698: Assuming SRHND with sequential sub-dominance as in
699: Eq.\ref{srhnd}, then Eqs.\ref{seesaw}, \ref{seq1}, \ref{dirac} give
700: \beq
701: m_{LL}
702: \approx
703: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
704: \frac{a^2}{X}+\frac{d^2}{Y}
705: & \frac{ab}{X}+ \frac{de}{Y}
706: & \frac{ac}{X}+\frac{df}{Y} \\
707: .
708: & \frac{b^2}{X}+\frac{e^2}{Y}
709: & \frac{bc}{X}+\frac{ef}{Y} \\
710: .
711: & .
712: & \frac{c^2}{X}+\frac{f^2}{Y}
713: \end{array}
714: \right)
715: \label{mLL2}
716: \eeq
717: where the contribution from the first right-handed neutrino may be
718: neglected according to Eq.\ref{srhnd}.
719: This was shown to lead to a full neutrino mass hierarchy
720: \beq
721: m_1^2\ll m_2^2\ll m_3^2
722: \eeq
723: and, ignoring phases, the solar angle only depends
724: on the sub-dominant couplings and is given by
725: $\tan \theta_{12} \approx a/(c_{23}b-s_{23}c)$ \cite{King:2000mb}.
726: The simple requirement for large solar angle is then $a\sim b-c$
727: \cite{King:2000mb}.
728:
729:
730: Including phases the neutrino masses
731: are given to leading order in $m_2/m_3$ by diagonalising
732: the mass matrix in Eq.\ref{mLL2} using the analytic proceedure
733: described in \cite{King:2002nf},
734: \bea
735: m_1 & \sim & O(\frac{x'y'}{X'}v_2^2) \label{m1} \\
736: m_2 & \approx & \frac{|a|^2}{Xs_{12}^2} v_2^2 \label{m2} \\
737: m_3 & \approx & \frac{|e|^2+|f|^2}{Y}v_2^2
738: \label{m3}
739: \eea
740: where $v_2$ is a Higgs vacuum expectation value (vev) associated with
741: the (second) Higgs doublet that couples to the neutrinos
742: and $s_{12}=\sin \theta_{12}$ given below.
743: Note that with SD each neutrino mass is generated
744: by a separate right-handed neutrino, and the sequential dominance condition
745: naturally results in a neutrino mass hierarchy $m_1\ll m_2\ll m_3$.
746: The neutrino mixing angles are given to leading order in $m_2/m_3$ by,
747: \bea
748: \tan \theta_{23} & \approx & \frac{|e|}{|f|} \label{23}\\
749: \tan \theta_{12} & \approx &
750: \frac{|a|}
751: {c_{23}|b|
752: \cos(\tilde{\phi}_b)-
753: s_{23}|c|
754: \cos(\tilde{\phi}_c)} \label{12} \\
755: \theta_{13} & \approx &
756: e^{i(\tilde{\phi}+\phi_a-\phi_e)}
757: \frac{|a|(e^*b+f^*c)}{[|e|^2+|f|^2]^{3/2}}
758: \frac{Y}{X}
759: \label{13}
760: \eea
761: where we have written some (but not all) complex Yukawa couplings as
762: $x=|x|e^{i\phi_x}$. The phase $\delta$
763: is fixed to give a real angle
764: $\theta_{12}$ by,
765: \beq
766: c_{23}|b|
767: \sin(\tilde{\phi}_b)
768: \approx
769: s_{23}|c|
770: \sin(\tilde{\phi}_c)
771: \label{chi1}
772: \eeq
773: where
774: \bea
775: \tilde{\phi}_b &\equiv &
776: \phi_b-\phi_a-\tilde{\phi}+\delta, \nonumber \\
777: \tilde{\phi}_c &\equiv &
778: \phi_c-\phi_a+\phi_e-\phi_f-\tilde{\phi}+\delta
779: \label{bpcp}
780: \eea
781: The phase $\tilde{\phi}$
782: is fixed to give a real angle
783: $\theta_{13}$ by,
784: \beq
785: \tilde{\phi} \approx \phi_e-\phi_a -\phi_{\rm COSMO}
786: \label{phi2dsmall}
787: \eeq
788: where
789: \beq
790: \phi_{\rm COSMO}=\arg(e^*b+f^*c).
791: \label{lepto0}
792: \eeq
793: is the leptogenesis phase
794: corresponding to the interference diagram involving the
795: lightest and next-to-lightest right-handed neutrinos \cite{King:2002nf}.
796:
797: \section{LIGHT OR HEAVY SEQUENTIAL DOMINANCE?}
798: Assuming sequential dominance described in the previous section,
799: there is still an ambiguity regarding the mass ordering of the
800: heavy Majorana right-handed neutrinos. There are two extreme possibilities
801: called heavy sequential dominance (HSD) and light sequential dominance
802: (LSD). In HSD the dominant right-handed
803: neutrino (always denoted by Majorana mass $Y$) is the heaviest,
804: \beq
805: X'\ll X \ll Y
806: \eeq
807: Then assuming that the 33 element of the neutrino Yukawa matrix is
808: of order unity, this leads to a ``lop-sided'' Yukawa matrix,
809: since $e\sim f \sim 1$,
810: \begin{equation}
811: M^{HSD}_{RR}=
812: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
813: X' & 0 & 0 \\
814: 0 & X & 0 \\
815: 0 & 0 & Y
816: \end{array}
817: \right)
818: \label{hsdmaj}
819: \end{equation}
820: \begin{equation}
821: {Y_{\nu}}^{HSD}_{LR}=
822: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
823: a' & a & d \\
824: b' & b & e \\
825: c' & c & f
826: \end{array}
827: \right)
828: \label{hsdyuk}
829: \end{equation}
830:
831: On the other hand in LSD, the dominant right-handed neutrino of mass
832: $Y$ is by definition the lightest one,
833: \beq
834: Y\ll X \ll X'
835: \eeq
836: Then still assuming that the 33 element of the neutrino Yukawa matrix is
837: of order unity, this leads to a ``quark-like'' Yukawa matrix,
838: since in this case $e\sim f \ll 1$
839: consistent with a symmetrical structure with no large off-diagonal elements,
840: after reordering the right-handed neutrinos,
841: \begin{equation}
842: M^{LSD}_{RR}=
843: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
844: Y & 0 & 0 \\
845: 0 & X & 0 \\
846: 0 & 0 & X'
847: \end{array}
848: \right)
849: \label{lsdmaj}
850: \end{equation}
851: \begin{equation}
852: {Y_{\nu}}^{HSD}_{LR}=
853: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
854: d & a & a' \\
855: e & b & b' \\
856: f & c & c'
857: \end{array}
858: \right)
859: \label{lsdyuk}
860: \end{equation}
861:
862: Note that in LSD, the right-handed neutrino of mass $X'$ is irrelevant
863: for neutrino masses and mixings, as well as leptogenesis.
864: For all practical purposes, the LSD model reduces to an effective
865: two right-handed neutrino model.
866:
867: \section{LEPTON FLAVOUR VIOLATION IN THE CMSSM WITH SEQUENTIAL DOMINANCE}
868: At leading order in a mass insertion approximation
869: \footnote{For a complete list of references on lepton flavour
870: violatio see \cite{Blazek:2002wq}.}
871: the branching fractions of LFV processes are given by
872: \beq
873: {\rm BR}(l_i \rightarrow l_j \gamma)\approx
874: \frac{\alpha^3}{G_F^2}
875: f(M_2,\mu,m_{\tilde{\nu}})
876: |m_{\tilde{L}_{ij}}^2|^2 \tan ^2 \beta
877: \label{eq:BR(li_to_lj)}
878: \eeq
879: where $l_1=e, l_2=\mu , l_3=\tau$,
880: and where the off-diagonal slepton doublet mass squared is given
881: in the leading log approximation (LLA) by
882: \beq
883: m_{\tilde{L}_{ij}}^{2(LLA)}
884: \approx -\frac{(3m_0^2+A_0^2)}{8\pi ^2}C_{ij}
885: \label{lla}
886: \eeq
887: where the leading log coefficients relevant for
888: $\mu \rightarrow e\gamma$ and $\tau \rightarrow \mu \gamma$
889: are given approximately as
890: \bea
891: C_{21} & = & ab\ln \frac{M_U}{X} +de\ln \frac{M_U}{Y} \nonumber \\
892: C_{32} & = & bc\ln \frac{M_U}{X} +ef\ln \frac{M_U}{Y}
893: \label{C2131}
894: \eea
895:
896: We have performed a global analysis of LFV in the constrained
897: minimal supersymmetric standard model (CMSSM) for the case
898: of sequential dominance, focussing on the two cases
899: of HSD and LSD \cite{Blazek:2002wq}.
900: We parametrise the matrices \cite{Blazek:2002wq} in a quite general
901: way consistent with sequential dominance. The numerical results we
902: show here are for a particular case of HSD and LSD defined below
903: \bea
904: M^{HSD}_{RR}&=&
905: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
906: - & 0 & 0 \\
907: 0 & \lambda^{3} & 0 \\
908: 0 & 0 & 1
909: \end{array}
910: \right) 3.10^{14}GeV \label{HSD1} \\
911: Y^{\nu HSD}_{LR}&=&
912: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
913: - & a_{12}\lambda^2 & 0 \\
914: - & a_{22}\lambda^2 & 1 \\
915: - & a_{32}\lambda^2 & 1
916: \end{array}
917: \right)
918: \label{HSD2}
919: \eea
920: \bea
921: M^{LSD}_{RR}&=&
922: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
923: \lambda^{6} & 0 & 0 \\
924: 0 & \lambda^{3} & 0 \\
925: 0 & 0 & \gg 1
926: \end{array}
927: \right) 3\times 10^{14} GeV \label{LSD1} \\
928: Y^{\nu LSD}_{LR}&=&
929: \left( \begin{array}{ccc}
930: 0 & a_{12}\lambda^{2} & - \\
931: \lambda^{3} & a_{22}\lambda^{2} & - \\
932: \lambda^{3} & a_{32}\lambda^{2} & 1
933: \end{array}
934: \right)
935: \label{LSD2}
936: \eea
937: where $a_{ij}$ are order unity coefficients,
938: $\lambda=\sqrt{\Delta m_{21}^2/\Delta m_{32}^2}\approx 0.15$.
939:
940: In Figure \ref{hsd} we show results for HSD for $\tan \beta=50$,
941: and $r=a_{32}/a_{22}=-1$.
942: The results show a large rate for
943: $\tau \rightarrow \mu \gamma$ which is the characteristic expectation
944: of lop-sided models in general \cite{Blazek:2001zm} and HSD in particular.
945: We also show the error incurred
946: if the LLA were used (our results are based on an exact calculation).
947: In Figure \ref{lsd} we show results for LSD for $\tan \beta=50$,
948: and $r=a_{32}/a_{22}=-1$.
949: The results show a much smaller rate for
950: $\tau \rightarrow \mu \gamma$, and also the error incurred
951: if the LLA were used (our results are based on an exact calculation).
952: In Figure \ref{theta} we show that the 13 mixing angle is controlled
953: by a ratio of subdominant Yukawa couplings,
954: $r=a_{32}/a_{22}$ and therefore cannot be
955: predicted in general, although in particular models this ratio
956: may be fixed by the theory.
957:
958:
959: \section{LEPTOGENESIS AND ITS POSSIBLE RELATION TO CP VIOLATION MEASURED IN FUTURE NEUTRINO OSCILLATION EXPERIMENTS}
960:
961: Is there a link between the CP violation required for leptogenesis,
962: and the phase $\delta$ measurable in accurate neutrino oscillation
963: experiments? In general the answer would seem to be no, however
964: in certain classes of models the answer can be yes.
965: For example in sequential dominance we find that for HSD there is
966: no link since the lightest right-handed neutrino of mass $X'$
967: is quite relevant for leptogenesis, but completely
968: irrelevant for the determining the neutrino angles and phases.
969: However, in LSD there may be a link since in this case the lightest
970: right-handed neutrino is also the dominant one, and so plays
971: an important part in both leptogenesis and in determining the
972: neutrino mixings and phases. Moreover in LSD the heaviest
973: right-handed neutrino of mass $X'$ is irrelevant for both
974: leptogenesis and neutrino mixings and phases, so the model
975: effectively reduces to a two right-handed neutrino model
976: \cite{King:2002nf}.
977:
978: The details of this have been recently worked out for the LSD class
979: of models in which the neutrino matrices are as in
980: Eqs.\ref{lsdmaj},\ref{lsdyuk} assuming the sequential dominance
981: condition in Eq.\ref{srhnd}, and in addition assuming that $d=0$
982: which corresponds in this case to a 11 texture zero
983: \cite{King:2002qh}.
984: Although the class of model looks quite specialised,
985: it is in fact extremely well motivated since it
986: allows the neutrino Yukawa matrix to have the same universal form
987: as the quark Yukawa matrices
988: consistent with $SO(10)$ for example, where the
989: 11 texture zero arises naturally \cite{King:2001uz}.
990:
991: Returning to Eq.\ref{lepto0}, it may be expressed as
992: \beq
993: \tan \phi_{\rm COSMO} \approx
994: \frac{|b|s_{23}s_2+|c|c_{23}s_3}{|b|s_{23}c_2+|c|c_{23}c_3}.
995: \label{phi121}
996: \eeq
997: Inserting $\tilde{\phi}$ in Eq.\ref{phi2dsmall}
998: into Eqs.\ref{chi1},\ref{bpcp},
999: \bea
1000: &&c_{23}|b|\sin(\eta_2+\phi_{\rm COSMO}+\delta) \nonumber \\
1001: & \approx &
1002: s_{23}|c|
1003: \sin(\eta_3+\phi_{\rm COSMO} +\delta).
1004: \label{chi12}
1005: \eea
1006: Eq.\ref{chi12} may be expressed as
1007: \beq
1008: \tan (\phi_{\rm COSMO}+\delta) \approx
1009: \frac{|b|c_{23}s_2-|c|s_{23}s_3}{-|b|c_{23}c_2+|c|s_{23}c_3}
1010: \label{phi12del}
1011: \eeq
1012: where we have written $s_i=\sin \eta_i, c_i=\cos \eta_i$
1013: where
1014: \beq
1015: \eta_2\equiv \phi_b-\phi_e, \ \ \eta_3\equiv \phi_c-\phi_f
1016: \label{eta}
1017: \eeq
1018: are invariant under a charged lepton phase transformation.
1019: The reason that the see-saw parameters only
1020: involve two invariant phases $\eta_2, \eta_3$ rather than the usual six
1021: is due to the LSD
1022: assumption which has the effect of decoupling the
1023: heaviest right-handed neutrino, which removes three phases,
1024: together with the assumption
1025: of a 11 texture zero, which removes another phase.
1026:
1027: Eq.\ref{phi12del} shows that
1028: $\delta$ is a function of
1029: the two see-saw phases
1030: $\eta_2 , \eta_3$ that also determine $\phi_{\rm COSMO}$ in Eq.\ref{phi121}.
1031: If both the phases $\eta_2 , \eta_3$ are zero,
1032: then both $\phi_{\rm COSMO}$ and $\delta$ are necessarily zero.
1033: This feature is absolutely crucial. It means that,
1034: barring cancellations, measurement of a non-zero value for
1035: the phase $\delta$ at a neutrino factory will be a signal of a
1036: non-zero value of the leptogenesis phase $\phi_{\rm COSMO}$.
1037: We also find the remarkable result
1038: \beq
1039: |\phi_{\rm COSMO}|=|\phi_{\beta \beta 0\nu}|.
1040: \label{remarkable2}
1041: \eeq
1042: where $\phi_{\beta \beta 0\nu}$ is the phase which enters the rate
1043: for neutrinoless double beta decay \cite{King:2002qh}.
1044:
1045: To conclude, we have discussed the relation between leptogenesis
1046: and the MNS phases in the LSD class of models defined by
1047: Eqs.\ref{lsdmaj},\ref{lsdyuk},\ref{srhnd} with the additional
1048: assumption of a 11 texture zero.
1049: Although the class of model looks quite specialised,
1050: it is in fact extremely well motivated since it
1051: allows the neutrino Yukawa matrix to have the same universal form
1052: as the quark Yukawa matrices
1053: consistent with $SO(10)$ for example, where the
1054: 11 texture zero arises naturally \cite{King:2001uz}.
1055: The large neutrino mixing angles and neutrino mass hierarchy
1056: then originate naturally
1057: from the sequential dominance mechanism
1058: without any fine tuning \cite{King:2000mb}.
1059: Within this class of models we have shown that
1060: the two see-saw phases $\eta_2$, $\eta_3$
1061: are related to $\delta $ and $\phi_{\rm COSMO}$
1062: according to Eqs.\ref{phi121},\ref{phi12del}.
1063: Remarkably, the leptogenesis phase is predicted to be
1064: equal to the neutrinoless double beta decay phase as in
1065: Eq.\ref{remarkable2}. Since the heaviest right-handed
1066: neutrino of mass $X'$ is irrelevant for both leptogenesis and
1067: for determining the neutrino masses and mixings, the model
1068: reduces effectively to one involving only two right-handed neutrinos
1069: \cite{King:2000mb}.
1070:
1071: In this talk I have demonstrated that the
1072: physics of neutrino mass, flavour and CP violation are all closely
1073: linked. When the information from the neutrino sector is combined with
1074: that from the quark sector, including ideas of family symmetry and
1075: unification \cite{King:2001uz}, it is just possible that it may be
1076: enough to unlock the whole mystery of flavour.
1077:
1078:
1079: \section{Acknowledgements}
1080: I would like to thank Milla Baldo Ceolin for her kind hospitality
1081: at the X International Workshop on "Neutrino Telescopes".
1082:
1083:
1084: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
1085:
1086: \bibitem{bahcall}
1087: J.N. Bahcall, these proceedings.
1088:
1089: \bibitem{smirnov}
1090: A. Smirnov, these proceedings.
1091:
1092: \bibitem{mcdonald}
1093: A. McDonald, these proceedings.
1094:
1095: \bibitem{asuzuki}
1096: A. Suzuki, these proceedings.
1097:
1098: \bibitem{kajita}
1099: T. Kajita, these proceedings.
1100:
1101: \bibitem{ysuzuki}
1102: Y. Suzuki, these proceedings.
1103:
1104: \bibitem{fogli}
1105: G.L.Fogli, these proceedings.
1106:
1107: \bibitem{pontecorvo}
1108: L. Radicati di Brozolo,''The Bruno Pontecorvo Legacy'', these proceedings.
1109:
1110: %\cite{Maki:1962mu}
1111: \bibitem{Maki:1962mu}
1112: Z.~Maki, M.~Nakagawa and S.~Sakata,
1113: %``Remarks On The Unified Model Of Elementary Particles,''
1114: Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ {\bf 28} (1962) 870.
1115: %%CITATION = PTPKA,28,870;%%
1116:
1117: %\cite{Lee:1977qz}
1118: \bibitem{Lee:1977qz}
1119: B.~W.~Lee, S.~Pakvasa, R.~E.~Shrock and H.~Sugawara,
1120: %``Muon And Electron Number Nonconservation In A V-A Six Quark Model,''
1121: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 38} (1977) 937
1122: [Erratum-ibid.\ {\bf 38} (1977) 1230].
1123: %%CITATION = PRLTA,38,937;%%
1124:
1125: %\cite{Elgaroy:2002bi}
1126: \bibitem{Elgaroy:2002bi}
1127: O.~Elgaroy {\it et al.},
1128: %``A new limit on the total neutrino mass from the 2dF
1129: galaxy redshift survey,''
1130: arXiv:astro-ph/0204152.
1131: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0204152;%%
1132:
1133: %\cite{Pierce:2003uh}
1134: \bibitem{Pierce:2003uh}
1135: A.~Pierce and H.~Murayama,
1136: %``WMAPping out neutrino masses,''
1137: arXiv:hep-ph/0302131.
1138: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0302131;%%
1139:
1140: %\cite{King:2002nf}
1141: \bibitem{King:2002nf}
1142: S.~F.~King,
1143: %``Constructing the large mixing angle MNS matrix in see-saw models with right-handed neutrino dominance,''
1144: JHEP {\bf 0209} (2002) 011
1145: [arXiv:hep-ph/0204360].
1146: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0204360;%%
1147:
1148: %\cite{King:2001ce}
1149: \bibitem{King:2001ce}
1150: S.~F.~King and N.~N.~Singh,
1151: %``Inverted hierarchy models of neutrino masses,''
1152: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 596} (2001) 81
1153: [arXiv:hep-ph/0007243].
1154: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0007243;%%
1155:
1156: %\cite{Barbieri:1998mq}
1157: \bibitem{Barbieri:1998mq}
1158: R.~Barbieri, L.~J.~Hall, D.~R.~Smith, A.~Strumia and N.~Weiner,
1159: %``Oscillations of solar and atmospheric neutrinos,''
1160: JHEP {\bf 9812} (1998) 017
1161: [arXiv:hep-ph/9807235].
1162: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9807235.
1163:
1164: %\cite{Pascoli:2002xq}
1165: \bibitem{Pascoli:2002xq}
1166: S.~Pascoli and S.~T.~Petcov,
1167: %``The SNO solar neutrino data, neutrinoless double-beta decay and neutrino mass spectrum,''
1168: arXiv:hep-ph/0205022.
1169: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0205022;%%
1170:
1171: %\cite{Klapdor-Kleingrothaus:2001ke}
1172: \bibitem{Klapdor-Kleingrothaus:2001ke}
1173: H.~V.~Klapdor-Kleingrothaus, A.~Dietz, H.~L.~Harney and I.~V.~Krivosheina,
1174: %``Evidence for neutrinoless double beta decay,''
1175: Mod.\ Phys.\ Lett.\ A {\bf 16} (2001) 2409
1176: [arXiv:hep-ph/0201231].
1177: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0201231;%%
1178:
1179: %\cite{Feruglio:2002af}
1180: \bibitem{Feruglio:2002af}
1181: F.~Feruglio, A.~Strumia and F.~Vissani,
1182: %``Neutrino oscillations and signals in beta and 0nu 2beta experiments,''
1183: arXiv:hep-ph/0201291.
1184: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0201291;%%
1185:
1186: %\cite{Aalseth:2002dt}
1187: \bibitem{Aalseth:2002dt}
1188: C.~E.~Aalseth {\it et al.},
1189: %``Comment on 'Evidence for neutrinoless double beta decay',''
1190: arXiv:hep-ex/0202018.
1191: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0202018;%%
1192:
1193: %\cite{Klapdor-Kleingrothaus:2002kf}
1194: \bibitem{Klapdor-Kleingrothaus:2002kf}
1195: H.~V.~Klapdor-Kleingrothaus,
1196: %``Reply to a comment of article 'Evidence for neutrinoless double beta decay',''
1197: arXiv:hep-ph/0205228.
1198: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0205228;%%
1199:
1200: \bibitem{petcov}
1201: S. Petcov, these proceedings.
1202:
1203: \bibitem{peach}
1204: K. Peach, these proceedings.
1205:
1206:
1207: \bibitem{weinheimer}
1208: C. Weinheimer, these proceedings.
1209:
1210: %\cite{Choubey:2002bh}
1211: \bibitem{Choubey:2002bh}
1212: S.~Choubey and S.~F.~King,
1213: %``Gamma ray bursts as probes of neutrino mass, quantum gravity and dark energy,''
1214: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 67} (2003) 073005
1215: [arXiv:hep-ph/0207260].
1216: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0207260;%%
1217:
1218: \bibitem{glashow}
1219: S. Glashow, these procedings.
1220:
1221: %\cite{King:1998jw}
1222: \bibitem{King:1998jw}
1223: S.~F.~King,
1224: %``Atmospheric and solar neutrinos with a heavy singlet,''
1225: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 439} (1998) 350
1226: [arXiv:hep-ph/9806440].
1227: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9806440;%%
1228:
1229: %\cite{King:1999cm}
1230: \bibitem{King:1999cm}
1231: S.~F.~King,
1232: %``Atmospheric and solar neutrinos from single right-handed neutrino dominance and U(1) family symmetry,''
1233: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 562} (1999) 57
1234: [arXiv:hep-ph/9904210].
1235: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9904210;%%
1236:
1237: %\cite{King:2000mb}
1238: \bibitem{King:2000mb}
1239: S.~F.~King,
1240: %``Large mixing angle MSW and atmospheric neutrinos from single right-handed neutrino dominance and U(1) family symmetry,''
1241: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 576} (2000) 85
1242: [arXiv:hep-ph/9912492].
1243: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9912492;%%
1244:
1245: %\cite{King:2000hk}
1246: \bibitem{King:2000hk}
1247: S.~F.~King and N.~N.~Singh,
1248: %``Renormalisation group analysis of single right-handed neutrino dominance,''
1249: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 591} (2000) 3
1250: [arXiv:hep-ph/0006229].
1251: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0006229;%%
1252:
1253: %\cite{King:2001uz}
1254: \bibitem{King:2001uz}
1255: S.~F.~King and G.~G.~Ross,
1256: %``Fermion masses and mixing angles from SU(3) family symmetry,''
1257: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 520} (2001) 243
1258: [arXiv:hep-ph/0108112];
1259: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0108112;%%
1260: G.~G.~Ross and L.Velasco-Sevila,
1261: %``Symmetries and fermion masses,''
1262: arXiv:hep-ph/0208218.
1263: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0208218;%%
1264:
1265: %\cite{Blazek:2002wq}
1266: \bibitem{Blazek:2002wq}
1267: T.~Blazek and S.~F.~King,
1268: %``Lepton flavour violation in the constrained MSSM with natural neutrino mass hierarchy,''
1269: arXiv:hep-ph/0211368.
1270: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0211368;%%
1271:
1272:
1273: %\cite{Blazek:2001zm}
1274: \bibitem{Blazek:2001zm}
1275: T.~Blazek and S.~F.~King,
1276: %``Muon anomalous magnetic moment and tau $\to$ mu gamma in a realistic string-inspired model of neutrino masses,''
1277: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 518} (2001) 109
1278: [arXiv:hep-ph/0105005].
1279: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0105005;%%
1280:
1281: %\cite{King:2002qh}
1282: \bibitem{King:2002qh}
1283: S.~F.~King,
1284: %``Leptogenesis - MNS link in unified models with natural neutrino mass hierarchy,''
1285: arXiv:hep-ph/0211228.
1286: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0211228;%%
1287:
1288: \end{thebibliography}
1289:
1290: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1291: \begin{figure}
1292: \vspace*{13pt}
1293: %\leftline{\hfill\vbox{\hrule width 5cm height0.001pt}\hfill}
1294: \mbox{\epsfig{figure=LFV_in_HSD.eps,width=14.0cm}}
1295: \vspace*{1.4truein} %ORIGINAL SIZE=1.6TRUEIN x 100% - 0.2TRUEIN
1296: %\leftline{\hfill\vbox{\hrule width 5cm height0.001pt}\hfill}
1297: \caption{The upper panels show the predictions for the branching fraction
1298: for (a) $\tau \rightarrow \mu \gamma$ and (b) $\mu \rightarrow e\gamma$
1299: for HSD using the parameters described in the text.
1300: The lower panels (c), (d)
1301: show the fractional error $\Delta_{ij}$, defined in the
1302: text, that would be
1303: made in calculating the off-diagonal slepton masses if the leading log
1304: approximation had been used instead of the exact calculation.}
1305: \label{hsd}
1306: \end{figure}
1307: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1308:
1309: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1310: \begin{figure}
1311: \vspace*{13pt}
1312: %\leftline{\hfill\vbox{\hrule width 5cm height0.001pt}\hfill}
1313: \mbox{\epsfig{figure=LFV_in_LSD.eps,width=14.0cm}}
1314: \vspace*{1.4truein} %ORIGINAL SIZE=1.6TRUEIN x 100% - 0.2TRUEIN
1315: %\leftline{\hfill\vbox{\hrule width 5cm height0.001pt}\hfill}
1316: \caption{The upper panels show the predictions for the branching fraction
1317: for (a) $\tau \rightarrow \mu \gamma$ and (b) $\mu \rightarrow e\gamma$
1318: for LSD using the parameters described in the text.
1319: The lower panels (c), (d)
1320: show the fractional error $\Delta_{ij}$, defined in the
1321: text, that would be
1322: made in calculating the off-diagonal slepton masses if the leading log
1323: approximation had been used instead of the exact calculation.}
1324: \label{lsd}
1325: \end{figure}
1326: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1327:
1328: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1329: \begin{figure}
1330: \vspace*{13pt}
1331: %\leftline{\hfill\vbox{\hrule width 5cm height0.001pt}\hfill}
1332: \mbox{\epsfig{figure=theta13_1_3_spleen.eps,width=14.0cm}}
1333: \vspace*{1.4truein} %ORIGINAL SIZE=1.6TRUEIN x 100% - 0.2TRUEIN
1334: %\leftline{\hfill\vbox{\hrule width 5cm height0.001pt}\hfill}
1335: \caption{The prediction of $\sin^22\theta_{13}$ as a function of
1336: the ratio of subdominant Yukawa couplings $r=a_{32}/a_{22}$
1337: for the HSD class of models.}
1338: \label{theta}
1339: \end{figure}
1340: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1341:
1342:
1343:
1344: \end{document}
1345: