1: \documentclass{ckm} % twocolumn proceedings style
2: %\documentclass[preprintstyle]{ckm} % or preprint style
3: \renewcommand{\ttdefault}{cmtt} % but keep CM typewriter
4: \usepackage{amsmath}
5: \input mycommands
6:
7:
8: \confname{Workshop on the CKM Unitarity Triangle, IPPP Durham, April
9: 2003}
10:
11:
12: \title{Precision computation of the leptonic $\Ds$-meson decay
13: constant in quenched QCD}
14:
15: \author{A J\"uttner and J Rolf\thanks{This work is part of the ALPHA
16: research programme. JR thanks the organizers of the conference for
17: the kind invitation.}\thanks{HU-EP-03/26, SFB/CPP-03-09}}
18: \address{Department of Physics, Humboldt-University Berlin}
19:
20: \begin{document}
21:
22:
23: \begin{abstract}
24: We summarize a computation of the leptonic decay constant $\fDs$ of
25: the $\Ds$-meson in quenched QCD on
26: the lattice. We perform a direct simulation at the masses of the
27: strange and the charm quarks at four different lattice spacings from
28: approximately $0.1\,\fm$ to $0.05\,\fm$. Fully non perturbative
29: $\rmO(a)$-improvement is employed.
30: After taking the continuum limit we arrive at a value of
31: $\fDs=252(9)\,\MeV$, when setting the scale with the Kaon decay
32: constant $F_{\rm K}=160\,\MeV$. Setting the scale with the nucleon
33: mass instead leads to a decrease of about $20\,\MeV$ of $\fDs$.
34: \end{abstract}
35:
36: %% \maketitle needs to be after the author and address info and the
37: %% abstract...
38: \maketitle
39:
40:
41: %% standard LaTeX from here on...
42:
43:
44: \section{Introduction}
45:
46: To get reliable estimates of weak decay constants like $F_{\rm B}$
47: lattice QCD has often to be supplemented by chiral extrapolations
48: and/or heavy quark effective theory. These introduce substantial
49: systematic errors~\cite{ryan}. In addition, the usual
50: lattice errors like statistical errors, discretization errors, finite
51: volume effects, contamination from excited states, perturbative
52: renormalization and quenching~\cite{flynn} have to be
53: understood or eliminated.
54:
55: The $\Ds$-meson however is special in this
56: context. It consists of a strange and a charm quark. Both can be
57: implemented precisely directly on the lattice as has been done
58: recently by the ALPHA collaboration~\cite{smass,cmass}. Thus neither a
59: chiral extrapolation nor an extrapolation to heavy quarks (or similar
60: strategies) have to be used. Still we expect the $\Ds$-meson to be
61: similar to other heavy light systems. Therefore it can be studied to
62: understand all the other error sources mentioned above.
63:
64: The goal of our work, which has been recently published in~\cite{fds},
65: is a precision computation of $\fDs$ in quenched QCD. We aim at a
66: combined error of three percent. To eliminate the
67: discretization errors, we perform fully non perturbative
68: $\rmO(a)$-improvement and simulate at four different lattice spacings.
69: This allows us to take a reliable continuum limit. Finite volume
70: effects have been shown to be negligible in~\cite{smass}. At our masses
71: they are expected to be even smaller. We {\sl define} our plateaus
72: such that the contamination by excited states stays below five per
73: mille. Finally all the uncertainty due to perturbative renormalization
74: has been eliminated by using the non perturbative renormalization
75: techniques of the ALPHA
76: collaboration~\cite{Jansen:1995ck,Luscher:1996jn}. The only
77: systematic uncertainty we cannot deal with at present is the
78: quenching error.
79:
80: A precise value of $\fDs$ in quenched QCD is desirable since together
81: with a computation of the decay constant in the static approximation
82: it will enable us to see how far the heavy quark effective theory can
83: be applied safely. In unquenched simulations we can then rely on this
84: experience in the computation of $F_{\rm B}$.
85:
86: The $\Ds$-meson is stable in QCD. It decays weakly by an emission of a
87: W-boson into a lepton and a neutrino. The branching ratios can be
88: measured experimentally. They are summarized in~\cite{pdb}. Given the
89: CKM-matrix element $V_{\rm cs}$, $\fDs$ can then be determined, since
90: the standard model predicts
91: \begin{eqnarray}
92: &&\text{BR}(\Ds\rightarrow\text{l}\nu) =\\
93: &&\frac{\text{G}_{\text{F}}^2}{8\pi}\ \tau_{\Ds}\
94: {F_{\Ds}}^2\
95: \vert V_{\text{cs}} \vert^2\ m_{\Ds}\ m_{\text{l}}^2 \left( 1-
96: \frac{m_{\text{l}}^2}{m_{\Ds}^2} \right)^2.\nonumber
97: \end{eqnarray}
98: Recent
99: experimental data are shown in table~\ref{tab:exp}~\cite{exp}.
100: \begin{table}[htbp]
101: \centering
102: \begin{tabular}[c]{cc}
103: & $F_{\Ds} [\MeV]$\\ \hline
104: ALEPH & $285\pm 19 \pm 40$ \\
105: DELPHI & $330\pm 95$\\
106: L3 & $309\pm 58\pm 50$\\
107: CLEO & $280 \pm 17\pm 42$\\
108: BEATRICE & $323\pm 44\pm 36$\\
109: E653 & $194\pm 35\pm 24$
110: \end{tabular}
111: \caption{Experimental data for $\fDs$.}
112: \label{tab:exp}
113: \end{table}
114: The status of lattice computations was reviewed in~\cite{lat2} with a
115: quenched world average of $\fDs = 230\pm 14\,\MeV$. Table~\ref{tab:lattice}
116: summarizes some of the latest results.
117: \begin{table}[htbp]
118: \centering
119: \begin{tabular}[c]{cc}
120: & $F_{\Ds} [\MeV]$\\ \hline
121: UKQCD~\cite{ukqcd} & $229(3)+23-12$ \\
122: APE~\cite{ape} & $234(9)+5-0$ \\
123: MILC~\cite{milc} & $223(5)+19-17$
124: \end{tabular}
125: \caption{Lattice results for $\fDs$ in quenched QCD.}
126: \label{tab:lattice}
127: \end{table}
128: %With QCD sum rules one
129: %currently gets $\fDs = 235\pm 24\,\MeV$~\cite{sum1,sum2}.
130:
131: \section{Strategy}
132:
133: The decay constant $\fDs$ is defined by the QCD matrix element
134: \begin{equation}
135: \langle 0\vert A_{\mu}(0)\vert \Ds(p)\rangle = i p_{\mu} \fDs
136: \end{equation}
137: of the axial current $A_{\mu} = \bar{\rm s}\gamma_{\mu}\gamma_5{\rm
138: c}$. To formulate this problem on the lattice we eliminate the bare
139: parameters of the QCD Lagragian in favour of physical observables in
140: one chosen hadronic scheme. Our strategy~\cite{npmass,smass,cmass} is
141: to use the kaon decay constant $F_{\rm K}$ to set the scale, that
142: means to compute the lattice spacing $a$ in physical units as a
143: function of the bare coupling $g_0$. The bare strange quark mass and
144: the bare charm quark mass are eliminated by the masses $m_K$ and
145: $m_{\Ds}$ of the kaon and the $\Ds$-meson, respectively. We neglect
146: isospin breaking and take the quark mass ratio $M_{\rm s}/M_{\rm
147: light} = 24.4\pm 1.5$ from chiral perturbation theory~\cite{chiral}.
148: Here $M_{\rm light} = \frac{1}{2}(M_{\rm u} + M_{\rm d})$. The capital
149: letters denote the renormalization group invariant quark masses, which
150: are somewhat larger than the $\MSbar$-masses. In quenched QCD they
151: take the values $M_{\rm s} = 138(5)\,\MeV$~\cite{smass} and $M_{\rm c}
152: = 1.654(45)\,\GeV$~\cite{cmass}. The results mentioned above have been
153: obtained in units of the Sommer scale $r_0$ which is derived from the
154: force between static color sources. $r_0/a$ has been computed to a
155: high precision in~\cite{scale1,scale2} as a function of the bare
156: couling. The Sommer scale is affected by lattice artifacts only at
157: $\rmO(a^2)$ in the quenched theory. Setting the scale with $F_{\rm K}
158: = 160\,\MeV$ is equivalent to using $r_0 = 0.5\,\fm$ while the nucleon
159: mass $m_N = 938\,\MeV$ roughly corresponds to
160: $r_0=0.55\,\fm$~\cite{smass}. This deviation is the typical size of
161: the quenched scale amiguity.
162:
163: \section{Theory}
164:
165: We perform numerical simulations in $\rmO(a)$-improved lattice QCD
166: using Schr\"odinger functional boundary conditions~\cite{nara,sint} on a
167: $L^3\times T$ space-time cylinder. For unexplained notation we refer
168: to~\cite{notation}. We define the
169: meson sources
170: \begin{equation}
171: {\cal O} = a^6\sum_{{\bf y}, {\bf z}}\overline{\zeta}_j({\bf
172: y})\gamma_5\zeta_i({\bf z}),
173: \end{equation}
174: \begin{equation}
175: {\cal O}' = a^6\sum_{{\bf y}, {\bf z}}\overline{\zeta}'_j({\bf
176: y})\gamma_5\zeta'_i({\bf z}),
177: \end{equation}
178: with flavour indices $i$ and $j$ at the $x_0=0$ and $x_0=T$ boundary,
179: respectively. From these we compute the correlation functions
180: \begin{eqnarray}
181: \label{eq:fA}
182: f_{\rm A}^I(x_0) &=& -\frac{1}{2}\langle {\cal O} A_0(x)\rangle,\\
183: % f_{\rm P}(x_0) &=& -\frac{1}{2}\langle {\cal O} P(x)\rangle,\\
184: f_1 &=& - \frac{1}{3L^6} \langle {\cal O}' {\cal O}\rangle.
185: \end{eqnarray}
186: Here $A_{\mu}(x)$ denotes the improved axial current. It receives a
187: scale independent multiplicative renormalization $\za$ on the lattice.
188: In terms of these correlation functions $\fDs$ can be written as
189: \begin{eqnarray}
190: \label{eq:fds}
191: \fDs &=& -2 \za (1+\ba (am_{{\rm q},i}+am_{{\rm q},j})/2 )\nonumber\\
192: &&\times\frac{\fa^I(x_0)}{\sqrt{f_1}} \
193: (m_{\Ds}L^3)^{-1/2} e^{(x_0-T/2) m_{\Ds}} \nonumber\\
194: &&\times
195: \left\lbrace 1 - \eta_A^{\Ds} e^{-x_0\Delta} - \eta_A^0
196: e^{-(T-x_0) m_{\text{G}}}\right\rbrace\nonumber\\
197: &&+ \rmO(a^2).
198: \end{eqnarray}
199: Here the factor $(m_{\Ds}L^3)^{-1/2}$ takes into account the
200: normalization of one particle states. The contribution $f_1^{-1/2}$
201: cancels out the dependence on the meson sources. Because of the
202: exponential decay of the correlation function $\fa^I$ the product
203: in~(\ref{eq:fds}) is expected to exhibit a plateau at intermediate
204: times when the contribution $\eta_A^{\Ds} e^{-x_0\Delta}$ of the first
205: excited state and the contribution $\eta_A^0 e^{-(T-x_0)
206: m_{\text{G}}}$ from the $O^{++}$ glueball both are small. A plateau
207: average can then be performed to increase the signal and is understood
208: in~(\ref{eq:fds}). Further explanations for equation~(\ref{eq:fds})
209: and details can be found in~\cite{Guagnelli:1999zf}.
210:
211: \section{Parameters}
212:
213: We discretize the space-time cylinder using four different lattice
214: spacings $a$ but keep $L$ and $T=2L$ approximately constant in physical
215: units. To this end we use the same bare couplings that have been used
216: in the determinations of the strange and the charm quark masses
217: in~\cite{smass,cmass} by the ALPHA collaboration. From this work we
218: also take the hopping parameters for the quarks. Our choice of
219: parameters is shown in table~\ref{tab:par}.
220: \begin{table}[htbp]
221: \begin{center}
222: \begin{tabular}{lllll}\hline
223: $\beta$ & $n_{\text{meas}}$ & $L/a$ & $\kappa_s$ & $\kappa_c$\\ \hline
224: 6.0 & 380 & 16 & 0.133929 & 0.119053 \\
225: 6.1 & 301 & 24 & 0.134439 & 0.122490 \\
226: 6.2 & 251 & 24 & 0.134832 & 0.124637 \\
227: 6.45 & 289 & 32 & 0.135124 & 0.128131 \\ \hline
228: \end{tabular}
229: \caption{Statistics and parameters for our simulations.}
230: \label{tab:par}
231: \end{center}
232: \end{table}
233: In table~\ref{tab:const} we show that with this choice indeed the
234: physical conditions are constant to a sufficient precision.
235: \begin{table}[htbp]
236: \begin{center}
237: \begin{tabular}{lll}\hline
238: $\beta$ & $L/r_0$ & $r_0 m_{\Ds}$ \\ \hline
239: 6.0 & 2.98 & 4.972(22) \\
240: 6.1 & 3.79 & 4.981(23) \\
241: 6.2 & 3.26 & 5.000(25) \\
242: 6.45 & 3.06 & 5.042(29) \\ \hline
243: \end{tabular}
244: \caption{Demonstration of constant physical conditions.}
245: \label{tab:const}
246: \end{center}
247: \end{table}
248:
249: \section{Computation of the decay constant}
250:
251: To compute the decay constant $\fDs$ we use the
252: combination~(\ref{eq:fds}) of correlation functions. For all parameter
253: choices we find plateaus as functions of $x_0$. These plateaus are
254: shown in figure~\ref{fig:plateau}.
255: \begin{figure}
256: \hbox to\hsize{\hss
257: \includegraphics[width=\hsize]{plateau.sm.eps}
258: \hss}
259: \caption{Behaviour of $a \fDs^{\text{bare}}$. The full symbols denote
260: the plateau range.}
261: \label{fig:plateau}
262: \end{figure}
263: Their extent is roughly from $4r_0$ to $5r_0$. At small respectively
264: large times we fit to the functions $\fDs(x_0)$ the expected
265: contributions of the first excited state and the
266: glueball~(\ref{eq:fds}). For details see~\cite{fds}. We define the
267: plateau such that their sum stays below 5 per mille.
268:
269: Since we deal with heavy quark propagators on APE1000 in single precision
270: we have to check that the rounding errors are small enough.
271: Our check against runs with a double precision code~\cite{milccode}
272: reveals that the rounding errors are smaller than one per mille.
273:
274: After averaging $\fDs$ over the plateaus defined above we get the
275: values shown in table~\ref{tab:fds}.
276: \begin{table}[htbp]
277: \begin{center}
278: \begin{tabular}{ll}\hline
279: $\beta$ & $r_0 F_{\Ds}$ \\ \hline
280: 6.0 & 0.540(14) \\
281: 6.1 & 0.576(13) \\
282: 6.2 & 0.598(16) \\
283: 6.45& 0.614(15) \\ \hline
284: c.l.& 0.638(24) \\ \hline
285: \end{tabular}
286: \caption{Simulations results and continuum limit for $\fDs$.}
287: \label{tab:fds}
288: \end{center}
289: \end{table}
290: These data can be extrapolated to the continuum limit. Here we leave out
291: the coarsest lattice. The
292: extrapolation can be performed in $(a/r_0)^2$ since we employ non
293: perturbative $\rmO(a)$ improvement. Here we take $\ba$ from the Los
294: Alamos group~\cite{ba}. Since this involves an extrapolation of their
295: data we have also used 1-loop perturbation theory~\cite{baPT}. Then we get
296: $r_0\fDs = 0.631(24)$, which is in perfect agreement with our main
297: result, $r_0\fDs=0.638(24)$, or, using $r_0 = 0.5\,\fm$, $\fDs =
298: 252(9)\,\MeV$. The continuum extrapolation is shown in
299: figure~\ref{fig:cont}.
300: \begin{figure}
301: \hbox to\hsize{\hss
302: \includegraphics[width=\hsize]{co.eps}
303: \hss}
304: \caption{Continuum extrapolation of $\fDs$.}
305: \label{fig:cont}
306: \end{figure}
307:
308: \section{The quenched scale ambiguity}
309:
310: To estimate the quenched scale ambiguity of $\fDs$ under a scale shift
311: of 10 percent, which is typical for the quenched approximation, we
312: consider $r_0\fDs = f(z)$ as a function of the meson mass $z = r_0
313: m_{\Ds}$. We expand $f(z)$ around the physical value $z_0=4.988$ up to
314: first order. A 10 percent increase of $r_0$ corresponds to
315: $z-z_0=0.5$. With an estimate of $f'(z_0)$ from a linear fit of
316: $r_0\fDs$ around $m_{\Ds}$ we get $f(z)-f(z_0)\approx
317: 0.008(3)$. Converting back to physical units, now using
318: $r_0=0.55\,\fm$ we find that $\fDs$ decreases by $20\,\MeV$,
319: corresponding to eight percent. The estimate of $f'(z_0)$ is possible
320: since in addition to the hopping parameters already discussed we have
321: also performed simulations around the charm quark mass value.
322:
323: \section{Conclusion}
324:
325: The leptonic $\Ds$-meson decays can be studied on the lattice without
326: chiral extrapolations or heavy quark effective theory. This has
327: enabled us to perform a computation of $\fDs$ with a precision that
328: matches the precision goals at future experiments, for example,
329: CLEO. The precise value of $\fDs$ in quenched QCD, together with new
330: precise data in the static approximation, will show how far heavy
331: quark effective theory can be applied safely. This is of importance
332: for the unquenched computation of $F_{\rm B}$ in the future.
333:
334: We will supplement this analysis with more data around the charm
335: mass. Part of this data has already been used to estimate the quenched
336: scale ambiguity of $\fDs$ under a scale shift of 10 percent.
337:
338: \section*{Acknowledgements}
339:
340: This work was supported by the European Community under the grant
341: HPRN-CT-2000-00145 Hadrons/Lattice QCD and by the Deutsche
342: Forschungsgemeinschaft in the SFB/TR 09 and the Graduiertenkolleg
343: GK271. All the production runs were carried out on machines of the
344: APE1000 series at DESY.
345: The check of the rounding errors ran
346: on the IBM p690 system of the HLRN (http://www.hlrn.de) and on the PC
347: cluster at DESY. We thank the staff at the computer centres
348: for their help and M. Della Morte, S. Sint, R. Sommer, H. Wittig and
349: U. Wolff for useful discussions.
350:
351: \begin{thebibliography}{9}
352:
353: %\cite{Kronfeld:2002ab}
354: \bibitem{ryan}
355: A.~S.~Kronfeld and S.~M.~Ryan,
356: %``Remark on the theoretical uncertainty in B0 anti-B0 mixing,''
357: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 543} (2002) 59.
358: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0206058].
359: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0206058;%%
360:
361:
362: %\cite{Flynn:1997ca}
363: \bibitem{flynn}
364: J.~M.~Flynn and C.~T.~Sachrajda,
365: %``Heavy quark physics from lattice QCD,''
366: Adv.\ Ser.\ Direct.\ High Energy Phys.\ {\bf 15} (1998) 402.
367: %[arXiv:hep-lat/9710057].
368: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9710057;%%
369:
370:
371:
372: %\cite{Garden:2000fg}
373: \bibitem{smass}
374: J.~Garden, J.~Heitger, R.~Sommer and H.~Wittig [ALPHA and UKQCD Collaboration],
375: %``Precision computation of the strange quark's mass in quenched QCD,''
376: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 571} (2000) 237.
377: %[arXiv:hep-lat/9906013].
378: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9906013;%%
379:
380: %\cite{charm}
381: \bibitem{cmass}
382: J.~Rolf and S.~Sint [ALPHA Collaboration],
383: %``A precise determination of the charm quark's mass in quenched QCD,''
384: JHEP 12 (2002) 007.
385: %[arXiv:hep-ph/0209255].
386:
387: %\cite{fds}
388: \bibitem{fds}
389: A.~J\"uttner and J.~Rolf [ALPHA Collaboration],
390: %``A precise determination of the decay constant of the $\Ds$-meson in
391: %quenched QCD,''
392: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 560} (2003) 59.
393:
394: %\cite{Jansen:1995ck}
395: \bibitem{Jansen:1995ck}
396: K.~Jansen {\it et al.},
397: %``Non-perturbative renormalization of lattice QCD at all scales,''
398: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 372} (1996) 275
399: [arXiv:hep-lat/9512009].
400: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9512009;%%
401:
402:
403: %\cite{Luscher:1996jn}
404: \bibitem{Luscher:1996jn}
405: M.~L\"uscher, S.~Sint, R.~Sommer and H.~Wittig,
406: %``Non-perturbative determination of the axial current normalization constant in O(a) improved lattice QCD,''
407: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 491} (1997) 344.
408: %[arXiv:hep-lat/9611015].
409: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9611015;%%
410:
411:
412: \bibitem{pdb}
413: K.~Hagiwara {et al.} [Particle Data Group Collaboration],
414: Phys.\ Rev.\ D{\bf 66} (2002) 010001.
415:
416:
417: %\cite{expsummary}
418: \bibitem{exp}
419: S.~S\"{o}ldner-Rembold,
420: %``Experimental Status of Leptonic $\Ds$ Decays'',
421: JHEP Proceedings, HEP2001, hep-ex/0109023.
422:
423: %\cite{Draper:1998ms}
424: %\bibitem{lat1}
425: %T.~Draper,
426: %%``Status of heavy quark physics on the lattice,''
427: %Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 73} (1999) 43.
428: %%[arXiv:hep-lat/9810065].
429: %%%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9810065;%%
430:
431: %\cite{Ryan:2001ej}
432: \bibitem{lat2}
433: S.~M.~Ryan,
434: %``Heavy quark physics from lattice QCD,''
435: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 106} (2002) 86.
436: %[arXiv:hep-lat/0111010].
437: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0111010;%%
438:
439: %%\cite{Bernard:2000ki}
440: %\bibitem{lat2}
441: %C.~W.~Bernard,
442: %%``Heavy quark physics on the lattice,''
443: %Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 94} (2001) 159.
444: %%[arXiv:hep-lat/0011064].
445: %%%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0011064;%%
446:
447:
448: %\cite{Maynard:2001zd}
449: \bibitem{ukqcd}
450: C.~M.~Maynard [UKQCD Collaboration],
451: %``Heavy-light decay constants on the lattice,''
452: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 106} (2002) 388.
453: %[arXiv:hep-lat/0109026].
454: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0109026;%%
455:
456: %\cite{Becirevic:2000kq}
457: \bibitem{ape}
458: D.~Becirevic,
459: %``Heavy quark phenomenology from lattice QCD,''
460: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 94} (2001) 337.
461: %[arXiv:hep-lat/0011075].
462: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0011075;%%
463:
464: %\cite{Bernard:2000ht}
465: \bibitem{milc}
466: C.~W.~Bernard {\it et al.},
467: %``f(B) for various actions: Approaching the continuum limit with dynamical fermions,''
468: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 94} (2001) 346.
469: %[arXiv:hep-lat/0011029].
470: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0011029;%%
471:
472: %%\cite{Narison:2001pu}
473: %\bibitem{sum1}
474: %S.~Narison,
475: %%``c, b quark masses and f(D/s), f(B/s) decay constants from pseudoscalar sum rules in full QCD to order alpha(s)**2,''
476: %Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 520} (2001) 115.
477: %%[arXiv:hep-ph/0108242].
478: %%%CITATION = HEP-PH 0108242;%%
479: %
480: %
481: %%\cite{Penin:2001ux}
482: %\bibitem{sum2}
483: %A.~A.~Penin and M.~Steinhauser,
484: %%``Heavy-light meson decay constant from QCD sum rules in three-loop approximation,''
485: %Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 65} (2002) 054006.
486: %%[arXiv:hep-ph/0108110].
487: %%%CITATION = HEP-PH 0108110;%%
488:
489: %\cite{Capitani:1999mq}
490: \bibitem{npmass}
491: S.~Capitani, M.~L\"uscher, R.~Sommer and H.~Wittig [ALPHA Collaboration],
492: %``Non-perturbative quark mass renormalization in quenched lattice QCD,''
493: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 544} (1999) 669.
494: %[arXiv:hep-lat/9810063].
495: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9810063;%%
496:
497: %\cite{Leutwyler:1996qg}
498: \bibitem{chiral}
499: H.~Leutwyler,
500: %``The ratios of the light quark masses,''
501: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 378} (1996) 313.
502: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9602366].
503: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9602366;%%
504:
505: %\cite{Guagnelli:1998ud}
506: \bibitem{scale1}
507: M.~Guagnelli, R.~Sommer and H.~Wittig, % [ALPHA collaboration],
508: %``Precision computation of a low-energy reference scale in
509: % quenched lattice QCD,''
510: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 535} (1998) 389.
511: %[arXiv:hep-lat/9806005].
512: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9806005;%%
513: %
514: %
515: %\cite{Necco:2001xg}
516: \bibitem{scale2}
517: S.~Necco and R.~Sommer,
518: %``The N(f) = 0 heavy quark potential from short to intermediate distances,''
519: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 622} (2002) 328.
520: %[arXiv:hep-lat/0108008].
521: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0108008;%%
522:
523:
524: %\cite{Luscher:1992an}
525: \bibitem{nara}
526: M.~L\"uscher, R.~Narayanan, P.~Weisz and U.~Wolff,
527: %``The Schrodinger functional: A Renormalizable probe for nonAbelian gauge theories,''
528: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 384} (1992) 168.
529: %[arXiv:hep-lat/9207009].
530: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9207009;%%
531:
532: % SF for QCD
533:
534: %\cite{Sint:1993un}
535: \bibitem{sint}
536: S.~Sint,
537: %``On the Schrodinger functional in QCD,''
538: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 421} (1994) 135.
539: %[arXiv:hep-lat/9312079].
540: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9312079;%%
541:
542: %\cite{Luscher:1996sc}
543: \bibitem{notation}
544: M.~L\"uscher, S.~Sint, R.~Sommer and P.~Weisz,
545: %``Chiral symmetry and O(a) improvement in lattice QCD,''
546: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 478} (1996) 365.
547: %[arXiv:hep-lat/9605038].
548: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9605038;%%
549:
550: %\cite{Guagnelli:1999zf}
551: \bibitem{Guagnelli:1999zf}
552: M.~Guagnelli, J.~Heitger, R.~Sommer and H.~Wittig [ALPHA Collaboration],
553: %``Hadron masses and matrix elements from the QCD Schroedinger functional,''
554: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 560} (1999) 465.
555: %[arXiv:hep-lat/9903040].
556: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9903040;%%
557:
558: \bibitem{milccode}
559: We have used a modified
560: version of the public lattice gauge theory code of the MILC collaboration.
561: {\scriptsize http://www.physics.indiana.edu/\~{}sg/milc.html.}
562:
563:
564: %\cite{Bhattacharya:2001ks}
565: \bibitem{ba}
566: T.~Bhattacharya, R.~Gupta, W.~j.~Lee and S.~Sharpe,
567: %``Scaling behavior of improvement and renormalization constants,''
568: Nucl.\ Phys.\ Proc.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 106} (2002) 789.
569: %[arXiv:hep-lat/0111001].
570: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0111001;%%
571:
572:
573: %\cite{Guagnelli:2000jw}
574: %\bibitem{}
575: %M.~Guagnelli, R.~Petronzio, J.~Rolf, S.~Sint, R.~Sommer
576: %and U.~Wolff [ALPHA Collaboration],
577: %``Non-perturbative results for the coefficients b(m) and b(A)-b(P) in
578: %O(a) improved lattice QCD,''
579: %Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 595} (2001) 44.
580: %[arXiv:hep-lat/0009021].
581: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0009021;%%
582:
583: %\cite{Sint:1997jx}
584: \bibitem{baPT}
585: S.~Sint and P.~Weisz,
586: %``Further results on O(a) improved lattice QCD to one-loop order of perturbation theory,''
587: Nucl.\ Phys.\ B {\bf 502} (1997) 251.
588: %[arXiv:hep-lat/9704001].
589: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9704001;%%
590: \end{thebibliography}
591:
592: \end{document}
593:
594:
595: